The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About090007_CORRESPONDENCE_20171231wwp-,., 11 w 14ROW 5 F xvg p ❑b DSWC,Afifi al Feedlot Operation Reviews ' ' "'��£ '"� � ,{� a b`.#'m AnImaFeedlot OPeration'SWIMspectlon zx ��s i �. v&Es w,f S.,. `�` D _,",.k ,✓ 8 �`i".:.ra t• x x `. :-..�xw adex.s :? .......... W ttoutine p Complaint O Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review O Other Facility Number Q Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit ® Certified ❑ Permitted Date of Inspection [7 =,Z Time of Inspection t UD 24 hr. (hh:mm) Total Time (in fraction of hours (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review it Inspection (includes travel and nrocessinnl ❑ yNoo�t Operational Date Last Operated: ....... .......................... . ..... . ........ ........ ............................... . .................. ............... ................ FarmName•L ... �^.:Q.r................................... County:........... ................................................ Land Owner Name: ....,[�r/^.��....L�� 4—'�.�.............................................. Phone No: ....... 9/0�....�1�.2..... (�/4................... Facility Conctact:............1.7..,1./.�.......Y.'9.1 /e........................ Title:................ ......... Phone No: .................. Mailing Address:....... r :..0' .... ... !2 ` .. I....... ✓ Cl�?. wN .... G�........2 93,3% ....................... OnsiteRepresentative: .........^G-!11..... !Nr................................................. Integrator:....S.. L.p l.�X_1'sr .. . Certified Operator: ..........4,C.�� ......................................................... Operator Certification Number: . ........................................ Location of Farm: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I................ 4 ....................................... ............. .,........... ............................................................................................................................................ a Latitude �� 4 �« Longitude 0 6 46 .L,epgrai 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Wateel (If yes, notify DWQ) e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ Yes #No ❑ Yes �No ❑ Yes kNo ❑ Yes o ❑ Yes ll1kNo ❑ Yes ONO ❑ Yes � No Continued on back Facility Number: 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ONo 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes )No 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes kNo 5tructure.5 (l.agoons and/or Iioldine Ponds) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes kNO Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 i�♦ 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes , o 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes kNO 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ANo (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes �'No / Ante kplication 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes WNo (If in excess of WMP, or runoff enteringwaters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type .......... 51:7(Pe..................................................................................................... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? XYes ❑ No _r_�-----. 17 Does the I'acil:.-. have _ lack . ,. ,,, I, IC..Q..I,IIy IIAVG � IA�.jC ul auCClua�e acreage for land application? ❑Yes No 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No 19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes O(No 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? i ❑ Yes P'No 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? For CertifiedFacilitles ❑ Yes ANO Only 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes qNo 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes P(No �.4 I7nl_c rP�nrrl kpeninn need : r7 • p' ng need alilpr o Y etnent I Yes U NO Comments (refer to`question #) Expggn YES answers and/or anyrecommendatrons or' any'oth(er cominenits ''x' Use drawings.of facility to,better explain situations: (use additional pages as"necessary} �6.ZCG'G�. is 6->✓..- y.e,�,yr.c,� l.r o�f� dVa �� .� �,�coc% f�ie� ,Ic��-.9-� ��.� • � a�.us��- E .�--� .rr� Vim.-'c�,•�� Reviewer/Inspector Name`x, ,. Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ 1% � ��Date: 7` zz --97 cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary I�IIUvelllbet 13 1776 Mac Campbell Mac -Ray Farms Inc. P.O. Box 2654 Elizabethtown NC 28337 SUBJECT; Operator In Charge Designation Facility: Mac -Ray Farms Inc. Facility ID#: 9-7 Bladen County Dear Mr. Campbell: �E EIV"' ED NOV 19 1996 FAYETTEVILLE F-7G. OFFICE Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly, requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be submitted by January 1, 1991 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 214 v22T and may result in the assessment of d civil penalty. If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office. Examinations have been offered on an on -going hasis in many mnntie8 throughout the state for the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026. Sincerely, A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. ., for Division of Water Quality Enclosure cc: Fayetteville Regional Office Water Quality Files KO. Box 27687, �T� = ``I, Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 ] 7687 1� f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Voice 919-715-4100 - 50% recycled/100% post -consumer paper Division of Environmental Management" Animal Feedlot -Operations Site Visitation Record Data: 101�3JL . Tune:_ . Generallnformadm Farm Name; v County; Owner Name: a c_ C bone No-�a -! o� On Site Representative: Mailing Address;-._ P. 4� Physical Addressll:.ocation:_ Sk 17 0 9 — Cr -'s Latitude:_.•`) ! Loa 'tude:_ / / Operation Description: (based on design ebamcterkda) 7jpe of Swine No. of Aalmgdt Type of Poultry No. of Animak Type of Castle No. of Animals O Sow O Layer O Dairy ONursery O Non -Layer O Beef Ia Feeder Othrr7Ype ofUvestock -11-V- - _ Number ofAnimals: _ R64 Number of Lagoons:. _,_(incluVe in the Dr wfogs and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon) FacIIIII Inspeetlon: Lagoon Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than lfoot + 25 year 24 hour. storm storage?: Is seepage observed from the. lagoon?: Is erosion observed?: Is any discharge observed? G flan-m ide 0 Not Man -merle Cover Crop nfllRi the fOI`itlfV Medl rr.n++ s--.-a&-- ♦or �1• ��i-la .. —ore ov�rw.bti. ■va ap3a�aiiUfi`:. Does the cover crop need improvement?: (Uo the gimps which rued LVnn rent) Crop Setback 0*eHa • Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application? Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? ,. .Is aniirW waste ISnd ann?Led of snrav irr+vated within 25 L—et of B1we 1 . c.,.......� �r--- r'—� ..p .........r...+:ie uucaaaaa A01— Januw717J99b Yes ❑ Now Yes O NOA Yes 0 No(FV Yes ❑ No$ v_ _ r % i cs 61 kloiar l�iD}� Yes 0 . NoAj Yes 0 -NoR. Yes 0 No Yes 0 No _. Mauttersa�te Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes 0 Not h there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes 0 No 0 Does record keeping need improvement? Yes 0 No O Did the f6cility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Managemeat Plan on ske? Yes 0 No ❑ rxpi-sin $ny Ycs aaswess• signatxuz: _ Date:.T �9�? e . Farttiry Asse&umw unit Use Mrarl n enu YNeedad Drawings or Observations; r • �'� �'� .j Gy.+ ,.r a- i.lti 4 .. i w+ti�••��.r. �.�`.•ir �n �w `11 FN�+•r, p{•w9�,'y�rw�rL�V+r•►� �� . • wr•a�r•�r. r�Hw .•r7 �••.•. •� �,•;� I �:� �:.K L. r••.+..+�rI�M. � �.. AOI — Januaq 17,1"6 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Fayetteville Regional Office Animal nnaratinn rmmnlianre Tncnartinn Fnrm Farm Name/Owner MAC -RAY FARMS, INC.. _Mr. Mac Campbell Mailing Address P.0 BOX 2654 ELIZABETHTOWN, NC 28337 r.1:f--k Inspection Date Farm No. 7/12/95 BOC#213 - PH. 910-862-4107 HOME 682-8827 _T3IAt-L-- � Co. All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in the Comments Section to enable the deemed Permittee to perform the appropriate corrections: SECTION I Confined Horses, cattle, swine, poultry, or sheep SECTION II 1. Does the number and type of animal meet the CAFO (.0217) criteria? (Cattle (100 head), horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste system)] 2. Does this facility meet criteria for Animal Operation REG15EMI0N? 3. Are animals confined fed or maintained in this facility for a 12-month period? 4. Does this facility have a CERJIFIED ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN? SWINE Y fl Comments _X_ _X_ _X_. 5. Does this facility maintain waste management records (Volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with specific cover crop)? _X_ Administration and Program Management Y Comments 6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum setback criteria for neighboring houses, wells, etc? _X-.._ SECTION Field _III Site Managgmgat Y N CoMmeots 1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon construction within 100 ft. of a USGS Map Blue Line Stream? _ _X_ A 7lC E5 an ld TI waste1ia-uJ applied i or spray irrigated within 25 ft. of a USGS Map Blue Line Stream? X 3. Does this facility have adequate acreage on which to apply the waste? _X_ 4. Does the land application site have a cover crop in accordance with the CERTIFICATION PLAN? _X_ 5. Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? X 6. Does the animal waste management at this farm adhere to Best Management Practices (BMP) of the approved CERTIFICATION? N/A 7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient freeboard? How much? (Approximately _16" } X_ A. Tc tha a+na-al rnnflitinn of thic rAFn farility_ gv including management and operation, satisfactory? _X_ I SECTION IY FREEBOARD IN THE LAGOON IS LESS THAN WHAT IS NORMALLY DESIRABLE. THE OPERATOR HAS BEEN PUMPING IN ORDER TO PREVENT OVERFLOW. DUE TO THE POORLY DRAINED/LOW PERMEABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOIL, OPERATOR SHOULD PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO ALI BUFFER REQUIREMENTS FROM FIELD DRAINAGE DITCHS. r x. MAC -RAY FARMS, INC. 8640 FINISfUNG (12-720) -ELIZABETHTOWN ,7 fl 1706 700 i 707 1704 3 1709 11 1700 1708 � L44 1708 1704 r r f Monroe.5 1714 ,` ry •4.0 1704 .f 1710 \ { J} 17-1 487 ry ftr�e2,� !� 1771• `� b 1720 17i8_ ,9 1716 �+►. 1,6 ,ry .a Blad 11RR 17l '� 1719 +,r i.it� 1714 S_ ork A `1.6 s _ _ 0 1713 1715 1717 LT,q Bluefield 1712 Lisbon 1712 •3 171z � 1708 1710 4 " _ 4— MhC-StRyIm NCC. Q \ f L7�1 3 Ste_ ►a 1760 N1 ladl¢ N j q n 174_1 11 1710 dfi' 1 , 65 5 6' 3 OIRDLTIQVS TO MAC -RAY FARMS 3M. ; F" ELIZABETHTO N TAKE STATE RACD # 1700 TChmrDS CIARKTON, APPRX. 2 MILES Error ELNEEETIffam JUST PAST' BAM►Mlq rRF X _ VFM Tyr M mn Mr■n*kw vnan a Vyna • DXVTAyON OF RL4Y 201RUNTAL M1WAGMSNT Wo"MWW 9, 1994 StJ&7=: Compliance Lnapection Comty Dear : On , , an inspection of ycr= animal opa raction was p=f'ormad Fayetteville Regional Office (FRO). plaame find ITthe enclosed a copy o our Compliance Inspection Report for your information. It is the opinion of this office that this facility is in csompliance with 15A NCAC tail, part .0717, and that Animal waste Management is being properly performed. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel frsq to aon-act me at (9101 7A0-1541 . sincerely. Lnclosura cc: facility imp i^rcY 3rct..r /�, LI MMTH CAROIIne DWAR7Mffir1'i' OF P1WMONN=, HEALTH & WATUPAL pMOUR=SS DMSION OF ffiW11iONMffiy'fAL MANAGMQW Fayetteville Regional Office Animal Operation Compliance Inspection Form +1h�'�.✓I.w..».,1•wJl w• �:.•�wA r � nw•.N..w.»..r...,...a.s.r �K: �, � ._� 21 M.� '� , .,..�. ,«.«. •,.,.,�w.,..wr�:�„ ol.M:iW ,. . �.: y�y�y� i�N� .. � �4V.� �JIN f.�iwMM��vlu �• .a • ., n. �. .,»W.�rw..:,,..�.w,.,,.,,�«� ,' � .....$ ...:'. ...:... .4iYi y �n.� «.. ..w.»»��J.F��4.µMY.q....An w.k+:ww%:Kwy'I!. r�"'.:.:J!:... All questions answered negatively will be discussed in sufficient detail in the Comments Section to enable the deemed iPermittee to perform the appropriate corrections: Horses, cattle �inpoultry, or sheep 1. Does the number and type of animal meet or exceed the (.0217) criteria? [Cattle (100 head), horses (75), swine (250), sheep (1,000), and poultry (30,000 birds with liquid waste system)) 2. Does this facility meet criteria for Animal Operation R13OISTRATXgM7 3. Are animals confined fed or maintained in this facility for a 12-month period? A- t7naa f-hi a ftar�� Zii�v haves si [`i!R•PTFTR[� EAISYET. 5. Does this facility maintain waste management records (Volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with spec_iig corer erofl)� 6. Does this facility meet the SCS minimum setback criteria for neighboring houses, wells, etc? Y I N I COIMMNT6 u✓ L✓ gvc z �3 -j Y..._r. _ - i. 1. Is animal waste stockpiled or lagoon construction within 100 ft. of a USGS Map Blue Line Stream? 2. Is animal waste land applied or spray 7.Tii.1S�p<pfi p/.4i,.ilili 2J ft• v� o Vv^.ele♦ vat Blue Line Stream? 3. Does this facility have adequate acreage on which to apply the waste? Does �ti,_ 1 and r p icati nn site- have a cover crop in accordance with the S. is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or 0161,er iMr ta.i .ter.•+ 6. Does the animal waste management at this farm adhere to Seat Management Practices (BMP) of the approved (MXYXCLLT- 13? 7. Does animal waste lagoon have sufficient ,f ll freeboard? How much? (Approximately f IL::' ) S. is the general condition of this CAPO facility, including management and operation, satisfactory? ,�/%� 5 Ae "A �,mments � � o of ,� (,,-5 ;�, /,/ �7,7 -7P dr 2. The BOARD, desiring to comply with the permit identified in paragrAph 3 � � p,' a r •'� � �'� i f . � - � jam; { .. . r' li'..j� �' '� r � • i � � � i � .�, ' .�?,- � � ,, 1 II f� j rqy.-