900036_PERMIT FILE_20171231

n
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Kenneth Cox
3408 Tom Greene Rd.
Waxhaw, NC 28173
Dear Mr. Cox:
e��
�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 13, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Ken Cox Farm, Facility #: 90-36
Union County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on August 12, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. The facility was in good shape. However, you need to ensure that all forms pertaining to
the application of waste are properly filled out.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, �y�C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 - _ Ma 50°% recycled/]0°.o post -consumer paper

[3 DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
ouhne p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ in p
Facility Number
Farm Status: [3 Registered p Applied for Permit
Certified p Permitted
p of perational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Ken Cox Farm
❑'
Date of Inspection Z
Time of Inspection i/fir lid 24 hr. (hh:mm)
County: U.A.io.m................................................. MRO..........
OwnerName: Keauelh................................ Cox............................................................... Phone No: .7.44-7.6.-MR........-----.............................................
Facility Contact: ...................................................... .....................Title: . Phone No:
Mailing Address: 34118.Tam.C�umelt aa:d................................................................... Iva.xhlw..NC......................................................... 28173 ..............
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Ken.S.. .................................... C.QX .................................................... Operator Certification Number:19246 .............................
Location of Farm:
z;sotltl�..ap�xa�,,4._,;RL:ta;nM_ktnug�t.Iadge.-;pgAmil:Uggg,�xaxtxec;Oro ............................... a
Latitude ®0®4 ®44 Longitude ®" ®6 ®41
DesignCurrent' Design Current . Design Current
w,
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population'
[3 can to ee erf;
p Layer
® ee er to ums
❑ Non -Layer
❑ arrow to can
r., Total Design Capacity
E ;Total SSLW
❑ arrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Finis
p Other
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
450
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
p Yes )4,No
❑ Yes 1a-No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[]Yes '-No
p Yes �io
❑ Yes' No
Continued on back

7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in.responsible charge? Li Yes c,�, No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes /�� o
. Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Stricture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
C................. .................. I .................... ....................................... .........---...--.---.--...---..............................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes XNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes Po
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes I*No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ya/Yes p No
Waste Application l�
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes Po
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type f i.. ....lrc.�..l� a .T •• Su... �.� . C................................................................................................................. ............
r.. y.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes XNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes �To
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? © Yes P:iJo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes *No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes liz,No
2I. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes )No
For Certified Facilities Onik
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? Yes XNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes ANo
24. Does record keeping need improvement? )KYes p No
gReviewer/Inspector Name a�"#t�M:ez'0s5-,I"� "-
F Reviewer/Inspector Signature:14 Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Fa il' Assessment Unit 4/30/97
act tty Number: 90_4 Date of Inspection
Additional Comments and/or

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
4 Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Don Simpson
1026 Roanoke Ch. Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Mr. Simpson:
'TIM
WA
1DEHNR
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
May 16, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Simpson Turkey/Swine Farm
Union County, NC
I have enclosed a Request for Removal Form for you to sign and mail to the address listed on the
sheet. Please make it to the attention of Sue Homewood. I visited your farm on May 12, 1997 and verified
the closure of your swine operation. Upon inspection I noticed that a few of the lagoons need to be
pumped. Also, it appears that there may be some seepage from the "bottom" lagoon from which you
irrigate.
Arry further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also,
please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per
violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If you
have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
Alan D.Johnson
Environ. Spec. I1, Water Quality
AJ
IMT
919 North Main Street, �y� FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 �TM 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary -
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Kenneth Cox
Ken Cox Farm
3408 Tom Greene Road
Waxhaw NC 28173
Dear Kenneth Cox:
1 � •
AMA g-.O. 44d
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
OrFF�*�
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REIN&i?Ciff- WP
EPMRONMENT, HEALTh
& NATURAL RESOURCM
January 24, 2000
FEB 4 2000
1111310N Of INVIR11MMEATAi MANA&EMENj
IIOORESVILLI 1E61ONAL OFF19E
Subject: Removal of Registration
Ken Cox Farm
Facility Number 90-36
Union County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per'the terms of'15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poult with a I quid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens P.E.
cc: Mooresville Water Quality Regional Office
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycted/10% post -consumer paper

�" f t??'' i ' g;s,,< `6E�i?'E: 3r D1VISlOn O��Sorl and;.Wateir3COn5eCVatlon QpCrdtlOnaR('V1CW 36?[#IE.{'I CIE E i3 �E;Ei� Ni i}? ?if¢ 3€'�I21Y �i€.'.3I E;Es�`�!
t
3 . i as ...,r 3� "
Division 'of Soil acid Water Conservation - Conipliance.lnspectioii
j -Division of Water Quality = Compliance Inspection r
'Other Agency Operation Review., i , ...,> , ,.! r,, „` t . �E?
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-un of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other I
Facility Number Dale. of Inspection !�V
"Timer of Inspection j 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Permitted )A Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O ce;ctionfalDatc Last Operated:
Farm Name: Kgn..... 4E7�......... Wi.. Count.y:.....t!`i!4.17?.!........................................................
Owner Name:.......:.:ICI ......i?................. Phrrne Nu:....'. 3_...................................
.................................. ...................... ......
FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title............................................................. Phone No:.....................................[..............
Mailing Address: .......�,.��..�.. �l!YI.....U`��t�F4�......R,A........................................................��....f�. ....
T K rq- f
Onsite Representative: �er .....0 . Integrator
.........................
........................ CO ........ Operator Certification Numbei .......j.C�...1 Certified Operatnr:.,.,. :....'.!'�l�
n of Farm:
................................................................... ...............................................................................................
...... . ?
Latitude Longitude
3Wine capacity ropuiauon
❑ Wean to Feeder
ceder to Finish .44Sd
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I 1 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I.
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream ImpacLS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes 1�rNo
Discharge originalcd at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conv4yance man-made ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. I1'dischargc is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters ofthe State ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes GNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes xNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1�
Freeboard(inches): ..............�1...............................................................................................................................................................................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type ............ a..r�......................................................................................
0
❑ Yes *0
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ' &o
❑ Yes ,No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes 9To
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 3ZNo
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
❑ Yes �2 No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes �PTNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes )4-No
Required
Records _& Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes 'PINo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
WUP, design,
[:]Yes '.No
(ie/ checklists, maps, etc.)
19.
Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes ❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes &•No
22.
Fair to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Pertnit?,
yam{`'
Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
El .�No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ,;2 No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes JZLNo
No.vhAH'tlOnS or deticienicie's .were' noted. during ttii�.visit:.I'.ati �viyl.ree'eive no Mrtiier... •.
. ......
eorrespotndence. ... .this .visit... ... . . . . :: ...... .... .......... .. .
Comments (refer' to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any.recommendations or any other,eomments i
;:,j i
Use drawings'of fadlityto Better explain -situations. (use additional pages as necessary)i
�•t°,�c�S � eAl JSc.c-r'C�, �..G� L.v�-s � c-p��1 G1.4 I O� Y�e.�t�YC .S h�� QC(J.�l'vt pc�:'l� / ,,�
Q
�h b Quo c,s �. t a nu who s , rin +T G ak i s re.w, i led
�- 11,1 y Le rre-- t Y�� -� vvtec - hem pis
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�14"!9 Uh
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ^ �,� /�y�. Date: , t ;j 4 j 11/6/99

Draft - Revised Iamuary 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION .& DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number y 2 _ 3� Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: e`i C r acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: ;ePQ1rdy Part 11 eligibility hem(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: -
Date of site visit ±/,MXJ _ - _
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recentrWUP: Annual farm PAN deficit: Ci pounds
,Irrigation 'System(s) - circle t 3. hard=hose traveler, 2..center--pivot system; 3.-linear-mov_ a system;.
4- stationary sprinkler system w7perrrma rent pipe; 5. stationary spnnkler-system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary'gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART L WA Determination:Exemptions (Eligibilityfailure, .Part II, overrides Part.l exemption.)
El .Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wAttabie acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2./D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable .acres, is complete and signed by an .I or. PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acresjs complete and signed by a WUP_
E4 75%.rule exemption as verified in Part Ill_ (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail -the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART'II.75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination.
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below: 1
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater.(PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear,illegible, or lack of informatiari/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
bufferlsetbackacreage; or25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields Iess than 5 .acres for .travelers or less than
2 acres for -stationary sprinklers).
__I//F4 '1lIIA determination :re uired because CAWMP credits fields 's acrea a in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted 'in table in:Part Ill.

Draft - Revised January 20,1999
Facility Number
Part ill. Field by Field Determination .of 75% Exempfion Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'-2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
S
s� 1
opi arse'
p L,v.,.,
.e r
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J_ML.0 NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption If possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
" :FIELD'NUMBEW - must.be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS3 -back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] Apr 21 '97 14:13 P.02/02
REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 214 .0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number:
Farm Namc: �a Y,r Vtn
Owner:
Mailing Address:
rrall -7
County:�-
This Operation is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out of business/no animals on site
closed out per MRCS standards
-- below-the-thr�shold_.(t�ts�haa.150�*+1, 1eo=tanfincdsaul�,..J.�horscs�1004_sE�e�_or
30,000-poul[ry witl a liquid anima] waste management syFtem)
I am fully aware that should the number of animals increase beyond the threshold limit or the
operatiou meets the 21-1 .0200 registration requirements for any reason, I will be required to
notify and re register with the Division of Wuter Quality.
Signature: LDater
Please rcmm cmmpletrd form to:
DEHNR-DWQ
Waw Quality Section
Cumpliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleig34 NC 27626-0535
R R-419 7

NCDENR
JAMES S. HUNT JR.
GaVeRNOR
M COEV ITT;."
;:%'S`ECRETARY '#rF'•rK
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsouRCEs
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 24, 1998
Ken Cox
3408 Tom Greene Rd.
Waxhaw, NC 28173
Subject: Site Inspection
Ken Cox Farm, Facility #: 90-36
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Cox:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your Iocal agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORRSVI LLH, NORTH CA ROLL NA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recornrnendations for Nitrogen {ND Application for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the com is 18 inches high.
• . Fes cu e/Orch ardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
,
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 ibs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting)_ Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
1 D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

County
Eneon
Owner
jKennetb lCox
manager
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
Ken Cox arm
1704-764-3298
Phone Number
Lessee
7 0
•' n•, n WIRO
i.i.mi. �:w:.�vinnroe r�wy:.511 scam: approx. 3m�: �uu... • ..hough �;nge.=.at,Junctron tii:t:o . • •
Greene; l�ci.(SR 1 9):.a�id Yry 52 ..:�a�ce �e ..o..g........ �........... Stare s . . .... . ..V . P..
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
Ken S. ox
A kX Qpe #,Q , ,: QOW • . Date inactivated or closed
. :.
Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity
Total 450 Swin-E�:]
SSLW 60,750 Feeder to Finish

Latitude
Longitude
S ar at01/01/78
e
ee.....
1eaFlill
Spec': I'
r�.te for
.
Loudermilk
p Request to be removed p Removal Confirmation Recieved
Higher Yields
Vegetation
Acreage
Other
Comments ' Basin Name. lCatawba
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits Database

_'f`e'/ram
NCDENR ,
' .LAMES B. HUNT JR.:
Ken COX
-. c ••�.
GOVERNOR
3408 Tom Greene Rd.
Waxhaw, NC 28173
f
.0 ;,..
_WAYNE:mcDEVITf,':R
• SGCRETARY i '�;,, ��r
Dear Mr. Cox:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 31, 1998
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Ken Cox Farm, Facility #: 90-36
Union County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July
30, 1998. You need to contact your technical specialist to have your pumping marker
properly placed in the lagoon. Also, the specialist should be able to give you advice
regarding weed control on your lagoon embankment.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc.
Union SWCD
INon
-Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
VP1
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOREBVILLE� NORTH CAROLINA 2a1 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONBUMRR PAPER

�ya'a� Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency f
Q Division of Water Quality;'
Routine
of
Facility Number I
© Registered jVI Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted
[low -up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection I /
J;4I,VI 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName; ..............Acen............ a4 .......... %rdYi.......................... ... County: ........ .r.,44............................. .......................
Owner Name: ...................... IK-gfn ............. Zak Phone No: %�'.�.�..�..d.... ........ I......................
Facility Contact:... ..................................... .. Title: ....... Phone No:
Mailing Address:....ti.l�...............'C?1........LFf'eP,l.� .....�C7�........... ............... k..h.lX, ! 1................... ...r�.�...3......
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:...... vi...........................COX.............. ......... Operator Certification Number,.......: Z .
I.nratinn of Farm!
.. { 4f y........
/
i. .JRJj....... .....K.......... f�... r .w[.}r, ........
_
.....-... ...�.M.L�f.... 4...... .. �� ...wf..T�rl L.n........D...:.h....................
�
Latitude ®' ' ®" Longitude ' 4 "
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )KNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 06 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes P(No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes W—No
maintenancetimprovement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes b No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes kNo
7/25/97

i3
Facility Number:
• 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? 0 Yes lOrNo
Structures (LagoonsMolding Ponds. -Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ..... ................................... .................................... ................. ................. ...................................
............ ......................
Freeboard(ft): ....... /.....Z 6 .................... .................................... ..................... ....... .................................... ........... .................. .....
....................................
10.
Is. seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
KNo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
KNO
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Ayes
[I No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
KYes
0 No
Waste A'lication
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
0 Yes
4.No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .......... .I-ey.i r.1 ....................................................................... ...............................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
0 Yes
IqNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
Q­11NO
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0 Yes
�o
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
0 Yes
)iJ No
20,
Does facility .require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0 Yes
9NO
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
0 Yes
)KNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
0 Yes
ONo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
0 Yes
NVo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El Yes
MNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
El Yes
XNo
13 No:vidlatiohs 6r d6ficien'664'e're",ni6tM. during this" visit'. You:will r'e'ce'i've� fi6, ftirtlier'-'. -
cotre9060dekc AboOt this: visit: -', I
V� ek1170-.1,7 0...7
xed
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4Z . it)-.1--ze-t�_ - Date: 7-36-2,V__

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Kenneth Cox
3408 Tom Greene Rd.
Waxhaw, NC 28173
Dear Mr. Cox:
AIFNWA
1:3EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 1.3, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Ken Cox Farm, Facility #: 90-36
Union County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on August 12, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. The facility was in good shape. However, you need to ensure that all forms pertaining to
the application of waste are properly filled out.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason,
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, ;6 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115NVf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 1096 post -consumer paper

LELDSWCAnimal FeedlotOperationReviewWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
p on ine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
[L
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection Ud 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: G Registered p Applied for Permit
■ Certified p Permitted
p of perational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Ken Cox Farm
Owner Name: Kenneth ................................. Cox...............................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:.........
Mailing Address: 34h&.1om.Greane.Rna,d...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: ..........................................................................................
Certified Operator: Ken.&.........
Location of farm:
.... Coax ...........................
County: Union ................................................. MRO...........
.. Phone No: .70.4-16.4 , 298........
.............. Phone No:
Waxbam..NC......................................................... 2817.1 ..............
Integrator:.....
Operator Certification Number:1924.6.............................
Latitude ® s ®6 ®� Longitude ® A ®6 ® fi
a..t2j a ° t1lii9 ` !1`p °y>n .E�; ! , j {y6 E t'E E € ;• a• ° ( , :3 a;'x. [E - E €' E,.xx E.( , c .afaie°6! ` S;f`.•3 3''d9 f-
T e of Operation N�;x?? Vt� 11}°. € a fl . € €i€ t€ s € € +fls @fi,fl�S 11��1$� V : � ic; ii g i,31�?t3:.. €iilfl,a,32d33; °t �} , tsitti€5:....,Et €' � i € ;=.i.13€ ,• s;;€d EH , � 1$�;,;e EdlE f,.>,,,€�:EE€� s€csrgE v i y° ` € � i ;it:€3E> €1Ei 'l:'•3,!
YP P s,31��!$11,Des�gn I(��t{{,Current � � ,i ii9.4 ki1��V� €� 4 � � i��kii � ;:=i�Design�° g�, Current ����i��.� �€1� � 3 y��' 4,' � � �� , ;; .€�Dese n� l�j� �
°.1. 1 ki ..s 41,,•iSi1 a 9 ,3 a 1ai91� ad;c;i,. V Yll,lj,csv (Ii.iS.�,r.ar:L!4: ii..�.,T:%iV� UU�°.1ik' k lr , 31..,.i,...k4 + h d i.°".t i €.r•'r. Po ulation ,. , Poultryi�' 1 iCa ac:lt 1'o ulatilon' Gaktle �� iE , i !"
PC`. , ,P, ....Y : P „ 1d1 r vCapac�ty 1Populatron
n 1 i _, x ;i,rs➢ IIF tc,,. _? .,ss ,,,€°s € €alas a„ u,€A u;,a E :�j 4 $ EE,Nat.VeV .e.a9a7xli17tEVti ,-aiEt4�€a°�is.,,.t,4itr[ € ac,etu€¢.. n€. l s ssfteF . i 4 E� ik ,,.fl , ,,, - r<.,:,E.' '
Ef ❑ can to Feeder i p ayer ❑ airy fli
Y, H Feeder to mis � on a er El on-Vairy
❑ Farrow to ean ➢xa11E�, ,'i , Rb I. i.,�FP€i* 1E'I [�'-Erflil�'." la €{€�.- h '?k%:�� 1l �; ! it { f_t.V� '�V P :gT
,€$1€E�a�i'I€$a3�1? iks�x€3 k 1 flP;�€ �,Ei r a>•Eyy EEE1: e ai �: € Ei:xii3!�€ii Ei°'°'"ai.lt t� ail E� 3 S:.,fl:.,.:aE3E€V�fl�i.#...tEt ,y f �§ �i r i € €f 6E p i_ ` i1V kEl
,11< : arrow t0 Feeder e
�g:E EE ❑ $ 3€¢9 �99}} ��y3I���� �4' {{jE(g(3�'T€O�t$ �1q�es1gI1�CA�IflB�Clly �$ i� L, 450
1��
{,
Farrow t0 Finish
. ❑
OtheI60,750
��
..s ❑!$! i� i ,.! 3 1,,< i I "`V 13 is i`i�E,.. E, €((E s €e$ag'°a l8 �3V.'k a§r$i3 3'�3kii�,�,1 ,E, .9 i €I'i 'aF:>.xs €€ i :, is,s�3E:::ie 1" E Eii¢s¢4F tfc,xi ; ` t'S 4'.
�9_�:s�eui�HkEkl9E9i$S�=$•:� i1i�v3a�a�1!?.goons IrHoldEng4Ponds31i�1�CN€=i3lili�ja'�� E:pry;e3s3€Ex��Gk11$ISisia�BI411141aEa�}i........,.>.>.>.>.,.,._...................:.m.......<.„.................<.............. --.,,:,..,.,.,.
►Number �',a p u sur ace Drains Present ❑ agoon Area p pray
ofELaie rea �;
��N,d�f�a`'�lkliiC�CI&`u��.�"�i1ii1C:��i,aiEii�'i'i,M.
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes XNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? © Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes -'S&T
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes y No
maintenance/improvement? 1�
4/30197 Continued on back
1W'­1vt1T I— ar. Wk 'fC

7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? u Yes 'No
8. Ve there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (I 1lgn_ons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �1'No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.�4...2............................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes WNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Po
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes A15No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es p No
Wa5le Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes )KNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type--...Q✓..f 1.... k.-O..ze-ca...TL,a�u.. L�. ty........................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ YeSX.No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes )2y�o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes PNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes *1No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes dNo
For er 'fie cilities Qnly
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? Yes XNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWI PI ❑ Yes XNo
24. Does record keeping need improvement? )'Yes []No
IN
Reviewer/Inspector Name
'.�.:. ; t �rMINE � ,. .rf:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: fir?
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Fa il' Assessment Unit 4/30/97
Facility Number: 90_4 Date of Inspection
S' F's- �{, 1 '
Additlonal:Comments and/or Dtawtngs t� £,, v u §+^ €�
'R�nN�i a...+:3.,.-,i.'ssi.atl;.t.:.:':'S�?t,;.h;"!'{?fe�&::b:t�3,1�in'z�.1`,:.'C':x��3riA,`:%.,q•Nli, '�',,i.m

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Ken Cox
3408 Tom Greene Rd.
Waxhaw, NC 28173
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Ken Cox Farm, Facility #: 90-36
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Cox:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
P.O. Box, 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
� 1
-Y
D. Rex Gleaso kL,E.
Water Quality eional Supervisor
cc: UnionSWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Ken Cox
KEN COX FARM
3408 Tom Greene Road
Waxhaw NC 28173
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: KEN COX FARM
Facility ID#: 90-36
Union County
Dear Mr. Cox:
1 • �
90
a H N
N-C_ DEPT. OF
ENV11Z,0NM�,NT, 3IEALTk3,
& NATURAL Rr-SOUfiCES
NOV 19 1996
DIVISION OF El1V1i'9tl!'=1ir,L "Ay�SE.',EfiT
WriESVILLE REGINAL MICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996:
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely, f `
A. Preston Howard, Jr., ., trector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, NVfrC
�Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100l 50% recycled/ 1 Mo post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: —
Facility No.3 —3+S
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:- 1995
Time: ELL, _
Farm Name/Owner:. _ Cc'�C
Mailing Address: �
County: ' �� Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative;Vecc!,U Phone:
Physical AddresslLoc
a—il
Type of Operation:SwinePoultry_Cattle_Design Capacity -Number of Animals on Site:
Latitude: ° ' " Longitude:
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
I P
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: 1Ft. �Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 1&o Was any erosion observed? Yes or [&o
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? &or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings' or No
100 Feet from Wells?(Sor No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(No)
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes oo
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or lRo If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? %or No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name����`
cc: Facility Assessment Unit