780048_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
NORTH CARO M
Dwrbnout of Evaingirnnm+e�

AF�j� pENR-FRO
WUNEWROCT 25 2011
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources D1 Q
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor
Mary Evans
Evans Farm
14905 NC Hwy 41 S
Fairmont, NC 28340
Dear Mary Evans:
Director
October 24, 2011
Secretary
Subject: Receipt of Lagoon Closure Report Form
Evans Farm
Facility No: 7848 (deemed permitted)
On October 21, 2011, the Aquifer Protection Section received a completed Animal Waste
Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form from your facility. This form indicates that all
lagoons have been closed in accordance with NRCS standards and that no animals will remain
on this farm. There is no permit to rescind since this operation was deemed permitted according
to 15A NCAC 2T .1303.
Please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at 919-733-3221 if you have any
questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
J. R. oshi
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
AWS Permit File — AWD780048
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NOTtl Car0l111a
Internet: vnvvr, ncwaterquality,org a ���1� N��/! ,
An Equal Opportunity 1 Afrmadve Acdon Employer N �/ K` `lU,�

• Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: 6U..•r Ev Facility No. - si
Owner(s) Name: �t.c�-r ✓
Mailing Address:I t-poe NL
5
Phone No: q10-(RA5-LoCOAI
F� �N-�Or•-� i� G_ �153,-4 0 County: Qo%Eda.�
O eration Description fremaining animals only):
lease check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. ofAnimals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gibs
o Boars
Type of Poultry No. ofAnimals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. ofAnimals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type of Livestock,
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold?
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: D
Type of Dairy No. ofAnimals
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number ofAnimals:
Yes No
Yes Q
(Name) '�64AV,. of the Water Quality Section's st ff i}�l he Division of
Water Quality's W -10 ., i Regional Office (see map on brick) was contacted on 9 Zq r (date) for
notification of the pending closure tth 's and or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to the start
of closure, which began on •S 1 (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North
Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please ,Print):
Signature: i1�Q.�.� G�/llisc.rr/ Date: o "
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas..
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Wi ! I l4— C.t.11
Affiliation: NC 4 A 05ycL
Address (Agency); q`t3 ��11.+.� .F, . M,�II I,/�ji,+���� 1JC- Phone No.: 2FV9 1yo v
S ignature: 'I''�'``f �r _ Date: 1
Return within B days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section
Compliance Group
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PT C' . I \4,>rA 1 R IOW)

ULM
a 4"
nm+E
Steve Troxler North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Commissioner and Consumer Services
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Date: October 10, 2011
Subject: Mary Evans Farm
Robeson County
To: Mitch Miller
Robeson County Soil and Water Conservation District
440A Caton Road
Lumberton, NC 28360-0450
Patricia K. Harris
Director
I have reviewed the final closure condition of the lagoon located at the Mary Evans Farm. All of
the agitated material from the lagoon has been removed using agitators and honey wagons. All efforts
were made to get all of the agitated waste material out of the lagoon in accordance with NRCS standards.
The project has been completed as detailed in the lagoon closure plan. I am satisfied that the closure
completed on this farm meets NRCS standard 360 and recommend payment for this project.
I hope this letter brings this matter to closure. Thank you very much for your assistance and if you
need further assistance please let me know.
Sincerely,
William Carl Dunn, PE
DSWC Environment Engineer
MAILING ADDRESS
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
943 Washington Square Malt
Washington, NC 27689
Telephone: [phone]
Fox Number: 252-975-3716
An Equal Opportunity Employer
LOCATION
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 5, 1999
Horace Evans
Evans Farms
Rt 2 Box 60
Fairmont NC 28340
�4�
f
• T4 s
OM% 00=%
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Removal of Registration
Evans Farms
Facility Number 78-48
Robeson County
Dear Horace Evans:
RECEIVE®
INIArl 1 4 1999
FAYETTEVILLE.
REG- OFFICF.
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer he registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
too
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
�
Aanl,L
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Fayetteville Water Quality Regional Office
Robeson Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
6 �-�
Facility Number �
Time of Inspection
.;30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified 13 Applied for Permit © Permitted
113 Not Opera tional
Date Last Operated :..........................
Farm Name: nS... /'I✓t
.....................�..., .......................................................................................�
County,R.
.....................`0
(% ' .......................
. ?..............
Owner Name: ................1.:�'.'nc.t......................... lL�ft],......................................
Phone No:...........I......�,10.........(p�..
...� 21..........
FacilityContact: .............l...l`' AOC ............CRA5......... Title: ............................ I., ........ I...."".,.........
Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.................................6...................................................
......
...�t.lrlh'`!.rt....G...................
...... cxtrl�
Onsite Representative: .............. ........,......................................
Integrator:...............
........
Certified Operator;................1�e . '1................ ................ Operator Certification Number .........................................
Location of Farm:
C
C
Latitude' �_�• �° �46 Longitude • ' it
Deli >t:. Current
i}esi m
Current . n `DeliTCurreit
Swine
Cs►pacity..,Population Poultry
Capacity
Po ulation
Population'% Cattle #,Ca act typ_.
p_. v .n.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
,�°
[] Dairy
,_
❑Feeder to Finish
❑Nan -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
'
❑ Farrow to Wean
_
:.
E
❑Others
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
00
eJ
Total De5tgn CapaClty
VIItS
� f S
-�`i f �ty"mF -� �h`� -
s f
❑ Boars
L
k �Tfltal SSLW --
Subsurface Drains Present JI❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?,
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes P(No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes
3U No
❑ Yes
[[ No
NZ#
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
IxNo
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes 0,No

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds. -Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ................�................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?.
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ANo
Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ,
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes ATo
❑ Yes LYNo
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes ' ❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
%No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
j(No
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
XNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? Ayes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0, Ndviolathins' °or deficiencies.we're-noti d-during this. visit.- You:will i6ceive n' 611irtlier�
: egrres'pOOdehO Ah'out this:visit'.
1
I �
Reviewer/Inspector Name
j Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

it 7%w
Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
10 Routine O Camnlaint O FollaW-un of DWO insnetion O Follow-un of DSVVC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection VZ
Time of Inspection
: � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered l3 Certified E3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted JE3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name; .... UG Fr LA,'-- County: ... kpbe.T.4—-::................................................
..............................................................
Owner Name.,..Ar°tQC—.........................L!�....,.......,.................................... - Phone No:...... 11F.M.40(e. !.l............... .......... .............
Facility Contact: r•o-CP G LJah5 Title: ►� Phone Na ,,.,
.........................................................6.w.n'�,,..................................., r&m.e' .........................
MailingAddress: ........��`! ..��...&a%............................................................. .._.L. r.'►?<l.t�h.l.,�....i�.� ................. .......... z�'3��.
Onsite Representatrve., C� .......................v� Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator, s i`Operator Certification Number;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
..................................................
Location of Farm:
0
'o
Latitude Longitude
k T
Iesrgnfi
Currents Current
Des y Current
xSwme
_
Capacity
gV'Des�n
Popitiatton Poultry ; Capacity Pa p
Cattle Ca tci Pi elation
P P
g
❑ Wean to Feeder
,elation,
❑ Layer
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Layer
❑Non Dairy
f
❑ Farrow to Wean
4FEM ��
❑Other + E
t
❑��rxj;
Farrow to Feeder
a o Y �.. Total Design Capacity', FOV,.
Farrow to Finish
@d
❑ Gilts
fq o
`
..k i £', k j,�Val SV>�
t
El Boars]
gzjc� _ Z:VT rt: 4 e
Mithbetof Lagoons ! Holding Ponds ©
f-_
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
tr.a�
❑ No Liquid Waste Management $yysema y�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
U(No
Discharge originated ac ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other,
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
I
.d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
9No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
V(
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
o
T
maintenance/improvement?
b. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
o
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures L.a onns Holdin fonds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft). ......................... ....... .............. ............... ....... ........... ........................ ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes �Nci
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering water. of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...........o r'.........a
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those de ignated in the Animal Waste Management Plan {AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For_Certified or Permitted Facilities Only,
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance -of the Permit?
No.violitions.or. der�ciencies.were;noted di'ring this;visit.' You:will receive ho,ftiriher ::
:. •correspondence ab"out �this� visi t:- : � : � : ... � :. � ; : � . � . . • : - :... ; : ... .. • . �. � :.: ,
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes 2�NO
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ Yes
I'Er No
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7-4,-re czre Ao ko55 a� side. Nr Sins r`s wO'rk'j wilC IVRCS
ar4 eer7'I-�� ca�"tr�• J
S"
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: LW,,— C1 _ J Date: /L' / _ r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Horace Evans
Evans Farms
Rt2Box 60
Fairmont NC 28340
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Evans Farms
Facility ID#: 78-48
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Evans:
R E c =;'E�VED
Nov 19 1996'
FAY ETT EVi LE'
l!Fr-,,,
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. or
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O, Box 27687, W 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 vaC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
OW
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/I Mo post -consumer paper

J
F (zo
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources « • t
Fayetteville Regional Office 7
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N F�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
December 13, 1995
Mr. Horace Evans
Rt. 2, Box 60
Fairmont, NC 28340
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Evans:
On November 3, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility Is
in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management.is being
properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910)
486-1541.
Sincerely,
R'� /5e-
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician IV
RR/bs
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: NO
Facility No. 7 s - 4w g
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1/Z 03 , 1995
Time: /53 D
Farm Name/Owner:gj-ea "-s 116 +-a c e— va u .S
Mailing Address: RoL,4e- 2 Bux' & O Farr~.." NC_ Z93�LO
County; 90 6.4 N
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: dorac Eyanrs Phone: Ylo- & z j - 4,6,z
Physical Address/L amtion: f i-u k q 1 to 5gu 1U: e:C Fa 1 vwso v f
Pcss A(=L ToV_' Farm Joea,:,.ei-
Type of Operation: Swine .,,, :.-, Poultry_ Cattle
Design Capacity: goo Number of Animals on Site: 2 So
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:_ • • Longitude• •
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) (5�or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la oon(s)? Yes or® Was any erosion observed? Yes or®
Is adequate land available for spray? (e or No Is the cover crop adequate? <!& or No
Crop(s) being utilized: RoW s
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings. or No
100 Feet from Wells? r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orb
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or(O1
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes orb If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes
Additional Comments: ;Jr r eel a6 :,✓ �� cr rd e� w
-���� a�fiati d Dece,,�be.r 3/ 9f7.
inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
&�
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed: