820026_Inspection_19990310

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
March 10, 1999
Marshall Lee
319 Fox Lake Drive
Clinton, NC 28328
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
Marshall Lee Farm
Facility No. 82-26
Sampson County
Dear Mr. Lee,
On March 1, an Operation Review was conducted on Marshall Lee Farm, facility
no. 82-26. This Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two
visits scheduled for all registered livestock operations during the 1999 calendar year. The
Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
Duringthe Review, it was noted that the small grain had been over -a lied
greater than 1% of the PAN recommendation for that crop. It was noted that the small
grain had been over -applied by 8.5 lbs. N/Acre on pull A. Mr. Lee stated that he did not
apply to bermuda last growing season on this particular pull. He failed to have his
General Permit on the arm site. He was not aware to contact DWQ in regards to
overapplication. Mr. Lee needs to reduce PAN on bermuda by 8.5 lbs. NlAcre on pull A
this growing season.
You are strongly encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for help.
You may also want to contact yourlocal Soil and" Water Conservation District Office since
they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or financial assistance to
implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with
environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the
State, and the animal waste collection, treat, storage and disposal systems must be
properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified
operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with
this Operation Review. Please do not hesitate to call me at 910/486-1541 extension 292
if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information.
7; , I (
Scott Faircloth
Environmental Specialist it
cc: DWQ-Fayetteville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files
Sampson County SWCD
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / APPIRMATIvE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POET -CONSUMER PAPER

-�"- - i jl i'� ;il! .I .. •'•.'; fi (:- 6 ia';ijt?d' - .Ij�`�33 3 -I' ...,.I�"I i 1 - E:#.iai Niiulif liliefr=:•t:1€1tF r - i!fl"1' 4!?I"'i i1.11P11`- I,iii�n
l;i;� i}3;!II'I ,iEl ? ,�I.®6Divlsiorrof Soil.and Water Conservations„10 erat�on Revlew�l�Ifll; ��, I11flh.. ° 13 If; (1
Ef 1i } I 1 I! f011.;,ii lfl I f ( III���I ill
' CPtC::;�'I�Ji-#Elllt d�l4.E�11� ii iC 3�,. iyI iI ' 1 C rf !,
-13Kision.ol Soil and Water,Coiiservation Compliance Inspection 'I' .. I ttE' V�j �II�IN`j`'y lar
a 1. ,;€.'�.H.III�lJ Llir
•.i. .':.1{,.�; :r h {I=..,'` r, i. 1”
Division of Water.Qualit ,Cam liance Ins ect[oni`` LIm
nhy rE,, pa! p ii,.ra `'� i. r';, r 1 ,I ,'r' a 1}}I i:�,°I ; ', . itift.i IE ajI:i w! +:.: 1. a,, R1 �: ,I�( +1 ,. ,© Uther:�►ryYency;..Oper,ation Reviev+;�.I I!!i 1 F.11 !),-`, . ' E �i,�;,, E .;{Y-11j� i [( ,! < j�Li$ 4 Ir c. 2 I .. .. Y i _--.: .,.err,. ;17 ,r�•., - F iC, ,w;•eE;;,,. .�;;, !Ei SdE<, $i.�3 dl,i�.,l . Ills}I.;, #. �IIE,,3iYr,1,��E.l:il.k11,{i�li ;iiC .fill.?,1,.�[. ,�1 lll�i�laE17f-.ii.
14P Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 82 26 Date of Inspection 3-1-99
Time of Inspection 13:15 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Jallot O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:'MAr5haU.Lf~cXArM...................... .. County: Sampaoia......................... FRO ............................................................ .............. ..
OwnerName: N.tax,5hall................................ Le. c................................................................ Phone No: 910:-592.440.4 ...........................................................
Facility Contact: 5brshall.Lce..................................................Title:wapr.................................................. Phone No: 59.2::4.40.4 ................................
Mailing Address: 319.1�.o.&.1,Ae°Axlvc.............................................."........I................... Ckalwa-INC ........................................................... ZU28 ..............
Onsite Representative: Mait'.5�M111, m.............................................................................. Integrator: lurarrWl'.Skaa.Rr CArrWENFuddug ...............................................
Certified Operator: ZY nab,All.j........................... LgA ..................................................... Operator Certification Number:183.9hj.............................
Location of Farm:
?.r.Qalx.lxwxl.4.,..at.Clunxo�a.xa�a�.l�fx.Qr.1.91..a1sa.dna.as.�tklxis.A��..r.Q.cee�d.1,l.mites..ta.xkr�a.exassr.�a.tntexs�.�tAorn.:... _•
indM.1.91.&.unci.19194ad..eamkiauig,skcax X.tQx.., ..nailcx.tb�.>arM.is.at :tb�e.xi txt..earl.is.yislble. rQra.Xhe.rva!d.....................................
Prb....
Latitude 35 ' O1 12 Longitude 78 • 15 24
Design - Current
Sine Cavacity Ponuiation
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 2480
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder loon
Lj Farrow to Finish
i is
Boars
Design Current Design' Current
Poultry Capacity, Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I 1 1[] Dairy
ILINon-Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,480
Total SSLW,' 856,800
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field AreDTa
.. �� 1: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ij
Holding Ponds'/ Solld`Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the'conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? nla
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
�trncture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ..............43,:'.............. .
...............................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
\\, seepage, etc.)
116199 Continued on back
�� A

�4 Faglllty Number: 82-26 Date of Inspection 3-1-99
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ADnlication
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type C�zastal.letxrutd� .{ay.) ...... .......
StaI1.��raxn.�Yt»rstws�............................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Managemen Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?t r ❑ Yes El No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 4 ❑ Yes ® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
`
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? �g •
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
® Yes
❑ No.
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
IN Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? v4k"
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard'problems, over application)
® Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
No:violatioins,or. deficiencie's:vvere�noted duriiig this.vis_it. -Yau,willfecdiv . rio further. •;1.
correspondence, about this,visit:. ; ; . ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
116/99
1,

' gacilt�v Number: 82-538 1 Date of Inspection -
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
r
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures requite maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? �� / '�C; ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN 6S � ® Yes [:]No
12. Crop type ..............Fps. u�..(.Ciraz�l.............. .... CQ� tai.> s~xnnuda.�Gxa �)...,....... ..................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
® Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?.
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ® Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ® No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of desig4 / ❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®No
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? d
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)/(I
❑ Yes [:1 No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [IYes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?❑ Yes ®No
• • No;vioiations or. defideucies:were noted during;this visit: -You ►*ill receive no; further. :
correspondence about this•visit:. ..
Comments refer to' u :.r1,, 1 1 I „r,
s ( q estioq#) Explain any YES'answers and/or any recomlmendations!or`any',other,comments�I�l1 ;
Use drawingVs of faeilit to'better ex�llaiii situations.'((use'additioual p1 es asmecessar :':T... -!.'`r I '�' 'yr a',1�. €'� ,({� Rik
,.7. . 4 ; �. i .. 1. p,+., "'.1. , x :l . _. ,3. P.PI4 . Y .el': at:-.. . 16.y,)kl'�, . u .,' aL saU! ! i k1lll _ri11�11��hr1.;�'�Hl���e��
7 --Need- o agoon to toe oa 'Sla ible.see e-probt m- s oroutm-wall-oflagoon.= �&
I I -,In cases where PAN has been over-applieeaterthan10 a o% f th`e PAN'recommendation For-that-crop,.stop.irrigation, notify
DWQ, secure alt rnative.lif-1 pplication-sites,-Natice.of-Referral-to-DWQ.
7- ,tPlastic le drifts to ' ispv proper y, prevent u entry of materials.
18- Need to fill out.in li�grain
rm site for permit application purposes.
l h- - pplied 22 lbs.71:ac:re�to smalfor pull-ZB,
Note: Soil test calling for lime to spra fiel
;I13I 3 �
'{r,- .'I _: �xi I I ,' r��.[ij 7 �.,'.._.r r rel r �(iSit il'.. �•, +li("I+Il5rf_ C;i i� r EE): Ci 1:rtllr I1tn.f i III�ji�lai(Plj •�ij
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scot � rcl th r. f� ;.i, da��r �??,H,uYI'I:!r � PIlI�.IiII�I�1� ,li i �t E lil(+,9
Re viewer/Inspector Signature: �-- Date:
1/6/99
1