820051_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
July 06, 1999
Aubrey Moore
100 Balkum Road
Rose Hill, NC 28458
SUBJECT: Opperation Review Notice of Referral
A81B Hog Farm
Facility No. 82-51
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Moore,
On June 22, an Operation Review was conducted on A&B Hog Farm, facility no.
82-51. This Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10D, is one of two
visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1999 calendar year. The
Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was noted that the small grain over -seeded on bermuda had
been over-apppplied greater than 10% of the PAN recommendation for this crop. According
ion
to Sect111.6.F. of the general permit issued by the Division of Water Quality, it states
that overapplying animaigwaste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters should be reported to the Division of Water Quality.
Over -application occurred on hydrant #10 by 19 lbs. of nitrogen to small grain over -
seeded to bermuda.
You are strongly encouraged to contactour certified technical specialist for help.
You may also want to contact your local Soil andyWater Conservation District Office since
they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or financial assistance to
implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with
environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the
State, and the animal waste collection, trealment, storage and disposals stems must be
properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge ofYa certified
operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with
this Operation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 910/486-1541 extension 292
if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
Si ce
cott Faircloth
Environmental Specialist II
cc: DWQ-Fayetteville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files
Sampson County SWCD
L&S Farms
MR PAUL RAWLS
FAYEITEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
225 GREEN STREET
SUITE 714
° -fn~ `IEVILLE NC 28301
228 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX SIO -486.0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - BO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

E
Facility Number 82 51 Date of Inspection 6-22-99
Time of inspection 9:15 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted [3 Certified ® Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: A.&.N.Hy1;..Arm............................................................................................ County: &Mptiofa........................................... F.RQ .............
OwnerName: A.ubtrgy................................... M0.0re ......................................................... Phone No: 910.-.532.-A.855 ...........................................................
Facility Contact: A.uhru..1.! more...............................................Title: Qw.11er ................................................. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 1Q.QB911kuMRQ,3.d............................................................................... ftse.HUI... NC........................................................ ZR45.8 ..............
Onsite Representative: Aubxttx..M9t u........................................................................... Integrator: L&S.k:arms.............................................................
Certified Operator:l3xAlRxd..i............................ Uats................................................. Operator Certification Number:190.71 .............................
Location of Farm:
Cabe..421..S�.tr.Qarl.Cli�tlant.kt2tyaxds.klaKxells.gn..ap���n.10..pniles.la..enndary.ltd...11.40..luxatxight..arx.r.�vas1.119:A..a>vtd.ga................
�Dxa,;;;r�nis;Qpr.tat;ilA,b;1;n;hak.......................
............................................................................................................................................................... .
Latitude 34 • 49 43 +' Longitude 78 • 16 4 10 «
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish 8240
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Lj Farrow to Fee er
JCI Other
Lj Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
8,240
El Gilts
Total SSLW
1,112,400
Lj Boars
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑ Sllbsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S stem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -wade? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ........................................................................................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): .............. 2.Ct.................. .............. 35... ................ ............... 0.......................................................................................
...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23199 Continued on back

l;achity Number: 82-51 Date of Inspection 6-22-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Millet, Wheat, Pepper
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
: � No•violatitiris:or:de�ciencie§•rvere:noted:during• this visit: ; Ydu_ will receive no ftirther
corres otide.nce.. .bo' t this.visit....... ... ...... . ... ...... .... - ... • • • .... • • • • . • .
NI 1 ,., . ,
n # : Ex lairc an iYES answc
Comments (refer -to questin ) p , ' y rs and/or any relcommentlations or any other comments !,r, ;3ti'i'a��Ii�hl{.
Use drawin sof faciht fo.,better explain'sltuations use additional pages as�necessar �,
g y { P _g.,,, L, of < < �;��I �00, �.� ��I ,< <,�,�.• �,• I . t;� ; ��s��� �.lu.��� �I� ,� i�E �.,� �'��,, r� . �..� h�
11- Overapplication occurred-19lbs. nitrogen to small grain on hydrant #10 to small grain overseeded to bermuda. Notice of
Referral will be sent to Division of Water Quality in regards to overapplication.
17- Need to have Certificate of Coverage (2 page letter) and General Permit for Swine Operation with paperwork on farm site.
18- Need a copy of Waste Utilization Plan with paperwork on farm site. Need to fill out insect control, odor control, mortality
checklist, and emergency action plan for farm site. Need a copy of all storage calculations of all lagoons with paperwork on farm
site from technical specialist which certified the facility.
19- Need to contact Enviro-Ag Compliance in regards to record keeping. Crop types need to correspond with crops in field was
Utilization Plan. Crops were incorrect on Irr-2 forms, no com crop on farm site. Need to have updated irrigation records
r.
Reviewer/Inspector Narae Scotttr
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number: 82-51 (late of Inspection 6-22-99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ® Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:, " " ti e eOP i
sent to Fayetteville Regional Office along with Waste Utilization Plan. Need to apply small grain pumping to their windows of
application. Need to apply Bermuda pumping to their windows of application. Record keeping needs a lot of attention. Farm is
Permitted.
26- Need to extend discharge pipes out into lagoon pool area so waste is discharging at or below lagoon level surface.
32- Need to extend fill pipes on flush tanks and pull pit boxes to the bottom of tanks/boxes for odor control measures.
t
3123199