20051403 Ver 1_Complete File_20050725

W AT ?9QG
?r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 7, 2005
DWQ# 05-1403
Guilford County
Mr. Frank Wyatt
City of Greensboro
Engineering and Inspections Division
P. O. Box 3136
Greensboro, NC 27402-3136
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Wyatt:
The City of Greensboro has our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill in 194 linear
feet of perennial stream and 0.074 acre of wetlands in order to install gravity sewer lines for the Summit
Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall in Greensboro, Guilford County, as described in your application received by
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on August 4, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have
determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3374, which can be viewed
on our web site at htt2://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Number 12 when it is issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should secure any other
applicable federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project, including (but not limited to)
those required by Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification.
This approval is valid only for the purpose and design that you have described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certifications and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or
in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certifications, as
well as the additional conditions listed below:
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all other specific and general conditions of the
Certification are met. No other impacts, including incidental impacts, are approved:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Streams 194 linear feet Four unnamed tributaries to Reedy Fork Creek
located - % mile north of the intersection of Hicone
Road and Summit Avenue in Greensboro, Guilford
County.

o ` Carolina
Aturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Certification Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 Internet httpll:h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Customer Service Number: 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Frank Wyatt
Page 2, DWQ# 05-1403
September 7, 2005
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
Wetlands 0.074 acre Wetlands along four unnamed tributaries to Reedy
Fork Creek located - %Z mile north of the
intersection of Hicone Road and Summit Avenue in
Greensboro, Guilford County.

2. Soft bank stabilization methods, such as the use of erosion control matting and the planting of
appropriate ground cover, shall be utilized to the maximum extent practicable. Riprap may only be used
below the normal high water level. The original grade and elevation of the stream's cross-section must
be maintained. Riprap placed in the stream bottom must be inserted into the bottom matrix to a depth
sufficient to provide the thickness of riprap required for scour protection. The elevation of the stream
bottom must not be increased by the placement of riprap. Placement of riprap must not result in
destabilization of the streambed or banks upstream or downstream of any crossing.
3. In those areas where the construction corridor must be installed parallel to and closer than 10 feet to a
stream channel, appropriate sediment and erosion control measures which equal or exceed those outlined
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual or the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual (available from the Division of Land Resources
at NCDENR regional offices or the central office), whichever is more appropriate, shall be designed,
installed and maintained properly to assure compliance at all times with the North Carolina water quality
standards that are applicable to Class C waters as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0211 Fresh Surface
Water Quality Standards For Class C Waters. Such measures must equal or exceed the requirements
specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual.
These measures must be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites,
including contractor owned and leased borrow pits, which are associated with this project.
4. Permanent, maintained access corridors shall be restricted to a maximum width of 20 feet, including
manhole locations and vehicle turnaround areas.
5. Where joints must be placed in sewer lines within the foot print of the stream channel at crossings
having topographic and bedrock constraints, the jointed section shall either be completely enclosed in a
steel encasement pipe sealed at both ends, for aerial crossings, or encased in concrete from bank to bank,
for buried crossings. At its discretion, the City of Greensboro may use ductile iron pipe with
mechanically restrained joints in lieu of concrete encasement.
6. If concrete is used with any fill material, it shall not be allowed to come in contact with surface waters
until it has cured.
7. Upon completion of the project, the Applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands
Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. Along with the Certificate of
Completion form, please send photographs upstream and downstream of each stream-crossing site to
document correct installation.

Mr. Frank Wyatt
Page 3, DWQ# 05-1403
September 7, 2005
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You a written must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this eGeneral Statutes to thenOfficedof Adminstrat ve
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality DW u WmstontSalem Regional Offs eWater at 336c771f
you have any questions, please telephone Daryl Lamb in t Q
4600, extension 293.
Sincerely,
e
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/cdl
Attachments
cc: Todd Tugwell, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
Wetlands/401 File Copy
Tony Kozuch, Facilities Management Division, City of Greensboro, Greensboro, NC NCO 8235 136
Michael A. Iagnocco, Ralph Whitehead Associates, Inc., P. O. Box 35624, Charlotte,
s-: p a
SEP 1 4 2005
CENR • • c iY
1`?T?;tai)? FJM[? :;TG Jf e,r?Tl:1? f fv:PiG?
Triage Check List
9/07/05 Project Name: City of Greensboro - Summit Ave. Sewer
Date: DWQ#: 05-1403
County: Guilford
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office i? r, I L To:
60-day processing time: 9/01/05 -10/30/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
0 Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
00
1000 W. Morehead, Suite 200
Post Office Box 35624
Charlotte, NC 28235
[phone]
[phone] FAX
3505 Koger Blvd., Suite 205
Duluth, GA 30096
[phone]
[phone] FAX
4348 Southpoint Boulevard
Suite 310
Jacksonville, FL 32216
[phone]
[phone] FAX
10800 Midlothian Turnpike
Suite 302
Richmond, VA 23235
[phone]
[phone] FAX
454 S. Anderson Road
Suite135, BTC 517
Business Technology Center
Rock Hill, SC 29730
[phone]
[phone] FAX
105 Wappoo Creek Drive
Suite 4A
Charleston, SC 29412
[phone]
[phone]
3301 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 111
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
[phone] FAX
6405 Metcalf
Suite 516
Overland Park, KS 66202
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)
RALPH WHITEHEAD ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers Charlotte Atlanta Jacksonville Richmond Rock Hill Charleston
Raleigh Kansas City
To: N.C. Div o a er ' I ty
Wetlands/401 it %L?
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
00003 OF IJ o LIV?IUU???L 1?
Date: 8/30/05 Job No. 2979-300
Attention: Cyndi Karoly
RE: City of Greensboro - Summit
Avenue Sewer
DWQ # 05-1403, Guilford County
Greensboro, North Carolina
X Attached Under separate cover the following items:
Shop Drawings Prints Specifications (1 a?? D
Copy of Letter Plans w'
Change Order Samples SEP 1 - 2005
Copies Date No. Description DENR-WATER QUALITY
Page 5 of 11 of the Summit Aven ER BRANCH
5 8/30/05 1 Construction Notification for Nationwide Permit No. 12
(Revised)
These are transmitted as checked below:
For Approval Approved as submitted
x For your use Approved as noted
As requested Returned for corrections
For Bids Due F1 For review & comment
Remarks
Cyndi:
Resubmit copies for approval
Submit copies for distribution
Return corrected prints
Prints returned after loan to us
On behalf of the City of Greensboro (COG), enclosed please find revised copies of page
5 of 11 of the PCN form for the Summit Avenue Sewer Project. Per our field visit with
Daryl Lamb on August 24, 2005, revisions have been made to the Stream Impact Table
and Cumulative Impact Table (on page 5) to include potential permanent impacts
associated with the open cut channel method. As indicated in the permit application, the
COG's intention is to bore and jack beneath the subject stream channels, whenever
conditions allow, which would potentially eliminate all channel impacts. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 1068.
Copy to Dlae I Lamb; COG; Signed Michael lagnocco
If enclosures are not as indicated, kindly notify us at once
N:\PR0J\2979-300\Sumrrut Avenue\Pernul\PCN-pg 5 Revised\DWQ Transmittal Form 8-30-05.doc
L
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls,
gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and
profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Tn nnlriilnta nnranaa mnlt;nlv lenoth X width then dividf- by 41 560
_
Stream Impact v Type of Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet (acres)

1 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
3-4 50/25 0.004/0.002
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
2 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation Perennial 12-15 54/25 0.01710.009
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
3 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation perennial 8-10 54/25 0.011/0.006
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
4 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation perennial 5-7 36/25 0.004/0.004
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 194 If or 0.036 acre temporary; 100 If or 0.021 acre permanent (if open
cut method is used)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
47111 avrn.,nt;nn rlrarla;no flnndino drninaoe hnikhearls_ etc_
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
acres
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres) temporary/permanent: 0.036/0.021
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.028*
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.064
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) temporary/permanent: 194/100
* Project also involves 0.046 acre of temporary wetlanct impacts
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 5 of I I-revised
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls,
gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and
profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
To calculate acreage. multinlv length X width- then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact Type of Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres

1 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
3-4 50/25 0.00410.002
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
2 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation perennial 12-15 54/25 0.017/0.009
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
3 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation perennial 8-10 54/25 0.011/0.006
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm

4 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
5-7 36/25 0.004/0.004
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 1941f or 0.036 acre temporary; 100 if or 0.021 acre permanent (if open
cut method is used)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill- excavation- dredging- flooding- drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
acres
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres) temporary/permanent: 0.036/0.021
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.028*
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.064
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) temporary/permanent: 194/100
* Project also involves 0.046 acre of temporary wetland impacts
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 5 of I I-revised
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls,
gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and
profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
To calculate acreage- multinly length X width. then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact Type of Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres

1 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
3-4 50/25 0.004/0.002
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm

2 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
12-15 54/25 0.017/0.009
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
3 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation Perennial 8-10 54/25 0.011/0.006
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm

4 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
5-7 36/25 0.004/0.004
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 194 if or 0.036 acre temporary; 100 If or 0.021 acre permanent (if open
cut method is used)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill- excavation- dredging- flooding- drainage- bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
acres
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres) temporary/permanent: 0.036/0.021
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.028*
Open Water Impact (acres):. 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.064
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) temporary/permanent: 194/100
* Project also involves 0.046 acre of temporary wetland impacts
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 5 of I I-revised
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls,
gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and
profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
To calculate acreage- multinlv length X width- then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact Type of Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet (acres)

1 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
3-4 50/25 0.004/0.002
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm

2 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
12-15 54/25 0.017/0.009
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
3 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation Perennial 8-10 54/25 0.011/0.006
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm

4 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation
Perennial
5-7 36/25 0.004/0.004
Creek and backfill temp/perm temp/perm
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 194 if or 0.036 acre temporary; 100 if or 0.021 acre permanent (if open
cut method is used)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill- excavation- dredging- flooding- drainage- bulkheads- etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
acres
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres) temporary/permanent: 0.036/0.021
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.028*
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.064
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) temporary/permanent: 194/100
* Project also involves 0.046 acre of temporary wetland impacts
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 5 of 11-revised
Triage Check List
Date:
To: , V 1,
8/8/05,-
FILE C6,
Project Name: City of Greensboro Summit Avenue Sewer
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem Regional Office
60-day processing time: 8/4/05 -10/2/05
DWQ#: 05-1403
County: Guilford
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
00
1000 W. Morehead, Suite 200
Post Office Box 35624
Charlotte, NC 28235
[phone]
[phone] FAX
3505 Koger Blvd., Suite 205
Duluth, GA 30096
[phone]
[phone] FAX
4348 Southpoint Boulevard
Suite 310
Jacksonville, FL 32216
[phone]
[phone] FAX
10800 Midlothian Turnpike
Suite 302
Richmond, VA 23235
[phone]
[phone] FAX
454 S. Anderson Road
Suite135, BTC 517
Business Technology Center
Rock Hill, SC 29730
[phone]
[phone] FAX
105 Wappoo Creek Drive
Suite 4A
Charleston, SC 29412
[phone]
[phone]
3301 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 111
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
[phone] FAX
6405 Metcalf
Suite 516
Overland Park, KS 66202
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)

AuG _ X00115

RALPH WHITEHEAD ASSOCIATES, INC. /?
Consulting Engineers Charlotte Atlanta Jacksonville Richmond Rock H2 Gh^ lule6 nq
1 40 3
Raleigh Kansas City
V. t
F I L
To: N.C. Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
LEUUER OF U ° ° M-MMAL
Date: 8/3/05 Job No. 2979-300
Attention: Cyndi Karoly
RE: City of Greensboro - Summit
Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall
DWQ # 2005-1403, Guilford County
Greensboro, North Carolina
X Attached Under separate cover the following items:
Shop Drawings Prints Specifications
Copy of Letter Plans
Change Order Samples
Copies Date No. Description
1 8/3/05 1 1 1 Check made out to DWQ for $475 - Processing Fee
These are transmitted as checked below:
For Approval Approved as submitted
For your use Approved as noted
x As requested Returned for corrections
For Bids Due 11 For review & comment
Resubmit copies for approval
Submit copies for distribution
Return corrected prints
Prints returned after loan to us
Remarks
Hey Cyndi:
On behalf of the City of Greensboro, enclosed please find a check in the amount of
$475 to cover 401 Certification processing in the above matter. My apologies for
erroneously including a check in the amount of $200 with our application. Your efforts in
getting our application off 'hold' and making up for the time lost while you returned our
check will be most appreciated. If you hav ny questions, please do not hesitate to call
me at [phone], ext. 11Q68.
• A ///
Thank you.
Copy to File
If enclosures are not as indicated, kindly notify us at once
Signed Michael lagnocco
N:\PROJ\2979-300\Summit Avenue\Perrrt\DWQTransmittalFonnapplicationfee475.doc
O?ok W AT ?RQG

July 27, 2005
Guilford County
DWQ # 2005-1403
CERTIFIED MAIL
Ralph Whitehead Associates, Inc.
Attn: Michael Iagnocco
PO Box 35624
Charlotte, NC 28235
Dear Mr. Iagnocco:
' V/r
AUG 2005

On 7/25/05, the Division of Water Quality received your application on behalf of the City of Greensboro
Summit Avenue Sewer for 401 Water Quality Certification in Guilford County, North Carolina. Please note that
beginning January 1, 1999, the N.C. General Assembly passed legislation requiring payment of a fee for all 401
applications. The fee for applications is $200 for projects impacting less than an acre of we and and less than
150 linear feet of streams. For projects impacting one or more acres of wetland or 150 or mor feet of streams,
the fee is $475. In order for DWQ to begin review and process your request, you will nee to send a check in
the appropriate amount made payable to the N.C. Division of Water Quality. Your check is eing returned for
correction of payment amount. Please reference the above DWQ # on all future corresponden e. The project
has been placed on hold pending receipt of payment.
If you have any questions regarding this letter please do not hesitate to call me at (919)-731786.
Sincerely,
clr? i /r
Cyn i Karoly
Enclosure: Check # 20259 for $200.00
CC: File Copy
Central Files
dq.y CYAA µY of 010 '4U . Prod a'+ ? 0-s
t 9 ? t ? of ? ?.( l vti ? cv?
e1eVtA. o E-r Off e tT . ?Slvl m- !wt Pac-TS
Were +40APorAcy Z oe
I I wcl
20051403 City of Gmsbro Summit Ave Sewer_retu for paymt
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http:! 12o.enr.state.nc.tis,"ncwctlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
.Division of Water Quality
ZZA
NODE`
W AMichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\O? QG ' ?, ? ! North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Uj r U Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
? ? ?? V
,'r?
O .? Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
July 27, 2005
Guilford County
DWQ # 2005-1403
CERTIFIED MAIL 2 0 0 5 1 4 0 3
Ralph Whitehead Associates, Inc.
Attn: Michael Iagnocco
PO Box 35624
Charlotte, NC 28235
Dear Mr. Iagnocco:
On 7/25/05, the Division of Water Quality received your application on behalf of the City of Greensboro
Summit Avenue Sewer for 401 Water Quality Certification in Guilford County, North Carolina. Please note that
beginning January 1, 1999, the N.C. General Assembly passed legislation requiring payment of a fee for all 401
applications. The fee for applications is $200 for projects impacting less than an acre of wetland and less than
150 linear feet of streams. For projects impacting one or more acres of wetland or 150 or more feet of streams,
the fee is $475. In order for DWQ to begin review and process your request, you will need to send a check in
the appropriate amount made payable to the N.C. Division of Water Quality. Your check is being returned for
correction of payment amount. Please reference the above DWQ # on all future correspondence. The project
has been placed on hold pending receipt of payment.
If you have any questions regarding this letter please do not hesitate to call me at (919)-733-1786.
Sincerely,
Cyn i Karoly
Enclosure: Check # 20259 for $200.00
CC: File Copy
Central Files
20051403 City of Gmsbro Summit Ave Sewer retu for paymt
iZb NR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httn:?%112o.enr.state. ne.us'ncwetlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748

202591
RBC CENTURA BANK
RALPH WHITEHEAD ASSOCIATES, INC. CHARLOTTE, NC 2820
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 66-85-531
GENERAL ACCOUNT July 21 2005
P.O. BOX 35624 CHECK DATE Y b
CHARLOTTE, NC 28235-5624 g
PAY t
Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars E
AMOUNT $200.00
TO
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
2321 CRABTREE BLVD., SUITE 250 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE t
RALEIGH NC 27604
?sM', nr
113000 20 2 5911' 1:0 5 3 L008 501:0 7 900 L 2 9 LOu'
00
1000 W. Morehead, Suite 200
Post Office Box 35624
Charlotte, NC 28235
[phone]
[phone] FAX
3505 Koger Blvd., Suite 205
Duluth, GA 30096
[phone]
[phone] FAX
4348 Southpoint Boulevard
Suite 310
Jacksonville, FL 32216
[phone]
[phone] FAX
10800 Midlothian Turnpike
Suite 302
Richmond, VA 23235
[phone]
[phone] FAX
454S * Anderson Road
Suite135, BTC 517
Business Technology Center
Rock Hill, SC 29730
[phone]
[phone] FAX
105 Wappoo Creek Drive
Suite 4A
Charleston, SC 29412
[phone]
[phone]
3301 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 111
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
[phone] FAX
6405 Metcalf
Suite 516
Overland Park, KS 66202
[phone]
[phone] (Fax)
f..
RALPH WHITEHEAD ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers 'Chap a Atlanta Jacksonville Richmond
Raleigh Kansas City
Rock Hill Charleston
i \i..\, Li Y L LI tJ U IER OF tl UMl1VI NVAL
To: N.C. Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
2005 1 403
Date: 7/22/05 Job No. 2979-300
Attention: Cyndi Karoly
RE: City of Greensboro - Summit
Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall
Guilford County
Greensboro, North Carolina
x Attached Under separate cover the following items:
Shop Drawings Prints Specifications
Copy of Letter Plans
Change Order Samples
Copies Date No. Description
7 7/22/05 1 Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall, Pre-Construction
Notification Nationwide Permits No. 12
1 7/22/05 2 Check made out to DWQ for $200 - Processing Fee
These are transmitted as checked below:
x For Approval Approved as submitted
For your use Approved as noted
As requested Returned for corrections
For Bids Due For review & comment
Remarks
Hey Cyndi:
Resubmit copies for approval
Submit copies for distribution
Return corrected prints
Prints returned after loan to us
On behalf of the City of Greensboro, enclosed please find seven copies of the PCN for
the Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall Project. If you have any questions, please
do not hesitate to fall me at [phone], ext. 1068.
? ?1, Thank you.

Copy to File; COG
Signed Michael lagnocco
If enclosures are not as indicated, kindly l5 ?J v ? V R D
D
JUL 2 5 2005
NAPR0J\2979.300\Summil Avenue\Permit\DWOTransrrittalFormPCN.doc
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STJRMWATER BRANCH
1W
Website:
' www.rwhitehead.com.
1000 W. Morehead Street
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28208
Mailing Address:
Post Office Box 35624.
Charlotte, NC 28235
704 372-1885 Voice
704 372-3393 Fax,

s
1
1
1

f

RALPH WHITEHEAD ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
Charlotte Atlanta Jacksonville Richmond
Rock Hill Charleston Kansas City Raleigh
July 22, 2005
FEDERALEXPRESS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Attention: Mr. Todd Tugwell
2005 403
rca
Q GC?C???IC? D
JUL2, 52.005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification
Nationwide Permit No. 12
Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall
Greensboro, North Carolina
RWA Project No. 2979-300
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
On behalf of the City of Greensboro (COG), Ralph Whitehead Associates, Inc.
(RWA) is submitting the attached Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) form
(Attachment A) with supplemental information, and accompanying figures and
supporting information, to request the issuance of Department of the Army
Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12 for the installation of a sanitary
sewer outfall. The COG has retained RWA to act as its agent in matters related
to wetlands permitting for this project. Reference Attachment A for an Agent
Certification of Authorization. Figures referenced in the ensuing discussion are
included in Attachment B.
The project involves the installation of a 7,950 linear foot (If), gravity sanitary
sewer outfall. The sewer will begin at Summit Avenue and end near The School
for the Deaf, where it will tie to an existing manhole (Figure 1 and 2). The sewer
corridor is generally 40 feet in width and maintains a 15-foot stream buffer
(excluding actual stream crossings) throughout most of its length along an
unnamed tributary of Reedy Fork Creek. The proposed project corridor is
predominantly wooded, but also contains several clearings and/or pastures. The
proposed 12-inch outfall will extend from Summit Avenue at Station 79+50 to
Station 32+49.22 located near the crossing point of Stream 2. The 12-inch sewer
then becomes a 16-inch sewer. The 16-inch sewer extends from Station
32+49.22 to Station 0+00 located just south of The School of the Deaf, where it .
ties to an existing manhole. Proposed permanent right-of-way (R/W) widths
range from 20 feet. near Summit Avenue to 25 feet at the project terminus. The
sanitary sewer outfall is proposed pursuant to NWP No. 12.

Mr. Todd Tugwell
July 22, 2111
Page 2 of 7
As described below, permanent losses of waters of the U.S. proposed as part of this project
would be de minimus. However, open cutting of the channel may be required for installation of
the sanitary sewer. In addition, a general condition of Section 401 Water Quality Certification
(WQC) 3374 cannot be adhered to. Namely, the construction corridor may be 50 feet wide at 4
crossings (Wetland A, and Streams 1, 2, and 3, described below) due to the possible presence
of shallow rock and steep topography, dictating that additional area may be required for open
cutting and dewatering. This application is also being provided to the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) since all conditions of WQC 3374 cannot be met.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the sanitary sewer installation is to provide sewer service to existing residential
and commercial areas within a recently annexed region of the City of Greensboro. In order to
meet obligations associated with providing sewer service to annexed areas, the COG would
need to commence construction of the outfall by October 2005.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands, were delineated in the project area by
RWA Environmental Scientists Adam H. Karagosian, P.W.S. and Ashley Oliver in May 2005.
Wetlands were delineated using the 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual''.
Reference Figure 3 in Attachment B for an Approximate Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands
Boundary Map.
Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. in the project corridor included four stream channels and four
small wetland areas. Mr. Ron Small of the City of Greensboro Stormwater Department
classified all four streams as perennial in December 2004. Reference Attachment D for Stream
Assessment forms completed by RWA.
Stream 1 is an unnamed, perennial tributary of Reedy Fork Creek, located at Station 62+65. In
the project corridor, Stream 1 ranges in width from 3 to 4 feet, measured at the top-of-bank.
Stream 1 has bank heights of .approximately 1 foot (Attachment C, Photograph 1). Stream 1
had flowing water at the time of the May 10, 2005 site visit. Riparian vegetation includes red
maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Japanese honeysuckle (Locinera
japonica), jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Virginia
t creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), and spicebush (Lindera benzoin).
Stream 2 is an unnamed, perennial tributary of Reedy Fork Creek, and parallels the entire
length of the proposed sanitary sewer outfall. The outfall has a single crossing of Stream 2 at
1 Station 34+15. In the project corridor, Stream 2 (Photograph 2) has a bankfull width of
approximately 12 to 15 feet, measured at the top-of-bank. Stream 2 has bank heights of
approximately 3 to 4 feet. Stream 2 had flowing water at the time of the May 10, 2005 site visit.
Riparian vegetation includes honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos), tag alder (Alnus serrulata),
multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), common buttercup (Ranunculus acris), blackberry (Rubus
betulifolius), muscadine (Vitus rotundifolia), and jewelweed.
Environmental Laboratory, 1987, "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, " Technical Report Y-87-1,
U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
El
Mr. Todd Tugwell
July 22, 2005
Page 3 of 7
L Stream 3 (Photograph 3) is an unnamed, perennial tributary of Reedy Fork Creek, located at
Station 13+30. In the project corridor, Stream 3 ranges in width from 8 to 10 feet, measured at
the top-of-bank, and has bank heights of approximately 2 to 3 feet. Stream 3 had flowing water
at the time of the May 10, 2005 site visit. Riparian vegetation includes tulip poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), red maple, arrow arum (Peltandra virginica), greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), poison
ivy, and jewelweed.
Stream 4 is an unnamed, perennial tributary of Reedy Fork Creek, located at Station 0+45. In
the project corridor, Stream 4 (Photograph 4) has a bankfull width of approximately 5 to 7 feet,
measured at the top-of-bank. Stream 4 has bank heights of approximately 2 to 4 feet. Stream 4
had flowing water at the time of the May 10, 2005 site visit. Riparian vegetation includes tulip
poplar, red maple, sweetgum, poison ivy, spicebush, and jewelweed.
There are four small wetland areas present in the project area. Reference Attachment D for
Wetland Determination data forms. Wetland A (Photograph 5) is a paulstrine forested wetland
located near Station 40+75 within the project corridor. Dominant vegetation in this wetland
includes ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), red maple, beaksedge (Rhynchospora spp.), variable panic grass
(Dichanthelium commutatum), jewelweed, and poison ivy. This wetland was saturated at the
time of RWA's site visit, and contained several pockets of standing water. Wetland A is
estimated to be approximately 0.018 acre in size.
Wetland B (Photograph 6) is a palustrine emergent wetland located within a forested floodplain.
Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes Nepal microstegium (Eulalia viminea), dog violet
(Viola sororia), and variable panic grass. Wetland B is estimated to be approximately 0.033
acre in size, and is located near Station 28+00.
Wetland C (Photograph 7) is a palustrine forested wetland. The wetland is seep-fed, and
crosses the proposed project corridor near Station 8+00 and proposed Manhole #4. Dominant
vegetation within Wetland A is also representative of this wetland. Wetland C is estimated to be
approximately 0.04 acre in size.
Wetland D (Photograph 8) is a palustrine forested wetland, which surrounds Stream 4 near the
School of the Deaf. Dominant vegetation in this wetland includes red maple, sweetgum, tulip
poplar, jewelweed, poison ivy, Virginia creeper, assorted rushes, and arrow arum. Wetland D is
estimated to be approximately 0.018 acre in size.
The City of Greensboro hereby requests a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdictional
Determination for the wetland delineation. Attachment D includes Routine Wetland
Determination Data Forms. Reference Attachment B, Figures 6 through 12, for approximate
locations and boundaries of the waters of the U.S. within the project area.
Impacts to Waters of the U.S.
The proposed project consists of the construction of an approximate 7,950 linear foot sanitary
sewer outfall. The proposed project would result in the loss of approximately 0.028 acre of
wooded wetlands. There will be a temporary impact of 0.017 acre to wooded wetlands and
0.029 acre of temporary impact to emergent wetlands. In addition, no more than 194 linear feet
of jurisdictional stream (Stream 1 = 50 If, Stream 2 = 54 If, Stream 3 = 54 If, Stream 4 = 36 If)
7
Mr. Todd Tugwell
July 22, 2005
Page 4 of 7
will be temporarily impacted during construction of the sewer. Proposed impacts are
I summarized in Table 1 below. An overall plan view of the project corridor is. presented on
Figures 4 and 5, Attachment B. Proposed impact areas are depicted on Figures 6 through 12.

r
f

1

Table 1
Summary of Estimated Impacts
Jurisdictional
Area Type of
Jurisdictional Area Permanent
Impact (acre) Temporary
Impact (acre) Length of
Temporary
Impact*
if)
Wetland A Wooded Wetland 0.006 0.002 --
Wetland B Emergent Wetland 0.00 0.029 --
Wetland C Wooded Wetland 0.022 0.007 --
Wetland D Wooded Wetland 0.00 0.008 --
Stream 1 Perennial -- -- 50
Stream 2 Perennial -- -- 54
Stream 3 Perennial -- -- 54
Stream 4 Perennial -- -- 36
"These impacts represent a worst-case; the uuu intenas to Dore Deneam sueams wnere pidumodw.,
however, the feasibility to bore will not be determined until an evaluation for the presence of rock is
completed.
Permanent Impact Totals: 0.028
Temporary Impact Totals: 0.046 and 194 If
Activities on the project site involving impacts to waters of the U.S. will be required to follow the
General Conditions of the Nationwide Permits (Federal Register Vol. 67, No. 10; January 15,
2002), applicable Wilmington District Regional Conditions, and applicable State consistency
conditions.
Minimization/Mitigation
As previously described, impacts associated with the proposed project's NWP No. 12 activities
would be de minimus. There will be no permanent impacts to streams due to construction of the
sanitary sewer outfall. The COG intends to bore beneath the stream for installation of the outfall,
if practicable. In the event that the outfall cannot be bored beneath the stream and an open cut
method is employed, the crossing has been designed to be close to perpendicular to the
channel, and the stream banks would be reestablished to pre-construction contours. Soft bank
stabilization, such as erosion control matting and plantings, will be utilized to stabilize any
impacted stream banks.
The proposed temporary construction corridor width has been limited to 40 feet, where
practicable. The corridor may be 50 feet wide at 4 crossings (Wetland A, and Streams 1, 2 and
3) due to the possible presence of shallow rock, steep topography, and depth of excavation
dictating that additional area may be required for open cutting and dewatering (Note: The
presence of shallow rock is widespread in this portion of Guilford County and the COG's survey

Mr. Todd Tugwell
July 22, 2005
Page 5 of 7
crews have documented observations of rock at numerous locations in the project corridor). At
Streams 1, 2 and 3, the 50 foot construction corridor width will actually result. in temporary
stream impacts of only 40 feet. The impact lengths identified in Table 1 above include sediment
traps and dewatering basins situated at the top-of-bank of these streams These erosion and
sedimentation control features should not result in stream channel impacts. However, additional
stream. impact length is included in this application, as noted in Table 1, in the event that
installation of these features impacts stream banks and riparian buffer area. Reference the
Standard Sedimentation Control and Temporary Creek Crossing Details included in Attachment
B (4 sheets).
As an additional minimization measure, the construction corridor or easement is narrower (15
feet) on the stream-side of the proposed sewer than the opposite side (25'), providing an
additional undisturbed buffer for much of the length of Stream 2. The sewer outfall was offset to
allow clearing limits to be kept 15 feet from the top-of-bank of Stream 2, thereby avoiding
impacts to the stream. The edge of the construction corridor is at least 15 feet from the top-of-
bank, except between stations 43+10.93 and 46+00.93 due to steep topography and limited
space availability. Edge of construction will also be within 15 feet of the-Stream 2 top-of-bank
near Station 0+00.00 and 3+50.00, due to the fact that the proposed sewer must be tied to the
existing manhole at the project terminus. However, at no location will the edge of the
construction easement extend to within 10 feet of the top-of-bank of Stream 2.
Impacts to each stream in the project corridor were minimized by aligning the sewer to cross
these channels at a near-90 degree angle. The proposed easement parallel to Stream 2 in the
central portion of the project area was shifted to the maximum extent practicable. In addition,
the depth of the sewer was reduced through this area in an effort to minimize the width of the
construction corridor. An additional measure to avoid and minimize impacts includes limiting the
construction corridor to 40 feet throughout the entire length of the easement, to the maximum
extent practicable.
Possible sedimentation of the stream downstream of the construction area during and
immediately following the construction phase will be minimized to the maximum extent
practicable by strict implementation of, and compliance with, a State-approved sediment and
erosion control plan. Erosion and sediment control measures will be inspected for compliance
with construction contract documents, as well as following storm events, to identify needed
repair, maintenance, or redesign.
Mitigation efforts for this project included avoidance and minimization of impacts to jurisdictional
waters of the U.S., including wetlands. Additional mitigation measures proposed include using a
wetland seed mix in the cleared wetland areas, and allowing successional scrub-shrub
vegetation to restore those areas of the temporary construction easement situated beyond the
proposed permanent R/W in wooded wetland areas. In addition, wetland areas will be backfilled
with topsoil excavated from these areas during construction, maintaining hydric soil type and a
i seed source in these areas.
Activities on the project site involving impacts to waters of the U.S. will be required to follow the
General Conditions of the Nationwide Permits (Federal Register Vol. 67, No. 10; Tuesday,
January 15, 2002), applicable Wilmington District Regional Conditions, and applicable State
consistency conditions.

Mr. Todd Tugwell
July 22, 2005
Page 6 of 7
Cultural Resources and Protected Species
r dated Jun 29, 2005, the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office SHPO
In a lette d J ( )
indicated that no historic resources would be affected by the project. Reference Attachment E
for a copy of the SHPO correspondence.
A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database provided existing
information concerning the potential occurrence of threatened or endangered species within
Guilford County, North Carolina. This database indicates that the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) is the only federal and/or state threatened or endangered species known to
occur in Guilford County. .
An assessment of potential Bald Eagle habitat (see description below) in the study area was
conducted during the field review on May 10 and 11, 2005. Appropriate habitat for the bald
eagle was not identified.
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) _
The bald eagle is associated with coasts, rivers, and lakes, usually nesting near large bodies of
water where it feeds. Nesting habitat in the southeast usually occurs in large pine or cypress
trees. The bald eagle is listed as a current record for Guilford County. The proposed project is
not expected to impact large bodies of water and no areas resembling the habitat requirements
for this species were observed in the project area.
Considering the lack of potential habitat in the project area, the likelihood that the bald eagle is
present is concluded to be remote.
Closing

1

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If you have any questions or need additional
information concerning this project, please contact either of the undersigned at [phone].
Sincerely,
RALPH WHITEHEAD ASSOCIATES, INC.
Adam H Karagosian, P.W`S. Michael A.
Senior Environmental Specialist Project Man
CC: Guy Ingle, COG
MMB/MAI:mmb
P.W.S.
or Scientist

Mr. Todd Tugwell
July 22, 2005
Page 7 of 7
Attachments: Attachment A: Pre-Construction Notification Form & Agent Certification of
Authorization
Attachment B: Figures
Attachment C: Photographs
Attachment D: Wetland Determination and Stream Assessment Data Forms
Attachment E: SHPO Correspondence

¦
i
ATTACHMENT A
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FORM &
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
¦
1
1
1
1
1
1
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I ,4 Zhux4y 1 kaj representing the City of Greensboro, hereby
certify that I have authorized Michael A. Iaanocco, P.W.S. of Ralph Whitehead Associates,
Inc., to act on the City's behalf and take all actions necessary in the processing, issuance,
and acceptance of this permit and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby verify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Applicant' gnature
0
Date
Agent's signatur
O
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
v

t

!J
1
1

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 5 1 -4 0 3
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP No. 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information p ? /;:?L r=
?J
D
1. Owner/Appli cant Information JUL 2 5 2005
Name: Frank Wyatt
Mailing Address: City of Greensboro
Engineering and Inspections Division WETME)SANDSTORMWATFRF2aeu lj
P.O Box 3136
Greensboro, NC 27402-3136
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Frank.Wyatt(cr?2reensboro-a)
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Michael A. Ianocco, PWS
Company Affiliation: Ralph Whitehead Associates, Inc.
Mailing Address: 1000 W. Morehead Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28208
Telephone Number: 704-372-1885 Fax Number: 704-372-3393
E-mail Address: michael.iagnocco(a)rwhitehead.com
Page 1 of I I
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
1 4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: Greensboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From I-85, take US 29
North. Exit Hicone Road, headed west. Travel approximately'/4 mile, and make a right
onto Summit Avenue. The project is located approximately'/: mile north of the Hicone
Road/ Summit Avenue intersection on the right.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum See attached sheet at end of PCN form.
6. Property size (acres): N/A - Linear Project
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: U.T. of Reedy Fork Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/rnaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The 7,950 foot sewer line begins at Summit Avenue and
ends to lust south of The School for the Deaf. The proposed project corridor is
predominantly wooded, but also contains several clearings and/or pastures

I Page 2 of 11
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed proiect consists of the construction of an approximate 7,950 linear foot
sanitary sewer line. A portion of the sanitary sewer line will consist of a 12-inch line,
while the remainder will consist of a 16-inch line. The 12-inch lateral will extend from
Summit Avenue at Station 79+50 to Station 32+49.22 located near the crossing point of
Stream 2. The 12-inch lateral then becomes a 16-inch lateral line. The 16-inch lateral
line extends from Station 32+49.22 to Station 0+00 located iust south of The School of
the Deaf, where it ties to an existing manhole. Equipment to be used includes backhoes,
excavators, and other typical heavy construction equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the project is to provide
sewer service to existing residential and commercial areas within a recently annexed
region of the City of Greensboro
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
• certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No previous iurisdictional determinations or permits have been
issued for this project
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future project plans are being considered at this time. Appropriate notification will be
provided should future impacts to waters of the U.S. be proposed.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
I Page 3 of 11

Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed project consists of the construction of an approximate 7,950 linear foot
sanitary sewer outfall. The proposed project would result in the loss of approximately
0.028 acre of wooded wetlands. There will be a temporary impact of 0.017 acre to wooded
wetlands and 0.029 acre of temporary impact to emergent wetlands. In addition, no more
than 194 linear feet of jurisdictional stream (Stream 1, 2, 3, and 4) will be temporarily
impacted by the project.
r
The nroaosed temporary construction corridor width has been limited to 40 feet, where
practicable. The corridor may be 50 feet wide at 4 crossings (Wetland A, and Streams 1, 2
and 3) due to the possible presence of shallow rock and steep topography, dictating that
additional area may be required for open cutting and dewatering. At Streams 1, 2 and 3,
the 50 foot corridor width will actually result in temporary stream impacts of only 40 feet.
The impact lengths identified in the Table below include sediment traps and dewatering
basins situated at the top-of-bank of these streams These erosion and sedimentation
control features should not result in stream impacts. However, additional stream impact
length is included in this application, as noted in the stream impact table below, in the
event that installation of these features impacts stream banks and riparian buffer area.
Reference the Standard Sedimentation Control and Temporary Creek Crossing Details
toward the end of Attachment B (4 sheets).
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Located within Distance to
Impact

Site Number
Type of Permanent

Impact
Temporary
100-year
**
Nearest

Type of Wetland***
Impact* Impact (acre) Floodplain Stream
(indicate on (acre) (yes/no) (linear feet)
map)
A Excavation 0.006 0.002 No Adjacent PFO
and backfill
B Excavation 0.00 0.029 No 20 if PEM
and backfill
C Excavation 0.022 0.007 No 201f PFO
and backfill
D Excavation 0.00 0.008 No Adjacent PFO
and backfill
Total area of wetland impact proposedt: u.uzu permanent; um4o temporary
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.109
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
Page 4 of 11
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must he included- To calculate acreage- multiply length X width. then divide by 43.560. -
Stream Impact
Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact t9
Intermittent Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma . Before Impact linear feet acres
I U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation and perennial 3-4 50 0.004
Creek backfill temporary
2 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation and perennial 12-15 54 0.017
Creek backfill temporary

3 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation and
Perennial
8-10 54 0.011
Creek backfill temporary
4 U.T. of Reedy Fork Excavation and perennial 5-7 36 0.004
Creek backfill temporary
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 194 If or 0.036 acre temporary
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill exenvntinn rirerioinv flnnriina_ drainage- bulkheads- etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project.
Stream Impact acres : 0.036
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.028*
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.064
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 194
* Project also involves 0.046 acre of temporary wettana impacts
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Page 5 of 11

8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
' Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts associated with the proposed proiect's NWP No. 12 activities would be de
minimus. There will be no permanent impacts to streams due to construction of the
sanitary sewer line. The COG intends to bore beneath the stream for installation of the
outfall, if practicable. In the event that the outfall cannot be bored beneath the stream
and an open cut method is employed, the crossing has been designed to be close to
perpendicular to the channel, and the stream banks would be reestablished to pre-
construction contours. Soft bank stabilization, such as erosion control matting and
' plantings, will be utilized to stabilize any impacted stream banks.
The proposed temporary construction corridor width has been limited to 40 feet, where
practicable The corridor may be 50 feet wide at 4 crossings (Wetland'A, and Streams 1, 2
and 3) due to the possible presence of shallow rock and steep topography, dictating that
additional area may be required for open cutting and dewatering. At Streams 1, 2 and 3,
the 50 foot corridor width will actually result in temporary stream impacts of only 40 feet.
As an additional minimization measure, the construction corridor is narrower (15 feet) on
the stream-side of the proposed sewer than the opposite side (251), providing an additional
undisturbed buffer for much of the length of Stream 2. The sewer line was offset to allow
clearing limits to be kept 15 feet from the top-of-bank of Stream 2, thereby avoiding
impacts to the stream. The edge of the construction corridor is at least 15 feet from the
top-of-bank, except between stations 43+10.93 and 46+00.93 due to steep topography and
limited space availability. Edge of construction will also be within 15 feet of the Stream 2
top-of-bank near Station 0+00.00 and 3+50.00, due to the fact that the proposed sewer line
must be tied to the existing sewer outfall. However, the edge of the construction easement
will not extend to within 10 feet of the top-of-bank of Stream 2.
Page 6ofII

I Impacts to each stream in the project corridor were minimized by aligning the sewer to
cross these channels at near-90 degree angle. The proposed easement parallel to Stream 2
' in the eastern portion of the project area was shifted to the maximum extent practicable.
In addition, the depth of the sewer was reduced through this area in an-effort to minimize
the width of the construction corridor. An additional measure to avoid and minimize
impacts includes limiting the construction corridor to 40 feet throughout the entire length
of the easement, to the maximum extent practicable.
Possible sedimentation of the stream downstream of the construction area during and
immediately following the construction phase will be minimized to the maximum extent
practicable by strict implementation of, and compliance with, a State-approved sediment
and erosion control plan. Erosion and sediment control measures will be inspected for
compliance with construction contract documents, as well as following storm events, to
identifv needed repair, maintenance, or redesign
J
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, 'enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
Page 7 of 11

i
Pl
h
d
f
construct
on.
ease attac
o
description of the current site conditions and proposed metho
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation efforts for this project included avoidance and minimization of impacts to
iurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands. Additional mitigation measures
proposed include using a wetland seed mix in the cleared wetland areas, and allowing
successional scrub-shrub vegetation to grow on the edges of the permanent easement in
wetland areas. In addition, wetland areas will be backfilled with topsoil excavated from
these areas during construction, maintaining hydric soil type and a seed source in these
' areas. Also, in the event open-cutting of the streams is necessary, soft bank
stabilization, such as erosion control matting and plantings, will be utilized to stabilize
any impacted stream banks.

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at htti)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/M/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No E]
' 2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
Page 8 of 11
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
' Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or .0260.
N/A - no state or local stream buffer impacts proposed
XI. Stormwater (required by DW
Q)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
No storm water management is proposed. The contractor will abide by state and local
erosion and sedimentation control requirements during grading and construction
operations
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
' Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA

Page 9 of I I

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
' Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
' Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No ?
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
' http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The project will not result in appreciable increases in development within the project
corridor. Existing residential, commercial and institutional businesses are currently
' located near the project corridor. The sanitary sewer outfall will not cause additional
development, but rather is being conducted to provide sewer service to existing residential
and commercial areas within a recently annexed region of the City of Greensboro.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
' It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
' choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
' Construction of the proposed sanitary sewer is proposed to begin in October 2005.
e
7 22 0 4
Applican Age t nature Date
(Agent's signature is va d only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

' Page 10 of 11

SITE COORDINATES PER CROSSING

Stream 1 36.1563°N, 79.7329oW

' Stream 2
Stream 3 36.1618°N, 79.7277°W
36.1661°N, 79.7251°W
Stream 4 36.1684°N, 79.7234°W

' Wetland A
Wetland B 36.1631°N, 79.7274°W
36.1648°N, 79.7271°W
Wetland C 36.1676°N, 79.724°W
' Wetland D 36.1701°N, 79.7219°W

Page 11 of 11

l? O A
<
k"N
Not
to Scale

? ?
t V V
North Carolina Vicinity Map
g
Greensboro Vicinity Map
City of Greensboro
Summit Avenue Sanitary RALPH WHITEHEAD Site Location
Sewer Outfall ASSOCIATES, INC.
Greensboro, North Carolina FIGURE 1

_ S N
` ? :S c eft. „Z 4s iCcL`2 .Td i uO J/ 1
J' t
_ Cc?S ..? . _ • ? . ?. ;. GeC?2 -
L .$ ce62 1 ? - s r
6
s c ?s • ; ''
m is+? tsars aid fir; Proposed Sanitary ?i
Sewer Line
c0 R ? •1 Li ?' ? C?E!?r ,.r ?? ? ?
Zd47
411
a r r r? rF
.L ?
AoB
1. EAB
o h _ C'ts+s !:' ua2 A
a
- Not to Scale
Mapped Soil Units in Proiect Area atr?{?? ti '?
Cecil sandy loam (CCB)
Chewacla sandy loam (Ch) X
Coronaca clay loam (Co) North Carolina Vicinity Map
Enon fine sandy loam (EnD)
Madison sandy loam (MaD)
Vance sandy loam (VaC) City of Greensboro
Summit Avenue Sanitary RALPH WHITEHEAD Soil Survey Map
Sewer Outfall ASSOCIATES, INC.
Greensboro, North Carolina FIGURE 2

'` ? I .mC
t II 0.00
L C
W
?pOC
e ! 3 LL
fA co
0
CL
a
Q
N

LEGEND
TEMPORARY IMPACT
AREA
® PERMANENT IMPACT
AREA
CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED UTILITY
EASEMENT
STREAM
-w-w-w- WETLAND BOUNDARY
u?e9
0
o
0
O0
ii.
` ?,O o0 gure

Fi?uye l2 ? o
o g
? " I I I
'Q
°on o iQ I
c:l
N o ?7 q
a I to o
§ ll ?,J Q I 0 ?, I I G C7 0
00 0
4 ? o l O
s "17
GRAPHIC SCALE DA 06/27/05
PROPOSED SUMMIT AVENUE SANITARY SEWER O UTFALL 350 0 175 350 DM WN BY:
T JL
CHEGKEDBY:
n OVERALL PLAN VIEW
( IN FEET ) IGUHE ND.:
t I inch = 350 ft- 4
r
a 6 ? ?
a F
S Q
rh Fd ? UWW ahW VFi 5
W ? I ? \
O
Q
b
%111 on
o ;
vvv i
d ° 0 X11 '?
r
<3
-

i o
w°

i ?

.c
W 0

zc

Cl)

O
q \? ? N
h
O

? w
i i
i
o ;r O O 4 ? 4?
0
o
i It E3
o ?,p
t lu Ij las - b ?INI-IHOiVVY
Bep'?IYJOdlluV?S-tl0E-6L 62\LBuPO.I? iNdad\anusntl 3!uunS\OOE-6L62\fOMd\M

11

11 a IMPACT AREA: STREAM 1 ( IN FEET) HWRE NO.:
ti
CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ALL EFFORTS POSSIBLE
TO DISTURB ONLY THE AREAS OF THE STREAM
WITHIN THE 20' PERM. UTILITY EASEMENT.
INSTALL SILT FENCE PARALLEL WITH CHANNEL
DURING CLEARING & GRUBBING. REMOVE TO STREAM 1
INSTALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND [TEMPORARY IMPACT:
THEN REINSTALL UNTIL GROUND IS STABILIZED.
COG STD. 216
SILT FEN E
COG STD. #219 (TYPICAL)
ANTI-SEEP COLLAR
I --- - --- 15STREAMNBUFFE---------------------------
----- - - -- --- - - -- - - - - - ...- -------- -?
--------------------------- -?-- / --------------------------------------------------
--------------
--------- --------- - o-------------------
_._ PROP, 500 00 LF
------------- 2--------- --- 3 ------ 0-
PROPOSED 20 UTILITY EASEM
ENT
M
?- -- PROPOSED 40' TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
USE PUMP AROUND METHOD TO INSTALL
SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN
IN COG STD. #213 STREAM CROSSING STREAM CLASSIFIED AS PERENNIAL BY
AFTER SANITARY SEWER IS INSTALLED, RON SMALL WITH COG STORMWATER DEPT.
MAINTAIN AS PER COG STD. #214 I 12?16?04
USING CLASS II RIP RAP. I DRAINAGE AREA = 29.35 ACRES /
i
s I ?
a
N
n
r. LEGEND
„ TEMPORARYIMPACf
c AREA
e
o ® PERMANENTIMPACf WOODS

. AREA
LINE
? CONSTRUCnON ;
_
a EASEMENT
i
PROPOSED UTILITY
EASEMENT
a r?r? STREAM
[ -W-
7 W-W- WETIANDEOUNDARY
N

$

ROPOSED SUMMIT AVENUE

C SCALE
GRAPHI
DATE:
06/27/05
DRAWN BY
o
o
40 a o :
DBs
SANITARYSEWER OUTFALL CHEC

t I inch = 40 M 6
LEGEND
TEMPORARY IMPACT
USE PUMP AROUND METHOD TO INSTALL
AREA SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN
® PERMANENTIMPACT IN COG STD. #213 STREAM CROSSING.
AREA DO NOT USE TEMP. CMP ® THIS CROSSING.
_ CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AFTER SANITARY SEWER IS INSTALLED,
_--_----_ PROPOSED UTIII7Y MAINTAIN AS PER COG STD. #214
SET USING CLASS II RIP RAP.
wwww? ? ? ? ? STREAM
-w-w-w- WETIAND BOUNDARY
STREAM CLASSIFIED AS PERENNIAL BY
IRON SMALL WITH COG STORMWATER DEPT.
12/16/04
DRAINAGE AREA = 1,125 ACRES
STREAM 2
TEMPORARY IMPACT: 54LF ;'
I1-- WOODS /
LINE %
I
PROPOSED SEWER OUTFALL
APPROX. 550' NORTH OF
nX.CDWf'Al1 Wi('11 TC'klCl NI
I
I PROP. COG # 200 IAH #10 PROP. COG 200 It,H 11
STATION 32+49.22 ` STATION 35+32.11
I ,
1. It
?_??. „__ PROP. 282.89LF 1
I
33 12" SAN. $EY:-Etr _ t I
3
35
COG STD,/#219 -_- --, I
ANTI-SEEP COLLAR ? - - - _I_
e
? ' I I
i ONTRAGYTO SHALL ONLY CROSS THIS STRE 'M TURING
I THE 1WVALL TION OF THE PROPOSED SANITA Y EWER.
DJURING AETRAL OTHER PHASES OF CONSTRUCT ON THE
CONTRACT WILL ACCESS STATION 0+00 ?3+50
•------------- --FROM THE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF PRQPERTY,
y AND WILL ACCESS STATION 33+50 TO THE PRQJECT
END FROM SUMMIT AVENUE.
CONTOCTOR TO MAKE ALL EFFORTS PO SLE
TO DISTURB ONLY THE AREAS OF THE EX. DUKE WITH N THE 20' PERM. UTILITY EASEMJITRfAm
N POWER ESMT. _ INSTALL SILT FENCE PARALLEL WITH CH NNEL
DURINt?G CLEARING & GRUBBING. REMO??E ITO
Y ( INST L . PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND
THEN EINSTALL UNTIL GROUND IS STABILIZED.
TE'
GRAPHIC SCALE BA 06/27/05
r PROPOSED SUMMIT A VENUE 40 o Zo ao ORAwN BY:
SANITARYSEWER OUTFACE ?Ls
V CHECKED BY:
7
L IMPACT AREA: STREAM 2 ( IN FEET) FlW RE NO.
z 1 inch - 40 M 7

u

11

LEGEND
TEMPORARYIMPACf
AREA
® PERMANENT IMPACT
AREA
_ CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED UTILITY
EASEMENT
STREAM
-w-w-w- WETLAND BOUNDARY
CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ALL EFFORTS POSSIBLE
TO DISTURB ONLY THE AREAS OF THE STREAM
WITHIN THE 20' PERM. UTILITY EASEMENT.
INSTALL SILT FENCE PARALLEL WITH CHANNEL
DURING CLEARING & GRUBBING. REMOVE TO
INSTALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND
THEN REINSTALL UNTIL GROUND IS STABILIZED.
INSTALL COG STD.
#215 STONE DITCH CHECK
- - O N
- - - - - - - - - - - -
w«?? mar ?'
12
13
- ---- - - - - - ------ -
STREAM CLASSIFIED AS PERENNIAL BY
' RON SMALL WITH COG STORMWATER DEPT.
12/16/04
DRAINAGE AREA = 51.75 ACRES
STREAM 3
f TEMPORARY IMPACT: 54LF
PROP. COG 200 MH #5
" STATION 14+05.82
nonDnSED 40'
M _ pV_Q5ER 25'_ IIWTY'EASEMEUJ
PROP 500 QQ-.1- /
4
- 1-.--.---
CO STD. #219 Lj
WOODED AREA ANT
I-SEEP COLLAR / /
-----------
- -`- ------------- ------- -------------------- --
'I
a

USE PUMP AROUND METHOD TO INSTALL
SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN
IN COG STD. #213 STREAM CROSSING
AFTER SANITARY SEWER IS INSTALLED,
MAINTAIN AS PER COG STD. #214
USING CLASS II RIP RAP.

PROPOSED SUMMIT AVENUE GRAPHIC SCALE 06/27/05
D .N 6V
4 0 0 20 4 0 .
JLS
N SANITARYSEWER 0UTFALL HE K
ED BY

Q! IMPACT AREA: STREAM3 ( IN FEET) cuae o:
I inch = 40 ft. 8
I

t

t

c??w
L) 'u)
d??W
CENTRAL SCHOOL
FOR THE DEAF
s
CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ALL EFFORTS POSSIBLE
TO DISTURB ONLY THE AREAS OF THE STREAM
WITHIN THE 20' PERM. UTILITY EASEMENT. _
INSTALL SILT FENCE PARALLEL WITH CHANNEL
DURING CLEARING & GRUBBING. REMOVE TO
INSTALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND
THEN REINSTALL UNTIL GROUND IS STABILIZED.

LEGEND
TEMPORARYIMPACP
AREA
® PERMANENTIMPACf
AREA
_ CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED UTILITY
EASEMENT
STREAM
-w-w-W- WETLAND BOUNDARY
I/
i.
STREAM
TEMPORARY IMPACT: 36LF :-'

?
waipv. ci
/w
STREAM CLASSIFIED AS PERENNIAL BY
RON SMALL WITH COG STORMWATER DEPT.
12/16/04
DRAINAGE AREA = 22.10 ACRES
` WETLAND D
TEMPORARY IMPACT: 0.008 ACRES
_PROPOSED 40' TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
r.
PROPOSED 20' UTILITY EASEMENT cv
Clq
PROP 350.00 LF 16 SAN. SFWFR °
--- --------_ ----------r---------- -
----------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------

USE PUMP AROUND METHOD TO INSTALL
SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN
IN COG STD. #213 STREAM CROSSING
AFTER SANITARY SEWER IS INSTALLED,
MAINTAIN AS PER COG STD. #214
USING CLASS it RIP RAP.
PROPOSED SUMMIT AVENUE GRAPHIC SCALE 06127i05
40 Q 'lQ 40 DMWN BV:
SANITAR Y SE WER 0UTFALL JLs
NECKED BY:
IMPACT AREAS: STREAM 4, WETLAND D ( IN FEET) fi6UREW.:
I inch = 40 ft. 9
F1

I

INTERMITTENT STREAM BEGINS
HERE @ UNDERGROUND SPRING
a
15' MIN. UNDISTURBED
STREAM BUFFER
I '
BEGIN JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
r?
r ?.
r
p CD 5. ?vDgOt

I
I -
I
COG STD. #216
SILT FENCE
_ SPA.
PROP 3b 9 LF '
4? --'
ASEMEN?'
Did D?1,\S? E ?- ./--?
QRpppS COG STD. #219
NTI-SEEP COLLAR
USE PUMP AROUND MEIIHOD TO INSTALL
SANITARY SEWE;11P AS SHOWN
IN COG STD. #213 AM CROSSING
AFTER SANITARY SE IS INSTALLED,
MAINTAIN AS PER G STD. #214
USING CLASS RAP.
0003W
WETLAND A
• TEMPORARY IMPACT: 0.002 ACRES
PERMANENT IMPACT: 0.006 ACRES
I
*J
CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ALL EFFORTS POSSIBLE
TO DISTURB ONLY THE AREAS OF THE WETLAND
WITHIN THE 20' PERM. UTILITY EASEMENT.
INSTALL SILT FENCE PARALLEL WITH CHANNEL
DURING CLEARING & GRUBBING. REMOVE TO
INSTALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND
I - THEN REINSTALL UNTIL GROUND IS STABILIZED.
--- -----------------
Ex. Detention
Pond STREAM CLASSIFIED AS INTERMITTENT BY
I '
RON SMALL WITH COG STORMWATER DEPT.
12/16/04
I DRAINAGE AREA = 6.50 ACRES
James M. Ellington ETUX
Sandra C. Ellington
07-04-0193-A-0458-00-082
5712 Summit Avenue
Greensboro, NC 27214-9605
I
0002W
Lily S. Coble ETAL
EddieR. Souther, Sr ETAL
Jacqueline S. Amos ETAL
Tommy Souther ETUX
Linda Souther
07-04-0193-A-0458-00-083
5710 Summit Avenue
Greensboro, NC 27405
PROPOSED SUMMIT AVENUE
SANITAR Y SE WER 0UTFALL
IMPACT AREA: WETLAND A
LEGEND
TEMPORARYIMPACT
AREA
® PERMANENTIMPACT
AREA
_ CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED UTILITY
EASEMENT
STREAM
-w-w-w- WETLAND BOUNDARY
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40
( IN FEET )
I inch = 40 R

F1

r-11

LEGEND
TEMPORARY IMPACT
AREA
® PERMANENT IMPACT
AREA
_ CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT

------- PROPOSED UTILITY
--
EASEMENT
STREAM
-wow- w- WETLAND BOUNDARY

i
/
ti/
/
PROP. COG y 200 MH
STATION 27+48.82
/
0031E J
Gladys C. Coble BY HALL
07-04-0193-0-0458-00-006
3600 Esterwood Road 1
Greensboro, NC 27405-9521 1
?W 1
v? 1
o ? I ZI-
?N JLa7
WETLAND B l?
A TEMPORARY IMPACT: 0.029 ACRES lz
I Ig
PROPOSED 40' TEMPORARY 1
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 1
PROPOSED 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 1
PROP 20710 LF - 16" S N SEWER
028 29
/01
I lo
PROPOSED SUMMIT AVENUE
SANITARYSEWER OUTFALL
IMPACTAREA: WETLAND B

STATION 29+55.93

GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40
( IN FEET )
I inch = 40 fL

u

LEGEND
0034E
State of North Carolina
Central School for the Deaf
C/O Tommy Cline
07-04-0193-0-0458-00-037
1321 Moil Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
TEMPORARY IMPACT
AREA
® PERMANENTIMPACT
AREA
_ CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED IMLICTY
EASEMENT
STREAM
-w-w-w- WETIAND BOUNDARY
STREAM CLASSIFIED AS EPHEMERAL BY
RON SMALL WITH COG STORMWATER DEPT.
12/16/04
DRAINAGE AREA = 0.70 ACRES
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SANITARY SEWER
ACROSS MAN MADE DITCH DURING DRY
WEATHER WHEN NO FLOW IS PRESENT. WETLAND C
AFTER SANITARY SEWER IS INSTALLED, TEMPORARY IMPACT: 0.007 ACRES
INSTALL S-75 MATTING OR EQUIVALENT PERMANENT IMPACT: 0.022 ACRES
IN DITCH AREAS FOR STABILIZATION.
PROP. COG ,# 200 MH
STATION 8+05.73

---
____ -g

Y: 05
PROPOSED SUMMIT AVENUE GRAPHIC SCALE w- V:
40 a 20 Qa DMWN B
SANITAR Y SE WER 0UTFALL JLS
CHECKED BY:
IMPACT AREA: WETLAND C ( IN FEET) -UNE-
1 inch = 40 ft 12
?ol
/
/
/
t
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR STREAM CROSSING
NOTES.'
1) EROSION STONE TO BE "CLASS I" RIP-RAP UNLESS DESIGNA TED DIFFERENTL Y ON PLAN.
2) PIPE SIZE AND NUMBER TO BE DETERMINED BY ENGINEER ON PLAN.
3) TEMP. STREAM CROSSING TO BE CONVERTED TO C. 0. G. ,1214
UPON PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION.
2 OF 2
Cl T Y OF G R E E N S B O R O
STD. NO. REV.
t STANDARD TEMPORARY CREEK 01_91
CROSSING DURING CONSTRUCTION 213 03-97
; 12-04

1 t0NMI'
.
10' X 10' DEWA TERING
W 3 BASIN @ 2.' 1 SIDE SLOPE
a \ ?- - /l I TOP OF BANK
STREAM `
-?
FL ON
SANDBAGS
1 ' THICK #4
WASHED STONE
25' 15'
40 ' CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PLAN
POL YETHYLENE FABRIC
ON FACE (8 ML THICK)
STREAM
FL OW -?
EX. IN V.
CREEK
SANDBAGS
SYNTHETIC FIL TER --
FABRIC
12 "
OVER
PIPE
TEMP. 24 " TO 42' CMP
18"
MIN.
1 ® CROSSING
10 ' PIPE
F-MIN.
SECTION A-A
TOP OF BANK
1

TEMPORARY
STONE DAM
NOTES.'
1) EROSION STONE TO BE "CLASS I" RIP-RAP UNLESS DESIGNATED DIFFERENTL Y ON PLAN.
2) KEY SANDBAGS 6 FIL TER FABRIC INTO CREEKSANKS AND INVERTS WHEN POSSIBLE.
; 3) PIPE SIZE AND NUMBER TO BE DETERMINED BY ENGINEER ON PLAN.
8 4) CONVERT TO COG STD. #214 AS PROJECT IS STABIL IZED(SEE COG STD, ,#214)
5) SANDBAGS, POL YETHYLENE, 6 TEMPORARY CAP MAY BE DELETED ON DRAINAGE DITCHES,
WITHOUT ACTIVE FLOW, AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
N
C/ T Y O F G R E E N S B O R O
STANDARD SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FOR CROSSING 5T0. NO, REV.
o1-91
DRAINAGE DITCHES OR STREAMS DURING COW. 213 03-97
a 20' PERM. R/W
Y
y - 10'?
` PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
EARTH BERM Q
(TYP.) ----- - - - - -
STREAM,'
FLOW
- - - TOB
NA TURAL
GROUND Q RIP-RAP
CROSSING TYPICAL
PIPE
SYNTHETIC FILTER
FABRIC
PLAN
PROPOSED
EARTH BERM
(TYP.) -1
TOP OF BANK
T
DA
EX. IN V.
CREEK
DRAINAGE DITCH OR SMALL STREAM
- SYNTHETIC FILTER
1 FABRIC (AS PER
3 NCDOT SPEC #1056,
TYPE-2)
CROSSING PIPE
`-18' CLASS I
RIP-RAP
SECTION A-A
NOTES:
1) PERMANENT CROSSING FOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT.
2) CLASS I RIP-RAP TO BE LAID MIN. 18 INCHES THICK OVER ENTIRE AREA OF DISTURBANCE
(AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER).
v
3) CLASS II RIP-RAP USED IN LARGER STREAMS (AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER).
0
4) AS PROJECT IS STABILIZED PLACE SYNTHETIC FIL TER FABRIC G SPREAD A L L EXISTING
EROSION STONE INTO PERMANENT LINER AS SHOWN. ADD STONE AS NEEDED.
C / r y OF G R E E N S B O R O
STD. NO. V.
STANDARD SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FOR CROSSING
W DRAINAGE DI TCHES OR STREAMS AFTER CONS T. 214 03-97

e
v
ATTACHMENT C
PHOTOGRAPHS

Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall
Greensboro, North Carolina
RWA Project No. 2979-300
Pho
Photograph 2: View of Stream 2.

Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall
Greensboro, North Carolina
RWA Project No. 2979-300
Phc
71

1

Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall
Greensboro, North Carolina
RWA Project No. 2979-300
1 Phc

1 Phc

1

Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall
Greensboro, North Carolina
RWA Project No. 2979-300
Phc

Photograph 8: View of Wetland D.

ATTACHMENT D
' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS &
STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA FORMS

r

LI

t

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project/Site: 5 u hn m i + AV
Applicant / Owner: C i k
Investigator: Adams
Date: 15l l o l c S
County: 67 v I Irm rd
State: S C
Do normal circumstances exist on the,site? Yes ? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes Nom- Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No ? Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
vcr+cTA-rInKI
bPI

Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. US t-o< I Alan G 9.
2. ax iAUe?'2 nS va I' T 10.
3. U yo C. S e Ar,
4. rw2 G61 FAQ
5, 5 q lc 11.
12.
13.
0 I'f ??
6
h At 14.
.
,
7.Tox i roh S t L
- 15.
8.c-1n an v?? Gow?M?a+?rn
_ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACK or FAC excluding FAC+ 8 1= 10?
Remarks: hy?rpphy?U 1T? ?Vl`?
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide
Aerial Photographs Gauge
Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: _
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N Q (•)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N l a., (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper
"
12
Depth to Saturated Soil: _(in•) _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
_
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks: _ ydm (0
cx ?M-
n.
0
1
1
D p- i
SOILS
Map Unit Name
C?-PQ,?
10Qm I Ntg r3 Drainage Class: t( -W -6t(o
i
SG(n4
n
y
(Series and Phase): r lW Aso .
I vdu,l-fs
Taxonomy (Subgro4jp):GAYe-1, ?Aplm;4i t,}?¢rmit. Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Soar S bA ?( rre C-1 vr l
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseil Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-19 13 J.5 Y I 7? 4 L aWrnon Is*t d lja\1 loaYo
Hydric Soil Indicators: .
Histosol
Histic Epipedon _ Concretions
_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ,
_
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colo rs - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: , f I ry.,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes t/ No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No -
Remarks:
X?d, Yyl Qt , OP/ I s ?f? n
13 0--t
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: svmm I ?1sbD ro 1VL Date: 5110
5
Applicant /Owner: Lill C rCens ar-o County :GGL)(/ rd
Investigator: m 0,?I v, sh(c OLLre-r State: G
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ?1 No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No
7- Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:cwid f?
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.CaryinusirnrD?1nianct 9.
2. Li r &n d ron ivliolfkrzf T_ -C._ 10.
3Qu0<.us M1,rz-
4. h(, o r rwb mkro T F?CU
s s FfI G 11.
12.
5.q?YL 5 vQ_ 13.
6.T x?C? tDn S µ FAQ 14.
7. arJ h2 vs H
- 15.
8. n? v r a ?, non ru PAC-"
? 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 6 = 7S o
Remarks:
d?-opal -h Vge+a ton cj-c L
a.r,?t?a.-?-t ve S e Ae's ctvmt 'a Q_
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: rJ LA in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
- Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
- Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper
12"
- Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks No yJ to, v I ?i( i ca_?of s y f¢ Sevt

SOILS p_
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): I`Ic?dcso .?
(OCim NIQ J Draina a Class: u1E?' a ,41

Taxonomy (Subgroup): -e k pllni?C"- `r *r)VUC. ( 16 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Sbf-j -t til c , 3 a i S 77.
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0- a l? 10 Y Q 3 no wy-We-5 viler ( oa r1'7
3 1 a } P? r7 yI ??o yny?-I-? e5 tv ?a j ? a V-n
Hydric Soil Indicators: _
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: So I (5 a'l-e rlc)+
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes_ No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes _ No L.-?
Remarks: ?-? , ? p # a ?
C Gr .C d- ?s r?o
w?hI'n a u f'Car .
F)1 - _.1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
AV s
Sump Date:
s
Project/ Site:
Applicant/ Owner: Vl Y'b County: UUI' IfOrd
Investigator: AAaW l ' S (t 01 J -State: - p(G
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No ?
N Transect ID:
P-3 yle Hand
Plot I13:
o
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes .
(explain on reverse if needed)
?icr-_CTATtnAI
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. t O S Lm?r i m i n?rt? 1? s n(1+ - 9.
2. QI Jwl Mmuftt+vn? ?'I_ 1o.
3. io a- SOrot'ia _ ?G 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 2 = o w to
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
V
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Inundated
- Other ? Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: - Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N a (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit Q (in•) ? Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper
12"
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: W? tsar ?? ?,?u?a y cX, 4es-, GA J S
?1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SOILS
b9 3
Map Unit Name n ' 1
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:.
o I ??L uI i -- I vvovt;
Taxonomy (Subgroup):_- nC-'?ia0y mXlroyIQGid Ay'rrolb Cyonfirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
r o I'l "17
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
_ to y 4/2 ID_ r 12- -314 loam
'3' lay 10 7 R/? (0 y 2 5?3 ?omrnon, -Fainf loam
Hydric Soil Indicators: .
Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: {? GQ r i sa '
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No Within a Wetland? Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ? No -
Remarks: ? /3 ?. ? ??r-1 ci P rt3 ??-.'?'] -?2?-e---?''e- l7 ? -? ? S
a
e
t
i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
bM
Project/Site: Surlmi? A-Xinve, r sborB?
Applicant / Owner: GI I C"lre2nsh a ro
Investigator: A Avg ratVgo,;, la'vl , A?hlcy 01,vt-r ?L Date: 15-1 it O's-
County: Grui'/rvrrf
Stater N C,

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ? No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)?
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No
Yes Nom Transect ID:
Plot ID:?7'3 4 lawce(
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1'' V` yoc-tdog aGrtis _
1 9.
2.M6&td4+t9iurn vimn riey"i
a S o r a,
4
4. oc{ o phvTUrr. pelt0. ?+^ FA(,-t
?

? 10.
11.

12.
5. rs 1. r la a? ?_ r-1 13.
l,ir-t A, rvn +v i Q
6. Films 14.
?
7.ACI r- raA FU W1 15.
8.T07-LodeViJr,.n_ rA rLifts V ?(L 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). V9 = S°f.
Remarks:
uy 6L'tp?hy- c' 9&+n-$?6? Is d,o rr 1 niw_A4
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: a (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: m.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
- Inundated
- Saturated in Upper 12"
- Water Marks
- Drift Lines
- Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper
12"
_ Water-Stained Leaves
- Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Na ?ydnolog Inn IcoAr.r pre gent
y
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SOILS

Map Unit Name I (? . (' A es

cc TV 109a 2?? o drainage Class: ( ,EQ??iZLtV?
(Series and Phase): l Q
_ s
C?c
Taxonomy (Subgrou ): Ih MappedType? Yes
IPConV
y h?rrn« _No
v yr v v rr 'l
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
Q ?_ lD y 12- 3 2 no M04le s N 10 C4 m
3 to (2 't loo MAe 5 N/ ig a M
Hydric Soil Indicators: .
Histosol
_ Histic Epipedon _ Concretions
_ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ?L 0 4t/ SI-; C S &1' IS
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ?' Within a Wetland? Yes_ No '
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
R;7arks: r?l ?-
3 a?
USACE AID#
SA ?f- S+t-ccum
1
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following.•nformation for ft e stream reach under assessment: ,
1. Applicant's nam • 424 C lf6002. Evaluator's name:
, , ?U-- I
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation: \a " 30
5. Name of stream: _ S 6. River basin: C4K ?l? P'
i
7. Approximate drainage area: •' a ?? S 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.372312): Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS o o Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/G1S Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note y roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
T VIA (l Y1 k lolln I(n X 4' ? _ C)N-
14. Proposed cannn
15.. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time of '--bt-n
17. Identify any special waterway classifications know
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters
-Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (O If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (XSg l0
21. Estimated watershed land u:.c: Residential _% Commercial Industrial Z 0 % Agricultural
% Forested% Cleared /Lagged Other
22. Bankfull width: 4 - 'I sk 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) 'Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends :Z Frequent meander -Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a' brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 5-7 Comments: - S?
S
?s
Evaluator's Signature ? 4t, ,r An' E? _ Date
This channel evaluation form is intended two be used only as a guide to assist landowners and a vironme tal professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
t

rSTREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
1
r
r"
r-
r
r
i
r

I
IS
S ECOREGION POINT RAiNGE
- T
CHARACTER
C SCORE
Coastal Piedmont V[o.untsin

1 Presence oFtlow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strop, flow =max points)
Evidence of past human alteration 0- 6 0:__ 5 1-

(extensive.alteration=0;naalteration=max oints)` " 4- r

3 RRiparianzone .
0-6
0-#` /
(no bnfFer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer= max points)

4 Evidence of nutrient orchemical dischnr«es
e
0-5
0-4
0=4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges ="max pointsl .
-

' S Groundwater discharue
0-3
0-4
0_4 -
. (no discharge = 0; springs-seeps, wetlands, etc: max' points)
V
r
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
_
0
4
4.:
0
0=?
n
?.
(no floodplain =0; extensive flood lain max points) - - _

'
".+
7 Entrenchment/ floodplain access
0 5
0-4
0 2
(deeply entrenched -0; Frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 - fi
0 - 4
0 - 2 o
h
(no wetlands = O;aaree adjacent wetlands = max points)

9 Channel sinuosity

"
0'75
0-4 ..
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0. natural meander=
max paints) 3

Igo Sediment input
? '
0=5:
? G-14
? a'-4
-(extensive deposition=0; little or- no sediment max points) .

ll Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
Np
0_4
0_5 htGiltil
(fine, homogenous =0; large,diverse sizes=max points) rt ??

lr Evidence of channel incision or wideninu
b
?
0-5
0-4
(}-.5
3
-: (deeply incised = 0;stable bed 3t banks =max pointsl
77 " Presence of major bank faiiures
0=5
? 0-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks =max points) "
' Root depth and density on banks - ,
-3
0 '4
0_57
(no visible roots = 0, dense, roots- throwhour= max points)
a: Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
-5
0
4

0,
5
(substantial impact =0, no evidence = mar points) -:
7

16 Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
0 -3'
0- 5°
0 -6
. " (no riffles/ripplcs or pools = 0; well-developed-=max points)
'
17 Habitat complexity
0- 6

`
0 - 6

0 6
=

3 P°
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
2
13 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-S
0-5
0-5
S

(no_ shading vegetation= 0; continuous canopy = max points) vna

14 Substrate embeddeduess
NA*
6-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded -0; ' loose structure = max)

20 Presence. of stream invertebrates (se(; page 4)
0-4
0-5
-0-5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)

31 Presence of am
P.hibians
0"-4
0_4
(no evidence = 0; corrunon, numerous types = max points)
Presence of fish 0 _ 4 0 -4 0 - 4 npnt
*-? (no, evidence = 0; conunon, numerous types = max points)

2' Evidence of wildlife use
?
0 - 6
0 - 5
0 - 5
I
(no
evidence= 0; abundantevidence = max points) AL
Total Points Possible 100 ' 100 ' 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enterQn first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
r
r
,r
r

,f

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
' STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET '
6
Provide the following. information for the stream reach under assessment:
??ts bo 2. Evaluator's name:
cari s name: d ?%( ?K A-64?r
^
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation:
9 "`p6
a-
River basin:
,
5', Name of stream:
7. Approximate drainage area: 5- y 8. Stream order:
ks 9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: C-,.
coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
11. Site oordinates (
Latitude (ex. 34.372312): Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
t

r

i

t
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 11 -ex r r-ts "I X01
15. Recent weather conditions: C?l i I1IVIY
16. Site conditions at time of visit: `-51AA W U
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
-Section 10 F Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters -Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)-
IS. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the eva lion point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? Y NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ?)0 % Residenti.1 Commercial I0 % Industrial _% Agricultural
I n ?% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: l'y 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
L? OS
Evaluator's Signature IL 0 4 '0:9 Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to a used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subjectIo USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1
r
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSIVIENT WORKSHEET
1
1

CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE
,
` SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flowfpersistent pools in stream
(no. flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points) ` 0 - - 4 0 - 5
Evidence of past human alteration
?
(extensive alteration =0; no alteration = max points) 0 - 6 0- 5-
3 Riparian zone:.
0 -?6
0 - 4 0 - 5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide, buffer = max points) ., 3

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharaes' .'
' . -
-
t
T
- (extensive discharges = 0;' no discharges="max points) - 0-5
, 4
00-
°? - ?. .
5 Groundwater discharge 3 ' "
` 0 z
Q no discharge = 0; sprines-" sees:vetlands, etc. = max points) 0 0
4 - 1
U
6.' Presence of adjacent floodplaia
4
.

(no flood` lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points) 0- 4 072
0-
?.
7 -Entrenchment/ 'floodplain access ; 0- 5 0- 0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent. floodino.= max paints)
3 Presence of adjacent wetlands"
0 -6 ?
• 0 -4 -
0 - 2 i
0
(no wetlands= 0; large adjacent wetlands =maxpoint, )
Channel sinuosity
(extensive 'channelization = 0; natural meander =max points)
0 -4"
0 -
10 Sediment input '. .,.
-(extensive deposition=, 0, little or no sediment = "max points)
I1 Size &?diversity of channel bed substrate _ *.
`
0 - 4
0 - 5
3
(fine, homogenous = 0; laree: diverse sizes =max_ Dints
X12 t Evidence of channel incision orwidenina
}i (deepl incised = 0, stable bed &banks = max points)
"13 Presence of major bank failures _. 0-5 0-5
(severe: erosion0; no: erosion, stable banks = max_pofnts)

14 Root depth and density on banks

'
0-3

-
0-

a-5 t
(
no visible roots -Odense roots throuhout=
max points), I

15 Impact by agriculture; livestock, or timber, production
0-S
0-4
5
0
(substantial impact=0;_no evidence .= max points) -

16 Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool, complexes
`
"
"
. (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; welt-developed= max points) 0 _ ' 0 = 5 0
- 6
Q - 1 Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat= 0;? frequent, varied habitats= max points)
0 -"6
0 - 6
?. 0 - fi

13 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-S
(no shading veectation?=0; continuouscano v=max points}
Substrate emheddedness *

(deeply embedded = 0: loose structure = max) I , NA 0-4 0-4
^0 Presence of stream ianve[tebrates (seepaga 4) 1

(no evidence = 0; common, numerous' pes = mwc oints) 0-4 f 0
5 0=5

Q 21 Presence of amphibians

- (no evidence = 0; common, numerous t y pes = max points) 0 -4 0-4 0-4
1
C
22 Presence.of fish
0- I
0-4
0-4
(no evidence -_0 ; common, numerous type s = max
Dints)
„23 77 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-S 0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 1,00 100. 100 I
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
Y;w
L?vt
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
i
P?
i
ECOREGION POFNT RAINGE
CHARACTERISTICS `SCORE'
. "Coastal .`Piedmont : l?l
`ountain

1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 - 5
- 4
0 - 5
f (no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration-
' 0 = 6` : ; 0 -5
(extensive alteration = O;
noalteration = max points)

? Riparian zone
?
'
"
3 _ -
(no buffer= 0; contiguous, wide buffer --max oints) 0-.6_ Q=4 0-5 7 -

4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
-5

U

-4

5
(extensive discharges= 0;.no discharges = max points)

5 Groundwater discharge
b
11
0-3
0-"4
3
(no discharge = 0 springs, see s-wetlands etc. = max points)
U
6 Presence of adjacent tloodplain
0-
0-4 `
?0-2
(nofloodptairr 0;extensivefloodplain=max points). _
y
-7 Entrenchment! flo-odplain_ access
1
0?-s .
0-4:
f)-?
2
(deeQ[v entrenched 0; frequent flooding.=max points)
d s

s.• Presence-of adjacent wetlands
0-6
074'
0-2
3
(no wetlands= 0; large adjacent wetlands =max points}

`q Channel sinuosity
0-5'
0-4
0-3
extensivechannelizatron=0;natural meander max points)

IO' Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0=4 "?

(extensive deposition= 0, little or no sediment= max points) .

L1 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA
? 0-4
?0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes= max oints) al

12 Evidence of channel" incision or wideninfz
h
0-5:
0-4
0_5 w'
"(deeply incised =0; stable bed & banks =nicer points) -• cl o

71

13 Presence of major bank- failures

0-5

0-5,

0-5
5
d
2
(severe' erosion - 0; no erosion, stable banks - max points)

14 Root depth and density on banks '
0-3
0-4
0-5 row
4 (no visible roots .= 0, dense roots throughout =max points) a ?-

'
15 Impact by a-riculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4•
0=S Z
J
(substantial impact=0; no'evidence = max points)

16 Presence of riffle-poolfripple-pool complexes
0-3"
0-5
-0-6 o
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
:'t
-17 Habitat complexity
0=6
0-6
k 0-6
3
- (little or no habitat = 0; `frequent, varied habitat's = max points) C

13. Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5-
_'O
(no shading vegetation= 0; continuous canopy- max paints) L

? Substrate embeddeduess
"
NA
0-4
: 0-4
-:
(deeply embedded=0 loosestnicture=mar)

20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see ge4)
page
,.a?

0-4 _'

0-5

0-5 -

b
•
(no evidence =0;"common, numerous pes ax, omts) .-
. lcti,h:

l Presence of amphibians
"
0-4
0-4
0-4
Q .
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous pes =max points) -?
Presence.of fish
0-
4,
0-4
G'- A
(no"evidence = 0; common; numerous types = max points) ,
`
?3 Evidence of wildlife use
{ 0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)

Total Points Possible

100

100 "

100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
i
e;r- 1 I ?
?C
rr r,P rLV
p rk/S
n c.?q
7h
-V r?P

,l(s ck,
1°kI Is
o
(J?lae_
S
F? Cks

ATTACHMENT E
SHPO CORRESPONDENCE
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
'
Michael F. Easley, Governor Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Office of Archives and History
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Resources
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
June 29, 2005
' Michael A. Iagnocco, P.W.S., Project Manager
Ralph Whitehead Associates, Inc.
PO Box 356214
Charlotte, NC 28235
Re: Summit Avenue Sanitary Sewer Outfall, Greensboro, RWA 2979-300, Guilford County, ER 05-1311
' Dear Mr. Iagnocco:
' Thank you for your letter of May 25, 2005, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
' Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
' Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
' Sincerely,
w1a a-,
Peter Sandbeck

e Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801
' SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801
Invoice Number Date Voucher Amount Discounts Previous Pay NetAmount
Permit App. Fee 8/3/05 0022254 475.00 475.00
NC DMSION OF WATER QUALI Totals
GENERAL 475.00
475.00