STONEYBROOK FARM_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
2

qF--",
State of North Carolina
Health and Natural rResources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May 17, 1995
Mr. Jimmy Vinson, Manager
Environmental Resources
Brown's of Carolina
105 East College Street
PO Box 487
Warsaw, NC 28398-0487
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Stoneybrook Farms (Bruce Huggins)
Robeson County
Dear Jimmye
On May 10, 1995, an inspection of your animal operation was performed by
the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a copy of our
Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion,of this
office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H, Part .0217, and
that Animal Waste Management is being properly planned during the consr-ruction
phase of this facility.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
^'"
isoon
Grady
Environmental Engineer
GD/mla
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovia Building, Sulte 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH A NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
Farms/Bruce Hu
PO Box 487, Warsaw, NC 28398
10, 1995
910) 293-3600
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
SECTION_ I
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
(-)
1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed
the (.0217) criteria? (Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system))
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4. Does this facility have a CERTIFIED ANIMAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN?
5. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
0
Mn
11M
OEM
mom
mum
BOO
61

r
r
SECTION III
rield Site Ka
1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have,a
cover crop in accordance with the
.qERTI ICATION PLAN?
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
6. Does the animal waste management at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
($MP) of the approved CERTIFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately )
B. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
SECTION IV
ee
9 "", I I ".
!IN
am=
No=
No=
IN=
EMERE
go=
On the date of this inspection, this facility was under construction. The
lagoon was being graded and some houses were being built. Waste management
for this facility will be followed in accordance to the certified plan once
approved by the technical specialist. This facility does = have a certified
waste management plan, however, one will be approved prior to stocking
animals.