20190503 Ver 1_More Info Received_20190509

Homewood, Sue
From: Mark Reich <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 2:49 PM
To: Homewood, Sue
Cc: Phil Ross; Josh Johnson
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of
Incomplete Pre -Construction Notification)
Attachments: 1828_001.pdf, 10121 C Sealed Sheet 4 12-21-18.pdf
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Good Afternoon Sue,
I completely understand about doing too many things at the same time as I was doing the same on my end. I will work
up the area of the blue and include that in our chart on the first sheet.
I have attached a copy of the plan and profile drawing for the improvements under 1-40 and to the south to provide a
larger area of what is going on. You will note that all sewer alignment to the south is more than 50 -ft away from top of
bank south of 1-40. 1 have also attached a potential alignment for a perpendicular entry crossing. I would not
recommend revising the plan to provide a perpendicular entry crossing as shown for the following reasons:
1. 2 additional manholes would be required (total of 4) within a 106 -ft section of sewer line.
2. 2 90° bends would increase turbulence of the flow and increase the likelihood of an overflow.
3. Town has obtained easements (in processes of being recorded) from Hinton property and may be in
condemnation with Linville Family, LLC (not responding to offers from Town).
4. Total length of sewer alignment would be longer, increasing installation, maintenance and land acquisition costs.
I will revise the sheets we previously submitted to reflect the revisions comments below and forward to you upon
completion.
Let me know if you have any other suggestions for the south side.
Mark Reich
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 2:16 PM
To: Mark Reich <[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>; Josh Johnson <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
Hi Mark,
Sorry, I left the office early yesterday and had a site visit this morning.

It appears that I was trying to do too many things at once yesterday and completely missed that the areas you have as
existing use is fill for the pond. That makes complete sense now. So, you have it correct as is, the only impact that is
new would be the blue area.
So now we have to figure out what to do with the impacts on the eastern side of 140. It looks like these would be "other
than perpendicular crossings" impacts but since I only have a small snapshot image, is there anything I'm missing on this
side?
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Mark Reich <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 3:54 PM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>; Josh Johnson <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Sue,
The green area that I have shown is the fill slope of the pond. The contours shown represent a slope of 3:1, thus all this
area was originally filled. If the only area that I can count is the rip rap, then that's what I will count, but obviously the fill
slope of the dam impacted the buffer zone if the buffer zone existed at time pond was constructed. Let me know if I can
only count the area shown to be rip rap or the area of the fill slope is included (as shown).
Thanks, Mark
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2019 3:21 PM
To: Mark Reich <[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>; Josh Johnson <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)

Hi Mark,
I know how confusing this is, so bear with me please. I've attached your drawing with some notes. From manhole 9 to
mh 10, we'll call that a perpendicular impact and from mh 10 to mh 11 that would be a "other than perpendicular
crossing" impact.
See my notes for what should be existing versus what you need approval to impact. Or at least, what I think based on
not having seen the site.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Mark Reich <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 3:14 PM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Cc: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>; Josh Johnson <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Sue,
As a follow-up to your email to Phil regarding the Brookford project, I have attempted to update the map as to how I
interpret your comments for the project. Italicized text is your original comment.
1. You can deduct the area that's part of the detention pond outlet from your impact amounts in both Zone land
Zone 2. On the attached drawing, I have shown 2 areas in green. The area in green at MH 9 is the existing rip rap
area installed by NCDOT during construction of 1-40. This area can be deducted from the calculations. The
second green area includes the fill slope of the detention pond and the area of the rip rap channel outlet. Is this
a correct interpretation?
2. It's a perpendicular entry into the bufferso we treat it like a crossing. The blue area within zone 1 is considered a
perpendicular entry. Is this area considered an impacted area and will be part of the mitigation area or do we
need to list area as a perpendicular impact or allowable impact?
3. The existing use areas will be identified in the chart shown on sheet 1.

Please advise if my interpretations are correct and if so, I will update the chart on sheet 1. Josh is out of the office this
afternoon, or I would have asked him for his opinion prior to sending to you.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Mark D. Reich, PE
Main 336-226-5534 ext. 208
Mobile [phone]
740 Chapel Hill Road, Burlington, NC 27215
CK www.awck.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Phil Ross
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2019 1:40 PM
To: Mark Reich <[e-mail]>; Josh Johnson <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
Mark
Sue Homewood has started her review and has the following comments below
Please review and advise
Thanks
Phil
-----Original Message -----
From: Homewood, Sue [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2019 1:25 PM
To: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
Well, now that I've reviewed it, there are some questions, sorry:
Based on what I can tell, these impacts fall under "Non -electric utility lines, Impacts other than perpendicular
crossings". That means that impacts to Zone 1 will require mitigation. However, on Sheet 2, the western side of 140, you
can treat the tie in as a perpendicular crossing, even though it doesn't cross the stream, it's a perpendicular entry into
the buffer so we treat it like a crossing. Also, you can deduct the area that's part of the detention pond outlet from your
impact amounts in both Zone 1 and Zone 2. So if you can send me an updated Zone 2 that shows these areas using
different colors, and calls out the riprap area as an "existing use" then you'll need to get a mitigation acceptance letter
from DMS and send all that to me. Does that make sense?
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office

336 813 1863 mobile
[e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Homewood, Sue
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 8:59 AM
To: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
Ok. I'm going to move forward with reviewing and issuing the buffer impact application "as is". If the jd turns up
something you'll have to re -submit to include any impacts necessary under the NW12. We can talk about how to do
that IF it's necessary.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 8:57 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<maiIto: [e-mail]>
5

Thanks Sue, Yes we will move forward with the jd , even though we do not think there are any wetlands ( Josh thinks it
will be a good idea to have it done). I will call Bryan and give him an update. Mark thought we had one done, but the
project started in 2012 and ECS cannot find any wetland studies.
Thanks for your guidance!
Phil Ross
Stormwater Program Coordinator
Alley, Williams, Carmen, and King, Inc.
740 Chapel Hill Road
P.O. Box 1179
Burlington, N.C. 27216
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Homewood, Sue [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2019 8:26 AM
To: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
Thanks Phil. If there are any low/questionable areas then having a jd done for the line would be prudent, however if you
don't need coverage under a Nationwide permit from the USACE then you don't technically NEED a jd. You could
respond to Bryan that an error was made on the submittal form and that this application is solely for buffer impacts,
that there are no stream or wetland impacts along the project.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office
336 813 1863 mobile
Sue. [e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>

Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 4:58 PM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<maiIto: [e-mail]>
Hi Sue,
Mark Reich was trying to find out from ECS if a wetland study had ever been done on it, he thought it had, so the last I
heard they finally got back with him and it had not had one. He was going to get Pilot Environmental to do one. I do not
think it has been done yet.
Since this was my first permit submittal, not sure if it was right, but most of the pipeline is outside the buffer except
where it was required to go under the Highway in the existing encasement.
Any guidance you can give will be much appreciated!!!!
Thanks
Phil Ross
Stormwater Program Coordinator
Alley, Williams, Carmen, and King, Inc.
740 Chapel Hill Road
P.O. Box 1179
Burlington, N.C. 27216
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Homewood, Sue [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 3:36 PM
To: Phil Ross <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
Importance: High
Hey Phil,
I was getting ready to review the buffer application for this and I was wondering what (if anything) ever came of Bryan's
email below.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood
Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality
336 776 9693 office

336 813 1863 mobile
[e-mail]
450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston Salem NC 27105
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (US) <Bryan. K. Roden [e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 9:44 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] SAW-2019-00648_Brookford Road Sanitary Sewer Extension (Notice of Incomplete Pre -Construction
Notification)
Importance: High
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<maiIto: [e-mail]>
Mr. Reich,
On April 17, 2019, we received the Pre -Construction Notification you submitted on behalf of the Town of Kernersville on
a property located in Forsyth County, North Carolina. I have completed my initial review of the application and I have
determined that it is incomplete and deficient. The following information is necessary for the revised Pre -Construction
Notification (PCN):
a. The Corps does not regulate county/state stream buffer areas. The Corps regulates waters of the United States
(WoUS) pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Action and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. WoUS are
defined in 33 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 328. These waters include more than navigable WoUS and are the
waters where permits are required for the discharge of dredged or fill material pursuant to section 404 of the Clean
Water Act. Please be aware that any discharge of excavated or fill material in WoUS and/or any adjacent wetlands will
require Corps permit authorization. The type of Corps authorization required (i.e., general or individual permit) will be
determined by the location, type, and extent of jurisdictional area impacted by the proposed project and by the project
design and construction limits. Therefore, based on the information provided in PCN this proposed project would not
qualify for a standard permit and would be eligible to be permitted under a general permit (Nationwide Permit 12,
Utility Line Activities).
b. In Part C(5)(a) you stated "wetlands or streams have not been delineation on the property or proposed impact areas."
As specified in General Condition 32(b)(5) of Nationwide Permit 12, "The PCN must include a delineation of wetlands,
other special aquatic sites, and other waters, such as lakes and ponds, and perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral
streams, on the project sites." Therefore, a delineation of the proposed project area is a required piece of a complete
PCN. In addition to the delineation of the entire proposed project area, the associated delineation report (which may
include figures, maps, wetland datasheets, stream forms, etc.) must be submitted along with the revised PCN. Also,
during the review process of the revised PCN, the Corps may determine if a site visit is needed prior to issuing a
Nationwide Permit for the proposed project.

c. Part D(1) needs to be revised to include all impacts to streams and /or wetlands within the proposed project area.
PLEASE NOTE:
- If there is any confusion on the Section 404/401 permitting requirements, then please reach out to Sue Homewood
(with the State) and/or myself prior to submitting an incorrect application. These deficiencies discussed above could
have been addressed during a phone call or pre -application meeting prior to submitting the PCN to the Corps. In the
future, if you think a proposed project qualifies for a Standard Permit (WoUS impacts of greater than 0.5 acre of
wetlands or 300 linear feet of stream) then I would recommend scheduling a meeting with the Corps and the State
Water Quality Section to discuss purpose and need, avoidance and minimization and alternatives analysis for the
proposed project.
- A Department of Army determination does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other Federal,
state (401 Water Quality Certification), or local approvals/permits. The permittee should contact the appropriate state
agency to ensure a 401 Water Quality Certification is not required for the proposed project.
Please provide the information requested above in ONE consolidated response within 30 -days of the date of this
correspondence. If you do not respond within 30 -days, the request will be administratively canceled. Please contact me
via telephone or e-mail if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Bryan Roden -Reynolds, WPIT
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Office: [phone]
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcorpsmapu.usace.army.mil%2Fcm_apex%2Ff%3F
p%3D136%3A4%3A0&amp;data=02%7C01%7CPRoss%40awck.com%7Cc8234146bb494a9642bd08d6d3da297e%7Ce6ca
3f5a5a6c4af99c51e20cdf8ec7d b%7C1%7C0%7C636929331302153534&a m p;sdata=blkpSyd % 2BA7N U H4yCKW LfaxpH M
253 FV%2 F n kqj F r%2 BoG i t k%3 D &a m p rese rved=0
9

STA. 21+21.34 _
HEADWALL _
\ — l ZONE
now 0, BU FER 1
T SEWER EI SMT / TARY/ *441,
®� /ftft
�� / 24-f- 0
CO) - SEWER
�3+00 PROP. 8 SAN _�-% 25+00
�4"
SSMH NO. 12
POND STA. 23+95.89 LB /
/ CHIMNEY) DRAWDOWN STA. 23+84.35 L�
/ _ /
DRAIN - PIPE
BA
/ J /
/ / l
AME XVA, LLC
FENCE / _ _
D.B. 36885-72-6603
51 PG. 6182
SSMH NO. 10 / SSMH NO. 11 I i
/
STA. 2T+62f.-5-8 \ STA. 22+68.03
EXISTING DETENTION POND
LEGEND NEW IMPACTS FOR: SHEET NO.
alley, Williams, carmen 8v king, inc.
O ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS & SURVEYORS ` ` PERMANENT BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 BROOKFORD ROAD SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION 2
` EXISTING USE ZONE 1 IMPACTS FORSYTH COUNTY
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 KERNERSVILLE, N.C.
EXISTING USE ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 SCALE: 1" = 30' DATE: 5/8/19 1 DWG.BY WDF PROJEcrNo.: 10121C OF 2

C-11
SSMH NO. 7
STA. 17+49
ZONE 1 BUFFER
- ZON 2BUFFER t
SEWER17+0-2--
20' SANITARY / f
SEWER ESM'T I
SAMUEL R. I-IINTON, JR
~\ 17 -EMILY HINT`
PIN 6885-71-9805.00 _ I�
D.B. 2847 PG. 3038 I
P. B. 25 PG, 83-
\�...�
LINVILLE FAMILY LLC I
PIN 6885-82-0034.00
IMPACTS % D.B. 2204 PG. 4150
BUFFER ZONE 1 1,825 S.
BUFFER ZONE 2 3, 993 S. F.
TOTAL BUFFER AREA 5.818 S.F.
( (� ][F alley, williams, carmen 8s king, inc.
LEGEND
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &SURVEYORS
PERMANENT BUFFER ZONE 1
Fnn[7740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 PERMANENT BUFFER ZONE 2
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203
SSMH NO. 8
STA. 18+55
00
COD
/ o
NEW IMPACTS FOR: SHEET NO
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE
IMPACTS BROOKFORD ROAD SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
FORSYTH COUNTY
IMPACTS KERNERSVILLE, N.C.
SCALE 1' = 30' DATE 317119 DWG BY WDF PROJECT NO : 10121C OF 2

n
LL
0
0-
0 0
0
r)
0
a
v
v
M
0
N
N
3
0
C14
a
m
THIS PLAN DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, LINES, APPURTENANCES,
ETC., AND THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PIPES, VALVES, ETC. AS
SHOWN ARE IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY
THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT
�� I
LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, LINES, PIPES, ETC. BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, AND
AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYAND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM THE
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS/CLEARING LIMITS ARE DEFINED AS THE LINE \� \�
CLOSEST TO THE PROPOSED SEWER MAIN FROM BROOKFORD DRIVE / /
12' STONE FILTER LIMIT CLEARING LIMITS TO PERMANENT
CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVEANYANDALLUNDERGROUND
UTILITIES, PIPES AND VALVES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT OF
ANY CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED FACILITIES TO DETERMINE IF AN ITEM WILL
TO MANHOLE N0. 7. CONSTRUCTION LIMIT NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY I
WHERE ZONE 2 BUFFER LINE IS CLOSEST TO SEWER MAIN. IP
OUTLET WITH 12'X5' EASEMENT ACROSS LINVILLE FAMILY, LLC
SEDIMENT STORAGE PROPERTY
NEED TO BE RELOCATED.
EIP
\—
THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HAS MADE NO EXAMINATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER ANY HAZARDOUS OR
TOXIC MATERIALS ARE PRESENT OR CONTAINED IN, UNDER, OR ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR ITS
WATERS, OR IF ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC MATERIALS HAVE CONTAMINATED THIS OR OTHER DO NOT ENCROACH INTO ZONE 2
12' STONE FILTER / / '
I
BUFFER OUTLET WITH 12'X5' 1� —
`
6' SILT FENCE
/ '� OUTLET, TYPICAL
—
PROPERTIES OR ITS WATERS IN ANYWAY WHATSOEVER. NO SUB -SURFACE EXAMINATION OF ANY TYPE LIMITS BETWEEN STA. 4+00 AND SSMH NO. 71 SEDIMENT STORAGE // /
HAS BEEN MADE BY THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT, AND ACCORDINGLY, NO OPINION IS EXPRESSED OR /
PP SSMH NO. 8
STA. 18+55
INFERRED ON ALL SUCH MATTERS. FURTHER, NO OPINION IS RENDERED AS TO ANY VIOLATION OF
ANY ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS OR REGULATIONS, EITHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL RELATED TO THE
INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT IS IN NO WAY LIABLE FOR ANY
/ \ / -
SEE SHEET 5 FOR PLAN VIEW
/ / p�� TOWN TO OBTAIN ZONE 1 & ZONE 2
\ /! S
VIOLATION OF SUCH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS SHOULD SUCH EXIST.
/ /oe I — S —_
/ BUFFER ENCROACHMENT
FROM AND PROFILE NORTH OF 1-40
PROPOSED CLEARING � �— �
'� � — — !
LIMITS � i / / ��
�� / INV. -888.08 NCDWQ FOR
�J SSMH NO. 7
` �\
ENCROACHMENT FROM
TO SSMH NO. 11 PIN 6885-62-8880.00
000 B FFER� /
sN
\
\ \
LINVILLE FAMILY LLC
D.B. 2204 PG. 4150
SILT FENCE,
TYPICAL
�oNE �F F SEWERS 17+oo_
, Z / PROP, 12' ���
\ / / 0 N E�
��
-� _ I
so3,� °O L
3719. / \
� \
l///
SSMH N0. 9
STA. 21+21.34 SSMH NO. 10 EXISTING GRADES
TA. 2-1+-64.58 �/ ON SURVEY BY ALLEY
SHOWN BASED
WILLIAMS
6' SILT FENCE
OUTLET TYPICAL
6+00
/
FP ��r
/ / /\
\S
CARMEN & KING,
INC
ESTIMATED INVERT
OF PIPE AFTER °NE
P 125
�' /� / 15+00 SSMH
—STA
/ s�'o8•• J T �cp
N0.
l \
7+49 / \ l
i/
/
/ HX
REPAIR -882.00E
7
SSMH ND/6 /
/ O �1 1 i /\ /
�/ \ ,l \ \
\ a / 1 F�� T \\ 20� \
` l NG \ Opl /
76..E
ll -
/ —
/x_+35
PROPOSED CLEARING/l
LIMITS
j / // / ��
/ BARBED
WIRE
��� /
° 0
k00
//
ACCESS
_
FENCEQzl
P / � 00 /
- �i /
/
\ 30' TEMPORARY I / /
CONSTRUCTION l / l
\ /
��/
I
�/ '•� \ � \ \ � / / / / / / / / PIN 6885-71-9805.00 / /
/ � , // J I
��, 23
�\ ESM SSMH
\ \ O \ \ \\ / ER / 'T •
/
N0. 5 1 I r R"OPO D F OUSE✓ / SAMUEL, JR & EMILY HINTON
/ D.B. 2847 PG. 3038
l / /
0 EW ESM /—S-TA.�2+85— UCAT14N / PP
\ cr \\ 12+0 N. i C��oN j _ _ �/ P.B. 25 PG. 83 /
I I / LOT 11 0
EIP /I I , l r" /
,
/
Z
/\ O \ / CON // / i
/685-8-1=X605.00�
\ I
I l
/ l ,l / /E
,BARBED
/�SAMUn, JR &-��MILY%IINTON\ /
2847 PG. 3038 0 0o
TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION l /
, l
INCE G
--D-.B.
,P.8-2-5
11
\
\P -G. 83 INV. -89;12
LOT 7
ENTRANCE l / l
MIN. L=50' /
EXIS ING
/ / RIP \ TEMPORARY DETENTION POND —
EIP �
MIN. W=14'
MIN. T=8" l
l
�_-
��
^^ \\
\ l.J�`� /APPROX. LOCATION OF PROP. SEPTIC
✓ \ / FIELD AS TAKEN FROM FORSYTH
EIP—
�-
3 � \\ l COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH
\ J II 1 \ / / IMPROVEMENT PERMIT
11 PIN 6885-82-0034.00
LINVILY
AMPG.
LLC
D.B.I2204LLE
4150
ENCASEMENT NOTES FOR CARRIER PIPE INSTALLATION UNDER 1-40:
SIGN �� \ EIP /
j 1.1
6"WWAjw
SEE OVERALL EROSION CONTROL PLAN
1. ACCESS FROM OR TO 1-40 WILL NOT BE ALLOWED UNDER ANY
CIRCUMSTANCES.—
2. COPY OF VIDEO OF ENCASEMENT PIPE AVAILABLE FROM OWNER UPON
EIP EX. T ROAD
/ \ AO�N
(SHEET 9) & TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
REQUEST.
°
/ \ I EXISTING
FIEI-Dlvl 3866
SR
A�,A
SHEET 11 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES.
( )
PLAN
3. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM INSIDE EXISTING ENCASEMENT PIPE
4. ALL DIP CARRIER PIPE SHALL BE RESTRAINED JOINT PIPE.
5. TWO SPIDERS OR CARRIER PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT
/ I I/ DRIP—RAP
—
/l I/ / / PIN 6885-72-9838.00 GRAPHIC
/
SCALE 1 " = 40'
\�
QUARTER POINTS OF CARRIER PIPE (5 FT FROM EACH END OF 20 FT
JOINT).
I Ill / POPE L E BUILDING COMPANY INC 40 0
D.B. 2681 PG. 234 _
/
40 80
SCALE: 1" = 40'
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEAL EACH END OF ENCASEMENT PIPE.
I \ TRACT 1—
/
1-40 C
NT OLE
ACCESS
CL:
" 40'
R.
" 4'
v R .
905
905
N
Hi�—
Z
N
�
Q
UTILITY DESIGN APPR OVED
^00
900
Water & Sewer
v,/
O
O
Utilities Director Date
�I
Q
DO
Z
N
1
<J
0C O
»
Approval by the Utilities Director of the water and
sewer infrastructure depicted in these plans does not
Q
)
O
Z
I
N
I
IP S.
0
constitute approval for any other purpose than that set
forth in Section 64 of the Water System Policy and
Q95
8V 5
O
130
Section 36 the Sewer System Policy the
v
(n
(n
O
of of
City/County Utility Commission. To the extent other
=
O
O
Q
U
permits, licenses, permissions or the like must be
r
9
®
147.VI
m
J
. E E
L-
C S __
_ _- --
_
obtained to complete this project, such are specifically
not granted by this approval and must be obtained by
P
0
OS D
^
�
EIS
IN
W
I
~
—_
--
----
-
the Developer andlor his designee.
890
FILL,
TY .
P
0 IL
�
>
I
- --- -- ----
-- ----
SE
-- 0
WE
88 0
Approval of these water &sanitary sewer plans does not
v
Q�O
ri
2 6 4
L_
NV. 89 .19
constitute approval for construction. Approval of
construction must be in formal written agreement. Failure to
S L
0'
obtain such agreement prior to beginning of construction will
V. C.
1 -JOINT
TR
N
ITI
N
TYPICAL, , ID RS
0
ECA EM NT
relieve the City of any financial participation in this project
whatsoever.
12
' Dl
CUP
IN
r,
tal
1.20%
'_ 1
»
P
N.
S
ER 0.52%
STAINLESS STEEL
885
woe
14'
1
" S
'
VU
tj
EER
AP
RO .
REE
CITY of WINSTON-SALEM
885
19
35
L
sY:
ED
AP
R0 . C
EE
SIAL
APR
X. CR
K
1.
APR
CREEK
XE)
, -
,
ECA EM NT
73'
LEFT
'l Cl/
RO .
007
RE
A
K
89'
LEFT
ca
cc
I
83
LE
I.
I
��� 1*
880
880
»7n
1)
\
J
l
'
25
U
cr
12634
C I
V.
8
.00
t FNG NEE
E`�, �•'
., ,.
75
""'��
75
12+00 13+00
14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00
18+00 19+00 20+00
21+00 22+00
MIM
alley, Williams, carmen 8v king, inc.
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &, SURVEYORS
BROOKFORD ROADQ ANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE
BOOK NO.
DATE: 12118118
JOB N0. 10121
FILE.
1COMP
0121BASE2018.DWG
PLAN AND PROFILE
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
STA. 12+00 TO STA. 21+50
SHEET N0.
4
DRAWN BY WDF
1B
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534
ABBOTTS CREEK TOWNSHIP - FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
KERNERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
CHECKED BY.-
I
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203
MDR
OF. 13

STA. 21+21.34 _
HEADWALL _
now
• — BUrIrER 1 /� -� r- -
�0/
20' SANITARY / / �% *441,
�_� SEWER ESM'T.
IS4(NT
I00- -
24+ 0
01
Co
% SAN SEWER
23+00 PRPP. 8� f25-�-7oo_
SSMH N0. 12
u, �4" POND STA. 23+95.89 LB \
DRAIN E� —� // PIPE DOWN STA. 23+84.35 L�
/ \
l
BA 0 P _ ��.
/ J
/ l ACC XVA, LLC
l FENCE / 6885-72-6603
D.B. B. 351 PG.82
�
/ SSMH N0. 10 / SSMH NO. 11
STA.— 2T+ 64-38- \ STA. 22+68.03 #
� _
EXISTING DETENTION POND
�
-� -
/ /1111 - _\
IMPACTS
REMARKS
BUFFER ZONE 1
464 S.F.
PERPENDICULAR CROSSING
BUFFER ZONE 2
0 S.F.
EXISTING USE
LEGEND NEW IMPACTS FOR: SHEET NO.
alley, Williams, carmen 8v king, inc.
O ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS & SURVEYORS ` ` PERMANENT BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 BROOKFORD ROAD SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION 2
` EXISTING USE ZONE 1 IMPACTS FORSYTH COUNTY
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 KERNERSVILLE, N.C.
EXISTING USE ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 SCALE: 1" = 30' DATE: 5/8/19 1 DwG. By WDF PROJECT NO. : 10121C I OP 2

SSMH NO. 7
I' STA. 17+49
-----------------------
1B / sow
-
' ZONE 1 BUFFER y,
ZON 2 BUFFER
/ o
000
SEWER 17+��
/ � 2" SAN • �
PROS
16+00
/ 20' SANITARY
SEWER ESM T. \
SAMUEL R. HINTON, JR /\
&EMILY HINT0W—
PIN 6885-71-9805.00
D.B. 2847 PG. 3038
/ P.B. 25 PG. 8j--
o LINVILLE FAMILY LLC I
\ \ / PIN 6885-82-0034.00
/
D.B. 2204 PG. 4150
alley, williams, carmen 8v king, inc.
Lu
LEGEND
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS &SURVEYORS
PERMANENT BUFFER ZONE 1 IMPACTS
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 PERMANENT BUFFER ZONE 2 IMPACTS
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203
SSMH NO. 8
STA. 18+55
IMPACTS
REMARKS
BUFFER ZONE 1
822 S. F.
MITIGATION REQUIRED
BUFFER ZONE 2
2,450 S.F.
MITIGATION NOT REQUIRED
It
a '
J
It
�u y � 1-as�-
NEW IMPACTS FOR: SHEET NO.
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE
BROOKFORD ROAD SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION 1
FORSYTH COUNTY
pKER�NERSVILLE, N.C.
SCALE: 1" = 30' DATE: 518/1/PROJ-/ DWG.BY WDF ECTNO.: 101-/
21C OF 2