770011_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
DqMrWM Of OWhOnI

r
e
Routine O Comalaint O Fallow-un of DWO insacction
Facility Number
Farm Status:....is!�
'ollow-up ofDSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection©
Time of Inspection ov Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and !processing)
FarmName: arsI:a".Ci..»..»..�..........»._...»»»..».
S 5 9�
Owner Natne:
L�
y. „.1�a2�„.....».......», Phone No:..(qjr.�.l. �.. ...... .»».».
Mailing Address: { »_
OnsiteRepresentj�ti�e: ..Can.L:Integrator:........................».....».»..»,»........,,, ......»._
k /ylq�Si+alj
Certified Operator: .......»..:......»...._......».__.._...._......„ ,,_......._,.....� Operator Certification Number: _...........» .».........._»...
Location of Farm:
• i !f. a it M I,i 1.-'^�l� ..1 -. i� i /, k7RA
�a
LatitudeLongitude Q• �� Du
IMLNot U erational Date Last Operated: 9'$ 7 % 7
Type of Operation and 1
Capacity
General .. - • , , .. ✓ k
1. Are there any buffers that heed tnaintenanceAmprovement?o
•.; - ;.
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWG u
c. If discharge is observed, what is the'estimated flbw'in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require
a maintenancelimprovement?
❑,Yes ff No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes' 10,40
❑ Yes No
❑Yes No
❑ Yes (0 No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes R No
Continued on back

6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)?
B. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdine Pondsl
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): ..Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the,integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses as
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
. (if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop:type .a hCYN��U:.. ... ......
a.
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a Iack of available irrigation equipment?
For'Certified Facilitler Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes U.No
❑ Yes 8 No
❑ Yes t�.No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Lagoon 4
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [ANo
❑ Yes , No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes - ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Conzritents'(re er to"questron #) ',�Explam any YES answers and/or any�recommendarions or a>y nthercominents� ` ;� �� �� , � �
xi}se drawings offacilityt#o better explara�srteiations (use addttionalpages h��lgecessaryjM t �w �,l ?�
It r
,L
7-k;s. , ,. Is r of t,, oper-r;ow a..d kas na+ beer- -For' ever o-,dear'
Q
:41:r. lagoon- is 4o be, closed oq+, 4 r-tLtsf be. Aovt,e in accordQnee
Closure S�.v�d.aras,
S-F I a.gooj,_ Is -6 foe lei o_s i st -f-ker+e w', ll kaue ko be, a wasma✓�a�ew,e �ian �ife(�f
F(Jure o'-- -*-ks s4e '%s uwC9y-k A. a+ f�e presc^
8
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date: y /b - ?
cc. Division of Water Qualit}Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Marshall McDonald
360 Graham Rd.
Rockingham, NC 28379
Dear Mr. McDonald:
A60TIMWA
IDP.HNF;Z
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
April 16, 1997
SUBJECT: Annual Compliance Inspection
Jerry Gardner Farm
Registration No. 77-11
Richmond County
On April 16, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected the subject swine facility. Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. - It is the opinion of this office based on the
information provided and observations made during the inspection that the facility was in
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part.0217 at the time of the inspection. Please refer to the
comments section on the rear of the inspection form for information regarding your facility.
Please be aware that all swine facilities with a liquid waste collection system designed for
a minimum of 250 hogs must have a certified waste management plan on or before December
31, 1997. The district MRCS office, Agriculture Extension office, or the Division of Soil and
Water have specialist available to assist you with upgrading of existing facilities and
certification.
If You have any questions concerning this matter, please call John Hasty at (910) 486-
1541.
Sincerely,
/I C /� ';z
2ohnC. Hasty, Jr. 14
Environmental Specialist
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audry Oxendine - FRO DSW
Wendy Rudd - Richmond Co. NRCS
Wachovla Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 NOC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Volce 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

F ! "p: w s �"'-s.�t' n-f ); F i. �� k � «.7e 3 F 'x: k.�.x � - - f'�°'�-� G � %y, ,4 ..-•M ^��. �. .. i °-. ,Ari.
a DSWGniml�l��edloQ ration
:DWQ Animal?FeediotE Qperai3on Sit aspect o � �, a
�fJ,R , y� l k - ' 1 a•� F .s' 'Jti!° a �" � `r�� P P
��..�
12 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ Inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection¢=97 I
Facility Number Time of Inspection ; Qv Uae 24 hr. time
Farm States: Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)--L=—�
Farm Name:'--Sect'e,�a� County:.�,.1>��..,_,.
OOwner Name: �� m Cr� Phone No: C 1 D S �S .r me
wner ,,...
MallingAddress: FLU Cr.-kAt - 15r-i iJ. j60Lt"'ir /1,J G 2B1
Onsite Represent Sri C ortcAj ,:.......r.� Integrator.•
t /�rorA41I
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
of 9
. - ,.w R12-�;1�1!'I*':d�i��i' .#�TZC�"CT'-..�iT.iL. .. r4'�*Yti.�-.�i.•'ii3
Latitude �•�� r.�� Longitude 9 0�
1\ot Operational Date Last Operated: q,5RL 7
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
oultlY. 9 r Nttntber.� �;� Number ;
k
.El Wean t0 Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish Non Beef
farrow to Wean
""h..� M
O o eedC
Farrow to F i h 1 ❑ Other Type of livestock
„Y•' yx F�. z ;" y » "' A'Fk ��x a r tz ra8k`, <. � � .} ti� A,
✓sk�xF q � 5 :r'.. � x3, � k ,� ys"r,„ y ss. _',.� �, ,h � i� ��� �. ... ,;,y;� `:'" ��e air°
Number ofki. oatis/Holden Pottds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
gam. �� 'q " ��� ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? _. .
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the•estimated flow•in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
-[�No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
ONO
❑ Yes
6 No
NI—
❑ Yes
44 No
❑ Yes
WSJ No
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ Yes
14 No
Continued on back

6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
$tructures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds/
9. is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): ..t.agoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses as
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
'Waste Aaalication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
.(If in excess of Whip, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .. P r W u oa
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management PIan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility requite a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes lINo •
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes O.No
❑ Yes ❑ No
'Lagoon 4
❑ Yes I, No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ONO
A Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 1ANo•
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7--Xis 4r?A. ,jC #,da+ ;#% operdk+;o►- a..A kaLs no+ been. -for over m-jeo ,
Z-P. f atoon.. Js 4o be, closed oml-,i i+ ML(S+ be 4Ke in accordancew;�L 'N RCS
Closr.lrC S�.�dards. -� inn, kefi
Sf sloop,- is -6 be lei o-s is, +ker�e w,11 haue 4-o be ix
w0.rfe Mar�a�ev�teti Q P
r- +ke dis�ascel a� jo g oor� +`�u�l�.
Fa+'ur8 0' - s4e 'I s u: itCer4,,t; A. cL+ fj,.e preses 4 +s
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc. Division of Water QuaI104-(rater Quality ,Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qualify
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Jerry W. Gardner
Jerry Gardner Farm
Rt 2 Box 171
Laurel Hill NC 28351
Dear Mr. Gardner:
April 3, 1997
ID.IEHNF;Z
RECENED
APR071991
FANG� SCE
ILLE
RE
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Jerry Gardner Farm
Facility Number 77-41
Richmond County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility.- Please'return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator..
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system,'is'a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you.of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997,
If you have questions concerning this. matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].�.'
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, �ly� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
NTelephone 919-733-7015 50% recyOes/10% post-consumer.paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Jerry W. Gardner
Jerry Gardner Farm
Rt 2 Box 171
Laurel Hill NC 28351
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Jerry Gardner Farm
Facility ID#: 77-11
Richmond County
Dear Mr. Gardner:
NOV 19 1996
ENV, MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Bang Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
ston oward, Jr.,-I?.E&-, I rector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, W 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 7fi87 N'VfC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
AW
Voice 919-715-4100 �' "r � 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

CORRESPONDENCE
NU� i TH L.iP1RUUN8 e
D of of fro— r t0! owl

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Tommy Peacock
Mr. Ray McDonald
486 Old Laurenburg Road
Hamlet, NC 28345
�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Alligator Farm
Aquaculture Propagation and
Production Facility
Richmond County
Dear Mr. Peacock and Mr. McDonald:
Thank you for meeting with me and other State, County and North Carolina State
Univeristy representatives on September 2, 1997, regarding your proposed alligator farm in
Richmond County. Observing the site, discussing your production scheme, and seeing the
drawing of your proposed buildings to house the alligators, provided a better understanding of
the project for all in attendance. It is our understanding that the proposed farm is for grow -out
oWy and that all alligators will be returned to Florida for processing. A processing facility will
be viewed differently than alligator production.
Based on a summary of your alligator production farm provided by Mr. Tom Ellis,
Director, Aquaculture and Natural Resources, North Carolina Department of Agriculture, the
Division of Water Quality considers this facility to be Deemed_ Permitted. A Deemed Permitted
facility will n-ol require issuance of an individual permit to begin alligator production under
current regulations.
Although your alligator farm will not be required to obtain an individual permit, it is
recommended that the holding lagoon, spray acreage, and cover crop be sized and managed to
meet the same minimum standards and specifications as required for an approved Animal Waste
Management Plan. Also, it is highly recommended that you or a member of your staff attend the
Operator Training School for Animal Waste Operators. Contact the Richmond County
Agriculture Extension Office for a school date and time. The school is very informative and
beneficial for your proposed endeavor.
225 Green Street, Suite 714 FAX [phone]
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

._. ... -1-- ...-a. - -- _ . , .'., .-...._, - . - .... --- ... ._w -. _ .
Mr. Peacock and Mr. McDonald
Page 2
September 11, 1997
As you are aware, your alligator production facility will be the Qy facility in the State
of North Carolina. Once you begin production, this facility will undoubtedly be visited and
observed by numerous State and Federal agencies, local government officials, and possibly the
public.
Thus, all waste management practices must be implemented in the m—o§j efficient manner
o s' ! Improper management could result in loss of the "Deemed Status", issuance of an
individual permit, and enforcement action including a Civil Penalty.
Should you have any questions, feel free to let me know.
GD/bs
Sincerely,
"14� (�Ie-- �'
Grady Dobson
Environmental Engineer
cc: Dennis Ramsey
Thomas W. Ellis
NC Dept of Agriculture
Aquaculture and Natural Resources
PO Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Jim Cummings
NC Dept of Agriculture
PO Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Tom Losordo, Assoc. Professor, NCSU
Fish & Wildlife Department
PO Box 7646
Raleigh, NC 27695
Enclosure (Mr. Tommy Peacock only)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF OF WATER QUALITY
September 11, 1997
Mr. Tommy Peacock
Mr. Ray McDonaId
486 Old Laurenburg Road
Hamlet, NC 28345
SUBJECT: Alligator Farm
Aquaculture Propagation and
Production Facility
Richmond County
Dear Mr. Peacock and Mr. McDonald:
Thank you for meeting with me and other State, County and North Carolina State
Univeristy representatives on September 2, 1997, regarding your proposed alligator farm in
Richmond County. Observing the site, discussing your production scheme, and seeing the
drawing of your proposed buildings to house the alligators, provided a better understanding of
the project for all in attendance. It is our understanding that the proposed farm is for grow -out
pAly and that all alligators will be returned to Florida for processing. A processing facility will
be viewed differently than alligator production.
Based on a summary of your alligator production farm provided by Mr. Tom Ellis,
Director, Aquaculture and Natural Resources, North Carolina Department of Agriculture, the
Division of Water Quality considers this facility to be Deemed Permitted. A Deemed Permitted
facility will = require issuance of an individual permit to begin alligator production under
current regulations.
Although your alligator farm will not be required to obtain an individual permit, it is
recommended that the holding lagoon, spray acreage, and cover crop be sized and managed to
meet the same minimum standards and specifications as required for an approved Animal Waste
Management Plan. Also, it is highly recommended that you or a member of your staff attend the
Operator Training School for Animal Waste Operators. Contact the Richmond County
Agriculture Extension Office for a school date and time. The school is very informative and
beneficial for your proposed endeavor.
225 Green Street, Suite 714 FAX [phone]
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Peacock and Mr. McDonald
Page 2
September 11, 1997
As you are aware, your alligator production facility will be the Q& facility in the State
of North Carolina. Once you begin production, this facility will undoubtedly be visited and
observed by numerous State and Federal agencies, local government officials, and possibly the
public.
Thus, all waste management practices must be implemented in the most efficient manner
,possible! Improper management could result in loss of the "Deemed Status", issuance of an
individual permit, and enforcement action including a Civil Penalty.
Should you have any questions, feel free to let me know.
GD/bs
Sincerely,
C/
Grady Dobson
Environmental Engineer
cc: Dennis Ramsey
Thomas W. Ellis
NC Dept of Agriculture
Aquaculture and Natural Resources
PO Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Jim Cummings
NC Dept of Agriculture
PO Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Tom Losordo, Assoc. Professor, NCSU
Fish & Wildlife Department
PO Box 7646
Raleigh, NC 27695
Enclosure (Mr. Tommy Peacock only)

VI Text or House Bill l 16 - Columbus/No Feeding of Alligators. (Local)http://www.legislature.state.nc.us-997/bills/house/hbiloI 16.full.htmI
6�,J t� Do bs o1
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA J
SESSION 1997
H4
HOUSE BILL 116*
Committee Substitute Favorable 2/26/97
Senate State Government, Local Government and Personnel Committe e Substitute
Adopted 8/ 14/97
Fourth Edition Engrossed 8/18/97
Short Title: Columbus/No Feeding of Alligators. (Local)
Sponsors:
Referred to:
February 12, 1997
RECE1�E®
c-p 0 S 1991
FA E-TrEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT TO PROHIBIT THE FEEDING OF ALLIGATORS IN COLUMBUS AND
BRUNSWICK COUNTIES.
Additional Information Available on: Bill St,ttu,,
Section 1. It is unlawful to intentionally feed, or to
entice with food, any wild American alligator, Alligator mississippiensis.
Section 2. This act does not apply to:
(1) Persons feeding alligators that are lawfully
maintained in protected captivity for educational, scientific, commercial,
or recreational purposes; or
(2) Officers of the Wildlife Resources Commission,
persons licensed or otherwise authorized by the Commission, or local
animal control officers, when relocating alligators by baiting or
enticement.
Section 3. Violation of this act is a Class 3 misdemeanor.
Section 4. This act is enforceable by law enforcement
officers of the Wildlife Resources Commission, by sheriffs and deputy
sheriffs, and by other peace officers with general subject matter
jurisdiction.
Section 5. This act applies only to Columbus and
Brunswick Counties.
Section 6. This act becomes effective December 1, 1997.
of 1 08/25/97 10:10:29

http://www.ncga.state.n...tories/senate/s0816.txt http://www.nega.state.nc.us/.htmI I ... 11—info/histories/senate/s0816.txt
HISTORY OF SENATE BILL S 816 Date: 8/25/97
ALLIGATOR/YELLOW
PERCH PRODUCTION Time: 3:16 a.m.
Introduced 4-14-97 by CONDER
Date
Action J. Page
4-14-97
S
REF TO COM ON FINANCE
4-29-97
S
REPTD FAV COM SUBSTITUTE
4-29-97
SA
COM SUBSTITUTE ADOPTED
4-29-97
S
PLACED ON CAL FOR 04-30
4-30-97
S
PASSED 2ND & 3RD READING
4-30-97
H
REC FROM SENATE
4-30-97
H
REF TO COM ON SG
5-28-97
H
REPTD FAV
5-28-97
H
CAT, PURSUANT RULE 36{A}
6- 9-97
H
PLACED ON CAL FOR 06-10
6-10-97
H
PASSED 2ND & 3RD READING
6-11-97
H
RATIFIED
6-12-97
H
PRES. TO GOV, 06-12
6-23-97
H
SIGNED 06-19
6-23-97
R
_Ga!L.
CH. SL 97-019
I of 1 08/25/97 10:1 1:10

Full Text of Senate Bill 816
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/.htmI I ...senate/ratified/sbi10816.full.html
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
1997 SESSION
S.L. 1997-198
SENATE BILL 816
Additional Information Available on:
AN ACT TO ELIMINATE THE NEED TO OBTAIN PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE WILDLIFE
RESOURCES COMMISSION TO RAISE YELLOW PERCH COMMERCIALLY IN SOME AREAS OF
THE STATE AND TO ALLOW ALLIGATORS TO BE RAISED COMMERCIALLY.
Che General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
Section 1. G.S. 106-761(c) reads as rewritten:
"(c) Exceptions for Species Not Listed. -- The following fish
species that are not listed in subsection (b) of this section may be
produced and sold as if they were listed in that subsection with the
following restrictions:
(1) Hybrid _teiped `-___t striped
bass. - - The hyi9 eid � f ape 6 i9 a a a 9 1ei � beto e � _ _ = a aeiepte6
6 yr h e &O a V 6 0� � rt a l l Lzv efig a om a"i �: i4 e e m ee e�-
pre -ate Production, propagation, and holding facilities
in the Meuse, Roanoke, or Tar/Pamlico River basins for the hybrid
striped bass shall comply with additional escapement prevention
measures a� prescribed by the Wildlife Resources Commission.
(2) Yellow perch. -- A letter of
approval from the Wildlife Resources Commission is required before the
yellow perch, perca flavenscens, may be raised at a facility located west
of Interstate Highway 77."
Section 2. Article 63 of Chapter 106 of the General
Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:
"§ 106-763.1. Propagation and production of American
alligators.
(a) License Required. -- A person who intends to raise American
alligators commercially must first obtain an Aquaculture Propagation and
Production Facility License from the Department. The Board of Agriculture
may regulate a facility that raises American alligators to the same extent
that it can regulate any other facility licensed under this Article.
(b) Requirements. -- A facility that raises American alligators
commercially must comply with all of the following requirements:
(1) Before a facility begins operation,
it must prepare and implement a confinement plan. After a facility begins
operation, it must adhere Co the confinement plan. A confinement plan
I of 3 08/25/97 10:16:00

Full 'Text of Senate Bill 816
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/.htmI 1,..senate/ratified/sbi108 l6.full.html
must comply with guidelines developed and adopted by the Wildlife
Resources Commission. The Department may inspect a facility to determine
if the facility is complying with the confinement plan. As used in this
subdivision, 'confinement' includes production within a building or
similar structure and a perimeter fence.
(2) A facility can possess only
hatchlings that have been permanently tagged and have an export permit
from their state of origin. The facility must keep records of all
hatchlings it receives and must make these records available for
inspection by the Wildlife Resources Commission and the Department upon
request.
(3) IF the facility uses swine, poultry,
or other Livestock for feed, it must have a disease management plan that
has been approved by the State Veterinarian, and it must comply with the
plan.
(4) The activities of the facility must
cemply with the Endangered Species Act and the Convention on. International
Trade .in Endangered Species. The Department is the State agency
responsible for the administration of this program for farm -raised
alligators.
(c) Sanctions. -- The operator of a facility that possesses an
untagged or undocumented alligator commits a Class H felony if the
operator knows the alligator is untagged or undocumented. Conviction of
an operator of a facility under this section revokes the license of the
facility for five years beginning on the date of the conviction. An
operator convicted under this section may not be the operator of any other
facility required to be licensed under this Article for five years
beginning on the date of the conviction.''
Section 3. This act is effective when it becomes law.
In the General Assembly read three times and ratified
this the 11th day of June, 1997.
s/ Dennis A. Wicker
President of the Senate
s/ Harold J. Brubaker
Speaker of the House of Representatives
s/ James B. Hunt, Jr.
Governor
2 of 3 0812557 1116:00

Full Text of Senate Bill 816
http:l/www,ncga.state.nc.us/.htmI I ...senate/ratified/shilOR 16.full.html
Approved 5:06 p.m. this 19th day of June, 1997
3 of 3 08/25/97 10:16:00

http://www,lFgislature .... stories/house/hO l 16.txt http://www.legislature.state.nc.us...ill_info/histories/houselhO l 16.txt
HISTORY
OF HOUSE BILL H 116 ( = S 85) Date: 8/25/97
COLUMBUS & BRUNSWICK ALLIGATORS Time: 3:08 a.m.
Introduced 2-12-97 by ARNOLD
Date
Action J. Page
2-12-97
H
REF TO COM ON LOC&RGI
2-26-97
HA
REPTD FAV COM SUBSTITUTE
2-26-97
H
CAL PURSUANT RULE 36(A)
2-26-97
H
PLACED ON CAL FOR 02-27
2-27-97
H
PASSED 2ND & 3RD READING
3- 3-97
S
REC FROM HOUSE
3- 3-97
S
REF TO COM ON ST GVT
8-14-97
S
REPTD FAV COM SUBSTITUTE
8-14-97
SA
COM SUBSTITUTE ADOPTED
8-14-97
S
PLACED ON CAL FOR 08-18
8-18-97
SA
AMEND ADOPTED #1
8-18-97
S
PASSED 2ND & 3RD READING
8-19-97
H
REC TO CONCUR S COM SUB
8-19-97
H
REF TO COM ON RULES
1 of 1 08/25/97 10:10:23

James A. Graham Nvrt4 (Curalina
Commissioner
department of �.,Sriculturr
,x tru turr anb Natural �Resmrrces
September 2, 1997
Mr. Grady Dobson
Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality, DEHNR
Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Dear Grady:
Thomas W. Ellis, 111
Director
RECEIVEn
SE'P 0 4 1997
FAYETTEVILLE
AEG. QFFICE
Thank you for meeting with us at the proposed alligator farm in Richmond
county this morning. This is definitely a case where seeing the site and the plans
provided a better understanding of the project for all of us. This is to be a grow -out
facility only with no on site processing. Current plans are to return the harvest size
alligators to Florida for processing.
As we discussed, I am preparing this overview on behalf of Tommy
Peacock. In order to provide you with this information, I will fax this to you and
have the attachments faxed from the appropriate authorities also. The original will
be mailed to Mr. Peacock for his review and possible revision. If you have any
questions about the applicability of the information or its relevance to the .0200
rules, please contact Mr. Jim Cummings of NCDA at 919 733-7125.
The initial stocking of alligator hatchlings at the site is planned for early
October. These will be housed indoors as required in the 1997 authorizing statute,
attached. The statute also requires a management plan approved by the State
Veterinarian, if dead livestock or poultry are used as feed. This plan approval
confirmation is to be faxed to you under a separate cover. The Wildlife Resources
Commission will be considering the escape prevention issue at their September
meeting, attached is a letter proposing building and fence criteria. I have also
issued the Aquaculture Production License to the facility.
Post Office Box 27647 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

The initial stocking is to bring 200 alligator hatchlings of approximately 4
ounces each to the farm. The waste management plan is to flush the wastes into an
existing swine lagoon. The existing wastewater and the waste from the alligators
will be applied as appropriate to an 18 acre field in accordance with agronomic
rates and soil test results as provided by the NCDA Agronomic Services
Laboratory. Due to the size of these alligators and the small amount of waste that
they will produce, we,feel that this operation should be considered as deemed
permitted in accordance with the .0200 rules.
The future expansion of this facility is dependant upon the supply of
hatchlings from other states. Mr. Peacock would like to bring an additional 2000
hatchlings onto the farm each year until a standing crop of three different age
classes of alligators total 6,000. All hatchlings must be from out of state and
appropriately permitted from that state. Full compliance with the Endangered
Species Act and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species is also
required. No alligators are allowed to be taken from the wild in North Carolina.
The ultimate number of alligators on the farm will also be determined by the
treatment capacity of the existing lagoon and the agronomic application of
wastewater to adjacent farmland.
The production of alligators takes three years from small hatchlings to 70 lb.,
six foot long harvest size alligators. The' alligators will be fed ground chickens
which are the mortality of two nearby poultry operations. Excess chickens will be
ground and frozen into blocks for later use.
The farmer wants to be in full and complete compliance with the rules of
DWQ before significant poundage of alligators are allowed on the farm. His
schedule is have a complete animal waste management plan by October of 1998.
This is to address waste handling, storage and treatment and land application. Ben
Knox of the NCDA Agronomic Services Division has offered to prepare the waste
management and application portions of the plan. NRCS has been contacted
regarding the engineering specifications.
The following description of water use and the nutrient composition of the
waste has been extrapolated by Dr. Tom Losordo of NC State University (from
Pardue, J. H. Et. Al., 1994. Treatment of Alligator Farm Wastewater using Land
Application. Aquacultural Engineering. Vol. 13, pages 129 - 145.). If you have

any questions please contact Dr. Losordo at 919 515 7587. These computations
are based on a 1000 head facility.
For a large scale production facility 2 gallons of water per animal per day
should be planned for use.
Raw wastewater
BOD5 —
452 mg/l =
7.541bs/day/1000head
TSS =
379 mg/1 =
6.83 "
Volatile Solids --
219 mg/l =
3.66 "
Total P =
10.9 mg/l =
0.18 "
NH3 =
77.5 mg/l =
1.29 "
NO3 =
4.6 mg/l =
0.077 "
TKN =
153.4 mg/1 =
2.56 "
I hope this information will be of assistance` to you. I look forward to
hearing from you soon regarding this project.
With all best wishes.
Sincerely,
ZThomas W. Ellis III
Director, Aquaculture and
Natural Resources
cc Mr. Tom Peacock
Dr. Tom Losordo
Mr. Jim Cummings

James &Graham Nart4 Carolina Thomas W.'RIGS, III
Commissioner Director
Pepar#men# of �Srirulture
jXgwu-ulture aiv. ,NMtur71 esmrrt>'s
August 28, 1997
To: Randall Wilson
From: Tom Ellis d-y---
Subject: Alligator Containment on Farms
Pursuant to recent legislation, alligator farming is allowed in North Carolina. The
restrictions include provisions such as indoor production only, hatchlings must be
from other states, licensing as an aquaculture operation, dead animal management
if poultry or livestock are utilized as a food source as well as compliance with
provisions of both the Endangered Species Act and Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission is charged with adopting guidelines related to containment including
fences and buildings. Enclosed is a copy of the legislation.
I predict that we will only have one alligator farm in our state due to the lack of
availability of hatchlings from other states. This proposed farm in Richmond
County, has complied with all conditions appropriate at this time, except for the
containment guidelines which have yet to be adopted. They would like to bring
alligators on site from Florida in early October.
The alligator regulations in Florida and Louisiana are extensive, however the
rules regarding containment simply state that the alligators must be contained.
This is apparently due to the difference in the types of operations. Most of the
alligator farms in these states are out of doors and utilize native animals. Any
escapement would be of no environmental concern but of a financial nature to the
fanner.
Post Office Box 27647 Ralcigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

� f �
I would like to propose the following containment requirements:
1. A perimeter fence with a height of at least 4 feet and depth in
ground of at least 1 foot, be provided. All gates shall be
securely locked except when the farm manager or
employees are working within the fence.
2. The building shall be of concrete block construction. Any doors or
other entrances shall be kept locked except for periods of time
when work is ongoing within the building.
3. Roof structures may be hinged in a manner to partially open to
allow ventilation during hot weather. Block walls shall be at least
30 inches vertically to prevent escapement during these times.
NCDA will make at least annual inspections of the farm to insure that all
requirement are met.
If you have any questions or would like further information to be provided to the
Wildlife Commission about Florida or Louisiana's rules or our effort to develop
the CITES plan , please contact Rebecca Dunning (919 793-4118). For other
information let me know. I will be available to discuss this with the Wildlife
Commission if appropriate.
Thank you for your assistance with this over the past year and a half.
cc. Rebecca Dunning
Original has been mailed.

1
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
.lames A. Graham, Commissioner
Raleigh, North Carolina
AQUACULTURE LICENSE
In accordance with the provisions of GS 106-761, 1, James A. Graham,
do hereby grant
SANDHILLS GATOR FARM
the following aquaculture license(s) for:
X Aquaculture Propagation and Production Facilities
(including -Holding Pond/Tank)
Commercial Catchout Facility
Holding Pond/Tank
These licenses are conditioned upon compliance with GS 106-761
and the regulations implementing this statute as adopted by the North Carolina
Board of Agriculture.
The above described license shall be valid from January 1, 199 7 through
December 31, *� 2001.
Permit Number 0300
Date s .1s 97
James A. Graham
Oomrrussiotier of Agriculture

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
1997 SESSION
SENATE BILL 816
RATIFIED BILL
AN ACT TO ELIMINATE THE NEED TO OBTAIN PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION TO RAISE YELLOW PERCH
COMMERCIALLY IN SOME AREAS OF THE STATE AND TO ALLOW
ALLIGATORS TO BE RAISED COMMERCIALLY.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
Section 1. G.S. 106-761(c) reads as rewritten:
"(c) Exceptions for Species Not Listed. -- The following fish species that are not
listed in subsection b of this section may be produced and sold as if they were listed
in that subsection with the following restrictions:
Hybrid striped 6ass. striped bass. - The hybrid striped bass shall
-
basins. in Eliese basins , Production propagation,
and holding facilities in. the Neuse. Roanoke, or Tar/Pamlico River
basins for the hybrid striped bass shall comply with additional
escapement prevention measures as prescribed by the Wildlife
Resources Commission.
M Yellow perch. -- A letter of approval from the Wildlife Resources
Commission is required before the yellow perch, perca fiavenscens,
may be. raised at a facility located west of Interstate_ Highway 77."
Section 2. Article 63 of Chapter. 106 of the General Statutes is amended
adding a new section to read:
106-763.1. Prona2ation and production of American allieators.

conviction, , An ol2erator convicted under this section may not be the operator of any
other facili . y rewired to be licensed under this Article for five years beginning_on the
date of the conviction."
Section 3. This act is effective when it becomes law.
In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 11th day of
June, 1997.
O NNtS A WICKER
Dennis A. Wicker
President of the Senate
HAMW J. BRBMER
Harold J. Brubaker
Speaker of the House of Representatives
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr.
Governor
Approved .m. this day of , 19
Page 2 Senate Bill 816

09/05/1997 13:15 9197330454 ROLLINS LAB
James A. Gratmm
Commdssloner Peiii rtment 11f &griculturg
Peieril erg Pi6ision
PAGE 02
Dr. GemW C. Edwards
State veterinarian and Dtrecsor
Dr. JX AWA Director of Laboratories
Dr. JA. Qtrim, Assistant Director of lAborstoties
ROLLINS ANIMAL DISEASE DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY
September 5, 1997
Mr. Tommy Peacock
486 Old Laurinburg Road
Hamlet, North Carolina 28345
Dear Mr. Peacock:
Reference is made to your request to feed dead animals at your
alligator premises in Richmond County. Farm location QBSP #1.4-
136-25-02.
The North Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) has reviewed
your disease managetfient plan, visited the site and discussed the
department's livestock and poultry concerns.
You may use this letter as a permit to feed dead poultry
carcasses to alligators on the above premises in accordance with
the following:
1. Poultry carcasses are to come only from the Roy
McDonald Farm (QBSP #22-004-10-06) and Sand Hill Farm
(QBSP ##22-005-01-21) .
2. Dead birds will be put in plastic containers with tight
covers at the entry to the farms away from the poultry
houses.
3. Dead birds will'be picked up daily.
4. Carcasses will be immediately fed to alligators or
frozen and stored on the alligator premises until fed.
5. Containers used for this purpose must be cleaned and
disinfected prior to another use.
The department will make periodic inspections°of your facility to
determine if all provisions of this permit are being met. This
permit may be canceled if the NCDA determines Chat the operation
presents a disease threat to livestock or poultry.
Rollins Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Rose Hill Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
Box 12223. Raleigh, N.C. 27605 [phone] Box 37, Rose Will, N.C. 29459 [phone]
Western Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Poultry Disease Diagnostic Laboratories . Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
Box 279, Arden, N.C. 28704 [phone] Box 476, Robbins, N,C. 27325 (910) 949-2.241 Box 39. Edenton, N.C. 27932 (919) 48z3146
Northwestern Animal Disease Diagnostic: Laboratory Griffin Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
P.O. Box 70, Rifkin; N.C. 28621(910) 526-2499 Box 2193. Monroe, N.C. 28110 [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEHNFZ
Wachovia Building, Sulte 714, Fayetteville Ni
FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 �� C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

09/05/1997 13:16 9197330454 ROLLINS LAB PAGE 03
Page 2
September 5, 1997
if additional or different sources: of dead animals are needed,
you must notify this office to get approval..
SincerelWAti
' �
Dr. J. K.
Director of Laboratories
JKA/ch
CC: Dr, George C. Edwards
Mr. Grady.Dobson
Dr. Jo Anna Quinn
Mr. Jimmy Collie
Mr. Tom Ellis

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEEHNF;Z
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville y� FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 N%[Wc An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 i 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

fames A. Graham
Commissioner
Ev"a fFtr RECEif�Cll�tir/
s + y APR 18 1947
,WIIrt4 �ttrIIltn�t AEG, �FFICEr. George C. Edwards
State Veterinarian and Director
P,epartment of ;kgriiculturie
Peterinarig Piftistion
Dr. J.K. Atwell, Director of Laboratories
Dr. J.A. Quinn, Assistant Director of Laboratories
ROLLINS ANIMAL DISEASE DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY
April 17, 1997
Mr. Grady Dobson
Environmental Engineer - DEHNR
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
Dear Mr. Dobson:
Reference is made to our discussion regarding feeding dead
poultry to alligators.
The responsibility of the Veterinary Division of the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture is to -'assure that dead animals
which are considered diseasecb are handled in such a manner that
diseases cannot be spread back to livestock or poultry.
Before dead poultry could be fed to alligators in North Carolina,
we would require a disease management plan. If the plan was
approved, a permit would be issued by this office.
Attached is a draft plan for alligator production in North
Carolina, which is being submitted to a Legislative Study
Commission on Seafood and Aquaculture. Our concerns are
addressed in item 4 on page 2.
If you need additional information please call this office at
[phone]. For more information on raising alligators in
general, you.may wish to contact Mr. Tom Ellis at [phone].
Si rel
Dr J. K. Atwell
rector of Laboratories
JKA/ch
Attachment
CC: Dr. George C. Edwards Mr. Tom Ellis
Rollins Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Rose Hill Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
Box 12223, Raleigh, N.C. 27605 [phone] Box 37, Rose Hill, N.C. 28458 [phone]
Western Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Poultry Disease Diagnostic Laboratories Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
Box 279, Arden, N.C. 28704 [phone] Box 476, Robbins, N.C. 27325 [phone] Box 38, Edenlon, N.C?, 'Z?32 [phone]
Northwestern Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Griffin Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory
P.A. Box 70, Elkin, N.C. 28621 [phone] Box 2183, Monroe, N.C.28110 [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

�raFf
The Commercial production of alligators for meat and hides has proven to be a
valuable farming enterprise in several states (Louisiana, Texas, Georgia and
Idaho). There is significant potential and interest in expanding production to
North Carolina.
Alligators are raised in confinement in buildings. They. are kept in the dark and
are fed ground meat (poultry or swine) or fish. The alligators are introdu ed to the
facility as hatchlings and grow to between 4 and 5 feet in length in a years
Alligators can be tagged at birth. Eggs are either taken from the wild, by
permission of the appropriate state game agency, or are produced by captive brood
stock.
The current North Carolina interest is from Richmond County. The proposal is to
utilize the mortality from poultry and swine operations to feed the alligators. This
low cost food will compensate for the cost of heating the facility in the winter.
The proposal would bring hatchlings from Florida to North Carolina for grow out
and processing.
The impediment to such a farm rests with the state Wildlife Law (113-337) which
authorizes the Wildlife Commission to regulate wildlife except as specifically
authorized by statute. There is no mention of alligator farming in the statutes.
Alligators are currently listed on both Federal and State Endangered Species lists
and commercial trade in such animals is highly regulated to protect the wild
populations.
Nothing in this proposal should be interpreted as an infringement on the authority
of the NC Wildlife Resources Commission to regulate the wild alligators in our
state. This is simply a plan to allow an agricultural commodity from another state
to be grown to harvest size in North Carolina.
The legislation necessary to provide this opportunity while protecting the state's
wild alligators and other resources needs to include certain safeguards. The
following conditions are proposed for your review and consideration.

1. Only hatchlings, with documentation from the state of origin will be
allowed into the state. Records of numbers, tags, etc., would be reported to
NCDA and kept on site for inspection by NCDA or Wildlife Resources.
2. All hatchlings shall be tagged prior to entry into the state.
3. All production and holding facilities must have 'a confinement plan
approved by the Division of Wildlife Resources.
4. The use of swine or poultry for feed must comply with a disease V
management plan which must be approved by the Division of Veterinary
Services, NCDA.
5. The processing of the alligators must comply with regulations for other
aquaculturally produced species.
6. Compliance with the CITES requirements shall be the responsibility of the
farmer. Any expenses incurred by the state in assisting in compliance will
be the responsibility of the producers. , .
7. Alligator production shall be considered a form of agriculture and shall be
licensed as a part of the state. aquaculture development act's licensing
authority.
8. Severe penalties for any inclusion of wild alligators.

�Q�..ut laR� Po7twntkR f�iNE`}
_ _ pew r 10- u_.---
GLlowtaRri►f-44t ~� rPoSJ�ilyt
F4aaR DRAiN�
PAC, "
�rA�J
,4tjbh, GCS G Ai-o F r�R M
r�.
3,95
f�ab 1,,iL �t�Ak6 lop fJc l<c
Ll
g � 1 aLo c- rn �/,�, t,, p L i 14 r, n'1-7 .;. 'ter
- - 76 ,Ct�� a aN
DY��airy
729 ✓z ?
DRaiN GXtAYJ VT J
T
T,3�FFQD aA'14��//
.s /A p t
12 C
rL2
ly
$Nr'= C o,vCr2 Tr-"1l.
i
3
I�41
s
ii. Cpn>� KDi_
e
j{fi0M � G
r
N
T
kpeoO0
ape
l{ FF LIP �
J Fo(� l�i�A�1�
�Vt k� iGI
lao

rtodtlne O Comvlalnt O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other I
Facility Number r2 7 / 1
Farm Status: ��57�red
Date of inspection 1 If-14-97I
Time of Inspection ' or' Use U hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Fun Name:*-- Slertl County:. �iC.�&WA'd
rr
Owner Name: /� C�+yna 1� - - Phone No: 9 t p g.9 5-_--q5y1c
AMIlog Address: �t'y �+'� - �c lC 3 Lai. T A) G 29'31
Onsite Represeot;gvs? C ►► Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
� A�■1� �i7f�i �l.�i;R��7l�effTf�-1=�i � rrTi�:llr.. a�r4Ititl f� , /�
-Latitude �• �� C�" Longitude �• �� ��
l\ot Oper—st—lon'T'l Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Systyx r;:i'"• r�'e�K
Swiae,�f >Lfr w �=�Pou1 F ». Number,,. �{ Cattle�fumber `; 7 '� Number m hy`:..
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ " -
,�,� +�d
❑ Feeder to Finish; ❑ Non Beef
Farrow11 o Wean t �# " W x '!d { � i n r t} ��..
sL€tea ��, ,H '✓ fi'$C &
El w o Feede
113 Faagw to Finish er Type of Livestock
vim, S,
, 7- fJIM
i 4 #.,,.S - i�, t,.'';aS',.�i . .v" ' }a : r �r 1,�,nS �'� ...x •t%``�• u.. .kt+..in
.r.��°":�Y �.9 "^ Ar�•��S '5.:� �•ra i� �' 1 Yt�T4 s �k# x�.. "A.�es
r kNumber o,�f Lagoons /Holding Pbnds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present�
.
. - r ,� �.
x�aR." :.lu Lagoon Area .<: ❑ SprayField Area
h,
rh+°+, r.,.,, Mra ram, :;o,+�t'„u,. - vt ..,t <^•:•,. 3. ,`` , ✓'e� ,', it - -
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancefunprovement?
❑ Yes
UNo
I Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
®No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
© Yes
16No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the'estimated flow'in'gal/min?
NIA
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
a. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
R'No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
10 No
maintcaancelimprovement?
Condnoed on back

08/2b/97 08.41 USDA -RURAL DEU.-->19104860707
_„Y ECM Pg. 01/01
• .... \ • J
- �VVI • ii � w� � `7
4,� N 7 H
i .r ,•�5 5
5.1
1, 4 5, 1�11 t 7 ► y { fm MAIQ*RT^ •I
— Is; ^ •? • .. u \ n b a �.(•� ,• ►r , J•�•a'a /.ws.e Q. cKlAn
h! f I
AWL, 01
Sill
� 0 .. � � �7]■ 1 f. 1, 7N „tf. � 5 r � hr.r
{J 1 ••� R Jill. Ian ,T J �- ], ly,•
.°� ► '? !ui {^ntee '•'� �'��, ClOSU, .SYp. !� ■ �7
♦ �•'�1] VJf 11ir . �, off'" s . �a R� I
\ µw
J ,UAM,
ti
3 ML
RQ cim rVl
r, 0 1 ■
lZ,O■ � ♦ J1 k.. �
dr
LAU
i • r,' Ilia `F+��.'.,,�a, uw
I,
12
I Bar
a
I , �
,bl b
lm
•� ♦ G