820470_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

i
_ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
February 24, 1999
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
c/o David Nordin
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
Farm 2328
Facility No. 82-470
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Nordin,
On February 16, an Operation Review was conducted on Farm 2328, facility no.
82-470. This Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two
visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1999 calendar year. The
Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was noted that the bermuda had been aver -applied greater
than 10% of the PAN recommendation for that crop. According to Section I1 .6.F. of the
generalermit issued by the Division of Water Quality it states that overapplying animal
waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or where runoff enters surface
waters should be reported to the Division of Water Quality. it was noted that the bermuda
had been over -applied 113 lbs. of nitrogen on field #12.
You are strongly encouraged to contactour certified technical specialist for help.
You may also want to contact your local Soil andWaterConservation District Office since
they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or financial assistance to
implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with
environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the
State, and the animal waste collection, trey ment, storage and disposals stems must be
properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge ofya certified
operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciatesyour cooperation with
this Operation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 9101486-1541 extension 292
if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
IJ741Jk
Scott Faircloth
Environmental Specialist
cc: DWQ-Fayetteville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files
Sampson County SWCD
226 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 283o1-8043
PHONE [phone] FAX $10-4ae-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - BO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

F. „ ®;Division of ,Soil and;Water,Co'nservati'on �OPeratio�n'Reyteiv,: '�
�� �
O'Divisioii o1 Soil'innd;Watcr, Co�iscrvatian -Com �Iiance 16s ec'tian'
„ ".f p l}, i'
lip.;,
OiDivislonof,Water Goan IisnceIris � � i!I
��,
k�,t�,:,:��,,�....��,„�if,hi
k'
�,; ,.,i, Qualrt action �{j +
7: - i. �i i� '+.�,1',� VY". .LIQ , R FI;£.'. .I.. ,�
,.,�, � 0 Othr.r A g ency ::.Operation Review,,, � CC � M,af ' � ::..:;> a j�{„t
�i .�
�
ti
; :: �
I! �
, ;F.1',3
�.�� P
(_,
�IC
I,
ti'} 1i
��..
{6i
1fi
fjj.!i
, ,� ,
'I'....d_:.i�sr�� r um aia_•: A .u. •.r ;„elPv„I ,,,,�� �,,, ily���L Y��f,�P��Iii�iE��^�,zi,F _� i��� !I l��i l3��'I����y
��i•�!i.
4E
I�1 i0
J3
Ft., -it
.
11 ��f4'�I�I�
• Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection OFollow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 82 470 Date of Inspection 2-16-99
Fiine of Inspection 14:45 24 hr. (hh:mnn)
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 23,2:x ..................... .... County: SampaQjn......................... ......... EKQ.............
........................................................................................... .........
Owner Name: ................................................... .0urroff's-EwdsJu .............................. Phone No: 9.1.Qr.293.:3.43.4..................................... ......................
Facility Contact: IYJickta l.�irX Halm..........................................'Title: EAUpjUy.pC........................................... Phone No: 29.1-3.414 ................................
MailingAddress: f'!).. .a .� b........................................................................................... !!'aXsa ,..lY........................................................... 2> 39. ..............
.... .................
Onsite Representative:]lficli��1.{'rXafl�tlU,.J.aznit;. �tlIxiS..................................... Integrator: Carr.vlt'sk.a.arfs,I,ttc........................ ................
Certified Operator: axteX................................ kt s................... .... ..... ........ Operator Certification Nunber•1.7#fj1.............................
Location of Farin:
lsa�ulh .....gxsi;iof,S9r:af?rn,,;,9:nail....................................................................................................................... +
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 0 1 0« Longitude • 6 44
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder 1886
LJ Farrow to Finish
= is
oars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer Z I❑ Dairy
❑Non -Layer[ ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,886
Total SSLW 984,492
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Ficld Area
Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar yes & Stream Im_ pacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance matt -made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin'? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches); ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,24"
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
116199 Continued on brick

+Fac[ „ Number: 8Date of Inspection F 2-16-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/imp rove ment? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markirigs? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type ....Coastal..t~rxnu�a,G�,xazu).... ...... ....................... Mdk1Qra. Qd............... ........ ,........ Xy....Oxared................ .,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ® Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records ,& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. hail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
N:o:violations or. deiiciencies:wei e' •noted during; this visit: You will •receive do further;
correspondence about this'visit:
:s u r e u,! 1 �1"
Comments (refer to question #): 'Ezplaiii uny YES answers andlor any, recomniendataoits or,any other,Ecommen s �,�u'I
'uatloris. E ii E"
Use'drawin s, y otter eieplain sl (use addrtonalFpages°as necessary).`E'�I ;'lijr" �;, + J .�;
facilit to�b,
g t a i,�'I�llil`''lE�
,af r; ,.,..� .. �fl�,
According to the database, Start Date 0 1/0 1/87 Certification Date 04106195.
8- Hydrant at lagoon, Need to repair mater leakage of hydrant during pressurization or depressurization of system. Need to install
butterfly valve immediately to prevent future discharge into Waters of the State, Waste was contained at hydrant.
11, 22- On field #12 Over -Applied -1 13 lbs. Nitrogen to bermuda. Over -Applied > 10% of PAN allowed in WUP, Notice of
Referral to DWQ.
19- On field #13 Millet PAN loading should be 135 lbs N/acre instead of 150 lbs. N/acre. On field #1 Millet PAN loading should
e 150 lbs. Nitrogen instead of 170 lbs. Nitrogen.
11- Field #7 Over -Applied 15 lbs. Nitrogen. Over -Applied < 10% stop irrigation, secure alternative sites, contact technical
V iTM]
r.. '...1t-1 'x`11! i �1 �l� III`j
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott aEir to;; �+ ' -, ;
�- . �'�� �,�1 : I�i4i:'�'E�E .111 !1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
1/6/99

., "40