WATKINS SWINE FARM_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENC.--E--
2 14
M
Department of EnWmnmental Qual

December 12, 1995
ATTN.- Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Environmental Management
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, N. C. 28301-5043
Mr. Stephens:
Robert J. Watkins
Rt. 2 Box 362
Wadesboro, N.C. 28170
P1 j
(DEC 15 1995
ENV. MANAGEMENT
FAYETTEVILLS RAG. OrriCE
This letter is in response to NOV letter dated November 17, 1995. The items stated in
the plan as correctable are being handled as outlined below,
• The upper lagoon has been pumped to level of 1.5 feet of actual freeboard at this
time and we are continuing to pump and haul to bring the needed 2 feet as written in
the waste management plan and to provide as much storage as possible.
• The lower lagoon was pumped out as much as the pump would pick up and has
approximately 2 feet of freeboard. Future plans for this lagoon are: pipe plugged
from upper lagoon to cut off any flow. Continue to keep pumped out. Plan to
decommission lower lagoon this summer with technical assistance provided by
Brown Creek Soil & Water Conservation District, and have completed by September
30, 1996. A copy of abandonment plan will be sent to your office as plan is
completed.
• Repair fittings for broken pipe have been purchased and will be installed by
December 15, 1995.
I hope that these actions will address the concerns stated in NOV. If there are any
questions, please contact me and we will try to answer them.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Wat ins

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • •
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ID E H PA F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Managment
November 17, 1995
Mr. Robert J. Watkins
Route 2 Box 362
Wadesboro, N.C. 28170
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Failure to Follow Waste Management Plan
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(d)
Watkins Swine Farm, Peachland Hog Farm
Anson County
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation for failing to follow your waste
management plan. This is a violation of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217(d).
On November 14, 1995 an inspection was conducted of your animal operation by the
Fayetteville Regional Office The inspection, attached, revealed that the waste holding
lagoon at the Peachland Hog Farm had six (6) inches of freeboard in the upper
lagoon.
The lower lagoon at the Peachland Hog Farm was observed to have NO freeboard. It
is the understanding of this office that the lower lagoon may no longer be in use.
If the lagoon is not in use and will not be brought back into service proper closure
procedures should be followed. You are urged to contact Mr. Lin Taylor, District
Technician, Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation District at [phone] for
technical guidance in this matter.
Please be reminded that until this lagoon is properly abandoned the appropriate
freeboard level must be maintained.
-continued-
Wachovla Bullding, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

i
Mr Watkins
November 17, 1995
Page 2 of 2
Also, during the Peachland Hog Farm inspection it was discovered that the discharge
pipe leading to the lagoon from the center confinement barn was partially broken. The
pipe (near the lagoon end) appeared to be damaged. This pipe should be immediately
repaired to avoid pipe failure and discharge of swine waste to surface waters.
A review of the "Overview of Nutrient Managment Plan Robert Watkins" contained in
the Nutrient Managment Plan received by this office December 14, 1995 states in part
the following:
" Mr. Watkins will need to keep at least two feet of freeboard on the lagoon"
Failure to comply with these rules can result in civil and/or criminal penalties or the
facility may be required to apply for an individual nondischarge permit. For your
information, one copy of the state regulations is enclosed.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice you must notify this office in writing of
what actions have been taken to comply with your waste management plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Michael Wicker, P.E., Water Quality Regional Supervisor at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor
cc: Michael Wicker, P.E., Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Robert Barton, DC Anson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Russel Sikes, Anson County Cooperative Extension Service
Steve Bennett, Area 7 Regional Coordinator, DSWC
DEM Planning Branch T ~-
DEM Operations Branch
N O C
ti ao
m '�
rLj r� p � ci ;.
LCl m m
"hu
C}iCg¢
m
ac(iZOW
i�
I
rc
ri
o
o
z
o
n
m
Q'.
N
N
o H
7
O i
-Z
v
o
�i
aR�i
m
PG
M1�
>
m
O
,
ZON``
-In
3
a3
.4 g
W
a
�i
01I
V
y .a
Q
O
O
_
�
3
vJm��
h
06s 140JOW '00'9b'00:1
Sd

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANDAAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION REMRD
DATE: tA, 1"5
Farm Na=/Owner: 1 ,� UQ.1
Maaling Ad s:, - o �, �,.�nd@�boro r yC . "t70 _
County: sera
Integrator: CA Phone:
On Site Repr ntadve: Phone:
Physical Address1ocation:
Type of Operation: Swine ,g Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE______ DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:— • -9 —' Longitude:_,_„ • ,_..,,,_`�'
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes orlo Actual Freeboard: ® Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or�&Was any erosion observed? Yes or (seepage was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or Not Evaluated)
Crop(s) being utilized: (Spray Field or cover cropwas not evaluated Me. c.9G u t" P &,A (, WL.
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No N� (Otq% "`�
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o p4o4 ire
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Une: Yes or No
It animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or4ther
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No(waste management records were not
Additional Comments:. _ _ _ - - - _ -- reviewed)
more rou h will he condjActed in the future.
_Please _contact .DEM should any condition arise that poses a danger to surface waters,
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPA map to determine `.'Blue Line" status.
_ If you have questions concerning this report please do not hesitate to .contact the inspector
at [phone]. please contact the inspector if the above information is incorrect.
1 R.a s �a
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

A.

Cool H he i.. iML
State -North Carolina
Department of Enylronment,
Health and Natural Resources +
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor C
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Managment
November 17, 1995
Mr. Robert J. Watkins
Route 2 Box 362
Wadesboro, N.C. 28170
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Failure to Follow Waste Management Plan
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(d)
Watkins Swine Farm, Peachland Hog Farm
Anson County
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation for failing to follow your waste
management plan. This is a violation of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217(d).
On November 14, 1995 an inspection was conducted of your animal operation by the
Fayetteville Regional Office The inspection, attached, revealed that the waste holding
lagoon at the Peachland Hog Farm had six (6) inches of freeboard in the upper
lagoon.
The lower lagoon at the Peachland Hog Farm was observed to have NO freeboard. It
is the understanding of this office that the lower lagoon may no longer be in use.
If the lagoon is not in use and will not be brought back into service proper closure'
procedures should be followed. You are urged to contact Mr. Lin Taylor, District
Technician, Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation District at [phone] for
technical guidance in this matter.
Please be reminded that until this lagoon is properly abandoned the appropriate
freeboard level must be maintained.
-continued-
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer 5C% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

rr
Mr Watkins
November 17, 1995
Page 2 of 2
Also, during the Peachland Hog Farm inspection it was discovered that the discharge
pipe leading to the lagoon from the center confinement barn was partially broken. The
pipe (near the lagoon end) appeared to be damaged. This pipe should be immediately
repaired to avoid pipe failure and discharge of swine waste to surface waters.
A review of the "Overview of Nutrient Managment Plan Robert Watkins" contained in
the Nutrient Managment Plan received by this office December 14, 4995 states in part
the following:
" Mr. Watkins will need to keep at least two feet of freeboard on the lagoon"
Failure to comply with these rules can result in civil and/or criminal penalties or the
facility may be required to apply for an individual nondischarge permit. For your
information, one copy of the state regulations is enclosed.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice you must notify this office in writing of
what actions have been taken to comply with your waste management plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Michael Wicker, P,E-, Water Quality Regional Supervisor at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor
cc: Michael Wicker, P.E., Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Robert Horton, DC Anson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Russel Sikes, Anson County Cooperative Extension Service
Steve Bennett, Area 7 Regional Coordinator, DSWC
DEM Planning Branch
DEM Operations Branch

Site Requires Immediate Attention: ,
Facility No.
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Nooer;� rc 19- , IM
Time: 1 g : OC: -_
Farm NvWOwner: .�
Mailing Address:AA 7n
County: 04 son
Integrator: 6& Phone:
On Site Repre ntative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: Sri EQ asp
Type of Operation: Swine _g- Poultry— Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Cerrdfication Number: ACNEW
Latitude• Longitude• • •
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or(o Actual Ft. L Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes ot( Was any erosion observed? Yes or dD (seepage was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or* Not Evaluated)
Crop(s) being utilized: (Spray Field or cover crow
a
*.,A "l
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No Na4, {0C4°d
ofoA pleA"
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or;other
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Plum Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on sperifc acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No(Waste management records were not
Additional Comments: _ reviewed
v e thorough s o w -unducted in ure.
_Please contact DEM should any condition arise that Roses a danger to surface waters.
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine `.'Blue Line" status.
If you have uestions'concernin this report please do not hesitate to.contact the inspector
at [phone]. please contact the inspector if the above information is incorrect.
S
Inspector Name
rc.+��
Signature
ec: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Neetied.i.

State of Worth Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 •
Fayetteville Regional Office
James . Hunt, Governor C
Jonathan B Howes, Secretary G
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
Division of Environmental Managment
November 17, 1995
Mr. Robert J. Watkins
Route 2 Box 362
Wadesboro, N.C. 28170
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Failure to Follow Waste Management Plan
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(d)
Watkins Swine Farm, Peachland Hog Farm
Anson County
Dear Mr. Watkins:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation for failing to follow your waste
management plan. This is a violation of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter 2H, Section .02I7(d).
On November 14, 1995 an inspection was conducted of your animal operation by the
Fayetteville Regional Office The inspection, attached, revealed that the waste holding
lagoon at the Peachland Hog Farm had six (6) inches of freeboard in the upper
lagoon.
The lower lagoon at the Peachland Hog Farm was observed to have NO freeboard. It
is the understanding of this office that the lower lagoon may no longer be in use.
If the lagoon is not in use and will not be brought back into service proper closure
procedures should be followed. You are urged to contact Mr. Lin Taylor, District
Technician, Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation District at [phone] for
technical guidance in this matter.
Please be reminded that until this lagoon is properly abandoned the appropriate
freeboard level must be maintained.
-continued-
Wachovla Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX 910-48"707
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr Watkins
November 17, 1995
Page 2 of 2
Also, during the Peachland Hog Farm inspection it was discovered that the discharge
pipe leading to the lagoon from the center confinement barn was partially broken. The
pipe (near the lagoon end) appeared to be damaged. This pipe should be immediately
repaired to avoid pipe failure and discharge of swine waste to surface waters.
A review of the "Overview of Nutrient Managment Plan Robert Watkins" contained in
the Nutrient Managment Plan received by this office December 14, 1995 states in part
the following:
" Mr. Watkins will need to keep at least two feet of freeboard on the lagoon"
Failure to comply with these rules can result in civil and/or criminal penalties or the
facility may be required to apply for an individual nondischarge permit. For your
information, one copy of the state regulations is enclosed.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice you must notify this office in writing of
what actions have been taken to comply with your waste management plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Michael Wicker. P.E., Water Quality Regional Supervisor at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor
cc: Michael Wicker, P.E., Regional Water Quality Supervisor
Robert Horton, DC Anson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Russel Sikes, Anson County Cooperative Extension Service
Steve Bennett, Area 7 Regional Coordinator, DSWC
DEM Planning Branch
DEM Operations Branch

s
Site Reguir= Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIltONMENTAL MANAGFAMW
AND+IAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Farm Narwowner: ti��.��•tA
Mailing Address: Ro,31 ecounty. &!'n
Integrator:
On Site Repre ntative:
Physical Addresvl ocation: SE
DATE: � , I995
Time: 1 C6
Phone:
Phone:
Type of Operation: Swine _x. PouItry Cattle
Design Capacity: I Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: `,�'
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or(& Actual Freeboard: �' Ft. —!--Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes orgl Was any erosion observed? Yes. or (9 (seepage was
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or* Not Evaluated)
Crop(s) being utilized: (Spray Field or cover crop was not evaluated) Mr, Lj,,,�k,e e.' C.Lj ��1 O-OA
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No N-L �oi4in
or.e.Cr r.od �]r[Aa1�.
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line: Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into water of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or-0ther
similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No(waste management records were not
Additional Comments: - reviewed)..
_ This was a yea brief ins.2ection. a more thorough inspection will be conducted }n thefuture.
Please contact:.DEM should any condition arise that poses a danger to surface waters.
* This farm was not located on a USGS TOPO map to determine ?Blue Line" status.
If ZOU havequestions •concemin this report please do not hesitate to -contact the inspector
at [phone]. Please contact the•inspector if the above information is incorrect.
rf -
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

r

10 - ti
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr_ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
F15WA
�EHNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Section
July 17, 1995
Mr. Robert Watkins
Rt. 2 Box 362
--Ra'S60ro, N.C. 28170
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Robert Watkins Farm
SR 1252 near Peachland
Anson County
Dear Mr. Watkins:
An inspection of your farm was conducted July 14, 1995. Please find
enclosed a copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It
is the opinion of this office based on Regional information and observations
made during the inspection that the facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC
2H, Part .0217 and the Animal Waste Management is being properly conducted.
This office requests that you maintain a copy of your certified waste
management plan and waste management records at the farm for future
inspections. Further it is strongly suggested that the area immediately
adjacent to the waste storage lagoon be mowed in order to periodically make
visual inspections of the lagoon dike.
If you have questions regarding this inspection, please do not hesitate
to contact this office at [phone].
S incerely,f-
Paul-E. R6wis(
Environmental Specialist
cc: DEN Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
Farm Name/Owner
I
Inspection
Date
Farm No.
Robert Watkins Farm
July 14,
1995
N A
Mailing Address Facility Telephone Number
Rt. 2 Box 352, Wadesboro, N.C. 28170
All comments will be discussed in Section IV of this report.
SECTION
I
SWINE
SECTION
11
Y M Comments
1.
Does the number and type of animal meet or
exceed (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system))
X _
2.
Does this facility meet criteria for Animal
Operation REGISTRATION?
3.
Are animals confined fed or maintained in this
facility for a 12-month period?
4.
Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL WME
MANAGEMENT PLAN?
X #1
5.
Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
_ _ _02

z
Administration and Program MangggMent Y Comments
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc'. _x_
SECTION III
Eield Site Management Comments
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of USGS Map
Map Blue Line Stream? JL
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream? _ rt T#3
3. Does the facility have adequate acreage on
which to apply the waste? _x_
4. Does the land application site have cover
crop in accordance with the CERTIFICATION PLAN? _#4
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of the
state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or
other similar man-made devices? _ X
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices (BMP)
of the approved CERTIFICATION? _x_
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approx. 3 ft.)
8. Is the general condition of this animal facility,
including management and operation, satisfactory? _x,_.._
SECTION IV Comments
1. Farm has a certified waste management plan based on comments by Mr. Russell
Sikes with the Anson County Agricultural Extension Service.
2. Files were not reviewed as part of this inspection.
3. A detailed inspection of the spray field was not conducted at the time of
the inspection. It is reported that waste is currently being transported
land application site by the owner.

4. The certified waste management plan was not reviewed at the time of the
. inspection.

Inspection notes:
This consists 6 barns and one lagoon
Lagoon Location
Lat 34 57' 18" '
Lon 80 15' 51"
Photo Time 15:20
This facility is not well maintained
odor during the inspection was excessive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vegetation has overrun the barns, vines are grpwing on the barn walls reducing
air flow through the barns.
Area immediately adjacent to the lagoon should be mowed.
A follow-up inspection should be conducted within 2 to 3 months.

'0 P1°A
,L*y a+M
T ,
[i[[
1. (
L
r
t'
�
y�
•tw
LL>�1
.eTi
•.
+r
vwto
r
a
r
i.N�rS
eTet
t'
I
l
TUT
F: Li1m
ut
a
an
i
�
C.Ti i iT
'iw
r
CI
Z
a• itn
r
r fn'
ti
Kii 4Y
y ��
—
•,
[ x
qy
a v
[
.y•t
6fL[I
tIkm ta—w
0
Sir t
6:tt _
7w !
TT
ftxl GWt
4
z,
Lt
vn i'r'f
r�
fwl
ti
4
SriT e
cit
it
tELi /
OL
pw a'e x[[ Ft �.
IT
� r'r _ tm Y �.
FM
"'Y r
n �. • t} � 4
Cis [tit
YM
�MRKIWZ

.�
.. .. r .

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
ROBERT WATIONS SWINE FARM
FARM FIELD MAP
. BLUE LINE STREAM
. SOIL TYPES
. ACREAGE
. FESCUE PASTURE
SOIL TEST
WASTE ANALYSIS
•;; DEC 14 1994
•`NA pFFICE
CALCULATED AMOUNT OF WASTE
REALISTIC YIELD EXPECTATION
FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPLICATION RATE SHEETS
NUTRIENT TIMING AND APPLICATION METHOD
PLAN EXPLANATION
WHOLE -FARM PLAN SUMMARY

.r

14
64,
FUR

Field Data Sheet
Field ID t Total Crop Acres _ 17, - Acres Useable tar -7
Soil Series t
Environmental Hazards or Concerns
❑ sinkholes
❑ surface water
13
Nutrient Sources
13 CCo�tnetcial Fertilizer'
Animal Manures
❑ Sewage Sludge
❑ Septage
❑ Other By -Product
Previous Crop :
Is field clan ed as HEL?
f�o
❑ Yes
Field leaching potential — ❑ Low
Irrigation Equipment
W-N-one
❑ Traveller
© Portable
0 Center Pivot
❑ Solid Set
0 Lateral Move
4 rt-OC Ill- ")
Predicted Crop Rotation Sequence
(if double -cropped, list sTjc6i
perop first) Realistic Yleld(s) Expected
Year (1) F=�SCA 1P wt £�_ 3-6 vn L. To .-i s
Year (2) F
4 `
Year (3) ' ` c 4L t N
Biosolld Application /
Application Equipment
SD'madcast
❑ Banded Applications
❑ High 0 Starter Fertilizer Rig
❑ Mature Spreader
❑ ln* ion
0 l~ertigation
Tillage System
❑ Cm ventional
13 Reduced Tall
❑ No -Tall
N Residue Credit
Plant Available N Required from Previous Crop
30 tbf/ 1 SU rt U
Soil Test Results:
Date of Soil Sampling 1 ! r *7 - ci * Soil Class: -2- Mineral 17 Mineral./Orgartic 0 0gpnic
pH CEC fB P-I 4 i K-I Ca% 3 Mg% J' .1 Mn_I /tri Zit-1 079 Cn i,�_
Nutrient R mmendations:
Lime: ,S N: See Ahove P205: W' 1 t6'k20: U Mg: 0 S: U Mn: O Za: _0_ CW d
[f using only commercial fertilizer, go to section 6.
a

& Manure Application -Rate Worksheet -_
■ Calculate Nutrient Needs (For Field # # of Acres?`�.�
1. Crop to be grown 5Gu.e L 6
J.
2. Realistic Yield Expectation (RYELLL.1 r acre
(tram yield histories of RYE tames)
3. Total PA -Nutrients Required
per acre per fieid
e N *aired (Ibs PA-Nlacre)
■ P305 required (lbs PA-P,Odacre)
0
■ K20 required (Ibs PA-K20/2cr0
■ Zn.mquimd (Ibs PA-Uscre)
■ Cu required (lbs PA-Cu/acre)
.—
4. Residual N Credit
(Um in rotations following legumes. dairy manure. municipal & industrial biwolids).
3. Starter or Preplant Nutrients Applied
■ N (ibs PA-N/acm)
--.�
e P205 (lbs PA-P.Os/acre)
_
■ Ks0 (lbs PA-Ks0/acre)
■ Zn (lbs PA-Zn/acre)
..�..
■ Cu (ibs PA-Cu/acre)
B. Net Nutrient Needs of Crop (lbstacre)
e N = t - N (lbs PA-N/acre)
mW N ism 3 waidoJ N a+du ism a serr N ism S
■ PlOs P205 (Ibs PA-13,0)acre)
,ew ,sm, 3 .rr+ ram isn, S
■ K20 � —�� ,.. K=0 (lbs PA-K20/acre)
■ Zn a Zn (Ibs PA-Zn/acre)
■ Cu = 0 Cu Qbs PA-Cu/wm)
e Calculate Nutrient Rate to Apply
7. Nutrient Totals from By -Products or Manures
(From waste analysis tables . If analysis report already gives available nutrients. skip to item 9.)
■ Total N (lbslunit) 000
■ Total P305 (Ibs/unit)
e Total K20 (Ibs/unit)
■ Total Zn (lbs/unit)
• Total Cu (lbs/unit)
S. Amount of Nutrient Available to Crop (based on application method. Multiply value in item 7 times
availability coefficient from relevant fact sheet in "Resources" section.)
■ N (Ibs PA -Nacre)
■ P:Os (Ibs PA-P.O, acre)
a r S Y 12
6-2.1

■ K20 (lbs PA-K:O/acre)
a Zn Obs PA-Zn/acre).,
• Cu Obs PA-Cu/acm) �—._—
{ 9. Application Rate four [Primary Nutrient
■ Primary nutrienti
■ Amount of primary nutrient needed (from item 6) Obs/acre)
R Amount of by-product or manure needed to meet primary nutrient needs
(Divide value above by item 8.)-4:2&
10. Pounds per Acre of All Nutrients Supplied by Amount of Manure or By -Product Applied at
the above rate. (For each nutrient, multiply the plant -available nutrients calculated in item 8 or from the
NCDA report by the application rate.)
• N Obs PA-N/acre)
r g
■ P,Qs Obs PA-P20s acre)
- ■ K10 (lbs PA-K2O/acre)
"b��^ ...
e Zn Obs PA-Zntacm)
�.�.._
E Cu (Ibs PA-Cu/acre)
11. Does the by-product or manure have a calcium
carbonate equivalent (CaCo, eq.)?
© yes 0—no
If yes. what is it,
12. Does the soil test call for time?
0 yes - t no
If yes. how much per
13. When the material is applied at the rate required by the primary nutrient (item 9), will there
be enough liming to change the use or application rate?
0 yes l? no (continue with nutrient balancing)
If yes, recalculate the loading rate based on time requirement.,
(CaCo, eq.) X (application rate from item 9) = amount of lime per acm—
14. Nutrient Balance = net nutrient need (+) or excess (-) after application of by-product or
manure at calculated rate. (Subtract the nutrient needs of the crop given in item 6 from the nutrient
rate applied, which is given in item I0.)
■ N balance (Ibs PA-N/acre)
■ P205 balance (lbs PA-P,Os/acre)
• K=O balance (Ibs PA-Kz0/acre)
• Zn balance (Ibs PA-Zn/acre)
• Cu balance (lbs PA-Cu/acre)
ca,4 . 5 ..
l8�-ram �
q.68
21,02
cam. �- 1t_:t.c� � �- E,�,�'�,,..,,,�,�.��,�-- vt �S�...J-•::
. 6-Z2
LA

Relative Nitrogen Fertilization Rate
of Forage Species by Month (Piedmont & Coastal Plain)'
Crop
Jerwsry
r*bnrery
March
Apt!
Msy
. June
July
August
September
October
November
December
!!stature
% N
Tal Fescue
N
"I
H
HI
Lit
L
M
M
L
N
100
Ordrardgrass
N
H
H
H
M
L
L
M
M
M
N
L
100
Kentucky' bluegrass
N
H
H
H
M
I.
L
M
M
M
N
N
65
Rescuegrass
N
H
H
H
M
M
L
L
L
M
M
L
as
Hybrid Bermudagrass
N
N
L
M
H
H
H
M
M
L
N
N
100
SvAlchgrass
N
L
M
H
H
H
H
M
L
L
N
N
70
Flackigrass
N
L
M
H
H
H
H
M
L
L
L
N
as
Qamagrass
N
N
M
H
H
H
H
M
L
L
N
N
;. 100
Caucasian Gluestem
N I
N
L
M
H
H
H
H
M
L
N
N.,
70
" Bahiagrass
N
N
L
M
H
H
H
M
L
L
N
N.;
_ _70 ::
Y� Peril Mitt
N
"R N
N
N
H
H
H
M
M
L
N
N.
ti B5
Sorghum/ridan Hybrid
N
N
N
N
H
H
H
M
M
L
N
H,.
s f00 _-
Crabgrass
N
N
N
N
M
H
H
H
M
L
N
N,
; „70
Italian Ryegress
L M
H
H
M N
N
N
L
L L
L:
100,
Small Grain
IvAnter ryes
L
M
H
H
L
N
N
N
L
M
M
L
too _
i
' N = Do not apply nitrogen, L = low rate : M = medium rate, H = high rate.
Apprnximale rates for bermudagmss arc L`<i5 1bs/ac, M 25 ibs/ac and H SQ+ ibs/ac. ,
2 Not adapted except in piedmont and mountains.
Not adapted in most of piedmont or mountains.
4 While some forage growth may still continue, ratilization at this time may weaken the plants ability to overwinter.
' Between May 15 and August 7 (piedmont) September 1 (coastal plain) no more pion a total of SQ Ibs PA-N/ac should be applied.
9
9

.—If
Relative Growth Rate
of Forage Species by Month (Piedmont & Coastal Plain)'
Crop
January
February
March
April
May'
June
Juty
August
September
October
November
December
Relattre
Crorrth
Tat Fescue
L
L
M
H
H
L
L
M
M
M
L
L
100
Orchardgrass
L
L
M
H
H
L
L
M
M
M
N
L
100
Kentuck bluegrass
N
t
M
H
H
L
L
M
M
M
H
N
65
_ Rescuegrass
L
L
M
H
H
M
L
L
L
M
M
t.
65
Hytxtd Bermudagrass
N
N
N
L
M
H
H
M
M
L
N
N
100
SvAichgrass
N
N
L
M
H
H
H
M
L
L
N
N
TO
Flecldgrass
N
N
L
M
H
H
H
M
L
L
L
ti,N
65
Gamagrass
N
N
N
M
H
H
H
M
L
L
N
; N
_ 100
Caucasian tthiestem
N
N
N
L
M
H
H
H
M
L
N
,.N .�
70
Bahtagrass
N
N
N
L
M
H
H
M
L
L
N
N
__ 70 -.
Peart Meet --
N ----
--- N ----
- N ----
N -
NI
H
H
M
M
LN
N
85
Sar{ n-dsudan Hybrid
N
N
N
N
M
H
H
M
M
L
N
N
too
Qdbgrass
N
N
N
N
L
H
H
H
M
L
N
N
70
Italan Ryegrass
L
L
M
H
M
N
N
N
L L L
L
100
Smal Grain
(w1aw rye)
L
L
H
H
L
N
N
N
L
M
M
L
100
' For species adapted to the mountains, the growth rate is generally delayed 2 to 4 weeks in the spring and stops 2 to 4 weeks earlier in the [all.
2 L = low growth rate; M = medium growth rate; H = high growth rate -"
11 Not adapted except in piedmont and mountains.
Not adapted In most of piedmont or mountains.
Relative to other species in the same section in the table.
9

■ K20 Obs PA-K:O/acre)
ttt Zn (lbs PA-Zn/acre)
.=.. ]b P C
9. Application Rate for PNmery Nutrlent
a Primary nutrien '�'�� N
0 Amount of primary nutrient nee (from item 6) U (lbs/acne)
■ Amount of by-product or manure needed to meet primary nutrient needs r 0 a
(Divide value above by item 8.)
10. Pounds per Acre of All Nutrients Supplied by Amount of Manure or By -Product Applied at
the above rate. (For each nutrient. multiply the plant -available nutrients calculated in item 8 or from.
NCDA report by the application rate.) Sy,rt�OA LL4J a���
■ M N (ibs. PA-N/ae) --
e , P=Os (lbs PA-P Oslacre)
e K;O (lbs PA•K=O/acre)
■ Zn pbs PA-Zn/acm)
e Cu (lbs PA-Cu/wm)
y 3
•`7 .�' t .�,�-fir �
I'S� • tJ 3O9
4- 7
r`....
11. Does the by-product or manure have a calcium carbonate equivalent (CaCo, eq.)?
❑ yes P"', no
If yes, what is it?
12. Does the soil test call for lime?
des ❑ no If yes, how much per a ' .
13. When the material is applied at the rate required by the primary nutrient (item 9), will there
be enough liming to change the use or application rate?
0 yes C3' no (continue with nutrient balancing)
If yes, recalculate the loading rate based on lime requirement:
(CaCo, eq.) X (application rate from item 9) = amount of lime per ac=
1a. Nutrient Balance = net nutrient need (+) or excess (-) after application of by-product or
manure at calculated rate. (Subtract the nutrient
needs of the crop given in item 6 from the nutrient
rate applied, which is given in item 10.)
■ N balance (lbs PA-N/acre)
a PzOs balance (lbs PA-P=O�acre)
b=�
■ K.O balance (lbs PA-K�O/acre)
`I
■ Zn balance (Ibs PA-Zn/acre)
■ Cu balance (lbs PA-Cu/acre)___.Z.,_..
06 G-n eCL V
6.2.2

Blosolid & Manure Application Rate -Worksheet_-
■ Calculate Nutrient Needs (For Feld # 1: # of Acres + Z
1. Crop to be grown
2. Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE)er acre
(from yield histories or RYE tables)
3. Total PA -Nutrients Required per acre
per field
■ N'required (lbs PA-N/acrc} " 20
■ P20, required (lbs PA-P20s/acre)
e K20 requited (lbs PA-K2O/acre)
■ Znrvrequired pbs PA-Zn/acre)
■ Cu required (lbs PA-Culacre)
4. Residual N Credit
(Use in rotations following legumes, dairy manure. municipal & industrial biosoiids).
S. Starter or Preplant Nutrients Applied
■ N (ibs PA-N/acre)
■ P20s (lbs PA-P,.O,/acre)
.._
e, K20 abs PA-K�O/acre)
1Z�
■ Zn Obs PA-Zn/acre)
■ Cu (Ibs PA-Cu/acre)
B. Net Nutrient Needs of Crop (lbs/acre)
■ N =Z— - - — --� N (Ibs PA-N/acre)
OW N i�a ] ewiAor N asd's ism 4 enrea N lam 3
■ P205 = f PzOr (lbs PA-P205/acre)
oar firm am ] .m. ae.n ithn ]
■ K20 = — K20 (Ibs PA-KP/acre)
a Zn = _ Zn (lbs PA-Zn/scre)
■ Cu — _ Cu (lbs PA-Cu/acre)
■ Calculate Nutrient Rate to Apply
7. Nutrient Totals from Hy -Products or Manures
(From waste analysis tables . If analysis report already gives available nutrients. skip to item 9.)
■ Total N (lbs/unit) d$ I b ll�
■ Total P20] (lbs/unit) 6
■ Total K2O (lbs/unit)
■ Total Zn Obs/unh) %�
■ Total Cu (lbs/unit)
S. Amount of Nutrient Available to Crop (based on application method. Multiply value in item 7 times
availability coefficient from relevant fact sheet in "Resources" section.)
■ N (ibs PA-N/acre)
■ P205 (Ibs PA-P205/acre)
&2.1

mm

Farm Owner:
Liquid Manure Slurry Field Records
Spreader Operator
Field
No.
Date Manure
Applied
Fleld
Acres
Crop
Application
Method*
loads (Gals)
Manure
loads (Gals)
Per Acre
o - soil Incorporated (disked) ; be - broadcast (surface applied)
JCB/BAE/NC5U/7-92;

gallons/acre = gallons/load x loads/Meld field acres
manure nutrients applied, lbs/ac = manure nutrient analysis, lbs/1000 gallons + 1000 x gallons/acre
x 83.5 = lbs/1000 gallons
ppm x .00835' = lbs/1000 gallons
Ibs/1000 gallons x 27.154 = lbs/acre-inch
M

Orchardgraw so
IN
20
-all
qw
a
IPPIPm
Jan Fab Mar
Figure 1 (continued)
Relative growthlates for
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sap Oct Nov Dec
forage crops (lbs/acre/day)
74.2

Whole -Farm Nutrient Management Plan Summary
Producer's name:
ddress: 2 Telephone:
ASCS Tract:T-
'Vqjj.0 , E S tip f
Farm location: Qnv_-� . �,'_, r, €�N • .f. Sw�n� a,r-.�, lac�lc,d ldI. ��
.*D o� .- 1 ro Z.7 = i Z r vt- �Pl�t-�1 �ca.,�cf.
E 15
Type of operation: SWIne- Fn,,-v-o+,.>+o 1=•, ni s�
Assessment of Plan for Entire Farm
circle one
■
Is the farm in a critical watershed area?
yes
o
■
Have water quality problems been identified in the watershed?
yes
If yes, what are they?
Does the plan consider these problems?
yes
`� o
■
Are any erosion problems apparent on the farm?
yes
no
If yes, have the eroded areas been considered usable acres?
yes
no
For what priority nutrient is the whole -farm plan being written?
N_/ P20, Other
Varies with field
■
Will nutrient sources other than commercial fertilizer be used on the farm?
yes
no
If no, skip to last item and signature section.
■
Is enough land available on farm to use all of the primary nutrient that is
produced?
Pes
no
If no, have alternate plans been included for the excess nutrients?
no
■
Is daily spreading of nutrients necessary?
no
■
Is land available for daily spreading?
yes
no
■
Have plans been made to track the potential buildup of nutrients other than
the priority nutrient?
es
no
■
Does this site/farm need additional storage facilities for best use of the
nutrients, both agronomically and environmentally?
yes
no
If yes, is the submitting party making plans for necessary storage?
yes
(h../
■ Based on the facts and representation of the submitting party, will this plan
comply with technical requirements for proper nutrient management? yes no
Submitted by: Date: _ 4.2 —,Gz-- 9G
eperation assistance by:
Iapenq
N.C. Cooperative Extension Service
1.2

Field Data Sheet
Field 10 � ` J��_
Total Crop Acres %
Acres Useable for
Soil Series
Blosolld Appticstion �.
Environmental Hazards or Concerns
Is field classed as HEL?
Application Equipment 2
0 sinkholes
e' No5 t
0-broadcast
❑ surface water
13 Yes
❑ Ba xW Applications
0
Field leaching potential — o Low
ci High 0 Starter Fertilizer Rig
0 Muture Spreader
Nutrient Sources
Irrigation Equipment
❑ Injection
❑ Commercial Fertilizer'
trNone
0 Fettigation
,1221` Animal Manures
❑ Traveller
17 Sewage Sludge
❑ Portable
Tillage System
❑ Septage
❑ Center Pivot
0 Caeventional
0 Other By -Product
0 Solid Set
E3 Reduced Till
❑ Lateral Move
❑ No -Till
Crops
Previous Crop s
r
Predicted Crop Rotation Sequence
(if double-cro , list spring op first) r Realistic Yields) Expected
Year (1) i-e!q F 5 ►C ray LT
Year (2)
Year (3) I
Soil Test Results:
N Residue Credit
Plant Available N Required from Previous Crop
Date of Soil Sampling 11--17 q V Soil Class: -11 Mineral 0 Mineral/Organic 0 QrWic
PH�/ • I CEC �� P-1 Q K-i _(on Ca% z9_LZ Mg% 7 Mn-I �1.5`'� Zn•I l'L7q Cu-1 •S6
Nutrient Recommendations:
Dime: Q --- N: See AbovC . P205: a jgft2o: !� O- 5a Mg: , D S: Q` MIL Zj : 0 _ Ge 4
'if using only commercial fertilizer. go to section 6.
A
N

Calculating Amount of Swine Farrow' to -Finish Lagoon Liquid
The amount of liquid to be irrigated from swine farrow -to -finish production farm lagoons
can be estimated by the fallowing method. The amount is dependent an the amount of
fresh water used, lagoon surface area and sealing, and local climate.
a. Number of productive saws:
b. Days per year animals in production facility:
c. Average pounds live weight equivalent per sow:
d. Total pounds animal live weight (a x c) :
e. Lagoon liquid surplus :
manure and urine:
excess fresh water :
lagoon surface rain surplus :
total :
f. Total farm lagoon liquid surplus :
no. sows (a) x gals/saw/year (e)
g. Divide gallons by 27154 to get acre -inches:
gals/yr (f) f 27154
-To,n k soov* 6_ =5 14044- 1
"GLul.eI /"t°`h
TYPICAL ACl'UAL
1000 z/D
365 3657
1417 '1W'7
1417J000 217S 70
-------- gals/sow/year--------
5180
3460
1860
10500 103,00
----------- gals/year -----------
10500,000
------acre inches/year------
386
735 1 oaf s
3-12

11/07/94
u
I MLO v Iwn r Or_a. 1 w1 V
REPORT NO: Ydd2Ei2
COUNTY: ANSON
r1aMioDg°ftr"ertofPqxtAve Agronomic Division
SAMPLE INFORMATION
LAB TORY.-RESULTS
SAMPLE
10
DESCRIPTION
WASTE
CODE
DM - %
N - %
P - %
K - % -
. Ca - 91i
.Mg.• %,
_ S - .96
FsPPM
Mn-PPM
Cn•PPM,,
Mo-PPM
,-me- %.
:-CL 76,:
_N7-PPhI`
:Cd-PPM
"QIp
Wine, Liquid
53
Q`00
1p
Q.Ol
44
I
Q
Q.
fippl
'NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP I. ibs/a
OTHER ELEMENTS
A �� TION ,"
NITROGEN
P205
K,O
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Mo
No
CI
Ni
Cd
Pb
OD
IRRIGATII}P:..
2.8Q
1.43
7.51
O . fi3
Q . QQ
Q .63
p . Q3
w• 00
Q .0
4r 00
, p0
0.00
1.88
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP
OTHER ELEMENTS
APPLICATION"' °",.
NITROGEN
P20Y
K=O
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR
Fs
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Mo
Na
G
NI
Cd
Pb
METHOD
SAMPLE INFORMATION
= :' -_, LABORATORY RESULTS r *�
SAMPLE
DESCRIPTION
WASTE
OM - %
N - %
P - %
Ca-%
Mp - %
S % 'Fa-PPM
Mn-PP11A,
' Zn-PPM
CwPPM
a-PPM
Mo-PPM
No %
CI-%
NI-I'PM
PPCd•M
Pb-PPM,
ID
CODE,.
1.�K-%
�'
!
t
GOR.ve
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP
OTHER ELEMENTS
APPLICATION
NITROGEN
P20S
K,O
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Mo
No
CI
Ni
Cd
Pb
METHOD
I
I
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP
OTHER ELEMENTS
APPLICATION
NITROGEN
PZOS
K,O
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
H
Mo
Na
G
Ni
Cd
Pb
METHOD
t
SAMPLE INFORMATION
:r LABORATORY RESULTS
SAMPLE
DESCRIPTION
WASTE
DM - %
N - %
P - %
K - % .
Ca - %
Mg - %
S - %
Fw-PPM
ZMPPM
Cu•PPM
87PPM
Mo-PPM
No - %
CI -.%
NFPPM
Cd-PPAA
P�PPM
,
ID
CODE
IF
,fir
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP +
OTHER ELEMENTS
APPLICATION NITROGEN
P201
K,O
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
$
Mo
pia
CI
NI
Cd
Pb
METHOD
I
NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE FOR FIRST CROP
OTHER ELEMENTS
APPLICATION
NITROGEN
P=Os
K20
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
SULFUR
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Mo
Ns__17
Ni
Cd
Pb
METHOD -z;a .},
GUMMUIV 1 b-
ELVMENTALCONCa"RATTONs Nutrients available for the first crop are based
Solids- Dry Weight Bsais":t: PwcwwOm Matter (SoEds1 n estimates of mineralization rates and projected
Liquids - Vokmw Basis : r ,= - :.;: r- . - r * '':,:°. __ : .
N-%Nitrogen :Capps► !mn N&rftf itAVARABILITY loss for the application method listed.
P_QL pMw+��.ww.w �Aw.n.ww 1A.wwM •.. � _ —-..���ww..+.wwwe 1.� A.ww....r.....� ... I"� _ ...+ n ... L'v... L ...., .. — C w .w _ w .n A w 6 F. .w .. /. w 7 .. — — — --I-

-1 . - --- -
UAIDESBORC--- NC 28170--
FARM LOCATION (COUNTY):
FIELD INFORMATION:;
OESTRESULTS jw,`-Q;428,61
sAmPLE
AM tFn LIME . I
FM. LAST
SOIL
I -M? -
BS-%
At
-,H
.
C77j11­­
!�4 Zr#4
CU4
S4
SS4
"03H
NH.N
Na
No.
1PREvKmIsCR0P
•
CLASS
crs- w
ii muni-ra
is-, & -
0
154
'f"
TA .
MCFOWP
P205
—04
FIEUGGiTIM *1
--
14
i
1-44
on]
OITA&
RG::tll C
:N3
&1
--a- .'a-'
_4§4 11A
-6A
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP'
OR YEAR -- •-
'SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR "
CROP TO BE
LIME
P'O.
Mo
SEE
cROPTO BE GROWN:.
WE
w
P205
X20
No
SEE
'CU
NOTE
NOTE
.0
r
11291-24
-Z3
FESJOGJT 8 0
13*0
20a-200-1220-246a
020—%o
a
12
FE3494J 10
—269
A]
43
in
"'-FIELD INOORMATION
, Aj.i dll� �4
.JEST RESULTS5.
SAMPLE
No.
PREVVM CRoP
APPLIED LIKE REff. LAW CFIOP
+O-E
0
AC
�W. .
TL
ft%
r4 ZM
zsa
su., �
-
1`01411Na
Yr.
UA P20S
K 20-
!C
tjoms ar!
I
3ire�-Ic
�G nVE
;�11*3
2r�,�t
L"o SM4
ti 12 Ig
I I,.
-qejla :Iz
—79
a
zw-
48,::-,
10
got
027
3FIC
..3mmlni
SUGGESTED -TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP. OR YEAR
-SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR)
CROP TO BE CROWN
Law
K
�203
K.0
US
Cu
Mn
SEE
NOTE
CROP TO BE GROWN
LYE
P20S
KjO
go
Cu
zn
0
UP
SEE
NOTE
FESIOG dff 114 14
O. 51
100-20111 -
age —120
a
142
FES41061TIP F
MW
24OC-2010
0991—ILIC
a
io
10_
a
:Q
12
FIELD ik06AmATlbk
SAMPLE
PREVICICIS CAW
APPLIMWD
FVAT, LAST I
SOIL
.
!!CLAW
IM11% WN
W%
AC
PH
P4
K4
Co.%
&W
C04
54
S94
NOON
NHIN
... Na
CX, G::;
1
IS !Gcl!!�111
'K,7,�O
:W
- -
t 15 13
(052 1
T-H
_7R T2a
0
012
FESIGGAMM
..
'.1 _IR L
1.2
- - 5: :'
A 4 4'
-
233
. I %. .
m*
6
a
22
asl
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP OR YEAR
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR)
CROP To BE GROWN
Low N
Paoll,
V'O
Mg
Cu
Zn
-I...-Mn
SEE
CROP TO BE GROWN
LINE
K
PZO3
KZO
wil
CIA
zn
B
un
120'0-1210
NOTE
F FE S J Or. J7 IM ' 0
OvS1140-200
0
43
0
4:
40
2
FESJCGJTIP P
'ANG
1139-200-100-220
C
cr
-13
FIELD INFORMATION
_'Y-?1TEST RESULTS-':
SAMPLE
PREVIOLIS CROP
APPLIED LOW
FERT. T CROP
SOIL
Hh"
WN
CEC
BS.%
Ac
PH
IN
K4
k*%
Mf"
Zn4
Cw4
.1
_SS4,�'
NO.
L-�4-,
MM M
ISiO4417'.':-'
S
VIA
PO,
C;, 314 L
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROPOR YEAR
.SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR)
CROP TO BE GROWN
LM
P203
X20
M9
ICU
ZA-1
_]_mwl
see
CROPTO BE GROWN
UWE
P20,
Kjo
hgg�
Cu
PA.
.0
am
SEE
NOTE
NOTE
7.,
FIELD INFORMATION
- , - .. - - ;L .. -
:." - ' _ _"' T ..
��EST RESULTS -±- � " -
SAMPLE
PREVIOW CROP
APPLIED LIME
FEW. LAW CROP
S=
a t7l�
CEC
a"
AC
PH
-j P4
Mw% �;
M.4
zn4
Qb4
34
1*4
1" ,,[,,7NH
iw--
CLASS
'-T;!M
.31*
r
r4 al
I
71A.
n 7,
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR FIRST CROP
OR YEAR)
SUGGESTED TREATMENT FOR SECOND CROP OR YEAR)
CROP TO BE GROYM
LIME
Pao,
r'20
Mo
Cu
zn
S
Mn
So-
CROP TO BE ORO"
L�m N
K20
M9
Cu z1v
0
Mn
SEE
NOTE
NOTE
7
TEST RESULTS (N.C. Wets will not compare dirft-ft to numbers obtairi" by ot[her methods.) TREATMENT, lbs/a unless specified
swc3aft. MIN = Mineral BS­% Bus SaUnzdan. % of CEC 1*% = Magan*im. % at GEC NOON a MIUMN N. MORW LikiE. T = IOrmflU UXL/IWD sq. tL V'O a patodu M - MaJ1000 sc� N.7A zinc
.

OVERVIEW OF NUTRIENT MGT. PLAN
ROBERT WATKINS
Mr. Watkins operates a Swine Farm in the Peachland Area of Anson
County. He purchased the farm out of foreclosure from FmHA and the
farm is land locked so he does not have the option of sray irrigating
the waste from the lagoon. His only option is to haul the waste and
spray on his farm that is 15 miles away and or sale to nearby neighbors
to fertlize pastures. Soil test on his own farm and analysis of the
lagoon waste indicates that he has more than enough pasture to handle
all the waste that the farm will produce if he can not sell it to
nearby farmers. Mr. Watkins will need to keep at least two feet of
freeboard on the lagoon and indicates he will be using an agiator to
stir up the bottom of the lagoon that will in turn make it easier when
he sells or closes down the operation in several years.
He has recently hauled two hundred loads out of the lagoon with
an independent contractor and hauls several loads a day when the land
is dry enough to get over. It is important that Mr. Watkins mointors
the lagoons constantly and keeps up with the hauling especially when
pastures can use the waste, more so in the fall and spring when the
fescue grass is growing. Several farmers want to apply to no -till
small grain which will good to apply it in January and February instead
of topdressing with nitrogen or fertilizer. Mr. Watkins will need to
take Solution Samples twice a year to make sure there are not major
changes in the analysis and a need to change the land rates.