Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout670077_Inspection_20180706Facility Number ®- O Division of Soil and Water Conservation ` / O Other Agency v for Visit: Referral Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: 909 County: Farm Name: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Owner Email: Phone: Title: OnsiteRepresentative: /gngr 4,1 Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Region: Certification Number: yZ 5 (a Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer n 99I INon-Layer W to Finish ean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Design Current Dry Poultry Capacltv Pop. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other. a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3 Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes e-No- ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [3-<7 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes E-1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued Facill Number: Date of Inspection: Waste collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E]-lqo❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier. Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): _ < 9 ZG 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc ) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ETITT ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 ! o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9 Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste ApuGcation 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes DlTo— ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P,1�1:1 NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16 Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box ❑ Yes []-Io- ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE [—]Yes ❑ o ❑ Yes [`No ❑ Yes LrJ o ❑ Yes TNNo ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NEB 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E 'vim Page 2 of 21412015 Continued lFacinty Number: Date of inspection: 24. Did Pe facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the perim ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes P ' V ❑ NA ❑ NE ' the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance• 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes LQ Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28 Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? � 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 21'�E ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other. 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW? ❑ Yes L'J TN ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ElYes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. I Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). q I Sly n _r S Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signatw Page 3 of 3 0.e Phone: t \U [ IV r/" Date: i� 21412015