090039_ENFORCEMENT_20171231 (2)

ENFORCEMENT
Department of Environmental Qual

Case Nllli b I' �. I 'i l�ttarll►� - al���lrio]'i��YI�:1h�i�ifF:�i :fr3�.�""1�
4 , 1
,mli! f IIEliu:` .''� `:''�- :.�>tp�arr+at�..NyaSto-la{:� kfi"�C; i� I ',��iF.bAd�Il :�tCo�ill
Ad r •ti ( �i���� .Yol►F1�{o711nT> ;1� {: t „t A `t i 124 i yslIFATOTI
1��A�II!IOrilr�ii,}a�f,V,�l. ��� l�i���:`h�i�'o�►� � , i
lntojh>liilCa> Vko MYol i'fkw
[(�'ll�tr�wcii'iFi�l If1�l�fll;Z
I1AR i{ 11> ik'
ft"4ntAj,w %aboloull
114,10141ua:
i�ablf�'uIR-T�'o�dh7agl {[ isri={�=
1 C F �
rrk . 7 � rk -.eA,u h• r .
if mtlu,
�rwjeVumpp�LY��,,yW�IS
r -
ri�k4�l]1�1a�.��''d���.Yi f;►1hl:lk��p�rw�n;� � �`Vw �i� �,�
Y Y 9 �y • 1 11 ♦7c�tf.T1E�1.1i►]] �i?L_�,�,4.S1N7...t,S.Sdf.14�Fi1.I..STdT.��
fl.
I V4'I f J 1
Iltriolo, lVoiOUst4wil 77T
1I&AdAi�:ilulC! ,,�ctt+aoiefl
h
rl Fi il\ 11!vI+,IMI•F�ll-, k1�tGi•7i+:[;iA!<i• ♦ e I�. _ .. - -- .. _�. . _- � .�- _— .....
��� I�.L�! 4�.J � , � --�-•-- ..... . � is , . d i j w�
�_ .�..,..,.._....... .. __.. ... �. [�t tl:�ta If ►{�' � E u to _.. f{ �f�?11CtiI4 �A4 1 leQ�3a1�� 11?Tt+�; +s 1 1�fl�f::+fl�k [41I,,,.t�,tl+t� i[. FiF;i�..Cf•1�w�;I4T��
1 � ,
®.A,..
I, MAP, Rl,s�i,t+ill tir�1�l
Comments
r -
ri�k4�l]1�1a�.��''d���.Yi f;►1hl:lk��p�rw�n;� � �`Vw �i� �,�
Y Y 9 �y • 1 11 ♦7c�tf.T1E�1.1i►]] �i?L_�,�,4.S1N7...t,S.Sdf.14�Fi1.I..STdT.��
fl.
I V4'I f J 1
Iltriolo, lVoiOUst4wil 77T
1I&AdAi�:ilulC! ,,�ctt+aoiefl
h
rl Fi il\ 11!vI+,IMI•F�ll-, k1�tGi•7i+:[;iA!<i• ♦ e I�. _ .. - -- .. _�. . _- � .�- _— .....
��� I�.L�! 4�.J � , � --�-•-- ..... . � is , . d i j w�
�_ .�..,..,.._....... .. __.. ... �. [�t tl:�ta If ►{�' � E u to _.. f{ �f�?11CtiI4 �A4 1 leQ�3a1�� 11?Tt+�; +s 1 1�fl�f::+fl�k [41I,,,.t�,tl+t� i[. FiF;i�..Cf•1�w�;I4T��
1 � ,
®.A,..
I, MAP, Rl,s�i,t+ill tir�1�l
Comments

Of "' �. -f 11V
'S
V\
�•
4P
q
.3-fIA-n--k�SIVA �Q
��►a�a�OUa
h`.11Yu�v
OQ '7VO3
GF — 60 a
G�.il gar
wv OAO" 1�1)ql

1
C? Z�s 3 a (\0 )
'I/,

+.. Lt i ice:•:. i �'.,``Vi r p'j `� t ",R ' ..�; \ i l �� �Gt_�^. "^•'V 11 �l{ f„Y�,..� . )r .
+%�JJ"f��7 { ♦+ �!'� � t R .^..+ '�.. '1 \ `4�~`_J \Y0. /r yf tir.✓R. .
7 X' �'`" 1 \ .� �..s `�I' 1. `� l .� "� `"1 , •', .- "' , to
Rl
Y.i • f y •'�� a��.r { •�1 IR I r' 1 �"j t �:K C � t,1, \ {..o,,: Ate' +' t / "•. � (
eo
w AI
,L`.n-+, ` .i t` •..�J" r d t4 �,. ,/�'/,j°'t,..., err ,..
�� ,�'4 1. 4hyiaR { a, 1. :r� :Ry.. % tip. , � � A-hx. wl•�t � r� l!\�,if" ...� '�
f.. _ A ..•. �'
L4rw l.x • _''.'/+', ,ift:• �. �' "v ♦�` ��� '.. -,-I"'..• .,. '♦�". � � ` ) / fi w"+./"• ... � r.
•t. � �I �.�� /pI/�{.ram .. •� V *� jY � %`�,,. �'' -'/'r .""y��}1 S!'y 1;4] 1 ..., tr+lj
ly`f1.
f w"'.•'r" '!/ f' f t! '/ ! I • fA"` i (f 1 ( ..�""`♦ 1 /f ! /max
Vw
!Z' l{" � i,. {M • ,��(I,c } 1
fill
` t r` . r \ ir„ y.. � _ 'ti.'w. =•7 = - _ ♦1 1...... a�� �l T '_ � ,,..��/,C'�
y f ` / ... / � 1 \ � • _ "`�... ,,,may. } ,• `. _ . ' %�
�`� •-•� tf _ ♦.'..'14�1 i 1' �_...../�, R\\ L��, l�'''� �.... `• �,. w. f _ �f, h�'�� ,�Y' ` ;, �\+�thT.
-5`_`) � 'i(, ;.. ..•.' t"/ j t -•y ._/. 7'` y-. ../ �,•�rl .�. �-! .,
5,}r�
/-. r',.- .+. --"• { fi ' l } (' /r„} l � ♦ t. _ r.. - .. �'Y'•. 1 'r,'R:: ♦ r \�'gree + � `*- .t ,e:�'
. 'yam ; i ' / ti \• ` - ♦ I � I�j+.;� l t. >s� '\ • J � 1 t}i � �--' - � � a i
• _ 44 � � / r 1 L\ _ �_. - ...y, �.r�/ � r _ w . �♦. ate., � 'fin. x'S. ♦ ' f 1V 15 r -. w / it �\,,_�,`� rw../i.�♦
i 1` �• ?,j , 1 .J'J ,.. T` R\} __�..1.% \1•til.`$�}/�t Phil ; k` f /' .� l- .-{•�-
r

`` \,
\..� •, � \� 'ji
� r r,`,
,� �,r •-'Y,:/�- •r:: ..-T-
�fj'1{ r ��`� `i..`�.,.�;
L •- '+
.f J _��'f/ .� �i'
\
,t''
`r,1t ,�i�hj;I
J.'•
\I1
i'/�/
Al f/J �i
r t� !1 \
3 +I '� ••
`1
�;, � �'' : I 'E
4 "C
141. !'I ;J /�rti�
}!',�•p �i /; , r Ir> I� � -,It;` �'it:�:
'
� S, r r
�� `%
%'
C 1� 1
'` \
`�•�' •i"
,. \ r-•�_ ,�r
,.' � � 1.
' �l•,r
�,
7•, ✓ 4
f�
� .: ,. : _ �+ f (p r
N:./ J�
�:•J
'_..�,_ ,`� /�.,EV-
ID� i r /,�'il 9• �i
� }ram y/.
y5` �V,�.,l`• 4 r! �'�
�/ /
� � r' r.,r
F
�l`
\ � /,it` ` '/ `.1
r
f f
'�'1 �� !' �
- SI l �!',�� �,
)
\
i. ` T `.. •\ l
r� ��`'%\
�,��..-r_(_-.L 4• ; ',r�ir-\``.,.
LI
} ��rf%'i` r,�
\\-
`--• ,���'�r-' '
1 i' /` ^:_�hi!',j,
`4� ,' ' ~,, �5�r- �.-�;;a
,��+, •.i 71�=j•'�j ' ���`
�=..f�.`
��,�
/� _Y!r
'/r +,`-� _ •-''•
��
7...�Fr
- ' ,i��+�,
-�.`
y I ��.;`-�
J�`�\" ,rl ��``, /I
. - F'
"_"�� ...
•� �v"�`
_,r` �` -t
`�` f \_, '�� f r,`r'
'
_fir
`, �;;: %�� , 1,., �,
VA
���,•j�° •11' 1—` C\-'' \'%j�;',{
til(Lf {_-_
.v -' �:'d _ -r
, ;'1 �, �r` `'"
+''
? \ ---� 1ti'' r"
�'� �• !, f� \ y-,
`? r i' � •"'-'1 �
rm
�r y 1: •:.��; . J
:�,1
� ..%r
+
, 1 ` , j f� k'I ` �
mil/ i
:�� �� �� � \��. �
� ,
„'�,-�•,i �'-, '�.. i \t,;/'
I .• -
s ��'j. � ', "` f 11' 'Ixy i
'' �h`!��'�t`-
♦;r`� ' \�C'
: �'�J 1 1. E fif lr`\
v, .•, /< :ir ls.i_
v / '
-- 1 'a 1 r }
�
E ��•
q �\` C.
i \ ���.�' �r
.. l', I 4!\1��r ':�z•l;j, �
1'�' �SI'v\ �l r'-`�
�S.-'�-%.1 ;,,y,-yi t..,
-,L,t . r.:�: y'./ `�`�`', t
� ''1�.:-' •..�'�_�•
:.i/1,_.k,.•,,.�r�i,�...�'�.;:,`-��:-•,,
40
i`'.7 �'t°? y'��''�:^- -_
( , 'S 1ti,, i'-'..-r�',?�`�_''a/.
`y;_ tiJ,1`%• �••\
--'rJ.;)�1! 33 � , r i, •
� ,I`r/1 Ir'�
�.I,�`��•f` q•r��.
1
�'---"`-�.
E,
�� f
��.�_�,•-. •'', �
�1 � y
••i�'r�-
`�}i �11 r�:l`C_{�
t•.
h '�,
%
_i� -i �
"~`V f �$
_�.. .../i/�,/
��` F.,� / 1
��y�.,_�_,l1�'f�/~�"
- '�' J •!f�/• (
\•i r-'r lYl./Jf'`�.. `'-��',
'� r '—
_•�\\ \
1 c\q`� �\ .��
00.
�'� J..
- ;•:', � 3
i•
/ 1
.-� 1 r �,'� - Y`., ! -
4-r''1£ �:r �J .-`'�S�-��
't r: ;;-.,x,� - -.,.I
,r:,, �t�
J�rJ �l '\` ..0 r�����{; �••
.111�I •'.`l`k,( `,^ti%K
�°� Sul\
,`'
Ur
ti�r:�--`- � _l
•.� .-. ,,...,
..r-
- --. _
_;�
,
.�\, l } { r �\ .: �'
'1. •� 1� l 1 �i,,
� • - i, -
' / e 1 _ W , \ T in
r c'"-.wr �_^, 1..,/Y/ l
•��
'
l
• •
(,,�'
��4 1 ��`�
` '•�• ._� '��
� I� y 1j5j
� r � � lr~. ��, 1. \_ �
�1 �' � ��'-_..
�
.__ � ':i � _ f' ��`k � j
/ ' � _ 'J., �1. y �,� •
•\�,,
. r� r� -i�� ' �
4 � ` 7 '
'(1 .• , � \ :1 -� i' �� @ /�J�j:/�,��'-•�,
'1=,_
� �;1'k r�r
• • ',��41,.� ,
\ I
� �'' � �'�/'
� 1 f ()
�++ � '!
� -\
�' f ``\�,\�� _-—i_:��ll
r;;---�+��; ���z�=�-
�� `�- ; >r. k t .�\•�; "f=
�`,r��1 � j��Ir',r"`��,',�1�, •)
\i� ..�..
r��
i - \� �'4I''l\+ -
J'f,�/'f � ,-��' �r�-�-_._..
;r ; /`)/,� t ..�_,;\ -
.(!I I! �' r~` 7�..�,. .\
t• - ' it I
•' r,l ���J• �•'��,#'
4 fly' �-.. ' ' •i' I
'� � .; '!i' -
r
.�\ � •t7` w� �. $ �•�� (\��
�.� '�. ,� ;fit• �. �• .)(`
`! F � � ' � . '�•!� :��..r •.
-\�• ./. \` •�v\� j':..�;
r�--.��,} j.y... �
�,;r '�;�, ,-� �
:',��' � ' �
j! u J �' .! 'f�-- 'I
��r.
-'
Lr �
Ny�f ,.:11,! �-Y'<;l
�' •� _'�
>_ �
s �
",\, r\+• r,
i % J
_f
l;
,)r
(• �•
�.. = ry:.__
-�� f ,�,:';"a���ti'•,�,;.
r` %;
,11`
l � �
�. � r i �4 J\, k
fr._ �;�� .,��
(� � i V
•; � �, :.`�—'.:,'t� �
1 •.• '- - ^ ,1 '•
_�_y �-_t-;:__, t �, � ��
'
�...=.i
',. �/. "7 , ,� 1 • ,? I�V! "` . J S
.ram , .. � • F ^ r
' � ` � f J
•;
�/, `'•�.
•/
4
1� � \
$ `��l
-.. I/,',r`
!r N I�� \,I
\/ ` •`,..`\� �)t
`
/. i. r. ( !� ._•.;♦i\..� `G
c'
, •SV. � ;_,/-. � • �, � • 7 �
� -
-.
/ (�. ��
rR
. - � / , L.I:F /- I''
•�
���'f!
//
� /
�i r' r
,"�`
-� 1 .,
.� 'f
�.J ,�`s�
+� �- , /rl� �C;•, � `
- ^�_` / l- % '! � �r!
77 ,.., �. � ,,,., - ,... : ,
f ��Ir J/ rn it ~
fl�;'�_,
� � � ..... , - rI r -
' / /f Z(�' •5'' • ��-,L
.1.;,, ',r�- {r?
r' � f
\ l ?"Y i / ` , � fir; //
`,, rJ! � �T %�-!, _' 1 r
`—/ .
'
,
,l '•,fA �a'
/
�'�-
�� 1 ��� _
`�-� \ ��'\� 4'i-'l` ��':
`'>--._•- +--� ' � � I j '-'`
� '`i '._�`. \ � .,,. � S
- y' �'Yk L` w �r -' �°I,� r i'.`
} \. ��.
_.,�'y1� J'�,�J \ / i- � '�! y'
'' r � i 7 n /
\� r �,i:` 1
�.� � J /' /
-p1_•
, �� y7 .,�,�
�_'�.:r��rt`�,.
f
.<�` ` -- y \l r` 1 '\� � - !
�I'm- �tiVr If ,
\r•� _, :� . ": �
•`!i'r�' `- •'•
fT
1 r'2h i s ' (' .` /
'f'� !! r� ��'1'.
1 . - i •, •y 5 �'
', .�,'.:lh�'1 f!� �
-' : ,�
f
/
"*�-�\l�
\1 rl �
'•� ��� �' ys '_,,1 f � �t� ����'
l 1 �' 1' r ,'r} °
i j '•�
� .• ''' I
�o • ' .,• `.'1 � `�-;-�t { i �
'�.. r; , _ `.~ =
� \-' f �,. i � f" � $ ✓ r• - / �r' .• �r
.'� Y lam 1 I �,i'f� - 1 i tr-/'4!'
_. J, � /
� /�
�.
\`t\m
ri �
sir. `
`f �, ,, �) i;, l /;
,\ , I jt• l r
' ; iy � r ��,�� ,
E. 1 ��/'• ' �
�� � � r -, `� ,` .r,
�.� r ,y4-!�, , �'` °.: >� r
. I�
_.r •,Nr, •,, �/ • a
- .�' - J`/'a: �' �„ .�'
'� y,�•' �
/
q1 -�
I fit
�� ��'( �l 1°\�'r''ii I'�
}�._
'9'�I �Y• '1�//J/�r
'/�%}I''i r,. �:� 'S�-:.J !f,.��:
�1.• � ,¢ IJ �_. - .-A"`
r /� `
'�
-` 1 ' 1, y �
-.�� `' � � r/'� -i lr \ •t \
• .'J1 r1 �,� � ' �
I' `' '�(rt ram'-'' V I �r
� t.� , r !
�' `'Y
�C�� � ..�.11
����`
4���t- ��,,i, i+rl° �f! �\ ��r
� F '7� j�� �i� L. 1
�-`'L. ��
,'/ ir'1\, x.,l
j `! �!`!�_ � \/,, f 't` ,'
_ r Ly -1y i .�; �,
'' �j•, r
i C(��.. ,o /
.';?�! ��• !
J./� T .•` �\ ��_
�Iv'.1' `\
�%
y !!
,��_
� ..- _ KI'��
;t}� c ^�""�
•,. �. \� ,, � ��
r ''ii' ' r
�.... ','�',..�i .r,�i fop C'`^
171
:} , , �',
i �1
� /
Vi
..�" %
I -- ri.^�
%/ ) - - fir 11-.
r i- �,y'ir .. ,• ' ;,, ,,r
�'�,Y ; ._ _ 1
+4 r�
-• `� •�-•
��
��yf^�
� 1 ,f�'i� yw,}l
I r .lF.' rr.�-,
,�� � I i lif .�- j, r_
�~ �• •• 1•-�l h -\ � •�1
�• /r. r y
� /gr\ `' +"��� � �,
r �{;�5 w�k•
^,' _ ���
�
J` � .1 '1 Ir' r-;„
� /, 't`, ✓
h
1
—
, f�,l \,
�til � i h ^I �� 7� r li, ;
��
1 � ! ' , / \i
r
,(r.'�,yJs",! '!
� :',%
�_v-•f -
"'�
'Sr\\ ' '�
%
�..,` i
li ! �, i� _1�
El ;rl
,r�
ij '` i •\, '\ \`
-
r = F i�,,i
..._...,
,..�-,;.
-�-'•`\l
I1
J
�
v1:/,
Imo-
t'
��,
�.. �1C, r'
i j,
� r � r f
/ ��
)
-� /"•'�, f
•:J ,/
_ ...._...__ n• / i `
.�i ) ,�",' r
I' � ` m /
,•-. � `�.�
•.�
ice`
j�)
'V
�� ',n �4 rr•1'`r``i�'
P.
{
�� �
r•,:.u,_
14
/ Ida:
�J', 5` �
...�' �i'
i 'f`
\rll �:,i,.
r
`�
/•r/, �,r
03
J
„

lea G�
a/��p o
b�
a � rS
/��°°
12A
3 �,5
--3
Ar
cs
-3
Z'5ex-,," -'� /, /0 1,15 n J�
6C)
C) /,/o
-3
a
oo
a. ob
/,3()
),�o ?
30
LAI'

su3 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
'DER
fez 7.� — �.� ,�. .S •_
i :''DAMES=.8. !-HUNT JR r
:. �.?GOVERNORI
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
F'AYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Water Quality
April 10, 2000
TO: Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance
FROM: Jeffery Brown 1 /0
Environmental Engineer
SUBJECT: Enforcement Package
Mitchell Norris Farm # 1 and #2
Facility No. 09 - 39
Please find attached a fast track enforcement package pertaining to the discharge
of animal waste at the subject facility.
Thank you for you corporation regarding this matter. If you have any further
questions or need clarification on any details please contact me.
JB I
Attachment PlIft y! �t. W
i
Cat tr
Q
j� -� r§ 1,� «5 f,•`°, 225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 / SYSTEL BLO. FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FA% SIO-480-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLE0110% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

FAYErMVILLS DIVISION
817 Castle Hayne Street Fayetteville, NC 28303 Phone [phone]
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
i
PAGE Oi
CLIENT NAME SADDRESS:
Ar,b WA r DLA
,5"d-p
as 5 •f 1(—
pre-r-. 5fre�T
UV Ile. C oPHONE:
PO
PR,O/JEECTILOCATION:
I ' [ l7[C AG 11 %l��lri"f5 u
AOF
g
T
L
E
TYPE OF ANALYSIS
-
PRESERVATION CODE
CODE: A = <4'C ONLY
9 = HNO3 (ph<2) + <4'C
C = H2SO4 (ph<2) + <4'C
D= NaOH +<4'C
E = ZN Acetate + <4'C
F =
CONTACT PERSON: ff�� �
�C s
0
A
�/v % �I'�
L 0
SAMPLER:
��11nn
DATE 1 METHOD OF SHIPMENT:
LAB ID #
SAMPLE TYPE
DATE
TIME
COMP
GRABS
PH
D.O.
TEMP'C
CHLORINE
Al
9
A-
0,k
a
is
--g- oo
!a .' 15
A
A-
4
t- g-co
a o
V
A
A-
g -?--00
1a: q 0
t/
1-
f
c
Relinquished ' { ignaturel
1
Date p
a0�
Time
, f
-71�
Reh wished by: (Sighatugl
vA4411
2
Date
Time
)
MRelinquishe.d
3
Date g
Time
//
8 �
Retinq (Sig
s- 4
Da
C)W
n
Time
:g
y'
DatO
Time
Relinqu ed by: (Signattkef
Date
Time
5
6
Relingwshed by: ISignature)
Date
Time
Relinquished by: (Signature)
Date
Time
%
8
Comments or Special Hazards:

/ 6I
�'
elf
�. •
V
1 II i`
� - j
\FBowMV
•`n \,,r
�/.—'
4 � I i,4- �C�y7•Mny
LiS lj 1Be>k •'_
/ �,
�
F a_
-
\.
—
ST TE
FC
Mi
as
'',
sot '• / �' �lq,•'
Little Suoaf
Via!
-
Iv`.BM :ram
- /
1
I
L^.J•
fl 1
1 v
IJ \
'. FrrnN,
I
/ 1
11
,, \ I
I s ♦
I , . •
I i.
r
'. ,��
0 �..
� Mil
63
I
t
JJ
'!I�
t1�
-.% r - �.�. �
- \ � ,.� � (.1�
f
)'
ems'•
i '
'c .:
('�
sJ.

®Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION NC #11
817 CASTLE RAYNE STREET NC #37714
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28303 USDA #3787
[phone] / [phone] (FAX)
http:Hwww.microbac.com
CHEMISTRY - MICROBIOLOGY • FOOD SAFETY - CONSUMER PRODUCTS
WATER - AIR - WASTES - FOOD - PHARMACEUTICALS - NUTRACEUTICALS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
CLIENT: NC DENR - DWQ
ADDRESS: Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
CONTACT PERSON: Mr. J. Brown
ACCOUNT NUMBER: #KNO03
SAMPLE ID: 1. Source - ID #OOWE2759
2. Discharge Point - ID #OOWE2760
3. Pond Outlet - ID #00WB2761
4. Ditch - ID #OOWE2762
DATE REC'D: 02/08/00 SAMPLED: 02/08/00
SAMPLED BY: J. Brown
DELIVERED BY: D. Lopez
SAMPLE CODE: WW,.Stream, Grab
REFERENCE: Mitchell Norris Farm
DATA REVIEWED BY :�-A-56 L�-�
DATE REPORTED: 02/18/00
ANALYSIS METHOD 1 2
BOD (mg/L) EPA 405.1 606 15.0
COLIFORM; FECAL (per 100 ml) SM18 9222D 43000 74
NITRATE (mg/L) EPA 353.3 <1.0 <1.0
ANALYSIS METHOD 3 4
BOD (mg/L) EPA 405.1 20.9 6.9
COLIFORM, FECAL (per-100 ml) SM18 9222D 25 66
NITRATE (mg/L)� EPA 353.3 1.2 1.36
0
CATS: < = Less than
> o Greater than
PAGE 1 OF 1
The data and other Information contained on this, and other accompanying documents, represent only the B
sample(s) analyzed and is rendered upon the condition that it is not to be reproduced wholly or In pan for
advertising or other purposes without written approval horn the laboratory.
USDA-EPA-NIOSH Testing Food Sanitation Consulting Chemical and Microbiological Analyses and Research

Fast Track Freeboard NOV Checklist
Date
Time
Onsite Rep
Facility Name Mrkbe--Ii Ak-M!; 'n"e
Facft Location Z, AY
5,4P
Name of Owner
Address of Owner A2
A)C -Q
Name of Cert. 2p!!rator llwh
Integrator
Type of Facility (sow, feeder to finish,
Number of animals onsite
Number of animals certified for
Freeboard level 13
Notes:
"'Jp
Z4ti
a
ALI -(4b L
3, Vl-
0 00
/* Ll
5'tal 1,k
A—/
Inspector's Signature
Date
cae-
oil rug LI
44 k
� 1/9�, k-)

t y
t _} .pia+. }.• -�,r-' T-1%A ,L .� _ . - .a -<f'i' yc._ _-
fiy �„ , ¢ i �0'Misioin of Suil and;Weter Conservateon -Operation Re�►iew-
t+ b
l ' +" V0;1bi*is10n of Soil and, Water Rbnservatlon
�kj �°ffF. l,`t•c�'G, °tSi� i�{� ft'l.f� !ff.Il. opIIi. �� I Ir,l iI'ilIl E+E'�-''af!i.(„a,'a�S'l� -:r fi't1'� DlWv,; �lc� 5l,e:s OE:I n• €IOE:-�'.f:4isiWf��.a,� r11. ;a"€iI't' IeEI.Ir�:E, '`Cn. U�l;�,,la�.l-!.t� =s EI1C',i.l.l„ vk .� 1E'Eirl r .!.'[ •=1.Ci!'' kIlxhoIINim'i3: �- p,.:l°i'! ibia>I nE'c
cttnom Rance1In"�eo
110tirit
{dQperatron Rev
t i ,<56�'e, f� I E•4aI¢¢iI!1!4iF�iryi'tst,i�p'd teII� It3 �If+f ttEI �l-rt.of,,roj`t'�ri1:'t:t�it,l.,,i�!i.Is- II -II,.. .°�� i I'�"I}'qr.i�. y�,y�i l lierrf✓i''�3• s"i�Fi::�,aII.'.cn� S« °e �r. Irrt5, ir j4I�.."s.'i��.,i,"Irid'' ' I1irtjt�, `�ffrrIl' A�?}n'`1;�[ t =vip4RE. ' I 1I,.v�; ':'"
...�'
:
10Routine O Complaint 0 Follokv-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review *Other
err r I lull ii,�r�� L.I -
Facility Number Date of InspectionU
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified Cj Conditionally Certified a Registered 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ....................•.....
Farm Name: ............. Aik.11......County: ..........1C!�......�a ............
..
OwnerName: ................. .it.. ... ...... '. t.......,...............,............... Phone No...............'�`... ..... °� 3 5,�.............................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. TTiitle:........................
Mailing Address: ........ ..,�a� �... .!_6C-y.-f 41
J....�! .............°..
Onsite Representative :............1....:.�. T.....,......1 `�d�I l rj................................
Certified Operator:.... Hai C�C +......• If'..`.-----.�eil'/`t.....�........--•---..........
Location of Farm:
..................................... Phone No:...................................................
....... I ....... . �a �r.... rj.c.........
Integrator:..... i..:.!�....�!�;�..... r'
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Ab
... ...............................................................
Latitude a ' 46 Longitude 0 4 44
Design 'Current Design • Current I Design , ' Current
Swine :Capacity, Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle ' Capacity' �,Pdulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
ff
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean ; q.I
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ,
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design n Ca acit
❑ Gilts g P y.'.
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed From any part of the operation? [�� Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon pray Field ❑ Other
a. It discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑YesNo
b. II'd ischargc is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (fl' yes, notify DWQ) Yes ❑ No
U.
If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? -3._5
d, Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 19No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Su I ore b
Identifier: t, It
Freuboard(inches): ................ ................ ............ .................. ... _............................... .................................... ..................................... ...................................
,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Condaued on back

R
Facility Number: 0,7 — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any siuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? �/Ponding [IPAN
12. Crop type "'12j ' � . .'S�h..'C,f'.^ 44^' n CJZ.wI_.5
Lqr=�__]
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No >
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
(Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated iif the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes �No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This "facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigat ion,,freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
yIQlp i jgs'op . dertcies -wr re npteo. OiWift (;hjs:vpsjt; • Y:ou :will-teceiye 00 N thot
CO' resp6M66e. about, this visit . . . .
7.1L
'C� n.�.r'e.:ia..e, n�..-'.� /n :a..�. i.unr.-m.�.e..�rl-r�47 r...n it..�,':...i. nfti o.•�'nn:N ii� a
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
[XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
AL
y Sfis V(Sr-t 1M"O +ram r if L UYL ${�E. �j
Sj '4e.- ,
.7 � � �.t�.i,W ' °+p +
Reviewer/Inspector Name bit
`' t, s.,° "y':4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �,�„��,� , .L t...� Date:.

7
Fact ity Number: Date of Inspection
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27,
Are therc any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28,
is there any evidence of wind drift during land application'? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged Fill pipe or a pertnanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
bona omments an or rnwtngps .,! t� ,-
. _...-„ ., ,. ... .. ,.. d. '. „ _ .si I i�fli�i+4�.._ �Y ...��3i..
�. �MywtL. ltiGrp � `�`'vC6 Sr►ti0 !lf5aTAn 414Wah
tAAXO I;,,,g-T•Lu, -fir s -tom 0►J
N sly -Ito
d-tv +ia- 4joU "tj,4_� M4, 1i , 1✓,Z� t
Fed V7,-M a rmaaa Onaev�
.,VLJ UJJ
13
u,,,, q"",d -fv- 6 lu�
J

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FAYETTEVILL.,E REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 21, 2000
Mitchell Norris
125 Harrelson Road
Clarkton, NC 28433
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Permit No. AWS 090039
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
Facility No. 09 - 39
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H
.0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
On February 8, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality inspected the Mitchell Norris #1 & #2 swine facility in
Bladen County. It was observed that the facility was irrigating and wastewater was
ponding and observed leaving the spray field. Wastewater was.observed entering
a pond adjacent to the spray field at hand. The pond contained an outlet that forms
an Unnamed Tributary (UT) of Hammonds Creek which is Class "C SW" waters.
It was then recommended to Mr. Norris to shut the irrigation system down and to
construct an earthen berm to prevent additional wastewater from entering the pond,
Both lagoons were also observed to be in the emergency storage level (7 inches and
13 inches), which is less than the minimum required for structural stability (less
than 12 inches).
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. If not already completed, lower the lagoon level to the required freeboard on a
suitable waste application field as soon as weather permits and per the CAWMP.
tFF�,�J
i w f e1 "A ai F P. I A
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 1 SYSTEL SLID. FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% R11CYCLEO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r . '%
Page 2
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
March 21, 2000
2. Please provide specific actions proposed to prevent future freeboard deficiencies at this facility,
which are not in compliance with the CAWMP and the General Permit.
3. Provide a detailed explanation as to why the runoff from the application field occurred.
4. Perform a more detailed and thorough inspection of the irrigation system along with spray field
conditions on regular basis before and during an irrigation event to prevent the future release of
wastewater.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility's General Permit being
revoked and being required to obtain an individual non -discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the Division of
Water Quality has the atithority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per
violation.
You are hereby notified that based on the above information the Fayetteville Regional Office
of the Division of Water Quality has no choice but to consider sending recommendations for
enforcement action to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The recommendation concerns
the violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 for discharging wastewater into the
surface waters of the State from a non -discharge facility.
If you have an explanation for these violations that you wish to present to this office please
forward a detailed explanation, in writing, of the events noted and why you feel that this office
should not proceed with recommendations for enforcement. This response should be received by
this office on or before March 31, 2000. A copy of this response will also need to be submitted to
the DWQ Central Office at the following:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1671
Information provided to this office and the DWQ Central Office will be. reviewed and if
enforcement is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration.

Page 3
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
March 21, 2000
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Mr.
Jeffery Brown, Environmental Engineer or myself at [phone].
Ner,
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc; Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Sam Warren - Bladen Co. MRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
Steve Lewis - Compliance Group
Garth Boyd - Murphy Family Farms, Inc.

I
T -d
j2d
lz�E - - /P
� pjqe�;6--r
BSG9-S*'9-OT6
J84JBE eRuoS
RECEIVED
APR 3 2000
,FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE

f : i
PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: Oq - 31
coi�lht►: 0-40rd
RECEIVED
Facility
*2- _ A P � 2000
CartHf D star Nuns: _ /''f � ?Z � C- ..� fVO�,� Operator _ - -- .�.���..a
FAYETTEVI LLE
#
REG. OFFICE
1. Current liquid level(s) in Inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam tot lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon NameAdentifier (ID)* 2-
Spillway (Yea or No):A)o
Level (inches). - „ ,17 1 F7
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures
Five and 30 day Plane of Action are attached Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour Storrs elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached_ Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations.i Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables, included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(%), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval f om the DMW*n of Water Cuallty odgE to tries of waste
to a site not covered in the faci ty's cortified animll wasto manaosornsnt plan.
Operation will be partial r fully depopulated.
attach a comp sc edule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
• it animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number. lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for tha receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: Aj 0
I hereby cerift that I have reviewed the Infarnutton bated above and Included wlthin the attachad Plan
of Action, end to the be: I of my knov"a and ability, the Informstion is accurate and correct
Phone: -- L!0-OP�Z- Z359 -
N ITeh,eLy.- Aveez/ s
FaACoverVag• 2fzIMO
2 -d 69L.9-9ir9-Di6 JaqJag eRuc6 as :ED DO ED Jab

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
..y
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (10):
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker Inches
b. designed 25 yr,124 hr. storm S structural freeboard %�+ inches
c. line b - line a (inches In red zone) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design to
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48_ /d % , `7Z5galtons
12 ft
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
1. temporary storage period according to structured design D — days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design to
h. actual waste produced current herd I x lire g
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design , ft'
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design ft3
k. clines h + i ♦i) x 7.48 x 30 May, _ gallons
line f
4. Total PAN to be lend applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated Z Z ! Loo _ Z• 0 1b11000 gal.
m. tlinee e + k1 x line 1 = �lb PAN
1000
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
PDA (30 Day) 2l21100 1
E•d 8SG9-9i,9-0T6 jigaeE eFuaS d6I -E0 00 E0 idu

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIE8
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1, Structure NamelidenViier (I0), Z
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr.124 hr. storm storage 8 structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker �� inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm 8 structural freeboard inches
c. line b - line a (inches In red zone) _ -2— inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. ift s x line d x 7.46 - gallons
12 ft
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design ,,,,_,,,, days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design /Z/05-Y ft'
h. actual waste produced = currr2nt hard # x line g = ���� ftl
certified herd 0
I, volume of weah water according to structural design _.0__ ft)
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design ft'
k. (lines h + i +i) Y 7,48 x =ay
lire t
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
1. current waste analysis dated 21 Oa
rn. Ifings g +� x line I =
1000
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
PDA 130 DaY) V21=
1
2-17 9z3 gallons
lb140R0 oat.
SZQ lb PAN
jP-d BSL9-S09-0T6 Jaques eRuos d6T:E❑ Do 60 Jdd

II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 26 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1, structure ID: line m a Ib PAN
2. structure ID: 2 line m = lb PAN
3. structure 10:
4. structure ID:
5, structure ID:
6. structure ID:
n.linesl+2+3+4+5+6
tine m = Ib PAN
line m = lb PAN
tine m = lb PAN
line to = lb PAN
lb PAN
Ill, TOTAL. PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PFRInn nA UnT I IRT FIFE_nS TO WHICH PAN CAM NOT 199 APPLIES DURINQ THIS 20 DAY PERIOD.
c, trVA 0-
FiezD
p, held 0
h ya�f#
q. Crop
r. acres
s. rernainino
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(iblacro)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
jibe.)
column r r s
u.
application
window'
^29- 2. Z4
E72rr1a
1 •
3o2-9-9-z,Z-4
2-
2.
z3o
G7
- -4
3A
__ p
v
3p1�_lr
3,B
30
z ^ 6
311
7 7
!V,q___ _
J. 1
.9os
33io
3029-1
2,3
05'
_
0L
c�Z9' 3
7
7,3
30
J 0
r_
owZ93
,B
3, 5`
30
0
4o2,9�3�_�
�,=
—
;far
Z
2929
4
2-
05'
410
`302g-3,4
/i
2.7 •
305'
fZ3
,30
I ZA-
_T
3p
3.1------
—
*tat% current crop anaing application Rate or next crop applications Wginning date for available' receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period p
v. Total PAN available for all ANrh (sum of column t) • 4 ib, PAN
PoA (30 Day) V21/00
2
S - d 89Ls-5bs-0T 6 JBRJeg es;u06 d6 t : ED DD ED .add

a
4
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied films n from section Iq ir # O V Ib. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section MI) _ _ l 3� Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w • x) a -iz9� lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. N tine y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
Including pump and haul, depopulation, hard reduction, etc. For pump A haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new Information. if new fields are to be
Included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to Ow PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permittod
facility provide Information regarding the herd population and lagoon frosboard levels at the
Mcelving facility.
NARRATIVE:
41,417IL LftCaa�J ��1/�Z /S
�� �� � C��ftl�l�. S � 1 � �� Gt1iLL /��G/�I Sc LUi✓C
/QE577 C� 7WI S S/TEF /.)771- L4 6aoA) ZCVEL /S
�4n rEk .
�0Nv 17 oAIS
/�XM I T
Pa► (30 Day) 2J21100 3
9•d 9SL9-Sb9-Oi6 jaqueg eRuoS d132:60 00 £0 Jdy

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF )
MITCHELL NORRIS )
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE )
WATERS OF THE STATE OF )
NORTH CAROLINA WITHOUT A PERMIT)
AND VIOLATION OF )
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000 )
NORTH CAROMNA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 00-065
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, I, Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make
the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mitchell Norris owns and operates Mitchell Norris #1 and #2, a swine animal
operation located in Bladen County.
B. Mitchell Norris was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS090039 under General
Permit AWG100000 (the General Permit) for Mitchell Norris #1 and #2 on May
29, 1998, effective May 29, 1998, with an expiration date of December 31, 2001.
This permit does not allow the discharge of waste to waters of the State.
C. On February8, 2000, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater by Mitchell
Norris #1 and #2 from a sprayfield to a pond adjacent to the sprayfield.
D. Mitchell Norris had no valid permit for the above -described discharge.
E. Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit states in part that "The maximum waste
level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). At a minimum, maximum waste
level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate
storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot
of structural freeboard."
F. The CAWMP for Mitchell Norris #1 and #2 requires that the waste level in the
lagoons does not exceed nineteen (19) inches.
G. On -February 8, 2000, DWQ staff observed that the waste level of the two lagoons
at Mitchell Norris #1 and #2 were seven (7) inches and thirteen (13) inches.
H. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $656,25.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mitchell Norris is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. The pond adjacent to the sprayfield constitutes waters of the State within the
meaning of G.S. 143-215.1(1) pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6). ""Waters" means any
stream, river, brook, swamp, lake, sound, tidal estuary, bay, creek, reservoir,
waterway, or other body or accumulation of water, whether surface or underground,
public or private, or natural or artificial, that is contained in, flows through, or
borders upon any portion of this State including any portion of the Atlantic Ocean
over which the State has jurisdiction."
C. The above -cited discharge constitutes making an outlet of waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1) for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
D. A permit to construct or operate an animal waste management system is required by
G.S. 143-215.1(a)(12).
E. The above -cited failure to maintain the liquid level in the lagoons at the level
specified in the CAWMP violated Condition No. V. 3. of General Permit
AWG100000 which is issued for swine waste management systems.
F. Mitchell Norris may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2)
which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is required but fails
to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S 143-215.1.
G. Mitchell Norris may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2)
which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who violates or fails to
act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by
G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Mitchell Norris
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
I. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has the authority
to assess civil penalties in this matter.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Mitchell Norris is hereby assessed a civil penalty of.
$ 4,000.00 for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1 on February 8, 2000.
$ 1,000.00 for violating Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit by
failing to maintain the liquid level in the lagoons at the
level specified in the CAWMP.
$ 5,000.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is 10 percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 656.25 Enforcement costs
5,656.25 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.I(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Mitchell Norris
125 Harrelson Road
Clarkton, NC 28433
Dear Mr. Norris:
NOV 0 G 2000
FAYETTEVI LLE
REG. OFFICE
SUBJECT
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH C,AROLINA DEPARTmeNT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RcsmRcFs
November 1, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Retraction of Civil Penalty and
Issuance of Revised Civil Penalty
Mitchell Norris #1 and #2
Farm #9-39
Bladen County
Retraction of Case # DV 00-039
Issuance of Case # DV 00-065
On May 25, 2000, The Division of Water Quality assessed a penalty in the amount of
S5,656.25 against Mitchell Norris for making an outlet to waters of the State without a permit
and violation of conditions of the General Permit AWG 100000. Upon further investigation, it is
the decision of the Division of Water Quality to retract the civil penalty assessment for case #
DV 00-039 and reissue the assessment with a new case # DV 00-065 and a civil penalty in the
amount of $5,656.25.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Any continuing violation(s)
may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
,6lailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699- t 6I7 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh. NC 27699-1617
Art Equal Opportunity lAfrmaliveAction EmploYer
50% ren•cled / 109r post -consumer paper
hrrp://h2o, enr.srate.ne.its

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. I43B-282. i (b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(e) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
•'
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan McLawhorn
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
ATTACHMENTS
cc: ,awls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
File # DV 00-065 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public information Officer w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST } ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 00-065
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated, , the Undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 20`
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN
IN THE MATTER OF )
MITCHELL NORRIS )
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE }
WATERS OF THE STATE OF )
NORTH CAROLINA WITHOUT A PERMIT)
AND VIOLATION OF }
GENERAL PERMIT AWG 100000 )
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 00-065
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, I, Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make
the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mitchell Norris owns and operates Mitchell Norris #1 and #2, a swine animal
operation located in Bladen County.
B. Mitchell Norris was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS090039 under General
Permit AWG100000 (the General Permit) for Mitchell Norris #1 and #2 on May
29, 1998, effective May 29, 1998, with an expiration date of December 31, 2001.
This permit does not allow the discharge of waste to waters of the State.
C. On February 8, 2000, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater by Mitchell
Norris #1 and #2 from a sprayfield to a pond adjacent to the sprayfield.
D. MitcheIl Norris had no valid permit for the above -described discharge.
E. Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit states in part that "The maximum waste
level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). At a minimum, maximum waste
level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate
storage to contain the 25=year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot
of structural freeboard."
F. The CAWMP for Mitchell Norris #1 and #2 requires that the waste level in the
lagoons does not exceed nineteen (19) inches.
G. On February 8, 2000, DWQ staff observed that the waste level of the two lagoons
at Mitchell Norris #1 and #2 were seven (7) inches and thirteen (13) inches.
H. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $656.25.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mitchell Norris is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. The pond adjacent to the sprayfield constitutes waters of the State within the
meaning of G.S. 143-215.1(1) pursuant to G.S. 143-212(5). ""Waters" means any
stream, river, brook, swamp, lake, sound, tidal estuary, bay, creek, reservoir,
waterway, or other body or accumulation of water, whether surface or underground,
public or private, or natural or artificial, that is contained in, flows through, or
borders upon any portion of this .State including any portion of the Atlantic Ocean
over which the State has jurisdiction."
C. The above -cited discharge constitutes making an outlet of waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1) for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
D. A permit to construct or operate an animal waste management system is required by
G.S. 143-215.1(a)(12).
E. The above -cited failure to maintain the liquid level in the lagoons at the level
specified in the CAWMP violated Condition No. V. 3. of General Permit
AWG100000 which is issued for swine waste management systems.
F. Mitchell Norris may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2)
which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars
(S25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is required but fails
to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S 143-215. L
G. Mitchell Norris may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2)
which provides that.a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars
(S25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who violates or fails to
act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by
G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Mitchell Norris
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.I(b)(8).
I. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has the authority
to assess civil penalties in this matter.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
M. DECISION:
Accordingly, Mitchell Norris is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
S 4,000.00 for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1 on February 8, 2000.
$ 1,000.00 for violating Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit by
failing to maintain the liquid level in the lagoons at the
level specified in the CAWMP.
$ 5,000.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is 10 percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
S 656.25 Enforcement costs
S 5.656.25 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation.
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
1�'-\-od ,
(Date) Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
ATTORNEY GENERAL.
State of North Carolina
Department of Justice
P. O, BOX 629
RALEIGH
27602-0629
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Colson, Non Discharge Permits
FROM: Mary Penny Thompson, Assistant Attorney Gener-e
DATE: August 1, 2000
ea
Wy
AUG 0 1
Repiy
Maw I
�1WR QUALITY
Mare�t�aEnvir" OFFICE
Tel: [phone]U(1 .
Fax: [phone]
mthompC7,n32il.j usstare. n c . m
AUG - 8 2000
PAY ET i 1=W-1
REG. Oq F;�-
RE: Civil Penalty Assessment Appeal by Mitchell Norris;
Bladen County, DV 00-039; 00-ERR-0933
Please note that I have been assigned to handle the civil penalty assessment appeal by Mitchell
Norris. DWQ assessed Mr. Norris a penalty in the amount of $5,656.25 for violations of the water
quality statute and rules as well as animal waste permit no. AWS090039 by discharging waste from a
sprayfield into waters of the state, failing to report such discharge, and violating the permit's freeboard
limit. I will need to begin preparing our case as soon as possible. Please review the important dates
listed below and provide me with the requested information by fax (if feasible) as well as a clean copy by
mail.
August 4, 2000 Prehearing Statements and Document Constituting Agency
Action due to be filed with OAH. I received a copy of the
central file, but need any additional information from other files
or regional office files, inlcuding photographs or other
illustrative materials. Please send any additional documentation
you might have in reference to this file by August 10, 2000,
September 25, 2000 Discovery must be sent to Petitioner to give us enough time to
receive answers prior to hearing.
November 13, 2000 Hearing set in Fayetteville, NC with Beryl E. Wade,
Administrative Law .fudge presiding.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this case, please do not hesitate to call ine at
my direct line number: [phone],
cc: Tommy Stevens, Water Quality Director
Coleen Sullins, Water Quality Section Chief
Paul Rawls Water Quality Regional Supervisor
EP142363/wp6.1

MICHAEL F, 1<ASL,EY
A7rORNEI'GENERAL
State of North Carolina
Uepartmenl of justice
R 0. BOX 629
RALEIGH
27602-0629
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Casson, Non Discharge Permits
FROM: Mary Penny Thompson, Assistant Attorney Gener e
DATE: August 1, 2000
RE: Civil Penalty Assessment Appeal by Mitchell Norris;
Bladen County, DV 00-039; 00-EHR-0933
Reply In:
Man- fenny Thompson
Environmental Division
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
mthomp@maiI jus.staie.nc.us
Please note that 1 have been assigned to handle the civil penalty assessment appeal by Mitchell
Norris. DWQ assessed Mr. Norris a penalty in the amount of $5,656 25 for violations of the water
quality statute and rules as well as animal -waste permit no. AWS090039 by discharging waste from a
sprayfield into waters of the state, failing to report such discharge, and violating the permit's freeboard
limit. 1 will need to begin preparing our case as soon as possible. Please review the important dates
listed below and provide me with the requested information by fax (if feasible) as we] I as a clean 1copy by
mail.
August 4, 2000 Preheari>ng Statements and Document Constituting Agency
Action due to be filed with OAR. 1 received a copy of the
central file, but need any additional information from other files
or regional office files, inlcuding photographs or other
illustrative materials. Please send any additional documentation
you might have in reference to this file by August 10, 2000,
September 25, 2000 Discovery must be sent to Petitioner to give us enough tiipe to
receive answers prior to hearing.
November 13, 2000 Hearing set in Fayetteville, NC with Beryl E. Wade,
Administrative Law Judge presiding.
if you have any questions or comments regarding this case, please do not hesitate to call me at
my direct line number: [phone]. ~
cc: Tommy Stevens, Water Quality Director
Coieen Sullins, Water Quality Section Chief
Paul Rawls Water Quality Regional Supervisor
EP/423631Wp6.1
21M

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
ATTORNEY GEN£RAI.
State of North Carolina
Department of .justice
P. O. BOX 629
RALEIGH
27602.0629
MEMORANDUM
TO- Kim Colson, Non Discharge Permits
FROM: Mary Penny Thompson, Assistant Attorney Gener e
DATE: August 1, 2000
Reply to:
Man- fenny Thompson
Environmental Division
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
mthomp@mail jus.state.nc,us
RE: Civil Penalty Assessment Appeal by Mitchell Norris;
Bladen County, DV 00-039; 00-EHR-0933
Please note that I have been assigned to handle the civil penalty assessment appeal by Mitchell
Norris. DWQ assessed Mr. Norris a penalty in the amount of $5,656.25 for violations of the water
quality statute and rules as well as animal waste permit no. AWS090039 by discharging waste from a
sprayfield into waters of the state, failing to report such discharge, and violating the permit's freeboard
limit. 1 will need to begin preparing our case as soon as possible. Please review the important dates
Iisted below and provide me with the requested information by fax (if feasible) as well as a clean !copy by
mail.
August 4, 2000 Prehearing Statements and Document Constituting Agency
Action due to be filed with OAH_ 1 received a copy of the
central file, but need any additional information from other files
or regional office files, inlcuding photographs or other
illustrative materials. Please send any additional documentation
you might have inreference to this file by August'] 0, 2000.
September 25, 2000 Discovery must be sent to Petitioner to give us enough time to
receive answers prior to hearing.
November 13, 2000 Hearing set in Fayetteville, NC with Bern] E. Wade,
Administrative Law Judge presiding.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this case, please do not hesitate to call me at
my direct line number: [phone]. 4
cc: Tommy Stevens, Water Quality Director
Coleen Sullins, Water Quality Section Chief
Paul Rawls Water Quality Regional Supervisor
EPI42363/wp6.1
��G

MICHAEL, R EASL fEY
ATTORNEY GENERAL
State of North Carolina
Department of Justice
P. O. BOX 629
RALEIGH
276Q2.0629
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Colson, Non Discharge Permits
FROM: Mary Penny Thompson, Assistant Attorney Gener?o
DATE: August 1, 2000
Reply to:
Mary Penny Thompson
Environmental Division
Tel: [phone](10
Fax: [phone]
mthomp(&mai I ;I usstate.nc.us
RE: Civil Penalty Assessment Appeal by Mitchell Norris;
Bladen County, DV 00-039; 00-ERR-0933
Piease.note that I have been assigned to handle the civil penalty assessment appeal by Mitchell
Norris. DWQ assessed Mr. Norris a penalty in the amount of $5,656.25 for violations of the water
quality statute and rules as well as animal waste permit no. AWS090039 by discharging waste from a
sprayfield into waters of the state, failing to report such discharge, and violating the permit's freeboard
limit. I will need to begin preparing our case as soon as possible. Please review the important dates
listed below and provide me with the requested information by fax (if feasible) as well as a clean `copy by
mail.
August 4, 2000 Prehearing Statements and Document Constituting Agency
Action due to be filed with OAH_ l received a copy of the
central file, but need any additional information from other files
or regional office files, inlcuding photographs or other
illustrative materials. Please send any additional documentation
you might have in reference to this file by August 10, 2000.
September 25, 2000 Discovery must be sent to Petitioner to give us enough time to
receive answers prior to hearing.
November 13, 2000 Hearing set in Fayetteville, NC with Beryl E. Wade,
Administrative Lave Judge presiding.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this case, please do not hesitate to call me at
my direct line number. [phone].
cc: Tommy Stevens, Water Quality Director
Coleen SuIlins, Water Quality Section Chief
Paul Rawls Water Quality Regional Supervisor
EP/42363/wp6.1
Mr
inr

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr, Mitchell Norris
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
125 Harrelson Road
Clarkton NC 28433
Dear Mr Norris:
LT.9;WA
dm
D E N R
May 25, 2000 -,
RECEP1 h
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violations) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
Bladen County
File No. DV 00-039
Permit No. AWS 090039
JUN 7 2000
FAYETTEVILLE
REG. OFFICE
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Mitchell Norris #1 & #2 in the amount of
$5656.25, including $656.25 in enforcement costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was -taken under the
authority vested in me by delegation pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(h). Any continuing violations) may be
the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiverforrn). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Ms. Linda Forehand
Water Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% posl-consumer paper

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed justification for such
request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness of the amount
of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of any of the statements
contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You must
execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement
which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.I(b) were wrongfully
applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Linda Forehand
DENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
•'
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an administrative
hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to the Office of Administrative
Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan McLawhorn
Registered Agent
Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date stamp (not a
postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being referred to the
Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the penalty. Please be advised
that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which occur after the review period of this
assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Linda Forehand at [phone], extension 526.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional,$uperv.isor w/zattachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public information Office w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
COUNTY OF BLADEN NATURAL RESOURCES
IN THE MATTER OF ) File No. DV 00-039
MITCHELL NORRIS )
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE } FINDINGS AND DECISION
WATERS OF THE STATE OF } AND ASSESSMENT OF
NORTH CAROLINA ) CIVIL PENALTIES
WITHOUT A PERMIT )
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, I, Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water Quality�(DWQ), make the
following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mitchell Norris owns and operates Mitchell Norris Farm, a swine animal
operation located at 1709 Coley Road in Bladen County.
B. Mitchell Norris obtained Certificate of Coverage AWS090039 under General Permit
AWG10000 on May 29, 1998. This permit does not allow the discharge of waste to
waters of the State.
C. On February 8, 2000, DWQ staff observed a discharge of wastewater by Mitchell
Norris Farm from the sprayfield to a pond which flowed to an unnamed tributary of
Hammonds Creek, Class C SW.
D. Mitchell Norris had no valid permit for the above -described discharge.
E. Condition No. III. 6. f. of the "Monitoring and Reporting Requirements" of the
Animal Waste Permit No. AWS090039 requires that the permittee shall report by
telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more
than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of overapplying animal
waste where runoff enters surface waters.
F. Mitchell Norris failed to notify the Fayetteville Regional DWQ office of the
discharge of wastewater.
1 of 4

File No. DV 00-039
Mitchell Norris Farm
G. Condition No. V. 3. of the "General Conditions" of the issued permit states in part
that "The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that
specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). At a
minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the
level that provides adequate storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event
plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard." The 25-year, 24-hour
storm event for the facility's location is between seven and eight inches according
to the National Weather, Technical Paper 40, Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the
United States, 1961.
H. The CAWMP for the Mitchell Norris Farm requires that the waste level in the
lagoon does not exceed nineteen (19) inches of freeboard.
On February 8, 2000, DWQ staff observed that the waste level of two lagoons at the
Mitchell Norris Farm were seven (7) inches and thirteen (13) inches of freeboard.
J. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $656.25.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
11. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mitchell Norris is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. Hammonds Creek constitutes waters of the State within the meaning of G.S. 143-
215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
D_ The above -cited discharge constitutes making an outlet of waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1) for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
E. The above -cited failure to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of overapplying animal waste where runoff enters surface waters
constitutes a violation. of Condition No. III. 6. f. of the Animal Waste Permit No.
AWS090039.
F. Mitchell Norris violated Condition No. V. 3. of Animal Waste Permit No
AWS090039 by failing to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified.
2ol4

File No, DV 00-039
Mitchell Norris Farm
G. Mitchell Norris may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2)
which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty -live thousand dollars
($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who is required but fails
to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S 143-215 or who violates or fails to
act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by
G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Mitchell Norris
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.I(b)(8).
1. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has the authority
to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, 1 make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, OWNER is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ 14 t O o O for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1 on February 8, 2000.
$ O o a for violating Condition No, III 6.f. of Animal Waste Permit
No. AWS090039 by failure to notify DWQ of a discharge
within 24 hours.
$
$ 5,000
$ 656.25
$ S, 40 Sty. z S
for violating Condition No. V. 3. of Animal Waste Permit No.
AWS090039 by failing to maintain the liquid level in the
lagoon at the level specified in the CAWMP.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is j _ percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
3 of 4

File No. DV 00-039
Mitchell Norris Farm
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
- -I, 'r - a cz, 4 't r -� �
(Date) Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
4 o f' 4

19
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT } WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST } ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. } STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling
for violation(s) as
set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality dated,
the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive
the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged
in the assessment document.
This the day of , 19
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

CHECKLIST AND TRACKING INFORMATION FOR ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
FARM NAMEm � C.[� P I.1 N-6rri,
S 2 r-,�-
FACILITY NUMBER
COUNTY_,
INSPECTION REPORT DATE 2 -1 Y--d Z
NOV/NOI DATE ISSUED -Z/-vZ
RESPONSE FROM GROWER DATE REC'D J�- "4
DEED AND MAP
PERMIT INFORMATION
MAP OF FARM AND
INSPECTION LONG FORM
❑ DATE REC'D
b PICTURES N/A
X FINDINGS AND DECISION DOCUMENT
❑ MEMORANDUM TO JEFF POUPART
❑ STREAM CLASSIFICATION (PULLED FROM BIMS AND ATTACHED)
(IF DISCHARGE CASE)
SUBMITTED TO SUPERVISOR DATE �-
duck /, F- � -- ca-
DATE PACKAGE FORWARDED TO RALEIGH

A�
t'A
NCDENR
Noah Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
March 21, 2002
Mr. Mitchell Norris
289 Turtle Cove
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Subject: No ice o£_yjolatiQn/Not,'cN a of Intent
Administrative Code IS NCAC 2H .0217
Mitchell Norris 1 & 2 Farm
Facility No. 09-39 Permit No.AWS090039
Bladen County
Dear Mr. Norris:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted for the subject animal waste disposal
system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your General
Permit.
On February 13, 2002, the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
received notification that the number one (1) lagoon freeboard was less than that required by your
General Permit. A 30 day plan of action was sent to this office as required. On March 13, 2002 a
routine inspection was conducted on the farm site. The inspection revealed that the number
lagoon was back into compliance. However, the number two lagoon, which was in compliance at
the time of the Plan of Action for the number one lagoon, had only 16 inches of freeboard. Ms.
Sonya Johnson prepared a Plan of Action for this lagoon at that time. There have been multiple
Plans of Action for this farm site within the last year: 2-21-01, 8-21-01, 2-13-02 and 3-I5-02.
This continuing non-compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by the Division of
Water Quality. This action can consist of one or more of the following: a Notice of Deficiency
(NOD); a Notice of Violation (NOV); a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction; and/or
a requirement to apply for coverage under an individual non -discharge permit or a NPDES
Permit.
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street - Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone]FAX: [phone]Internet: �ryv�v.enr.5tate4nc.uslNlt
An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Norris
March 21, 2002
Page 2
The action chosen will be based on a complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the
inadequate freeboard; the actions taken to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being
proposed to prevent the problem from reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide this office with an evaluation of the reasons for the
freeboard deficiency(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard deficiency(s). This evaluation
and strategy must include, but is not limited to, the following:
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoons.
A summary of all discharges or runoff from the facility.
A summary of any repairs necessary to the system to bring the farm into compliance.
A summary of any modification to the CAWMP in the past 24 months.
An evaluation of water usage and management at the facility.
Current sludge accumulation in the lagoons with schematic.
Freeboard levels in the lagoon for the past 24 months.
Wettable acres needed and available acreage as specified in the CAWMP.
Irrigation records for the past 24 months.
Rainfall records (if available).
Specific actions proposed by you to prevent future freeboard violations.
This information must be received by this office no later than A=130. 2002. Once this
information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will be made as to the
appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be evaluated on its own
merit. The efforts by the owner to notify DWQ of the problem, efforts made to resolve the
problem, once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future problems will be positive factors
in this determination.

f
i
Mr. Norris
3-21-02
Page 3
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or liability
for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions regarding
this letter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr. John Hasty of our Fayetteville
Regional Staff at [phone].
Steve Lewis -Compliance Group
Chris Bordeaux - Bladen Co. NRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
John Bizic - Murphy Family Farms
Sin, fly,
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
for Visit (1) Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 09 39 7 Date of Visit: 3-t3-2002 TLne: 13:ti0
M O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted IN Certified Q Conditionally Certified D Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..........
Farm Name: N tcbell l4otrrit.#L&.#Z......................................................... County: Blwkn .................................... FjEt3].........
OwnerName: �Ibtt�laelL._._..._.-------]YQIs.-...-._.._..-...-----------• Phone No::23.2.-----.-•-•---------•---------•...
Mailing Address: 189.1..Unk.care...................................................................._..............1juakeduaw.R.N.0 ............................................... 28337...............
FacilityContact:........................................................... Title: ............... ................... ,............ Phone No: .....................................
Onsite Representative: .---,-----._-._..._._.___._.....___.._...._._._._._. Integrator•.
Certified Operator: 5 itsbe1.W.. ..................... Narts ................................................ Operator Certification Number: ...........................
Location of Farm:
1709 Coley Road IV
ftschatges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? © Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon E-j Spray Field 171 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Q Yes CK No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rain?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes Ol No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes H No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a dischargc7 E]Yes H No
rite C211gction & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Yes C] No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................... .......................... ................................................................................ ...........................
Freeboard(inches):.... ........:_._ .............. .......................... ...» ....:.........:».. I..... ................ .......................I......_.,...

i UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE t� ' Z
-,. , .
,rst1Class.Mail
Z
PM c'
�., --�-.
Postage.B.F,ee. P2�ltl
LISPS
•
Pemit'N& G10----
.'
25 IWAR 4
_
+
Sender: Please print 20flZ , address, a
DENR -• DWQ
JOHN NASTY
€ �)
�,
225 GREEN ST — SUITE 714
N•�
?
FAYETTEV'ILLE NC 28301
� I
f'
I
t .•+
IIli�likl111�111�1l111i��lil�ll�[i1�3I111111�11�11I11T1I�1i11 „

Facility Number: 09-39 Date of Inspection 3-13521142
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes � No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenanee(mprovement? 0 Yes X No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
CK Yes
Ej No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
0 Yes
H No
Waste Application
10. Are there any butlers that need maintenance/improvement?
E) Yes
1L9 No
IL Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
9 No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
, ~
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
19 No
14. a) Dees the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) 'Phis facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
El Yes
U No
15. Does the receiving cop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
IR No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? Yes H No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes X No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) H Yes Ej No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes CR No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No
22. bail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) d Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 1:1 Yes N No
d No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
0 field Copy ❑ Final Notes
19. No irrigation was performed from October to January yet the lagoon level in November from 11-2 to I 1-16 went down 6 inches in
igoon #2. In October lagoon # 1 dropped 8 inches from 10-5 to 10-26.
oastal bermuda will have to be evaluated this spring. Unable to determine stand due to winter rye crop which looks good-
S. At the time of the inspection there was waste coning out of the back of house #3 and the last 5 pens on the north side of the house were
anding on water. There is obviously something blocking the outflow and causing the waste to back up in the house, The flush tank had been
Lmed off'.
Reviewer/Inspector Nsme Jo141r,Hngty
Reviewerlbspector Signature: ^ . Date:

I
1. Date of Inspection(s): 2_13-02
2. Regional Office: Egy_gtteville. Division of Wag Quality
3. Name of Owner Of Property: Mitchell Norris 1 8c 2 Farm (Copy of Deed attached)
4. Name of Operator: Mr. Mitchell Norris
5. Address: 289 Turtle Cove
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
6. Phone Number: (910) 86 -2352
7. Description of Facility Location. Map excerpt attached.
On the south side of SR 1709, approximately one quurler mile from its intersection -with
Highway 87 south of Elizabethtown. NC.
8. Date this facility began operation: The farm has been inLlLoperation since 10-21-94.
9. Date of last expansion: The facility has not expanded since original construction.
10. Has the facility registered with DWQ? YES _ NO_
If YES, date of registration: ?
11. Does the facility have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan?
YES .2, NO _ is one required? YES NO _
Date Approved:
12. Has this facility received a CAFO Designation? YES..X_ NO_
if YES, date issued:
13. Type of Operation: Feeder to Finish
14. Number and type of livestock: ThCrg were1 344 finishing hQa
time of the inspection.
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled, or confined and fed or maintained
in any 12 month period. Twelve ,12, months.

2
16. Are crops, pasture, or post harvest residues sustained in the normal growing season over any
portion of the lot or facility? Yes, the farm was designed to have apr�roxir� tee ly 5o acres
of land on which to apply waste. The Certified waste management plan calls for bermuda Wu
with l jzraiLi qgver crol2 tQ be growni i n sites, Ihe farM hg5 approxirn1y
�0 acres ,p,U which to irrigate.
17. Type of Waste Management System: SxVme_a_re kept in total confinemeriLfree stan-ana s, with
slotted •s over • • !'d • ftorn floQr pits into a wagg
lagoon composed agoon ftom which waste canr'
pu=ed tbLQuyl buried juigation pipp5 to hydrants and sprayed on the fields via a "travelgc"
surm un and linear
18. Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and proximity to same or other
surface waters: Thery j$ ;I swine opqati itely' ii m QD
SR 1704,
19. Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.: There are a few residences and a new
sigh SchQQl in clos _pro2cimity to the farm
20. Approximate depth of ground water table in the area of the facility or discharge:
21, Proximity of facility to surface waters: There_ s a sma!L=d Qn the farM site,
22. Animal waste discharged. N=
Witnesses:
John Ua5ty. DWD-WO Fayetteville Regional Qffice [phone].
23. Are pollutants discharged in the waters of the State? No-
24. Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event less severe than the 25-year,
hour storm? lND
25. What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation?: 1_ `one.

3
26. What is the duration and gravity of the violation?: Mr Norris has sobmitted niaerous plans
of a�Ai. n� far high freeboards Mgr this farm. There have been four submitted bety&een 2-2 l -01
and 3-15-02.
27. Water Quality Assessment:
28. What is the cost of rectifying the damage?:
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?: Based on observations made dining
30. Was the violation committed willfully or intentionally?: YES — NO -2L
Explain:
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority?: Ms. Norris has had
Iwo previous discharges at this site alonu with numerous high freeboard instances over the
past five,years. There has also been documented odor violations by the Division of Air
Quality-
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?:
Regional Costs are as follows:
Mileage: $0.23 per mile for 65 miles $14.95
Copy of deed and map BIaden Co. Courthouse 4.75
John Hasty @ 19.77 per hour
1.5 hours drive time
4 hours report development
5,5 hours total 108.73
Paul Rawls t@ 3 .$1
1 hour (Supervisory Review)
Total $160.30
33. Type or general nature of business: Swine_ Feed,@F to Finish Operation
34. What is the violator's degree of cooperation or recalcitrance:
35. Are there any Mitigating Circumstances?: NO

E
36. Assessment Factors
a. IWC:
b. Receiving Stream :
C. Damage Yes _ No _2L (Based on observations at the time of the investigation)
If YES, include report from Wildlife Resources Commission,
37. in-dude_a-copyAf any -Designation letter signed by the Director.
38, Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator: Lower the lagoon to thQ required levg of 12
inches of fregUoard.
39. Recommendations for further DWQ Action:
- Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent (forwarded March 21, 2002
- Enforcement Action
- Reinspection
' 1 Other Comments:If f •f t • ••. • •r 'u• • �.
Sim Ihirly day plans Qf actign were submitted but ty 1he time one lagoon was lowered the
other Iggoon was less thanthe required freeboard. i. plan of action was submittedin Augug
QL200-t--at.d berm nQ rainUl to binder any irrigationThe •

1 �
.>��1 is p' • '�L • , .
I
tiAL
N X ,
Alp
16
1 I `III 111�''r. _, �, �, 11�. � '.'i t- '� � •r � � 'J
.rl< yya '��4i1�f1" r'q'� y, � ^ ,yf • y.� � _ �, _ ` t j
U •I I J tt !r'�r
1 G �•
i
µ
Wyllie � -,. +� I;hdh �'y� - i, `' • 4 / ,?i;.
7 I:I

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF BLADEN
File No. PC
IN THE MATTER OF )
MR. MITCHELL NORRIS }
MITCHELL NORRIS FARM
#1& #2 }
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATIONS OF
ANIMAL WASTE PERMIT ) AND ASSESSMENT OF
AWG100000 AND 15A NCAC 2H.0217 ) CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, I Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director of
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. Mithchell Norris owns and operates a concentrated animal operation
in Bladen County.
B. The Mitchell Norris Swine Farm was issued Certificate of Coverage
AWS090039 Under General Permit AWGI00000 on May 29, 1998.
C. + On February 13, 2002, DWQ was notified that the number one lagoon
g freeboard was less than required by the General Permit, A 30-Day plan
VP of action was sent in to the Fayetteville Regional OfIIice, At the end
of the 30-day period the number one lagoon was back into compliance
and the number two lagoon was out of compliance. There have been
multiple plans of actions for high freeboards at this facility. ( see
NOV/NOI attached in this enforcement)
D. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter
totaled S,16Q.30 .

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following;
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Mitchell Norris Farms is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1.
E. Mitchell Norris Farms may be assessed civil penalties in this matter
pursuant to G,S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of
not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation
may' be assessed against a person for failing to act in accordance with
the terms, conditions or requirement of a permit required by G.S. 143-
215.1,
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against
Mitchell Norris Farms pursuant to G.S.143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S.143B-
282.1(b)(8).
G. The Director, of the Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation
provided for by G.S. 143-215.6A(h), has the authority to assess civil
penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, i
make the following:
Accordingly, Mitchell Norris Farms is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ for continuous freboard violations which is in
violation of the General Permit and 15 A N C A C 2H. 0217.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent of
the maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143 - 215.6A.
$ 16U0 Enforcement Costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty

I have considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1)
The degree and extent of harm to the natural
resources of the State, to the public health, or to
private property resulting from the violation;
(2)
The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3)
The effect on ground or surface water quantity or
quality or on air quality;
(4)
The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5)
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6)
Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7)
The prior record of the violator in complying or
failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory
authority; and
(8)
The cost to the State of the enforcement
procedures.
(Date)
Alan Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality

Facility Number -'` -- r{ r
Permit Number
Address
Phoone:
i_�rI0r1`
Regional Supervisor
Ctuvner�{F'ir�t Name Mi#�h�il .
G"
R.Contact
egions Phoe
F'�ul'�herman
910}�486 154fi� rw_ j
rescinded

eery FaciityInforri;t�oln
Facility Number 09 39
Bladen
irnainty
Owner
Mitchell Norris
Address
289 Turtle Cove
Elizabethtown NC 8337
Location
709 Coley Road
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
VA
Certified
Farm Name ❑ Premium Standards Op
I Mitchell Norris #1 & #2
Phone Number
862-2359
Lessee
Re.-n __-
0 ARO 0 MRO 0 WARO 0 WSRO
@ FRO O RRO 0 WIRO 6
orris
Comments I'
originally certified as 2 separate facilities (09-207 deleted) per one WUP per Sonja Johnson
❑ Inactive o eration La oon Clgsed Date inactivated or closed
Type of Operation T
N Swine (:1 Poultry Cj Cattle [I Sheep Q Horses ❑ Goats ® None
Design Capacity
.��:iqq:'4}`}n
Total 1 7,344 1 Swine
SSLW 991,440 Feeder to .Finish
r ���ii�'i��i�:.,bi`;'%+: �::;ti'�� S'rti:'�;+�i.;}`l,�iyi:;i'.:•
.Scx;.A�s:
Number of Lagoons I .Holding Ponds � Lagoon Total Capacity ft' 1,625,664
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ja Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
0 No Liquid Waste Management System
Mitchell Norris #1 & #2 Murphy Family Farms

y
Latitude
34.5783
34 11 34 42
---------------- - ----- ..............................................
Longitude
34.5783 78.5444 78.5444
34 34 42 78 32 40 78 11 32 11 40
Request to be removed 0 Removal Confirmation Recieved
.........................
Comments�.........�^..^:........................................................................,,, ,. -
Regional DWQ Staff
Basin Name: ICape Fear

rocwc
^No MAV14^RG
►TTDWMVL AT LAW
CoueTMOnR a"we
.L0j^W'tMT0WM. MC
7e777
Prepared by: RI:UBEN L. MOORE-' .lR.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BLADEN 10- �
Book
Page
0451
0504
1I1.10
6L&HR COUNTY IBC
07/10/2000 2i36 PM
CUILITY C. LMS
rwVUt do
ly; W7
Deputy/hv.a
WARRANTY DEED
Do/ -(-
THIS WARRANTY DEED made this the Gth day of July, 2000, by and hctwcen the
following: CLAUDETTE, L. NORRIS, hereinafter referred to as Grantor; and MITCHELL
NORRIS. hereinafter referred to as Grantee.
WITNESSF,Ili:
That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN ($10,00) DOLLARS, and
other good and valuable considerations to them in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof
is hereby acknowledged, have given, granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these
presents do give, grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, his heirs and/or
successors and assigns premises in Bladen County, Elizabethtown Township, North Carolina,
0Imol more particularly described as follows:
SEE SCHEDULE "A" & "13" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN
BY REFERENCE
Note: This conveyance is made pursuant to a separation agreement dated this clay
between the parties hereto.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with all the appurtenances
thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, unto the Grantee, his heirs and/or successors
and assigns in fee simple forever.
And the Grantor covenant that they are seized of said premises in fee and have the right to
convey the same in fee simple; that said premises are free from encumbrances; and that they will
warrant and defend the title to the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set her hand and seal, the day and
year first above written.
A'b IIIII—TI O� (L" r
s (SEAL)
10 C AUDETTE L. NORRIS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
BLADEN COUNTY
I, ISI a Notary Public for said County and
State da hereby certify that CLAUDETTE L. NORRIS, personally appeared before ripe this day,
and being by me duly sworn, says that they executed the foregoing and annexed instrument for
the purposes therein described.
Witness my hand and official seal, this day of�u L4, 2000.
NOTASY.PUBLIC
IL q I f
My Commission expires:
AMr
""CoV .•
�Kh
t
WINED - f 41 - t3 u.
By TAX Pf.V E
WINED - f 41 - t3 u.
By TAX Pf.V E

`_-
took
0451 o4s
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY Or BLADEN
The foregoing certificate of-- a Nolary l'uhlic of
Noi*Carolina, is certifiers to he correct. This instrument was presented for registration this
day of at a13� a'clock _�M., told duly recorded
in this Office of the Regisoter 1)ccds ofr Bladen County, North Carolina, in Book Page
erg REGISTER OF DUDS
REGISTER DEEDS
11
1
t'
i

bei
SCHEDULE "A" 0451 6
Lying and being in Rlistabethtown Township, Sladan County. NC, and being more
particularly described as follows:
88GINNIN at an existing concrete monument said concrete minument heirq
on the South margin of the Georgia Pacific property described in Map
Boom 14,'Pa" 5, sladen County Registry, being also the Northeastern
corder of the Ratio Arlene llinlew property described in Book 127, Page
795, oladen County nogistry and rune thence with the Georgia Pacific
pevperty line North 65 degrees 17 minutes 25 seconds Best 2,086.94 feet
to an existing iron pipes thence with the David L. Priest property line
described in Book 256, Page 420, Bladen County Ilogistry, thence with the
Priest. Dine South 27 degrees 04 minutes 20 seconds Bast 269.94 feet to
an iron pipes thence with the William J. Bair property described in Book
111, Pop 700, Sladan County Registry, the following hearings and
distance$ South 24 degrees 45 minutes 40 seconds Rant 1,244.50 feet to
an iron ptpsr thence South 23 dsgnme 11 minutes 03 seoa , a Bast 674.57
feet to pn Iron pips: thence with an easasent given to Mule Qaen Clark
Bair South 10 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds Mesta 73.39 feet to an iron
pipes thence with the Noble Gwen Clark Heir property line and with an
old rev South Al 41sgrees 13 minutes' 40 seconds Mast 2,136.54 feet to
an iron stales sits tiesrres with the "ade Itylor pcsqsrty described in ,
hook 177, Pays "s , Sladan County ltigistry, North 22 degrees 30 minutes
Meat 2,401.02 feet to the point of the beginning and containing 110.94
acres, more ar less exclusive of the State bed right of way 1709.
This poopnrty being osare specifically shown and described on a plat of
survey estltled OMW for Mitchell Nwris", dated Jsmary 5, IM, by
Clarence 11oll, Jr., %gistered Surveyor, record *d in Plat'Beak A=115,
page 1152 B]uden Causty Wgistry.
m
I
�j
lM1 -
If
d
r•
A

F
s
_
iJ n w ...I
A;Z
a
a^
r �i F k�i3 i
x of r' �• 1 ��
F '_f 4tls
� Iw
M� 5 fib
u• r F
ho
tug
fit`
a
f r
gg
y
:eyb.um Am
Will",
m
�a.
Epp g 1 1
pp2 Plt -wa.�¢
Nn Cd egH del
m
��ae1c� s
be FLH bg5 �
g95o fAnl a.° , C
E — ,
4

Mitchell Norris Farm 1 & 2
289 Turtle Cove
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
April 29, 2002
ATTN: Paul Rawls
Division of Water Quality
225 Green Street Suite 704
Fayetteville, NC 28314
Dear Mr, Rawls,
MAY I2�02
This letter is in response to the Notice of Violation issued to Mitchell Norris 1 & 2 Farm (FN:
09-39) dated March 21, 2002. Since the last inspection, the lagoon levels have been lowered to
the required freeboard level by utilizing an additional traveling gun on the farm.
Enclosed is the information you requested concerning freeboard levels and irrigation records for
the past 24 months. The current waste managment plan based on wettable acres is included as
well as a copy of the previous waste management plan. The sludge accumulation in the lagoons
has been checked in the past week by Murphy -Brown personnel and I will forward the
documentation to you as soon as I receive it. An evaluation of the buildings showed no signs of
fresh water leaks. Hanging waterers have been installed within the last several months to reduce
wasted fresh water.
Several factors have contributed to the deficient freeboard situations at this farm in the past. In an
effort to reduce the odor complaints at this farm, 1 have refrained from irrigating at times when
the wind direction is toward neighbors. During wetter periods, I allow the fields to dry as much
as possible to eliminate any ponding or run-off potential. "These two practices in themselves limit
the available window of opportunity for irrigation. Another reason for higher lagoon levels has
been the lack of a dependable hay contractor. In the fall of last year, the hay was left on the field
at various stages of harvesting preventing irrigation for several weeks. These factors as well as
heavier rainfall during certain periods have contributed to the deficient freeboards at this farm.
To prevent future deficient freeboard levels, I plan to purchase additional hay equipment and rely
less on custom hay cutters. I am also in the process of buying an additional traveling gun to take
more advantage of good pumping days while still trying to accomodate neighbors. Over the past
several months, hanging waterers have been installed it�the houses and 1 am considering installing
additional pressure regulators which will make more efficient use of fresh water.

I am very concerned about the freeboard levels at this farm and will continue to strive to keep this
farm in compliance in all areas. If you require any additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
d
Mitchell Norris

Weekly Rainfall & Lagoon Level Records
Mitchell Norris Farm
r
r-

Weekly Rainfall & Lagoon Level Records
Mitchell Norris Farm
r f�r)aZ— -Iw -6S

Weekly Rainfall & Lagoon Level Records
MITCHELL NORRIS FARMS
r-.

Norris Farms
Opl-
WEEKLY RAINFALL & LAGOON LEVEL RECORDS
r.

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Grower(s):
Farm Name:
County:
Farm Type:
Farm Capaclty:
Storage Structure:
Storage Period:
Appncation Method:
Mitchell Norris
Bladen
Feed -Fin
7416
Anaerobic Lagoon
180 days
Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution
of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste
is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed
before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials,
cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but
less than 10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen_
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed
under DWQ regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
Page: 1

problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than
30 days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If you choose to change
methods in the future, you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for different application
methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. in some cases you may want to have plant analysis made, which could
allow additional waste to be applied. Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to
be flexible so as to accomnraate changing waste analysis content and crop type. Lime must
be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific crop production_
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR ( gallons, ft3, tons, etc.):
7416 animals X 986 gaUanimaUyear =
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN PRODUCED PER YEAR (lbs):
~ 7416 animals X 2.30 lbs/animal/year
7,308,468 gallons
17,056.80 lbs
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown,
soil type, and surface application.
Page: 2

r
Tract
3029
Field
Soil
Type
Crop
Code
Yield
/Ac
Ibs N
/unit
Acres
Liss N1Ac
Residual
Lbs N
/Ac
Ibs N
Required
Time to
App
1
NoA
B
4.6
50.00
1.81
230.0
416.30
Apr-Aug31
2
NoA
B
4.6
50.00
2.43
230,0
558.90
Apr-Aug31
3A
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
3.56
305.0
1085.80
Apr-Aug31
3B
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
1.47
305.0
448.35
Apr-Aug31
4
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
3.87
305.0
1180.35
Apr-Aug31
5
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
1.05
305.0
320.25
Apr-Aug31
6
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
1.44
305.0
439.20
Apr-Aug31
7A
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
2.93
305.0
893.65
Apr-Aug3?
7B
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
1.17
305.0
356.85
Apr-Aug31
8A
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
4.69
305.0
1430.45
Apr-Aug31
8B
NoA
Cam..;
6.1
50.00
4.13
305.0
1259.65
Apr-Aug31
9A
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
5.85
305,0
1784.25
Apr-Aug31
9B
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
4.46
305.0
1360.30
Apr-Aug31
10
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
1.34
305.0
408.70
Apr-Aug31
11
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
4.74
305.0
1445.70
Apr-Aug31
12A
NoA
C
6.1
50.00
3.20
305.0
976.00
Apr-Aug31
12B
Gr
C
5.5
50.00
0.82
275.0
225.50
Apr-Aug31
ALL
AuB
K
75.00
48.96
75.0
3672.00
Sep 15-O030
F-Mar
r"
Total 48.96
Available N
*Difference
18262.20
17056.80
-1205.40
-indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer
annuals.
'A negative number reflects the total Ibs of additional nitrogen needed to achieve yields on
acreage listed in chart. A positive number means additional acreage is required to utilize the
nitrogen produced by the farm.
NOTE:
This plan does not include commercial fertilizer. The farm should produce adequate plant
available nitrogen to satisfy the requirements of the crops listed above.
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N requirements.
In the future, regulations may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses nitrogen.
In interplanted fields ( i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded in bermuda), forage must be removed
through grazing, hay, anchor silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed when they
reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle should be removed when plants are grazed to a
height of four inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed for hay or silage, care
should be exercised not to let small grain reach maturity, especially late in the season (i_e.
l�
Page: 3

April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too high and this will definately interfere
with stand of bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced yields and less nitrogen
being utilized. Rather than cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as is
the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small grain earlier. You may want to
consider harvesting hay or silage two to three times during the season, depending on the
time small grain is planted in the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late September or early October. Drilling is
recommended over broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or cut to a height of
about two inches before drilling for best results.
The following legend explains the crop codes listed in the table above:
Crop Code Crop
A
Barley
B
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Grazed
C
Hybrid Bermudagrass - Hay
D
Corn - Grain
E
Corn - Silage
F
Cotton
G
Fescue - Grazed
H
Fescue- Hay
l� I
Oats
J
Rye
K
Small Grain - Grazed
L
Small Grain - Hay
M
Grain Sorghum
N
Wheat
0
Soybean
Lbs N utilized / unit yield
1.6 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs, N / ton
1.25 lbs N / bushel
12 lbs N / ton
0.12 lbs. N / lbs lint
50 lbs N / ton
50 lbs N / ton
1.3 lbs N / bushel
2.4 lbs N / bushel
50 lbs N / acre
50 lbs N / acre
2.5 lbs N / cwt
2.4 lbs N I bushel
4.0 lbs N / bushel
Acres shown in the preceding table are considered to be the usable acres excluding
required buffers, filter strips along ditches, odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas
not receiving full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total acres in the fields
listed may, and most likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of animal waste_
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
Page: 4

approximately 0.36 pounds of plant available nitrogen per animal per year in the
sludge based on the application method listed earlier.
�• If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 13348.80
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid bermudagrass hayland at the
rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 44.50 acres of land. If you apply
the sludge to corn at a rate of 125 pounds per acre, you will need 106.79 acres of land.
Please be aware that these are only estimates of the PAN and land needed. Actual requirements
could vary by 25% depending on your sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and
applications.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION:
The irrigation application rate'should not exceed the intake rate of the soil at the time of irrigation
such that runoff or ponding_eccurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not
exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the
plant available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface irrigation is the method of land application for this plan, it is the responsibility of the
producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly
irrigate the acres shown in the preceding table. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following is provided as a guide for establishing application rates and amounts.
Tract
Field
Soil
Type
Crop
Application Rate
in/hr
Application Amount
* inches
all
all
all
0.50
1.00
*This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil assuming the amount
of..ndmgar. allowed for the crop is not over applied. In many situations, the application
amount shown cannot be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must
be removed on the average of once every 6 months. In no instance should the volume of the
waste stored in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one foot of
freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
It is the responsiability of the producer and waste applicator to ensure that the spreader equipment
is operated properly to apply the correct rates to the acres shown in the tables. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount of waste per acre and the proper application prior to applying the waste.
r
Page: 5

Additional Comments:
r
r
r
Page: 6

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION
v Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement:
Itwe understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste nutrient management
plan for the farm named above. Ifwe know that any expansion to the existing design capacity
of the waste treatment and/or storage system, or construction of new facilities, will require a
new nutrient management plan and a new certification to be submitted to DWQ before the new
animals are stocked.
Itwe understand that I must own or have access to equipment, primarily irrigation equipment,
to land apply the animal waste described in this nutrient management plan. This equipment
must be available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon
in the event of a 25 year 24 hour storm. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the land
according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates which produce no runoff.
This plan will be filed on site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist:
Affiliation:
Address:
Signature:
r
Telephone:
Please Print
Sonya J. Barber
Harvest Net, Inc.
P.O. Box 32
Council, NC 28434
[phone]
Date
V-7
Date
Page: 7

05/09/2001 00:29 FAX
Q 02
r^
._4v
IN
NoM Ca dha Simm univrdy is a lend•
girt and a cwd hqm iMddalion
of The unhr * d NNM COMM
Memorandum
TO: North Car Hna Corded Technical Specialists
FROM: NC State University Forage Production Wo*group
DATE: July 13, INS
SUBJECT: Crop Ma(egement PraMeas for Select Forages
Used in Waste Management
Department df Crop Science
Collage of AW06M ens We SC won
Cempwaux 7020
Raleigh. NO 27MS-7e20
918.515 2W7
910, 515.7050 {tan}
The following is a four -page summary of suggestions for management practices for some
forage crops that can be used in waste management plans. These suggestions are a result of
discussions within the NC Stele Univexity forage Production Workgmup, a group comprised
of NC State faculty and NRCS agency personnel with expertise with the crops.
There one limited documented womb responses of some of these practices on the many soils
and environments where these crops are ctmently being grown. The Forage Production
Wodcgroup has taken do available data and used the combined experiences and realistic
estimates of key people to come up with suggestions that will allow farmers to incorporate
these crops and practices into waste management pleas. As data become available to
substantiate or refute these suggestion, the Forage Production Workgroup wdl make
appropriate changes.
Ban nuik Ove waled With Cowl Nye and Anmeal Aye .
Currently two types of 'YyeM$7 are being tried for vvhtte r cl ersuedint in fields used for
anima waste •wig Quealp[c is a winter._wt 2ual .srlpallgr* that looks similar to
wheat, barley andAaasi Auroral ryt ass is a whew Annualss gran that looks much like tall
fesm. Bout. of-ttt - grasses, when growing fling the wiser on bediWa sod, can have
significant i -on kubMusm bermuda yields. Iff effect. the total yields from an acre
growing the tint tion ofbtamuda with these winter annuals will usually yield between 1-2
tong more per 4cre bon bermuda grower alone for the. year. Therefore. the total ammnt of
PAN /acre fpr_the year is about IOD Iba.more thtm for bwO* abne. Although cereal rye and
amoral ryegrass ,ate suitable crops for overseeding, the management of the crops are different
and tittle Practices implemented" are depeadent on the crop selected.
. 1:•p is y r ..
It

05/D9/2001 00:29 FAX
"CM*M slue l NVWSIV is a land- Depa*wnt of Crop Silence
pal miirm dy rid a ca 0=1 ftWW
of Tho l *Kdy d NaKh canfta
Fvr $m-A 5rQin
"Op d AWk dWm and Life sdaneae
Q=Fus Ba= 762D
Rdaigh, NC 27595.7820
M 9-5,PS—NM7
e19.315.7950 (Iwo
Cereal Rye
The cereal rye should be planted by October 15 to provide the best opportunity to get winnter
growth. The most consistent stands are obtained from drilling rye into snort (less than 3
inches tag) bermnrdagrasa sod. If drilling is not possible, the seeds may he broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a light cultivation with a disc or tillage implement. The seeding rate
fat broadcast planting of seeds should be 1-5 times the rate for drilled seeds. The lsgt
application of animal waste is to be applied to the bwriuda prior to Au 31. An
application of 50 Ibslacre of Planet Available N (PAN) may be applied between Septe-mTxx 15
and October 30. An additional 50 lWacre of PAN may be applied in February-Mamh- If rye
growth is harvested on time and does not significantly shade the berminda. PAN rates fer�
subsewnt bey Wa crap -are based on realistic yiekb of be muk A harvest is r�equk d pr.�r � E
to heading or Apnl 7, which ever comes >3n. This is necessary to minimize the potential for ,k
shwimp, bermuds and nxhi :ing its yields- The PAN rage for grazed systems with bermuda
over'seeded with cereal rye must be reduced in accordance with MRCS Technical
Standard 0590
AantW Ryegrses
Annual ryegrass should be permed by October 15 to paovlde the best opportunity to get winter
growth. The mast cous>stent stands are Obtained tiom drilling ryegrass into shun (less than 3
iwfts tall) bexnculagrass sod. If drilling is not possible. the seeds may be broadcast on short
bermuda sod followed by a tight cultivation whb a disc or i0lage hWlernent. The seeding rate
for broadcast planting of seeds should be 1.5 times the rate for drilled weeds. The last
application of animal waste is to be applied to tha bernnda prior to August 31. An
application of 50 ibsfacre of (PAN) may be applied between September 15 and October 30_
Alt additional S© Is/acre of PAN may be applied in February-Umb. If addamnal PAN is
applied to the ryegrass in ApaMay. line PAN rate for the bermuda must be reduced by a
corresponding amount. This is necessary because ryegrass srowth during April -May will
reduce bamttda yields aid sbcmtea the time built can filly utilize the N. A harvest is
repaired by b mft or April 7. which ever comes first to prevem shading of emmiog
bermada during April -May period. To favor the Production of the belnmida, additional
barvests of ryegrass w1'tl be requked when the ryegrass canopy reaches 12 to 15 inches height.
The PAN rate for grazed sysm with benmWa ovemeeded with annual ryegrass must be
reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical Standard M.

05/09/2001 00:29 FAX
Q04
Nodh Caroltw Swe Lft mly is a Im - Department of Crop Maws
pram OWNY ON a eaaA WO w9dion
al The Unh"of Honh Caroft
C.dM@a at Agedd4we are Lila 5eWmee
Cempre Ban 7620
Adakik HC 27N9 TOO
919A1S M7
919.616.79" 04
F.anem cdowsma
Limited data are available on the response of gauftrass to various levels of N and soil types
in North Carolina. However, until further data is collected the following guidelines may
be used.
1. On sandy textured soils that are well drain or excessively well drained, gamagrass may
yield similar to hybrid bermmdagrass at similar PAN rates.
2. On heavy textured soils that are poorly to somewhat Poorly drained, gamagrass'may yield
1.5-3 times more than hybrid bermmda.
Camagrass establishes slowly and will not usually paoduce much hamstable forage during
the establishment year. It is hest to allow the growth during the seedling year to accumulate
for most or all season: if it is to be hanrasted, i should be done after Sill seadhead formation
on a m*rity of the plants. Therefore. PAN for the seedling year should be modified
amonlingly. Overseediog gawgrass with winter animals is not aurerdly advised because the
harvesting or gazing management of the winter annual crops fining February -April would be
detrimental to the survival of gamagrass. Gamagrass should not normally be harvested or
graved below 6-9 inches stubble.
Application rates are to be based on the realistic N rates that address the N mods per too of
hay. a realistic yield and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay in the 24-
36 inch stage of growth, the N rate rages from 40-501bshon of dry matter. The PAN rate for
grazed systems mist be reduced in accordance with NRCS Technical. Standard #590.
The application window fflr gamag[ass is slightly earlier than for bermuda: gamagrass starts
growing about 3-4 weeps earlier than Comstai t - - - agtass and about 2-3 weeks earlier than
Tifton 44. Crdmagrin is dormant from lust to Mauch. The last aPplieation of PAN in the
summer should be prior to August 31.
17etc eVwt (U Ala a)
Rescuepram is a cool season grass and makes most of its growth from March -June and
September -November. it should receive most of its N during the September October and late
Rhmary through May months. Litaited data are available for reagstic yields of rescuegrass
on various sons and at various N levels in North Carolina. However, until further data is
collected the following suggestions may be useful.
_ 1. On sandy. well drained to eaceaively dMineQ soil, fesCrreg m may yield 1.5- 3 tiw
fescue, assttuct n a umttbftn and dense stand of grass is p nwnt.

05/09/2001 00:29 FAX
11 05
el
Motor Cwohte fte Univw* is a hrx� Deparmwnt at Crop Science
{pled w*m* ad a were mdwon
Of ThO UMWMlry Of C=bn2
CaGne al AWxuib" and Lfa Sc Mww
Campo Box 7M
RdkftK PIG 2789-64M
919_B1&2"7
1i19-615.7959 N*
2. On wet or poorly drained sofla, rescuegrass may yield .75 -1.0 tunes as much as fescue.
3. On soils where both are well adapted the yields of resmegrass may be 1- 1-5 times more
than fescue.
The above RYE estimates assume that stand density is maintained through natural mKvding
every year. Although rescuegram is a Hpamnial" it does riot rmhmain dense, satishmory
stands unless it is allowed to rued every year. Even under this management U. is likely that
disease will atfea one or more growths in some years.
Appliadion TWO are to be based on the realistic N raw that address the N1 needs per ton of
hay. a realistic *ld and an appropriate application window. When harvested as hay, the N
rate is similar to other cool season grasses such as fescue, ranging from 40-50 lbatton.
RestuMus may also eonkme some growth in June -August of moistme is available. During
these off-seasons, rescueg m should not receive more thaw about 25 Is N/acreh wrath. Only
apply 25 lbs Nfacte in June -August if the e4uhmlm of 1-inch of waux can be appfiqd at the
same tone. If the clop does not respond with at least a 1000 lbs of growth within a 3-5 week
period do not make another application until the plants have had the opportunity to use the
previous application.

l
Nettable Acreage Determination For Existing Irrigation System
Mitchell Norris Farm
Facility No: 9-39
Nettable Acreage Computations
Hard Hose Traveling Gun. 3" Ag Rain with 1.081n ring nozzle.
Hydrant
Flaid
Lane Spac.
Wei Dia.
Pull Length
Pull Ac.
Stop Area
I Start Area'
Pull"
Total Ac."'
1
3029-2
240
300
225
1 1.39
0.63
0.39
0.75
1.81
2
3029-2
240
! 300
490
3.0.4
j 0.63
0.39
0.60
2.43
3A
302"
240
300
480
2.98
0.00
0.58
1.00
3.56
3B
302M
240
300
250
1.55
0.63
0.77
0.50
1.47
4
3029-6
240
I 300
500
3.10
0.00
0.77
1 1.00
3.87
5
3029-1
240
300
85
0.63
0.63
0.39
! 0.68
1.05
6
3029-1
240
1 300
240
1 1.49
1 0.63
0.77
0:50
1.44 '
7A
3029-3
240
1 300
330
2.05
0.51
0.77
0.88
2.93
7B
3029-3
200
300
180
IM
0.68
1 0.72
0.50
1.17
8A
3029-3
220
300
780
I 3.94
0.00
0.75
1.00
4.69
8B
3029-3
220
300
670
3.38
0.00
0.75
1.00
4.13
9A
3029-3
240,
300
820
5.08
0.00
0.77
1.00
5.86
9B
3029-3
240
300
720
4.46
0.00
0.00
1.00
4.46
10
3029-5
300
125
0.77
0.66
0.40
0.73
1.34
11
3029-3A
J 200
300
1 870
1 4.99
0.00
i 0.72
0.83
4.74
12A
3029-3A
200
300
890
5.11
0.58
0.72
0.50
3.20
12B
3029-4
300
30
0.19
0.66
0.80
0.50
0.82
48.98
"Start Area has been reduced accordingly for pulls with less than a full throw of gun in the start area.
"Pull is a factor adjusting for the throw of the gun. A value of 1 is a full throw of gun, 0.5 Is a half throw of gun.
'*'dotal Acreage is the sum of Pull Acreage, Stop Area, and Start Area multiplied by Pull factor.
Wetted Diameter of 300 feet is achieved with a 1.08 in ring nozzle at 60 psi.

40
:.. rn
46
Ztk

i
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE
August 8, 1996
PRODUCER: MITCHELL NORRIS L
LOCATION:
CLARKTON NC 28433
i
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TYPE OPERATION: Feeder to Finish Swine
NUMBER OF ANIMALS: 7416 hogs design capacity
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified
rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant
nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application
cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged.so"that all plant
nutrients can be.balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always
apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can
utilize. Soil types are important as they have different inf ilitratior
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available
water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land
eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special pre-
cautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per
acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of the nutrients
for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground
3 not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
' This plan is based on waste application through irrigation for this
is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you
choose to inject the waste in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for"injecting waste and irrigating waste are
not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage require-
ments should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
j management facility. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to
the lab for analysis.
# This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
PAGE
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
7416 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 14090.4 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
7416 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 17056.8 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.

/ WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
PAGE 3
C
-COMM
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USED
APPLI
TIMT
��
6.1
i 1
1—
N5XT5LK 0-2%
305
MAR-OC
3029 2A NO FOLK 0-2-t g 5. I _� 05 13.9 11189.!
R0C
3029 13 INORFOLK0-2 C 15.2 260 1 22.5 15850
MAR--°(
jVL:J j fU-Lb I
bri I14VKr'VIAr%t.1 {JU3 lkZ.0 bbIVV
3029 ` o a 0-2 Bx 6.1 Jan I j9, J2897..
MAR•-O,
2 - A11JIS° iwa,. 13113600.
F�t.,(dt SEP-A
TOTAL 17170
-- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirments. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone
Management Act will require farmers In some eastern counties of NC to
have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses Nitrogen.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.
`ftw (Required oxily if operator does not own adequate
land. See regdired specification 2.)
PAGE
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE& CLASS-
op
IELD
LBS
COMM N
**
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW
PER AC
AC
USEI
APPI
TV
D
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted)
or winter annuals follow summer annuals. -
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseec
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain reach maturity,. especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with the stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time small grain is planted in the fail.
The ideal time to interplant small drain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying summer
annuals under stressed conditions. Nitrate poisoning
may occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for
nitrate levels is recommended.
* Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
** lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAGE
The following legend explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
I
4�
I
ii
�I
�i
fJ
'I
h
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
5
PER UNI
BC
HYBRID BERMUDAGRAS S- CONTROLLED GR.NZED
TONS
50
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
BP
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-PASTURE
TONS
50
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2.4
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TOTAL
AMOUNT
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
48.4 17170.46
*** BALANCE I -
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
NOTE:_ The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic
land 'application of sludge'at agronomic rates. The sludge will be
nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements_ Your production
facility will produce approximately 2743.92 pounds of plant
available nitrogen (PAN) per year in the sludge that will need to be
removed on a periodic basis. This figure is PAN when broadcasting
the sludge. Please be aware that additional acres of land, as well
special equipment, may be needed when you remove this sludge.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
YAtar�
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
waste water.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of
the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs.
This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure,
soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application
amount should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the
soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen
applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
Your facility is designed for 180 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6 months. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be within 1.7 feet of the top of the dike.
If surface irrigation is the method of land applidation for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and -Aez' to er
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
amounts of Nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis r
for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and the pr
application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
None. Fie- id 2, 3 , .p g- sA cx-b I ; a, �\ e,3
1 U G s.�� �er rn v �Q . �' S TO b �� °� 9
G .5 5 CC 4 A g (5� r. 1r1c ,'� d o�"� C
%t`la�y v se S P► o, 9 ro ., G r o� a , 4K c-se �c
Tel
s
i.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN PAG
Plans and Specifications
f
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct dischar
during operation dr land application. Any discharge of waste whiX
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are sub)ec
to assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division
of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate
land to properly dispose of waste. If the producer does not own
.adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide MRCS
with a cony of a written agreement with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application for the life expectancy of the production
facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is
a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be a plied to meet, but not exceed, the
Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soi.z- type,__
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System
(ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater
than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips
will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter
strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEN.
(See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390
Interim Riparian Forest Buffers).
5. odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when the
wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops
or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the MRCS Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or
to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift
from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies
and to provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in
such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf
area is covered.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take-up released nutrients. Waste shall
not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a
crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that
are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips
are present; (See Standard 393 -- Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right -of ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface_ waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site
by a "technical specialist". Animal waste should not be
applied on grassed waterways that discharge into water
courses, except when applied at agronomic rates and the
application causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into
the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate
storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition to
one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to
areas where considered,appropriate. Lagoon areas should be
kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of -erosion, leakage
or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and imple-
mentinv a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility
of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept
on site.
PAGE
is

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
re»�
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER / MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the ap-
proved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and/or storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new utilization plan and a new certification
to be submitted to DEM before the new animals are stocked.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to equipment,
primarily irrigation equipment, to land apply the animal waste
described in this waste utilization plan. This equipment must be
available at the appropriate pumping time such that no discharge
occurs from the lagoon in a 25-year 1-day storm event. I also cer-
tify that the waste will be applied on the land according to this
plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no runoff occurs.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: MITCHELL NORRIS
SIGNATURE: l}.1� t i1 DATE:�-
NAME OF MANAGER (if different from owner):
p ease pri-n
SIGNATURE: DATE:
NAME OF TECHNICAL SPECIALIST: R. Dean Morris
AFFILIATION: USDA- NRCS
ADDRESS (AGENCY): 122 Ag. Service Ctr.
Elizabethtown NC 28337

Ll,y).-1 ) \j C-1 , , , -
I
isr
c p -or H Q;-f
C-

• Farm
Hydrant
Year
Crap
Lbs N Reg.
Lbs N Applied
Lbs to Apply
M. Norris Farms
03A
2002
Ber Hay
305
30.78
274.22
M. Norris Farms
04
2002
Ber Hay
305
34.02
270.98
M. Norris Farms
06
2002
Ber Hay
305
37.80
267.20
M. Norris Farms
07A
2002
Ber Hay
305
48.06
256.94
M. Norris Farms
08A
2002
Ber Hay
305
23.22
281.78
M. Norris Farms
08B
2002
Ber Hay
305
31.32
273.68
M. Norris Farms
09A
2002
Ber Hay
305
37.26
267.74
M. Norris Farms
09B
2002
Ber Hay
305
43.74
261.26
M. Norris Farms
12A
2002
Ber Hay
305
41.04
263.96

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 03A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay acres Covered 3.56
Lbs N Required 305
Year 2002 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-6 Lbs N to Apply 305
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/07/02 •
5:30:00 PM 7:30:00 PM ° 60 182 21 &40
2 - 2.00 0.23 12.42 ,
292.58
5.42
04111102
4:00:00 PM 7:00:00 PM 60 182 32760
f 2 2.00 0.34 18.36
274.22
5.08
I
� I � I
�— F— � 0.00
274.22
i-- 0.00
274.22
�—
F^ � I Q ___._.___._
[� � � 0.00
274.22
F-- F— I v
F-- F-- F-- 0.00
274.22
�0
� 0.00
274.22
��
F--
F—
F— F—
F—
0.00
274.22

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 04 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay
Acres Covered 3•87
Lbs N Required 305
Year 2002 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-6 Lbs N to Apply 305
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/15/02
1 2:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 60
f 182 43680
F2 2.00 0.42 22.68
I2$2.32
5.23
04/16102
9:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 60 182 21846
f f- 2 2.OD D.21 11.34
270.98
5.02
I
I F-- F Q
I-.___._�_—� �
0.00
270.98
- �
�I _
l ' � � _0.00
270.98
F— F— F o
F— F-- I 0.00
z7o.s8
r-
F °
F— F— I— _o.o0
27Q.9a
F—
��
F—
F—
F7-0
7—
F—
F—
_ 0. QQ
270.98

0
M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant
Crop
Year
Field
06 # Sprinklers
Ber Hay Acres Covered
Lbs N Required
2002 Lbs N Residual
3029-1 Lbs N to Apply
1
1.44
305
305
Date Start Stop
N11000
Lbs N
In to
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
to Apply
Apply
0�4/05/02 1:00:00 PM 3:30:00 PM 60 182 27306
� 2 2.00 a.7o 37.sa
1267.20
4.95
-F— F— F-6—
F-- F— F— ry 0.00
267.20
�—
f F 0.00
267.20
F
�p--��
� � � _ 0.00
267.20
i
F— F— F-- u 0.00
267.20
a..__—
o.oa
267.2a
F-- F— F —0�
F— F F— . o.o0
267.zo
F�
�^
0 ,
F- 0.00
2 672a

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 07A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay acres Covered 2.93
Lbs N Required 305
Year 2002 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-3 Lbs N to Apply 305
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/17/02
16:00:00 PM 8:30:00 PM
f 60
1182 273a0
2 2.00 0.34 18.36
286.64
1 5.31
04/18/02
12:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 60 182 43680
F2 2.00 0.55 29.70
256.94
4.76
F— � I 0
�— � � _ 0.00
256.94
I
F-- F-- I
I
I F^ 0.00
256.94
F—
_.
F F— F 0---.
F— Ff_ 0.00
256.94
�—
F-- I— F—fl '
F-7——0.00
256.94
FT F— F 0
F-- F—T f -- _ 0.00
256.94
F—
F—
F—
0.00
256.94

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 08A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay acres Covered 4.69
Lbs N Required 305
Year 2002 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-3 Lbs N to Apply 305
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/07/02
11:30:00 AM f 4:30:00 PM
1 00 182 54800
2 - 2.aD 0.43 23.22
281.78
5.22
f --
F— �0
F— F— F-- 0.00
281.78
I— I
�µ 6.00
281.78
F—
F— F-- p ,
��
F— F— F— _ 0.00
281.78
�� � 0
F-- F— I — 0.00
281.78
F—
F— I_0
F— I F— D.OD
281.78
�0
6
F—
F--
F—
O.OD
281.78
F—

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant
Crop
Year
Field
08 B # Sprinklers
Ber Hay Acres Covered
Lbs N Required
2002 Lbs N Residual
3029-3 Lbs N to Apply
1
4.13
305
305
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/15/02
1 2:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 60 182 43680
f 2 2.00 0.39 21.06
�283.94
5.26
04/16/02
9:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 60 182 21840
I ` 2.00 0.19 10.26
273.68
5.07
f ----
F-- F-7 F 0 ,
F— ��F— 0.00
273.68
F— F 0.00
273.68
�
_ I— I— p '
�
f — F
F-- 0.00
273.68
F— F—
F— F— F^ 0.00
273.68
F
F—
F7� -
F—
F—
F—
0.00
273.88
F—

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 09A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 5.85
Lbs N Required 305
Year 2002 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-3 Lbs N to Apply 305
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/05/02
1:00:00 PM 1 5:00:00 PM 60 182 43680
2- ^ 2.00 Q.27 14.58
29Q.42
5.38
04/16102
1:00:DD PM 4.00:00 PM 60 182 32760
I - 2.00 0.21 11.34
279A8
5.17
04117/02
11-.30:00 AM 2:30:00 PM 1, 60 182 32760
2 I 0D 0.21 11.34
26i-74
4.
f F — I 0
F._— F— FD.DO
267.74
F—
I
�— � I
I — I Q.00
267.74
�—
��
� F— I
F-- F-- F-- O.Qa
267.74
---
�— 1
1 — Q —
F— F— F-- 0.00
267.74
F—
I F— I 0
F— F-- F-- Q.00
267.74
F—
�— - --0
F— F6.00
267.74

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant
Crop
Year
Field
09B # Sprinklers
Ber Hay acres Covered
Lbs N Required
2002 Lbs N Residual
3029-3 Lbs N to Apply
1
4.46
305
RIOR
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/07/02
5:30:00 PM 7:30:00 PM
I 60 182 21840
I 2.Q0 0.18 9.72
295.28
15.47
4:00:00 PM 7:00:00 PM 182 32760
�14.5828Q7
5.2004/11/02
04/18/02
12:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 60 182 4�3680�
�2 2,00 0.36 19.44
281.2$
4.84
�
I
F— --- 0.00
261.26
F— F— I v
�— � � _ 0.00
261.26
f —
� F— � 0
� � �^ _ 0.00
261.2E
F— F— Fa
F— F— F-- . a.00
2s1.2s
F— F o
F— r 7— _ 0.00
2s1.26
��
F—
F—
F—
F--
F—
a.oa
261.2s
F�

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 12A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Ber Hay Acres Covered 3.2
Lbs N Required 305
Year 2002 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-3A Lbs N to Apply 305
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
04/16/02
1:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 60 182 32760
f 2 2.00 0.38 20.52
1284.48
f 5.27
04/17/02
11:30:00 AM 2:30:00 PM 60 1 22 327fi0
F2 2.00 0.38 20.52
263.9fi
4.89
F— F— ��
� � F— 0.00
263.96
F— �� F— [0.00
263.96
F-- F_._._., 0.00
263.96
F— � 0 �
I— -- F— I 0.00
263.96
F— F— 0.00
263.96
I
F^
F—
F—
F—
F— 0.00
263.9fi

'Farm
Hydrant
Year
Crop
Lbs N Rep.
Lbs N Applied
Lbs to Apply
M. Norris Farms
03A
2001
Oak Hay
74
13.04
60.96
M. Norris Farms
04
2001
Oat Hay
74
26.65
47.35
M. Norris Farms
06
2001
Oat Hay
74
30.24
43,76
M. Norris Farms
08A
2001
Oat Hay
74
58.78
15.22
M. Norris Farms
088
2001
Oat Hay
74
22.11
51.89
M. Norris Farms
09A
2001
Oat Hay
74
22.87
51.13
M. Norris Farms
12A
2001
Oat Hay
74
34.69
39.31

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 03A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Oat Hay Acres Covered 3.56
Lbs N Required 74
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-6 Lbs N to Apply 74
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03/07/02
9:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 60 182 21840
1 2.1 Q 6 Fo
6Q.96
1 .08
� � � o
F—' � F� _ a. oo
Ba.96
I
F-- I—___.— f -- _ 0.00
F-- I__— F-- _ 0.00
60.96
.__._
F— I ( Q
F-- F-- F-- _ 0.00
60.96
�—
F— � � o �
F-- F— F-- ^ a.00
so.9s
F-- F— F °
F— F— F— Q.QQ
60.96
F—
�o. ;
[6.00
FE96
F_

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant Q4 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Oat Hay Acres Covered 3.87
Lbs N Required 74
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-6 Lbs N to Apply 74
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal INAc Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
01/30102
1 3:30:00 PM 5:30:00 PM 60 182 21840
1 2.10 0.21 11.91
62.09
1.10
03/07/02
2:00:00 PM 4:30:00 PM 60 182 F27300
] 2.10 0.26 14.74
47.35
0.84
F� � �
F � � 0.00
47.35
F________.___
F— I I -
0.00
47.35
�____..-_
F-- F— I _
F_..___-__.-._ F--- 0.00
47.35
F-- F— I v
F— F-- F_.__._._..__ D.00
47.35
F-- I— F-0
F— F— F— 0.00
47.35
—-
� F— F— ��
F— 0.00
47.35
��
F—
F—
F—p
F—
F— F—
0.00
47.35

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 06 # Sprinklers 1
Crop Oat Hay acres Covered 1 •"
Lbs N Required 74
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-1 Lbs N to Apply 74
Date Start Stop N11000 Lbs N In to
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N to Apply Apply
03/28/02
10'00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 60 182 21840
i 2.00 0.56 30.24
43.76
f 0.81
I -
F I F— _ Q.QQ
43.76
L__
—
I -- -- 0.00
43.76
�...�___.._-.
F-- F-- F-- 0.00
43.76
F— F— F—o—
F— F-- F-- 0.00
43.76
_.�
F--
F- F-- F— � 0.00
43.76
0 ,
F— F— F— _ 0.00
43.76
F 0 ;;
F--
F--
F^
0.00
43.7fi

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 08A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Oat Hay Acres Covered 4.69
Lbs N Required 74
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-3 Lbs N to Apply 74
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/AC Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
01 /30/02
f 12:00:00 PM 2:30:00 PM 60 182 27306
F 1 2.1 Q 0.21 11.91
62.09
1.10
112:00:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 182 32760
15.8803/06/02
2.f 10 $
Q8246220.2
03/08/02
2:30:00 PM 5:30:00 PM 60 182 3276Q
l 2.10 0.28 15.88
30.34
Q.54
03/24/02
1:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 6Q 182 32780 !
22,00 15.12
15.22
Q28
I -
�0.228�
I— I — I _ O.OQ
15.22
�—
I � � p
� F— _ 0.0D
15.22
�I
���'-
��I - _0.00
15.22
(
F— F 0 _
F-- F-- F— _ D.00
15.22
F—
�~
F—
F—
F-6—
F—
F—
F—
Q.00
1522

M. Norris Farms
Waste
Irrigation
Report
Hydrant
08 B
# Sprinklers 1
Crop
Oat Hay
Acres Covered 4.13
Lbs N Required 74
Year
2001
Lbs N Residual
Field
3029-3
Lbs N to Apply 74
Date
start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
02/25/02
4:30:00 PM 8:30:00 PM 60 182 43680
�1 2.10 0.39 22.11
51.89
0.92
I F— F-6—���
f
F-- F— [ --- �
F-- F— [-- . 0.00
51.89
f �
�---__-1 F— F —o
F-- F— F—^ _ 0.00
51.89
�—
�� � 1 -
� � � 0.00
51.89
I v
1—
— 0.00
51.89--
F— r ° ,
{
�
F—
F—°
F—
F--
F— o.o0
51.8$
F—

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 09A # Sprinklers 1
Crop oat Hay Acres Covered 5•85
Lbs N Required 74
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-3 Lbs N to Apply 74
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N11000
Lagoon gal In1Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
02/25/02
11:00.00 AM 1 3:00:00 PM l `" 182 43680
I 2.10Y F 0.27 15.31
158.69
1.04
03/28/02
10:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 60 182 21840
2-0p
I - 0.14 7.56
51.13
0.95
�^
7-- F— F f}
F— 0.00
51.13
-- F —6
F-- f-- . 0.04
E 51.13
I
I_-.__ �- — F— 0.00
51.13
I 1 _
I--- P
_ 0.00
'59.13
I--
I—
F p
� I �
F—
0.00
51.13

M. Norris Farms
Waste Irrigation Report
Hydrant 12A # Sprinklers 1
Crop Oat Hay Acres Covered 3.2
Lbs N Required 74
Year 2001 Lbs N Residual
Field 3029-3A Lbs N to Apply 74
Date
Start Stop
Time Time PSI GPM Gallons
N/1000
Lagoon gal In/Ac Lbs N
Lbs N
to Apply
In to
Apply
03/07/02
5:00:00 PM 1 7:00:00 PM l "v 182 21840
I 2.10 0.25 14.18
1 59.83
1 1.06
03/27/02
1:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 60 182 32760
2- 2.00 0.38 20.52
39.31
0.73
1— 1 Q -._.
�� F—_— F— O.OQ
39.31
_,.,_—
O.QQ
F— 0
!— 0. QO
39.31
Q.OD
39.31
l�
I� F
� DOQ � .
39.31
-�
I —F—f
0
F—
F—
F—
O.Op
39.31

'Farm
Hydrant
Year
Crop
Lbs N Reg.
Lbs N Applied
Lbs to Apply
M. Norris Farms
01
2001
Ber Gr
230
0.00
230.00
M. Norris Farms
02
2001
Ber Gr
230
0.00
230.00
M. Norris Farms
03A
2001
Ber Hay
305
198.91
106.09
M. Norris Farms
03B
2001
Ber Hay
305
14.58
290.42
M. Norris Farms
04
2001
Ber Hay
305
169.43
135.57
M. Norris Farms
05
2001
Ber Hay
305
16.85
288.15
M. Norris Farms
06
2001
Ber Hay
305
28.35
276.65
M. Norris Farms
07A
2001
Ber Gr
260
28.78
231.22
M. Norris Farms
07B
2001
Ber Gr
260
0.00
260.00
M. Norris Farms
08A
2001
Ber Gr
260
30.75
229.25
M. Norris Farms
08B
2001
Ber Gr
260
50.06
209.94
M. Norris Farms
09A
2001
Ber Gr
260
119.18
140.82
M. Norris Farms
09B
2001
Ber Gr
260
30.94
229.06
M. Norris Farms
10
2001
Ber Hay
305
116.64
188.36
M. Norris Farms
11
2001
Ber Hay
305
14.85
290.15
M. Norris Farms
12A
2001
Ber Hay
305
81.22
223.78
M. Norris Farms
12B
2001
Ber Hay
275
0.00
275.00

'Farm
Hydrant
Year
Crop
Lbs N Reg.
Lbs N Applied
Lbs to Apply
M. Norris Farms
02
2000
Oat Hay
74
4.75
69.25
M. Norris Farms
03
2000
Oat Hay
74
31.97
42.03
M. Norris Farms
04
2000
Oat Hay
74
71.96
2.04
M. Norris Farms
06
2000
Oat Hay
74
7.34
66.66
M. Norris Farms
09A
2000
Oat Hay
74
17.28
56.72
M. Norris Farms
12A
2000
Oat Hay
74
23.76
50.24

'Farm
Hydrant
Year
Crop
Lbs N Reg.
Lbs N Applied
Lbs to Apply
M. Norris Farms
03A-1
2000
Ber Hay
305
177.93
127.07
M. Norris Farms
03A-2
2000
Ber Hay
127.07
59.40
67.67
M. Norris Farms
03B
200D
Ber Hay
305
51.30
253.70
M. Norris Farms
04-1
2000
Ber Hay
305
211.41
93.59
M. Norris Farms
04-2
2000
Ber Hay
93.59
54.00
39.59
M. Norris Farms
05
2000
Ber Hay
305
75.06
229.94
M. Norris Farms
06
2000
Ber Hay
305
64.53
240A7
M. Norris Farms
07A
2000
Ber Gr
260
13.50
246.50
M. Norris Farms
08A
2000
Ber Gr
260
88.34
171.66
M. Norris Farms
08B
2000
Ber Gr
260
150.39
109.61
M. Norris Farms
09A
2000
Ber Gr
260
74.25
185.75
M. Norris Farms
09B
2000
Ber Gr
260
15.12
244.88
M. Norris Farms
11
2000
Ber Hay
305
104.22
200.78
M. Norris Farms
12A
2000
Ber Hay
305
89.10
215.90

Irrigation Field Records
Farm
Week of
Operator
1 is
•I
M r r
� r r
®®�
r +
®
�r •: �
EWA, Mph
MMMMM�r
Mo
Comments:
r.

r
Irrigation Field Records
Farm st^ —
week of
Operator _ Q, 15
I i :
p M-
IRE Me
Comments:

r--
irrigation Field Records
Farm %4.
Week of
Operator
"Ilb
Ulu
W �,: o�
ff. M
Me a�:���r�
Comments:

Irrigation Field Records
Farm T
week of
Operator
Comments:
w

Irrigation Field Records
Farm t
Week of -
Operator�� ;
C ► I"nM®MIllIrI�
M.
1
� ►
Mims
MINE"'
ROMIM
MITIOM
• i Kill
1M`MMON!
IMMININ
Comments:
r':

r-
w
Irrigation Field Records
Farm 16 „
Week of -an,n
Operator S�A t� ,S.
Start , Stop Inches
Date PSI GPM Time Time Pull Applied
�-� 2
Comments:

r
Irrigation Field Records
Farm
Week of -01
Operator
- M,
ILI "..
Fla
1NINE
MEN
Comments:
r

29
A
Irrigation Field Records
Farm k r
Week of -
Operator
��MAK
�. I.
pal
Mr.."NUMMIMw"
Comments:

Irrigation Field Records
Farm ►�
Week of�j tjlo- ti a. o —
Operator M—
ri - ".
0 F17 A
.um ns afes
....� ,I
,
,.
•
afffwm
Ali► i , i
M
I r
. ► bw
rLxNM
Comments:

r-
Irrigation Field Records
Farm
Week of --
Operator �NL) _ C s
rr„■�
T�
r. � �
, 1
TKIWI!, as
SIU��
66w
PRO
�S��M.
Comments:

Irrigation Field Records
Farm
Week of
Operator
R#MI.
M-R.
RM
ERR
Comments:

r-
MEM-1.
MINE",
IRM
l ! li
Mom=
, i
'..*
9►t"OIL
, •l►
M27M�.
-
ft"IRM
"
Comments:

Irrigation Field Records
Farm Y;
114
Week -of
Operator
� Ll"4
i 1=
f I��
f f I
M_P7i�
✓.o.
1 ��~M61
_
61,
nb=�=
Comments:
r

As
Irrigation F d Records
Farm
Week of
Operator
1 �.
l JAM
f k�
�61
/ ,
KV!MI
iIT lf�l���
Comments:
Fla

r
Irrigation Fleld Records
Farm
week . of?l
Operator
w
Comments:
,: MUM
MSEMA Mom���
I

Comments:
r

Irrigation Field Records
Farm L `�
Week of
Operator
FM
MI-M
IER
����rl'■Lr�®■�
. �
�F.�7
�r�
� � err
t�
Comments:

01-
Irrigation Field Records
Farm ,z a
Week of \ n-- fit - k \ -r) t-
Operator Cn , t �O.Z6 . -
Ii :
M
1
��
r:
!• 1
r� A
W.
�!
��f
r
..�
/iA
?MIN
M + •
M
RVKIM
• i
�ii t1
M
M.
ROD
Comments;

A
Irrigation Field Records
Farm 14- Z
"Rai'
Comments:

i
r
Irrigation Field Records
Farm
Week of
Operator
_ - � I:.
--il
M i E
E i ♦
®®
� I.1
ti�i
®
JE •= r
� � � �
t�����rr�'r1I�'...�
Lill
- • .
�
�.�����*ice,
.. ..
�•y� ��
.---• r�ii\'���
Comments:

r
r
Irrigation Field Records
Farm
Week of Oc - QF - 30-- a-D -
Operator _� .,\�O-nz -- --- --
1 ipa,t0 �1�����frrl�J
i►
��
�
Comments:

Irrigation Field Records
Farm
Week of Qrl'
Operator _Q6 t .
Date
ant
Crop
Lagoon
PSI
GPM
Start
Time
Stop
Time
Pull
Inches
lied
•- rr
s
i
�
I
I
f
Comments:

r"
r--
Irrigation F d Records
Farm °Z.
Week of
Operator
F n-I
Mv. -
P. I"
417057
M
rMi�r
M.% a
fif}
®�I-
M>��!
f...
W oIi
�
Comments:

RecordsIrrignUon Field
1 (3r)
Operator
P - M,
Fe. - ME
"I-
�. ,1y► 6yAs
I M
MA
1 M •,
omm
.� . 6tl
�ii�i��©�
', .Ell
6 am
IPM
Comments:
rrr

r�111
r",
Pl-
Irrigation Field Records
Farm �- Q
Week of - -
Operator
Comments:

r�.
Irrigation Field Records
Farm
Week of - -�
Operator _Cn,y
PSI
GPM
Stm
Time
Stop
Time
IDOWA
Comments:
r,