820538_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

'I.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
March 10, 1999
Rand Tyndall
189 Beaverdam Road
Clinton, NC 28328
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
Randy Tyndall Farm
Facility No. 82-538
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Tyndall,
On March 1, an Operation Review was conducted on Randy Tyndall Farm, facility
no. 82-538. This Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10D, is one of two
visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1999 calendar year. The
Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was noted that the small grain had been over -applied
greater than 1U% of the PAN recommendation for that crop. It was noted that small
grain had been aver -applied by 22 lbs. NlAcre on pull 2B.
You are strongly encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for help.
You may also want to contact your local Soil and" Water Conservation District Office since
they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or financial assistance to
implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with
environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the
State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems must be
properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified
operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciatesyour cooperation with
this Operation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 9101486-1541 extension 292
if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information,
S'c�e-reef
cokt Faircloth
Environmental Specialist II
cc: DWQ-Fayetteville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files
Sampson County SWCD
228 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

� ► 1 iii ! _.
x.43 ij. I,,!
19 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 82 538 Date of Inspection 3-1-99
Time o1' Inspection 9:20 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not opera Date East Operated:
Farm Name: Fatxdy-.Ty>xtlaU. ,ataxl................................................................................. County: S,am7asmxt........................................... FRO.............
Owner Name: RAIldy..................................... IY.md,ala....................................................... Phone No: 5A4-tt792;.5.f4-!j8Q4.......................... ....................
Facility Contact: RAFAdy-Tymdall..............................................Title: Qw.rier.................................................. Phone No: %+:6192 ................................
Mailing Address: W..leavvi dm.11ud....................................................................... CjjgjQA.'NC ........................................................... 2RUB..............
Onsite Representative: Rapdx,.TyM;da,1L............................................. Integrator: CArKKt11'.KlFuQdSbg.................
Certified Operator;Rudy.A ................................ Tyridwi............................................ Operator Certification Number:1,6754 .............................
Location of Harm:
.r.A.rm.Glunku�t.!Laky.4�l.lY,..ka.�a:asl�xsarxs.Qluix�.Stalx,.x>�cp�.tx�il.lalt�.1.st.x�d,.It�c>c.xt?..kLr�.l�ik�L�xy.l�2.1.13�aYex�datn�.>;.d�..ik.�vlll.... +
a�..abQuk.�1.4..af.a.nnLl�.�dn�m.ltlxia.xaad.ap�.kh.�.xi;�>xk,.
Latitude 35 • 02 , 22 +1 Longitude =a
23F-1-671,
Design Current
1
Design Current
Design ' Currenit '
Swine ,Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity.Population. Cattle ;,
Capacity, Population,,,,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
Non -Layer
Non-Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
29 Farrow to Fee er 500
❑ Other
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
500
Gilts
Total SSLW
261,000
Boars
Number of Lagoons
1
; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area `i°
°Holding Ponds [SolEid Traps
•
❑
Ef No Liquid Waste Management
Discharges & Stream ImRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Stnirh,re. t Stnicture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ..............24'.'............... ...........................
.....................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
116199 Continued on back