900038_PERMIT FILE_20171231

NUH I H CAROLINA
department of Environmental Qual

F This map is prepared for the inventory of real property found within Union County, NC and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are hereby notified that the aforeme
1 contained on this map. Union County and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for the information contained on this
Grid based on the North Carolina State Plane Coordinate System
V. April 24 All dimensions in feet
)14

Water Resources
ENVIRCQNMEN'tA L QUr/ LITY
Bennett C Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Rd
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Bennett C Baucom:
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
1_
Cirector
PeCEIVEb1NCDENRIDWR
August 30, 2016
SEP 2 2016
WQROS
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Re: Renewal of the Expired Permit
Permit No,: AW1900038
Union County
Your facility was approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation Individual Non -
Discharge Permits, which expired on 11/30/2014. Our records indicate that the Division has not received
from you a completed renewal application form to date. In order to maintain coverage under the current
Permit, please complete one of the following actions:
Please indicate if your facility is depopulated and the lagoon(s) of storage pond(s) at your facility
have been properly closed according to the NRCS standards. In that case, you may send us a written
request to rescind this permit by submitting a completed Lagoon & Waste Storage Pond Closure
Form. A blank copy of the form can be found at:
httr):/ldeci.nc. gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-hermits/wastewater-branch/animal-
feeding-operation-permits/reportingforms
2. Please submit a renewal application form that must be completed, signed and returned to this office.
Please include two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan along with the field maps, if
your facility is still active.
The renewal application form for the State or NPDES Individual Permit for Existing Operations can be
found at:
http://deq.nc. gov/ab out/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/animal-
feeding-operation-permits/applications
3. If you area cattle facility that has gone below the threshold animal numbers (< 100), you may request
the rescission of your permit provided if the average size of the confined cattle herd at the cattle facility,
calculated on an annual basis during the three years prior to the request for rescission, is less than one
hundred confined cattle.
Please submit the requested information within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter to the following
address:
NCDENR—DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
Continued...
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resoureoa
1636 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
919 807 6464

Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a permit within the time period specified may result in a
civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid permit would constitute a violation
of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact me at 919-807-6341.
— . — Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi, Soil Scientist
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: _ Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Unit Central Files - AWI900038

Environmental
Quality
January 10, 2018
Bennett C Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Rd
Monroe, NC 28110
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
R1=CEIVEDMCDENRIDWR
JAN 112018
WOROS
MOORI=SVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Re: Renewal of the Expired Permit
Permit No.: AW1900038
Union County
Dear Bennett C Baucom:
Your facility was approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation Individual Non -
Discharge Permits, which has since expired. Our records indicate that the Division has not received from
you a completed renewal application form to date. In order to maintain coverage under the current Permit,
please complete one of the following actions:
1. Please indicate if your facility is depopulated and the lagoon(s) or storage pond(s) at your facility
have properly been closed according to the NRCS standards. In that case, you may send us a
written request to rescind this permit by submitting a completed Lagoon & Waste Storage Pond
Closure Form. A blank copy of the form can be found at:
http://deg.nc.gov/aboutldivisions/water-resources/water-resources-pertnits/v astewater-
branch/animal-feeding-pperation:Rennits/rel2orting-foms
2. Please submit a renewal application form that must be completed, signed and returned to this office.
Please include two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan along with the field maps,
if your facility is still active.
The renewal application forth for the State or NPDES Individual Permit for Existing Operations
can be found at:
http://dea.nc. ov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources^pgMgtslwastewater-
branch/animal-feeding-operation-permits/applications
3. If you are a cattle facility that has gone below the threshold animal numbers (< 100), you may
request the rescission of your permit provided if the average size of the confined cattle herd at the
cattle facility, calculated on an annual basis during the three years prior to the request for rescission,
is less than one hundred confined cattle.
Please submit the requested information within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter to the following
address:
NCDENR—DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Continued...
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
919-707-9129

Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a permit within the time period specified may result in a
civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid permit would constitute a violation
of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact me at 919-807-6341.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi, Soil Scientist
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Unit Central Files (AWI900038)

W 11�1.���{ '.
r Y �j�
i{} 1
�,y/��1 �.sf�1.�,/�.� •'►.:_4'� A- �-ems--� � � ;�' � ry� �—
!� '0 7
if

44t
, Z A4
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL OTECTION SECTION
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED S ~� September 30, 2010
Bennett C. Baucom
OCT 1 9 2010
Baucom Brothers Farm --
6002 Morgan Mill Road NC t?ENR
Monroe, NC 28110
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-1047
15A N.C-A.C. 2T .1304
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
Individual Permit AW1900038
Union County
Dear Mr. Baucom:
On September 21, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Baucom Brothers Farm and the permitted waste disposal
system.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to maintain an adequate marker to determine the waste level in the Lower Lagoon. This
is a violation of Individual Permit Condition 111.2, and the Certified .Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1:
Coordinate with Union SWCD/NRCS to complete the installation of an adequate marker to
determine the waste level in the Lower Lagoon by October 31, 2010.
Violation II:
Failure to maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records. This is a violation of Individual
Permit Condition 111.2, II1.6, and 111.7, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation 11:
In the future, maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records in accordance with the permit.
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section ! Mooresville Regional office One
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 N rthCaro1 *
Phone: 70+1-fi63-16991 Fax: 704-fi83�i0401 Customer Service: 1.877-523.6748 atura!!r�
ina
Internet: www.ncwaWrquality.org
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Raueom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
September 30, 2010
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by October 15, 2010. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 21, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWI900038
Regional Permit File AW1900038
Jb

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Resources
� F �
Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
RETURN _RECEIPT „REQUESTED September 30, 2010
Bennett C. Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-1047
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
Individual Permit AWI900038
Union County
Dear Mr. Baucom:
On September 21, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Baucom Brothers Farm and the permitted waste disposal
system.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation 1:
Failure to maintain an adequate marker to determine the waste level in the Lower Lagoon. This
is a violation of Individual Permit Condition III.2, and the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP).
Re uired Corrective Action for Violation I:
Coordinate with Union S WCD/NRCS to complete the installation of an adequate marker to
determine the waste level in the Lower Lagoon by October 31, 2010.
Violation It:
Failure to maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records. This is a violation of Individual
Permit Condition I11.2, I11.6, and 111.7, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation II:
In the future, maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records in accordance with the pen -nit.
Division of Water Quality /Aquifer Protection Section / Mooresville Regional office One
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NorthCaroI tna
Phone: 704U3-16991 Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1.877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org ;VJgtUW!`,ff
An Equal oppodumily 1 Affirmalive Aclivn Employer

Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
September 30, 2010
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by October 15, 2010. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 21, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWI900038
Regional Permit File AWI900038
jb

4
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 900038 Facility Status: Inac the Permit: AW120M Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Insection
Reason for Visit: Routine County
Inactive or Closed Date:
Union Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09/21/2010 Entry Time: Q1,30 PM Exit Time: 010.0 PM
Farm Name: Baucom Brothers Farm
Owner: Bennett C_Baucom
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone:[phone]_ _
Mailing Address: 6002 Morgan Miil Rd _
Monroe NC 28110
Physical Address: Ze�!jlon Williams Rd
Monroe NC 28110
Facility Status: n Compliant N Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35°06'30" Longitude: 80°27'00" _
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy 200 Travel 112 mi west on
Zebuion Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The Baucorn
Milling Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon
Williams Rd
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Bennett C. Baucom
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Bennett C. Baucom
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beall
Phone: [phone]
Inspector Signature:
Ext 216
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
8. Failure to maintain adequate marker to determine waste level in the Lagoon; NOV to follow
21, Weekly Freeboard records not maintained; NOV to follow.
24 Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AV0900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 0912112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations design Capacity Current Population
Swine
G Swine - Farrow to Wean 0 0
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon LAGOON 18.00 24.00
Page: 2

J
Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number:
900038
Inspection Date: 09/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason For Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
®n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
❑
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
w
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e l large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion,. seepage, etc)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? n ■ n n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
■
❑
n ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
®
n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AVVI900038 owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom
Inspection Date: 09/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 900038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
n
PAN?
-"
n
Is PAN > 10°/%I10 lbs.?
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sail Type 1
Sail Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Sail Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
n n .
16 Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n
n
■ n
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
❑ n
18 Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n n
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n
WU P?
Page: 4

Permit: AWI900038 Owner - Facility: Bennea C Baucom Facility Number : 900038
Inspection Date: 09/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason For Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
Design? n
Maps? n
other? 0
21. Dees record keeping need improvement? n n n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections? n
Weather code? n
Weekly Freeboard?
e
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after ? 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Al
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
In
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n e
n n
23 If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigat+on equipment (NPDES ol
n
e n
24 Did the Facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
® n
n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
n e
26. Did the facility fait to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n n
■
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n In
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit of CAWMP?
n e
n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n v
n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
o ■
n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AW1900039 Owner - Facility: Bennett C BaucOm
Facility Number: 900038 .
Inspection Date: 09/2112010 inspection Type: Comp0ance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
yes No NA NE
Other Issues n o n
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
nnn
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
nonn
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

FILE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett C. Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Mr. Baucom:
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
September 30, 2010
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-1047
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
Individual Permit AW1900038
Union County
On September 21, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Baucom Brothers Farm and the permitted waste disposal
system.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation L•
Failure to maintain an adequate marker to determine the waste level in the Lower Lagoon. This
is a violation of Individual Permit Condition III.2, and the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
Coordinate with Union SWCDINRCS to complete the installation of an adequate marker to
determine the waste level in the Lower Lagoon by October 31, 2010,
Violation II:
Failure to maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records. This is a violation of Individual
Permit Condition III.2,111.6, and III.7, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation 11:
In the future, maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records in accordance with the permit.
Division of Water Quality I Aquifer Protection Section / Mooresville Regional Oft One
610 East Center Avenue, Suite301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NorthCarolina
Internet:
temet Dwwyv.ncwatMerquality7o�rg 663.60401 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6746 Aawally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Bascom Brothers Farm/Faeihty 90-38
NOTICE OF'146LATIONI
Sei6mber�30,-2$10}
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by October 15, 2010. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
W, . (i
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 21, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWI900038
Regional Permit File AWI900038
jb

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 900038 _ — Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AW1900038 - n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Union Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 0912112010 Entry Time: 01 M Exit Time: 03:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Baucom Brothers FarmOwner Email:
Owner: Bennett C Baucom Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6002 Morgan Mill _Rd _ Monroe NC 28110
Physical Address: Z_ebulon_Williams Rd Monroe NC 28110 _
Facility Status:' n Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: , 5°06'30" Longitude: 80°27100"
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy. 200. Travel 112 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The Baucom
Miliing Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
Question Areas:
jj Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
IN Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beall Phone: [phone]Ext.216
Inspector Signature: Date: 2�0
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
8. Failure to maintain adequate marker to determine waste level in the Lagoon, NOV to follow.
21. Weekly Freeboard records not maintained; NOV to follow.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Sennett C Baucom Facility Number : 900038
Inspection Date: 09/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon LAGOON 4$.00 24M
Page: 2

Permit: A1NI900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 0912112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at
Structure n
Application Field
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? In n ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n Cl ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
El
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
In
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I,e l large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
B, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
■
n
In
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste -Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
n
n
improvement?
11 Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding'? n
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Sennett C Baucom Facility Number : 900038
Inspection late: 0912112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application
n
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the CAWMP rea&y available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n■nn
�In■n
❑■nn
n■nn
Yes No NA NE
Q ■ n Q
n■nn
n
Page:4

Permit: AWI900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
tnspection Date: 09/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design?
Maps? ❑
Other? 11
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
!�
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
■
❑
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker-on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
❑
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
C3
❑
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
n
■
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
❑
-__'-- _
Vac
Mn
IJA
NG
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n f�
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

A, . 1
Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Sennett C Baucom
Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 0912112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Other tssues
n nn
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
■
32, Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss revlewlinspectien with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 0 0 0
Ono
Page: 6
9

for Visit: IN Routine
O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: %X.2 . Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: c Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _Ve_Atfl�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
l)esign Current Design Current Design Current
Svv"ine _ Cap cityP p WetaPodltry Capacity Pap. Cattle Capacity 1'0*"
t� -Kati,• w �.
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
�� � �,� ; 'd �°
Desiga Current
D . Poaltr Ca aci Po
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
La ers
Non -La ers
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other ' F� ASTurkey
Turkeys
Poults
Other
Other.
-`IRTi:.B5daVl.�MMI:M.'r�tlK/�R.�•}�_ma�;]14MAik!'2D.:wwr
•.wMwwiisr.#!t;'�Wlws-islw��.c'mis
.-��'.:w'-.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑Yeo ❑NA ❑NE
[Dyes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ NOIA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No_"�A ❑NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑Y o ❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Estill Number: -
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is)torage capacity (siructural phWSjorrn storage p heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes�Aa� le/vel into ctural freeboard?
Strucfii re l S ?2� Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ` L
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the'structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes �I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ITINA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes — IJ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ ntal threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ • Yes J❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �E] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): '
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 1)o NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes :CSL-1qo_'_7M NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ P Checklist ease Agreements ❑ Other:
21'. Does r d keeping need improvement? If yes, check e a propriate :boxbelow. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA NE
Waste plicatio —Wee Freeboard aste Analysis I�Analysis ste ransfers eatherCode
n�mfall toy ckin Crop Yield 120 Minute InspectionsMonthly and I" Rainfall Inspections �iudge urvey
7
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ig ❑ N ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

! Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
M 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Co ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes C] N�NA ❑ NE
Atha.- law 0c
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of er ns as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -a ication)
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
MIN
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below- Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require afollow-up visit by the same agency? ❑Yes to
M
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA [] NE
FI-Mi
Irew.. M : �N_
L I
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

ILE
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
Bennett C. Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Mr. Baucom:
Donald R, van der Vaart
Secretary
November 4, 2015
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-3 8
Individual Permit AWI900038
Union County
On September 25, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Baucom Brothers Farm and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during
the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory, however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerel ,
James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosure: Compliance inspection Report dated September 25, 2015
Jb
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.nedenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made In part by recycled paper

ti
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
900038 Facility Status:
Inactive Permit: AW1900038
Denied Access
Inpeactlon Type:
Compliance inspection
inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: union Region:
Mooresville
Date of Visit:
0912512015 EntryTime: 12:30 pm
Exit Time; 1:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Baucom Brothers Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Bennett C Baucom
Phone:
704-283-6897
Mailing Address: 6002 Morgan Mill Rd Monroe NC 28110
Physical Address: Zebulon Williams Rd
Facility Status: X Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Monroe NC 28110
Latitude: 35' 06'
Longitude: 80' 27' 00"
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy. 200, Travel 112 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The
Baucom Milling Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sennett C. Baucom Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector($):
Inspection Summary:
Facility Operators again advised to coordinate with Union SWCDINRCS to develop and implement a plan for closure.
jb
Phone: [phone] Ex1
Dater Gb
page: 1

Permit AWI900038 Owner - Facility : Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 90D038
Inspection Date: 09125115 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Walla Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Cl000d Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON 18.00 24.00
page: 2

Permit: AW900038 Owner - Facility : Bennett C Baucom Facility Number 900038
Inspection Date: M25115 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vislt Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yee
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ■
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes notify DWQ)
❑
❑M
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6_ Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑M
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Y NQ. No Na Na
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 0 ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 1M10lbs
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsiudge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWI900038 Owner - Facility : Sennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 09/25115 Inpsection Type: . Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yee No No No
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

r
Permit: AWI900038 Owner - Facility : Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 09/25/15 lnpaection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and _D2cuM2!jts
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ 0
❑
25_ Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ M
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an acfively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other lssues
Yes -Na-Mg- Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Cl
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
■ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

a2
j'r%j9j'4y,�§Humber
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Ass � I
Reason for Visit: ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: % Arrival Time: JOSTft Departure Time: ounty: 1 Region:
Farm Name:
1p
4 ''Q '
Owner Email: �~
Owner Name:
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Cont 11 Title;
Onsite Re resel e
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: — %_ Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Numbe
7
V F r "idF r d6I:iW �-.'.'b�i��+n.'�Sy��.?�
�� �. �.`..
��.:�'Py',A'� ����k�i"
Current
,
t �' 1 �•�,�.� x�
rc
Design
,
Curren"t
Swine
CaBpacity
P°
W,etPoultry
Cap ity Pop.
Cattle
Cap�ac�ty
Pop:
.�
Wean to Finish
La er
Non -La er
I
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
D` IPoult'+ '
';
y 'Design aCuirrerit
Ca aci Pop.
D Heifer
,3
Farrow to Wean,
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Non -Layers
1
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
f
Turkeys
T,[lther
Turkey Points
i
r
Other
Other
a
_ •�
�,..:,,:yam-:.s:�...�.,,.,�.�..�,.,.
�,���,...�,.
..,,,���..�.�,
-
,..�.
.
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No tA. ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑Ye ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21412011 Continued

s
Faclli Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection &.Treatment►
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? tes
es PNo
❑ NA ' ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? .❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3- Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): '
5. Are there any immediate t4to-tyof any of the structures observed? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ a hreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ��
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o
[] NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.' ❑ Ye o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu; Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Ap 'cation Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes *00
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
❑ No
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Oes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check. -ice
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements r:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the propriate box below. o NA ❑ NE
e Appli ' n ee card to Analysis it Analysis a5 W de
fat Stockin Crop Yield ❑ Minute Inspections [Ty and 1" Rainfall I spections Sludge Survey
22. Di the facility fail to,install and maintain a rain gauge? [] Yes �<No NA
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate.waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No ' ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[:]No NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA E] NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
�10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
s
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, aver -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Ye
A ❑ NE
o4E]
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Ye
A ❑ NE
L
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[] Y
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
� cif � � . •
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Bennett C Bauco>n
Baucoin Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Rd
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Bennett C Baucom:
PAT MCCRORY
Govcmor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Srcreron
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Uireclor
February 23, 2016 RECEIVEDJNCDENRIDWR
FEB 25 2016
WOROS
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFRCE
Re: Renewal of the Expired pen -nit
Permit No.: AW1900038
Union County
Your facility was approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation Individual Non -
Discharge Permits, which expired on 11/30/2014, Our records indicate that the Division has not received
a completed renewal application form from your facility to date. In order to maintain coverage under the
current Permit, please complete one of the following actions:
1. Please indicate if your facility is depopulated and the lagoon(s) or storage pond(s) at your facility
have been properly closed according to the NRCS standards. In that case, you may send us a written
request to rescind this permit by submitting a completed and the pennit is rescinded. A blank Lagoon
& Waste Storage Pond Closure Form can be found at: http://portal.ncdenr,org/web/wq/aps/afo/report
2. Please submit a renewal application form that must be completed, signed and returned to DWR. The
application form for the State or NPDES Individual Permit for Existing Operations can be found at:
http://portal.ticdenr,oriz/web/wqlaps/afo/apes. Please include two (2) copies of your most recent Waste
Utilization Plan along with the field maps, if your facility is still active.
3. If you are a cattle facility that has gone below the threshold animal numbers (< 100), you may request
the rescission of your permit provided if the average size of the confined cattle herd at the cattle facility,
calculated on an annual basis during the three years prior to the request for rescission, is less than one
hundred confined cattle.
Please submit the requested information within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter to the following
address:
DEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
Continued...
Suua ol'North Carolina I IinFriroomcnlxl Quality I Water Resources
1636 Mail setvicu Cunler I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636

Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a permit within the time period specified may result in a
civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid permit would constitute a violation
of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact me at 919-807-6341.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi, Soil Scientist
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Unit Central Files - AWI900038

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN 'RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett C. Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Mr. Baucom:
F�LE-
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary,
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
May 11, 2016 Director
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
NOV-2016-PC-0167
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
Individual Permit AWI900038
.Union County
On May 6, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality
Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected Baucom Brothers Farm and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank John Kenneth Baucom, Jr., who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, yoware hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animalwaste disposal system pursuant to 15A North. Carolina
Administrative -Code 2T .1304, .you have. been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:.
Violation I:
Failure to maintain waste level in the Lagoon to provide for adequate storage capacity. 'This is a
violation of Individual Permit, Condition V.2,, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, take all necessary additional steps to -insure waste level. remains in compliance with
the permit.
Violation II:'
Failure to notify the Division of Water Resources of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond as noted in the Weekly Freeboardrecords) as required by permit.
Failure to notify DWR is a violation of Individual Permit Condition II1.9, and the CAWMP.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality, Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 � Mooresville, North Carolina 29115
704 663 1609

Baucom•Brothers Farm/Fad ity 90-38
NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
May 11, 2016
Page 2 '
Required Corrective Action for Violation II:
In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by May 27, 2016. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and.prevent recurrence in the future.
The Division of Water Resources is considering a Recommendation for Enforcement against
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38 for the referenced violations. Should you have
justification that the violations were caused by circumstances beyond your control, or have
additional explanations, please include the supporting documentation in the written response.
We will review your response and forward it to the Division Director as an attachment to the
Recommendation for Enforcement. The Director of the Division of Water Resources may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any
"Person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a permit under authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources,-NCDEQ
enclosures: Compliance Inspection Report dated May 6, 2016
Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation via E-Mail
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AW1900038
Regional Permit File AWI900038
jb

Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 900038 Facility Status:
Inpsectlon Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 0510612016 Entry Time: 03:00 pm
Farm Name: Baucom Brothers Farm
Inactive
Permit: AWI900038 Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Union Region: Mooresville
Exit Time: 5:30 pm Incident #
Owner
Owner: Bennett C Baucom Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6002 Morgan Mill Rd Monroe NC 28110
Physical Address: Zebulon Williams Rd Monroe NC 28110
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 06' Longitude: 80' 27' 00"
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy. 200. Travel 112 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The
Baucom Milling Company is teoated on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
Question Areas:
�. Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, S Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certifted Operator: Operator Certification Number
Secondary OiC(s):
On -Site Representativols): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Bennett C. Baucom Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone: [phone] Exi
Date:
Inspection Summary:
4., 30. Weekly Freeboard records indicate that the maximum waste level in the Lagoon was exceeded from November, 2016
through March, 2016. Failure to notify DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOVINOI to follow.
19. Facility Operators advised to complete and submit a permit renewal application form ASAPI
ib
page: 1

Permit: AW190003B Owner - Facility ; Bennett C Baucom Facility Number; 900038
Inspection Date: 05/06/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 0 0
Total [resign Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
' Oislgnatad Observed .
Type Idontifiar Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LAGOON iB.bO 21,00
page: 2
ell

Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number:
900038
Inspection Date: 05/06/16 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Imoacts
Yea
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
110
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
a. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
.0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ .
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWI900038 owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 05/06/16 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
900038
Routine
Waste ADplicatlon
`fes
No-Ne Na
Crop Type 1 i
Fescue (Hay,.Pasturej . ,.
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type'2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4 "
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the'receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
.❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre .
❑
N Cl
Cl
determination? ,
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
E
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily'available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design? .
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Yes No Na No
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ E ❑ ❑
A
page: 4

Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility : Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Dates 05/06/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yee No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility tail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ■
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ 0
❑
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ N
❑
appropriate boxes) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
r
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
EIS
❑
Other Issues
Yea No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. bid the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
0
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

ti
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
February 13, 2017
Bennett C. Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
r,7�� � L E
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
Individual Permit AWI900038
Union County
Dear Mr. Baucom:
On February 8, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Baucom Brothers Farm and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank John Kenneth Baucom, Jr., who was present
and assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerel ,
B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated February 8, 2017
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 29115
704.663-1699

0 Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 900038 Facility Status: Inactive Permit: AW1900038
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Union Region:
Dale of Visit: 02/0812017 Entry Time: 04:00 pm Exit Time: 5:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Baucom Brothers Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Bennett C Baucom Phone:
❑ Denied Access
Mooresville
704.283-6897
Mailing Address: 6002 Morgan Mill Rd Monroe NC 28110
Physical Address: Zebulon VW1am5 Rd Monroe NC 29110
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 06' Longitude: 80' 27' Go"
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy. 200. Travel 112 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The
Baucom Milling Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Sior, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number -
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Rep rosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Bennett C SaUcdm Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Bennett Cr SaUCom Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Phone: [phone] EX
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspoction Summary:
t-19. Facility Operators again advised to complete and submit a permit renewal a li SAP!
jb
page: 1

Permit: AWI900038 Owner - Facility : Bennett C Baucom Facility Number; 900038
Inspection Date: 02/08/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Farrow to Wean 0 0 .
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Dlsignatad Observed
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freaboard
Lagoon LAGOON 18.00 Y0,00
0
page- 2

Permit. AWI900038 Owner - Facility Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 02/08/17 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2 Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3 Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yea
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9 Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea No Na Na
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
It yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN , 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manureJsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWI900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number:
900038
Inspection Date: 02/08/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste ApRlication
Yes No Na -No
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?'
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil'analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

El
Permit: AWI900038 Owner - Facility : Bennett C Baucom Facility Number:
900038
Inspection Date: 02/08/17 Inpsection Type: . Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yee No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail.to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M
❑
(NPDES only)? ,
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application'equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ 0
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
Cl
❑ M
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ■
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
El❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, aver -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑M
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify .
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ M ❑ ❑
page: 5

Environmental
Quality
January 31, 2017
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Rd
Monroe, NC 28110
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZDANERMAN
Director
r��C�N�GIii�;'7 �VRit7�Pltt
Re: Renewal of the Expired Permit
Permit No.: AW1900038
Union County
Dear Bennett Baucom:
4 '!
Your facility was approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation Individual Non -
Discharge Permits, which has since expired. Out records indicate that the .Division has not received from
you a completed renewal application form to date. In order to maintain coverage under the current Permit,
please complete one of the following actions:
1. Please indicate if your facility is depopulated and the lagoon(s) or storage pond(s) at your facility
have been properly closed according to the MRCS standards. In that case, you may send us a written
request to rescind this permit by submitting a completed Lagoon & Waste Storage Pond Closure
Form. A blank copy of the form can be found at:
htW:Hdeq.nc. gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/animal-
feedina-oteration-permits/reportin -fg oM
2. Please submit a renewal application form that must be completed, signed and returned to this office.
Please include two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan along with the field maps, if
your facility is still active.
The renewal application form for the State or NPDES Individual Permit for Existing Operations can be
found at:
htt�://deq.ne.gov/aboutldivisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater -branchlanimal=
feeding-operation-hermits/applications
3. If you area cattle facility that has gone below the threshold animal numbers (< 100), you may request
the rescission of your permit provided if the average size of the confined cattle herd at the cattle facility,
calculated on an annual basis during the three years prior to the request for rescission, is less than one
hundred confined cattle.
Please submit the requested information within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter to the following
address:
NCDENR—DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
- "`Nolhtng Cornp�res: -_... Continued...
State of North Carolina j Environmental Quality ! Division of Water Resources
Witter Quality Regional Operations section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a permit within the time period specified may result in a
civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid permit would constitute a violation
of NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact me at 919-807-6341.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi, Soil Scientist
Animal Feeding Operations Program .
cc: M6:" bresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Unit Central Files (A"00038)

�=
trtLE
AG'A'
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett C. Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Mr. Baucom:
On March 14, 2014, staff of the
Quality Regional Operations Se
permitted waste disposal system.
and assisted during the inspection.
April 4, 2014
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
John E. Skvarla, HI
Secretary
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
NOV-2014-PC-0086
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
Individual Permit AWI900038
Union County
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
ction (WQROS), inspected Baucom Brothers Farm and the
We wish to thank John Kenneth Baucom, Jr., who was present
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to I SA North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation 1:
Illegal discharge of animal waste into ditch. This is a violation of Individual Permit Condition
1. 1, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation 1:
Follow procedures as outlined in Individual Permit Condition II1.5, and the CAWMP.
Violation II:
Failure to maintain waste level in the Lagoon to provide for adequate storage capacity. This is a
violation of Individual Permit Condition V.2, and the CAWMP.
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28155
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper

Baucom Brothers Farm/Facilily 90-38
NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
April 4, 2014
Page 2
Required Corrective Action for Violation Il:
Continue to follow the proposed actions outlined in the PIan of Action (POA) dated March 17,
2014, and received in the Mooresville Regional Office on March 17, 2014. Take all necessary
additional steps to insure waste level remains in compliance with the permit.
Violation III:
Failure to maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records. This is a violation of Individual
Permit Condition III.2, III.6, and III.7, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation III:
In the future, maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records in accordance with the permit.
Violation IV:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Resources of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Lagoon resulting in a discharge) as required by permit. Failure to notify DWR is
a violation of Individual Permit Condition III.9, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation IV:
In the fixture, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specifidd corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by April 21, 2014. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the future.
The Division of Water Resources is considering a Recommendation for Enforcement against
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38 for the referenced violations. Should you have
justification that the violations were caused by circumstances beyond your control, or have
additional explanations, please include the supporting documentation in the written response.
We will review your response and forward it to the Division Director as an attachment to the
Recommendation for Enforcement. The Director of the Division of Water Resources may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any
"Person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a permit under authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.

Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
April 4, 2014
Page 3
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosures: Compliance Inspection Reports dated March 14, and 19, 2014
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation via E-Mail
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWI900038
Regional Permit File AW1900038
jb

J
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 900038 Facility Status: Inactive_ Permit: AW1900038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Union Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 03/14/2014 Entry Time: 11:QQ„AM Exit Time: 02:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Baucom Brothers -Farm _ I Owner Email:
Owner
Mailing Address: 6002 Moroaa Mill Rd Monroe NC 28110
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: Zebulon Williams Rd Monroe NC 28110 „• ,_
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 25°060" Longitude: 80027'00"
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy. 200. Travel 1/2 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The Baucom
Milling Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Otherlssues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone: [phone]
Ext.21 fit
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s): QJ
Inspection Summary:
1., 4. Illegal discharge of animal waste into ditch observed during inspection; NOVINOI to follow. Initial assessment/documentation of
discharge. Facility Operator advised to coordinate with Union SWCDINRCS to complete and submit a POA, and pump down Lagoon
ASAP! Maximum waste level in Lagoon exceeded; NOVINOI to follow. It.was noted that additional storage capacity was available for
transfer into the Wash Pond.
21. Weekly Freeboard records not maintained; NOV/NOI to follow.
30. Failure to notify DWR of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV/NOI to follow.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWI900038 Owner -Facility. Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 03/1412014 inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
00 Swine - Farrow to Wean 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon LAGOON 18.00 .00
Page: 2

Permit. AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 03/14/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ■
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ■
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.0 large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc,)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom
Inspection Date: 03/1412014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 900038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
yes
No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Sail Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ 13
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Q
■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

.1
Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
inspection Date: 03/14/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
❑ ■ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an activbly certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 03/1412014 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

s
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soli and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 900038 _ Facility Status: Inactive _ Permit: AW1900038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Q4_myjanLe InsnectiQn Inactive or Closed bate:
Reason for Visit:Follow-up. County: Tinian Region: M%2re�ville
Date of Visit: 0311912 14„ I Entry Time: 01-00_RM Exit Time: Q2:00 PM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: Baucom Brolher5 Farm Owner Email:
Owner: BQiinett C Baucom Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6002 Morgan Mill Rd Monroe NC28110
Physical Address: Zebulon Williams Rd - __ __ _ Monroe NC 28110
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°06'30" Longitude: 80'27'00"
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy, 200, Travel 112 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The Baucom
Milling Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd_
Question Areas:
W Dischrge & stream impacts Waste Col, Slor, & Treat
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Bennett Cr Baucom Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone: [phone]
Ext1,6t2.,���`
Inspector Signature: Date: '7vr�i't
—7�—r
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
1., 4. Illegal discharge of animal waste into ditch observed during inspection on 03114114; NOV1NOI to follow. Discharge impacts in
process of being addressed.
fb
Page: 1

Permit: AW1900038 Owner -Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number : 900038
Inspection Date: 03119/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon LAGOON 18.00 15.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ■
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? 0
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ■
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe U ■ U U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properiy addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Page: 2

Imm
4
FILE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvada, III
Governor April 4, 2014 Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett C. Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm'
6002 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
NOV-2014-PC-0086
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
Individual Permit AWI900038
Union County
Dear Mr, Baucom:
On March 14, 2014, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected Baucom Brothers Farm and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank John Kenneth Baucom, Jr., who was present
and assisted during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I: -
Illegal discharge of animal waste into ditch. This is a violation of Individual Permit Condition
I.1, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
Follow procedures as outlined in Individual Permit Condition II1.5, and the CAWMP.
Violation II: ,
Failure to maintain waste level in the Lagoon to provide for adequate storage capacity. This is a
violation of Individual Permit Condition V.2, and the CAWMP.
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28155
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opporninity 1 Atfirmatlre Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38
NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
April 4, 2014
Page 2
Required Corrective Action for Violation I1:
Continue to follow the proposed actions outlined in the Plan of Action (POA) dated March 17,
2014, and received in the Mooresville Regional Office on March 17, 2014. Take all necessary
additional steps to insure waste level remains in compliance with. the permit.
Violation III:
Failure to maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records. This is a violation of Individual
Permit Condition III.2, III.6, and 111.7, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation III:
In the future, maintain the required Weekly Freeboard records in accordance with the permit.
Violation IV:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Resources of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Lagoon resulting in a discharge) as required by permit. Failure to notify DWR is
a violation of Individual Permit Condition 1II.9, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation IV:
In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by April 21, 2014. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the future.
The Division of Water Resources is considering a Recommendation for Enforcement against
Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-38 for the referenced violations. Should you have
justification that the violations were caused by circumstances beyond your control, or have
additional explanations, please include the supporting documentation in the written response.
We will review.your response and forward it to the Division Director as an attachment to the
Recommendation for Enforcement. The Director of the Division of Water Resources may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any
"Person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a permit under authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.

Baucom Brothers Farm/Facility 90-39
NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
April 4, 2014
Page 3
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosures: Compliance Inspection Reports dated March 14, and 19, 2014
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation via E-Mail
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AW1900038
Regional Permit File AWI900038
ab

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 900038 Facility Status: Inactive _ Permit: AW1900038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Union _ Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 03/14/2014 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 02:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: j3OcgW Qf9;hers Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Bennett O Baucom _
Phone: [phone] _
Mailing Address: 6002 Morgan Mill Rd Monro-eJVC_28110
Physical Address: ZZe ulorl Williams Rd Monroe NC 28110
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant . Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'06'30" Longitude: 80"27'00" _
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy. 200, Travel 1/2 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The Baucom
Milling Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
Question Areas.
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Bennett C. Baucom
On -site representative Bennett C. Baucom
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector 5lgnature: slate:
Secondary Inspector(s): QJ
Inspection Summary:
1., 4. Illegal discharge of animal waste into ditch observed during inspection; NOVINOI to follow. Initial assessment/documentation of
discharge. Facility Operator.advised to coordinate with Union SWCD/NRCS to complete and submit a POA, and pump down Lagoon
ASAPI Maximum waste level in Lagoon exceeded; NOV/NOI to follow. It was noted that additional storage capacity was available for
transfer into the Wash Pond.
21. Weekly Freeboard records not maintained; NOV/NOI to follow.
30. Failure to notify DWR of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV/NOI to follow.
ib
Page: 1

Permit: AW1900038 Owner • Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number : 900038
Inspection Date: 03114/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
DR Swine - Farrow to Wean 0 0
Total Design Capacity: D
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Designed Observed '
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
LAGOON
18.001 .00
Page: 2

Permit. AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 03/14/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts— Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ■
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? F1
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ■
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe U ■ U U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management Q ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Q
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AW1900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom
Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 0311412014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs,?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop acid/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ Q
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ in Q ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

IN
Permit: AW1900038 owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number : 900038
Inspection Date: 03/1412014 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? Q
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
x
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
Q
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
Q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a ralnbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ❑
■ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels O
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon Q
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Page: 5

Permit. AW1900038 Owner -Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 03/14/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ In ❑
rt+kftr leealne Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ONOO
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, IN ❑ ❑ Cl
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IN
Page: 6

a Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 900038 Facility Status: Inactive „ , Permit: AW1900036 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up _ County: Union Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 03/1 W2Q14 Entry Time: Ql;,Qo PM Exit Time: 02.00 PM
Farm Name: Uaucom Brothers Farm
Owner, Bennett C_QgWcom
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: QQQ2 Morgan MIA Rd Monroe NC 28110 _
Physical Address: Zebulon Wllllams Ed „ Monroe NC 25110
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°06'K' Longitude: °2 '0 "
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy. 200. Travel 112 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd- Farm is on right. The Baucom
Milling Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
Question Areas:
N Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone, 704-663-1699
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
1., 4. Illegal discharge of animal waste into ditch observed during inspection on 03114/14; NOVINQI to follow. Discharge impacts in
process of being addressed.
C
Page: 1

Permit: AM900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom
Facility Number, 900038
Inspection Date: 03119/2014 Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Regulated Operations- Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean
0
0
Total Design Capacity:
0
Total SSLW:
0
Waste Structures
Designed
Observed
Type, Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard
Freeboard
lagoon
LAGOON
18.001
L 15.00
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
■
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
e
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ Q ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
■
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8_ Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Page: 2

03/17/2014 08:50 FAX
R 001/002
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FORM for HIGH WASTE LEVELS
IN STRUCTURES AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: - County:
Facility Name:
Certified Operator Name: Operator M. a
Date that High Waste Level Was Initiaily Reported to DWQ:
DWQ Contact Name: de J1 301 ty 6.GLC.o W . 1601XA a
Current Situation
1. List the current waste level(s) as measured from the waste level in the lagoon/storage pond to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for structures without spillways; and from the waste level in the
structure to the bottom of the spillway for structures with spillways. Also list the quantity of waste
above the maximum liquid mark (also called "start pump")_
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure Name/ID:
Spillway (yes oro
Waste Level (inches): 1
Above Maximum Marc (inches):
Darn is Slumping or Seeping 0 or no):
Mitigating Fa or
2. Brief summary (incl. date, type, and amount) of precipitation events contributing to high waste level:
I� cau/ 124" LS T- 4ts F,3L)l aptO LJ,^-1JV r
aca4-k 11te,e C.Omi nj -JFra rti old F iaof; -51, -ram kL�
3. Date of most recent waste application event: Of e n*� w#) 1-„a H W a4e r ; YL
4. Per the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), how is animal waste land-applied'at
your facility (e,g. solid spreader, irrigation, honey wagon, slurry truck)?
Evaluation of Waste Management tern
5. If applicable, has the cattle lot and barns been inspected for leaking drinkers? Have repairs been
made?
fi_ If applicable, is there enough guttering on the barns to exclude fresh water from the waste
structure? If not, when is installation or repairs to be made? no igm cr , j s7+&J
Hiph Waste Level POA Form-Mar2010

03/17/2014 08:50 FAX IM002/002
7. If applicable, is the diversion ditch around the waste structure functioning properly and excluding all
fresh water from the structure? }1hrs Ll, CrO A _. d
S. Describe all methods employed to contain the waste or to exclude it from surface waters (e.g. berm,
ditch, retention hole, alternate application method, removal of cattle to pasture):
moocc d,'r�6 low, Blare on 0avk% ro sir ode rr'DOud
Proposed Strategy
9. Describe moisture conditions in the field (e.g. standing -water, application equipment mars down in
field, "trafficability" across the soil, soils able to absorb application without runoff, application fields
frozen and/or snow covered):
10. Given optimum soil and weather conditions, what is the earliest possible date that land application
could commence?
11. Do you have a waste analysis obtained within 60 days of application?
12. Proposed receiving crop(s), acreage, and application window(s):
13. Is waste to be pumped and hauled to an off -site location? If so, list the volume and PAN content of
the waste to be hauled as well as the proposed site(s) with their related facility number, number of
acres, receiving crop information, etc. Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water
Quality prior to transfer of waste to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste plan.
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above, and to the best of my knowledge
and ability, the information Is accurate and correct.
MROPILRAP.-JRa
Owner/Manager (print)
Date: 2 "/ 2.71 4y
er/Manager (signature)

HCDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ...
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Bros. Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Bennett Baucom:
Division of Water Duality
Colleen H. Sullins
Director
December 14, 2009
Subject: Permit No. AWI900038
Baucom Bros- Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Union County
In accordance with your application received December 10, 2009, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Permit issued to Bennett Baucom authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system. You had indicated the animal population at this facility to be zero until such time as the waste
storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Baucom Bros. Farm, with an annual capacity of no greater than an
anneal average of zero (0) Swine.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until November 30, 2014 and replaces the COC
No. AWS900039 issued to this facility previously. You are subject to the conditions of this permit until
the closure of all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a letter to the
Division of Water Quality to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of closure of all
containment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee- from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a i00-ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 1.43-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, Notch Carolina 27699.1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 011e
Phone: [phone] t FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 North Cclrohna
Internet wwv,.ncwaterquaiity.org � �}
An Equal Opportunity t Af lrmative Action EmD1uypr � �/atuwI4
pr

W
This Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
This fagility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. 1f you need additional information
concer t1t f er mit. please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Union County Health Department
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Notebook File AW1900038
Permit File AW1900038

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL SWINE ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Bennett Baucom
Union County
FOR THE
continued operation. and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Baucom Bros.
Farm, located in Union County, consisting of zero (0) Swine and the application to land as specified in
the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until November 30, 2014 and shall be subject to
the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters, wetlands. or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25-year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAVrMP and this Permit.
2. No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 2B, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.
Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 143-215.1 OB(l) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility.

5. Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case -by -case basis by the Division.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
Soil pH on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. In no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively -
growing.
6. Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system,
7. Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
_,•labels;-will-novItarm the cover- crop., and will not,contravene•the•groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC-2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps,
S. Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.
9. -Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.

10. A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands. Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles; light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste-
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other.written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
Facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
18. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
49.- Any -major structural,repairs to-lagoons/storage ponds must -have written- documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.
M. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.

2. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a
subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with
recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to thd time of application as
practical and at Ieast within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application,
This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen- • Zinc'
Phosphorus Copper
4. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on -site or record
the off -site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition III. 9. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a.. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The -length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on -site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
c. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition III. 3.
A copy of this Permit, the Facility's permit, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Perrnittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.

7. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by'the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface -waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing; and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the.following events:
a, Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or
equal to that required in Condition V. 2. of this Permit.
Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
d. Failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
C. Any failure of the animal waste management system that renders the Facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
f. Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368,
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the Division Regional Office.

IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
1. The Penmittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
c. Inspect, at i=easondb]:C-times­ any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25-year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25-year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
I
Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) North Carolina Standard far Closure of
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to,the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -ratification of the Division and
submittal of the Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.

4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
I
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit,
This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
6. The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revolting and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0l 1 l (e). An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or'beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
VI. PENALTIES
Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the 14th day of December, 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
for Coleen H. Sullins, Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AW1900038

B: elie, James
From:
Pitner, Andrew
Sent:
Monday, May 05, 2014 10:38 AM
To:
Bealle, James; Lawson, Christine
Subject:
FW: Baucom Lagoon -Union County
Attachments:
Baucom Lagoon.pdf
Hey Christine,
Please take a look at the attached situation here in the MRO. We had to issue a NOV/NO1 for water coming out of the
lagoon this spring when things were wet. Give James and/or I a call to discuss before we respond to Rick. Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Pitner, P.G. - [e-mail]
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office (MRO)
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
MRO Main Phone: [phone]
Direct Office Phone: [phone]
MRO Fax: [phone]
DWR website: http://www.ncwater.org
NOTICE: Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Pigg, Richard - NRCS, Monroe, NC rmailto:Richard. [e-mail]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 10:05 AM
To: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: Baucom Lagoon -Union County
As per our conversation:
The lagoon on the facility of Bennett and Ken Baucom was originally owned by C. A. Williams. Mr. Williams sold the
Baucom's the hog farm years ago. During this process no one ever noticed or thought about the fact that what was
transferred to the Baucom's only included part of the lagoon. Fast forward several years and Mr Williams other property
was sold and developed into residential housing. Now as it stands the Baucom's own one side of lagoon and several
residential property owners own portions of the other side (see attached map). The lagoon is no longer operated as the
hog facility is closed and hog houses have been torn down. The Baucom's would like to close out the lagoon in order to
be relieved of the liability of maintaining it. The problem is that due to the enormous costs of closure they need financial
assistance. That's where we come in. We have "cost share" monies for this type of thing. However I'm being told all
owners must be on contract in order to proceed. Not sure (have not asked yet) if all landowners would be in agreement
to -close -this -lagoon. —My -questions are (1) where -do we go from here-and-(2)-whatlegal/regulatory obligations -do -the
residential landowners have in this process?
Rick Pigg
Conservation Engineering Tech. (ATAC)
3230-8 Presson Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
704-233-1621 Ext 3

4K
6
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any
unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the -information it contains may violate the
law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. if you believe you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.

Type of Visit: 4F Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time; Departure Time: County q_K) .�.._
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Rz
3 �e ;
g�
Desi n Current
Capacity' Pop:
Desi Current° .Desfgn Current
Wet#Poultry Cap city Pop. Cattle Cap city; Pop"' '
Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
INon-La
er
Dairy Calf
r
FeCAtr to Finish
` .
rt' "_;` t
:_ d Design ;Current
Drypoult 1 �Ca a�ci „ . �, , Row
Dairy Heifer
arrow to Wean
ow to Feeder
DryCow
Non-D'
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Turkey Poults.
Other
�4 . ,,. ..I � 6 r • zi ;A..r .�
Other _
Other
C;-
:�c c sa?!ardw�•.;:.,rk �r;w::nc.�w,rwwrn;:awr+�,rtt:u.rnn.wwir-:;:n�.wr.hw.:t.-
:,z::riswn.ax>:,nx[>ar,,vrs„.r,.;aaveni:;:.w.:�•:-tFsxH:ns•urr�r.�
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes ❑ N NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑ N A ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Elp ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste C llectlon & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity.(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Y Rio [] NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [3Yes ❑ ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillw
Designed Freeboard
Observed Freeboard
5. Are there any immediate e-a o the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [a Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Y o NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Apiplicati
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 I ..Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Y�e�
NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc,)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Are
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the C ' cate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the
the atsprotzriate box.
[] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA NE
�] NA ❑ NE
❑ NA eNE
hecklists ❑ Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreementsi%[:]
6��aste
Dos record keeping need i rovement? If yes, check the p iropriate box below esA ❑ NE
Application;rekly Freebor12O
aste Analysis oil Analysiseather Code
Rainf�h:' tockingp Yield inute Inspections Monthly and 1" Raige Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?[:]YesNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faelli Number: - Date of Inspection:
•� 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? 'If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ N NA ❑ NE
�propriate box(es) below.
lure to complete annual sludge survey ZFailureto develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No-oVNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? es o ❑ A ❑ NE
Other Issues — -
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Ye�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emer ens as required by the Yes a ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-app ication)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1�9L ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
ILI
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
YeNA
❑ Y❑NA
�Wv k CY
Phone:
Date:
21412011
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE

I�JjC Vli • tall. Q/ \,V1XJFAA4Z1MG KHaPCc LIUH `/ WFlc■aLIVIR lXVVjfZ T k_/ 01,1 Ut_tUIG L' V7littallVll `.f iC4llllltAl tlJatatallt.G
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: It 1 ; Departure Time: ld2VVKICounty. 40V \ Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
x _s Design'_ Current 1 Di
Capacity Pop Wet PouItry Cal
L �•'G ...mot [- S1 ..LM ..S-.
Wean to Finish Layer
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer
Feeder to Finish s ;
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder ,66 Poultry.,.Ca
Farrow to Finish FTLavers
T(jilts
:
Boars
J
Discharges and Stream Imnaets
Pullets
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
iga r Ciirreot « Design Corr e
icily.. -Pup Cattle Capac[ty
�r
ti
„Current ,`
Po"
4
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Turkey Pouets
m4
Other
1� ,r
a
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1 c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ -Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[] No
[DNA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or•compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑PAN > LO% or 10 lbs. ❑Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
2l. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

aeul Number: Date of Inspection:
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA [] NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE?
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [] No' [] NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [] No [] NA 0 NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Coinments (refer.ta giiestion ft Explain any,YES answers and/or any additional reconifhendad6ns`or any other eomnients. ;x
Use,drawings`of:facilityto' better.etrplain situations.{use ;additional.pages as necessary) 3' Ms ':,� �f. w'z: `.' : ;'r• : r '
Reviewer/inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
.emu i w airirrrr�..
Date of Visit: 10I t Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: QA� Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number -
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
- �' 1 S- �'ti k�.{- �•'.iy k.�R •Mli' - � Ap F'4
yi- a :, x'1�' ,�•;
iF _ } a .�..:� K J l
�'..'?..,• t �.- - -�' �,a.f,� ?
'+� F' it'. +�•�.J Yi"rl'C�Y T`r .%`. '4C
' ''t .-5. � �"�id•.s'" '*�.n�Y
Design Curren#
�'
;^
Deiiign Current
Swine -Canaei Ponce' �y°"
$u
WetPoult f Caffie ti =�' RPo� 5
-I4«
• pr,• ice.: vc�. j..�i
' T
-i'uf . ! •
,Canaci``�.Po"�lJ
`
hTwCs�Pac_i
Wean to Finish,
La er�
"�
Wean to Feeder
Non -La Non -Laver
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
f
;
Design y Current -
y
Farrow to Feeder
„ f N
'`�` � s ,Dr lPouult
Ca acf Po
t
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
r.
Y
e r 1.
s
iy E
4 A
a r� A• '1:S;u.
*il'�
7 y
1 A �•L A,
tik r
,.Uther�';.
.M .�Y
*�h
F
Other
:� a
..ti�
La ers
Non -La ers
Pullets
7'urke s
"Furke Faults
Other
Diseharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dal Heifer
D Cow
Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Broad Cow
[] Yes ❑ Na ❑ VA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Na
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

[Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE.
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
I L Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
I7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Re4uired Records & Documents
❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
E] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: _ - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(cs) below,
[] Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List stnocture(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively cettified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[3 No
[DNA
❑ NE
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (rt fer.to gti'est�oii #)::Explain any YES answers and/or any, additional recommendad6ns or any other cominents
Use drawings of facllity'to bet#er eacp[ain`situations(use'additiodal pages as necessary
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

DiAsibii Df Water Quahty x
1 ty`Number �- ;®Y s�� ' OcD1�193on Of SO1lrandpWaterICottServa
` a R'a ,r -�:a � 4 40t11 agency � ra
/ Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 18 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: IOVOOT Arrival Time: 03:� _ Departure Time: :$ _ County: Region: �AVO
Farm Name: j�t%J ��Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
7`� ; '�'� Design -Current z ` , Design Current • - r Design Current
..; b y ' ,i '- • � ,t - p _. _.. -og- �`fa
t .Y a i 1 E t O Itr $ :Ca aei r .?,PO +4 .y 's A.:
Swine C pac ty .Pop ^4 kWe P u Y p tYy� P n` s Cattle ^ r ' �,� tCapacityW Popp.
.w ,: N ,,_ w -ti.: 4 ..w,an, s r �s ;,: �.zls, _ t� 7 i3hs.a ,t ., waft , , � ri �'..a'04 � .. „a..� A �xu
Wean to Finish La erz
�.
We to Feeder > Non -Layer
Feeder to Finish .' •i
Farrow to Wean ° `i`"tea �g� urgent
Design C r
w�rcpv p,::�$' Ir �j
Farrow to Feeder �nD Fault -?Ca aci �Po
Y .
Farrow to Finish
Gilts z
Y
z Boars
.!}�'i�i .�46
�;. ek 4'a"; }^AEkrx 4 t.rkV'r� Fs,,.Gyc '.dq��y! §'4�i•, i`-�a�.'�kpxy `a ��'3(�'�d�fz��..;, �.a,:,.iry•
5Y i" �'°4: r�. S ,." r f '�i Y`� �g ✓d '' $ b'4q r ",L `vim A °'v '.ii`. 1�41 Y
.�OtheC eu a s 64f S 1, A �&
Other ;' IZ
M x
Layers
-
Non -Layers
�°•�
Pullets
4�
Turkeys
�
Turkey Points
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 2 of 3
Dai Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA [[] NE
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ E
2/4/1021 Continued
0

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑'.NA NE
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ E
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[:]Yes
[] No
❑ NA ❑ E
. waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
[] Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload' ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA.
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [-]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping ne provement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application lekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
aste ran
❑ Weath
r Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge S
ey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes [-]No
[] NA
NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

Macili Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes ❑ No E] NA
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspectiori did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑
[—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA
NE
NE
NE
NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
[] Yes ❑ No [DNA NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Comments (refer to`gde§tion ft-Explain•aby,�,YES answers andlor ainyhadditionat recommendations or any other comments _
16e jraw s of.facil>t to'better_ex lain situations: additional a 'es as necessa ' '
g t3'' ( p_ g r3) z
J
$ 1AU
WAS
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

® Division of Water Quality r
Facility Number .Q 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency I e r
L
fVisit ®Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
n for Visit 40 Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow up Q Referral 0 Emergency Q Other ❑Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ;�o Departure Time: z7�,ZZ County, : _ Region:
Farm Name: ,` t1V `' ,_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: C�" rV l _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: C Integrator:
rt E
Certified Operator-__ A ,V l Operator Certification Number: —1
Hack -up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: 00 = I Longitude: Q° 0, = `,
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Disclharp-es & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any pail of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current "
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifej
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: ff
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes IL o El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ Na
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
El Yes
El NE
❑ Yes eE01
❑ NE
ElYes
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structvrc,7,, Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
H
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any -of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or -managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public healt or
7. Do any of the strictures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No❑NE
Structure 5 • Structure 6
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
mental threat, notify DWQ
Yu_ 6A<� ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
raintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the `receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP? ❑ Yes JRVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ,Oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes t5�&p ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes NQI< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�}o
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check e o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ esi n ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does
srrecord keeping ne vement? If yes, check t appropriate box below. ❑ ❑ NE
Rto Applicati W 1 Freeboard waste Analysis it Analysis aste Transfe Annual Certification
/// Rainfallckt Crop Yield 1�-i20 Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rain Inspections er Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/[nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
1�z
v
El Yes cc!5 [I NA El NE
❑Yes ❑No❑NE
❑ Yes
❑N
❑ Yes
❑NNA
o
N
❑ Yes
NA
❑Yes
❑N
❑ YesVO❑ NA
El NE
❑ Yes
ElNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Tgo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes>�;
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye
❑ NA
R
❑ NE
❑ Ye
,. ❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

t
._i!it'y
®Dlvisian of Water Quality
of Soil and Water Conservation 1iFac
qtV O�oC
er>Agen y''
-
Numbcrer•,
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0 AVI, Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: V Region: MID
Farm Name: ��1J Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
r
Title:
Phone No:
_ p _ Integrator: _
Operator Certification Number:..
�%yvl r Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: cQi,atitude: = ° Longitude: °
or
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
_-- - I � ❑Non -La ec
Dry Poultry
❑
Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑
Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑
Turkey Poults
❑
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
no.
0
��M
■
MG�
1P.2 M►..12
Number of Structures: El
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, noiify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes,. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No aNA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ' R�ZX FINE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA El
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Y�Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes . ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure IStur 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: (�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):"
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrt o any of the s &QjSjqkcs observed? ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ y ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?S ❑ Yes.❑ NA ❑ NE
$. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? res o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures equire ti � ❑ Yes_ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
------------------
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that nee [� Yes Ado ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes t!q4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes�e
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
'� ` .. r m - � i}�a, :• r rpa r['C-: s3-�4+k j� ✓ ` _;
Comments (refer to question,#) ,Explain any, YES. answers and/or gpy�recommendatlons�or anyot6er cammeats"
Ilse+drawings of facility 6),better explain sI#nahons .(use addltioslal,pages sivecessary)
Reviewer/Inspector Name = Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

.i
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes >kTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to Have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. WUP ❑Checklists gn her
21.
Does r cord keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application Wee reeboard 105 e Analysis oil Analysis
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Transfer Annual Certification
_
ainfall tucking rop Yield 20 Minute Inspections onthly and I"
Rain Inspections Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes '4Lko ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑Yes ❑ No El
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No a[EE331 NA 0 NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [INo ANA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWNIP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of deaA�ils within 24 hours and/or document'
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal? -
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of ===a situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye_s--i� 5o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes*o
VVVo
El NA
NE
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye No
El NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 1;ro—
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Coiiiuetits andlor.Di•awings:.
CC `'9z
N
12128104

1)lvtsion of Water Qualtt3'Fv` ; `' s- t[` `r s'
Faeility; Nuitnber t=O Dt�ision of Soil{and Water Conservattori r rWx
ti Other Agencyd: a' �' S f Sq tar
-..r
Type of Visit 40 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Fj 2%Ao Arrival "Firne:P iP? _ . Departure Tinie: County: \J _. Region.
Farm Name: C' `1�� j 2 Owner Email:
Owner Name: �vVY G "w G— Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: _ Integrator:
Certified Operator: or Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine ,
i ❑ Wean to Finish
0 Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feede
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o ❑ { Longitude: ❑ ° = t t
Design Current . Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
s
rTurkc
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed frorn any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:.
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? .
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA /❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Structure 5 Structure
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify 1
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) '.
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA '
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'! El Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
i.•."ate.w.:..g
Etc lhty to better'explain'situations (use: additional pages as.nc
LJ NE
❑ NE
wo
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
�❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name :, - t; -i }' ` Y �� yam: wi;<,, a� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued
NE

Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection
Re aired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to hnve Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
the appropirate box. ❑ WDP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ 1
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certificat
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA J❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
L S S
Additional Camments &ndlor Dra�vin S r5' Y'.t I lr s 3 j c 4 Sa ' w+ r rain
g r k
L`Ft�
o
-.a
12128104

Division of Water Qual:ty=
FaCl�lij'tNtlmb�r; Division of Soil and Water Consi ervatron�'
'(Oher Agency
Type of Visit # Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint C) Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: a%%'/0c1 I Arrival Tiim,�e: ��'-�P Departure Time: b' � :� 1'r'� County: � �_. region:
Farm Name: -bow CM �a :s ,:z Owner Email:
Owner Name: _— rl�j"U`'G. Phone: _
Mailing Address: - _._ — -- - - -- -----
Physical Address: �^
Facility Contact: _ _ Title: _..�_ _... _ Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Gc
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
.-----------r
Integrator
e- ,<'>
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Locution of Farm: Latitude; =O 0 4 = a Longitude: = ° a & = tl
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Fceder to Finish
1„arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feede
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other ..:
❑ other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry C4paeity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
Non-
Poults
Discharges & Stream Imparts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
j
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3: Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from'a discharge?
❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of inspection r�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm 'storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard`?
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA I I NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA I I NE
Structure 5 Structure
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): l �' h
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(iel large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes; and the situation poses an immediate public health, or environmental threat, notify')WO
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
IS. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determinations❑
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1 .� s... i z.�.y'�o°� t - K �,,• `7 i ��ti" c ri i, `,�.0 ,��'r�� �'" Sis�r ��Y�C }
Reviewer/Inspector Name `,;y� z; �, ; -.�' rt� 4�, F-,, +. <:s:. �,�ti, �. �,�.;�. k�;� ..� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

' Facility
Number:
— Date of inspection
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
El NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
the approprrate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
I I NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certif
catior
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather C ide
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
33,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
s
d NE
Arddrtlonal Comritents and/or Drawtn S: f L M1 n h` 7 C�$tt
12128104

:t
700WP��.
Facility Number
t]
cp Lrvtston or water Quaixty
0 Division of Soil and Water'Consei-vatlon
ii nthar'Aaanvv ;
ILL
Type of Visit '&Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit & Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: a '.V_ . County: V "U. �" '_t.Region: _"__� .�!
Farm Name: a, Owner Email: _
Owner Name: Phone: ------ - ---- — --_------- -
.-Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: _ _ Integrator:
Certified Operator: _ _ Operator Certificate n Numb
Back-up Operator: ack-u Certii"icati Numb�K7,
- - V\�
o�s s
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
41;1 19'�C711�vql '4f�a
.Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Laye rs
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design . Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
0-Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters or the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to tl'e Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA �] NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NE
❑ Yes ❑ No '16A NE
❑ Yes o/❑ NA NE
El Ye I ❑ NA NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number -� - Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No Iskm
NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
F�Ag�
Observed Freeboard (in): �
5. Are there any immedia r "tintegrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, eepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
❑ NA
NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental
threat, notify DW
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ElNA
NE
8..Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ YesKN
El NA
NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
El Yes❑
NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [:IPAN > 10% or ] 0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
I5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑
Yes
❑ No�NA NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ E.
Ft
Reviewer/Inspector Name '' r ', �' _ "� A
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

t
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to Iiave all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certi ication
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections E]WeatherCode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
2& Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EINE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EINE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 9NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes [INo ❑ NA 9 NE
12128104

Baucom Brothers 2 90-38
Subject: Baucom Brothers 2 90-38
From: James Bealle <j ames.bealle@ncmail. net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:12:03 -0400
To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
J.R.
"additional correspondence to follow" issue #6...
jb
James Bealle <iarnes.bealle(&,ncmail.net>
i� Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
..... .. ............................ . ................. .. . ............................. ............. ..
Content -Type: applicati
Aws900038070620.pdf 1
base64
................. .
1 of 1 8/7/2007 2:16 PM

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 9Q03Q _ 8 Facility Status: Active _ _ _ _ Permit: AWS900038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Uniop _ ___ Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: =012007 Entry Time:01:30 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Baucom Brgthers 2 Owner Email:
Owner: Beaneft Q j aucom Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 602 Morgan Mill Rd _ Monroe NC 28110
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant N Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: " Longitude:80°27'QO"
From intersection of Zebulon Williams Road and Hwy. 200_ Travel 1/2 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The Baucom
Milling Company is located on Hwy 200 just north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Bennett C. Baucom Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: 3WP_ 'k>f :zem7
Secondary I
Page: 1

Permit: AWS900038 Owner - Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 06/20/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
6. Facility Operator advised to coordinate with Union SWCD/NRCS to develop and implement Closure Plan <or> maintain Permit and
applicable records as per discussion.
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Lagoon embankments, and vegetation shall be
mowed regularly.
8. Failure to maintain adequate markers to determine waste levels in the Lagoons; additional correspondence to follow.
10., 11,, 14,, 15., 17., 18:, 19., 20., 21, No records maintained since 2001; additional correspondence to Follow.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
25. Failure to conduct Annual Sludge Survey; additional correspondence to follow.
26. Failure to designate an actively certified OIC;.additional correspondence to follow.
ib
Page: 2

Permit: AWS900038 Owner . Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 06/20/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Feeder 380 0
Total Design Capacity: 380
Total SSLW: 198,360
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon LAGOON
1800
18 00
Page: 3

9
Permit: AWS900038 Owner - Facility; Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 06/20/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ n 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ■
❑
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
■
❑
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
■
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑
❑
■
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page: 4

Permit: AVVS900038 Owner • Facility: Bennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 06/20/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Aeplication Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Cl
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
nn■❑
n❑0E
n❑n■.
Yes No NA NE
■000
■❑inn
■
Page: 5

Permit: AWS900038 Owner -Facility: Sennett C Saucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Oats: 06/20/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ■
Design? ■
Maps? ■
Other? ■
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
■
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
■
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
fl
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
26: Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
■
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

. Permit: AWS900038 Owner - Facility: Sennett C Baucom Facility Number: 900038
Inspection Date: 06/20/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection_ Reason For Visit: Routine
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
39. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 ■ Q 11
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fait to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Q M 0 Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
fl■❑Q
Page: 7

Type of Visit A Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ?a k(k OX( Arrival Time: Departure Time: l County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: si`Rt��„l� QvC C9 fV\ Phone: vZy 3' �. 9 7
Mailing Address: A'n �{'�Y1�f`ZF,A Ne a811 d
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: £ S1w�4�'AL3COM
Certified Operator: �RY1>?.A�}COf✓1
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =]' =' ="
Longitude: = ° =' 0
Design
Current
Design
Current '
ap
^D"A,ign Cut renf
Swine
Capacity
Population
Wet Poultry
C**opacity
Population
Cattle
❑ Dairy Cow
Cap�cty Population
❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
x`l�
`
_
❑ Dairy Heifer
El Dry Cow
Dry Poultry
[� Farrow to Feeder S20 Q
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La ers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
-Layers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
El Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Other
❑ TurkeyPuults
10 Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (1 f yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12128104
Continued

J
Facility Number: 50
Date of Inspection "
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ti-A Onn
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �(NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ;0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [% No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes C&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[)I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
W. No
W.
El NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments;(refer to question #)::.Explain any YES answers and/or any reco.mmendations,or any other=comments
Use dra'wmgs;of facility:;to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary}:
1
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name - — �' -.� - ------ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: iO
Page 2 of 3 " 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —3$ Date of Inspection 1 ti t,
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ wUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24,
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Otherlssues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Qr p n o'i wv A CaQ.; t3 G �-�►,t p c�-a�t.� i-o 1< no...� A g s=q n to
lbowm> s_A-C_ .
�'(3',L ^ w A'� t-R N o...s
S
A-o
d�se.>,S.s C.1osv��.. F'•�i��L.� 1z��
Page 3 of 3 12128104

w a rF9Q�
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC 28110
Dear Bennett Baucom:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and !Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E.
NC DEPMEiRMINtki
AND NATURAL RE _ L
October 1, 2004
OCT 15 2004
MOORESViLLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DW0-GROUNDWATER SECTION
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS900038
Baucom Brothers
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Union County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on April 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Bennett
Baucom, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and Iand
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AW S900038 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Baucom Brothers, located in Union County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 380 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC:. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay -careful attention to the record kee in
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section —Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NofthCaro ina
Phone: [phone] I FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us ;Vaturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive, relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone].. If you need additional information -concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Union County Health Department
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS900038
APS Central Files

N
L
f Visit P Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
n for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: I .Q Arrival Time: It t 0UA0. I Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: a[wr.N Owner Email:
Owner Name: + j�Phonep:
Mailing Address: �jOo�. Aor'gAr• e, jl i'za/ �^ �T /"G�,i.d^rA� �i11 0
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Latitude: ❑ c ❑ , Longitude: = ° ❑ t
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
[]Layer
j! ❑ Non -Layer
Other
❑ Other Ji
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made`?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Daia Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes )9No []NA ❑ NE
El Yes
El No
El NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
`gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
)dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

-C
U,
Facility Number: — q Date of Inspection SOS
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 01No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes '%No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Nin No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
ElNA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o
ElNA ElNE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ElYes o
El NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesN'FrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14.' Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes IRNo
El NA
El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
l6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determinations❑
Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name kh Phone:
MCA
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: rL-Aw Date: 1� j
12128104 Continued

0.
Facility Number: tyO Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
?es
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
�es
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit'?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit'?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
ElYes
o
El NA
El NE
El Yes
o
El NA
El NE
El Yes
No
❑ NA
El NE
El Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
)6No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
t�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additi,4h6I Coihmc:h6 and/or Drawings:
1 k l- ,�akl
12/28104

O�o� WATFRQ� Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
p�pT. OF qW&O S
February 6, 2004 IijD KMUW KSWRCI=S
r OFFICE
Mr. Bennett Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe, NC 28110
Re: Annual; Permit Fee
Permit # AWS900038
Dear Mr. Baucom,
FES 1 1 2404
I received your note regarding the permit fee for the swine operation. Since the lagoon at
the farm has not been closed, your permit is still required. When you close the lagoon, please
notify me and the permit can be rescinded. If you have any questions, please contact me at (919)
733-5083, ext. 539 or Paul Sherman at [phone], ext. 529.
cc: Paul Sherman
Fran McPherson
' :Sohn os d MR0
Farm file # 90-38
Central Files
Sincerely,
4: �/�' � e, Z_ - et �
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
NCDENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623.6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affinnative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
h tp:/lh2o.enr state.nc. us

M_
oF\N A��4
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQ„ ESTED
BENNErr BAUCOM
6510 MORGAN MILL ROAD
MONROE NC 28110
Dear Bennett Baucom:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
I*C DOT. OF FAS1I11!ONOflEW
OM MATUpA RESUl.IRCSFS Alan W . Klimek, P.E. Director
Lt Y` `';M OFFICE Division of Water Quality
JAI 2 0 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2004
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Baucom Brothers
Permit Number: AWS900038
Union County
1n accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1OG, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year 6f the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 7/10/2000.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 7/10/2003 - 7/9/2004 is $150.00. Your payment was due 9/6/2003.
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
Sincerely,
.F
*iL J
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Mooresville Regional Office_
Union County Health Department
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper

o`'o� W a r�qp�
May 1, 2003
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC 28110
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department o; Envirppir�n�i�f�an(1jNa;ur4Reso`r Yes
Mari I. }C! nrek ����Dlrec;or
V700RESl3itr ror�a:1 ito oualityf
:1m
MAY 1 9 2003
Way NOV
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS900038
Baucom Brothers
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Union County
Dear Bennett Baucom:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water (duality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Swine Waste Operation General
Permit AWG1G0000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Perntit.
In accordance with your application received on April 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Bennett
Baucom, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWS900038 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the-Baucom-Brothers,-located in- Union County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 380 Farrow to Feeder swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be -replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Aew
h
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Canker, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Intemet httpY/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking '
of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
'-�Zde /-
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
M. (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Union County Health Department
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWS900038
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
,lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC 28110
Dear Bennett Baucom:
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANO NATURAL RESOURCES
November 6, 2000
I tom,
RASA LTR
1 2000
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Baucom Brothers
Facility Number 90-38
Union County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Alan Johnson on 3/31 /99 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
❑ The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of Information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Alan Johnson the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Alan Johnson, at 919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, NC 28115, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions please contact Alan Johnson at [phone]. If within 90 days you are
unable to provide Alan Johnson with the information you are automatically required
to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within
180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 'Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumes paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
JK Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 clays. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable -Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

C1_
O:�r1-T
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RED( UESTED
Bt:hINETT BAUCOM �r ' .�.�� +��ld � @i�
6510 MORGAN MILL Roan
MONROE NC 28110
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Baucom Brothers.
Permit Number: AWS900038
Union County
Dear Bennett Baucom:
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215. I OG, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 7/10/2000.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 7/10/2002 - 7/9/2003 is $150.00. Your payment was due 9/6/2002.
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Non -Discharge Branch CompIiance/Enforcement Unit
,,MooresvillF1tkgional:Office
Union County Health Department
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

1qJ
-h�µNCDENR .
sz ,-W
JAMZS B. HUNT JR.- .y f
i WAYNE MCDEVrTT
SECRETARY
. �'.`+.:^'.',,. ,.•..y, yr, i 4'�i� ..an°3S:Ce � ��
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 20, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
Baucom Bros., Facility #: 90-38
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Baucom:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
July 16, 1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the leaks from the rear of your
swine mouses.
Specifically, Mr. Johnson observed several discharges from cracks in the
foundation of your concrete wastewater diversion structure. The noted discharges are
a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and your deemed permitted
status. In addition to the leaks, the number of animals at the facility (376) does not
agree with that in your certified plan (350). You must either remove the excess
animals from your facility or contact your technical specialist for revision of your
certified farm plan. The specialist can also help you properly set the pumping marker
in the lagoon.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by July 30, 1998
addressing the deficiencies noted above. In responding, please address your comments
to the attention of Mr. Johnson. Be advised that this notice does not prevent the
Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for this or any other
violation.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]o
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Em PLOYER - 50% RECYCLEDl10% POST-CONSUMI&A PAPER
Tom.-. +w+ '

Page Two
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

I
Ai
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVIL.L.E REGIONAL, OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 6, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
REITM RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject: Notice of Violation
DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Baucom Bros., Facility #: 90-38
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Baucom:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
March 31, 1999. This report is being issued as a Notice of Violation due to inadequate
freeboard in the lagoon. Specifically, the liquid level in the lagoon had encroached into
the 25 yr./24 hr. storm event storage area. This is a violation of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1. Also, some of your waste application records did not have the
accompanying waste analysis information and there was also an apparent
overapplication of PAN (nitrogen). Please see the enclosed report for more comments.
It is requested that you submit a written response to this office by April 21, 1999
indicating the actions taken to correct the problems noted above. Please address the
response to Mr. Johnson.
In addition to the above, during many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted
that some farms are often missing one or more components of the certified farm plan
that should be available for review. The items listed below must be available for review
during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, buffer zones, feed areas.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Should have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA Za1 IS
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

i
l-
Page 2
Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists that have been completed.
Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of
Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should
be applied during the time, the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general
waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

Request of information for Mandatory Wettable Acres Determination
Your facility f.'— 3 has been tentatively flagged for a mandatory Wettable Acres Determination.
The basis of this requirement is due to a lack of available information to exempt your facility from this process. In an effort to
promote flexibility, we are granting your facility a fourteen(]4) day window of opportunity to provide our office with the information
indicated below. We suggest that you contact your Service Company, local NRC_S, Extension, or Soil and Water District office for
any assistance they may be able to provide. Upon further review of this information, your facility may be exempted from this
process. In the event, that a technical specialist cannot provide you with this information in the allotted time frame, notification by the
technical specialist will need to be made to establish an alternative schedule. If you, or the technical specialist have any questions
concerning this notice, please contact me. q
Address: A71&;;L 3a6b.� Phone: Due Date: f
c/o NC DWQ Fax: OF
o C+r G5 V i Ke.)' 'Y✓ .
+' ]. MaP /Diagram
Minimum requirements -- clear, ieQible map or diagram showing labeled hydrants, pulls/zones, and related coverage area
(lengths.etc.). It must include design restrictions such as well locations, streams, wetlands, property boundaries, ditches, etc.
Locations of hog houses g lagoon(s) must be included. Tract and field numbers corresponding to waste plan must be included. An
updated aerial photo, if available, may be useful.
?. Calculations
Irrigation calculations (D-? or equivalent) to back the related coverage area shown on the map/diagram. �A D-1 irrigation parameter
worksheet or equivalent is required and D-3, D-4 worksheets are recommended. Without doing a system calibration like will be
required in a full wetted acres determination, then 90% of the published throw (diameter) based on operating pressure must be used
for calculating acreage of pulls or spray zones -- in the case of stationary systems.
3. Updated Waste Plan (must be�based on effective wetted acres)
This Waste Utilization Plan option can be by fields or pulls/zones. Suggest indicating somewhere on plan that it is based on effective
wetted acreage. All fields listed in plan must be reachable with available irrigation equipment or under contract with a third party
applicator. Use of this option requires above calculations to be provided. Acreage claimed in waste plan using this option does not
have to meet the 75% criteria. The updated plan must still generate a nitrogen deficit.
4. Updated Waste Plan (redaction of acreage)
This Waste Utilization Plan option must label the fields by spray pull/zone or credit the acreage of each field as less than 75% of the
total acreage in the respective field. All fields must be reachable with available irrigation equipment or under contract with a third
party applicator. The updated plan must still generate a nitrogen deficit. A D-I irrigation parameter worksheet is required and D-2,
D-3, D-4 worksheets are recommended.
Nole: All documents must be signed by WUP technical specialist, irrigation Specialist, or Professional Engineer.

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number __3_9 _,��Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: S acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative:- keaile.& Baw-d:+-% Part It eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: . _ T61kil cn
Date of site visit: 3 3 1
Date of most recent WUP.:
Operation not required to secure.WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit. _ 2 3 __ pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
fi. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and DzID3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part II. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination.
Requirements, WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
/F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
.F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5. acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 ' WA determination required because CAWMP credits fields)s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage .as noted in table in Part Ill.

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number -
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS3
NUMBER NUM13ER1.2 IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
. i
1
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
4 determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the.
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

JA1Y1E5'B--H1JNT JR.
GOVERNOR
ff
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND, NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 8, 2000
�.MILL'HOLMAN
'SXCRETARY
Bennett Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Rd.
Monroe, NC 29110
ERR "M T F-
&V.
Subject. Notice of Violation
r
DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
NCGS 143-215.10C
Baucom Bros., Facility 90-38
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Baucom:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on May 4, 2000. During the inspection several problems were noted. This letter is
being issued as a Notice of Violation for the following:
Waste analyses were not available. This was also noted during last year's
inspection.
• Waste application records were inadequate. Your records indicate that
only 157,000 gallons of waste was applied last year. However, your farm
plan indicates that 1.4 millions gallons of waste should be generated
annually. Even with a reduced swine population, this does not account
for the total difference in the amount of waste generated and the amount
actually applied. If the records are correct, this discrepancy could
indicate a mechanical problem (flow rate) with the irrigation system, or a
leak in the lagoon structure.
Lagoon embankments require maintenance. Briars and other vegetation
prevent a proper inspection of the structural integrity of the lagoon.
Failure to provide complete records during an inspection and to maintain the
facility in accordance with your certified farm plan is a violation of North Carolina
General Statute 14315.1 OC and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A 2H
.0217(d). It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by May
19, 2000 indicating, the actions taken to correct the noted violations. Please address
your response to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
9130 NORTH MAIN STREET. MOORESVILL.E, NORTH CAROL.INA Zal lb
I -HONE 704-663-1 699 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I AIrFIRMA71VE ACTION EMPLOYER - So% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Bennett Baucom
Be advised that failure to provide timely waste analyses and adequate waste application
records in the future will result in a recommendation for enforcement. North Carolina Genera]
Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state
environmental laws and regulations, as well as criminal penalties.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Coordinator
File
M.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P:E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

.+
0F MT01
1�r)
�. Governor
William G. Ross, ; r.$Wretary
> North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
March 8, 2001
Bennet Baucum
6510 Morgan Mill Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Baucum Bros. Farm
Certificate of Coverage: AWS900038
Site Inspection Report
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Baucum:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 6, 2001. This letter
is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency for failing to keep the IRR-2 forms current, and as noted during the
inspection of the facility, the lagoon banks need to be maintained.
It is Mr. Johnson's understanding that the facility will cease operations in the next couple of months.
Enclosed please find the Request For Removal form to be completed and returned at the, appropriate time. A final
visit will be made to confirm that the facility is no longer in use. However, until operations are ceased, all records
and files need to be complete and in order.
Once the facility becomes inactive the farm will not be subject to an annual inspection; however, because
the facility is permitted, the following items must continue to be maintained until the lagoons are properly closed
out.
• Certification forms.
• Waste application records, with accompanying waste analyses. _ -
• Waste utilization plan, site diagram, tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not necessarily total
acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste produced by livestock.
• Waste and soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency action plan which must be posteiL
• Insect, odor control, and mortality checklists must be completed.
Certified Operator renewal card:
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate'to contact Mr. Johnson or me at '
[phone].
2=09—
NCD£NR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 Nora- Main Strom:, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

�' ,..:!_w. l.'k:'rtr.
Diwsion f
I v �1r MI A- t•�_
'
�'- ` at. �. Q i :anf Sod at3er• rfleservatiou
�♦y...
' V er Agen MM
r .. ,f v �# a r b� • �y y^ r '.
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit a Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Time -
Facility Number i Date of Visit: Q Time: •.>`
Nat O erational Q Below Threshold
M Permitted 13Certifed [3Conditionally Certified 0 Regisitered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold ......... ..—. ----...
FarmName . .......................... ........... ..._................. County:........ i.l..{.`.�:...----.........................................
OwnerName: ....................... .... ....... ��.............. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact:
Title: ............................................ I........ Phone No:
MailingAddress : .................. ...... ......................... ..................... ..................... _............. ................................................. _......................... -........ ..... -............. ......
Onsite Representative: itn. C......>kS.. vv�,,- integrator: ,,,,,,,
Certified Operator: . � t��- L ��'4 .... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
El Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� �• Longitude �• �
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer 1❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish ToW Design Opacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of L$goons' rl ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges, & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge orieinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other.. _
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach NVa.cr of the State? (If yeti, notify DWQ)
c. Ndischargc is observed, what is the es-Lmated now in wralhnin?
d. Does discharge hypass a ]agoon systc r.' (If yes. Mkiry DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes QNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
0 /01/Or Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
wast,t Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage'capacity (freeboard plus stoii storage) less than adequ=? ❑ Spillway ":: ❑ Yes ❑"No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structnic 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _—_ _
Freeboard (inches): k—� _'_2'-�._....... ... —................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes GkNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes[�lo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? MYes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes B Vo
9. 'Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes XNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes EkNo
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type r—v c
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certifies Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
[R!No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Jallo
rock outcrops present? ❑ Yes ❑ No
W'Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes []No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [KNo
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation,. freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) - Yes • ❑ No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes •® No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes gl No
24. Fail to notify regional.DWQ of emergency situations as required br General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes B No
25, Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes Q No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 9No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance ofthe Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hour" ❑ Yes IP No
01/O1/01 Continued

- Facility Number: Date of Inspection ,x . Printed on: 1/17/2001
r _
30. Is there any evidence of :wind drift during land application? (i e_ residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes. ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes JNrNo
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or _
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.} -- -w^ ❑ Yes ERNo
3�3. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
' 34. I?o the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit` You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to:question any;YES answer's and/or any;recommendations or any other comments -,Mr.
.. 4Explasn
Use drawings of i.:", my to betfer explain sttuateons {use addrbonaZ pages as necessary) �e Final Notes
Copy
t
11 / {
A.
' /'ta�1Ui/�GF /`7�d,�i'Yct✓ CS G_1r�
i VLSjj,Gc►� t[ 5 i�l✓ �sn�
l
S`LOccIdt6e,�Gr III-e- C
t'(P - ^ G 1J'Q'' r
' e- C C a[ e fly
ZI
C� c'� �• a �~
l �S v t Uu c�� �� tGti�.tult`-e
tL✓��`��._ r yu��\ ��5
'i> rE:T e.,A
Reviewer/Inspector Name
y
Reviewer/Iuspector Signature:
�G -
:��cr� .z-..— Date:
l
01/01/01

r-acility Number — Lagoon Number_,__ y ,.w Lagoon Identifier _ _ - • r
O Active. O Inactiv.e, Latitude Ej 0 F I Longitude
. r By GPS or Map? ❑GPS Ma
N ■ GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment'Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spilfway?
46. Adequate Marker?
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
O less than 300 ft O 300 ft - 1000,ft O greater than 1000 ft
O Yes O No
0<5 05-10 0>10
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O'No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Unknown
O Yes O No
O Yes, O No
O Yes O No
+.A
�1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Divisions of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN E1PT REQUESTED
ennctt aucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC 28110
Farm Number: 90 - 38
Dear Bennett Baucom:
4
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 22, 1999
You are hereby notified that Baucom Brothers, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply
for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm
has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
ZS'rely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
.Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.Q. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 10, 2000
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road T4s r , ,ov
Monroe NC 28110 �A %
JUL 14 2000
OWN OF emmma fu
mseq
ItUOAFsp�llif REp� $
Dear Bennett Baucom:
1 fflk�_K
•
��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS900038
Baucom Brothers
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Union County
In accordance with your application received on September 21, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Bennett Baucom, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG 100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Baucom Brothers, located in Union County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 380 Farrow to Feeder and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. Please note Condition 111.2 requiring a liquid level marker in the lagoon. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of stocked,animals above the number authorized by this COC will require
a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10%.post-consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS900038 ;
Baucom Brothers /
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone]'ext. 502.
Sincer ,
' Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Union County Health Department
-M,u�illi=Regional=Office; Wate�Quah y_Section
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
r
1

State of North Carolina h;,rFCC��
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) E�r�
General Permit -� Existing Animal Waste Operations 419ap�
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. lease
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Baucom Brothers
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Bennett Baucom
1.3 Mailing address: 6510 Moran Mill Road
City, State: Monroe NC Zip: 28110
Telephone Number (include area code): 753-1740
1.4 County where facility is located: Union
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From intersection of Zebu]on-Will iam's Road and
Hwv. 200. Travel 1/2 mi west on Zebulon Williams Rd. Farm is on right. The Baucom Milling _Company is located on
200 iust north of the intersection with Zebulon Williams Rd.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/92
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 90 (county number); �38 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descrtp ion: Swine operation
mow to Feeder
380- Certified Design Capacity
y m s; no. if no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
Is the above information correct? 1
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum nuer or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (R sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Layer
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef —
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 90 - 38

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas riot covered by the application
system): 30.00 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 8
2.4 Number o lagoo storage pon (circle which is applicable): 3
2.5 Are subsurface drains.present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? %�22 - 9 -- 93
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWUP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility. y
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, v
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.+--
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field. ✓
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.✓
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUPr
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field. ✓
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP. �-
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications. r
3.3.10 A site schematic. ✓
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan. ✓
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.v
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted. L✓
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility. ✓
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 90 - 38

Facility Number: 90 - 38
Facility Name: Bat, om Brothers 41,
. Oi
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: �h�m iyy�
❑ u
I, B-Ps+,A­e� fJ4.srcC&M _ (Land Owner's name ed in question 1.2), attest that
. /�� "" p 'flies
this application for Atgc- txid _ 7� 3 _ (Facility ti me listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be ret;4med to me as incomplete. f
Sionature Date
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting, information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING rNFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Pabe 3 of 4 90 - 38

D5N
RRDClVE
"o D � rory
1S i�99
BAUCOM BROTUF
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
SKETCH MAP
COMPONENTS
1. SKETCH MAP
2. PHOTO
3. SOILS MAP
4. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. WASTE APPLICATION AGREEMENTS (IF NEEDED)
Y11

a
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN a
Producer: Baucom Bros. Fac. 90-38
Location: Zebulon Williams Rd.
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Farrow to Feeder
Number of Animals: 380 sow wl litter
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting
nutrient. Waste must be analyzed within 60 days of each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are required so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop
to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop
can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. Waste shall
not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do
not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen.
Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters, which is not allowed
under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to
reduce the potential for pollution, the waste must be applied to a growing crop or applied
to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking
will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems, but may increase nitrogen into streams
due to erosion.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content
for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for
analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

nm
M;
00
m
16

`�
k3
A
ZZ),
C(5
/ 'Oeno

P. ,
so
a
M ),� W�V,61;a
Ord,
4i
let t,
tF
147
Rn
qlil�
.16
A"4
j'tr I

l
)NiTED STATES
4ENT OF THE INTERIOR
DLOGICAL SURVEY
546000, 547 548, _ 549 27'30" 55Q S5] r5
LIS
.56
,.T�..(�'��P �"S , 'r� (� • , •{Ttl.` •C� 1 SJ2 i r.�'` �• ,.s IT
5a7 _ Cyr. l l �- i`^ 497
4 f`i`k j. O �1i s• Lam!"
Ad.ane ..•\ L o• r� / f ���''� Ssr,�7 7r R
pp
��� r ! rJ ''`�rl ti I •1 �+}. 4u r1 l'` ,° ^ , 1 r• 1�.;
l { 0
}61j1��` � Cam• asc ,1 � ` ^ k ^�SSf7 �jf� 1 /•1t . '_C � I � . ��-.Ss, �r �,..• rl
.7.�; ._ n�.y I n(;• �''�'¢'� ,°r�"' 11, ! _�_.sr.-'�' ..}' r� < �,/ ,> J � p
fir-- ,� r : , �!�,' : / r ; 1/,/�! ^.Y• -w
MIA Chi y
It .
�7 �t��.! � r. -.��'� 1; (:�!., a 57R. FI}�r {) ` 1. y- {� � �• �� I• I� S, fix,--s
It
Ilk
Fna �� ,1-�� it : � ` 1 •' i • } 1 ,� I '+ � } � () , ' 0
4 �. I/ ,: /•- ! ,? �,, 'r" fir/ , ; f, •�1'
r U High Rch
N, •�� ^� } 1� r. O ''I I. I t - + `^1\.-5.4n �1 .) •��,�r�rh I! _ .�
10
['`.'.��=,.T-�r�/x/��--i:� '' /IrI ft` ���_ f, '� i �, + it � �• r �'~��•• ��E�, ,1 �`, � l ,
C.
f C ! ``• o r•~�' 1 ' f4�' , ram' ,, ,� '�'�
•„ ',, r�� i '' .r it 1• ':!1r •` 1-llO-!J' - s! f.`^' 00.
•�- .
1 �' }5� • 1
60
i�IaAfi Q I I f 1i' , I1 1 .I'i,\ '1'�]} . f � ,��� • �, �l 1) 1 �� \_, '� {
- � !,'.,1�_su� ,\ �; 1r ' _ -!! 1511�,'i,' 4 ,�,--�/• „,6p� , . �l.1''.i__`�...��, �,,IJ"{f _ ;
•�•?
• +,'� � � •� i1� } ! , 5.+�� � tit-, � _ � i�. l%.—•`
.41
to
bstati
' , ,I�' - , r•r S« I �f. .r I' 1 U ` /'., } � `� .1.1r +. 1I�� l i `` ,
till-
'F •:. Ilf �{
_,.'.. ,3i9' ��, •f.� 1 Cf.;' .r 1 Q '-Jl._ 1 f1 1 �� r-"'�

;s6 .
SOIL SURVEY OF COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA • SH
a�
I 3/s 1i2 1/4 a
SCALE I;24 000

U.S. DEPT . OF AGRICULTURE NC:-C:F•A --Z
613I L C CINSERVAT I CIN SERVICE
SOIL VIAF' LEGEND
NAME Baucorn Dr—cthers #'�: DATE: 1- i
Sni is or, this unit of Iand are:
Map Syrnbca I MapG i nq Unit
4'3B T a t'urn grave i i y s i It loam, 2 to 8% s I o ye s
Interpretative
Gr-.,up i nqs Interroretat I ons of So i I s
Taturn Th i s deep. grave I I sty i l i s a red to str oriq
brown silty c I ay, and i s we l i drained.
Areas mapped as eroded have C)- inches
f tcop s i I .
0

Q�
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN ffJ�p
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
320 animals units X . /1 ac. in /animal unit/yr = —1 5'3. _Z ac. in /year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
38C animal units. X G.5 lbs. PAN/1000 animal/yr. = a; ,170 lbs. PAN/year
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std._6331
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown
and surface application;
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil .. Lbs. N Field
4 No. Type • _AcreUtilized Application-,
MA
_M
GW, 60�
RM'
IN=.M,
-/
1 M
w. �`
�i lam%
/� r J
4 i/ -"NOME
9 7�
TOTALS �
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial
fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield
expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the
N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require
farmers in some eastern counties of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan
u
that addresses all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.

�O
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner should be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 2])
Tract Flds. Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac. Utilized Application
RYE
TABLE 2 N
TOTAL N .UTILIZED(Tables 1 & 2)
TOTAL N PRODUCED
SURPLUS or DEFICIT
D
p
�,Z
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application
of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require
precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. See
attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of wastewater by
irrigation.

$90-3
The crops shown in Table 1 are the typical recommended craps for waste utilization but is not an
inclusive list. Waste may be applied to other crops based on the nitrogen recommendation for R.Y.E. as
shown in NC Cooperative Extension Service Crop Production Guides, the NRCS Agriculture Waste
Management Field Guide or the NC Agriculture Chemicals Manual.
Table 1. Nltrotren M Fertilization Rates by Cron Yield
'A range is shown for N fertilization rates because N uptake is dependent on the available water
holding capacity (AWHC) of the soil. AWHC is primarily determined by the soiI's texture, percent
organic matter and rooting depth. Make your selection from the chart based upon the soil's texture,
inherent ability to produce, the occurrence of necessary conservation practices to protect the resource
base, and the landuser's historical crop production.
Crov Nitroeen Recommendation
Wheat'
1.7 - 2.4 lbs. N/bu.
Barley'
1.4 - 1.6 lbs. N/bu.
Oats=
1.0 - 13 lbs. N/bu.
Rye=
1.7 - 2.4 lbs. N/bu.
Triticale'
1.4 - 1.6 lbs. N/bu.
Corn -grain
1.0 - 1.25 lbs. N/bu.
Com-silage
10 - 12 lbs. N/ton
Sorghum -grain
2.0 - 2.5 Ibs: N/ctiut.
Soybeans'
3.5 - 4 lbs. N/bu.
Cotton'
0.06 - 0.12 lb. N/lb. lint
Tobacco -Burley - See current year Burley Tobacco Information Guide available from North Carolina
Cooperative Extension Service.
Tobacco - Flue -cured - See current year Tobacco information Guide available from the North
Carolina Cooperative Extension Service.
Sorghum-Sudangrass
45 - 55 lbs. N/ton hay
Sudan grass
45 - 55 lbs. N/tort hay
Pearl Millet
45 - 55 Ibs. N/ton hay
Bermudagrass (all areas of state)-
40 - 50 lbs. N/ton hay
Tall fescue
40 - 50 lbs. N/ton hay
Orchardgrass
40 - 50 lbs. N/ton hay
Timothy
40 - 50 lbs. N/ton hay
Crabgrass
40 — 50 lbs. N/ton hay
Eastern Gamagrass
40 — 50 lbs. N/ton hay
Rescucgrass
40 — 50 lbs. N/ton hay
Small grain
50 - 60 lbs. N/ton hay
Switchgrass'
See footnote'
Pine Trees
40 - 60 lbs. ac/yr
Hardwood Trees
70- 100 lbs. ac/yr
NOTE: Reduce all hay crop nitrogen rates by 25 percent When grazing. For etch ton of hay harvested from a
pasture system the nitrogen application may be returned to the PYE (N) application rate for hay.
I When waste is to be applied to soybeans, it should be accomplished at preplant or planting. The crops entire nitrogen
needs should be met with this application
2 N rates in excess of 120 pounds per acre are seldom justified for wheat, barley, oat, rye, triticale, and cotton. Do not
apply more than 100 pounds of N when oversceding small grain or Ryegrass into Bermudagrass.
3 The total Nitrogen application shall not exceed 120 lbs. Per acre per year.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1998
Rev. 4

U
Union County, North Carolina 107
TABLE 5.--LAND CAPABILITY AND YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE
(Yields are those that can be expected under a high level of management. Absence of a yield indicates that
the soil is not suited to the crop or the crop generally is not grown on the soil)
i
Soil name and I
I
Land I
1
I
I
I
I
!
I I
I I
map symbol Icapabilityl
Soybeans I
corn I
Wheat I
Grain
ICorn silagel Grass- I
rescue
I
I
I
l
I
sorghum
I Ileg%=a hay I
pasture
I
I
Bu J
Bu 1
8u I
Bu
1 Tons I Tons I
AUM*
I
AeB: I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
Ailey ---------- 1
IVs 1
18 1
45 I
--- {
---
I --- I --- I
---
I
Appling--------I
I
I
IIe I
1
1
40 I
1
I
95 I
I
I
60 1
E
--'
I I 1
I --- I 4.9 1
I I I
8.0
AgC :
Ailey----------1
VIs---
I
Appling --------
[
I
IVe I
I
I
25 J
I
I
70 I
l
€
35 I
---
I I I
I --- I 4.2 I
I I I
7.0
ApB-------------I
Ile J
40 1
95 I
{
60 1
---
I -`- I 4.8 I
8.0
Appling I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I
ApC-------------I
Iva I
30 1
70 1
I
50 1
---
J
I --- 1 4.2 E
7.0
Appling
I
I
I
I
I
I I l
AuB**: I
I
I
I
I
I I I
Appling--------I
Ile 1
40 1
95 1
60 1
---
I --- I 4.8 1
8.0
I
Urban land -----I'
I
VIZI3"-
1
I
!
I I }
I
84B-------------I
I
IIe I
!
30 1
I
85 1
I
55 1
50
I I I
1 10 1 3.9 1
---
Badin
I
BaC-------------I
I
IIIe I
I
25 (
I
75 I
I
40 I
40
I I I
I --- 1 3.6 I
`--
Badin I
I
I
I
I
I I !
I
BdB2------------1
I
IIIe i
1
25 I
I
70 I
!
35 1
45
I 1 1
I --- I 3.0 1
---
Badin
BdC2------------1
IVe I
20 I
60 1
30 I
35---
Badin f
I
I
I
I
I I I
I
I
BuB**:
I
1
I
I
I I
Badin----------1
IIIe I
I
--- 1
1
--- I
I
------
I I I
I
Urban land -----I
VIIIs---
I
I
BuC**: )
I
1
I
I
I 1 I
Badin----------I
Iva
---
I
Urban land ----- I
VIIIs
!
CeB2------------ I
I
IIIe I
1
50 I
I
90 I
I
--- I
50
I I I
I --- I 2.4 1
5.5
Cecil I
I
!
I
I
I I I
I
CeC2------------1
I
IVe I
I
40 I
I
80 I
I
--- I
40
I I I
I --- I 1.8 1
4.5
Cecil I
I
I
I
I
I I 1
I
ChA-------------1
I
Ivw I
!
30 1
I
100 1
I
50 I
---
1 I I
E 12 I 4.0
Chewacla 1
I
1
I
I
I I l
l
CmB-------------I
I
Ile I
I
45 I
I
90 1
I
50 I
45
1 I I
1 14 I 4.0 I
7.0
Cid I
I
l
I
I
l I t
1
CnB**: I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I I
I I !
Cid------------ I
!
Ile I
I
--- !
I
--- I
I
--- I
I
---
I --- I 4.0 I
l I I
7.0
See footnotes at end of table.

Union County, North Carolina 109
TABLE 5.--LAND CAPABILITY AND YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE --Continued
I
Soil name and I
I
Land I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
map symbol Icapability{
Soybeans I
Corn I
Wheat
I Grain
ICorn silage!
Grass- I
Fescue
I
I
I
I
I sorghum
1 Ilegume hay I
pasture
I
I
Bu I
Bu )
Bu
I Bu
I Tons I
Tons I
AUM* r
Pgc**: I
I
1
{
I
t t
I
Gullied land---1
VIIIe---
I
I I
I
t
$CA: I
I
1
I
)
I
I
I
I t
I
Secrest--------I
Ilw I
35 1
105 1
45
1 50
{ 19 I
2.0 1
7,0
Cid------------ I
IIw 1
35 1
90 1
40
1 45
{ 16 {
3.5 1
8.0
I
TaB-------------I
I
IIe 1
I
35 1
I
95 1
55
I
1 50
I I
) i8 1
1
3.0 1
B4O
Tatum )
I
1
I
1
l I
1
I
TaC-------------I
I
IIle 1
I
30 1
I
85 1
45 I
I
40
I I
1 17 1
I
2.5 I
7,5
Tatum I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
TaD-------------i
I
VI® I
t
--- 1
I
--- I
--- !
I
---
I I
I --- I
!
--- I
4,5
Tatum I
I
I
I
I
I I
{
I
TbB2------------I
I
IIle I
i
25 I
I
90 1
1
50 {
45
I I
I 16 I
I
3.0 )
8.0
Tatum I
I
I
I
!
I !
I
I
TbC2------------ I
I
Ive I
I
35 1
I
80 I
1
40 1
35
I I
1 15 1
I
2.5 1
7.5
Tatum
I
TuB**: I
I
I
{
!
I
I
1
I
I !
I I
I
I
Tatum ---------- I
Ile I
--- 1
95 1
55 I
---
I --- i
--- I
---
I
Urban land -----I
I
V111s---
I
I
I
I
I 1
I
I
I
ad -------------- 1
VIle---
I
1
I
I 1
Udorthents I
I
I
1
I
I {
I
E
WhB------------- I
I
IIe I
I
'-- I
1
80 1
i
--- 1
50
1 i
1 --- 1
I
3.6 1
6.0
White Store )
1
I
1
I
I I
I
I
WhC------------- I
I
isle I
4
--- t
I
6o I
I
--- I
---
1 i
I --- !
I
3.4 1
5.5
White Store 1
I
I
I
I
I I
[
ZnB-------------I
I
IIe I
4
'-- I
I
60 1
I
30 1
---
) I
{ 12 1
I
2.5 1
5.0
Zion
I
ZnC-------------I
I
IIIe I
!
-`- I
I
50 1
I
25 1
--
I I
I 10 I
f
2.0 )
4,5
Zion I
I
I
I
1
l
I
l
I
I
1 I
) I
I
I
* Animal unit month: The amount of forage or feed required to feed one animal unit (one cow, one horse, one
mule, five sheep, or five goats) for 30 days.
** See description of the map unit for composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.

COMPUTATION SHEET
SUBJECT
U. S. DEPARTMENT OFAGRICULTURE
P�
'4,opx; z �o "- "2GG X q
�G2�G• �%iJ � ►Z.
� 7.5 260
lS•a X /C%� � � .�
14713
= </ 7[�/
jS r 0 C.
� , J
C'/t'C•LYI��= ��� �%� _ •'�'C�%�''� ��i%� •, ,rill72

VITAS rE UTILIZATIJN PLAN 1Qq
�l
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization
of waste water.
Field
No.
—1
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Soil Type
TaB
Crop
Corn Wheat
_Soybeans_
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
0.19
Application
Amount (In. )
.50
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A
SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for /,Zo days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation _
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
Narrative of Operation: Begin pumpout of the holding pond
when fluid level rises to six inches below the spillway.
Pump down schedule is included with your Waste Utilization
Plan. owner has asked for a revised Waste Utilization plan due to
the fact that his original plan addresses 350 sows, Farrar to
Feeder, he has the capability to house 380 sows which he has on
hand as of this revision according to Bennett Saucom.
As the owner / applicant it is your responsibility for the
management of the liquid level of your lagoon. Care should be taken
to go into the winter months with the level of the lagoon down
to allow for the storage months that will not allow you to pump on
the winter crops due to frozen or saturated soil conditions.
4

I J/ ik
WA!> rE UTILIZATIJN PLAN o-j�vl9�
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
I. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state
by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application,
or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited. Illegal, discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the
discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which
to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land
to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a copy of a
written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in
the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management
System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is
used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and
appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These
filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. [See FOTG
Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest
Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding.
(See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
5

a
WALOTE UTILIZATON PLAN'
�[
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued) S OP
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to -surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive to odor or
flies and provide uniformity of application..
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading
rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter
cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided
adequate vegetative filter strips are present. (See Standard 393 - Filter
Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist.". Animal
waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
discharge directly into water courses, and only then at
agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff
or drift from the site.

WA& rE UTILIZATI-JN PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged
into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide
adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited
to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and
structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended
or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and
erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc.,
should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent
breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
7

/' - C c
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Opersior Name: Ayzza"�' _
Address:
Z �1f1' 9// G'
Telephone:
TABLE 1. - Field Specifications
County:
Date:
CX1U131T D-1
Field1
Number
Approximate
Atlaxlmum
Useable Size
of Fleldz
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop(,-;)
N'laxlmum
Application
Wild
(In/hr)
Nlawlmorn
Application
per Irrigation
CYcle3
(inches)
Comments
1 See attached Inap.
2Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
311cfer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field office Technical Guide, Section 110. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rntes for the soil and crop used.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

Q-
h
EX111BIT D-3
. TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
Field Not
and
Line Not
Number of
Hydrants
Wetted
Diameter
(feet)
Hydrant Spacing (n)
Along Between
Pipeline Pipelines
Application
Rate
(inlhr
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Time
Inches Gun (psi) Hydrant hr
Comments
z
33c
ISee attached map.
2Show separate entries for cacti pipeline with hydrants in cacti fieid.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specificafions
Traveling
Irri ation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
1;2/ 21
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
/r,(,-
Design Precipitation Rate (inlhr)
2
Hose Length (tect)
XXXXXXXX
Type of Speed Compensation
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
Pump Power Requirement (Itp)
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
Designermny provide thrust block details on separate sheet.
TIIRUST HLOCK
LOCATION I AREA (sq. ft.)
90" Bend
Dead End
Tee
See USDA-NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430.DD.
1;XfUM DA
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
S(lllrce Ca115C 131�'l['s to 1liinimizc Odor Site Specific I'racliccs
Falnlslc:ld Swine pluduction O Vegetative or wooded buffets;
is'ltecommended best management piacticcs;
9"'Qood judgment and common SCOW
Animal budt'surfhccs 1liilj manure -covered animals Dry floors
Hum sullaccs Wel ularlulc-covered Ilools I>p'Slotled floors; - --- —
f r—lValcrcis luc;llcd over slutdcd Ihlols;
[a—l-CC(ICIS ill high end uI solid fluols;
��Scrapc manure buildup liom floors;
Fonder fluor Vcnlilaliuu for drying
A4annc cuilccO(III pits • Urine; f.;irFrcyuent nrunuc rcnloval by flush, pit icch:ngc, �-
Pallial miclobi;ll decomposition r or scape;
&fUnderfloor vrnlilation
VUnlilation Uxhaust fans •
Indoor surfacUs •
Flush Iauks
Plush alleys
Pit recharge puinls
Lill stations
Outside drain cullectiun
of jnrlcliull fluxes
Volatile gases;
Dust
Dllsl
■ Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid while larks are filling
• Agitation dnfltlg waslClvalel'
conveyance
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid while bits arc filling
• Agttall11r1 during stamp tank
lilling mid drawdown
• Agitation (luring wastemilei
CUflveyance
ANIOC IIlllcl 11, 1996, I'agc 3
9--l-an limilltellance;
LET I;fI lclent ;111- movCmclil
9- Washdown between groups of animals;
CV Feed additives;
(K I•ecder coveys;
f Fecd delivery downspout exlendcrs to fecdcr
covers
P'Flush Ialik cVVcis;
CKIi end fill lines to near bottom of umin s with
;u1ti-siphon vents
0" Underllour 1111sh with underfloor mililation
C51' Exlcnd recharge lines to near bullum of pits
Ivith allti-Sillhotl VCI115
O Sump 1:111k covers
RYllox covers

Source —--(11usc Iti1'i� ril fllininlixr Udor Sitc Spccilic i'r;lclic _
Jslld Ur draillpilles at • Agitation during waste►vater W'P.Mend discharge point of pipes underneath
Ingooll conveyance lagoon liquid level
La9 ooll surfaces + Volatile gas Cnussiolls; @`-Proper 11t,o011 liquid capacity;
• Biological Mixing; ❑ Correct higooii slar(up lttocechtres;
• Agllattion ❑ Minimum surface. area-to-volintic ratio;
ff "'MilliMuni agilatiolt when ptiniping;
lit igalitm sprink
uuules
Slorage lank or basin
surl:lcc
+ Iligh picssure agilatinn;
+ Wind drift
• Partial micaobial (Iccomposition;
• Mixing while filling;
• A-ilalitlll wheal emplying
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
f' Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
WY Minimum reconinieuded operating pressure;
&'11Mnp intake near lagoon liquid surface;
❑ d'luup from second -stage (goon
Cl Bottom or midlevel loading,
❑ 3'auk covers;
❑ uasin sui face mats orsads;
❑
1'ioven biological additives or oxidants
Scttlirig basin slll I;acc
11aattal ilticrobiial decomposition;
❑
Extend. tICA11Tpi(1C Unllets UI1tiCftlCa(Il llt(111r1 -
•
Mixing ►vhile filling;
level;
•
Agilalion when emplying
❑
Remove soled solids iegularly
Mamne, slurry or sludge •
Agitation when spicadilig;
❑
Soil injection of siturylsludges;
splcader oullets
volatile gas Cntissions
❑
Wash iesiduad manure From spreader alter use; �
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uicovefed manure, •
volatile gas Clalissiolis while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges _•_" -
slun), or sludge oil field
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within'}8 III-S.;
sillfaces
El
Spread Spread in thin uniform layers fur rapid Haying;
❑ Proven biological Additives or oxidants
Ucad animals a Carcass decolnposilion R-11lroper disposition of carcasses
Dead allimttl disposal • Catcass decomposition ❑ complete covering of carcasses fit burial pits; '
pits O 1'roltcr location/conslruclion of riisllosal pill /y//�
Incinerators • Incomplete collibnslloll ❑ Secondary stack burners
AMOC vcnibci' 11, 1996, Page 4

hisect Control Checklist for /Animal Operatiol►s
�Sourcc C MISC _ Ilf1tE!'s to Conlrul [itsrcls Site Specific f'raclices
I.hlsh Gultels Accumulation orsolids I' Hush system is designed gild nperaled
sufficiently to remove accuntillatcd suliEls rraill
�tillcis as designed.
a,,itciiwve bridging solids ni
-discharge
I.a.,oUn$ alit Ills • (2Im.-Jed Solids Mailllaill lagoulls, scllling bashiS alld Ilils 1vIICIC
pest Inceding is apparent to millimire Ilic
CI1IS141g Rf solids to a depih arms rnETrc II1all ( -
8 inches over more the it 30% of sin!dike.
Excessive vegetative Uccripilig vct;C1i1li01I
(. IUM1l
f;Ccdcrs
Fecd Storage
FeelI 1; 1141.+gc
Maintain vegetallivC colih-ol along franks of
fagoolts and other iIII pounthIle Ills to prevent
accunitantion ordccnying vegetative,,after
alunb mice's cdge ail impcundmenl's perinicler.
DI-v SYSICIlls
0 Design, operate rend maintain (iced syslenis
bunkers avid houghs) to minimize the
accunlutation of decaying wastage.
C] Clcan tip spillage on a rouiinc basis (c.g., 7 - I Il
day interval during stonier; 15-30 day hilci val
Elln'ntg winicr). _
nccimiol,lliErns i,1 iced lesiducs C1 Iteduce nmistusc accumulation witllill and
a101111 l immediale perimeter or fecit skrrnge
areas by insuring dlaiinage away Frain site
ailnllor providing adctfuale ccrnktinlneut (c.g.,
covered bin ,For htcivei's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
❑ Inspect firr and iellion of- bi-cak tip nccumithled
solids its filter strips arcnnd reed storage as
needed.
ANIK. .ATr►lbey 11, 1990, Page t

moo/Q�'
ti,Pulcc Crllrse iLnll's 11) C ull(rul Itrsects SiltSl}ccilic I'l-aclives
Aidimil Ilolding Aicas Accuuurlalions ofanirmtl wastes ❑ Eliminate low ateas that hap moisture alum;
anc! Iced lvaslalie fences and other lucalions where waste
;ICL'ttnlrllates and distill bance by animals is
milrim:rl.
Cl lvlainlain Icticc ru►vs and filler sir ills amillld
;ulini11 Iroldillf-I areas to 111inill1i7.e
accumulations of wades (ix" irlspccl for and
rcorove or bleak up amintulaled solids as
--needed).
Ury AlallmC I fondling Acummilaliuns of nuintal wastes ❑ Remove Slilllagc on a ruulinc basis (e.g., 7 - I
Syslents day inlet val dating summer', 15-30 clay interval
du6ig whacr) wheic manure is loaded tin- land
thplirrtion or disposal-
L1 Provide For adequale drainage around maims c
stockpiles.
Cl hlspcct I'or ;ntcl remove or break up accutn tlatcd
wastes In filler strips around stockpiles mid
n1a11111c handling areas as nccded.
For more infolurdion contact Ills t:ooperativc llxlellSlolr Service, Ucpallnlcnt of 1 nlolmdugy, Ilox 7613, Noilh C.—HUH la Stale University,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page 2

Mortality Nlana;ement Niethocls
(check which method(s) are beingimplemented)
G Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 7 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete inci,i4ration
�.! In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and desia:,
approved by the Department of k7riculture
Q env method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
mad e possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangerin,
human or animal health. (Writteri approval of the State Veterinarian must be "-
attached)
A
Dz:e mbe, 1 S. 1996 1Y , -,Z

EMERGENCY ACTION FLAN
PHGy`E Nli-NIBERS
DWQ 919- 733- 5083
E�iLERGEyCY VlavAGEvIEvT SYSTEM g2,93-3�'3�
5 WCD 3
MRCS v? - 3 Z F 3)
This plan `viii be impiernenced in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overrZowing, or running off 5ice_ You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all emoloyees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this rhay or m--v not be
possible. Sugaested responsesm some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. .add soil to berm to increase e?evarion of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an accedcable rate.
c. Stop all tlows cc the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contra ctor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temoorary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incomorace 4vaste*to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reasom's) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application races for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: L-lakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Scop irrigation porno.
c. Close valves to eji„unate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior co restarting pumas.
D: Leakage from bush systems. houses. solid separators -action include:
a: Stop recycle puma.
b. Stop iriiulion rurno.
N ke sure no slchon oc=urs.
'i. scoo ail flows i7 t%Z .1CUSe. r;USrl '+steMs. or solid sz:)arators.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting? pumps.
E: I_,-akage from base or sidewall of la Loon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
tlowin= leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sumo or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
put in a submersible pump. and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate -the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
?. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration'
c. Anv damage noted. such as employee injurv, fish hills. or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property'?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
r. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters"?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)'?
h. How much reached surface waters'?
Contact appropriate agencies.
a. Durin¢ normal. business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - After hours, emergency number: 919-7533-39 •-
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item ? above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness at the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local ENIS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES. phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice!technical assistance phone number - -
-=: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and e ,plain your
problem to there and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damaze.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors .address:
c. Contractors Phone:
Dec: mbe.- IS. 1 "n

6: Contact the technical specialist who cwrritizd the lagoon (MRCS. Consulting
Fn_rinze:, etc.) ``
a. Name: l) "LC7-'aa
b. Phone: - 3
is Implerneit procedures a; advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damaJe. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening? a.aaitl. Y
C

G7 0 ' 042�
0 �C i -tea Arno ��
�7 ndy'►rd �i0 �7rd �O�d.'
oP14,
# wW���/i�-7
i�
sop_ss/ 93 /VT�
I�
"�� poi �!7tP�/ �J' � Q � LFr7r�► sb� L'O�/1�r • ({ �} I '
L
i

I
4-

United States Soil 530 W. Innes St.
Department of Conservation Salisbury, N.C.
Agriculture Service _ _ 28144
Subject: ENG - Design Approval DATE: February 22, 1994
Solid Set Waste
System
File Code: 210
To: P.R. Loudermilk
District Conservationist
Monroe, NC
This memo is approval of the design submitted for the solid
set waste disposal system for -the Baucom Brother's No. 2
swine operation designed by Kings Manor. This system is for
application of effluent from waste treatment lagoon for a
380 feeder to finish swine operation. The system consist of
4" main line, 1 sprinkler heads, 4 outlets, 25 hp motor and
pump, and the other material to make the system function.
After the system is installed, the installer will need to
supply written certification that all material and work are
in accordance with the design. The data submitted for
review and approval are attached.
It was noted that the results of the sample tested by the
NCDA Lab. showed no phosphorous (P) in lagoon. This is
probably an error. Another sample should be tested and the
waste utilization plan adjusted accordingly.
14' tl��
Vernon Jones
Civil Engineer
Attachments
c: T.H. Wetmore, Jr.
W.S. Moser
H.J. Pate, Jr.

z.
r--, I 1--;r X rw C: C)
I KE!---; t-i I I—L- ROFID
10 N F-
i Ji
BAUCUM PROTHERS
WTF'J.NG FOR IRRIGATMN PUNP
1
0041-2t-175RS PANCL!
7r I
I
00.1- t Of., EtP.EAi,- ER
t P
1
MOTOR r;TAFRTER. ENCLOSURE AND OVERLOADS
I
GROUND RVID AND F (TTINGS
t
TOO'
jt4 THWJ CU WIPE
7 j 00
If .14
#�-3 T�lvltl CU WIRE
PVC C'.i.,.,IrllDu IT Ar-11D F I TT 1 NGSI
7 ff,
I
DTU7'-7.'!' SAFET"' SWITCH
E 0).*:,.. fit-)
6
1,, cY)F-,f,FL.,Ex OND FITTINGS
CIO
I
TIMER OND ENCLOSURE
1
4 X 4 Y L(-)' TREATED POST
14.
1M,9TOl..l-orl&j ANU I -ODOR
TOTAL.
TOT AL-
(,!jjCjjj: i--fy,jr,
FlIP 61)
ANY r-:H(Nl-lGE'- FrE EXTRA)-

• III��171. j j
"'inqs Manor
No,
3507 Watson Church Fed.
I]ate
r
�,�— q
Monro:1, NC 2r�8*110
704-753-�1.1 92
ar,
f
O
rt•3pnsni
Submitted To:
111/nrk To Sa Perform^_tl
Mime
Street
IYJtiJ1""' h►'f% v�ow�.
Street �a,�r� �c.•- rU.��i� �rne„�+t
City
fir p,✓/ cr G
City
State
Statp
/ j, C ,
[Jere of Plans
Phone
Architect
We hereby pruLnne t.n litmish/the materinls and perform (t�hr. tnh{tr twcrmrsory
for the ccrnpiar.inn of
Se
!/U eJ Nd 4 ,,t �U cf C
0
el /C c- TA
n o!ofr/j ,d,✓nr G�i9/Z��' �'T`" PxcP1.T+y r�dex4�
III rn, rinl is: ritr•Irntll.-nd to f7e a; spnCifind, and ttrP ;shove wnt•k to he performed in -.iccnrrJnncr vritl, l:hn sira,vEnaS prtd
specifirntimir, sullmAted for shove work and completed in a substantial wovkiminliko mirmi!r- fnr• Um Burn of
Clalhrs 1+5 yC 5 3• c�� f•
with paynirttt-, to ba mnde as fallows: �� t1�o� �u�" / /'C�`'
nr,v altrrntiCrr pr rlr, :•int'nn ir... rt nhnvC Snry;ifirntiM9 invnlvmg R,tnj
rrr.t.,, will b- Ctrrr.Ul.••j Only iq—n •mitt-n [,rrlrr^., onr{ Nil[ hnroms; rin
^,triq t 1mi-ge,, rvrr and nt,rJwr t..'r� r^tirnete. Alt +lc)r'4mmnntr rnr,tingnnt
ut•r,n roikcn, Prr'4lnntrt or elnlr,yr. Lnycrd mrrr rmitrmt. Cwr,t- to carry
tire• tnrmv!o OrA ntl,••• r,nrrrc•_+.y irstrram:rl ui,rn nl4"r work. Wnrk.
n,r•t'� Comor!m !-,gt,rtn vnr! P!ihlic Liability Imour inre on above -Nock td b9
t'ly-!n Out by
C cr7�it c xax- -
Respectfully submitted
Per
Note --This propor:nl may he withdr-awn by t.rs if rot aGcePtrd
within 30 Inys.
n,l ;fa=1'�� rt.f`il;': f �I' f'fl�ll'Zlnl11.
., et - �r'� r •. ',t i, ,, r. .,t". .'i•.t •I r,t •r rr ��1 :r� }i •r ,�l iy' nr.o .r•I �I, r!rf �t nrl isl r` n"I,Ip., �. .I I.„hr � •�r •i (•r..{

0
� L
ti
i
.a
V
V/ -. .1/ r

I
rr" �
' II
. Q f7
,.-rfj',,' � /.�iyi .� r �f ✓ `N /7�Y / •q� �7� //�rlr"'�`� Il % ��-i �tl �4// /
71�(6�d��
d7 -P Iv-7 I-e"
VOL
rrlf/f

e
�C!S
4�7n0-7
e/
i
`EDIOAJoIN
t4
�007

��14s-
Ir
1 �
��[� �� 4ff
JR
=�9
s r9 rl�
y (j
7
i'
lr
j•
/7
PW
C�9'f ram, r�
o0G
� � J
i
SS
u
e
ON
io

VQ 0 .0 .4 0, ,

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
�
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT ,J7
�J
Name of Farm: Saucom Brother's Farm
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from
a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be f'iled on -site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will
be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: Baucom Brothers Farm
(Phase print) c_e
Signature: Date: X f2-
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Phase print) Wayne S . Moser
Affiliation: Soil Conservation Technician
Address (Agency): Union Soil & Water Conservation District
�504 Lancaster Ave.
Monroe, NC 28112
Signature: Date: jZ J-A,;Z 99
1.1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
January 6, 2000
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC 28110
1 ilk" •
�=w00%
WINK
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS900038
Additional Information Request
Baucom Brothers
Animal Waste Operation
Union County
Dear Bennett Baucom:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by February 5, 2000:
1. The Certification on file for this facility is for 350 sows farrow to finish, however, all other documentation
submitted states this farm is a 380 farrow to feeder operation. Please clarify the maximum design capacity
of this facility and submit a new certification form for that number and type of animals. A new certification
form has been enclosed for your convenience.
2. Please submit an Operation and Maintenance Plan.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. PIease
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before February 5, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
S' cerely,
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

C - Animal Waste vlanagement Plan Certification
(Please tv a or 2rint all information that does not require a sienature) 1,
Existin or.: New or Er andt d . le use ctrcie one
General Information:
Name of Farm: FaOTtoo:
Owner(s) Name:_./1��ff'r�{C_C�7 Phone Nor,
Mailing Address: �`�/G� r % % D i CIF `� 17
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: �}rfcroN
Latitude and Longitude: See�11119 f Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road 75__,
with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):c
Operation Descriotion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
D Wean to Feeder J Layer _ J Dairy
ZI Feeder to Finish D Pullets :3 Beef
.D Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder 3 C3
J Farrow to Finish Other Type of livestock: Nrunber of Animals:
J Gilts
J Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds: 3 Total Capacity: 4�_0,4 0 Cubic Feet (ft3)
.Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO ! (please circle one)
117 YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the. Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25-year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Consen-ation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days o de transfer. /]
Name of Land
Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AIVC -- August 1, 1"7

Technical Specialist Certification e'
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named_ above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division.of Environmental Management
(DEM).as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent_
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
ar'_ Existina facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
J New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ 7 4Z /" CZ
Affiliation 1,15 C. Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):_ Go' 4•0 Cgs r- .ice onroe Phone No.: vZ 8 9-
$) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization: chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation /aSIJ„�CS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): o ve Phone No.:
Signature: Date:-4zezop
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
TrlFacility with u ezteri r I (SD or WUP-or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
J Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from to ing Ihd hevy ujVarees have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRLrS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 4&'C. rarO, , l�
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): _ Phone No.:
Signature: � Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1"7 2

"D). Application and Handling•Eguipment
Check the -appropriate box
1d� xis( t1� nr exoandin; facility wish exis[in; waste at�eiicatio to equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
_I New, exoa[tdsd._or__existing facility without „e�istiny w�, tZ =IicatiQll eauipment for spray irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as pan of the plan).
w expnOed. or o facifty withoua2nlicaCion eguir land spreading nusing
52rav irrigation, (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for tithing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintmined; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): r'
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date: /0-
E) Odor Control. Insect Control Mortality Management and Emereencv Action Plan (SD.
Si. WUP, RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklis4 an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be i emented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
Si4 nature:_
Phone No.:
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
31, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded * cu �WalJ�SI Q n�
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by mail all ad�oitung property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached 1-14 --17 '
Name of Land
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC — August 1, 1997
3
Date:

f5
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Stara e. Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (Sl)
,Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the. appropriare box
ar'The cropping system is in place -on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
J Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by . (monthldaylyear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
Q Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan Can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation 4 ,la _ _ _ ,Date Work Completed.
I
Address (Agency
Signature:
Phone No_:
Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan,
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DELI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: 400*7e-Z-�
Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

t
D) ApplicatiQjl and Handline Eauinmo._Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
W Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready
for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
Cl Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been
installed but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a
signed contract; equipment specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the
plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been
provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
0 Conditional approvallknimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the
plan has been purchased and will be on site and installed by
(month/day/year); there is adequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed
and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the cropping system contained
in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and
are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 4-1-C�r�i�d �'• � ��
Affiliation: � — r _—.. .._.
Address(f
Signature
No.
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked. r
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling
equipment as specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of
delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified
in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the
waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Date:
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this .form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- April 24, 1996 5

--� e -1-71- eamccl�
Operation and Maintenance Plan
This facility is to be maintained in a safe and healthy
condition at ❑ll times, in compliance with all local, state
and federal laws.
Impoundment
A protective cover of vegetation will be established and
maintained on all areas disturbed during construction,
(embankments, berms, diversions etc.). Lagoon areas must
be mowed and .kept accessible to Vic. laj .inspection. Keep
all lagoon areas free of woody vegetation, especially the
top of dam, pool edges and back slope of embankments.
Perform a regular inspection and repair as necessary any
erosion, rodent burrows, seepage or other threats to the
integrity of the impoundment.
Waste Handling Equipment
Perform regular inspection and repair as necessary all
waste handling equipment, (pumps, meters, pipes and
electrical components etc.) to avoid leaks, overflow or
other spillage of effluent. Manage to avoid excessive waste
volume situations due to unexpected failure of equipment.
Liquid level
Establish visible markers to delineate top and bottom
pumping limits. Maintain maximum liquid level six inches
below emergency spillway. Monitor sludge accumulation
annually and remove as necessary to keep of least four
feet of liquid capacity available. Maintain separate disposal
areas for sludge and apply at agronomic rates with no
runoff. Sample sludge or use book values for N in
calculating disposal rates.
Permits
Maintain emergency action plan in a prominent location at
the facility. Keep current and available all permits,
licenses, etc. as required by the State of North Carolina.

,� 4�,,�.e .i!�a17•�a�'ea[�:�,�"'r„tip
b •�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
A 6 rkl� ; ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
j -MA
LT14K
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MDORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
-c
.JAMES',HUzhrJR.
WATER QUALITY SECTION
GOVERNOR
May 8, 2000
,13iLL ;HOLMAN
.SS@CRE:rARY
Bennett Baucom
`.
6510 Morgan Mill Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
+';ICERR-T.:S1,EYENB• .✓�
DI11 R,;"' =
Subject: Notice of Violation
" Aiv,�" `
DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
NCGS 143-215-IOC
Baucom Bros., Facility #; 90-38
.+
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Baucom:
> 4
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on May 4, 2000. During the inspection several were noted. This letter is
problems
being issued as a Notice of Violation for the following:
yro" `= `
• Waste analyses were not available. This was also noted during last year's
inspection.
L:
Waste application records were inadequate. Your records indicate that
'
only 157,000 gallons of waste was applied last year. However, your farm
plan indicates that 1.4 millions gallons of waste should be generated
`
annually- Even with a reduced swine this does not account
population,
for the total difference in the amount of waste generated and the amount
? w"iA``
actually applied. If the records are correct, this discrepancy could
indicate a mechanical problem (flow rate) with the irrigation system, or a
leak in the lagoon structure.
r �" " ; .:=^ i;
• Lagoon embankments require maintenance. Briars and other vegetation
prevent a proper inspection of the structural integrity of the lagoon.
Failure to provide complete records during an inspection and to maintain the
,: Z- - 4 ' 0.
facility in accordance with your certified farm plan is a violation of North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.10C and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A 2H
.0217(d)- It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by May
19, 2000 indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violations. Please address
your response to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
']Y'�-.n
01
I ..r.SY TIC-�•JM.Mf.
7.
:. 1,
97H NORTH MAIN STREET. MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
•.R Nh r...,
... .. .....,,....-. , .Lr•".-e�.,,w.; .,i �..
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]p
AN $.OVAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVG ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RgCYCLEOl1096 POST -CONSUMER PAPER

0
Page 2
Bennett Baucom
Be advised that failure to provide timely waste analyses and adequate waste application
records in the future will result in a recommendation for enforcement. North Carolina General
Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state
environmental laws and regulations, as well as criminal penalties.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Coordinator
File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional'Supervisor

Division of Soiland Water Camserration - Operation Review
13 Division of Soil and Water ConRET-VatiOD Compliance IMgMitiOD
MgDivision of V'ater Quafiry - CAmq3limceinspection
()Verafion RC'rje
).'D Ifillt. ¢ Clomy)iaiw Q Fohow-ur. o"DMIQ inspectior, 0 FofloA-up oVI)SWC review 0 Other
Datc• ai- j 11sriectiou (— �C) rj�)
Time OF inspuctiorl Z4 hr. (bh:mm)
a-ve. Conditionliv C-tirsed ReuvztL e dimp
............... ........
­4­'_­�-�;:.�,­­­z:� . . ..................... . . ........... ............. ............................ .......................
................ ...... .................................
...... ........ r_ ........ mn .......... . ................... . ................ _
0.ztzih--- '_-onLuc*: ..............................................................................
. Nti:-; ............. . ................................................
. Phontu Nw ........... . . . ...........................
.................
........ = ................................................. ............ .............
k...........
....................
Integrator . .. . ...... . . . ............. . . . . . . . .......... . ......... . ...
.............
17>
........ .. ............
Operator "'!L-riffication Numi)er: ....c .. M
- ocaficir 0-., Farm-
........................ . . I—— ... I., ....... ..., ................ 11 ............ I ............ .... I ........ I ........... ­ .... ... ................. . ......... . ....................................................................... ....................... ) db.
. ..... . .............. ...... ............................. ......... I ..... . .... ............. I . . ............ ................. I ............................ ­ ................. ............................................... ......
Desigr, Curren- Dusigr. - CLrren- Desigu ;Current
—anuciCallaritv Ponuiation
r" Popuiaii0f, -Cavacit. !1opuintion
7 a �n,
17
!:�arnmv L�
Total D-esigm C4vacity 41
N
Number
lioidin,'!,�undq / Sofie, Trans
-
,U.jYSUr.-aLtLrerains Presen: 3211a-00LAr.
LIIUUIU Svsterr.
FiekAm ! -,
imt)"Cv.
a r 'har", from. any nan o- thc. oncratior.'
I: die cm.
7,7 V'Z:�
m: Lauo.)T. Otn---.
Ohicr%­fc.
71 'v
L I di.;: i a r c i= c -, t j.; cu C L:. ciic 1. 7
a 1 0 :' t i IC V-
n o I
L. DuL:; VNIMSF is 7 Yt::+ N(.
tmm an nmmizt� m notontia: wavers_ im:)=_- th,.- 'kV ate..
ttrSate, t�t7 r7om it cs�ar
7;
No
(jrt=r),)arcI SLormsio,-ag
i
Snflv
Structure- S-7_71UM =
Struolurz:
suurturo 6
1.1.-1.-4 . .............. .................................... ....... . . ...................
.................................... ....................................
........ . . . .... . .................
an, m1m.'-d-la1v aT". 0
s,saver.'c-osiol-,
5.
Continucc: or.
back

w
taciIity NDate of ljispection
5. Are there szructures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes Z No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health -or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 7 Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? TZ� Yes Q No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes %;� No
Waste Anniication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 6No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pondin<g ❑ PAN Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes MNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑`Yes ❑ Nd
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes J„No
lb. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q No
Required Records & Documents
17. Pail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
I& Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)) Yes ❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑Yes jO No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge' ❑ Yes B No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge. freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes fi�lNo
23. Did Reviewerilnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 0 Yes [ r�No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes RNo
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes P'No
Viola#ioris,ot-d ficienCies H+CI'e I10 @d 04l'jf%1 1t t1S,VlSIf; Yoit ;will reeeiye flo further; ; ;
' CO ' es'PO ' n ' abhtit this visit_ . . . . . :.. ..: . .. :: :: ' ::::::. ... .. . .
Comments (refer to question #)..Explain, any YES ataswers.aad/orarty recommendations or any otber comments.
Use drawings of facility to b otter explain situations `(ttse additional pages as necessary)
,,��,,�/ •rr
ilLt i r �J C_( 1[ t'V- P S t U C; ! rc ci r fi�+` �J ii� C� t are;
fit'-1-Z t'L�• �Y1 Cr � rl@- "�:•?� �L' : �t15 � E�L.�IC��-♦ [%�"�"�/l:� �� L: 4���'�'. � � .
L[�r..�C�-�
5�C`a- 'i� V.I\,
'��;r..-L
CLtr1U'a.� L+C `1Cr�FW t�o'� V1 Gl kr' �Lle
cj'�'�•� Ai L.`e C *5
1
�"-'"�'� Mom. �'E-c��:�1t CW��t,•✓1C.\ ?C)j)rrt!'•�.�0�'l � ���C�-�:\�Sit�'�-•
LL/CE -iTG- _12i i G hl S T S /I /T G. 0'-, /c Lt c . u3n- s-k—_ c_..�>Z)k, cA7 L3 v,, V e_ Ccw i fit°' \ VS e) k '_9 iA_L IV
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /f Date:
3/23/99

Facilih' Number: — Dal( oC inslrection
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storanc pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes RKNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation!
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes r�No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application" (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt, ❑ S"es J3'No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application sprap system intake not lo,=ed near the liquid surface of the lagoon' ❑ 1'es t&Nu
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted`' (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. cte.) ❑ Yes C-J No
U . Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover" ❑ )'Cs �IN(�
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent temporary cover'? ❑ Yes aELNu
1
3r-3/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC 28110
Dear Bennett Baucom:
IT 1 0 •
pow
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENviRONMENT AN T RAL RESOURCES
"WRONMENT, HgAL7,n
December 30, 1999 4k NATURAL RESOURCHS
JAIL t I pftg
l; 5181 of ammiltAl MARABfMf tT
1IltSi it lmft 8AW
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 90-38
Union County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial 'sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY I, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincer ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

� 1
9
1
_ ___�_ .___._ _. _.— ..- -a._ — _ --� �_. _.__.. .. _ ram.. �_�_.__ ____ .. _. ___ _�_ .. _ y.• __ -..t.
el: 62
'66 1 l E UdV
• ti , -. ;.. -.. „_, , ,, -� � vet ;� .
,1'}�•.�.1. !' _w, `.d�iur..JlPi.bNsy7:i�A'4-l.-wf �i� llfQ y +'• Y1{j � .

4-11
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESViLLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 6, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject, Notice of Violation
DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Baucom Bros., Facility #: 90-38
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Baucom:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
March 31, 1999. This report is being issued as a Notice of Violation due to inadequate
freeboard in the lagoon. Specifically, the liquid level in the lagoon had encroached into
the 25 yr./24 hr. storm event storage area. This is a violation of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1. Also, some of your waste application records did not have the
accompanying waste analysis information and there was also an apparent
overapplication of PAN (nitrogen). Please see the enclosed report for more comments.
It is requested that you submit a written response to.this office by April 21, 1999
indicating the actions taken to correct the problems noted above. Please address the
response to Mr. Johnson.
In addition to the above, during many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted
that some farms are often missing one or more components of the certified farm plan
that should be available for review. The items listed below must be available for review
during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, buffer zones, feed areas.
Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usabWwettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
Waste and Soil analysis info: Should have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MODRZOV ILLS, NORTH CAROLINA 291 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 50% REcYCLEG/T0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists that have been completed.
Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of
Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should
be applied during the time. the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general
waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

Request of Information for Mandatory Wettable Acres Determination
Your facility l✓` 3 has been tentatively flagged for a mandatory Wettable Acres Determination.
The basis of this requirement is due to a lack of available information to exempt your facility from this process. In an effort to
promote flexibility, we are -ranting your facility a fourteen(14) day window of opportunity to provide our office with the information
indicated below. We suggest that you contact your Service Company, local NRC_S, Extension, or Soil and Water District office for
any assistance they may be able to provide. Upon further review of this information, your facility may be exempted from this
process. in the event, that a technical specialist cannot provide you with this information in the allotted time frame, notification by the
technical specialist will need to be made to establish an alternative schedule. If you, or the technical specialist have any questions
concerning this notice. please contact me.
Address: Prl &;'L Sattivxson Phone: Due Date. YZ& f I
c/o NC DWQ Fax:
a glts '
Z1. Map /Diagram
Minimum requirements -- clear, legible map or diagram showing labeled hydrants, pulls/zones, and related Coverage area
(leng-ths.etc.). It must include design restrictions such as well locations, streams, wetlands, property boundaries, ditches, etc.
Locations of hog houses R la;oon(s) must be included. Tract and field numbers corresponding to waste plan must be included. An
updated aerial photo, if available, may be useful.
{/ 2. Calculations
Irrii,ation calculations (D-2 or equivalent) to back the related coverage area shown on the map/diagram. A D-I irrigation parameter
workshect or equivalent is required and D-3, D-4 worksheets are recommended. Without doin- a system calibration like will be
required in a full wetted acres determination, then 90% of the published throw (diameter) based on operating pressure must be used
for calculating acreage of pulls or spray zones — in the case of stationary systems.
3. Updated Waste Plan (must berbased on effective wetted acres)
This Waste Utilization Plan option can be by fields or pulls/zones. Suggest indicating somewhere on plan that it is based on effective
wetted acreage. All fields listed in plan must be reachable with available irrigation equipment or under contract with a third party
applicator. Use of this option requires above calculations to be provided. Acreage claimed in waste plan using this option does not
have to meet the 75% criteria. The updated plan must still generate a nitrogen deficit.
4. Updated Waste Plan (reduction of acreage)
This Waste Utilization Plan option must label the fields by spray pull/zone or credit the acreage of each field as less than 75% of the
total acreage in the respective field. All fields must be reachable with available irrigation equipment or under contract with a third
party applicator. The updated plan must still generate a nitrogen deficit. A D-I irrigation parameter work -sheet is required and D-2,
D-3, D-4 worksheets are recommended.
Note: All documents must be signed by WUP technical specialist, irrigation Specialist, or Professional Engineer.

Vil
" D,Division of Soil and .Wafer Conservation'-' Operation
Division of Soil and 'Waie'r Conservation - ComR jance lnspectiori +E ° + r
Division of Water Quality Compliance Inspection
t ' , Q Other Asency - Operahon'Revrew
10_Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ insEection Q Follow-up of DS%VC review Q Other ,
Facility Number 3 Date. of Inspection j to
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
d' Permitted IXCertified © Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not Operaational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......... , ?..F:c..C;.. ............... .......... County: ....... QVI..1.-b.1A........................................................
Owner Name: .......... d a!L Cl. :l.1 ... d ........................... Phone No: ....... ..5 .. ..... e .. ..I ......... ................
Facility Contact: ......'Title Phone No:
Mailing Address: ....: �4� /!.¢�f,.rr�2....� 1.�/.... ... ...................................................... a�.. �..�. ....
Onsite Representative:....I� t eml.E'-f`�'1..... .�X�.FLi L.�kS............................ Integrator, ....................................................................
.......
Certified Operator:..... ---------- �kt.C44 ........................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
I.,ocation of Farm: Wert
!..r�..-.rK....^rL�.....i....kl..G211....th1�SGi4S................�Caa�.................... _ .............
...........................................
/ ` ( ...... �r. tisfc. `1l.,Fa..... ��JLfta'r,-,�...... .......�'F.t.l.,eri.....fti r:A...l.': s .<.La.L' ;.......... ���
Latitude �'�� �« Longitude �• �� ���
awrne uapacrt3
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
rrow to Feeder �v
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I JE] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity �v
Total SSLW lyre
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharmes & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated al: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [:]Other
a. If discharge is observed,.was'the conveyance man-made?
1). 11' discharge is observcd. did ii reach: ❑ Surface Waters [_-]Water,; of the State
c. II'Clischarge is observcd. what is the estimated flow in gallniin?
d. Docs discharge hypass a lagoon syr-tcm?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Idealifie[': r4�/t.1743!'I reCr—o�r��
Freeboard (inches): ......., �.. 2 -(.................................................I..........
El Yes
;No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes %4 No
❑ Yes [YNo
Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
1 /6/99 ' Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of th6 structures need maintenance/improvement'?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
0
❑ Yes [XNo
❑ Yes OV
Yes ❑ No
Oflyes ❑ No
❑ Yes �'No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/impra>vemcnt? ❑ Yes [:�,No
11. Is there evidence of over app]ication? f❑ Ponding ANitrouen ❑Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type ............. t�cl 1......5.. .+�,YJ. 1t......" ... P.........................................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?.
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, Docs record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0: Xo Al6ja'tions or. dehc e* n* d s .were noxed. during ahis;visit:..Y'ou will.re�ceive na Mrther. . ; . ;
• : • ecjrrespgridenee' about; this visit.; ; ; ; . ; .:.. ; ; . .
❑ Yes ;kNo
;j Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 5?�No
❑ Yes )Q No
❑ Yes ]C No
❑ Yes &No
.JZYes ❑ No
❑ Yes Q No
[,Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes tZ No
❑ Yes _UNo
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any:recommendaiions or any..o_ther c'o' m' ents
g, y explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary:!1 a t E ! ' se rawm s o act tt to better ) a ,.
..
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
o
r 5 l — -"' 11 /6/99

3/23/99
V
4
L.
Facility Number: Date of luspectiou E'�
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below tKyes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
2T Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes b(No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes 'KNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land.application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes N[No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 13 Yes 'KNo'
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 13 Yes XNa
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 'Ayes ❑ No
:•,i
i a a3 .131z:'°3+ it E ! .[? �d �{i- - �j _'3{
� - �c.{, c _.,�e 2�. {NEv � <7. €- ��n,9��{.H5 rts iil.I:, ':.t€$.. is a� i e'Erf_'.i ..I _leCaL!§LS€$e6�k�6,nF4E.. r•i� 9L.-311���.mt-. > ➢}4 ...1.3_rf�._�.€tta.�, .E.F99j�,..�.3a <�-;set. l� �- i.mm_aai.,."it�iil� � ��:Is`v.�.s3Sa�tet;6_ �{�...i,YLle, e
w45 l
P-t..._.,4V\- 'PJ�`�f"O �(` 5\"Lim}
J. •�0.V�� _�.h:v'�
�e.?•au .«,ti�,,-t✓�s, v�'�.�� `� ��� :.w.DC�u�i11��:• ���,,51� l,a,,til�s 11���� �� 10�
5�t+�Vv,`���'��
isc��ryC� G pro �1(,.etil re v-o � �4��n
`1 aA-

Draft - Revised ]anuary 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 6— - Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: &2 kz e G tgg s acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: kem., Part 11 eligibility items) F9 F2 F3 F4
inspector/Reviewer's Name: T46 an
Date of site visit: 34311� �
Date of most recent WUP: 8
operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption El E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: __7 3 ___ pounds
.Irrigation System(s) -circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; b. stationary sprinkler system wfportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 4. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D203 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination,
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below: 1
F1
/F2
F3
/F4
Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
bufferlsetback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5. acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number -
Part 111. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS'
NUMBER NUMBER'S IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
lL _ _ _ , ,
FIELD NUMBER' - hvdrant_ oufl_ zone_ or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers denendinn on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspectorfreviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER- must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 5D%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Hack -up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

.
JAM ES B. HUNT JR. j{•
4,u GOVERNOR y
,�� WAYNE MCDEVITT
ECRETARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 20, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bennett Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
Baucom Bros., Facility #: 90-38
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Baucom:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
July 16, 1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) due to the leaks from the rear of your
swine houses.
Specifically, Mr. Johnson observed several discharges from cracks in the
foundation of your concrete wastewater diversion structure. The noted discharges are
a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and your deemed permitted
status. In addition to the leaks, the number of animals at the facility (376) does not
agree with that in your certified plan (350). You must either remove the excess
animals from your facility or contact your technical specialist for revision of our
certified farm plan. The specialist can also help you properly set the pumping marker
„-
in the lagoon.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by July 30, 1998
addressing the deficiencies noted above. In responding, please address your comments
to the attention of Mr. Johnson. Be advised that this notice does not prevent the
Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for this or any other
violation.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MDogH8V1LLE, NORTH CARa L]MA 28115
PHONE [phone] FA% 704-663-6040
• ;•, ,_.1� �•. •_ RS'"•+�e�="'^ AN EQUAL OPPRRTUNITY /AFii R1.f4YFV8 AGTiON E6EPLa Yaq - 80% R6CY CLlO/1 O% PO 9Y-Ca Hsi/MEq PAPER

Page Two
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

0.0
ivision of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
a-u ;3
outine Q Com faint Q .Follow-u 'oC D11 ins cvtion Q Follo►c-n of [?SWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection ,
Facility Number Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered ertified ' 3 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not o erationa] Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ................ 1.,(..i.L..C..c.,/� .......1 1-G7'...,..................................... County:..,... ......,.,..........................,...................
Owner Name .............. i l ! .!e.!'..,.....-fit ................................... Phone Phone No: ........ 2.Z.....ti�....-,:.L.:2.'-Yd ..........................
FacilityContact: ...../................... ........................................... Title:.., .................................................. ... Phone No:............,......................................
Mailing Address: .... 4aP. S..v.........!%Q.Y .�r�t..,%7�%...�t.............. .../%�Ut'.l./`/�....................... ........................... ..........................
Onsitc Representative:........ .!!�C..................... .......... Integrator:, .....................
Certified Operator:.........ex!-.h.�q.rr!1................. 23Q... IA. C,0'.kl..'1................... Operator Certification Number .............................
,ocalion offarin: Or—F Z
rrx�� r�, .. i.,,s .. ►��. - ..�a..............H s., Z0.0 ........ , .b.n....... w�l. it: s . ............. A
......... ....
..��tA.�P....1�.......-RJ...S....1.`,...'..11..........(Lr...�......'.',".....,..ro...11t.L...:....�(r.�......lri..k�. .LL7r................................................................ 1
Latitude U' C=" Longitude ®• 2 ��]4'�
�. Design ; ,Current
Design Current ,` Desrgn Current
Swine'F Capactty.Population"
Poultry �..r;Gap:tcity Population "Cattle Capacttyl'opulattoa
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer El Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 2.
❑Non -Layer NJ on-
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish `Total
Design.CapaCity �#
❑ Gilts
r Mc >3
-: ❑ Boars
. ; > .Total S S L W'.
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
° ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
'jVo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
ANo
b. [f discharge is observed, did it teach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
FNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ,al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
WYes
31�No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ANo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
X,No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
A Yes
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
�No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
PNo
7/25/97
Continued on back

Pacility Number: --
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) 17
9, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structur I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:...i..f...t!'�. Q71.. .. flt.!l.!(l.... d
Freeboard(ft):....... `,t........ ..............__ ..:...... ...... ............ .................. .......... ................. ..»...... .......... ....... I...........
10, is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Wt.ste_Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... Q. r l ......................... .......... .................. ....... ............ ..... ....... ..._..... ........ ..........................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management flan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
Fqr Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
�] No.vitdlations-or, deficient:ies.were-i O'ted-dur.ing thisMsit.- Y.664411 receive n' 61tirther
. • correspQi�dehce about this: visit:... ' ::::. . :.... :: � : , .. .. . .:. : : : :: - :.
❑ Yes VLjqo
❑ Yes P!.No
Structure 6
❑ Yes I%N0
❑ Yes k No
Pa
❑ Yes JkNo
jqYes ❑ No
El Yes t No
❑ Yes [K No
❑ Yes IX No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes `UNo
-k Vt et-e— a •r. se V er- u l l+ecr k s IDCa W a�- ?4e, repy-
�D GV` M L C-r t_+rte- W a �� Sr f 4 �UD 1,b/ ea*60,21
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: z� Date: - hR

Count
neon
caner
Bennett IBaucom
manager
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
isaucom -sroiners
Phone Number
53-1740
essee
Region
0 ARU 0 MRO 0 WARO 0 WSRO
p FRO p RRO p WIRo
�ocauon.:. �ii mite west an Geuuron w.unams xoaa oir riyvy. zuu norx[n... ne.m��►in .comp.any.is-ioc'ateu'
off. $ir x �0. Rey �uS �lox�h. 4� Xlle. i#ex5eetloA.�{'it� Ze73plon .Kd�
. .... ........................ T
Certified Operator in Charge enn
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
�k:.���, �?�' ;Qpek 3�ftx a o�vi� : ash
aucom
Date inactivated or closed
Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity

4. Latitude
Longitude
p Request to be removed p Removal Confirmation Recieved
L7 irrigation;
p Higher Yie
p Vegetation
p Acreage
p Other
Comments ;; Basin Narne:IYadkin
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits Database

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A
•
Mooresville Regional Office f
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary 1DF-=HNFZ
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Bennett Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Baucom Bros., Facility #: 90-38
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Baucom;
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be retarded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 )T/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, 'WA W� FAX [phone]�
Mooresville. North Carolina 28115 f An Equal Opportunity/Af`firmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50°lo recycled/lT/. pe5;-consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
0 other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also; please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this Ietter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleas eegional.
Water Quality Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC 28110
Dear Mr. Baucom:
3WA
I)E N FZ
c DR", o�
April 3, 1997 � NA URAL i 1 j0� ;cis.
APR 7 1997
A11t1�!fJ!i �F rhvneyB[UTAt MANASCUM
tra"��e4�itE A�ti�r�Al BFf�f
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Baucom Brothers
Facility Number 90--38
Union County
You were notified by letter dated November 12, 1996, that you were required to designate a
certified animal waste management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by
January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form for your
facility. Our records indicate that this completed Form has not yet been returned to our office.
For your convenience we are sending you another Operator in Charge. Designation Form for your
facility. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later
than April 25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need
assistance in locating a certified operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management
system, is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an
appropriately certified operator is designated. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability -for any past or future violations for your
failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and
Certification Group at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
bb/awdesletl
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosure
P.O. Box 29535, V ;6 FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 NVf CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmahve Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/10% past -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC 28110
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Baucom Brothers
Facility ID#: 90-38
Union County
Dear Mr. Baucom:
a H N FZ
N.C. DEM OF
ENVTRON1,4rNT, HEALTH,
F1 NATURAL TrLSOU:zCFS
NOV 18 1996
DIVISION OF ':A AJi EN1
MILT ZILLLE REG INAL OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely, .
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.0, Box 27687, IN,
W 4CRoleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 V An Equal Opporiunity/Affirmotive Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 - = - 50°/o ►eCycfed/1D°b post consumer paper