The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About090047_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231° j,]DSWCAnimal Feedlot Qp"oration Review $a g '; BW� Animal Feedlot Operation Slte Inspect1onp , 3 s'`r.� ws�r 10 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review ' O Other Facility Number Farm Status: t9 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit )59Certitied ❑ Permitted Dale of Inspection Time of Inspection O'er 24 her. (hh:mm) Total Time (in fraction of hours (ex:.1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review w] it Inspection (includes travel and processine) ❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .................................. . .................. .............................................................................................. FarmName; » ...�_» � �. ».. `! t'-.......................................................... County:............ 131RQ,E!tJ.................... ....................... LandOwner Name: .........�d��. . .. ........:`. ..1�:..................... Phone'No:.............................................. .......... . ...... . .................... Facility Conct.act:........ VP2. .... .yY. ....................... Title: ................. ............. Phone No: (.<..f f�� ...-5—Yj?z Mailing Address:..........' .....,1I... ... .7Q »,t/L� ,t` ....lf !�:. ».. .......» ...»...» ...� Onsite Representative* .......... ,P E...»...... ........................... »...... Integrator:..... !./...C`' Certified Operator: Operator �...............»...........»�.�...a(...� ........,.,.� Operator Certification Number:... ........ . . ........... Location of Form: Latitude Longitude Type of Operation and Design Capacity � _ k _y, # a a r f - - �x ::-i r� 'y a ss Design Current; i[lesign r Current¢ a Design;, Current Swine ,. Ce" eci Po' "Wlatiari Poultry;;, w, C. ai'i:Pa uiati n -�C>;ttieCa eci lP ulition r Y [] Wean to Feeder 0 Laver ❑Dai ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy Farrow to Weans Farrow to Feeder- Total DesignCapacity `<k r� �r Farrow t Finish �: f1 'x ., f ...... ;., ,Number of°Lagoansr/�Haldiiig�Ponds � ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon AULJ ❑ -Spray Field Area General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Of No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 1ANo b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes RTNo c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes E,No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes j No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No maintenance/improvement? 4/3C}/97 Continued on back Facility Number:.. °!.9.........YZ 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Strystureg„(Lagoons and/, r Holding osids) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Freeboard (fit): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 32 ./ . 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes X No ❑ Yes )M No ❑ Yes V1 No ❑ Yes RNo Structure 5 Structure 6 ❑ Yes A No ❑ Yes IRNo 'Yes tj No Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type ....!Z.f..'................................................................................................................................ 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? For _Cer_tilled f acili Only 22, Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ Yes M�No ❑ Yes A No ❑ Yes OKNo ❑ Yes E No ❑ Yes )@ No AYes ❑ No ❑ Yes P No ❑ Yes )gNo Ye ,W No AYes ❑ No Comments (refer to question Explain any YES'answers and/or,any recommendattons ar any other catximents Use drawings of factlityKto better gplain sttuatior s.W5e additional pages as necessary) Reviewer/]nspector Name, Reviewer/]nspector Name, W* F y Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ � Date: =5 2� ` 7 cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Qualit}, Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B: Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director - Golden Farms Inc Golden Farm Rt 1 Box 276 White Oak NC 28399 Dear Mr. Golden Farms Inc: AWOMW% Owwft� 1DaHNFZ April 3, 1997 RECEIVED APR 0 71997 FAV E W ElfiL E REG. OFFICE SUBJECT: Notice of Violation Designation of Operator in Charge Golden Farm Facility Number 09--47 Bladen County You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office. For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge Designation Form for your facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified operator. Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997. If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at (919)733-0026. Sincerely, for Steve W. Tedder, Chief Water Quality Section bb/awdeslet t cc: Fayetteville Regional Office Facility File Enclosure P.O. Box 29535, 1•�� FAX 919-733-2,496 Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 NAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Telephone 919-7 337015 50% recycles/ I Crk post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources .fames B. Hunt, Jr_ Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Golden Farms Inc Golden Farm Rt 1 Box 276 White Oak NC 28399 ffl�!WA 4 EDF—=HNF;Z November 12, 1996 SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation Facility: Golden Farm Facility ID#: 9-47 Bladen County Dear Farm Owner: RECEIVED NOV 12 1996 FAYETTEViLLE Apn- OFFICE Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly, requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H .0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty. If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office. Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 91gn33-0026. Sincerely, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P ector Division of Water Quality Enclosure cc: Fayetteville Regional Office Water Quality Files P.O. Box 27687, �•� FAX 919-715-3060 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Nvf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/100/o post -consumer paper