820723_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

NUHTH UAHLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

January 28, 2003
Mr. Kraig Westerbeek
PO Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Re: Green -Wean Farm
Permit Rescission
Permit # AWS820723
Dear Mr. Westerbeek,
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E- Director
Division of Water Quality
ft
Per your request, Permit # AWS820723 for your farm is hereby rescinded. You should
no longer receive invoices for your annual pern it fee but if you do, please contact me at (919)
733-5083, ext. 571 or Sue Homewood at [phone], ext. 502.
Sincerely,
4 �
Keith Larick
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
cc: Sue Homewood
Fran McPherson
cF.ayeUexilie:Regional 0f ice-,
File AWS820723
Central Files
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
http✓/h2o. enr. state.nc. us
NCDENR
Location.
512 N. Salisbury 5t
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

. IV
Y
r. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 17,1998
Garth Boyd, Ph.D., Director
Land & Nutrient Management
Murphy Family Farms
PO Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
SUBJECT: Green Wean Experimental Swine Farm
Garland Site
Garland, North Carolina
Sampson County
Dear Garth:
This letter is to clarify the Division of Water Quality's policy on non -
conventional swine facilities.
In a letter dated May 7, 1998, Mr. Kraig Westerbeek provided this office
with a brief summary of the Green Wean Swine Farm located near Garland, NC.
Mr. Westerbeek indicated that this facility was originally stocked in November
1996 with 240 swine. This number is below the 250 threshold of 250 swine as
stated in North Carolina Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H .0217
(1)(A). As the result of being below the 250 threshold, an approved Animal
Waste Management Plan would not have been required. Also, Mr. Westerbeek
stated due to his interpretation of the .0200 rules and the fact that the animals
would be housed for less than 45 days, a permit would not be required per House
Bill 515. NC Administrative Code 2H.0203 (Definition of Terms) (16) states
the definition of a feedlot as follows:
(16) "Feedlot" means a lot or building or combination of lots or
buildings intended for the confined feeding, breeding,
raising or holding of animals and specifically designed as a
confinement area in which animal waste may accumulate or
where the concentration of animals is such that an
established vegetative cover cannot be maintained. The
confinement period must be for at least 45 days our of a 12
month period and not necessarily consecutive days.
Pastures shall not be considered feedlots under this Rule."
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAPDX. INA 26301-SO43
PHONE B1 O-486.I S41 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/tO% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Dr. Boyd
Page 2
June 17, 1998
The main point with this definition is 45 days out of a 12 month period and not
necessarily consecutive days. By definition, the Green Wean facility would be considered a
feedlot.
Mr. Westerbeek's letter indicated that on March 30, 1998, a pilot test of 2,600 nursery
pigs were stocked into this facility to study performance. You indicated that the 2,600 nursery
pig waste generation would be equivalent to the 240 animals previously stocked at this facility.
Thus, you were implementing a Steady State Live Weight EauivalencX for the nursery pigs.
The Steady State Live Weight issue is still very controversial. The Inter -Agency
Guidance Committee appointed by the 1996 Session of the General Assembly has not as of this
date resolved this issue. Until this matter is resolved, the 250 swine threshold for requiring a
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan/Permit will take precedence.
Since this pilot study was initiated in November 1996, the Green Wean facility will be
considered existing. Should you keep less than 250 animals on this farm, a Certified Waste
Management Plan would -o-t be required. Should you desire to stock this facility with more than
250 animals, a permit to operate would be required. I have discussed this matter with Sue
Homewood, DWQ, Non -Discharge Permits and Engineering Branch. Sue indicated that a
General Permit for this facility could be attained by Murphy Facility Farms, provided all the
appropriate information about this facility is submitted. At a minimum, the following
information should be submitted for permit approval to our Permits and Engineering staff-
(1) Complex Size:
(a) Size of buildings
(b) Number of buildings
(c) Number of animals proposed per building
(2) Was teeneration
(a) Volume to he generated
(b) Disposal method
(c) Storage plan if waste is stockpiled
(d) Waste nutrient content

Dr. Boyd
Page 3
June 17, 1998
(31 Land Arg
(a) Map of Green Wean Complex
(b) Fields and acreage to be utilized
(c) Crop type
(d) Location distances to houses, property lines, ditches, and surface waters
(e) Soils evaluation
The above information would be equivalent to information required for a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan certified by a Technical Specialist. Once the above information
is received, a General Permit for the Green Wean farm would be given consideration for a
General Permit.
Should this facility be restocked with more than the threshold number of animals (250)
prior to receipt of the appropriate permit, an enforcement action would be inevitable by this
Division.
If you have any further questions, feel free to let me know.
Sincerely,
Grady Dobson
Environmental Engineer
GD/bs
cc: Sue Homewood, P&E

M RPHY -
FAMILY FARMS
June 15, 1998
Mr. Grady Dobson
Department of Environmental Resources
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Dear Grady:
RECEIVED
F
YG
-VILLE
yFF10E
In response to your inquiry about the Green -Wean farm near Garland, I have verified that
all the pigs have been removed and the farm is completely depopulated.
Before we restock the farm, we will acquire whatever permitting and/or certification that
DWQ requires for this deep bedding system. Sue Homewood is trying to make that
determination now.
I am,
Sincerely our ,
W
Garth W. Boyd, Ph.D.
Director, Land & Nutrient Management
GWB:rbc
cc: Jeff Turner
Gary Mann
Kraig Westerbeek
Post Office Box 759, Rose Hill, North Carolina 28458, [phone], FAX [phone]

RECEIVE
NCUENR
MAY 0 7 1998
Division of Water Quality
Att, Robert Heath REG. ���
225 Green Street
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mr. Heath
This letter is in response to your April 15, 1998 letter regarding the Green Wean
Farm in Sampson County. This facility was originally stocked in November 1996 with
240 sows. This farm began as a research project for our company, to determine the
production benefits, if any, of raising swine on a bedding material vs. concrete. The
amount of floorspace and bedding per pig, as well as estimates of the nutrient content of
the dry waste product, were determined through research gathered from like facilities in
the midwest,
This farm was not registered with your division for two reasons. First, the number
of animals on the farm was below the threshold level for 0200 rules. Second, certification
procedures for the 0200 rules were geared towards anaerobic lagoons or other `wet'
systems. The waste treatment system used by this farm is the same as the one used by
poultry growers. A dry litter management plan was written for the 240 sows this time to
insure that the nutrients leaving the farm would be disposed of properly.
On March 30th, 1998, the farm began stocking 2600 nursery pigs to test their
performance in this housing situation. On February 23, 1998, Mr. Green and I produced a
dry litter management plan for this facility that accounted for the waste generated by these
nursery pigs, plus that generated by 4500 finishing animals, The finishing animals shown
in the plan were included at the owners request but were never stocked. I produced this
plan using the guidelines for poultry dry litter management. I have included it for your
review.
Murphy Family Farms neither asked for or received a permit or certification for
this farm. For the reasons outlined above, we did not think it to be necessary to certify the
farm under 0200 rules. In addition, we did not think it had to be permitted per SB 1217
because it housed animals continuously for less than 45 days, which seems to be an
exclusion under this bill.

We are willing to cooperate in any reasonable way to insure this farm's compliance
with all applicable rules and regulations. If you have any questions, please call me at (910)
289 2111 ext. 4556.
�Iraig W-esterbeek
NM Manager
Murphy Family Farms

DRY LITTER NIANAGEtiIENT PLAIN
Esistina or New or Expanded (please circle one)
General Information: f
Narne of Farm: S)f��v� �o►� _ 1 0� r,�ti
Land Owner(s) Marne: r,.' ✓ Phone No: alp 9 a- 3 1
Maiis.r.g Address: I,
, Ri �� .AIC ;;L'C-Ll Sqi5
County:
Operation Description:
Type a}par r. NO- of.4nrmals Type of f c. OfAnimals
❑ i urkev 0 Broiler
O Turkey Breeder ❑ Broiler Roaster
❑ Turkey Brooder (Poult) ❑ Broiler Breeder
❑ Turkey Grower Hen = t7 I?ulless
0 Turkev Grower Tom Ot��er aiL1p wee:
L1500
Manure Handlin; Method: Oucmir• of Litter Produced
❑ 'Whole Litter Tote! Litter Prodixed
❑—/Niaaure Cake
C�` �tcc:piled Litter ' 1, 19 (0 T4r-1 3
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing_ I (we) understand the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the dr,, litter management plan for the fare named above and
will irolement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacirtir of the waste
tr-__aZment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new dry firer management plan to be
completed_ I (we) understand than the animal waste application program shall be enec:iveiv taimained and
operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of waste to surface waters, wetlands or surface water
dr?izase systems (except for stoma everts exceeding the =3-year, ?--hour storm). The prod=ucerlrhird -parry
applicator must report by renewhone to the appropriate Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Re-gional Office as soon as
passiale but in no case more than 34 hours or the next business day followin; the occurrence or first knowledge of
the occ :re:tce of any failure of the animal waste system or rranspor sys,em that results in a discharge to the surface
wzte. i of the state or an over application of waste. (See the attached asap for the regions covered by each DWQ
regiocai office). Compliance with the recommendations contained in this plan is the sole msponsioility of the
far_-cr/third party applicator. Any questions concerning the tnforcement of this plan should be addressed to the
regional office of the North Carolina Deparrrient of Environment, :?e_itti and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality, Water Quality Section (see act-ched map).
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of ProducerfiManager (if diffe- t - om own - : s L �,re.ew .-1
Signature: Date: a L
Preparation P►ssist hv': ¢�s 4e- Date: a 3 3
Address: Phone: ' a
' it tr_hkal assistaner is proviNed in the dcveloprnenr of this plan. the person providing sssistaacc should sien the form.
DP—%IP Marcia 17. 1997—Page 3

DRY LITTER MANAGEMENT PLAN
GREEN WEAN FARM
SAMPSON COUNTY
2/23/98
The following plan addresses the waste management procedures for the Green
Wean Farm located on SR 1211 in Sampson County. This facility uses a dry litter system
similar to poultry houses to capture the waste produced_ The litter produced will be
spread on surrounding fields as outlined in this plan.
The following waste will be produced by this facility:
-2600 hd. wean -feeder x .4lbs bedding/lb gainx401bs gainx7turns/yr.x3lbs litter/lb
bedding-- 436.8tons litter x 5.11bsTN/ton(avg. )= 2,227.68TN
4500 hd. feeder-finishxllbs bedding/lb gainx250lbs gainx2.5turns6rrx3lbs litter/lb
bedding-4219tons litter x 5.1lbs TN/ton(avg.)=21,515.63TN
Total Nitrogen = 23,743 lbs
The following fields will be used for waste application:
Tract _.
_ Field
Soil Type
Acres
T2728
1
WaB
32.39
2
WaB
6.00
3
WaB
13.5
4
WaB
14.92
T 10174
1
WaB
5.26
2
WaB
2.36
3
WaB
.63
4
WaB
2.72
T331 i
1
WaB
1.49
2
WaB
.40
3
WaB
.63
4
WaB
1,40
T3318
1
WaB
8.76
T3321
1
NoB
2.75
T3315
1
NoB
21.54
2
WaB
2.40
3
WaB
25.41
TOTAL
142.56

The following Nitrogen rates should be used on all fields for the crops shown:
Corn
93.75 Ibs N/acre
Soybeans
100.0 lbs Nlacre
Wheat
96.0 lbs Nlacre
Rye(grazed)
50.0 lbs Nlacre
With all fields in a corn/wheat/ bean/ rye rotation, grower will be able to apply and utilize
24,218 lbs N in a years time based on the RYE's of crops being grown.
Please refer to the attached set of required specifications for dry fitter. These
specifications include guidelines for application, stockpiling, and record keeping. Also
included as part of this plan are all necessary agreements for landowners receiving waste
and third party applicators. Grower should keep records on the attached DRY1,2,and 3
forms and should refer to calibration information for the calibration of spreaders used for
application. Nitrogen generation values are based on averages and could/ will vary from
those outlined in this plan.

Required Specifications
1. Dry litter will be sampled as close to the time of application as practical but at least within 60 days of
land application for waste analysis_ The state average ti content for dry litter as shown in the
North Carolina :laricultttral Chemical Manual published annually by NiCSU may be used to
calculate application rates in lieu of individual waste analysis; however, waste analysis is still
rev,uired. For more information about proper procedures for sampling manure For nutrient analvsis,
see Cooperative Extension Service publication number AG-2139-33, SoilFacrs: l:iraste .3nalvsis.
2. Litler will not be stockpiled within 100 feet of perennial seams or Groundwater wells.
3. Soils from fields receiving poultry litter applications will be sampled annually for astandard soil
fertiliry analysis. For more information about proper procedures for sampling manure for nutrient
analysis, see Cooperative Extension Service publication number AG-439-30. SoilFactr_ Careful Soil
:Sampling — The Key to Reliable Soil Test Information.
4. Lime will be applied in accordance with the standard soil test report to assure suitable conditions for
crop growth.
.5_. Alternate fields will be used for land application of litter should soil copper and zinc concentrations
reach a level that -is potentially harmful to the receiving crop. For more information about excessive
soil copper and zinc levels, contact a technical specialist that works for the Cooperative Extension
Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, North Carolina Deep meat of Agriculture or the
local Soil and Water Conservation District.
6. Liner will be applied at rates not to exceed the agronomic nitrogen rate of :he receiving crop. Rates
should be based on NCDA soil test recommendations or alternatives Given in NNRCS standards, such
as realistic yield expectations. For more information about realistic yield expec:ations, contact a
technical specialist that works for the Cooperative Extension Se. —vice, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, North Carolina Department of Agriculture or the local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
r. Record Keeping for Land Application:
a. Records will be kept for three years of soil test and waste analysis results.
b. Records will be kept for three years indicating the location of fields and rates at which litter is
land applied. (See Attached Forms DRY -2 and DRY-3)
S. If a third party contractor is used for cleanout of the poultry houses and/or land application, the
ownerlmanager of the poultry operation will:
a. beep a record of the name, address and phone number of applicator (See Third Parry Applicator
Agreement)
b. Keep a record of the amount of Inter removed (Form DRY-1)
c. Provide an appropriate waste analysis to the third party applicator
d. Provide a copy of these guidelines to the third parry applicator.
Best .management practices may be used to further protect water quality. For more information about
appropriate best management practices contact a technical specialist that works for the Cooperative
Extension Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, North Carolina Department of Agriculture
or the local Soil and Water Conservation District.

0
�
. 4
a
A. I .
.di{
0"

% /I 1 =L/ L Boa
-jz/'I'- NOA BOB Tn WaB
NOA BOB Au �` In Re
waB r
Pn • �V/' rr-- ^.f1 Le► {' r i BH a` BOB
EB
Ln~' NoA ,
NOB
Ra ; BOB 1 s In Tn ..
'- Au 7155 -y a9
oe
BOB `— 11 r Tn ''y / _ Ra g
W aB 1 +Kob
Ra L
NOA
J l� Ra Ra �, 'toy��, y TT, w;.• , r �f n'+.,
NIaC W a3� Au W al i, s
Wa8 '
Was 'k .
1 ! �.
wag. �n GOR 4D
NOA Pn y :� BOB o GG FO 0O
Ra ae '.ti GOA w t r
'Tr- _ Tr cy
C8 Pn. -xWa9 \ - u+
Re Was �•
NOA
aur W L 1 WaB y r" �oP a f r ,:r NOA rY 3 _ o8a S-
ti
iy,;� x+' ' } - - Tn -WaB :� -. `., h''u �'- a s.,e../•'
SH
Fo F Pn Au/q�/ r
vwl
Nob : HOB:
BOB
Tr 0 Z/
oA
Wo pd �.•" Auer `\- BOB
x -
_• �, _, fix. , 2 �_ '�,�• .� µ _,�� � . � :-ae- -
�.,,, BOB-
ry WaB
Bon 'r .Y LY y \\ •-/
j' ��:rre; E�� �- � =ter.• t _ .-��_ j_ ,-r' �•, � =�...
Wa8 �.}}-.T�y2}
` �' ., ram. R a • W .,,ti, :. �sF ;�• y.;. ''!'
BOe' --
�` � r x--. � � r G' c-HK :�._ -`Y -"B p` -oOP �•.'� ti ��� w.'�.
t" Wa8 4"_ zi/ , r ✓ rP ,. i_ iai x� �: s ili
NOB
Grc
Wag � �7 •, , JRO. , � - ';-.
JO.,Y CaB
a8 BOB CeA
f.
U
NOB f 11}D a'LY
Boa
�� ��• WaB
am_y
lo' o°!
7'. AG
.3 -Tr.`• tiaA 4+_,.1Tn
Ra • f. _ �Y r ' Fa was =Y
,g BOB
i.J - J . '�!� a - •- 16 Aa

EXAMPLE SHARED RzsPo\sIBILITY AGREEMENT FOR LAND APPLICATION of POULTRY LITTER
I. The conditions listed below are required by the State of North Carolina to protect water quality.
These conditions apply to litter removed from operations with housing capacity for more than
30,000 birds. The poultry litter covered by this agreement was removed on 199� from
the poultry operation owned by located at
in
County.
a. The litter must be managed to ensure that there is no discharge of the litter to the surface waters.
b. Litter will not be stockpiled within 100 feet of perennial streams or wells.
Waste sampling and providing a copy of the waste analysis to the applicator is the responsibility
of the producer. This information will be used in determining the application rate. The applicator
will provide the waste analysis to the landowner or land user as appropriate. The state average N
content for dry litter as shown in the North Carolina Agricultural Chemical Manual, published
annually by NCSU, may be used to calculate application rates in lieu of individual waste analysis;
however, waste analysis is still required.
d. Application rates will be ealcul itedto not exceed the agronomic nitrogen needs of the receiving crap.
e. Litter will be applied at rates not to exceed the agronomic nitrogen rate of the receiving crop.
f. Soils from fields receiving poultry litter will be sampled annually.
g. Soil pH for all fields on which litter is applied will be maintained in accordance with the standard
soil test report recommendations.
h. Should soil copper and zinc concentrations reach a level that is potentially harmful to the
receiving crop (above 700 on the NCDA soil test report), the land owner or land user should
contact a qualified specialists to discuss options for future applications of litter.
i. Record keeping for land application.
1) Records will be kept for three years of soil test and waste analysis.
2) Records will be kept for three years indicating the location of fields and rates at which litter is
land applied.
11. 1 the landowner or land user of fields where litter is applied accept responsibility for items
a. b. h and from part 1_
Print Name
Si --nature
Phone Number
Date
M. I the applicator agree to meet items a, b and all remaining conditions not accepted by the landowner
or landuser in Parr 11 above.
Print Name Phone Number
S ignature Date
DPLNIP— Mamh 17. 1997—Page 3

Dry Litter Utilization - Third Patty Applicator Agreement (Example)
I, herebv acknowledge that I have received a copy, have read and
understand the Dry Litter Management Plan dated that was developed for/by
for their facility located at
in County.
I hereby agree to manage and land apply the dry poultry litter that i received from this facility in a
manner consistent with the requirements of this Dry Litter Management Plan and keep copies of all
required records as specified in the Plan. Furthermore, should I choose to use and an alternative waste
utilization system, such as composting and marketing, the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Regional Office must be notified in writing.
Third Parry Receiver. Date:
Manure Producer.
Technical Representatives:
Dare:
Date:
Term of Agreement: 14_ to ,
0PL.%IP—t%4a=h 17. 1997—Page 7

Table 1.. Nitrogen Fertilization Guidelines per Unit of Realistic Yield
Commodity
lb N/Realistic Yield Expectation
Corn (rain)
1.0 to 1.25 lb N/bu
Wheat (grain)
1.7 to 2.4 lb N/bu
Rye (grain)
1.7 to 2.-,Ir lb N/bu
Oats (grain)
1.0 to 1.3 lb Nlbu
Barley (grain)
1.4 to 1.6 lb N/bu
Soybean (grain)
3.5 to 4.0 lb Nlbu
Triticale (;rain)
1.4 to 1.6 lb N/bu
Sorghum (grain)
2.0 to 2.5 lb N/cwt
Corn (silage)
10 to 12 lb N/ton
Sorahurn-sudangrass (hay)
45 to 55 lb N/dn, ton
Pearl 1vlillet (hay)
45 to 55 lb NI/dry ton
Berrnudagra_ss (hay') all areas of the state
40 to 50 lb N/dry ton
Tall fescue (hay')
40 to 50 lb Ni/dry ton
Orchard grass (hay')
40 to 50 lb N/dry ton
Timothy (hay')
40 to 50 lb N/dry ton
Small grain (hay'}
50 to 60 lb N/dry ton
Cotton
0.06 to 0.12 lb N/lb lint
Pine trees
40 to 60 lb N/acre/year
Hardwood trees
70 to 100 lb N/acre/year
' Reduce N rate by 25 percent when grazing.
Table 2. First year nitrogen availability coefficients for poultry litter.
Application Method � � Nitro -en Availability Coefficient
Broadcast -unincorporated 0.5
Broadcast - incorporated _ _ 0.6
DPLN1P—,March 17. 1997—Paec 9

Broiler Roaster House Whole Litter Typical Actual
a. dumber of birds per flock: 12500
b. Number of flocks per year: 4
c. Pounds market live weight per bird: 8
d. Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock: 2.6
e. Tons litter per year (a x b x d _ 1000) : 130
Broiler Breeder House Whole Litter
Typical Actual
a. Number of birds production facility capacity:
8000
b. Days per year birds in production facility:
365
c. Pounds market live weight per bird:
6
d. Pounds litter per 1000 birds per day:
01
e. Tons litter per 1000 bird capacity per year: (b x d _ 2000) 24
f Tons litter per year ( a x e _ 1000) : 192
Turkey Brooder (Poult) House Whole Litter Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 20000
b_ Number of flocks per year: 7
c. Average pounds market live weight per bird: 2.5
d. Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock: .73
e. Tons litter per year (a x b x d 1000) : 105
DPL.%,t? viarch 17, 1997 ?age 1

Turkey Grower Tom House Manure Cake Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 8000
b. Number of flocks per year: 3.4
c. Pounds market live weight per bird: 25
d. Tons cake per 1000 birds per flock: 2.5
e. Tons cake per. year (a x b x d = 1000) : 70
Turkey Stockpiled Litter Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 8000
z
b. Number of flocks per year: 3.4
c. Pounds market live weight per bird:
d. Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock:
e. Tons litter per year (a x b x d _ 1000)
Turkey Breeder House Whole Litter
a. Number of birds production facility capacity:
b. Days per year birds in production facility:
c. Pounds live weight per bird:
d. Pounds litter per 1000 birds per day:
e. Tons litter per 1000 bird capacity per year: (b x d _ 2000)
f. Tons litter per year ( a x e - 1000) :
25
6.6
180
Typical Actual
6000
365
20
204
37
DPLNIP---March 17. 1997—Page 13

Form DRY-1 Dry Liller Cieanotil Records
Farm Owner Third Party Applicator
Owner's Address Third Party Applicator's
Address
Owners Phone !1 Third Party Applicator's Phone 4
(1)
(3)
(4)
Use of Lillef
Date
mmlddlyr
N of toads
Removed
Spreader Volume '
(cubic feel)
Spreader Capacity F
(Ions)
Total Removal
(tons)
(4) ►I (2)
Temporary
Storage
(Ions)
Spread
on Farm
(Ions)
Removed
from Farm
(Ions)
Other ]
(ions)
Totals
' C%III lac luuod ill oper,ilor's mmuial for Ilse spreader. Caniacl a load dealer if you do not hrrvc your o+vner'y nranual,
' Scc ailachcd shecl for formula,
' 11114!:AIL: IN! (i.c., Malik: I'MI, cnmpnsled soil alunico4llrlenl, cnnuoeociall), dislrilluled organic fellituer, etc.)

Form DRY-3
Tract N
Field Siza (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Plione b
Field N
Dry Litter Application Field Record
One Form For Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone u
Front Animal Waste Management Plan
Cron Type Recommended PAN
—LI!_orrc!trig [Iltlacre) � (B)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Dale
(inMdd/y()
N of Loads Per Field
Wei,jhl of Loads
(Ions)
Total Weight
(tons)
(2) x (3)
Weight Per Acre
(Ionsrac)
(4) + (A)
Waste Ahulysis' PAN
phllen)
PAN Applied
(Iblac)
(6) x (5)
Nitrogen Balance '
(lblac)
Crop Cyclo Totals
Owner's Signature Spreader Operator's Signature
' L a❑ be fulrnd in uperilur's niauilal iiir the spreader. Cowncl a lucid dealer if you do nol Irave your owner's ilPunrd.
Sec Your waste 111allit8cliteld Plan Frir s:ostiliflot; IrelIuenc'y. At n iniiltinittil, %vaste analysis is re(lidwil willtiti 60 {lays or land nlioicaliun eveuls.
' Liitor the value received by subiracliii(; culunin (7) frunt (11). C milinuc s11111Mcliu(; eulunln (7) liunl colunul (8) fulluwin6 each ap)tiicatinn emil.

5. Multiply the manure density by the cubic feet capacin° of the spreader and divide by 2000
to get the tons of material in a spreader load.
%veieht of 5 eal manure x 1.5 x spreader cat3acity (ft ')
Spreader load (tons) c �000
Solid and Semi -Solid Manure Spreaders
In order to calibrate a spreader for solid manure (20 percent or more solids), the following
materials are needed:
1. Bucket
2. Plastic sheet, tarp or old bedsheet. An even size, 8 feet by 8 feet, 10 feet by 10 feet, or 12 feet
by 12 feet. vill make calculations easier.
3. Scales
Z
Calibration method.•
l . Locate a large and reasonably smooth, flat area where manure can be applied.
2. Spread the plastic sheet, tarp or bed sheet smoothly and evenly on the ground.
3. Fill the spreader with manure to the normal operating level. Drive the spreader at the
normal application speed :award the sheet spread on the ground, allowing the manure to
begin leaving the spreader at an even, normal rate_
4. Drive over the sheet at the normal application speed and settings while continuing to
apply manure. If a rear discharge spreader is used, three passes should be made: first,
drive directly over the center of the sheet, the other two on opposite sides of the center at
the normal spreader spacing overlap.
5. Weigh the empty bucket and plastic sheet, tarp, or blanket.
6. Collect all manure spread on the sheet and place it into the bucket.
7. Weigh bucket and manure and subtract the weight of the empty bucket and ground sheet.
This will give you the pounds of manure applied to the sheet.
8. Repeat the procedure three times to get a reliable average.
9. Determine the average weight of the three manure applications.
DPLNIP—.March 17. 1997--rage 19

Example:
What speed should you run if you wish to apply 4 tons of manure per acre with a 3-tan spreader?
Your spreader application width is 20 feet and your spreader empties in 6 minutes.
Travel speed (mph) = 3 tons x 495 T 3.1 mph
6 min x 30 t't x 4 tons/acm
Spreader Pattern Uniformity
To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap needed, place a Iine of small
pans or trays equally spaced (2 to 4 feet) across the spreader path. The pans should be a
minimum of 12 inches by 12 inches (or 15 inches in diameter), but no more than 24 inches by
24 inches, and ? inches to 4 inches deep. 'lake one spreading pass directly over the center pan.
Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the contents into equally sized glass cylinders or
clear plastic tubes and compare the amount in each.
The effective spread width can be. found by locating the point on either side of the path center
where manure contents caught in the containers is half of what it is in the center. The distance
between these points is the effective spreader width_ The outer fringes of the coverage area
beyond these points should be overlapped on the next path to ensure a uniform rate over the
entire field. `-Flat-top," "pyramid," or "oval" patterns are most desirable and give the most
uniform application. "VT." "W," "steeple," or "topside" patterns are not satisfactory and one or
more of the spreader adjustments should be made.
DPL.MP—,ttarch 17. I997—Page 21

NCDA onomic Division 4300 Reed Creck Road ,' RAlItei 'NC .27607=6465;`- 919 .:733=2655 :<.,; ..-, ,; ta. } : , :;, ` .: } Re ort No: W01904 W:
C;rnrver: Greeimear terms (;opies 1'r): Ultillty I:xtelision Director
1656 Ubmerer Forest Road LiSDA-N CS -Sampson
®
Garland, NC 28441
Waste Analysis R eport l:am: -�
12/ 1/97
Sampson County
5 nl'v: �.
r
'[:�Itora�u'""�tiC'saltrl� -�'"
s r w i *� �x! �� • v 41 ;t, �, s 1
ir:idlJlinu�util�ss:oltier�vvlsi-iiot64l ��t ��� z z��. rk,e �.�°�"��..,;� ,,
,Sanlp!e ID:
N
1' S Ca Af f S to Afn %n Crr if Alo
FL
h7ir+! . 15643
9185 9707 10399 2920 2026 1152 77.9 218 33-3 7.34 150792
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NII4
FCS
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb At Se L! li SS ON UM% CCE96 AI.0 torts
1851 6.84 658 9.64 40.89
�,DescHplim.,,\OR-N
Gom stet s
Urfa
pllcailarfMellrod :-
Broadcast
N P2Q4` XxO., Cn' �Jll9 ;°rl SY t ='ie * :: `Alit ' ',. Zn Y Sri I3 : '; "Mo Cl
5.1 lU. 7.G
3 5.1 1.4 :0.99 ' 0.57 .i'g 0.04 ti 11 0.02 c •
Na Ni Cd 1'b At Sa i.i
1.5
Soil into
6.4 12.9 8.6 6.4 IS 1.2 0,71 0,65 U.13 102 T
1.5
itrogen is very higli in relation to csubon (Low C:N itatio). It (lie waste pro+ltict is to he used as a raw material In co,iiposling, blend it will another nrllerhd with a high G:N nitio, The C:N mtio should he 20-30 for
deal composting condiliorts.
'oluble salt level is very lilgl
The compost cannot be tlsed as a landscape soil or polling media Without blending other materials to lower soluble salls 10 art aml)table level. Very high suluble salt,S likely indicate very
sigh nutrient availability. T
e a matching soil sample to further evaluaie fill and nutrient avallaliility.
'out ost lI is higher tha ideal for lam production. if the compost Avill he used'as a himisca )e or polling soil blend other materials or add elemental sulfur to decrease )11 to [lie desired range. /tea general role, add
p P P>h p Il po� i, fi F I E;
.25 lb. of elemental stl it
per cu. yd. of soil to lower It 0.5.1.0 unit. One month after treatment, take a soil sample to deternikie if 1l is within the desired range.
Saul le info.
Lahoralo Results
arts per million ttnless otlierwise noted
Sample In
A'
I' $ (:rr All, 5' /r Airr /.n
r;rr 1t Ah) r,7 c;
OLD
1,61al 33429
15956 28372 19855 5323 5782 1253 221) 508
75A 13.4 322369
1N -N
Waste Code:
-NI14
Ft;S
-NO3
Na N( Cd Pb At Se li II
SS C:N DAM (:CMj AIE tons
3521 7.07
800 9.64 81.21
Deseription:
OR -IV
Composted. Swine Waste
Urea
Reciimmettdattona: ' `> , K�r: ; '
� Ntitriebts AVailablk for f�lrst.Crs1 t `` .' + y: MOM LM blssJs ' `
Otticr Ellemcnts"'y" Jbsitoli girt brtsts
pik4florr Method
N 'P205 A 20
'Ca Mg s ` : re ; r ' Afri 7rf Cir' ° ll rlfrt Cl
Ara Ni Cd Pb Al Se U
Broadcast
11.7 35.4 44.2
19.4 5.2 3.7 1.2 0.22 0.50 0.07 0.01
5.7
Soil Incorp
27.2 44.2 49,8
.24.2 6.5 4.6 1:5 0.28 062 0.11Y) 0.02
5,7
itrogen Is very 1041 in relation to carbon (i,o+v C:N Ratio). If the waste producI Ls t0 Ile used m .a rnv nmierial in con iposiirig, blend it whit another iimleri,l
_
with a liigh C:N ralio. The C:N ratio should be 20-34) fur
dCal composting Conditions.
,solobie:sall level 15 very high.
Die compost cannot he used as a landscape soil or polling media 1011101.1t hlCndiilg other !Materials io lower soluble sally to iii acceptable level. Very high soluble salts likely indicate very

NCDA onomlc Division' 4300„Reed Creek Roads Uii t NG'x76o7 G�fG5� �lq y �3r2G5 ' Gfo e : G reirii !ear"Farmer � Re ' ° rt Nos: W0i9p�i`�' " Z "�:
sl nuttiertl �gahllitp Take a matching soil saki le 10urther evalua(c p"ii'and_iiutrlen;t aiialy
lmilt
R {, •., :Ka_+4dK
tip�+...i'Y Rtii`-.•Y „,•*t 5 l $it t 7: t
ompas; pii is higher than tdeai for plant prodtYclwn., if the compbst will be used as "a l�Yidscajic pr fwliin_g Soil, Ulei'ilo* ltier uii't&I'is or.add'eleniei<ital suif►ir to decrease pl l to the desirccl rani c. M,i a Ohei`al rule, add
).25 lt�. of elemental sulfur per co. of sail to loiser }ill 0.5-1.0 mill. One month'alier IrealnYcnt, Bike a soil s�ihlp eto ile c if"ifne If pll is'walYlll tlrc dcsirCd rasYgc.
i�

-------------------
I
!- ./
' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 17,1998
Garth Boyd, Ph.D., Director
Land & Nutrient Management
Murphy Family Farms
PO Box 759
Rose Hill, NC 28458
SUBJECT: Green Wean Experimental Swine Farm
Garland Site
Garland, North Carolina
Sampson County
Dear Garth:
This letter is to clarify the Division of Water Quality's policy on non -
conventional swine facilities.
In a letter dated May 7, 1998, Mr. Kraig Westerbeek provided this office
with a brief summary of the Green Wean Swine Farm located near Garland, NC.
Mr. Westerbeek indicated that this facility was originally stocked in November
1996 with 240 swine. This number is below the 250 threshold of 250 swine as
stated in North Carolina Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H .0217
(1)(A). As the result of being below the 250 threshold, an approved Animal
Waste Management Plan would not have been required. Also, Mr. Westerbeek
stated due to his interpretation of the .0200 rules and the fact that the animals
would be housed for less than 45 days, a permit would not be required per House
BiII 515. NC Administrative Code 2H.0203 (Definition of Terms) (16) states
the definition of a feedlot as follows:
(16) "Feedlot" means a lot or building or combination of lots or
buildings intended for the confined feeding, breeding,
raising or holding of animals and specifically designed as a
confinement area in which animal waste may accumulate or
where the concentration of animals is such that an
established vegetative cover cannot be maintained. The
confinement period must be for at least 45 days our of a 12
month period and not necessarily consecutive days.
Pastures shall not be considered feedlots under this Rule."
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAVETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY l AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLE0110% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Dr. Boyd
Page 2
June 17, 1998
The main point with this definition is 45 days out of a 12_month period and no
ntppssarily consecutive days. By definition, the Green Wean facility would be considered a
feedlot.
Mr. Westerbeek's letter indicated that on March 30, 1998, a pilot test of 2,600 nursery
pigs were stocked into this facility to study performance. You indicated that the 2,600 nursery
pig waste generation would be equivalent to the 240 animals previously stocked at this facility.
Thus, you were implementing a Steady State Live Weight Equivalency for the nursery pigs.
The Steady State Live Weight issue is still very controversial. The Inter -Agency
Guidance Committee appointed by the 1996 Session of the General Assembly has not as of this
date resolved this issue. Until this matter is resolved, the 250 swine threshold for requiring a
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan/Permit will take precedence.
Since this pilot study was initiated in November 1996, the Green Wean facility will be
considered existing. Should you keep less than 250 animals on this farm, a Certified Waste
Management Plan would not be required. Should you desire to stock this facility with more than
250 animals, a permit to operate would be required. I have discussed this matter with Sue
Homewood, DWQ, Non -Discharge Permits and Engineering Branch. Sue indicated that a
General Permit for this facility could be attained by Murphy Facility Farms, provided all the
appropriate information about this facility is submitted. At a minimum, the following
information should be submitted for permit approval to our Permits and Engineering staff-
(1) Complex Size:
(a) Size of buildings
(b) Number of buildings
(c) Number of animals proposed per building
(2) Waste Generation
(a) Volume to be generated
(b) Disposal method
(c) Storage plan if waste is stockpiled
(d) Waste nutrient content

O-M
Dr. Boyd
Page 3
June 17, 1998
(31 LgDd Area
(a) Map of Green Wean Complex
(b) Fields and acreage to be utilized
(c) Crop type
(d) Location distances to houses, property lines, ditches, and surface waters
(e) Soils evaluation
The above information would be equivalent to information required for a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan certified by a Technical Specialist. Croce the above information
is received, a General Permit for the Green Wean farm would be given consideration for a
General Permit.
Should this facility be restocked with more than the threshold number of animals (250)
prior to receipt of the appropriate permit, an enforcement action would be inevitable by this
Division.
If you have any further questions, feel free to let me know.
GD/bs
CC' Sue Homewood, P&E
Sincerely,
Grady Dobson
Environmental Engineer

Y4
' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEviLLE REGIONAL OFFICE
f
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 15, 1998
I0j a UVE31.
R R ! I I R R
Dr. Garth Boyd
P.O. Box 759
Rose Hi11, NC 28458
Subject: Request for Information
Green Wean Swine Farm
Sampson County
Dear Dr. Boyd:
On April 8, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted a site investigation at the Green Wean
Facility located on Ebenezer Forest Road at the request of the Division of
Soil and Water to determine if the facility was required to register the
facility. The investigation revealed that the facility had approximately 1000
wean pigs in one of the houses.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following information be
provided for review:
1. Information regarding the date of construction of the farm, design
capacity and any additional historical information.
2. information regarding the date that the farm was converted to a
nursery and stocking occurred.
Please provide the above information and any other pertinent information
in regard to this facility to this office on or before May 15, 1998.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NaRTH CAROLINA 28301-S043
PHONE [phone] FA% 910-486-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 509E RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Dr. Garth Boyd
Page 2
Green Wean Farm
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Robert Heath, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist
cc: Sue Homewood - Compliance Group
Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. NRCS
Audrey Oxendine - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
Murphy Family Farms

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Murphy Family Farms
Green -wean Farm
PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Attn: Kraig Westerbeek
Dear Kraig Westerbeek:
/ 0IT
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 10, 1998 11 EC H E
fiLJ .9/8
'EVIU e
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS820723
Green -wean Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Sampson County -
In accordance with your application received on June 30, 1998, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Murphy Family Farms, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Green -wean Farm, located in Sampson County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 2600 Wean to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in `accordance with NCGS 143- '
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, `and injunctive relief.
f
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% past -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS820723
Green -wean Farm
Page 2
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be fmal and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely
ALA. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Sampson County Health Department
Fayetteville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Sampson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File

e-Hb v ',, F:7ka) 2�7— 72-3
MEMO From:
To:
Division of Water QQuafity
Date: � � �`"
Subject:
C'��� � tee o i �n� + do
� qak oLka �
0 �'s L�-
a� ` w r cc�n -e erns I comffri-)�D--
4 J998
FAY � ai�g
REG. OFFICE
AS A-
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
PO Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 / Phone: [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existingd Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Gr t.-_V% — e ,,� FC, ,r
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: /A T::�k w, % 1-, �nrnn S
1.3 Mailing address: t 7J/
City: g e V{ I r 1, State: G Zip: $
Telephone Number (include area code): �1Q) R 9
1.4 County where facility is located:
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearestlmajor highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map +with the location of the farm identified): r ,,,� [,a; a,� !�f C i-c, �Ce_ Nl Z4
'incr.;n rC�S rrir;, Av- ,4\ni 5�QH. �', 1.0
a^ tticc n yF1 5 11 . j-=i1u.;� 14 k% -.y.
1.6 Print Farm Manager'snname (if different from Land Owner): �t.1
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): IIVuC2),Ij �o.rrr S
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 1j ({ j (99
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): jVA A
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: A -""% (county number);
(facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: �,Z,-tee operation
- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? = yes; Fno. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The 'No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structureswere designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry
No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
Wean to Feeder X(Z*D Layer
Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer
Beef
Farrow to Wean O# sow) Turkey
Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 1 of 4

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 19 a. ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 33. 00
2.4 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? or NO (please circle one)
2.5 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one) 111A
2.6 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
<�r NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?. 66, 15- z, _ ^
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? $qev%. 1:�:.
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Aanlicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
32 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAMAP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations,
i%e CAWNIP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3 2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injecrion, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops gown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 I Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3. l 5 Lagoon/storage pond capaciry documentation (design, calculations, etc.) If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, such as irrigation design or site
evaluation, please include the additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO•G-E 1/28/98 Page 2 of 4

Facility Number.
Facility Name:
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
`
I, /' ,n ,�
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1 2), attest that
this application fob — ILA3co% v"\ (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will i)e retSKmed to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date �rlfoI9 -
5. rAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
i, C ✓ Zs G e (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for C, rp G .-% — 6e Q n (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Sign a n �� Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
R4LEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 1/28/98 Page 3 of 4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (1/98)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polls
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax (9I0) 486-0707
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance "
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 29405-3945
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
_ _ :�
Alamance
Rockingham
AlIeghany
Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-G-E 1128/98 Paae 4 of 4

POULTRY DRY LITTER MA1'AGEtifEi~T PLA JN
xistin<► or `e%v or Expanded (please circle one)
General information:
Name of Farm: G te_ e% - (.Jce}-r. ��•✓ - _
Owner(s) `ame: k'A wr r-.. Phone No: �i0) ' a 1 1 }
Mailing Address: t� t�. c-a,. 759 _
Alen D '9 '5 T ur
County: JUN J 0 l96
Operation Description: ,
Type of Poultry Ho. ofAnimals TypeVf_?V__1_7 No.
0 Turkey O Broiler
J' Turkey Breeder 0 Broiler Roaster
0 Turkev Brooder (Poult) i7 Broiler Bre:der
O Turkev Grower Hen C
u] r> e-
0 Turkey Grover Tom
Manure Handfing Method: Quzntir,ofLiner Producea
i] Wino;_ Li-t. -
0 'Aanur- Cake
��Od kc� . "JGo►n - Qe_JP- e'
Total L iaer Proc:::ed
434-3 iD�cJ 5
I (ive) verify that all une above information is core.-, and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the
operation and m_inienance oroc:dures es:abiishtd in the dry liner managernenr pion for Eh: farm a_rted above and
will implement znzsc _rocedures. I (we) kr'ow ;;,at any expansion to the existing design capacity of the ws:c
treatment and storage systern or corstrumion of r:_w facilities will require a new dry lazcr manzee:zent Diann to b.
completed. I (w=) undt.stand that the animal tip-=ste application program shall be effectiveiv maintained : n.:
op"Eed as a ,neon-Ctscharge sVSIem to prevent tt:e discharge of waste to surtaCl- wnt Mrs. wetlands or sumac_ WZt'_:
drainage systems (except for storm events exc-tiding the 25-year, 24-hour storm). The producerithird par-;
applicator must report by telephone to the appropriate Division of Water Quality (DLi+Q) Regional Office as soon as
possible but in no c?Se more than 24 hours or the next business day following the occurrence or rs, I;aowledge of
the oCCUr enCe of Z.-,V failure of the animal waste system or =sport system that results to a discharge to zhe su,iace
waters o f the stzle Oran over application of waste. (See the ar-ached map for the regions coveredby_:ai;� DV Q
regional officn). Cor,Dliance with the recommendations contained in this plan is the sole responsibility of the
farmer/third parry applicator. Any questions concerning the enforcement of this plan should be addressed :o the
regional off ice of ;be North Caro€€na Departmcm of Environment, Health and , latural Resources, Division of Wattr
Quality, Vv/ater Quality Section (see at'tachcti map)_
,`lame of Land Owner: �%.A. T V, rr% 5
Signature:
,Name of Manager(ifdifferen g4owner):
G ✓� �� �+ �
Signature: A
Prep3rati,
Address:
Date: Gil Lr1 T
Date: (,ow98
Date: (of/(ol� _
phone..
. If technical :ssiStan c: is provided in the c1cvciopm=,( of this plan, the person providing assis:aner should sign thr fort_
DPLNIP--.'•larca i7, 199:—Page3

DRY LITTER MANAGEMENT PLAN
GREEN WEAN FARM
SAMPSON COUNTY
2/23/98
The following plan addresses the waste management procedures for the Green
Wean Farm located on SR 1211 in Sampson County. This facility uses a dry litter system
similar to poultry houses to capture the waste produced. The litter produced will be
spread on surrounding fields as outlined in this plan.
The following waste will be produced by this facility:
-2600 hd. wean -feeder x Albs beddingAb gainx401bs gainx7turns/yr.x3lbs litter/lb
bedding= 436.8tons litter x 6.4lbsTN/ton(avg.)=- 2795.5TN
Total Nitrogen Produced= 2795.5 lbs
The following fields will be used for waste application:
Tract
Field
Soil Type
Acres
T2728
1
WaB
32.39
2
WaB
6.00
3
WaB
13.5
4
WaB
14.92
T 10174
1
WaB
5.26
2
WaB
2.36
3
WaB
.63
4
WaB
2.72
T3311
1
WaB
1.49
2
WaB
.40
3
WaB
.63
4
WaB
1.40
T3318
1
WaB
8,76
T3321
1
NoB
2.75
T3315
1
NoB
21.54
2
WaB
2.40
3
- WaB
25.41
TOTAL
142.56 acres

The following Nitrogen rates should be used on all fields for the crops shown:
Corn
93.75 lbs N/acre
Preplant(March-April)
Soybeans
100.0 lbs N/acre
Preplant(May-June)
Wheat
96.0 lbs N/acre
Preplant(Sept-Oct.)
Rye(grazed)
50.0 lbs N/acre
Preplant(Sept-Oct.)
With all fields in a corn/wheat/ bean/ rye rotation, grower will be able to apply and utilize
24,218 Ibs N in a years time based on the RYE's of crops being grown. For the purposes
of this plan, the grower is required to have a minimum of 15 acres of corn, 15 acres of
soybeans, and 30 acres of wheat available each year for waste application. All
applications will be made preplant_
The crop rotation shown will require the grower to maintain a minimum of 180 days
storage area for stockpiled manure. To provide this storage, the grower will construct an
earthen area for stockpiled manure of 10000 cubic feet or more. This area will be graded
to divert surface water from the manure stack and stockpiled manure will be covered at all
times. These precautions will prevent nutrients from leaving the stockpile area via surface
runoff. When stockpiled litter is to be applied, it will be loaded on manure spreaders by
front end, or slid -steer loaders and broadcast onto the fields.
Please refer to the attached set of required specifications for dry litter. These
specifications include guidelines for application, stockpiling, and record keeping.
Additional guidelines include:
1. No waste shall be applied within 100 feet of a well
2. No waste shall be applied within 50' of a public right of way.
3. No waste shall be applied within 50' of a perinial stream or wetland.
4. No waste shall be applied within 20' of an open ditch.
Also included as part of this plan are all necessary agreements for landowners receiving
waste and for third party applicators. Grower should keep records on the attach
DRY 1,2,and 3 forms and should refer to calibration information for the calibration of
spreaders used for application. Nitrogen generation values are based on averages and
could/ will vary from those outlined in this plan. Grower MUST sample litter prior to
application to determine exact Nitrogen concentrations.

Required Specifications
1. Dry litter will be sampled as close to the time of application as practical but at least within 60 days of
land application for waste analysis. The state average N content for dry fitter as shown in the
tiVorrh Carolina Agricultural Chemical Manual published annually by NCSU may be used to
calculate application rates in lieu of individual waste analysis; however, waste analysis is still
re.quir_d. For more information about proper procedures for sampling manure for r ntnt anal -vats,
see Cooperative Extension Se; vice publication number AG-139-33, SoilFacrs: ;Vaste analvsis.
2. Liter will not be stockpiled within 100 fee: of perennial streams or eroundwater wells.
3. Solis from fields receiving poultry litter applications will be sampled annually for as:andard soil
fertiiiry analvsis. For mot_ information about proper procedures -for sampling manure for nutrient
analysis, se- Cooperative ' —Extension Service publication number AG- 39-3D_SoilFacrs: Careful Soil
Scmpling 1 ne Key to Rel:aale Soil Test Information.
�. Lime will be applied in accor-_-;-nce with the standard soil test repot, to assure suitable conditions for
C.-OD Qrowth.
.S, Altemate fields will be used for land application of litter should soil copper and zinc concentrations
.. react. a /evil thavis-potentially harmful to the re__ivina crop. For more information about excessive
sot] copper and zinc levers, contact a tec:.nical specialist that worts for the Cpope a,ive L:ctension
Service, :`iarural Resources Corservation Service, Nor-Lh Carolina Dcpar=m cent of ='c:titure or the
local Sail and Water Conser raron Dis-u ict.
6. Li er will be applied at rates ;,OE to cxcead the a4ronormic nitrogen rate of the re-ceivire cop. Rates
shouid be based on NCD.-k soil test recornmendations or alternatives ziven in NN.CS s=ndards, such
as realistic yield exoecm:icrs. For more information about realistic yield exzec:ations, contact a
technical specialist that works for the Cooperative .Extension Se -vice, Narurrl Resources
Conservation Service, North Carolina Departmeat of Agriculture or the local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
7. Rccord Keeping for Land Appiication:
a. records will be kept for L<hree years of soli test and waste analvsis results.
b. Records will be Dept for three years indicatine the location of fields and rates at which litter is
land applied. (See .fit-,,chtd Forms DPY -2 and DRY-S)
If.a third party contractor is used for cleanout of the poultry houses and/or land application, the
owner/manager of the poulr7v operation will:
a. Keep a record of the nacre, address and phone number of applicator (See Third Par'-V Applicator
A fire=:merit)
b. Keep a record of the amount of litter rt moved (Fort, DRY-1)
c. Provide an appropriate waste analysis to the third pasty applicator
d. Provide a copy of these guidelines to the third party applicator.
Des: management practices array be used to fur-zher vroEec; water Quality. For more info -oration about
appropriate best management practices contact a technical specialist that works for the Cooperarive
Extension Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, North Carolina Department of Agriculture
or the local Soil and Water Conservation District_
y Y.r..: • . DP�`SP-3laszh 17. 199i—?9ge 4

t' �'i. ;�• r .'+.;t�':�. T:..��i:�.+ r. ,+ �rp +i......{,•:.`.. >il..Y"��'✓rJf�•.i�l (.,,r �r l't' UJ `
i♦ y. ) �J,. ! r4 i,n•' "y t '/ Jf 1 rip
�r. " T 1.•r.�k5. r �'•C• :ik r 5 f , „d{'ylt , uyR f ,,' 1 �,•r IxL �i�t�!+Ipi11�. }� rQt�tl 4'
r \1 1 t it Y tt Vv. r• } 7\
. f.n•i" ., \ + 1 .� i� ]� t "' S" M a _ -I �.. "'L'r["t.�[�n l[^i. `,,,,
rEu :✓, �. �.`.+k jt;[L`'1-•/?'• t,{� j v. tJrJrit.`i hr R.;[+.{R r.AI �;^ i4�.T✓� ?/ •1 ry'�t'l/�1� li 1' �7•.t� �l V> .�:ti�>'i �•{^4 '!: �.Y.j " \. ..yJ \ r Ji•1!•�SFi"Y< . �Tr \..l..r„s{.l \Qq �"il'f'i !1y9."i5�w -il; ylil�'T 1±77Ji.:•.,�,'>r j j�.
..r ;Y "• i •�; �� f ,w Y..\'�.. ^:•. Y':q rl, "11 "i'1 ', . ,l"trr.0�•�Iftr1 i ". {; 1� fMr'll YL' 1 7 Ct
;� Yt.: ti ((' k1 ,a; f ! ly!1• { i\ f >Ti.q Ir
.:dl• !i• r! t tl'i�' gCYn:}.^1'i'r'. J. "aYr•i'�.1 ! 1'rk "
'.e .,� r 9 }}'' ��' � ,+s.��•' 1 � R"1 r I.:f ��••.�.
� .� i t� r \ A ''r: :�W:,�,.1\�! $'r'{� �: i'0.i4�j• {' .e[F>.: i .Y , tt •' ,y "t"1�4`�., ��lU )r:: .1 :.'JC;)R'�5r :.i1�'Ji.a�,r� rout 7 A 9�Mi it `i'
t ••� �r� J,•. .I:it v ��11�,�,.. ,.. +� }+�`• :� � � v' i.. :`D� . \ �lrr':' r ' •1tt ,"r' !.I1j �lr,^t; 4f:) 3 i, > :"1 e"
1�1 5r :7! 6 y1tTi(� 5 C ' li. Jy(jy/r( a 3 : ♦,tx ���y , �1 "4�.�� �. .��; �\,.• �� ii �1 •�` ,.. �' 'f�..1! •r t"tJ�•1'r'� q �Vil .. ' �;1;!: lr'i �r{(i���r.. "�i r��'t"•,y.r1.Nrt (, I�itl:lt �(•��7�Jin.. Ufa �4I y.
�5 fRT rS,..� " 51.1;�1\'r l' )M1.,.�t,1y.I V,� r� •.'{V �� �l•'�` �1i:lr )r"t r���J1 ✓., "F,��„C�. i {�!+i ♦fi�%'t<II..Ir � 5�•�j Ir l \I ��1"nR je:, rV ,. ,.."
t %,` `• ., aY 1 �, �• 1 YL{• r •(> ji}rcft '° l K` VA 1 +Y+, iii 5 t# fr.+li';ir N (1 f`•_l Y;
.�� � \•`� �"i �.--�•.►'r.�`"I.,.n�F."�4�tir, a>"-'•r"r%k1•,�I.T1S:7• ir;. 'i�n`, �::..:.�tss�'f� ir�.!trTiL y�7"l; r���, ,j�:iiJi�t,^'"�' y °��
" 'd 1'--- r 1 `• `9>i"1 �'P " i ,t�1' t• lT "q .�t i j ,TS�F "� r'�b11'.S': �+iw �t,e'y-Tj` i r,�, a•�rrilr u t r
' J �'•v,•'" '\ - .)t. ( ti �. ,•}/��j' J .r' I. 4,i i'1 .tr: iy, +r ri t1.
YJ
•�4 �; r �%. I .� tuTf �'.r •IT/��tRL .�^rc �i , �. � \'`r1yi11 f)!.r•}FFSFL1?jD i�ri f•{iRi" !71'�,` rt :0
x 1 , r y��.: -4 ,? 5-1.•���fyyr555,,,\ Y I,tY' ��`111��� S•% r L rn !4i{"••r/,) M1 r +�
�'% � '• '�� ��tq�'fi;N ` 5t'>L\I.j�RWL !!'rkyiilrtr Yl' ��. r\4�'���11Y'>�tfWI
}�6'•.•r•#2t
\U \` .:'�.`+a; r: t" �y,\i ,'1'1 \`� cq't41. r '•`„ 1�>`,� �'rr}R, 'y .1 1 5`ult!Errr4� M+ `�, Ar \•{.>,.'`iil pJ R�
•t Y "h; }I`� ♦,r r,rl, wy i ft'
f4 r 5 � '�. � t , w� f' • trfi �,: �•y,�, (,�
.1• 1}; �Dr h! Ar 1, 1 I\+r T ,,j .i •"�3 .,: °&. IV <f rN' �'ll'i
a.
? s �iiLr 1 + r C7 M fr•".1'. er. i r f r.��l r-- • . { i 7
Y: S, i'. �•1 tt i
1 / Y 1 1 lr t LV"'Lw4,`
d— 'r \'n„'n L/t/",`�..,�\.el+l 'lry Y• •t. sly N,y .L '}r NSA
�r1
7 �'� �; • r.y .".i Lt i.•N, S �F`e�!t` \1 h h �►5�.v: rtti"� fa�'1) "Y1..S t r 1 JV YtF
-�' T."L•'1 )`,w>'� J. `i \�I;1•' 'mot ��,f�'Y 1. I' \ �A a \ �T. `�tw+ f` t w{ry[� rYtl j,lY"t'L1 rr �t 4SA
�� - +•a t�.ri "��;� � .. / �`1Niµ� ' ' r'+•t'. \� rA ¢r ' is ;• n '�'.""'+cy�i�N d
I. fin. , � � =3- . �° � 'knJl;:yt�,.>,.1 �'•;,; __----- � � �� } �•
e�'!ri•iJi !'• ' r t() i ttT� hl• ' i 6Z�r , n� D JA�"M1 { +� ,
" ,.�� 1 ., !` ( C�3 !�• MCJ r., `• f•i'�, , 5• jr J'•ILI •} 1 r Ir.� w •r"`; S3
���," VVrr �r{.� 1 � . . .1 .j � n . 'ii + iJ -`iL.� /• ;�`5L�]ft rl 6.
li'ei t4 Y'IUel IIr t��� (' � 1'. A � � i 1i•'� K ?u
?�" t •�
� I�i� �1 i 1 r� '�• ��{l�' � �i y �n. Tr w�,•t_� � �+ i r.l � �•-' �j�rb;7ji�LJi,' y :j1 r f 1tI l�l j{.ti�` �'• .�1.�` 14L,i �t{i t- •� ` feltiN,i..
r
`inD .'r5 "l+r llro•�',�t�;iTpSr'�. t ) ILA
Al
a f I"� 3 art r ` t' 1 p �� 5 •�
-i
�yw",,.,•yf���� t� ����'>r is y� r'•1 �5•;IJ � t!) 1 r ,1, ^.tf �'+ !.� tt 5 ) On (� � �'•~+��';` 7), p�Cp�!�jy^tea ti �i
,4~ ivi15y r +lj, ti a.l• R �♦ 5 \ 1f, 4\ Tt1\\ I ''K "A• t i /
4;
',/�Ir
{ 1\tiiith
t! .''r}i tl,, t, vt7�F' S" F �rri G •r, t +J •�1 - 'n�.� 31 �1 yJ�`1 11•ii rl 1't'
"rsr 'Fih 1'�'4"°Yi l �e "'�i 3 f ,� hJr. ` 17 yS d .i� `•l"r 1�)J�i62jptl, t ,(wP.. n�. t.
�• { id r yq,t •�1 . ; _I1+lt�
" r r 5 tt x. L j' n, ,Y) `f. •?`C� .
+�y Sm 1. •r'{`',>{ {�R�?"'iKCv.�Yf'VYZ 4. r.r ��"�'�••'.�r'�'t�, i�,F"! . a".`
> ". f ~ � 4 ( J iy •�•,�, MYI.1 > llpyAA t" j " e � >r°.' � ' � 7a�i5.i • y •�
`r,1s by �}�y x: �It� tIF+:'Fs." �i$,•4•, •+ a i xYppa7'_�' tk�i' a:�[p.
'.17 p``• i i',j �n 1la�a t* �T1 ?�( rt t+is �, lW. nt\ t i .. l ry JI ! • Tr i'.1 I r l '•I r tr `i {
(IM,\) P' .l 1!•i yj1h , ik r + r a h 17., 1 i wM Py �� ti , { 1 A L,rl` .r • �' yi ♦ ti^ i+�,Itla !�.ti{`M'i
-�; �R Yt i �tiyt rJ Y4eY a••.t�v Y 5�J ► 1 •c^ry"r• {t/5iAr ('91'� r i., 4�,�,` ... � �r `t �'A ,\ 'tbl'r"+,t i\}"i •:.F.: v~l*!ri i•1 1 " ,�ii 1 .L �r r 1- \l\• 'f .: r 'R t!.• Y 3{ i w IF y4 \►•c, f1i t' t :i >• 4 t 1. ;yal ) )J� '7. .�^ r1 5(,F N�{��R.4 `. a "
i tf �.1{'••�.\' .t�6. r{ifi fi. t� "'�/1�'!1 4'-1.;y a{�'•�'"�� v > y4r{3'f'�, iC••^' r (�7 . \ �1:+� tY� �+; ,6 , 1 rl• t dW ��' r 1 J d )r i,J„'S X K
(♦ 1 t ) 41 1 { 5r t' /i i Ik 4v. o .•I:F f
�� r. � .. ��,! , � 1 , r1 ,. P .
�` 7 ,�ti,; p ', •. ;I " ''d
<t."#ti 4t? �' �y ' fF ' h: 'h� . -i_ 1 " ..t. ,'� .'R.' ."�5'• 7 Crf.tj}Fi"Ll l`>It 3 .. � �� � ; k J •. r. �.! r !'\. , J , ` L q't- 5'� Mf . d •5..� •Z' 4:..riV..,f I :Yr•I �?•,}+ .51� ^ y..ttrtt 1l,`# IC , 5 , R- )f"1• K 1'n <tv 1iK', i e
�. 5�,� � . i ,k k.�l'".. .'�t\�n•1 '•i i' � �'i'iD rV r I ri i''if ? + R . }•c iv,• . i ":• V n i f•i l .'^ 6 /(f"rr r 4 T/r •�t''y�\ <it '•Y. �♦+•' ' t 1�+t. ittv�,'tC h l f 1115„ t i e�{ i 7J t Jt . rr••'.•t !.1':%", < 1�.: `4 . Yt �''•a/rS'>t. _ T' a Q. (1� t't'!a r r
yO1 t• J t 5"f J:rr S .. tth'+ r1+V""' �; `•�l >t (,.:, 1" t0•. •. A+ 4�t£.`; ...L_ ..Ld^.
1 {'w` iJ'' ` a 7 ,lr' V h7 5:!'i'Cv y 1 vtrlti. A'1 1 1 �i: ,, {Yi a ..
4 9>'i' ;w,! [ ''�, i.R �� ,J ��� rC�c •5, $rear ., t , t " •' �,.. ;. 1 • wx r . :
�)311 k r n.. a•,. v`Li��f '�r!���r,.'�•T '1 v.�, 1 - r -t )r5 l i ♦f r Ml
•{lC,,t3�,'Itj�('L .Y�Qfy�",• ... 'i. fir. `1i•F'7"1.\;+r r:.'4; 5iyl lit 1>�C )r ..�� I !'l/t\r yt'f r�r Jj'rt� 1{1r�{yyr
{�}. 1 T`;yf�:�""_ �J � t a .1: /ta •t�.Y9•Yp'!�. �p�41 i•'.���.� i J tFl �)ir ':�{Fy��� ) 1. �iti4,i 1 r , r r 1 .� A.."" v vt*�.�,:Y t.
� 1� 1 1.r aytl t " .� tl? {Ir i `•. 4 4r 1 i 9 a'. 1 ( \� (; ar r •h,+• t t h' f J ^ I {. 1 . S „�
rMµ 1 rS} .1 %r�' j �rir.' .'`5 `W�Y1 f ' 1 /tl �(/Y{ }-e)1 , i + �P 1�. J,+f NR,' � t ��\^ � '`�F t it i 1 '>'t. i �•,
N! ��,(� i �> �b i5 r rill �� r �"Y'Y"b\1 i54 1. 1 � f �1i��'V tll j 5 A ` �y �.'�' r 7: ,�1F �.'71'1"" �Y+•, J • � r
"'>- r1 •/�7Y,��.' 1 rQ}"��( t il' 71tr1.t + ! i a { >,�4 5 { 3. . r ,_� ,,,r '"1p id''.t ',� C'i
��i•5ir� S�'{>�J.��'r/:'.•,�,1 �q •ifi(�t �It\�. ». 1 �.�� �i. .w r �1 , 7.7: y7� _Ir Si+!'• I.r��1,M1+,r:+Yt,'I,f r�(�� k „YY 'fi'�rl .•r , 1 r
•�9t'; � tf,7Y••.?t�''^^/,\tlri•A� P��'Yt.. A.'., rr'i.lia4t. l v.. .N.? .. Ji yj•!ITti- 1\ �.-ir4!.-, .. 1�:.,;T`Y.IF JI iT. Wit. r:'u . "Vif?,tia �t.i.11 aµ. t^i '�r `.

i / V T IcaA t' Bob 1 vv E J° Ta
• Bog - PY . - 1l �� �)! r•
NOHop,Ra _ ^�
tvaB
pn. :*^.'r - j� Le► �. 1 $" ._ 1a1 RD
Boa
`r 906 ti-G ::. G°A
RDA f,
Re I NOS
g - '.•a• rry 8°S / _ To Tn _,/!E
AuMae
ll Wa8 T°' =' �'. •, a
c •W
BOB -a Re
was : _ .Hobbs .0 ..5
Ra
R KOA
wM .ti _ _ - .i�- ti4.�;::•..~... �,' A --To-•- was t;•
was
wag I oA z ' want": i,
•` _ NOA "" �„ _'� .� Bob _ - '�o Gp Fo
Re
ia9RO
Y -
i::r Co n vJa$ Ln 0
NoA
ro
� Re "�• ' = s � was
Kok' Bo8 wap .
BOB
ru
_ ..ems � _ -{'f�f ' � �" ---'�• Via' _
' ::t -- swab Fo' ,fr'�- _ -- : �•=:.•,,
-�� �•�"" $ •�'�- •':`'t7 •,`'1Na Rerl-� Sn.. N°A' � •'� ,•~ - .p ].
wa '
Sr
AU
NoB
/ ,:j. __':F:�R-- --�_. '�_� _BAY - _ - - •�- �� :�.0
..--JJ •'i�`1` '•r . : l:.' - ' ..� 9°8 ,I' Au ^ UD
We
BOB
wo
waB.!
was ` t�'; :•' _ was.
B°9
_"-BOB • LT y s_-
Nab •. �_.-� ••a�'�''� ;=m��,�`�' • -,... i � - � � � •.- - W ._. •"" - _ ';'
eae t
ter` Wa6 7��c.- _ ze_y:-:. _�\4 _ - 17' •�' - i-
'��r• Yt. "•`:��i.-,f.. -s� e��3r ' _' � - � . .. - o s j Q5 `�'?--��r,.�;.:
Nob - ia:.:�•.•'`y`K `- .'?N�_4'i .r ; _� ^ - ti+•�`. �. . �A.r' :.'
waB ''- "" Ro' 'yi _ gag _ •= _%�••:
a8 BOB
SOB
N°H �• •''D 7i� - .f:. - iyq:...``
17
INAC Cl
• '�-Ta "1_ST •:,'] -�'N• c_..- w .'+F, 3•`. N.
Pr•. _'
r !ta - ,`. +`` f'- - !•' •'ii� - _ ".• was U'
IT
BOB

F_XAMPLE SHARED R.E5P0\s1BILITY AGREEMENT FOR LA,SD APPLICATION OF POULTRY LITTER
L The conditions listed below are required by the State of North Carolina to protect water quality.
These conditions apply to Iitte: removed from operations with housing capacity for more than
30,000 birds. The poultry liner covered by this agreement was removed on 199 from
the poultry operation owned by located at
in County.
a. The litter must be managed to ensure that there is no discharge of the litter to the su f"ace waters.
b. Litter will not be stockpiled within 100 feet of perennial streams or wells.
c. Waste sampling and providing a copy of the waste analysis to the applicator is the responsibility
of the producer. This information will be used in determining the application rate. The applicator
will provide the waste analysis to the landowner or land user as appropriate. The stare average N
content for dry litter as shown in the Xorth Carolina Ag iculrural Chemical Manual, published
annually by NCSU. may be used to calculate application rates in lieu of individual waste analysis;
however, waste analysis is still required.
d. Application rates will be calculated to not exceed the agronomic nitrogen needs of the receiving crop.
e. Lincr will be applied at rates not to exceed the agronomic nitrogen rate of the receiving crop.
f. Soils from fields receiving poultry liner will be sampled annually.
d. Soil pH for all fields on which liner is applied will be maintained in accordance .with, the standard
soil test report recommendations.
h. Should soil copper and zinc concentrations reach a level that is potentially ham, ful to the
receiving crop (above 700 on the NCDA soil test report), the land owner or land user should
contact a qualified specialists to discuss options for future applications of litter.
i. Record ke-_ping for land application.
1) Records will be kept for three years of soil test and waste analysis.
?) Records will be kept for three years indicating the location of fields and rates at which litter is
land applied.
II. I the Iandowner or land user of fields where litter is applied accept responsibility for items
a b. h and from par I.
Print Name Prone Number
Signature
Date
III, I the applicator agree to meet items a, b and all remaining conditions not accepted by the landowner
or landuser in Pan II above.
Print Name
Signature
Phone Number
Date
DPLM? Mamh 17. 1997--?3V 5

Dry Litter Utilization Agreement for Leased Land (Example)
I, hereby give permission to apply waste
from his poultry production facility on acres of my land for the duration of the time shown
below.
I understand that this manure contains nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and trace elements, and when
properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use of animal manure will
reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner.
Date:
Manure Producer: Date:
Technical Representatives: Date:
Term of Agreement: I9— to ,
DPt_NIP March 17, 1997—Pagc 6

Dry Litter Utilization - Third Party Applicator Agreement (Example)
I, herebv acknowledge that I have received a copy, have read and
undersmnd the Dry Litter Management; Plan dated that was developed for/by
for their facility located at
in County_
I hereby agree to manage and land apply the dry poultry litter that I received from this facility in a
manner consistent with the requirements of this Dry Litter Management Plan and keep copies of all
required records as specified in the Plan. Furthermore, should I choose to use and an alternative waste
utilization system, such as composting and marketing, the Depa=ent of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Regional Office trust be notified in writing.
Third Party Recriven Date:
Manure Producer.
Technical Representatives:
Date:
Date:
Terra of Aaresment : .19� to ,
DPLMP 'A=h 17. 1"7—P2st 7

Worksheet: Crop Nutrient Requirement Worksheet. Use one worksheet per crop.
Example Your Farm
1. Crop to be grown Corn
?. Crop realistic yield expectation from MRCS
standards or farm records 110 bu/acre
3. Nitrogen fertilization guidelines per unit of yield
(see Table 1) 1.0 lb N/bu
4. Cron Nitrogen requirement (? X 3) 110 lb N/acre -
3. Starter fertilizer tutroeen 25 lb Ni/acre
5. Commercial f_-rtilizer 0 lb N/acre
7. Crop Nitrogen need from poultry dry litter minus 5
rrunus 6) 85 lb N/acre
8. Poultry •dry litter Plant -Available Nitrogen (,Note: If
using an NCDA Waste Analysis, skip to Sc.')
a) Total nitrogen composition of litter from farm
average'-, or state average as shown in the MC
A-gricultural Chemical _Vamcal. 38 lb iNhon
b) Nitrogen availability coe?ncient (sce Table 2). 0.5
c) Plant -available nitrogen (a X b) or from Waste
Analysis. 19 lb Nihon
9. poultry dry litter application rate (7 = 8) 4.5 ton/acre
10. Acr--s of crop to be grown 95 acres
11. Total litter required to meet the asronotnic N
requirement for this field (9 X 10) 427.5 tons
` waste analysis is rrquircd within 60 days of land application.
Liner application rues can be based on average nutrient content values for the f= pruvidVaq waste sarsipizi tequircd is be
_ kca are used in the development of the average values_ Y 3 f] 998
DPLNSP—March 17. 1997—P7;c 3

Table 1. Nitrogen Fertilization Guidelines per Unit of Realistic Yield
Commodity
lb v/Realistic Yield Expectation
Corn (grain)
1.0 to 1.25 Ib N/bu
Wheat (grain)
1.7 to 2.4 lb N/bu
Rye (rain)
1.7 to 2.--'r Ib N/bu
Oats (grain)
1.0 to 1.3 lb N/bu
Barley (_rain)
1.4 to 1.6 lb N%bu
Soybean (grain)
3.5 to 4.0 lb N/bu
Tritica-!e (grain)
1.4 to 1.6 lb �11bu
Sorghum (grain)
2.0 to 2.5 lb Nlcwt
Corn (silage)
10 to 12 lb N/ton
Sorehunn-sudangrass (hay `)
45 to 55 Ib N/cln, ton
Pearl vlillet (hay')
45 to 55 lb \T/dry ton
Bermudaarass (hay') all areas of the state
40 to 50 Ib l idry ton
Tall fescue (hay')
40 to 50 lb N/dry ton
Orchard grass (hay')
-0 to 50 lb N/dry ton
Timothy (hay')
40 to 50 lb NIT/dry ton
Small grin (hay)
50 to 60 lb v/dry ton
Cotton
0.06 to 0.12 Ib N/lb lint
Pine trees
=10 to 60 lb N/aerelve_r
Hardwood trees
70 to 1001b Ni/acre.�year
' Reduce N rate by 25 aercent when _gg ing.
Table 2. First year nitrogen availability coefficients for poultry litter.
Applicast -u
arion Method Nitro -en �,vailab iliry Coefficient
Broadcnincorporated 0.3
Broadcast - iacoroonted 0.6
DPL.NIP—r 2mh 17. 1997—?aze 9

Worksheet for Calculating Poultry Litter Production
The total amount of litter removed from farm production facilities can be estimated by the
following method. The amount is somewhat dependent on the type and amount of litter added
initially and may vary by as much as 20% depending on the farm practices.
Broiler House Litter Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 25000
b. Number of flocks per year: 5.3
c. Pounds market live weight per bird: 4
d. Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock: I
e. Tons litter per year (a x b x d =- 1000) : 145
Broiler House Manure Cake Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 25000
b. 'Number of flocks per year: 5.3
c. Pounds market live weight per bird:
d. Tors cake per 1000 birds per flock: 0.3=1T
e. Tons cake per yeaz (a x b x d -= 1000) : 50
Broiler Stockpiled Litter Typical Actual
z� 4
a. Humber of birds per flack: 25000
b. dumber of flocks per year:
c. Pounds mazket live weight per bird:
I Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock:
e. Tons litter per year (a x b x d _ 1000) :
s= C= IVEt_,
OUN i 4
DPLy1P Mwr-t 17, 1997—Pzze 10
5.8
4
1
145

Broiler Roaster House Whole Litter Typical Actual
a. Number of buds per flock: 12500
b. Number of flocks per year: 4
c. Pounds market live weight per bird. 8
d. Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock: 2.6
e. Togs litter per year (a x b x d - 1000) : 13 0
Broiler Breeder House Whole Litter Typical Actual
a. Number of birds production facility capacity: 5000
b. Days per _year birds in production facility: 365
c. Pounds market live weight per bird: 6
d. Pounds litter per 1000 birds per day: 131
e. Tons litter per 1000 bird capacity per year: (b x d _ 7000) 14
f. Tons litter per year ( a x e _ 1000) : 192
Turkey Brooder (Poult) House Whole Litter Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 20000
b. N L ber of flocks per year: 7
c. Average pounds market live weight per bird:
d. Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock:
e. Tons litter per year (a x b x d _ 1000)
2.5
.75
105
DPLNIP --M-ch 17. 1997—Pagc 11

Turkey Grower Hen House Whole Litter Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 12000
b. Number of flocks per year: 3.4
c. Pounds market live weight per bird_ 16
d. Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock: 5
e. Toros litter per year (a x b x d _ I 000) : 204
Turkey Grower Hen House Manure Cake Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 12000
b. Number of flocks per year: 3_d
c. Pounds market live weight per bird: 16
d. Tom cake per 1000 birds per flock: 1.7
e. Tons cake per year (a x b x d _ 1000) : 70
Turkey Grower Tom House Whole Litter Typical Actual
a dumber of birds per flock: 8000
b. Number of flocks per year: 3.4
c. Pounds market live weight per bird: ~� 25
d. Tons litter per 1000 birds per flock: 7.5
e_ Tons litter per year (a x b x d _ 1000) : 204
DPLNIF— iarcy 17, 1997—Pagc 12

Turkey Grower Tom House Manure Cake Typical Actual
a. Number of birds per flock: 3000
b. Number of flocks per year: 3.4
c. Pounds market Iive weight per bird: 25
d. Tons cake per 1000 birds per flock: 2.5
e. Tons cake per year (a x b x d _ 1000) : 70
Turkey Stockpiled Litter Typical Actual
a Number of birds per flock: 8000
b. Numb--r of flocks Der year: 3.4
c. Pounds market live weight peer bird: 25
d. Tons litrer per 1000 birds per flock: 6.6
e. Tons litter per year (a x b x d ; 1000) : 180
Turkey Breeder House Whole Litter Typical Actual
a. Number of birds production facility capacity: 6000
b. Days per year birds in production facility: 365
c. Pounds live weight per bird: 20
d. Pounds litter per 1000 birds per day: 204
e. Tons lister per 1000 bird capacity per year: (b x d _ 2000) 37
f. Tons litter per year ( a x e - 1000) : 212
f)PL%1P `larch 17, 1997--?:oe 13

optional Worksheet for Balancing Poultry Dry Litter Production and Utilization -
Includes Land Owned and Leased by the Farmer
t11 t21 I oy i;l
Dr. Litter Manure Applied io :'leij
FarvJSdd /Tract Acre t Crop Apptication Rafe (2) W tsi
{ { mnvxre uxts
I I
I !
I I
I I I
I I �
I !
f f •
I I I
1 I
{ I
I f �
f I !
I I I
I I I
f !
I
! I I
I ! I
I I
I I �
I I I
I ! I
I I I -
Drr UApPk-"I . Bd--re T W D,. I.;—A,,Wd. u� - ..
• TwW Drr WLr f,+axas.
From Crop Nutrient Requiremcnt Worl;shc_t
_ From Crop Nutrient Requirzment Worlsh==
' From Rovv (a) of WDrLsheeu On -Farm Plant Available Poultry ylanurc Nutricnts Produced
DPL%4P 1iar_h 17. t997—Nge t-t

Form DRY-1 Dry Litter Cleanoul Records
rarm Owner Third Party AplAcalor
Owner's Address Third Pally Applicator's
Address
Owners Phone N Third Parly Applicator's Phone N
{1)
(3)
(4)
Use of Llller
Dale
mmlddlyr
N of Loads
Removed
Spreader Volume
(cubic feel)
Spreader Capaclly '
(Ions)
Total Removal
(tons)
(4) x (2)
'Temporary
Storage
(Ions)
Spread
on Farm
(lolls)
Removed
from Farm
(tons)
Other ]
(Ions)
i
Totals
' Cinl ba found in opernlur's imunial lur Ilkc spreader. Conluel a luclll klcalcr if YOU du uol lukvc yarn• owner's nun1md.
' See «11:1c114A shim for formttlu.
' rEulia-al'! Ira: (i E. , E:aEllc feed, disrkibkEle+l orI n k fektilieer, CIc.)

Forat DRY-2
Farm Owner
Spreader Operalor
Dry Litter Applicatiuil Field Record
For Recording Dry Liller Application Events on Different Melds
Traci H
F'leld A
Dale
(mmlddlyr)
Crop Type
Field Size
(acres)
Application
Melltod'
N of Loads
f er Field
Volume of loads
(cubic feel)
Spreader Capacity'
(Ions)
I '
,1
' 51 n sail incorporated (diskcd); lilt A 11FOR(ICn51 (surface applied)
' Ctn► I,e found ill uperldor's rimuand for the sprcuder. Cultlact a lucid dcaier iryou du riot imyc your a►s mes i mmmi,
' Scc n11iLL'IIL'II Ctlli1114011 ShcLl rur Ilse runuula.

Forin DRY-3
bacl N
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone N
Dry Litter Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Spreader Operalor
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone It
From Anlmal Waste ManaUmnent Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (0)
(1) (2)
13)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(0)
Dale
(nlrnlddlyrl
0 of Loads Per Meld
Weilhl or Loads
(tons)
Total Welydhl
(tons)
(2) K (3)
Wolglal Per Acro
(louslac)
(4) + (A)
Waste Analysis' PAN
(lUflan)
PAN Applied
(Wlac)
(6) (5)
Nilrooen Dalance'
(Ibrac)
lo) - (7)
I
Crop Cyclo Totals I I µ j
Owner's Signature -Spreader Operator's Signature
' Lan l,c rwmd in operator's maimal lair llic spreader. Cmdacl a lucnl dcaier iryuu du net have your owuer's mamull.
" 5ce )•uur,vash: rlumagentt:nl plan fur sam)diu6 rrequeacy. At n minhuum, ►vaste om,lysis is required wilhial 60 aldys or inmi applicmim, events.
' I`nler Ile value received by snbimcliuL cullraaau (7) liunl (11). C:uu61111C subil;l0ind whiltiu (7) filial col,lartn (9) E'ullu+via4t: Cull aallplica,lllm L'1mil.

CALIBRATION OF MANURE SPREADERS
Effective utilization of manure is not possible if you do not know how much is being spread over a
given area. Calibration of your spreader is a simple and effective wzv of improving utilization of
nutnenu 4-1 manure more effectively. Onhv by knowing the application rate of your spreader carl you
correctly apple manure to correspond to your crop needs and prevent water quality problems through
the over application of animal manure.
Applicators can apply manure, at varying rates and patterns, depending on fonvard gavel and/or
PTO speed., Rear box settings, Qzte openings, operating pressures. spread widths and overi* S.
Calibration defines the corribinazon of s--ztin¢s and travel speed needed to apply rnanure, bedding
or wasie«ater at a desired mie and to ensure uniform appllcation.
Spreader Capaciry
Liquid spreader capacities are normally rated by the manufacturer in gallons. ylultiply by 0.0042
to get tons.
Solid and se_:i-solid spreaders are razed by the manufacturer either in bushels or cubic leer
(multipit• bushels by 1?4 to get Cubic meet). ylost spreaders have r%vo rating capacities: (1) struck
or level 5.ffl. and (2) heaped. Calibration of solid manure spreaders based on its caaaciry
(volume) is difficult to estimate accu.-ateiy because the density of solid and semi -solid manures
are quire var-;able. Density is the we ahz of -The manure per volume of manure ( pounds per cubic
foot). Vlarure density varies depending on the type --1d amount of -bedding used as well as its
storage method. Therefore, if you estimate spreader application rates as the volume of the
rriantse the spreader holds you are overlooking the fact that some manure w4iehs more than other
manure. Ins can cause a signi"r c2.7t e-or when calculating manure application rates.
Since manures and litters have eiuerei t densities, an on -farm test should be done. To dete:zni.ne
the load (tons) of a manure spread--,-=
1. Weigh an empry S-ealion bucket.
?. rill the bucket level full with the material to be spread-. Do not pact —thllt,.ate'lal in the
bucket but ensure that it settles similar to a loaded spreader.
3. Wtizh the bucket again. Subtract the empty bucket weight from this weight to calculate
the weight of the contents.
4. Multiply weight of contents by 1.5 to calculate pounds per cubic feet, density.
UPL'-IP '—loch 17. 1997—P.L--c 13

w
5. iviultiply the manure density by the cubic feet capacity of the spreader and divide by 2000
to get the tons of material in a spreader load_
%veight of 3 ¢al manure x 1.5 x spre_der capacity (ft `)
Sprcadcr load (tons)
2000
Solid and Semi -Solid Manure Spreaders
In order to calibrate a spreader for solid manure (20 percent or more solids), the following
materials are needed:
1. Bucket
2. Plastic sheet, tarp or old bedsneet_ .An even size, 3 feet by 8 feet, 10 feet by 10 feet, or 12 feet
by. 12 feet. will snake calculations easier_
3. Scales
Calibration method.
1. Locate a large and reasonably smooth. flat area where manure can be applied.
? Spread the plastic sheet, tap or bed sheet smoothly and evenly on the ground.
3. Fill the spreader with manure to the normal operating level. Drive the spreader at the
normal application speed _oward the sheet Dread on the around. allowing the manure to
begin leaving the spreader at an even, normal rate. y
A. Drive over the sheet at the normal application speed and settings while continuing to
apply manure. If a rear discharge spreader is used, three passes should be made: first,
drive directly over the center of the sheet, the other two on opposite sides of the center at
the normal spreader spacing overlap.
5. "Weigh the empty bucket and plastic sheet, tarp, or blanket.
5. Collect all manure spread on the sheet and place it into the bucket.
7. Weigh bucket and manure and subtract the weight of the empty bucket and ground sheet.
This will give you the pounds of manure applied to the sheet.
8. Repeat the procedure three times to get a reliable average.
9. Determine the average weight of the three manure applications.
t)PUMP—March 17, 1997—rage 19

10. CalcuIate the application rate using the following formula or Table 5-3:
Application rate (tonslacre) - lb m2nure collected x 3I.73
sheet length (ft) x sheet width (ft)
11. Repeat the procedure at different speeds and/or spreader settings until the desired
application rate is achieved.
Example:
What is the application rate (tons per acre) if you collect 3.5 pounds of manure on a 10-foot by
10-foot tarp during a calibration run?
Application rat.- (tons acre)
8.= lb manure x 21.79
loft x tort
'fable 5-3. Calibration of Solid :Manure Spreaders
Pounds of Manure ions of Manurc Applied/Aare
Anolied to Sheet
Size of Ground Shee:
8' x 3' 10' x 10' 1 2' x 1
1.35 tons;aC.-C
1
0.34
0.22
0_ ? 5
3
0.68
0,44
0.30
3
1.02
0.65
GALS
4
1.36
0.87
0.61
5
1.70
1.09
0.76
6 .
2.04
1.31
0.91
7
3-� 8
1.52
1.06
8
2.73
1.74
1.21
9
3.06
I.96
1.36
10
3.40
2AS
1-51
15
5.10
3?7
227
20
6.31
;.36
3.03
Many times it may be necessary to adjust the race in which waste is applied �&om the way it is
normally spread. Changes in application rate can easily be done by incressir" odecr;asing the
sped in which the waste is being avviied. In order to perform these calcuiadons, the spreader
load (tons), duration of application (minutes), and the average width (feet) of normal
application needs to be known. The application rate and travel speed can be found using the
following equations:
Application rate (tonsfac: e) - soreadcr load (tons) x 395
time (min) x width (ft) x travel speed (mph)
Travel speed (mph) - spreader load (torts) x 495
time (min) x width (ft) x apolietion rate (toos/acrs)
DPLtIP-,'*tarh 17. 1997-Page =o

Example:
What speed should you run if you wish to apply 4 tons of manure per acre with a 3-ton spreader?
Your spreader application width is 24 feet and your spreader empties in 6 minutes.
Travel spccd (mph) -
Spreader Pattern Uniformity
3 tors x 495
6 min x 30 iT x 4 tonVac.
- 3.1 mph
To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap needed, place a line of small
pans or trays equally spaced (2 to 4 feet) across the spreader path. The pans should be a
minimum of 12 inches by 12 inches (or 15 inches in diameter), but no more than 24 inches by
24 inches; and 2 inches to 4 inches deep. Make one spreading pass directly over the center pan.
Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the contents into equally sized glass cylinders or
clear plastic tubes and compare the amount in each.
The ef`ective spread width can be, found by locating the point on either side of the path center
Nvhe:e manure contents caught in the containers is half of what it is in the center. i he distance
benveen these points is the effective spreader width. The outer fringes of the coverage area
beyond these points should bz overlapped on the ne-a path to ensure a uniform rate over the
entire held. "Flat -top," "pyramid," or 'oval" parterns are most desirable and -give the most
uniform application "�," "W,T' :steeple," or "lopside" parterres are not sausiactory and one or
more of the spreader adjustments should be :Wade.
DPL-1P Mamh 17, 1997—Page 21

Following is a list of the DEHNR-Division of Water Quality regional offices along with a map showing the counties
under the jurisdiction of each regional office.
w
1Yls 1r0 } 1 •i '"
u-.r
u�../
Ow.
Wr
N.A.
0...r
�v 4_\ _
L.'—
IVr
ci-J.J L—w! I i T
1. Asheville Regionai Office:
59 Woodfn Place, Asheville, NC 23301; 704-251-6203; FAX [phone]
2. Winston-Salem Reg
lonal Office;
585 Waugh town Strew, Winston-Salem, INC 27107; 910-7714600; FAX [phone]
a. Raleigh Regional Office:
3800 Barren Drive, itaieiEh, NC 27609; 919-571-:700; FAX [phone]
4. Washington Regional Office:
'1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, NC 27389; 919-946-6431, FAX [phone]
_ _ .:
5. Mooresville Regional Office:
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, SIC 23115; 704-60-1699; FAX [phone]
6. Favetteville Regional Office:
Wachovia building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301; 9I0-486-I541; F.AX 910436-0707
7. Wilmington Regional Office:
127 Cardinal, Wilmington, NC 28405-3845; 910-395-3900; FAX [phone]
DPLti1P—Mamh 17, 1997—P:p 22

NCVA
u
c Division43(lo Rccc! Creek Road 1xalci h NC 27 y-'1 ��i5 919 733.2655 ` Re art No: W01904 W -
12/ III}7
f;roruer: Grcenwear Forms (.blues 71):: I'}Tinily Nxienslon Director
/`4 1656 Pheneaer forest Itoml [ 51)A NlttwS-Sanipsun;
Garland, NC 28441r;tr i.1✓
�? JUN 'i 0 It 98
Waste n a l ys is e o r t0,
hr�rarr:
Simpson (:oUJ►tY
SU l•'lrifo: V.P r. ?t
I.hlioraio" "[tesult4t"ar
"�pimlllloli imless•iithcrwise iidtetl 'ty� ? �'; ""s' •. % ,rl'. #
Saslple ID:
N
p A Ca Al S Ile AM 7n Cr1 11 A10 CI C
FL
Nal 15643
9185 9707 10399 2921) 2026 1152 77.9 218 33.3 7.34 150792
1N -N
Waste Code.
-N114
11 1'L Al Se H SS C:N PAM CCE% lons
Na Ni C1N A1.f:
FCS
NO3
Description:
OR-N
1851 6.84 658 9.(�4 40.R9
Composted$a•!nc Wast
tfrcrr
RecatnuieAdAtlOr15: ''�; 1.: •'S' ?; ;,:.' :',' :.�:' NulrlChtS.�vaifal�le for First Crop. ; ++`„ .`...'.i ;tbs/1D/�ttiet_trrJStS� _
Utiler LlC[1tiCritS .'.�.- . ifrS/IOiJ Civet trasls
pplicaliad Method
N P20s K20 C4 hlg S . re 3111 . ' 111 � CIO:`: R A10^ CI
Na N1 Cd 11b Al So 1.1
0roadcast
5.1 10.3 7.6 5.1 1.4 099 0,57 om 6.11 o.02 'r .:
1.5
Soli MCorp
6.4 12.9 8.0 6.4 1.8 1.2 0.71 0.051 0,13 0.02 T
I.5
itrogeo Is very Mot In rclal on to carbon (Low UN Rafio). If file Svaste 1xudlict Is lu he usell m a raw material In ci!mposllne, blend it wif i anulher m.dcrlal with a high C:N ratio. The C,:N r;dio shutild be20-30 fllr
deal composiing eondilions.
'olubte Sall level is very lilgl
731e compost cannot be used as a landscape soil or putllltg tllCdia wlth0#if hICllding tither mmerials to lower sohihle salts 10 111 acceplahle level. Very Vigil Soluille sails likell' llidlule very
Aoi nutrient availability. T ke a malching still sample to further evalimle pli -mill nutrient avallahilily.
;nmpost pll is higher 111a
Idea1 for plant production. If the compost will he used 15 a landscape or Iiuliirtg sail, bleml Wier malcrials or :rdd rlemeulal stilftlr to decrease 1►11 lu llie thlred mige. r s a gmicral rule, add
►.25 lh. of ciclucntai su _Ir
�►er c11N }l Uf sail lu lutvcr IiII 0.5_I.0 unil_Ove nwnlh after lreAmeni, lake a soil sampkt to titter+nine if pti Is within the desired r:l ige,
Sample Info.
Laboralory Results (pa IV. per million 11111CSS otherwise noted
Sample 1D.
N
P K Lit Atg - 1' _ Fu AN %rr
(11 11
Abi
- - -
olD
161111 33429
15856 • 28372 14)855 5323 3782 1253 229 508
75.1 13-4
32230)
IN -N
Waste Code:
4114
FCS
403
Na _ _ N1 Of 111) 411_ _ 50_ Li pit
5T C:N
_11A1% - l.'l_, % -ALI: ror1.f
Description:
OR-N
3521 7.07
800 9.64
81.21
Cam osled Seine Wade
flrea
Recommen alipas: '
Nnlricnts Avaitabic Ior f trst Cru J 1bsllorJ filet basis
Other Elements
_ M511011 C11,et busts
r(pplicationMethod
N P205 K20
Ca Atg S la Ali) 7.1r Cu 11 All) CI
Ala Ni
Cd Ply ,11 Se I.i
llroadeast
21.7 35.4 44.2
194 5.2 3.7 1,2 0.22 0.50 0.07 0.01
5.7
Soil hicorn
27.2 44.2 AS
.74.2 6.5 4.6 15 0,28 0.62 0,09 0.02....
5.7
11rogm Is very Illgh Ili relallou
to carbon (Low CA it;i O.
If the waste product is to iK used as a riw illalerIal In Coll 1pustiug, blend It i�Ilh ,iuolher milerlal wlIll a high GN ralia,
The CN ral€o should Ile 20-30 for
dell cornposlhig candiliuns.
11rhie salt level is very 11101. VIC compost cannot he used z a landscape SUIT or pottlag media Svithout Illeniitly, oiller lilalrrlals Iu lower 5101trllie SA6 to 111 accept -Mile levl'l. Vert' hig11 5111t1111C salt% likely indlute very
f,

-at
Facility Number and Name: Murphy's 82-723, Green -wean Farm
Instructions on last Pake
IN.
WRIN 8k, aa,_ _n
�Mg
Ara; -
Z
E �-Wg%
W g
-S
a�RN
Description of Concern'
W
_N
g .45
Of
7r-L-ggg
- "M '4
WIN
IN
g
qg Om
- Er=
;Ymzz-
M
0 min-
R—E,
4w,
xg
gX4
9 R WO WO
NP, EU
n -
Wi
I
IIR t
PR
;zMt
N I
EResponse
g MAX
MM
EN
wPK
�O S
EIE
EM• VD
RW_.
22—
S
Mi M T
S
d_ stW5
jgW-
SA
I0t
gBaH
u
W�J _
..1
O�i
K
-Ww
Nm
Mram
t
lOaw
',
04
W E71
MMW2M1
NZ
_WRqM
"OW O�
-
-U1
Mw
-SRp. i
A- A
-2 6
_
I - -
g&
_
ggE
-
7M_xarE-7I l-Ti'..-}'_
U
-d
-
-fl
gg.5
W&MMANINI
MOF OM
4
NIN
N
'00,
A_ -MIN
M
TWO
QFM Ma R-1
gg �N
N�v
P
_0
N.
_Nt
_,eio a
�,z gm
9-015®R
M
P-M
X o
INWr.i
U MR1. -_ -
LO 3,
,_cMM5iMnm��
M
L IF
gxgig,
p- T�g-,O�*,gg_o � ®R
gg
CAR— A
go.-g-
0�
K�I :6�� - k
SUMB - --ME
OAN
_310
2 IS
"WERt ; E_
T _1 A:
-AN
- T-i at
ma
01-RZ
ngi-R!S
Hi
%:
,g
g 30
I0-v
?11
92E" 5
1M
I ,

-a
Facility Number and Name: Murphy's 82-723, Green -wean Farm
Instrzictions on last page
E.-
lk--
-L]
Subsurface Drain S3
�
Gx
100g- Kv ROM
�g, gy * 1,51r-42 I
FRI,,
Micturalags
ing, s uesi�
Description of Concern
?
N
z
MM -R�
1 .
-......... ..x. �.3 sad-r'•fr#"
-
g, N
_..r' R'tea
H
Response
Farm has not been used in 2 years. This
farm was a dry litter farm, had no lagoon,
and waste was spread on 3,d party land.
I-EM-2
*2UMM
J p'g MMM
MMM�VIO 47
V W-MOM
�il-
'WAAU
It
M a-
MUM-
ZE g
Q
W M ,;Afi-
";'"'s.,'.. Ji _c'»?r.':�,y \.. ]N Z" X'=' i
0
-MM
y ras �r3 C-is4' - +a .3.
ON-
04-
X
M
M
—==.I
M M MM
m5;;
M
Ro-
0" AIM

Concerns are based upon DWQ records consisting of deficiencies noted in state inspection reports, NOVs, penalty assessments and/or reports submitted to DWQ by the farm. Carefully
review your records to identify the specific concern or concerns and then describe the concern under the appropriate heading together with a reference to the specific record and the date of
the record (i.e., inspection report dated or NOV dated ___. J. With the exception of "discharges," which cover calendar year 2000, concerns are based on DWQ records for the
calendar years beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 2000.
Describe in as much detail as possible how the concern has been addressed, or, if it has not been addressed, the measures the farm intends to undertake to address the concern and a
schedule for completing the measures.
3 If subsurface drains are present, state whether you know that the drain(s) is discharging groundwater uncontaminated by hog waste, and if so, the basis for that conclusion.
3

, e;�,
Facility Number and Name: Murphy's 82 -723, Green -wean Farm Instructions on last pate
X� E A
v
f
V_
i K-;, F.Tee. oar S-
j j - A - � &_.
3
-6
ettap"-
Description of Concern'
-0, M
4_
4�
Y C
Th:. R
w. T, %
�71
3
5;. 7
A
AS
------Aw -
F Rt
iza 4A
IVa�_
.: 7
_Aw
�
4ZW
_
MI-<Dk
3
2
7- -
Response
4� - -;P, w z..=L:w
2�:7 QK;�
-
P R
A J, L':"
�T' �..4_
L;
J_.
;tE
x
k�
44 P
C
D-
A
fm " A t.
4
j,
.7
. jf_-L 72
;w
7
57,
:qz
N
7j' m
----- — --------
V
4- w S77—
W.7
t
4
z
T7 _
F7
_X5
54
La.
_2 PK�-
n
j W
? U7,
25:
4, W
F
A m
Kr',
, . �I
At
2 L
N,
73'.
ZP
z7 A-K
5*-
R A�
4Ai
Zs�
#
X A
_Ik
Z4,r-
3�.
.7
- K

Facility Number and Name: Mur hy's 82-723 Green -wean Farm
Instructions on last
- R --
917_' _.
-- - - - - -- - -- -- - - -
_ —-�" �� --'_`. �t s-�'rcF - =
x'r-:- �m•. c _,��ws`�-�-- -- ra
r. ,� - .r � M-x - P;W-M.
Description of Concern
Sr-^s. a. .�
`z -3«.:
80
-_ �y- es'r� moo' -� m-• F' .$:_.
_ .zr.,m
GW !'j
r 1 { IFarm
has not been 1 in 2 years. This
farm was a dry litter farm, had no lagoon,
1waste was spread on party land.
,
- � -Yas��'+�-ray ��` � _
.-•
�'z�q
"s��� � �,
_
_
� � � ,��
ir
f 3
yy
C'
averAN
3"
-ems

if -61
' Concerns are based upon DWQ records consisting of deficiencies noted in state inspection reports, NOVs, penalty assessments and/or reports submitted to DWQ by the farm. Carefully
review your records to identify the specific concern or concerns and then describe the concern under the appropriate heading together with a reference to the specific record and the date of
the record (i.e., inspection report dated or NOV dated _�. With the exception of "discharges," which cover calendar year 2000, concerns are based on DWQ records for the
calendar years beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 2000.
2 Describe in as much detail as possible how the concern has been addressed, or, if it has not been addressed, the measures the farm intends to undertake to address the concern and a
schedule for completing the measures.
3 If subsurface drains are present, state whether you know that the drain(s) is discharging groundwater uncontaminated by hog waste, and if so, the basis for that conclusion.
3