710003_Inspection_20181120

Division of Water Resources /
Facility Number] - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation /
O Other Agency VVV
Type of Visit: O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
on Reasfor Visit: O Routine O Complaint rt7 Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: J O County: Region:
Farm Name: l q,,Ig& L J /, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: I Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: C� "eA" Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swinc Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I I ll-aer
Wean to Feeder I Non -Layer
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean Design Current
Farrow, to Feeder Dry Poul Capacity Pop.
Farrow to Finish Layers
Gilts Non -Layers
Boars Pullets
Turke s
Other Turke Paul[s
Other Other
Discharacs and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DW R)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
2ory Calf
Dai Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes Po ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
K2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of L42015 Condnaed

Facili Number: Dateoflns ection: ( -Zp-
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Fs storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
'f�lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Struchure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Idemi0er. d�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
IP No
"f�
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste AUDIRntlan
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes ® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAW MP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
c'P NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
h NE
19. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
Reaulmd Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
® NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA WMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
PjP NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[4NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[� NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain minbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[d NE
Page 2 of
21412015 Conrinaed

(Facility Number: Dateoflns ection: 11-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate boxes) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
Ifyes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? Ifyes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ®NE
❑ NA ONE
❑ NA [4 NE
❑ NA (ni, NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes [W No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [�] NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
W NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question 0): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
ZPMLut 6la�oJYS L9
iroM -%
PrbCron �� 01- �U�,<e l 9 c erf'k .1- beAmi hotse
Wore 5 �b,,
30
4P -7
-A6 iz.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1��,U�[,t.J/e//�/%J�ino.J Phone: ! /2L 21G 7Z3�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �g"(i5f /// Date: 11 2(9 /if
Page 3 of 21412015