Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout710003_Inspection_20180205Facility Number 4 - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation 11---�� O Other Agency O Follow-up O Referral O'Emergency O Other Date of Visit: �/ I j/PPf �� Arrival Time: Departure Time:© County: Farm Name: Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Phone: Region: Onsite Representative: r/PS �dn� Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Swinc Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish I I La ver W to Feeder Non -La er eeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Design Current Farrow to Feeder Dry Poult Capacity Pop. Farrow to Finish Lavers Gills Non -Layers Boars Pullets EtE 'turkeys Other Turke Poults Other Other Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _ a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _ d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dai Heifer D Cow Non -Doi Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes E24o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [-]No ❑ NA ❑ NE [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 21412015 Continued Facility Number: IDate of Inspection, 2. Waite Collection & Treatment ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes No NA NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in):_ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ['Lble- ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0,110 ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes O'No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, cheek the appropriate box below. [—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [D'9E ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10°/ or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [�FNE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA CTI E 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA QdNE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EKE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑'FIE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklisrs ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: / 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ^�rvC ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and l" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain minbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ,❑ E Page 2 of 21412015 Continued Fscilit Nu ber: Dateof Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA lE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No EJ- AA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes En No ❑ NA En' ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PI 'v ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Stomge Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the permit or CA WMP? ❑ Yes / ❑-IPO ❑ NA �No ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ff ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question t): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawines of faciliry to better exolain situations (use additional oases as mecessarvt. 7e2 P)!�Si�n, t'"� .S L-[a i•/ro��FiP ���//?°"",f Q �I 0 La Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: 7/o77G 7��y Dale: 7 S (F v I 2/412015