900020_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: S�
Owner Name: V Y W
ca�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Latitude:
Region: kl" '.
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Dye„signCurrerRt
Design Current
Design
Current'
t
_ Swine
CCapacity ,Pop.
Wet�Poultry
Capacity
Pop
py
Cattie
'�`d
Capacity
'
�.,w€.xx..,
,f,,.
zit..
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er I
I
Dairy Calf
A.
Feeder to Finish
Dr `zP,oultr.
Design
Ca aci
Current
P,o ,
Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
F ow to Feeder
Non- airy
rsi
arrow to Finish
�
Layers
.,
Beef Stocker
Non -Lavers
�
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
P ..
Turkeys
Other ' _
_ 1
W
TurkeyPoults
Other
<�..,:eNr"+ASV'�.�'iNm'u:.M1u4f�NEeMLwtW..fht3'.'?4R�.,W'Eo:.r•A>A►+b A:?�Ys,3l'
': -. ..:.. .. ...�d
� .. I k _
Other
.�rs�A.v RifiR�i:1JM::i Mlil'�Xk.:wi:'L��[iM.AR."�NY,••yF,'hYK1n �vM
:+Y'.3;1F':'•fi�v_AW..
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Ye NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No LJNW [] NE
2.. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [:3 Yes ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [] Yes �LGNA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -
Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
`$ a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
e l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: Lam`
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Are there any immediat(
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
ie structures observed?
❑ Yes3NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes[ ] NNo NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes'JTXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ ental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes a [] NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes n ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Ye NA NE
Required Records _& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Y o NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes a ❑ NA ❑ WE
the appropriate box..
❑WUP [I Checklists ❑Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Doe record kee ' g need i vement? If yes, ch a appropriate box below. Yes L7�a NE
aste lication Weekly aste Analysis ❑ Soi alysis ❑ Waste ransfers ❑ Weather Code
ainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections �❑ 'Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ N�o
Yes ❑ No NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facifl Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permi 7 es o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. � � p� ��
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels `
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA [] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No
and report mortality rates that were higher thannormal?
❑ Yes
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of ern en ired by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ s r
❑ NA
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
�] NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes JKL>/❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to queshori'{ Ezplain any YES'answefs and/or any additional recommendations,6r5any other eomments
I IL
S".t _L.tL.,
Reviewer/lnspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

.a
North Carolina Department of Environmental QualiL
,
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
November 4, 2015
Marion F. Cox
Cox Brothers Farms — 601 S Farm
6409 Rape Road
Monroe, NC 28112
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Cox Brothers Farms/Facility 90-20
General Permit AWS900020
Union County
Dear Mr. Cox:
On September 25, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Cox Brothers Farms — 601 S Farm
and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Russell F. Cox, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
es B. Pealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresv7 le Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 25, 2015
jb
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 4 Affirmative Action Employer — Made In part by recycled paper

w
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 900020 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 09/25/2015 Entry Time: 05:00 pm
Farm Name: Cox Brothers Farms - 601 S Farm
Active
Exit Time
Permit: AWS900020 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Union Region: Mooresville
6:00 pm Incident #
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Owner: Marion F Cox
Phone: [phone]
Wailing Address: 6409 Rape Rd
Monroe NC 28112
Physical Address: 6431 US Hwy 601 S
Monroe NC 28112
Facility Status: MCompliant El Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
34' 51' 23" Longitude: 80° 25' 11"
Eight miles south of Monroe on Hwy 601. Look for the wood fence and the Cox Brothers
sign on the left hand side of road.
General location: Southem part of the county just north of Lansford Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John R Cox Operator Certification Number: 19245
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Russell F. Cox Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Russell F. Cox Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James a Phone: 0 - 3-1699 Ev
inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s): 11
Inspection Summary:
06/29/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.74 Lbs11000 Gallons
03/23/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.18 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/24/14 > Soil Analysis
jb
page: 1

r
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 09/25/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Finish 1,200 1,200
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 1,700,400
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 90-20POND 18.00 46.00
page: - 2

0
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 09/25/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yea
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
01111
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &_Treatment
Yee
No Na_ He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any Immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea Na_Na-He
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 09/25M5 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yee
No Na Na
Crop Type 1
Cam (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean,
Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yee
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
. ❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

P.
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility: Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 09/25/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Ye§ N2 N@ No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fall to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon'/ Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ M ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ E ❑ ❑
page: 5

r
(Type of Visit: WCompliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: •. Departure Time: l4�"J County:0'�'� Region:
Farm Name: 7`r ^ 1 /
Owner Email:
Owner Name: y V l .00, S �'� 7� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
V t�'
Certified Operator: � �SeA
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
I
Integrator:
Certification Number
�na=� _�
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to FeederI
jNon-L2yer
I
DaiKy Calf
Feeder to Finish
1� Design,
D .Poult , �Ca c
Current
po
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
D Cow
ow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
arrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
F] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No VA ❑ NEYes ❑ No❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No Jg�kA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesfN
A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 ' 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?: -
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes ,., NA ❑ NE
[]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integAty of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yesls�o NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes >150 [3 NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes> o ❑ NA [] NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes�eo ❑ NA ❑ -NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA [a NE
maintenance or improvement? ;Ko
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ E idence of % d Drift [3Application Outside of Apprqved Area
12. Crop Type(s):. Co�'CQ�Z�Vlk_A L'�'M--- -- --
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
4_-ig O ❑ NA
] NE
acres determination?
�
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
ReQuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[] NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes eck
❑ Yes
NA
[] NE
-the appropriate box.
❑ WUP rsts ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does. record keeping need improvement? If yes, check. the appropriate box below. ❑ s ❑ No - NA ❑ NE
❑ Wa lication ❑ Wa&ly-�d ❑ ysis ❑ So' a e rans ers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall' ❑ Stocking f ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued
1

Facility Number; Ck �f - 'L-6
Date of Inspection;___
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
NE
❑ NE
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose ofjjaadAaLmas with 24 hours and/or document ❑Yes ❑ o ❑ NA] NE
and report mortality rates that were hig er than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
Yes ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
a1 a1 .tom
Reviewerllnspector Name:
ReviewerAnspector Signature:
❑Yes�❑NA
❑ Ye NA
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
Phone:
Date:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE..
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3
V412011

�.y
Water R esources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 13, 2016
Marion F. Cox
Cox Brothers Farms — 601 S Farm
6409 Rape Road
Monroe, NC 28112
F�L
L
CCRORY Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Scrretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Cox Brothers Farms/Facility 90-20
General Permit AWS900020
Union County
Dear Mr. Cox:
Dvecror
On May 18, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), .Water
Quality'Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Cox Brothers Farms — 601S Farm
and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Russell F. Cox, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jame Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated May 18, 2016
jb
Slate of North Carolina I Eaviroamental Quality I Water Resources J Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 � Mooresville, North Carolina 29115
704 663 1699

'.t
Division of Wafter Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
900020 Facility Status: Active permit.
AWS900020
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County: Union
Region:
Mooresviile
Date of Visit:
05118/2016 Entry Time: 04:30 pm Exit Time: 5:30 pm
Incident g
Farm Name:
Cox Brothers farms - 6015 Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Marion F Cox
Phone:
704-764-9775
Mailing Address: 6409 Rape Rd Monroe NC 28112
Physical Address: 6431 US Hwy. 601 S Monroe NC 28112
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant -integrator:
Location of Faun: Latitude: 34° 51' 23" Longitude: 80° 25' 11"
Eight miles south of Monroe on Hwy 601, Look for the wood fence and the Cox Brothers sign on the left hand side of road.
General location: Southern part of the county just north of Lansford Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John R Cox Operator Certification Number: 19245
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representathre(s). Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Russell F. Cox Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Russell F. Cox Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspoctor(s):
Inspection Summary:
04119/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.32 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/05/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.94 Lbs11000 Gallons
01101 /15 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone: [phone] Exl
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility: Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 05/18/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Finish 1,200 1,200
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 1,700,400
Waste Structures
Dlslgnated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 90-20POND 1 t3.00 48.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility dumber: 900020
Inspection Date: 05/18/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine .
Discharges & Strearn Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structu re
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storaae & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6..Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Ape ication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Yes No Na No
❑ 11111 ❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ III ❑ ❑
Yes No No No
❑■❑❑
INS inns
❑ 111 ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ 111 ❑ ❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number:
900020
Inspection Date: 05/18/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
:Waste Application
Yee No Na No
Crop Type 1
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 2 .
Soybean, wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ M ❑
❑
18. Is there a,lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Igo No Np Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

0
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number.
900020
Inspection Date: 05/18/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yee
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1".Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Surrey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
Cl
❑ E ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
11
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ • ❑
Other Issues
Yea No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
Cl
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ N ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 5

Fype of Visit: iV Compliance Inspection U Operation Review O Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit:. /'Routine O Complaint Q Foiiow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: OZ' Departure Time: p 4 Eounty: Region: r_
Farm Name: C.� �' ��' "� g �"�kS " �� l5 Fq Owner Email:
Owner Name: ''1�'�-T� �t �� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: R
Certified Operator: L" _ Certification Number: `
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: `�—
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design
Current
$wine .1,
Capacity. Pop.
WetPoultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle
Capacity
Pop"
Wean to Finish
La er
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
`Design
Ca aci
Current
l'o .:.
D4jg Calf
Dairy Heifer
r:
Feeder to Finish
4
"
Da:oulti,
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Nan -Dal
arrow to Finish
>d7
Layers
Beef Stocker
ilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Z211";
Turkeys
Other _N _�'
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
.;srx.?arx+u.ir«.=:.+tar.'..�,r.�;a�u.s�.���y.,bwieuw=!axe.rz.r.:„m,xw•.wxr..n++.wN;*
mru.xam.�a«,w=,.w�o..tea-r.,�r:a�-Fi.:�e+c�.wn.,a,�:
r, �
Dischar¢es and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[]Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes�00
NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Y o NA NE
n a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NE
-,-6], Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: i
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes - To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste managemerit or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ ental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed, pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 4�<3 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes-"'f�❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Ar
12. Crop Type(s): '
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes_ o 0,1A ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes jlfR� ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility'fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all 77�
is of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE'
the appropriate box � �i ❑
Ettw hecklists esr a s ase A eements Other:
21. Do record keeping need inn ement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es j7a�
❑ NE
aste pplication eekly Freeboard ante Analysis A�onthly
nalysis4Ze rans ersr Code
fall tucking field 0 Minute Inspections nd 1" Rainfall Inspectio udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued
A

I
Facility Number: -
Date of
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
l
Yes NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Y o ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher an normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over- ca ion)
[—]Yes o O—NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Yes 1 A ❑ NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [DNA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes . / No-70 NA, ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
- K_r
a L)OL'z
Ck
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Yes%,❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3
21412011

Water Resources T
Environmental Quality
February 15, 2017
Marion F. Cox
Cox Brothers Farms — 601 S Farm
6409 Rape Road
Monroe, NC 28112
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Cox Brothers Farms/Facility 90-20
General Permit AWS900020
Union County
Dear Mr. Cox:
On February 14, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Cox Brothers Farms — 601 S Farm
and the permitted waste.disposal system. We wish to thank Russell F. Cox, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed, report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated February 14, 2017
.lb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office k 6l0 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663.1699

u
Division of Water Resources
Division of So'ii and -Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 900020 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 02/14/2017 Entry Time: 02:30 pm Exit Time
Farm Name: Cox Brothers Farms - 601 S Farm
Owner: Marion F Cox
Mailing Address:
Physical Address
Facility Status:
Location of Farm:
Permit: AWS900020
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Union Region:
4:00 om Incident #
❑ Denied Access
Mooresville
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
6409 Rape Rd Monroe NC 28112
6431 US Hwy 601 S Monroe NC 28112
0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude: 34' 51' 23" Longitude: 80° 25' 11"
Eight miles south of Monroe on Hwy 601, Look for the wood fence and the Cox Brothers sign on the left hand side of road
General location: Southern part of the county just north of Lansford Rd.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John R Cox Operator Certification Number: 19245
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Russell F. Cox Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Russell F. Cox Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
04/19/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.32 Lbs/1000 Gallons
02/05/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.94 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/11/16 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone: [phone] EX
Date:
page: 1

C
Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 02/14/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason For Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Finish 1,200 1,200
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 1,700,400
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifler Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 90-20POND 18.00 42.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility: Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 02/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is. any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
0
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
0
❑ 0
0
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No No Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na, No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
Inspection Date: 02/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine'
Waste Application
Yes No Me
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ El
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a. lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ E ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ E ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0130
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS900020 Owner - Facility : Marion F Cox Facility Number: 900020
inspection Date: 02/14/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents YY N�No
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ M ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? It yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
00110
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

W ASIE M AN AGE1ViE T PLAN o
RECE
COX BROTHERS FARM IVED 1 DENR 1 DVvQ
90 -20 * P lon seton
MAY 2
zoos
CONTENTS
1. SITE SKETCH
2. WASTE MANAGEMENT SCOPE &.
SPECIFICATIONS
3. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
4. RECORD KEEPING SYSTEM
5. ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
6. INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST
7. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
S. MORTALITY MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST
9. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
14. SOILS MAP
11. EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
12. AGREEMENT SHEET

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Producer: Cox Brothers Farm - "Lanes Creek" 90-20
Location: Hwy_ 601 South, North of jet of 601 and Landsford Road
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation:: Swine - Farrow/Finish
Number of Animals: 1200 Sows
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of
surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before
each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to ma.-imize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding
capacities.. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per
year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either
of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disiang will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques, '
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

Waste Management System 312-1
Waste Management System (No.)
Definition
A planned system In which all necessary
components are installed for managing liquid and
solid waste, including runoff from concentrated
waste areas, In a manner that does not degrade air,
soil, or water resources.
Scope
This standard establishes the minimum acceptable
requirements for planning and operating waste
management systems. It does not apply to the
design and Installation of the system components.
Purpose
To manage waste In rural areas In a manner that
prevents or minimizes degradation of air, sod, and
water resources and protects public health and
safety. Such systems are planned to preclude
discharge of pollutants to surface or ground water
and to recycle waste through soil and plants 10the
fullest extent practicable.
�. Conditions where practice applies
This practice applies where: (1) waste is generated
by agricultural production or processing; (2) waste
from municipal and Industrial treatment plants is
used in agricultural production; (3) all practice
components necessary to make a complete system
are specified; and (4) soil, water, and plant
resources are adequate to properly manage the
waste.
Planning
General. Waste, as used In this standard, Includes
both liquid and solid waste, waste water used in
processing, and polluted runoff such as that from a
feedlot.
A waste management system for a given enterprise
shall Include the components necessary to properly
manage waste and prevent degradation of air,
water, soil and plant resources. A system may
consist of a single component, such as a diversion,
or may consist of several components.
Components shall not be installed until an overall
waste management system has been planned.
Components. Components of complete waste
management systems may Include, but are not
Ilrnited 1o, the following:
Debris basins
Dikes
Diversions
Fencing
Grassed waterways or
outlets
Irrigation systems
Irrigation water
conveyance
Pond sealings or linings
Subsurface drains
Surface drains
Waste storage ponds
Waste storage structures
Waste treatment lagoons
Waste utilization
Design criteria for Individual components shall be
according to standards in the National Handbook of
Conservation Practices. The criteria for the design
of components not Included In this handbook shall
be consistent with sound engineering principles.
Planning considerations
1. Waste should be used to the fullest extent
possible by recycling It through soil and plants. If
very little land is available, such practices as
lagoons and oxidation ditches may be needed._
2. Clean water should be excluded from
concentrated waste areas to the fullest extent
practical.
3. Manure shall be collected and safely spread on
land, treated, or stored until It can be safely spread.
Adequate storage must be provided to allow
spreading during favorable weather and -at times
compatible with crop management and available
labor.
4. Polluted runoff and seepage from concentrated " -
waste areas shall be Intercepted and directed to
storage or treatment facilities for future disposal or
be directly applied to land in an acceptable manner.
G. Waste water from processing shait.t]@ collected
and directly applied. stored, or treated before using
it.
6. Adequate drainage, erosion control, and other
soil and water management practices shall be
Incorporated to prevent system -related problems..,
-_ •,.,art
.. ;',�::,'i, Div di•
y.
SCS,.Jan_uary'1l

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS...
1. Animal waste shall. not reach surface waters of the state by runofl� drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject
to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Environmental
Management for every day the discharge continues.
?. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. if
the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide
MRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use. of the land for waste application for the
life expectancy of the production facility. it is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
;. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (_4CS). If anACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
[See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest
Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disldng after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
(continued next page)

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause
drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control
conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application..
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no more
than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to
a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may
be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips are
present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal, waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and only then at agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system_
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition
to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
(continued nest page)
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
goon embankments, berms, pipe rung, etc.). Ifneeded, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or
discharge.
19_ If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.
... K.-.." - . ..

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1200 animals X 10479 waste/animal/year-- 12,573.600 waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
12 5573 600 Gal/Yr. X 3.56 lbs. PAN/1000 gal= 44,762 lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from NC Tech. Guide Std. 633) or (NC WASTE ANALYSIS REPORT, see
attached) (Circle one)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown
and surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Lbs. N Lbs. N Month(s)
# No. Type Crop Per Ac.* Acres Utilized Application
54276
&
3911
1
BaB
CmB
Corn
88
M
Z YZ
13,200
March - June
54276
&
3911 1
1
BaB
CmB
Wheat
88.4
VR
AWFeb.
Z e/Z
13,260
Oct. - Dec.
- March
54276 1
&
3911
1
BaB
CmB
Soybean
117.25
M
Z c/Z
17,588
May - August
54276
2
BdB2
BaB
Corn
1
77.5
1=
G1
9,300
March - June
54276
2
BdB2
BaB
Wheat
76.5
9
L j
9,180
Oct. - Dec.
Feb. - March
54276
2
BdB2
BaB
Soybean
96
t=
G I
11,520
May - August
54276
3
BaB
Corn
85
28 3`
4,760
March - June
54276
3
BaB
Wheat
93.5
3G
4,236
Oct - Dec.
Feb. - March
54276
3
BaB
Soybean
105
-i 3 `
5,880
May - August
FUTALN
326 69,924
*This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied.
they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.

PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN ANALYSIS
NC WASTE ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
DATE ANALYZED
SITE #
90-20
SITE #
January, 1997
4.3 lbs./1000 gal.
August, 1997
4.1 lbs.
March, 1998
3.5 lbs.
March, 1998
3.3 lbs.
December, 1998
2.6 lbs.
3.56 lbs./1000 gal.
Average
Average Analysis Based on: 100% of Volume From 90 - 20
3.56 lbs./1000 gallon

FIELD 1
SOIL
REALISTIC YIELD EXPECTATIONS
BOOK VALUES
CORN SOYBEAN WHEAT
BaB - Badin
85
30
55
CmB - Cid
90
45
50
TbB2 -Tatum
90
25
50
AVERAGE B/A 88 335 52
FIELD 2
SOIL CORN SOYBEAN WHEAT
BdB2
70
25
35
BaB
85
30
55
AVERAGE B jA 77.5
27.5 45
FIELD 3
SOIL CORN SOYBEAN WHEAT
BaB 85 30 55

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements.See attached map showing the fields to be used for
the utilization of waste water.
Your facility is designed for 296days of temporary storage and the temporary storage trust be
removed on the average of once every 6 MONM. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed 18" from low point in top of dam..
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste
APPLICATION BY IRRIGATION
Field Soil
No. Tvpe
Application Application
Crop Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
1
BaB
Corn
.35
1
Tract # 54276
Cn1B
Wheat
TbB2
Soybean
1
BaB
Corn
.35
1
Tract # 3911
CmB
Wheat
TbB2
Soybean
2
BdB2
Corn
.35
l
Tract # 54276
BaB
Wheat
Soybean
3
BaB
Corn
.35
1
Tract # 54276
Wheat
Soybean
iriia TABLE 15 NUT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Narrative of Operation:

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN NARRATIVE
This plan is to define the nutrient management for Cox Brothers
Farm 90-20 known as the "Lanes Creek" farm. The operation
consists of a 1200 sow farrow -to -finish located within the
boundaries of two tracts, 54276 and 3911, totalling 1330 acres.
The 12,573,600 gals of waste generated annually will be applied
to three spray fields. Field 1 lies within Tract 54276 and 3911
and consists of a center -pivot system with a wettable coverage
area of 180 acres. Due to an intermittent stream lying within
this area a section of approximately one -sixth, or 30 acres has
been set aside to meet the requirement for buffer. Field two and
field three consisting of 120 acres and 56 acres respectively,
are located within the interior of two fields with total acreage
of 199.7 acres as determined by FSA estimates.(see aerial photo)
Waste is applied to Field 2 and Field 3 with the use of a hose --
reel traveling gun. The 199.7 acres provides adequate buffering
for the spray areas in Fields 2 and 3.
The 12,573,600 gals of waste produce 44,762 lbs of Nitrogen based
on an average NCDA analysis of 3.56lbs/M gals.
This Nitrogen will be applied at rates not to exceed .35 in/hr
and .75 in. per event as prescribed by NRCS estimates of soil
type.
The cropping system is a corn: -wheat -soybean rotation with a two
year uptake of 89,924 lbs/N. Additional Nitrogen removal may
occur due to the harvesting of volunteer Ryegrass Hay or as the
result of increased yields resulting from improved varieties or
production methods.
The 88,0961bs generated and the 89,924lbs utilized results in a
Nitrogen balance of-1,8281hs of N.

01/14/99 04:26pm 1 704 291 2191
USDA Unian Ca
-->2833734
ECM Pg. 01/02
UbIITEI) STATES
DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES
CONSERVATION
SERVICE
SUBJECT: Cox Bros. farm
Lanes Creek Farm
Lagoon Volumes
TO: Jerry Simpson
Co-Opersctive Exton
Courthouse.
Monroe, N.C. 29112
604 LANCASTER AVE.
MONROE. NC 29112
[phone]
DATE: 1-14-99
Enclosed are the appyroxitnate dimensions oft1be Cox Bros. Waste Sw age Stvrine. I
w ew out on 1-14-99 sad measured the damns. I could not accurately measure the
depth, but according to the heigtd of dam, front slope, etc. The total volumes are close. I
appears with a, total of 2,135,100 cu. & s zce it show accommodate the ft eeboard, the 60
day storage, and the lagoon txmatm cot volumes. See the attached fguncs for the approx.
di ons. It appears the main body Is 490` x 645' x 15' avg depth..
If I can be of ftfta service please contact me.
Richard E. Pigg
Conservation Technician

01/14/99 04:27pm I 704 291 2191 USDA Union Co. -->2033734 ECM Pg. 02/02
/V(f W6Z-
(fox &r.5-
T
.20
A2a
If
2� art, -dwol.,fl

11
I
Swine Farm Waste
Management Odor Control Checidisi
Source Cause. IIMI's In 111inikuixe iidnr _ Site 5pcClflt I'(tr[ti[L'f .',~—
Irilnusfea:f • Swine: prnduclion Vegetative or wooded brtffcrs'
_ �/ .,.._ .ram ;_;= :�''%.::,•,�.r1i'.
Gi Recommended best management praclices; _. ... ., 1. i•.,.,;,t:,:-.
/
i Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces + Dirty manure -covered animals Dry floors
floor stirfaces + Wet manure: -covered floors Slulted floors;
;:kr ilt y W
6""Watcrers76caled over slotted floors;
/ ' � t r rl • � l� `•r Fr R G 5
feeders of higif end of solid floors;
+,•:i •i+.3:i1... [_Y scroperiranurebuildup from floors; �, ,; '';;'i F y*�3t �, #3;
6- Underfloor vcntilalinn for drying
Manure collection tits.
l
.- •.. Urine'
i .s... . ... ... .. •.
,
I'reg11en1 tllarllrre rLn10V71 by IltkSh, Itrl rt<ellarl,e.,
- •-.-. .,. • :.•�;..., . _ .
• Partial microbial decomposition
r scrape;
Underfloor ventilation
: +:�;,.: •1+i>s'i+ E:: =r�.: I,r� ' '
Ventilalilrn e:Xharlst I:Ins
• Volatile gases;
l tut maintenance;
(/I1,fficicllt air movenicill
Illduorsuifuces
• Dust
f ' Waslldown between grimps of aninial5;
1'
P""l-ced suldilives;
+ J,
ti�ceder covers;
1 ccd delivery downspout extenders 1n feeder
f
covers
w . _..W....__
I'Iltsll t;lnks
• Agitation o f recyclud lagoon
M:" ljsh lank envers;
liquid while tanks are: filling
Exlend fill fines to near bottom of tanks with
r
• loi-siphon vents
Fln�h ullcps
Agitldiao during wastewaler
Cr Underfloor fiuslt with nnderiloor velrlikuion
cnnveyaltce
_
1'il 14dlar�c lle,irtrs
+ Agitation of recycled lagoniv
Of Extend techrirge lines In !tear hotttmi uflihs
:.
liquid while piss are filling
WWI anli-sil,lloll vculs
_._...__. ,Wi.._ ....__ ... ;:.� ... .
lilt slutitsils
• Agilation daring simnp tank
CI Slurp lartk covers
,�J
filling and drimlown
Owi,ide,lnlinuufluction +... Agitationdl
Ur j1111LtRlrl [loxes Conveyance
AMC - NOVU1111,er 11. 1996, Page 3
WUSIL:wrller JUP
1)UX CL)Vcr5

l
ate-• � — _ - -- - - -- - -- -- - _ .... _ . _ . __ - _ ;-•--7
Swirce Cause BIVIS . in p-linimize udur Site Specilic PI-Ictle
filed ofdrliinpipes at 0 Agilaliun during wastewater Cl I„flead discharge point of ilipcs umicrncati)
I;guon culrvcyntice Ingooll iitll)id level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas culfssiuus; Itr i'toper laoouu Hc1lidd capacity;
• Dinlugical mixing; tro'/culud lagoon starlill) plucedures;
• Agilaliuii f� inim um surface area-lo-volume ratio;
[Fl hliuimuit) ul;ilaliun Ivltcu puiltping;
V❑ %-leclialliull Rcraliul);
I'rovol) biological nddili es
liiiplion spriliklcr l ligll III ssineagilrlagilatiulr, Irtigalc oil dry drays will) little or r)u NOW;
nuzzles Wiltd drill t"Minimum recomnlcndcd operating pressm c;
Q1I' imp inlaku near Inguou liquid surface;
['f Pump tiuin second-slagc ligoun
Sluinge tank or basin • Piutinl miciubial ticcompositimi; ❑ Bottum or midlevel landing;
SmIace & Mixilig while filling; � Tack covers;
IF Agitatum LYIICII Cilkptylllg Cl Basin stu•l'ace Inats arsolids;
Cl I'roven biological additives or oxidanls
Scllliny l)asin Sill face P;Illi:tl ulicrul)i:ll dt:cumpusitiull; Cl 1.xlClltl dlmilllille oullcis Illidellicnill liquid
• Mixing while filling; '� 07 level:
• Agitation L hen emplynag ❑ Itemove sidled Solids regillariy
lvl:lntilc, silmy ur sludge At;it;tliurl weal sp icatilig; T ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spaeader uutlCis Vol -Wile gas Cil)isslulls ❑ Wash residual immure from'spreader allot use;
UlICUVCI ed rnallul C*
slurry or slutip on lield
surl';accs
I-C;1(I ;IIIiIIinIS
f:J Proven biological additives or oxitlanls
Vnlutilc gals cillissiuns while Cl Suil iujedion oI'sill lTy/sludges
(l)-ing
(_.muls.i dcuumposllion
Nft
[)earn ,minr,,l tlispus;ll (;ncass ilccuulpu.eiliun
pitc
Illujillpi Ic Conllnisliula
p
�1A1(]C v�n,hcr I I, 19911, P.11 (: •1 .
d Suil n)cuil,uratiull within 48 Ills.;
❑ Spread ill thill 111141111 laycls fill- Inpid Ilying;
Proven biological additives or oxitlaws
0- INuperdispu,iliuuafcnlcasscs
❑ CulliplClu Covuling of c lmnssus ill bill'ial flits;
0 Plover lucaliull/curlslluclitm ul, disposal pits
1-.1 Sccunalwy slack bmntrs

tw III i I Mi1111116 6lath--_- - - - Silt Specific 111'aclius
Lill —100u^ • Al!ilaliim (Ruing 5ulup tank �}rl Sunip lank covels
filling a1i11 (Ilawdum) fi(
I-Ild urdrlinpillcs at Agitatitlli dining m slumiler ❑ E:xlcnd tliscliargc point urpipes mwetimmit
Inguml cullveynuce liguun litlukl level
Lagoon surlcires •�VOtatilc gets Cnlissiulrs;
• lliulogicullllixinli;
Agilaflon
VC'Iuper kiguun lipoid capacity;
'micul lslbuun sWilup pruceduics;
�1 i�'Iiilifulllll sill ilec ilicll-lV-vuhillic 1716o;
Ol Minilntun abilaliull ►vltilc plullping;
Cl l uchanicrll acraliull;
!!I .Oven bifulut,'ical liddilins
prig-wwn sprinkler High plessuic abit:diull; - Ir )bale ull dry d;tys with Wilt: urnu Mud;
norzlcs9 11'End (frill l 'llirlluul recoil imetided upaaiing pruccdurc;
I'uuip illtake scar labuull liquid surlacc;
1pI' up no"i secund-mabc lagvurr
Ural bild5 Cnicass dectnnpusitiunl - I'ruper dispusiliun of carcasses
—Uead Mild II sal hits C'"rrt:ass decomptl-Silitlll F_l C(inlplcie cuvaing urcalc;Isses ill bulial hits;
0 Iliupurlucalitlli/conshudion uI dispusal itiis;
14
YYYVVVV
f 1lip,�pu5al pil covers lightlilliug
Simiding waicr aiumid 0 Inipl uper (liailrlgr; Glade and landscape Such 111a1 Willer diailis
f:Ii:ilitics 0 Nuatobbil dccunlpusiliull ur away frulll racilities
urrnnic nlallcr
—I` ml imckud n11tu Inililic • I'(iul iy II171ililail1Cd MXCSS IOIKIS F-11111 access ivad maintenance
i oads I I ui n I;u m access
Addilimml lali:lr ation : _ _ _ Availslde l�lum :
yl'vldhy N.I.Imm.- I Wgcglut nl ; UlUU 11.u1(:ilI1411' 1'ackcl NCSII, Cuunty 1, c r i�yn C:cnlcr
Voulhy Laycr I'lixi ohm Faddy klanure M rim%enrrrll: I Irg11 Rise, Dup Pit ; I UAIi 131.83 NCSU - 13AF
I'uulliy Layrr hu(krcliull Fclt:ility Mlnnine.11•1anilgenlc111: llndeicage Flush - Laguun'rrc(llnrclrl ; UUA1; IJU-81 NCSU - HAI.
I,ngnun I1csil;n null 44;111;ll:culcnl lilt Livcslnck hlanurt 11Ci1lIIlClit nacl Sltlrill;C ; Ii13Al; IUJ 83 NCSU-l3AC
Calillli'liull ul- Alanulc cult Wasle,valcr Applicad(in Ialnip metcl ; F13AIi Fact Sltcct NCSU- BAEs
I'Itlllcr Disposal ul Dead I otillly ; PS&T Utlide Nu, 19 NC:SU - I'uullry Sticlice
NtliS.111CC C OOLC11I5 in Aui iml Mlanui(' I1in"agniC111: Oduis gild F1ics ; PRUMI, 1995 C,unremice I'mccedings Flundn C-uupcialive ExIct15iull
A11IOC -' NuvclIsbul 1 1, P.96, Page 7

i�
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Siiuree f:ullse 11R91's Its Cunll-ol Inserts Siii Slleeiric I'r,►mires
(cells
1111111 gullets ACC111111rlaliOle of solids [ Fit1sh system is designed mid operated
se flieiently In rclnOVC accumulated solids from
rulers as designed.
Remove bridging of accumulated solids jet
- eli:ergc
I.:iUmms and fits Cruslcd Solids Maintain lagoons, stilling basins and piss where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depllt of no omrc: than 6 -
B iuclees over more than 30% of surface.
I.xccssive Vegulativc 0 Decaying vegeLginn Mainlain vcgetalivc control along banks of
{ iIImill lagoons ant( other impoundments In prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along waler's edge on inlpotim1mcnt's perimeler.
Dry Systems
• Deed Spillage Design, uperlte and maintain feed sysiums (e.g.,
hunkers and boughs) Ite n6itimite:1he
f ccumulation of decaying wastage.
f�f Clean np spillage on a routine hasis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval ditring sunllller, 15-30 day ittterval
S���i �gc •� Accumulations orfi
A 1.I I C - Ni ovembcr 1 I , 1996, Paul; €
residues (!K Iterhrce fimkLurc lICC111111il'.6 111 within tlrul
111Otilld imu ctiiiltc peritimer nrtceil sim.,ge:
areas by insinhig drainage oway li'nm site
and/rer providing adetlume comaimnent
covered bite for brewer's grain and similar high
nuisture grain I►ioducts).
t`T Inspect Im tuld l elli(w : err itrcak lip :icl:nnte11.iled
snlhis in filter strips 11rollod feed str►r;ige as
1leeded.

_FitIcc Cause� III'sI's In Collfrul lissecls - Silc Shccilic i'r:�clicc+
Altinlnl I lolding Aieas Accuinulaliuns Ill ininial musl in►inalc low laccas litsit Ilap Illuisture alollg
.011d 1LCd la'a.SlilgC ICIICCS and other localimis whelC waste:
:iccalntnlates Gaud distulbauct: byaniluals is
�ininiiil.
Maintain Iclice luaus anti Iillerships aiuwid
i111imal liulding uicas it/ ntinillike.
:accumulations uI IYil5lus (i.e., inspect fur and
icinova or break till accumilkiled solids :as
�Uly M anllle 1IIIII(llhlg Act; tits IsInd uns ul• animal %vastes 17 Iteinovc spillage un il'rvtllitic basis (C.g,, 7 - W
Systems clay interval dill ing sunwter; 15-30 clay interval
alilt ing ►rimer) whcic maaurc is luadcd Fur land
uphlicatiun ur disliusal_ '
❑ 1'luvidc Im ildequalu draililagc niumid n1,11ame
t stockpiles.
❑ Inspect lirr and icutuve ur break uli actin ubiled
W.-MICs ill iillcr sUips 8r1111111 Stockpiles and
nuinurc handling areas ns uccdcd.
Fur nwrc illrolmaliull CuIllacl Ihl: CouperativC 11-Wellsiun Sclviec"Depaltincnl ul•Isnlunlulogy, Dux 7613, Nuilh C'aruGria State Uliivcisily,
Raleigh, NC:, 27695.761J.
AN-1 IC - 1luncaulier 11, 19116). I'at:c 2

Operation and Maintenance Plan
This facility is to be maintained in a safe and healthy condition at all times, in compliance with all
local, state and federal laws.
Impoundment
A protective cover of vegetation will be established and maintained on all areas disturbed during
construction, (embankments, berms, diversions etc.)_ Lagoon areas must be mowed and kept
accessible to visual inspection. Keep all lagoon areas free of woody vegetation, especially the top
of dam, pool edges and back slope of embankments. Perform a regular inspection and repair as
necessary any erosion, rodent burrows, seepage or other threats to the integripy of the
impoundment.
Waste Handling Equipment
Mp
Perform regular inspection and repair as necessary all waste handling equipment, (pumps,
meters, pipes and electrical components etc.) to avoid leaks, overflow or other spiIlage of
e$luent. Manage to avoid excessive waste volume situations due to unexpected failure of
equipment.
Liquid level
Establish visible markers to delineate top and bottom pumping limits. maintain maximum liquid
level six inches below emergency spillway. Monitor sludge accumulation annually and remove as
necessary to keep at least four feet of liquid capacity available. Maintain separate disposal areas
for sludge and apply at agronomic rates with no runoff Sample sludge or use book values for N
in calculating disposal rates_
Permits
Maintain emergency action plan in a prominent location at the facility. Keep current and available
all permits, licenses, etc, as required by the State of North Carolina.

N-fortality Management N-lethods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
:.l Burial three feet benewh the surface of the around within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at Fee t 300 feet from any flowine
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Q Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
J Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or anima; health. (Wriuen,approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

►'..j,� Y -. �•n is „•.aH..;
.� .
''j, . r,.; .
�—Tom'+y'zn .
•=� �3P'ti!rsr•
v -. '-:,,,tidy t k�i•-k?�';
MS
,
/sy�e•t•..'y�.I'Sr,; ,rS:'l�„<; Jyix r..:, :�'
, i... ! .CJi
- �fy.:r .%�
4- Y•fy,••.�
fir. �
�{ E ? yt L r?: y� / ^Y �ti.�r� ,.,+L4 Jf�{•�ti i++1�`+,;
yrT"')ri110,L,fy j• ,irn t.a•� r� C,�.•.�.1!�S`✓ �5:`"*�-..�"'iJ
N• vh a `•i'V r
- '.' ur�j �_ '•,Si,��='�-'7-.^X.�J.i •i+��": J •:.5. �• :•'::1 ��...:�.a'.: ' •T'�� I r•''a't Tl� � s}', ': S�
�` F .w� �. � [ +r� �6- y •.. f.•:ii •:=�' sj'S��y! [� �� ,• h4 1I`"•�•`•t J• A•�j1
•�`� is. � i �rt,. 1. YT - ���+t' S`:� lL4 Si .ii'r.���a�+KY I./�ti •.t•� .ei- t;.!1•r•'7�;�y� e`
N• t n 1,L ..r,Y -'r, atr. , fi" " �c r - h j � - v I: ..rr r� r'•�t:' 1 F. ;•✓r- r� . 4:., a"'ti:.ra�
�- �+�1 , I �IIT w•'hYi• ,� �i.; {�„�.,��r� ��j!rn , +��yr-+
., r I,.•?i 1,1� r t.t„ hi Wr ;'�- S�ttj�y}y!"rnq. r:r;*r''c2,�.,~Ww ►�,b,xr.'
7 1 r " s!:"3::.�• �• .p y .,.�IJ , �s
r ++•: + ,lL:• a :. l; Y ( y l T . {.L1` �' C% c l :^t. -+ t r x fr i t7 Tl✓tko
�jr<-• � ' 4 ,4,'::r�';� rr71�Y1.+�w r.� �y.._'�ic•� rr�S.t ti9"Oa.�
�:: :� Ir -_� a•r:..' �3r, r.5�;. w3�+� Lx-`} ,r'1F�•�f��r �•�Fj +�;�•S'�`�►� ��bdr J;
�' r •V•�-" �• '�..:t,.?ems:'.." �°�•'`'�at
4h�,•'�-'�i-!�{'�•�.rGt11.,y.�7+ �'r!
1'1. s t �. ' 1�• S A a 9�
r:.t"i` C. E. _ r ;�,,,r�tr c _. �-� {'.r.•�T�1-' , f �;t:.�h��}9i mr ct. S •.,��
��,�
,- �,j.': ' � ,[.�Yj �,....r+Y i'�y' '.'•.° ?r1: `4`-t'Y '3'j�'�}•`i�'�y ��-7- t�{:j ��.�"+'•��J`°'r =�'t,•
{}t%. .. � �~, - '7';�t�'f.>•�jl.�lF�= i },yw%-1i`.�ia l�r� fl�f� ♦�y� � �t5i"�'�t"y�'.•d'i.-T�,�„p4ti'
J'~ • `•}S�_j rJ�l' .''{ J' y f �1 ��1Cr' t.! +{-.! - c••�� "'+}i
'h rti • ..,%,' s�• VO—El�
�r�'►,Z,C:���„���4`1'�
'.e'r .i. �•� r1 f' A•i Sl ��, T �. eQ, �-� •-.....; 4a"q.,. :YL .a�" }l °
�� 1��-�`-`��,t,� ^"•� t�- �a .,J,�,sl +'a�'riT� `��-� y= a,: s'".�f. •,yy:''� � +.{izy „
,y• > - -: i"r" ��! - P� J`� Sr'�,l.•L'�`,•���y�'1-6'�Cx`� st' w�•R Yni.�C..5.1-ply..++
l�'fw r�•i•q'�k. 4 _^ T'i"`'- !�'l� ?•l�Y �„•i3�T1�.-�� T '��L� `�`7�.i
� rr",n Jr 11 5 I- f 4,' i 1. z^rti'R :t ��f�'�� �� •,•',•r.% ��t, - r 1 •
.r i 1 1. f J' •1'• .f �, •. 1 T; ' � � � u �7 �4.. �ti rf`�� 41 .F [ � y - .
r ,! - :... + -'. - ) -,J.Y +{'r, 5 -+ �•.I��r.- } -•.211s.n,•1
�v7
� 1 .ate >• J +tt � � i~ - lr � t cj,, .rs% '�'�i�,J �' y..J+...-.�:1 '` ti 7 + ~ r r r '1
•en.ysw. %rt [ f Y� t e 1w .��'k +a .Sri rrY�r+,�r .if:tr,, r �. 1 �e
7Y �'� ��• ar i^aL"'f"''�„�h'Yv.*�.,K -y rL�. cl•L'Y 't Yr h� r 't4 ».,rs. r4..a 5.���`^tii Sl.rt"_� 1 �T-r ,,. t 4 ��
r' r i '� - rj- . 3 ` c: f '°, t a ' .s rr +f e• - i. I� s a -
}. r�-, ati.. , -T � W ,i '� ! � 1.:, . sr n1 � .., ` _ �L r" � ; 54i�' .�„ ; - <•�,� zrs �1 - l 'r�
ty;� f!_.... � �, f f^•, = tc �'C : � .�1r• f,r 3 S > .�';•7,k,,.f? 'rs'3-�.�� .,l r t >.-,�
!-Jim�ti i y y3. r Z• ! ` x 1 :Frst r."�:�;i '2
r -. �.s� 4 �'� '�•� I L» - 5 � }-. 9 .w �'. \ 7 � C7 � '-ram .
' ,+ „yr „e 4�;'..1.5"• `w., l , .-_ - i i ^r � 1 y 'r • 1 S
lzgz r}'1r.61+ r' A•rr• !-'. `L'£ l��v.e'-"r•'>, "T 5 :l ti\ y t r a -7 s`�M �h� ' �4 't ( `
:r".^. .«a:a.: -I t* • 1 � 7bG-++ ISf^F �r.'n - { IT,t ° } � f ` _� r + `'•.r * i (' �.
' f147. r '� rx ' •: J•.fd t rh" is � a-�' r'r s �i`:.7.: ;. "rd'' .F .r,. a L
e'tii�-'t�`C'.'.4�•���':�rt+"Y 1s�cM•.�-},�.��•t. r, �,,��tty`'T isl�y� 9 'i"yr+} _._:k. `,rii':a��4 �' a�• .�•••tµe�ft ;. 4 � +�. . ...� ,` ;+-£Qil� :.`TS'"'f )ki ['+�„"t �1+�•i�'i ;5, `yrh°�S.rZ�s.
s� � ti�'+� �.'. �rs� r •r--',i:;;�
^"!'
...�.•a+»• * va r� � � 1 .G �'.i., im •5' .�+�- � ,r. r7v � �� i � . . Y '
�1,"15p�.i'��Cp, .e T - 4 y�S �t 5 -?��. � i '# 1•,,,,C�y+ *� � Y J � y y � '
i�. ��'� ��ta.,-''•��-.�v'+',a r-r 1T�t��}� �� y^' �51,r, � fj .!d„ !•�'.,-r�,-'. �-��,
Lrw �►• •-�1' a ;;iN*' �-tom, t; tti.�j a �: �• c. <,-,� - {� r �^ � -• --. r4 v �_. `�i�-�•
+�re�-,f-'e '' ,J.`�i•�'� r�'��, ':"'��•h�'��" �`rl �.Fy,r �; -�.s�. u'', �'ti�'r� w ^ c..• � ,� tC y � NY C
��.tit ;4 x •af'e �i .F �r`� J- T r+ s^ 3yi '�Sy 1 ems' r - �' a - d- i
_ 7 '4• t�r'7^rp�Y"tL�'' rt ,C�i,w `}sa# •i_ S 4W��. ,i1�3 f_�•�� 'J' r ��� 4'T,
r?
��-�.�' .�, Y'. aT F tv �' _�J u� 'LY�.• r`I• s' '.L� � �,^ 5_Y+ sN �.*•r wA;f.l; + e %1 ,' y �i
�,,�3�yf° JDs �T+'r -.r'.y J%'� Y r �[ � --•'�Y f ;.•✓y�1>t• �� '� + 1 �.},
Y_,. a 5L. Ha !• � "":�• : �rt}.�' � s`` �•�'C_ �� t a, '*�,-. r' {r� �h'�n �"Lti .,�ef. tiA y, Z �•� ' � 1 .:5,::'.ti,y 1 � j 7'i. (t� j � 1 J�+:e
1a„ ;.:,:' 7 �`ra :�j`:: � 4�� � v �"�.s.�-L x=r[.• 5a�ri'r" h�„rr`1,� �: �.4 cey.a,.�Y�;yk.} l,►^-c'•yr'.' r ,,'-1:yrLvi?. ':i r o-i_ i= r'cr°rIF•"^`r�'r
s � td' r.,.,a�, ;• i �r� z��k:,- �- t 4 '4 �. 1-�,;.` r^„�1?�.:,e✓;,r `�. »-�a•i;
-.. Y �.,a _ err .L Sr. >`" •1 - „^� r r •t��b�sit ti }3['' -•� �pr xr{ K^Y.• r�`+:. ;"a,:cr''4�x,� 3.� �-- Q t e Y•.. ��z' ,�.rG,,..rY�?+' � cr��'. �-�
7.wi i •�,W.• Yf' a ,.L L'�%•.._a,; •-fir C �`• fi f t in�l T--,�i••77++�r �M�.
. � � [ 9 - ,� r1 ry-'74"s - r - y� �....A, -•r �.�3 tr`• _ ' Ly- y�L-� '�L�"r �ti.'�..!++-• • a ^ar�t'�*• '{t Q ;,.
-�Y ��•y11�.'1}. �Ti"7•�� '�� n�� � �Ei� .t.r••. �LS�, }rL�yy,�,j - K +/;J� '��„'{►,i����,t(
.Q'•/�]IS t i"+�, ,, 3i►•[i�f•k mil✓ i5
+ram! •�73Y'r��t���Nj{T•? �'���i,,- _ ,+ >��a� r.�'fai� � �i r a�i�
'�r' r . �'�'" �'•,>,fi �� � ."mac C•�'��ri�f S� � > p.. ti "c`'r..--s .- -a:�'
�,�r�" (�` �A{' r Y »r'Y�y��+r�• y.!,. a r.�3•�i�. ��+ ti�,�7-' :i, },.s
'���.f `Z�� •�{ < rtrr�i j:�„�"_ s,,.•'rv;� l'��S',i�Cs' .. �x•'=4t �p�A��s,,,/y�La• Idyl '�s+7 ch ?. ��,�+'•T f rat t ,1 1t
�-�=` � c �� 1"' ,P''a.' Fr+.. .••sr4.r�y',,;Iti•1 �X� ?,p•Sq.I. i�.S4Yf-.ter! J `'-!. r ��:n'�. �..:, Sf�"• �=' ..;'.r,•

i[`� _Sir 1fT'�hllLIMILASNPA
•ti _.. `Y
Wa
irk V�ljj�i �: �}+ii,�•1 � ly �`��' Y. ,� �� ��,. •3:-'.a_i- "�� �' r',+, �',
•'•f;.' (ti .:��Yr ` � uar• t_.Fes._:.... � �,,.t�
Rma
t .:��`� J..��=fir .Y ♦ � �.i �:w -`�%_:.�� .V.•,."'i_ - ,. .tea ,..
�� .. X; V,,.. may.;- - •. .::: � � ,•_, • d- .
�y fi�tt,,..,, "_�•,.. ;: ��.T11� 3•;
_ ;�*•l ����• Y i"�y4�f a^Y •"li:� L'!Si w\i _ .T +y lM1•' � '$� - z�:-[�wj�1 I
*nw lj'�� �� � •[w IS"-' r ti`Y .p s�'1}�•° � T �.'
Ii1.ai�•-�,'f 7�1,�•� r��� •i � wY.::�Il sr�.•; - �'t' ,.
♦� yl � .��r•4d �� A��.jAj11 ��� .l r � Ei !� r���+�yy�y(�1� � r r.M1 ��'.'. ��ri%�J
`�� �„Yull r k�'���l1�+7' +c' � �1�i•- � �y�_ �- t
'yam .�' F �S[b--i �'- ' i e. Y �. , %. .;�`x• r •
::? 11 � � � h.' . r, y �' ' i �]v �� , ;-1^• J - ' i`S.rs.s v � `e•' wr a
r ;�•J.,
4• � s .:��:. �r �� �� �• y ,tea �. ' •_� � •�.� , �1 y ;�
+;fir tia �-:7`._, �i..w 'a'•�*"'��.%.•.. + �' ��� �`y ~'r' , -� _
/'.t Y. " SJ- � •. .n�' ,.n. s ?may.^' I. ' ' :-a
"� {'�-•�.}��-� . �� S. R+l^_ �����K' �{. _ �� ", rR' •. �.1 �...r� 1Ip +yam

a
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONZ ~ NU MBERs
DWQ-70-4�6u-1699
EMERCEwCY -NMA AGE:vIENT SYSTEM 704-283-3536
SWCD 704-283-2163
MRCS 704-283-373B
Tits plan will be implemented in the event that :wastes from your operation arm let -ins,
overtiowing. or runriine off sate. You should not wait until :wastes reac i surface :waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make eVzry etfort to
ensure dial this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the faciiity. The following are sorne action iterns you s ►ould take.
1. Stoo the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or tray not be
Possible. Suggested responses. to some possible problems. are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stofl all fEows to the lagoon immediately.
d_ Cali a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is encenins lagoon. -
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:.
a. Immediately stop waste application-
4
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff_
e. Evaluate the application mces for the fields where runoftoccur;ed.
11
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eUrninate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakaze from l;Iush systems- houses. solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Scop irrigation pump.
c. Nlake sure no siphon occurs.
d. stop all tlo"ws in the ;ICU: d, t'tush systerns. or solid separators.

. M
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting_ pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
tlowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all sezpaR?.
put in a submersible pump. and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowin6r animals. trap or re -hove animals and ftil
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
'�. Assess the extern of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a_ Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration'
c. Anv damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property dama_Te?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface ovate ,—,?
R. Are potable water wells in danger (zither on or off. of the prope.—,y}?
R. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriatc agencies.
a- Dutria normal. business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office: Phone - After hours, emergency nurnber: 919-7--3-39
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the derails
of the incident from item ? above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the 5Vill. weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures chat have been undertaken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local ENIS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES. phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
and local NTRCS office for advicuftechnical assistance phone number - -
r: If none of the above works call 91 I or the Shrifts Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
o: Cant= the contractor of your choice to brain repair of problem to minimize of: -site
damage.
a. Cotluacwrs Name--
b. Contractors Address:
C. Contractors Phone:
18. I9c.t)

6:' ContacE Elie Eechnicsi specialist who certified the lagoon f `+RCS. Consultin_4
a. vame:_ Rick Pi
`.- ,. gg .Terry Simpson
b. Phone.: [phone]
. Implement procedures as.adwised by I71,yQ and Eechnical assistance agencies to
rectify the damave. repair the swsce n. and reassess the waste rnanugtrnent plan co
keep probierni with release of wastes from happening apin.
L�z_�m; t: 18. 1996

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: cox Brothers Farms
Owner/Manager Agreement
i (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm
named above. 1(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment
and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to
the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. 1(we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface wasters of
the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be
filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water CQnservation District and
will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
(Please print)
Marion F. Cox et.al.
Signature: XDate:
Name of Manager(lf different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist:(Please print)
Date:
Jerry B. Simpson
Affiliation: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service
Address (Agency):. 500 N. Main Strut, Room 506, Monroe-., lac^ -78119
Signature: Date: ©�