820165_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua

w
....6i{f' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICK
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 17, 1998
DCNR—FRO
MAR r 12004
Mr. Somboon Kachaenchai
P. O. Box 238 ®WQ
Autryville, NC 28318
Subject: Request flor Removal
1'ig,gy Farm
Facility # 82-165
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Kachaenchai:
E?nclosed please find the request lbr removal lbrm we talked about on
Wednesday, September 16,1998. Please fill this out and return it to the
address at the bottom and your farm will be removed irom our database.
if you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to
contact John C. Hasty, Jr. at [phone].
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
JOHN C. HASTY, JR,
��.. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST A*A
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY NCDENR
218 P■YRTTRVRLLR, NC 28301
PHOHR 910.484.1841 FAX [phone]
�Q$� 11•��l''j.
Sincerely,
1
John C. Hasty, Jr.
Environmental Specialist
228 GF491EN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-8043
PHONE 9I0-488-1841 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 2H .0200 registration requirements. Please, in activate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number: �oQ , 166
Farm Name: P ` fc>"z
t
-S
Owner.omeoxy KtICHAENCHAT
Mailing Address: p 0 ' Box a,3(3
/4 uT-A Y V'T l -L IVC.. d8 31 S
County: 3 AM P,30 IN
This Operation is:
C
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
�NZ_ out of business/no animals on site
closed out per NRCS standards
below the threshold (fess than 2Mswine. 100 -confined cattle, 75 -hones, 1000 -sheep or
30,000-poultry
with a liquid animal waste management system)
` N&w
I am aware that even though I may qualify to be removed from the animal operations registration database, the
Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) may still require me to obtain a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP) or an individual permit for this facility. This decision will be made based on this
facility's actual or potential impacts on surface waters of the State of North Carolina. I am also aware that should I,
in the future, decide to repopulate this facility at or below the originally registered number of animals, I am required
to obtain a CAWMP and request reactivation of the facility from the DWQ prior to stocking animals. Any expansion
to this facility would require me to apply for, and obtain a permit prior to expansion.
Signature: , ruc f`v���, .-e�zo� ' Date:
Please return completed form to:
DENR-DWQ
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RR -2196

CDA omeci�vLsian - 43ROy�Road- )3aleig�aN� �3��64165 _
x(919) 733.2655
uoderstan&ng theWaste A..j,,is Re,.,t
Waste products must be disposed of in ways that protect the environment. The keys to proper disposal include analyzing the waste product and planning application rates
based on agronomic requirements. The Waste Analysis Report provides information necessary to use these materials as a resource while protecting the environment.
Sample Info This section contains sample identifiers, specifically the sample identification number, waste code, and description. These data are
Heyto:Abb did
supplied by the grower on the information sheet submitted with each sample.
N
Laboratory Results Wastes can be analyzed for up to 20 elements. Routine analysis includes most of the nutrients that are essential for plant growth—
ALE-
Ag{ -cultural Imae equivalent
N, 1, k Ca, Mg, S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B and Na. Other elements may be analyzed if they are potentially harmful to soil or plants when allowed to increase to
B
n
excessive levels. For example, when the waste is a by-product from a municipality or industry, the heavy metals Cd, Ni and Pb are routinely included in the
C
carbon .
analysis. Upon request and if conditions warrant, certain waste types can also be tested for Al, Cl, Li and Mo. Results are reported in parts per million. If the
Ca
Calt �um �-
C equtval ce
sample is a compost or compost ingredient, values for pH, SS, and C:N are reported; pH values are also reported for all liquid animal waste samples. DM%
.GGE%
, i
Cadmium,
is reported for all dry waste samples. CCE% and ALE are reported for waste products that have neutralizing value.
�,
(.t1ltmde
Recommendations This section can have three parts: (1) Nutrients Available for first crop based on application method; (2) Other Elements that may
3Llfl/O-
Iv lQltJ •' Y
impact application; and (3) agronomic comments indicating precautions that should be taken when using the waste.
-
4��yµLLCi
(1) Predictions of nutrients available for the first crop are based on estimates of mineralization rate and nutrient loss, depending on application method.
gig
PbtassLuu
Estimates are reported in lbs/ton for solid wastes and lbs/1000 gallons for liquid wastes. "T" indicates that an element is present in a "trace"
&ISO
>= r
quantity (c 0.005 lb per measured unit).
E;
Ft
Li
Within the fast month after waste application, 50 to 75% of the nutrient quantities listed will become available for the crop. Therefore, plan to apply
'
wastes near the time that plants will require nutrients. The remaining nutrients gradually become available over the next three months.
Vlit
�
M� Aise
�
Nutrients not available for the first crop are mineralized to available forms over time, usually years. Certain nutrients, such as Zn and Cu, may
+�
N•
�Nitrogea
accumulate in the soil in significant quantities. If waste is routinely applied, monitor nutrient accumulation with sail tests at least once every two
Na ,
Som
years. Some cropping systems and metal levels may necessitate annual soil samples as well.
NH4
Anunoniu<ri-nmuge�
ALE and CCE% are reported for wastes that may have neutralizing value. ALE indicates the amount of the waste product required to equal 1 ton of
Nirliel
good quality cultural lime (CCE%=90). If waste materials have significant neutralizing value, aPPIY them o�Yat rates neces Yto optimize H
XN0
Nitrate.tjibrogen,
�a
for flexibility the information sheet allows two choices for application method Predictions of available nutrients are based on the type of waste and
P '.
Phphonls'
the method of application. If you decide to change the application method after the analysis is complete, contact the Agronomic Division at (919) 733-
Pz�5
b
Lead
2655 for a revised recommendation.
pPH
Mtsiue of acidity ar alkalinity: '.
(2) Quantities of other elements that may have an impact on the environment—Na, Ni, Cd, Pb, Al and Li— indicate the likelihood of harmful buildup in
s ^
Siilfur „
the soil. Like nutrients, they are reported in lbs/tan for solid wastes and lbs/1000 gallons for liquid wastes.
55 _`
Solulile salts
(3) The recommendations section may include agronomic comments when warranted. These provide general information on the waste product and alert
?rp.u -
the user when plant nutrients or heavy metals are high enough to warrant special precautions when applying the waste. for diagnostic samples, site-
Zinc
specific recommendations are provided based on information sheet data. The more thoroughly the problem and its unique conditions are described
on the information sheet, the more pertinent and site specific the recommendations will be.
April 2003 10,000 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of $205.41 or $0.02 per copy.

NGDA` orionic.Divi ion `4300 Reed :Creek.Road Ralei I:'NC',276Q7�6465 ^ .919 733k-Z655_yp Report No: WU5811. ,W
Grower: Kachaenchai, Somboon Copies To: _
P. 0. Box 238
k ^4
Auk -ville, NC 28318
Wste Analysis R eport Faun'
2/3/04
Sampson County
".i '.Y•. ».i.`_t'. -.
Sam le,Info "";_.>::I:abora#o
.._ _:,.s.....' - .-.' ..T.-. .:.:. :.-_: a _•.¢� «.:.•,.�+.:
r,,millroninmless;otlienvise?noted
_
: rResults arts;
Sample ID:
N
P R Ca M
9 S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Afo Cl C
001:
Total 20.3
28.0 105 115 32.3 5.36 2.48 0.29 0.34 0.07 0.49
IN -N
Waste Code:
-AIH4
Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li PH SS C.,N DM% CCE% ALE al
ALS
-NO3
36.7 6.05
Description:
OR-N
Swine Lagoon Lig.
Urea
^�r.-yw.
rn
tNut
Recommendations; t" ,�;n�r enAvailaiKle;forxFust,C%a , :,:: ,> ,:lbs/I0f1(1� alloris�
Other'Eleaieats - ,-<<;16s1I000; alloris: _;;
- --Tj. -
4:b%' [,Y•. -":i;. �1 €'[i u`q'v - - -��240
lscatwn=Nletboit: N�:P�05.�` Kz0�4 'Cd='�" S Fe. MGu` B Mo Gly
w� : ��M"�.�.- ., ' rya:
£3. e .- ,. -. ... _�,,., .. _. ' 3- 5 ... L+ _ 3' ['� 4.'._ - ... is '�:k
:? I :.,.. ... :. • -„L.. e,_.., tT �..`:..r+�' .. : ME
Irri on 0 O8 5:0:67 19'. r n ,. .5 - [�x :'+�.
0:03 0 01 T.C T
n - �'.~ �•i:3k'.-. C'^.i �v k�
Nab Nib Cd Pb.._ Al �Se Ll
y s
b f:�i�:' �'`M •i:. 4M .S' .y enc I� 1'
.5,x-imh+ _... .,r,. ',olt.'
0:31
_-. 1".G-..;�:.
,"�..
a Ji
. .+:0:37 -4.0:84^• r.:0.1.p �: �.
�i..�.7- r.A J' "7r E }!:"
��'•y.. .:Y'„".a �:^... #�.c.r-;x
•s .: ''X� ^� � � -- 1.. -�x=.• - - ri�'
- '� - �? �':.. '-�'N �" -.T-.� r
�"
-
- ,��< •-fir: .s:' F..
Y ' t �,�'.�E "t'T _ 'vc }s k: ,� xc ..��
'l�^k.. "r.:'_.^^. 'b s^,... x c�
:
y.'S'y zV
• s-4 i4�. -c« �.� ."
z { a 1 : .3• � -� -
_ .x. -. r .� {
"'�i h ,�'.Yr �. .:''C•. 4'Z:
"
e H oftlie l ooii?li uid'is
P � q..
-- ._. o- :� _ r.. ry _: _ .-a�ay. ti:. s>..'—:+a .r'.>.c' _: rsa' e.., :._ s..' .�>-.x. ..;.;;r
below the;ideal,ran a for:bactenal action and.waste treatmentGraduall ust, tl{b 'add<n Yl1b: of: cultural'fime; er;1000.cuftof ii "uid[rebiainin in't6e I ooii'.'Sam le;thell'
g Ys1 P Yas i; P Q g P
:r,. .Si-:
onth :and:canGnue'to:adiust
�1.'• _?:- :
,a h-. �. ti- .t:•.- .:a,-..i -x -
pH until d �s:withfnkhe desuedrange 0f.7.0 8 ©.

0 Division of Water Quality
tl♦ Division of Soil'and Water Conserr+atio..n
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OQ Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number f32 165
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date of ViSit 1 3-21-2000
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: IZ73.1::9.8 .......
Farm Name: Piga.Farm.................... .... County: Sampspn.......................... .... FRO
.............................................................................. ............. ............
Owner Name: SpMb(15121 ............................... katr ileacb,9i............................................ Phone No: Qty -S �- 5b2........................................
...................
Facility Contact; .................................. ....Title• Phone No:
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ...................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
l? orm.I.Q.catign;..........................................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine Conacity Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean 230 0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle 'CapacityPopulation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 230
Total SSLW 99,590
Number of Lagoons 6 Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
Discharp,es & Stream Impacts,
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewerllnspector Name ;Trent Allen. - � Neill Ray
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

Facilif'y Number 82— 165 Lagoon Number
Q.1......... Lagoon Identifier InacgQQ.n..Q1........................
O Active # Inactive
Latitude 35
02
03
Waste Last Added .. - �..-....................................
Longitude
78
36
04
Determined by: ❑ Owner 0 Estimated
Surface Area (acres): R.,4.3 ........................
Embankment Height (feet): 5 ................................
By GPS or Map? IRGPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: JR032114A
Distance to Stream: 0 X250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes ©No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): *<5 05-10 0>10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No Oi Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 3-21-2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (Inches): 36
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
Ilcatfon equipment
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact 0 Yes O No
0 No 0 Unknown with representative

'Facility Number 82— 165 Lagoon Number Q2........ Lagoon Identifier Inadve-1agQQ,n..Q2.......................
O Active 6 Inactive Latitude 35 F02-1 03
Waste Last Added .12-.3.1--U ....................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): Q.,4Q........................
Embankment Height (feet): ground-leme.l...
Longitude 78 P71 09
By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: JR032114A
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0<5 05-10 0>10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No # Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 3-21-2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 6
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
Icatlon equipment fail to make contact
and/or 5prayfield 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown with representative *Yes O NO
unavailable
comments
'VI

Faciiiiy Number 82— 165 Lagoon NumberQ........
Lagoon Identifier In Glil!..1g4GiXl..Q.......................
0 Active 0 Inactive
Latitude 35
02
07
Waste Last Added.1,-.-.....................................
Longitude
78
36
04
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): .1.,2.1
Embankment Height (feet): ................................
Distance to Stream: Oi X250 feet
By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: R032114A
0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 X1000 feet
By measurement or Map? []Field Measurement ®Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? *Yes O No
Intervening Stream? O Yes 0 No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): #<5 05-10 0>10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No # Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 3-21-2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 9
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
*Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage OQ Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ration equipment
and/or Sprayfield O Yes
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact S Yes O No
0 No O Unknown with representative

`\h
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Routine O_Complaint O Fallow -up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
tL
Time of InspecInspection, 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered �,g,, Certified D Applied for Permit 0 Permitted Not Operational Date Last Operated:
g lal PP I <......7:...
FarmName:........ pj.rt?..........'County: .........................................,
Owner Name: ... ...1.E.I.t JJ (z.Q►4,..................... Phone No: -5'31 —,35._6-7
Facility Contact: „��,!yf. o n.....Title:.... Phone No:
Mailing Address: ............ ....... .........../t:rL.(..................................... .........3
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Number:..................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' « Longitude ' 6 {f
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
❑ Wean to Feeder
'
❑ Feeder to Finish
x if
Farrow to Wean 2—o
A;
❑ Farrow to Feeder
t
❑Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97

Facility Number: Z
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LagoonsAolding Ponds Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ................................ .................................... ................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
AYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
Structure 5 Structure G
.........I.....................................................
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Perini ted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0, No. o'1a'tions,or deficiencies4erenoted,during this:visit._ You:will receive -no -f irilier
correspondehd outthis:visit:-: :: . ;
ce
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑,Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
pplati� anyYEsan'swers antilor any recoinmeridaflons `or any other cottments.
orruuts refer fn } uestion #):E�cNo
1tJse d win s�ai' faci�ty taj'Wette'War e Plain sttuatiii&, (rise additional pages�as'nec ss yryJ1: '`
t.4'i,'�.K"
`,Pre iJere MO dq's Pr�SGa 0. e ;nn� o� �c5 ifiSd�.
jJ`f
�
erg "Ji /I be Orwr $en`!" Jo m 0061' 4jr rewa.000-1
.
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name x
;s7* .....
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
)I-

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 17, 1998
Mr. Somboon Kachaenchai
P. O. Box 238
Autryville, NC 28318
Subject: Request for Removal
Piggy Farm
Facility 4 82-165
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Kachaenchai:
Enclosed please find the request for removal form we talked about on
Wednesday, September 16,1998. Please fill this out and return it to the
address at the bottom and your farm will be removed from our database.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to
contact John C. Hasty, Jr. at [phone].
enclosure
Sincerely,
4
C "
/ohnC. Hasty, Jr.
Environmental Specialist
218 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTRYiLLE, NORTH CAROLINA 20301-5043
"T PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- SO% RECYCLED/10% PO&T-CONSUMER PAPER

• REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 2H .0200 registration requirements. Please.inaetivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facili Number:
Farm Name:
Owner.
Mailing Address:
County.
This Operation is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out of business/no animals on site
closed out per NRCS standards
below the threshold pus than 250 -swine, 100 -confined cattle, 75 -horses, 1o00 -sheep or
30,000 -poultry with a liquid animal waste management system)
Comments:
7 am aware that even though I may qualify to be removed from the animal operations registration database, the
Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) may stili require me to obtain a Certified Anitrud Warts
Management Plan (CAWMP) or an individual permit for this facility. This decision will be made based on this
facility's actual or potential impacts on surface waters of the State of North Carolina. I am also aware that should 1.
in the future, decide to repopulate this facility at or below the originally registered number of animals, I am required
to obtain a CANYMP and request reactivation of the facility from the DWQ prior to stocking animals. Any expansion
to this facility would require me to apply for, and obtain a permit prior to expansion.
Signature: ' Date:
Please return completed form to:
DENR-DWQ
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
RR -208

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
® Division of Water Quality
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of MV0 inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection LLQ
Facility Number 2 G
Time of Inspection 91 da 24 hr. (hh:mm)
N'Registered E3 Certified d Applied for Permit Mermitted 113Not Operational I
cDate Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: . � � ....... ... ............................... .. County: .........t.�Tf� y�f I, ........................................
Owner Name: ....... ............4tiorv...........��.5..-��i4.fc.•�� Phone110: 1. .
FacilityContact:....... ''!............................................... Title:..................../.........,,................................ P�hhonnee No:..................................................
Mailing Address:....... > is ,....A2;0 rr ,1.1�..5.,�.
f{�r�T ill........R.i7...Q2?e ..........................
Onsite Representative: ....... ,�-�/..��ll"F�✓........................... ... Integrator:...(�- ...................
Certified Operator;............................................................................................................... Operator Certification Numbers.........,........
Location of Farm: zJ, _ 7 A/ V-- 1.�Z G .4 ,,
9
_............................................................y ..r ......� � .... _....._........,......,................... _...r. ...... ........................ ............ ....... .... ........ ......... .................. ..................
Latitude Longitude • 44
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes X No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PR No
Discharge originates] at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
•d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes X No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 15 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No
mai ntenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes XNo
7/25/97
Continued on back
C
Capacityv Populattort5 , '..,Poultry :pCapacity Populattoti- cattle CapaCtty Pppulatton
,Se .n $16
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
,
❑ Feeder to Finish❑ Non -Layer ' ❑Non -Dairy[;
'
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other " T
Farrow to Finish x Total Design Capacity`
-F
El Gilts ,
< 'T'ota! SSLW
❑ Boars
e
,
-'g
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ®'z❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area ;
.h a ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System N" xs
R ...: < .� -�' ,_,�'•.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes X No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PR No
Discharge originates] at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
•d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes X No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 15 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No
mai ntenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes XNo
7/25/97
Continued on back
C

114
Facility Number: gam- 16
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Od No
Structures 1,aDons ljo I.d.ing Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ N�C?�
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
............................
....., f� ..... it .....1..... y ...................... ��............�j it J ..........yr
!r'...........
Freeboard (ft): ......�, .*.....�....... .�I,.....1�vfa2/.......f,rb:'2�... /9 .f ..........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes gNo
H. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes XNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes jj'No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Da any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? 'Yes ❑ No
Waste ADDlicatiOn
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ,( No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..... -52:' �.,G?,+ A4X...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes KNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
t8. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site,representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
WYes
❑ No
Yes
�No
❑ Yes
No
XYes
❑ No
❑ Yes
KNo
KYes
❑ No
13No violations or def ciencies.were; inoted-during this:visit::You will receive i &further-:
0&0906MOO Ahoiut this.visit. : .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
9 �s �' G''%e/A. •�.�.� �.��� D� �.� .ria �� v� ��
/<3 /,,,, is . <,i �L of 3 / ,.d -��,�. •� 604 ewJ
14 Zxac 4( cAPD
+ A
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

i
FA
MR. SOMBOON KACHAENCHAI �� 5. 997
L.
PIGGY FARM j j u
PO. BOX 238
AUTRYVILLE, NC. 28318-.'
PHONE [phone]
n 1y 1r 1997
MR. STEVE TEDDER
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY IL BOB
PO. BOX 29535 UEHNRRALEIGH
REGIONAL OfF10E
RALEIGH, NC. 27626-0535 9
Dear Mr. Tedder:
From a telephone conversation with Mr. Gary Scalf, a member of
Murphy Family Farms' Land & Nutrient team, I understand that I
would need to write you a letter of intent on my pig farming
operation, Piggy Farm. The facility registration number is 82-492.
Currently, it houses 636 sows and 24 boars.
Below is a plan of actions to reduce sowherd down to 230 sows
and 10 boars:
1. On August 11, 1997 or so, we will cull 14 boars.
2. From July 7, 1997, we will not take any replacement gilts
nor boars
3. From August 11, 1997, we will breed 11 sows per week for
the next 20 weeks.
4. From August 11, 1997, we will cull 20-21 sows per week
with sow Losses at about 2-3 sows per month.
5. By December 26, 1997, sowherd should have 230 sows and 10
boars.

6. On June 1, 1998 or so, we will have all 10 boars removed.
7. On June 1, 1998 or so, we will stop breeding.
8. By October 19, 1998 or so, this operation will come to a
close.
In the mean time, I will contact the local NRCS office for
information on lagoon closure and cost sharing.
Sincerely,
r
Somboon Kachaenchai
Operator
CC. Gary Scalf, Steve Green, Scott Bockenstedt, Gary Mann, Terry
Coffey, Jim Stocker

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Somboon Kachaenchai
Piggy Farm
Rt 2 Box 72-A 1 or 152 Beechwood Lane
Autryville NC 28318
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Piggy Farm
Facility ID#: 82-165
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Kachaenchai:
1 � �
q
EDE—=HN1Z
NOV 19 1996
FAYEITt tiltL 1_E
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on-going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. ., hector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, 4C
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Volce 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: �0
Facility No. - % S
DI MION OF ENVIRONN(EN'TAL MANAGEMENT
AND IAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: P3 A %5 , 1995
19
Time: b r
Farm NamelOwner:Y_-IJew V'ke'm
MailingAddress:.- .L.7.7319
County:
Integrator: u
On Site Representativ SOW" B QOV►n Phone: %0-551 35V'1
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: (An Number of Animals on Site: t Zn
DEM Certification Number: ACE. DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ° �' �" Longitude:— ° '
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) or No A Freeboard:__3—Ft. _(Inches l.a► M O & i
Was any seepage observed from the n(s)? Yes or o as any erosion ob ed? Yes OTC
Is adequate land available for ray? Ye r No Is the cover crop adequate? Y�or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Y or No
100 Feet from Wells? or o
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Fat of USGS Blue Line Stream? Ye-110ro§
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes v No
Is animal waste discharged into water of -Aa state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (vollames of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes ori
Additional Comments:
Ce i ►0R,.1A r x'1%.1.6 If! c D , l\n C ; �, J to oA NO- 3 `
��L S�_�
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Somboon Kachaenchai
Piggy Farm
PO Box 238
Autryville, NC 28318
Dear Mr. Kachaenchai:
49
D E H N R
July 30, 1997 RECEIVED
AUG b 6 1991
FAYETTEVUE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Closure Schedule
Facility Number 82-165
Sampson County
The Division of Water Quality has received your letter dated July 1, 1997 regarding the
scheduled closure of the Piggy Farm. North Carolina Administrative Code 15A 2H .0200
requires that all swine operations with greater than 250 total swine obtain a certified animal
waste management plan by December 31, 1997. The schedule you proposed in your July 1,
1997 letter stated that the sow herd would be at 230 sows by December 31, 1997, however you
will not stop breeding these sows until June 1998. Therefore on December 31, 1997 yQu will
have greater than 250 total swine on the site and will be required to have a certified animal waste
management plan by that date. Should you chose to change your closure schedule so that you
will have less than 250 total swine by December 31, 1997 please inform the Division of Water
Quality in writing of your proposed schedule.
If you have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sue
Homewood of our staff at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
CY&V)CL
Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Cc: Murphy Family Farms
;FaydttevillFRegional Office ---DW Q?
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 30, 1997
Mr. Somboon Kachaenchai
Piggy Farm
PO Box 238
Autryville, NC 28318
WA4j;*
D E H N R
RECEIVED
AUG u6NY/
FAYEiTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Closure Schedule
Facility Number 82-165
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Kachaenchai:
The Division of Water Quality has received your letter dated July 1, 1997 regarding the
scheduled closure of the Piggy Farm. North Carolina Administrative Code 15A 2H .0200
requires that all swine operations with greater than 250 total swine obtain a certified animal
waste management plan by December 31, 1997. The schedule you proposed in your July 1,
1997 letter stated that the sow herd would be at 230 sows by December 31, 1997, however you
will not stop breeding these sows until June 1998. Therefore on December 31, 1997 you will
have greater than 250 total swine on the site and will be required to have a certified anidial waste
management plan by that date. Should you chose to change your closure schedule so that you
will have less than 250 total swine by December 31, 1997 please inform the Division of Water
Quality in writing of your proposed schedule.
If you have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sue
Homewood of our staff at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
C'4/&V'4
Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Cc: Murphy Family Farms
Fayetteville Regional Office-- DWQ
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

'
DIVISION .OF - MMUWNHENTAL KANAGMMT
•
4 Nc4ti l,7iexs 15;: ,1983
`
Hr Soaboon, Manager
,
Autryville, Poet Office,
Autryville Hog-FFacility �•
!
Autryville, Notth Carol_iha 28318 ;. '
r .
SUBJECT: ' Coiiceatrated Animal'(�Oading+'Operatioi►
is 1)60igutioa f
T
t. Somboon Hog Farm .
'
r
' • Autryv1116, 7A th Oaroiiiue
' f , . ;,
A, gampeon .County ..
Dir Mr: Somboons'
CJsi'August 13, 1985 you received notif icaCion that your mdue opdration
" y
'iniii Feed Lot € yeretion dela, to problems
has been desi8� g a ta'd- as a Conceatiated i
`
f '
f
r
whichoccurred bt your facility 04iina .Juan and July 1985. On October 15. 1985.
;
r.
ti 8u ` Invest by lir. Grady 1?oliBon; "Snvironmentai- 8ngineer,4and' Paul Rawls, `• `'
4r."
Haeil bring' Technician of this off3te xevaelad;that -your aiva,opareition twit ,
tC
has no• discbanp to tho State'-s. su rface waters' and' is in co4liance with . Animal=~
t
Lot RegulaC30AY., �• ,
cau'tinued' aanagemdut of uasto hdndlii'sg`-facilit as is-ass'ential to the
rotactioh-6fr'�iivix6nmFmt.
:productivity of �rwr ( i�a'`operati , an&to the 'pth�
P.1"as be advised that the Fayetteville Regional Office -will perWicnrlly
;
iuva�tigate your facility, to . assure cawiip ace with State - Lew. .
-,Should you have any questions: do not ,hesitate to con'tasct tir. Grady Dobson,
Environmental Snginoer,'of this office, ast [phone].
'IGIN& wNEb 6Y
ION t,
Redra gional Supervisor-,.- .'•_'
�.
ccs`Nater Quality Section Chief, r;
ft., dim �tockeY
'GD .cbm �'

HE SAMPSON INDEPENDENT Wednesday, August 91,1985-
<: z .,_�� ', • mow.,.. �.,, .•:,a�:r''.._ , .•,-.
Four.:notified
Four swine producers In the vicinl-
ty of Big Swamp, west of Roseboro;
"have been advised that they must
permanently elitmnate.dlschaege oto-.
�nlmal waste irito�fie stream.
But, said MIc.Noland, Fayetteville
regional supervisor*'of the Division
of ' Environmental•:'Management,
N.C. Department :of Natural
" Resources, no civil penalties will'be .
assessed.-''. •`:,., .; _ ,... <:
4� • betters ,advising of the "violation
were sent to Elmer. Faircloth, Joel
Faircloth, Leroy Autry and Jim
Stocker._ ;
�' All of them"' either have ' k eliminated the discharge or are tak-
Ing satisfactory steps to do so,"
Noland said.
On June 27, a fish still was
discovered at Big Swamp bridge,
j about two miles off N.C. 24 west of
j Roseboro, prectpitating ,an in -
E; vestlgation. , , n ,
'At the time the stream level was
extremely low and temperatures
high.
,As best we can tell from our In-
vestigation, it was probably a com-' '
bination of high temperatures, low.
stream flow and animal wastes. It is
quite possible that given the low
!.',stream flow and high temperatures,-',
' the fish might have died anyway,"
-said Noland. ' '
1,. • This does not alter the tact,''he
i.' said, that it's illegal for a concen-
trated animal -feeding operation to,
allow the discharge of waste Into a
stream.
Civil penalties can be a`ssesed, but
Noland said all the farms involved
�had , been. cooperative and im-
mediately taken appropriate action-,
to correct the sltuatlob. `
, . Recent' rains have ' also brought-
stream
rought-stream flows near, or in some areas
z.above, normal, Noland said:
It was not determined how many
fish died in the June kill, but
" estimates were around 1,000. .
"The Wildlife Resources Commis-
-slon did not do a pick-up, the only
way you can get a close approxima-
tion," Noland said.

State of North Carolina ENV MWAGG NT
LL RE
Department of Natural Resources and Community opment
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REgUESTED
Mr. Jim Stocker, General Manager
Murphy Farms, Inc.
P. 0. Box 759
Rosehill, North Carolina 28458
SUBJECT: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
Designation
Autryville Hog Facility
Mr. Somboon, Manager
Autryville, NC, Sampson County
Dear Mr. Stocker:
This letter is to notify you that your hog farm.was investigated on
June 28, 1985 by members of the staff of the Fayetteville Regional Office
and determined to be a concentrated animal feeding operation. This being
the case, you should submit applications for an NPDES Discharge Permit in
accordance with Title 15, N.C. Administrative Code 2H.0223 and adopted
Federal Regulations 40 CFR "Appendix B to Part 122 - Criteria for Determining
a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (122.54)."
This designation was made based on the following consideration: There
was a discharge of animal waste from one of the existing two stage
stabilization lagoon systems by a manmade conveyance into a highway drainage
ditch which eventually flows into Big Swamp, Class C Swamp, Cape Fear River
Basin.
If you can permanently eliminate the discharge of wastewater to the
surface waters within sixty (60) days from receipt of this notice to
submit permit applications, a permit application will not be required. If
modifications are necessary to permanently eliminate the discharge of
wastewater to the surface waters of the State and they cannot, or are not
completed within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice, a Permit
application must be submitted. For your information, the following items
are enclosed:
1. Code of Federal Regulations - Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611.7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal.Opportuniry J Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Stocker
Page 2
2. Three copies of NPDES Permit Application - Short Form B
If you cannot permanently eliminate the discharge within sixty (60)
days, the Permit applications will be processed. Said Permit will contain
a time schedule leading to the completion of construction of an animal
waste management system not discharging to the State's surface waters. We
know from past experience that excellent advice with regards to managing
animal waste may be obtained from the N. C. State University's Department
of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at 919/737/2675.
Permit applications should be submitted in duplicate to the Director,
Division of Environmental Management, P. 0. Box 27687, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611. Assistance, if desired, can be obtained by contacting
Mr. Grady Dobson in our Fayetteville Regional Office at 919/486-1541.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
ORIL'! AI- SICKED BY
R. PAUL WILMS
R. Paul Wilms
Director
Enclosures
cc: NCSU, Biological and
Agricultural Engineering
Mr. 'Somboon

H014
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 26, 1985
MEMORANDUM
T_0t;1:- Page Benton, Coordinator
Enforcement & Emergency Response
THRU: George Everett
Water Quality Section Chief
FROM: M. J. Noland, Regional Supervisor
Fayetteville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations)
Autryville Area Hog Farms
Autryville, North Carolina
Sampson County
During the week of June 25, 1985, the Fayetteville Regional Office was
conducting an investigation in response to a report by Mr. Bobby Buff,
Wildlife Fisheries Biologist of a fish kill at the 611 1256 bridge over Big
Swamp, "C Swamp", Cape Friar River basin, in the Autryville Couvaunity of
Sampson County. Our investigation revealed that the fish kill resulted
from low oxygen levels in Big Swamp from dry conditions and low stream flows
along with the presence of animal waste discharges from localhbog operations
(see attached report). There were four (4) hog operations found to have
discharges through man-made conveyances from waste handling lagoons. Three
(3) of the farms were farrowing -feeder pig operations and one (1) was a farrow
to finish operation. The following describes the subject discharging hog
operations.
(1) This facility was operated by Jackie Sessoms, had no discharge and
less than 1,000 animal units.
(2) N & C Hogs, Inc., Joel Faircloth, Owner/Contractor for Murphy
Farms, Inc., Rosehill, North Carolina.
This farm is a farrowing -feeder pig operation which consists of
approximately 2,UOU to 2,500 swine less than 55 lbsp and
approxd¢nately 750 sows and 200 boars (380 animal units). There
are three (3) hog containment buildings housing the farrowing
operation, pig nursery and gestation areas. All houses discharge
Into a single stage lagoou system (approximately ly -.2 acres in
size) which overflows through a duce siphon pipe overland and
eventually into Big Swamp. 4 ,

-v
Memo to Page Beaton
Page 2
July 26p 1985
(3) Leroy Autry Hog Farm, Leroy Autry, Owner.
This farm is a farrow to Finish hog operation which coca ses of
' .';, ?; •-p approximately 300 sows, 170 boars, 4000--5000 swina' greater 'than
55 lbs. and 3000 - 3500 swine less than 55 lbs. (2068 animal
units). There are eight (8) hog containment buildings housing
the farrowing; operation, pig nursery, gestation areas, and finishing
areae. The wastewater from these buildings is handled by four (3)
single stage lagoon systems. The smallest lagoon (.25 acres) had
dike failure and wastewater flowed overland approximately 100 yards
Into an adjacent manmade drainage canal to Big Swamp.
A sample of the discharge was taken at the lagoon and in the
drainage canal and the following analysis was revealed:
Location B2D5
At lagoon 200 mg/l
In Drainage Canal
Downstream from
lagoon 180 mg/l
Fecal Coliform
1,400,000/100 Ml
(4) Elmer Faircloth flog Farm, Owner/Contractor for Carrolls of Warsaw,
Warsaw, North Carolina.
This farts is a farrowing -feeder pig operation which consists of
2400-3000 swine less than 55 lbs. and approximately 600 soars and
150 boars (300 animal units). There are three (3) hog containment
buildings housing the farrowing operation, pie nursery and gesta-
tion areas. All houses discharge into a two (2) stage lagoon
System (total size approximately 1 acre). Both stages overflow
due to lack of maintaining the proper freeboard level and dis-
charge via an adjacent manmade drainage canal to Big Swamp (Class
C-Swp).
(5) Murphy Farms, Inc., Mr. Somboon/operator.
This farm is a farrowing -feeder pig operation which consists of
2000-2206 swine less than 55 lbs and approximately 600 sows and
-
150 boars (300 animal units). There are seven (7) hog contain -
;V'.
sent buildings housing the farrowing operation, pig nursary, and
gestation areas. At this facility thare are two (2) separate
two 42) stage lagoon systems. Each system handles the waste from
3h buildings. Both lagoon systems consist of 3 ponds;vith
two (2) primary and one (1) secondary lagoon, each.8pprokiliistely
1/2 acre in size for a total lagoon treatment of three (3) 'acres
for the entire operation. The lagoon eystem(s) were overflowing
due to a lack of naintainiag the proper freeboard which allows the
lagoons to discharge and eventually reach BIg Swamp.

Nemo to Page Benton
Page 3
July 26, 1985
During the course of the inspection. determinations were made in accordance
with ReCe Administrative Code 2H.0123(a)(3) for a Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operation an described in 0 CFR Appendix B to Parts 122 Criteria for Determining a
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (122.54) which covers facilities with 300
,to 1000 .nimal units. The previously discussed hog operations all have greater
than 30U animal units.
A. It was determined that a pollutant discharge(s) does occur to the
surface waters of the state through manmade conveyances which are
directed to the surface waters from the four (4) above mentioned
hog operations.
D. The discharges do occur to the state's surface waters (Big Swamp,
"C --Swamp, Cape Fear River Basin) through manmade. conveyances at the
subject hog farms. The discharges do occur as the result of
improper waste management practices and are not the result of a
25 year. 24 hour rainfall event.
Samples were collected during the fish kill investigation from the waste
dischargers in the Big Swamp drainage area and revealed the following (see
attached location map).
Sari to Date
June 24, 1985
Location
A. Bridge on SR 1246 (Downstream
of hog operations)
B. Bridge on SR 1256 (Downstream
of hog operations)
C. HC 24 (DoRastream of hog
operations)
D. Bridge on SR 1233 (Downstream of
hog operations)
E, Bridge on SR 1233 (Downstream of
hog operations)
Pecal
Coliform/
D.O. Lm/l) Ph 100 ml BOD m /1
4.5 -- 150 2.0
1.0 7.5 400 15
3.6 --- 40 3.3
1,4 -- -- --
Pio flow - the stream splits at this location
and there was no flow at one bridge crossing.-

Demo to Page Benton
Page 4
July 26, 1985
Sample Date
SR
1246
B.
t
i. :. t� 'YC':: i •-'{Y L
.,.1 .. ..r h• '':Sii b i L.l. i �
�. (,.'F. •1:._ C'.
`• r . _.-+. �:,
y+ s
i L �. �. L.h�-. .3 K�. w•i l.�
L7
FIV -1-f4
June 2701985 .' r•o, i i i:li ;s '-ti w : _.5:. k' �C'ti:f;�:_
d -! .i�;.
F
'1: 11�?�iC tiL
f:Cc 2: Cti i.l'n
dJ.:;
z::._- 'C
i'_ ��."r: i"1 Si °•w•l- .�
art
r--.. zir _' 3.: c): C:t: is k;i't . C i _.
SR
1414
Fecal
R.
SR
1246
(South River upstream of Big Swamp
Coliform/
D.O. m /1
-�'
-100 ml : `
BOD Qig t."
(South Fiver downstream of Big Swamp
Discharge)
B. Bridge on SR 1256 -'(Downstream
C ' : from hog operations)
;'6 t =,r r;
7.5
18001100 ml
21"' nig/1
Farm #3 at Leroy Autry Hog Lagoon
Discharge
-•-
--
10900,000/
100 ml
200 mg/l
Farm 03 approximately 100 yards
downstream from hog lagoon
discharge -- -- =- 180 Mel
P. Bridge on SR 1414 (upstream
from hog operations)* 1.6 6.36 80/100=1 2.2 mg/l
D. Bridge on SR 1233 (Downstream,
from hog operations) 3.0 7.88 220.000/
100 ml 14 mg/1
eon this date Dig Swamp had virtually no flow and had actually ponded in certain
areas. The extremely high temperatures along with low streams could have both
contributed to the low D.O. readings.
S22?le Date
July 1, 1985
Sample Location
A.
SR
1246
B.
SR.
1256
C.
NC
24
D.
SR
1233
F
SR
1414
G.
SR
1414
R.
SR
1246
(South River upstream of Big Swamp
Discharge)
1.
NC
242
(South Fiver downstream of Big Swamp
Discharge)
Dissolved Oxvren (ma/1)
1.6
6.4
6.0
6.0
4.8
4.6
5.6
5.6

4
Un
U"
tIL .7 1% U13
Liu,
LOA
un
im
ua um IF4
LM Lug
J*
LM
44D
WL
nu
im
327t
R
un
uu IAUIA
L
.5 It
f
144!0.4
'
IA ' liu ���
t
12�
Lama
At
wl�
T4w ��
4. 016
7 �
.3
jut
ini
im
im
un
qp 1211
tw
LVA
Aim im Im
U0.
UK im
an
Ila
Lan• %*
I=
Im
so
Alt
3A
v UK
1111 rt
.4
12U
Un
lin
IUA
im1
JL4f
>
1 44
'
Ilb
A 1J
Liu L2 -d
r
Im Lima 242
24
qq
bLot
G
LIQ row. 141
7
IL49
m
40
2D
I -j
JA
411
Nb
RO iow
.0
LIU
.9
POP. Ixy
1404
Im
Im
'N
LW
1M.
3
itu 141.1 Um op 24
NOVA
.0 'v
IAIA
a .0
131 V
Ila
Litu
sk.4.4
!W
4
Un
U"
tIL .7 1% U13
Liu,
LOA