820710_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

li r] Division of Soil and=W
K E [3 Division of Soil arid`W
i -E Division of Water Qua
-13 Other Agency -Opera
Q - Operatiofl;R
tterJ Coi iservsi
Y.. - - nice Insp
ction - pv, €:
ion-
10
Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ ins ection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection /
.. _ Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified Q Registered [ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ............ _......._.......................................... County:....... e S4! ....I.._.........-- --.....................
Owner Name: ...!6 .W�,............................................................. ... Phone No:.��9�
` t�T�
Facility Contact: ....... 0,411 . ........ /„f. .. Title: Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: ...... ---.l.......�..... t ....l..f� ...... .............. .. ��...... r3.F. ................. ......._._.... ..........................
�,�A�t ....f/., ... Integrator Onsite Representative: ...... i
....... .....................................
Certified Operator:....... elevE...... '.... /................................. Operator Certification Number:....... L/..O¢._.Z..........
Location of Farm:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................... .............. -.11- --- FA
Latitude Longitude • �' �'°
Design Current Design Cuirestit Design Current
Swtne � _ <. -_
Capacity Population Pouitr3' Ca achy . Population Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
[I Layer ELI Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
;.r
ff Farrow to Wean - -- "
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design. Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars = Total SSLW
_= K Nnmber of:Lagoons / ❑ Subsurface Drains Present -1Lagoon area VD Spray Field Area
Hold�ng'Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a[ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. [f discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes IN No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Watcr of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ANo
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Doers discharge bypass a lagoon system'? If yes, notify DW [j Yes g] No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R5 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ,® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
a
Freeboard(inches):....zO...............................................................................................................
. .
5- Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes M[No
seepage, etc.}
3/23/99 Continued on back
IF
li r] Division of Soil and=W
K E [3 Division of Soil arid`W
i -E Division of Water Qua
-13 Other Agency -Opera
Q - Operatiofl;R
tterJ Coi iservsi
Y.. - - nice Insp
ction - pv, €:
ion-
10
Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ ins ection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection /
.. _ Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified Q Registered [ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ............ _......._.......................................... County:....... e S4! ....I.._.........-- --.....................
Owner Name: ...!6 .W�,............................................................. ... Phone No:.��9�
` t�T�
Facility Contact: ....... 0,411 . ........ /„f. .. Title: Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: ...... ---.l.......�..... t ....l..f� ...... .............. .. ��...... r3.F. ................. ......._._.... ..........................
�,�A�t ....f/., ... Integrator Onsite Representative: ...... i
....... .....................................
Certified Operator:....... elevE...... '.... /................................. Operator Certification Number:....... L/..O¢._.Z..........
Location of Farm:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................... .............. -.11- --- FA
Latitude Longitude • �' �'°
Design Current Design Cuirestit Design Current
Swtne � _ <. -_
Capacity Population Pouitr3' Ca achy . Population Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
[I Layer ELI Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
;.r
ff Farrow to Wean - -- "
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design. Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars = Total SSLW
_= K Nnmber of:Lagoons / ❑ Subsurface Drains Present -1Lagoon area VD Spray Field Area
Hold�ng'Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a[ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. [f discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes IN No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Watcr of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ANo
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Doers discharge bypass a lagoon system'? If yes, notify DW [j Yes g] No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R5 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ,® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
a
Freeboard(inches):....zO...............................................................................................................
. .
5- Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes M[No
seepage, etc.}
3/23/99 Continued on back

y �
Facility Number: Z — '] Q Date of, €nsptctian
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Applieation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of over application? �❑�Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Pian (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21 _ Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same arency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes)
h—CNo
❑ Yes WO
❑ Yes P§rNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ,RNo
❑ Yes ;}No
❑ Yes [RNo
❑ Yes Is No
kyes qilpwo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes JgNo
❑ Yes &No
AYes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ;WNo
❑ Yes $ No
❑ Yes E§ No
❑ Yes ja No
❑ Yes :RNo
0: Q vii>~l�t is cis o. tefeciet�.. .were intjted ditcitigthis;visit; . . . vial . . . . e>.i fu>�thet;
corres 6iidenCe. abouf this visit_ ;
Comments {refer to question #)::Ezplaln an YES answers and/or -an recorrtinendathons of an : oth_er comments: _'
y Y
._
Use drawings of facility 'to better explain situations (use additional pages as t cessary) �r
T._. V
piri.� .rii6�� .��i�� �✓.rel�R,Erf►.r��� ��
s�ct�s--- � !� �"1�'.,'� ',6,� cam✓/ ..���1..� ,�p.��/
Reviewer/Inspector Name ry
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ,7 /
►N
3/23/99

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor Issues /
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below El Yes /pl�
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? /�
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were anymajor maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, ctc.) [-]Yes '�t No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes LC No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? [ /(!$1jQNo
3/23/99

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 R+tutine O Comnlaint O Follow -uta of DWO insrimlion O Follow -un of I)SWC review O Other 1
F- Faciliq lumber 2 Wei
13 Registered ® Certified 0 Applied for Permit ® Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection '7: 24 hr. (hh:mm)
1E3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ........ ..... ....,,
Farm Name: ,f%`/" -?/_.,f _... County: ...._ .rr P,� !"�...m......... _w.....
OwnerName: ............ aftK...hf��/................................................................... Phone No: l.�2-a .................................... ..... ......
Facility Contact: �.. .......".. &C..-............. Title . ........................................_.........------. ---- Phone No:.....................
Mailing Address:...... 0� .I!! ,r .../.,tlCLt _ f.... ": -.A/ (f ..... 1.... .......--— ................. ........................ ...................
Onsite Representative:.../..', / ..(��,�(�.sj' ... .. ...... . Integrator:......0 __e -0-Xir� ................
Certified Operator, ......... ,FctP�t, T? . Gv S ... Operator Certification 1'umber;..�l.�,
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 4 46 Longitude ' ° 44
Y 5 ,:.`.Design Current Design Current Design ' .' Current
Swine fix" - 4.. Capactt3 ;Population `LL PoultryCapacity Population ..Cattle , `,C:apacity Population -
Wean to Feeder S20a SZ46 ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
D Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑
Farrow to Wean
❑ Other
D Farrow to Feeder
¢
D Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds JE1 Suhsurface Drains Present © Lagoon Area ❑ Spray field Area
$" Nr �6 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System K
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/impravement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon 0 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenanceJimpro vement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7- Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible Charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes IgNo
❑ Yes IoNo
❑ Yes IWNo
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes 1kNo
❑ YesgNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes E; No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No

r cility \lumber: Z — -71e
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
0 Yes )6No
Structures (Lagoons.liolding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.)
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ YesANo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure. 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
�(No
Freeboard (ft): ............. 31 ............. .........- .. .. .......+ /..._ i.W . _ ..�
_
.w ..._....... .. .. _ .. _
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes 1KNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 4 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes KNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
0 Yes
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
24.
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes 1% No
Wrote AvOication
14- Is there physical evidence of over application? 0 Yes X No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........ �A--..... ................_.....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? Q Yes ANO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? Yes 0 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Yes ❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Q Yes
DO No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
;KNo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
�(No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
XYes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities OP -1
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
0 Yes
P�No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
14 No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
iPo
O—No violations or defficiencie's were noted -during this:visit. You:will receive iso further
eorrespondence 6bout thK visit..'-'.
Corrmieitts (tr' fec to question #):.Explain any YES answers and/or any recoimiimendations or any other comments.
Use drduin;s of facitit to bettrr explain situations. (use additional pages as Necessary} a
�': ....,.,r. . a„...
ia...,- .
tip,1` .rte-' fr��f'/�-yr fes. l� � lely lwolr X
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name p V_;, �.: ° � � .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .� Date: 3?—2ell— I F

0� ..Ij,
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
WDivision of Water Quality
• Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DIVQ inspection 0 Follow -u of I)SWC review• 0 Other
Facility Number 2 `710 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0 Certified [] Applied for Permit (3 Permitted IM Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: A%.. .z.--77� / .. County: ........
Q t*w^J.......,..�.............................
Owner Name:...........................lNr...1`.�..................................................... Phone No: ......�Z�.J...7�i�
........
.....
Facility Contact: ......... .Pr.v ......Lc*%. 1 .� ..... Title: .. Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address :........s ..,G ?- ..1C�P . P �� 2 �..�.................................. ..........................
.... /....... /.... ......... ............ /
Onsite Representative: re ...... .1!.e(_— ....................................... integrator:..._.*�r.. ... ......._.....--
Certileed Operator; ............. AZO -r ��� .....,��,,�,,..... G:/�� Operator Certification I`umber;-..-.-�� ..Z.-.-........
Location of Farm:
Latitude D• & « Longitude 0' 0' "
Currentt;Design Current
f
P©}}ok on . Pattltry: , Capacity Poptilatiaa .�
uc:
® Wean to Feeder
H ❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
-< ❑ Boars
Number of Gago6ds /Holding Ponds
x ,� -
hwv
z
❑ Other
. '. r -- �Ttu#alaDtestgn
: ��b ��Capscii
Dairy
Nan-Dairy
a*ityY.
Subsurface Drains Present 1ED Lagoon Area ip Spray Field Area
V ❑ do Liquid Waste
General
1 _ Are.there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Cq No
?. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P9 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance rnan-made? ❑ Yes J9 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface. 'Vater'! (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notifv DWQ) ❑ Yes )KNo
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation! ❑ Yes KNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes WNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes �KNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time ol' design? ❑ Yes IQ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'! ❑ Yes {?'No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility D=umber:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lavoons,Holding Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes CR No
❑ Yes 4 No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(fty ..............7r....... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
1 I. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop ype1�+^ .......................... 0r � .................. . C7 .............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted, Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No. viola tions•ar de'ricieneie's were -noted -during this visit.::You:will re'eei've.izo fiirtlier
correspondence: about this:visit.•' - : - : : :
IN Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IR No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes C'No
© Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes JR No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PY'No
❑ Yes 9; No
❑ Yes J8 No
❑ Yes X No
{C©mnt�ts (refer.to question #) �Explapn any 1'ES°answers andlor any rect>utrrtendattons or any�oiher�cgnunents���"
�;
Use tlra�s of:lfaetltty>to better explant sttuahon.� €fuse addt£ronal pages as;necessary) �� .,� ,�:�� °" � 4� �`�•:
..�<...�, ,�,�•-•� __�� � .�. � .Ar.�, .. �,., .... .,.;. . � . =� .:���,r������
Jam,.
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name w 9w
�r
Reviewer/inspector Signature: ���`����� Date: -7/42.7 y?