090157_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

ENFORCEMENT
NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qnal

N 10CDE�lR
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY
Ji
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 3, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J.J. McCree
P.O. Box 119
Dublin, NC 28332
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
J.J. McCree Farm
Facility No. 09 - 157
Bladen County
Dear Mr. McCree:
On June 25, 1999, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality conducted a routine inspection of your swine facility located in Bladen County. It
was observed that there were portions of the inside and back slopes of both lagoon dikes
that failed to have permanent vegetation. The newly sprigged coastal bermuda field (field
#3) contained competition with other grasses and broadleaf weeds. A review of the
irrigation records inrii a; t at the Rani Av. . ilabl- mrogen (PAN) rate for the small grain
ovar<;_:ed ha .Jc;en exr . IE 1 by approxim-it:la/ a;.:VPtl pounds. The total acres in the field
were used to ca'culate th ?,AN balance ir.stnad of ft actual wetted acreage as computed
in the irrigation layout. Tr irrigation layout c,,p4' i ..,e 1 ?'Iat permanent markers needed to be
installed in the w �s,e a, ,lication fields. A of tha fescue fields contained cows,
however the C,,r. ,ied An i a i Waste Plan (CAWMP) did not specify grazing
for the,:,,e fields.
The Division of 0iat7,. QualittJ requests :13L owing items be performed:
1. Continue effo t ; on es.+. it ,fishing a bott the inside and back slopes of
lagron dikes to:.revanr Pvos,on.
2. Keep weedy and ether grasses controlled in `iT . >tal bermuda throughout the current
growing season to allow ooa,tal to spread. Evr 1e a.astal at the end of the growing
se -ison i',.) determine it some Yea, will regvira r(-; pJ; j j i'r .
3. Comply with he CA i'v Al'; . id the General Permit when applying waste using the correct
PAN rates as spald;ieci o - ,h crop.
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/f 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
J.J. McCree Farm
August 3, 1999
4. Need to install permanent markers in the spray fields to indicate the exact locations as to where the
irrigation equipment must be set-up to accurately cover the field as specified in the irrigation layout.
5. Consult with a technical specialist in order to revise the CAWMP to include grazing on the fescue fields or
immediately remove the cows from these fields in order to be in compliance with your current CAWMP.
Please notify this office in writing on or before August 27, 1999 at the letterhead above as to the actions
taken or proposed to be taken to resolve these deficiencies. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving
this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have or may result from these deficiencies.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jeffery Brown
Environmental Engineer
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. NRCS
Audrey Oxendine - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
Alfred Smith - Earnest Smith Farms, Inc.

q// AUJOD 7z-)
v
74- Mr-D7,lrwl�vj
-7- pp,7'
A 14�4
Awl, 7f
2KVA�cw v
ID

a�a�WArq
cf) ,'�; Z' \
© 'C
February 1, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Kenneth A. Autry
489 McLean Rd.
Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NCGS 143-215 et seq. & Section 402 of the Clean Water Act
Kenneth Autry Farm
Facility No. 9-157
Bladen County
Permit No. NCA209157
Dear Mr. Autry:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES)
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to N. C. General Statutes 143-215 et seq. and
Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, you have been found to be in violation of your NPDES Permit.
Violation 1: Failure to apply waste in accordance with the facility's NPDES Permit and the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan. (Permit No. NCA209157 Section II Condition 4)
On 2-01-05 ponding was observed on a spray field of the Kenneth Autry Farm during an irrigation
event. The ponding was observed in the company of you the farm owner. Waste was standing at
the end of the field as well as in the field itself. The waste was still contained on the spray field at
the time of inspection and remediation measures were taken by you.
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1:
Please apply waste in a manner to avoid ponding, hydraulic overloading, and possible runoff of waste from the
spray field.
Violation 2: Failure to inspect the land application site as often as necessary to insure that the animal
waste is land applied in accordance with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
( Section II Condition 15 )
Monitoring of the waste application site includes the physical inspection of the application site
perimeter and inset for ponding and possible run off. The weather, leaks, equipment malfunction,
reel speed and any other application variable should be evaluated during monitoring.
One
NorthCarolina
Alaturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Aquifer Protection Section 225 Green St. Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 500% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

(v
Mr. Autry
February 1, 2005
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action above, please submit the
following items on or before February 18, 2005 unless another time frame is indicated below:
1. Copies of all the pumping records, lagoon levels, rainfall records and waste analyses for this farm from
October 1, 2004 to the present along with a copy of your CAWMP.
2. Please have the OIC for this farm include an explanation as to how this violation occurred.
3. Please have the OIC include a list of the steps that will be taken to prevent this violation from occurring in
the future.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions
for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy
a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Mr. Larry Baxley,
Environmental Specialist, or myself at [phone].
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Barnhardt
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
SB/tab
cc: Keith Larick - Compliance Group
Trent Allen — SWC, FRO
Central Files - Raleigh

- - -------- -------- ofn
R E G EAN E D
2 -1 1999
FAYE-17EVILLP
RE31.0FRGE
54
C,IJ MD
Z,
-T 46W --N Ll 0 Ike
C?F
tea7-d--D �-Rz-,w-tj %r��" *4-4ca 7W
Peginike-AJ7- MhRkEkj-
44D&V-CDRLZr
A ,I
-�P4C77 Aicw- -Tn Ve R n s
6hA-)S-
a 0 Ca7-FWD- RR&VE4,
s A&,owy -- - ;�Virin z - f 0 - - - 6ve.-L, M 0 - - -
Zill
.4 C

THE SANFORD HOLSHOUSER LAW FIRM
PLLC
SENATOR TERRY SANFORD (1917-1998)
GOVERNOR JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.
MAILING ADDRESS:
POST OFFICE BOX 2447
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602
ONE EXCHANGE PLAZA
219 FAYETTEVILLE STREET
SUITE 1000
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27601
Mr. Bob Heath
DENR
Wachovia Bank Building, Ste 914
Fayetteville, NC 28301
TELEPHONE 919 / 755-1800
FACSIMILE 919 / 829-0272
May 28, 1999
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
RE: Subpoena for Office of Administrative Hearings
98 EHR 1763 (Jeffrey J. McCree)
Our File No. 030806.001
Dear Mr. Heath:
WASHINGTON OFFICE
SUITE 470
901 15TH STREET N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSWILE 202/371-6279
RECEIVED
JUN 1 1999
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
Please be advised that the above -referenced hearing that you have been subpoenaed for in
June has been tentatively rescheduled for the week of September 13, 1999. We will inform you as
time approaches of the new hearing date.
Sincerely yours,
THE SANFORD HOLSHOUSER LAW FIRM
Christine S. Golmitz, CLA
Certified Legal Assistant
/csg
61909.1

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC #11
817 CASTLE HAYNE STREET NC #37714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3787
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
AIR • FUEL • WATER • FOOD • WASTES
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CERT #21912
CLIENT: NC DEHNR DATE REC'D: 01/16/98 SAMPLED: 01/16/98
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714 SAMPLED BY: B. Heath
Fayetteville, NC 28301 DELIVERED BY: P. Rawls
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Paul Rawls SAMPLE CODE: Waste water, Grab
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KN003 REFERENCE: McCree Swine Farm
SAMPLE ID: 1. Discharge from field - ID #98WE1271
2. Upstream - ID #98WU1272
3. Downstream - ID #98WD1273
4. Below dwnstm @ intersection w/stream - ID #98WD1274
DATA REVIEWED BY: %rlLw �._,
DATE REPORTED: 01/21/98
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ANALYSIS bMHOD 1 2 3 4
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
COLIFORM, FECAL (per 100 ml)
COMMENTS: < = Less than
> = Greater than
SM18 9222D 12613 364 4900 1441
R CI:qv
PAGE 1 OF 1
I'''!I 2 3 1993
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. p; FjrJE
The data and other information contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the sample(s) analyzed and is
rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes without written approval
from the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

4L
M
OBAC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY, INC.
817 Castle Hayne St., Fayetteville, North Carolina 28303
Ph— tQ 10) R64-1920 - Fax [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE ' OF i
P.O.
CLIENT NAME
PRQIECT/LOCATION
F-C
WATER COMPOSITE SAMPLING DATA
►�W
M
AUTOMATIC
DISCRETE BEGIN: END: TEMP
SAMPLERS
(S18nelure l
SEND REPORT TO:
PHONE
`1
TIME DATE DATE TOTAL FLOW
7
CONTINUOUS TIME TIME TECH
MICROBAC DMSION
Sample Chest
Sample Temp.
Method of Shipment:
Chest Temp. 'C
'C
Date Time
FLOW FLOW FLOW
PROPORTIONED INTERVAL MLS / Sample N samples
LAB I.D.
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION / LOCATION
COLLECTED
DATE TIME
SAMPLE TYPE
COMP I GRAB MATRIX
NO.OF
c NTAINERS
CONTAINER
TYPE /
ANALYSES REOUESTED
PRESERVATIVE
i7c
I
I
�
Ad
z,hea r,�
I
I
I
I
(Reellinq ' ed by: (Signature)
Date
Time
I e ived by: (Sn-ture)
Date
Time
Rglingojst�d b : (Signature)
Date
Time
Re 'ved by: (Si'nat e)
ate
Time
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Date
Time
Received by: rSign lure)
Date
Time
5
6
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Date
Time
Received by: (Signature)
Date
Time
7
81
Comments or S'R ttt— iIV
Or Dd
1 "1 23 1998
FAYE'TTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
J.J. McCree
J.J. McCree Farm
PO Box 119
Dublin NC 28332
90�A
,�EHNR
November 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: J.J. McCree Farm
Facility ID#: 9-157
Bladen County
Dear Mr. McCree:
'_�
NOV 19 1996
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
ADire
A. PrestonHoward, Jr., r
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Fayetteville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, 4 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 fC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

al Pi�
it
`n`,� n a: g g
e 0
ea
atio
............
I tit) Of i i IN;44 �-IXOW Q I
'Ile all.
1
C
I i)�N(0if
•
Lr
I kl11 �A
, OW,
C0111111011t

ps �1c
Bu
W A rF .T[� `✓
Michael F_ Easley
Govemor p� `✓
G7 William G. Floss Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
July 13, 2001
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
TO: Kathy Cooper, nm.';10 ��
Special Deputy Attorney General
FAYE"
FROM: 'fferr T. Steven , ' ` AE" E
TTEVjQFVi�LLL
SUBJECT: Request for Collection P_enal#ies
Please initiate collection proceedings for the cases listed below. Copies of the relevant documents
for each case are attached. Please call Steve Lewis at 733-5083, ext. 539 at your earliest convenience to
discuss. Thank you for your assistance.
Violator
'7 / Craig King — Watha K-6 Farm
Case Number
DV 00-012
Date Assessed
June 29, 2000
Date Received
July 27, 2000
(Mr. King did not send back the certified mail green card when this civil penalty was
received but he did file a contested case petition in OAH on July 27, 2000, Mary Dee
Carraway handled the case. Mr. King lost. DWQ does not have any record of the OAH
decision being reviewed by the EMC. Mr. King has not paid and we do not believe he
has filed for judicial review. The criminal case associated with this discharge is
scheduled for the end of this month in Wilmington. We don't know who the civil penalty
case was assigned to when Mary Dee left.)
J. J. McCree DD 98.012 November 18, 1998 November 24, 1998
(According to Sharlene Moses' records, Mr. McCree still owes $1,998.97 and his last
payment was made on 3/28/00. Your office has been handling this one and should have
the relevant paperwork.)
Three B Farms, Inc. PC 99-006 June 17, 1999 June 29, 1999
(Steve Lewis talked with Anita about this case. The civil penalty was received in June
'99. There was no response within 30 days. Steve called Thad Bullock, one of the
corporate officers of Three B Farms, Inc., in Nov. '00. Bullock said that they had
requested remission. Since the paperwork might have been lost on our end, we sent a
copy of the CPA and an administrative hearing waiver/stipulation of facts form. That was
received on 11/28/00 but no remission request/waiver was returned. Another letter was
sent in May'01. No green card came back on that letter.
Three B Farms, Inc. sold the hog farm in Sept. '99, shortly after the civil penalty was
assessed. However, Three B Farms, Inc. is still registered as an active corporation with
the NC Sec. of State as of 7/13/01. We're concerned that the Bullock's will dissolve
Three B Farms, Inc. if they get a demand for payment letter. Anita thought we could do a
combination demand/collection filing letter.)
�QENR
Customer Service Division of Water quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
[phone]
1 80t] 623-7748 +'

ATTACHMENTS
cc: Wilmington Regional Office - no attachments
sit9vi11iona!! ffice - no attachments
� Y giona�
Enforcement Files - no attachments

ro 'Owl
5 tµ S7AI[
cUU
FAYETTEVILI.,fi�` tare of North Carolina
mICHAEL F. EASLEY REG. OFFICr I-)ej.)artment of Justice
A77011NEN' rt.nrsRAL 1', O, BOX 620
RALEIGnH
?ariOZ,OYnoo
January 44 V
Laurie B. Gengo
One Exchange plaza
219 Fayetteville Street
Suite 1000
Raleigh, NC 27601
Via facsimile & U.S. Mail
Re: J.J. McCree v, DENR - 98 EHR 1763
Dear Laurie:
Etcpky to: iNlary 1). Carraway
Environmental Division
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27602-0629
This letter regards the proposed settlement agreement that I sent to you on September 22,
1999. As I have communicated to you by telephone, my client is willing; to settle this case for the
amount that was proposed in the draft settlement agreement. It is my understanding from my
conversations with you that you are unable to reach your client about such offer. If I do not hear
from you by 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 5, 2000, 1 will begin preparing witnesses for an
administrative hearing that has now been scheduled for 1:00 p.m. on January 11, 2000, in
Fayetteville, North Carolina. As such, my client will no longer be willing to discuss settlement of
this matter after January 5, 2000.
An additional matter that must be addressed is the issue of the outstanding responses to
Respondent's Request for Admission, Written Interrogatories, and Request for Production of
Documents that I served on you on August 19, 1999 and that were due September 20, 1999, by
Order of ALJ Robert Roosevelt Reilly, Jr. Please forward your client's responses to these
discovery requests by Thursday, January 5, 2000,
Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. I look forward to hearing
from you soon.
Very truly yours,
NaryDeCarraway
Assistant Attorney General
cc: Hon. Robert. R. Reilly, Jr. OAH
Tommy Stevens, Director, DWQ
Paul Rawls, FRO
t !

I,
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lori B. Gengo
One Exchange Plaza
219 Fayetteville Street
Suite 1000
Raleigh, NC 27601
State of North Carolina
Department of .justice
P. O. BOX 629
RALEIGH
27602.0629
September 2, 1999
Re: J.J. McCree v. NCDENR - 98 EHR 1763
Dear Lori:
4�
pa
Reply to: Mary D Carraway
Environmcntal Division �9
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27602-0629 --}
RECEIVEUm-,
S FP 7 1999
FAYE;-Tp 1►!_! �-
ACC. 0FriLc
As I told you in our telephone conversation of Friday, August 27, I am now the attorney
of record for the above -referenced case. In reviewing the case file, I noticed that on April 30,
1999, you offered to settle this case on behalf of your client for the amount of $0.00 for the civil
penalty assessment and $0.00 for the investigative costs. After speaking with my client about
this matter, I must inform you that the Department is unwilling to accept such offer; however, the
Director of the Division of Water Quality, Kerr T. Stevens is willing to accept the amount of
$2000.00 plus the investigative costs of $400.57 in lieu of the original $4,457.00 assessment,
which included $457.00 in investigative costs.
A hearing for this contested case is scheduled for the dates of September 30 and October
1, 1999, in Fayetteville, North Carolina. If your client is willing to accept the Department's
above -stated settlement offer, please let me know by Monday, September 13, 1999. The
Department will not engage in any further settlement discussion regarding this matter after
September 13, 1999, as it will be working with me to prepare this case for hearing.
Please tali me if you have any questions regarding this matter. I look forward to hearing
from you soon.
Very truly yours,
(Y-L ,,�
Mary Dee Carraway
Assistant Attorney General
cc: Tommy Stevens, Director, DWQ
Robert Heath, DWQ-FRO
Steve Lewis, DWQ

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 27, 1999
MEM D s
To: Mary D. Carraway
DWQ Attorney
Through: Pawl Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
From: Robert Heath
Environmental Specialist U
SUBJECT: J.J. McCree Package
Mc Cree Swine Farm
Facility No. 09 - 157
Please find attached information pertaining to the J.J. Mc Cree Swine
Facility that you had requested from the files in our telephone conversation
of August 19, 1998.
Thank you for your cooperation regarding this matter. If you have any
fimher questions or need clarification on any of the details please contact
Paul Rawls or myself.
I

CAFO COMPLAINT
McBee Swine Farm
Hwy 701, Nr. White Lake
Received 1116198 @ 12: 00 PM
Received by: Paul Rawls, WQS
Complainant. Sandra Russ [phone]
[phone]
Mrs Russ called in to report that the McRee Farm (09-157) had been spraying swine waste in
"One Hole" all week
Mrs Russ indicated that the farm had been spraying all week and was spraying today in the rain.
C:
Mrs Russ believes that with the saturated soil conditions (from the rainfall that has occurred this
week) that waste is running off of the field and into nearby waters.
Mrs Russ stated that this is not the first time she has observed the farm spraying in the rain.
I told her that her concerns would be relayed to the swine stag. -
She would like a follow-up call after WQ goes out to the farm.
Contacted Bob Heath via pager at 12:25 PM.
Bob was near Carthage at the time and indicated that he would travel to the McCree Farm after
he left the farm he was inspecting at that time.
cc: Bob Heath
. DWQ Swine File McCree (09-157)
.._.w._r_...

a Routine 0 Complaint OFollow-uBofDWQ Inspection O Follow-u of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection ,z1—
Facllity Number
Time of Inspection v '� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status, ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection Includes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: :._ _ ... �...1 ».�CC..,CA4 ..�» . »_.._». .- County: ..,�.� rrr. �»......_............ .�...
r n q
Land Owner Name: _..»,.�'..._...� ..»» _.............». Phone No:..! �� .�?:..tA .........
Facility Conctact: ____ z.y . C,�e�....t'c.._....... Title: Phone No:....�........_.. ._._.. _
Malling Address: c '*2F'3 Z
OnslteRepresentadve:.»» . - �.._... %� Integrator:._„».,
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: _.,„...»»... „.....»„...,
Latitude • 4 " Longitude 4
Thrpe of Operation and Design Capacity
s� �Y#-# 'l : Via. �;,�--;..ysr.. , �a'.L s•.� r, � �; : �. ', �. .�s h:�:: .+� ��,Kr,,w�,� #-"uC`, ' •�� � .�y, � � .. ��y:�..�:7.; 5tl�
"�, , ` :Design MLurrent �+ < 1)e'sign r Current' , ; �� T Design t £ ,Current
* # h s s, �;�,il r "q ..>y Na4,e -� .:,n.. ,j o, i a r,-a::'ili bi r� xC s
Swine§t.'aEa acl �Po' uiationN>oultryz Ca aci 'Pau atio�Caftley: acT " l" Intl
y J La
Wean
Non -La ❑ Non-Dairyl
A_ a
?��s
EAMLw Feed
F b" - m.
f { . 3 �}f �t �4;'ni =� f'A 'h 4 qi• � -3 $^i,J
Total zvesign Caffil <' a'
�.fTotf:
N
Numberrof La "0'0 °IHa1dEQg Pon I. Subsurface Drains Present
h ;� Lagoon Ares 'Spray Field Area
to Feeder
� Felder to Finish
Fa w to Wea
Farrow to Finish
ther-__....
fienerill
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes %Na
2. 1s any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes Trio
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes X No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes JgN0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes �No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes KNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes � No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/hoidingpends) require ❑Yes � No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes %Na
2. 1s any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes Trio
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes X No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes JgN0
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes �No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes KNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes � No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/hoidingpends) require ❑Yes � No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

w: ,ty Number:...
1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Q Yes
ONO'
T Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
t' No
B. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
;KNo
Struc
9. Is storage capacity {freeboard plus storm storage} less than adequate?
❑ Yes
tgNo
Freeboard (it): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
. = z 22- F
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
Kio
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ANo
I2- Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
JgYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
;"No
Ande ©.pnliratiQn
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
DjrNo
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type —I&Csire-Zr. �E� ................�........» .�... �...... .....-......... _»......w.._
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
Wo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
H No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
X Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow -tip visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on -site representative?
Fgr Facilitles Only
❑ Yes
QNo
Certifled
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
)KNo
21 Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ^
© Yes
❑ No
Comments {refer to question #} - lvxplaia any,YES answers arrdlor'any reegmmendations orany.ot5er colruntats.,�
Use`drawings of facility to better explain'sittratrons.` (use add�trorral gages as necessary} i ��bi Pxr
7 ,C 6s pititsY /��r Ca.•�o.�/ .� -'.ice- o 7t.�t3..r �Gr dvE
%E
i9. 7�� icR ifs►-fi�s1 t •f�..,e..l.:.�c✓E�xtyp.P.,.) ¢ ��► .�.r.e
l
rD� ��.✓ r,..S .EMI 1
2b. DA-) ,?bplr/7%Nrca'� �.E/�j �6;/ +�a w.rrrr.� �i� �,t,ri�,tl�i-✓/r �,.��j+�.w� 1�+0
Reviewer/Inspector Name . ,. , -_' P ;. -r t€ N : , r�€� '.. w.
ReviewerllnspeetarSignature:�� ��"P.�'� .. _ Date:r,2V — ?;;'
s
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility assessment Unit 4/30/97
1

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other
M Division of Water Quality
O Kotttine 0 Complaint O Follow-up of DNVQ inspection O Follow-u2 of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 1
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh,tnm)
® Registered Q Certified © Applied for Permit D'Permitted © Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Dame: �..f11 C County: _ _._.._.. +«. ..........__... ,
M.... �..._. ......_.,...... _..._ .
Owner Name•..._..... �.+._c.t.t�'...5f"� . t.X..._...............»._...W__..........W. Phone No:...... _.................. ........_........ .. ... ............ ...........
_.
Facility Conta. � '_Lit A ._. _.. Title:......,..:......^..._...r .._ ......... Phone No: ...................... . ..... .......... .... .
It -falling Address:.,._ ...r»_. . � ... 1.�.....,�G( 1.<..�' .... t .. .......
P „ ,r%.. ......._.......... �........._.�. /.,._ ..,-.
Onsite Representative•.._.......�A!✓� s _, Integrator: ........
��P,� .,�e�+L.!s..... ........ ...._
Certified Operator;.,.,„„se.. Operator Certification Number,..._....._..........„.._ ..
Location or Form:
Latitude Longitude �• �� ���
:Desi� CurreotwV`�,�v.��SS 'Desi �:r4Curr+enta.,� 5 Destgn;CuYreeit�
wine �. t � .,' '' Cg�taciiy ..Population Potd" - Capachy , Population` .y CatileCapacily�=Papulatfan.. .
n3. N.:.._. .. .. -
VC3
Feeder ' ' Dairy
jj]
Finish Non Dai 0 WL`aeier13
o Ceder o Finish , j � -0� Total Design CapariEy
El Gilts
Total S5LW
p: D Boars
iNtimb"t lagoons f_Holding Ponds' .r Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area '
m - No - �,#
❑ Li uid Waste Management Systew. t
,La
Non La er
i. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon M Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
Q Yes W No
CErYcs. ❑ No
%YQ Yes X1 No/49
es
❑ No
❑ Yes IM No
❑ Yes NJ No
0
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ Yes
;M No
Continued on hack

.._ ­ _ - r _r"L_f_I
8.; -fie there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes M No
Structures fLaQno1ls.111old•ine Pn11ds. Flush_ Pits._ etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 'Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. ..._...». »..._ ........... ......_...._.._....... ».. »........._...» ....._ ....._........._... _ _. _.. » .»..
freeboard (ft):
10. Is seepage -observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes WNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes El No
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? J[Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 14 No
(If in excess of VIMP. or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....�t f�fs- e!. ,�t.N» ».. »........»».».._. _ .._ �. .......»....».... _...»......»_.... _....... _.............._.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?. ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
IS. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted FacHities 12nly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Yes • ❑ No
❑ Yes
1%No
/e 'Yes
No
Yes
❑ No
t9Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NdvioWtioiti•ar defleiehd&.iere-ii6lid-during this'vWL, You'will riceive flti further:
:. correspondence d out this.visit:.. :. :...:.. :...: .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
A
Comments (refer io.guestion,�l); Explain any YESAansers andloan3; recommendations or any other comrtieritt+, �kais
Use drawings o; facihl to better explatn'sitaations:'{use additrotigl pages=as necessary}•, n Y�r d i �;I r"
u
y.a° ��C
4/17 c ►,t '00�04je�O�`A&-r
7/25/97H!
Reviewer/Inspector Name s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �.T Date;

„^& S»s.s:4s�":w's�tutw�;'.mterF§�:�fYSk+1.r:.-:�??mid`ui.aeay.arcins+�w¢�aao.�u:Ya',..,itklS«ewe€ ��w.air..x�«'�"„FcF�rabaJi�raui.�«��Sq�f'a'�°�i ��,�,+ Fi' •�'t '�$Y,,
�r] Divislon of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
4 r Division of Water Quality
Y
r
Q Routine ® Complaint Q Follow-up of DNVQ inspection O Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 1 d
Facility Number d
Time of Inspection l �24 hr, (hh:mm)
13Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit O Permitted rNot Operational Date Last Operated: ,,,,„
FarmName: _..._ ...,!1..c..L...-�`�...� .�. _...._... County:_.........»..r..�!._...»................ .._ ...
Oumer Name:.._.._ .. �1;_ S %...,,_,.._ C t',�.e� ... W_... _. _..._. Phone No:
Facility Contact: .... 7.._ ...._...�....� _...... _ Title: r ..��_ //........ Phone No: »..........w...... » ... _..
Malli!!g Address:_
Onsite Representative:..».»........ ..��T�. C=.�. »_ .. Integrator:......1�1....
Certified Operator:.,,._... Je.......f�» L.�+Ci>E Operator Certification Number-.____..._.--
....... _ ..
Location of Farm:
0
'c
Latitude Longitude =• =' =u
Y? r hFYAs DGSigRQ; CurEeIlt'�,�'? ykD�5lgn Ct10ECntgr DesigpaCUECeRt:x,
Swine , z: „s�� Capacity''Population .,Pouttcy .Capacityr`Pogutation �.> Cattle, :Capacity.Fopuiatia ;
Wean to Feeder La ❑ Dairy
k ® Feeder to Finish gd;.�-EENon-Layerl❑ Non-DaUj
',
s ❑ Farrow to Wean ¢�
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other +�w, * ; NIP-
k a1
Farrow to Finish Design CaptiCity�
0 Gilts
10 IIOtlra a ' - 1•'�'�4 r Try w .; L 4,+i�,�„* �,,'�,. r st, i -L �tll SL 11 •
3;^✓- T.wti', ,{ea ciW.Et. a, ,_ltye;l, it;
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System01,
Srsrigtal
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvernent? ❑ Yes 0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 13 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes P9 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 1p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
A Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes CkNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ( No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IR No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require ❑ Yes JXNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97
Continued or: back

:.:ility !lumber: D �.a
8. Are there Iagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes R1 No
Structures (Lnt nons,liold!tie Poltds. Flush Pits. eftJ
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes 0 No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: /� .....»......._»......._...........................»».....»........._........_...........m......................w
Freeboard(ft): »..� . »».%( ..i�.r' �._......_ ...... ». ,..» ......... . » »» . _»»... ..., ._ ......�......,. .........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes P No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Z[No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? pYes 0 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
OYes
0 No
Waste A01t ati n.
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
2rYes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop
type ....��'.tr$..... . ........ .._. _ ....._._ .
�.... ...
_
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
EZNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?.
Yes
0 No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
9 No
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
I$Yes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
L] Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permi1tgd facilities Ugly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
CJ Yes
❑ No
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 Yes
0 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
0 No
No vioiatioils or de'f ciencies were' 'n tted during this:vfsft.- You m'1111 recef:ve no further
e6eresppndebl 6. about this.visit'.: .
tents(referto,question#),11, lain'any:YESansr►ers'and/or'
uairi�s of facthty [o better explarn 3ituattons (use addtltoenai
. k
7/25f97
p-;. T A. h'a.s T•7r'r'4Y"ri'` i,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/lnspe-ctor Signature: Date: f Jo

E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
E Division of Water Quality
1i Routine. O Comnlaint O Follow-up of D%V0 inspection O Fallow -up of I)SIVC review O Other 1
'S7� Date of Inspectfoq r�,9
Facility Number O
Time of Inspectinn 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Registered ® Certified 13 Applied for Perndt Q Permitted [p'rot Operatlonal 1 Date/Last Operated:
Fares Namc:....... .. 4C,r'f��.. '19t2i! ..._ ..... _.. �_..�_ . _ County: ....... .»......:f�� .................
.._
Ommer Name: _..�v ... ..., �.....M.....w ._ ..._.,_.._... Phone No:...... /D .. '..U. i�.f.......... .......
_.
Facility Contact: _........ � ..`... C �itf ...._» .. Title:___... ...... . ....... . . ....... ............ Phone No: ...... _.............. ......... ................
�.
Mailing Address: _.....-E �....741iK...f.. 9,,c................ ;z.f6Tg�,........�....................... ............ ..,.
Onsite Representative:—_ l........ ...s... ... Integrato.r:......6T���'�
Certified Operator._....... .��..... .:.. ........ _...._........ Operator Certification Number...._____....
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
x ''• Desi n Current s y� 9� $ t M xt K Uesfgn " CurrenE Design " -.Current �bx
4t 'ysj7�C 5`�" ,A IiR y Vr - -. n �' a&'<.'Y"
Swine W ,; Capacity Population , .,Poultry . ° , ..Capacity Population Cmttle .,,{ Capacity' ,Population
❑ Wean to Feeder d❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish Y, [] Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean g K�
❑Farrow to Feeder Other A.
,; ❑� .. � .�7 s, -' ,,
❑ Farrow to Finish r P� P Total Design.i`Capaeityx
❑ Gilts
❑Boats G �€ x r 5 ��; T6tal SSLW
k ,',,",yYqN y��$, 5,.,
El,
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
;i, t hr' `. % '`.i��y�m �e Mv� s� ib �°Y -a,.. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System >}✓��`'��";� ` 'y;�,k ,�;�
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,o No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes )VNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes kNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Watcr?'(lf yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 32'N0
r
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [] Yes XNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ' No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes XNo1
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97

Y
Lf'acillty Number: Of
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes *No
Structitm (Lo2oonOOlding Pfluds,.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes t"No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. .. _ . ...... _...» . . ._�....._...................».... » .. ....... .... _ ......... ._
Freeboard(fr):..._......2... ..... .»..........._...... ............................»...............».:.............................................__....
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion,'or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level maskers? ❑ Yes KNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ANo
(if in excess of fWMP, or runoff entering water of the State, notify DWQ) .
15. Crop type ? C.�t+r�� .. �'L+!t �! .. }...1� .� .. ... .. ..... ... , .... .......... _ ».....» .. _. .................... ..... ...._ _
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes P4'No
17. Does the facility have a lack, of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes XNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes OKNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ YesSIN
No
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yeso
22. Does record keeping need improvement? Ayes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Encilitles Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ,N No
?A. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 9No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑'. No:vlolatiohi oi deficiencies.viwere.ntited-duuritig this:visit.• You.will irecei fve no further
:. correspondence: Ahout this:visit:..... :.:........... ::.::...:.: ,
Commrnts(rrfer to question) ArEspialn any YEStansKers andldr any r�cnminessdut�ons or anp.otler comments ' � #5�
Use drawings of facility to better explain sstuatons {usc add�tiona! pages as necessary} h ;' is h PV,.r„
Xk
14,
/ ! 7/25/97 H
f
Reviewe {k
r/Inspector Name W.s 4.W. ..
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: O /

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 27, 1999
I&MURNINK7i
To; Mary D. Carraway
DWQ Attorney
Through: Pawl Rawls
r
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
From: Robert Heath Ael
Environmental Specialist H
SUBJECT: J.!_ McCree Package
Mc Cree Swine Farm
Facility No. 09 - 157
Please find attached information pertaining to the J.J. Mc Cree Swine
Facility that you had requested from the files in our telephone conversation
of August 19, 1998.
' .. Thank you for your cooperation regarding this matter. 1f you have any
further questions or need clarification on any of the details please contact
Paul Rawls or myself.

CAFO COMPLAINT
McBee Swine Farm
Hwy 701, Nr. White Lake
Received 1/16198 @ 12:00 PM
Received by: Paul Rawls, WQS
Complainant: Sandra Russ [phone]
[phone]
Mrs Russ called in to report that the McRee Farm (09-157) had been spraying swine waste in
"One Hole " all week
Mrs Russ indicated that the farm had been spraying all week and was spraying today in the rain.
c
Mrs Russ believes that with the saturated soil conditions (from the rainfall that has occurred this
week) that waste is running off of the field and into nearby waters.
Mrs Russ stated that this is not the first time she has observed the farm spraying in the rain
I told her that her concerns would be relayed to the swine staff..
She would like a follow-up call after WQ goes out to the faun.
Contacted Bob Heath via pager at 12:25 PM.
Bob was near Carthage at the time and indicated that be would travel to the McCree Farm after
he left the farm he was inspecting at that time.
cc: Bob Heath
DWQ Swine File McCree (09-157)
I

O Routine O Com taint O Follow-up of DWQ Inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Thne (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 mfo)) Spent on Review L�
❑ Not Operational
Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:County:_ ......„ ........`_.�,,
Land Owner Dame: � �`�.. ���� „„... - ....„�.„„.. Phone
Facility Conctact:.!,T CC ��� „.„„„ Title: Phone No:
Me—
Malling Address: .-.�c.....,...L..L„d.!... .z4p„,3z .�..„„„........„..:........„.
Onsite Representative:.„„. Integrator:...,...,.
Certified Operator: 77 ——Operator Certification Number.,___- .
umber:..„,...„........._-.
Location of Farm: /./,, „_ -,?/!)'/ ��„�I' A. /.r'&' , -2 ....I .01 .0 . %'dz
Latitude Longitude Q• �6 µ
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
z:•e� '� r J e�`�-.`. s 'M4ti`ttle
,'.esCrenti .en,4
t
ou° • i aci „P ula
❑ Wean to Feeder ' Mayer
❑ Da'
-• 0 Feeder to Finish z ❑ Non -Laver ❑Non Da'
Fa w to Wean: 0 rr, ,� r, .•' :.r�.w"i x
MXI
Fa w a eeder�Tat�al Design Capaci�ty }'
f c . � `�,.,,
F ow to Finish
Te .�v
J���.�.
A{ ❑'f110
`aA'�S"i�. xalt }�uhY � .'��":r a ,rir�; «.x•� x e t - - .. �q vrees:. .•;pa,
`z Number of Lagoons IrIoitiitag oubsurface Drains Present
❑ La oon Area ❑ Spray Field Area �<r�
fleneral
I - Are there any buffers that need maintenancefimprovement? ❑ Yes 1KNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? . ❑ Yes 1,$N0
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon [3 Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes )4 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Wo
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge.bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than fora a discharge? ❑ Yes No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

,tyNumber:. Q42_— I
1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ;KNo
,Structurgs (LggaonN and/or Holding _Pl nds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate? ❑ Yes ZNo
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes P(No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ANo
11 Do any of the structures need maintcnancerirnprovement7 19Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or en0ronmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes [rNo
N,
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?. ❑ Yes b?'No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ze:� ...w ........ �. _ ...._. �.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes a No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
1S. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewl"inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
IQ No
For Certified Facilities Onty
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
JR No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments. (refer to question #) '.Explarn any YES answers aadlor any. recommendations or'any other cotttrnents.j
'� i".4Yw.`�i
Use drawin Of facility t0 better explain situations (use additional 'pages as necessary
gf
I t 77c h� a,cw aG%6� ,v .. �w,�.r✓ tg t�a,.�.e.✓ 1 al.• s-
4
.
/9. 7%c iert1 dv A .�`-A..49*4114 ri4t�• „l�.� p.�vi..%
'
rac.��r� i,t,,ti�,tl�i-✓/r C,00 ,,�fsrwe J�o
17
Revlewer/InspectorName
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
jF 21 —
a
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4130/97

��� F � ^�� r.� Divisian of Sail and Water Conservation ❑Other Agency � ����; F
��� ,� _�] Division of Water Qnaiity �y# �> �
^k�A--'•..ai.,.e-.;'P.Nr:.C!!vee,'.,T,'1,'a.'�.".%Y!.FRK"-.^-�:tl?'+S�d4v*:v,Y.`C`.�s."5. �;":=�:3°.'r.�'YRi. 4.-�^�Y-'M .'-;;'�'�. ":1'.'^pYt .. T Y 1� N„
O Rogtine O Complaint .Q Follmv-r, of M%72 ins action O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
a Date of Inspection J
Facility Number O
Time of Inspection ?A hr. (hh:tnm)
® Registered © Certified 13 Applied for Permit ti Permitted [3 Not O crational Date
Last
Opperated:...........„,
FarmName:. --. tiI, ..,�w ..�et%r 1t''�..... ..... County: ...... _........ �A"..w..... _................................
Owner Ilerne:.....» ....e,-�.-!..�k... L.d�1�r.._ .................. ...... w _.. Phone No:
FacilityContact: _...Slx..l�r...G ................ Title:............................ ..._....... ...... » .... Phone No:..................................................
Mailing Address: ll..•?...... �� ........R.E.-Y.z........................................... .....»......
..........
Onsite Representative:.._ .....d!!/ ._ _ _.. _ .._ .. __.... »... ... Integrator: .........
Certified Operator;_. .., e. _ _ _ .------� w Operator Certification Number-,_.... ............. ...
Location of Farm:
r,.. .v... .F ty.. ..�� F..
Latitude Longitude �• ����
Ign-
Swiue�'C pacesPopulation; Pa�Wtry ,;F'apachy Populat an. Cattle ��t a agcit Po tilatian
A prerd
yR £
« l� Y p,. y. p
Wean to feeder
92 Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Weanjjj
K ❑ I=arrow to Feeder r Otherr�:
,. ❑ Farrow to Finish `;TOtal Design Ca } $c>It a
�Sfh, g P �y4
❑Gilts}��,� t� z i7al� �•�'°idx 'pr �'
❑ Boars Ke�� ;�,�iYH� i��aP#,Eer d �bp Total ,L7A7LW,ay^ a
f
Numise� of Lagoons lHoldizigr��artds� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
'' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
La er
Dal
❑Non -Layer
Y: (] Non-Dairy
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes CR No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ® Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes � No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) C[Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the esdrnated flow in gal/min? /d
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2d No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Ed No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? M Yes ❑ No
S. Does any pan of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 19 No
maintenance/improvement?
fi. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes EU No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes � No
7125197 Continued on back

8,: -ve there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes X No
Sir}rctures f1..agcrom.11oldjtlL Pallds. lush Piti,gtc_l
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? JWYcs ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure,5
Identifier
Freeboard(ft): _ ...� : f� . 71.... .........-..... .»».•. .................._............. ....... .............. .. ............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes CkNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
11 Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvernent? ❑ Yes E9 No
-(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate'public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ,XYes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? El Yes 14 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff enteringg� waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......... ..._...... .... _ . _ ,..._..•,...._..........•................................_.....
15. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 0 Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ;I Yes ❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes RNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? leWaYes ISj No
20. Does facilityrequire a follow-up visit by same agency? XYes [] No
21. Did Revicwerllnspector fail to discuss review inspection with on -site representative? Yes ❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? 0 Yes ❑ No
Egcllifi�� Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AAW? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? 0 Yes ❑ No
No violationsvor deA encie's ►sere noted during this:visit._.You:rvili receive tno further .'
eorresoondenct fiWit tbis:visit:• :... ::..::..:...... .
fl7R'IP]lfC�T`PFPT to nI1P_ct�An �ti_:�
/ t
.ram f8� eo•..�.e.•► wow
Reviewer/inspector Namei5pl
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: X
Date:
7/25197

&�q`;]DivisionoFSoiland'�'VaterConservation ❑Other Agency, �$
�'` �� Divtston of Water Qttaiity �-� ���'�
p ,
.. sF_.l. �`�-:�`w.:...Y:?�'f"'F'e v,.9�-",.,.f �.?#'..„T.r`•,•.is.:/^w»}!ryAt�v�.,d!y!:.^I!9�?)DT4Y,m,4?'Co':2'➢�!Mfr �: �'.�C�?JG�. Qs.
10Routine ®Complaint O Follow-up of D1�`Q ins�c�tion 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other �
i-■ �rriu u�r.�i i�rrru� i ii-rr�i. ■ ww.rw�
Date of Iwspection Q
Facility Number ��{ 15� Time of Inspection C �24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered 0 Certified• [3 Applied for Permit Q Permitted 13- Not Operationai Date Last Operated: _
Farm Name:County: ........ „......... ,od4� —1........ ............
_....... ..... ...
Owner Name:..„:.».» �f».,�... S,%„.... ......,e '� .............„................ Phone No: ....... »............... .......,......... ........... ...... ...... .........
........w
Factuty Contact:........»......».»...»...........„ ..�........»»....».»..»....... Tjjiflle:..»»... -....... ...... ...
�».............. ..— ......
... Phone No: »..»... .» .»............._...r.
Availing Address: M.„..Oc...ID.... fr .„ ,IC.+!'�k�.!!,� ...a.!'w .„f,,�...... .........» ......... ».
Onsite Representative%...,...-,.2z:- ..... Integrator:...... �A .1.. / f�,.....
i�
Certified Operator;.-_,„. red, %0-r7.. „.„„.. ,„.. i1.0j!f,.,1e��._- Operator Certification Number;.„:..„ »....
Location of Farm:..
Latitude 6 0" Longitude•
4 m Design ;Cprrent3.
CarrentM� Desiga Curret► '
3�
Swine" ` C a `acit po ulatinn
P Y : p
3 Pou - h< F
Capacity 1?opulatloa - Cattie _. Capeclty 1'opulaEiod
A, .
f ] Wean to Ferrier
, .. 4 �:;
w
Layer Dairy
yl
[$ Feeder to Finish
Nvn-Layer Non-Dairys
0 Farrow to Wean
����.<; ,,;_, ,...d Y :
��
�''[
[ Farrow to Feeder.
Other S#�$ '`.� "xo�i�f#<x
Farrow to Ftmsh
s
`TotalDesignCapacity9:
Lilts
r
❑ Boars
'r � , , rr jV.= a s T
;'
Number oiLagoons lHoldmg Ponds 0 Subsurface Drains Present 0 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
L ,�
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
*�
1. Are'there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
r
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
.a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/bolding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria is effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible chfirge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes No --
0 Yes No
❑ Yes IM No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes UkNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ER No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes Pq No
Continued on back

Allty Number: d — /s?
& Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Strmclltrt; (Laaoons.t#olding Ponds. Fiush Pitiatcd
9- is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No
Structure I. Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...............„...».....................
Freeboard(ft)...... ........ /?.... »...... ..... - .w.................» ...........»..... w..........,....»................................ _...._.»......».......... »..............
10..Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes P No
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;[No
12, Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ; Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses "
an immediate public bealth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markets? j Yes © No
n,aste C
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? XYes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........447". C..... - ._. » ...... . ,...... » _.. _ W. W �».......... _......... »................. ........ ......................................................
16, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWW)? ❑ Yes F'No
17: Does the facility have'a lack of adequate acreage for land application? Yes [Q No
I$. Does the receiving crop need improvement? i Yes 0 No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes E'No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 2Yes ❑ No
21. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 5& No
22. Does record keeping need itnpro'vement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
For Cerfirled or Permitted Facilities Qniy
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Petlnit7 ❑ Yes No— _
F3 No.violations or de#'iden' this were in6ted-d>iring this'vis!L, Yov:will receive no ft rther :.
correspondence Aoitf-this:vis1L,'•.
Ctiriiments (refer lorqucsion) ,Expiate any YES answers and/ or any recomritendattorts orany, other cflmm4 r
N
hhk -sy'Cj i ri DnXa� - a
USe,drawEnQgS of facilyt��Tf W better�Xplatn situab4its. (Use mdditlanai :as necesss�ry ' M1;ry
pages
\.f ..i'. «i,.: 113.YS
R
r -
7/25197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: '— Date: f �4

Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
E Division of Water Quality.
190'koutine O Comnlaint O Follow-up of lMO inspection O Follow -tip of DSWC rcview O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number O �-;-���--�
Time of Inspmlion LLB 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered 0 Certified [j Applied for Permit 13 Permitted ❑ Nnt Opera—fit7n—a-11 Date Last Operated: „....
Farm Name:County: ...............
.� ..........
.....» ...».........»..,
Oumer Name:......... c!-» .. ��� laFir<»....»„ .... .»„ ».» ..»........„. Phone No:......rI.......... ».....
„
Facility Contact :.......... '». `.. C ? ..„...... Title: .„ ......»..... .... ......................... Phone No:.............. „............... .....
M.
Mailing Address: _....../fir. �... ��9�e....���!� !` �l...�.. ;Z.R 6714? ...................... ».... .............. ...„.. .... „».... »»....
Onsite Representative:... 7-;1.. �1..{Integrator:......1¢�'''p...l�!'`...1......
Certified Operator;„,..,. +�� „... �. l,,. � ........................ Operator Certification Number :.......................... ..._.............
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• [ �� �«
y� * ;' ,t t Design Current ( k4 Desigq , ;Current; fry .. `� l�es�gn `. Current ; .. ..,.
Swine Capacity`,1'opulatiori Poultry t , 'Capacity..Popufatian LL Caltle .:Capacity PoPiila#iott
Fran to l:eeder❑Layer ❑ Dairyder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-Dairyrow to Wean ; . t q 3 �`
❑ Farrow to Feeder
+❑ Other���'
E y
❑ Farrow to Finish ` sr ��� , v`� Totat Design Capacity
❑ Gilts;
❑ Boars Total SSLW
° Number of Lagotias! Holding Pgiids ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray field Area F'
77
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes V No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NNo
Discharge originated at: Cl Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes kNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Wo
r
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONO
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes *0
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require ❑ Yes XNO
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Na
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7125/97

y
Lcility Number: go
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes , '�No
Structures (Log gons.Holding_bonds. Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 40NO
Stricture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier............. ... ....:_ _.....�.._........_.......... ».. ........».... ._......__..... _....� ....�_..._..:..................:......... . .
«.� A� Freeboard (ft): ..».._...._..». _�... _ ..._ _ ..._........._.._...� ........._ ........ �_......................... _..»........... .......... ».... .........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion,'or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancerimprovement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ANo
Mlikste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ANo
(If fib extess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type t«C�/rf�...'�+!*..lr}...J.. ........ _ _ _... _....._..».......... ....... ........._........... ».... ».»»».._...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes KNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes XNO
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ANo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ YesSIN
No
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yeso
22. Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No
For Cerfified or PermitirdFacilities -
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ,K No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes dNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No:vlolkio'ns or deficiehde's.wereitoted during this_visit:- Voa-_vMl recei've-no f&t ei-:
correspondence: Eihoat this:visit' .
Comments{re%r to gilestion'ti) w Expl<rstn any'YE5 3ans�et s and/or an3 recommendat%ons or any other comments '
Use drawings of facility to better explain stfuat,ons {usc add:tianalpages as necesssary)k�" T
N�. L-, w . ..✓.. X. „k . �s r t.N... .,3R4:wa:A. .•a'..;s i+ I u . + i L
RA h
/25/97
r *' y �, Ckfi v.`,�
EReviewer/Inspector
r/InspectorName";' „>€s:IIk'„�'ti,_i'`* .,v:k� s�r,')�a
la
Slgnature: Date: O J

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 27, 1999
To: Mary D. Carraway
DWQ Attorney
Through: Pa►vl Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
From: Robert Heath
Environmental Specialist H
SUBJECT: J.J. McCree Package
Mc Cree Swine Farm
Facility No. 09 - 157
Please find attached information pertaining to the J.J. Mc Cree Swine
Facility that you had requested from the files in our telephone conversation
of August 19, 1998.
Thank you for your cooperation regarding this matter. if you have any
further questions or need clarification on any of the details please contact
Paul -Rawls or myself.

CAFO COMPLAINT
McBee Swine Farm
Hwy 701, Nr. White Lake
Received 1/16198 @ 12: 00 FM
Received by: Paul Rawls, WQS
Complainant: Sandra Russ [phone]
[phone]
Mrs Russ called in to report that the McRee Farm (09-157) had been spraying swine waste in
"One Hole " all week.
Mrs Russ indicated that the farm had been spraying all week and was spraying today in the rain.
c
Mrs Russ believes that with the saturated soil conditions (From the rainfall that has occurred this
week) that waste is running off of the field and into nearby waters.
Mrs Russ stated that this is not the first time she has observed the farm spraying in the rain.
I told her that her concerns would be relayed to the swine staff..
She would like a fallow -up call after WQ goes out to the farm.
Contacted Bob Heath via pager at 12:25 PM. _
Bob was near Carthage at the time and indicated that he would travel to the McCree Farm after
he left the farm he was inspecting at that time.
cc: Bob Heath
.. DWQ Swine File McCree (09-157)

O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC re0ew Q Other.
Date of Inspection ?J—
Facility Number Time of Inspection v '4 ti 24 hr. (bh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours �
Farm Status, ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 1
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
13 Not Operational Date Last Operated:,.....,_......_..�...�.....,_.. ..:,._,....�....,,..
Farm Name:..,..�i..�l..c..,,, ...t �i' fir 7 ..,, .....,.-....,, Couaty:.......„
Land Owner Name:.,. J zz _.L... Phone No:
FacHity Conctact:.., a r 7._,..1-fc�jf��.. Tit€e: � .�,,,,_ Phone No: _.....,. '
Mailing Address:...... R n ...... 292:..�.iJ �� .2���Z .._...�._.......�.... �....-...».._._�
Onsite Representative: 5t.._,�..�..P.�.:�„-, ,.,.,,_,... �..,.. Integrator: �.�.....�......-.�. ...r...„.......
Certified Operator:.,...._ :,.gaG,...0 -`/-- - Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm; �Krr� c. �`� �r�..� filit:�o+� li:►.x �, .a��„ �...� .+w�s vci /.�.�
Latitude a ' " Longitude ' •
'type of Operation and Design Capacity
D
�$j.>: t?iSnc r .. �4 �. ";. .l�-;•„ r t: Mat,
s'tis
�� h'Designr�Grrentp�,esi$nCurrent' �•,F-0 + Design#Current ••
*pie, ..'.� Ca aci Po uiatlott:i E w:Pou�try,,.;; Ca` ac Po ulat a �- .0cl P ulaf o
❑ Wean to Feeder is K",� EONon-Dairvl
® Feeder to Finish O % Non -La
ffFarro�% to WeanKA rt#y Af r#t Yak &s' a,ln,� w:, la 5 of < w '14'221
rl Fa o FeederTntaI Design Capacity ,
�r
nish
'j ❑ .. k ._.'___,.u.M.
OtheS �.
�r,w�.`x•Pw��ri•ra•u:�rr^YY(f'm .... ,: ..,..,,,., ... �,,..._, , ».. a,,,,.c. .a_. sS*�.. 3F,..,.'�l�'b,} s:�'� »'o-�` ��t�.C?a� f, a'i+ , ,i,.,. .;�o-�s. �� ux
y Y
Nurrtber�of Lagoons Y- Hold In% I
, Subsurface Drains Present
D Ol)n Area k� ❑ Spre Fleld Ares' µ�E
2 s ;.- .,r�, .a. as k z ;elf�'S• ` .^�t. t:�,.:e-.. ,S ,i t tl
GeneMI
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenanceJimprovern=0
❑ Yes
%Na
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? `
❑ Yes
KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field a Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
X No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
JXNo
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑yes
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
KNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
4f30197 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

r
Number:.. Q ^...� �.._... .. .
.ty
is facility not in compliance.with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑Yes
JgNo
-7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
tff No
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
;KNo
C
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
JH�No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10, Is seepage observed from any of tha structures?
❑ Yes
KNO
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity ofany of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
`$No
12. Do any ofthe structures need maintenancerimpmvement7
JKYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
;ZNo
Waste Appliratlon
14.. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
WNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) ,
15. Crop type�`...�t.aE��M ..�..............._ �... _� ..— _.._..._....
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes allo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of.the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes No
eZ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes jR No
❑ Yes IR No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question . Explain any YES answeis and/or any recgmmendattoas os any athcr cttmmeats , A
Use drarvtrt s­f faci1i ` to.better ex lain sitrratrons: use addtttanal ages as necess A
g tY p C P B
/2 . 7� IAy ao.� aGkicr ,v �..� {�w,tt✓r%Sys.Ja.✓ i+Q S.
t 8. 77.x co-e,cxi" �.►. � � 7 �.ts�rr �r.. .�r. �v�
/9 L itR �7JD.t) L .r�.s .�oat�t4t • 1° f.0 /, -6"-C
Imo! WiLw/ /Nf /C� � a
.2d. ��% ��/✓«�r� ��/"'��e.� �m /^'�s.�.� �s� i,c,trt,rlE's../�r �k�re.I�a
4
a
Reviewer/Inspector Name° ln1.3��.3#. 1;. °� $r
Revlewer/Tnspector Signature: Date: Lp -,2l
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
4/30/97

' r=
�'❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Akency i
f2 Division of Water Qu�.ality.,
0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of MVQ ins cation 0 Follow-u of DSIVC review 0 Other
Date of inspection I
Facility Number ; ,
Time of Inspection - 24 hr. (hh:tmm)
®Registered 13 C—errtified ❑ Applied for Permit 13Permitted 113 not Operational Date Last Opperated. »,»,,.,»„
Farm Name; _. �I......t...C..�. County: »..... w......
i�'.. _.....»...».......».»...._..
Owmer Name:...._ . _....�.1 _.�d'e1iEt-,1............. ... _» Phone No:........ »».. ....»»... »»... .» »... ».........»»...._ ..».»
Facility Contact: _..iL►.- C�,lil ...._.... _.... Title:.. . »......_...... _ ... _.... » ......... Phone No: _.... »....» ...._ ...........».... _..
Mailing Address:. _... �� _ .U, _�!�',!!»._�1 ...» . (1..� ...... r t ..a..V.. . ....
....... »............. ............ .......
._ ....»»
Onsite Representative:........ If�dIntegrator:_.......... ..........
._...._.
Certified Operator;�,»„ �c. .„ efr !!it .�»,...» .._ ......._ .» Operator Certification Number ,......... ................. ...�....
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
:CltrTe�t DPSi Current , °� �'. ir' t CSIgIi CllrrCllt r", D
Swine Cepacity._Papula#ion tPoultry w �aPactty i'apuiatian� Cattle n ','tcapac,ly Poptiiation...;
a,
FFeeder
o Feeder La er ; Dairy to Finish ❑Non La er ❑Non -Doi to Wean .><, �,�
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other 1� �x r �k -t t ' a f: f S n v
€. n� fi,f k a �u y,u owt51 y j
. ❑F+arrow to Finish ��-��� �T€►tai Desig4n Capacity
❑ Gilts {� j 4r .y N 5. �'�=. X i�-_xo
?'t"� rr, iAr� a ixx _ pj, t
Boars {}`g"� �� } L, y"`�� i+ ,Total SS..
�y,:, 9=� x i
+� Number'of Lagoons 1 Main Ponds 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present IIDLagoon,Area IC Spray Field Area
4 � g *� `` r� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
MP
Gyneml
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 0 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
C. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were. there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
maintenance improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125197
❑ Yes No
RYes ❑ No
❑ Yes Al No
}Yes ❑ No
/,0
❑ Yes Pd No
❑ Yes 19 No
91Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes IN No
Continued on back

B., Aze there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (Laeoons.11olding Ponds.Fiusli Pits. ets.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? JWYes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ... .... _ .._ .....» .......� ....... ».......... ................. » ............ » ........................ _.....................
Freeboard (ft):.-.....% � �.... ..... _........ _.......
.....
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? 0 Yes JXNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes ®No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum, liquid level markers? ja Yes ❑ No
W se Applicallon
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? 0 Yes M No
(If in excess of /W?MP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type C.(Sk-re✓!1.,�!�_.......................... ......._................. ...... ...... ........ ...... ............................... _ .............. _..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes [i No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ro Yes ❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes JZNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? XW-wY'es M No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes ❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Yes ❑ No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Ur Culilld or Pemritted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
13 No.violationi-or def"icienci6s Kerenoted-during this:visiC .Y.ou.Vill receive no ft rilier :
:. • correspQndeilce ahouf �this:visit:- :... � . � . � � . ; ; .. � . ' ....:: • .. • .. ; ..: .. .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
7M,97

�, .. '; .✓�' � - �: i�ad,.:�Aiitl.��A's'���t4X'..e5,�•ar;,��Sr::s4:iaar. `"»lust'�.C�lrt�wf;7f:;,.�aiwti�iiaa,+•+3:.i�,�:'.':� ...,�, - f -' °��
F g] Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
RM Division of Water Quality
.'fw'ti.-
O Routine V Comnlaint O F'olloK•-up of l)NN'O inspection O Follow-up orDSWC review O Other
Facility Number G Date of Inspectlon / d
Time of Inspection r.0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered ❑ Certified [3 Applied for Permit Q Permitted JE3 Not Opera Date
Last Operated:
FarmName:.... ..,t .c ..�.f��w...._..».» ,�......».» .....»».. County: ...............»..�5�?,lr._...........................
OmmerName:....._». ,!„......_.2_1...... ....... Phone No:......._ .....»»..... ».»..... ».»......._.....»..............._..» .»
FacilityContact: ..» ............_ .» .............»_.. »..... Title: . » .............. _ _.. Phone No:.. ._...... » ....». _ .. ..._...
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:..—.-. ` .,.. .. ��Q' ....._» Integrator....... 1
� ,-�-• _,., Operator Certification Number Certified Operator:.�(.-,e�-,t GI � �� p •
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• =6 =+* Longitude =• =' ="
AM
Drsipp rx•Curreatf' Desi Current ':�
Vxp -,b-- a', v p,.. 3R .1-. "�°� ',4�.`9� -. P�! A� , -, Qi.ln
,.5wifle ".�# a ,3 Capacity Population Poultry s� .Capacity Pop:!fation;Cettle4 ,.'n°,Capacity,Popufationt
Wean to Feeder La er Dairy
Feeder to Finish gTD Non -Laver -, ❑ Non -Dairy
rq ❑ Farrow to Wean"i it t: �:�.5i' sv, ^}# - �i'v�...�. xud<ir• # s �9 "¢`u pia"-r na`. "y r,''' '`"-.,
Farrow to Fender
Other
[� Farrow to Finish r �� TotalDesigts Capacity`,`
,s
}i : GlltsnL- tY „f5'�`�`RY:
a a Rt +-rt ; Total S�iLW�`„
t: ❑ Boars �`�
Nurabker of Lagoons 1 Hoidang Ponds I J ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area cy
0 No Liquid Waste Management System
Seta! .
1. Are•there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
2. Is any discharge observed from any pan of the operation?
❑ Yes
13 No
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
( No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
-d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
CkNNo
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
1A No
4, Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
IR No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
MNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
P No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
N No
7/25/97
Continued on back

:.Iltty Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 10 No
Structures (Laeoonss,Hol ding Ponds.Flusli Pits. etc.!
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ». _._ _ ... .._» » ......r....».......»......».......... .....
Freeboard(ft)............. ................. ..... _.............._..........»..................................»..
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes f � No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes MNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9.12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lacy adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
31'Rste Anpilcatlon
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........10. 9...............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWNW)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
Four Certified -or_ omitted Fa0lifles Onh=
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q No-,violatiohs' -ar ddIdencie's'*ere'itot'ed.d'ing this:visit, Yoit:wlll ireceive no further
.-.-correspondence
QEryes ❑ No
fa Yes Q No
ErYes Q No
❑ Yes E2"No
X Yes 17 No
❑ Yes ED No
❑ Yes lgNo
UYes ❑ No
Yes R No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
CDI1lntellt5(refer�to question #j ;y,Explain any: YES�t+nswers`andlor any >;ecotnntendaf�iotxt or�any other co�unetit� �;� �, •�,
Use drawings of Witity to better explain srtuatibnC use additional pages as necessary 5 U -
%VYnah':. 1, ':# : ,t �x �, rf. , i .k•• r . r . Ga;..r.: r a.,. ..C.s' i. 7ri:9K- , eiPx: "' xs»,�.. �a.`y
7/25197
Reviewer/Inspector Name t ; t , _ 7 ��' , �����, y,, , ,G r Mryr�� y{� ; s y I '
. 2Y.+ % i. titiY�1'b 1.'?r S•Sg�Anir4LFa�i�ila?z�.4`�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: `� Date: / �L

Division of Soil and Water Conservation (3 Other Agencya
Division of Water Quality.
10-ltouth)e O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO Inspection O Follow -tip (if DSWC review O Other I
Date of Inspectlon
Facility Number Time of Inspection [i 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered ® Certified Q Applied for Permit 13 Permitted © Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarnrName:•.......... county: . .........................dr•..�..................... ..... ................
Owner Name: �.. _ ..»_v�.._....�... _............� »_......» .... Phone No:....J/D� ..d. .........._
Facility Contact: _....M �...Y CSC- ]�.......»�.. Title: »w_..................... p Phone No:
11lailing Address: _..�°.�o... ._L�9 .....f.�✓.�".V..%_A1 �. . ;ZeJ14. ......I........ ........ .�..» ......_ .. ............. ........ ..
Onsltc Representatives..... I�.../...:`....... .' ..... Integrator:......
r >
Certified Operator;. _....T »Sala... ..... ..__... Operator Certification Number;. ..............:.........................
Location of Form:
0
'a
Latitude l �i• �� �" Longitude ��• ��"
ryt Design '-CfIT�CAts�x`� ? 'r'n,--Design,".Ct1Trl'n�i, Design
fx.77Swute:_}'Ai:_,h, Ca'pacity';Population ,;,,Poultry - ..:, Capacity :Population"; Cattle.k,; `'.Capacity,Population;
w• ❑ Wean to Feeder [� Layer D Dai ��.
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑Farrow to Wean " °' x
�s,. � 0��2'�'�"'• ,z = z'� �x
❑ Farrow to Feeder ( y
Other
❑ Farrow to Finish VTotal Deli n Ca acit'
© Gilts r °' AZ.
�}�Yz
❑ Boars �'`�4 Tat815SLW'-:
EAR-1
ber of Lagoons 1 Holding Poitda ❑Subsurface Drains Present C1 Lagoon Area Spray Field Area fi
❑ No Liquid Waste tlianagemcnt S3 stemma°<y�f Y,
GgnCr al
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,0 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J-No
Discharge originated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes WNa
b. If discharge is obsen�ed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 14No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes �No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes )�No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes qNo
maintenance/improvement? , l
b. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7125197

,I acifity Number: 0 $? f
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes *No
Structrires (Lagoons.Holdina blids.1lttsh Pitid[C.)1
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Nlo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier..... __ _. _ ...._ r.....___.._.»... w.............»......_.... ...._ .. �....._..... _.. .................... ..... »
Freeboard(ft):. _ .....% a ......_..................._....._................._...............,................... _ .............._...... _.... .........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
11. Is erosion,' or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes] No
12. Do any of the structures nett maintenance/improvement? (� Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ANo
Waste ARplicallpA
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ANo
(If in excess of /WMP, or runoff
1entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop typo .....?..C�frf,..L/+*�....J... ............_ .. �.....»..»...........»».........»..................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW V)? ❑ Yes 14'No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes XNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ YesS?No
No
21. Did Reviewcr/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes
22. Does record keeping need improvement? Ayes ❑ No
FgL_Qr1in3 d or Permitted Facaflies Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWW?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑, No' violations or de'rtcieincies;were,ittited-durifig this: visit.: You:wiiI receive no further:
correspondence atioot this:visJL - ..:... ... • , 1. • : .
❑ Yes ',M No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ❑ No
• t
Comnteats (rNferto que'st(61?'.` „EapLahi any ^YES answers and/ar an? recommendations or any other. comments"
Use drawin s of fact tit to better explain stluaEtCo'ns FrLuse addrhorial es as necessa . ^ £
:I #iL wi+6 .�.,..' ..,"S.. y-�'M'�_�.�+:.'ha.-:'.[.i.. n8 �/ �'11.i4
7/25197 y
:-.t S. ., .". J .I. .. j r,.� vgv x ..i ax•+..rr�.. i. as ,^ .. a x N',
Reviewer/Inspector Natne;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 4 %

Division of Water Quality
July 27, 1998
MEMORANDUM
To: Colleen Sullins
Non Discharge Permit Section
From; Robert Heath
Environmental Specialist, FRO
Thru: Stephen Batnh
acting Regional Oe or
SUBJECT: Enforcement Package
31 McCree Swine Farm
Facility 09-157
Please find attached a fast track enforcement package pertaining to
the discharge of animal waste at the subject facility. The subject facility has
required numerous inspections due to their failure to comply with the
certified animal waste management plan.
If you require additional information or clarification, please advice.
0I
Attachment

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINANORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAMPSON
IN THE MATTER OF
Jeffrey J. McCree
J.J. McCree Swine Farm
J
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT
15A NCAC 2H .0217
File No. DD
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A,
I, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director of the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. J.J. McCree operates a concentrated animal operation in Bladen County.
B. The J.J. McCree Swine Farm was deemed permitted as a nondischarge
facility on October 14,1997, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
C. On January 16, 1998, DWQ staff' observed a discharge of wastewater by
the J.J. McCree Swine Farm from associated spray fields to Little Colly
Creek, which are Class Class "C - SW" waters of the State within the
Cape Fear River Basin.
D. The J.J. McCree Swine Farm had no valid permit for the above described
activity.
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter
totaled $400.57.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. J.J. McCree is a "person" within the meaning of G. S. 143-215.6A pursuant
to G.S.143-212(4).
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The Little Colly Creek constitutes waters of the State within the meaning
of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S.143-212(6).
D. The above -cited discharge is a violation of the nondischarge pernut.
E. J.J. McCrea may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to
G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than
ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) per violation may be assessed against
a person for failing to act in accordance with the terms, conditions or
requirement of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against
J.J. McCree pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
G. The Director, of the Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. 143-215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I
make the following:
Accordingly, J.J. McCree is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ for discharging waste to the waters of the State in
violation of I SA NCAC 2H .0217.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S.143-215.6A.
$ Enforcement costa
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors fisted in O.S.143B-282.1(b), which are-
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State,
to the public health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
• (2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air
quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply
with programs over which the Environmental Management Commission
has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date)
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality

ANIMAL _ MERATI0IY,,,,,,INSPECUUN FORM
1. Date of Inspection(s): JAI u 16. 1998
2. Regional Office: Fayetteville, WWrr Quality Section
3. Name of Owner Of Property:
4. Name of Operator: Mr. Jj. McCree
5, Address: P.O. BQx 119
Dublin, NC 2$332
6. Phone Number: (910�6U-U66
7. Description of Facility Location, Map excerpt attached,
Travel from Elizabeth1_j2wn on Hyw IQ 1 East to fjjnn on left a2proximately 2 miles East of
White Lake. NC.
S. Date this facility began operation: The_farmbas been, in fllll operation i cn a June 30,1.925,
9. Date of last expansion: ILA
10. Has the facility registered with DWQ? YES NO_
If yes, date of registration 6I30195
11. Does the facility have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan YES.X, NO_
is one required? YES -XL NO_
Date Approved: June 30. 1995
12. Has this facility received a CAFO Designation? YES— NOX
If yes, date issued:
13. Type of Operation:

14. Number and type of livestock: There were approximately 2880 feeder to finish hogs
present at the time of the inspection.
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled, or confined and fed or
maintained in any 12 month period. elve (12) month
16. Are crops, pasture, or post harvest residues sustained in the normal growing season over
any portion of the lot or facility? Yes, the farm was designed to have approximately 30
acres of crop land on which to apply waste. The certified waste management plan calls
for combination of bermuda gam' fescue,and smaluzdn,s to be grown on various sites.
I I �11 lid, 11111111 1 1 -06 7 i"','
61
18. Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and proximity to same or
other surface waters: It was noted that one other swine farm is located upstream from this
facility.
19. Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.: It was noted that a residence was
Iocated approximately 2000 feet from the south portion of the spray field.
20. Approximate depth of ground water table in the area of the facility or discharge: unknown
ORR" AM - Zip -imiTriimf Ter,[ir
22. Animal waste discharged. Swine
Witnesses: _ Robert Heath, DWQ--W-Q yettevilleRegional Office_(210) 486-1541,
23. Are pollutants discharged in the waters of the State? 3M
If so, how? Waste application was being conducted 013 the afternoon of/14198at the time
of the inspection. Waste was running off the fields int12 Uttle CollyS;=k during the
jWp icatiun event. (See attaCphotos),

24. Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event less severe than the 25-year, .
24 hour storm? Yes, A discharge occurred from this facilily on 12r about January 14,1999,
It is also important to ngIC that the lagoon had (15) inches_of freeboard. Also no 25 year
-24 hour storms had occurred recently..
25. , What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to public
health,or to private property resulting from the violation?: The discharge has caused thintroduction of nutrients into the receiving surfac.r. 3maters, that 3mill Cause or add-tn the
possibility of algal blooms and accelhication of the slow moving waters of_the
receiving stream. Also, samples taken indicate elevated fecal coliform levels downstream
of the facility.
***PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COMPLETE LAB RESULTS
AND PHOTOGRAPHS FOR MORE INFORMATION***
• 11I1 • 1 • 1 . 1 ME . "j : 1.1 ' ►/ lrl•.+ r 1 1 • 1 11 I�Igo"
+ r1• r• 1 - -1 •1+ 1• 1'. . - ✓ �1• 11 - + r 1• • rrl• 1 • �-
" 11 • 1 1 . + 1+ 1 1 + 1 " 11 • rr ! + rll 1 �� •
27. Water Quality Assessment: At the time ojR��o I�====J ow=wu
significant 1' point 1ere it entcmd the Little• Making up. 1 estimi
25 of 1 "totalflc�& in 1

28. What is the cost of rectifying the damage?: ri" 3mritcr observed -no areas thatcleanup
activities1' recommended, There has been 11 =ort of 1 • 1 1 ".. 11 impacts
outside the area of the1 1`.1o1
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?: Based on observations made
during the investigations, the cost was significantly decreased by applying the waste to an
wa unsuitable ste apolica ion field due to the potential savings of having to_�truck_the K+aste
to an ar.=tablr. sitc-
30. Was the violation committed willfully or intentionally?:
`�
� rl - �� � • 1 ':� 1 11 - 1 � � ' C � 1 � � 1 � "r,- 1 it � - 1 I I' 11 1
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority? LL
McCree Farm was ,registered with the DWQon June, 30, 1995. The facility received a
Notice of Deficiency) on Auguq A 1997 for failure to establish the renuired cr=
in the splay field and for no grass cover on the lagoon banks. A NOV was issued on
lau _ 2$, 1998 for this discharge and another NOV was issued on February 4, 1998 for
applying waste to a saturated waste application field resulting in waste ponding in the
sprayfield`
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?:
Regional Costs are as follows:
Photo, film and developing: $ 11.75
Mileage: $0.20 per mile for 80 miles: $ 16.00
Fecal Coliform ($22.00 per sample) * 4: $ 88.00
Robert Heath @ $ 17.62/hr
2 hours - Drive Time
$
35.24
1.5 hours - Investigation
$
26.43
5 hours - Report Development
$
88.10
houri 8.51QW
$
149.77
Kerr T. Stevens - 1 hour (Supervisory Review)
$
35.05
Central Office Review
$
100.00
Total $ 400.57
33. Type or general nature of business: Swine, Feeder to Finish Operation

R aU --
►/ 1/ 1. 4Raa- MIT1 1r :. 1- 1 •i -11 1"1 •,1 1 ',/,
1 1 a I 1 1 /R al R RI
i•-rl1.1-1 //'IRI :1 R11' 1 a l 1 I ll" 1 . 1� ' l i11 1.//a'1 1' 1 got
35. Are there any Mitigating Circumstances?: NO
36. Assessment Factors:
a. IWC : Visually Estimated at 2.5 % at the confluence poinj bCl &=n ditches draining
waqte from the spiny site and Little Colly Creek.
b. Receiving Stream : Little Colly Creek, Class "C-SW" Waters
c. Damage Yes _ No X (Based on observations at the time of the investigation)
If YES, include report from Wildlife Resources Commission.
116MMIT3
38. I.R. I Owner/Operator:
Immediately Rte 11 to the fields,
wllar to nreve7t 9TV-future.discYaree-of
39. Recommendations for further DWQ Action:
notice of Violation (Forwarded January 28, 1994
- Enforcement Action
Rein spection
�1 • oil wl1 nu.r 1• al 1 /1 • dpollwWo
. r 9 .' . r a1 / 1, -' 1 0 1 116111M In I 1 11416 NEIN(•: ./ . 1 1 C 1 1 1 r r 1
1l 1l l- .C. /1 /1:R ./.• 1 1 1. .'//1 .1a /. /I.I

11,i p� {"� �!•, ��'1 � _ �ii� � �,y � �,;i:.��� r ��, p'N. lr
,ayl,�•y.A1 {n��1+ V'.r� IF, i,{ S`.�'{��`F�, �i C y,-r� ;v +�t'�:•`�}F.•� Ik,i'FP ?
ry A r.y � }'f!A �r+t }I�r t. {:r, �� Yna't �,'r 0. r..0 • ,>k. t�J'.,•k tii'q � �.. -•1 w
1J}IS"91'.Fi.'."'�'"'- �rr�.ra• +r' *. ti , � w a�.�•.,a j,TF�.y.� i�4M�*iey,,.�v�
..t rY Yir�,�n•e'l�;fi��t �+ 1�4,x�pt�;���ja�k,�.�'.r: �'{a���•�Y �I.i : ��wf r5'��,�,(��� i 'Fair "�'*,�,��_y �.lt��.
ly+�•��a�Fi�Nl1 ;"iud � i �t1T'M�r j;t,r�t`;r'tayYw r":N �;;~ `$F� ii��' ,y :w �'t, ,�p.}yy"`�''i ��, ��tr�ri•5•
�,��..M f„1�'�`---`++++++���a�v� kY �e ' •��'i� ;,�5�!�,�i'i•r� �r'•,." �t i+i,�'q,�:`�`'.'"ry.^Ytli�{?
W tl "�' 'i•. y q� ,+,�� ✓1i",'� : Fl �y� 6
rN lrR,�JS�i r� � � S• '!�fi 7 $ 1 j,h, � � � � .% r �, ..�c•
,�,ti d �' (`i S� �il� + 41��C �,�t ����.rsj$frt'2`E;,� 4.�,�,,�J�.t�+�4 � �g,�� i�'ii;�j•ne i�r: J .
yy�y„� .�.�.r.=, ?:*;S e�7"dd'��'•l5 v%�,�f':''}a�'��:�,~,� r'� : �:e•����,a.l.'7!!'�':."�'.3r�a�'��'4i'EtYt'>�`�'l . �t�`.-:aim � rh�l►�tia•.
ii
=�.�ya -f4Kr :t rA1r yR( •1 WI. r+l,tX ?"i' �1{��iaY:.•d.f44r tn!h v%'/r' F•�JNya4�-v/' '� ..•, c.. 7-wfs'."
,�r jP4�\: . F:p• 'r++'r`f#: ]}. x` �i. w � I�tA `.�okpo!i
N�'/
•
' '�_ r;, :•rl4.y.Jn.«11l"J'�'�.. _....�•.. � '� r° '
AWN
11q�7ro:
r 1. r� �� ,� •fir [ 4��� cc..::
l �f f,: ,'grottTi: ! `J : 1�r�N,.t 1.++��Sr ,d !'• f�P t
"1,' • : ;.r •. '�l � � • - ...ram e' �•+ T# s � .. � � . .
r.�1���d1' ri` r�' ,1 ' �'.,.r,�'-� .�i�,'�...'�r a�.'� 1�t•�•��i�T�'�;`�'rii�+�'•y,�t!�
�tifiT iY! L�'r1 - _ i.•:Y,"''Y.�I+r.k� �Y.-t �'Jv .� ,:w...
r.: .4�►� � �,,��FF'''''''�' r"�} If _ _ � � r • i . r�r'. r y� •'�L 7`P� N3��...t� �l yS � A h y�
law
40.
.. N •_ o r . � ♦+'�S' . � rt� 'S.u'• r,; �4 irvi•kn,}l�
ri, r t ,1��j r `•r1 �F4 r �.�.� rii .f•WI�?"�i'+: r'�•F . * f�j
. it j1'r„r�;' J S 'r' .:�. �,� 'A'r.. •.sr�'-•f� � i �/�� i �,�{��it�,it .� �•' .R';t.}'T* �'�l a�'4.
J i � a � �� �1 N F,lRtywS€.i•�' ti :( � 2s }i 1��..r wYs9` s° �Jt,�'*y�f. �;*,j'r�g..�r•�•
�. ;ri � J :��..'.'4a�,f •t:�:�r�•� � T.�.�'y� �,�,. f.h r•^�,,.'°•,. „^���J J NL •+.�.
•{ t r-�•-'i - ��,.r � f'"'r �`!' r I ti' a •! Jr •frfr,', ,. �r 1lCy;• 1•'��+' �r)�. M
s ,. '� • fi R� ..r F 7' t r }.i j'hf dr�.'c 4. •t l�+�rrrr(� Lr , rx' 3� 1•,
• s } r ;.i "+•4++ r• .• .,7..,F ',{ �. :": Y *%t.•,i`�`"x"`. irr"'•' `tA`1f�3.ilK' J et x•' �i GG

;�
Vol

J.J. McCREE SWINE FARM
DOWNSTREAM of DISCHARGE POINT
LAGOON LEVEL

RECEI-VED
JUN 2 2 1998
C FAY[TTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
�//am/s c�
fiNf-z 7e,-7 -Al-fid, 1)1.D",114,1
Mx ►oat Pow, pipe
z iv s5-14 Alf D pRobUce- sa m uc 44 1� o zr3,
LA idol
1.cJ r,n rP� ,Pa rnp iri� w - un D�� w A Teo oE-
DRcv ou 7,o- I K) fly yWe4-, S io P6- �?ecel of n
Rp-� A 40,47, 1- 3 ) rnes R weed :7- LvAso-
MAJ ;?6Doe -TApi �aTn%J Rl?e ADm
D rc� P;'40. 54'ij -j7- al QAD res7j�y
weoPec Pum�,
Av5- 7,4e, 44, , e ;pi5 ;I- wed I' ge sn Twr��u4f,
l mile :zn Sr#111 LW eg- 9PDLIOD P-61M JW I� 4rbi )
pR ZAA D 04 rn Y JZ)fi��e
/�� M
t v ► aucR �e m � JLss o
reg--,
f//isA l in e 1:wgs r gpo-10 fop- -1e1 5
4rn�u�T a �A��- �W ��yin� ; AT
. L AlwtA -ern �uRBI ihy An D CAMS 0 5 S,1`7e4

r
c
_ _
ff::C M � e�4�
p°fix tJ�__
�IL�iGin� (6 C,
- ---- ------ - ....
Y
1�

I
t
FA1'ETTV 1 LE
REG, OrFICE
--
o of'
.:rlo?rall ��A�t�y
Aj
A�e RelOs
� � /
dee
IKOIIIIZD 111i:' Idell
Come MZ�)Ivr
75� Agoallo wrzt/,, / '8eli�o Gv�`�.
IVoa#c> 71-1�e Z14) WeA
/Q� Zwz� ) Z-M�p
ZOW Semis ,�,�un
-
ad�T some,

I
oF 7— pRd blem.s T Aivcr zz- 2?e
-�Cl�• flue- acyu/c> zv cw*,k _ Tferke—
0 9 erats
V// ge lC in AM
r GJ� AR e �ko �
�� �n 1 Ne �urnlJ��
-Zr
o> A6Dr,i� % SAnbY Co A� l �3-1
ri,&m)s zzn r �w� � r�-� p1, • W//
Gcao�l� 17410(mare pumpM f . za summee .
m�nr An D PR,eUeAr %T Rc} e .fi e
��
7

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISIOI7.
NC #11
- 017 CASTLE HA,YNE STREET
NC #3'7714
f
FAYETTEVILLE, NC A.8303
USDA # 787
t..
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
AIR FUEL WATER FOOD
WASTES
-
- ,, .. r:% LJJ"''::i. tY'•i-. rs[:4Nf.> q' _ :.t:� . ,a . „J, r. _
• , - - 4 _. • v .y.
;F- ,
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
;.Vicar #21912
•rP ! •l'k-3 ?11'S y �4 ��, -
- •�F�:-t j4'`v f J-tk" •~ ' ` • ,.. :•'T,'t-`Zf,'
_ ". L i"``� '3 i fi,4i:}+ 'j L
CT,TRNT: KC DFFlNR
= DATE-RECrD: 01/16/98
'SAMPTAD'. •01/16/08
ADDRESS: Wachcvia Building,
Suite 714 SAMPLED BY: B. Heath
Fayetteville, NC 28301 DELIVERED BY:- P.Rawls
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Paul Rawls
SAMPLE CODE: Wante water, Grab
: ACCOUt•IT NUMBER. #1424003
REFERENCE: McCrea
Swine Farm
SAMPLE TA: 1. scharga from' f'ieId'
r
f
G
2. Tipst ream - ID 099FR.11272
3. Downstream -
,Ib #98WD1273
4. Below Ld mstm
@ intarsecti.on w/,itrarim - ID #g6WD1274
DATA REVIEfIED BY:
DATE REPORTED: U1/21%
98
F+ ++++Ft•++i++i++4 i+iri++a+r++•+i+#i+++++++i+++++++##+#+++++k+t++s++++♦++++i ri+i+++!
ANALYSTS _- THUD 1 2 3 4
4+#�i++r+r+ii+i###++ri+4iir++++w#♦##-►+i#4#+fir##+++#+#+++++i�+Ii#+++++i #tt++i #++#+#++i+*#t+4•
COLIFORK, FECAL (per 100 ml)
SM18 9222D 12613 364
it
4900 1441
COMMEtrTS: Less 'th6fi- ... _ `,'..... �:-
> a Greater than'
14V ?
998
fir�� �.r Lis
��' .�' �1 f4 ,� alb, -�.�r� .. •' .L r�� J ; �
.. _ Y _,. �. - ,-(•= :•i:, ..,. �. x�.�.�.:,,..3e .�,::�-�"s},':y'•:.:naY �,r�,.: ,`-f. �'r.:'.. s.. - ;'y,_~•'��i �'_=.--•- -
PAGE 1 .OF 1 ; ..
TM darn and other Inflprmadon aoRWned an thk and other e=mpanyrng documents, represent only the eantpre(e) anaVM and Is M E M 9 E R
rariftmd upon tha concoon that a Is not to be reproduced wholly or In pen for adv nwnp or other purpom whhout written approval
ham tha Lwmnklary.
USDA•EPA-M OSH Testing Food Saeltstlw Corauitletg C wordei i and t+11cnblolagir;el Anatyaes end Resmdh

mtcROBAC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY, INC.
817 Castle Rayne St-. Fayetteville, Nattb Carolina 28303
OI..... to im tt&& tWM _ Far Mini MA-W"4
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PAGE � OF F
P.O. / CLID0 NAW
PRO ECTJLOCATION
WATER COMPOSITE SAMPLING DATA
: M
ALftOIAATIC
OtSCRETE BEOWk END: TOP
Tlw WITS DATE TOTAL FLOW
SAirPIAM
sm F010" Ta
12
TY33
p low )
io � 4
-CONfRWOW Tow- TIw TECH
MKXXIBACCOVION
rwIa chold
s I Tutp
Cf+tulTamp 'C
oft
FLOW FLOW ROW
FROPORPO1ED DEWWAi t"ISample57nans+Ira
LABLM
5"Numm
shom"Oemwo7miL XAM N
CbJECTED
Mtn =4
Um"I"K
Cmr � Ii11118 atun
NQCF
OWAMM
CMAI"
TYKE!
AIM VMREQS-%'I%D
F OMMAiNi
up s��
��
I
I
r�cLu t �o�; +�
9��� ►Z�Z
2
�1;z r
�
o...a,ns�Far�
3
�
q,q.�"
4S
�
I
I
.
I
blr (Sgnafl re)
Tema
blr j
Date
Time
. Siyrlaarej
pate
Time
nr: e)
to
rune
r 3
1
3
[�..�-. -- _ 410111=0mommimmommil
liekl(sig utwo)
�lea W.
oats
711m
Aecohod by. t ' )
Date
Time
5
1 6
�7 ism l
DaEe
Time
Received by: I of
Dale
rtme
F:7�br--
7
I 8
Comments or S#rCbVED
JAY %3W
FAY =7 - LLE
RED, ar F10E

�---i� 154 743 524
us Posw service
Receipt for Geninea mau
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail See fIRIM19e
M. t tg McCree
met & Number
PO box 119
Post Office, Stale, d
Dublin NC 2B332
Postage
$ - 32
ceOW Fee
1.35
SpwW CWtory Fee
Pwtficted Delivery Fee
Retum Receipt Showing to
r Whom b Date Delivered
1.10
Retum ileceip151MM 10 Whom,
Date, & Addressee's Addles
p
o TOTAL Postage A Fees
$ 2.77
Co
s7 Postmark or Date
1
I
=- NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 12, 1998
1cCree
119
C 28332
r: Notice of Recommendation of Enforcement
J.J. McCree Swine Farm
Facility No. 09-157
Bladen County
Dear McCree:
This letter is to notify you that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality is considering sending a recommendation for
enforcement action to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The
recommendation concerns the violation of 15A NCAC 2H.0217 for the
discharge of swine waste into waters of the State.
On January 16, 1998, staff from the Division of Water Quality,
Fayetteville Regional Office, responded to a citizen complaint concerning
swine waste being applied to a saturated field resulting in runoff to the Little
Colly Creek. An inspection of the subject facility was performed and the
discharge was confirmed and samples were collected and submitted for
analysis.
If you have an explanation for this violation that you wish to present,
please respond in writing to the Fayetteville Regional Office within ten (10)
days following receipt of this Notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and
if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be
forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
its GREEN STREET, BUTTE 714, FAYETTEVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 28301.5043
PHON9910.409-1541 FAX [phone]
AN EgUAL OPPORTUNITY JAFFIRMAMI ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLE0/10% PDXT-CONfUMER PAPER

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Robert Heath at
[phone].
Sincerely,
`Kerr Stevens
Regional Supervisor
KTSIRFH
cc: Non Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files
Garlmid Farm Supply
m
SENDER:
■ Complete Rams 1 andlor 2 for additional sembos.
I also sir z ti to rtiCeive the
re
■ Complete items 3, 4e, and Alb.
following services (tor an
• Prim your name and address on the reverse of this form so thal we can retum INs
extra fee).
card to you.
• Mach thu farm to the lrM of the mallpiesa, or on fhe back H spaoe does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
•Write*Retum Ramipt Requested' on the mallpieos below the article number.
■The Return Receipt will show to wham the article was delivered end the date
Z, ❑ Restricted Delivery
delivered.
Consult postmaster for fee.
3, Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
P 154 743 524
J J McCree
4b. Service Type
PO Box 119
❑ Registered ja Certified
Dub',. in NC 28332
0 Express Mall p insured
Q Return Receipt for IrSemNrdse 0 COD
7. Date of Delivery
7
5. Received •.ant blam
8. Addressee's Address (Only H requested
i' i. `
and toe fs paid)
. 6. Signature: (Addressee orAponV
P.
X

to 154 615 804
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
NoJnsurance Coverage Provided,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Do not use for lntemationalMail See reverse ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Senito FAYE7TEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Mr J J McCree
dublin NU ZDJZc
POPAP $ .32
i
Certttted fee 1.35
Special Delivery Fee
Restncted tin Fee DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Reum Receipt Showing to 1.10
Whom d Date Delivered February 4, 1998
Retum Pxeo Sh WN W Whan,
oo Date, & Addressee's Address
TOTAL POMP 3 FM $ 2.77
co
ih Powmrk or e �D
DatMAII.
V RECEIPT REQUESTED
2/6/98
.....McCree
P.O. Box 119
Dublin, NC 28332
y.. Subject: Notice of Violation
E Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
J.J. McCree Swine Farm
09-157
Bladen County
r Dear Mr. McCree:
You are hereby notified that, having been deemed permitted to have a
non discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant
to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On January 30, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted an inspection of your swine farm
_
located of Rghway 701 in Bladen County as a result of a complaint
concerning swine waste being applied in a saturated spray field. The
inspection revealed that animal waste had been applied to a field in which a
_
fescue Crop was established' however, due to saturated soil conditions and
over appliation;pondingwas occurring. A significant amount of wastewater
was ponded in the spray field adjacent to Little Colly Creep which is Class C
Swamp waters.
Y
-
225 GREEN STREET, ButTE 714, FAVtTTLV1LL1, NORTH CAROLINA 26301.5042
PHONr O10-466-1641 FAX [phone]
AM SQUAL OPPORTUN ITV /AI/I RMATIV[ AcTiON EMPLOYER - 50% R9CVCLtW10% POST•CONSU Man PAPER

Mr. J.J. McCree
Page 2
February 4, 1998
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following item be addressed:
1. Curtail waste application when the soil is saturated.
Failure to comply with the above condition may result in the facility losing its deemed
permitted status and being required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this office is preparing recommendations for enforcement action
for the violation noted. 1n no way does this notice absolve you for any past or future violation.
Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more
than $10,000.00 per day per violation.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before February 15, 1998, regarding
corrective actions taken or planned. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr. Robert Health, Environmental Specialist, at (910)
48b-1541.
N
m
9
KTS/rh
cc: Sue Homewood
Sam Warren - B
Audrey Oxendir
Central Files - F
Sincerely,
SENDER:
■ Complete items t anedlw 2 for additional saniou.
I efsa wish to r calve She
tj
■COmplate Hems 8, 4a. and 4b.
following services {for an
■ Print your mane end address on the rover" of this tom, to that we can ralum this
e)etM fee):
raid to you.
*Attach this k"m to Me font of the mailoace, or m the back d spew does not
1. O Addressee's Address
■W to hftrn Rocelpt Asqueated"on the mattptece below the arlids ranter.
2, fl Restricted Delivery
■The Ralum Receipt will show to whom the artide was delivered and the We
dwivelmd.
Consult postmaster for fee.
J . J. McCr'ee
PO Box 110
Dublin NC 28332
6. 5Ignatu►e: (a ydros or I
ant)
X
PS Form 9811, December ION
4a. Ait ds Number
P 154 615 19K-,
-
,
4b. Service Type
❑ Registered
Ea certified
© Express Mal
❑ insured
fB Retum Fiewipt for Merchandse ❑ ODD
7. Date of Delia
q
B. Addressee's Address (Only lfrequested
and lee is paid)

P 1,154 615 798
ens Postal Service
Recelpt for Certified Mail
�` �
NO lnsurw=Coverage Provided.
�'"'= NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Do not use for lntemaBonal Mall (Lee revor$
ISM to
Mr 3 Jm McCree
FAYETTEVILt_E REGIONAL OFFICE
li9
aarBox
c ul�lro ' 'P 32
Fa>rlepe $ .32
ceuaed Fee 1.35
SwW Delivery Fee
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Pmbided Dd my Fee
Return Whom ARDa a Da4 g ID1.10
January 28, 1998
Rekn RocW gv#jq m W—
Oate, & Mdes *l Address
TOTAL PoateQe a F.e,cc
IF�ED MAILPOattnnartcor
R—�FCEIPT REQL���p
28 98
/ J
1. McCree
Box ]14
Dublin, NC 28332
Subject: Notice of Violation
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
J.J, McCree Swine Farm
09-157.
Bladen County
f - _
' f
Dear Mr. McCree:
You are hereby notified that, having been deemed permitted to have a
non discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant
to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On January 16, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted an inspection of your swine farm
located off Highway 701 in Bladen County as a result of a complaint
concerning swine waste being applied in a saturated spray field during a rain
event. The inspection revealed that animal waste had been applied to a field
in which a small crop was established- however, due to saturated soil
--: , —�-—�
grain
conditions and over application a discharge was occurring. A significant
tt t.,,=".�,--4.�•r::-;;
amount of wastewater had runoff the spray field and entered a ditch
adjacent to the field that connected to Little Colly Creek which is Class C
Swamp waters.
225 GR[TN STRLLT, 6VIT9714, FAYRTT[VILL[, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
`
PHONE [phone] FAIL S tO.4a6-0707
AM EQUAL O*/OWWWTV IAFIrERMATIV[ ACTkOK BMrLOYRR - 50'K 1IECYCLEDJ10% POST-CONOLF+IRR fA►[R

1._ , , a-. . IA
Mr, J.J. McCree
Page 2
January 28, 1998
0
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
2. Curtai] waste application when the soil is saturated.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing it's deemed
permitted status and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that office is preparing recommendations for enforcement action for the
violation noted. In no way does this notice absolve you for any past or future violation.
Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more
than $10,000.00 per day per violation.
Please provide a written response to this office on or before February 15, 1998, regarding
corrective actions taken or planned. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr, Robert Meath, Environmental Specialist, at (910) 486-
1541.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor
Compretetttterne t
andror 2 for eddnia W satviaea.
I also wish totmeive the
a •Complete items 9, aa, and !b.
CC: Sue Homewood - Compliance OHM your name end address an the reverse of this lam so that we t an rslum finis
following Services (for an
you.
Ord'° u NA"':') this fn,m to the"of the maitt>,eae, or on the bark N "oe dm not
Sam Warren - Bladen Co, NR(
extra ie8),
1, 0 Addressee's Addy
Audrey Oxendine - DSWC Fa3 ■wr1e'Rfwm RKSO Raquwtseon the rnaI*w below
the anida rr■nber.
2, ❑ Restricted Deliver
Central Files -Raleigh e�;� aBO�'t MU show to wham she aMde was deemed
wW "„ dale
Consult postmaster for fee
3, Aftle Addressed to:
4a. Article Number
Mr 3 3 Mee
P 154 615 798
PO BOX 115)
4b. Service Type
Dublin NC. 28332
❑ Registered fit] Cart
❑ Express Map ❑ Insu
m Retum Recelpt for Mornher>dise ❑ COE
7. Date of Delivery
6. Received
B. Ad ressee's Ad ress (Only ifrequesh
and too is paid)
_ 6.6igna re: tAddrowoo orAganf)
v

CAFO COMPLAINT
McBee Swine Farm
Hwy 701, Nr. White Lake
Received 1/16198 @ 12: 00 PM
Received by: Paul Rawls, WQS
Complainant: Sandra Russ [phone]
[phone]
Mrs Russ called in to report that the McRee Farm (09-157) had been spraying swine waste in
"One Hole " all week
Mrs Russ indicated that the farm had been spraying all week and was spraying today in the rain.
c
Mrs Russ believes that with the saturated soil conditions (from the rainfall that has occurred this
week) that waste is running off of the field and into nearby waters.
Mrs Russ stated that this is not the first time she has observed the farm spraying in the rain.
1 told her that her concerns would be relayed to the swine staff..
She would like a follow-up call after WQ goes out to the farm.
Contacted Bob Heath via pager at 12:25 PM.
Bob was near Carthage at the time and indicated that he would travel to the McCree Farm after
he left the farm he was inspecting at that time.
cc: Bob Heath
DWQ Swine File McCree (09-157)

PROPERTY / T!S PIN NUMBER RT. NO. PRIOR VALUE CARD* LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPERTY FACTORS
";Ji,:,;"t .7,.Ji UQ R: ' j;t: fit[: 'S 1) A MARbHUNFT ACCESS TOPO LNO IMP SHAPE
RECORD OF OWNERSHIP PAGE STAMPS PROPERTY LOCATION CLASS OCCUP
-,r art 4 1 00 01
4009418 US 701 13 0•
KEAhL D W % ' BUILDING
1. 0.00 LISTED DATE Zama %COMPILETE
2 •CARDS FINISHING; HOUSES F fW*_
t Hl-
ACT YR BLT D, BUILDING ELEMENTS AND CALCULATIONS i - .. _.. , _-...!_. » - �M _ I. l _ _ _- _ w _j rffi.
-� t- ;- _44
DESCRIPTION VALUE DESCRIPTION VALUE 1 -
FOUNDATiON _ - ATTIC lAlFM % I- _E �I.
BASE GF AREA ., i ! t
FLOORING SYSTEM - - -
-1 i
BASE S F
STRUCTURAL FRM, 1- _ ! 4 r.» I _.. _ STORY
EXTERIOR WALLS CAD
WALL HEIGHT -�-_
I -
ROOF FRAMING _��� ! .. I.._�TF
ATTACNNENTB ..1._I _ !„ -(�- I I k i 1
ROOF COVER i
ROOF DESIGN � 4-H
FLOOR COVER
MTERIOR FiNIS!!
CABIMUWORK
I
ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING
PERMMETER WAT
--�• _ _ �• _ I
FIXTURES NONE
SPRINKLER GRADE
SYSTEM -- i
HEATICOOL CIEPR. PIF/E I
` ✓' LAND DESCRIPTION CALCULATIONS
FIREPLACE TOTAL FRTG. DEPTH LIT. PR. OEP FAC FF PRICE SUB TOTAL SH TOPO Rm OTHER Aw LAND VALUE
VALUE
FIN X NER3HBORH000
BASEMENT U14F JINFLUtMt P
SUMMARY OF OTHER IMPROVEMENTS SOUARE FOOTAGE SF PRICE SUB TOTAL SH TOPO FVW OTHER ADJ LAND VALUE
LINE 0 1 CODE DESCRIPTION CONST. SIZE AREA RATE YR CEP VALUE
e- t\ (FV Q
4._ L'V f-ICHS 'I3
.:iJ 6 HOi.7 +:++.f V % JV 5' } .J�F(J QA59 ACRES S12f FAC NET% RATE LAND VALUE
4 ;'9 STC7/UTYEP ' V 1 1000
5 t 55. V : C+ ET Ci .. ll
C7w {r 7. J. To V6 t
TOTAL 1. :f r ACRES 1.04. i.0 TOTAL VALUE LAND 45823
LAND USE VALUATK)NS AND TOTALS
SALES INFORMATION TOTAL VALUE SUMMARY OF OTHER IMPROVEMENTS
1 i :L oo CLASS •ACRES RATE LAND VALUE TOTAL USE
AMOUNT 80000 TOTAL VALUE LAND c
VALUE LAND
DATE • t 45BOO BOPENNLANOUILOM S� TOTAL USE
DUAL SALE
TOTAL VALUE BUILDINGS .1 C-s 19 0 0 WOOD LAND VALUE BUILOINGS
TOTAL USE VALUE
TOTAL VALUE 22 i *i 00
.. .. ... _ .. � .. _.. TOTAL ACRES

aooK 347 PX01920
ESTER. BPApv.
STEP A GREENE
IT- -EIS -1 LAW
..fWAf •.f?fl41 Do,[
of frrn..M '•C 24337
Prepared by Gary A. Grady, Attorney
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN
WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED, made this the 26th day of September, 1994, by
and between EUGENE A. JACKSON and wife, ZELLE H. JACKSON, and
MARJORIE J. WIGGINS and husband, TALMADGE J. WIGGINS, parties of
the first part, and JEFFERY J. MCCREE, party of the second part;
WITNESSETH
THAT said parties of the first part, for and in consideration
of -the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable
considerations to them paid by the said party of the second part,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have bargained and
sold, and by these presents do hereby grant, bargain, sell and
convey unto the party of the second part, and his .heirs and
assigns, that certain tract or parcel of land, situate, lying and
being in Colly Township, Bladen County, North Carolina, containing
59.65 acres, and 104.11 acres respectively and being further
described as follows:
TRACT A
Same being Tract 5A according to plat entitled "Florrie
M. Jackson Heirs", dated July 28, 1989 prepared by
Millard T. Owen, III, Registered Surveyor. Said tract
containing 59.65 acres and recorded in Plat Book A-79,
Page 795, Bladen County Registry.
TRACT 8
BEGINNING at a nail set in the right of way of U. S.
Highway # 701, which nail set is Korth 00 degrees 32
minutes 26 seconds East 75.68 feet from an existing nail
in the centerline of the intersection of U.S. Highway #
701 with S. R. # 1551; thence South 25 degrees 53 minutes
49 seconds West 359.68 feet to an existing iron stake
(axle); thence South 85 degrees 41 minutes 41 seconds
West 249.87 feet to an existing iron stake; thence South
86 degrees 01 minutes 24 seconds West 830.80 feet to an
iron stake set (at a leaning lightwood post with
pointers); thence South 22 degrees 57 minutes 34 seconds
West 308.40 feet to an existing iron pipe; thence North
80 degrees 50 minutes 21 seconds West 1263.17 feet to an
existing iron pipe; thence North 24 degrees 56 minutes 34
seconds East 2157.07 feet to an existing iron pipe;
thence North 24 degrees 56 minutes 34 seconds East 275.00
feet to an iron stake set; thence South 70 degrees 18
minutes 00 seconds East 540.00 feet to an iron stake set;
thence North 45 degrees 07 minutes 23 seconds East 352.70
feet to an iron stake set; thence South 78 degrees 18
minutes 24 seconds East 482.26 feet to an iron stake set;
thence South 65 degrees 51 minutes 57 seconds East 450.00
feet to a nail in the centerline of U. S. Highway #701;
thence with the centerline of U. S. Highway #701 South 05
degrees 47 minutes 59 seconds West 200.51 feet to a nail,
South 03 degrees 28 minutes 34 seconds West 199.47 feet
to a nail, South 01 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds West
164.02 feet to a nail and South 00 degrees 32 minutes 26
seconds West 948.04 feet to the BFCTKNTun

0
s 347 P—,4921
164.02 feet to a nail and South 00 degrees 32 minutes 26
seconds West 948.04 feet to the BEGINNING, containing
104.11 acres, and being all of Lot #6 according to plat
entitled, "Florrie M. Jackson Heirs", dated July, 1989,
prepared by Owen Surveying, and recorded in Plat Cabinet
A-79, Page 795 in the Office of the Register of Deeds of
Bladen County, North Carolina, to which map and plat
reference is hereby made for a more complete and accurate
description of said real property.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid tracts or parcels of
land and all privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging to
him, the party of the second part, and his heirs and assigns, in
fee simple forever.
AND said parties of the first part covenant that they are
seized of said premises in fee simple; that the same are free and
clear from any and all encumbrances, that they do hereby warrant
and will forever defend the title to the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have
hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals, this the day and
year first above written.
"IX -.-- .•.(SEAL)
EUGENV A. JACKSO
j 7.2 — `�� Q-7
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
�C c_ s: = c`. •fC - (SEAL)
K ZELL B. JACKSON
Vq
-
N
¢, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
(SEAL)
MARJ RI J. WIGGP4S
b =Z a
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
w a�
c QM"
9
(SEAL)
TALMADGE JJ WI INS
2 *0 - 50 -5 3 (- 7
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

Till
�F awns reEu eii2�- i� �.ra,rwruv..ani
�e� I��Wwa
I
Rm,enxa
�Y'�{ssx�
�i� � IA� A�FAYPIlIPM � 'ei
�� 4dh•
I
Prs RTY s
Amm a ,f HEM
LOGTFD w
M-LY TO.WNSWP, §LADEN COUNTY, N. C-
LL.9.. I
LY.
u u °sir to Ia
x n rc•Ro�w co�w,n
Td oY
pusL�c
� cau
LOCA-
COLLY TOWNSHIP, §LADEN COUNTY, N. C.
—um _,
�:r_ .�
� _ SrPRSp��
tY Oy
�Ysou ,
on.wwo 300-0
' ,_ 64."XV99yyyu
-
i
su>
Y F[M
ee
II
�
r ff OF B-Ww
I
YROPEPTY �
mum 19 AKIWN HEW
LMATM N
COLLY TOWNSHIP, §LADEN COUNTY, N. C.
a""§a E• I1x
xORni c.+ irLi cur fWuiY
Ta 4w
ypt.+n_r 'd'z�e+4 0.'�x
�11 Bf.tG
300-0