20041920 Ver 2_401 Application_20090817

DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] • Fax [phone]
To: Ms. Lia Gilleski
NCDWQ 401/Express Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Letter of Transmittal
Date: 8-17-09 Job # 0912
Attn:
Re: Third Fork Creek permit
WE ARE SENDING YOU
Attached Reports /404k MapsC77 (Z) F- fi
Copy of letter Plans Data
Prints Photos X Permit
COPIES DATE # P s DESCRIPTION
5 8-17-09 65+ Permit application for
proposed Third Fork Creek Southern Greenwa 'G) I
Durham, Durham Co., NC
1 -- check in the amount of $1,000 for permitting fee
1 CD overall project maps and 8x11 1:30 scale maps
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED
X For approval Approved as noted
For your use Approved as submitted
As requested Returned for corrections
For review and comment For your information
g 1W qtr r--,
, L
LZ "? 1 `
1 2JU J
UENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
REMARKS: Lia,
I've enclosed 5 copies of the permit application for Third Fork Creek greenway. Since
our meeting, the 2 box culverts have been redesigned as concrete boardwalks (City of
Durham decided they could go without the heavy culverts for maintenance vehicles).
Impacts to perennial waters have been eliminated. JCA visited the 2 small pipes that
showed stream impact, but didn't have impacts on the table. Nothing qualifies as stream
at those sites, therefore, no impact. Our Wetland Biologist took photos if you'd like to
see them. ***Coulter, Jewell, Thames is delivering this package with their plats, which
are not included on this transmittal.*** I've left the relevant 8x1 I maps (those without
design changes) in this package as a reference since they show the wetland labels,
however, all impacts will be depicted correctly on CJT plats. Final note - as CJT plats
went to final print, we found a few discrepancies in calculations (not depiction). Impact
numbers on my tables in the PCN supersede all numbers shown on the Mats.
COPY TO: Dan Jewell - CJT SIGNED:
Danny King - City of Durham ?- I ? ? &r?,
If enclosures are not noted, please contact us q-ediately
Endangered Species Surveys 9 Environmental Assessments 9 Land Management 9 Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] • Fax [phone]
17 August 2009
Ms. Lia Gilleski
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit/ Express Review
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Dear Ms. Gilleski:
Enclosed is a permit application for jurisdictional impacts along the proposed Third Fork Creek
Southern Greenway in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina (see attached maps). I've enclosed 5
copies and a check in the amount of $1,000.00 (Express Review fee) in this packet. The proposed
project was permitted in 2005 under a Nationwide Permit No. 14 (Action ID 200020046) and
corresponding Water Quality Certification (DWQ Project # 04-1920). The Jurisdictional
Determination was also renewed in 2005 and is valid until 17 March 2010. Work on the project never
commenced and the permits expired in 2007. The original permits included a southern and northern
trail. The enclosed application is only for the southern trail. Due to budget constraints in the current
economic conditions, the City of Durham postponed construction of the northern trail indefinitely,
likely for several years.
The proposed greenway trail will become part of the Durham Area Greenway System and is
intended to provide residents with a safe place for recreation in nature. Most of the trail will be
constructed within existing sewer and road rights-of-way. Additionally, most jurisdictional impacts
are within these non-forested, disturbed rights-of-way. Jurisdictional impacts were avoided and
minimized by revising the project alignment several times during the initial permitting process, by
crossing in areas that have already been disturbed and by using no-impact boardwalks at 13 crossings.
Project impacts include 0.045 acre of forested wetlands, 0.329 acre of non-forested wetlands
(0.374 acre total wetland impacts), 157 linear feet of intermittent ditch/ unimportant stream and
12,390 square feet of riparian buffer (4,440 in Zone 1 and 7,950 in Zone 2).
Endangered Species Surveys 9 Environmental Assessments • Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
Since our pre-application meeting, the following has been changed: 2 box culverts have
been removed and replaced with boardwalks, reducing impacts to minor wetlands impacts at the ends;
riparian buffer impacts have been included in accordance with the Jordan Nutrient Rules; a stream
impact at Wetland W, which was inadvertently left out, has been added; all impact calculations have
been reviewed for correctness and updated where needed.
The following documents are included in this application to assist in your review: 404 and 401
permits from 2005 (including the updated Jurisdictional Determination), USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheets and DWQ Stream Classification Forms for proposed impacts at stream
crossings, a copy of the application for in-lieu fee mitigation credits to the NC Ecosystem
Enhancement Program, protected species survey report and a letter from the State Historic Preservation
Office. Please review the enclosed permit application and contact me if you need any additional
information. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Jenni er M. Archambault
d
Wildlife Biologist
CC: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer - US Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. Daniel King - City of Durham
Mr. Dan Jewell - Coulter, Jewell, Thames, P.A.
Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
401 Oversight/Express Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist
® The application fee (Checks may be made out to "N.C. Division of Water Quality"
- $240.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts
- $570.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts
- Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance Letter)
® Five (5) complete and collated copies of the PCN Application and supporting
documentation (instead of providing 5 copies of the full size plans you may provide two
copies of full size plans along with three copies of 11 X 17 plans)
? Stormwater Management Plan (if applicable - see PCN Form Help File Section E)
1) Please provide three (3) copies of the stormwater management plans along with all
supporting information pertaining to this project including the following:
a. Entire site development/layout plans delineating all drainage areas;
b. Design calculation sheets for all proposed BMP(s) sized for both on-site and
off-site drainage;
c. BMP supplements for each proposed BMP and Required Items Check List
(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm) along with all required
items;
d. A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each stormwater
management facility;
e. Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include
(i) Erosion and sediment control plans;
(ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed BMPs;
(iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all
BMPs and associated components - inlet and outlet structures,
forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations.
? If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the
following along with site plans and PCN form:
1) Three (3) copies of the details for on-site diffuse flow provisions, (refer to
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp_jorms.htm).
® DWQ Stream Determination Forms for streams on property and DWQ determination
letter for wetlands or streams (if applicable).
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and
detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is
a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum:
Maps and Plans:
® The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map - Please cleanly draw or
delineate the site boundaries on the topographic map.
® The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map -
(required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman
Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -
Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures
any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Copies of the
Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
current soil survey and/or soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS
County Office (http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/). GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
® Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property
and project on the map. Please indicate north arrow and scale. Please include applicable
road names or State Road numbers.
® The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide full
sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
® Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Topographic contours with elevations
• Any existing structures and impervious areas
• Existing utility lines and easements
• Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features
• North arrow and the scale (1":50' scale is recommended).
® Proposed conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include:
• All jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated
buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2)
• Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) - lots must be
developable without further impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands,
streams water features and State regulated buffers. Building envelopes must be
provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot
• All built-out structures and impervious cover
• Final grading contours with elevations
• All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream,
wetland, or water features - if applicable)
• Impacted areas - these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN
form.
? Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must include the following:
• Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and
drainage ways
• All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to
wetlands must be at a non-erosive velocity, generally less than 2 ft/sec during the peak
flow from the 10-yr storm)
• Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and policies
• In certain cases (see Section E of PCN form), final stormwater management plans must
also be provided (see Stormwater Management Plan Checklist)
® Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream,
water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at
a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts
that will be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated. Please provide cross sectional
details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts <_ 48
inches, and 1-foot for culverts > 48 inches).
Version 1.4
January 9, 2009
Wetland Impacts:
® Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing
vegetation and any clearing must be specified.
? All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars.
Construction detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
® Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
® Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be
maintained.
Stream Impacts:
® Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as
the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of
the stream to be impacted.
® The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as
much as possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should
be indicated. Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on
the impact map(s).
? For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be
provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank,
the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the
minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank.
Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of
subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location. The report must
comply with the Division of Highways - Guidelines for Drainage Studies and
Hydraulic Design, prepared by A.L. Hankins, Jr., State Hydraulics Engineer -
1999.
? Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off-
setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order
to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross
section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream
stream cross section including the stream flood-prone area.
? Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill
associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank
stabilization. The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and
enumerated.
DURHAM O y- I q 20 V 2.
tliX OF DURHA
General Services ©erartment
Project Management Division
2011 FAY STREET I DURHAM, NC 27704
919.560.4197 1 F 919.560.4970
1 $ 69 www.durhamnc.gov
CITY OF MEDICINE
March 3, 2009
AUG 1 7 2009
US Army Corps of Engineers DENR-WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
RE: Third Fork Creek Greenway Trail
To Whom It May Concern:
Dr. J. H. Carter III & Associates, Inc. is authorized to prepare and submit the necessary
permits for the proposed Third Fork Creek Greenway, Durham, Durham County, NC.
Additionally, this letter grants permission to federal and state regulatory authorities to
conduct site visits on the property to evaluate wetland boundaries and project impacts.
Sincerely,
Daniel
Daniel L. King King
Senior Project Administrator
General Services, City of Durham
Digitally signed by Daniel King
DN: cn=Daniel King, o=City of
Durham, ou=General Services,
email=daniel.king@durhamnc.
gov,c=US
Date: 2009.03.03 07:24:52
-05'00'
`o?oF war?RpG
Uj 9
I?,?I o
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.0 November 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Third Fork Creek Southern Greenway
2b. County: Durham
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Durham
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name on Recorded Deed: City of Durham
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Daniel King, Senior Project Administrator
3d. Street address: 2011 Fay Street
3e. City, state, zip: Durham, NC 27704
3f. Telephone no.: [phone] ext. 245
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer Archambault
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc., Environmental Consultants
5c. Street address: 515-F Midland Road
5d. City, state, zip: Southern Pines, NC 28387
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): See Table 1
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 'N - W
1 c. Property size: - 44.7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: Third Fork Creek

2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW (from source to a point 2 mi. upstream from NC
Hwy 54). WS-IV; NSW (from 2 mi. upstream from NC 54
to New Hope Creek (Jordan Lake))
2c. River basin: Cape Fear River Basin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Most of the proposed project will be along existing sewer and road rights-of-way. A small section of the project will
traverse a City Park (Garrett Road Park). Surrounding land use is primarily residential, with a few highways and
commercial districts. The flood plain of Third Fork Creek is predominantly forested.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Unknown; only wetlands along the proposed project route were delineated.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Unknown, see above.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The trail will become part of the Durham Area Greenway system and is intended to provide Durham area residents with a
safe, City-maintained greenway for recreational activities and a natural areas experience.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The applicant proposes to construct approximately 3.7 miles of a 10-foot-wide paved trail from Garrett Road Park (near
the intersection of Garrett Rd (SR 1106 and Hope Valley Rd (NC Hwy 751)) north to Southern Boundaries Park (near
Martin Luther King Pkwy (SR 1146). The project includes 19 jurisdictional crossings. The proposed crossings will result
in impacts to 0.374 acre of wetlands and 157 linear feet of intermittent stream channel (ditches). One stream crossing will
use 2 30-inch pipes and and 1 crossing will extend an existing 24-inch culvert (2 total stream crossings). All other
impacted jurisdictional crossings will be filled for the width of the trail. Fifteen (15) boardwalks have been included in this
updated design in order to avoid additional wetland/stream impacts
The trail len
th includ
6
f
t
id
.
g
es
-
oo
w
e connector trails
to adjacent subdivisions. The entire length of the trail will be paved with concrete (along roads) or asphalt (along sewer
rights-of-way and in cross-country sections). Dump trucks and standard grading equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ? Preliminary ®Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): previous consultant Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
.
JD renewed in conjunction with previous permit on 3-17-05 and expires 3-17-10.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
?i
O
N
Fr?1
W
z
rW
IE--4
W
I/O
1""h
r-I
W
?4
N
Z < < < < G < < < < < w w i < < < < <
Q N M O O D Z O O O O O f O O 4m p 0 0 N U-1 N OI O I!1 N f N U3, N In N
F
? O S N O z f O_ co N_ W! p ? N cq O Q O O O
y
W
3 O O O O O O O O O O O O ^ N O rh in

O 4 0 0 0 0 o i o 0 0 o to 'o o o to „? "? ?, f of+ S o 0 0
U- w z O N n n o O ui '- O O O ? M O In
Y
o
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
It
K
K
K
0
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
0
K O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O N O pp O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O

p
0
ZI+ Z < Z i .. ._.__. _....
J 0
J 0 O O O O O O O O O O P, O O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O
r O O o o O In
_
?
W O O O j
C
O
O
O W
Qp p
O
O
0
0
O
N

?'
to

r'
n

r
CO

n
O

r
I/1

1''

f
n
n

o
f

i

O

O

O

O

O
n

°
°

o

o

o

ow
o

"

n

O
M

N

S

N

1?
n

f
C
<L. li
o
0
0 a
o
G
O C%l n
O I.
C
C
M
G
C O
G
O , 8
h t?
C
no

LUD
NO
0
>
U

<
U

<
U

<
U

`
?}

<
U

<
UU

<

<
U

`

U

Q

<

<

<

U

<

<

<

<

U

U

U
UU

<
U

<
UU

a
U

<
U

<
U

<
CLO:

Ow

CL

w

M

0

o
1

f

O
f
N

O
I

h

N

1

M

f
N

S

I
?

N

O

I

f

?

n

N

0

0
-

0
O

f

N
<

N
^
<

a0

O
Q

?
<

t0
p
<

'-
<

N
?

n
Z

$

a

Of

0
f

f
Q

o

O
Pit

?- 0S
W
d? ? C C O o
O o
O O O 0 O O o o O O O o O O O O O 0 p
0 O n O O N/^

W
N
O
I -
S *
C4
I C4
O
C4 !2
O OD
0
1
O
O
O
O
I
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
If0
N
O
o
NM
N
a
W 0 O
0 0 0 0
O
-
N
W < < Z ? < ` < ` < ? Z < < < < < < < ? ? < U i Z Z <
?++

' If0 in N O t00 p
f
O p
1
O N N O C4 rl N n .i0? ?
p
S (7! p
ID <
N <
M <
O <
92, <
w p
0D
f
n dm
p
119
M pp
{O
N
Q n o O O O O O N O M O in ri O O ID O O M n C IG N N G INj
Q

U-

f
Ch

1

7

V

O

Iv1.

1A

to

10

`i m

m

ff

~S in

f

NS
to

S

W

rI

S

- r

O

f

N

O f

m

100

? M

nm

og pp

Ifl

S

p M

Nm

01

01

fN

t

l?

S

O`

1?/?

10 S n

_?tpp

p N

pIN

IA

?g

?

O

f n

f?

pp

/ m

.

_ 4m

f

fN

U

40

f
f
M

n

NO in

f<

ln
f
M

l
M
a0
f

ttpp
fp
1 1 1
O I 1 10 1 1 10 1 1 10 10 1 1 11 1 I S S I
1
10 N.1 -
10 N
0 N
0 81
10 p
n 1
1 oo
nN
10 N
10 N
0 N
0 N
0 p
1 tON
10 f
IO?
10 p I
0 no
10 n-
10 1
0 CDt1
10 aD-
10 OBIS
1 1 N1
10
I
10
10 8- 1
10
10 N I
10 N.1-
1 N^
10
1
o
IO
? 0
010
1C 1
w
C 1
IC
C4 n l
0/p
N
01f O

Olf n l
OIO
1
01f n l
OIO
1N
CIf 1
Ip

f 1
ro
N
f 1
In
N
f IA

N
f 1
?n
N
f 1
?f

f

f
IC4 1

IN N I
O
C4
I I
all
N
IN 1

IN N I
ON
IN N I
O
I
§ N
O
1 I
10
1? N I
0
1? ^ 1
ap
1 ^ 1
m
1^

1p ?

1p

1

1?

I^

z

Ol

Ol

f

01f

f

f

Off

01

OIf

f

01

f

f

Ifl ln

O

Of

of

pf

d

0
^ 0

0
^

0

0
^

0
O
O

z
O

9-1 0

O

0

O

0 N

S Np

°O Np

°O Np

°O
?m
Y
r
Y
Y
r
Y
r
r
r
Y
r
r
r
Y
r
Y
r
r
r
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
a

J
? ? z ? ? I lzil Izi1 ? ?p vzS a

d

1

!
? 11..??
K7
z
W J
`?

?
W Y?
&
02
_
W
OZ

W
05
2 t
OZ t
J
?
W
U

:11
S 1
YtJ

F M A P j

9
IJ t?
WtJ

N

K

,,
a
W L'i
4

L
W
E

K

K

C

C

K
SY

K

w

w

w

p I?W
O r
n r
Ss<
O
t
1 r
< < 5r< Y
< r
.y<
C < < r
?< Y
< t?
O I??
O r
S< < y?
O I??
O ? ? -j
y! a
.
O .3
O 43
O y2
O 8
O 131 4Ag a n A
J

z
g

w
,
?,
,
y?
l.lW

W
{J?1

.9
WW

2JI
O

Qg
W
W

i
?
W

??
W

?

"

?
W

?

Q

Q
?W
W
W O O O O
Q

o

v
x
?
3 V
?o
? 1
0
0
0
3
rJ
m
U
&
v
v
Q
Q
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
This project was previously approved by both DWQ and the USACE, however, the work has not commenced and the
permits have expired. The application was submitted 11-26-04. The original 401 Certification was issued 1-11-05 (DWQ
project # 04-1920). The USACE permit verification (NWP 14) was issued on 3-17-05 and expired 3-17-07 (Action ID
200020046). The original permit was for both the Third Fork Creek Southern and Northern trails.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
There are future plans for another section of trail north of this proposed project, however, it is a separate project and each
trail has a defined starting point and terminus. Each trail stands alone and the projects are not dependent on each other.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or impact (if known) DWQ - non-404, other)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.374 acre
2h. Comments: Please see attached Table 2.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
Stream impact Type of Stream name Perennial (PER) or Average stream width (feet) Impact
number - impact intermittent (INT)? length
Permanent (P) or (linear feet)
Temporary (T)
S1 ® P ? T culvert UT to TFC ? PER ® INT 2-3' 73
S2 ® P ? T culvert UT to TFC ? PER ® INT 2-3' 84
S3 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S4 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S6 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
3g. Total stream and tributary impacts 157 If
3h. Comments: Please see attached able 3 for stream impact site number and coordinates. All impacts are to unimportant
ditch/intermittent stream; perennial impacts have completely avoided with the most recent design changes (Aug 2009).
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version

SUMMARY OF IMPACTS FOR
THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL
DURHAM, NC 8/17/2009
SOUTHERN TRAIL
PIPE &
WETLAND TYPE OF PIPE TRAIL RIPRAP STREAM
SITE IDENTIFICATION IMPACT (lenath-LF) (area-SF) (area-SF) (length-LF)
SECTOR A
Al-7 impervious fill 258 65
SECTOR B
Al-4 boardwalk 0
Area B boardwalk 0
C1-5 impervious fill 406
D1-4 boardwalk 0
E1-4 boardwalk 0
Area F boardwalk 0
G1-7 boardwalk 0
SECTOR C
Al-6 boardwalk 0
61-6 impervious fill 200 160
D1-3 impervious fill 473
E1-4 fill leading to boardwalk 7
F1-9 impervious fill 540
G1-3 boardwalk 0
1-11-3 impervious fill 500
11-3 boardwalk 0
J1-7 impervious fill 1490 190 73
K1-4 boardwalk 0
1-14 impervious fill 870
M1-4 boardwalk 0
N1-5 impervious fill 320 650
01-5 impervious fill 400
P1-3 fill between boardwalks 700
Q1-2 fill between boardwalks 730
R1-6 impervious fill 750
137-COURTLAND DRIVE impervious fill 1640
COURTLAND DR - S1-2 impervious fill 2975
T1-4 impervious fill 600
T4-7 impervious fill 370
U1-7 impervious fill 605
1.18-11 impervious fill 880
V1-4 boardwalk 0
W1-4 impervious fill 250 260 84
SOUTHERN TRAIL
WETLAND TYPE OF PIPE TRAIL RIPRAP STREAM
SITE IDENTIFICATION IMPACT (length-LF) (area-SF) (area-SF) (length-LF)
SECTOR D - No impacts - trail has been realigned to higher ground
COLUMN TOTALS: 14,964 SF 1,325 SF 157 LF
ACREAGE: 0.344 ac 0.030 ac
SOUTHERN TRAIL TOTAL: 16,289 SF STREAM
0.374 ac 157 LF
Table 2. Proposed impacts to wetlands, Third Fork Creek Trail-South, Durham, North
Carolina.
Section C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Located Distance to Approximate
Impact Type of Area of within Nearest GPS
Site Number Impact Impact 100-year Stream Type of Wetland Coordinates
(indicate on (acres) Floodplain (UTM
Zone
ma) (es/no) (linear feet) ,
17
Sector A
Al-7 Fill 0.006 No 30 Forested wetland 684176
3977020
Al-7 Rip-rap
St
bili
ti 0.001 No 10 Forested wetland 684207
a
za
on
- 3977241
Sector B', s _
C1-5 Fill 0.009 Yes 60 Non-forested 684938
ROW 3977243
;
Sector C
131-6 Fill 0.004 Yes 0 Non-forested 685557
ROW 3978560
B1-6 Rip-rap 0.004 Yes 0 Non-forested 685557
Stabilization ROW 3978560
Dl-3 Fill 0.011 Yes 90 Non-forested 685589
ROW 3978598
E I-4 Fill 0.00002 Yes 0 Non-forested 685658
ROW 3978738
Fl-9 Fill 0.012 Yes 10 Non-forested 685728
ROW 3978827
H1-3 Fill 0.011 Yes 100 Non-forested 685847
ROW 3978979
J l -7 Fill 0.034 Yes 0 Non-forested 685962
ROW 3979166
J I-7 Rip-rap 0.004 Yes 0 Non-forested 685940
Stabilization ROW 3979336
L14 Fill 0.020 Yes 60 Non-forested 686133
ROW 3979372
NI-5 Fill 0.007 Yes 0 Non-forested 686252
ROW 3979513
N1-5 Rip-rap 0.015 Yes 0 Non-forested 686252
Stabilization ROW 3979513
01-5 Fill leading 0.009 Yes 125 Non-forested 686345
to boardwalk ROW 3979626
PI-3 Fill between 0.016 Yes 125 Non-forested 686345
boardwalks ROW 3979626

Q 1 2 Fill between 0.017 Yes
125 Non-forested 686345
boardwalks ROW 3979626
R1-6 Fill 0.017 Yes 0 Non-forested 686435
ROW 3979705
R to Fill 0.038 Yes 125 Forested 686483
Courtl and Dr Wetland 3980002
Courtland Dr Fill 0.068 Yes 0 Non-forested 686570
to S 1-2 ROW 3979799
TI-7 Fill 0.022 Yes 75 Non-forested 686711
ROW 3979983
U1-7 Fill 0.014 Yes 175 Non-forested 686733
ROW 3980025
U8-11 Fill 0.020 Yes 125 Non-forested 686733
ROW 3980025
WI-4 Fill 0.006 Yes 75 Non-forested 686869
ROW 3980292
W1-4 Rip-rap 0.006 Yes 45 Non-forested 686869
Stabilization ROW 3960292

TOTAL 0.374 ac*
* 0.045 acre of forested wetland
0.329 acre of non-forested wetlands
Table 3. Proposed impacts to streams, South Third Fork Creek Trail, Durham, North Carolina.
Section C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Length Average Approximate
Impact Site T e of of Stream Width of Acreage of Perennial or GPS
Number Im act
p Impact Name Stream Stream Intermittent? Coordinates
(indicate on (linear Before Impact (please specify) (UTM Zone
ma) feet) Impact 17N)
Sector C
Extension of Ditch
J1-7 existing 24" 73 UT to TFC 2-3' 0.0050 Intermittent/ 685962 3979166
culvert Unimportant
2 - 30" Ditch
WI-4 culverts 84 UT to TFC 2-3' 0.0058 Intermittent/ 686903 3980544
Unimportant
TOTAL

IMPACTS 157 ft* 0.0108 ac**
* All impacts are to intermittent/unimportant stream channel (ditches)
**All non-forested streams
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all o en water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
- Permanent (if
(P) or applicable)
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
M. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: N/A
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
5. Pond or Lake Construction NIA
If and or lake construction pro osed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ® Other: Jordan (Cape Fear)
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact (square Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
B1 ®P ? T Green-
way trail Third Fork Ck ? Yes ® No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
6h. Total buffer impacts 4,440 7,950
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are at 5 locations along the proposed trail and Third Fork Creek. See Attached Table or a
description of impacts by location. Impacts for the greenway trail are allowable under the Jordan Nutrient Rules Table of
Uses provided there are no practical alternatives. Most of the - 3.7 mile trail has been proposed outside of the buffers. This
trail design has been in place for several years prior to the Jordan Nutrient Rules effective date (8-11-09, 6 days ago). The
portions of the trail that encroach upon the buffers offer the best overall placement for the trail - the trail will be placed within
the existing sewer right-of-way, which is already disturbed. Moving the trail out of the 50-foot buffer in these locations would
require additional disturbance of forested wetlands, including clearing, within or just outside of the buffer area.
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
Table 4. Proposed impacts to riparian buffers, South Third Fork Creek Trail, Durham, North
Carolina.
Section C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
6. Individually list all impacts to riparian buffers below:
Buffer
impact Reason for Stream Name Buffer mitigation Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
location Impact required? (square feet) (square feet)
(Station)

Sta. 90+50 Greenway trail Third Fork no 0 700
Creek
Sta. 100-103 Greenway trail Third Fork
Creek no 2,340 2,300
Sta. 134-135 Greenway trail Third Fork no 540 900
Creek
Sta. 170-172 Greenway trail Third Fork
Creek no 1,560* 2,450*
Sta. 176-177 Greenway trail Third Fork no 0 1
600
Creek ,
TOTAL

IMPACTS 4,440 7,950
*Impacts at Sta. 170-172 are in an area that currently consists of paved parking lot that will be moved
9 feet to allow for the greenway trail.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Approximately 98% of the proposed trail route will follow existing sewer and road rights-of-way. The soils in and along
these rights-of-way have previously been disturbed and the corridors are maintained as non-forested areas. Placing the
trail along these rights-of-way reduces the amount of impact to non-disturbed areas and this design was considered to
have the least amount of impact. Additionally, this route will minimize necessary clearing and is in accordance with the
City of Durham's tree buffer ordinance - a 50-foot buffer was maintained from Third Fork Creek Trail, where feasible.
During the original permitting, the plans were revised several times after wetland delineation and consultations with the
Corps in order to avoid and/or minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas. Since the 2004 permit, impacts have been further
reduced by changing 1 perennial/important stream crossing with adjacent wetland impacts to a no-impact boardwalk.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The use of boardwalks are planned at 13 crossings to completely avoid jurisdictional impacts at these sites. One low rise
crossing (Sector C, line E) will be used to minimize stream impacts (Figure 3).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

®Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: N/A warm, cool, cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): N/A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.42 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h.. Comments: Requesting mitigation at a 2:1 ratio for 0.045 acre of forested riparian wetlands (=0.09 acre mitigation) and
1:1 mitigation for 0.329 acre of non-forested riparian wetlands, totaling 0.419 (-0.42) acre. Copy of application is attached.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier Required mitigation

(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6d. Comments: Mitigation is not required for the proposed buffer impacts.
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified

within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? [] Yes ® No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? ? Yes ? No
2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ? Yes ® No
2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? ® Yes ? No
3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction
3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater ? Coastal counties
management programs (check all that apply)? [_1 HQW
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the E] ORW
? Session Law 2006-246
approved stormwater management plan. ? Other:
3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Durham
3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? ® Yes ? No
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy
of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved
Stormwater management plan stamped as approved).
4. Information Re uired for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? 16.00%, see Table 1
4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per
General Certifications 3704 and 3705? ? Yes No
4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the
stormwater management plan.
4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted
for each stormwater BMP? ? Yes ? No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? ®Yes ? No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? ?Yes No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed Greenway Trail is intended for the public to enjoy the natural surroundings and will not encourage further
development in the area. Cumulative impacts to downstream water quality are not ex
ected as a r
lt
f thi
p
esu
o
s project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
There are no waste-generating facilities included in this project.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.0 November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
h
bit
t?
? Yes N
a
a o
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? ? Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A protected species survey was conducted (see attached report).
NC Natural Heritage Program GIS data, updated Dec. 2008 (including Natural Heritage Element Occurrence
Significant
,
Natural Heritage Area and Managed Area GIS layers.
USACE map "NC Counties with Hydrologic Basins with Rare Aquatic Species":
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS/esa/watersheds-rare-aquatic-species.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS: http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm;
This project is not located on the NC coast.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
? Yes No
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Letter from State Historic Preservation Office 11-13-02.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: A portion of the Third Fork Creek trail will be built in the regulated
100 year flood fringe. All box culverts over tributaries; boardwalks and other structur
h
b
es
ave
een designed to achieve a
no-rise condition using the requisite HEC modeling methods, and these calculations and certifications have been
approved by the local Durham FEMA Official. In addition, the remainder of the trail has been designed so that the net
result is that no fill or other materials will be placed in the 100 year flood fringe that would cause a chan
e in th
fl
d
g
e
oo
fringe cross section anywhere along the project limits, other than the structures described. (Submitted by Coulter, Jewell,
Thames, P.A.)
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Project engineer (Coulter, Jewell, Thames, P.A. has
flood layers depicted on drawings.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
P. Supplementary Information, continued
Jennifer M. Archambault, Agent
A VAIJU:,?PV A All A N 8-17-2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ApOic ntiAgent' Signature
(Agent's sig at re is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
L. ?. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: 200020046 County: Durham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: City of Durham, Parks and Recreation Department
Attn: Beth Timson
Mailing Address: 101 City Hall Plaza
Durham, North Carolina 27701 Telephone No.: [phone]
Authorized Agent: Dr. J.H. Carter III & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Tracy Rush
Mailing Address: Post Office Box 891
Southern Pines, North Carolina 28388 Telephone No.: [phone]
Location of property (road name/number, town, etc.): The Third Fork Creek Greenway project is approximately 5.5
miles in length, and travels from NC 751, 2000 feet north of Garrett Road (SR 1116), to the Norfolk-Southern
Railway, 1000 feet south of Fayetteville Road (SR 1118), in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina.
Site Coordinates: 35.9448 °N 78.9346 °W USGS Quad: Southwest Durham
Waterway: Third Fork Creek . River Basin: Cape Fear
HUC: 03030002
Description of projects area and activity (see page 2 for a summary of authorized impacts): Activities associated with the
proposed project include mechanized land clearing, excavation, the installation of culverts, and the placement of
fill (earth, riprap and pavement), necessary for the construction of the Third Fork Greenway Trail.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide or Regional General Permit Number(s): 14
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Todd Tugwell at telephone [phone], ext 26.
Corps Regulatory Official Date: 03/17/2005 Verification Expiration Date: 03/17/2007
Copy Furnished: NCEEP,1652 Mail Ser ice Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Page 1 of 2
Determination of Jurisdiction:
? Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
(Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
? There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
? The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference the
jurisdictional determination issued on (Action ID: ).
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The project site contains tributaries to Third Fork Creek, and adjacent wetlands, which
flow the Cape Fear River, a navigable waterway.
Corps Regulatory Officia&?D Date: 03/1712005 Determination Expiration Date: 03/17/2010
Cnmmarv of nthnrized ><mnacts and Reauired Mitigation
Action ID NWP / GP Open Water (ac) Wetland (ac) Unim ortant Steam lf) Important Stream (If)
# # Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
200020046 14 0 0 0 0.47 0 133 0 86

Impact Totals 0 0 0 0.47 0 133 0 86
Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (ac) 0.47 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (lf) 219
Required Wetland Mitigation (ac) 0.5 In-Lieu/EEP Required Stream Mitigation (If) 0
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions:
1. The permittee shall make payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in the
amount determined by the NCEEP, sufficient to perform the restoration of 0.5 acre of wetlands in the Cape Fear
River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03030002. Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only
after the permittee has made full payment to the NCEEP and provided a copy of the payment documentation to
the Corps, and the NCEEP has provided written confirmation to the Corps that it agrees to accept responsibility
for the mitigation work required, in compliance with the MOU between the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated
November 4, 1998.
Page 2 of 2
OF WATER
\o? pG
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 11, 2005
Ms. Beth Timson
City of Durham, Parks and Recreation
101 City Hall Plaza
Durham, NC, 27701
Subject Property: Third Fork Creek Trail
Third Fork Creek (Class C NSW, 16-41-1-12-(1)
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Ms. Timson:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 04-1920
Durham County
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 219 feet of streams (86 feet perennial, 133 feet intermittent) and 0.447 acre of
wetlands for the purpose of constructing the referenced park trail, as described within your application
received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on December 1, 2004, and in additional
correspondence received January 4, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the
impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and Randleman regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with
your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire
upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 211.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved Plan Location or Reference
(Units)
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Noce hCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Emolover - 50% Recvcled/10% Post Consumer Paoer
Ms. Beth Timson
Page 2 of 3
January 11, 2005
Stream 219 (feet) PCN form
Wetlands 0.447 acre PCN form
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
Ms. Beth Timson
Page 3 of 3
January 11, 2005
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the
stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern and longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each
culvert. The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization
techniques must be used where practicable instead of rip rap or other bank hardening methods. If
rip-rap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the stream bed, unless specifically approved by the
Division of Water Quality. Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure continuity of water
movement and be designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh at 919-
733-9721 or Eric Kulz in the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Lit C
Cur
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWKlcbk
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
cc: Jay Carter, P.O. Box 891, Southern Pines, NC, 28388
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 041920ThirdFork(Durham)401
IN-LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Print this form, fill in requested information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-1652, fax to 919-715-2219, or email toValerie.MitchenerCcDncrnail.net. Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes (location map is required).
C";:0i?i CT IN I"0 RMAI]I'DN APIPLICAiNI'S AGL.14'(
1 Business or Individual Name
2. Street Address or P O Box
3 City, State, Zip
4 Contact Person
_ __ ____ _ ___ __;Mfr??,?-??.;%?\?t:L,fv?v?tr??-?'" ._?>??r?_? ? _.IL!??
5. Telephone Number {; 1
Y
I.-
16 . Fax Number 11 7 E-Mail Address (optional) t
....._...
PROJE-iCT INFORMATION
8. Project Name
9. Project Location (nearest town, city)
'"AT I ACH MAP SHOWING IMPAC l 1. UC ATION " ? /L?
10. Lat-Long Coordinates (optional)
11. Project County
12 River Basin
13. Cataloging Unit (8-digit) (See Note 1)
02
,?-? Z
14. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13) © ?c k 1. t r rti+t c , >.? 1
15. Non-Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
16. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
17. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
(See Note 2)
18. Buffer Impact-Zone (sq. ft.) (e.g. 12,345)
(See Note 3)
19. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
(Indicate names, if known)
20 Other Regulatory ID Information
(e.g., USACE Action ID, if known)
I ,PORTS T
Check (J) below if this request is a:
- revision to a current acceptance, or
- re-submission of an expired acceptance
- extension of unexpired acceptance
NIA
rm Cool
.......... -1.1-.1-1.11.11.1-
Zone 1 Zone
USACE: DWQ:
S"gnature of Applicant or Agent:
Uate:_
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, go to EPA's "Surf Your Watershed" web page:
http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm Note (9) above: requirement to attach location map.
Note 2: For guidance on stream temperatures, go to:
htto://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/WETLANDS/Mitiaation/Documents/Stream/Appendices/ADDendixl.r)df
Note 3: Buffer mitigation applicable only in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico and Catawba river basins, and the Randleman Lake
Water Supply Watershed. Direct all questions to Valerie Mitchener at 919-715-1973 or valerie.mitchenerCcDncmail.net
Statement of Compliance with Session Law 2008-152 An Act to Promote
Compensatory Mitigation by Private Mitigation Banks
(link to SL 2008-152)
Prior to accessing the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) In-Lieu Fee
Mitigation Program, all applicants are now required by law to comply with
Session Law 2008-152 An Act to Promote Compensatory Mitigation by Private
Mitigation Banks. All new requests submitted on or after Oct. 1, 2008 MUST
include this form signed and dated by the permit applicant or an authorized
agent. Applicants with unexpired acceptance letters may continue with their
plans to use the In-Lieu Fee Program or withdraw their request and seek other
available mitigation options.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand SL-2008-152 and have, to the best of my knowledge,
complied with its requirements.
Please check all that apply:
There are no known private mitigation banks with the requested credit type
located in the hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWQ
Fist).
I have contacted the mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts
will occur and credits are not available.
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private
mitigation banks.
A
S4 nature of Applicant or Agent
l ?- -.
Date
J?cjAi-4u, AY07-v,,,,rW(_)cu1+-
Printed Name
DR. J.H. CARTER III & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 891 • Southern Pines, N.C. 28388
[phone] • Fax [phone]
15 June 2009
Mr. Dan Jewell
Coulter, Jewell, Thames, P.A.
111 W. Main Street
Durham, NC 27701
Dear Mr. Jewell:
This letter is in reference to your request for a protected species survey for federally-listed
plants and animals within the proposed Third Fork Creek Greenway (Southern Phase) corridor in
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina (NC). The project corridor begins at Garrett Road Park near
the intersection of Garrett Road (State Route 1106) and Hope Valley Road (NC Highway 751), runs
generally northeast for approximately 5.3 miles and terminates at the end of Courtland Drive. As of
June 2009, 3 species were listed as Endangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for Durham County: the red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis), smooth
coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). The RCW is listed as of
historic occurrence.
The project corridor was surveyed on 28 May 2009 for federally-listed species. Known
populations of Michaux's sumac and smooth coneflower were inspected prior to the surveys to
determine their general condition and detectability at this time of year. Michaux's sumac populations
were fully vegetated and easy to detect. Smooth coneflower populations located within Durham
County had basal rosettes, however, no plants were flowering or had a flower scape. This species is
most easily detected and distinguished from other Echinacea species by its characteristically tall
flowering stalk and large, purple, drooping flowers.
The RCW is endemic to mature, fire-maintained pine forests in the southeastern United States,
where it was historically common. Typical nesting habitat includes pine or pine-hardwood stands with
a minimum age of 80 to 120 years where the RCW excavates nest and roost cavities in living pines.
The RCW requires a large area of pines > 30 years old for foraging habitat, with a foraging preference
for pine trees >I 0 inches in diameter at breast height. Logging, fire exclusion and conversion of
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments • Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting
forestlands to agricultural and other uses have destroyed most of this species' habitat. The project
corridor and surrounding area did not provide suitable nesting or foraging habitat for the RCW.
Michaux's sumac occurs in sandy or rocky open woods and is dependent on disturbance to
maintain the open quality of its habitat. Many occurrences of this species are in artificially disturbed
habitats such as highway and powerline rights-of-way (ROWs). Major threats to Michaux's sumac are
fire suppression, habitat conversion, hybridization, geographic isolation and fungal disease.
Smooth coneflower occurs in dry open woods, clearcuts, on roadsides and in powerline ROWs,
usually on magnesium and calcium rich soils associated with gabbro and diabase. Natural community
types containing smooth coneflower include Xeric Hardpan Forest and Diabase Glade. Soil series'
typical of these communities include Iredell, Misenheimer and Picture. Optimal sites provide abundant
sunlight and little herbaceous competition.
The project corridor consisted of a heavily disturbed sewer ROW within the floodplain of Third
Fork Creek and a few road ROWs in a heavily developed suburban neighborhood. Road ROWS were
frequently mowed and were unsuitable habitat for either species. The sewer ROW had a dense
herbaceous cover of fescue (Festuca elation) mixed with horse nettle (Solanum carolinense), several
sedges (Carex spp.), witch-grasses (Dichanthelium spp.), soft rush (Juncus effusus) and vines,
including poison-ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) and
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Soils within the corridor are mapped as Chewacla and
Wehadkee soils, which are poorly drained and located on floodplains (Soil Survey of Durham County,
North Carolina, 1976).
Conditions within the project corridor were unsuitable for Michaux's sumac and smooth
coneflower. The proposed project will have no effect on species listed as Threatened or Endangered,
or proposed for such listing, by the USFWS. Please contact me if you have any questions concerning
this information.
Sincerely,
?
?f I', "O
Jennifer M. Archambault
Wildlife Biologist
Endangered Species Surveys • Environmental Assessments 9 Land Management • Wetlands Mapping and Permitting

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
November 13, 2002
Alicia Jackson
Dr. J H Carter III & Associates
PO Box 891
Southern Pines NC 28388
Re: Recreational Greenway, Durham, Durham County, ER 02-11306
Dear Ms. Jackson:
Thank you for your letter of October 18, 2002, concerning the above project.
Division of Historical Resources
David J. Olson, Director
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources
which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as
proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all
future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
avid Brook
DB:kgc
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone] •733-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 2 7699-46 1 8 [phone] •715-4801
I
CJ 79°1000° re°05(10 s Continue on Page 19 7
•79.1667` DA MLLE VA 79.0033° ROXBORO? 78°52'30"
36°07'30
° r
x I SANS ARxsu P° 157r x ? ? I\
NCH CLAPA pPWf / "4p N o 86 57 ? / 9 P'Pq? ti ° / I\\ BE
F 1 D P° % ci } ¢ / MPs ° 9N / /.q, ?.,. 1 Il
1 %
LEBPNON PD _ F c f --_ U E ?x0 I? ° % / \ {? A 9 _ \
p E ? GO q?P I ' CU) / EBENFZEP I ? r ? ? ? 9o i L E OR_.
X50 0 42Y N M I \.t CHURCH PB S' _ ` RD
_ 9 Q ? r
`i - ?' ICI ,ILJ
3
n / DUK'E?OR)rST -? ?° -b os I ? 93 OI ) ?
ax
=y L,?.56 GH DIVISION
F iew ,. o sP° 1
t ,oT fir' ' L 36°05.60
'ENO RIVER -, r 0 Euu ? -STATE PARK `... z - __ - P „FPt<* P i 36.0833`
- E EFlandEe His o g s o ou9k 70 Co MOUn[a T yl L 7 $T _
•_I6
M t Ns`/ m?'FfF?oHE
- _ V e ( 96 RI Ile Park
1
_ - 'h ?EOno Po xo ib-?pFY-
!
Ps ? I P ° °'O"?'ef 16 BISON
1980 ?Tx i-? ? ? ? ? ,roxr Poof /? ? ? B ,- ?[ NEaxox A
1 \ ': e 5 p 9q a
? I Q ' \ E OIL r a" W?LJ /r f'1 ? _
4 of 40 _ -Exr
f V
/ 261
? _ 157
p ,, =, , r 65 9 5P
L.
DUKE FOREST _ ? .cpW A s sal
l ? _ ? KENO DIVISIONS I2
_ I s= I "-_ . o. _ ,,? '.e° oLO x 70 and.E? csolsl actor
J I-. PDT P .\ / ,ld 1I5
_ I l q r ? ? ?? ° EA Ben ett a 11
tNEµtA a ..-PO rn 751 85
OU a ?' I r
?? ?' ewrlN e?li -I-Hup?
_ HiII
00.4W0 ( 0 DDMRDI VI ON L_:. k o fl 55
,
so I
\
Nuq uN s Po 17 W
y q r"Nr P+ G. TYB1x \ r - 11. °L sN [/q? 6 ,s 36.00001
? oUx ? 0 9R
1 ,
\ I ._ _ Bla k.. .d
? P 50,
o
°
1 crow I, ???? 86 v? _? l PICrc7 - - la7'
m z g
o a 61fi L?
LO P e° _
Eubankd / nE,e I ) i5 + -
!r ! c :roaa EueAxxs Po - -
3
PO PNOPEOS. it _ °i( //
lffP / ? `? ? \ I W 40 %I - dnPPE
L \-, -N -? qay
o NI 751 / ?I? Re
c° y ! - '- - 55
> x MCC
LAJ 4 MC a n? CHAPEL Ll N
LEY i alveMer HN' / / \\ 09
?? e° I eW la
x orac ?j -1 a 7? o kl[p9nT L ?h
? f r R
8
[
- -7 I 54 II \ I I cs ??
o I
? ? ?V l 1
\ c o 35° 55.00-
-C 35.9167"r-
'-
I
_: Sa E 5 ? ? 1 ? f 86 ?L ?`?` q4' 15 zxe °1 ? 9 a 40 ??.: ? `
' /` zxlr, r sal oa cl
G EExse xo HWN I \ fly \ 0 4(j' k0 54 2
- 9 °? t. - ? ?? Nf e 1? p n c er'2;0? 501 54
lu, _. a\ ° a ? BIN \ 1 ??? „at Hap I FHi''II .va5oN:? : ee P .
2 / i I? J - 2 111 m - " ?,
?N AV
P° I 1 c ?- M ??? MACC. I el flav sb , C. ta, cah I - a oP? 7 P?, L E o y?
r `? / ° l- °jYO R m6 °? Er oa,.. E ?'a arrden a uiax'a, sF
' r µP ?S A ?P e a
aal - P o -
i -? ' l o Po S q9 Y y I\ ?xo 1 - C
\o -_. _s s j - eq _ -I I I4 s es Le
_ P
s ?
URcO
•(¢(1PO ign -? ?.7 i `? Z 1--a -C11 T Y CO ?,_a., q Ly o^=? kr o
caw
fPP. - - - r ty
EMOPE ea 11ty 9 9f ?" °i - 751 ??< C
W m
x
a r ? _
_ o? j °E[Y I Z`3
LAMOPt q 0 PC a l ? x CNUACM D
MANNS CHAPEL
4
NEW OPE GAME AND I r „ / d[s 55 _?'..,
POLKS
? 35'50'00..
L r. -. / a uxm rP. x
.8333x,
9 /' q\? Rd Bo the C?'9?- ?lq0 _ I / y¢
/ ? aoPf o?q?<< I s s CAAPENTER
FlP
1 0 f r, - _ sm
OAN HILL w gWKFH VCNENPS -- -_ PfW o q 1 W w P w
- ' / 0 RERNO HO / B f PO ew?.iope (Yqr. _ m q I _ 3
/.. I \ I °a a JACK eENP tt ¦ R9gG N Fq - . L? ; c
fl0_ / 90 7 0 EW9
J S 9Nf PO C ? Pb J
?\ EP ST P°sP I (`2 e° .1 OS BZ PELLL E M / 9?fF9
S
i r ;qo r / / - Far.mRlon \I. -q_ eggc[9 j oH_ I GPEex Ir o0
I ¢ /
1
z9 q??"D o I
i \? iY'' i' flH'N(Frs / > ¢P x / - , X -PC
/
V -
f r - _ '.L os R
i
ri ,x-_ 0 501 15 0 i_r1/ : aiNE to
[ vv i - _ ? Po 2 - - I B2
1 e? \ _ zLFYEI 1 ,
°xos
-- Y,m, m qyL cornett ?° I q0 IG1 EExv vEl ___
BE.
a BIE0E PO 1 - E9r
a I _ 1 u „fP GS `e° ? 01
H
\- ?' _ CFt R 0.e
_ L
- I n
S?? . ?? ?? \p? far. J - ? 1'_,? ). ?f?a ??.'•' ??a?F7,??9
•??? r. ? t??? i,l i ? ?I A„ BM?3 ( ? -w i n ti iI 41 ?? •. •. i? ? ? o
I )j
Sk .4-
South Boundaries Park
;? U r r ?._ ; ? Sew °• ` . ` \ ~?? . ; ?s 4gcl,?/;?t - t-? t.-: ?6 E • . J?l
?j ,."? -? UippesJll _ `• y ,1', 1.. / .?• ?r ?•, • J??
? ? ? •? ,/ ;VY e;sWe ? ? ??-Y .7. ?"`? Y?' nom., ?-?_?• "? al r ????? ,jl ??
tt '\ ?? r?u: as d I. f S Z?? ?'
`,• ?, ?1 4. •?#? ? .? ? 1 '? '' J?. :3?' r /j?'? ?? i??. a ?? ?-? ',rte _;?.
rr.. i• , It y ( /
/X/;
iove'volley
`?. fir `1a. - rCOUnlry Woa'?
' ?'? ? ?! • 1..% 1. ? I ?:+1^ . \, ? ? SCI T: f' ,J ' II ..,/?._. ?i 1 ? Y' • "? ? ._ -
{ Proposed greenway trail,
Hope Valley Rd.
Garrett Rd.
c1l
y J„ f
7
124
'J j
? ? U'?ti ben- Jordan -? ?'. ? .? ?.?rr`? ..? 7 _ ?? / -? / ?• Jl? ??? _.
.,I • - i Jr-!'r HIKb : h _ 7 _ ?.J•i -y?„_ / r i,
Garrett Road Park -
i .p?a j ' .Sta. Ja9
Location of the proposed 'T'hird Fork Creek Southern Greenway, Durham, Durham County, North Carolina.
0 0.5 1
Miles
Aerial photograph showing the proposed Third Fork Creek Southern Greenway, Durham,
Durham County, North Carolina.
0 0.5 1
Miles
v
raPni IN/' - SHEET NUMBER 30
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROL
2 020 000 FI_ w C
WsB WsE WsB \ / Wh WsC CrB �y"...� F
�' \J 1 Ws6
WsE V�
WvE2 / \ m \ _ WsB
z J r
WsE /" `WsC �(
W %5,wsc Wsc: i
E Ur wsc
w5�\
3 /: WSC ` /Ch t `.
Ws6 I
\ Gu
y ' Gu wsE —WsB p
WsE
WSC / WsC Ch� WSC WsC
a WsB
�� I WSC c
Ro •� ' n
l
/ co sC
WsB
WsE/ WsC
WsB w Cc Qk
Cof ;j / WSC 3:. Gu
WsB / w
� r'v'�%_• WsB PfE
1 Mfc WSC Pf.E ` \WSC
WsE
WSC 11 -
m U 1 WvC2 Gu'...��
o M WsE �J / C�� U U Q /. cc se /
o O f1SC._ �( Ch ' WvC2 GrB , 3 _�� W5E Ws \
Z
EGy i -..- WvC2 Ws_.,,�. i WSC WSC
o Q '/ MfC WsB q WsB
WSC \
awp GrB
cn , \ U , \ Gu PIC
u o w 3 l
Wsc I" Gu WvC2 /
I— d GrcWs6 _..
O l —P \ /
WSC s
o Z c WB!
0
AIA Gu[ysC \ Gu .
o �
f— WsE �� WsB I ` � •"� 0
p Z N
CrUr G<
c \ c, 3%
x Oc \Gu j
u , GU — _ _= wsc —I, WsB<
v fi —
wsc
a Q A .� W
= W5E WsB �`—__ _ ti I ' WsB ti ws6 t cc
5 of
3� ef� Gr6
Heb
CrC \ W5C /' �� GrB / Ur
WSt� Gu /ice
6 CrC (/ WsB, �. U
PiE
MfCS .2, /u /
N /
-Ny CrB
WE MfD CrC / ld l Berea . Cc
QEF PfE \ Cc WsB 1 WSC
\ i ,Church N
� —
Gu
Ws6
i Ws� Wn Wn
IV
wl
uu WSC
PfE
WVC2 WvC2 CrC
IrB WsB z-
WsE o // j/ WSC
WSC
WsC \\ WsE 2oP \ 1 WsC \
2 1 l
MfC WsE � �� G 11 } \ Ch
/%1 ` WSC II
PfC \ /'Gu �a II 0 WsB
PfE Gu /WvC21 Zcl wsc . /! �— Cr6
\\ WsB WsB-Ws(
;,,
WsB
i �/- WsE GrB
WvC21'
` 1 '1NsB Ur 6G / Cc I ri WvC2: T \.
WsE! WsCs0 Ch, WSC
w y3`�-'f CrB
WsE --- ------ - \.
W� ---"

5-TV E A M CCOSS1 KY-,-
5ECTOW- G UMt1
USACE AID#
DWQ#,
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FM STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AW
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Cl- V 0 F L i4rrl 2. Evaluator's name: 7ELq kIJSN
3. Date of evaluation: it - 19 - O L4 4. Time of evaluation: I S a -M
5. Name of stream: ? -}? l1 rJ rD r IL G-Q k 6. River basin: C&bQ, ?Q Y
7. Approximate drainage area: ?" 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: at) ?4- -kA 10. County: V r? &VI
11. Site coordinates (if knowcn): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): O p
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ] ?] 4o . 51 ) N Longitude (ex. -77.556611): M c 51.2 D L 1 W
Method location determined (circle): GPS opo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note near y roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
splo-I?V '1Al pbttl 6.PA1k2fr?% f7rial Dr?vP rkvxel t--IA-MnC.WA Coovt
14. Proposed channel work (if any):- C.l.) I V t? r+ -Vh r h 1 K i rL g rt r&i
J
15. Recent weather conditions:- _L! V SEASo r" I U War rn rI
16. Site conditions at time of visit: a °
17. Identify any special waterway classificati ns known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: $% Residential % Commercial Q% Industrial U % Agricultural
Ll-% Forested -a% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( r 11
22. Bankfull width: 2-3 -WeA 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): Z - 3 +?? T
24. Channel slope down center of stream: --V/Flat (0 to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 2-6 - Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 11-2-10-64
This channel evaluation form is intend to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the U ited States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
LIME T
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
# CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
1
(no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max oints 0-5 0-4 0-5
Evidence of past human alteration
2

extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5
'

3 Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4
2
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max oints -

5 Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
U no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = max points)

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2 ?
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max points) J
Entrenchment / floodplain access

(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)
0-5
0-4
0-2 I

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j
0-6
0-4
0-2

1
(no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points) I
9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3
Q
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = max oints
11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5
I
fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5
'
>? (deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points)

13 Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5 Z
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max oints

14 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
H no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5 2
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points) J
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6
D
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = max points)

17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6
I
F.? little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4
1
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 0-5 0-5
O
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
0 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4
?
O no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max oints
04
O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
b
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5
I
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 6
S
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
Project Name: EeMW Iti?_. Basin: C&pe- Fiat' County: D v v ham Evaluator: t4t4
Ay 1,
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Latitude: Signature: In
-Third its k e g 35° 5to.511D N ? C-
Date: 1 i - lq- bq USGS QUAD: SW [vt ha w? Longitude:=16., 27 L ation/Directions.
. 5L
PLEASE- NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature Is a man-trade ditch, then use of th orm is not `5TeEA M
necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural cvzoSS 1 $16-
stream-this rating system should not be used* 5EGTbg C
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line) L I rJ E J
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active
3) Does Topography Indicate A ?
Natural Drainage Way? 0 ( 5 J D I T? N 1 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOL 0 G Y INDICA TOR POINTS.-
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
1.5
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS.
H. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS.-
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(' NOTE: if Total Absence OjAU Plants in Streambed 2 1 .75 .S 0 0
/c Nnf d dA-- Car,. 7%;. Co.- rnVF COO of IF SE CO NDA R Y B IO L O G Y I ND I CA T O R

TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent) n 0
1/0
Seurov- C .11--}
Sl y-ElgM cabs) N G
5E670C C L1 k1F- vJ
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
t?,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: r
1. Applicant's name: Clay D1= bij lt_11Am 2. Evaluator's name: ?2l?Ly Lt),;
3. Date of evaluation: t I - l 11 -64 4. Time of evaluation: S a vn
5. Name of stream: OT ib %i 1rA rV--6rPO L 6. River basin: Ci8 _ Ft&V
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: so xe.A 10. County: y y w?
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): l
Latitude (ex. 34.8723 12): ASS T.Olta M Longitude (ex.-77.55661 1): a%4 -55-(0t'D1q W
Method location determined (circle): GPS opo Shee Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note near y roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
Trout Waters -Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters -Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluatior
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: S50/o Residential
L% Forested
22. Bankfull width: 2 -3 lee
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Flat (0 to 2%;
i point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? Sw
--L% Commercial ,Q% Industrial Q% Agricultural
Q% Cleared / Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): to"
1 entle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) -Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight-Occasional bends -Frequent meander -Very sinuous -Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 32- - Comments:
Evaluator's Signature _t ," L E..Z " Date // -uo -01
This channel evaluation form is intend to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
b
16. Site conditions at time of visit: L7 _v d u;A
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: -Section 10 -Tidal Waters -Essential Fisheries Habitat
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET L l W F= W

#
CHARACTERISTICS' . ECOREGION POIN T RANGE
SCORE
Caastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools In stream
1 no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5
Evidence of past human alteration
2 extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points) 0-6 0-5 0-5
Riparian zone
3 no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points 0 - 6 0 - 4 0 - 5 2-
of nutrient or chemical discharges
4
4 extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4
a Groundwater discharge

U 5
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = max oints 0-3 0-4 0-4

6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2 ?
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max points) \ J

a Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 2
" (deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points

8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
j
0 - 6
0 - 4
0 - 2
no wetlands = 0; large ad
acent wetlands = max points
Channel sinuosity
9 extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-3
Sediment input
10

deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = max points) 0-5 0-4 0-4
2 -
I 1 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
Size NA* 0-4 0-5
fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max oints
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 2

(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points) -
13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0-5
2
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5
Z
H no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = max points)

15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5 COvts
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max oints o?
16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes

• 0-3 0-5 0-6
D
no riffles/riles or pools = 0
well-developed = max points)
F 1 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6
little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max points)

18 Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = max oints
19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4
'
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
=
•
i 0-4 0-5 0-5
>4 no evidence = 0
common numerous types
max po
nts)
0 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4
b
O no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max oints
W l
O
22 Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5
2
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) Z
,uL,ii 0
Ain
L 04-lu
til
V9
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
• NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: _DU12N ?°t-\ Ri. -Basin: C e County: DOr yldr.,, Evaluator: -1 ip-goy P-US14
67-e-E EIS bt! 141 e d Y
DWQ Project Number: Neareg Named Stream: Latitude: Signature: /11
Ihirc3?prLi?yQQk 3?°•?56?1+J
Date: E 1 - O t} USGS QUAD:
Longitu4,, a 5 S gLcation/Directions:
*PLEASE- NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made duc then use o?h orm is not g-T ??A yyl
necessary. Also, if in the best professional Judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural
stream-,this rating system should not be used* C 0-055 1
Primary Field Indlcat6m '(Circle One Number Per Line) S Er-To 1z C,
LINE W
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 1 3
('NOTE, X-Red & Bank Caused By Llitchi r And WITHOUT Sinuo itv T en Score 0')
10) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated /"•
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
H. Hvdroloev Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Dischuge Present? 0 2 3
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:.
PRIMARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS ?,
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR
II. Hvdrologv Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
n------ . __
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0
•'° °" "" ' oe10%
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
7 .5
1.5
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV v Mostly OBL MO y FA Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above Skin TMs Step UNLESS SAV Pm nt*).
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS.Q-
T O7'f1L POINTis (Primary + Second
ary?= (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least
Intermittent)
26 .-4S
Intermittent / Unimportant (no aquatic life)
Durham Greenway Stream Crossing Sector C Line W (36" culvert)

impact

pipe/riprap
?5
DS DELI NEATIGN-"-?
RA„ AREA Al -7

8-2-04
10
a

t

/j

Rua=Z.`,3 s
OUT=247..:

« A f
\ B-D3
AO'
B 4 /
B- B-D2,0 Ail
`t 1
no trai impact l • •,?
1, l
4 \
• , standard
` PT STA boardwalk
6+592
PC S
36+41. t
4-4
,? oa ay ???1 1 . TA 364
flat
B-C b ardwalk
trail i act !
B- 1 B-C4
PT
35+3 }61 _
1? A 35+0.00
B-C3
PC S
34+6 n
WETLANDS DELI EATIO %
SECTOR B, AR A C1-5
B-C2
SECTOR B, A EA D1-4:
L ;-
1 "=30' N
8-2-04
,
/ v
entire sheet
in floodplain
}

ail impact
tandard -G1
oardwalk ,? ?\
IPC
J PT
g+
9?
T TA -G6 °o
9+46.00 j
r G2.
i ? ? B-G
r
? 1 B-G3
+°? WETLANDS DELINEATION 1 "=3o'
SECTOR B, AREA G1-7 8-2-04

00
strea impact
oo?
0
?-sided culvert
entire sheet r
in floodway
0:1 %trailli do
9+4
PT STA , o
9+28.0
C=134 CV
PC STA 1 C=C2
.. 8+92.48 ?'s
/
C-B1
C-135
TA 88+0.00
no trail impact
C-
C-Al i flat
?
boardwalk/
/
?-A4 / stream impacts
STA C C-A
3.36
! t J
S? o
i `
WETLANDS DELINEATION
f SECTOR C, AREA Al -6
l SECTOR C, AREA B1-6
1 »=30'
8-2-04
i
i tr
10
D _
C-68
trail impact
10
STA 92+0.0
Ss C-`C7
10
1
14 2
D
o
1?o°a - - - - - - - - -
77\
-C5
i' TA 91+0.00
PT STA
90+8815 _ .
i C-C4
90 9 5
C- ,.
1
i+
PT STA
8$+91. -
r•
C-83 WETLANDS DELINEATION
X0:1 tcAil ' _ SECTOR C, AREA C1-8
• • SECTOR C, AREA D1-3
N 1 »=30, N
2 C'64 _ 8-2-04
S _ C_C2-
-Ql
entire sheet
: in floodway
C
im trail on this \
sheet entirely
in floodway
i ,
R
P
i?
C-G1
ETLANDS DELINEATION
SECTOR C, AREA G1-3
SECTOR C, A EA 1-11-3
no impact

1
1 "=30'
8-2-04
tre?r?r ptact /•
•d
TA 111+0.0
PC STA )l

no impact
PT STA
109+11.81.
/
l?
/ C-J5
PT
11 0.3'1
PC STA _
110+46.97 C-
rip rap
PT STA impact
110+36.
" C-J1
PC STA
109+99.05
j
i
f
'2 - C-11-
1
W NDS DELINEATION
CTOR C, AREA 11-3
N
i
jp
30'
1`30)
8-2-04
trail on this sheet
in floodway

TA 1
C?

f
i
i
T -
pipe impacts _ 11a
00,
C J7
trail pact
PT STA
1
PC +39.65
STA - - - -,f" - -
111+30.28 ?•
t 'I i ct r - - - - - -
d
Cr
TA 111+0.
_ C-J5 r
PT streom impact
11 .3.1
% WETLANDS DELINEATION
rip rap '`. • . ?- - SECTOR C, AREA J1-7
impact
/J
1 "=30' 8-2-04
41
J' )7
/ .
entire sheet TA 116+0 ?
in floodway 9
i
i
no impact - g?? f% ?/
A 115+0.0
P
STA
114+57.76
C STA
114+45.49
/A-
C- 1
TA 114+0.00 ? -
i -K2
i
i
i
.i
113+0.
WET NDS DELINEATION
SE TOR C, AREA K1-4
- N
1 30
` 8-2-04
?1' ° C P
END BW
Rat 125+38.96 /
/
entire sheet b ardwat.,
in floodway
/
BW STA
- 125+06.94
TA 125+0.
TARTBW
124+94.1 ' c 3
C-
d
-M4
- - d/ SS
- / / C-M1
i? • _ / _
/ no _
- - d impact
trail impact
TA124+O.Q - - . . _ -
/
/
/

WETLANDS DELINEATION
SECTOR C, AREA 1-14
SECTOR C, AREA M1-4
lV- IMI R-P-n4
LL.
.r t=
,l
gz
c Be
', •• .. .. AA 'J trail imp.
I# AA A-
I
• A
--
I Q - - ?. - -R6
A /
trail impact i
C-Q
l•
..1
,
C A' C-PS
A•?
- ,l
WE LANDS DELINEATION
stan? SE C, AREA 01-5 -8
?r boat w SECTOR C, AREA - 8-2 04
SECTOR , AR Q 1.3
trai impact SECTOR R1
f ? A
II
II ?
24.7
II
h
II
h , y-
II /
II ,
It
/
II /
r.?
IZ
..0
?o
o_
o?
Uv ,
ss 3.9
IANIELS -
R-10
-? N 89'17°00" E _----------? /,
0719 0 99-8483 3;
418- -? 06A trail impact
MAY WILLIA!?1 & 1??o2WATSON ,
BOOK D/2`0 N N 2: RSG? 3 \II? ???
LS E: 1 FA M
>28
3/4" Iron PipeY X
1430 S A
REA
3/4 Ira-, P;wo a E
N AI M23"

A
?l r ^D+
/ A r
1d ?
r
/ r
r r
r
r
r
r r
47AT
' ,11M °11
° E N 89°50'08' E
? J
N
_ss- o
4" 1 .' ?P

i CITY 9FE
\?AoCITY
DB 2
aZ 0 N
USE
i
\
r
r r \
r r
r r
r r
X?
J
*ORD 09.5+ ? 2g'S 6'
I.P.S. cs??
? r
sass' i .,.
/J r
r
r r
141
ww' r' C-S2
WElLANDgg NATION
SECT RIJ
SEw RC
wr
ior m ` l
w I
LLpp w
LANDS DELINE 0
SECTOR C, AREA 6-7
;' SECTOR C, AREA 1-
l'-80'8-2-04
• ; y?r
i
' A
-R6 '
?'? ooa
.? i f rq
/ L :l 4 a .JU /
? x28T
C-T3 f
C-T2
t JI: J: Jf
u_ aea / J: „a:
14
C-T1
standard boardwalk
J J
f C-T7
trail im
J. 1. s
J
J<
J:
C-T4

standard boardwalk
trail impact
i ,,VETLAND,S DELINEATION
SECT R , AREA T1-7
N j'
"=30'
8 2 04 J
entire sheet
in floodway

,I -U7
C-U a
i f
f
i /
C-U4
u
w y? J
1 ?v <
.L
trail impact
trail impact
?j WETLANDS DELINEA ION
SECTORC, AREA U 1-
N
1 12 = 30
8-2-04 /

-? i
r
'
entire sheet
in floodway T? ?62x /? V j
WETLANDS DELINEATION
SECTOR C, AREA U8-11
SECTOR C, AREA V1-3
1 "=30' N c
8-2-04a>?
vi
y _
flat boardwalk
k
D r
i ;•
i
l
-U1 / trail impact r
9B j? `%r
-Ul
?i
j -U8
!! 1
+r/J
;
??' no impact
err
?, W rr
i _
,?? app • ;?
-• O
'`' i trail hnpart /'
pipe impact
4 • e impa ?
W W3
ETLANDS DELI EATION ,
SECTOR C, AR V3-4
SECTOR C AREA W1-4
r ,,r
ii WZ
r1 =30" N
8-2-04
r
r '
r v/
'9162x ?,r ;
?' ,? MH / i
%106.8 '1 ?
01
t
t
f
PC STA
78+02.19
r 'a
t y ? ?
no impact PT STA 4 c'"
_177+04.64
WETLANDS DELINEATION; STA 1774.00
SECTOR D w y W
F 'PC A
N 76+81. ct??
1'=30"
Creek
PT STA /
i' 176+43.06 /
f
/ I l ' ~ ~
/ / MATCHIdNE 0 / l ' ~~j ~ MATCHLINE 0 ~ ~
/ ;~I i , ~ I a
/ / / / w
p / ' ~ ~i / ~3~/ / ~ / I ~ I I `III : i I / ~
/ / I_ I ~ 1\ l x
/ i a TREAM REPAIR AREA / / o 's / / p~ti~ / I I~ o A I ~ a
/ j RE: 4/D-4 / / - ~ k / / ~ / / I~ I ~ I I \ w
~~I ~
/ ~ ~ / / o' ~ S / 5~~~ / I ~ 13 ~ W \ ~ - I \ ~ ~ Q TM
~ , 91 ~ ~ I ~ P o ~ S / I I ~P~ / I . I ~ >W ~ 3~ I - 1 i v 6 ~ p ' ~ I I
/ ~ Y / I I ~ I / SEE 1A/D-1 FOR TRAIL GRADING I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I I a ~~~0~~~
_ ~ / I I / I- . Q I I J
ALL RESEEDING OF DISTURBED ~ ' W I . I~ I~ 'Q I 6 I Z ~ D
. / / AREAS IN THIS SECTION IS TO BE - LEGEND / ~ v7 ~ I I I
' N ~ X RIPARIAN GRASS MIX. PROPERTY RELATED ITEMS / ~ " " 0719-02-87-1013 ~ 1 ~ I~ I In s I I I Z ~
/ Z - - EXISTING PROPOSED ~ 1 TM 506 01 006 ~ I~ - ~
,I HOPE VALLEY FARMS NORTH DA - - PROPERTY LINE / I / 1 DB 3147 / 302 I 25~.~ I, ~ ~ i i l i
F/J-B WATERSHED - - - e- EASEMENT LINE I ~ , I I
~ a Z~NING~ R-20 I ~ \ ~ ~ 13 I I t ~ I I I ~ 111 West Main Street
USES VACANT sTRUGTURE ~ ! 0 ~ ~ I ~ I l I I ~ ~ Durham, N.C. 27701
~ ! ~ o o- =X=X= FENCE ~ TM o y ~ l I I ~ I z p 919.682.0368 10" MAP° I ~ I o ~ 1 I I c~ f 919.688.5646
1 "MAP o RETAINING WALL ~ 0719-02-76-449 0 1 r
• TM 422-01-012 + ~ CITY OF DURHAM o I I I r o~ ~ ~ ~ w www.cjtpa.com
r ~~O PAVING I DB 2247 / 989 r I I ~ i \ ~ I
_ I EXISTING PROPOSED A F/J B WATERSHED i I ZONINGS R-20 ~ ~ \ I I I,
s CURB ff GUTTER ~ USES VACANT ~ \ ~ I 1 1
12' MAP° OF PAVEMENT \ ~ ~ EDGE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 12 MAP° I ~ I ? \ \
I CONCRETE SIDEWALK \ ~ • \ \
' r ~ 1 ASPHALT SIDEWALK ~ \ e~~ \ ,n fr ~ v I - I \V ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ A ~ ~ ~ 1 " MAF ~ PT STA HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT SIDEWALK \ ~ \ 1 MAF~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
'2c ~ ,r ~ , 99+48.52 ~ A \ ` \ A V A ~ ~ \ ~
T ~ , , ' • ~ \ , ~
~ " ~ 1++43.21 0~ BEGIN IN NG OM POINT \ ~ a \ \ ~ V ~ • 1
1 . °J PG N POINT OF CURVATURE y , I r I ~
~ a PT lt~ f' ~ ! POINT OF TANGENCY ~ Z ~ \ I ~ I ~ ~ ~
PC STA UTILITIES 1~ \ EXISTING PROPOSED ~ ~ \ I I G)
~i ~ 99+13.92 ~ \ A ~ ~ ~ ,
T Q UTILITY POLE . ~ x ~ V I I ~ 0 252.1 ~ ~ ~ I o ~ Project:
~ ~ r o ~ GATGH BASIN \ ~ ® ? \ '~y k ~ ~ ` ~ +
~ 1 r rn ss RAISED MANHOLE \ 1=L00 AY O
3 \ ~i 1 \ ~ ~ I ` I , F 51LT FENGE ~ ~ \ ~ \ I THIRD FORK k
20"ASH tt so -so- STORM DRAINAGE PIPING \ ~ p . ~ o U VERT \ \ 1 ~ GL 20"ASHII 1 ` RE: 2/D-3 ~ ~ • ~ ~ CREEK TRAIL
~ ~i ~ SANITARY SEWER ~
Q x i / \ ~ A 2 0719-02-76-4498 -FO- FIBER oPTIG LINE '
~ ~ w TM 422-O1-012 1 1 ~ > ~ g ~ v~_ 1 ; ~ v _ ~ p ~ \
• ~ CITY OF DURHAM NOTE: CITY OF DURHAM SEWER LINES d ~ ' ~i ~ W ~ s DB 2247 / 989 EASEMENTS SHALL BE ,4GGESSIBLE AT ALL 1 I ~ / ~v 1 ,
1 ~ d. F/J-B WATERSHED TIMES FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS w ZNNING~ R-20 THROUGH CONTACT WITH THE GENERAL I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ AI ~ ~ 1 DURHAM OPEN SPACE AND TRAIiS .
~ "~i USES VACANT CONTRACTOR. 1 ~ I I\ 1 ~ ~ 11 51LT EENGE
wl ~ ~ TOPOGRAPHY 1
W T Y ~ ' ' 338 338 . i ~ vI ? I am_3 NORTHISOUTH
~ J CONTOUR ~ Z W ~ I 1~ II 1 TRAI L SYSTEM
• ~ ~ ~ TREES < 10" X 157.5 + 157.5 SPOT ELEVRTION (TRAIL G/L} W ~ I
s W10E '2y ~ STREAM (TOP OF BANK) / ~ I ~ ~ i I ~ 1 ~ 252.E DURHAM NC
60 R~`1~ ~ w ~ I D D~~yp,~ ~ Fw FLOODWAY / I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I I
APR Ow O ~
\ w 1~ FP FLOODPLAIN (FLOODWAY FRINGE) _ . n ~ ~ 1 la r ~ a ~ / 1 ~ I
_ - ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ 50' STREAM BUFFER ` DURHAM STREAM BUFFER
REQUIRED (SIZE VARIES} ~ ~ 1 \ d
0719-02-76-1384 w ~ NOTE: NO FILLING IN FLOODWAY. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL 0719-02-76-138 19-02-76-184 1 I OWNER:
TM 422-03-009 , ~ TO BE DISPOSED OF OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN. ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ I CITY OF DURHAM
CITY DF DURHAM ' N ~ 1 s . DB 2536 / 766 ~ ~ ~ \ , I TREE PROTECTION 101 CITY HALL PLAZA
F/J-B WATERSHED ~ N N NOTE: WHERE NO PROPOSED GRADING IS SHOWN, ~ TRAIL 15 TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO A \ ' ~ I 1 I FENCING DURHAM, NC 27701 ~ I
ZDNING~ R-20 USES VACANT ~ FINISHED TOP ELEVATION THAT MATCHES ~ ~ ~ / I RE: 3/D-3 / ATTN: BETH TIMSON
THE EXISTING ADJACENT ELEVATION. \ ~ , ~ , J ' \ ~ PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
~ ~ 1 ` ph:919-560-4355
~ ! u , ° EROSION CONTROL ITEMS w \ PROPOSED I ~ fx:919-560-4021
~ \ z ~ v SILT FENCE (TEMPORARY) RE: 2/D-3 ~A \ ~ ~ ~
1 c'V ' ~ ~ \ .
TREE PROTECTION FENCE RE: 3/D-3 ~ ~ ~ 10 WIDE (TEMPORARY)
SPHALT TRAIL Tsn TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH RE:5/D-3 v ~ ~ ~ / ~
RE. 1/D-1 ~ -3 \
O o~,o ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION RE• 1/D ~ ~ o0 • ~ ~ / \ .
7 IVY. ~ ~ ~ ~ SEDIMENT TRAP RE:9/D-4 \ . ` ~ ~ ® (TEMPORARY)
~ ~ ~ ® ROCK GHEGK DAM RE: 7/D-4 \
. ~ F END HEAVY (TEMPORARY) \ . v • • ~ ~ I~ 01~ ~,~~Ry ~ /
~ DUTY \ ~ ~ PT STA / \ \ ~ I ~ h~ 2 5~
ASPHALT 96+69.08 / REMOVAL OF ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1 1 ~ II' ~ ~ / i /
~z ' PAVING AND RESEEDING OF TH05E AREAS FOR STABILIZATION 5 ~ J / 5. 1 ` TO BE COMPLETED PER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN ~ ~ ~ I ~r 1 : `:~~~`:'s; I
•i.
' . TYPE o 071 2-75-3907 VEGETATION i ~
TM 422 O1 012A EXISTING PROPOSED
' WI E GONG RAIL a,.'':::>;.; KIVA HAITHCDCK / ~ DB 4338 / 866 , aK TREE TO BE REMOVED I ~ C,~ I
EI D LOCATE T ID O _ GONG BOARDWA F/J B WATERSHED TREE/SHRUBS ~ T 5. RE: / 1 30'X8' WITH RA G R8.0 ZDNING~ R-10 NOTE THAT EXISTING TREES ~ ~
• P STA USES VACANT 6° aK ~ ARE DRAWN WITH SCALED ~ 1 ~ ~ . I I , 1 TREE
• ~ ~ RE: 2/D-6.1 ~ ROOT PROTECTION ZONE 96+ .13 EQUAL TO 1 RADIUS PER 1 1 \ ~ p~' ,r ~ PROTECTION R.
W .'y• • ~ TREE TRUNK CALIPER . 1 I 1~~ GP~`a~~l ; ~ h ~ • ~ RE~ 3/D-3 / DRAWINGS NOT RELEASED
v ~ 5~ ~ VEGETATION LINE \ I I <:>r,;;..: FOR CONSTRUCTION
INOR ENTRAN IGN ~ ° 'e o> I ~ ` + i 1~~ / \ Job Number: 0831
co TWO P05T S I 4
~ NOTE: FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ASSUME SECTIONS OF ) . o E: 1/D-8 ~ _ J FLAT BOARDWALK, LONG BOARDWALK, AND HEAVY DUTY _ ~ ~ • V J -
PE 'E ASPHALT SECTIONS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN r _ E GONSTRU ION I ~ S , / Drawn WLR CP JW JC KB - ~ _ I i. ENTRRNGE E: rl , ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ Checked DAJ Eos TRK saB
~ . ON PLANS BUT ACTUAL LOCATION WILL BE LOCATED I ? • ~ ~ Date 10128105 CD RESUBMITTAL 2/D-4 ~ ~ • ~ ~ 2115106 BID SET
~ IN FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION BY LANDSCAPE 1 ~ ~ _ , Revisions v7~ I ~ • ' / \ . / - - ~ - TREE 3105106 ISSUED FOR
~ ~ ARCHITECT AND VERIFIED BY GENERAL SERVICES AND 0719- 2- -1300 d ~ ~ , J :;_:::1:~? 2 . ~ . I , ~ OTEGTION CONSTRUCTION
TM -03- 7 ~ _ _ DURHAM PARKS AND RECREATION. . DOUGLAS & AMARA AU P ~ 0719 02 1973 ~ ~d ~ TM 422- -012B I~ ~o ^ I' ~ ~ ~ ~ F=ENGN 611b109 BID SET b. I RE: 'J/la`J 7114109 BID SET
DB 360 / 44 . ~ CITY DF URHAM I • ~7 I ~ ~ ` 1 1 d~ / 1 SH°°1 "AH
F/J-B WATERSH d ~ ` 1 sH~ ~ 1 "A H DB 2018 598 ZNNING~ R-10 ~ F/J-B WA SHED WHERE NOT INDICATED, LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS ~I •
~ / ~ 1 SH . USES 1 FAM RESID ` >:?<>f{';::` ZDNING~ SILT FENCE OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE ~
~ USES VAC ~ I ~ ._52.5
P / • ~ T START 160 0'""""'~4 l \ ~ P253.~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ° 12" AK ~ ~
• ~ 012" AK ` • O _ _ PT STA CAR 0719 02-75 390 LE HEAVY ~ ~ 0 I ' Q TRf~IL ~ 1 GR,4DE NOT ~ 1 `s 2 , ~ ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS
P ~ TM 422-01-012A ~ DUTY 95+31.47 ~ o ~ ~PµDSCgp~,~~/ I G ~ 'KIVA HAITHCDCK ~ •a ; I GP I TO EXCEED y ~
~ ASPHALT ~ . Z 9~, v , ~ ~ Q. DB 4338 / 866 ~ W 6' I _ :1 ~
Q F/J-B WATERSHED ~ PAVING : x ; 1050 x : G' / DE EA D TLAND AREA ZD ~ R-10 RE: 3/D-1 ~ - ; Q~ I 5go ~ 1 ~ ~ Sheet Title: I ~ ~ ~ A ~
1 05F- 2AG ~ ~ i y: / USES ACANT o d ,
/IMPACT EA o ~ ~ ~ / / ~ Z 9 / I 1 ~ + v ~ ~ TRAIL -
/ 442 5 - 1 AG ~ ~ ~~o Q l ~ ~ ~ FV~N F~`Po• I
- ~ ~ °'1 1 ~ ~ ~ CARDINAL DRIVE
MAT 1~k-r 77~ SECTION
& EROSION CONTROL PLAN 30 0 30 60 90
CD-18 Pc sTa SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN GRADING & EROSIO h7 ME] Md i Sheet Number
I TRAIL - CARDINAL SECTION 94+79.95
1 " = 30' Scale 1" = 30' CD-18

' ~ /
/ I I I• _ I / ~
_ ~ / ~ I I .4~~ A i ~ ~ / ~ ~ I / v
• o o i
• hX / / I I I~ ~ II / ~ ~ ~ oo ~
~ l ~ ~ i l ~ ~~x / x
,~MaTCi~ x i
• ~ ~ l I ~ ~ I MATCHLINE N W
. PC S / / / I ~ ~ a
94+79 / a ~ / I / / I I / csT o I N
~ /
' / . • _ WARNI SIGN
l i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~
20 Ll= ELAT / BOARDW,4LK RE: ~ / • , ~ h ~ /~ti z
7/D-6 LEGEND ~~~~00 i ~ b / I z
10" ASH o ~ • • - ' • - • . _ PROPERTY RELATED ITEMS ' ' l - ~ ~ ~ o" AsH o I
EXISTING PROPOSED / f -I• • ~2i ~ 28 ~ r -
i~ / - - PROPERTY LINE ~ 1 1 ~
B LLARD 4/D-2 - - - e- EASEMENT LINE ~
~a , O WITH PAINTED ~ ~ o . o I ~ ~ ! ? 111 West Main Street
• DIAMON a 0 STRUCTURE • . . • ~ ' a ~ I ~ I ry FNG NGRR~3/D-~ °o ~ ~ W Durham, N.C. 27701
• ~ ~ ~ o o- =X=X= FENCE ~ ~1 I ~ ~ z p919.682.0368
_ _ RETAINING WALL ,:.0719 2 75 3907 ~ ~ - • ~ ~ f 919.688.5646 I ~ I ' z
TM 422-01-012A KIV HAITHCOCK ~ ~ I J X0719 2-75-3907 w www.cjtpa.com I ~ ~ TM 4~2-01-01zA d~
PAVING ~ I I ''KIV HAITHCOCK /
' _ ®F/J B WATERSHED~~ EXISTING PROPOSED (Y ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ _ ~ a ~ F/J B WATERSHED~~
~ CURB ff GUTTER I ~
~ WARNING SIGN o _ - EDGE OF PAVEMENT
~ ~ RE: 1/D 8 07 9-02-75-1973 • ~ ~ ~ 422- 1-012B ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' o ITV OF DURHAM CONCRETE SIDEWALK / I I .
~ a u " DB 20 / 598 w ' F/J-B ATERSH ASPHALT SIDEWALK - - _ _ / I I r 25~.o X /
N ° ZONINGS R-10 ~ _ USES VACANT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT SIDEWALK ~ I I /
/ ~ ~ .
0 4 END HEAVY g ~ ~ ~ ` DU"TY ASPHALT sra STATIONING FROM POINT ~ I / I ~ w
° " " PAVING„ ~ o ~ 1+43.21 OF BEGINNING
~ i~" O X Pc POINT OF CURVATURE I it l ~ g ~ o ~ 1.
POINT OF TANGENCY
- - g UTILITIES ~ 1 EXISTING PROPOSED
u u u u u" Q UTILITY POLE Nq
u I I ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ G~R~TRgI(~ . . ~ Project:
GATGH BASIN " a - ® ? 1 . 1 ~ /
RAISED MANHOLE u s ~ ss /
S " " " " " " " " " ' " " so -so- STORM DRAINAGE PIPING ~ THIRD FORK
D CULVERT DELINEATED " a " " ` ~ ~ ~ CREEK TRAIL
WETLAND AREA ~ SANITARY SEWER 2g~ /
8479 5E - .19 AG ~ j~~ ~ ` ` ` w ~ ` ` ` ` -FO- FIBER OPTIC LINE ~ ~
~ 2 IMPACT AREA ~ ~ ~ ~ p - W ~ _ _ ~ u~ 071 02-75 3907 NOTE: CITY OF DURHAM SEWER LINES 3
473 5E - .010 AG " ~ . TM 422-~1-012A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ f 071 02=75 `397
. ~ KIVA HAITHCUCK EASEMENTS SHALL BE ,4GGESSIBLE AT ALL 0 ~ TIMES FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS _ • TM 42z-D1-OI2A . - ~ I \ ~ ~ ~ KIVA HAITHCOCK • / DURHAM OPEN SPACE AND TRADE
• ~ ° THROUGH CONTACT WITH THE GENERAL _ . ~ ~ F J-B WATERSHED CONTRACTOR.
" ~ S v 84 59' E ~ " " " " " TOPOGRAPHY ~ • - ~ ~ - I F~J-B WATERSHED
• ~ ~ • - ~ ~ - ~ . ~ ~ ~ x25 . ~ ~ ~ NORTHISOUTH
.1 ~ 338 338 / ~ _ ; w CONTOUR ,e~ ~ 248.2
-l 105.93' X 157.5 + 157.5 SPOT ELEVRTION (TRAIL G/L} ~ BEGIN 40 LE HEAVY ~ . / ~ - - ~ 2 ss ` x2~o.~ . - .I. ~ ~ u TRAIL SYSTEM ~ -
Q 0 0, OQ DUTY ASPHALT ~ ~ ° ° STREAM (TOP OF BANK) ~ '~;S - DURHAM NC
~ PAVING RE: 3/D-1 ~ ~ /
~ " " " " ~ Fw FLOODWAY
_ ~ • - " THIRD FORK GREEK FP FLOODPLAIN (FLOODWAY FRINGE) /..ice
T STA ® so' STREAM BUFFER DURHAM STREAM BUFFER
91 +5 .73 REQUIRED (SIZE VARIES} 251.2 ~ s~
" " " ( ~ " NOTE. NO FILLING IN FLOODWAY. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL
~ TO BE DISPOSED OF OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN. ~ ' ~ / / ~ ~ / ~ OWNER: ~ CITY OF DURHAM TREE PROTECTION
FENCE RE. 3 / . • / / / \ 101 CITY HALL PLAZA
" NOTE: WHERE NO PROPOSED GRADING IS SHOWN, ' / / / / DURHAM, NC 27701
01 OA 1RAIL 15 TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO A WARNING SIGN " " ~ SS FINISHED TOP ELEVATION THAT MATCHES 016 oA / ATTN: BETH TIMSON
0 RE: 1/D-S THE EXISTING ADJACENT ELEVATION. " " ~ / . ~ / ~ PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
h o PC ST EROSION CONTROL ITEMS 51LT FENCE RE. / ph:919-560-4355 2/D-3 ~ / / ~ / ~ fx: 919-560-4021
/ ~ ~ /
F " ~ 91 + 1..92 PROPOSED .t~ ~ m ~ -gF SILT FENCE (TEMPORARY) RE: 2/D-3 ,~y.'
0719-02-65-8677 `1 ~ I I ~o ~ /
424-01-006 ~ TREE PROTECTION FENCE RE: 3/D-3 W()ODBRIDGE III HOME (TEMPORARY)
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC - ° 14, sY OVERLAPPING 25' Tsn RY DIVERSION DITCH RE:5/D-3 II I ~ ~ ~ 4" sY / ~ 51 LT FENG~ RE:
F/J-B WATERSHED TEMPORA " " AND 35' SANITARY , DB 1144 / 871 I ~ / ~ / /D 3
• o~,o ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION RE: 1/D-3 ZONINGS PDR-4 SEWER EASEMENTS I• I /
P SEDIMENT TRAP RE:9/D-4 USES VACANT ® (TEMPORARY) I ~ / ~ ~ ~
- 9 .7 n ti ~ DELINEATED ® ROCK GHEGK DAM RE: 7/D-4 0
`s ~ WETLAND AREA (TEMPORARY) 0
~ ~ 17838 5E - .41 AG ~ ~ I X25.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IIl
PT ST NO IMPACT AREA ARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ~ REMOVAL OF ALL TEMPOR 89+97 40 AND RESEEDING OF TH05E AREAS FOR STABILIZATION 15 I
BOLLARD 4/D-2 , Ok0 TO BE COMPLETED PER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS. 0 1
~ 2-B WI PAINTED DIAMOND °b~ (2) 4'X8' BOX CULVERTS ~ ~ ~ ~ r~~ I ~ I I (36" SEWER) • o ~ ~ GROUND 252±
a ~ ` ~ ~ • ' VEGETATION PERPENDICULAR TO . 1:: ~ . 1 ~ ~ INV=240.08
• ~ STREAM GROSSING EXISTING PROPOSED ;5~'`'' ~ SS ~ I 1 ~ \
~t~• PC A ~ RE: 1/D-6 TREE TO BE REMOVED DELINEA WETLAND AREA ; " ~ w ° aK o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A s (21" SEWER)
90 9.47 TREE/SHRUBS 3 1 5E - .078 AG . ~ ~ . " ~ i °5 ; ; _ ~ ~S~ ~ %4' ~ 1 1 1 I GROUND 252± RIP RAP JOINT PLRNTING ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I INV=244.82
ti NOTE THAT EXISTING TREES IMPACT AREA 6° aK ~ ' PC STA ' m ARE DRAWN WITH SCALED INSTALL GLA55 TALL GLA55 B RIP RRP MIN. ~THIG~ ~w.. 4 V ~ I I
44 51= - ,0.10~G ~ ROOT PROTECTION ZONE ~ 89+61,84 EQUAL TO 1 RADIUS PER 1 RS.~HOWN RE: 5/D-4 ~ / ~ ~ 1
i ~~i'+. TREE TRUNK CALIPER I I DRAWINGS NOT RELEASED
• ~ ~ ~ WARNING SIGN , ~ • • i ~ ; ~Y' VEGETATION LINE . . RE: 1/D-8 ~ • ~ ~ 252 ~ ~ I I 1 FOR CONSTRUCTION 51LT FENCE RE: / ~ I III 1 TEMPORARY STRERM
10 WI ASPHALT TRAI E: 1/D-1 2/D-3 ~ ~ ~ ~ - I I I I GR0551NG-ON51TE ,lob Number: 0831
" 10" ASH ~ ' o ~ ( ~ o" ASH I ~i l ~ I ~ DETERMINATION
° ' " NOTE: FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ASSUME SECTIONS OF RE: 2/D-4 I l I / 252.2 Drawn w~RCP~w~c~
G~ ' ~ - - - - FLAT BOARDWALK LONG BOARDWALK AND HEAVY DUTY ~ 4,~ ~ t / ~ ~ I Checked DAJ EOS T '~f4B
° 14" B E 0719 02 75 3533 , ,a ~ 506-O1-007 ASPHALT SECTIONS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN 0 14" B E / / Date 10128105 CD RESUBMITTAL TREE PROTECTION ~ ~ , / / ~ / / I ~ Revisions sr~5106 BID SET
° °i; ti HUPE VALLEY FARM HUA TREE PROTEC o h° DB 2356 / 949 ON PLANS, BUT ACTUAL LOCATION WILL BE LOCATED 1=ENGING RE: -ENDING RE: 3/D-3 ~ / ~ ~ 3105146 ISSUED FOR
~ ` ; ~ ~ F/J-B WATERSHED IN FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION BY LANDSCAPE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / / / / I CONSTRUCTION
~ ~ ~w°j ' ZONINGS PDR-4 ARCHITECT AND VERIFIED BY GENERAL SERVICES AND f~~~~ S~ 5~ } ~T, h ~ ~/l~/ I 6115109 BID SET
, ~ USES VACANT DURHAM PARKS AND RECREATION. r 4-BN ti ~ ;~~I~, 1,~~~;~ ~ / 7114109 BID SET ° Q ~ , / / I
ti ~
0719-02-65-7360 / ' 424A-O1-005D ~ 2 / / SEE 1A~D-1 FOR TRAIL G ADING \
i WHERE NOT INDICATED, LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS WDODBRIDGE III HOME ~ ~ / / / ~
OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC ~ SILT FENCE OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE 2 1.1 14" M F/J-B WATERSHED / ~ ,4>> .y
DB 1144 / 871 ~ ~ o` CAR
ZONINGS PDR-4 4„ ~ ,,,......,~1 ' z 4" ~ ~ ~I ~ / ~ E~S~ON CO~R~ LSUBM~AL
USES VACANT ; ~ o : ~pNDSCgpF''./ n SILT 1=ENGE RE: '~~0h ALL RESEEDING OF DISTURBED = 9~: = 2 - ~ =ENGE RE: ~ I 2/D-3 , ~
5• 1 AREAS IN THIS SECTION IS TO BE = 1050 ~ Sheet Title: ~ ? ~ 14~ ~ / ~ /
RIPARIAN GRASS MIX. . o
'.d N ~r ~ , ~ / , ~ ~ TRAIL -
c MATCHIdNE M ~ ~ z r~ M ,f' r ~ / ~ ~ • ~ TANAGER TRAIL
~ ~ '•,.FVJ~~ u at~P.o• ~ MATCHLINE M , / i~ - - -
pV/ SECTION
& EROSION CONTROL PLAN 30 0 30 60 90
CD-17 SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN GRADING & EROSIO h7 ME] Md i Sheet Number
I TRAIL - TANAGER TRAIL SECTION
1 ' = 30' scale 1" = 30' CD-17 OF 55

_ +
\ ~
0719-02-99-6222 / ~~y. \ TM 418-02-004A ~ ~ ~ MATCHLIlVE T ~o ~I
CHRISTINE BARNETT FOWLER? ~ ' , TCHI~INE T ~
DB 1886 / 146 \ ~ ~ tX ~ ZONINGS R-20 ~ ~ 0 ; v
~ 1, USES VACANT \ x- ~ ~
~ t.~ 25 o v ~ 259.6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ U
~ ~ f Q
\ ~ ~ \ \ \ 1 W
DELINEA D WETLAND ARE
10477 SQ ET - .241 AG v~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y . . /v_~ ~ a
IMPACTED AREA \ i.
398 5Q ET - .009 AG ~
\ \ \ ~ ~ \ ~ - - \ ~ ~ ~ r I o
0719 02-99 6073 \ \ ~ TREE PROTE ION ~ _ _ \ ~ - . \ ~ ; _-TM, 418 OZ 004B \
EEN ING , , x \ ~ ~ CI OF DURHAM EGEND \ L ~ p. _ Z
\ ~ RE: 3 -3 \ DB 461 / 118 \ \ \ _ PROPERTY RELATED ITEMS
\ ~ ZON ~ R 20. \ ' o EXISTING PROPOSED \ © ~ ~ ~ e d II _ y,I .
0719 OZ-99 4012 ~ _ + 5p S - - PROPERTY LINE O ,
TM 418-02-004 ~ ~ ~ ' \ ~~AM s~ ~ \ ~ BUMP CITY BF DURHAM „ ~ " ~ ~ ~ E~ - - - e- EASEMENT LINE
\ ~ DB2103/281 ~0~,, II ~ ~ ~ ~F~~ ? 111 West Main Street I 1 ~ ~
ZONINGS R-20 ~ a ANG PT - \ STRUCTURE ' 132+75.76 I II ~ ~ z { . ~ - _ ~ Durham, N.C. 27701
USES VACANT ' o o- =x=x= ~ 132+74.79 adjusted FENCE ~ ~ ~ ~ i p 919.682.0368 I ~ ~ , ~ o + 1.5~ r:` ~ ~ c~ f 919.688.5646
i , RETAINING WALL ~ v ~
10„'•MAP , s I ~ ~ o"MaP w www.cjtpa.com
~ PAVING I ~ ~ +
130 LE BOA WALK jr ~ _ EXISTING PROPOSED j RE: /D-6.1 ~a
P ~ ~ ~ N CLEAR TREES TO 101 CURB ff GUTTER
~ ~ 5 0 ~ PROM PROPOSED ,5 N ~ ~ ~ EDGE OF PAVEMENT II ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ EE PROTEGTI ON
_ ~ ~ \ ASPHALT TRAIL - BOLLA 4/D 2 I ~ II ~ 9 ~ EENGING
50 STR Z < CONCRETE SIDEWALK EAM BUFF WITH PAINTED DIAMON ~ , ~ , ER ~ b ~ _ ~ I RE:3/D-3
ASPHALT SIDEWALK ~ PT STA I II ~ ~ f y ~ ~ II ~ I ~ , ~ ~ .
132+6.97
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT SIDEWALK 5 ' 0 STREAM B UFF~R \ I ~ ~ 26 ~ II , ~ ~ o ~ ~0 ~
'
° , sra STATIONING FROM POINT + 1+43.21 I OF BEGINNING \ ~ ' ~ i ~ Il
• 10 ASPHALT TRAIL ~ ~ Pc E \ ~ POINT OF GURVATUR • ~ RE: 1/D-1 _ ~
\ POINT OF TANGENCY n ~ UTILITIES
~ WARNING SIGN I • EXISTING PROPOSED ' , ~ I ~ ; x I ~ ~ ~I I III , ~ I ~ .
\ v RE:1ro-a ~ UTILITY POLE
~ ~ ~ . II ~ I T / Project:
• W ' ~ ~ GATGH BASIN ' . 1 ~ \ . i
• G RAISED MANHOLE N ss O
LIMIT OP WORK 10 10" .G so _so- STORM DRAINAGE PIPING ~ ~ ~ ; ' N~ ~ / THIRD FORK
h I ex z+' ' f C STA o GuLVERT r~, t B.~~M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CREEK TRAIL
- ~ ~ ' 131 +23.82 SANITARY SEWER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I /
1 ~ , f \ WARNING SIGN; -FO- FIBER OPTIC LINE ~ ~ I ?F ~ ,
RE: 1/D-8 ~ ~
NOTE: CITY OF DURHAM SEWER LINES 3 EASEMENTS SHALL BE ,4GGESSIBLE AT ALL I ~ \ ~ ~ s ~ ~
\ PT STA TIMES FOR MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS ~ ~ O ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ \ ;I~ \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ OO ~ DURHAM OPEN SPACE AND TRADE .
DELINE~ED WETLAND ~ 0 130+97.73 THROUGH CONTACT WITH THE GENERAL ~ ~ CONTRACTOR.
4984 5 .114 AG M TOPOGRAPHY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ " ~ ~ ~
: , IMPACTED AR A , ~ ~ ~ , I ~ 51LT PENDING NORTHISOUTH
323 SQ PT - . 0 G ~ - ~ ~ ' = 338 338 NTOUR Go ~ ~j ~ ~ ~ ` , ~ ~ I I ~ ~ TRAI L SYSTEM
~ ~ , . ; r ALL RESEEDING OF X 157.5 + 157.5 SPOT ELEVATION (TRAIL G/L) ~ ~
DISTURBED AREAS IN THIS \ STREAM (TOP OF BANK) ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ DURHAM NC
l ~ . SECTION IS TO BE _ I ~ ~
' ° RIPARIAN GRASS MIX. FW FLOODwAY END 6' TALL GRAIN ~ ~
? ,;r ~ - FP - FLOODPLAIN FLOODWAY FRINGE) \ ~ ( LINK PENCE AT ~ A ~ ~ ~ s 6
' \ ~ + jr~ ~ ~ 50' STREAM BUFFER SURREY GREEN ~ ~ ~ / PC STA DURHAM STREAM BUFFER ~ 9A ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ .g, I ,
PROPERTY NE REQUIRED (SIZE VARIES) L 130+41.31 ~ ~ ' ~ I TREE PROTECTION \ ~ A ~ ~r., . N ~ I ~ FENDING
THIS PENCE 5 THE ,!i OODWAY. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL ~ NOTE: NO FILLING IN FL ~ OWNER:
LIMIT OP WORK ~ TO BE DISPOSED OF OUTSIDE OF THE FLOODPLAIN. \ I RE: 3/D-3 ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF DURHAM
~ 1~` ~ ~ ` ~ ~ I ' 101 CITY HALL PLAZA
r' ~ BOX GU VERT L NOTE: WHERE NO PROPOSED GRADING IS SHOWN, I ~ RE: 3ro-6 TRAIL 15 TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO A ~ DURHAM, NC 27701
` \ TION THAT MATCHES ;:',,A FINISHED TOP ELEYA ~ V ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TEMPORARY STREAM ATTN: BETH TIMSON .,~~;w P~::
' ~ : 1 ; I / THE EXISTING ADJACENT ELEVATION. l~ 0719-OZ-98-1734 5~1 T PENCE ~ ' I I GR0551NG-ON51TE PARKS & RECREATION DEPT
i % L~:, i, TM 418-04-001 ~ f - : ; ' ~ I , 4o BEE ° ~ ~ ~ REMOVE ISLAND EROSION CONTROL ITEMS R~; 2/~p-3 ~ ;~f ~ DETERMINATION ph:919-560-4355 i , _ ~ \ 40~` BEE ~ , y ~ ~ RE: 2/D-4 fic: 919-560-4021
GEBRGE & LBUISE MCKEE ~ ta ~ I OP05ED /
DB 304 / 412 r PR ~ Z~NING~ R-10 ~ ~'4 SILT FENCE (TEMPORARY) RE: 2/D-3 ' ~ ~ , ~ ~ fir, ` `1 _ f
USES VACANT ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ , \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 'r-~~ t'r ~ ~ RIP RAP
TREE PROTECTION FENCE RE: 3/D-3 t • + , , (TEMPORARY) ; ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~~s~ 1 ~ RE: 5/D-4 ~ ~ ~
~ t 4 TsB SION DITCH RE:5/D-3 ~ \ ~,W TEMPORARY DIVER / i" _ ~ ~ , ~ _ ~ 11 ~ i
'l- ~ 1 j^ f0 0
• ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION RE: 1/D-3 _ o , y'~ ~ Oho ~ " PT STA _ a
~ I SEDIMENT TRAP RE•9/D 4 / ~ 1;' I 129+78.7 TEMPORARY \ I„ ® ( )
. ~ ~ • ' ® ROCK GHEGK DAM RE: 7/D 4 , / ~ 11
(TEMPORARY) B~LARD 4/D-2 - ~ ~ ,~I ~ II
1 WITH PAINTED DIAMOND ~ WARNING IGN
' ~ REMOVAL OF ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES RE: fro-8
AND RESEEDING OF TH05E AREAS FOR STABILIZATION 15 TO BE COMPLETED PER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS. 1 / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
' ~P ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ II
~ . ~ Q VEGETATION / ~ ~ ~ ~ i o
/ ~ is EXISTING PROPOSED .SET 6 TALL CHAIN LINK o ~ STA . TREE PROTE~~ON ~ ~
ENGE ON EASEMENT LINE • o ? A TREE TO BE REMOVED ~ 1 +49.65 rn ° aK FENDING o
c~ 3 TREE/SHRUBS / RE: 3/D-3 w ~ ~
' NOTE THAT EXISTING TREES ~ ~ ' ~ 6° aK ~ ARE DRAWN WITH SCALED ~ CLEAR TREES TO , , ~ ~ X264 ry w ~ ~ ~
t`': 'it ROOT PROTECTION ZONE ~ TREE PROTECTION ~ PT S ~ EQUAL TO 1' RADIUS PER 1" ` ~ ~ X264 / ~ i V ~ W ~ I ~
i 128 .2 ' rn TREE TRUNK CALIPER PENCE . i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ DRAWINGS NOT RELEASED
~Y' VEGETATION LINE ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I All FOR CONSTRUCTION
~ w I ~ 1, ~ / ~ ~ ~ 62 ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ 51LT E GE Job Number: 0831
.m N I / I 1 q N ~ ~ ~ V' ~ I ~ RE: 2~-3
10 ASPHALT TRAIL ~ ~N ~ NOTE: FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ASSUME SECTIONS OF ~ • Z RE: 1/D-1 ~ ; ~ FLAT BOARDWALK, LONG BOARDWALK, AND HEAVY DUTY ~ I ~ ~ ~ W -n~ ~ ~ Drawn WLR CP JW JC KB
I ASPHALT SECTIONS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN _ W ~ ~ ,r Checked DAJ EOS TRK SAB
_ P STA , 0719-OZ-98-1592 4 , ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Date 10128105 CD RESUBMITTAL
TM 4ZOA-05-002 r ON PLANS, BUT ACTUAL LOCATION WILL BE LOCATED In ~ 1 46.8~~2 ~ IN FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION BY LANDSCAPE ~V~"'" SURREY GREEN HBA , ~ V ~ f` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ Revi5i0ns 2115106 BID SET ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ \ 3105146 ISSUED FOR
\ DB 1189 / 672 I ARCHITECT AND VERIFIED BY GENERAL SERVICES AND ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION
F/J-B WATERSHED 12" .GUM DURHAM PARKS AND RECREATION. ~ ~ / V ~ ~ 12'~~;GUM ~ ~Z ~ ~ 2 6115109 BID SET
• \ ZBNING~ PDR 4 ' USES VACANT ~,r~'" ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 7114109 BID SET
'S; ~ ~ ` 5 V _ ~ 1
~ ~ WHERE NOT INDICATED LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS L 1` 0 ~ r, ~ , ~ ~ ~V ~ f"'.~ . _ X64 ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y I \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s fi' I
• i ~ i ° w,~ SILT FENCE OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE ~3 o ~ \ [Y'
\ o + p ~ ~ I \ \ ~ ~ + - III p j
24 0 ~ 1 ~ - UJ C A ~~i ~ ~ , \ ~ R 0 \ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS
I ~ ~ • ~ 55 \ 1~ Z ~pNDSCgp~.~~
~ti1~" Q ~ ~~p Fq~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C'
~ .W 1 ''4.. C 7 •N ~ i - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Sheet Title: A
1 1050 , x . h 111 JT ;
- ; ~ 1 _ OAK N . d ~ N MAT S 9~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ Q ,~~~AK , ~ ~i ~T s TRAIL
~ 0 ~ ~ ' Z ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . SURREY GREEN
1 \ _ 4 ~ ~ i I %.FV~~1 uQt~P.o 1~
lit
Isla \ _,N_ I SECTION 3
& EROSION CONTROL PLAN 30 0 30 60 90
CD-23 SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN GRADING & EROSIO h7 ME] Md Sheet Number
I TRAIL - SURREY GREEN SECTION 3
1 ° = 30' Scale 1" = 30' CD-23

THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL, DURHAM NC
WETLAND DISTURBANCE - SOUTHERN PHASE
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PIPES
TRAIL IMPACT BOARD- UNDER
LOCATION THROUGH WETLAND WALK TRAIL
AREA A
Al- 7 258 SF
NO
PIPES ADJACENT
AREA B
A1- 4 0 SF YES NO
C1 -5 406 SF YES NO
D1 -4 0 SF YES NO
E1- 4 0 SF YES NO
31 -7 0 SF YES NO
AREA C
A1- 6 0 SF YES NO
31 -6 365 SF NO CULVERT
C1 -8, D1- 3 760 SF NO NO
E1- 4 240 SF NO NO
F1- 9 540 SF NO NO
G1 -3 0 SF NO NO
H1 -3 500 SF NO NO
- 3 0 SF NO NO
J1- 7 1490 SF NO YES
K1 -4 0 SF NO NO
L1- 4 870 SF NO NO
M1 -4 0 SF NO NO
N1 -5 205 SF NO CULVERT
01 -5, P1- 3,
TO Q1-2 2340 SF YES NO
02 -3, R1- 6 750 SF YES NO
R7 -COURTL AND 1195 SF NO NO
S1- 2 COURTLAND 3165 SF NO NO
T1- 4 600 SF NO NO
T4- 7 370 SF NO YES
U1 -7 605 SF NO NO
U8 -11 880 SF NO NO
V1- 4 0 SF YES NO
W1 -4 220 SF NO YES
AREA D
NO IMPACTS, TRAIL HAS BEEN REALIGNED AWAY FROM THIS AREA
TOTAL 15,755 SF
.362 ACRE
START SOUTHERN PHASE OF TRAIL
AT GARRETT ROAD PARK
MATCHLINE 1:2
ROSE BROOK DR V
-0?0PD ?, 1 7 OPEN ® ?'r
S?,JHR000 SPACE
OPEN SPACE A
HOPE VALLEY 1 I ®? .
FARMS ?t ?? o
i
,+ z
WETLAND SECTOR A
(t? 1 WETLAND AREA
v..
1
aouo \\ A1-
1
,• GARRETT ?
ROAD PARK /
0
o
n ?
0
Q

v
f? °0
a
o

a
r
WOODSEDGE a a Al-4I SPACE ?a
APARTMENTS D 1
? r a
? v - I r FL DWAY
C1 r
WETLAND SECTOR B
Al 4 5 WETLAND AREAS
mat ? \
FORK CREEK
PHI '
7 Ida
• RQF
PPING? o ' a
TER
0 ? FLOODPLAIN
?.. ?- 0 DPLAIN FLOODWAY / FLOODWAY
LEGEND
-- PROPERTY LINE -- FLOODWAY
WETLAND SECTOR FP- FLOODPLAIN
ss SEWER MANHOLE STREAM BUF=FER
PROPOSED TRAIL
SEWER MANHOLE (TYP)
North
-J
500 0 500 1000
EaEfl MA
Scale 1 500'
Project Job Number: 0831
Sheet Title
THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL Drawn WAR

fter ? Jewd ? Tha
Ca
???
NORTH/SOUTH TRAIL SYSTEM DURHAM NC
Checked Oh
Date 8-31-04 OVERALL TRAIL

WETLAND
u
PA Re
visions 7-31-09
DELINEATION MAP
ENGINEERING.PLANNING.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE OWNER:
CITY OF DURHAM WETLAND DELINEATION SOUTH TRAIL
111 West Main Street Durham, North Carolina 27701
p919.682.0368 f919.688.5646 PROPERTY & FACILITY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
Tc? NOT ISSUED FOR
TM 101 CITY HALL PLAZA, DURHAM, NC 201
GUILLO RODGRIGUEZ
II CONSTRUCTION
SHEET 1 OF 4
R OPEN SPACER TRm&
D
PHONE [phone] (FAX [phone])
THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL, DURHAM NC
WETLAND DISTURBANCE - SOUTHERN PHASE
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PIPES
TRAIL IMPACT BOARD- UNDER
LOCATION THROUGH WETLAND WALK TRAIL
AREA A
Al- 7 258 SF
NO
PIPES ADJACENT
AREA B
A1- 4 0 SF YES NO
C1 -5 406 SF YES NO
D1 -4 0 SF YES NO
E1- 4 0 SF YES NO
G1 -7 0 SF YES NO
AREA C
A1- 6 0 SF YES NO
31 -6 365 SF NO CULVERT
C1 -8, D1- 3 760 SF NO NO
E1- 4 240 SF NO NO
F1- 9 540 SF NO NO
G1 -3 0 SF NO NO
H1 -3 500 SF NO NO
- 3 0 SF NO NO
J1- 7 1490 SF NO YES
K1 -4 0 SF NO NO
L1- 4 870 SF NO NO
M1 -4 0 SF NO NO
N1 -5 205 SF NO CULVERT
01 -5, P1- 3,
TO Q1-2 2340 SF YES NO
Q2 -3, R1- 6 750 SF YES NO
R7 -COURTL AND 1195 SF NO NO
S1- 2 COURTLAND 3165 SF NO NO
T1- 4 600 SF NO NO
T4- 7 370 SF NO YES
U1 -7 605 SF NO NO
U8 -11 880 SF NO NO
V1- 4 0 SF YES NO
W1 -4 220 SF NO YES
AREA D
NO IMPACTS, TRAIL HAS BEEN REALIGNED AWAY FROM THIS AREA
TOTAL 15,755 SF
.362 ACRE
LEGEND
--- PROPERTY LINE -FW FLOODWAY
WETLAND SECTOR rp- FLOODPLAIN
ss SEWER MANHOLE STREAM BUFFER
MATCHLINE 1:2
I MATCHLINE 2:3
/ i HI-3 ?
G1-3
I.. 1_9
{? r
JII?I o?!
OPEN ?.. LF
/ SPACE /
,
F / lll-.1 'X/' 1
?..?b .
1 OPEN i
AI-6 SPAC
L WOODRF?SGE ° _S REAM REPAIR AREA 1
t , = z \ STAB X50
t _...?.'_.. _.. F 7
2 I I
Z ?
r
it
` a z z 9?
i r , 2 9L
i t i z r?00o
x ? 1 •, , 1.l
ti
N I.
2
? OPEN ?
1 SPACE z
1 EAGLE RIDGE a0-
? z
I
I •\
SECTOR C•
JVD AREAS
North
500 0 500 1000
Scale 1 500'
Project Job Number: 0831
Sheet Title
THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL Drawn WAR

0??? ??wd ^ ?M(BS
Ca
NORTH/SOUTH TRAIL SYSTEM, DURHAM, NC Checked Da
Date 8-31-04 OVERALL TRAIL
WETLAND
V V PA.
u
di WETLAND DELINEATION Revisions 7-31-09 DELINEATION MAP
ENGINEERING.PLANNING.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE OWNER.
CITY OF DURHAM -SOUTH TRAIL
111 West Main Street Durham, North Carolina 27701
p919.682.0368 f919.688.5646 PROPERTY & FACILITY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
Tc? NOT ISSUED FOR
TM 101 CITY HALL PLAZA, DURHAM, NC 201

GUILLO RODGRIGUEZ
CONSTRUCTION

SHEET 2 OF 4
DR OPEN SPACEAlNTRmm
PHONE [phone] (FAX [phone])
THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL, DURHAM NC
WETLAND DISTURBANCE - SOUTHERN PHASE
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PIPES
TRAIL IMPACT BOARD- UNDER
LOCATION THROUGH WETLAND WALK TRAIL
AREA A
Al-7 258 SF
NO
PIPES ADJACENT
AREA B
A1-4 0 SF YES NO
C1-5 406 SF YES NO
D1-4 0 SF YES NO
E1-4 0 SF YES NO
G1-7 0 SF YES NO
AREA C
Al- 6 0 SF YES NO
31 -6 365 SF NO CULVERT
C1 -8, D1-3 760 SF NO NO
E1 -4 240 SF NO NO
F1- 9 540 SF NO NO
G1 -3 0 SF NO NO
H1 -3 500 SF NO NO
1- 3 0 SF NO NO
J1- 7 1490 SF NO YES
K1 -4 0 SF NO NO
L1- 4 870 SF NO NO
M1 -4 0 SF NO NO
N1 -5 205 SF NO CULVERT
01 -5, P1-3,
TO Q1-2 2340 SF YES NO
Q2 -3, R1-6 750 SF YES NO
R7 -COURTLAND 1195 SF NO NO
S1 -2 COURTLAND 3165 SF NO NO
T1- 4 600 SF NO NO
T4- 7 370 SF NO YES
U1 -7 605 SF NO NO
U8 -11 880 SF NO NO
V1- 4 0 SF YES NO
W1 -4 220 SF NO YES
AREA D
NO IMPACTS TRAII HAS RFFN RFAI I(',NFF) AWAY FRnM THIS ARFA
TOTAL 15,755 SF
.362 ACRE I
rc
0
E]
o
I
I
I
3
' ......

CITY
DUR AM
? z
z
r
a,
z
0%,
LEGEND
-- PROPERLY LINE -rH FLOODNAY
NETLAND SECTOR FP- FLOODPLAIN
ss SENER MANHOLE STREAM BUFFER
North
500 0 500 1000
Scale 1" = 500'
r
I HOPE VALLEY v
II a FARMS
OPEN SPACE ?
2 f KI-4?
MATCHLINE 2:3 / a
Project Job Number: 0831
Sheet Title
THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL Drawn KRH

d 8A
Ch
k OVERALL TRAIL
Rer?Jewd TG?a
?c??
C?o NORTH/SOUTH TRAIL SYSTEM DURHAM NC ec
e
Rake 8-31-0 E
I
u
P'0.
WETLAND DELINEATION
Revisions 7-31-09
D DEL
LINEA
EATION MAP
ENGINEERING.PLANNING.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE OWNER:
CITY OF DURHAM -SOUTH TRAIL
111 West Main Street Durham, North Carolina 27701
p919.6820368 919.688.5646 PROPERTY & FACILITY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NOT ISSUED FOR
TM 107 CITY HALL PLAZA, DURHAM, INC so,
GUILLO RODGRIGUEZ Uu CONSTRUCTION SHEET 3 OF 4
wLw Orexx Srnce AND Txn¢s
PHONE [phone] (FAX [phone])
THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL, DURHAM NC
WETLAND DISTURBANCE - SOUTHERN PHASE
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PIPES
TRAIL IMPACT BOARD- UNDER
LOCATION THROUGH WETLAND WALK TRAIL
AREA A
Al- 7 258 SF
NO
PIPES ADJACENT
AREA B
A1- 4 0 SF YES NO
C1 -5 406 SF YES NO
D1 -4 0 SF YES NO
E1- 4 0 SF YES NO
G1 -7 0 SF YES NO
AREA C
A1- 6 0 SF YES NO
31 -6 365 SF NO CULVERT
C1 -8, D1- 3 760 SF NO NO
E1- 4 240 SF NO NO
F1- 9 540 SF NO NO
G1 -3 0 SF NO NO
H1 -3 500 SF NO NO
11- 3 0 SF NO NO
J1- 7 1490 SF NO YES
K1 -4 0 SF NO NO
L1- 4 870 SF NO NO
M1 -4 0 SF NO NO
N1 -5 205 SF NO CULVERT
01 -5, P1- 3,
TO Q1-2 2340 SF YES NO
Q2 -3, R1- 6 750 SF YES NO
R7 -COURTL AND 1195 SF NO NO
S1- 2 COURTLAND 3165 SF NO NO
T1- 4 600 SF NO NO
T4- 7 370 SF NO YES
U1 -7 605 SF NO NO
U8 -11 880 SF NO NO
V1- 4 0 SF YES NO
W1 -4 220 SF NO YES
AREA D
NO IMPACTS, TRAIL HAS BEEN REALIGNED AWAY FROM THIS AREA
TOTAL 15,755 SF
.362 ACRE

?? SOUTHERN
\ BOUNDARIES 1
\ PARK J)
L
I E,6// • o? E-
= 2
LEGENE) MATCHLINE SOUTH 3:4
-- PROPERTY LINE -- FLOODNAY ,
NETLAND SECTOR FP- FLOODPLAIN
ss SENER MANHOLE STREAM BUFFER /i
TRAIL - BEGIN NORTHERN PHASE
END SOUTHERN PHASE
0
ETLAND SECTOR D
1 WETLAND AREA
O I .,....? a
ti
8-1 . z . U1-7 = I-
g /
0 E:I ?? ?. .. T1-I a
r \i=
....... .
O _
?a
D SECTOR C
North
500 0 500 1000
Scale 1 500'
Project Job Number: 0831
Sheet Title
THIRD FORK CREEK TRAIL Drawn KH

0??? ??wd ^ ?M(BS
Im ? ? Ca
NORTH/SOUTH TRAIL SYSTEM, DURHAM, NC Checked DAJ
Date 8-31-04 OVERALL TRAIL
WETLAND
V V PA.
u WETLAND DELINEATION Revisions 7-31-09 DELINEATION MAP
ENGINEERING.PLANNING.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE OWNER.
CITY OF DURHAM -NORTH TRAIL
111 West Main Street Durham, North Carolina 27701
p919.682.0368 f919.688.5646 PROPERTY & FACILITY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NOT ISSUED FOR
TM 101 CITY HALL PLAZA, DURHAM, NC 201
;.
GUILLO RODGRIGUEZ

CONSTRUCTION

HEET 4 OF 4
DR OPEN SPACE R Tm
PHONE [phone] (FAX [phone])