620001_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
N a LT.. U QM.. 0 6
ftorb"nt of Environmental Quu1

Y
` `State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources i &71'01�WA •
Fayeffevllle Regional Office r
James 8, I Bunt. Governor ED� H N
Jonathan B. Howes. Secretary
DiV1Si09)F WATERQUALITY
May 27, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Johnny Adams
Adams Egg Farm
Route i Box 94
Tray, NC 27371
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Lack of Necessary Lagoon Storage
Adams Egg Farm (Reg. tl52-1)
Hwy 109 North
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5/7/97, staff from (fie Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
inspected the Adams Egg Farm. It was observed that the liquid waste level in the lagoon
serving your operation was dangerously high and overtopping at several paints along the
embankment. This condition clearly does not meet the minimum 19 inches cif combined
freeboard and storage criteria.
Although no waste from your facility was observed entering the waters of the State, this
situation poses a significant threat to nearby surface waters. Consequently, it is of the
utmost importance that you lower your liquid lagoon level immediately via the spray
application of waste on an established vegetative cover during appropriate weather
conditions. In addition, it was apparent that the heavy build up of solids in your lagoon has
greatly reduced the storage volume in this structure. This problem must also he addressed
in Girder to consistently maintain the minimum 19 inches of combined freeboard and
storage. It is strongly recommended that you consult a technical specialist for information
regarding the removal and disposal of the solids in the lagoon. It is also required that you
have the enclosed certification documents completed by the appropriate technical
specialist(s) and submitled to the address listed on page 5 by no later than June 30, 1997.
Wachovfa Bullding. Suite 714, Fcryeitr ville I - * FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 NV4F C An Equal Opportunity Afffimotive Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

i : 4
.LAMES 13
IENR...
} v
�.t
HUNTJ.1. s
A
Johnny Adams
AdamOs Egg Farm
Rt l Box 94
Troy NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION VWENLD
AaLl
April 17,1998
.1?,� 2 3 1998
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OF-FICE.
Subject: Classisfication of Animal Waste Management Systems
Facility: AdamOs Egg Farm
Facility ID #: 62-1
County: Montgomery
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on
June 21, 1996. This bill requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in
Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal waste management system that'serves 250 or
more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000
or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our records indicate
that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is available for animal waste management system
operators. For information on the training programs please contact your local Cooperative
Extension Agent. Operator certifications are issued by the Water Pollution Control Systems
Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). For information on the certification
process, please contact the Technical Assistance and Certification Group at [phone].
The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system is based an the
nature of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the
animal waste. There are two types of animal waste management systems, Type A and Type
B. Type A animal waste management systems are generally used to treat waste generated by
monogastric animals which produce a low -fiber waste. Type B animal waste management
systems are generally used to treat waste generated by ruminants and other animals which
produce a high -fiber waste. The type of training and certification an operator receives should
correspond with the type of system(s) they intend to operate. For more information on the
classification of your system please contact the Technical Assistance and Certification Group.
As the owner of a registered animal operation with an animal waste management system, you
must designate an Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the
WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to operate your animal waste management system yourself,
you must designate an employee or engage a contract operator to be the Operator in Charge.
The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or another person, must
possess a currently valid certificate of the appropriate type.
Sincerely,
" 74—
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cd/AW OIC Designation
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Qualtiy Files
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
KO.Sox 29835, RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27026-053S
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLE0/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

ad
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 31, 1997
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Johnny Adams
Adam's Egg Farm
Rt 1 Box 94
Troy NC 27371
�EHNR
E C E�VE"D
NOV 1 4 Idyl
FAYETTEV IeLt-
REG. OFF=IGE
Subject: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and
15A NCAC 8F .0201
Adam's Egg Farm
Facility #: 62-001
Montgomery County
Case #: OV 97.053
Dear Johnny Adams:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and a notice of a civil penalty assessed against
Johnny Adams in the amount of $500.00. This assessment is based upon the following facts:
Johnny Adams operates an animal operation and associated animal waste management
system in Montgomery County.
As of January 1, 1997, in accordance with N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201
a certified operator in responsible charge is required to operate the subject animal waste
management system.
Iri accordance with 15A NCAC 8F :0201(a), the owner of each animal operation°having
an animal waste management system must submit a letter to the Certification Commission,
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Technical Assistance and Certification Group, which
designates an Operator in Charge with the appropriate type of certification. This letter
must be signed by the owner and the certified operator and be submitted to the
Certification Commission by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date.
In November, 1996 and April, 1997, DWQ mailed notices to all animal waste management
facilities who had not designated an operator with the DWQ.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/lfl% post -consumer paper

Johnny Adams failed to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator
in responsible charge of the subject animal waste management system, in accordance with
15A NCAC 8F .0201(a).
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Johnny Adams violated or
failed to act in accordance with the requirements of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F
.0201. A civil penalty of not more than $1,000 per day may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to designate an appropriately certified wastewater treatment operator as
required by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.5 and 15A NCAC 8F .0500.
Based upon the above facts and conclusions of law, I hereby assess Johnny Adams a
$500.00 civil penalty for this violation of N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 817.0201 pursuant
to the authority delegated to me by N.C.G.S. 90 A-47.2 and 15A NCAC 8F .0201.
Please find attached another Operator in Charge designation form. Please complete this
form and return it to:
WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If the aforementioned operator designation form is not at the above address within 30 days
of your receipt of this notice, you will be subject to further civil penalties of up to $1,000 for each
day that the operator in charge designation is not submitted. You may contact DWQ's Training
and Certification Group at [phone] for information about designating a certified operator.
Within t�days receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Please submit payment
to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535 ,.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative

hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You
must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14313-282.l(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief/DWQ
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626r0535
OR
3. ' Submit a written request for an adnnistrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
and
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to: E
Mr. Richard Whisnant '
Office of General Counsel
NCDENR
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which
occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],
extension 581.
Sincerely,
a
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. .
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/attachments
a

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE NIATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
PERMIT NO. )
ENVIRONINIENTAL MANAGEMENT
C011v2MISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADNIINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed*civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division 'of Water Quality
dated, , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , I9_,_ '

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
-QPERAIQR RN CH RC,
DESTGNATION FORM
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Facility ED Number: County:
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address.
City State Zip
Certificate # Social Securit-v #
Work Phone Nome Phone
Signature Date
OWNER
Mailina. Address. City
State Zip Telephone#
Sianature Date
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535

Site Requires Immediate Attention: IV 0
Facility No. ( 2 - I
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 3utY Z o , 1995
Time: 15 . v o
Farm NameJ4wner: Ada wv s E22
a v nn I � o i, Aw
Mailing Address: Rt 1 B" 91 ?'ro N C, :17 37,
County: _ i'i ON't!) O nwt
Integrator: i Phone:
On Site Representative: 3cHHN•j Aacx5 Phone: 07W) 5572-3531
Physical Address/Location:iau.T /o`I of" l,��i�v►.; z R;y�v
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry ✓ Cattle
Design Capacity: 510oo any"r. Number of Animals on Site: Si, 00 d
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude• «
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately l Foot + 7 inches) (fR or No Actual Freeboard: .3 Ft. 5 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the Ia oon(s)? Yes or® Was any erosion observed? Yes or®
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? �& or No
Crop(s) being utilized: XOW CV6 ukN4---V R f-
Fes c tee..
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? di;)or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes off
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Lure: Yes oxg
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes ordQ If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover c-rob
fp)? Yes orr
AdAAditional Comments: / �` ; S rL3i S �en-C� o s ;3p M(AJc Q - 1 FG V Wti3 • OwAoe-Y J ��►+�
_['1-�•i—S Y s W e, r Ki r N QC.S 4o o bjcL i I`/ a Qd P r% 6*e d•� � s J'MPNRI S-s"A.4
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

rIzo
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Fayetteville Regional Office
00% A
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor p � H N R Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 14, 1995
Adams Egg Farm
ATTN: Mr. Johnny Adams
Rt. 1, Sox 96
Troy, NC 27371
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On July 20, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by the
Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our Compliance
Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility is
In compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being
properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact me at (910)
486-1541.
Sincerely,
Ricky Revels
Environmental Technician IV
i'7:71
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

s
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
JOHNNY ADAMS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Natural Resources Conservation Service has previously
provided Mr. Adams with a waste utilization plan for
disposal of effluent from his lagoon onto fescue and bermuda
grass. This permanent vegetation will be planted between now
and the middle of May. An irrigation design has been
developed and approved, and will be installed in the near
future. This plan is being developed to address the
immediate need to lower the level of the lagoon so that it
does not discharge to surface waters and to allow time of
approximately one year for establishment of the permanent
vegetation.
There are two fields that will be used for disposal. Field
No. 1 contains approximately 3.2 acres and will be no -till
planted in corn. Field No. 2 contains approximately 18.8
acres and, it will be no -till drilled with a rapid growth rye
grain normally used for grazing.
This plan calls for pumping one and one half vertical feet
of effluent from the lagoon. Below are calculation's of
volumes of liquids and nitrogen content of this liquid.
Surface area of lagoon - 1.5 ac.
Removing 1.5 vertical feet = 1.5 ac x 1.5 ft - 2.25 ac-ft
2.25 ac-ft x 12 in/ft = 27.0 ac-in
Nitrogen content = 90 lbs/ac-in
Total Nitrogen being removed =
27.0 ac-in x 90 lbs/ac-in = 2430 lbs
Total area available for disposal = 20.2 ac
(1.8 ac of field no.2 will not be used due to steep slope)
Amount to be applied per acre = 27.0 ac-in = 1.34 ac-in/ac
20.2 ac
Nitrogen applied per acre -
1.34 ac-in/ac x 90lbs/ac-in - 120.6 1bs N / ac
Maximum application rate = 0.3 in/hr

SLUDGE ,
Mr. Adams plans to have the sludge removed from the lagoon
with a track backhoe. It is recommended that this material
be stockpiled in the area between the chicken houses and the
lagoon. With it stockpiled in this area any seepage as it
dries or any runoff that could occur would run back into the
lagoon. This material should be analyzed prior to final
spreading. After this material is analyzed Natural Resources
Conservation Service will be glad to assist in developing a
plan for proper disposal.
The following acreage for waste application will be needed based on the.
crop to be grown and surface application:
Paid
sad
Type
Gap PA&LIHo
ylela
`j 1.1s. V
r pwAc.
I�
A &$
tta. Y 4 Worm of
Utilized { Apolkadon
IBAD lt.a
f T�iT� ,�,
c ti R �i
Iza Rd. 4 20.6
Z.Z
3 g (c
�f MAZL H
tit I I1 1 13.0I I M C
Amount Qt N Produced
Swo•w+r CwHat
Narrative of operat{on
Call the Soil and 'Mate: Conservation District Office after you receive
waste analysis repo`- to obtain the amount pe= acre to apply and the
irrigation application rate prior to applying waste.
?=eparad by P� � .3-
Name icle Date
Concurred in by
_-duce= Date

1 /� �• �,r� Al `a •'3,4 ''' . ' : , , ' ','s
-A
�r yi%r,� Nit,
i2—A
1 v t t• �i- �j1RJ t+►��' ! ,r'r w,s V �: !� i`ii P•. 17, �'j'1
�• `,�• .}Kt
4`• +j 'ifr�•.'ri'.'' #'�'�:-�4''.� R. �} ''M
�'• KtI �r1:. 1 Rri J•••:. )y
a` =i. t. `' ►.':'i' 1 ie:,r j�R�} �ff'Ri:- [1.\l:+�rs, •'i; ri 7�:
/ ..�} ,a T.•'• .`. .'/r i•; ` 1 'f _! ��.'Y1!''*fAi��.#:i•''. .�•
�11'•'.'+}•.. 1•.i.h �ri� rJ:r� ..
low
1:P l ,' t• i il� �.i. r +i} �I�fs`* 1 •`i''b 1 ft'`.1` 1. Y;i
�•' ■ 1 {+ �
.. � ✓ � ' .•,•'� . � •rt'.� �' � ,.:., 1 4'�t�f�Jy; 3Y r'... wt �.,'1{r}� ;t'; .
'�+• r :'1 �''�' ,# ,1 •5ni br,,1,� �. e (S,��Sy i �� ,'�• 4 y� , +� �,i„�-,,'lil:.� \�.,.�• � � ` ,,�' 1•{F� �.
i'l 1 ".�- �, '�ti` r, �• 'r rn'�r{l,' .=`I'ri� r'l�-'i#r� i� '�y� f_ry'•yn i
SY� ` ItN. IJ 1''►r; VI .1�, fjI.�!�t irsrl; y� .�rL!•1•� ,�
w ` /1y+ i�r}{'�r'� r� �, ' > 4—
w• , �• "t •' '1 r j1f '' !# �' 'i '� (` i!. � lii , d�t�'1�' tC •j
'iplt
fo
f m rrl �� • .'
VN r ►ap f
S, k.. ,�j! ,'y'r /` �} ' �: Y . '[�• ,
u' . t � � .� .\ 1 \>' , .�•' l.'s� '� . � 1'-, r C, ' . J '11E,.� f � y, .Ir r� S(1 `' ��
fil' c�``� � k- ca► '• 1,i\, x '�H.'• .�, ` 'r:l.,;:;�M. r :, l��f� ,;I�•',,w r ..r�. ; �` �� ,���", " �'-� • �t � '"�. ,r �,.
S'!,. {`r �'i �''}{ 1�,i1` .. �t1i� i'. '/} "�y :1; 1� +�y\.t,.��"r •.` r /rt /,` .+ w?, .�r,
IWF
E. M� .'� '� .t'•, ,.�}x .i,'. �•'' �: ���rrrrr...•.. �a,h' s�\•.f ::i f . R1}ya� '` �t;+• '; ,` r..,1 .� `�.. .r, *�: s•,h;.ti'[ •i•i r l:�l �.(yr Y,', �. l''1 t•/
�► J Z � ,v . ,' ; i' I t '� ., rf . ti ; �11 af= ` 1. L O
.t �i 'i' � �' •rr� � •� �13��'�'''1•"r• � pit +••M�
:; 1.:�_r .i,.r �i•'`a ` �� •�. r f 1 i� ��• w �r r r!!'� � t j `�"�'�►�i��.s �13��.r�+k�' ;;'�
.�.,� '�'J �i ":.y ••;� �,- .� ri 14:.J'11,,)�. ,�,?,�.a ,�Ss;1 •'L�'��Ir �1,w1:,�
�' Y �� ii' i �r , �l�r V. I'* ' �. rl .fit �+7tFr �t T y'
r/ ti w x i } (I T' 1�:f. ' 5it;� •�'
�•• .,,,5,., ! ��� �'i'. ,,ti.{ , tEr• •T• . / •. yam~+.. r •�.
q. x� y, :..� !; i t : tz.; �`�; • ;.:fit' ' 1
` * _'
`e`, a" ,it •�� ry 1N±7tL`' e?••k�E !i' 4•;'+e
rr'•'� lY��rg, �Rf � Y �' , r /1: i'tt � sLt" f�'' :,. �;rat• � i y• ,�f• �i; •-•j .
i, 41•`/ �,, •r 1'�' .. t* ir1�= 1'e ,'' i ,'v;, .�Y:1'i 'ri yjJ d.t� �.u,.�.yr� + d':} �.ti•1 ..
Si��.•M' ,% � �r .t •�\.1 '�T. ,v �!L'i�h'��k S� fl Fri. ` ,�!ll,r L''t+i:f'1''.>��ifrl. �`�I.
i1.•,',` TT�,� #;.;,;.6. rf ii .:� ly ,,.� "'fi.; .. V � r.. i= '� ..y'• r '!,, s i' .. d �• +C. y�'•.r":r�•• {
r'` _ �![�K.t �,•ci .•�i �}:� : {,.fi' ..fj+ r � '�a .u• � �ptr• 7Y',.1 d �a..!cL.'t�F� <
� S 1 '� •ri 't�� c '1.5, �i i� •r ~.� !� �*'•'45•r +�!•{I 't��a il' ��•1
i ''�•►' : ��...'•+•�4 '�ti !: .*,� ,� 'aa.F1 i+lr"i Ltir�r�',',l
,fu' r r �Sti� p S'a�' ll.. \•y. 'i,, y.
•.:� M�.1� •< i.�irr 'e �' .� 7 .rllf.:. .. .y';, ��q � •. }r�ts�, �••�e;�} �r ryf.tir,,j1�, ., .� I;ti wj� � �#
ITA
,. '�rr�r'=^i';., 5ti�� ••5;��';;,.ti �r .Ir � ��.��":.7; •�ZV/1:� err -�' yja[+,:C�•,r�'�F� t�;:;+!�i'yd'.•�-`,��'�; .�1�,i+,���;�����'1` '�1
.sue . `� `' i+s' tr': ` ` 'i•.T�yi ,r',1!ti ' ` ,% �il "4'` '�;�, �� 0., �" +I �#� is+r� �r r``�:.
=/�L] �' niy '•i!~'ki..�r- \ u ` ~� 111�.{ '. n4�fax`'r F,1�1•\;v/arl 1, Jv�: 1 .,■]}
IN
_ �1` , -/ � +• y��' .�• r 1 'S � �l .r+yl-'j • `' a1III."' ��f },,. �� i'��i.�
' '��4�'{fr i�` � r 1�' ,7\a �-' ._� y,i.f� I�1�;� ��ir :i °4 s4 frt � '1 �••,VV ' r r;��ii� � % , ��i•'
f, ��l,';;;{'+� ,;irk{i/}� M ))i•� .�.,�•� i,•'li;: u-.h'/f -� �'
1�.. .lt;, r�. fit. r1j `S �•�Y•[. ,,i t� r T �• ''�" �' 4 • 1 at�"r.,�''! y, ��1, sri't ♦ �1�
i,Ti �•y!f fyif��,�i,,l_���r 'ar. `�F r� r ..i � '. ., y":�i,"''• '-� � � '' ��� 7 i'i•��
y i'; i +I��Er{:;% .,K ��. 1 N r }}'' �'�r�r�% •t,• • �. ��•fff��pCy aTT "1f► � '
N "'1:. .3'�~J.r. r' t. r, ,, r y '��' f{'ry '� ' ,��{;.ri �j1'• rye; t�•J.Y".. !!•;`. ...
L itC' 1 �y'i���.r.•'1. :i"''�y'`! rw w•r,,;»s W•
'c: . 1 /r*�ry4;�•� M + ,
y,t y + �'�.ir.;.7•..cr eS .. ,y�t.t'.' 7..,,. v��y'i�1.• j;'k,� 41• ^t r�r,. '.`�,
'I.r�vs ,�,FI%' { ~ r'IL. 7 +�7, 7 :Y+rTt
?.f, ryt' �f �', �r%
, ;' • • ,I `�,{ � ��.��� k,'. �.Y. � �{'i�a•� j.�'' ;{'r.; �' � � /d. '�-`•din . � � �, '� ��`.� I' _..t,
,

•
ot,
4 f:l?P -,6,1
I
44
Ap
Q6
---
Iq At
VIA
Me
Nq
`'"}
4 4
ui 4
k Xvu C
V.
' t ' ��� r Oc.i �' ;j,; . % r� � i. 7 �r.` �i �:�+ 1:•i. �f,��•':jv'�c. { �: �;,: � �- �;_, �:! t; � �i, ,
111A.
V.
CA
IV
14a'
IF
U
Vk,4
Qk
t
AS
* of
I� bk.
INZ 4;
j"
d.T.
ml
I" wn-,�
py,
Ii7
4AW& rt.
Vat.

iE$Np fiolfiij D!vWcb--;-4300L
Grower.. Adams, ohn
Copies To. County Extension Director
R1. I Box 98 Hwy 109 N.
KnM Ben
Troy, NC 27371
Buchan, Ed
-.sr- �.,, Analysis R -hor
Waste L�ortFarm
Buchan, Ed
Suite 714 Wachovia BIdg-
Fayette-vifle, NC 28301
3/14/96 Montgomery County
S=pk m
DAN N P I Ca A(g S Fe Mn Zn CU B Afo
a Na Ni Cd Fb
AMMI
6% 191 1407 167 32-1 46.4 5.56 0.97 1.27 0.09 1.82
188
Waste Code.-
Nutrients Available for First Crop OW1000 PROns
Other Elements I6sII000La—flons
ALP
Application Mdbad N P205 K20 C4 Mg S Fe Mn ZIS Cry 8 MO
d
Na Ni Cd A
Oawriptiolv
Broadcast 2.5 2.6 11.3 0.97 0.19 0-27 0.03 0.01 0.01 T 0.01
1.6.
Pouf�oou Liqi
i
MR vo
oN. --
O"s maw _

02/24/95
10:26 TY110 572 9066 ANGELA :i: CAROL
SCSI L & WATER
C0NSERVAT10N
Montgomery Soil & Water Conservation District
227.0 North Main 8treal, Troy, N. C. 27371 • phone: [phone]
COVER SHEET
FAX TRANSMISSION
In case of difficulty in transmission of Fax, please call (910) 572r2J00.
19001
TO. 1 FAX NO.jID / D O07
FROM: FAX NO.
DATE:
i
RE :i1 n rt. _ir3td� �vY1(.caf' .r,r�S�'� nvt
NOTE:
Total number of pages (including this cover sheet) S—
Transmitted by:
Time:
0
i

02/24/95 10:26 %T910 572 9066 ANCELA * CAROL
10 002
e
iAI,f cu) STATES OIL 227-1i NORTH 1~I/lIN 91"HEFT
DEPA(RTMEIIIT [IF C ONSIIIRW1T WN ; TF CJY , NORTH C ARCIL I NO
AGRICULTURE S E R V I C;E 27 =+"71
October- 19, 1994
Mr. Johnny Adams
Fit. i , Esprc 9C1
'Troy, North Car-+alina 2-7371,
Lear Mr. Ad acns s
Attached i s a cf.)py of ynur Waste Utilization Plan for your
pouItr5,, operation. Please review and sign the Sig attire pzye
th imt is marked with a red "X", and return it to mf, in the self-
-Ad
drPcseci envelope. Mr. Darr will also rteeci to sign the plan.
YOU May I.eF,:p the remaiminq pages f:oi- your records.
IMPCJR:7"ANT -- in addition to speci•Fi.c.ations in your plan ---- keep
in mir'+d that the Calcium that; bLi.lds• Lip of^01_tfld YOUr• ot.ctlet pipe
need to bce removed and dried for, several weeks before applying to
1 ant-J. Thi 5 should d bf_., removE.--mi every 2•--. year-s in ordeir to
rnnti nt:ai n the adc-quate capacity of your l aueon.
If YOU have any questi.onn, please do not hesitate to call.
SinCereIY
&e-XL
fing a D. F-li l 1
Ui stri r-_t Conservationist.
Attac_hfnents
FEB 24 1495
WV. MANAGEMENT
till IJJILLE REG. OFEIC

02/24/95 10:26 '0910 572 9066 ANGELA .:. CAROL 1@003
d . . V
POULTRY WASTE
UTILIZOTT.UH F'LAH
MD617L•:i1fIERY C:GUN'ry
PRODUCER: ;So 1r] R s�Arr+"ti.5._..._........
k:I Ck�,1 OF U1:'l_RWr I i1N.
f'rf'F OF WASTE F (tC 1.1 i 1'Y -
t'1atr r and mi r quality protection require proper
rna_r-tzi.jemer)L of organic waiaGt.e -From ragricultur aj, optn-r-m-t:inns.
Rt�:cycl i no o+ agricultural waste mates-ii.k1 s by land
application for plant uptake and crap production Is a
traditional and proven waste application technique.
Properly y done, rac:yu l i ng by 1 Lind tapr.A. i c;at i mn and c:roFa
is -rr e rivi r-onrrrc-m L- al 1 y .iourid rrrethod o4: wasti, ma.nagpiiien t .
Your poultry waste management +acil.lty has been
r t?si.gned +or a given rtor akge capar_i ty. When the waste
reaches the de si yned level it must b* land applied at a
specified rate to pcil l uticm (if sur--FLzce and/ter gr-OL.md
water. fltie plant nUti--ientS in the animal waste should br,
encourage d so that 1a13. plant nutri eats can be hat anced far-
r e.--il.i.stic_ yielcis o+ the c.r•op to be grovrrr.
SPECIFICH`I'lONS QUIDS
i� a{:.t_or a ar-r� i mport not in implementing yc_,ur wa5t,e
-ion plan in urder, to rnar;irrtiZrr till -Value
ca+ ..,rr ►J'tO a.nd to erisul"tr that it applied in an
environmentally safe manner.
1 . -rhe? Troy Field 0f+i ce rnL(St have: doc:Ume-ntai: i c%r+ in thr
?,IIS'Z3`iyn folder th".-At: you either- own car- have, fang tvrm access
Lo adegi.t,wte land an which to properly apply � f, ie waste. IF
yOU do not own *desgLHIte I and on wh i ah to proper 1. y atpp 1. y
waste, you shall. provide SCS with A copy of a +-jr:i.then
agrrtcomr?nt with ;a 1ra.ndowner!s? who i!:/a;re within rceaaonabiP
pr o;.• i mi, ty 7 ---d 1 owi nq'I yULl t M US:rJ t hrr•2 land for r-aa4.t m
application #or the: li.,Fe es;rlectanay of thE! EDrcacUc:L-•iun
f ac,i 1 i ty . iThi. t� document -,i yned Lit the, b;--,t, tocrr by 1 ondow hers
will be If an agreement is:- di as-olved you are
rempon ible for obtaining sLfffirienL land to continue. r_c,
,•,Lpply /our- waste .in Ran envi r-onmentT.0l y saf* manner-.
2. Waste shiAl l he opp.+ i Lid to mefei: thcy rd trcigen rll,cdtw
Fc?r� rr�<l.isti.c yield%; based on soil type, ?vailabl.e mcaisture,
his-tor-ica1 data, c.liFri ate condi.tiono , and levc:r1 o+
managr;mont , unI eels there gar~-F3 regUI ati on t:h at. re--itri, ct the
ratm o•F 4-1ppIical.i;:,n of other nutrients.

02/24/95 10:26 U010 572 9066 ANGELA * CAROL IjE004
3. Animal waste shall not l':+t applied to l a.nd er ceding at
grimatr:r- than 5 ton5 dyer- acre per year.
4. Master sl­iall be incorporated immediately after
Spr-eading nrl r-spas FLIbje.'t:A to f l oocJi ng. Waste i s not to E)e
applied on areas sub Ject. to f l oc-ldi. n g Unless i ncor•'p€orati ian i m,
used -
5. Waste shall not be applied to sistt.€rated soils or on
land when the sur•¢ace is, frozen.
b. Apply waste to growing cr-nps in such Gi manner that
no more than€ 20 to '25 Percent. € f the loaf Rrerc is covercu.
:/. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or
winter for spring plarrted crops or', soils vjit.h a high
pote+ntii�l -for leachinrl L�nl,es�s s1_+ecia.l prccal.€tioni; are raktar€
tc, mi ni mi : e leaching and er€akrl on . NaL=te r1L1tri r=r'lt 1 t);--%di ng
1"c�'k.�s nn +_1"iC-SP_ 15C,]i is %hvuld be hold to a mini.mLAM wi titer
cover— cr-ops plimited to takrz- €.Ap r•-Pleased nutrients.
0. V!aste shall. nat be applied closer than 25 4:faet: to
5U1l F 6CF i.—jolter. 'I"his d i s t?SI'1c rfiR-%y he rc-�ClL€f::ed P- '-C1V;€ € od
ad(z qu a to vegetativef i 1 ter stir i p5 %�r"r� pr eserl t .
4. Waste ,hall. Tint be spplied cloWor 'thcln J00 ft;,ct from
aiater- wel 1 z for t' urrraln cnris,ump ti sin.
10_ hlaete shall not be applied closer than 2.0,0 feet: of
dwc 1.1 ings other then those owntid by the l arlduser..
11. Waste shall not he applied in a airmen i- not to reach
other prclpwrt,y and f.)trbl i(Z r^i�;lht--oF 4�tys.
needed
to apply the pool t- ,
wastr,7 are t.+ckse.d on
t}
n- _t' rient
ci:ant'.erlt +or this
of bird. Acreage
r
fonts may
bc? rroria or Less. I
Dn Lhe wastes cinalysis
r"epw, L
+roar your
ar._�sto rr+ariagemen't
i 1 i t.y.
1:1_l; _clr�rc1r;_gi_nur�>s,tE...!nr��gr�rn!:.,..:t.4,i i.;r.`f..,..?._,•t?,F1...r�tl„_thr-_
FVr)clunt q+ Nitrogen pr•r:adUC-ed pc_,r yi:—ar -
W..,10 r birds Y. 73 lbs W/trird/yr = Z3823 tr_t al. N
-----
AMc+c.+nt i ag non t_i qui d to pomp p v�,r year-,
.i_`:�c=s€_► t> .:.:. ,��:�.1. Clt�l-Ions 1,1. _ . 4' t7a1 ].rnCy/yr
it of Lagoon Liquid to Sump acres
r10 last 1_: .82 �-icr,L-irlch - 42.?7 ac:rez-incch/yr-�
iis(jg

02/24/95 10;28 U919 572 9086 A GELA CAROL =05
Fhe following arre,:g, for waste Epp1 icotiran will he needed
Laeed an the crop to be grcyn and : ur f ice opp l i cat L Qn:
-,y.•.EIELD! SOIL! CF:UP;
F:EALISTIis; LUX.!
AMESII_BS, M.
0014TH(=)
11 T`F'E �
YIELD
I .'ACRE 1
; l!TILI7.E
NFRUED
z V 3 ; .s i+�� cr�ud�:
G 7"`�Rc-_
1 3-0Q '
--� 3300
J
`� TONYAG__
_._ ...t`�
Zoo
3--_-
cue_
--' _
-°0Q ---t
1 f 1
1 1
1
1
TQrAL3900
-) 75_:
��!�F�us OP
1:yEF���T
l+I�_rr:3ti. •.•E �•f l_IC]r'r�tir,��1:
L.FmC1anr_r miens to in=tc' T 3 waste irrigation Er_r.elri to laid
E oly his poultry waste on f iglds of Ber"lill'.na Gramm and
FesiC: e which wli. J l Ne cut for hay.
Call Ohs 'McMqumery M I and Water Conservation District ��..,, -
L.I�� f• i r ys 4i' tmr you -acei ve Nost e C�r!:.1l ys i �1 report to obtain the
amQunt per cars to apply prior to applying the waste. The
number i5 (9105722=Tf"Ir;i. /� q
p{:;1:P<:,RED
Angell 0. Hill
CGPhi:;UF:M Es,;
1 •�_ Tin j 1-,.?.[T'_

United States Natural Resources 530 West Innes Street
Department of Conservation Salisbury, N. C.
Agriculture Service 28144
---------....--------------------------------------------------
Subject: Eng- Adams Egg Farm (Johnny Adams) 2-13-95
Irrigation System Design
Design Review & Approval
Montgomery County
File Code:210
To: Angela Hill
District conservationist
NRCS, Troy, North Carolina
Attached is the approved design for the Adams Egg Farm
irrigation system. This system was designed by Ronnie wall
of Gra-Mac Distributing Company; Mocksville, N.C. and
approved by Angela Jessup, Civil Engineer, Yadkinville, N.C.
I have revised the waste utilization plan to include the
items noted in Angela's letter of approval. If you have
questions about the additions made please give me a call.
When I talked with you on Monday February Gth you stated
that Mr. Adams had told you that he may try to do the
installation of this system himself. If Mr. Adams pursues
this course of action additional information will have to be
provided for review and approval before any work is done on
this system. Following is a list of some of the items that
will be needed:
1. Detail drawing of typical hydrant or riser installation
including all concrete details and dimensions.
2. Detail drawing of motor and pump installation including
concrete details and dimensions, and piping from lagoon to
PUMP.
3. Detail drawing of end cap and drain line assemblies
including concrete details and dimensions.
4. Detail drawings of all elbows and tees including concrete '
details and dimensions.
5. Material specifications citing the applicable ASTM for
all components used in the system.
The above list is not all inclusive, other information may
be required.

You should inform Mr. Adams that if he decides to do this
work himself and proceeds without providing the needed
information the Natural Resources Conservation Service will
have to withdraw assistance on this project.
If you have questions or need additional assistance let me
know,
H.J. Pate, Jr.
Civil Engineering Technician
cc: T.N. Wetmore, Jr.
A.G. Jessup
t

UNITED STATES Natural Resources Technical Services Office
DEPARTMENT OF Conservation P.O. Box 8
AGRICULTURE Service Yadkinviile, NC 27055
Subject: FNG - Adams Egg Farm (Johnny
Adams), Irrigation
System Design Approval,
Montgomery County
To: Angela D. Hill
District Conservationist
USDA -MRCS
Troy, NC 27371
Date: February 6, 1995
File Code: 210
Enclosed you will find the approved design for the subject solid set
irrigation system. This system is approved as designed by Ronnie Wall, Gra-
Mac Distributing Company, Mocksville, N.C. This design does not include
electrical components necessary to operate this electrically powered pumping
system. Mr. Adams probably will want to contract this work to a licensed
electrician.
The major components of the approved system are: 1 - Berkeley B2 1/2-25 HP
pump & 3 phase motor, 2 - Nelson F100 guns and gun carts, 5 - 6" x 6"
hydrants, 9 - 4" x 4" hydrants, approximately 1,400 lin. ft. of 6" dia. PR200
PVC pipe, and approximately 1,500 lin. ft. of 4" dia. PR200 PVC pipe. As
documented in Mr. Wall's letter dated 12-9-94, the lengths of pipe included in
the design were estimated from aerial photographs; therefore, Gra-Mae will
need to supply written certification that all materials and installation have
been completed in accordance with the approved design and a set of "AS -BUILT"
drawings showing the actual layout of the installed system. (Please note: If
any major changes to the approved design are required during installation,
these changes as well as the supporting design documentation must be submitted
for approval before the changes are made in the field.)
The waste utilization plan is approved subject to the addition of the
following information to the plan:
1. Due to the high volume of solids as well as significant levels of heavy
metals, salts, and other trace elements usually found in lagoon sludge; the
existing lagoon sludge should be removed and properly disposed of prior to use
of the irrigation system. Future removal and disposal of sludge should be
addressed in this plan. Practice Standard 633, Waste Utilization, Table 24A,
page 633-16 contains nutrient values for layer anaerobic lagoon sludge that
can be used in developing this part of the plan.
2. Since this irrigation system is in close proximity to Highway 109, the
plan should recommend the establishment of trees to provide vegetative
screening between the highway and the irrigation system.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service,
formerly the Soil Conservation Service,
is in agency of the
Department of Agriculture AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

Adams, Johnny
Page Two
3. The plan needs to address the management and disposal of waste during the
establishment period (minimum one year) for the fescue and bermuda grass,
After these additions are made to the Waste Utilization Plan, please provide a
copy to Jerry Pate for his review and approval.
Angela G. Jessup
Civil Engineer
cc: H. J. Pate, Jr.
T. H. Wetmore

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
JOHNNY ADAMS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
This operation is a poultry layer operation with 52,400
birds. A recycle flush system with a anaerobic lagoon is in
place. Natural Resources Conservation Service ( formerly the
Soil Conservation Service ) did not assist with the design
and construction of the lagoon, but it appears to be
adequate. The landowner plans to install an underground
solid set waste management system. The system as planned
will cover approximately 14 acres. The landowner plans to
plant 3 acres of fescue and 11 acres of bermuda. Liquid
effluent will be pumped on this fescue and bermuda providing
safe disposal plus water and nutrients for hay production.
LIQUID EFFLUENT VOLUMES
Liquid effluent volumes to be irrigated are taken from
Practice Standard 633 Waste Utilization page 633-15. Laying
pullets volumes are 22,201 gallons per 1000 birds or 0.82
acre inches per 1000 birds.
Volume in Gallons:
52,400 x 22,201 = 1,163,332 gal./yr.
1,000
Volume in Acre Inches
52,400 x 0.82 = 43 ac-in/yr.
1000
In actual operation liquid volumes may vary above or below
the figures shown above due to high rainfall, drought, or
evaporation. Good management by the landowner will be
required for proper operation of this system.
PLANNED IRRIGATION RATE AND VOLUME
The system will be installed according to the attached
design furnished by Gra--Mac Distributing Company. Based on
information provided the system will over approximately 14
acres and will have 14 risers. Part of the system has 6 inch
diameter pipe and part has 4 inch diameter. Two Nelson Fla©
guns can be operated on the 6 inch line at one time. only
one gun can be operated on the 4 inch line. Gun performance
at 70 psi at the head using a .86 ring orifice will be 135
gpm at a diameter throw of 275 feet. Gun spacing is between
175 and 180 feet.

The following calculations will be based on operation of one
gun:
135 gpm x 1 gun x 60 min/hr = 8,100 gal/hr.
By operating system for two hours at each riser:
8,100 gal/hr x 2 hr = 16,200 gal
16,200 gal. W 0.60 ac/in volume pumped
27,154 gal/ac/in
Riser covers approximately 1.0 ac
0.60 ac/in = 0.60 in/application; 2 hr = 0.30 in/hr rate
1.0 ac
Volume pumped per cycle:
0.60 ac/in x 14 risers = 8.4 ac/in/cycle
Required number of cycles per year:
43 ac/in = 5.12 cycles/yr
8.4 ac/in/cycle
Time per cycle = 28 hrs
Time per year = 5.12 cycles x 28 hr = 143.4 hrs/yr +
(Time does not include moving guns from riser to riser)

SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Any anaerobic lagoon will accumulate significant amoounts of
sludge regardless of the bacterial digestion efficiency.
This accumulation of sludge in time will diminish the
treatment capacity of the lagoon.
This lagoon has been in place for approximately 12 years.
According to the landowner it has not had any liquid pumped
out, and no sludge has been removed. A large amount of
sludge buildup was observed in this lagoon during the first
visit to this farm. In order for the lagoon and the proposed
irrigation system to function properly this sludge must be
removed and properly disposed of prior to the use of the
irrigation system. The removal of this sludge will require
the use of a large trackhoe or dragline. The material will
need to be excavated, loaded on a spreader truck, and land
applied. Listed below are estimates of the plant available
nutrients contained in this sludge:
NITROGEN - 49 lbs./1000 bird capacity
52,400 x 49 lbs/1000 birds = 2568 lbs/yr
PHOSPHOURUS - 268 lbs. /1000 bird capacity
52,400 x 268 lbs/1000 birds = 14043 lbs/yr
POTASSIUM -- 36 lbs. /1000 bird capacity
52,400 x 36lbs/1000 birds = 1886 lbs/yr
The information provided above was taken from Natural
Resources Conservation Service practice standard 633 - Waste
Utilization, table 24A.
Lagoon sludge also contains significant levels of heavy
metals, salts, and other trace elements. Prior to land
application a laboratory analysis of the waste material and
the soil to which the waste is to be applied is highly
recommended. Once an analysis is obtained we will be glad to
assist with a waste utilization plan for disposal of this
material.
Mr. Adams has cleared the site where the irrigation system
is to be installed. vegetation will be planted in the near
future on an area of approximately 14 acres. It will, take a
minimum of one year before this vegetation is properly
established, and the area used for disposal of lagoon

effluent. Mr. Adams shall provide the Natural Resources
Conservation Service field office with a copy of a written
agreement with a landowner who is within reasonable
proximity, allowing him the use of their land for waste
application for a minimum of one year.
VEGETATIVE SCREENING AND BUFFERS
The location of this irrigation system is in close proximity
to Highway 109. It is highly recommended that the landowner
establish a vegetative screen of trees between the location
of the irrigation system and the highway. This screen will
help reduce odors and will help prevent drift of the
effluent onto the road right-of-way. A tree species with
rapid growth characteristics should be selected. Some
examples are loblolly pine or Virginia pine.
A vegetative buffer a minimum of 50 feet
maintained between the roadway drainage
perimeter of the irrigation system.
wide shall be
ditch and the wetted

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
JOHNNY ADAMS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Natural Resources Conservation Service has previously
provided Mr. Adams with a waste utilization plan for
disposal of effluent from his lagoon onto fescue and bermuda
grass. This permanent vegetation will be planted between now
and the middle of May. An irrigation design has been
developed and approved, and will be installed in the near
future. This plan is being developed to address the
immediate need to lower the level of the lagoon so that it
does not discharge to surface waters and to allow time of
approximately one year for establishment of the permanent
vegetation.
There are two fields that will be used for disposal. Field
No. 1 contains approximately 3.2 acres and will be no -till
planted in corn. Field No. 2 contains approximately 18.8
acres and it will be no -till drilled with a rapid growth rye
grain normally used for grazing.
This plan calls for pumping one and one half vertical feet
of effluent from the lagoon. Below are calculations of
` volumes of liquids and nitrogen content of this liquid.
Surface area of lagoon = 1.5 ac.
Removing 1.5 vertical feet = 1.5 ac x 1.5 ft = 2.25 ac-ft
2.25 ac-ft x 12 in/ft = 27.0 ac-in
Nitrogen content = 90 lbs/ac-in
Total Nitrogen being removed =
27.0 ac-in x 90 lbs/ac--in = 2430 lbs
Total area available for disposal = 20.2 ac
(1.8 ac of field no.2 will not be used due to steep slope)
Amount to be applied per acre = 27.0 ac-in = 1.34 ac-in/ac
20.2 ac
Nitrogen applied per acre =
1.34 ac-in/ac x 90lbs/ac--in = 120.6 lbs N / ac
Maximum application rate = 0.3 in/hr

SLUDGE
Mr, Adams plans to have the sludge removed from the lagoon
with a track backhoe. It is recommended that this material
be stockpiled in the area between the chicken houses and the
lagoon. With it stockpiled in this area any seepage as it
dries or any runoff that could occur would run back into the
lagoon. This material should be analyzed prior to final
spreading. After this material is analyzed Natural Resources
Conservation Service will be glad to assist in developing a
plan for proper disposal.
The folloving acreage for waste application will be needed based an the
crop to be grown and surface application:
FCC! Sall Clap Aeaiistic Us. ,v Acres $ us. N WRM of
Type Yield?!I Utilized Aapllandon
! �$AD 10 I
TATO I CARN I !20 i3il, �2Q• } 3. Z I 3$ 6 Mf�rzc:k -
7C7AL 2d• z
Amount of v Prmcucea
I Z
3wowa-af caticit
i
Narrative of operation
�j&vja7 NR�%-illll a.'t#1teT�� ���arZ�Ii1�L�i�71.
Call the Soil and eater consez"lation District Office after you receLve
:caste analysis repor - to cb taln t ie a:' aunt per acre La apply and the
:.=:igat:cn application rate pr'_or to applying was;e.
?=ena; sd by
14
Name i4,e OaCe
Conc r eda in a`,,
CdQcgr uata

POULTRY WASTE
UTILIZATIOM PLAN
Mf]NTGfJMERY COUNTY
PRODUCERz
ADDRESS: ,,. �,_.......... ._...7 .,._.......,...7Jr, Iv a..._..3..7._.1
PHONE: o
KIND OF OPERATION:.,
TYPE OF € ASTE FAC:l:l_:[ TY R ...__ .__.P���tr�.,..._._......_
Water ,and air quality protection require proper
management of organic waste 'fry?fit ,:griGl.4l'f:ur-al. operations.
Recycling of agricultural waste materials by land
application for plant_ upt.akm and crop production is a
t'.radi ti anal and proven waste application technique.
Properly done, recycling by land application and crop upEak:e
is an environmentally sound method of waste management.
Your poultry waste management facility has been
designed for a given storage capacity. When the waste
reaches they designed level it must be land applied of a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or- ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should V?
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
SPECIFICATIONS EUIDE
Several f ac.:t ar-s are important in i mp 1. emont.:i. ng your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value
of the wast':e and to E?f15aL.1re that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner.
1. The Troy Field Office must have ciocument K i on in the
design folder that you either own or have l ony t orm :access
to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If
you do not: own adequate land on whichi to properly apply
w as l.e, you shall provide SCS with a copy of a written
agreement with a .l,ancJc. wnmr" (Q who is/are within reasonable
proximity, allowing ?'r.:rc_r to use the land for was.to
application .for thc_s life expectancy of the production
facility. (This document signed at thie bottom by landowners
will be sufficient). if an agreement is dissolved you are
responsible for r._bti»aining suffic:ient land to cont:inr.am'h.,o
apply your waster in an environmentally safe manner.
2. Wasto shall be applied to meet the nitrogen gen nerd5
for realistic yieldm based on sail type, available moisture,
historical data, clAmate conditions, and level of
managomunt, unle ms, there are regulations; t.hat restrict the
rate of application of other nutrients.

3. Animal was-te shlal.l not bti applied to Land er-adintl at
gi- ater than a tons peI•- avxe F_im- year .
4. Waste shall bi- incorporated immediately aftEnr
spr"esd:.i ng on 4:+t_tt:i je.+c_t- to •f l r_► di r}y. Vjast:e i m not to be
applied an areas subject to flooding Unless, incorpor-ation i
used.
`. Waste shall riot be applied t(a saturated soils or on
land when the surface is frDZLIn.
• b» Apply waste- to growing crop, in such a manner that
no more than 20 to 25 pe=?r"cent (J'f the Iezk+ RI -ea OF3 covri"rd„
*I. Waste nt.ttr-iem-t-, shall not bcr? app1iv.ci in fi`.a11 or-
wirAer -for- gipr-inq planted cr-ups on saili-:� with a high
potential for- 1 ear- i ng unless special `1rE rzat.t't.l onvi c i-e. talren
to mi n l mi e leaching lg ate nutr l f rvt 1 oad i ng
re"ate a an t.hrtme soils shOI..tl d f3F_' held to a minimum ilnd wi ntei-
cover- crrps p1al')tE_`(') to take t.tp r"eale+=rcied ncat.riPrlt4 .
0. Waste shalt riot be applied closer- than 25 Beet to
ur'f rice water. This d:i st. -ince may he r-edc.ir eve rrnv:i 1- od
.-Ad(m�clt..t8AF_' Vf2ycftat1,v®r fi1.tcir- stx'jpEi ,:ar-'ey pr,(:,senk;.
9. t}Jast.e2 shall (ICA h.}e apjr:tl i e_ d closer th on J OC) •f ec t fr-om
alwatec welly -for- hLIe'{Ian CC_1nsc.tmption.
10. braste shall not be appl i erl closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the l andl_tsr'r.
11. Waste shall not be applied in a mannr r not to r-each
other- property and l:+t..tl:7.i. i. r_ right-of-ways.
Thr:= rucres, nec.�r..lc.?d tc) rappl y the poultry waste. ar-e trictsed C:+n
typical nt_(trierILI: cont.eirlt -For this t.yl::{ca of Lm.rd. Acr-e+�c�4�
Y-ecj .ti I'"F: men'I: s may be. rotor-e or 1 ems. f,r, se rl on 't hc- v.oa Fite analysis
report from your waste m+_anage,rnent;, facility.
The deli gt�_gfy_ratlr �Wa--Ae_ management .f aci 1 i tyi � I.)ased on U.
fc?i hca-i n . .._ _....._ .._.
Amount of hIi tr-ogen produced per year:
1i�4.,. t�lc�I birds .. 73 1bs 11/fair^d/yr- = 30_25 total. H
APIO(st•It of Lagoon Li r:}ui d 'LD pump per year:
bird:; >( 22,201 gallons cl;tllc-)ns/yr-
,.:. _
Arnnt.lnt of Lagoon Li yui d to pump pot' a crer
:, lrr'0 birds x .82 acr -incty !t;� .'�7 acr e--inch/yr'
1iOO

Th'te f of l ► wing acrengQ for waste pp l i c3ti nn will he needed
based on the crop to be grown and surface appl i at,LQn:
.,,--FIELD: SOIL; CF;UP;
PEOUISTIC:
LPS.rE. 1
ACKS;LDS. M.:h'00TH!W
1 T'YPE; ;
'YIELD :
/As: RE :
WII_IZ&AP
LIED
3 h e o u ��c_r Ada
" 4c,
S00 w_ _
1_I �_ 3300
_
^3
._•_-` .,...7
pr�
; T' cur++;
-rcN '.
�Ac
zDo
._.. ; _ .__0 _.
6
; (t'1arc. -Air` i
4!� .�e6
;
;
I
ru
TOTAL
AM[7(A T f. F N
FRODUCED.
332
UF,f=LUG OR
DEFICIT
Londowner pt ans to install A WaFte Irrigation E,r qTm to land
appl•, his poultry o. vhE-; on Kofds mf Derrrtuda Qr'e<., ano
F auue which will be cut for hay.
Call the Montgomery Soil and !hatQr 3 onsTrvation Di.wt;rirr-
G'► Mice a+ter you receive waste analysis report to (?h] E. ai n the
_+.mQunh per acre to :.rp)-`,v priar to applying the waute. The
number i5 !` 10)5 2--^I00.
PREPARED Wt Ll L 't, L /-0 —If— � �/
tangelo �►. Mill
CONCURRED E�Y: y --- O,/!M ._ ........._ �!' _'._.__..,..----- JC .�v-.v'�l� 9L
qzhnry i .tiara
O'TNEF': I _Ah•EDOa,srilrW; I. Ile AWL I W. derr Ill
2
y

GRA,-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TEI.RPHOHM ADVANCE EXCHANGE
19191 99a-3232
19191 998.3000
12-9-94 i
Re: Johnny Adams Egg Farm
Slurry Irrigation Dry Hydrant System
ROUTE 2, BOX 212
MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27028
This quote and specification information;is based on visual inspection and
aerial photo measurements only. Actual ground measurements and elevation
readings are not possible until the land has been cleared of brush and
overgrowth, Therefore, the actual installation layout may vary from the
attached design and pipe footages may vary slightly also. The labor
charge listed in the quote is intended only to guide SCS personnel as to
the possible cost of the installation and is not a firm quote from Gra-
Mac as to an installed price. There are no electrical components such as
wiring, disconnects, magnetic motor starters, etc., included in the quote
except for the 25HP electrical motor to'drive the pump. Mr. Adams should
have a local electrical contractor provide these items for him as needed.
The system is designed to operate two Nelson F100 guns at once with only
one gun operating on one four inch lateral line at one time. Gun performance
at 70 PSI at.the head using a .86 ring orifice will be 135 GPM at a dia-
meter throw of 275 feet. Gun spacing is between 175 and 180 feet (275 X 65%).
The application rate at this spacing is .42 inches per hour. Velocity
flow in the 6" SDR21 PVC pipe for two guns is 3.12 feet per second and in
the 4" SDR21 PVC pipe 3.32 feet per second. Pump selection was based on
a need of at least 20 brake horsepower so a 25 horsepower pump and motor
has been selected to insure proper operation. Pressure requirements
are listed below.
14000 6" PVC mainline ' @.,270 GPM 3.0 PSI
i 5 ao'- 4" PVC mainline @ 135 GPM G .0 ; 8- PSI
Gun operating pressure' 70.0 PSI
Elevation 10 feet 4.5 PSI
Mi,sc 5.0 PSI 204.4
`WF. F PSI 1W . 5 TDH
88.5
The Berkeley irrigation pump selected is capable of 275 GPM @ 86 PSI.

COIfPUTATION SHEET
SC"MG-423 Rev. "0
U. S. DEJ TMENT OF AQRICULrURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
STAT PROJECT
C R �.� .� �, sa ij N Y
BY TP DATE' n C CHECKED BY DA TE JOB NO.
SUBJECTT J
ar; !D Esc 6 t� EVALU f,T1 o rj SHEET._ Or
1 II
.... 3 �
2.t� Wr f Ir
}}
i;t;p-E Loss
P5 r
I
I
FQR:. ',�► bI Pt i S D R .I ...... ._P
_ -y L,t1Y4! (tU DMA W G'
IT Qr RrA
31i
n
;_.P. ...I_.. _t"---�'l:.� ► f ...�����.�'':; i .�_
. z _ _ ._.
x

©li@9i95 013:56 BRA Mr _► 11W)Ar_-.v7mn�
NO. 3%
erlceley's We 8 close -coupled end-suctloo ceill'I gat pumps arc
ideal for most applications requiring high performance, easy mainLonancue
and moderate tnifial cost. Gau iron construction with unique back pull-out
•II I design permits access to tlic impellor without disturbing the plping.
hit nillt 13n•1latll
11 ON-4fnlnal Cast ]mi. pm►4tlhlg
1111a litiCn{1th LIMM4.'try Irt inlnllltiia
14:i1fx:Ilnt1 uutl In8hflaln poslove
,tn;;lhlttfl(.1hGciaitnl nrlchlnt;d lu
Invpol' cllmpuncnt tal.'lting.
f4L7AIIA Sf1i'mmil11IIIt$I1lftr
voirhilly tir(rtmi Ify our luma of
I`111;llx t M Ill uuxl our hills
t;Ultl;L10,; lily thlrt11111i1s,, �p
1,111aliflity,111(111111R6'tit"t TRI
1 Hf;Il eili+:iL•11CI'.11 Ail
Iluilllr'll:111cf- mul 9111N1111.
I1011-1. It 1-111110;InCt. i III, hul
ii fir t' of IN, maii} critcri;i
ill' II: t' Ill It' Ir'tl.9141 1r1IN.
lhtdl•I,n'1f1A,N:N'11'A1611: ill;
51h791S\Il.1l, Fn•N� r Sl:u,
with t'In'r(1KI+n1 trnlxlnnl nielnl pony
111111'11irI 1114Inteourr•f1'rC tgxvltkzn
tllf( Iti,11h111Hn allralli n,44jum'i'
M1111211 IritAing, Ilplkinhl 6ridt1
: kn11n11k' [tic ltlx't't:ll tq>I+lftnU+aln.
4iIIJAIIIfir Cam ptiulhq;
;Itxl fls;+kdr1TM
I1u:n.gr:+rJ'n I��t11�t�x1a1
(�1llllill'IlE-I'�l'Y I'YI;III!R,L►ll
1' ll� r linitilh• lh+r,,hlc R+11t+h,
(ix SNIil1'rI11Y1lnY;t;1�':II
Ir1 I'II Ir it�t1'ti
t a'gvs Illy" -is, olid (Ittlmulntitlrrt
141:111+l lealpl'r;+1Ul11
n1il'I;II11la1-.111911
H1.11'I,1SRAilly, RMINIA:;K
h113n, FI1 l)?r S1N$A x
pillif ll's m;nllnllrn tnr%Wf(xl
fI'4whill k' ood 1111Si1Y H►illilit
fivill Nl'lll'_
VNI:N 1III:111111'1rW.1c
diltvilvd athl war111ilvd.111 11p1h111'4'
ivr111rovi", and pptlalhig diltivii I %.
i k,dianlcVIll;llatiml lit mhnT kvring
11VIM lend lom" Ott lift, I t�vd troll hicki'd
1n nndpr W1,11.'flimnled (IIr noINIIIIt141
vlTk'kauy of ixlltt pump I n1d mnhtr.
DI:;17I WIN*.
{ I1k1,.1 be 11IIt11+'d
11) IIIIC tll his,
pltlilinl>~ inr
i 1liiilllris•onI•t�licatt,
�Itliitl'k' mrlrlriy at'c
1:quhlllf•tl Mill hpo d
ft I tillillnll;SntIUI;SCt41l'hl'
rl:nxl;lyd rl�41 1'd:;9
I1t;I1l.%QAR11{
11ROW IVOR RIM:
arldtalik+oil lauilc (IIIN01.
1(114*111, ON:
inrl agxlr �1'1s plt'ri,�r lrllltu'lrlr dt�KlKn (111`!nt'r1'1+:ted
li}drrlulh't�liil•Et'n+�,1L1rk• [rrlln iltk•l-11:11k�! ti1J;(ti
di:thwm,,, 1hunIt)trintilcowtilrcllwormerAl
tl�+'. I V;+f'k Indl'in11 IGtit;;l111IUtv111 ci►��• It•ltxnal ;lllti
1t7ttdr vtlNnnn dll:pgllhlV; pii+lnTl'tlrnttn4kifK ctnR
1„nritlrll'iq,�lrwlk ntr Inplrlk't lilr lklitlllpR 11r4rfeilr.
%Q1DR-flOYKED TYPE as MATERIALS Of CON11TRUCTION
I'lift IMitrnr
Ales ousiritrthin
1:11n1RIIa01111rrl:ti li lrrlllrVllilnt
IttINlsu• 1111c+1 NnWIPP01011
CIIP1n11+11 tlillrflld I !i i'rlllrllgrn
Vr?ltfits Cmn
Ct1lot lrlln
AA7N1,WO Cl"110
Vid Iron
ASN . O Clots 30
li'cur Rhtt
11ttl117j'
•SNrll wil4 (INS' tH1,111111
Iltl,nYi•
iSTII IiiA tfi.'d?' f1I11
r'.
C�1iLht]q
r1$tllfhi0i:Ir11te;10
Qru117!1,.
d8I'll B8ii91+111YiCB7S40)
A.!ityteticr
Al NrlaitltY
„
I'l1Ft 111111
lltfll
11uIl
S CI71,1IO I:ltptas if1
da IAr jAYlokvt
Cnat•Irun
MW A'Td 1;1Rt:j3l1
..
Gr1s4 Uun
AbTtI A4U (,lrrtil �0
1i11itfl tYi 1Yr
d 11; N.S.
11 I! -I lit\ i
11h ;.+
dltii ilb'.
hmlt+:rll �ittb
4rlilaa�
1'rf111n*
�
� . - —
903
Mt'111�11
=I

W\~09/�5 Q8�55 8RA lihqC � 170463D887'?
.
SIM
Pik
20
IMM
29
"' F. ., - Foai
20.
350
Is
20
ISO
Ion
Pik
20
IMM
29
"' F. ., - Foai
20.
350
Is
20
ISO
Ion

• • B•IG GUN° PERFDRMANCE TABU IS U.S. UNITS
100 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 240 TRAJECTORY"
100 T TAPER BORE NOZZLES -
P.S.I.
Nustlo
s-
GPM PIA.
Ne7 zto
M.
GPM D!A•
Nozzle
A.
GPM DfA.
NntRle
AS,
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
.7-
GPM 01A,
Nnttto
xs-
GPM DIA.
Nos41e
'a. CIA.
GPM DlA.
Nor lie
GPM DIA.
Nettle
.9'
GPM OfA.
N04s1e
1a•
GPM CIA,
�twIQ�
SO
'A >z'
20 °s w
�;:01 :uLi230T,
a1103' r„"e 240.'.5
115 256'
. 1201FM270t1
136 203,
^`tt0 :•;,i250y '
130 I6S'
T-00 260
ISS 225'
;;i5s:.1; ,3"osiae
;t134,,:a.:2Sa'::
ISO! 273,
-1d4L:�. �60a1t
177 302•
s,
--- :614.}
','1a2' 2aZk:'
165 260'
i.1 w:
127 310'
-„T r-s
i 210�r;..325 r+
`_-r.:•.r,,:'::;:1':': Z
204 M.
Z:Mr.rCT:r$isr^
243 336'
�-
r:2Sa.4, z..�54.-
50 205'
�
64 215,
--
74 225'
07 235'
�$USEMI D'
103 263,
p.,+i4SrxY.a4szd:
100 245'
1d 6D ti
120 275'
s"�...'so, c,140�y29$'i•
70
�-
4:430.r
60 225'
-
75 235,
60 M,
, 4
90
,t00:V
110
60 245'
M72Z3T=MKfSZ37
76 255'
a3 256'
92 273,
100 27W
111 290'
117 203'
135 205,
4�1305
Is$ 300,
Txf63-'' 31'13
171 324'
175 at..
195 335'
201 326
�2I'CA-L33at'r.',
222 344'
223 33S'
Z2JS
247 3S5•
274 362'
j280r' .322
301 3a0,
129 30Y
160 31S•
'Ayallabte only with 1`100 A 5R100,
100 R RING NOZZLES .
100 DN DIFFUSER NOZZLES
PSI
.71RING
GPM DIA
r7Pjr4
GPM DIA
aIRING
GPM DIA
&4RI11G
GPM DIA
.09RING.
GPM DUI
.93AING
GPM DIA
9eAm
GPM DIA
D.SON
GPM DIA
0.6am
GPM 0iA
-03ON
GPM DIA
o.nDN
GPM DIA
40
66 208
78 212
a1 215
103 224
lie 235
a6 168
91 142
lie 126
134 230
i' SM
152 242
4S 4S4
`
sgm4
.,:�...1 ui'
�� ,
' ��5:117
E . 'ri�91=
110 200
� r.,.
142 216
at 235
91 255
96 240
1'Itso 2G5
110 245
127 275p�������,
7`
141 270
S"ii15 Q" is`
163 300:1r�-pp,�109
164 275
iS L -295
30S
183� 200
2ti 31 Si,i
-
4/ zY.A
.x t r•cwsf+�
Gi ,t
�1. `315,�
'�ktv
, ..c*'^�"T._rx'n._
r
_
100
105 27C
1200
1.12 295
1132 30S•
31srn[.
102 320
.'.lUj4rj25^ .
2t2 325
?�22�2:73]5�
236 33S
k
0 I
M �$�
T�:��ea�3��
—
err.-..� e'�rY?'�
�s t w �
_ r-•.r+r
-The dlarnoiar of throw Is apPrOlImal°ly 3%1e30 for the 21• trajectory anolo. 6% Iota for ,0•,
150 SERIES BIG GUNS -- 240 TRAJECTORY"
14n T TAPER BORE NOZZLES
P.S.I.
Nozzle
.7-
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
9 '
GPM 01A.
Nozzle
1a•
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
ta•
GPM DIA.
Nozzle
1.1'
GPM OtA.
Nozzle
1.2"
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
1.3'
GPM Wk
.,tj50:::
60
L-L6; t00$i1;1YAO
Ito 265'
2 :% 2
,i: :.ti310».;:r_::I.-
225 32S'
3..2<5;�"7w� 310.'d
260 355'
290 375'
tii�?3a5aB5t_•y�?"370
320 305'
255 ► =330'
275 345'
i.t�',x.29.5,';:C;i:380::.K'w
315 375'
3?S''...1..=300'r.:_�a
': r3007'� " 31Sr
3J0 365'
i. 355•' . 3l10,
380 395'
385 380, r
.." r...4.fA ,.
445 410•
Sao 440'
S�Sa'"^r450,'rt"
545 4a0'
143 255`
'
102 305'
=WU 320'.L I.2.
J-%0 (Ye--
n0
'~
100
5tt.t6
t20
:�.,�
128 290'
16S 310,
210 335•
143 310'
157 33D'
10S 330'
51(
235 355'
A%n3B5:
355 t00'
,�„�,•r"A10G�w
365 420'
425 42W
:',.wg451A36r
465 440•
204 350'
250 375'
150 R RfNG NOZZLES
P.S.I.
Rimy
As
GPM Dix
Ring -
X.
GPM DIA.
Ring
I M.
GPM CIA.
Rinp
Ilia'
GPM DIA.
Ring
1.25
GPM DIA,
"in
1.34 �
GPM 03A.
Ring
1.41
GPM DIA.
Go
165,' zE?ASlV."
5'i�;r.»32a`-t;,�;
27S 335,
293,s, `.,c330',sL"�y ..,�4
315 360•
`r�r«-s 335 zr 370'y„�...
ass Sao
�s'�.',..+`37Q��s,;;390;
305 4D0• _...
:y,,;.300;-�;;335.,�:�
=350+y;.,.,..3SQ'"-
110 2G0'
143 260'
102 am.
�73� euytU;
r..-•:1.�11
210 320'
22s ass,
',"�z'i'is2W5.^,`�„+�330'j; +tTy;•;u
it
200 ' 340'
=...ti275:, . ;t9S0 C �
z9D 3aD
3" 350,
=4355�065:�r
MI ....'..
300 380'
Cd"ii4051 , 390�'�'uimz"'�•.475.T
42s +oo'
;,,"•-,�4iS.:.'r'iS:O'
465 42W
305 365•
•�" i.15-� {r�+�'�.yyBD,,
a..r^v Aw:14a,.'
445 305'
Dbd1
soD +ts
I-545 435' ~
,;mo
no
120 200'
Ws 300,
MU
,00
�'•�
t7o
^=W=330:1"
s43 3oD
1as 3xD
Ti�i93.1047,::!',:35Q'""';
z3s 340+
u.';;3053705
320 30ir
157 515'
204 335•
250 3G0'
"The dtarnalor of throw 1a approalmatOly 3% lots for the 21 • trajoctory an01o.
200 SERIES BIG GUNS - 270 TRAJECTORY"
,nn T TAPER RnAF Nn77LES
PS. I,
Nozzle
GPM ' DIA.
Nozzlo.
LP
GPM DIA.
N°zi19
1.2•
GPM D A.
Nozzle
Ix
GPM DIA,
Nazzlo
1,4'
GPM DIA,
Nozzle
1S•
GPM DIA.
Ndzsle
W
GPM CIA.
Nozzle
1.75'
GPM DIA,
gusto1A5•
19'
GPM DIA•
'I Got
70
za0z
90
�.w1D0A
I10
Ti1203I
130
'
7 h'
3054:.390'af;
;u'%M5 .".:410':244s,-77
400 430' „
= $I��4SO==T.SQ0=—
545 465'
,:;,:575W,,r,480'.,s
GOS 495'
�a3o.W�:,':so5r•�-•'w
655 515'
$55 4S0' T
.470.:d„:Lu675i1�4a5'=-
US to$,
.t,yaBO";a;'600'h;,,
69s SIS'
�725;..ts3o'M :
755 540'
•y 630 46S'
:'
715 505•
,::;:755;; ;,520,L;;;
790 535'
�r:,�d2S',,;,";ssa �
660 S60'
„;7—,sos- 470'.;
755 406'
ra05M54lF' �.:.-t.650i�:S3S�a
855 536'
„ �j1ti13d0", „SSO't'•'
045 565'
� 96sT•^'seo�
1025 390'
4: 495':i,;
a90 515'
loos 555'
_.;r,.1060.�Y''.57.sr,—
Ilia Sao,
M'iiao;�,eds
13 62t1'
270 360'
=2bQ=7A=
310 390'
340 410'
i�•�
J70 42S'
310 M.
=�nO
350 410,
�S
390 430,
S�XO��•
425 445'
355 395'
415 410,
iS�US.:vM30ai
475 445'
yd'.500 :4fi4'
525 470'
•r'"`.."S"ASi;:'Aed:•u
S6"r 405'
fA)
405 '425'
O.,G
445 450'
GiL-hsr
465 465'
Inn R RING N07ZLES
FAA,
1 14' Rtng
`1.29^ sauna
AZT Of&
1 %1 Ring
0.46" aduall
GPM DI
1 yy- Ring
(1S0' aquae
GIM CIA,
1 !p' Ring
040, aarlall
GPM DW
I %I Ring
(1.741 aUuaq
GPM DIA.
1 rA- Ring
j4A3• aczusn
GPM OUL
2" Rlhq
(193• liOVA
GPM OM.
r.26Ds�
U
1
QS.�-..+"37QA�'
365 300•
=W0C.ZY,405C'{' r
::r,.:�I,4a0: w:�::..790:.:....
445 410' •,
,;n."A"o A60�,� •'.425=
...vA7o.•:.:::ld:���r.,a.�:
S1S 425'
=55S.,.'�,440 i[;y;
.. S3Si.�..'.:::<�'i:..�
565 440•
:=w 630�s:�+''455�,. C,
+:..
69s 455'
r: •.755itr, 476u'
s0
z: 70'&
250 340'
:m`f0.}` r '
330 370'••
=
00
%Blom
100_
>;•
,a,1"�
120
290 370'
ZOVOMMMMU
325 300'�{r�
y0,._�i�' i.T.r.
66
355 410,
380 400'
CMU6M=737$i:
425 425'
44S 420'
�'�i'7 zsR S
Soo 445'
.•�T.•1
23��.`,rti5,;e":w
515 440'
y�*.' .rC55r'T
57S 465'
=T.T
a...iAO.f�.'''.r'471i t.
G30 4a5'
'r?asi-'11Io'r1r^!'
Sao 455'
=Fff2S ».AVV=-'..
600 480•
^'T7�
�1,I;D95 ..,,z •49A:.,..c70D-
725 500' �
yas6os�
675 47W
.s7is .iaS• .
755 500'
^f, T� �tr'•' r; Z
„Si0 -
~ 025 520' ~u
'�"'tacoa"2s'
gas 400'
=r.- •Es5=s:kNai'=--
900 52W
.�'i-645.;•,,,A53.i
Of15 S45'
% ''-I S'=sao•.t,•,;
465 445'
4WSWOM 3Ai '
345 465'
I A56itF.+3w'47DI='' :"
'The 6amoiar of throw is appr9slnwtoly 2% lost for the 24• Irajoctvry angle. 5% Ives For Old 21 • tralworf a"td.
The DIG GVW pollormucd dale has been vt WAW under Word test cendblons and may Do adversely alfdclad by wind. Poor, hydraulk drlltancd camilront at orhor lactart+.
Nelson Irrigation Corporallon makoe no ropr°soalallvn logarding droplet eondllivn, unilormily, or applicituori tale. 7,

1 of '3
Agri -Waste Managem,ent
Biological and Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, AlULTSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
1. SAMPLE. COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
L. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 Ibs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors.
IL. From storage ,
a, Collect about 2 Ibs of manure from under the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. Liquid Hanure Slurry
L. Under -slotted -floor pit
A. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over and
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered loser end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from S or more locations or at least I quart.
d. Mix and add about ]/A pint to nonmetallic sample container.
if. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. 'cake sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper•ag;tator pump or propeller agitator.
h
b. Take subsamples from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
+ Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

2 of 3
. C..1lix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
L. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on and of 10.15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10.15, away from bank edge.
c, Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within 1' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
L. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and the
other 4 subsamplas- from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6' by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix. and add
about-2-3 lbs litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
U. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18* into pLle.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.
k

3 of 3
It. SAMPLL' PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any ocher way,
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, Create, cc transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable Way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample cnzitainars and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricu.lturaL Lib, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 uhitepine Road 2320 S, Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 IJhaeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
Li, Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 Winton Road
Raleigh, HC 27604
Ph: [phone]
iv. HASCO
901 Janesvilia Avenue
Fort Atkinson, W1 $3130
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
C. The NCO& provides this service for North Carolina residents.
L. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/'Waste/Solution Advisory Section
glut Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
U . Forvard $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, tte.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery. finishing; turkey -breeders,
.brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter: etc,)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine-pLe
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv, Routine analyses performed an all samples: N. F, K, Ca. Ng. Na,
S, Fe, w.n, Zn, Cu, 8
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM. Kb,"Cd. Ni, Pb

rA
GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING J4 ING COMPANY
A
J7r;t7�JN ,tirr�r';i ti"r'!'nir�r'
COMN1_r'rr IRRIrn7'LON SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE ROUTE 2, BOX 212
(0101 888.3232 MOCKSVILLE. IV, C, 27O2B
M 91 998.3800
Ms. Angela D. Hill
Montgomery County NRCS
227-D N Main St
Troy NC 27371
RE: Waste Water Dry Hydrant Pipeline System for Johnny Adams
This letter is to confirm the installation of Johnny Adams' waste water dry
hydrant pipeline system. The system was installed by Mr. Adams under Gra-Mac
direction and according to the design specifications. Materials used were as
originally quoted; such as SDR21 PR200 PVC pipe, steel epoxy coated hydrants and
ground entry Z-pipe.
As designed, air valves, pressure relief valves, and drain valves have been
.installed properly. Bury depth of the PVC pipe is 36" and proper concrete
thrust blocks have been installed. Mr. Adams has been instructed on proper
operation and maintenance of his waste water dry hydrant pipeline system, with
special emphasis on buffer zones and application rates.
Sincerely,
Ronnie Wall, President
Gra-Mac Distributing Company
r

United States Natural Resources 530 West Innes Street
Department of Conservation Salisbury, N. C.
Agriculture Service 28144
--------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Eng-- Adams Egg Farm (Johnny Adams) 2-13-95
Irrigation System Design
Design Review & Approval
Montgomery County
File Code:210
To: Angela Hill
District Conservationist
NRCS, Troy, North Carolina
Attached is the approved design for the Adams Egg Farm
irrigation system. This system was designed by Ronnie Wall
of Gra-Mac Distributing Company, Mocksville, N.C. and
approved by.Angela Jessup, Civil Engineer, Yadkinville, N.C.
I have revised the waste utilization plan to include the
items noted in Angela's letter of approval. If you have
questions about the additions made please give me a call.
When I talked with you on Monday February 6th you stated
that Mr. Adams had told you that he may try to do the
installation of this system himself. If Mr. Adams pursues
this course of action additional information will have to be
provided for review and approval before any work is done on
this system. Following is a list of some of the items that
will be needed:
1. Detail drawing of typical hydrant or riser installation
including all concrete details and dimensions.
2. Detail drawing of motor and pump installation including
concrete details and dimensions, and piping.from lagoon to
pump.
1
3. Detail drawing of end cap and drain line assemblies
including concrete details and dimensions.
4. Detail drawings of all elbows and tees including concrete
details and dimensions.
5. Material specifications citing the applicable ASTM for
all components used in the system.
The above list is not all inclusive, other information may
be required.

You should inform Mr. Adams that if he decides to do this
work himself and proceeds without providing the needed
information the Natural Resources Conservation -Service will
have to withdraw assistance on this project'.'
If you have questions or need additional assistance let me
know.
?d 'V 0-r-L.,
H.J. Pate, Jr.
Civil Engineering Technician
cc: T.H. Wetmore, Jr.
A.G. Jessup
f

UNITED STATES Natural Resources Technical Services Office
DEPARTMENT OF Conservation P.O. Box 8
AGR I CLILTURE Service Yadk i nv i l l e , NC 27055
Subject: ENG - Adam Egg Farm (Johnny
Adams), Irrigation
System Design Approval,
Montgomery County
To: Angela D. Hill
District Conservationist
USDA -MRCS
Troy, NC 27371
Date: February C 1995
File Code: 210
Enclosed you will find the approved design for the subject solid set
irrigation system. This system is approved as designed by Ronnie Wall, Gra-
Mac Distributing Company, Mocksville, N.C. This design does not include
electrical components necessary to operate this electrically powered purving
system. Mr. Adam probably will want to contract this work to a licensed
electrician.
The major components of the approved system are: 1 - Berkeley B2 1/2-25 HP
pump & 3 phase motor, 2 - Nelson F100 guns and gun carts, 5 - 6" x 6"
hydrants, 9 - 4" x 4" hydrants, approximately 1,400 lin. ft. of 6" dia. FR200
PVC pipe, and approximately 1,500 lin. ft. of 4" dia, PR200 PVC pipe. As
documented in Mr. Walls letter dated 12-9-94, the lengths of pipe included in
the design were estimated from aerial photographs; therefore, Gra-Mac will
need to supply written certification that all materials and installation have
been completed in accordance with the approved design and a set of "AS -BUILT"
drawings showing the actual layout of the installed system. (Please note: if
any major changes to the approved design are required during installation,
these changes as well as the supporting design documentation must be submitted
for approval before the changes are made in the field.)
The waste utilization plan is approved subject to the addition of the
following information to the plan:
1. Due to the high volume of solids as well as significant levels of heavy
metals, salts, and other trace elements usually found in lagoon sludge; the
existing lagoon sludge should be removed and properly disposed of prior to use
of the irrigation system. Future removal and disposal of sludge should be
addressed in this plan. Practice Standard 533,'Waste Utilization, Table 24A,
page 633-16 contains nutrient values for layer anaerobic lagoon sludge that
can be used in developing this part of the plan.
2. Since this irrigation system is in close proximity to Highway 109, the
plan should recormend the establishment of trees to provide vegetative
screening between the highway and the irrigation system.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service,
formerly the Soil Conservation Service,
is in agency of the
Department of Agriculture AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EAPl.MB

r
Adams, Johnny
Page Two
3. The plan needs to address the management and disposal of waste during the
establishment period (minimum one year) for the fescue and•bernruda grass.
After these additions are made to the Waste Utilization Plan, please provide a
copy to Jerry Pate for his review and approval.
Angela G. Jessup
Civil Engineer
cc: H. J. Pate, Jr.
T. H. Wetmore

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
JOHNNY ADAMS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
This operation is a poultry layer operation with 52,400
birds. A recycle flush system with a anaerobic lagoon is in
place. Natural Resources Conservation service ( formerly the
Soil Conservation Service ) did not assist with the design
and construction of the lagoon, but it appears to be
adequate. The landowner plans to install an underground
solid set waste management system. The system as planned
will cover approximately 14 acres, The landowner plans to
plant 3 acres of fescue and 11 acres of bermuda. Liquid
effluent will be pumped on this fescue and bermuda providing
safe disposal plus water and nutrients for hay production.
LIQUID EFFLUENT VOLUMES
Liquid effluent volumes to be irrigated are taken from
Practice Standard 633 Waste Utilization page 633-15. Laying
pullets volumes are 22,.201 gallons per 1000 birds or 0.82
acre inches per 1000 birds.
Volume in Gallons:
52,400 x 22,201 - 1,163,332 gal./yr.
11000
Volume in Acre Inches
52,400 x 0.82 = 43 ac-in/yr.
1000
In actual operation liquid volumes may vary above or below
the figures shown above due to high rainfall, drought, or
evaporation. Good management by the landowner will be
required for proper operation of this system.
PLANNED IRRIGATION RATE AND VOLUME
The system will be installed according to the attached
design furnished by Gra-Mac Distributing Company. Based on
information provided the system will over approximately 14
acres and will have 14 risers. Part of the system has 6 inch
diameter pipe and part has 4 inch diameter. Two Nelson F100
guns can be operated on the 6 inch line at one time. Only
one gun can be operated on the 4 inch line. Gun performance
at 70 psi at the head using a .86 ring orifice ,wil.l be 135
gpm at a diameter throw of 275 feet. Gun spacing is between
175 and 180 feet.

The following calculations will be based on"operation of one
gun:
135 gpm x 1 gun x 60 min/hr = 8,100 gal/hr.
By operating system for two hours at each riser:
8,100 gal/hr x 2 hr - 16,200 gal
16,200 gal. = 0.60 ac/in volume pumped
27,154 gal/ac/in
Riser covers approximately 1.0 ac
0.60 ac/in 0.60 in/application; 2 hr = 0.30 in/hr rate
1.0 ac
Volume pumped per cycle:
0.60'ac/in x 14 risers = 8.4 ac/in/cycle
Required number of cycles per year:
43 ac in = 5.12 cycles/yr
8.4 ac/ n/� y le
Time per cycle = 28 hrs
Time per year = 5.12 cycles x 28 hr = 143.4 hrs/yr J
(Time does not include moving guns from riser to riser)

SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Any anaerobic lagoon will accumulate significant'amoounts of
sludge regardless of the bacterial digestion efficiency.
This accumulation of sludge in time will diminish the
treatment capacity of the lagoon.
This lagoon has been in place for approximately 12 years.
According to the landowner it has not had any liquid pumped
out, and no sludge has been removed. A large amount of
sludge buildup was observed in this lagoon during the first
visit to this farm. In order for the lagoon and the proposed
irrigation system to function properly this sludge must be
removed and properly disposed of prior to the use of the
irrigation system. The removal of this sludge will require
the use of a large trackhoe or dragline. The material will
need to be excavated, loaded on a spreader truck, and land
applied. Listed below are estimates of the plant available
nutrients contained in this sludge:
NITROGEN - 49 lbs./1000 bird capacity
52,400 x 49 lbs/1000 birds = 2568 lbs/yr
PHOSPHOURUS - 268 lbs. /1000 bird capacity
62,400 x 268 lbs/1000 birds = 14043 lbs/yr
POTASSIUM - 36 lbs. /1000 bird capacity
52,400 x 361bs/1000 birds a 1886 lbs/yr
The information provided above was taken from Natural
Resources Conservation Service practice standard 633 - Waste
Utilization, table 24A.
Lagoon sludge also contains significant levels of heavy
metals, salts, and other trace elements. Prior to land
application a laboratory analysis of the waste material and
the soil to which the waste is to be applied is highly
recommended. Once an analysis is obtained we will be glad to
assist with a waste utilization plan for disposal of this
material,
Mr. Adams has cleared the site where the irrigation system
is to be installed. Vegetation will be planted in the near
future on an area of approximately 14 acres. It will take a
minimum of one year before this -vegetation is properly
established, and the area used for disposal of lagoon

effluent. Mr. Adams shall provide the Natural Resources
Conservation Service field office with a co�py'of a written
agreement with a landowner who is within reasonable
proximity, allowing him the use of their land for waste
application for a minimum of one year.
VEGETATIVE SCREENING AND BUFFERS
The location of this irrigation system is in close proximity
to Highway 109. It is highly recommended that the landowner
establith a vegetative screen of trees between the location
of the irrigation system and the highway. This screen will
help reduce odors and will help prevent drift of the
effluent onto the road right-of-way. A tree species with
rapid growth characteristics should be selected. Some
examples are loblolly pine or Virginia pine.
A vegetative buffer a minimum of 50 feet wide shall be
maintained between the roadway drainage ditch and the wetted
perimeter of the irrigation system.

GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sates -- Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TLLEPHONEi ADVANCE EXCHANGE ROUTE 2, BOX 212
W101 008.92a2 MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
10101 008•3800 12-9-94 i
Re: Johnny Adams Egg Farm
Slurry Irrigation Dry Hydrant System
This quote and specification information;is based on visual inspection and
aerial photo measurements only. Actual ground measurements and elevation
readings are not possible until the land has been cleared of brush and
overgrowth, Therefore, the actual installation layout may vary from the
attached design and pipe footages may vary slightly also. The labor
charge listed in the quote is intended only to guide SCS personnel as to
the possible cost of the installation and is not a firm quote from Gra-
Mac as to an installed price. There are no electrical components such as
wiring, disconnects, magnetic motor starters, etc., included in the quote
except for the 25HP electrical motor to -drive the pump. Mr. Adams should
have a Local, electrical contractor provide these items for him as needed.
The system is designed to operate two Nelson F100 guns at once with only
one gun operating on one four inch lateral line at one time. Gun performance
at 70 PSI at.the head using a .86 ring orifice will be 135 GPM at a dia-
meter throw of 275 feet. Gun spacing is between 175 and 180 feet (275 X 65%).
The application rate at this spacing is .42 inches per hour. Velocity
flow in the 6" SDR21 PVC pipe for two guns is 3.12 feet per second and in
the 4" SDR21 PVC pipe 3.32 feet per second. Pump selection was based on
a need of at least 20 brake horsepower so a 25 horsepower pump and motor
has been selected to insure proper operation. Pressure requirements
are listed, below.
1400 - 6" PVC mainline ' @.,270 GPM .3.0 PSI
15 0o'- 4" -PVC mainline @ 135 GPM G .0 - 3$ PSI
Gun operating pressure 70.0 PSI
Elevation ± 10 feet 4.5'PSI
Misc 5.0 PSI 204.4
88f�6- PSI -197.5 TDH
88-S
The Berkeley irrigation pump selected is capable of 275 GPM @ 86 PSI.
I . e,�_; cj.,t/

U. S. DE! TMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SffjqVjCZ
r.OMPUTATION SM#rLrr
4c9-iNG423 P.. 149
j
o � .:ta]IA � ��
?Ipprti Less �; 270 C�Py
_ ..
f . _E -f
3. P51
Fa 16
OF
rA
Zts
�m

rr
Inspection Form for Animal Operations
(Note: Numbers 25-37 must be completed in order to
determine assessments)
1. Date of inspection: _ L- / 8/
2. Regional Office: FRO
3. Name of Owner of Property:
(Check Register of Deeds or Tax Office)
4. Name of Operator: °
5. Address:
{o
6. Phone Number:
7. Description of Facility Location (State Road Nos., etc.
Attach a Map)
S. Date this facility began operation:
9. Date of last expansion:
Explain:
10. Has the facility registered with DEM? Yeses_ No
If yes, date registered
11. Does the facility have an approved Animal Waste Management
Plan? Yes No,2 _. Is one required? Yes„ No date
Approved: ,.i e ,
12. Has this facility received a CAFO Designation? Yes4— No
If yes, date issued:
13. Type of Operation (Examples: farrow to finish, topping:
dairy: beef, cattle: Poultry swinq breeder, layers or
broilers, turkey, etc.): o J °'
14. Number and type of Animals �� y L
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled,
or confined and fed or maintained in any 12 month period.
1

�4
W
16. Are crops, pasture, or post -harvest residues suscaineu ixi
the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or
facility?
17. Type of Waste Management (Examples: 1) type of confinement:
free stall barns, sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots,
paved or dirt open lots,houses, or pasture; 2) type of
waste handling: direct spreading in solid form, slotted
floor with lagoon or pit, single or multi -cell lagoon,
aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray
irrigation, stockpiling, contractor disposal, etc.)
Gr". sk.� (awn:
^ALA d
18. Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity
and proximity to same or other surface waters:
NL
29. Proxim tynof facility to nei hb rin houses, wells, etc.:
C hurG �a, SlL b r- 3QO VAr
20. Approximate depth of groundwater table in the area of the
facility or discharge: P
21. Proximity of facility to surface waters (provide name and
class of surface waters): LAAEoA x S&04
22.
Animal waste discharge (including photos and witness, names,
addresses, telephone numbers and statements of fact).
Lr r
23. Are pollutants discharged into the waters of the state? if
so, how? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing systems,
or othr similar man-made device):
0
24. Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event
less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm? (If yes,
.include a brief listing of incidentp and suspected causes.):
2

25. What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural
_ resources of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation?:
25. What is the duration and gravity of the violation?:
27. Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of sampling,
field measurements, visual observations and slope and
vegetative cover of land adjacent to water, extent of
rainfall and other factors relative to the likelihood or
frequency of discharge of animal wastes and process
wastewaters). The effect on ground or surface water quality
or quality or on air quality:
r
28. what is the
ifying the damage?:
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?:
30. was the vi lation committed willfully or intentionall�y'�:
Yee NoExplain:
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or
failing to comply with programs over which Environ�: r I
Management C1mmisfsio has egulatory a t rity:
b%
32. what is the cost to the State for the enforcement
procedures?: yn M -
in R!^o (,
tz. �-
3
l

33. Type or general nature of business:
34. What is the violators degree of cooperation (including
efforts to prevent or restore) or recalcitrance
( stubborness) :
35. Are then any Mitigating Circumstances: %r
36. Assessment Factors:
a. IWC
b. Receiving Stream C. Damage Y/N If yes, include report from WRC
s - •
38. Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator:
39. Recommendations for Further DEM Action: (Re -inspect, Nov,
Enforcement Action, designate, etc.):
40. Other Comments:
aoform
Vol. K-1
4 ,

10: 20 V910 572 9060 ANGELA * CAROL 1E 002
i
UNI'TfD STATES SOIL 227-D NORTH 1MAIN STREET
DEPAOTMENT OF CONSERVATION TROY, NORTH CAROLINA
AGRICULTURE SERVICE 27371
_ti1 ----.-.------------------------------......----_-----:----------
October 19, 1994
Mr. Johnny Adams
Rt. tj Box 9B
Tray, North Caralina 27371
Dear Mr. Adams:
Attached is a copy of your Waste Utilization Flan for your
poultry operation. Please review and sign the signature page
that is marked with a red "X", and return tt to me in the self-
addresned envelope. Mr. Barr will alin need to sign the plan.
You may keep the remaining pages for your records.
IMPORTANT - in addition to speci0cations in your plan ---- keep
in mind that the calcium that builds up around your outlet pipe
need to be removed and dried for several weeks before applying to
land. This should bf removed every 2-3 years in carder to
maintain the adequate capacity of your lagoon.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
&4.4L S. 100
'Anudka, D. Hill
District Conservationist
Attachments
FEB 2
V, MANAGEMENT
t►Y�T� �lt�E REG- 0FHC

�Ft. � �'H ¢� FLt:.w�...,�.�.�dT�'k.^�iu q'�-.i:_�,' "'s"n n- - -- -- �... ..�.� �-..-...,.•. ..r _ . _ ..�..- ..,...,� .. _. "..F....:�,.T...___._ y..._.- - - -..
io:za U910 572 9000 ANGELA s CAROL 1M003
POULTRY WASTE
urILI;LATiON PLAN
MON'TGOMERY COUNTY
PRODUCER. -._ A, n -,_. "ken ,rh.5 .1
PHONE
f,:; I NJI) OF i1PErFcAT x t'31d : p, _
TYPE OF WASTE FACILITY:
Water and .air quality protection require proper
irr-�.na gernent of organic waste from ,agricul•t.urael, opinrations.
Recycling of agri cul tUr-81 waste materials by land
application for plant uptat:,r: and crop production is at
traditional and proven waste Application techni qwe.
Properly done, recycling by lend application and strop uptake
is an anvl ronine+ntal l y sound method of waste management.
Your poultry waste management facility has been
demigned for a given storage rapacity. When than waste
r`achas the designed level it must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution ref .3ur•face and/or ground
water. The plant nutl�-ients in the animal waste should be
encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
SPEC I F I CA"I- l ONS SU I DE
SrALi;:, al factors are importmint in impleme-ntinq your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer varlue
of the waste and to ensui-e that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner.
1. The Troy Field Office must have documentation in the
W:I_S,Tyn folder thatt you either- own or have long ter -at access
to adequate land on which to properly apple the waste. I f
YOU do not own adequate land on wtiich to properly apply
waste, you Shall provide ESCS with m copy of a written
agrec+rnent. with a landowner(s) who is/are within reasonable
pr-oxirni.ty, allowing you to use the land for waato
application for the .life ey.pectanay of the production
facility. (Thi!i document sigried at the b attorn by l arndowners
wi.11 be sL f f •i cj.ent) . If 'an ,agreement is dissolved 'you are
responsible for obtaining sufficient land to continue V.o
apply your waste in -an environmentally safe manner.
2. Waste shall he applied to me .t thLl� ni tragen MfMdU
for realistic.: yields; based on soil type, ..vailable mointure,
historical data, cl i rnate conditions, and level caf
management, unless there are regulations thent restrict the
rate of application of other nutrients.

3. Animal waste shall not tcv applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tone per ancre per year.
4. Waste shall by incorporated immediately after
spreading on areas subJec.t to flooding. Waste is not to toe
applied an areas sub_lect to flooding unless incorporation ias
used.
5.. Waste shall not be applied to sotur-ated soils ter on
land when the surface is fr=ert.
b. Apply waste to growing crops in such a manner that
no mare than 20 to 15 percent of the leaf area is covered.
7. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or
winter for spring planted crops on sails with a high
potential for leaching Ltnj.%pj special prkcAL(tions are taken
to minimize leaching and erosion. Waste nutrient loading
mates an these sails %hould be held to a minimum and wintmi-
cover craps planted to take up released nutrients.
. 8. Waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may he reduced provided
adequate vegetative filter, strips arp present.
4. Waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from
outer wells for human con:,umption.
1.0. Waste shall not be applied closer than 2()0 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landuser.
11. Waste shall not he applied in a manner riot to reach
other property and public right--of--ways.
The acres needed to apply the poultry waste are based on
typi-iL riutrient content for thim tvne of bird. Acreage
regc.ri cements may be more or less, ba,,ed on the wase-te analysis
r,epart from your waste marltagement facility.
f d 1 l�t�w ng,t
AMOUn•t of Nitrogen produced per years
4r".�rWr birds x 775 lbs N/bird/yr - U22 total, N
Amount Lagoon liquid to rJI.'MP per year-.
� �_qQQ birds )c' 22,. 01 gallons 1;�r�;y�rx ga11ans/yr
1000
i'Wiount of Lagoon. Liquid to pump per acre:
r14s4� birds rc .82 acre --inch g;�;27 acrce-inch/yr-

U910 572 9066 ANGELA CAROL
The following acreaq for waste Iapp.l i r_ +ti ran will he needed
brAm d on the crop to Oe prawn and surface Sapp l i cmt L Qn :
4 005
. .. FIELD 1 SOIL 1 CRUP ; REALISTIC; I_BS. N. 1 ACRES 1 LBS. N. 1 MONTH(3)
TYPE; � YIELD f 'ACRE 1 ! UTILi7.E i AFFLIED
3- ; .$ T u '$trMwd�i L 7"ti/4G_ ' 3CC) �r 330O
1 I 1 k 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I ! 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED 7325
SURPLUS OR DEFICIT
L;ndaNner plans to inptall ,„a waste Irrigation System to 1wid
apply his poultry waste on fields m+ Der;€iuda braze and
Fescue which will be cut for hey.
Call the Mantgamery Sail and Water Conseryation District
04 i. ce Vtar- you wecei ve waste analysis report to obtain the
amount per acre to apply pr•iar to applying the waste. The
number is 010 S7 ^700.
PREPARED 9'(--
An+acla D. Hill
r _ uT n r1'f WEAK
OTHER LAMDOWNEFS _�/(.�• _. , >Q.-�:Jl � /
Ij
J

Ffto
• State of North Carolina
t r Department of Envlronment,
TNTA
Health and Natural Resources • a
Fayetteville Regional Office
Janes B. Hunt, B. Governor p� H N F1
Jonathan . Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 23, 1994
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, North Carolina 27371
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Designated Animal Feeding
Operation
Adams Egg Farm / (registered as Barwood
Farms)
Montgomery County
CAFO 93-023
Dear Mr Adams:
On September 29, 1994, an inspection of your animal operation was
performed by the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a
copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the
opinion of this office that this facility must to obtain an approved Animal
Watte Management system.
Please note that a written response to deficiencies found during the
inspection is due in this office, 82later than�December 31. 19,94. '
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
Mr. Michael Wicker, Water Quality Supervisor,P.E., or myself at (910)
486-1541.
Sincerely,
Ricky Re els
Environmental Technician IV
cc: Facility Compliance
Enclosure
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carollna 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX 910-48"707
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

.
a
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH i NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form :
James Barr(Barwood Farms, I Sept.29,1994 I CAFO 93-023
iv Adams/Adams Eaa Farm.(CAFOf
Route 1, Box 98 I (919) 572r-3531
Troy, North Carolina, 27371
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections: -- -
SECTION I
Animal Operation Tvx>e: Poultry
BECTXON II
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system))
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation UGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIFU ANIMAL
NASTX WMAGEMT PLAN?
S. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
MINIONS
INIONO
OEM
11M
IN=�

XMION III
I. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream7
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CERTIFICATION PLAN?
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
b. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BRP) of the approved CERTIFICATIONS?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately _,2-3jnches`)
8. Is the general condition of this CAPO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
Comments
The Barwood Farm\Adams Egg Farm is a lease to buy agreement operation.
This farm is being required to obtain a certified waste management plan for a
previously constructed animal feeding operation. The bases for the
certification requirement is that this inspection revealed that the lagoon's
wastewater was 2-3 inches before overtopping it's dike. A written response is
required as a result of this inspection.

p
INV
OICE ---- 7 vdjci: 7 INVOIC
PAGE
E DATE NO
12/09/94 6 cci 2 -1 1
GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Route 2 Box 212
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
[phone]
s S
0 H
L Johi-mY Al Jafflc.'.:. I
D R 0 U t LZ J. DOX �-i 8 p
T T r a y , N 27 'l*.`.V,7 1. T
0 0
OR-1 4
DER N 6, .1
,.ORDER DATE
. ­, W1, - I .
CUSTOMER
i-
- - ,
I SALES"
I PERSON
I , 'PURCHASE -
I ORDER NUMBER .4
. SHIP VIA
SHIP DATE
1. . TERMS
6ID24
-,—I,-
12/09/94
—.,NO.,,.
*9999-1
-
I
I -De I i ve red
12/09/94
_t.QUANTIT—Y
. — 1'
' x,
ITIEWINIUMBER -1
. . %.. . . I .
ITEM DESCRIPTION
;UNIT PRICE
PER
UNIT
AMOUNT
LA r r y I rvin;--i t ion Dry
1 15 0 00
1
1 b,..)
Hydrant Pipelinc- SystE=2m
TFi()M::,. WJIJ F*Offi Y('.)l j
SALES AMOUNT
I C)
MISC. CHARGEE S
f-') Fil i.j
FREIGHT
JAN 1995
SALES TAX
TOTAL
Q
PAYMENT REC'D
ENV. MARIP,­
BALANCE DUE
I'- 1,j J(')
Jc,AyETTp-vI, I

I
13
GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Saks --- Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPf40NE! ADVANCE EXCHANGE
19193 996-3232
19191 998-3800
12-9-94
Re: Johnny Adams Egg Farm
Slurry Irrigation Dry Hydrant System
ROUTE 2, BOX 212
MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
This quote and specification information is based on visual inspection and
aerial photo measurements only. Actual ground measurements and elevation
readings are not possible until the land has been cleared of brush and
overgrowth. Therefore, the actual installation layout may vary from the
attached design and pipe footages may vary slightly also. The labor
charge listed in the quote is intended only to guide SCS personnel as to
the possible cost of'the installation and is not a firm quote from Gra-
Mac as to an installed price. There are no electrical components such as
wiring, disconnects, magnetic motor starters, etc., included in the quote
except for the 25HP electrical motor to drive the pump. Mr. Adams should
have a local electrical contractor provide these items for him as needed.
The system is designed to operate two Nelson F100 guns at once with only
one gun operating on one four inch lateral line at one time. Gun performance
at 70 PSI at the head using a .86 ring orifice will be 135 GPM at a dia-
meter throw of 275 feet. Gun spacing is between 175 and 180 feet (275 X 65%).
The application rate at this spacing is .42 inches per hour. Velocity
flow in the 6" SDR21 PVC pipe for two guns is 3.12 feet per second and in
the 4" SDR21 PVC pipe 3.32 feet per second. Pump selection was based on
a need of at least 20 brake horsepower so a 25 horsepower pump and motor
has been selected to insure proper operation. Pressure requirements
are listed below.
6" PVC mainline @ 270 GPM
4" PVC mainline @ 135 GPM
Gun operating pressure
Elevation ± 10 feet
Misc
3.0
PSI
3.0
Psi
70.0
PSI
4.5
PSI
5.0
PSI
85.5
PSI 197.5 TDH
The Berkeley irrigation pump selected is capable of 275 GPM @ 86 PSI.
(� -

INVOICE INVOICE PA ' G!
DATE J_ NO.
GRA-MAC: DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Route 2 Box 212
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
[phone]
S S
0 H
L Jo h n n y Adams
D Adams E g g Farm P
T Route I I 80, 98 T
0 . .. rov I NC 27371 0
12/09/914 Oucte
ORDEHN9.
ORDER DATE,
CUSTOMER
... L NO.z, -%
SALES-
PERSON
PURCHASE ,',
.ORDER NUMBER
. �
;- SHIP DATE ,
TERMS
t P
12 8 9 4
*99999
Quc5te
e r Cm d
UL:-c,n. re ei-ut
>QUANTITY!".
NUMBER
."
ITEM OtSCR!PTIOW
UNJTPR10E
F
ERATEM
AMOUNT .
OR69
(00
,
UNIT
1400
1400
HW600
H W 6 Gast-.:eted PVC
2.45
3, 4a(:).
Pipe (200 Psi)
19
15 (-2()
HVJ40(1)
i-1 & W 4" Gasketed PVC
I I El
1p
1 ,7-lo o()
Pipe (200 Psi
I
I
HR 112-440
4 x 4 ,! 4 Ter-.2 PVC -PR
25 90
EAC,
-15 9 C")
Gasketed
l
I
I
HR 11, 2-640
611 .,, 6" 4" "FRP PVC -PR
58. (..K.)
EACf'
5 8.00
Gask:eted
I
3,
1
IAR 118-060
6" ,, 90 Bend PVC -PR
L' 'I' I - 5 ()
EACF
.:)14.. 50
Ga s k: e t ed
III
1.
1
HR 1. 16 - 6 A.0
6",v 4" RedUcer PVC -PR
31 1(",
EACd
�1.10
GasT:eted
I
1.
6 -,-, 6 ,, 2 -Fapped Tee
27.50
EACH
'21 7 . 5 Ct
P V C-- F' R G a s !.:: e t ce d
I
1
1
G2X12N6
2" ,, 121" Galy, Nipple
6.
EACH
6.26
L
1
WEB101.07
2" Brocize Gale Valve
24. 4-,.,
IIACH
24.4
1,
S436-0-2,0
.2 .Is male AcInt'.
1,11.
LAu,l
I I I
0 PVC Sch 4
I
1-IFIS-6642--Z
6 m 42 Z Pipe
185.00
EACH
1, 9 5
fl.()
El' 2
2'111 PVC Flipe
5 C,
'0. 00
I
S406-020
2, 90 SIS E I I
i.74
EA(;J
1-74
fVl" l3ch 40
1.
C 16 0 B &. C
6" Ecrino Valv(e Oux Etociy
EACH
3.3B
15
FIPS-64��6 FC)
6 6 4 - ��6
1. 15 9, 0
EACH
7 7 'b
Hydrant Tee With 01_1 t 1. et
i
�
'F I Fl S -- 4 4 3 6 F'Fm D
-1. - 4 ,,, 4 x 3`6 b"Do"fy
14 cb .S'S 7
EP
1 308. 3::J
Hydrant Tee With 0 u t 1. c� t
r44'7--(.440
4 5 Cap PVC Sch 40
14 .71
EAC�
14 . "--i
0 n t 1, m u e d
SALES AMOUNT
MISC, CHARGES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
TOTAL
PAYMENT REC'D
BALANCE DUE

INVOICE, INVOICE PAGE
`-�DATE ;"..' NO.
GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Route 2 Box 212
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
[phone]
S
0
L Johnny Adams
D Adams 1:'-'gg Farm
T FtOute 1, Bo,..,. 98
0 7' T., C) y , NC-'. 27:57 1
S
H
P
T
0
OR.
DER NO'.
6RDER DATE
CUSTOMER -SALES.
PURCHASE, SHIP
'VIA
'VIA SHIP DATE
TERMS
NO.,
ORDER NUMBER
12Z08/94
*9999
CJLIQte De I J. ye2ed J:ec:pint
IT t'M440MB"ER
ITEM bESdR
U N 1T`PR CPER
1:
uN,
AMOUNT
SHIPPED.
2
2
NF100
Nelson F100 Full Circle
476.00
EACF
952.1,1(.)
Gk L. I n
2
2
Wileel Gun Cart
".5 0 .
1
7 Cy
I
I
H E T A V 1, 0
TAV 10(-') High Pressure
164
EAC
16 4 . 0 C.)
1'ri-Action Valve
I
I
PLtmp 'Table
45 . 0
1
45 . t:asj
I
I
Berkeley B2 1/2 ZPLS-25
1924. 00
1
1 924.00
HP Pump & Motor 3 PZ
I
I
GM4X35PT
A." x 35 ' PT Rubber Comb.
1. 7 6. 00
EACJ
176.00
Suction w/Strainer
I
I
GM4('.)0K-X-)QECC-C
4 x, 3 Eccentric
9 - Q (-)
EOC ,
39.(-,)(:)
Reducer W/C'CL(pling
1
.1
Psco
- k , t P.
ProtF.- #7 Primer Cc)mplF-
116. (K)
-
EACJ
11.6.()1.a
I
I
**
Floation Barrells
10.00
1
1 () . (A)
I
I
WEB4(17o3
3/4" Brass Ball Valve
7.74
EACI
7.74
60()W013
2
2
KAKC075
3/4" KC Nij:�ple
I - 1
EOC
2
— 6-2
1
1
6075 QN[3
314" ).,, 2" f3aly. Nipple
.56
EACI
E `Q.
x 1,A) Galy. Ell.
J f 7
E AC4l
A..i.i7
DigChiIPC,-44 Adwoter 2 1/2"
7 4. 1-1
? -1 0
MIP"l- X 4 X 90 Ell w/ Plr
j
3.
ACA1 1,:,,-46
Ame s ----Fi 4" Spring Swing
17 3. (m-)
EACH
17 "'5
Check VaIve
I
GMA23170-6-4
4" Flanged Wheel Gate
�` C.) q 5
EACH
20-22 .95
Val. ve
2A.
24
1'. B 0 5 (3 - 2 5
'5/E ,., 2-1/2 Balt
b
24
2-` 4
5 110 Nut
.44
E'-A C H
1 56
a
04 F F
4" Full Face F].,-nc,c-?
I -.)Q
EACH
9 C)
t
(Co ntinUed)
SALES AMOUNT
MISC. CHARGES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
TOTAL
PAYMENT REC"D
BALANCE -DUE,

:'INVOICE
TINVOICE�j PA
DATE.' NO:
GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Route 2 Box 212
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
[phone]
S
S
c
H
L J'ahnny
Adams
D Adams
1.-Egg F.arm
T
I Box, 9B T
0 "Fray,
NC 27373. 0
12/08/94 Quote 3
... . . .....
ORDER N0,.'iP,1
0' R D E R,1 D' � ATE'
CUSTOMER
'SALES
�';IRLJRCHASE),�,,��
SHIP VIA
�SHIP DATE 1°',
q IrK V!,
—ORDER�NILIMBE
-JERMS
(a) U 0
1'"OUZ94
UAN#T� R
ki K,
U bt:H
ITEM U bt:H
7�' -
PRICE',,
PER,
UNIT -,
AMOUNT
ORDERED
ILZ
PC21_­)(_,)#2 5
21:)(:)#. LiqUid P.' i 1 :1. e d PSI 15 C)
EACF
15 Q
GUagE -
I
I
PC12o9PT
Pt. Pyc Glue 4.08
EACH
4 . FJB
I
I
F' C 12 14 1:"]-
Pt. PVC Cleaner Z . 2e
EACH
3.2E3
Concrete for ThrUtSt
C) cd
Blacksi 5.0 Yards
L.abor—App rox, i ma te
4 354i,c:yCy
Installation Cost
SALES AMOUNT
17 (3 12 8
MISC. CHARGES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
I 2,E . 6 51'
TOTAL
17 13e:). 21
PAYMENT RECD
BALANCE DUE

SOIL&WATER
CONSERVATION
Moore Soil & Water Conservation District
P. 0. Box 908, 707 Pinehurst Ave., Carthage, N. C, 28327 • Phone: [phone]
September 22, 1994
Attn: Ricky Revels
Fayetteville Regional Office/DEHNR
Suite 714, Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
1 f
SEP 23 1994'
ENV. MANAGEMENT
EAjjjTEVILLE RED. OFFICE
The District Board and Staff at the Moore Soil and
Water Conservation District are looking forward to meeting
with you 9:30 AM, Tuesday, October 4th at our office. After
discussion here we will go out to two different farms to
meet with the farmers.
The following people plan to meet with you:
Albert Troutman - Chairman, SWCD
Raymond Doby - Member, SWCD
Ruth Kirby - District Conservationist, SCS
Jerry Hall - District Conservation Technician, SWCD
Alice Caviness - Administrative Assistant, SWCD
Please find attached a map leading to our office.
Should you have any questions, please give us a call at the
above number.
Sincerely,
Albert F. Troutman
Chairman
Enclosure
I' a"td lat, ze/c

.H
J.I ..a.
a.
Pat
y71
— �,`� �': • , `,� r� `� Via.
1111101! E.4 ii s
ja
LN i e'a'
y. ' r
vL ,S
CARTHAGE
POP. 915 . M r.7+
Ifft viniti'a U•R
.11 I. tt UIR ,tY
R .ID +
6e " w��y,l1i,yt;Y" 100 I�rvi D] tJ 77 o b �"
:�Y::.,.. oar•' ..� !ffi!• Ir
aD7 Yi
Sbl
- 11
7} AGRrcuL-rulZ
ti
q� I/n.}
Ili W' •� $ulL prN� y.
,I]t
NEx r TO POND '
w... _..__.... ..-... SAD -..-.. .. .. - - M '•ri
+tIDJ
.tow
?ti Ai
3
:1C7 n•
e�
i n
!'UI 77
Sr1 Ot
o •
HID G.11 -jilt .
.ti n
.Y1 Utt D
f.. Il]t
:t, J117 y
It/. 7 INl
/ �1 /iH �7 •1}I
SEP 231994,
CFNo.
LEGEND
��
rrrn•el a u,wrrrOVte• IOAo
CA*mo A W blA,"11' va A"
Son. *S-qt. O1 510M NnrAQD.OAO
"'ACID ROAD
Z.:XAIO
. Lay U1H4141111r.11W Al
DrvVlb L.OHWAt
t1GH,IA. WN" I.O.IWA ICAO►
A
fullce+tltlt ACCISI NI,IID'
II01161 *It 04II1I.11 TOAD
1I .A'1
rr Dt1.1 AO M.0,11 IOAb
1101R4 AID CICOHDARt 1040
f.0
11DR1.L AND U01.N
--�5---
r10.1.1IS11r, TOAD '
tooitc1ID soc-f M
0411151010X Dt11AMCl
IKA.II[ COUi
.. ,.�-
XIGwwAv wltmCXAM04
DI IAIII4 XIGMWAY"MCHAwGt
rw�Y�
11 ,e 7
1V'/
wett$iAlt
tf
U.S wwlllrn MOXwAr
1 �,
Il 1 M1.M11Ib rKr[1k IOVII
Wr40(0.0 HwAt
k,C, r/I]MII IID i1C•'CtI tDGll
MIrSt1H M[RCMAXOI mu-ml
I3DQ
m1con4uI. ROAD RUM KI
Ill
U-mrowoLmD CAN!
' - -
s,mr7•n. Am w i-or0 Or fRACKS
'
k1mr. Jr 1►.mf O•ItAlwG CCH/AVY
t.II.CAD, AM 041.Ir11 CV HACKS ��.�•
..'.,....w
MI
AfO, 1
SA.1onDA.I
Cf..t1.
C"
RIGXI3 Of- WAY
'�"• "'_
RA%P*.D Vlt1OM
C,t.AL c2oss I.0
--Ill—•—
ovllrAtl
uKIO.O h"At
O
ARMY. Nkw.c. MAlh.l Cart FIRD
Q
CCWM 01 MuwtV#4 All"I
t
_MID AIttl1A.V polo
4D
H.MG.1 ow ti1L11kY M fY1."
{r, r..•f
nu Of IOU rlllY ,
d
tIGN/w01r31
toast dualo $I.f
COMM
MAttOw SJOLAAA
WRA NILAAI
DAM wIIM IOC■
DAM
IrsIRVOIAL ICHMLM 1..1
J7iJ jh
rmM.AMI r1.1. ,AwP.Ls
04.CAII IIIvaIK]w
IOAb IMIOJGN MOlk17Aw /A11
Ma'pl—
t11GHM'AV PeCt,ONt tD 11.
'^*-4-
DRAW VAa OM M"
••�'� ..l�I
III(Hwar tum4l
Iota
�••r
t1aYl U+l
-
COYHIY Lf!
VIV OAKS
rISRVA10" OR /AI. 10tMib.m
w!Ir A4A
jam' ryu'.
Whit OlrMAIIb RMslji
DIPO—HDriACI
CARTHAGE — HILL CREST 0 CC/W.IY MAI
[j OIXf. IOWMl A4b v. LADIl
CARTHAGE FIELD OFr10E
Agriculture Center
706 Pinehurst Ave.
Carthage, NC 28327
910/947-5183

1
From US 1 take 15-501 towards Carthage. When 15-501 merges with 24-27 stay on
24-27.. Co all the way through town to first stop light. Turn left on [iwy. 22.
Exactly 1 mile from light turn left on Pinehurst Avenue. Agriculture Building
is on the right just beyond pored approximately 1/2 mile from Hwy. 22.
z
L3
VJ I
U
.F.
f
J
�i^�ciwrre i
iewa�� 2. Z
l.: ?(SON j 71C, I..
McY• c r�.
R
MN
Rcky s4-re-e-+
U) o rr�� C lex
�-I•ree�-
COrc
V)
Ul
0
n
J
V),
Rescn+ M� Co.
Mr i cti.a (-lure ��`J

bl$� REGIONAL OFFICE Fax:[phone] Jul 14 '94 12:00 P 02/01)
DEPARTMENT OF OWMONME.NT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
'DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RE QNAL C RD R
TO: MONTWMERY SWCD ,
FROM: JERRY DORSE'2T,
DATE: JULY 14, 1994
RE : WATER QUA ,I'TY 7
The water Quality Section (WQ) is a part of the Divirion of
Environmental Management (DEM) of the NC Department of
Environment, Health and Natural R2Sources (DEHM).
Yesterday I received a Call from Ricky ReVela, a WQ employee who
works out•of the Fayetteville Regional Office. Ricky has identi-
fied Montgomery County as an area with numerous agricultural.'opera-
tions. He is interested in taking a closer look At how these
operations r.elate to water quality. Ricky would like to initiate
this task in conservtion with the Montgomery SWCD. By state law WQ
staffers have the authority to inspect agricultural operations for
the purpose of ensuring water quality protection.
Mr. Revels pians to visit Montgomery County and would like to meet
with the conservation staff, district supervisors and myself. I
spoke with Tom Wetmore yesterday and he stated that on a schedule
available basis, Darryl Harrington can come back to Montgomery
County, to participate in this meeting and'the site visits. in
association with this visit, Ricky would like to see at least
three agricultural operations in the county.. One of these sites
is identified via.the ink circle on the enclosed USGS topo map
copy. This operation is described within the yellow high lighted
text on the enclosed pages. in addition, Ricky would like for you
to identify one of the largest animal operations in the county.and
a small sized operation to visit. I encourage you to select a
poultry operation and a swine operation.
During this visit Mr. Revels would like to discuss his responsi-
bilities, use of EMP's and water quality problems within the
county that you want to discuss. In addition, this visit will
provide the opportunity for you to Bee how WQ staffers look at
agricultural operations and to demonstrate to the agricultural
community that DEK is interested in helping land owners comply
with the law, as opposed to always assessing fines.
page 1 of 2
3aZ5 NffA Thint Mvd Suite 100, 44 Wswn-Safam, V 27107 pf►one [phone] fak(910) esF-7005

_ liJS REGIO-NAI- OFFICE Fax:[phone] JIjJ 14 '94 12:01 P.03/03,
• Pater Quality* page 2 of 2 JIuly 14, 1994
I need for you to do five things!
ggyalo and one, or two assistants f rom the Fayetteville
Office. Be certain to consider contacting Darryl
Harrington regarding participation in seleti.ng sites and
participating in this meeting,
- 17ecide on Zbo data for such a meeting. (9 C&- ,Vmts watts to mat as
soon as possibfe. En4std is a listing of dates on my sehedulz that are opm)
- telephone r).vnjber for the
operation identified by Mr. Revels on 4lze enclosed pages.
- Identity at leaps, two_othet animal o eratians that will be
visited.
- Send gut , eQw=ni.cat jone regarding the date and time of this
meeting. I am suggesting that Mr. Revels visit start at
the district office with one and one-half hours to meet /
talk and the rest of the time used visiting sites. Approx-
imately one hour (+) each for the site Ricky has identified
and for the largest operation that you will be selecting.
Less time should be required for the smallest operation.
Once the above items have been addressed, we need to clear the
date on my calendar and that of Mr. Revels. Ricky told me that is
willing to let_ymu rnat`-a rt, tbe ian , owners that will be visited
nr if R or vidgd with. the.namea,._phona numbers and addressesIham'
will. be gj d to handle this task,
At the last district meeting your district board expressed a
strong desire to protect water quality within Montgomery County.
I observed a level of enthusiasm that I would like to see in each
of the 24 districts within my region. Meeting with Mr. Revels
will make for a great opportunity to establish positive report and
direct your enthusiast. I am excited about this opportunity and
trust you will approach this opportunity with the same mind set.
I look forward to hearing from you;
cc: Mike Haywood with attachments
Angela Hill with attachments
Dewey Hotta w/o attachments
Tom Wetmore w/o attachments
Ricky Revels w/o attachments

WS REGIONRL OFFICE Fax :1--9I0-8%-7005 Jul 14 ' 94 12 :00 P. 01 /0-3
4 a Fax F
Date: JULY 14,1W
Nufa-e A CKY REVELS
Company OEHANR - OEM - Water Qaardy Section
Address: Fayedeville Regional Office
Address
PHONE # (910) 48&-15441
FAX # (910) 486-OM
# of PageS (Ineatding this gage)
From:
MR. JERRY DORS7 _ T
N.C. Dept. of Enrimmem, Health, & RlwurL-
DIMSION OF SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION
SM N. Point Blvd. Suite 100 Wins'^` "."'.em NC 27106
(919) 996-740T
[phone]
LA.,
Following is a memo that I am mailinv n„t mrinwl

• State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 27, 1993
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1 Box 98
Troy, North Carolina 27371
Q�
£ - OCT 29 1993
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Subject: Designation of Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operation
Adams Egg Farm
Troy, North Carolina
Montgomery County
CAFO 93-023
Dear Mr. Adams:
This letter is to notify you that the Adams Egg Farm/Cal-Maine (Contract) Chicken
Operation, is hereby designated a concentrated animal feeding operation in accordance with
Title 15, North Carolina Administrative Code 2H .0123, and adopted Federal Regulations
40 CFR 122,23. The designation of your chicken operation was based on the fact that you
confine more than 1,000 animal units (51,000 chickens with liquid manure system) for
more than 45 days in a 12 month period.
Since protecting water quality is such an important issue, this letter is also a reminder
that it is illegal in North Carolina to discharge animal waste to surface waters without a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. However, it is not the
intention of the Division of Environmental Management to issue permits to animal
production facilities but to require, as stated in the rules, the permanent control of runoff
from storms less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and to prohibit direct discharges
of waste through man made conveyance systems such as a pipes or ditches.
If you need financial or technical assistance with regard to managing animal waste
and avoiding water pollution problems, you should contact the local Soil and Water
Conservation District Office at [phone].
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r ~+
Mr. Johnny Adams
Page 2
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request an administrative hearing
within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this notice. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and
filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the Petition should be filed with this office.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to the Director, Division of
Environmental Management, P. O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC 27626-0535. Assistance, if
desired, can be obtained by contacting Tommy Stevens, Fayetteville Regional Water
Quality Supervisor, Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043,
Telephone [phone].
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this Designation will become final in
thirty (30) days.
Failure to comply with these rules can result in substantial civil or criminal penalties.
For your information, one copy of the federal and state regulations is enclosed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter; please do not hesitate to contact
US.
Sincerely,
Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: M Noland
Gerald Dorsett
Roy W. Reece, Jr.
Cornelius Davis
Tom Wetmore, Jr.

F2.o
=w`'SENDER:
�] • Complete Hems 1 and/or 2 for addHionaI UNIDO s V, I . �Iso -wish to waive the
a Complete items 3, and 4a A b. _ . :_..:.: _ - _ • .,,.._W7z following services Ifor,-en extra
r. Print your norm and address an the reverse of this form to that wj Can
return this card to you.
• Attach this form to the'front of the msinpiaa, pr &n the back f!:peel 1 Addressee's Address'.
does not pemdt.:�,is.- _
• Writs "Rotum Reaaipt Requested" an the msiipieae below the ertiCie raattber ;
The Return Recalpt will show to whom the arocie was delivered arW the date �' � RWricted Delivery
c tolluvasd, << - - . _ _. -. ._ Consult postmaster for fee:
0 [ 3. -Article Addressed to:
4e...Article Number °G
4b. Service Type
© Registered] InsuredIm
r5
l :■' r * r,4:F sC7y. T i ID<ertlfied '� O COD - .6
e
r,..,.,.,. „`..' F ......»,.•r..r __..; .. _ Express Mail © Return Recelpt for
, a'i�I' !' .-Merchandise
n - .' _���.�"":` •7:,Dete of Delivery Till adt"
i�,¢ 5... Signature (Addressee) Addressee's Address [Only If requested w
ti f4f Kalnd.fgo is paid)...— r-
m
.. _ :. atu(Agent) _ .... :IMo1f,
orm ecamber-1991.DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
ti.�i`,-:,�-.__�::,��ei..;a�;.,.�,. .R.r.+r �.....v-.�....,w'::•at~.-��+Y�i�:d...•"��:.�'C'-.__`�. ...r•.�dx�r. *-; ._.,.-�.____J":L _..-- —

Iq
i UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
i
( Official Business PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
A USE TO AVOID PAYMENT
H a� d A �1 � yeveCl b� T'�1`Q F POSTAGE, i300
.y
Print your name, address and ZIP Code here
EHNR / OEM
BEVERLY COATS
P 0 BOX 29535
RALEIGH NC 27626-0535

Drawings
-�N
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RED STED
Johnny Adams
Adam's Egg Farm
Rt 1 Box 94
Troy NC 27371
Dear Johnny Adams:
1�•
— 1
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAruRAL RmouRCEs
June 12, 1998 �ECE Ar
k:L;
5 1993
FAYC-TTEViLLr
PEG. 0pFICfz
Subject; Second request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Adam's Egg Farm
Facility Number: 62-1
Montgomery County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997,
In a letter dated February 11, 1998, received by you on February 17, 1998, this office advised you that
we had no record of having received the required Certification for the subject facility. Our letter further
requested that you provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not submitted as
required. This explanation was due by March 19, 1998. To date we have received no response from you.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled110 % post -consumer paper

f
Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that MUST be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(aXIXA). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H .0217(a)(I)(A).
Please respond within 10 days of your receipt of this letter and submit all responses to this matter to the
following address:
Attn; Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case. basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] cat. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Facility Piles Non -Discharge CompliancelEnforcement Unit
DWQ;'G ionil--Offi_zv
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aftmative Action Employer 50% recycledt10% post -consumer paper

CoRRESPONDENCE
z I
NLRM CA a(.? G
DeparbWat or EnWr onnwW tl Cline!

Irk
CCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director RECEIVEL)cretary
September 9, 2010 SEP 13 2010
William Darrell Greene
731 Dover Road
Star, NC 27356 DENR-FAYEiTilllLli:REG10lVAtOFRGI:
Subject: Certificate of Registration No. AWH620001
Manure Hauler Operation
Montgomery County
Dear William Darrell Greene:
In accordance with your Registration Form for Manure Hauler Operations received on August
31, 2010, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Registration issued to William
Darrell Greene. This letter certifies that you have met the registration requirements per 15A
NCAC 02T .1403(a)(2)(E). Your operation is deemed to be permitted by the Division of Water
Quality (Division) to carry out manure hauler operation activities, provided that the following
requirements are maintained:
1. the activities do no result in any violation of surface water and groundwater standards;
2. the activities do not result in a direct discharge to surface waters;
3. animal waste is applied at no greater than agronomic rates (15A NCAC 02T .0103);
4, animal waste is not stockpiled uncovered for greater than 15 days;
5. animal waste is not stockpiled within 100 feet of a perennial stream or perennial water
body;
6. a setback of at least 25 feet is maintained from any perennial stream or perennial water
body during land application; and
7. fields on which animal waste is applied has had a representative Standard Soil Fertility
Analysis within the last three years from a laboratory certified by the Division pursuant to
15A NCAC 02H .0800.
In addition to these requirements, each manure hauler operation must submit an annual report to
the Division by March 1 of each year. The report covers the activities of the previous calendar
year and must contain all applicable information required by 15A NCAC 02T .1404.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 919-73M2211 FAX 919-71H5881 Customer Service:1-877-623.6748
Internet www.ncwaterquality,org
An Equal Opportune y 1 Affirmative Action Employer
one
NhCarolina
Naturally

Enclosed with this Certificate of Registration are copies of the reporting forms and a copy of
1 SA NCAC 02T .1400. Please carefully read this Certificate of Registration and the attached
documentation so that you will be aware of all applicable record keeping and reporting
requirements. .
The issuance of this Certificate of Registration does not excuse you from the obligation to
comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal).
Please be advised that any, ,violation of 1 SA NCAC 02T .1400 or other applicable state statutes or
rules may resuif in'penalties' in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C,
including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
The Division may determine that a manure hauler operation requires an individual permit or
certificate of coverage under a general permit, based on existing or projected environmental
impacts, compliance with the provisions of applicable rules, and the compliance history of the
operation.
This operation is located in a county covered by our Fayetteville Regional Office. The Regional
Office Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional
information concerning this Certificate of Registration, please contact Aquifer Protection Section
staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
---------------------------
_r-
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures
cc: (Certificate of Registration only for all cc)
&ayettev lle Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Montgomery County Health Department
Montgomery County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFO Unit Central Files
MHO Files (AWH620001)

Pit (Oa-1 b
AUG 23
2001
C %Vo tyomeT `&kuvy 'M ni)F da7wftent
P4 Box 643 Troy, KC
Phone [phone]
Attn: Paul Sherman
DENR Water Quality
225 Green St, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Dear Mr. Sherman,
As discussed earlier today, I am sending your office information in regard to the
old John Adams egg hatchery property. It is my understanding from this conversation that
there is some environmental concern about this property in regard to possible cleanup.
The current owner Lester Galloway is considering this property for development.
I am including plats and surveys of the property in question, to show recent divisions. I
am also attaching tax cards of the surrounding property owners and a copy of the tax map
for reference.
The current owner has stated that his plans are to lease the property to the U.S.
Government for storage of military vehicles, along with a tack shop and trailer sales
office,
The County Planning Board is to hear this case for rezoning on August 27, 2001
at TOO pm. It is my intent to present any information that may be pertinent to this case
for the boards review.
I would like to ask that some basic information of the history and current status of
this case, be forwarded to me,
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
My fax number is [phone]
Sincerely,
Brian Huneycutt, County Planner

6ALLOWAT, LESTER F. 8 MAVIS A. 49331 0100 147 01 01-ELDORADD #1 6692 00 11 6317
1 OF 1
44329 US RVY 52 N. TC 3/21/95 8/i1/00 01
NEW LONDON, MC 29127 TRACT 3
6692 00 60 8906 ADAMS
RESIDENTIAL RW HWY 109
1 0210
2
3
4
5
6
MKT ADJ
TOTAL AC
27
POULTRY HE
40 420
16,600
27
EOUIPNENT
40 420
16,900
32
STG FR
32 41
1,312
32
OTC FR
1
8PR- HTD- A/C-
XC11P-
BOOK PAGE NO YR IN PRICE
399 290 06 99 01 V 30,000
341 577 07 97 N 500
268 240 12 92 PRIOR OWNER
194 752 20736-ADAMS, JOHNNY J.
194 165 79 53,000
FF/FT
1.00 998.40 10,97 01 10,932 01 05 03
XOWNED 1.00
10.97
10,952
F/U VAL
3.20 2.00
B 80
.150
L6,128.9
ADAMS ESG FARM
4.00 2.00
8 80
,OtO
1#612 G
32C EG5 STORAGE; C-162-A
8.00 1.00
8 80
.050
524 C
DBK399/PG288 ACTUALLY
200.00 1.00
8 89
1.000
200 8
RECORDED 08-04-00
MONTGOMERY COUNTY REVAL 1996
TIME/DATE 8:35:08-08/2L/a1
W9-GINNY
OBKF VAL
LAUD VAL—
TOTAL THIS CARD
TOTAL ALL CARDS
L -
8
0 93,070
T 93,870
19464
0952
29400
29400
MOTES CHICKEN HOUSES ROT IN USE VERY POOR CONDITION CHANGED FOR 99 4-9-99 JD

6ALLOWAY, LESTER F. ! NAVIS 49690 Oi00 Ot Ot-ELDORADO 01 6692 00 60 6719
t OF 1
PO BOX 270 0/00/00 it/24/99-- 0t
RICHFIELD, HC 29137 TRACT 4
6692 00 60 9906 ADAMS
RESIDENTIAL Ru 'Nvy 109
1 0210
2
3
4
5
6
NIT ADJ
TOTAL AC
1.00 998.40
NOVMED t .00
BOOI'PASE NO YR IN 0
384 378 09 99 Ot Y
369 34 12'98 Oi"Y
34t 377 07 97 N
269 240 12 92
194 752
SPR- HTD- A/C-
ICNP-
PRICE
19,000
13,000
SOO PRIOR OWNER
43912-DRAU6HM, CHAD
FFIFT
10.39 0t 10,373 01 05 03
10.39 10,373 F/U YAL
C-162-A
L
B
0�
T
MONTGOMERY CBUNTY REYAL 1996
TIME/DATE 8:53:29-00/21/01
Y94INNY
OBXF YAL
LAND VAL
TOTAL THIS CARD
TOTAL ALL CARDS
10373
L0400
10400
NOTES

='`
�'' �.
C
Q
'�
.L
�.-,
z
W
tv
-r-

FUTRELL, SILBERT 8412 0100 146 01 01-ELDORADO --#04YCON£RY WITT RErAL 1996
1 OF 1 TINE/DATE 8:37:39-08/21/O1
PO Sax 365 TC 3/21/93 0/63/00 01 99-61#0
DENTON, MC 27239 PACE LOT
RESIDENTIAL NMT 109
1 0410 Y
2
3
4
3
6
HIT ADJ
BPR- HTD- A/C-
NChP-
Mg PATE NO YR IN 0 PRICE
350 164 02 98 01 H
9T WILL
PRIOR OWNER
32629-FU70ELL, J. DALE
fF/FT
1.00 656.00 9.36 Of 4,204 Ot 01 03 2854
TOTAL AC ZCVMED 1.00 9.39 .6,284 F/U VAL 2834
MULLIKIN HONE PLACE
CHANGED TO WOODED i LAND
USE FOR 2001 B-3-40 JS
OBIF VAL
LAND VAL
TOTAL THIS CARD
TOTAL ALL CAROB
L 6.550
8
D
T 6.530
USE VALUE
6204 2834
6300 2900
6300 2900
NOTES

SOO .
10.75 A j 2.00A ash
it 9499�f C}(7
�B•OOA
�=/.�,w�o'��
`/�
}�C�
83w8
(.66A)
0272
TBA
9BA
� • 54A
. �
0
•
664A
3036
0271
2083 (.71A)
4018
036 $(. 26A)
$•
1899 8 4957
( 1. A5A) (. 27A)
2791
7
0
( 1. 20A)
54
0
3661
LfLa I5. I6AI
` Ito • 2
- 6A1
.00A do
• �J%�
26.70 +
2
s j 4331
8 9
(Ozz
LMA
Ob
8194
b 3s :� a
260
'�'� ¢
i 61A)
. a i4 57A
7023 s
4099
° _'°• c 55A)
• �,
o =
7$82
T.
A
1896
6O oA
3B8
.64
w,(f
4712
10.00A
l •
l96
(3.73A)ZZY
54a
{%
/5/
Q
w� •� �
$
2� TR 3 0
V
•
9448 ¢ *
•
' S 12�
048?, 6317
1434
20.02A
. 70A
CEOONIA a wi 1.65A)25
TROD I ST Toy 03
257A •
2363
23.41A
CHURCH 200 3
l0.97A
•
23.43A
3
t84 6241 02 `s'
1116
aQ .21A
(. 67A) " a a g
24
1'S4
3000 190
1020 4a'
1890
14.85A5
�
rf TR 4
22
b
•
± .
7 618
•
1
f
6,BA
3404
17 10.39A
0
400
}
(. 45A)
ve
L556 23
4 1
3463
2sT 2.00A — •q
{p��r�
31 3A
12•
-i
310
e R•
a Cz�3 4254_ ;1H5A• �a
_
..
6 1 40 140
LOT PIN 0 AtOTg L
pQ�
0123
•
7.32A 13•
) 8Rl47 14
2 8452 15
9r
9C
7
10.OA 6C10! 223r45 er►7 A
2m 99p ELDORA
SA 78
AA 9790 C489A
9 96"
10 9439
li .94
12 "m
-le o 13 9E67 A4A
2 3 E It 694, 000 � � E 1, 696, 000 �, � E 1, 691, 000 8

A
�
a
U
Uza
o
Q o
P-��
� N
w .��.
J
oz
✓ V1p �
¢ �V
O
J ..1_.� ..
W
4 ✓P N N
�0d
�.
R 9
o a}
a
a�
7• [aWEr 4
ea 69.
}
0
A^
l
w
4
a-
?
�
a
N
�
z
�
d
•Z U
9
•� � Q
oN
a s
O^
¢ n
~
V
wx
2
C>
Q .0 '
w iQrno
=nPa
4�Nm
•0
W O.W O
1
40
G
boo �
.. cr
d$3-
.�
0
e9, �ru
�3
1a' �
wl/ �41
w:
POW }
er is <
�4
Ep
a
o
@
Sx—
o
a
_
R
B z
O
ary
WQV
- 'e i
O
o JX=
2-P
mo
5 zoos
m m�`i
io_m
K7;1
w ��Zz�
E?lEIIIIEi��i�
A
IL
W
YN
b a
o
-_F.
QUO
Q' W U
W}1
4
F
w
POIi`�„
n�a
�zaz
W .Z.. o o
W
w
K
o o }I rjjYO`Q
ie'.s-E
. 4 „ e7• Mir
�w.
m
IK2
267.69'
Rz
Or
xBA
wxE NIP
4aCn

Z RK
o�
„ aa
'tAs4a2 <�
F
�dL�gn9u
o
F
y oil,
io:ff µr
.FS 61
e-Le
gZ2
� \
i srzol.e
±55
o$$ivtoi.l
g�tl§
Y191
m�
gyg'S
3
a""i usl
gpx;
- Mit
�
p
,p+j6 e ti
n ii®
N1b
' G) I .ro'Yaat 9
_ '1Y aIM_ ,VlO��YY.L
Ill .LL 61 �� a
a 3 .YB
1 i1 _ iV� �oBYZLZiIl
I °1 3v �py 9LYx LZ
c' i.l2. ZL •YB Nd I
>'1Y1o1.4L 12z
r^ 4 3.Ix.LZ .YBZy`
"� V g T1191-ZL
� r
6
Y � y 9e1
® �QY�y
_ S " V.
-_5
B.IFS
22
roR6
— 51
73g6
*n
_��
�viol.,O'
sQQQQ
��e.e

z�n 166H � b�
�aanNa6x� mn - "tid ��tls'J Hl`g ,xn sr u
...m..Eo6 Or
`,]NIA3ANn5 NPsdWlg tky�,���,!'�µ dd.+e
ao Aaw ns i q-
-x dLN3dO yd ft ou NHLY R S; r HHpf
-!O A3nans Nolslnlu V AaYONnoe
w.m gram ���ti�R. rmm.rxaar
,IIPoI 1x xtwisxens 3�a S:,avYb�
IWx^t xuevp v xi s, alaa.11dd sal e
�, xl oa,oe Ymururs.*nu
au.su� ,m ouvnoxw xaeawoe ,
Lpk
iq?$
�� �
g
,nuruyyp?
� ma,nmens �, s�r,nr3a
3ammmm xe viuram2 v�uv z
w n3;.;wsu'".w.mnare
rw r.wxv mm wv.i
urk3 ,
3�j � 166C�:
`JNIA3ALn5 NOSd WIS s�Fy b31S��%.+�
"rx�d�Hl�i°
�
2699 d� �1 uxm� w�m�xw �
¢xrm�s'
9M511Jutl2 �SR1
sya[ m �/%
�o+..w.
vx n, mrrcn,3 ram.
OWN SMYOV I NHOr 8 SHOT NKr
�o A3nens NPislAlo F ANtlo Nfl09
e
wma"� mam _ r =: nor
...rvs � °rrmv. en;wF� Y mrn r xxw }
YSI s l
n .w w�wM a".•.w ��e wwP+w aMw a
.�
WE
ws.L
,N.a ... �.s' w :Ri ,� nosems . �ao3� �
e•+"51�.7871�.
"'
owiAsanans i�osdivls
i6Yry yam'€
: y
�. ne
�srgw
iiw[v.Y3 �-,.y+
k
-0SL=xa�.v3Mi
Ac `i
F I
�/
�V
swvae r Nl for
��
U3d(Md WWI Or 4 ACY TiNHOr
:AD 13hen5 rPI51Ai4 ,uvuNnue
-
..w w
11
,IHn ALxitl� b'm L Ata,awaa cws [
,uur m 3i«uro+prn u n3an,wu raxr 2
inn 3 ,a,w�"u�� rn,
18
m °•v Lei n�Vu�v
I
� � � csx�wpv�.,p

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 17, 2000
Lester F.Galloway
Rt.I Box 94
Troy NC 27371
Subject: Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
AdamOs Egg Farm
Facility Number 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Lester F Galloway;
During the 1999 session, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law directing the North
Carolina Department of Environment of Natural Resources'(DENR) to develop an inventory and
ranking of all inactive lagoons and storage ponds in the State. In order to meet this directive, a
representative of DENR has recently evaluated the inactive lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) on your
property. Inactive lagoons and storage ponds were defined by the Statute as structures which were
previously used to store animal waste but have not received waste for at least one year.
The information collected on your property is contained in the attached field data sheets. Using
this field data, staff ranked your inactive waste structures as high, medium or low according to its
potential risk for polluting surface and/or groundwater. Your waste structure(s) was ranked as
follows:
Structure Number Surface Area (Acres) Rankins;
1 2.27 Medium
This ranking is based in part on the conditions existing on the day of the site visit. Changes in
these conditions or the collectiori and evaluation of additional data may modify the ranking of your
waste structure(s) in the future.
Information on your facility along with over 1000 others contained in the inventory has been
provided to the General Assembly. During this year's session, the General Assembly will consider.
additional requirements for future management of these structures which may include requiring
proper closure of inactive lagoons and storage ponds according to current or alternative standards.
225 Green Street, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 'telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% past -consumer paper

Rating of Potential Risk
Inactive Waste Lagoons and Storage Ponds
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Regardless of their ranking, owners of all waste lagoons and storage ponds have certain
management responsibilities. . These include taking appropriate actions to eliminate current
discharges, prevent future discharges and to insure the stability of their structures. Staff of the
Division of Water Quality will be in contact with owners of all inactive structures that have been
determined to pose a serious environmental risk, based on its ranking and/or additional field data
collected by the Department.
All liquids and waste removed from these structures must be land applied at a rate not to exceed
the agronomic needs of the receiving crops. Any major modifications made to the dike walls or
structure must be done, in accordance with current standards and under the direction of a technical
specialist designated for structural design. Your local Soil and Water Conservation District is an
excellent source for information and guidance related to proper waste application practices, structure
operation and maintenance, and other related animal waste management standards and/or
requirements.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility and liability for
any past or future discharges from your lagoon(s) and/or storage pond(s) or for any violations of
surface water or groundwater quality standards.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this process. If you have questions concerning
your inactive structures, please contact the staff of either in the Division of Water Quality or the
Division of Soil and Water Conservation in the Fayetteville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Montgomery County Soil and Water Conservation District Office
Facility File

Facility Number 62 — 1 Lagoon Number 0.1......... Lagoon Identifier J.n.,aCtl!1.e.,I gRQ11.Q1........................
*tom
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude 35 27 10
Waste Last Added -.-9........................................ Longitude 80 01 —8
Determined by: []Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): 227........................
Embankment Height (feet): j.... ........................
By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: S031417C
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? 0 Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet?. O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? *Yes O No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes Q No O Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 3-14-2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
(*Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 48
embankment condltlon 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
0 Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage 0 Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
Ication equipment fail to make contact and/or Sprayfleld 0 Yes (0 No 0 Unknown with representative 0 Yes 0 NO
unavailable
comments Seepage noted on lagoon wall (outside slope). Lester Galloway has purchased the
property and closed the layer operation. He wishes to close the lagoon as soon as
possible. The spray fields have been sold to someone else.
J

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q. Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other © Denied Access
Facility Number b2 1
0 Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date or Visit 3-14-2000
JO Not O erational 0 Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 2:21-99,,........
Farm Name: Adaat.'N.EggfaJrm......r..:.............................. .......... County: Maim;gmery..................................... FR ............
Owner Name: Lestrcrr.F................................. G.Ruo.way ................................................... Phone No: .7.04.4fr3-,tA3.2.................................. I ..............
..........
FacilityContact:.......................................................... ...............Title:..........................................
Mailing Address:)?,t.1.H.Q&94............................. . Tr.QX... N.C......
PhoneNo: .......................................
... ........................... I................ 27.37.1 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: . . ............................................................................ Integrator:.................. .............. ........... ....... ................................................
Location of Farm:
x.1.0.9..Notclktf .u�.xax..ion.xariftflF..ulfltiarmde.�arQs. arm .t�tt:. Nlm�edtax�i�.�htadisX.l�uxstr................................................................
............ ................................................. I ....... I ........... I ....... ....r.............r.............................. .................. ..........................................................................................................
.....
................. ........................................................ ........................... ................ ....................... ..................... .............................................................r...:........................................
❑ Swine ®.Poultry ❑Cattle ❑ Horse` ,
Design - Current Design Current .-.Design"'-',"',Current
1'oaltry '. Capacity
Population Cattle.. ..,:Caacity Po u' lation
M Layer
51000
0
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
^
Total Design'Capacity 51,000
r ,
Total SSLW .'`
204,000
Number of Lagoons ; , 1 .Holding Ponds l Solid Traps'.
s
Discharges & Stream Inlyachs
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li• discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.' ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. li' discharge; is observed, what is the estimated tlow in gallmin?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
P c�`s N i�1
Reviewer/Inspector Name jE'erryWWyatt� . x ' t.'..t ; ��> try r�]�rY:.J k� W
_.:� 4 �i'aFYy'� Z ��?�.:i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 5/12/2000

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Johnny Adams
Adam's Egg Farm
Rt 1 Box 94
Troy NC 27371
Dear Johnny Adams:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
RECEIVED
FEB 2 5 1999
FAYETTEViLLE
REG. OFFICE
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Adam's Egg Farm
Facility Number: 62-1
Montgomery County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
bekcw the tlire,5hold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid systern
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please subnut all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail alone with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to brine your facility into compliance.
Please he advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to brine each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Al��s L, Z ,
01
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5017'c recycled/10% post-consumerpaper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Johnny Adams
AdamOs Egg Farm
Rt 1 Box 94
Troy NC 27371
Dear Johnny Adams:
NCDENR
NARI CAI�A D IED
ENVFRONMENT ANDD NAT
March 5, 1999 MAR 2 4 1999
FAYETTEVUr'
REG. 01=MC
Subject: Removal of Registration
AdamOs Egg Farm
Facility Number 62-1
Montgomery County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of I5A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H ,0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stern
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at 019) 733-5083 ext 571.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Fayetteville Water Quality Regional Office
Montgomery Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

UNITED STATES NATURAL RESOURCES 227-D NORTH MAIN ST.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION TROY, NORTH CAROLINA
AGRICULTURE SERVICE 27371
------------------------------------------------------------
September 26, 1997
Mr. Johnny Adams RECEIVE®
Rt. 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371 SEP 2 9 1991
Dear Mr. Adams: FAYMEviLLE
REG. OFFICE
This letter is in reference to our telephone conversation on
September 22, 1997 requesting assistance in signing your
certification form. I have scheduled to be at your farm on
October 2, 1997 at 10:00 a.m.
Please be prepared to demonstrate that your Irrigation
System, that was installed by Gra-Mac Distributing Company,
is operating as it was designed.
If you have any questions, please call our office at
572--2700.
Sincerely,
Angel D. Hill
District Conservationist.
cc: Montgomery Soil and Water Conservation District
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
D.D. Moffitt
T.H. Wetmore, Jr.
A.G. Jessup
H.J. Pate, Jr.
R.L. Taylor
E. Buchan

SOIL.& WATER
CONSERVATION
-...,W ontgomery Soil 8, Water Conservatlon District
UG n 7 �gVf North Wn Street, Troy, N. C. 27371 •Phone; [phone]
rm • -I "
Mr. Johnny Adams
Rt. 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
SUBJECT: Request for assistance
. Adam's Egg Farm
Dear Mr, Adams:
August 5, 1997
On July 25, 1997, you requested assistance from the
Montgomery Soil and Water District to survey your lagoon to
determine storage capacity. On July 31, 1997, you also
requested assistance from the District office to complete
the certification form which you received from the Division
of Water Quality.
After review of your requests, the Montgomery County Soil
and Water Conservation District has decided on the
following:
1. As there is no documentation in our office on the
design or construction of your existing lagoon, we
suggest that you contact a private engineer to certify
the storage capacity of your lagoon. We cannot certify
the structural integrity of the dam, nor the capacity
of the lagoon.
2. Because you decided to have Mr. Ben Knox, Regional
Agronomist with NCDA, to develop a Waste Management
Plan, instead of following the Waste Management Plan
that was part of your Agriculture Cost Share Program
Contract, we suggest that you contact Mr. Knorr for
certification of the Waste Management Plan you are
following now.
3. We, with technical assistance from the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, will provide assistance
to certify the Irrigation System that was installed by
Gra-Mac Distributing Company. This is the only part of
.the certification form we can complete.
f IA

r1
It is our opinion that if these contacts are made on your
part to have those parts of the certification form
completed, you will be in a position to submit it to the
Division of Water Quality as required.
If you have any questions, please call our office at
572-2700.
Sincere y,
Mike Haywo , Chairm
Montgomery Soil and Water Conservation District
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation
D.D. Moffitt
T.H. Wetmore, Jr.
A.G. Jessup
H.J. Pate, Jr.
E. Buchan

Facility Number t
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 33 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (to fraction of hours
Farm Status: figRegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ».........»......................._.»...........
....»»._ .,»(............»................�...».._............_. .
Farm Name: ......... _.... County: .........
.i .:.!lf la::f� ...........................».
Land Owner Name: _��. ...._....., .L 3Qx1�.....».»._.......»..............
.»...... Phone No:......_..fe.lsr....__......__....»........».._......_....»__.
Facility Cooctact:..._W.... a"11Dx1`.'J�..�/mlrg.......... .».......».. Title: r..� ?' Phone No: ,�R�..+�,c..
Mailing Address: _...... ,c.u.....1... V a?t..!..`'......__.... .. �_t :.�`- ..... _...... .......��..�.....
Onslte Representative: ... ,W.... .. ....__.... ..... ......... �........�,.........Integrator: .......... ? .».».............................. .. »
CertifiedOperator:...........== .... ................ ...... _........__........ _...... _...... ....... »»..,_»., Operator Certification Number:_.......»..............__....�.,
Location of Farm,
.. .. ...... .»_.... .......»......... »..,....»......._ .... ..».................» ..........».....................».................._ ._.�_......... »_....»_ _ 4
.... _................ _..... .......... . _............ ......... ......... _....... .._...... ..._.._................ _».....
Latitude ` 64 Longitude ' ' µ
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
` Design 1`_`urrent Design Current Design Current #:
Swine r ? x Ga'acI Po ulation ., Poultry' _ .__ Ca aci `EPo 'tilBtlon .Cattle{. ,Ca aci Po�`ulatl n .>
❑ Wean to Feeder Layer Al SO Qo 0 " ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish § ❑ Non La er ❑Non Non -Dairy
El Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder i V.
arrow to Finish=
❑ OtherPT
` x Total SSLW f
b
Numbr oLga�oSaldlnrjPons � ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
� > onsI❑Lagoon Area PAPray Field Area
�l
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes $l No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 63 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes VgNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 12No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?—
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes IgNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 9 Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Co No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 19 Yes ❑ No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Facility Number:... i ... .... L.......
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or HoWinE Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard VOA^ Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ;KNo
64cs-�o
❑ Yes ONO
EfYes ❑ No
Structure S Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ?... ~ ?..1.. .. r-eau, Q4. ..7................... ....... �....__......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in -the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
I8. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
ForCe d FAcilifes Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?.
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes & No
i2l Yes ❑ No
5PYes ❑ No
❑ Yes 112 No
[]Yes ( NO
:0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 6a No
[BYes ❑ No
9 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [--]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question ): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) +
L1
�LA ts��+�sG, ti. vf.at Lowe
NIx,43 4* (e,-e-oNre s,It`d5 ! 5P
-- { VQ4..(�4� `� t. {� �'�., y�,��„ti/ C] �l!/YIj �� W .,!' U� S, i'f �a r►''i �i.''r✓1 S '{"�,1 � 4�Qt7 QY15 �1h�-_ i t 1 � °�/i
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signal
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Qualify Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

O Routine O Complaint O Follow-uR of DWQ inspection I&F011ow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number t Time of Inspection I 33 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Registered Q Applied for Permit (ex:1.2S for 1 hr .IS min)) Spent on Review [�
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:......_ ................................... ...................... .... ...............................................................................
Farm Name: ..,..».....a.�i.....'...!`,J
... _...................... County:..........1,.`.t?.i1wR.1~ »_............
Land Owner Name:... a .. ....i. lla ma ..... _......-» »......» .. Phone .............
Facility Conctact:.......... . .......................... Title:..O! '."�� �1M F" Phone No:.....ti !",,r...................................
Mailing Address: .... ,...112.0.uix.... �J....,.... :Q?�..�� `.......... ........ ..... .......................... ...........'.k.`.. .` ..g........................................
Onsite Representative:........,....... Integrator:..J.......... .....................................
.......
Certified Operator: ... Operator Certiffcatfon Number:.,..,,.............
Location of Farm:
,................................................................................................ I.................................................................................................................................................................
4 ! �[ .N...................................................................................
.........e�3
Latitude =a 4 " Longitude • G 44
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
I)esignurreut. ram^ Design t, Current Design Current
:.:.
:y r rw . y
Swine�� Ca ail :"'io" elation ,Poultry Ca dcl !I'o ulat n u Cattle, Ca'igcl To ula o'
�] Wean to Feeder La r N SO C00 RP. ❑ Dai
Q Feeder to Finish ); ❑Non -La Non -Layer �� ❑ Non-Dai
arrow to Wean �
Fi a v u
Farrow to Feeder T4talDe i n ap�City
10 Farrow to r Fi ish p�
x: �. �...�:
❑ Other i
.� _,�.:, »<-,,t';r�e."'�'=�``�.'&a. �:s. :�'�' y - �r ;�t�. f e« o?4i`f�,.�� .s'' t+'". '� 4� � � g•::�.'"•,%„
EQi
mSubsurface Drains Present
❑ Q Are Lagoon Area Spra Field a
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Z. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon Q Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galltnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/3 Q/97 maintenance/improvement?
Q Yes '& No
Q Yes ig No
❑ Yes 0?No
❑ Yes 1A No
r�
[� Yes
IgNo
Yes
❑ No
© Yes
No
Yes
❑ No
Continued an back

Fsellity Number: ,,,1 ... --...� .........
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes P�No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? o
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes QXNo
Ctructttres fi,,agoons and/or Holding Ponds}
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Ef Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (OPk Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.� ��... _. ............................ ............................ ............................ .................W.....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes WNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes &No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
aYes
❑ No
Wade
Aantieation
I4.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
19 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
`entering
Crop type . ..........?.......7............................................................................
16,
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in -the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
N/A B-Vn�
17.
Does the facility have a lack otadequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[2!�No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0 Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
I,No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
BlYes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
0 Yes
❑ No
Eor
22.
Cerlified )Facilities Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
A�
Corm Tents (refer to question*#) a 1?xplain'any YES,answers and/or any{ recoinmendatEons ar any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary} F E
`J
's I-we-r.Q, d t o vA i n. l 4 are _
c74acs� CS oE���Sh a_ Ytp��� wvec GtY� A �r *..=r4-.e
1 tis A-'S 4�sj o 4lQAN p jv^i b t works n'1 60Y`.15 -�p lov-ys 7 01 r /)
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signat
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

yi
+.,,.
(] DSWCs Animal Feedlot Operation Review "
€��D�� WQ�nl�lla� Feedlot "Operation�5>lteIaspe�ction� ��� � � -#�'�' ��,�4 `
0 Routine C Cum laint Q Follow-ue of DWR ins ection Follow-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:rnm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: JgRegistered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Perrnitted or Inspection Includes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operational - Date Last Operated:... _ »„.................. .....».
Farm Name:
'Land Owner Name:... .� �_....._.. __......._...... Phone No: »..... l:5?a ... .......... ........
» ..
Facility Conctact: w..,.. DIAri. �. _ ...»»..»»... Title: Phone No: .............
Mailing Address: ..».. .dx,...: .... a.,.... _...._ �_4.'..� . _..... __ ,2..2 ?. .....
Onsite Representative:Integrator: _ .......»............................. _..
Certified Operator: .... ...».... ,,, ... ,.__ _.._.Y .. _ »„ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
..»....... ....... »»........................... ....... ........ ..,........ ».... .... ......... ..­.............W...._....... _....... ........_..... ._..... _..............._.._..._...._............... _.......... 4
Latitude 4 K Longitude • ' '+
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
r a +" A
a DesignCitrrettt�< ` °" esign�unent�. �' Resign Current
Swine y,,, F. ,..Foul �D;u r Cattle
pa ci Po ulation {?'}'.. , Ca aci ` ,po ulation � hr t Ca` aci 'Po ula o
[] Wean to Feeder La ❑ Da'
�] Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer s= Non -Da
Farrow to Wean
g sr
arrow to eeder a . fi I utn1. jvesign Capacity
a ow F ish �" ��' '. °`
trta! SSLW
❑ Other y yq k
�s:ft
m�Nbe L gooa Hplding Ponds '"i r,4'Ej Subsurface Drains Presentha
r ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Gcntra1
.1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [] Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes CTNo
❑ Yes I$ No
❑ Yes
IgNo
1Z Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
C% No
10 Yes
❑ No
Continued
on buck

✓ Fasility Number: _19. _ — ..L.....
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Aio
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ONo
Structures {goons and/or Holding Ponds]
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 19 Yes ❑ No
Freeboard4)• Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes WNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E#No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
t2tYes
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
2 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .............:............ .. ...,............�._...�.............._......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in -the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
N/A EFfea— No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ONo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
:0 Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
&Yes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
19 Yes
❑ No,
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No'
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to question'#): Explain any YES. answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.`,:
Use drawings of facilityto better explain situations. {use additioiisl gages as necessary} .
... l � e ��N,� !� �;Cr 11 Y"�Yd • I'tIf GAL. KJ�tS�C �^�� � l� 1,.✓„vmad(�o�/
CMS 4VIi` iA (4404"-
�Lo Viais�t CoVeC c_rc� ro►r
N)c1J s J 6 A-P,
I 1
— 1 V - j, u 1}� P tUM � 11*r w IDS �7^v �tN-�15 � t �7 es
(� 1 f
A J_ � 1 1
!I
l
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signal
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

O❑ DSWC A 1m p� n al eedlot eration Review
�'. tZDWQ`Animal Feedlot OperattoneSlteginspectlon M =�
r
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection MFollow-up of DSNVC review O Other
©ate of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection 33 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Tinte (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .................................. . ...... . .............................................
............ ...................... ........................
Farm Name: ................ �a. hvt rc Ax!M ..... ° ....�r-;1'1x1............................ County:......... .Q t .i�5?.Y F�......,........
.....
.............
Land Owner Name: r ........_..... ..................... Phone No: d 7a �3.57
L nd 0 e e:.% T+rrx!5..... sc.Ht .
Facility Conctact:......... .. .....f t�►aN!n...... _.... ................ Title: EC Phone No:....... ...........................
Mailing Address: ........ Kosa Ko.%AR .... 7s...�1.................................................... ...............'..t.'..`'.`i...... r:...... .......».. _....... _2_2 1......
OnsiteRepresentative:.................r"............................................................................... Integrator:.J.................. . ......................................................... I.......
CertifiedOperator:..........."'..' : ............................... .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of farm:
ti
Latitude �" �� r��" Longitude E: �• C .
General � .
I. Are there any buffers
need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any parrof the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ LAgoon ❑ Spray field ❑Other :
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes (SNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 02 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ga.Uinin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ErNO
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 10 Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [7 No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require J0 Yes ❑ No
4/30/9 7 maintenance/improvement?
=.', Continued on back

Facility Number. ...Aca,�-... .... I..........
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Strustures L Lagoons andlor Holding Qttdsl
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard AI n Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
+,
10. 1s seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
s� �lo
'i ()
(] Yes ONO
L9 Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvemcnt?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Apitlicatioo
14, Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15, Crop type ............. ......
.'....i.:.t......... ,.a=P cv .Qc f..7............................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a iack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes JR•No
❑ Yes &No
-0 Yes ❑ No
aYes ❑ No
❑ Yes J9 No
❑ Yes M No
0 Yes ❑ No
0 Yes RNo
OYes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question j ;Explain any YES answers`and/or�atiy recomritendaiions or any.other comments —
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use addthonal pages as necessary) ., p £ xm }
Na�s -�-a c�of�.+>~ 6. Ce � �+ �{ c� �n i�' �s�e -�C" Q l ate,. ,:,����`�e• 4
! SLJjj ` I ,
csA.w;s� o, v+-p�jt (oVeC crab
f s 4, rQ,rw, ve sXS A P
r .
�nS +k41A�VN1 ^^a [Cs r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signat
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

Str to bf North Carolina
�e rtment of Environment,
.`9e alth and Natural Resources
.yettevllle Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
IDF.HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 7, 1997
CERTMED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Adams Egg Farm,
Route 1 Box 94
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Lack of Necessary Lagoon Storage
Adams Egg Farm (Reg. # 62-1)
Hwy 109 North
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 517197, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
inspected the Adams Egg Farm. It was observed that the liquid waste level in the lagoon
serving your operation was dangerously high and overtopping at several points along the
embankment This condition clearly does not meet the minimum 19 inches of combined
freeboard and storage criteria.
Although no waste from your facility was observed entering the waters of the State, this
situation poses a significant threat to nearby surface waters Consequently, it is of the
utmost importance that you lower your liquid lagoon level immediately via the spray
application of waste on an established vegetative cover during appropriate weather
conditions. In addition, it was apparent that the heavy build up of solids in your lagoon has
greatly reduced the storage volume in this structure. This problem must also be addressed
in order to consistently maintain the minimum 19 inches of combined freeboard and
storage. It is strongly recommended that you consult a technical specialist for information
regarding the removal and disposal of the solids in the lagoon. It is also required that you
have the enclosed certification documents completed by the appropriate technical
specialist(s) and submitted to the address listed on page 5 by no later than August 1, 1997.
Wachovla Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 Ni ff C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Emptoyer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

t
Page 2
Mr. Adams
717197
It has been duly noted by this office that NCDA Agronomist Mr. Ben Knox has already
developed a Waste Utilization PIan (WUP-see Part B, pg. 2 & 4) for your farm. However,
Mr. Knox will still need to sign Part B-as the recognized technical specialist
Please be advised that failure to address this and future problems in the allotted time may
subject you to additional enforcement actions and the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per day per violation.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and
liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these deficiencies. If you
have any questions concerning this matter, please call either myself or Mr. Ed Buchan,
Environmental Engineer, at [phone].
cc: Sue Homewood- Facility Compliance
Central Files - Raleigh
Audrey Oxendine- DSWFayetteville
Ruth Kirby - NRCS Moore County
Sincerely,
1�4a .
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 1DEF.HNFz
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISIONJF WATERQUALITY
May 27, 1997
Mr. Johnny Adams
Adams Egg Farm
Route 1 Box 94
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Lack of Necessary Lagoon Storage
Adams Egg Farm (Reg. # 62-1)
Hwy 109 North
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5/7/97, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
inspected the Adams Egg Farm. It was observed that the liquid waste level in the lagoon
serving your operation was dangerously high and overtopping at several points along the
embankment. This condition clearly does not meet the minimum 19 inches of combined
freeboard and storage criteria.
Although no waste from your facility was observed entering the waters of the State,40s,
situation poses a significant threat to nearby surface waters. Consequently, it is ot the
utmost importance that you lower your liquid lagoon level immediately via the so0y
application of waste on an established vegetative cover during appropriate weather
conditions. In addition, it was apparent that the heavy build up of solids in your lagoon has
greatly reduced the storage volume in this structure. This problem must also be addressed
in order to consistently maintain the minimum 19 inches of combined freeboard and
storage. It is strongly recommended that you consult a technical specialist for information
regarding the removal and disposal of the solids in the lagoon. It is also required that you
have the enclosed certification documents completed by the appropriate technical
specialist(s) and submitted to the address listed on page 5 by no later than June 30, 1997.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 N10C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
Mr. Adams
5/27/97
It has been duly noted by this office that NCDA Agronomist Mr. Ben Knox has already
developed a Waste Utilization Plan (WUP-see Part B, pg. 2 & 4) for your farm. However,
Mr. Knox will still need to sign Part B as the recognized technical specialist
Please be advised that failure to address this and future problems in the allotted time may
subject you to additional enforcement actions and the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per day per violation.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and
liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these deficiencies. If you
have any questions concerning this matter, please call either myself or Mr. Ed Buchan,
Environmental Engineer, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor
cc: Sue Homewood- Facility Compliance
Central Files - Raleigh
Audrey Oxendine - DSW Fayetteville
Ruth Kirby - NRCS Moore County

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources ala
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. }font, Jr.. Governor [D� H M FZ
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISIOK)F WATERQUALiTY
May 27, 1997
CERIFiE.Q MAIL
RETURN RLCEM REQUE-STED ,
Mr. Johnny Adams
Adams Egg Farm
Route I Box 94
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Lack of Necessary Lagoon Storage
Adanis Egg Farm (Reg. N 62-1)
Hwy 109 North
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5 /7 /97, staff from (fie Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
inspected-tlie Adams Egg Farm. it was observed that the liquid waste level in the lagoon
serving; ,y,.ouri:operation was dangerously high and overtopping at several points along the
embanknnent. ' This condition clearly does not meet the minimum 19 inches of combined
freeboard and storage criteria.
Alth6t.igh�'no.waste from your facility was observed entering the waters of the State, this
situatibn-'poses a significant threat to nearby surface waters. Consequently, it is of the
utmost importance that you lower your liquid lagoon level immediately via the spray
application of waste on an established vegetative cover during appropriate weather
conditions. In addition, it was apparent that the heavy build up of solids in your lagoon has
greatly reduced the storage volume in this structure. This problem must also he addressed
in order to consistently maintain the minimum 19 inches of combined freeboard and
storage. It is strongly recommended that you consult a technical specialist for information
regarding the removal and disposal of the solids in the lagoon. It is also required that you
have the enclosed certification documents completed by the appropriate technical
specialist(s) and submitted to the address listed on page 5 by no later than June 30, 1997.
Wachovla Building, Sulte 714, FayettevIlle N
�� C
FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301.5043 ` , An Fqual Qpporlunily Affprnative Actlon Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

["age 2
Mr. Adams
5/27/97
It has been duly noted by this office that NCDA Agronomist Mr. Ben Knox has already
developed Waste Utilization Plan (WUP-see Part B, pg. 2 &4) for your farm. However,
Mr. Knox will still need to sign Part, B as the recognized technical specialist.
Please be advised that failure to address this and future problems in the allotted time may
subject you to additional enforcement actions and the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000-00 per clay per violation.
Nothing in this letter should he taken as absolving this Facility of the responsibility and
liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these deficiencies, IF you
have any questions concerning this matter, please call either myself or Mr. Ed Buchan,
Environmental Engineer, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor
cc: Sue Homewood- Facility Compliance
Central Files - Raleigh
Audrey Oxendine - DSW Fayetteville
Ruth Kirby - NRCS Moore County

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
EDEHNR
DiViSiO�I 1 WATERQUALiTY
May 27, 1997
CERTIFIED MAI'
RETU N RM.-.MpL_-.>iY TE)
Mr. Johnny Adams
Adams Egg Farm
Route I Box 94
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Lack of Necessary Lagoon Storage
Adams Egg Farm (Reg. #G2-1)
Hwy 109 North
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams -
On 5/7/97, Staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
inspected the Adams Egg Farm, it was observed that the liquid waste level in the lagoon
serving your operation was dangerously high and overtopping at several Points along the
embankment. This condition clearly does not meet the minimum 19 inches of combined
freeboard and storage criteria.
Although no waste from your facility was observed entering the waters of the State, this
situation poses a significant threat to nearby surface waters. Consequently, it is of the
utmost importance that you lower your liquid lagoon level immediately via the spray
application of waste on an established vegetative cover during appropriate weather
conditions. In addition, it was apparent that the heavy build up of solids in your lagoon has
greatly reduced the storage volume in this structure. This problem must also he addressed
in order to consistently maintain the minimum 19 inches of combined freeboard and
storage. it is strongly recommended that you consult a technical specialist for information
regarding the removal and disposal of the solids in the lagoon. it is also required that you
have the enclosed certification documents completed by the appropriate technical
specialist(s) and submitted to the address listed on page 5 by no later than rune 30, 1997.
Wachovla Building, Sulte 714, Fayettemiie . FAX [phone]
North Corollnp ?_8301 5043 N r�C An Equal Qpporiurilty Afflrrnallve Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 5€r'h recycled! 1� post-consuntier paper

Page 2
Mr. Adams
5/27/97
It has been duly noted by this office that NCDA Agronomist Mr. Ben Knox has already
developed a Waste Utilization Plan (W UP-sce Part B, pg. 2 & 4) for your farin. However,
Mr. Knox will still need to sign Part B as the recognized technical specialist.
Please be advised that failure to address this and future problems in the allotted time niay
subject you to additional enforcement actions and the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per day per violation.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and
liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these deficiencies, if you
have any questions concerning this matter, please call either myself or Mr. Ed Buchan,
Environnientai Engineer, at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor
cc: Sue'llomewood- Facility Compliance
Central idles - Raleigh
Audrey Oxendine - DSW Fayetteville
Ruth Kirby - NRCS Moore County

of
Facility NumberO=H—= J
Farts Status: L4W S"�'QS
Date of Inspection I SY719
Time of Inspection Y o Use 24 hr. time
Total Time On lour:} Spent onReOew
Inspection (Includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: _ Pdwl s Nv►. _ ... county: .,....,..�..,,,,,�
Owner Name: PhoneNo•
Mailing Address;.... t�'� � � � � ^., - �.� - �. ��� � C.'" .. '17 -?_3 7
Ooslte Representative: Integrator...
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: ~�
Latitude Longitude
113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design
10 [] Wean to -Feeder .mil C
Feeder to Finish Non
Farrow to ftcu
FarrowLj lo FeedeE,s
Farrow to Finish ❑ Other T'voe of Livestock
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/'nnprervement? ❑ Yes MfNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? BYes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -trade? ❑ Yes QNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) E Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? ?
d Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? GYes E3 No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes QNo
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonAolding ponds) require U) Yes © No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is feclity not in compliance with any applicable setback ceiteria? _ - ❑ Yes VNo
7. Did the facility fail to bane a certified operator in maponar'ble charge ('if inspection alter 1/1/97)? Yes 0 No
S. Are theca lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed
Structures fLsaoons and/or Holding
9. Is structural freeboard leas than adequaao7
Freeboard (8): .Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2
D
10. Is seepage observed from any of the struchm?
? [] Yes .l No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Z Yes ❑ No
Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
❑ Yes VNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancehmprovement?
¢f any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste 1lcati n
14, 11 there physical evidence of over application?
.(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
1S. Crop type ...... � LsgL
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
EaLcCrfified F c 1
20. Does the facility fait to have a copy of the Animal Wasta Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Ili. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes ® No
.9 Yes ❑ No
SYes ❑ No
❑ Yes BNo
`Yes C) No
E3 Yes f9lo
,SYes ❑No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes Ra No
WYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Gies ❑ No
13 Yes 13 No
Conunenrs (refer to question #1� Fa�platn any YES answers acid/ur aisy.recommendations or 'tithe cotnmeats: „ <
Use�drac�►tugs of facillO to bitter ex am srruatiuns ,(use$d�tboaal peSes:ea���eceasarl'). _"� „�A, ;,� � �,•
r
� i.owe.r 1.Ju11 [a � Ic.t.�- � �,' tf+ 1'(n
),3.e ja. 1 O cl A/�-
/may
I�J•KC'�! Ta CSC Li.VL cis/ / ISL? ((V' '7�GVsti+ �U-gIJOY�
1J,Q s 4 C,c��t�y uvl `1'' tilluc Mr�d�-- � sv-' vr�-Q. �t1�J" ct-o? f� p..
ReAewer/lnspector Name , t �• /. `r�, i w � },"; `...: �k
ReAwer/Inspector Signature: Date: S- 7-�g1 "2
cc. Dlvbion of Water Quality, Water QuatitySecdon, Facility Assessment Unit t t/td146

1CL = J' =- Q WIEO 11M EPPIKWIG 9CMaCK Cresson?
1. Did the facility hil to have a certified operator In responsible charge (if inspection sfkr I/IA97)?
S. Are them lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be propctly closed?
Itructurel (Legoons and/or, Holding Xpnih)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Fmeboad (ft): -lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
40. h secpMe observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erasion, or any other threats to the integrity of any oithe structures observed?
12. Do any of the mcturts need Maintenancelimprovemft?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation posts an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
-13 - Do any of the structures lack adquate marken to identify start sad stop pumping levels?
jN"aste Agg "Otn
,14. Is then physical evidence of over application?
,(If in excess of MC, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
'15. Crop type
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have i lack of adequate acreage for land application?
IS. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
,Eor_Cerqfied Foeftes Only
20. Does the facility fall to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
,21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
,23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss m-Aew/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
Li ICS Qff INO
;6 Yes E3 No
13 Yes El No
Yes El No
Lagoon 4
U Yes E?No
D Yes 13 No
19 Yes E3 No
E;Vfes El No
0 Yes ONo-
J5Yes 0 No
0 Yes 9194o
OYw 13N*
[3 Yes MONo
E3 Yes Rallo
Wes E3 No
E3 Yes D No
des D No
8 Yes 13 No
Corfiments; (refer to question *):.,E)Tlain any,YES answersand/or d/, rtcoinmcnda�ions'or' M
- Y.Other
Use dia' oftacjit` bd6;Cx .1*"'
Ou
j1Oa'V'k_ 0" f
�e l e>jlof
I
I./
0/1
:gUNVTIA� tVLJ1VJ CW
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: /_�Zx ----- — Date., .—S-- 7—q 7
CC.- Division of 05atcr Quality, Water L)Mality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 1111 A for,

Q
State of North Carolina
Department of Erivlronment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
A, Preston Howard, Jr., PE, Director
April 3, 1997
Johnny Adams
Adam's Egg Farm
Rt 1 Box 94
Troy NC 27371
mum r-Mvr p -Lu l, 1
APR R 7 1997
FAY FrTEV -i L-
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Adam's Egg Farm
Facility Number 62--1
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you,were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator. Our records indicate that these
completed Forms.have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Application Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47,2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Facility File -
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535, AK FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Nl%f An Equal Opportunlrty/Afflrmattve Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post-consurner paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A, Preston Howard, Jr., P.E„ Director
Johnny Adams
Adam's Egg Farm
Rt 1 Box 94
Troy NC 27371
April 3, 1997
APR 0 7 1997
Fi y17__T7r.I,IL__:
Rr—_a 0 �; a,,=
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Adam's Egg Farm
Facility Number 62-4
Montgomery County
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, Our records indicate that these
completed Forms have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Applications Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January I, 1997,
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535, �4�� FAX [phone]
Poieigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 ��C An Equal Opportuntty/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

Q Rotitlne Q Complaint Follow-upof DWQ Inspection O Follow.uE of DSNVC review O Other
Date of Inspection
r�Faduly Number
Time of Inspection Use 24 6r. time
Faun Status: Total Time (In hours) Spent onReview
lor inspection (Includes travel and pmmstag)
Farm Name: CMatr. n.uirr
Owner Name: - 'Phone No: 1910) 572—'3757 �,
MzMingAddress.--I.am_1 ,., —... :,. ..._ .,.� 27371
Onsite Representative: �— tegratn 1.
Certified Operator. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
is
a,.a
�
►�i
Latitude De�` m W Longitude
13 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design
Other Type of Livestock
1. Are there any buffers that need a maintenanrxlimprovemaat? E3 Yes LINO
3. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? E3 Yes EZNO
L If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes V No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, tmotIfj► DWQ) Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimW
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes MNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the opetatioa?{.�;�o�ed ��c� �;�ts'es L7 No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than £tom a discharge? [3 Yes 12fNo
S. Dons any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/bolding ponds) require 10 Yes fl No
... _ ._ maiatenaacrJimproveraemrt? -

6. L iacility rm In compliance with any applicable setback crito:ria? - .. Oyu 10 - .
7. Did the facility tail to have a certified operator its responsible charge of kMm:don meet 1/1/9'7)? NI k r-�N,
L Are these lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly ckts V m Yes RNo
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdint' Pands)
9. 72 structural frcebosrd less than adecgrate? jDYes 13 No
Fxeboard (ft):. Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
Ca...M
10. Is seepage observed fmm any of the s nuaires? -' 7 Q Yes 13 No
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 13 Yes Bla
.U. Do any of thestructures need maintenancehmprovement? ❑ Yes UNa
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses ran
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate marke n to identify start and stop pumping kwels?
Rrafte 4vplieatfeErr
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
Of in excess of WMP, or runoff enty
entering waters of the State, notify DW
1S- Crop type = � 61
16. Do the active craps differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
27. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acrcage for lard application?
,19. Does the cover crop need improvemoat?
19. Ii there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
Fgy Certified >rac0iti�
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Nam readily avallable?
21. Does the facd"lity fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way'(
22. Does record keeping need imprtmetow?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewcrilnspector fail to discuss reviewlmspection with owner or operator in charge?
E Yes Q No
- 13 Yes E16w
D Yeas
WO
Q Yes
Wo
SYes
Q No
❑ Yes
ULN
❑ Yes ONO
Q Yes ` P4o
7 o
g1 Yes Q No
E] Yes IRNo
Comments (refer to quest;oa #) Explain 00y YES answers and/ daa�n�or �ny.otl�r,wmma1
Uacrawm bf factli to better ex lain s�ttsattons etse edcltt�oaal `a es rre -
$ :., . , _ „ty, %p _.. .._- (
oJt1�s1� Q, s�. �� ���.,,+ cis PxLe Vtj -a
Q
•wine. �,�ov res ns.t w�s� vu'� ;I /j J
LJ
r, �du/2fi �a�tiavl +9w� ttVC�E' 14.5 Vr� $PIt7 I,fy��/WIQ ia1c3
oQfj.,. 'j — e- TX W4' t'� we'Au V T V e C'O ve r- Vely Sv o r%
�-
""
Reviewer/intpector Narste`•'"r '"_
Revhverllnspector Signature: Date:
..
". Dlvfslon of Haler Quarlry, Water Quality Section, Farlllty Assessment Uni+ " " 101"

aa. as mcwty not in compliaaea with any atppliaable m bick ci#be ? — -
]OYUPilo•
7. inn the f':�-iL!; tH toy.:;:. a ceaffied operator in rmq*wibk charge (if boa after U1197)7
N f � �}3FetIr"34Jo
L Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which head to be properly closed?
Z] Yes RIo
V. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
J9Y= ONO
Freeboard ft .Lgooa 1 Lagoon► 2 lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed Otto any of the Woofs ?
n Yes 13 Na
11. 1s erosion, or any other ftrt�ft to the integrity of any of the suactures obaervad?
Yes Flo.
32. Do any of the structums need maintenan ovement? ' '
d Yes Pio
(If any of questions 91-12 w u sumered yes, and the situation poses in
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structurn lack adquate mwk= to identify start and stop pumping lrotW
ES Yes E3 No
Mast! AtsQlicatian
14. U there physical evidence of over application?
D Yes "o-
.(if in excess of VW, or runoff entering ww= of the State, notify DWQ)
Is. crop
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
Yes P10
17. Does the facility have it lack of adequau acreage for Ind application?
CI Yea Rio
1S. Does the caner crap need improvement?
Yes E3 No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
rj Yes Rio
Ur Certified FgeOfflu Onix
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes ONO
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Anima] Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes ONO
22. Does record keeping need improvmwa
o
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency!
M Yes 13 No
24. Did ReviewerIlmspertor fail to discuss reviewPmspection with owner or operator in charge?
E3 Yen 1PNo
Ccmmeiats (refer to questi6; i� Explain nrjy YES answers antllora reeoiam�danpns or say o
US:
drawings bf facility ta,better ezplaigaituat�ons; use aoaa�pages;"As
ctita�ryj .�;o •„ �,, 7;3*�t x�..,,,_ }
-- j�ez'�e C.� ot�usl� p�su .�-� assocr•e�lu�„�r' workr �rru+e aVerC+x ¢
yy • LPL �U ri'� t As`�. � G%lU�l - a j�.�
�dc►A� �a �o�vl ��'g u' � 1f' V �" AS,' • vl �k 5f V W
s 15,► „yes cps su� afiP�etiJ,
dw
ii te..Cs�•f'�i�. kbf7�+" W¢a V`r`v� GOYer• veJti,i Saori .itm� W
54 } { ( n.a.� �„ re,vrn o,�e o l �`ds •�. (o,�o r,
eel 8
RevieweMnspector Name��,'''
Reviw•erlinspector Signature; - - �p Date:
.may
cc Division of Water Qua t , Water QuaW Secdon, FaWity Assasmrnt Us& I ' " A~

Date of Inspection
Facility Number ;
Time of Inspection I I g Use ?A hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReAew
Farm Status: or Inspection (includes travel stud processing)
Farm Name: County:
Owner Name: Phone No;
Mailing Address:— 10 24 273 724---
Onsite Representative: integrator:....,=...T
Cerdfled Operator: Operator Cerdfication Number:
Location of Fame:
Latitude • Longitude Q•
E3 Not O eratianai Date Last Operated:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Clj=ow to Feeft
Farrow to Finish
1. Are there any buffers that need a eaintenancerinTrovement? ❑ Yes Wo
2 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes QIo
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? , ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ 0 Yes No
C. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in g4tnia?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) (}Yes MNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pert of the operation? ❑ No
4. Was &ere any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than $om a discharge? ❑ Yes IgNo
0
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 93 Yes ❑ No
_ . ........W . _ . maintenance improve ncnt?
i

6. h facuity not is compliance with any applicable setback criteria? - ❑ Yes '�ro
7. Did the fa';ility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? NIA E f"'El- o
S. An there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes fallo
Structures {Lopoons and/or HaldinQ Pondg -
9. Is structti al freeboard less than adequate?
reeboard'(ft)c : .Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? _
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the'smi&ftires need maintenance m4wovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was -answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or ebn lronmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste AAplieatlon - i - .
14. h there physical evidence of over application?
.Of in excess of VW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. tamp-
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Anima] Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
It. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
Far Certified Factiitles Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Wa m Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
Z. Does facility requi a a.follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer&spector;41 to discuss revie'w/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
Comments (referto`question:#) Explatn any 'ES answers and/or$�yreco=
A •
Yes ❑ No
Lagoon 4
' '? §E3Yes [] No
E2 Yes BNo
17 Yes Plo
M yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Elo-
❑ Yes Rio
❑ Yes %No
MYes 0 No
❑ Yes ULNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes `*10
7 13Ye3'$No
91 Yes D No
❑ Yes UNo
c o `` 'Js��. �,'}�.'-s a�-.� a'sSoGA luMI w D" ks .
I?Vd A5 -P W." 5Prop �1r'r_a$1o„ do � ��
c•o� 'Yr'av�s
S "'9 f5,JwAmt c-Ou'es c,rOC Surt.� 0PrL
�" �Y CBS, l'n.. CS ���� �f� {w�'!Y✓� in��DL'�,f (/�' "' "-�T U'F. CAl/� r' IIQJ'y S�l]Yi� :'��PJMI�-� �J% �Wv�.'
CzmM Sa
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: _ ._ „ e7 /7 Date:
cep MUhinn Af Uirirr llunlih.. WA#&-�-

Date of Inspection
Facility Number fob- - , I . .
Time of Inspection Use ?A hr. time
Farm Sixtus: car}iP Total Time (in boars) Spent onReview
lor Inspection (Includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: So�.R" %r�.rw►s g �arw► County:
OwnerName: Phone No:,-i2/0 J 5:11-33b, I ,�...,.
Melling Address: — A-, 1 � 14
Onsite Representative: I —�..— egft nt r.
Certified Operator —
Operator Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
❑ Not O eratianal
Date Last Operated:
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
-
'��+urr�be�
y • 7 , �y
Nrr,�� fir, aultxY Y Nvatber,.:'C.xttlew<" .fib
❑ Wean to Feeder's as o yak;;'El Dairy I
'
❑ Feeder to Finish x ❑Non- *k '113 Reef
W O W�V''...
Farrow to Einisb 1 ❑ Other ijrpe of Livestock
" ..s',.a t.a`:�.r y;�A� w�#'en«"'�'jtl ryi%-1-,+;,,t;,�1 IS�R=�i"�.�.��^�•�w..���""�'...>'�N'�,:5�«"7•.��.w�"�+€�,�, i4 "t.:k ,-r __ - y':�Y»;. "'� "d�%'x �.
} r,
Number of Lagoons !Holding Ponds I Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spra Field Area
e H;
I. Are there any buMn that need maintenancelirnprovemeat? 0 Yes BNo
2 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q10
a If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Dyes ;3 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface WatO (lfyes, notify DWG Yes P No
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discbwlc bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ym Mo
I Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? CFcaM C10%9A JRh P' ts),Mes 17 No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ]Q Yes ENO
I Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsUlding ponds) require 19 Yea 13 No
. .. ..... maintenanceJioaptvvesnertt?

6. b ihci3ity not io complieace with any applicable wrack criteria? - r] Yes 'P$Io
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 11i197)? ��,� S*O-I '' No
L An there lagoons or storage ponds on site which aced to be properly closed? t] Yes -12N0
Structures (Laeoans and/or Holding Pntrdsl
9. Is struc= l freeboard less am adequate?
Fraboand (Bj: • ,Lagoon l Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
r n
e
10. b seepage observed froth any of the structures?
11. b erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenanewimprovement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public bealth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate marker: to identify start and stop pung4g kvels?
Waste fL
14. b there physical evidence of aver application?
.(If in excess of %W, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWty
1S. Crop
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for lead application?
18, Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
M Certified Factllties Ohl ►
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plea in any way?
22. Does record keeping treed improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same ageW
24. Did Reviewar Inspector fail to discuss ieviewlmrpection with owner or operator is charge?
MYes ❑ No
Lagoon 4
Ll Yes rj No
13 Yes WOO,
fl Yes Pfiso
El Yes t] No
Yes Wo-
fl Yes
WO
E3 Yes
Wo
15Yes
0 No
D Yes
0rlo
E3 Yes Olo
E3 Yes VNo
7 0
93 Yes E3 No
0 Yes IRNo
t'ammeats (refer to sluestton #) Explain say ES answers and/or seccmrrieadao tls or an coma f W �~�`
Ute drawings :o!`t'acrlr"ty to better explasp artuagous use addibonalpages as ue�r,Mv
.... 11 nn , g x
C, t o k uSM fl*gr� "S.Mfa�4ot atVm�jl` WDrPCs to QtYVej dV2r�av�s �
� nn
:A�ln� �.ou`,e6 wet WC.�$�L CSv
1L6/c1�I �}
N -tea jdu�2-r ta�xavl ��'r�+�id �fV� �S V"O, Sere a�pl' fan CIA DMA �s�AW
IMPlJe s .. esfxy�� � r v -R e r�v� r- v , s�onm"J moire s
a`NYR�t 4•AC4a.� �f{Di..w wlnr�lnr �Y
Reviewer nspactor Name --+-r..""r -"w ,�---•.•,
/1 r,.�.:s��1�v��.:�,-
ReviwerRaspector Signature; g p Dart.
c, Divition of K'arer Quafi%. Writer Quality Secde.x, Facility Asseasment Unit .-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Johnny Adams
Adam's Egg Farm
Rt i Box 94
Troy NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams:
VUL-W TWA
E:)ERHNFZ
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Adam's Egg Farm
Facility ID #: 62-1
Montgomery County
N.C. nt'". CW
ENVIRONMENT. I-1 F..1t.T K
& NATURAL Ri SOUP(ALS
DEC 12 1996
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HIlA6E=
NOOOESVRLI 1;E6 OVAL OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an 01C,
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please tail
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
,
Sincerely,
FOR Steve W. er
Enclosures
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System ;0 Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 W% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

SOIL &WATER
CONSERVATION
Montgomery gait i Water Conservation Dlatrict
W-D North Main btmet Troy, N, C. 97371 ■ P"MI (610) 5""04
Mr_ Johnny Adams
Rt. 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams:
SIP; E r,
-OCT 8 1296
LLE REG. OFFIGL
October 8, 1996
On May 29, 1996, the Montgomery Soil and Water Conservation
District and staff from the Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources conducted a spot check visit to
your poultry operation on Highway 109. Their findings are
as follows:
1. The applicant's file at the District Office contained
documentation that'Mr. Adams was notified in writing
on February 23, 1996 that the operation had been out -
of -compliance since December 5, 1995.
2. The above referenced notification allowed 30 days for
the applicant to correct specific deficiencies and to
implement the Waste Management Plan. This thirty day
period ended on March 26, 1996.
3. The solid set system appeared operational and the appli-
cation fields had adequate vegetation, However, the
lagoon effluent level was well above the start pump
elevation and there was less than one foot of freeboard
storage. It was obvious that the sludge accumulation
greatly attributed to the lack of storage space. In
addition, it appeared the waste conveyance pipes from
houses to the lagoon were partially blocked, as the
ground was saturated with effluent and effluent was
puddling at the back of the houses.
4. The Waste Management Plan stipulated that the removal of
the accumulated sludge was necessary in order for the
Waste Management System to operate Correctly. This
Waste Management Plan is a part of the Agriculture
Cost Share Program Contract (Contract i65-95-04-16).

Mr. Johnny Adams
October 8, 1995
Page Two
Because your operation is clearly out -of -compliance, demand
is hereby made for the immediate repayment of the $12,852.00
you received in Agriculture Coat Share Program funds. Your
check or money order should be made payable to the N.C.
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources and
submit it within 10 days of receipt of this latter. Your
failure to comply with this demand will result in further
collection efforts by the N.C. Division of Soil and Water
Conservation, and the N.C. Office of Attorney General.
Sincerely,
Mike Haywood, Chairma
Montgomery Soil and Water
Conservation District
cc: C. Dewey Botts, Director
Jerry Dorsett, Regional Coordinator
NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
T.N. Wetmore, Jr., Assistant State Conservationist
Angela D. Hill, District Conservationist

SOL & WATER
CONSERVATION
Montgomery apii a Water Conservation District
227-D North Main Street. Troy. N. 0. 27371 a Phone: [phone]
Mr. Johnny Adams
Rt. 1, Box 9B
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams:
s 1996
YETTEVILLE REG. OFFICL
October B, 1996
On May 29, 1996, the Montgomery Soil and Water Conservation
District and staff from the Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources conducted a spot check visit to
your poultry operation on Highway 109. Their findings are
as follows:
1. The applicant's file at the'District Office contained
documentation that'Mr. Adams was notified in writing
on February 23, 1996 that the operation had been out -
of --compliance since December 5, 1995.
2. The above referenced notification allowed 30 days for
the applicant to correct specific deficiencies and to
implement the Waste Management Plan. This thirty day
period ended on March 26. 1996.
3. The solid set system appeared operational and the appli-
cation fields had adequate vegetation. However, the
lagoon effluent level was well above the start pump
elevation and there was less than one foot of freeboard
storage. It was obvious that the sludge accumulation
greatly attributed to the lack of storage space. In
addition, it appeared the waste conveyance pipes from
houses to the lagoon were partially blocked, as the
ground was saturated with effluent and effluent was
puddling at the back of the houses.
4. The waste Management Plan stipulated that the removal of
the accumulated sludge was necessary in order for the
Waste Management System to operate correctly. This
Waste Management Plan is a part of the Agriculture
Cost Share Program Contract (Contract #65-95-04-16).

Mr. Johnny Adams
October 8, 1996
Page Two
Because your operation is clearly out -of -compliance, demand
is hereby made for the immediate repayment of the t12,652.00
you received in Agriculture Cost Share Program funds. Your
check or money order should be made payable to the N.C.
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources and
submit it within 10 days at receipt of this letter. Your
failure to comply with this demand will result in further
collection efforts by the N.C. Division of Soil and Water
Conservation, and the N.C. Office of Attorney General,
Sincerely,
Mike Haywood, Chairma
Montgomery Soil and Water
Conservation District
cc: C. Dewey Botts, Director
Jerry Dorsett, Regional Coordinator
NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
T.H. Wetmore, Jr., Assistant State Conservationist
Angela D. Hill, District Conservationist

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
E:)EF.HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 6, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams c�
Troy, NC 27371 Y08Y �G /Of
f !�✓ ,�� SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co.
Dear Mr. Adams,
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that we have
received and reviewed you most recent correspondence concerning the
status of your farm. While we do appreciate your attention in this
matter, this Office will require more information regarding the
progress being made towards obtaining a Certified Waste Management
Plan for your farm. This Office must receive a follow up response
from you that addresses when you plan to have a Certified Waste
Management Plan 'and a summary of what has already been done in the
process of obtaining such a plan. This Office must receive your
response no later than August 20, 1996. If no response is received
from you by August 20, 1996, this Office will forward a
recommendation to the Director of Water Quality that he revoke the
deemed permitted status of your facility. This revocation could
4 ..•-�.J bL '- 1 a t in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg Farm
for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call
Michael Wicker, P.E. or myself at [phone].
sincerely,
FBuchan
Environmental Engineer
cc. Diane Wilburn - Facility Compliance
Gerald Dorsett - DSWC Winston Salem
Angela Hill - NRCS Troy
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North C orollno 28301-5043 NO C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Slate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
MA
1D1HHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 6, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
'(08y
Troy, NC 27371
0� SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co.
Dear Mr. Adams,
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that we have
received and reviewed you most recent correspondence concerning the
status of your farm. While we do appreciate your attention in this
matter, this office will require more information regarding the
progress being made towards obtaining a Certified Waste Management
Plan for your farm. This office must receive a follow up response
from you that addresses when you plan to have a Certified Waste
Management Plan and a summary of what has already been done in the
process of obtaining such a plan. This Office must receive your
response no later than August 20, 1996. If no response is received
from you by August 20, 1996, this Office will forward a
recommendation to the Director of Water Quality that he revoke the
deemed permitted status of your facility. This revocation could
rccult in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg Farm
fnr- operation of a waste system without a permit.
if you have any questions concerning this matter, please call
Michael Wicker, P.E. or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
E JB
Environmental Engineer
cc: Diane Wilburn -- Facility Compliance
Gerald Dorsett - DSWC Winston Salem
Angela Hill - NRCS Troy
Wachovia Bullding, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX 91D-486-0707
83 North Carolina 701-5043 N%`)v C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 91OA86-1641 60% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
EDF.=HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams,
SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that we have
received and reviewed you most recent correspondence concerning the
status of your farm. We do appreciate your attention in this
matter but this Office will require more information regarding the
progress being made towards obtaining a Certified Waste Management
Plan for your farm. This Office must receive a follow up response
from you that addresses when you plan to have a Certified Waste
Management Plan and a summary of what has already been done in the
process of obtaining such a plan. This response must be received
by this Office ten (10) days after the receipt of this letter. If
no response is received from you within ten (10) days of receipt of
this letter, this office will forward a recommendation to the
Director of Water Quality that he'revoke the deemed permitted
status of your facility. This revocation could result in this
office taking civil action against Adams Egg Farm for operation of
a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call
Michael Wicker, P.E. or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Z 1�
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
cc: Diane Wilburn - Facility Compliance
Gerald Dorsett - DSWC Winston Salem
Angela Hill - NRCS Troy
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 NOC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 60% recycled/ IQ% post -consumer paper

- Suite of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
FAA
[DaHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams,
SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co,
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that we have
received and reviewed you most recent correspondence concerning the
status of your farm. We do appreciate your attention in this
matter but this Office will require more information regarding the
progress being made towards obtaining a Certified Waste Management
Plan for your farm. This Office must receive a follow up response
from you that addresses when you plan to have a Certified Waste
Management Plan and a summary of what has already been done in the
process of obtaining such a plan. This response must be received
by this Office ten (10) days after the receipt of this letter. If
no response is received from you within ten (10 ) days of receipt of
this letter, this Office will forward a recommendation to the
Director of Water Quality that he'revoke the deemed permitted
status of your facility. This revocation could result in this
office taking civil action against Adams Egg Farm for operation of
a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call
Michael Wicker, P.E. or myself at [phone].
Sincerely, n
Z-�e-dC_
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
cc: Diane Wilburn - Facility Compliance
Gerald Dorsett - DSWC Winston Salem
Angela Hill - NRCS Troy
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville -Vy FAX 91D-486-0707
North Carolina 28301-6W3 NO C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 W%recycled/10% post -consumer paper

.:1.
Z O16 151 034
Receipt for
Certified Mail
No, Insurance, Coverage, Provided,
ro t Doi nettuse0b0hternetiiarrailMmill
ti$em Rtj,ersa}1
sitnn im
I
MR JOHNNY ADAMS
S`"eR0UTE 1 BOX 98
PC TkbYlfd Codt7371
Pastage
Certified Fee
1.10
Soeclai Deiivery Fee
Ae)Sh!Cled Dairvary Fen
M
kntwn Receipt Showing
la Whom & Date Delivered
1.10
G
C
OD
Raturn Heceipt Showing to Whom,
Date, and Addiessee'S'Address
TOTAL Postage
& Fees
A
t? .l
Postmark or Date
7-16-96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan S, Howes, Secretary
, M&4
111111111111111116 1DaHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 16, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams,
SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that we have
received and reviewed you most recent correspondence concerning the
status of your farm. We do appreciate your attention in this
matter but this Office will require more information regarding the
progress being made towards obtaining a Certified Waste Management
Plan for your farm. This Office must receive a follow up response
from you that addresses when you plan to have a Certified Waste
Management Plan and a summary of what has already been done in the
process of obtaining such a plan. This response must be received
by this Office ten (10) days after the receipt of this letter. If
no response is received from you within ten (10) days of receipt of
this letter, this Office will forward a recommendation to the
Director of Water Quality that he revoke the deemed permitted
status of your facility. This revocation could result in this
office taking civil action against Adams Egg Farm for operation of
a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call
Michael Wicker, P.E. or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
�i
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
cc: Diane Wilburn - Facility Compliance
Gerald Dorsett - DSWC Winston Salem
Angela Hill - NRCS Troy
Wachovio Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville * FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 N490 CAn Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 60% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Gbal) I
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 15, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams,
SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that we have
received and reviewed you most recent correspondence concerning the
status of your .farm. We do appreciate your attention in this
matter but this Office will require more information regarding the
progress being made towards obtaining a Certified Waste Management
Plan for your farm. This Office must receive a follow up response
from you that addresses when, you plan to have a Certified Waste
Management Plan and a summary of what has already been done in the
process of obtaining such a plan. This response must be received
by this Office ten (10) days after the receipt of this letter. If
no response is received from you within ten (10 ) days of receipt of
this letter, this Office will forward a recommendation to the
Director of Water Quality that he revoke the deemed permitted
status of your facility. This revocation could result in this
office taking civil action against Adams Egg Farm for operation of
a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call
Michael Wicker, P.E. or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer
cc: Diane Wilburn - Facility Compliance
Gerald Dorsett - DSWC Winston Sale 7
Angela Hill - NRCS Troy

Ln qq & �� 1
This office requested that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the MRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified Waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental -Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.
Ve
r j Araj C✓ el L 6 e. S 6 �✓�C � �
r
7�0 . .s a JIW-r.
407 'A a, 6W '/-V
q� rr 2 .►-� o ��
U
JUL Y 1 06
ENV, MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVIL.L_E REG. OFFICE
L111WIA P-6d
1?a /A% 0- /�'

This office requested that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the MRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in ite
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.
�Ve
D T-- e- ' �`"7 00 r✓ i,r
740 - 6 l,�- s 0 i/W-S-
/`All*-..e sr �7 ``j rr. •--e VW—
5-//.1l /--a P,- A
�--
q)C-Ae-0-11
.5Q-f'ldr,-L,
e_1 ^--V G:� <-
-�a ,.-q . _e--
%1 /� TV VIET v I Q ��
P'VED
JUL 11 IN6
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
Q A, Alt AW,4to -�

Stcte of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDF.=HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
JULY 81 1996
Mr. Gerald D. Dorsett, CPM
Regional Coordinator
Division of Soil and water Conservation
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241
Subject: Johnny Adams Egg Farm
Facility # 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Gerald:
In response to your letter of June 18, 1996 1 wanted to update you
on our last inspection of July 3, 1996. At this time the farm is
in much the same condition ad on May 14, 1996 and we hand delivered
Mr. Adams our May 20, 1996 letter with a requirement to get an
adequate certified waste management plan and respond within 10 days
as to when this would be accomplished. We had to redeliver this
letter because our previous certified mail of May 20, 1996 was
returned.
As you are aware both the local district representatives and our
staff have been concerned about this farm and held several joint
meetings onsite with Mr. Adams. Everyone , including Mr. Adams, is
aware of the deficiencies at the farm and the need to correct them.
We required him to get a certified plan in our letter of November
23, 1994. The farm obtained a waste management plan from NRCS in
March 1995 that allowed temporary application onsite of poultry
waste but required more extensive measures prior to final
implementation. In the winter of 1995/96 this office again was
asked to investigate this site. Overtopping of the lagoon was
apparent, however, the waste was seeping over at such a slow rate
and the lagoon is located at such a distance from surface waters
that no discharge to surface waters could be ascertained.
A review of the waste management plan revealed that no minimum
freeboard was required, that no application of wastes was allowed
until one year of crop establishment, that no certification of the
animal waste management plan had been submitted to DEM and that Mr.
Adams and NRCS were in dispute over his compliance with the plan in
order to finalize cost share money.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayeffevllle�� FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 N%q F C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Gerald Dorsett DSWC
July 8, 1996
Page 2
While these well documented deficiencies are serious concern to
this office we have not documented a discharge that requires
enforcement, we have tried to facilitate acquiring a certified
waste management plan and we are going to recommend the loss of
deemed permitted status if this matter is not resolved promptly.
we are constrained by the legal proceedings required to give proper
notice for such action. We did so in the May 20 , 1996 letter and
in our recent hand delivery.
As you stated the deficiencies noted in you letter of June 18, 1996
are indicative of a waste management system not being properly
operated and a threat to the environment. None of these
deficiencies warrant enforcement action by the .0200 rules because
the waste management plan in effect is neither certified properly
nor does it state specifically that these practices are in
violation of the plan.
Rest assured this office is going through the proper regulatory
channels to bring this farm into compliance with the North Carolina
Water Quality Regulations.
If you have any questions about this matter please contact either
myself or Ed Buchan , Environmental Engineer, at [phone].
Sincerely,
C
Michael C. Wicker, P.E.
Water Quality Section
Supervisor
Fayetteville Regional Office
MCW/mcw/dorsett
cc: Dewey Botts
Preston Howard
Steve Tedder
Dennis Ramsey
Kerr T. Stevens

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James S. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary June 18, 1996
Mr. Mike Wicker,
Regional WQ Supervisor
NC DEHNR DEM Water Quality Section
Wachovia Bldg., Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Dear Mike:
e��
E)EHNR
JIM it �B
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLE REG. OFFICE
I recently received a copy of a letter from your office dated May 20, 1996. This
letter references the May 14, 1996 visit to the Johnny Adams Egg Farm. In this to
Johnny Adams, it was stated, "further actions are needed to insure proper
handling of waste at this operation."
I have traveled by the Adams Farm at least six times during the past four
months. Each time I have observed the lagoon with animal waste at a level which
exceeds NRCS design criteria.
On May 29, 1996 I participated in an Agriculture Cost Share Program audit in
Montgomery County. During this audit I visited the Adams Farm and observed
several problems with the waste management system. These problems included:
- the lagoon containing waste at a level that exceeds NRCS design criteria
- a brown strip of vegetation on the dam, evidence that the lagoon has been
over topped by waste
• a lack of agitation that has resulted in a dense accumulation of solids
limiting the holding capacity of liquids.
- outlets from the layer barn that are clogged and have resulted in the
accumulation of feathers and waste products outside the barn and unable
to reach the waste lagoon.
These problems are indicative of a waste management system that is not being
properly operated and is a threat to the environment. I encourage you to take
action ASAP, that will get the Johnny Adams Egg Farm into compliance with
North Carolina Water Quality Regulations.
�Sincerely
Gerald D, orsett, CPM
Regional Coordinator
cc: Dewey Botts
Montgomery SWCD
Daphne Cartner
Tom Wetmore
585 Waughtown Street, N%)C
FAX [phone]
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241 'An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-771-4600 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDEEHNFZ
Division of Environmental Management
May 20, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5/14/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your egg laying operation and the lagoon
and spray fields serving the waste management of this operation.
An inspection report is attached outlining the observations of staff during
this inspection. It appears some of the corrections outlined in our letter
of March 5, 1996 have been implemented; however, as noted in the inspection
report, further actions are needed to insure the proper handling of waste at
this operation.
As previously noted in prior letters this office needs an update of the
status of your certified waste management plan. If no response is received
from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter this office will forward a
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Environmental Management
that he revoke the deemeed permitted status of your facility. This
revocation could result in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg
Farm for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions about this matter please call Ed Buchan or myself
at ( 910 ) 486-1541.
Sy�i"ncerely,
Michael Wicker, P.E.
Region water Quality Supervisor
cc: Chris Walling- DSWC
Gerald Dorsett DSWC ( Winston Salem )
Wochovla Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX 910-48"707
North Carolina 28301-5U3 NOC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

i
Division of Environmental Macagerrtent
Animal Feedlot Operadons, Site Visitation Record
Farm N J. ��_ r r-• fit`-: .� ,, .. .
Owtsdr Names -VIINd 1 s; No,• q kca -7 z_ -
On Site Repmrwatsttv+e: Integnmr. I (�°
Mailing Address: F ` \ oI<
-r t R
Physical
. Latitttdr: Lon lode: /
Qygrat[QnDissslutlon: (baled oa dedp chamctarWes)
7 5ow swine No. ofMLwab �floutery 4p gfAa nwlt O of Cady No, cfAnsnwls
r c� �7'
Q Nun y a NDWLayer `+—' a Bad
aFOOCIM
0*94�"oJ11►rcs&actr _ — - lv raJAwlnwfr
Mmba of lagoons: l (include Jn dx DraafaV and t?bwr.atJotu the bwboard of each tajoaa)
Y.C�op7t
Is IMoon(s) fine:board less than I foot + 25 year 24 boar storm Mmp?:
Yes O No 0
1s seepage observed from the, Iagvcn?:
Yea 17 No Q--
Is erosion obstsved .
Yes O No 0r-�
Is any discharge obir rA?
Yea 0 No Q---
a Man-wadr a NotM&WMOde
Cover Oup
®' O
Dona tlu facility Deed more acreage far spsa)riagg7:
Yes No
Does dbe cover drop need 1mprovttu aft
Yes G-'No 13
(Un Ae eropr which need bgwuw w)
Crop VW;
.. SalbaCl# Gyfraia '.:. .. ' _ _ ..
- '. " ' • • • ' . .
Is a dwelling located within 2ti0 feet of waste applita d=7 • .
Yes 0 Noe, .
- Is a well located within 100 feat of wasto uq pllcsd n7 -
Yeas (3 _V, a';-._.
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 fiat of VSaS nine Line Strom?
Yes ❑ No lr
is animal waste land applied or &pray Irrigated within 23 fm of Blue Line S cats?
Yes 0 No Er'-
AOI - jaQose7170!Id
r.....:i• Tom: 7.:� .+.,�1•:.

1
Does the facility maintenance Aced improvement?
Is flute evidence of pest discharge from any part of the operation?
Does record keeping need improvemmt?
Did the faciliry fell to have a copy of the Animal waste Management Plan
Explain any Yes a,Asww; -v , E- � t .�
i
� f
r
On the date of this inspegt,ion the lagoot
approximately 6-9 M which is inadequate for $torn
yr storm event,.. The lagoon level has been -lowed
inspection of •2/29/96 by this office and overL%,.r_ _
occurring during the 5/14/96 inspection as had -been previonw:Lr
observed.
The crop of oats on the field along Hwy 109 is beginning to come.
out; however, i't"is: grown over "w/ weeds. Spray equipment iwraW �a -
place and appeared functional. The pump motor and .electrical.
wiring is in place.
The non -functioning, -flush pit nated_ixLthe preir-.k�s, ins ection had__.,
been cleaned and ' ,was. functl ning... -it does app�a"r,
maintenance 'is 4ss.ar}c .to 'prevent—fu�pp�
It does not apeear any of the solids have
lagoon as suggested during earl ief'`in-spec
ACT— J 17
It does not appearan urther steps to obtain a 'more permar nei�t
vegetative cover have been taken. Fescue and bermuda grass were
included in the previous -waste management plan designed by. the
MRCS. An update of the cropping requirements is needed.

This office requested that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the NRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.

1r '"►
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
,lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
E)P.HNF;Z
Division of Environmental Management
July 3, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5/14/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your egg laying operation and the lagoon
and spray fields serving the waste management of this operation.
An inspection report is attached outlining the observations of staff during
this inspection. It appears some of the corrections outlined in our letter
of March 5, 1996 have been implemented; however, as noted in the inspection
report, further actions are needed to insure the proper handling of waste at
this operation.
As previously noted in prior letters this office needs an update of the
status of your certified waste management plan. If no response is received
from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter this office will forward a -
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Environmental Management
that he revoke the deemeed permitted status of your facility. This
revocation could result in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg
Farm for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions about this matter please call Ed Buchan or myself
at ( 910 ) 486-1541.
Sincerely,
Il� �a....W W•
Michael Wicker, P.E.
Region Water Quality Supervisor
Cc: Chris Walling- DSWC
Gerald Dorsett DSWC ( Winston Salem )
wochoAa Building. Sulte 714, Fayetteville N*CAn Equal Opportunity
910-486-0707
North Carollno 28301-5043 Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486.1541 5C% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Y.
Dlvislon of Environmental ManagemeW
Anl,mal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Reoard
Time: 3 3 d .� r.-•
Owaes None: J �v. , 'r L -1 -j -7
On Site Representad
Melling Address
Physical Addressll.ocadw -- -qLo..1.
O }t l C'>, :, e- -s, A ca {� �-lCJhh V`% t- --kc I, _ n. r_ : �7 /l�
.. r t,�-
I.atItttde:
(based on dedp ebsracurk9m)
of Shins No. gfAniatalr ubyl RUM agfAnitttotf qJ No. gj"mals sow`t r.lsi
13 NwMy O Nomqes � � O Beat
D Fooft
Mmber of Lagoons: 1 (hoefoda is the Dra+wlnp and Observations ma 5eeboatd of out Igme)
Loon s
Ii legaon(s) freeboard less then I foot + 25 year 24 hour' storm stomp?.
Is scepnge obsuved Isom the,It�ocaT: .
Is erosion observed?:
Is any disehugo obietvrsd?
O Man4ands o xxArlo""
C4per ChV
Does the fecMty amd more acreage far slomy*17..
Does the cover Srop need Improvemeat?:
( Wt Me c".t whah send bWwowesa )
ap A wmp — -
Yes 0 No 01"
Yes D '"v-1
Yes O No Er,
Yes O No !
Is a dwelling locate! wltw 200 feet of waste appucadw?
Is a wen located within I00 fat of anesto appliadon?
1h animal wasoa stochpi ed within 100 feet of USOS Blue Line Stream?
b aaima3 waste land applIed or aprsy inig" within 2.S fen of BIue Line St=m?
AOI — SOMNUy 17P%
Yes fd No 0
Yes 0 No D-'
Yes O No Gr�
Yes 0 No CYO
Yes ®' No D
Yes W No O

.e
Xaiusaaac+r '
Does the fadllty maintenance need ImptovemmV Y= gr No ❑
h them Mdenee otpast discharge dnm any pact of the opemdon? Yes Q'_'No O
Does record keeping need impmvpue V Yet �E�No O
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on sb? Yes e� No a
F,�cplain my Yea isnswms' sue. � !� �� � .�✓
an
cc Fad?OyAJnesomwVk& .. Use Atr dme w rNeoW
Draydn¢a or ObseCMUM-
on the date of this inspection the lagoon freeboard was
approximately 6=9 ° which is inadequate .for storage and a 24 hr/25
yr storm event :• The lagoon level, has been lowered. since the "last
inspection • of • 2/29/96 by' this office and overtopping' was 'not
occurring during the 5/14/96 inspection. as had -beers previously------,,
observed.
The crop of oats on the field along Hwy 109 is beginning to come
out; however, it!. is: grown over 'w/ weeds. Spray equipment. bras:; ors
place and appeared furetional . The pump motor- and .ele.c_�rtcal -.
wiring is in place _
r ins ection had.._.
The non-functioning.• flush pit noted be preuqug, LE___ .��.
been cleaned and' ,was functil5ning.:• -It 'does appear
maintenance is � esa r}�. to .'pirevent_ iuz
rl
It does not apeear any, of the salids have 'Ores f6�Ro'OVe1R
lagoon as suggested during• earl iefrispec�
A(O - J rf
It does not appearinurther steps to obtain as more permarrei�t "
vegetative cover have been taken. Fescue and bernuda grass were
included in the previous waste management plan designed by_the
MRCS. An update o'f the cropping requirements is needed.

04 This office requested that Adams Fagg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the NRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.

pAy.rq+F......aY, rYMt a.l.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
1DEHHNFZ
Division of Environmental Management
July 3, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 17371
Subject: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
21 - S 3
On 5/14/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your egg laying operation and the lagoon
and spray fields serving the waste management of this operation.
An inspection report is attached outlining the observations of staff during
this inspection. It appears some of the Corrections outlined in our letter
of March 5, 1996 have been implemented, however, as noted in the inspection
report, further actions are needed to insure the proper handling of waste at
this operation.
As previously noted in prior letters this office needs an update of the
status of your certified waste management plan. I€ no response is received
from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter this office will forward a -
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Environmental Management
that he revoke the deemeed permitted status of your facility. This
revocation could result in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg
Farm for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions about this matter please call Rd Buchan or myself
at ( 910 ) 486-1541.
Sincerely,
M. a'. vim. a,
Michael Wicker, P.R.
Region Water Quality Supervisor
Rc: Chris Walling- DSWC
Gerald Dorsett DSWC ( Winston Salem )
Wochovta 8ulic ling, 5utte 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carollna 28301-5043 NOC An Equal Opportunity Afflm-4fte Action Employer
Voice 910-486.1541 50% recycled/)0% post -consumer paper

L
0
' Diaslets of F.nrironroerital Manama
Anhoal Feedlot Operations Site Visltadon liaoord
Armei. a. f r. °' c r
Owoor Names J,,� f.: No• r' 0-
Oa Site Ropmentas€ *►T bugmtor _ _ 10
MaMnS Address.
Pbysimd
• . Latftade: Loa wdMs•
Operat#an listr gon: OmW oa de ddo ehara dwt9 l
2 �qf S�v<ns rib. q/Mlwslr Mhwo�dr La '
Nummy o rtoo-I.ger 0 ts.d
] Faader
?rhtrf}pt of LI►�rtmct Nwnbs� t�Aai�alt:
Number of Lapons:+ %--(Joch c is d* DmwInp and Obso-vadow tba Ambowd of auh ImSmO
Farnitz
h lagoon(:) f ceboard less than Itfoot + 23 ym 24 lane storm staeyel;
/
Yes er No 0
Is saepage amrvd from tha festoon?: • .
Yes O No w-
Is erosion observed?:
Yes a No mr
Is any discharge obserwsd?
Yes 0 No Q--�
a mm %TMWC a Not maoom d.
Cam DIF
& No 0
Does tha facility need roars acm'fe for spsvW-
Yes
Does the cover jM need lmpmvemmot?.
Yes Q-,No 0
� utr nL c�gpr �r;RrrJi aeut r y .
Se
Crop 4W
&Sda cram* s'••
Is a dwalsing iocaud withtr 2W feet of waste appiicadon?
Yes 0 hie
Is a weII located wlthim 1 OQ feet of ovasta spplieador<7 = : _
` Yes
Is animal waste st kpl)ed wiNa I W AN of VSCIS Blue Lime St:mmn?
Yes 0 No m,
Is animal waste land applied or spray irtigatad within 23 foet of Blue Line Stream?
Ya D No l3f
Atli — JM-W 17.!!!ti
' {: r -rt . �• to
0

Dees dya foaAity mminta ma need Impmema? Yet
h &n avfde= of past diwli► r fi= any pat of the opalike? Yet er'Ne D
Deers em kapins need IospsavaMWV Yes B-'No D
DId the hcft W to Bare a Cm of the Animal Waste Simuemeat Plan on dW? Yet � O
RVWM my Yes ism
�Ac 60
et Taft &MMMW Ebb - . vse AM*mwo rffesdd
Dmydngx or Obsarratbet•
on the date of this inspection the lagoon freeboard was
approximately 5-�9 " which is i.nadequate.for storage and a 24 hr/25
yr storm event -The lagoon level; has been' lowered since' the 'last.
inspection -of 2/29196 by- this office and overtopping' was 'nnt
occurring during the 5/14/96 inspection as had'been previously, ----
observed . _
The crop of oats_ .on the field along Hwy 109 is beginning to come.
out; however, it." is: gtown over "w/ weeds. Spray equipment'. ,WaW t
place and appeared funrctional. The pump motor and .ele.ctrjca1;;
wiring is in place •
The non-functioning flush pit hated-_r�the preu4�. insecibn hari__.w.:
been cleaned and .was . functl6ni:ng ... 'It does , app+2ar g d
maintenance i.e, ca8s �a.'p=event_.fuz:;Ap PXA .i *:tai � x r; ... s •
Del • ti':; r ...f the solids ha ":e�'�i a �` Ro r'e'� `r�5tti''t'1'��'"'
It does not apeear any o
lagoon as suggested"during earl i� ' napectitfn�
It does not appea�n}•urther. steps to obtain a more perarane�k
vegetative cover have been taken. Fescue and bermuda grass were
included in the previous waste management plan designed by.the
NRCS. An update of the cropping requirements is needed.

this office requested that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
Baste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
lnopection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
:his office. This plan was to update the MRCS waste management
>1an of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
�:urrent status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
maw
[Dr-=HNFt
Division of Environmental Management
July 3, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5/14/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your egg laying operation and the lagoon
and spray fields serving the waste management of this operation.
An inspection report is attached outlining the observations of staff during
this inspection. It appears some of the corrections outlined in our letter
of March 5, 1996 have been implemented; however, as noted in the inspection
report, further actions are needed to insure the proper handling of waste at
this operation.
As previously noted in prior letters this office needs an update of the
status of your certified waste management plan. If no response is received
from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter this office will forward a
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Environmental Management
that he revoke the deemeed permitted status of your facility. This
revocation could result in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg
Farm for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions about this matter please call Ed Buchan or myself
at ( 910 ) 486-1541.
Sincerely,
Michael Wicker, P.E.
Region Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Chris Walling- DSWC
Gerald Dorsett DSWC ( Winston Salem )
Wachovia Building. Suite 714, Fayetteville NOCAnEqual OpporFAX 910-486.0707
043 North Carolina 28301.5tunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/ iD% post -consumer paper

r
Division of Envirommeottal Man '�°� /"+►j1
Animal Feedlot Operations Site VWtadn Reoard
+ice. 3 •3 a ,� tM -
Fatm Name': A•J.� � �w a �• r �-• �• �'�`~� � y. � r.
Owner Nam •. •, tom• dl•..s.as>e Noo - c- a s3
On Site RepreaeDtati ,—
MaMns Addm:
Physical AddretR.or.ad o •+,., 1 �� _ l `t
r-- 4 Ar :, r -a o [' �_ riw. mot- �,. r.•, .�
Latitude: � Lon tpdtS:
�it iitltl DCScdgtlon* (bmd on "p ebwwwrbft)
r��i71f N0. �IlA�J1�Cjf OY(pf & � I�f N& of Am ak
O Fbadc
Othr vW=ct Number AMtmmlt:
Number of Lagoons: % (include in the Dravdnp and Obwwwadow the 6vaboard of out WNW .
Facililp I� '
O O
Is lagoon(s) fineboard Ian than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storase7.
Yes No
wepage obcaved from the Ingo @?.
Yet O No VI
.b
b erosion obsovedh
Yes C No wr-�
b any discharge obsarvod?
Yet O No Lim
o xM%VA* D NaYmataair
Caw CMI
Q' No O
Doe die fkMty Dead mom aCTU'V for spn~.
Yes
Does the Bova jM iDeed it Vm=ww a&.
Yes GNo 0
Arr d w cnw which ated b%wvwnw)
`ropMW
Is a dwelling located wI&W 200 feat of warn appliadmt s :
_ Ya O Ido -
b a well located within I00 feat of
Yes D
b animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USCS Blue Line Stream!
Yet a No or'
b animal wwa had applied err spray irrigated within 2S ftft of Blue Lim Suva?
Yea 0 No B�

Don the fkMty to otenanot: need Lmpwvemmt7 Yes
h there evidem of pact discharge fi m my part of the opaasl=7 Yes 11�9
Donn cord keeping need bVwvem d Yes
Did the beft fail to have a copy of the Aaiemal Waste Managem>,ent Plea on doer Yes "O
Explala any Yes imswets�� s� !d •. �✓ _ - —
QL Date•
ac FaeFl�tjAueu+nes t tbEr .. UnAM&*%P u j'1VwAW
Drawtnp or Obsery dom-
Qn the date of this inspection the lagoon freeboard was
approximately 6=9 " which is inadequate ' for storage and a 24 hr/25
yr storm event.. The lagoon level: has been' lowered since• the 'last
inspection -of .2/29%96 by' this office and overtopping' was 'nnt
occurring during the 5/14/96 inspection as had -been prev!�otlslr - - -
observed.
The crop of oats on the field along Hwy 109 is beginning to come.
out; however, i't'' is: crown over w/ weeds. Spray equipment'. ttalEr' fin
place and appeared furkc'tional. The pump motor. and ele.gfrjcal
wiring is in place. '
The non -functioning -flush pit nntad in t_he prev?,p,g ins�ec�ion' had.._
been cleaned and was functi6ning.:' 1t does
4apptaY
maintenance is,T�6Ge5 -to prevent-_fu:q;A - �24? * ;,,
It does not apLDear any of the s.cxlids have
lagoon as suggested` during. earl
It does not appeaany-further steps to obtain a 'more perm-dnent
vegetative cover have been taken. Fescue and bermuda grass were
included in the previous waste management plan designed by the
NRCS. An update of the cropping requirements is needed.

This office requested that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
-waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the MRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.

Y • / y\' '�'
r-��r �
O ,�� wV
1. V�
/1 1 1 I i1
3
31
F , `
q '
1p
Toi
n
\I I
I
)�r✓�
L
l"
J� �1
1
i
ti
Ni
Oft
00000
26
'25
'7' 3U'
'b24
"23
"21

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
ifflonv5WA
IDF.=HNF;Z
Division of Environmental Management
May 20, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Sox 98
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5/14/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your egg laying operation and the lagoon
and spray fields serving the waste management of this operation.
An inspection report is attached outlining the observations of staff during
this inspection. It appears some of the corrections outlined in our letter
of March 5, 1996 have been implemented; however, as noted in the inspection
report, further actions are needed to insure the proper handling of waste at
this operation.
As previously noted in prior letters this office needs an update of the
status of your certified waste management plan. If no response is received
from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter this office will forward a
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Environmental Management
that he revoke the deemeed permitted status of your facility. This
revocation could result in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg
Farm for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions about this matter please call Ed Buchan or myself
at ( 910 ) 486-1541.
Sincerely, ,
`h.&-;, .sz IDA-..d
Michael Wicker, P.E.
Region Water Quality Supervisor
CC: Chris Walling- DSWC
Gerald Dorsett DSWC ( Winston Salem )
Wachovaa Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 VOC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-4W1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Z LEES E44 L26
Receipt for
Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided
Do not use for International Mail
(See Reversal
Sent to
I
MR JOHNNY ADAMS
irv�,iC�UA 1 BOX 98.
'
P,O.t.$late andIP Code
TROY NC 27371
Postage
Cortitied Fee
1.10
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery fee
0)
Return Receipt Showing
to Whom & Date Delivered
1.10
i
„t
O
Return Receipt Showing to Whom,
Date, and Addressee's Address
TOTAL Postage
& Fees
1A
/
t
FOSIrttark or bale
5-21-96
Q

1
x
Dlvfsion of Environmental Man�emt3nt
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
> . s fi° 0.
n.-
• �
pkm Name: Ci. i '►�� /i�w�tin
Owner Na=x ne No :t
d• �! ) • wOn Site Reprrgegzar
MallingAddrtu: '� tc. 1 o� `
1 r Gov C. "Z"- 3 —T 1
pbyAcal
• Latitude: / 1 Lon lode: 1J.
OPeratlain • (based on dedp ehusctarfift)
7yyr qf3wf►w No, ef,lxLvatr I f!'ouiay -No. edML AU Type orCaalr Na. of"Mab
0 Nmlay O Non -Erns O Boaf
0 FOWC
Otlurrjpf oj7l++eMc t oJ"Mau. _
Number of Lagoons: % (include is the Drawfnp and Observations the bmboard *tout LRoao)
Facllib: I on:
I4aoo
1
is lagoon(:) freeboard less that I toot + 25 year 24 bour norm .torap?: Yes No ❑
Is seepage observed from the, lsgocal: Yes 13 No 0--
Is erosion obseroW. Yes 0 No &a--'
Is any discharge obsesvad? Yes D No 0---
0 Alax w ade O Nea Maw -a"
Cover CMp
Does tha f wMty teed more acreage for spw~. Yes I No ❑
Does the coves VP nmd improves n&. Yes W'No 13
(Us die a mpr wAicA twcd bgwv.r=w)
Crcpp we: — Acrattga'
1s a dwelling located within 200 feet o[wtcSte agPU=; tIoa? Yes ❑ xo @r,
fit a weD located within 100 feet of waste ttpplicatim? Yes 0
Is animal waste stocYpDcd within 100 foes of VSOS Blue Line Saw=? Yes ❑ N09
Is animal waste land applied or spray k igued within 25 feet of Blue Une Stte=7 Yp ❑ No E3�
A0I - yaanae7 17,flli .. r , w - „�wi ... j� • .

XaGrta�tawet
Does the fadllty tnaiauaanoe need inw owment? Yes W No O
b tie evldmeo of pact dbeharje bom ray part of the oparadw? Yea 8'No D
Does record keeping Deed impromU=d Yes W'��No D
Did the facility fay to have a copy of the Animal watt Managerneat Plea on dte? Yes Gd' No Q
Bcp & any Yet iammr V n :✓
! �l C�
Dewing -or Qbzeratlow:
on the date of this inspection the lagoon freeboard was
approximately 6=9 " which is inadequate for storage and a 24 hr/25
yr storm event.. The lagoon level:has been lowered since'the'last
inspection of•2/29/96 by' this office and overtopping' was - not
occurring during the 5/14/96 inspection as had -been previously
observed.
The crop of oats on the field along Hwy 109 is beginning to come.
out; however, it' is: grown over v/ weeds. Spray equipment'. vas An
place and appeared furxc`tional . The pump motor. and .ele.q�rjca1,
wiring is in place
k e' preu ins etion ' had__. .
The non-functioning flush pit nated �..snith c
__..T._.
been cleaned and was . functioning .: • 'It does appiar
maintenance is,3assar -l~o p'revert..�uX�.�pC]►.•hY�.M,xxr:-7= '"•�"•
It does not a ear any of the scrl.ids ha a Y`e 4o
lagoon as suggested" during, earl i . f' inspect itn -:' - '; ` _
it does not appe�ir-TnI urther steps to obtain a more peraaanei�t
vegetative cover have been taken. Fescue and bermuda grass were
included in the previous waste management plan designed by the
MRCS. An update of the cropping requirements is needed.

This office requested that Adams Fagg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the MRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.

70
A
Hill,
^26
oe
r
• ►�
I
�� 11
���IU✓%
�l
1�
;�� �✓
NN
.�1 I
It
a'
�2
m
30"

^---gate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A&6JFA
Fayetteville Regional office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDEEHNF;Z
Jonathon B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Environmental Management
May 20, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ` ►�/�^��'
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 17371
Subject: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 6 2 -1 c- A
L an Cvc� rYua (&n9& —
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. a d
staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your egg laying operation and the lagoon
serving the waste management of this operationX o-�
An inspection report is attached outlining the observations of staff during
this inspection. It appears some o6ote correction r
t
Vv-k
"W'V3 CJr� ru_e 1Q..
As previously noted in prior letters this office needs an update of the
status of your certified waste management plan. If no response is received
r from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter this office will forward a
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Environmental Management
that he revoke the deemeed permitted status of your facility. This
v revocation could result in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg
Farm for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions about this matter please call Ed Buchan or myself
at ( 910 ) 486-1541.
Sincerely, ;
V.,\ • c Si.n .SL Lam. 42% .
Michael Wicker, P.E.
Region Water Quality Supervisor
CC: Chris Walling- DSWC
Gerald Dorsett DSWC ( Winston Salem ?
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville '�T ' r FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 11 C An Equal Opportunity Af irmahve Action Employer
Voice 910-4W1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Division of Envimumental Managemod
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Remsd
Farts N • ci. 4n G �,�. f r•-► ��<-��c
Owns[ Name+ __Jlhoae No • et `7
On Site Representative: .1nteSruw. ] w
M&MnS Address• ' t '` Q•c
Physical Addt=&,oead
Latitude: I.on trade:
Opera Descrbdon! (based oe dedip dmrw4rhdo)
as" WLMW . y
0 N=n O xoert.ger a 1l+et
❑Feeft
OrherT�iafLlverax� � 1V+�brr��[alrhefe: - -- -
NUnbar of Lagoons,_{hulade m the Drt+[np and Qbser.atienr the tneabaard of each
FaellltE jampertioe:
lagaan(s)
Yes No a
b aboard less than Irfoat t 25 year 24 bonr, storm stompt
er Is seepage observed from the.lagoe n?.-
Yes a No E3'
Is erosion observW76.
yes a NOR--,
Is any dischmp obsmvod7
Yes 13 No 0---
0 MM WAdr Q Xa M004"
Cow chr
O
Does the fhaty need snore actdge for
Yes W No
Dotes the cover pop owd hnpmvemad:
Yes G"140 a
(lire ale CMW whirl seed bernsc w) ]�� F—
CMP 4pe'�-
t:
Isa dwttAia= located whtdo ZOD feet of wsitto applitxtiaa! _
Yes a Ido
L a sveII Iacaied within I00 test of ts+uste appliattiont _
Yq 0
is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USaS Slue Line Surf mt
Yea a No c '
T arsimal waste land applied or spray itrigsted wrift 25 ibet of Blue Lbe St m=7
Yea 0 No Sr,-'
'v,
[� fzry o C<ur
G a---- rv, C . U C� l}-y 1. L7� Z�
v w�

�laGwuaaeer<
Dora the fadk mainwaance need Impmvemeno Ye
L fhnn r4deaoe of past dircbm hum spy pan of the apentim? Ya ejiOD
Does record keeping Deed impravtmeW
Did the facillry fail to have a CM of do Animal Waste Maaa,gernem Plea on sioeT141E Yes "0t)
F.aplain any Ya anromm s— 'k ti L:.J '
cc foe ft 4suss mw [br
w
On the date of this
inspection
y�.<S
gj­ .k l r'V-&n g
freeboard um
t
Y. _....
e crop of oats_on the field along Hwy 109 is beginQjAq0NFb come
ou ever, it . is , grown over w/ weeds. Spra pment hras 4a • ..
place an eared fu.nc'tional. The pu or. and .eleq r�cal
wiring is in p _... . , ..
The non-functioning•'flus in the. preizkgi ins ection had._.
been cleaned and ' .was f.. g.. It does , apeaYt ;
maintenance-' o.'pireiu u
. .;'
It does not ap any of the solids ha
lagoon as s seed -during earli'
It do of appecrnji urther steps to obtain a mo ertnan6ik
veg tive cover have been taken. Fescue and bermuda g s were
uded in the previous waste management plan designed the
CS. An update of the cropping requirements is needed.
Cc c e
c._C� ,P �.9.1 ; 1-k
'X
U—

This office requested'that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 315196: To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the MRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
J current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
n management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
l inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
l� of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
r revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A W-gm
[DP.HNFZ
Division of Environmental Management
May 20, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5/14/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your egg laying operation and the lagoon
and spray fields serving the waste management of this operation.
An inspection report is attached outlining the observations of staff during
this inspection. It appears some of the corrections outlined in our letter
of March 5, 1996 have been implemented; however, as noted in the inspection
report, further actions are needed to insure the proper handling of waste at
this operation.
As previously noted in prior letters this office needs an update of the
status of your certified waste management plan. If no response is received
from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter this office will forward a
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Environmental Management
that he revoke the deemeed permitted status of your facility. This
revocation could result in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg
Farm for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions about this matter please call Ed Buchan or myself
at ( 910 ) 486-1541.
Sincerely,
Michael Wicker, P.E.
Region Water Quality Supervisor
CC: Chris Walling- DSWC
Gerald Dorsett DSWC ( Winston Salem }
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
Borth Carolina 28301-5043 NOC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% reocled/lam post -consumer paper

F�ulry N 1
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Tune: '^
Cdngral information:
icarmName• q-- �V- County:
Owner Name: J LY,.r, ` ad� r. _� one No: _ �o' 5 z -- S3 l
On Site Representative Q tegrator N ►�
MaRing Address: -x 2,21
rC- G •Z..� � 'T 1
Physical AddressA oration
z -yi Q r- •Y
Latitude: Lon rude: 1
QperatiDn-Descrlptim (based on design charnctsrinles)
r�pr of Sw1ne No: of Animair. oultry Na. of Animair 7)+pr of Cagle No. of Ar orals
2Sow S. `10o QDgiry
] Nknzay D Non -Layer p Bed
] Feeda
91hrr7ypr ojLwstock Number of Animals:
NLmber of Lagoons: t (ioclude in the Drawings and Observadom the fineboatd of each lagoon)
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard leas than I foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Yes Ed No ❑
Is seepage observed from the; lagoon?:
Yes (3 No U-
Is erosion observed?:
ices 0 No M--�
Is any discharge observ-,d?
Yea ❑ No 0-�
O Man-made O Nos Mawwdr
P aver Crop
Does
2--No 0
tha factiiry nerd more acreage for spraying?;
Yes
Does the cover prop need Lnprovemco&..
Yes WIND 0
y,,,,(Iin the crops whirls wed krns►r=W)
Crop type' A=W- Se Caws crr�`J '
Setback Criteria
Is a dwrlllag located within 200 feet of waste; applicadon?
Yea C) r4o or.'
Is a well located within 100 feet of warts appl3e d=?
Yes 0 .-r. Uy,_. .
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USOS Blue Line Suram?
Yes 0 Rio U
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
Yes O No U
A01— lannar7170%
...;; . r-.ar.f , t•

N
Marnten0uee
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yet 0/"'No O
h there evidence of past discharge fmm any part of the operation? Yes m""'No O
Does reowd keeping need improvement? , Yes `O�No D
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on aim? Yes �e3•' No D
Explain any Yes anavt+etsL x- in •:✓
si Doge-,
cc FaefyAsseinnm Unk .. UseAttaahnrasLt JINOMW
Drawlnjq gr ObservatloW
On the date of this inspection the lagoon freeboard was
approximately 6-9 which is inadequate for storage and a 24'hr/25
yr storm event, -The lagoon level has been lowered since the -lase
inspection -of-2/29%96 by' 'this office and overtopping' was 'not
occurring during the 5/1.4/96 inspection as had been previ,511sly,
observed.
The crop of oats on the field along Hwy 109 is beginning to come,
out; however, it: -"is: grown over 'w/ weeds. Spray equipment. waW� -Tn
place and appeared fU'n�ctional.. The pump motor. and .ele.ctrical:,
wiring is -in place. _
The non-functioning flush pit noted_iz�...t 6'prev3934s insp�ec�io�had.:_.....
been cleaned and ' ,was functioni:ng.. -It does , appear rq�k�:
maintenance 'i-p .essl�ary.ta--i-- o:t —.-4r.:
It does not apl2ear any of the solids have
lagoon as suggested during. earlie>` rispectirrns. , i:`
AOI japma 17'
It does not appear. an 'urther steps to obtain a 'mare permmnerit
vegetative cover have been taken. Fescue and bermuda grass were
included in the previous -waste management plan designed by.the
MRCS. An update of the cropping requirements is needed.

This office requested that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the MRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources m
Fayetteville Regional Office A&4
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 1DEEHNFz
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Environmental Management
May 20, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Subject: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery County
Dear Mr. Adams:
On 5/14/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected your egg laying operation and the lagoon
and spray fields serving the waste management of this operation.
An inspection report is attached outlining the observations of staff during
this inspection. It appears some of the corrections outlined in our letter
of March 5, 1996 have been implemented; however, as noted in the inspection
report, further actions are needed to insure the proper handling of waste at
this operation.
As previously noted in prior letters this office needs an update of the
status of your certified waste management plan. If no response is received
from you within 10 days of receipt of this letter this office will forward a
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Environmental Management
that he revoke the deemeed permitted status of your facility. This
revocation could result in this office taking civil action against Adams Egg
Farm for operation of a waste system without a permit.
If you have any questions about this matter please call Ed Buchan or myself
at ( 910 ) 486-1541,
Sincerely, ,
Michael Wicker, P.E.
Region Water Quality Supervisor
CC: Chris Walling- DSWC
Gerald Dorsett DSWC ( Winston Salem ?
Wachovla Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 NO An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1641 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

0
Divition or Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Ckrif ral Informadom
Farm Name,A
Owner Nail: _ J�""VtY�rL�f---�C�t�..��.. E� .... �ne, NQ• %
On Site Reptesentativie:L k)jVk
Mailing Address:
Physical
. Latitude:_ __/ Longitude:
Q rRtlonD6crl;?flcjjo (bawd an design ebaracterf s)
T Swine Mo. ofMlmab. DEE,eirouk'7 o, gfAa ftk O gfCauls NO. Of"Mab
o Saar
BUYU ' r
0 Nwmay 0 Non -Layer_ O Bad
0 Focda
0arrTyprofLAwitock Numbrr Afdn�aLr:
Number of Lagoons: 1 (include In the Drawings and Observations &be buboard of each Invan)
FagnIty ,
Lagoon
t
Is lagoon(s) f wbaard less than I foot + 25 year 24 hour stoma storage?:
Yes No 0
.Is seepage observed from the.lagoon?:
Yes 0 No Q�
Is erosion observed?.
Yes O No I$'^
Is any discharge obiet ind?
Yes 0 No ZY
� �an�ads C xosHare-rode
'over Chr
Does tha. facUity need more acreage for spmyimg?:
/.
Ya &- No 0
Does the cover imp need hapmveman .
Yes 2 No
( U f the emvps wAich Aecd torn wsr)
CIP type _ .�.,... AcrtW
Setback Crania
Is a dwetling located within 20D feet of waste applicadao? ' ' .:
Yes 0 No @�
Is a well Iocated within I00 fat of westc applIcadom?
Yes 0 -V.: Q-�-- -:
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Su==?
Yes O 'Non,
Is animal waste land applied or spray iciigated within 2.5 feet of Blue Line 5tiesna?
Yes © No E
A01— Jauoas7lTPM
•.•: ;^--mot... s�: .

Mafrrlsaasru
Does the faculty mainter3 = aced improvement? Yea ZNo O
h there r4denee of pass diceharge from any part of the operation? Yes 0--'No
Does record keeping nxd improvemcZ0 Yes �2--No C
Did the faculty fail to have a copy of the Animal waste Management Plan on she? Yw td' No O
Explain eny Yes antweta• �'� la �.✓
Si,�aasur �l i �, �0 i _ Date!
cc: Fwa y Assesvwv W Uri Anado nur $Meedrd
Drawings or Observations:
On the date of this inspection the lagoon freeboard was
approximately 6.9 " which is inadequate for storage and a 24 hr/25
yr storm event.. -The lagoon level: has been lowered. since the last
inspection of-2/29/96 by' this office and overtopping' was 'not
occurring during the 5/14/96 inspection as had 'been previ-busly-- •
observed.
The crop of oats on the field along Hwy 1.09 is beginning to come.
out; however, it: •is: grown over -w/ weeds. Spray equipment'. eras �• -in
place and appeared furl! tional . The pump motor. and .ele.c_tr�cal
wiring is in place.
e rem u ins=ec�.ion had__....
The non -functioning -flush pit nate�L�th P... L-_-
"
been cleaned and ' .was functioning. -It does ,ap.pea'
maintenance is,ee5sar. tQ. p'revent_ fur,„�.A,tmStiic.�.��xr:-•�;
It does not appear any of the scrl.i_ ds ha Ye�?OV618! _
lagoon as suggested during. earlief' inspections.
It does not appearn urther steps to obtain a 'more permaa4ht '
vegetative cover have been taken. Fescue and bermuda grass were
included in the previous waste management plan designed by the
NRCS. An update of the cropping requirements is needed.

This office requested that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the NRCS waste management
plan of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.

All
J�I
Sam
630
FEE
"26
O
fy',
l•'�
1. ��
.. `./
7
� { : �� ,� fir, :
"�: ��.�, • �'i
� ,-�
_..�_. �
✓'�' r
J
7 ,
tj
- uo
.,o.s

QUESTIONS AND PLAN DEFICIENCIES CONCERNING THE
JOHNNY ADAMS POULTRY OPERATION
A.) General Questions
* What and how much money was allotted from the Cost Share
Fund to the installation of irrigation equipment, pumps,
controls, electrical box, and power hook up ? Mr. Adams
has indicated that the $12,500 was used for the
installation of irrigation pipe and the respective
pumping equipment. However, no money was delivered for the
electrical requirements and controls - therefore it was
not completed. Also, why hook up power when the equipment
will not be used for an entire year ?
B.) Initial Plan Deficiencies
* One year for vegetative establishment ? This is not NRCS
specs. Generally, waste can be applied up to 30 days
prior to planting.
* How will agronomic rates be calculated for a cover crop
that does not receive nutrients for an entire year ?
The application rates will be significantly lower if
they are based on the yield from a crop that does not .
receive fertilizer.
* Plan does not provide any information concerning lagoon
storage or holding capacity or acceptable freeboard
levels.
* Plan does not address how the lagoon waste will be disposed
of while Mr. Adams is waiting a year to establish what will
probably be a poor cover crop. Nor does the plan give any
guidance where Mr. Adams should apply the solids removed
from the lagoon.
*

C.) Interim Plan Deficiencies
* Plan will allow Mr. Adams to apply waste on the main spray
field that was not supposed to receive any nutrients for
an entire year. Then after a year, he can apply waste on
the field again - makes no sense.
* Plan indicates Mr. Adams will apply waste on winter cover
crop growing on a 17 acre "sector" of his 14 acre field.
Makes no sense.
* Winter cover crop would not be active long enough to meet
his waste disposal needs. Still doesn't consider what he
is to do with the waste after his winter crop is dormant
and he is waiting a year for the main cover crop to be
established.
* Plan state that the removed solids should stockpiled next
to the lagoon so that any resultant runoff will drain back
into the lagoon. Nutrients will leach back into lagoon -
doesn't solve problem. Needs to land applied with tractor.

r'
_ _ --
� �_
- -_ _ --- --- -- - -- _ _ - - �_ . _ -- - �- - - --- - - - _(. _ . - � . - _ _ -- tl
f f . � _ _ _� _ .�
_� 33 _ ._
- � -- --- - - - -- - .----- - - --- --- - -- ��-f -- - , - ---- � -- - - - - - - -
I
j , ��
��; 1
_ti - - --- ---._ ____.... - -- ----- - -- --- �. ��- ---- - - - --- -. _..- ---- -�.._
i
J

we
NCDA nomic Division 4300pRee CreekTOW Ra[e� ANC Z7607 C►? 65 1 r7 55 � �'A '' Re No W008 4",
> - _. _
3
rt . -.
Grower:
Adams, John
Copies To. County Extension Director
Pa. 1 Box 98 Hwy 109 N.
Knox, Ben
Troy, NC 27371
Buchan, Ed
_�. �_.wasteAnalysisRqll o rt
Farm:
Buchan, Ed
Suite 714 Wachovia Bldg.
Fayetteville, NC 2830I
3/14/96
Montgomery County
w(e —Id
x :
sS0
on uess otherseTnoteds
sample ID.
DMA N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn
Zn Cu B MO
Cl Na Ni Cd Pb
1M_
616 191 1407 167 32A 46.4 5.56 0-97
1.27 0.09 1.82
188
Waste Code.
Nutrients Available for First Crop Ibs/1000 gaflons
Other Elements lbs/l000 allons
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn
2'n Cu B Mo Cl
Na Ni Cd Pb
ALP
Descrfptimi:
Broadcast 2.5 2.6 11.3 0.97 0.19 0.27 0.03 0.01
0.01 T 0.01
1.6
Poultry n Ligg
Rue�ndafi�ongo
sA. .
Nitrientxavailable fi►r_the''6rst
.P
crop are`based,cxi estimates of minral"izaticiii=rates and gralecteddass:forthe aPphcativmethoi
ea
Co
lcste� ►centrations of a�ne'and
x ..
athermetals are.mt.ecess .sTt%e waste.should�not
cause ctso ernironmenta{
temsj Eitelixed accordu +to reco iriended ract�ces ent VUIKW MonUar;nutri►wth
P
asi nnual sod test
-
Mark 0wenly4am�st
RM
��
"
�• ��
a
-
. . � .w ... � :�..._ � �� .' :

Waste products must be disposed in the environment in ways that protect
soil and water resources. The keys to proper disposal include analyzing the
waste product and planning application rates based on sound agronomic
practices and crop requirements.
Essential nutrients include major (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium),
secondary (calciurn, magnesium, sulfur), and micronutrients (iron, manganese,
zinc, copper, boron, molybdenum, and chloride) that are required for normal
growth and development. Potentially harmful elements (nickel, cadmium,
lead, sodium) include those that are not required for growth but may result in
plant damage and ultimately permanent damage to the soil if allowed to
increase to toxic levels.
The Waste Advisory Section determines total concentrations of essential
nutrients and potentially harmful elements on a dry weight basis for solids
and a volume basis for liquids. Nutrient availability is predicted based on
estimates of mineralization rate or breakdown of the waste and nutrient loss
depending on application method. Of the total nutrients predicted to be
released for the first crop, 50-75% likely became available during the first
month. It is, therefore, important to apply wastes near the time required by
plants. The remaining nutrients gradually become available over the next
three months- Nutrients not available for the first crop are mineralized to
available forms over years. For soils that do not readily leach with heavy rainfall,
it is possible for nutrients to accumulate to significant quantities over years.
.Laboratory results are reported in (ppm) parts per million except as noted.
Estimates of nutrients available for the first crop are provided in lbsfton for solid
wastes and 1bsC1000 gallons for liquid wastes. A'r (trace) printed for nutrient
availability indicates that the ' element is in very small quantity (under 0.005 lb
per ton or 1000 gallons).
Quantities of potentially harmful elements including Ni, Cd, Pb, and Na are
calculated as total amounts per ton (wet basis) or 1000 gallons (liquids) to indicate
the potential for buildup of these elements in the soil. Where waste is routinely
applied, nutrient buildup in the soil should be monitored with an annual soil
test.
An agricultural lime equivalent is calculated for industrial wastes that may
have a neutralizing value_ This value indicates the amount of the waste product
on a wet basis required to equal i ton of good quality agricultural lime (90%
calcium carbonate equivalence). Waste materials containing a significant
neutralizing value should only be applied at rates necessary to increase pH to the
optimum range.
N -Nitrogen
Pe - Iron
Solids - Analyzed on a Dry Weight Basis
Nutrient availability currently cannot be deterrnined with l ti0% accuracy.
P - Phosphorus
Mn- Mmvmese
Liquids - Analyzed on a Volume Basis
Many variables including the type of waste product and environmental
ii - Potassium
Zn - Zinc
factors (i.e., soil type, rainf4 temperature and general soil filth)
Ca - Calcium
Cu - Copper
DM - %
influence mineralization rate and nutrient loss. This report provides a
Mg - Magnesium
B -Boron
Pit Dry Maher (Sohn
realistic estimation of nutrient availability based on type of waste and
S - Sulfur
Mo- Molybdenum
application method
a- Chlorine
Ni - Nidw]
Caldum Carbonate Equivalent
Na - Sodium
Cd - Cadmium
Lime value
Pb - Lead

State of North CaroNna
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
IDF-=HNF;Z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 5, 1996
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams,
SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co.
On 2/29/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Environmental Management inspected your animal
operation and the lagoon serving this operation. It was observed
that the existing lagoon did not have the sufficient freeboard of
one foot and seven inches for the 25 year 24 hour storm event and
was overtopping at two points. This deficiency was also noted
during previous inspections by DEM staff members. It was also
observed that one of the exposed flush pits outside the chicken
house was apparently not functioning properly and allowing waste to
spill over into a nearby ditch.
In order to properly correct the lagoon deficiency listed
above, it is required that the lagoon level should be. lowered
immediately via the spray application of waste material as was
discussed on the date of inspection. It was agreed by Daphne
Cartner of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and this
office that the spray application of waste is acceptable as a crop
of oats has been recently sprigged on the spray field. In
addition, it is recommended that as many solids as possible be
removed from the lagoon as was also discussed. In summary, it is
the understanding of this office that you plan to obtain the spray
guns no later than 2/8/96 and provide power to the pumping
equipment so that spraying can commence immediately. It was also
then suggested that the solids will be removed as soon as the
lagoon level has been lowered signifi antly. It is also required
that the non-functioning flush pit be Cepaired as soon as possible
to prevent any discharges of animal waste to the surface waters of
the State.
Wachovla 6uliding, Suite 714, Fayetteville ��� FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5W3 Nvfv C An Equal Opportunity Afflrmotive Actlon Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 500% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Adams
3/5/96
Page 2
0
However, to remain a deemed permitted facility, all corrective
actions must be made by April 1, 1996 and you must obtain a
certified waste management plan within 60 days upon receipt of this
letter. Failure to do so may result in this office recommending to
the Director of Environmental Management that the facility lose
it's deemed permitted status and being required to obtain an
individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General
Statutes to discharge waste water to the surface waters of the
State without a permit. The Division of Environmental Management
has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than
$10,000.00 per day per violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please
notify this office in writing at the address below. If you have
any questions concerning this matter, please call Ed Buchan or
Michael Wicker at [phone].
cc:
Wachovia Bldg.
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer I
Chris Walling - soil and Water Conservation (Fayetteville)
Steve Bennett - Soil and Water Conservation (Raleigh)
Gerald Dorsett - Soil and Water Conservation (Winston Salem)
Dianne Wilburn - DEM Water Quality (Raleigh)
A

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
1DEiHNF;Z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 5, 1996
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams,
SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co.
On 2/29/96 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Environmental Management inspected your animal
operation and the lagoon serving this operation. It was observed
that the existing lagoon did not have the sufficient freeboard of
one foot and seven inches for the 25 year 24 hour storm event and
was overtopping at two points. This deficiency was also noted
during previous inspections by DEM staff members. It was also
observed that one of the exposed flush pits outside the chicken
house was apparently not functioning properly and allowing waste to
spill over into a nearby ditch.
In order to -properly correct the lagoon deficiency listed
above, it is required that the lagoon level should be lowered
immediately via the spray application of waste material as was
discussed on the date of inspection. It was agreed by Daphne
Cartner of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and this
office that the spray application of waste is acceptable as a crop
of oats has been recently sprigged on the spray field. In
addition, it is recommended that as many solids as possible be
removed from the lagoon as was also discussed. In summary, it is
the understanding of this office that you plan to obtain the spray
guns no later than 3/8/96 and provide power to the pumping
equipment so that spraying can commence immediately. -It was also
then suggested that the solids will be removed as soon as the
lagoon level has been lowered significantly. It is also required
that the non-functioning flush pit be repaired as soon as possible
to prevent any discharges of animal waste to the surface waters of
the State.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 N%P C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

'` 1
Mr. Adams
3/5/96
Page 2
However, to remain a deemed permitted facility, all corrective
actions must be made by April 1, 1996 and you must obtain a
certified waste management plan within 60 days upon receipt of this
letter. Failure to do so may result in this office recommending to
the Director of Environmental Management that the facility lose
it's deemed permitted status and being required to obtain an
individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be aware it is a violation of North Carolina General
Statutes to discharge waste water to the surface waters of the
State without a permit. The Division of Environmental Management
has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than
$10,000.00 per day per violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please
notify this office in writing at the address below. If you have
any questions concerning this matter, please call Ed Buchan or
Michael Wicker at [phone].
cc:
Wachovia Bldg.
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer I
Chris Walling - Soil and Water Conservation (Fayetteville)
Steve Bennett - Soil and Water Conservation (Raleigh)
Gerald Dorsett - Soil and Water Conservation (Winston Salem)
Dianne Wilburn - DEM Water Quality (Raleigh)

State of North Carolina . ' T
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A
• aFayetteville Regional Office I
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor C---
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary E H N
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE:��
TO:
FAX #: v(D) `7� t -�(o3 (
FROM:
Number of Pages, including cover:
NOTE:
Wachovia Building, Sulte 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 'telephone [phone] FAX 910-48h-0707
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

5'�rf
nr �
� r' �
February 19, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM WETMORE, AREA CONSERVATIONIST
ANGELA HILL, DISTRICT CONSERVATIONIST
FROM: DAPHNE CARTNER, EIT 46ki
THROUGH: JERRY DORSETT r�
SUBJECT: MEETING WITH DEM-WATER QUALITY
FAV'LLE REG; OFFICE""
During the February 12, 1996, meeting between NRCS staff and DSWC staff
concerning the cost share contract with Johnny Adams, we discussed meeting with the
DEM-Water Quality staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office to discuss the waste
management plans written for Mr. Adams.
Jerry Dorsett spoke with Ed Buncombe, DEM-WQ, today. Mr. Buncombe has
decided that at this time WQ will continue to work with Mr. Adams to pursue other
options.
Mr. Buncombe would however like for all governmental parties to meet at a later
date. The proposed time frame is between May, June or July. If you have a preference,
please let me know so that further planning/scheduling may begin.
1f you have any questions, concerns or thoughts on such a meeting, feel free to
contact either Jerry Dorsett or myself.
cc: Ed Buncombe, Water Quality Section, Fayetteville Regional Office
Angela Jessup, NRCS Area II Office
Jerry Pate, NRCS Area Il Office

16 RE61ONRL. OFFICE F'ax:1-910-"71-4E31 Feb 16 '96 15:25 P.01/01 -;
[ FaX F
hare:
To:
Name. Ed Buncombe
Company
DEH&NR.DEM- WaterQualilySection
Address:
Fayetleville Regional Office
Address
Pt10NF #
(910) 485-=1541
FAX #
(910) 4BH707
# u1 PageS (including this page) `
From:
INIR. JERRY DORSETT
N.C. Dept. of EmiromEnl, Health, & Natural Resources
DIVISION OF SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION
59 Mughtown Streel, Winston-Salem NC 2710 7
[phone]
[phone]
If you have been our. In t-r el_. again, then it inust not, be
rowing tnere, .Like it is d around Winston-Salem. T phoned
and was to.]-d that you will likely be back in the regional office
triis atternoon. I willbe in try affi.Ce for a while thifi
afternoon.
what king of meetinq are you wanting to see held? Are you wanting
to ac' .-,r'Y personn- -iether to review the J. Adam5' plan, or
are you -t ing the a o meet with J,'�,iny Adams for the
purpose of reviewing h2 ,,Ian?
FHB I6 '
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVUE REG, OFFICE

.WS REGIONAL OFFICE Fax:[phone]
l
,F
Fax
Fn 13
Date: ENV. MANIAC -AE"T
FAYETTEVILLLRLJ.1v;=R:E
f To:
Name Ed Buncombe
Company
OE UR - aEM- Water Ousflr Section
ddms :
Fayetteville Regional Office
Addmss
PHONE d
(910) 4*-1541
Fax #
(910) 48HM
Feb 13 '96 14:18
P.O1/C4 ='
# 01 Pages OnCluding thk page) __,I_;
From.:
MR. JERRY DORSETT
N.C. Dept. of Enviromeit, He0h. & Hatitra? Resources
DIVISION OF SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION
%5 wauohtown Street, Winston-Salem NC 21107
(919) 771-400
[phone]
I phoned earlier today and was told char_ you were out'. in tho field
working hard, so this fax is being sent in follow -tip.
z :rAturned to work yestereday and met with the staff in Montgomery
County, for the purpose of reviewing the plans that have been
drawn tip for Johr ny Adams. Prior to arriving for the meeting T
passed ny the Adams operation and noted that the waste lagoon is
tu11. The following plans are in place and have bPpn signed by
Mr. Add tts .
- An Agricuiture Cost Share L-)1an that is based around an
irrigation system. This plan requires establishment of a
cover and no irrigation of waste for a specific amount of
ime .
- An interim plan, that requires planting of rye and
subsequent/i.mmedliate spreadi_nq of waste, as soon as the rye
has emerged over approximately seven days of warm weather.
This plan was written to get Mr. Adams into Compliance with
the .0.1.00 rogul.ations.
The staff, district board, myself and representatives of the
Vatural Resources Conservation Service will be glad to sit down
with you and ocher DEM wQ staffers to discuss options for. the
Adams operation. If you are still interested in participating in
such a meeting, give me or the Montgomery District office a call.
Such a meeting can be Coordinated by the Montgomery District
Board, on a date that will work for all of the above listed.

- State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James S. Hunt, Jr., Governor H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 3, 1996
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Sox 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams,
SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 62-1
Montgomery Co.
On 12/9/95 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Environmental Management inspected your animal
operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was
observed that the existing lagoon did not have the sufficient
freeboard of one foot and seven inches for the 25 year 2+4 hour
storm event and was overtopping at two points. This deficiency was
also noted during a follow up visit shortly thereafter.
In order to properly correct the deficiency listed above, it is
required that the lagoon levels should be lowered immediately via
the spray application of waste material. In addition, it is
recommended that as many solids as possible be removed from the
lagoon. It was also noted that the deficiencies in the waste
management plan provided to you played a role in the overtopping of
the lagoon. Furthermore, it has been made clear to this office
that you intend to obtain a new and more suitable plan which will
meet your current waste management requirements.
However, to remain a deemed permitted facility, all corrective
actions must be made within 60 days. Failure to do so may result
in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status and being
required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the
facility.
WochoAa Building, Suite 714, Faye#tevltie ` FAX [phone]
North Carolina 2W01.5W NV C An Equal Opportunity Atfirmative Actlon Employer
Volce 910-486.1541 60% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Adams
Page 2
1/3/96
Please be' aware it is a violation of North Carolina General
Statutes to discharge wastewater to the surface waters of the State
without a permit. The Division of Environmental Management has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per
day per violation.
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify
this office in writing at the address below. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please call Ed Buchan or Michael
Wacker at [phone].
cc:
Wachovia Bldg.
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer I
Chris Walling - Soil and Water Conservation (Fayetteville)
Steve Bennett - Soil and Water Conservation (Raleigh)
Gerald Dorsett - Soil and Water Conservation (Winston Salem)
Dianne Wilburn - DEM Water Quality (Raleigh)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 3, 1996
Mr. Johnny Adams
Route 1, Box 98
Troy, NC 27371
Dear Mr. Adams,
Now
SUBJECT: Adams Egg Farm
Reg. # 09-23
Montgomery Co.
on 12/9/95 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Environmental Management inspected your animal
operation and the lagoon(s) serving this operation. It was
observed that the existing lagoon did not have the sufficient
freeboard of one foot and seven inches for the 25 year 24 hour
storm event and was overtopping at two points. This deficiency was
also noted during a follow up visit shortly thereafter.
In order to properly correct the deficiency listed above, it is
required that the lagoon levels should be lowered immediately via
the spray application of waste material. In addition, it is
recommended that as many solids as possible be removed from the
lagoon. It was also noted that the numerous deficiencies in the
waste management plan provided to you played a significant role in
the overtopping of the lagoon. Furthermore., it has been made
clear to this office that you intend to obtain a new and more
suitable plan which will meet your current waste management
requirements.
However, to remain a deemed permitted facility, all corrective
actions must be made within 60 days. Failure to do so may result
in the facility losing it's deemed permitted status and being
required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the
facility.
Wochovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville FAX [phone]
North Carolina 28301-5043 NQC An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Adams
Page 2
1/3/96
Please be. aware it is a violation of North Carolina General
Statutes to discharge wastewater to the surface waters of the State
without a permit. The Division of Environmental Management has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $10,000.00 per
day per violation. "
When the required corrective actions are complete, please notify
this office in writing at the address below. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please call Ed Buchan or Michael
Wicker at [phone].
cc:
Wachovia Bldg.
Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Sincerely,
Ed Buchan
Environmental Engineer I
Chris Walling - Soil and Water Conservation (Fayetteville)
Steve Bennett - Soil and Water Conservation (Raleigh)
Gerald Dorsett - Soil and Water Conservation (Winston Salem)
Dianne Wilburn - DEM Water Quality (Raleigh)

(qIV qq'� -0-7/-7
This office requested that Adams Egg Farm obtain a certified animal
waste management plan within 60 days of receipt of our last
inspection report of 3/5/96. To date this has not been received by
this office. This plan was to update the MRCS waste management
plan,. of 2/13/95 to reflect the conditions of the farm in its
current status.
This office requires an update of the status of a certified waste
management plan submittal within 10 days of receipt of this
inspection report to avoid this office recommending to�the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management that the proceed with
revocation of the deemed permitted status of this facility.
/C
e- A-v Lef 4L
741
• - $•' 'L- - 5' .f �.: � -�ri. .ter - .. / � �,//,/�
T.
-17
- • Y,' s? � i,. � d'I 1,,, t`rl , m�.y. y,. ' ., :.� �,:. -'�.� i' 1. `"' ' 7 . • n.. 1.P�e �',l,
� .., ,.','*:r 1, -1h• �.,r 11 h v,�`j � y��' ',fit "'.... '.� .+�I .., .1`;'� .�1t. +,R .1 �. ,
' - '�d� . "'�' ''i.1rr• .? %ri.Fr�,';(!: '1^ 4

r j` ���, . 7
.. t��

k-11. '

.:k

i

2-bt ZZ Z

r + � , ,
y�s� 'W k �
$ +• � 'J..
��.° .�
. �,.
r� �' S � +
'b.

Z& ZZ Z

Z61 Z c: C',

we

�- rx
;�� ,,:=
,�; • ;;
,�,_. „+ ,
k
i� ('� - , � ��'
,r.-.�a�i�ll�i�l`R:9'+'��,� ,�shVl�P,ii

f`�,'�11 , .'l `. vnu.,
a �'�'
` f � 1
..� '�:
'�4
e � '��
d a _ 5 -
�, d .v

- ��.�
y � ,
w
�-
�% f
?c ",�*�
*,.' .r
y
"�.
��,. � :..
.. - ,: <
�.
e � *<,'
' ,� ,- i�

� Ty 1
wf f �,y
—
� .i
/�• �l� rid �

p
I

,. ,I ,,c ��'�
r
t
r
1
'��
' � �.
1 I�� �
.: yi
'�ce.fNit
l � Y!�Y�P��'I . n,. .
r�.wip
�r�Y
�'. \wi �
��I i4�� , A

el'Ap

ti . C t '
.,1 . : t
,+ v
R ��N Ag n, d, t• '
n [ � �y). tsi�r� K +"-t'0. ���!n� � +FM�� t �� :� • a �tTik ,�� •"ji'�1' r
�`"G'�s^ .��wE„3i°.�,'A�1'a�r t t ,� t � �a � � ,

r r '

If

'Jlll�
'A ---
�\`\/� \�
« '

��' k'r
"�
�.
' - f h c� k� � r 4 , �
iN �+� r .r.a-11 �.'.� ��.��}` �� ,Y ,r i' � ail
.,�'>>.,.�,r.t
1� ' r r

•r o. 9�q,_„ ry
2 K!6

i rIK.
pp��eeii x71
-
i
196
,t T

Ww

(t. i
r I\
� I

i
Y
29 2 s9b

k,

�1
,`ia
� �.
�.j _ i -
�!d
4�`` �: " k
,4I_ �� ,� ���
��.,� ; k_� ti
tip:
f_ . �
� � �- �� .

� ,a?��,�^ , .
� � � ��'.a
� \
\ \

JN 4
NX
50,
-c IR
I

lie,

_ J

� �•._ � ._
v, ;v = { � ,
(� - - � F
���rr :�
K� �.f
;L' 1 ::\
7

7

i

� ,."dh.
II
111'
YI
/'�'
���,���'�
,1
��, �'I �
A
,�
} �, 1 %
i� �
��
1�'�� �it
ail �
�i
�
1
�
I
}ry111
1j1 � 14 ��
�n {1, ,��� W
W �
.� �
� 1
� �u.R �
�' � �•.I
i 1� Y 1 �'
I, '�. yl y �} � �
1 1,6
�� I
{v, �� I
�„ Sid 4 � � 1�! � �, ��

7F,'�� AP-x-
L AW
AL

\ I � � fli
.sst^rl¢'.. �y i � y �
N t`" �

\ M"Zh j ` 7 , '\ '1
limb
p.� I
1.
��

,� ,
�. J: ' Y -
1 ` � � `
� � �
�- J �� ,.y
S,l'y_,4i. r� .'PQ�Y.�
��

�� �
�� _�; �ti
� � _ ��
�,�_ ,?,
�►''",
.��

1

-
\t� .»
Air

d

,r,
t�

�x
ice•` 1 f A' �' ��� �_, - '' 1

a

� ; M

I�f
-'sue _� �� f }}_rww.
`hy T
1
_ „_
_ �' . //
�.�
,�. >.
�,-