780088_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
2 1
NO
�irr�wi�r�+rirrw■err"�I�
DWG of Envil go

NCDEENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Vllatec Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Marnece Locklear
Ben -Mar Farms
1000 Moss Neck Road
Lumberton, NC 28360
Dear Marnece Locklear:
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 24, 2011
Subject: Rescission of Animal Waste Permit
Permit No. AW1780088
Ben -Mar Farms
Robeson County
OCT Z 5 2011
DWO
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Reference is made to your completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
received October 21, 2011. Staff from our Regional Office has confirmed that this coverage under permit
is no longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Permit No. AW1780088 is rescinded
effective immediately.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management system you must first apply for
and receive a new Certificate of Coverage for animal waste permit. Operating an animal waste
management system without a valid animal waste permit or Certificate of Coverage will subject the
responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone] if you have any questions,
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Robeson County Soil & Water Conservation District
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office
APS Central Files (Permit No. AW1780088)
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-71R588; FAX 2: 919-71 RO481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: vrw , imatemualitv.om
o e
NCarolina
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmafive Acton Employer

,., . -i&
r Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: UA_nCe,,_ .._ _ Facility No:- $ -_%
Owner(s) Name: AA-e-r-mmelGv— I--
Mailing Address: IDOI Phone No: q�0'�3$'``��3�°
L tJ L- 'off'93Co 0 County: gob=sm►%-
O ration Description fremaining animals only):
Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Descrintion:
7),pe of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
7),pe of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 21-1.0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: O
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Milking
oDry
o heifers
o Calves
Number ofAnimals:
Yes No
Yes
(Name) b"An of the Water Quality Section's st4ff in the Division of
Water Quality's c ) Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on (date) for
notification of the pending ciosur of t1}is and or lagoon. This notification was at least 4 ours prior to the start
of closure, which began on Z. (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out,the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print)
Signature:
11Z I!- 11
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_„ W 1 ` I I a WN 61 0 , M A
Affiliation: MC OA DS VL
Address(Agency): 443 W.,flvw4" 54 Mot cacti++�� �^ me PhoneNo.: WI'7rf 7900
Signature: fl/1( �,�••�--� Date: to I I
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section
Compliance Group
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
pr r - 1 hAarrh 12 IMI

Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
General Informatinn:
Name of Farm: tCa.r 6y Facility NO. - 9
Owner(s) Name: _C
Mailing Address:
1..: tJ e-- -R-6,q { 0
Phone No: q IB-to Coit I
County: Qobso.`
O ration Description (remainine animals only):
�ftiease check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure, if there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock;
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: 0
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number of Animals:
Yes No
Yes Q
(Name) j�e'J ro by _ of the Water Quality Section's st ff iNhe Division of
Water Quality's Wu-6-4l Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on 9 Zy (date) for
notification of the pending closure th's and or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the start
of closure, which began on �y(date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. 1 have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print): L- vG A�
Signature: Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): wi I I ra.M C4,1 �}u�
Affiliation: NL 4 A 0) S Vc-
Address (Agency): q141 VkIL.!2 .i-•.. ----Ike MA11 W�l��y�'^ NC. Phone No.: 2 V4W 3y° d
Signature: ,� al�r,,r.� Date: 10' 7 - f /
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section
Compliance Group
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PT (` - I Marrh I R Inm

uLTV
1
Steve Troxier North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Commissioner and Consumer Services
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Date: October 10, 2011
Subject: Marnice Locklear Farm
Robeson County
To: Mitch Miller
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
440A Caton Road
Lumberton, NC 28360-0450
Patricia K Harris
Director
I have reviewed the final closure condition of the lagoon located at the Marnice Locklear Farm.
All of the agitated material from the lagoon has been removed using agitators and honey wagons. All
efforts were made to get all of the agitated waste material out of the lagoon in accordance with NRCS
standards. The project has been completed as detailed in the lagoon closure plan. 1 am satisfied that the
closure completed on this farm meets NRCS standard 360 and recommend payment for this project.
I hope this letter brings this matter to closure. Thank you very much for your assistance and if you
need further assistance please let me know.
Sincerely,
William Carl Dunn, PE
DSWC Environment Engineer
MAILING ADDRESS
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Telephone: [phone]
Fax Number: 252-975-3716
An Equal Opportunity Employer
LOCATION
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC

s -/-0'7-20/0
(3"6iVIsIon of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit @rfompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: /Q.'QQQwr Departure Time: County: IS2010S'�10'y Region:
Farm Name: B e N— 44Q — Owner Email:
Owner Name: 44a. kweee, Lo ek/e4 k— Phone:
Mailing Address: 16016 NO.S,S e-ck *� 1_ 4M Af A /1( C ze 36 O
Physical Address: ��
Facility Contact: L yr!airN eGe L-d cklez 4l' Title: 00WNelk— Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator: __ _ /,/l A
Certified Operator: /Y!�A,,.,..7`Vb PQ-'YA-kr+_ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feedei
Farrow to Finish
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: n 0
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
JU Boars
Other ZeWo
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at; ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Longitude: = o =' =
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ DairyCalf
❑ My Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: all
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NoLTNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No [3 A
❑ NE
❑I NoGIZA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Biro ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2<o 11 NA
[IN E
12128104 Continued

r �
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes rNo-DNA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes L7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): a„ ,� 3 $ fj�f o 3 w wv. See Ce .c.�rf 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
B-90 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
B o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
3<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement'?
Waste Ai mlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ElYes
UK01 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement'?
l 1. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes
,,.
NA 'TiE
❑ No ElLid
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) �e �w-[,�,d a� .,� �y.,`e [� Gi,a;nf Ca • S J
13. Soil typc(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
to ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
❑ Yes
,��,��
L7No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
ElYes
B No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
3 Vo ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
6<o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (r'efer to qu.estton##) xplainXany YES answers and/ any recommendations or anyother-commeruts
Use,drawtngs situations. (use addttiOn I pages as necessary): ,�3
�w a a F
No b UJQ 5 f e.L4 Y(N a S 1fLl u -Z So 1 I t. c.4+— t c_ a ¢.l<•- �
w�a r taw -�v r p> —,p G✓ S Cc..I z hA.tsc
L c; f 1,&:5 ),IGvr-v s� a-4✓"�
aar accuvvc..d 06 — 1u S A- V tyu,-S Cpl s,
Reviewer/Inspector Name ` ve(-S Phone: /D) $ram-3300
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: 3-
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —7 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual
Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Bi ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
;NA ❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2< ❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
RI' A ❑ NE
Other .Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
B 1vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
/
B o
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 1. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
B10
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
�,/
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
10
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addltianal Cammcnts a_ndI,�r Drawings:
4t 2—1 , loll}S �LrI+. /
Li c d- w z`�l� irosa�+v Iwe�1✓r�ad�`�� s 4-z> b e- f
mk- I R(o op-"Vv tiro � ,FP F...� c� [; to � tiro s lwd� � vv� /` S
12128104

ivision of Water Quality
Facility Number •7 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit
I5mpliance Inspection
0
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
�
C�outine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Utz rye Departure Time: Z : UO H County: Al"JrA/ Region: GX0
Farm Name: ge l — A(a ✓` Fa V tL S Owner Email:
Owner Name: 13�M.a ++.. i •.t F. Lo L�u ✓ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
0
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer +_ I
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Pou Its
❑ Other
Dischar,cs & Stream Im,Lacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude: Q o Q T [__1 "
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: El
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ,[.�], NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No L7 N/A ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No l3 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

:5f
Facility Number: '7 - $ $ Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Stn�ehrre I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): " 6 a /
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Cll< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑Yes L75o El NA El NE
❑ Yes 2<o- ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Q'No'- ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 21go ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes P<­ ❑ NA ON E
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [3<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare. Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [I Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) GC.J , a,�S �� `•yu•✓c_-. /� dp j 6 V4's,,/j
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
R<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility tail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
ET"No
❑ NA
El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
��
B o
ElNA
ElNE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Ele Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #f) Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility, to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessa� y)`:
ector Name ``� �- ,- T
Reviewer/inspector p /K�cK _ �I eVc.�S ' Phone: NO,$L�3,333V
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .t.4.,4,_ Date: 3-ZV •-200 i
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number:• Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes E o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other ,�,�
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes LINO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
2 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
3,5o
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
2'�lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
2 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2<oo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
L7o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29,
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
El No
El'
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Q-m.
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawin s `� � ;� a � � t �� �' ' ` .
g x_ R� t r t. ;`
.
,,< %, '.� ..`a
Page 3 of 3 12128104

�jyic-rtp/ �-fZ -2007
Type of Visit # Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z f2 Arrival Time:03.` f Departure Time: .��5` County: ROb-e-S0o%! Region:
Farm Name: 1y ei✓ —A1G11 /r;�� ►W- 3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: BGn/ : oL i,.,w f—, Lo c l e-c,,-- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: RtojlaL+ tj Lo cl Title: Owrvrt.— Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ��i�aK^� Lo<IIC�e�v— Integrator:
Certified Operator: Lo �'� Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = 1 ❑gd Longitude:. 0 ° ❑ I ❑
Design Current
DesignMPNEN155-ti-n—ni
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Poultry
CapacityCattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish 1
10 Layer I
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -La er I
I ❑ DaiEy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry
❑ Dty Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Non-Dai
❑ry
❑
Layers IN
Farrow to Finish D D
Non -Layers
IFEI
ElBeef Stocker
ILI Gilts
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys El
Other ❑ Turkey Puuets
Number of Structures:
Other 11 ❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes UjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
F No
❑ Yes
EN No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

. Facility Number: 7 $ — $ Date of Inspection 2/ o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �35 .4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
09 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
rK] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
[0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
VL
r+ 4-
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
fNo
NA
'NE
maintenance/improvement?
1
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
q� No
❑ NA
9 NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[%NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
8 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ElNA
24 NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
V9 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
($ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or anyothertom rents
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
V 7. CVW{iNwt- Mioc.t�/aSQAA) b i-, -S a -A tre-c-,. Laso &I (ijKid
iGNL.IS lJJ�4Fy�f
i
Zz CoiNv`C.. 4- c-. 1%A.C- I"ol4a vvok- da"p- trC&1oy,45 � oNdt ;-Spe-+
V
S�fjL�r Gs A�IGV
to et- I l �hG� YafN e,v
7
ReviewerAnspector Name Phone:
WO1 f'. 3- .3330
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
2 Z zoo 7.
Page 2 of 3 - 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: i — g$ Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes t% No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box, ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes HU No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[:�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the timc of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[7No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
(XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

iA,R01d4Gd1 tctc-
.r
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ~0(p'Q Arrival Time: Z % Departure Time: �.J County: R015457014 Region: FrzD
Farm Name: 19—e-IJOwner Email:
Owner Name: 1AAj b L o Phone: A r
Mailing Address: /0O_% / Cy5--/{�[Gl __1e�,_ _-- Lumb /YG 2S360
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
►ySV . __Lt7C-K �Pli tr Integrator: N�p_.•pQ.N� � 144—
Onsitc Representative: ___ g
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ 0 ❑ I ❑ 1{ Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ fi ❑ «
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I
❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Daia Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
I J_!
❑ Dairy Ileifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non- Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: FLI,
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes j9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
C9 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
Do NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
C9 No
❑ NA"
❑ NE
❑ Yes
I@ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

. ;,
Facility Number: 1 %_ $ $ Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 9 �!
--r
Observed Freeboard (in); ?,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes f@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes C@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 13e_vv,,u A o._. Cav,i ,
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
P] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[]
Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
1] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
CO NA
❑ NE
i� k s y" �V."� r"° R:Ill Comments (refer,)to question #) )acplaln apyYESanswers and/or any recommendations or any outer commeuts.
Use drawings of facili to better exi In situati ns: {use additlonal pages as necessary):
ID -1$ FaY ►r. j ti .►N a r r r•tAC i V S- fu s , llo &'%S1r_ alo% "'. - AeS a 6C&wPcd
t.J i�1�..I N ►� S � y�,0..�- �� �40 � .
I
�� Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Name 1.V61. -'' "¢: p -'s i •
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: / - D la -200 ?
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: - —'9 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes H No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes CO No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IX NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
10 NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9 NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes.
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addlt3onal Comments�andlarDrawm, iV..�.4 �bpL . FT W4 iT$ uY?IMF .,, +G TaXk� 5 d
C rn M. L _._ ,� ip i' _��¢���py{y�;� � �hq.�„, - � '�pySj�,p�r ay f '� i �f9T
J� 33, b, s6.4 ss,`�.-. j l'-+t, R4145 546,Ae ir-e-v cot
WaLS SoIIc� I.-yCr.J aaas[+�c4u��`µ.clrr# Vw►c.✓
chi Lt � 5 �o k, cP i­j e- c/cJ,"j vc./ v[ C/ -5- • !� ���� `
iNSPGc +'•,-. wi�I tom c d��i.JC.cI�- Ors o�^ a AAA',c f5,, 2'00
4,, d �-� �- t�� ,., -L.�.f w cx-�C i� �- a sere, I r�s c� S a v c..
12129104

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or Visit: /a D3 aI Time: % : Ov
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
M Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Farm Narme. .............!eg ...7 .::.........f'� r rrrs.........................................
Owner Name:..........1.,?.a.M.......... s?.Gr/.. ...............................
Mailing Address:..........%. a..�? ..1......./{� .......... <.Y,. 4k......... � .......
FacilityContact:...........................................................LL.................. Title:..........................
OnsiteRepresentative :.......... �7r:..... !4...........................................
Certified Operator: ............... 2&................... I...........4..?..G. tv, . ..................
Location of Farm:
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................•
County:... s c.N...............................FiCl3....
PhoneNo: .......................................................................................
...........4".a..7..6 ?f 4'. ,�......,l. .l ..........
Phone No:
Integrator: ...t!/.t.,..r.............................
Operator Certification Number; ..............7.........................
M Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 & " Longitude • 6 "
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? [:]Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? "la
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................ I................. ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): d /
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 7 9 — PS- Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancefimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Final Notes
l[7�`t,rt G'rG Orw`.! 'i�Qttr cr��w.a�`S Clxrr<w�4�+n� orti t�►... �ar+rr�. 1�r
l.Oe.4L�eay- to ryt3+ Cu�1r.w4 k@GipL►ti� o�r.tf O? C fGj�t��heoQ, r tce.
�i ACLk gs S S�re`� rCa 'k 't`h t .1�aV, %.-. �C'0 VV% uft`esq-
' 1 � , � o c K. `GCF rh 1� s'�' w1 a G-�' �, i S ,p c. r ,..-„ �� �- � o w obi. � �r�� Cs N S c, r• �[., b Y' '1
7- mow I�goo�+ bauGcs aro2 r�Mo��
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
?U,d `.C..S, IlCAL k0.VC' K.t+n 1.�Yr!Ow wq Q. 0"
tipw'�r0 �74C YOGF�r.� QG��� tiTi CL {
Date:
r7n2mM
rnntinuoA

Facility Number: w — �� Date of Inspection d3 a
Reauired Records & Document.~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
❑ No
Pg Waste Application M Freeboard CO Waste Analysis W Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[A No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (if no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
CKNo
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
Cj No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
)a � -T- •V a , •' i & h u + r e_ r►1 o J 4_la -(_1 1 O w. ri Cq l!Tr a �ti d'� 1 i L � � -�-�� C _ o (1 UV-1
W e c.1c.1 � 1 � 9 n o � I e_,v �.is � r. aQ.. rv-. �, ,�.E�•.1 � ,.� a..� -'1• e -'k' Y �R k Y.-, �� k s � � k ew. .` r.r 5 R c
CA y:1�4sy1J rdt... .�c.�\� recnrdts a+, �L � •�� �fe.��iar+s o-Cr lot
re Lj e S 0 �� r I-��. (� r.c� s' -,-4 f •. r� F1 •Yam+
(A,,, N b V ,,,, :11 b t "� s such- �o r i •, a��cc�nw}-Ir c rccri v cl�.s �.-�� l(J tc a s
'4AA-,
a
12112103

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection C) Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilitv Number Dulc of Visit: of 0 3 Tim- : Q
Not O erntional Below T reshold
® Permitted ® Certified O Conditionaliv Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above .Threshold:
Farm Name: lM GI` <afi.r. County: ULS be/3i2:3z
Owner Name: C{ t"', C,Y1rLti.r�_ - L",c r- Phone No: 1 d / ',.1 1 - 4 L 3 L
Mailing Address: / af?•3 (. O
Facility Contact: rvvtn Ld-AILL-&-r Title: ri t-mer Phone No:
Onsite Representative: �R pM 6, V'. J„ Lo C l - Integrator:
Certified Operator: Rprn t G.V` %C r% _ j Q dU ie &r Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 04 " Longitude •
Design Current
swine La acity ro ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
Farrow to wean
❑ Farrow- to Feeder
Gilts
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Ca acity Po elation
❑ Layer I ❑ DaiEX I _ I --d
❑ Non -Laver I 1 ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other L- I !
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 rJ I JL_i Subsurface Drains Present
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Manaeen
Discharges S Stream In
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:. ❑ Laeoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is obsened, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
irav Field Area l
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes' 10 No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes 51 No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches}: A
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection FLQIoil 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 4 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑ Yes [&No
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [� No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [A No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Wast llplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [NNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes JQ No
12. Crop type QPI'M t,, 4_e, 4-- _V , , . Ci-rY, i n Q, S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
[N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
� No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
C,No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
QjNo
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�&No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
allo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes [D No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes �RNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes CA No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes [ No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. Yon will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name I
Reviewerllnspector Signature:
""'y)"''' LJ Field Copy LJ Final Notes Nj
hp -tJ G4--t`c, �'� Gvtin C-4, rt
Date:
r
05103101
Continued

I . t
Facility Number: -JS 7- Date of Inslu-clion
Qdor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below E] Yes [:] No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? El Yes [R No
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes E No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes MNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes CR No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover? ❑ Yes No
":
.-AdditionalCrn oments and/or Drawings:"K� %
:
05103101

Facility Number pate Of Visit: Time: '.3d
Not O era 'o Below Threshold
0-Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated A ove Threshold:
Farm Name: Bek — M1+" F�r►v*_S County:4
Owner Name: 1 Lam//lP�G/✓--� _ Phone No: -/
Mailing Address: /d D I �' l OSS /��c�C �rsl. / G'•"'�r� e /T�+� _ /V Z93 4 a
Facility Contact: Title: hone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �� Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 1 0 64 Longitude ' 01 0
w Design" Current
„ Design 11 Current y ; Design Current
Poult`: I,,.l,_�V�Ca ac#IN'd n ulatiaa,g� Ci achy ulation
,;Ca`ttie ..::.� -':Po
❑ La er ❑Dairy
i�
I l•. ❑Non La er ❑ Non -Dairy
1
]t ❑tt
y
4Other II
4 4" 1i f= LFLu��l F! SQ9 d,.,3 E4 9>I�" ( 54
= 3 TotA Design' C� pactty �ee,
i'
.
6'
s"" < ,r a ris
?"Number of Lagoons= i ]
4 ,
{�
E� F{I rff,:: Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area S rav Field Area
3
€�I{F6�
����!
No Liquid Waste Mana System
II3lE !If €¢ �
�
, Holdlntlli nds;liSol ITraps �°
} 3s , ement
E,?
❑Wean to Feeder
❑Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste o lection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes �No
El Yes No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes 'No
❑ Yes No
El yes No
❑ Yes �No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05/03/01 Continued

Facility Number: 7$ Date of Inspection - 277 HE
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑Yes
No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
[ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
El\ Yes
, p �
� No
11. Is there evidence of over application?/ ❑ xcessive Pending ElPAN ElHydraulic Overload
El Yes
No
12. Crop type 'kitc/ /t ,Kr 4!�7/ afr daerle
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those des& ated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan AWMP)y
Yes
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yeso
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
ElYeso
tNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
ElYeso
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
1
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
[No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
ments (refer to question; #1 ' Explai�n� afiy YES answers4ndlor any,recommendations or!any oilier comments.: 4 `,'�
Cotrianswers
);:ilt3t
t [Akiril` .(. 'r � rt116� t'i : f i�i�Etr' E i�,rE s��3��.'h . u} io€�€FE lll .
Ilse drawings 6f facility to better'explain situatiions acldltional,pages'as neccssary).t.P.,� 4
r(aac ,. +i❑ Field Copv ❑ Final Notes
I.11'. a S }+.
ly,l
# .F1471:.fri.�: .. ..�s +:....-rl:n.+�; .a[k5 .,.�.. ..'h.'[n`!�{ !1"-.I ,:..} •ir'I'- "?,r 1M r, r:f`;. _ ....—!+.vcr«...--....•—..., ..
j
Reviewer/Inspector Name +k n , ui, a
>!
I 9
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date:
05103101 o/
Continued

Facility Dumber: — Date of Inspection 1
dor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
KYes ❑ No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes I�lo
❑ Yes NIo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional .Comments°and/or,:DraHttl&,;?,
J
05103101

1 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection _0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted KCertified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 1[3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: ...... r ...... f— r-rm 5-County:.......... .................. .......................
.... .............................................................
Owner Name:... 4&AYQL 4'Ne ..... .............................. Phone No: .................................
FacilityContact: ............... .................l...........&........ Title: .................................. ......... Phone No . ....................................... .
Mailing Address: Am�sAe'....'...................................... ....A.C...... 2.5...3J..d. Onsite Representative: ................... 0.kj.j1.eL .............................................................. Integrator:............... .:. ... I ..... I .................. I .... I ..................
Certified Operator: .... jgc. r aw... F ..... .... 1-anillp ... cR-.r .................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm;
IV
Latitude Longitude
Design: "CurrentAiVDesign:
D Current Current
P Cap 6 city��
oui�i;4� n paci0',:,j'iP0puiA
0
_:`PaT ttl
LaceryE,
t"
El Wean to FeederDai
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Non -Layer Jtl Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
[]Farrow to Feeder
Q Other
VarroW o Finish
Design Capacity';
—C;ilts
",Ej Boars
V"o�
n
-
j! 1"". i4
Number f F[] Subsurface Drains Presen=tjEl Lagoon Area I[] Spray Field Area
urn erso Lagoons J,
J
:AF 9
0
o'I d I II o" fi' d s"I S i d Liquid Waste Management Systen__i
�T,�
Discharp,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon El Spray Field E] Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d . Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: e/
Freeboard(inches): ......... .... ................... .................................... ................................... .................................... ............................
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3123199
[] Yes j� N 0
0 Yes No
El Yes 0
[] Yes No
❑ Yes No
I
❑ Yes No
I
❑ Yes JIV No
Structure 6
0 YeS�0
Continued on back

Facility Number: — �g Date of Inspection `— -O
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes gNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 071fes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes allo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes kNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes•,KNO
11. Is there evidence o over applicatio ? ❑ Excess' a Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes 9No
12. Crop type �y 7
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those design d in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reouired Records & Documents
IT. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20_, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
O;, Q yi pit¢t s.0 eeij+e q fu�th r
icorresporicieh& about this :visit:.... .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
nAQPQflC.f�P
S il�'Y.i�T .fY�Fr 81 v A=••••
;;�—% Ne&l ro ln'#ro X797VA- �vice"ks,
b / Ne�� ek9clkl %s7S a x ��si
Ned V� lie �d/•/ S� yes a-m PIC44dly V'
lc� P 11 0071- .Sa.'79 &'4 c�urr'tl
hme accorWI.07/ Aka/ r0
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/] nspector Signature: — Date: /--
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes :0
❑ Yes 97rNo
❑ Yes )EI No
❑ Yes ❑ No
9,Yes ❑ No
9Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 6:No
❑ Yes do
a

� V
Facility Number: ,F --r-' Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below /KYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes to
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? , Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments: an orDrawings: a 4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
December 13, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Benjamin F. Locklear
Ben -Mar Farms
1006 Moss Neck Road
Lumberton NC 28358
Farm Number. 78 - 88
Dear Benjamin F. Locklear:
/ • •
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOLJRCES
DEC 19 2000
You are hereby notified that Ben -Mar Farms, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may'also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Theresa Nartea at [phone] extension 375 or
Jeffery Brown with the Fayetteville Regional Office at (910) 486-154I.
Sincerely, ¢'
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Fayetteville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NO 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer' paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Benjamin F. Locklear
Ben -Mar Farms
1006 Moss Neck Road
Lumberton NC 28358
Dear Benjamin F. Locklear:
1 � •
Now
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 R EC E I! i'E LuJ
L4 -v\l s 2000
FAYG I 'I'EViLLC-
REG. ©rFICE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 78-88
Robeson County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
01� /�
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

a st'i �. (� Division of Soil and Water°Conservation' Operat7Q11 Review' 1 L t a Ertl 1 F ;.� ���
r';?i.lr ..<k ,!..w. �.�.i..-Ia ;xt 1pi .; EI,„,{1� 9.nl.�i:! 1t d %.�tlir 3 ' x �`Ey
Sion of SUilland'Water,Cons@CVAtiDIIE iCDr[I' lianceflns ection� Jr �" ;°Itaa� V. tI �t&�Ii�kErni I,
E t E I . I p .rp i, § f f� �1 ,F I , �, �� : r I )• i
1
'Division.of Water Quality Compliance Iinspectionx i
Other Agency.- Operation
.F r. 9.,, r fit. d E r ,E ItiV r... „.., r. - - r ,a. .. �rw.r <. r ,¢ a'�' d'. - ..,... ? . •. '� F_ x r .» 'r: r� �.I -t... lA... .'i.. . rr �� n. v . �.
12 Routine O Com taint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 4, 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted A Certified Q Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Yl _ I `� rwt County: l�Q�'fir........................ . Farm Name: C......................
Owner Name:...��,2.rn-, j�f,.t!6�.{..hr...........G._d.c�ICl.�4k1~................................ Phone No:............73........ ...�ra...:..............................
�� .
FacilityContact: ........... 1,1�/.Yl.�!yr�..................�..I..................T�ittlle......................................................].......... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ...... �?...Q...tc�......,1..:!.l rS..(...1J.......IS.Pt..:.......... :...� 5 .'? i;J ex..CThh.-� . N...,.....,............. 2..�.5.
..... G
Onsite Representative: ,w,�! .e.v .......................... .... ........... Integrator....................................................................
Certified Operator:.�'��.Q y l ►L,,,,,,, , LAG _ /e r...... .............. Uperator Certification Number:,.........................................
Location of Farm:
....................... ........... .. .. ............ ......................... I-,
Latitude Longitude � • ��
i
` Design CurrentPoultry r F', apaityl. Populatro 'Depsigny Cp Trent
Swine ) 6II , .;„� Ca aci Po ulation C esi n Cyrrentn r Cattle LCa acit Po ulAtion
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
I r 1:j 1.: '1 t : - t '
nds / Solid.'1'raps
..1�.r
- — L_t Lily Ci I I IL_j ULLIIy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
a fri r.!F'tr I> ea. i{fit e k I .
E- Other
° Total Design Capacity
<_;`t'' ,L�TatafSSLW:"'
fit f I
:;k ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
❑Spray Field Area E,
i : _ ..
� r j t ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water (if the State? (If.yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes Vf No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes E�No
❑ Yes 1]0 No
❑ Yes RrNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): �p....... ............................ ............................. ....... ............. :..................... .............. I............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
.........................................
❑ Yes XNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: — 98 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ,Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of over application? [:].Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12, Crop type
v%11L
le-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Docs the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management'Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
N,6 •yi j aiiOi js :or- dgrjcien> ie� -ftre j Opd. during 01S,visit; • :Y:op )rviiI ree�iye 4 uttj t er.
correspondence; about. this .visit. .. . ..
7, Need 4 7
kgeZrJ5 are W(-C- �.�r��n�e� tv-" � '�'�r e .Sal 5e�
❑ Yes 0 No
P(Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JZ No
[-]Yes %,No
Cl Yes gNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 1No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes &o
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes r No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes C9,No
Reviewer/Inspector Name , a r}r -" w It ._, tl..'ir" I ,ii, "n ),'P
t yJ r t
'J - a / "t�..�lAJi1..!i:�u . sl - . f-• - t� a lt�' .� -At sA. ;.i ra r
Reviewer/Inspector.Signature. Date:
A.
3/23/99

Ecility Number: 7 — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below XYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes KNo
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes JNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Yes ❑ No
�!d itlona_a.: omments and/or raW1ngs .,5° a- k a a , i'i4 � a H• ' F
J
3/23/99

[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
a Division of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Fallow -up of DSWC review O Other I
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection .' � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3 Certified © Applied for Permit 0/ Permitted 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name.. .�1 G?.J?'!..4 h�......�:.......4 l.fir".......................... County: ....................... �6snnn ..... .......................
OwnerName:....................h.....'.`?!`...../bli'YL„r�................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: ..........&<rk'p".qf-........... 4;�A.VrTitic:................................................................ Phone No: ...............................................
MailingAddress:...........l .p.L......... ,[1 .......L.`. a. ....... .-............... .......L ......./�1................... ................
T
Onsite Representative:........ t1�Cin%t.G�.......?................................ Integrator:..................h...f.' ..................
Certified erator.......... O rr-
p...�f.�,(�...............�s�.GF rvlr...................... Operator Certification Number..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0• 6 " Longitude ' ' " ,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes O No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 00 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 90 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes LV No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 1xNo
7/25/97

SA
Facility Number: —
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Stru-ture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: .......�.................
..............................................................................
Freeboard(ft):..................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes X No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
.....................................................................................
❑ Yes fi4No
❑ Yes P(No
XYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste -Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
j.
15. Crop type ...................... .........7 rm.wk..................................... ..........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted FAcilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0, No.vitilkions'or deF'iciencies. were -noted -during this:viAt.- :You.wil] i•ecei've' i o' Airther,
eoerespondeitee about this'visit. ::. '
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes
No
AYes
❑ No
❑ Yes
'ANo
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ Yes
P(No
OYes
❑ No
❑ Yes
9No
❑ Yes
ANo
❑ Yes
❑ No
is,i' ! / ��, , , ; /
I
I
` #17 A
/ / i A I7/25/97
I Revicwerllnspector Name
ReviewerlInspector Signature: J --a&� — J Date: 46—af —W

ul-23-98 10:02P McMillan's Electrical
r'
v1c�dE�NR
9108434740 P.01
9- a3- <rpRECEIVED
/DO l 46d-d 4" d
Q4� 7?
< <� 4 1998
FAYETTEViLLE
REG. OFFICE

N
O
a Form IRR-Z
0
0
a
N
0
Crop Cycle T-,�Irtj
m Owners Signatu M rL
Operator's Signatu a,~,
N Certi(led Operator (Print) 8_ /� t ` 1�L / jp (,k 47 Operator Cer ifimbon #
Tract #
Field Sae (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
RECEIVED)
.;I;i 2 4 1998
FAYETTEVII LE
Facility Number . Oi;Fl
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
c� Address d 6�,, .4.,
operators Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Rem amended PAN
Aa,W A tj
ilu" Loading (lWaam) - (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) 0 1)
I'
Date
(mm/dd/y�
Start Time
(hrmin)
End Time
rm
(hrn)
Total Minutes
(3) - (2)
# of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaUmin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(4) x (5) x (6)
Volume Per
Acre (galfac)
(7) + (A)
Waste Analysis t
PAN QW1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Ib/ac)
I(8) x (9)) + 1,000
Nitrogen Balance
b/ac
.v
iV
14-y
a/ .&
1.3
A
AV
If
Ir
r
7
9 ' see your annul waste manaWnent plot for sarnpift deqummy. At a minalram. waste anatob is raquied wow 60 days of rand application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8)- Continue subtractfg cokmn (10) from column 11) fonowft each appriEation event

0 Form IRR-11 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record RECEIVED
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields . ; f 1 1 1 d 1998
Farm Own Spreader Operator F AY Number-
G• QF FICE
r
U
r
S.
4J
U
�l
LLI
r
I
M
0
0
ri
W
M
N
i
r
7
r)
■ter-
-
r��
`
,
�-
�
fr_,�
r

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 15, 1998
Benjamin Locklear
1001 Moss Neck Road
Lumberton, NC 28358
SUBJECT: Request for Additional Information
Ben -Mar Farms
Registration No. 78 - 88
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Locklear:
On June 24, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division
of Water Quality inspected the Ben -Mar Farms swine facility. There were no
irrigation records available for review at the time of the inspection.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following information be
provided:
1. Submit a copy of all irrigation records for the current year to our office for
review in order to determine if record keeping is adequate.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before July 24, 1998
regarding the information requested. If you have any questions concerning this
matter, please call Jeffery Brown, at [phone].
Sincerely,
A6A04.7t—
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSWC
Ed Holland - Robeson Co. NRCS
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5049
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLE9)/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

il
v
1
`Z 423 572 478
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
tin insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail Ifee reverse
I NJAMIN LOCKLEAR
'T58r MOSS NECK ROAD
PI.M$?0'V;P NCe 28358
Postage
$
certified Fee
1.35
Spedal Delivery Fee
Rastrided Delivery Fee
u7
Return Receipt Stowing to
Whom & Date Delivered
Rearm Receipt &vh" to Whom
DaK & Addressee's Address
1 . 10
TOTAL Postage & FeesOD
0
c'7
Postmark or Date
ri
rn
n
07-16-98
SENDER:
I also wish to receive the
■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
f ■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
following SBIVICBS (for an
1 ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this
extra fee):
card to you,
■ Attach this form to the front of the mallplece, or on the back if space does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
.
permit.
■Write "Return Receipt Requested"on the maiipiece below the article number,
2. © Restricted Delivery
ry
2
d
■ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
= delivered.
Consult postmaster for fee.
uj
1 3. Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
t BENJAMIN LOCKLEAR
Z 423 572 478
°C
c
i 1001 MOSS NECK ROAD
4b. Service Type
r
LUMBERTON, NC 28358
❑Registered1 Certified
d
at
"•'
TI Express Mail ❑ insured
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
7. DaS iof Delivery
''
7 it
f
IJ
O .
t 5. Received By: (Print Name) B. Addressee's Address (Daly if requested Y
and fee is paid)
t
6. Signatu (Addresse@ or -Agent) N e
o X w'
a+
H PS Form 3811, D c mbar 1994
102595-99-B-0229 Domestic Return Receipt

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL' RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 15, 1998
I k"i -of M h"4W.014 x9i N I W 0
Benjamin Locklear
1001 Moss Neck Road
Lumberton, NC 28352
SUBJECT: Request for Additional Information
Ben -Mar Farms
Registration No. 78 - 88
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Locklear:
On June 24, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division
of Water Quality inspected the Ben -Mar Farms swine facility. There were no
irrigation records available for review at the time of the inspection.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following information be
provided:
1. Submit a copy of all irrigation records for the current year to our office for
review in order to determine if record keeping is adequate.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before July 24, 1998
regarding the information requested. If you have any questions concerning this
matter, please call Jeffery Brown, at [phone].
Sincerely,
#�� Aexvm-
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSWC
Ed Holland - Robeson Co. NRCS
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-3043
PHONE [phone] FAX DIO-486-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -80% RECYCLED/10% POET-CONSUMRR PAPER

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEYILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 15, 1998
Benjamin Locklear
1001 Moss Neck Road
Lumberton, NC 28358
SUBJECT; Request for Additional Information
Ben -Mar Farms
Registration No. 78 - 88
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Locklear:
On June 24, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division
of Water Quality inspected the Ben -Mar Farms swine facility. There were no
irrigation records available for review at the time of the inspection.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following information be
provided:
1. Submit a copy of all irrigation records for the current year to our office for
review in order to determine if record keeping is adequate.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before July 24, 1998
regarding the information requested. If you have any questions concerning this
matter, please call Jeffery Brown, at [phone].
Sincerely,
A6C:oz��
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSWC
Ed Holland - Robeson Co. NRCS
228 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA a8901-6049
PHONE [phone] FA% 91 0.486.0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLE0/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
r1 97% " --. 1 Lt�a

ti E ❑ [vision of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
¢� Division of Water Quality*
fl f
Routine O Comnlaint O F ollow-un of DNVO insoixtion O Fallow-un of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
I 'lime of inspection I / 1-; aU124 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ©QCertified �y© Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ,,,,•„
Farm Name: L?.� ...-.. rn.a .......Far+"......., ... County:...,..... 2 5 8 ►.......................1...........
........... .............
Owner Name: [ gyp! S.a W1,.t../s-... OC- (e° Q 1� . Phone No : 7 J..4�.r....T ..............................
Facility Contact: Prri a+!�.!..rti...,.y Nat
�. r... Title: s!%csJ 2.r.......... .......... I ...... .......... Phone No: ... . ........................
Mailing Address:... �. c .. V. ...1 .�."t^..... 5.., ..L1`?...•... �.. .,,..... ..,.....
Onyt rr
'te Representative:.69n OL- a, ..✓. � .l ar ..................... Integrator:.................... ' .... .,.. .!! .......,..............
Certified Operator;.L. .�.f'..�' ............... ............. Gl�l..C`' Q Operator Certification Number:.........,.........
Location of Farm:
Latitude r-�• �� « Longitude
t
t Desi Current _Desn
itt Destgn
Current Currents
y tfi' h 1
Swine; CApaaty Papulatton+
Poultry
.<
Poptlatiati '=C�rtte Capacity
;Capacity
�l'opulatioit°
Wean to Feeder
„ : ❑Layer
Dairy ¢
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
C
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
Farrow to Finish
Z
"
�..:
TotalDesign Capacity„ 2
❑ Gilts
4
f
h 'R
at L
F P fi T al S W
❑ Boars
$-
Number of La o�cttts 1 Hnidtn Ponds � Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Ls oon Ares
[I Spray Field Are
N .
❑ o Liquid Waste Management System
F
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
#No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
•d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
kNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
El Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
6, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable ,setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7/25197 Continued are hack

AA
Facility Number: n — S $
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laaaons.Holdina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Stricture. 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
freeboard(ft):...................... ................... ................. ................................... ............................ ......... ......
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
i 1. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes #No
❑ Yes No
Structure 5 Structure fi
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff enteri g waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15, Crop type �� r !!1.. ...... .. e.........................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
I& Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. 'Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.vitilations,or deficiencieswe're-noted-ditring this:visit.•_.Y.ou.YO11 iecei�e•no•ftirtlier
ct rrespandence ahout-this"visit.: :.:..:
Mr. l�ck1HRr 15 Wbt-� i /act W i/ITII� N QCS o,� Cefi i O t
I S cA_�orr�j N<j p 1� So ; d- �t1 q,Tet• �,�cre{- ry S .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes qNo
❑ Yes 9'�No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes gNo
......................................
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25197
7
i�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Benjamin F. Locklear
Ben -Mar Farms
1001 Moss Neck Rd
Lumberton NC 28358
Dear Benjamin F. Locklear:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
February 11,1998
RECE
1993
FAYE i EVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Ben -Mar Farms
Facility Number: 7 8-8 8
Robeson County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.E(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

`,, \
Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 s%�i=
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please -submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be. advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance. '
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Boa 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr.', P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Fi
A*,%% AONM% 000
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RECEIVED
hi A Q 2 0 1996
FAYETTEl/rLLE
F1EG.
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number .
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

{
RECE
IVED
StMe of NoHh Carolina
Department of Em ironnient and Natural Resources MAR .� 1�98
Division of Water Quality, WATER QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREENIE . is` barge Complianoe Ent.
(INFORMATION REQLTIRL12 FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
l . Applicant (Owner of the Facility): .+l
2. Facility No.
3. Facility Name; Bra &JR FAkhs-
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its
compliance)-
e
S. Mailing Address: _ /001 H o.rs_ __ _N0-G" d ----_ _
City: Lt-.�,",b a State: N C' Zip:
Telephone No.: (—J/o }
6. Count), where facility is located:d6�o�v-
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultr),, Cattle): rNe_-
8. Application Date:
II. ELIGIBILITI' FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered. by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who, makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31;
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register`by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation, District
2
FORIM SPAG 1/98 Page I of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan ,(Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made %i,ith technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Fundsexpended
E. Improvements made to the system
i
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
z�/-77
moo/
fc�vu, Olt'EYIsfA:wa
r�Gtgo...� /C�ei� Q fires 6..
2
--JA, e 42,
fih Ile a"? G.1 f
/-,e�9 oo., %t
r?.iZ9%
Lei /.1 w y-e�
!Ze&. A P/AA,
�/�C / 9
7 •— Gya-�f-•� �_
a-hd✓u r�-�.� s-
�'-oe7-`�
S1r au , -
.!5�/2!;Zf
F7r....
7 ���� � ...,
_;,�
� Cm-�..d /urn ter.. �n1N�v.v��
o,, . � p.�.. ' A14o0d 6y
�%�f�7-
G'o,,��a� ��w�i�r.a
Co-,./.�•a� .;�/
�arl�x._
fi��f�- -�., --
Gf�/9�-
N,e c s .
Pecs
W.al-t% -- � i� a*--f�Y fe�,✓•-�-- �.ev;*.y Sri._ s�.rz..
or
I G rZ A eg-g*Cdlw.0 1
eo
2 1-i AFS, d o �� ,t
3/9/ 9 i �,r,�,(,�,t: JL �..�..Q �-prn.. r•.. �% , '�a��� i�.. x n C,
7� �l : �•o. � .390 �/r.CLcu,.�o AtC d
FORA SPAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

wrr+.M a,� „ ,.. ►.mow,,.. r..+ „ �. ,,,. , . ., w,
IL PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION I.
Plcase list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility, The ENIC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long, (Use additional sheets if necessary). ;
�hr #Ar-12q,?
T,Y1tjt4y
Applicant's Certification:
1. Gi J►4 !J!1 I�oG Yattest this application for a Special Agreement
«'ith the Ir IC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
know edge. 1 understand if all a u'red . arts of this alication.gre not compleled and if.W
e aired sti orting infonnatio and atiac menu are not included tht_ S at�nljcation nackat: w' 1 ?: '
L� � �_.w_
he reiurneci as -incomplete. Furs ermore, 1 atte,St by my signature thai_1 fully understand-thauf
this facility is found io be ineligible to enter i to a special peteeMeaLALth-the ENIC notbing in'
Print Dame of Owner
Signaturdlof Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98
Date �:5;3-
Page 3 of 4

=�.
ROBESON SOIL AND WATE'!f CONSERVATION DISTRICT
440 CATON ROAD • LUMBERTON NI 28358 TELEPHONE [phone]
February 26, 1998
Benjamin Locklear
Rt 4 Box 550
Lumberton NC 28358
Dear Mr. Locklear:
Enclosed is your approved N.C. Ag Cost -Share Contract
78-98-09--08 for cropland conve.:sion to trees.
When you are ready to begin work on this contract, please
contact Richard Ward, Ag Cost -Share Technician at the above
number. He is available to asi3ist you.
If you have any questions, please call our office. We look
forward to working with you to improve the quality of water
in our county.
WAD / j me
encl.
Sincerely,
William A. Davis, Ch.
Robeson SWCD

Rcr.yLcd Itenr.s.
One (I) original and two (2) conies of the completed and appropriately executed
g plication farm, along with any attache bents,
TfIE COMPLETED API'LICA'CION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, FORTH CAROLINA 27626.0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 4 of 4