900034_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary -
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Keith Smith
Smith Bros Farm
2909 Faulks Church Rd.
Wingate NC 28174
Dear Keith Smith:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAb. RESQURCES
ti V f. wk
MNWRONIMENT, HEAT TltI;
A NATURAL RESOURCES January 24, 2000
FEB 4 2000
IMS1611 OF 6NViRINMENTAL MANAGEMENT
11111GI ;VILLE MIONAL Offigr
Subject: Removal of Registration
Smith Bros Farm
Facility Number 90-34
Union County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
PoultEy with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571,
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, P.E.
cc: Mooresville Water Quality Regional Office
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Serviee Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part 111. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS'
NUMBER NUMBER'.2 IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50'
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve a!
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be acce
by irrigation system. 11+-1

r `
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any or the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, [] Yes $(*No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? El Yes 'A No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes %No
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �ZNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes J?LNo
Waste :Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes g► No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen Cl Yes KYNo
12. Crop type .SG t:a ' ... &)Ae .,1 ......
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ElYes K\No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) 91Yes ❑No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? J ❑ Yes QM
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �Z,No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
`§kNo
Yes+No�
'Yes
No
❑ Yes
%No
❑ Yes
Wo
❑ Yes A No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector rail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes JKNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑Yes RNo
❑: N.O:VlalatiOnB or. defide' - id' es .were mated: during :tfiis-visit:. You wvill :receive nu further
b6er.esP6'dence' about: this visit. : :. ........:. .:: :: .....:: :
Comments (referito question,#).':Explain any YES answers and/or any,:recommendatiops or any other comments
Ilse:drawings 'offacilitytobetter explain'situations. (use additional pages asnecessary):< < _y y, r t
-7r'wte__ / P a Pt P I .
0
Reviewer/Inspector Name
1
3

1} ~ e
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes'No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'? ❑Yes (A No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes %No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? El Yes �No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required lop of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes `KNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen El Yes [To
12. Crop type ............ Gs •. ....... .&).1'ee,...... d"Gtct..�,ti,, . �f........................................... .
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes Fj No
9,Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes +,'No
❑ Yes 91No
❑ Yes 1)_�'No
,Yes #No✓
'Yes P No
❑ Yes )No
❑ Yes $allo
❑ Yes 9 No
23. Did Rev iewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes WNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes RNo
13 M) Al olations or. dehcieiricie-s .were noted. during .thi�s,visit:. You �viil.re�ceive nofurther...........................
eorresporideihee; aboitf this ;visit.; ; ; ;
Contnnents (refer,to question.#).' Explain any YES answers and/or any.recommendations ar;any other comments 3`>
, >.
Use drawings'of facility.to better.explainsituations. (use additional pages as necessary): ,}
u
Revi ewerA nspecto r Name 91
l }
Reviewer/Inspeetor Signature: z;,
Date:
-/— E`7 11 /6/99

CPFRHTI ONS BRANCH - WO Fax :[phone] Apr 21 ' 97 14:13 P. 02/02
REQUEST FORREMO-V4L OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 2H .0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility on th,c registration datab"e.
Facility Number.
Farm Name:Owner.-
s -7
Mailing Addmss: -2 F6i6
/ '71(
County:
This Operation is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry littcr poultry operation
taut ofbuslnosshto annals on site
closed out per MRCS standards
belQ.hrrshold-P�nnfacd_ca• 75•hgrsc�s, S00p-shee�or
30,000-poultry witL a liquid anima] wastc maaxgcment syzscni)
I = fully awaro that should the number of animals increase beyond the thresbold limit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for imy reason, T will be required .to
notify and re -register with the Division of Water Quality.
Signature: /JMZU4
Pt=t return completed form to;
DEHNR DWQ
Weccs Quality Sccboa
Cau*liaace Gmup
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-o535
Dare: 4 ` -7- 5 `1
R R-4197

A.
County
neon
Owner
Keith mit
manager
Address
Faulks Church Rd.
Wingate NC L8174
Location
Certified
Farm Name
Smith Bros Farm
Phone Number
essee
Region
OARO @MRO OWARO OWSRU
O FRO O RRO O WIRO
�ao'sw„n ite ore : .. .........x:g-Ties: turn.e trotaew
..........
i.::::::::::::::............... . .
.....:..
..... ....
•
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
Grady L. mit
Date inactivated or closed
0 Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity
Total 450 1 L Swine
SSLW 60,75U Feeder to Finish

Latitude
Longitude
p Request to be removed p Removal Confirmation Recieved
Higher Yields
Vegetation
Acreage
Other
Comments Basin Name: Taakin
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits Database

k
3❑Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other A enc
k
r.
�-Dtvtst n f er Quality
outine O Cam laint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number �--��
Time of Inspection I'� 24 hr.
©Registered Certified [3 Applied for Permit ©Permitted 0 Nth peraDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: �n'1.� Tl 1 . County:........ ...................................................
,/� Y
OwnerName :............ .... ke.s. ...............c�/.7..'I... z.. 61...................................... Phone No:..-z�.�....-� ��............................................
Facility Contact: ................................................... :.......................... Title: .... Phone No:
MailingAddress:.... ...7....... ............... .tr.IL ....... h ....... ................... ................................................................... .. t.7 ...
Onsite Rep resentative:...10.......... f! 1.�.. . Integrator:
................
Certified O erator;..,..,,..... `
A �.t ........................... �!%h.A.......................................... Operator Certification Number: ...... ��a..�a..��............
i.nraatinn of Fsnrm-
`�"txa!'t? �.....t...CJ�....... :'. ��.... .... ...,tY�.�. s Y.. .t0.-.....4... �.
Latitude • =I F2=" Longitude ' �' ®"
Destgrr Current Design u , Current = Destg�n Current
SrvureF
Capacity =Popa1:!tron v F'aultry' Capacity Population,Capacrty ,Paptxiation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Weeder to Finish
$"v ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
I
Rik!' Farrow to Wean"E
'
ElFarrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
R� :_ Tt>!tal Design Capacity, S
❑ Gilts
" w
❑ Boars
Total SSL.W S
s:G
l., >
Number d UL46ofii I Holding Ponds".
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
ff f:
.,.
��t x
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
L
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
EVo
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
1RNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
&'No
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
$4No
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
§Z-No
maintenance/improvement?
f.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
UNo
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
(Vii o
7/25/97

y
Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ` , No
Structures (Laeoon0loldine Ponds. Flush .Pits. etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONO
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
............................................................. ......... .................... ................ ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (ft) ........ .............. ...... ...................
.. ..........................................................,....:............................................................................I.................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes �O No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
,i
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......:.'....5r,14rw. .............................................................................................................................
C7.,
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management flan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.vitilations.or.deficiencies.were,noted,duringthis:visit.-You;will;receive,no,ftirther,::
OrrespOdeke: about this: visit:- :::::
.��yoan s�a�lc� b� ind
❑ Yes XNo
14 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes O'No
❑ Yes V�40
❑ Yes F,No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes t0No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes P, No
❑ Yes. 9No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes Aavo
❑ YesVNo
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /�����,��,�,r_ Date:

State of North Carolina
,l Department of Environment, tat
Health and Natural Resources 4 f• •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ID C
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Keith Smith
2909 Faulks Church Rd.
Wingate, NC 28174
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Smith Bros. Farm, Facility #:90-34
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified,.or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
P.O. Box 29535, Raieigh. North Carolina 27526-W35 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Epuot Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

k
Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
U. 1-D
D. Rex Gleaso . E.
Water Quality egional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Keith Smith
Smith Bros Farm
2909 Faulks Church Rd.
Wingate NC 28174
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Smith Bros Farm
Facility ID#: 90-34
Union County
Dear Mr. Smith:
N.C. DEPT. ar
ENVTRON .JFNT, I3E,4r.I f!
& NATU.RAL RESOui'm-S
NOV 19 1996
01VlSION OF ENVJPT111dMTf[ tfA.YASE.MENT
UOMSELLE REiON<fl. drfleE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which. designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Si2Preston
'
AHoward, Jr., , trector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P,O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4 100 50°% recycled/ 10°% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: —
Facility NoAc)-
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:1Q�_a , 1995
Farm Name/Own
Mailing Address:
Time: V. Z-.-6
er: .� &
County: C�\OCN Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: ',V `, -S\N
Physical. Address/Location:.3 macs-, i\csL %, _ _nn
Type of Operation: Swine�Poultry Cattie�Design Capacity Number of Animals on Site: Z
Latitude:
Longitude:
Circle Yes- or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately i Foot + 7 inches) Se or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o& Was any erosion observed? Yes ore
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes r No Is the cover crop adequate? es )or No
Crop(s) being utilized:b.�S�C�.V
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? �or No
100 Feet from Wells? &pr No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o0Q
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes orQ If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes o No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Keith Smith
2909 Faulks Church Rd.
Wingate, NC 28174
Dear Mr. Smith:
E:0EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 20, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Smith Bros, Farm, Facility #: 90-34 & 37
Union County, NC
A site inspection of your facilities was conducted on August 14, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. Concerning waste applications, all pertinant information (nitrogen balance, total gallons
applied, minutes irrigated, etc...) must be recorded. If the overflow pipe in the Iagoons is regarded as
the pumping marker, the pipe should be clearly marked and the waste in the lagoon maintained 6
inches below the pipe. At facility #37, the vegetation on the lagoon needs to be cut. Also, the date
when hay is cut and baled should be noted.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental taws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, NAW
�C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Actions Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 - 5O% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

utme p r7omplaint p Follow-up of 13WQ inspection p o ow -up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: 0 Registered p Applied for Permit
Certified p Permitted
p Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Smith Bros Farm Z
Owner Name: Keith ....................................... SraiLit.............................
County: Union .................................................. MRO...........
Phone No: 233:5181....................................
Facility Contact:......................................................................... ..Title: . Phone No:
Mailing Address: 29.Q9XaixIks.Chux.ch.Rd................................................................... .Wingaxe.NC........................................................... 2817.4 ..............
Onsite Representative:......j. .... R ti......sw.:..1' a ................... .................. Integrator:......................................................
Certified Operator:l?S'iason..K ............................... SxWth................................................. Operator Certification Number:1,668.Q .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®* ©' �T�" Longitude
Type of Operation 4; De n _ .-Cm
1;,.
Swine.CapacitP'opu
en't''.. _ • r �,= Design'_ �aturrent Design � Current.
160 Poultry _ Capacity�Population' -,',,Cattle Capacity.,Popalation
❑ Wean to ee er
® Feeder toMEN—
400
❑ arrow to can
❑ Farrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Other
❑ Layer
❑ airy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Daffy
X. r � ! ' s i;E• � C'' � � �,.
rTofal Design Capacity.'.
- . a
„ Total SSLW
§: u
t
[� h Sa�n.'+�,-'e i _ �•. `'a :�-3,3r �Lss '` F ry
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes )�No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �{ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other 1�
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �*No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes *No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ YesgNo
maintenance improvement?
4/30/97 Continued on back

7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? Yes No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
4Structures (La non and/or Holding Ponds)'
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes YVo
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
.11.2........................................................................................................... ...................... ......................... I...........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? []Yes Cl No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;YN0
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? �b Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an /�
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? 'Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes XPo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoffFntering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..... If.4,.0.(/ca.................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes AO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 014�0
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes KNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �la
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ANo
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes YNo
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? []Yes LkNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes xNo
24. Does record keeping need improvement? jXYes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name F j 3 �Li%iM Qh .�� !► s }. `yNMI� Y a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ �„ ��, _ Date: _ % f
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility lUsessment Unit 4/30/97
Facility Number: 90_4 Date of inspection 0
Additionalomments andlor Drin awgs y .G. A,r r'` e 7g.
. �ro

MSWCAnimal Feedlot Operation ReviewWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
e p Complaint p Follow-up ot DWQ inspection 0
Facility Number ,.41
Farm Status: G Registered p Applied for Permit
Certified p Permitted
p Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Smith Bros Farm
-up of DSWU review 0
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
24 hr. (hh:mm)
County: Union .................................................. MRO ..........
OwnerName: Keith...................................... SxWUx .......................................................... Phone No: 233 .51B....................................................................
Facility Contact: ........................................................ ...................Title: ......... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 2,9fl9.F.axtW.Cllurch.Rd....f.�........................................................... 33'ingate..N.0....................................................... ... 28.174..............
Onsite Representative: ... �'.l..T(at .../art..[....................................................... Integrator:................... ...........................................................
Certified Operator:..WilsonIL............................. S.moth................................................ Operator Certification Number:1668fI.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®' ®& ®u Longitude ®� ©5 ®&&
Type of Operation ' Design a .Current T,
"`Swine __ Capacity `Population
p can to 1, ceder
® Feeder to iriis
❑ arrow to can
p Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Other
Poultry
p ayer
L'
�besign Current Design ::, Current
CapacityPopulation ,Cattle Capacity Population ;
I
"i`°Total !Desig"
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
fi Capacity ._
1 'ia._F...
oW SSLW 60,750
QCneral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes b�xo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 0 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes >-No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes *No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes r
0
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge:' 1j Yes uNo
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes kNo
Structures (Lagoons andlor Holdir Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes�o
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
a..................................................................................................................................................................................1.........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes tj'�io
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes Xlo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes 9�No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? es p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes �q'No
(If in excess of WMP, or jrunentering waters of the State notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .....aeh.'N .................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWW)? ❑ Yes VNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yes XNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes CNo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes ;�,No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes dfio
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes Aio
Forsertified Facilities OnLy
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? © Yes KNo
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes)kNo
24. Does record keeping need improvement? XYes []No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�� r;.vo�•a-�a' `VL;� .��3,,�k„ i�'�.ar.��fi_ � .k.,.., �'k:�+tns�r"-�d.{-�,'=i-;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ 1 j Date: �„
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section,�Fa pility Assessment Unit 4/30/97
acifity Number: 90_4
Date of Inspection
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:'-:a�x,
„3