820463_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

.VW
3
I6 O
W3►�eni
15tV d tench School Road
Godwin NC 28344
—J-3. Pleas,,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF te5c_ E,,
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
March 11, 1999
31 S G6s 44
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral do
ayne Wrench -,.Farm
Facility No. 82=463 n,
Sampson County ,*;
Dear.Mr. Wrench,`'!
�s�s 'L;r ..,,
On March 5 an Operation Review was conducted on Wayn'ffw ch Farm,
facility no. 82-463. this Review, -,undertaken in accordance with,Gid15.1OD, is one
of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations dunk -g t,9 calendar
year. The Division of Water Quality.will conduct a second sitejhbn ;Rion.
,. '
During the Review, it was noted that the small grain "had; bs over -applied
greater than 10% of the PAN recommendation for thatZrop. It,' ' ed that the small
grain had been over-ap lied b 31 lbs. NlAcre on pull`#2'in fiel : Wrench needs to
reduce PAN on bermuda by 3 lbs. NlAcre on pull #2 in feel. s gFowing season.
,w'�.' ri
You are strongly encouraged to contact our, c j ed technical specialist for help.
You may also want to contact your, local Soil andyWate onservation District Office since
they may be able to provide you with additional tedriical and/or financial assistance to
implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for. your facility to be in compliance with
environmental regulations, animal waste`an��not be discharged into the waters of the
State, and the animal waste collecti,on,;Areatment, storage and disposal systems must be
properly sized, maintained and'op�lrl3ted under the responsible charge of a certified
operator.
.5
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with
this Oblation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 9101486-1541 extension 292
if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
g r • S' cerely l�
Scott Faircloth
Environmental Specialist II
cc: DWQ-Fayetteville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files
Sampson County SWCD
. ca
�% N2 l
2 5GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLE0/10% POST -CON SUMER,PAPER
}

Facility Number 82 463 Date of Inspection 1 3-5-99
Time of Inspection 14:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered 10 Not O' erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: W..gyAC,W.rgj0gh.y.arM.... ................................................... I...................... County: S,amptsou_..................................... ... FRO .............
OwnerName: W.pyilp. .................................... W.Kg1jr�L ...................................................... Phone No: 910:!5.67:75.434 ...........................................................
Facility Contact: Waync.W..ungh............................................. .I'itle: Atettier................. ............................... , Phone No: 5.67-5.43.4.......,..................
Mailing Address: 159.4.Q1d..\3.'rxAch.Srbanl.lett........................................................ ........................................................... Z83.44 ..............
Onsite Rep resentative:.Y.4AXlptY..WX.pjx0x......................................................................... Integra tor: CarmIl.:;wkmd9mg..................... ...........................
Certified Operator: Aubuy..W............................ 1?hi:glUb............................................ Operator Certification Number:179.35 .............................
Location of Farm:
Er.��.izti�xsg�tlam.Qf..IOQ!G.a��l.14R2..{11�tIs.�St�.rc1.�],.nu..tAQ2,.z.,�..m�i�cs.ta.sxa�.sxg�t.1Q9�..t.ux�as.lctt.�(1?4'gs.t�.alftcx..k�arrui�ng.Yk'.,nn....�
LQU2..,b..nailcs.xa.sid.xn.a�d.14'il.{>3yu�t>tni.liaad�.ani.l�e�X.kahixtg.left.ti4.�milg..a.tcft.;is.tax�tl�.c>u�txa�a�g.................................................................
Latitude 35 ' 08 35 ,1
Longitude
78 ' 33 09 11
Current
DesignDesign Design.,
Swine CapacitY Population
"PaultrY
accitY Po uNtion -Cattle tY iErnpulntiol
•n. ''
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish
I0 Non -Layer I I
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Fee er 960
10 Other
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
960
LJ Gilts
Total SSLW,
501,120
Boars
Number of LagoonsI . ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/ Solid Tra 0 . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management SystemE:�,,
Discharees & Stream Im_ i)acts
1. Is ariy discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ..............19..............................................................I...........
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
1/6/99
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
n/a
❑ Yes M No
❑Yes 0 N
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes M No
Structure G
❑ Yes M No
Continued on back '

Ficlht} Number: 82-463 Date of Inspection 3-5-99
6. Aie there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or 1\1
closure plan? I ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8: Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN
® Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type .... C.aasxal.B.er=u&.(Gxaze.).... ....... SMll.G,zain-Qura"d..... :........................ CQ.tlwan....................... . '.irtto..a d.,Stanxrt�er. Axtn�ial,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
® Yes7
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
® Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? -Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
• •,No;violations,or. del'iciencies-Wei e' -fioted,during:this:visit.' •You-v►rill,receive no: furthef ;
correspandence about this visit:.. ; .. . . . .. . .
C6niments (refer to question ft, Explain'any,-'YES, answers agd/or i ny recvmmendationsjor. any;,othe'r comments: , II 1„, N ,1E
Use drawings offacility,to.better"explain'situafians. (use addrtions�l pages as necessary),
- .,. #air i`.
,
��. E ..?,I�.E,Y i'j6�lin,l,p I..r,#�' .j„li.- .I,tlit ;• !,
7 Visual evidence of sludge build-up reducing treatment capacity of lagoon and reducing storage capacity of lagoon. Remove f
sludge and apply at agronomic rates (keep records SLU 1&2). Within 1 year depending on crop cycle. If sludge
removal/application is not addressed in the WUP, contact technical specialist for assistance and development of sludge removal
plan. Within 60 days. Need to extend discharge pipes out into lagoon so waste is discharging at or below surface of lagoon. Intake.
Pipe — 18 inches below lagoon level surface. Need to extend flush tank lines to bottom of tank. Need to repair clean out area of
disc arge pipe so waste is going to lagoon and not bypassing.
On field #2 pull #2 Over Applied -31 lbs. N/acre to small grain. Over -Application > 10% recommended PAN in WUP. Notice
of Referral to DWQ. I )
nspector Name
nspector Signature:
ij. '
Date:
3TT

FacT Number: 8Z-46� Date of Inspection 3-5-99
��i8: E id5 '.. `€td:- ,:€..:' -1. il.•.....M1tYn1" i 3rr iSfEr - !'li" R7.: ` E 6 $ .i' 4; : 1 i .. 5 §' !',� � ! . •. ±11 [a=. 1 i e€ 3. `'I'� k
diti'onal ,Comments`'`and/or
rnEds.;ir€r-a'Dr
13- Mr. Wrench is in the process of selling all cows. Need to establish bermuda at feeding area in spray field. May need to aerate +
Spray field once cows are removed due to compaction.
18- to fill out insect control and odor control checklist for farm site for permit application purposes.
19-.Vsoil map of spray field to correspond with Irr-2 forms (loading rates). Need to start keeping records on pulls with the
traveling gun (acres) and watch windows of application.
Note: Farm has been flagged for WA Determination.
� qq