BIOUS W. WILLIAMSON_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231

CORRESPONDENCE
2 1
� �"M � � ���

State of North Carolina
Department of Envlronment, 9F
Health and Natural Resources anodmik
Fayetteville Regional Office )A
James B, Hunt, Jr„ Governor p E H N F�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 6, 1994
Mr. Hious Wingate Williamson
402 Emwistle Road
Hamlet, NC 28345
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Confined Animal Feedlot Operation
(CAFO)
Hamlet, North Carolina
Richmond County
Dear Mr. Williamson:
On July 12, 1994, an, inspection of your confined animal operation was
performed by the Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). Please find enclosed a
copy of our Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the
opinion of this office that this facility is in compliance with 15A NCAC 2H,
Part .0217, and that Animal Waste Management is being properly performed.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Grady obson
Environmental Engineer
GD/tf
Enclosure
cc: Facility Compliance Group
Wachovla Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Atrlrmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r

w
i'
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MWIRONPUM, HEALTH & NATURAL RESOMMS
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Fayetteville Regional Office
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form
Farm Name/Owner Inspection Date Fars No.
SR 1615
_pious Wingate Williamson 12/94 _Old Gibson Rd
Mailing Address
402 Emwistle Road
Hamlet, NC 28345
All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in
the Comments,Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate
corrections:
SECTION I
Confined Animal Operation TvQe:
Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep
SECTION II
1. Does the number and type of animal meet
the CAFO (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head),
horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and
poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste
system)]
2. Does this facility meet criteria for
Animal Operation REGISTRATION?
3. Are animals confined fed or maintained
in this facility for a 12-month period?
4.• Does this facility have a (=TIFIED_ Ai�I!!AL
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN?
S. Does this facility maintain waste management
records (Volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with
specific cover crop)?
Y M Comments
x
x
x

r

.;
i,
Administration and Proaram Management
6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum
setback criteria for neighboring houses,
wells, etc?
ECTION III
Zield gjtj.N@aAg2ment
1. is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon
construction within 100 ft. of a USGS
Map Blue Line Stream?
2. Is animal waste land applied or spray
irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map
Blue Line Stream?
3. Does this facility have adequate acreage
on which to apply the waste?
4. Does the land application site have a
cover crop in accordance with the
CERTIFICATION„ PLAN?
5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of
the state by man-made ditch, flushing system,
or other similar man-made devices?
6. Does the animal waste management.at this
farm adhere to Best Management Practices
(BMP) of the approved CERTIFICATION?
7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient
freeboard? How much? (Approximately )
8. Is the general condition of this CAFO facility,
including management and operation,
satisfactory?
X N
11 Comments
— � —
x
Jc_ — —
—
KLA
_AL — _._.-
SECTION IV
Comments
The main complaint regarding this facility is flies. The Perdue Poultry
representatives are working with Mr. Williamson to provide fly control.