20051229 Ver 1_Complete File_20050708

?0F W ATFgQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
0/ L William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?J( r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimck, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 18, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-1229
Mitchell County
Kathy Young, Mitchell County Clerk
Mitchell County Board of Commisioners
Sdministration Building 2
26 Crimson Laurel Circle
Bakersville, NC 28705
Subject Property: North Toe River EWP M2004-14
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mrs. Young:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 450 feet of streams for the purpose of
streambank stabilization at the subject properties, as described within your application
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on July 8, 2005. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number(s) 3376 (3376). The Certification(s) allows you to use
Nationwide Permit(s) 37 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In
addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or
local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion
and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and stormwater regulations. Also, this
approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland
or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in
15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in
the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Norm hCarolina
Alaturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mitchell County:
Page 2 of 6
July 18, 2005
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount
Approved Units Plan Location or Reference
Stream 450 feet North Toe River
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
Mitchell County:
Page 3 of G
July 18, 2005
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. North Toe River is classified C, Trout. As such, the following Administrative Codes
. apply: 15A NCAC 0413.0125 and 15A NCAC 02B.0211
7. Sediment and erosion control measures must be implemented prior to construction
and maintained on the sites to minimize sediment in downstream areas. Seeding for
a temporary cover of wheat, millet, or similar annual grain or permanent herbaceous
cover should occur on all bare soil within five (5) days of ground disturbing activities
to provide long-term erosion control. The projects should be accomplished in stages
instead of leaving large tracts exposed to further storm events. Erosion control
matting should be used in conjunction with appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in
steep slope and riparian areas, unless authorized under Division of Land Resources
Erosion and Sediment Control approval. Matting should be secured in place with
staples, stakes, or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. Straw mulch and
tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas. In addition, because of an
anticipated difficulty in establishing ground cover during the winter, reseeding should
be conducted, as necessary, in the spring-time with a native annual and perennial
seed mix with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet or other grain.
8. Only clean, large, angular rock, large woody material, or other natural stream design
materials and techniques should be used for bank stabilization. Rock should not be
placed in the stream channel in a manner that constricts stream flow or that will
impede aquatic life movements during low flow conditions. Filter cloth should be
placed behind large rock that is used for bank stabilization. Properly designed rock
vanes should be constructed wherever appropriate on bank stabilization and
channel realignment stream reaches to improve channel stability and to improve
aquatic habitat. Root wads should be installed low enough in the bank so that a
significant portion (at least one-third) the root wad is inundated during normal flows.
Mitchell County:
Page 4 of G
July 18, 2005
9. The channel must be restored to a more stable condition. However, under no
circumstances should river rock, sand or other materials be dredged from the stream
channel under authorization of this permit except, if necessary, in the immediate
vicinity of the eroding banks for the explicit purpose of anchoring stabilizing or
flow/grade control structures or for reestablishing the natural and more stable stream
channel dimensions. Stream bed materials are unstable in flowing-water situations
and are unsuitable for bank stabilization. Stream dredging has catastrophic effects
on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form of the stream channel can cause
downstream erosion problems. The natural dimension, pattern, and profile of the
stream upstream and downstream of the permitted area should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or changing its depth.
10. Stabilization measures should only be applied on or near existing erosion sites,
leaving other stable stream bank areas in a natural condition. Grading and
backfilling should be minimized and tree and shrub growth should be retained where
possible to ensure long term availability of stream bank cover for aquatic life and
wildlife. Backfill materials should be obtained from upland sites except in cases
where excess stream bed materials are available. Berms are not permitted because
they block the floodplain, constrict and accelerate flood flows, and often fail or
impede drainage during large flood events.
11. Repairs to eroded banks should be conducted in a dry work area where possible.
Sandbags or other clean diversion structures should be used where possible to
minimize excavation in flowing water. Channel realignments should be constructed
by excavating the new channel from downstream to upstream before connecting it to
the old channel.
12. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank whenever possible. All
mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials. Equipment used in stream
channel must be clean, new or low hour equipment.
13.As long-term stream stability is a concern with this type of work, it is strongly
recommended that woody vegetation be established along stream banks where
possible. Any riparian vegetation planting should be performed in accordance with
the Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration.
(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/pdf/buffers.pdf )
13. Monitoring
The Permittee shall examine the stabilization work done under this Certification
on an annual basis for three (3) years following the completion of the restoration
efforts. This field evaluation should note the condition and stability of the
measures installed and how well the repair is holding up. A written report must
be provided to DWQ's Asheville Regional Office by June 1St of each year. The
report must describe inspection results, include digital photographs, list the date
of inspection, and describe any needed repairs or corrections.
14.The permittee will provide on-site supervision of stability work including, but not
limited to bank re-sloping, in-stream structure placement, and riparian zone re-
establishment, by an appropriately trained individual.
Mitchell County:
Page 5 of 6
July 18, 2005
15. If pasture along the stream is to be used for grazing, the permittee must inform the
appropriate landowners that cattle should be prohibited from damaging riparian
areas and from de-stabilizing the stream banks and channel.
16. Diffuse Flow
r
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected riparian zones
such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream.
17. Water Quality Certification Notifications
The permittee must provide a copy of this issued Water Quality Certification and
attached cover letter to each property owner where the approved work will be
performed.
18.Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 10 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B. .0200. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
Mitchell County:
Page 6 of 6
July 18, 2005
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Mr. Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at 828-296-4657. .
Sincerely,
0
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
AW K/khb
Enclosures: GC 3376
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: Stu Ryman
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
50 College Street
Asheville, NC 28801
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Asheville Regional Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 05-1229.EWP.Mitchel [County.NorthToe Rive r.Approval
e I
r

[Detailst
Protect Number: 20051229 Version: '1 Status: Issued LastActlon Desc Protect issued
*Protect Name Mitchell County EWP North Toe River M2004-14 *Project Type: f Stream Restoration! Creation
ProjectDesc: EWP
*Owner: 'Young, Kathy I Details... l
*Received From: (Applicant COE ID: *Primary County; IMltchell '.

i r DOTTIP: ! r,
Whom Region: (Asheville
Received Dt 0110812005 Reviewer (kevin.barnett
Issued Dt: 0711012005
*Secondary County
Statutory Dt 0 910 612 0 0 5
CAMA NEPAISEPARecelvedDt:'
DCM Office: SW Plan Received Dt
COE omre: jteviile Regulatory Field Omce SW Plan Approved Ot: Public Notice Published Dt
Last Updated Dy: '.robAdings SW Plan Location: Public Notice Received Dt:
Last Updated On 071110005 Sewage Disposal: ! P N. Comment Period Ends Dt
< Back r- j Close
f
Ready SID WPD1
{
i
p
I r
2 ? I}I
3
f
t
j 1
1
Triage Check Dist
Date: 07/11/05 Project Name: Mitchell EWP North Toe River M-2004-14
DWQ #:05-1229
County: Mitchell
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office
To:
60-day Processing Time: 7/8/05 to 9/6/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone : [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
1-1
Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Pennit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ? .
II. Applicant Information
1) Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Kathy Young tllitchell County Clerk to the Board of Commis 17 ? F
Mailing Address: Administration Building, Suite 2
26 Crimson Laurel Circle JUL 0 €t 2005
Bakersville, North Carolina 28705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (828) 688=" as c;,',:'y:,,TE?r^,I;cfi
E-mail Address: kyouilg@rnitcliell. main. itc. us
2) Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Stuart A. Ryman
Company Affiliation: Altamont Environmental, Inc.
Mailing Address: 50 College Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: srEmail@altamonteizvirom)ieiital. cons
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: North Toe River EWP M2004-14
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table I
4. Location
County: Mitchell County Nearest Town: Huntdale
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Burnsville, follow NC
Highway 197 N totivards Huntdale. When 197 Nforks to the right upstream of Huntdale stay
straight on Huntdale Rd. (SR # 1304) and turn left onto bridge at Huntdale. Cross the North
Toe River and turn right. Work Area 41 is located downstream about 113 mile and is on
river left. See attached Figure 1.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35.91600 N / -82.01601 W (approximate
center of project area)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Multiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): North Toe River
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/adi-nin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application:
Land use in the vicinity of the proposed project site consists ofpriniarily agricultural and
residential uses. Portions of the North Toe River were heavily impacted during Tropical
Storms Frances and Ivan. In numerous locations, the stream is clogged with woody and non-
native debris, reducing the hydraulic capacity of the channel. Additionally, one area of
streambank erosion threatens the stability of adjacent properties and structures.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The ETVP project area known as DSR No. A12004-14 is addressed by this permit application.
The project area consists of the North Toe River and its tributaries. The total estimated
disturbed area for activities covered under this PCN is approximately 0.5 acres. Since this is
less than the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan permitting threshold of 1 acre, a formal
approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan elements of this proposal is not needed.
However, the total disturbed length of the buffer area for iVork Area 91 is more than 100 feet,
therefore a formal request for a Trout waiver is being submitted.
The North Toe River is classified as `Class C' and Trout' waters throughout the project area.
The following activities are proposed in the project area:
1) One distinct area in need of stream bank stabilization has been identified, totaling
approximately 4501inear feet. High hater flow has severely eroded stream banks in this
area. In places, the riverbanks are over-steepened and very unstable, threatening
structures and property. Repairs in these areas will involve the following:
• Stabilize the channel in its post flood configuration using organic and rock structures.
• Stabilize the river banks by: removing unstable vegetation; stabilizing the toe of the
slope where necessary by placing large angular stone just above the water level, or by
the use offiber logs; backfilling behind and above the stone with rocky debris removed
from the floodplain or imported to the site; topping with planting media and planting
native vegetation.
2) Removal of organic, mineral, and non-native material fi°om areas where the hydraulic
capacity of the stream channel has been reduced based upon evaluation of existing cross-
sections and regional curves.
3) Softening of rnifzor over-steepened banks and riparian planting.
Work will include: stream bank stabilization in several areas described below. Equipment
used to accomplish the above tasks includes: rubber tired skidders, 15 toll dinnp truck,
hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chainsaws.
The general location of the stream bank repair area is provided in Figures 1 & 2.
Representative photos from these areas are included as Figures 3. Repairs for each of the
areas are detailed in Figures 3A.
Stemnbank Stabilization
Streambank stabilization is needed on approximately 450 feet of banks within the project area.
Stabilization is required at one distinct location shown in Figures 2.
Repairs at this area will generally include stabilizing the bank in its current location. A key in
trench will be excavated on the outside of the curve at the base of the existing slope as
necessary. Large (three to four foot diameter) angular rock, large diameter logs (greater than
2 feet), and/or natural fiber logs will be used to stabilize the toe of the bank at high stress
locations (e.g. the outside of bends). A second tier of material will be used, as needed. The
area behind the material will be backfilled with rocky debris material excavated from the
floodplain or imported material, and topsoil will be placed on the top of the reconstructed bank
to aid in the establishment of vegetation. Where sufficient space is available a bankfull bench
will be constructed in the fill area to increase hydraulic capacity and enhance future bank
stability. The area will be seeded with grasses upon completion of heavy equipment work. With
the landowner's permission, live stakes and bare root stock native trees and shrubs will be
planted on top of the bank stabilization work. In areas where high stress on the toe is not
expected (e.g. the inside of bends and straight sections with low banks), the use of large
material is not necessary, and logs or natural fiber logs will be used to provide the necessary
toe stabilization.
Work will be performed front the riverbank to the extent possible. In some locations, work will
occur in the dry above the normal water surface level. However, given the existing condition of
the stream bank and channel at these locations, it is likely that the stabilization of the toe of the
banks will occur in the wet. In such cases, sand bags, or the equivalent, will be used to deflect
water flow away from the work area, as well as prevent water from accumulating in the work
area. Standard erosion and sedimentation control measures, as subsequently described, will be
utilized throughout the project.
The work addressed in this application is intended to improve the post flood hydraulic capacity
of the stream reaches discussed and stabilize severely eroded streambanks that are threatening
structures. The proposed actions are not intended to enhance existing conditions or restore the
stream reaches using natural channel design techniques. Such activities would require detailed
engineering evaluation and design, which are beyond the intent of the EWP program.
On May 2, 2005, in anticipation of upcoming work under the EWP Program, the Board of
Commissioners of Mitchell Countypassed a resolution authorizing access to private land in
order to conduct EWP repairs. For this reason, individual Access Agreements are not
necessary for the workproposed in this PCN. A copy of the resolution is attached to this
application. A summary of property owners is included as Table 1.
At the site, work shall proceed from downstream to upstream to reduce sediment loading. All
staging areas will be less than half an acre in size. Work will proceed as follows at each work
area (as applicable):
1. Flag the lvork limits.
2. Mark live trees and shrubs to be protected.
3. Construct temporary construction entrancelexits where necessary.
4. Install sediment fence around staging areas.
5. At the end of each workday install erosion control matting on exposed soil using removable
stakes. Erosion control mats will be constructed of coin fiber or a coir fiber mixture fabric
for maximum erosion protection, vegetation establishment assistance, and for minimal
impact on wildlife. The applicant is considering the use of pre-vegetated coir mats to
improve erosion control measures and speed the re-vegetation process.
6. During construction, place large boulders, logs, or fiber rolls at the toe of repaired
streambanks where necessary.
7. Fill and compact behind boulders, logs, or fiber rolls. Cover with topsoil, install erosion
control mat, and seed.
8. Inspect and maintain repairs.
A site-specific engineering design based on a specific storm event was not completed because
the EIVP program is not intended to fiend stream restoration design or construction work.
Rather, the EYVP program is designed to quickly stabilize eroding stream banks to prevent on-
going erosion, sedimentation and possible loss ofproperty or life. Because natural channel
design methods are beyond the scope of the EiVP program, published literature values were
consulted in order to specify the bank stabilization and erosion control materials and methods
described in this document. For example, we have specified that filter cloth will be placed
behind large rock used for streambank stabilization or for in-stream structures to increase the
stability of the repair measures and minimize sediment loading to the stream. If root-wads are
used they will be installed so that at least 113 of the root is inundated during normal flows.
Clean, large, angular rock, large woody material, and natural fiber erosion control mats will be
used for streambank stabilization.
Once site construction has ceased, the banks of the restored channel will be seeded with a
native floodplain seed mix and the high stress areas will be lined with erosion control (EC)
matting to ensure bank stability. Furtherniore, sod matting will be grubbed on-site and used
(when available) to line the near bank regions of the constructed/stabilized channel to provide
immediate stability. Live stakes and matting staples will be used to secure the EC fabric/sod-
matting in these high stress areas. Broadcast seeding rates will be as specified from the local
nursery, generally 15-20 lbs/acre depending on species. Native shrub and tree species will be
planted throughout the project reach at a rate of 320 stenis/acre, securing near batik areas and
providing fitture shadiiig to the chaniiel. Existing woody vegetation will be preserved to
minimize project impacts. The following steps will be observed with respect to vegetation:
1. Exposed soil will be covered with erosion control matting at the end of every workday.
Mats will be secured using removable stakes.
2. The project riparian zone and/or buffer areas will be re-vegetated with a combination of
native trees, shrubs and herbs/grasses. All disturbed areas will be seeded with a temporary
native grass mixture immediately following completion of the work in those areas. Tall
fescue will not be used in riparian areas.
3. When possible sod will be taken from adjacent areas (with landowner permission) and
placed on exposed soil to provide immediate stabilization within five days of ground
disturbing activities.
4. If sod is not available on-site temporary seeding will occur on all bare soil within five days
of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control. If sod is used, the bare
area left after removal of sod will be planted.
5. Re-seeding will be conducted, as necessary, with a native annual and perennial seed mix
with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet, or other grain
6. Woody vegetation will be planted during the normal growing season assuming landowner
permission.
Removal of Organic and Rocky Debris
The applicant recognizes that some woody debris in the riparian zone is a necessary component
of habitat integrity and will strive to remove only non-native objects and those debris elements
considered an immediate or impending threat to life and structures. Contractors performing
debris removal tasks will be instructed to access debris on both sides of the river from the bank
on which the debris is located. Contractors will be instructed specifically to keep heavy
equipment out of the river channel. In some circumstances, it is likely that chainsaw operators
or heavy equipment support personnel may need to get in the river to cut or help free debris jams
being removed' In addition, large debris being pulled from the riverbank may result in some
riverbank scour. The applicant will instruct contractors performing the work to refrain from
cutting any live vegetation unless it is leaning toward the river at more than a 30-degree angle
and the river is entrenched or the riverbank is unstable at that point. Debris removed will be
hauled off site or chipped and disposed of in the flood plain. In cases where it is determined that
large woody debris can be utilized in current or projected future bank stabilization work, such as
in log vanes or as root wads, these articles may be stored on site out of the floodway upon
landowner permission. All areas disturbed due to debris removal and equipment access will be
reshaped and reseeded. Access to the channel will be perpendicular to the channel. Precaution
will be taken to protect mast production and stream canopy trees. Dead trees that provide den
habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be protected
Rocky debris within the flood plain and channel that reduces the hydraulic capacity of the
channel will be removed using an excavator. The removal of rocky debris will proceed from the
stream channel back toward the streambank allowing the excavator to work on the debris pile.
The reconfigured floodplain will be shaped in a manner intended to restore the hydraulic
capacity of the stream system. Rocky debris removed from the floodplain will be used to
stabilize the streambank, or will be hauled offsite. At sites where there is no eroded streambank
in the immediate vicinity, the excavated material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of
the streambank or will be hauled off site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an
elevation higher than the existing streambanks.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The work being described is exigency work under the Emergency IYatershed Protection program
to protect existing property and structures. Streambank stabilization will also prevent firrther
erosion and sedimentation to the North Toe River resource.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or pen-nits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream charnels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intennittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include stream bank stabilization. Precautions ivill be taken to keep heavy
equipment out of the stream channel except where absolutely necessary to install bank
stabilization measures. Work tivill be conducted in the dry to the extent practicable. Sediment
and erosion control measures, including sand bags, silt fences and reseeding, will be utilized to
minimize sedimentation.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
There will be no wetlands impacted at this site.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditch ing/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://Nvww.fema.gov.
* * * List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of
Stream Average Width
of Stream Perennial or
Site Number (see Type of Impact* Impact
Name** Before Impact Intermittent?
Figure 2) (linear feet) (ft)
Area 1 (Figure 2) Streambank Stabilization 450 N. Toe River 160 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.uov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapJc uest.com, etc.)..
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 450 linear feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
There will be no impacts to open waters.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
On behalf of Mitchell County, Altamont will provide contractors engaged in the implementation of
this work both written and verbal instructions of all impact avoidance statements provided below.
All heavy equipment will be kept out of the stream channel during streannbarnk stabilization and
stream relocation ivork, except where absolutely necessary to install bank stabilization measures.
Disturbance of channel bottom and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the
minimum necessary to allow for bank stabilization and debris removal sufficient to restore the
hydraulic capacity of the channel. Temporary grass cover shall be planted on all bare soil within
S days of ground disturbing activities. Provided landowners give permission, herbaceous and
woody shrub and tree vegetation will also be installed on the riverbank upon completion of bank
stabilization work Mitchell County will provide a site manager to routinely inspect and
supervise contractor work to help ensure impact avoidance instructions are being followed.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on Bold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrphndex.htm. If use of
10
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N14
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N121
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260. '
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage will not change. Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be
maintained throughout this project primarily through proper water management, construction
sequencing, proper staging and stockpiling of materials, and the maintenance, at all times, of
suitable channel capacityfor expected flow events. Equipment, fuels, lubricants, or other
potential sources of water pollution will not be stored in areas that could be flooded during this
project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
12
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
s- -or
Applicant/Agents Signat?Gre Date
(Agent's signature is valid only i an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
13
May 03 05 09:51a
NORTH CAROLINA
AN EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION
OF THE
MITCHELL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
p.2
MITCHELL COUNTY
WHEREAS, Mitchell County suffered "severe flooding" during the month of September; and
WHEREAS, severe property damage has occurred within Mitchell County, creating debris
accumulation and mud slides; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 166A of the General Statutes and Article 36A Chapter 14 of
the General Statutes, an emergency proclamation was issued to maintain order
and protect lives or property during the state of emergency.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS PROCLAIMED by the Chairman of the Mitchell County Board of
Commissioners that it is necessary to authorize county officials, their agents, or
assigns to enter onto private property within Mitchell County for the purpose of
removing debris accumulation and stabilizing mud slides.
IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Mitchell County Board of Commissioners adopted an
Emergency Proclamation on September 29, 2004 to take effect upon its
execution and remain in effect for one hundred and eighty days thereafter. It has
since been determined that term needs to be extended for and additional one
hundred and eighty days for a total of three hundred and sixty days.
Proclaimed this the 2nd day of May 2005.
eit Masters, Chairman
Attest:
4?? (J'atum /
Ka n Cler to the Board
A
o®o Feb 17 05 04:50p
13
v ?
fl?
MITCHELL COUNTY
26 CRIMSON LAUREL CIRCLE, Suite 1 E-mail: mitcty0mitche1l.main_nc.us
BAKERSVILLE, NC 28705
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
February 17, 2005
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
50 College Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Stu:
p.1
* - L
t"' c
?sy
?.
On January 20, 2005 at the Special Session of the Mitchell County Board of
Commissioners, they executed a contract for professional services relative to
EWP Project. Pursuant to this the Mitchell County Board of Commissioners
upon approval by County Attorney Hise, hereby authorizes Altamont
Environmental, Inc. to sign and execute all necessary permits and coordinate
communications with said regulatory agencies.
If you should have any questions concerning this matter or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, i
%, i Zc
Phil Ca ro
Acting County Manager
Table 1
Affected Parcel
North Toe River DSR No. M2004-14
Mitchell County, North Carolina
BANK
REPAIR
AREA PARCEL SIZE STREAMBANK
NO. PIN OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP (ACRES) STABILIZATION
1 81400750324000 Harbert & Shelia Dunning 6109 Lea Ray Rd. Greensboro NC 27410 23.86 x
`parcel located in Yancey Co.
Table 2
Affected Parcel Location
North Toe River DSR No. M2004-14
Mitchell County, North Carolina
BANK
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
REPAIR PARCEL PIN It OWNER
(DD) (DD)
AREA NO.
1 81400750324000 1Iobert& Shelia Dunning 36.02884 -82.326QL_jl
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
TT
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

s kk a K i
.i
' ?p
f
gag "Ill",
?" fl
r .a f?
t } ._ E S f i
Figure 3
North Toe River
Work Area # 1
DSR No. M2004-14
Mitchell County, North Carolina
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEviLLE, NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com

?uF?i
• "? A g.. y .,. r "t r'Y ^'9 + ,t?y?, '`?j ,y?4,?v ., y. '?„j" Air'' v. ` s a .J 'lee',.-'r•
!'a
1M59 ,
73
if
T
y"°?,,yrWq,?A7'`+rt,
.? T
}?. a1y''? 7 l
? r
CONTINUEa PROPOSED REPAIR FOR 450 FEET
04- ? . >!rs
a . ?' a dY,"' r
Av t . 4' i "?1«
yam"" ?'''?w
,
j r ! t
,
?'F TT q 6? 'b
F ?w.. _?• r» ?? !_ ? } ,^y ?.??,- .?.'?\t ;rte" ? ,'
1 k'?rN ? ?111?, Y,
pit
BACKFILL WITH SOIL, INSTALL
'" . "'. jai .... EROSION CONTROL MATTING.
W? r4"
AIM "wT ^' JrJ?MA*
a '
STABILIZE TOE OF BANK r r
d Y w x _u " rvr ?r1Nw ? nr k3' Y? ,?!?a».,Ary '+?' ?a.r "?'',"'•s, .^,°r°f,'.. u+.+w.. ?. ?. ?, ? ? .,.rv?nh?..:mc. ? ' ?
y s r;., ' .
MATH LARGE ANGULAR ROCK
7 (KEY IN ROCK AT TOE TO M„ .
1
.F -
SECURE BANK)
BANK STABILIZATION FIGURE
F ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
ENGIN ERING & HYDROGEOLO Y MEASURES
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL [phone] Foamen ].coin51 NORTH TOE RIVER- WORK AREA #1 3a
www. altamontenv ironmental coin
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE DSR No. M2004-14
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN MITCHELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: MITCHELL COUNTY, NC
DATE:
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information

1) Owner/Applicant Information ;'A OF
Name: Kathy Young Mitchell Count Clerk to the Board of Commissioners J U L 0 20 G5
Mailing Address: Administration Building, Suite 2
26 Crimson Laurel Circle CEP,r`? fEl' CUA IT,
1 tTlJ4'.)s1" 0S G
Bakcrsville, North Carolina 28705
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: kyoutig@niitchell. rniaitt. tic. us
2) Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: StuartA. Ryman
Company Affiliation: Altainont Environmental, Inc.
Mailing Address: 50 College Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: sryntiani@altarntonteiivirornmental. corm
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity snap
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: North Toe River EWP M2004-14
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table I
4. Location
County: Mitchell County Nearest Town: Huntdale
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Burnsville, follow NC
Highway 197 N towards Huntdale. When 197 N forks to the right upstream of Huntdale stay
straight on Huntdale Rd. (SR 4 1304) and turn left onto bridge at Huntdale. Cross the North
Toe River and turn right. Work Area 41 is located downstream about 113 mile and is oil
river left. See attached Figure 1.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35.91600 N / -82.01601 W (approximate
center of project area)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Multiple - See attached Table 1
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): North Toe River
8. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://112o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application:
Land use in the vicinity of the proposed project site consists of primarily agricultural and
residential uses. Portions of the North Toe River were heavily impacted during Tropical
Storms Frances and Ivan. In numerous locations, the stream is clogged with woody and non-
native debris, reducing the hydraulic capacity of the channel. Additionally, one area of
streambank erosion threatens the stability of adjacent properties and structures.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The ETYP project area known as DSR No. M2004-14 is addressed by this permit application.
The project area consists of the North Toe River and its tributaries. The total estimated
disturbed area for activities covered under this PCN is approximately 0.5 acres. Since this is
less than the Erosion and Seduitent Control Plan permitting threshold of I acre, a formal
approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan elements of this proposal is not needed.
However, the total disturbed length of the buffer area for Work Area 41 is more than 100 feet,
therefore a formal request for a Trout waiver is being submitted.
The North Toe River is classified as `Class C' and `Trout' waters throughout the project area.
The following activities are proposed in the project area:
1) One distinct area in need ofstream bank stabilization has been identified, totaling
approximately 4501inear feet. High water flow has severely eroded stream banks in this
area. In places, the riverbanks are over-steepened and very unstable, threatening
structures and property. Repairs in these areas will involve the following:
• Stabilize the channel in its post- flood configuration using organic and rock structures.
• Stabilize the river banks by: removing unstable vegetation; stabilizing the toe of the
slope where necessary by placing large angular stone just above the water level, or by
the use offiber logs; backfilling behind and above the stone with rocky debris removed
from the floodplain or imported to the site; topping with planting media and planting
native vegetation.
2) Removal of orgaiiic, »iiiieral, and non-native material front areas where the irydraulic
capacity of the stream channel has been reduced based upon evaluation of existing cross-
sections and regional curves.
3) Softeizing of miiior over-steepeied banks and riparian planting.
Work will include: stream bank stabilization in several areas described below. Equipment
used to accomplish the above tasks includes: rubber tired skidders, 15 ton dump truck,
hydraulic track mounted excavator with thumb, and chainsaws.
The general location of the stream bank repair area is provided in Figures I & 2.
Representative photos from these areas are included as Figures 3. Repairs for each of the
areas are detailed in Figures 3A.
Sb emubank Stabilization:
Streambank stabilization is needed on approximately 450 feet of banks within the project area.
Stabilization is required at one distinct location shown in Figures 2.
Repairs at this area will generally include stabilizing the bank in its current location. A key in
trench will be excavated on the outside of the curve at the base of the existing slope as
necessary. Large (three to four foot diameter) angular rock, large diameter logs (greater than
2 feet), and/or natural fiber logs will be used to stabilize the toe of the bank at high stress
locations (e.g. the outside of bends). A second tier of material will be used, as needed. The
area behind the material will be backfilled with rocky debris material excavated from the
floodplain or imported material, and topsoil will be placed on the top of the reconstructed bank
to aid in the establishment of vegetation. Where sufficient space is available a bankfull bench
will be constructed in the fill area to increase hydraulic capacity and enhance future bank
stability. The area will be seeded with grasses upon completion of heavy equipment work. With
the landowner's permission, live stakes and bare root stock native trees and shrubs will be
planted on top of the bank stabilization work. In areas where high stress on the toe is not
expected (e.g. the inside of bends and straight sections with low banks), the use of large
material is not necessary, and logs or natural fiber logs will be used to provide the necessary
toe stabilization.
Work will be performed from the riverbank to the extent possible. In some locations, work will
occur in the dry above the normal water surface level. However, given the existing condition of
the stream bank and channel at these locations, it is likely that the stabilization of the toe of the
banks will occur in the wet. In such cases, sand bags, or the equivalent, will be used to deflect
water flow away from the work area, as well as prevent water from accumulating in the work
area. Standard erosion and sedimentation control measures, as subsequently described, will be
utilized throughout the project.
The work addressed in this application is intended to improve the post flood hydraulic capacity
of the stream reaches discussed and stabilize severely eroded streambanks that are threatening
structures. The proposed actions are not intended to enhance existing conditions or restore the
stream reaches using natural channel design techniques. Such activities would require detailed
engineering evaluation and design, which are beyond the intent of the EIVP program.
On May 2, 2005, in anticipation of upcoming work under the EWP Program, the Board of
Commissioners of Mitchell Countypassed a resolution authorizing access to private land in
order to conduct EWP repairs. For this reason, individual Access Agreements are not
necessary for the workproposed in this PCN. A copy of the resolution is attached to this
application. A summary of property owners is included as Table 1.
At the site, work shall proceed from downstream to upstream to reduce sediment loading. All
staging areas will be less than half an acre in size. Work will proceed as follows at each work
area (as applicable):
4
1. Flag the work limits.
2. Mark live trees and shrubs to be protected
3. Construct temporary construction entrancelexils where necessary.
4. Install sediment fence around staging areas.
5. At the end of each workday install erosion control matting on exposed soil using removable
stakes. Erosion control mats will be constructed of coir fiber or a coir fiber mixture fabric
for maximum erosion protection, vegetation establishment assistance, and for minimal
impact on wildlife. The applicant is considering the use ofpre-vegetated coir mats to
improve erosion control measures and speed the re-vegetation process.
6. During construction, place large boulders, logs, or fiber rolls at the toe of repaired
streambanks where necessary.
7 Fill and compact behind boulders, logs, or fiber rolls. Cover with topsoil, install erosion
control mat, and seed.
8. Inspect and maintain repairs.
A site-specific engineering design based on a specific storm event was not completed because
the ETVP program is not intended to fund stream restoration design or construction work.
Rather, the ETVP program is designed to quickly stabilize eroding stream banks to prevent on-
going erosion, sedimentation and possible loss ofproperty or life. Because natural channel
design methods are beyond the scope of the ETVP program, published literature values were
consulted in order to sped the bank stabilization and erosion control materials and methods
described in this document. For example, we have specified that filter cloth will be placed
behind large rock used for streambank stabilization or for in-stream structures to increase the
stability of the repair measures and minimize sediment loading to the stream. If root-wads are
used they will be installed so that at least 113 of the root is inundated during normal flows.
Clean, large, angular rock, large woody material, and natural f ber erosion control mats will be
used for streambank stabilization.
Once site construction has ceased, the banks of the restored channel will be seeded with a
native floodplain seed mix and the high stress areas will be lined with erosion control (EC)
matting to ensure bank stability. Furthermnore, sod matting will be grubbed on-site and used
(when available) to line the near bank regions of the constructed/stabilized channel to provide
immediate stability. Live stakes and matting staples will be used to secure the ECfabriclsod-
matting in these high stress areas. Broadcast seeding rates will be as specified from the local
nursery, generally 15-201bs/acre depending on species. Native shrub and tree species will be
planted throughout the project reach at a rate of 320 steams/acre, securing near bank areas and
providing future shading to the charnel. Existing lvoody vegetation will be preserved to
minimize project impacts. The following steps will be observed with respect to vegetation:
1. Exposed soil will be covered with erosion control matting at the end of every workday.
Mats will be secured using removable stakes.
2. The project riparian zone andlor buffer areas will be re-vegetated with a combination of
native trees, shrubs and herbs/grasses. All disturbed areas will be seeded with a temporary
native grass mixture immediately following completion of the work in those areas. Tall
fescue will not be used in riparian areas.
3. When possible sod will be taken from adjacent areas (with landowner permission) and
placed on exposed soil to provide immediate stabilization within five days of ground
disturbing activities.
4. If sod is not available on-site temporary seeding will occur on all bare soil within five days
of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control. If sod is used, the bare
area left after removal of sod will be planted.
5. Re-seeding will be conducted, as necessary, with a native annual and perennial seed mix
with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet, or other grain
6. Woody vegetation will be planted during the normal growing season assuming landowner
permission.
Removal of Organic and Rocky Debris
The applicant recognizes that some woody debris in the riparian zone is a necessary component
of habitat integrity and will strive to remove only non-native objects and those debris elements
considered an immediate or impending threat to life and structures. Contractors performing
debris removal tasks will be instructed to access debris on both sides of the river from the bank
on which the debris is -located. Contractors will be instructed specifically to keep heavy
equipment out of the river channel. In some circumstances, it is likely that chainsaw operators
or heavy equipment support personnel may need to get in the river to cut or help free debris jams
being removed. In addition, large debris being pulled from the riverbank may result in some
riverbank scour. The applicant will instruct contractors performing the work to refrain from
cutting any live vegetation unless it is leaning toward the river at more than a 30-degree angle
and the river is entrenched or the riverbank is unstable at that point. Debris removed will be
hauled off site or chipped and disposed of in the flood plain. In cases where it is determined that
large woody debris can be utilized in current or projected future bank stabilization work, such as
in log vanes or as root wads, these articles may be stored on site out of the floodway upon
landowner permission. All areas disturbed due to debris removal and equipment access will be
reshaped and reseeded. Access to the channel will be perpendicular to the channel. Precaution
will be taken to protect mast production and stream canopy trees. Dead trees that provide den
habitat and are determined to pose no hazard to the channel shall be protected.
Rocky debris within the flood plain and channel that reduces the hydraulic capacity of the
channel will be removed using an excavator. The removal of rocky debris will proceed from the
stream channel back toward the streambank allowing the excavator to work on the debris pile.
The reconfigured floodplain will be shaped in a manner intended to restore the hydraulic
capacity of the stream system. Rocky debris removed from the floodplain will be used to
stabilize the streambank, or will be hauled offsite. At sites where there is no eroded streambank
in the immediate vicinity, the excavated material will be used to strengthen the natural berm of
the streambank or will be hauled off site. In no case shall the deposited material be placed at an
elevation higher than the existing streambanks.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The work being described is exigency work under the Emergency TYatershed Protection program
to protect existing property and structures. Streanrbank stabilization ivill also prevent further
erosion and sedimentation to the North Toe River resource.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or pen-nits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Proposed impacts include stream bank stabilization. Precautions will be taken to keep heavy
equipment out of the stream charnel except where absolutely necessary to install bank
stabilization measures. fork will be conducted in the dry to the extent practicable. Sediment
and erosion control measures, including sand bags, silt fences and reseeding, will be utilized to
minimize sedimentation.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
There tivill be no wetlands impacted at this site.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplaui**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mecnamzed clearing, grading, ini,
excavation, flooding, ditch ing/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
* * 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://Nvww.fema.gov.
* * * List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: None
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Average Width
Stream Impact Length of
Stream
Stream Perennial or
of
Site Number (see Type of Impact* Impact
Name** Before Impact Intermittent?
Figure 2) (linear feet)
Area 1 (Figure 2) Streambank Stabilization 450 N. Toe River 160 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uss.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 450 linear feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
There ivill be no impacts to open waters.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

Cif applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankrnent, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
On behalf of Mitchell County, Altamont will provide contractors engaged in the implementation of
this work both written and verbal instructions of all impact avoidance statements provided below.
All heavy equipment will be kept out of the stream channel during streambank stabilization and
stream relocation tivork except where absolutely necessary to install bank stabilization measures.
Disturbance of channel bottom and banks and equipment access areas shall be held to the
minimwn necessary to allow for bank stabilization and debris removal sufficient to restore the
hydraulic capacity of the channel. Temporary grass cover shall be planted on all bare soil lvithin
S days ofground disturbing activities. Provided landowners give permission, herbaceous and
woody shrub and tree vegetation will also be installed on the riverbank upon completion of bank
stabilization work. Mitchell County will provide a site manager to routinely inspect and
supervise contractor work to help ensure impact avoidance instructions are being followed.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http•//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.litml.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
10
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/fi
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify)?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260. '
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious acreage will not change. Erosion and sedimentation prevention and control will be
maintained throughout this project primarily through proper water management, construction
sequencing, proper staging and stockpiling of materials, and the maintenance, at all times, of
suitable channel capacityfor expected flow events. Equipment, fuels, lubricants, or other
potential sources of water pollution will not be stored in areas that could be flooded during this
project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Portable facilities shall be provided at the work site.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
12
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NCI
Applicant/Agents Signa
(Agent's signature is valid only if
S, Gov
Date
an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
13
Mau 03 05 09:51a
NORTH CAROLINA
AN EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION
OF THE
MITCHELL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
P-2
MITCHELL COUNTY
WHEREAS, Mitchell County suffered "severe flooding" during the month of September; and
WHEREAS, severe property damage has occurred within Mitchell County, creating debris
accumulation and mud slides; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 166A of the General Statutes and Article 36A Chapter 14 of
the General Statutes, an emergency proclamation was issued to maintain order
and protect lives or property during the state of emergency.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS PROCLAIMED by the Chairman of the Mitchell County Board of
Commissioners that it is necessary to authorize county officials, their agents, or
assigns to enter onto private property within Mitchell County for the purpose of
removing debris accumulation and stabilizing mud slides.
IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Mitchell County Board of Commissioners adopted an
Emergency Proclamation on September 29, 2004 to take effect upon its
execution and remain in effect for one hundred and eighty days thereafter. It has
since been determined that term needs to be extended for and additional one
hundred and eighty days for a total of three hundred and sixty days.
Proclaimed this the 2"d day of May 2005.
eit Masters, Chairman
Attest:
Ka n Cle to the Board
n nFeb 17 05 04:50p p.1
o d
v
L
lot/
1
MITCHELL COUNTY t.
26 CRIMSON LAUREL CIRCLE, Suite 1 E-mail: mitcty0m1tche1l,main.ne.us
BAKERSVILLE, NC 28705
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
February 17, 2005
Altamont Environmental, Inc.
50 College Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Stu:
On January 20, 2005 at the Special Session of the Mitchell County Board of
Commissioners, they executed a contract for professional services relative to
EWP Project. Pursuant to this the Mitchell County Board of Commissioners
upon approval by County Attorney Hise, hereby authorizes Altamont
Environmental, Inc. to sign and execute all necessary permits and coordinate
communications with said regulatory agencies.
If you should have any questions concerning this matter or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, X
Phil Castro
Acting County Manager
Table 1
Affected Parcel
North Toe River DSR No. M2004-14
Mitchell County, North Carolina
BANK
REPAIR
AREA PARCEL SIZE STREANIBANK
NO. PIN OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP (ACRES) STABILIZATION
1 81400750324000 Hcrbert &. Shelia Dwining 6109 Lea Ray Rd. Greciisboro NC 27410 23.86 x
.parcel located in Yancey Co.
Table 2
Affected Parcel Location
North Toe River DSR No. M2004-14
Mitchell County, North Carolina
BANK
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
REPAIR PARCEL PIN # OWNER
(DD) (DD)
AREA NO.
1 81400750324000 Herbert& Shelia Dunning 36.02884 -82.32692_jl
?
'. 'm - ? a jIF Aw.
,10
' W E
'4 S
wi-
:wen.
Work Area
#1
F
• ` - .. ,

FA

Legend
Roads
Surface Waters
0 200 Feet

p
Figure 2
Streambank Stabilization Sites
Work Area # 1
DSR M2004 - 14
North Toe River
Mitchell County, North Carolina

50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHF.VILLE, NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAC. 828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmenta l.com
w
?A?? ??ti k ?.t .Y/ _ ??.?r
h ij ? ??f •y ?`?+? k?,..

• k. ., t? F ?,?„ ? , i ?jl st
Figure 3
North Toe River
Work Area # 1
DSR No. M2004-14
Mitchell County, North Carolina
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, TIC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
1111 .•'.
It .,

x+l
o
r ..
f T.••" }
¢1•
1
w? 1w u Y ??a
Y
!T
i
ny? G y?yy?
VOte
'k fm_
{! Y •:'.?
%; Wa

l ?A I?F
BACKFlLL WITH SOIL. INSTALL
; . ..... EROSION CONTROL MATTING, °

AV A- 4 J
.ri. + i.i ,4-
,.
STABILIZE TOE OF BANK '
WTH LARGE ANGULAR ROCK ? ,, ,x • ? «
?' '" •F ` ?'Faeaw HkdFmwk^xnN?V..ek '?,qr. -*¢-
`d
(KEY IN ROCK AT TOE TO
SECURE BANK).
BANK STABILIZATION FIGURE
I? MEASURES
E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y O R O G E O L O G Y
50 COLLEGE STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone].281.3351
www.altamontenvironmentatal.c .com
NORTH TOE RIVER- WORK AREA #1 3a
DRAWN BY: ZAN PRICE DSR No. M2004-14
PROJECT MANAGER: STUART RYMAN MITCHELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: MITCHELL COUNTY, NC
DATE:
r