HomeMy WebLinkAbout670077_Inspection_20180706Facility Number ®- O Division of Soil and Water Conservation ` /
O Other Agency v
for Visit:
Referral
Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: 909 County:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Title:
OnsiteRepresentative: /gngr 4,1
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region:
Certification Number: yZ 5 (a
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
n 99I INon-Layer
W to Finish
ean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacltv Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other.
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3 Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes e-No- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[3-<7
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E-1Qo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued
Facill Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E]-lqo❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier.
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _ < 9 ZG
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc )
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ETITT ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 ! o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9 Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ApuGcation
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes DlTo— ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P,1�1:1 NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16 Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box
❑ Yes
[]-Io-
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
LJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑ o
❑ Yes [`No
❑ Yes LrJ o
❑ Yes TNNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NEB
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E 'vim
Page 2 of 21412015 Continued
lFacinty Number: Date of inspection:
24. Did Pe facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the perim ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes P ' V ❑ NA ❑ NE
' the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance•
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes LQ Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28 Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
�
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes [No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
21'�E
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other.
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW?
❑ Yes L'J TN ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
ElYes [N ❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. I
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
q I
Sly n _r S
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatw
Page 3 of 3
0.e
Phone: t \U [ IV r/"
Date: i�
21412015