900035_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
1 Department of Environment,.
Health and Natural Resources •
1 Mooresville Regional Office1WPM'N;A
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 1DF-=HNFZ
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
May 16, 1997
Ted Broome
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Ted Broome Farm, Facility #: 90-35
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Broome:
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on May 12, 1997 by
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
General maintanence is required around the facility, notably the vegetation on the lagoon. Also
pipes that are not necessary need to be removed from around the lagoon to prevent confusion during
operational reviews. The pumping marker in the lagoon needs to be clearly labeled. As required by the farm
plan the fencing enclosing the swine lot needs to be pulled back from the stream below the facility.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also,
please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per
violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If you
have arty questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
�1 D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Union SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, 4 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NVAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10°.b post -consumer paper

f )
:
DSWC Aaimal Feedlot Operation Revlew.
q
WQKAnilnal Feedlot Operration Slte Inspection
K
©'Routine O Complaint O Follow-u of DWQ inspection O Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
3"-/. c
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of InspectionUse 24 hr. time
Farm Status: _ � e ' Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview ��
"""" " """ """" or Inspection (includes travel and processing)-_=�
Farm Name: �__ i e �.... ?.::Z�S3a.... .. �r"% ... ...........
.» .. .«..., C011niv:.._ )lt c�`)
»..»_..._......._., ........ .....
Owner Name: ....lt._». ».r2arl? Phone No:.. _».�..._....� _..» .....»....__.....__
Mailing Address:.._. L�:.c1 ...i..+.s�.!1� I�. ._ _.. _ o� 1 x :_�':.
Onsite Representative: _ ...i'c�.... ' ��».. _..__. Integrator:. ...__._.....r..._ ._ .».............»._
Certified Operator: » .._. ......_ ..__........ _ _...._ .._ _ ... ...�.... - Operator Certification Nutnber: _.. W...,....._. _ .........
Location of Farm:
P
_A.12 lr�u.... _ ...... _ ...» _ ..........-
Latitude
Longitude �• ��
���
❑ Not Operational
Date Last
Operated:._.........._......_ ._..._.�.....w.»
........ ..............._. ...........__...
_.... _.._
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
�"�.SO s.;•� ,,
Swsne : H :.:
'Number ,Poultry Number :>rt Cattle €"Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Laver'`
�..
❑Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Non -La er
�'t ❑ Beef
CrOR"tO'WCdrl
L)
a { z nstc 3ysg��
arrow to Feeder
y
Farrow to Finish
❑ Other Type of Livestock
Number of Lagoaas / Holding Ponds ° ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area". ❑ Spray Field Area k
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvcment? 60-'r es ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 14-No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes kNo
a. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes I'No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? 1Z Yes �i' ?No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
B. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structures ,(Laaoons andlor Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
❑ Yes
[--]No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon] Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
14 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
$3 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
RrYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
ZYes
r .'No
Waste AUllication Aq
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
IgNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
�J
15. Crop type
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
For Certified Facilities On1v Aj­
20, Does'the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #):.Explain any YES ariswers-and/or.any. recommendations or any other comments .
Use ,drawin s of facili io better ex lain situatiot;s: use' additional, a es'as neces F ..
LC 4 tG moV c'� �_ j(Z� A e P1 /1 et:j`j C`c,.C, c..c�[� 11�0�� 5
t zo►�� �i��usee.� Sw� k� �a� S tit-�� r hv� wc�5
1k�.
/�
4105 ;1S �V\,ci:v��1ca�e^,C_-& /V/� LS
�►
✓14 IjIG.1 SI �tcs�•�e1( �c. C[��r� C- a� �b1c=1+« O-�'eC�'S tvt� �r►�c�(`t'r
..51cr )e_ P""k �-kOL s ;r� 'fit,. ia,���e� �C,_OCU.V
es �Le� {'
y 1 ��
�� t ie,
8
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviw•er/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc. Division of hater Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
1 -
A1 R
�L RESO)jRCEs
NCDEI,[C-IONAL OFFICE
NORTH CAROLINA DEP/�RTMEN 'OF•' t
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
i
February 20, 2002 Pro 2 2 2002
i
Ted Broome
Ted Broome Farm
2909 Weddington Rd. 3 -
Monroe NC 28110
Subject: Removal of Registration
Ted Broome Farm
Facility Number 90-35
Union County
Dear Ted Broome:
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant at
[phone] ext. 57]or Steve Lewis [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
X�Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Water Pollution Control System Operator Certification Commission
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Coleen H. Sullins, Chairman
February 19, 2001
Ted 0. Broome
2909 Weddington Road
Monroe NC 28112
Re: Animal Waste Management Certification Renewal
Certificate Holder: Ted 0. Broome
County: Union
Dear Mr. Broome:
P .TWA
NCDENR
Senate Bill 1217, enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1996, states "a certificate holder who fails to
renew their certificate and pay the renewal fee within 30 days of its expiration shall be required to take and pass the
examination for certification in order to renew the certificate".
You were mailed an invoice in October 2000 notifying you that your certificate would expire December 31, 2000, and
that a $10.00 annual renewal payment was due by that date. The 30-day grace period ended January 30, 2001. Since
your payment was not received, your certificate expired effective December 31, 2000. Therefore, you do not possess a
valid animal waste management certificate. Please note that without a valid certificate, law prohibits you from
performing the duties of an Operator in Charge of an animal waste management system.
The next available opportunity to retake the Animal Waste Management System Operators certification examination
will be June 14, 2001. An examination application is enclosed for your use. Please note that a completed examination
application must be postmarked 30 days prior to the examination that you wish to take. If you did not intend to renew
your animal waste management certificate or do not wish to get recertified, you may disregard this letter and your
animal waste management system operators certification will remain invalid.
Please call Beth Buffington at 919-733-0026, extension 313, if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
1
Dwight Lancaster, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
enclosures
cc: TAC Files
Mooresville Regional Office
1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1618
Phone: 919 — 733-0026 1 FAX: 919 — 733-1338
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNrrY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

=JAME9 B:'•HUNT,JR.,1.,-
GOVERNOR
N
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 26, 2000
Ted Broome
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
T. Broome Farm, Facility #: 90-35
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Broome:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
May 16, 2000. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
Mr. Johnson confirmed that the facility is below the threshold of 250 animals
and is no longer subject to annual inspections. Be reminded that until the lagoon has
been properly closed, it must be maintained according to the guidelines set forth in
your farm plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Enc.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
u:
4S;r rvr`ha CFrL
1 0 1 0
gig NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 26115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 90 35
Date of `'isit 5/16/ZaOfl Printed on: 5/17/2000
-- — - _ Not Operational Below Threshold
❑ Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: TW.U.[:uGtAAefArm....................................................................................... County: UJLIiQat................................................. N,[ o...........
ONvnerName: JCd ........................................... &.Qp.mc ....................................................... Phone No: 7Q.4.-.Zjja!5.6.46 ...........................................................
Facility Contact, ..............................................................................Title:........................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: 2909...W&dtliiaZttork.>id ........................................ ........... lYdanu}c..N.c............................ . 20.110 .............
Onsite Representative: J.ed.Urpoma ...................... . Integrator: CQX.BrA.tkjcr5.........................................................
Certified Operator: j g.................................... j?.!ULU................................................ Operator Certification Number:18Z33
Location of Farm:
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 34 • 5a 60 Lon;itude $0 a 36 1F 36
,Curre
F Swine Ce acit ' Porulat
P[03Wean�tEoFeedcr
eedFinish
arrow to Wean
"IE ® Farrow to Feeder 150 3
❑ Farrow to Finish
"i ❑ Gilts
?s. ❑ Boars '
":_ .. ._.-..3r NI��TI}1Pl'At' i.R4(]11I1C�-.y•.'
uuaui ; Uyp" ! au"U:;i ru a:
*; Design; Current + ` f :Design ;°w Current?
t7 , Ce aci . Poi ulatiori �,� Cattle "...�. a aci :Po Pulatioi
Layer 10 Dairy
Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Otherjs
,;"
- esl nCa act 150
Total iy
Total SSLW'e 78 300
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Yyl u4.j� �a1 G`�9
G ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System - ;,h
tt
12ischar;;es h Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If dischar ye is observed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in 4"a1/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notifv DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24
Continued on back

Racility Number: 90-35 Date of Inspection C� Printed on: 5/25/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ Ne
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Timothy, Orchard, & Rye T
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Qgauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(id WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
O;.NQ yiolatioi>s:ot- 4.00.0.0.eS•Were;aote 40iit -thig. VWit. ;I'ou-Will .receive•it-oft rfh;er- , ;
.. corresuoridence. about this -Visit.
was a verification inspection in response to Mr. Broome's request to be removed from the active list.
pond needs to be pumped. The liquid level was about 4 inches below the start pumping mark.
oral maintenance was needed around the facility. Basically, the grass needed mowing
of business.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes . ❑ No
U
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: —per

:§ A*A
tq�
JAMES'S. HUNT JR,
GOVERNOR
'-;.1311-L �HOLMAN
:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 18, 2000
Ted Broome
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
T. Broome Farm, Facility #: 90-35
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Broome:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
May 16, 2000. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
Mr. Johnson confirmed that the facility is below the threshold of 250 animals
and is no longer subject to annual inspections. Be reminded that until the lagoon has
been properly closed, it must be maintained according to the guidelines set forth in
your farm plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Enc.
Sincerely,
,-� D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
•. .2 0 :I p -
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLr, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]G
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 09; POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Farility Numi,er 7�=, Date of Inspection
I Time of Inspection `L j 24 hr. {hh:mm)
M Permutes? ZXertified 0 Conditionaliv Certifies: Registered ❑ Not Operational Daty Last Operated;
FarmName: ............ ..f . ��t......,r��..� c....:.f?... ........ a ....................... Count} :...................:.. i � E....................... ................ _.....
OwnerName ...................... . ......................... ..� G ?'................................ Phone No...........................................
FacilityContact: . Title: ..................... .......................................... Phone No: ...................................... ...... .....
Mailing Address: ..... ....� ��'� ��Gl ��•+y.x,rr......iCl............. ..... �:........:......-•-•---.....................
Onsitt- Representative . ................... t.e_L........ ..'.fir _vLc` ......... Integrator:...................................................
Certified Operator: ...........................;4.A .wk.,..........t . Operator Certification Number:
Luemtion o['Farm:
t........................................... ..................................... ............................ ...................... I ........................... .......... ............................................................................... ......... ...1.Wi
La dV , f� I i i` Longitude �• �
Design Current Design 'Current :Design :Current
.Swine -Capacity 'Population Poultn- Capacity :Population '!Cattle capacity -Po ulation
�J Wear, 1] Laver i (❑ Dairy
;17 Feeder to Finish 1 i Non -Layer f Non -Dairy
Li Farrow' tc Wean ; j
Farrow, to Feeder , ' (� UthCr j
Farrow to Finish i TotW DeSi,II Capacity. I
Gilts i
Boars E i Total:SSL-W '
1 'Number of Lagoons
Subsurface Drains Present 0 Lagoon Area 5 ray Field Area
J P
S
061ding:Ponds /'Solid Traps No Liquid Waste Management
Msc.harrges & Srrean; lmmictc
is ant' discnarL=;; observed from am' par, Of the ope,ation" [1 yes 'J'_RQ' No
Dig:chari': origimnt:,; a:: :,] Lapmon :1 Spray Field 71 Other
li CIISCharRts is observed. u•as the convcyance mart -made'? Yes 71 No
I" disc;larL'c i:: obscn Cc. diti it reach N%ratcr of the State? (If vcs. notii'r DWQ
c. ': tiisci;ar*e is onservt-'-. what is the estimated login ir. gal/min:'
c. Drt dis�itare. bypass a is<__*oon systuw? (Ii'va,. notk'y DWQ)
thcrt cvidcmct• of pas: discharee irom any nag of tht operation'.
were Cher_, and. advers_ impacts, or notentia': adverse: impacts to trte %,,aterS o tine State othCr than: from a aischarge?
V asu- Collection i 'i reatm n:
'. is stora^_e canaoity (ireeaoarc niu:. storm: storage: iess than adequate" Sniliva�
Structurr Structur; Structure Structure 4 Structure 5
iuentiiic;r:
~r'Cncrtrd l inensm:
yr. there am irnntCdiate threats to th_ int -rite o; an\. of the structures observed? (iCl trees. severe erosion,
seenaoC, er•. )
7 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes :]No
Yes No
Yes No
Li Yes No
Structure. 6
Yes E�No
3l23 rug Continued an back

Facility Number: — I)atc of InsprctirIn
6- Arc there structures on -site which are not properly addressed hndior managed through a waste management or
closurc.plan? ❑ Yes &No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ves, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7, Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes rNo
S. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, Gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes KNo
Waste :application
10. Are there anv buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Irl—j No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type v_ 'e')
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)) ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑i'Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
cl This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 9,No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes � No
Reuuired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IS.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
fie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19,
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required b� General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an -site representative?
❑ Yes.
1�No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Cj,No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0: No: vialatidi is vi' d3 riciencies -rk,ere prated• ditrifiii this:visit; •You will •receive ti6 fukther• • ; •
corres&iderrce:aboutthisAsIL,'.'.':':':':':':':':':':':
Comments (refer to. question #): Explain any YES;' ers andlor any recommendations or. any. . other.comnnents.
Use drawings of facility to better explairisituattnis „(usemddiiional pages as necessary):
r �"l•e� ��` G 4l�i .S / ZOc,.l a i� ::+WL�� J, Sc� L7
Reviewer/Inspector Name
/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� 1.,�� Date:
3/23/99

• Facility Number: — Date of laspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below []Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surfacc of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged Fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional omments an or rawings:
3/23/99

OPERATIONS BPRNCH - WO Fax:[phone] RRr 21 '97 14:13 P.02/02
)REQUEST UEST FOR R)EMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 21-1 .0200 registration requirements: Please inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number:
Farm Name:
Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
This operation is:
--
... .......
p.Ttir
ziO9 OeAol(v i �
i+i �0 9 2000
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out ofbusinesslno animals on site
— osed out per MRCS standards
hel4 P hold—om ii an.�S ne, I DU.conaucd salty._ 7 o�scs 1OQt� she__ s�or
30,000-poultry witt a liquid unitnel waste management sysrcm)
Comments:
i ara fully aware, that should tine number of animals increase beyond the threshold Bruit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 registration :requirements for any reason, I will be required to
notify and re register with the Division of Water Quality.
Si�natuze: Date:y� � d
?Itase return comnitcl form to: DEHNR•DWQ
Watt Quality Seetiou
Compliance Group
1'.0, Box 29535
Ralei; NC J.76z6-0535
RR-4/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Ted Broome
Ted Broome Farm
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe NC 28110
Dear Ted Broome:
1 • A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND �ygT�RA�4i RESOURCES
&Yl
w,"IRONMENT, HEALTH,.
December 30, 1999 & NATURAL RESOURCBS
JAN 11 2000
0lVjSlC# OF 6iV}pBl{i INTAL MA11AIEME111
MONISEltLE REGINAL OFFRE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 90-35
Union County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
I
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

AM
NCDENInv
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 25, 1999
DAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR Ted Broome
£" 2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY -
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
T. Broome Farm, Facility #: 90-35
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Broome:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
May 11, 1999. In general the facility appeared to be in good shape. However, a site
diagram of the facility is needed for your files. Also the insect control, odor control,
and animal mortality checklists need to be completed.
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are
often missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for
review. Please be reminded that the following items must be available for review by
the inspector during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, feed areas must be shown.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of
waste produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Must have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a
Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste
applications should be made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the
waste. In general waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: file

Facility Number '� Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Wertified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated .
y
Farm Name: .. County: ........... !\?. .ram....... a. ...................
Owner Name: .......................... . � r�... ....... �.✓��.................. Phone No: ..�� � S �c..`t�..... .................................
... �"....................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:.......................................................... Phone No: ................................................
Mailing Address: .�..I�............� `3..5`�...L!!�......................./1A.X11��................................................-..0 t.�.��........
Onsite Representative:..'.'. .........wec"/�''................................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:..........%! ..� .......................�c� �s
.................................. Operator Certification Number: ,,,I,��;�„�.............
lluocation of Farm:
AL
.................... ................. ............. ........................
itude 0• �� ��' Longitude �• �' �"
el-
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'KNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water ol.' the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N]o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes EkNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [ISpillway ❑ Yes �No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
4
Freeboard(inches): ..........d ............................................................ I ... ................................... ........................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes OrNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
&No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
14 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
$Z�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
No
12. Crop YP rtype —�S f
c
13. Do the receiving crops differ vyith hose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
RNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
qNo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
kNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ANo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
g Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
R No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
RNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
allo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
EYNo
Io yiolalritjns;vr lie# c..... mere it tea d�rh)g Ois:visit} • Y04 ;W10-fe6*46 ii6 furt4
corresnoridence: about this visit. :..........:::::::::::::.:::....... .
Co0 4, ��...G s.Iy Cy de's 90 .56w. s +rb Lr` ` �, AL
s-A2cL,C-3 t ee (0, of 00 a-\
� turn 44%,P— !C 4Spec,
Reviewer/Inspector Named%:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Ea,`i'41Tt4 �'
Date: . S r
3/23199

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? X,
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes QrNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes V""No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes KNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ZNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes PNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes KNU
i tona 6mments'an orD rawm r t,
ps r _ k o ii..
l� T !..,ks� -i.£! �, `� �
n
3/23/99

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number ' 9C - 3 Sf Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: aA acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: -A., "Ll, 7L:lc{- <- Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
inspector/Reviewer's Name:��?�j , /_ Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: 15"--l/— S exemption El E2 E3
Date of most recent WUP: -2 —fs_ Annual farm PAN deficit: -,s Q,� pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
e
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depictingwettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination.
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of informationlmap.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination. required because CAWMP credits feld(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number ) - 3 S
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER',2
TYPE OF.
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
41
I
4
1
l
f
I
I
f
I
I
I
4
1
r
�
I
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption.if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm s previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

�i
1-e
NCDENR
,LAMES E. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
;', s-'WAYTlE-MC�EVITT •�=;-. �
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 24, 1998
Ted Broome
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: Site Inspection
T. Broome Farm, Facility #: 90-35
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Broome:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or Bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROL1NA281 15
PHONE[phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /APFI RMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 509E RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSU MHR PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrate) Application for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
,
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 Ibs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals_ One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being ]geld in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has, the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E. \3
1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

t N F
1 �I
NCDENR ,
JAMES B. HUNTJR;
GOVERNOR
" WAYNE' MCDEVITT�
SECRETARY f
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 24, 1998
Ted Broome
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
T. Broome Farm, Facility #: 90-35
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Broome:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July
23, 1998. You need to remove the animals from the outer lot in the area next to the
farrow/nursery house to reestablish the stream buffer. A site diagram indicating the open
lots used and the boundaries should be obtained. Finally, you should have your technical
specialist assist you in installing a new pumping marker in your lagoon.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 261 15
PHONE [phone] FAX 7D4-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agencyh w _#
k:uIMINvision of Water Quality ", ' 0
outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW ins ection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number D_®
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered P Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted © Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name 7e-r�, ............. !r �. County: ........... "V..1..c..l.................................................
OwnerName: ................. sue........................... Wti..,,............................. Phone No:...... .. bra.. ! a......................................
Facility Contact: .................................................... ..�:.......... . Title. Phone No:
Mailing Address: 1........h [ . .4.. .5. !..... .................... .... ,................................................ .. I..(w.
OnsiteRepresentative: .... A.Jee,.......W.R....f� ................... .. Integrator:...................
Certified Operator;..----..-1 ..1...F ...................L ? l'.1..........................I....... Operator Certification Number, ..... tt3.a-3............
Location of Farm:
sa,a�l...... ....�e.Y............
.o."-x ...4. T .. ....... .. ...........................
Latitude •=' =" Longitude =10 =' EY40-
Design r Current
`: "'Design Current
Design !Curreiht
Svrtne `Capacity
"Population 1?ottltry Capacity Populahan4 Cattle
Capacity'1'opuIa on,
,_
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
3
n
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
..
❑ Darrow to Finish
Tfotal Design Capacity'
l J (�
❑ Gilts015
b
Y,
K< Tatal SSLW
❑ Boars
x
u
Number of Lagpdnst/Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
rvY
'3* ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System.:
�x
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? AYes ❑ No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes %NO
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes UI(No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement? ,,
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? El Yes &o
7. Did the facility fail to have a,certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ONO
7/25197

Facility.Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes �J No
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) ' `
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Oa'No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft):...........72........................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes )p No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes )6-No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? I ❑ Yes )4No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? []Yes No
Waste Afrplication '
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes DfNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..................... Pr.........................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes � No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes t No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
tgNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
t5-No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
)tg No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Wo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
6�No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
E�No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
`P+io
0 No.violations•or. deficiencies. were noted during'this:visit.- :You:will receive4no-ftirth'er :
: . c4rrespptatdei>rce ahoitithis: vis.it:• : ; . .: : • : .. , . .. : ::: • : • : � • ::. : � ::..
J.� a k3cx�I s:�-�� u..
�r.� -+-t�� ay o�►e._ ,r-�-�►-� �.�, '�-� � �� lad rwr�.x.�- -� `4•c�.� .�,.�-�o�,� �S (��,.r-s e.�
f�t`f �fj r t 1 r
JAO jQ Cum E /�1 — �tn'.0 Al S'I�eC i�1iS 7` T+a e(CU'r (ti'4t.�1 nA
11 ►tea � i �ci � c ti� v�l l � � p �ti �oCS � � o v-+ntlCa-r'�t5. Yl.eebS � ii�
7/25/97
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:�//r r Date:

Count
Eneon
Owner
Ted IBroome
Manager
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
i ea tsroome r arm
Phone Number
704-283-5646
Lessee
Region
O ARO O MRO O WARD O WSRO
O FRO O RRO O WIRO 717
jii'arm: Lacatian.:.Ap�x. 'l . . .miles , , q V� . .LV......on .Hwy . ti4. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
II
Certified Operator in Charge Ilwatts
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
Date inactivated or closed
Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity
Total 150 Swine
SSLW 78,300 Farrow to Feeder

i
Latitude
Longitude
Startdate
ee e ores
echnicalPhil
pecialis
Lou erm�
nt g for
p Request to be removed p Removal Confirmation Recieved
Higher Yields
Vegetation
Acreage
Other
Comments 1. Basin Name' lYadkin
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits Database

c
tt
r, NCDENR
JAMES 13. HUNTJR.;�'r°^=
GOVERNOR Ted Broome
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
T-+.-kVA4N MCDEVITT_,
Dear Mr. Broome:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 24, 1998
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
T. Broome Farm, Facility #: 90-35
Union County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July
23, 1998. You need to remove the animals from the outer lot in the area next to the
farrow/nursery house to reestablish the stream buffer. A site diagram indicating the open
lots used and the boundaries should be obtained. Finally, you should have your technical
specialist assist you in installing a new pumping marker in your lagoon.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 261 15
PHONE 704-663•1 699 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

�-❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
3�'Division of V4T ater Qttaltt�
.,3�fi
toutine ClCont laint 0 Follow-u oi'l)'kVC ins petition 0 l-ollorv-u of DSWC review, 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number I
Time of Inspection / 2�24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered P Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ............... ...f e 4.................... }.t 2.i.Y\ ........, r�'-��� k�........... County:.......... t 1.�.. .F.}.......................... .... ...... I............
O«merName 5. . ` .�AZM' 1, Phone No: c;2.�al.. �5...�i ..`f. ,........ .. f.,,_........................ ... ........-----....---•--.---.
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ......
Mailing Address:..... .�I.C. c1............................
Onsite Representative: .... J.J.L.ed -......(,Cel. ........................... ................
Certified Operator; ......... 11:' . . L L r
Location of Farm:
......... Phone No: ....................................................
.................................................. ?.....1.�:.
Integrator: ....................................................................
Operator Certification Number;..... /13.3..7j............
.►-x.k.................. ..... z.......►a,..............,... .�..-.....L:........... rh, -UCL-4,_.....n4.....t...s:._ r....Y:'4 ............. ...L&L�'t:................
C. � .......... ........................ ......................... ......... ......... ............ ........................ ................................... r
Latitude t j�t' C--6 f° Longitude 0 • �' , ? ,. 46
I Number of La gaits L Holdtn Poei6`1 l 1 `<❑ Subsurface Drains Present IID Lagoon Area I❑ spray Field Area I' j
No Liouid Waste
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If ves. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in f-aVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
A
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsibie charge?
7/25/97
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes *0
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes aNu

v
Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.11oldigg Ponds, Flush ,'its, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
"'ANo
❑ Yes ;R�No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):........3.................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level maskers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
I5 Crontype r S" {,'�
❑ Yes $Z No
El Yes 1-No
❑ Yes No
[I Yes No
0 Yes t2PNO
......................................................................I.................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes k VI 7V' No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewCmspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
13 No. violations, or" deficiencies were'r�oted-duririg this. visit.- You:wiil recei've,iro fu:rth:er,
correspi)ndence; about -this; visit::.
❑ Yes Id No
❑ Yes tgNo
[7 Yes tKNo
❑ Yes )M No
❑ Yes )4_No
❑ Yes qANo
❑ Yes 6�No
C] Yes 19No
❑ Yes f�fNo
Gi P� SCt.Y ►�� c5/,d (A JGi h �. r-e.N Vek Crow"` the 10 � �.► Ca ca [ f-
vt� 11
��s ` `k� �v. K•e� ` co
Ae- Yl11C,C C+( !s'ja c tC_1i5\
� " P(OAC� Q K_ej_
L � lA�.r�� (�1-Q' W
/¢ si� to"� rGC�t.. /�i cti�,,.l � t;pr� �o�-s � bo:��c�.�•��ts i�[e.�s -�, 1�. J
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: -Y /-)2 /r-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Ted Broome
2909 Waddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Mr. Broome:
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 16, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Ted Broome Farm Facility #: 90-35
Union County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on May 12, 1997 by
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
General maintanence is required around the facility, notably the vegetation on the lagoon. Also
pipes that are not necessary need to be removed from around the lagoon to prevent confusion during
operational reviews. The pumping marker in the lagoon needs to be clearly labeled. As required by the farm
plan the fencing enclosing the swine lot needs to be pulled back from the stream below the facility.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also,
please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per
Violation as wallas crinunal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If you --
have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
.\� D. Rex GIeason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Union SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, 4 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 a An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 1 M, I ;r,.„ : 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Y.
❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operaxion Re�riew
hi-
W AoimaI Feedlot O eration Site Ins ectib
x QY P. P n
'l ()"Routine O Com ialnt O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection y " !> Use 24 hr. time
_._.���
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
Farm Status:..,,. � .»......._.___,_.»,�,,..- ZJ'
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
FarmName:-.....»�`...... 1........��! 1» ..... ....w...._.... Couaty:. _. L�s;� c? : �.» ............_ .. _ ...........__
Owner Name:._ _.LtS� .» _. r27l� ._. .._._. ._. _.._. Phone N`o:..._ r.......... _ .__.... » ..__..... _
Mailing Address:�L�:.�:i.__i-a:.�?..t���� .� ...�s `_ ._.. _c�i,l��'--.._... _... _. .......... 2 1�C1 .._
Onsite Representative: »..�. .....tiers
Certified Operator: _ . ,-„_,,,.—,, ,,__,_,,,.,_ »._- -, ,.,,,_ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 4 « Longitude
❑ Not Operational j Date Last Operated: . _ ...�_. _......_.....__..._ .__ .
Type of Operation and'Design Capacity
Swrne' N Number
` Poultry
Number
Cattle ;" Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
' ❑ Lavern
.•
`:Eairv❑
Feeder to FinishNon-La
er
t:*`a n
rrow-to-Wean
Ye r � ,y
arrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Other Type
of Livestock
77777
Number of Lagoons /:Holding Ponds Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area❑Spray Field Areay `
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 69-Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes (}-No
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONO
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �INo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
Yes ;v ; No
❑ Yes ❑ No j
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Laeoon 2
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(I(any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4�
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes No
'Yes ❑ No
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
wpste Aaplication Alla
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..... 7..!.... ... ._ _._ .. ..» .. `^ .. cic �-� >
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
[Z'Yes r No
❑ Yes ['No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No
For Certified Facilities Oniv NI
24. Does'the facility fail to have copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in anyway?
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? —T ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any,YES answers:and/or.any recommendations or any other comments":: _
LTse' drawings _of facility io better explain situations. (use additional pages as,necessary)
,L��c v « �z� c� �s ``,, �A ` ��
r%1.C[ [�l %�G L[� 4iC e r V �� � T C r [i Cn /i t'�-,�S ��%.� �tiL '�5
4
fir, �It'C� IV1. � 7r,,',{t? <jed57 IZ) be
�- `e'e✓� .Sw; lti� � o� �• S�+C;.ve.t. r he�-� wc�3
/�c,+J 4f5 ;1r_-Js �0 6e-- �v,a„,� �.�tieC\, G NRL5 .
p.�b1Tv►- C4L
�
e- �,,,-,� �l�„�S ;w� 'tt�z. [ar��er laga�,�. `�� ����„�5 ►v�.w1�e�-s ►�eE��
b e CkeC,,jV 1C'6 e.Iecj,.
1� t
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Winter Quality Section, Fa`rility Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
4 Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Ted Broome
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
Dear Mr. Broome:
PIPFA Fd
T'* a
A47tA
1DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
T. Broome Farm, Facility #F: 90-35
Union County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending.on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon, If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
P.O. Box 29535. Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 60%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. AIan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleaso . E.
Water Quality egional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Ted Broome
Ted Broome Farm
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe NC 28110
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Ted Broome Farm
Facility ID#: 90-35
Union County
Dear Mr. Broome:
N R
a NA-r 1F.dC.T,�1
Nov 19 1996
a1i+lS1611 OF E1il'iCau'A[.'T41
ldOC;"ifSlr::'Az ,:E:IEI�F
!E RE6la!!At OffICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system,must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. res on Howard, Jr., erector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687,
=T�
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 a �p An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/ 10°k post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _
Facility No.SK -I;;-
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 10-XA 1995
Time: IN nv,
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:.q\`
County:l� u1 integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: tic j -- erne Phone:
Physical Address/Location:� LY& _'0A mtk-=P .
Type of Operation: Swine VPoultry__ CattleDesign Capacity�Number of Animals on Site:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
to
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) &r No Actual Freeboard:.�Ft.._�Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 1& Was any erosion observed? Yes 00
Is adequate land available for spray? OrNo Is the cover crop adequate? Yes No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 6� r No
100 Feet from Wells? 1 or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o9A.
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o18
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes orajo-) If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: =:4rb4 cwtetic� ,�` •.�
Inspector Names�x& �- p� Signature �.04�
cc: Facility Assessment Unit