820474_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

4-.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
February 24, 1999
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
c/o David Nordin
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
Farm 2123
Facility No. 82-474
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Nordin,
On February 15, an Operation Review was conducted on Farm 2123, facility no.
82-474. This Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two
visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1999 calendar year. The
Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site Inspection.
Duringg the Review, it was noted that the small grain had been aver-ap lied
greater than 10% of the PAN recommendation for that crop. Accordingg to Section 111.6.F.
of the general permit issued by the Division of Water Quality, it states Mt overapplying
animal waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CA MP or where runoff enters
surface waters should be reported to the Division of Water Quality.
You are strongly encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for help.
You may also want to contact your local Soil and -Water Conservation District Office since
they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or financial assistance to
implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with
environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the
State, and the animal waste collection, treaFment, storage and disposal systems must be
properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified
operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with
this Operation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 9101486-1541 extension 292
if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
Si er ly,
cott Faircloth
Environmental Specialist II
cc: DWQ-Fayetteville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files
Sampson County SWCD
225 GREEN 8TR88T, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PMONE 810-485.1 541 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

1.v. F c s-`�i-.,�. �-i[ 'r,i ,lJ�.
i-._:i°(E 1:{ii ......,.i ,. �¢rar.-;¢€F +as¢: � ,e,..-.9 - ;,.,•,€t.r, � ��na:,., ,s ,.,c c_„'�nsnEr ?�....,s€t..€:;:,.a,�.rsnru ..-..,unn �laa,v,°a � -.. � i r I 11111
A ?=>i°i; ®IDivision ofjSoil and Water, Cnnser,vation-i4 erationlReview,{!{ Jj i,� i : , i II.I„r,a<,;«„ r ., , I,i ar r ,„ § ?g,: p,i?i! a
: ti. i! of :,#,.#.i 41i,.,(�,. "'It [� Divisiot►IIIofSo�l and:,Waterl,Conservationl Compliance Inspection, :J 1 Id III
fl r r1 , do r IF, . • r., al.: rl n1 ri:ir�i: Is li . If1 iU! I ,,•i, Fria 1,, Ir! i l !( (((!� , ��� i li i.! ' :I I �!.
-!
U Dlvlsion of Water Quality[ Compllanee Inspectlon
F W - - ±' I Ea-. 11
[ , LOther,Agency1,'li.;I''.:II'[r' i.,
10
I u
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWCreyiew O Other J
Facility Number 82 474 Date of Inspection 2-15-99
Time of Inspection 14:04 24 hr. {hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Co ditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 2.1.23....................�VrA..................... County: Sampaoin ........................................... ERQ .............
OwnerName: ................................................... .............................. Phone No: 910.-.29.1-3.434...........................................................
Facility Contact: Davoid..N.urdiin .................................................'Title: Emplayeg .......................................... Phone No: 29.3.-.3.43.4 ................................
MailingAddress: R�... u7r`. li........................................................................................... W..0 rsaw..1N.C.......................................................... Z839.8 ..............
Onsite Representative:�Y.I�1.�lQxdltk,.1►]Ii�ltat;i.Srxtabl,.S*~Q.tX.Sfd IFlcand... Integrator: C�r.�Al1'.S� p.R[lLl]C................................................
Certified Operator: ....... S.trjCjjhnd..................... ..... Operator Certification Number:Z15,41
Location of Farm:
....n.aa .r ....; i.;alail;�s...rQ..n.:ixs;i...xg..s.. tla�...�:ixb..S.>Z..1.9,�3................................................................................................ �
_.
Latitude 6 64 Longitude
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity i?opulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
ILINon-Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 1000
❑Other
LJ Farrow toFinish
f
'Total Design Capacity
1,000
(jilts
a i
oars
AM
Total SSLW
522,000
Number of Lagoons 1 2 J J❑ Subsurface Drains Present JJ❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
0` 1
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes ® No
uxf(-[— Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
4., 4 a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
P t'j c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaal/min?
fr-0 ° d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Stnicture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.. Old..Lavoxi...........N.e .L�ataaart.....
..... .........................
Freeboard(inches): ..............2a... ...3.6'.:.......................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
116199 Continued on back

A..r
'IFacilify Number: 82-474 , Date of Inspection 2-15-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type ......�astal..exxruatia.{day).......... cmtaly.afamuda.k.0xrazel ... ,....... Sma1..Qrair.Q.y=&xi....................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ® Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
® Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
No:violations•or deficiencies:rvere•noted dtiritig.this:visit. ,You�will•receive tio: further ;
correspondence about this visit:: : : • .. . • . • . • ............ .: . : .:.: . : : .
Comments (refer to uestion0 :I!�Ex' lain,ani` YES1atisrve'rsland/or1aijy, recoirim'enda`tiuns'oEr�''an `!othe'rEcommen'ts'� "`1��I']i� �'IiGEI''ii�iir
(.; - ,.q.,, e_{..,�.,) iq. p:.. ...yl ��I-'' .I yl.:..i,i.: i.�.,1'.,dlhl'a.r�.,.�,.,rr9, i,ra,lylaP.I'wl��`��
l'SSar .''I I.IIiE it I y,rrllly l}r! 154��, l ,.i
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additiopal pages as nec . �)u;l!'E
Accoding to the database, Start Date 01/01/85 Certification Date 04/13/95 +
7- Bare areas with minor erosion on outer lagoon wall. Shape and stabilize with vegetation (may have to use annual until perennial
planting season). Stabilize within 90 days.
8- Overflowing flush tanks needs to be addressed immediately. Waste did not leave site.
11, 22- PAN applications should not exceed recommendations in waste plan. In cases where PAN has been over -applied greater
than 10% of the PAN recommendation for the crop, stop irrigation, notify DWQ. Notice of Referral to DWQ. Over -Applied to
small grain 18 pounds.
19- Need to correct Irr-2 loading rates and revise Waste Utilization Plan to include grazing of bermuda on all fields.
V
�.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name !S,cot . _, _. ' '—._ ,,..... .'I '' �.s?—i Ek lir•--�fil i`I I 9''T} I� �E l.n^rll k;,.;lu !II !1f E Il j i^ r F�^�E�
a r oth ' I• 1 l I f fyI {
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: '
116199