Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820180_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231CORRESPONDENCE NORTH CAROLINA Deparent of Environmental Qual State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director Brewer Honeycutt Brewer Honeycutt Farm 2962 Crumpler Mill Rd Salemburg NC 28385 Dear Brewer Honeycutt: VWA ' W NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES April 27, 1998 RECEIV E Subject: Removal of Registration Facility Number 82-180 Sampson County APS .i o 1998 FAYET EVILLE REG. OFFICE This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not require registration for a certified animal waste management plan. Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day. Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans are as follows, Swine 250 Confined Cattle 100 Horses 75 Sheep 1,000 LL Poul with a liquid wastes stem 30,000 If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your pperation please call Sonya Avant of our staff at (919) 733-5083 ext 571. Sincerely, A Al A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. cc: Fayetteville Water Quality Regional Office Sampson Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919.733.5083 Fax 919.715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper MEMO TO FILE July 11, 2002 The FRO has received notice from Mr. Wilson Spencer of the Sampson County S & WCD that Mr. Brewer Honeycutt is going to close out the lagoons at the Brewer. Honeycutt Farm which is no longer operational. John Hasty Environme l Specialist ❑ DSWC�nlmal Feedlot Qp� ICKRoutine O Comnlaint O Follow -un of DWO inspection O Follow -un of DSWC review O Other FDate of Inspection Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm) Total Time (in fraction of hours Farm X,'Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr .15 min)) Spent on Review ❑ ertitied ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)_ ❑nNot Operational Date Last Operated:......................................................................c............................................................................. Farm Name:....�[�ecW.P C ...1!e4#C,r7i!................................ County:......................».......d...... Land Owner Name:...rl!f........1`[ _........................ Phone No:..9ia.. r." .l ..._......................... FacilityConctact:.......qq......................................`.................................... Title:.................................................. Phone No: ............ _......................... ................... Mailing Address:....I..f.�P ...T..4! [ f.. ,t......l di ..................................... 111 .jR4�[ ..f................/�.............z?iM7 Onsite Representative: .....�P`l( ' ��j r fL........................... Integrator:.... C.. P 'i`............. ifsCertified Operator:......„ .� /f .. ..!�,� :.../�� .G;.11............. Operator Certification Number: ... �� ............. 7.. ........ Location of Farm: .T ... S.t. �'......................... Cy...1VC............................................... 4 .....................:................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................... Latitude ' S 11 Longitude & 64 Type of Operation and Design Ca acityy' a ��' zDesfgn Current; ��w{ g , g< p d� n g ' , F 14U,Desi n Current Desi n Current Swinex .. zCattle y W :_ Ca aci Po' uliitian = Poultry.,`<, _ Ca Bei Po "ulatian t :Ca aci 440 ulati6n ❑ Wean to Feeder JU Layer V❑ Dairy Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer Non Dai Farrow to WeanWIN :, Farrow to Feeder Tnta1 Design::: i iAil M91 j 4 Ulm Farrow to Finis x Totar{`ssLw� x ❑ Other VV �at a �so >" SNltmber of Lagoons'/ Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present A' ❑ ray Field L ❑ Sp Fie Area #: Lagoon Area A General 1. Are there any buyers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes gNo 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes t No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes )VNo b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes tlNo c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes IkrNo 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ).dNo 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 2 .No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ YesgNo 4/30/47 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back Facility Number: 7T. Z77l],,, 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ti 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 /. / ............................ .......... ..._..... ...... ............................ 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? Structure 4 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes J� No ❑ Yes P(No ❑ Yes ONO kyes ❑ No Structure 5 Structure 6 Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type..................................................................................................................... ....I..... . 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? l7. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 24. Does record keeping need improvement? /Z M ❑ Yes *No ❑ Yes j No XYes C\❑No ❑ Yes kNo ❑ Yes KNo ❑ Yes XNo ❑ YesNo / Yes `"`❑\\\\ No ❑ YesNo ❑ Yes / ` No ❑ Yes ANo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 11 nc rn Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: gA4,04, ,E If Date: 7 -1j --;P;7 cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary November 13, 1995 Brewer Honeycutt Brewer Honeycutt Farm Rt 1 Box 208 Salemburg NC 28385 SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation Facility: Brewer Honeycutt Farm Facility ID#: 82-180 Sampson County Dear Mr. Honeycutt: E)AirV r EHNR RECEIVED NOV 19 1995 FAME 11! EVILLE REGI, E)FFICE Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly, requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty. If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office. Examinations have been offered on an on-going basis in many counties throughout the state for the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please cal! Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 9191733-0026. Sincerely, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director Division of Water Quality Enclosure cc: Fayetteville Regional Office Water Quality Files P.O. Box 276$7, �� Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-76$7 �C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Voice 919-715-4100 ,. : ,. _ 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper