Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160742 Ver 2_NCWRC Comments_20190529Strickland, Bev From: Leslie, Andrea J Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 2:52 PM To: Mularski, Eric Cc: Brown, David W CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Homewood, Sue; Ferguson, Jeff C; Macemore, John W.; Goudreau, Chris J. Subject: RE: [External] Cedar Cliff Hydroelectric Development Auxiliary Spillway Upgrade Project - Section 404/401 Amendment #2 Hi Eric, NCWRC staff have reviewed the documents you sent in your May 16, 2019 email. We are providing the following comments on the plan sheets. Please contact Jeff Ferguson [(828-231-3517); please cc me if via email] to discuss these comments. Keynote #1 on sheet CCL -0104-021 states, "Docks are to be removed by others prior to construction." There is a standard floating dock adjacent to the ramp. NCWRC staff have been notified that the floating dock sections will need to be removed and stored off site prior to the start of construction. There is also an old fixed dock in place adjacent to the old concrete ramp. Please verify who will be responsible for removal of this dock. 2. The old concrete ramp located between the floating and fixed dock continues to be used for launching canoes and kayaks at this access area. Will the existing concrete need to be removed prior to or following construction and removal of the access road? Will that be decided based on the condition of the concrete remaining following removal of the construction access? If the concrete is to be removed, is there a plan for shoreline stabilization at this location? 3. The proposed Ditch #6 along with the construction of a rock vane plug and earthen berm between the ditch and ramp approach (sheet CCL -0104-020) should help with the sediment issues at the ramp. The longitudinal slope in Ditch #6 between the proposed 2024 & 2021 contours flattens out relative to the upstream and downstream channel slopes and at a point just below where flow from Kiesee Creek enters Cedar Cliff Lake at normal levels. It is likely that sediment carried by the creek following heavy rains will continue to deposit in this area. Over time, that section of the ditch channel may be filled in with sediment. Flow from the creek below the lake surface could then overtop the proposed berm and cut a new channel back through the ramp approach area. Has any modeling of sediment flow through Ditch #6 been done to verify that the channel slopes and dimensions will be sufficient to keep sediment moving from the mouth of the creek through to the proposed end of channel at E1.=2300'? 4. Detail #3 on sheet CCL -0105-012 shows a typical section of the proposed rock vane. Is there a specification of size and gradation for rock to be used? 5. Detail #4 on sheet CCL -0105-012 is the typical section for the temporary construction road. It will be built 3'± thick with surge stone placed over a geotextile layer. What are the plans for disposal or reuse of this stone after the temporary construction access road is removed? 6. Keynote #2 on sheet CCL -0104-021 states, "Contractor shall maintain aggregate base on parking lot in good condition." Will this plan include details for access area site improvements to stormwater drainage & BMPs, paving & parking/ADA delineation, etc. following this project? Will the access area improvements be by a different designer & contractor? What will the timeframe be for access area improvements following the dam modification project and drawdown? Thank you, Andrea Andrea Leslie Mountain Habitat Conservation Coordinator NC Wildlife Resources Commission 645 Fish Hatchery Rd., Building B Marion, NC 28752 828-803-6054 (office) 828-400-4223 (cell) www.ncwildlife.org Get NC Wildlife Update delivered to your inbox from the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Mularski, Eric <Eric.Mularski@hdrinc.com> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 10:23 AM To: 'david.w. brown@ usace.a rmy. mi I' <david.w.brown@usace.army.mil>; Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Leslie, Andrea J <andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org>; Mitchell, Robert K <kevin.mitchell@ncdenr.gov>; 'John. Eddy@duke- energy.com' <John.Eddy@duke-energy.com>; Wise, Jon <Jon.Wise@duke-energy.com>; 'Ala n.Stuart@duke-energy.com' <Alan.Stuart@duke-energy.com>; Nicholson, Allen (Furber.Nicholson @duke-energy.com) <Furber.Nicholson@duke- energy.com>; Ken.Karably@duke-energy.com; Banta, Tim <Tim.Banta@hdrinc.com>; Kulpa, Sarah <Sarah.Kul pa@hdrinc.com>; Little, Michael <Michael.Little@hdrinc.com> Subject: [External] Cedar Cliff Hydroelectric Development Auxiliary Spillway Upgrade Project - Section 404/401 Amendment #2 External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to am nc. ov Mr. Brown & Ms. Homewood, On behalf of Duke Energy, HDR is requesting an amendment to the previously approved Section 404 (Action ID 2015- 02543) and Section 401 (DWR# 2016-0742) Individual Permit for the Cedar Cliff Development Auxiliary Spillway Upgrade Project (Project). As part of the amendment, Duke Energy would like to include the revised water quality monitoring plan, an update to the USACE Individual Special Condition 20.0 regarding required depth of Turbidity Barriers, and authorization for additional impacts to Cedar Cliff Lake to accommodate the proposed Cedar Cliff Access Boat Ramp — Temporary Construction Access Road. Brief descriptions of these components are described below. • Water Quality Plan — A rock spoil assessment was initiated following internal review of the subsurface investigation report that indicated the presence of pyrite material in rock core samples in the auxiliary spillway rock face. These findings were discussed during a Project status update meeting with the environmental regulatory agencies (including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water Resources, US Fish and Wildlife Services, and NC Wildlife Resources Commission) on February 8, 2018. The recommendation was made to develop a Water Quality Monitoring Plan to gather baseline data as well as post -construction data as a due diligence measure to ensure that placement of all excavated material from the auxiliary spillway into the reservoir would not adversely affect water quality. Duke Energy developed a draft Water Quality Monitoring Plan and submitted the document to the agencies for review. On June 6, 2018, a teleconference was held to discuss the proposed Water Quality Monitoring Plan. Per recommendations made during the second meeting, the plan has been revised to include a Data Review and Reporting Requirements section (see attached). The revised Water Quality Monitoring Plan will be attached to the Section 404/401 Individual Permit amendment. • Turbidity Barriers - Duke Energy requests that SAW -2015-02543 Special Condition 20.0 regarding Turbidity Barriers be revised to read; "Prior to the initiation of any of the work authorized by the permit, the Permittee shall install floating turbidity barriers with weighted skirts that extend to a depth of at least 5 feet around all work areas that are in, or adjacent to, surface waters. The turbidity barriers shall remain in place and be maintained until the authorized work has been completed and all erodible materials have been stabilized." Cedar Cliff Access Area - Temporary Construction Access Road — Duke Energy would like to include an additional barge access area at the existing North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission's Cedar Cliff Access Area to support the Project. This will require an approximately 550 -foot -long temporary access road to the proposed barge location. The Cedar Cliff reservoir will be drawn down approximately 30 feet in September 2019 after Labor Day to support the installation of the new spillway hoist, maintenance of the radial gate, and the Project. The required reservoir drawdown will be sustained over the course of approximately 25 months. The barge access temporary construction road is necessary to maintain access to the Cedar Cliff reservoir for equipment and material support for the Project during the 25 -month period. Duke Energy is proposing to install an approximately 500 -foot long temporary stone construction access road below the Cedar Cliff Reservoir full pond elevation of 2,330 feet above mean sea level (feet msl). The proposed road will terminate at the 2,300 ft msl reservoir drawdown elevation for barge access (Drawing CCL -0104-021). Flow from Kiesee Creek has eroded the existing floating boat dock and sediment has been deposited in the shallow portion of the reservoir. Duke Energy is proposing to excavate the excess sediment from the reservoir to elevation 2,322 ft msl as shown on Drawing (CCL -0104-020). All excavated material will be deposited in upland areas. Installation of a permanent rock vane is proposed to deflect flow from Kiesee Creek away from the boat launch. A permanent rock ditch (Ditch 6 on the attached plans) parallel to the proposed access road will be installed to promote flow to the reservoir during the drawdown period. Ditch 6 and rock vane will remain after construction to promote flow away from the boat launch. To facilitate the construction of Rock Ditch 6 a temporary pump -around scheme will be employed along a section of Kiesee Creek as shown on Drawing CCL -0103-012. The proposed limits of the disturbance (LOD) area below the 2,330 ft msl full pond elevation is approximately 1.41 acres. A list of additional impacts below full pond elevation that are requested to be considered as part of this 404/401 permitting addendum are included in the table below. SHEET Number Type of Impact Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts CCL -0103-012 Dewatering 0 acres 45 linear feet Pum - Around of Kiesee Creek CCL -0104-020 Excavation 0 acres 0.49 acres CCL -0104-021 Barge Access Road (Fill) 0 acres 0.49 acres 2,065 cubic yards of rock fill CCL -0104-020 Rock Ditch 0.70 acres 0 acres (700 cubic yards of rock fill) CCL -0104-020 Rock Vane 0.03 acres (100 cubic yards 0 acres of rock fill Attached to this email are the revised Duke Energy Water Quality Monitoring Plan and the proposed Cedar Cliff Access Area Grading Plans and Details. We ask that you review the attached plans and include the additional impacts as part of Duke Energy's Section 404/401 Individual Permit authorization. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions regarding this permit amendment request. Thank you, Eric Mularski, Pws Environmental and Regulatory Team Lead HDR 440 S. Church Street Charlotte, NC 28202 D 704-973-6878 M 704-806-1521 Eric. m u larski(cD_hdrinc.com hdrinc.com/follow-us