900015_PERMIT FILE_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 10, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Joy Autry
4023 Van Sneed Rd.
Marshville, NC 28103
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
Joy Autry Farm, Facility #: 90-15
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Autry:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 6, 1998.
Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is being issued as a Notice of
Violation (NOV) due to the following deficiencies:
• Bermuda cover crop needs to be improved.
• The hay should be harvested in a timely manner.
• Failure to have available your completed waste application record.
The noted deficiencies are a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and
Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H .0217(d).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by August 6, 1998, noting the
action taken to address the deficiencies mentioned above. In responding, please address your
comments to the attention of Mr. Johnson. For technical assistance please contact your local Soil and
Water District representative.
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this or any other violations. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
/_D J
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Phil Loudermilk, Union SWCD _
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional. Coordinator
AJ
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MO.ORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2B1 18
PHONE [phone] FA% 704-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SOq RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Id
�j
July 11, 2001
Steve and Kathy Cassidy
6217 Secrest Short Cut Road
Indian Trail, NC 28079
704-892-2424 fax [phone]
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Attn: Mr. Johnson
Reference: Joy Autry Farm, Facility #90-15
Union County
Dear Mr. Johnson,
NC DEPT. OF t`N"RONMEvr
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
rro Iran
JUL 1 2001
l�
r,)N
Per my conversation with Phil Ladderman of Union County Natural Resources on July
11, 2001, I will be meeting with him at the old Joy Autry Farm on either Thursday, July
12, or Friday, July 13. I have scheduled a loader to be at the site on one of the above
dates to dig out the lagoon to determine how to get rid of any sludge that may be found.
I£ you have any questions, please contact me at 704-882-2424.
Thank you,
Steve Cassidy

r
1
Z ft -30

/A
o�oF WA7F9QG Michael F. Easley
` Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 28, 2000
Steve Cassidy
6217 Secrest Shortcut Rd.
Indian Trail, NC 28689
Subject: Breached Lagoon
Joy Autry Farm, Facility: #90-15
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Cassidy:
On June 18, 2000 this Office received a report regarding a breached lagoon at the old Joy
Autry Farm in Union County. In speaking with the Autry's it was brought to our attention that the
farm had been sold. Subsequent investigation led this office to you as the current owner.
It is not clear who breached the lagoon, but as the current owner you are now responsible for
the proper maintenance of the lagoon and the waste application fields. Should you decide to close out
the structure, the remaining waste (sludge) in the lagoon must be land applied at agronomic rates. A
closure plan must be obtained and certified by a technical specialist. In the mean time, soil should be
place back into the breach of the dam to prevent water from entering or leaving the lagoon.
For assistance on the proper maintenance and closure of the lagoon you should contact your.
local Soil and Water Conservation Office. It is requested that a written response be submitted to this
office by July 15, 2001 indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your
response to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
.44
�ICDENtt
Customer Service Mooresville Regional office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

4 ti
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT -OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
919 NORTH MAIN STREET
MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
REPORT: Complaint investigation regarding a breached lagoon at the Joy Autry Farm,
Facility: # 90-15, Union -County, NC.
DATE INVESTIGATED: June 18, 2001
CONDUCTED BY: John Lesley, Alan D. •Johnson
TIME SPENT: 3 hours
LOCATION: Approximately 1/2 mi. east of the intersection of Camden'Rd. and. Philadelphia
Church Rd. in Union County, NC.
RIVER BASIN: Catawba River Basin
PERSON CONTACTED: Tim Haney, Joy Autry, Steve Cassidy
REPORT:
On June 18, 2001 this Office received a report that the lagoon at the Joy Autry -Swine Farm,
Facility: # 90-15, had been breached. Mr -John Lesley of this Office investigated the complaint
on the same day..A breach in the dam was observed at the time of the investigation with sludge
remaining in the bottom of the lagoon. It appeared that it had been several months since the
breach had been created due to the grass clumps observed growing in the lagoon. Mr. Lesley
investigated an adjacent stream to the facility and did not see any observable impact.
On June 19`', Mr. Alan Johnson contacted Mr. Joy Autry and was informed that the property had
been sold to Mr. Tim Haney. Several days later, upon contacting Mr. Haney, Mr. Johnson was
informed that the farm had been sold to Mr. Steve Cassidy. Mr. Haney informed Mr. -Johnson
that the darn was not breached at the time of the sale of the property. In speaking with Mr.
Cassidy, Mr. Johnson was informed that the dam was breached. at.the -time of the,sale.
Mr. Johnson informed Mr. Cassidy that as the current owner he was responsible for the proper
closure of the pond. For assistance Mr. Cassidy should contact the Soil and Water Conservation
District office in Monroe, NC.
Please note: The Joy Autry Farm has been out of business since the beginning of 1999.

����`2t`1 ;�xf�f�` Q3.�` +�71 ��rr�}Y`��4-'.a � fL�fJl� +07!h,;•'.;: ���
•' � - tf z� s� ` � h; , •'� �, yr^ �� � 'h � � .:
t '�=._ _ y L ` t r'.af_31k�`.'• s lS yr�.'r+r� 77�� .'�
- ".. a4• c.. _.• :.'". 'ice:. n _ .r _

'« _S {�T1 �,f.1�_ �.r •1�; ! �f., S�'•T't, _ � ar' ..�.a -"",- • e�i;�x;;
J yes}�tix r•,. t.. 1 � r !, }+{�
r'f yr'.:�'. i; ,+• - ��. _..`_-�:�.fi: .�.t
•�•y�,: •}T e�L,'i��. • r��,,,�t 1� � f' I,,i�� i f�fV .i�� • ' ~ � 4- �. "-•' •'• � _ •r
zo
^ .ryt7, mac• b`+ 5�. 4• J' ~ � • � '
,� � . _ +� ,•. - :..� � .r •�..'. ���. ��'�. �'�� ems' .

r..#�" ``"yy"r.a� '�"'r'`�'•'". �.`� '� *•.'`��'. •r r; r ems►"'_' _ 11"' t,- Z'1�"«F.
Zy
.v 1 "� � `�" •!. 4 1 "�'-'°' �` �`-wS;`- .' . ��`i�Z 'K P �'_ "y Yi`�,..t `' ^y � > �-�,r l�_`�. �'. ".' .
" �t- .4 .e �.�r. ��'�� } �=,"i"'i _ »- i �.r3 s.1 yyA��'i,��f.....4woJ+"'.rr �- rrw•�•_ �S ,q� ��i..
' ti • � Yyr� �..1� R i ! {x/ �1 � � •+�, 11 k ` � P �'K •• � n
a1 .'�' ^�:� ,,;, a°...•� f �':'Ft,j'.st^''�F �+�'� '�i°�'. �y L� «' ;fit •, f ^.�' y ;
Pr �. � : y .�� � 'r � +,t�. �r_. ��5t.r"r. * Y �'�rT � ,��7} � t{ i g' .l Jy �r +r, r �,+ l.• .� IS ;,A �, 'r,
}* !
'74�+t' i
.+riff �+.\ w,i! S 4 i w }.�,J ''+R ♦►# t�7 i d;� �� a `,*.} e J- Tk.� T FsSY"r >f „•* -•tx * `k'�
{:� 1 � lLt�[,�4 F '! ^��. 3�, .•
rs •ir',•�'' :,j`'u- fo5;l�i�i;°�rji�y.d_� �.i �#11 A#./
r.
� M �7� 'Zl ' �� A;'sL' • r� 1 � 1; � �,
� YT�� E .Y.{"� �s,7+,� � 1 • r� �,5,t ��ivri 'y �+f l^�. y ;r {'i �•rJ�{i,�1; . r7+, �f, �� ..
;���'. a r ��•r^' 7 �' r � � ('i • '� r-Z'j�� �— �"•"'y�� 1f,5 ' i t
.q
-h`_K:''t1'' l/� i,'.v •a i- 1 Fas<`�Lt• n.ry �.�af•�dr.+'�'>r s,,,

Animal Operations
Facility
Number
I'arm Name
90- 15
Joy Autry Farm
Joy
90-25
Joy Autry Farm
Joy
90-21
Allan Baucom Farm
Allan
90-17
Bancorn Brothers
Bennett
90-38
Baucom Brothers
Bennett
✓ 90-7
Billy Braswell Farm
Bill
z•
90=27
J. Hilton Brooks Farm
J. Hilton
90-48
r
^ r
Broome's Farm
Toward
90-35
TO Broome Farm
Ted
90-36
Ken Cox Farm
Kenneth
90— 10
Cox Ilrolhcrs Farnrs
Marion
90-20
Cox Brothers Farms -
Marion
601S Farm
90-18
Cox Brothers Farms -
Marlon
Home Farm
90-43
Ronald B. Cox Farm
Ronald B.
Owner
Design
Address t_i_ ty/State zip pit Tanc Capacity Cert #
Autry
4023 Van" Sneed Rd.
Marshville NC
28103
704-624-6369
1640
Feeder to Finish
E007146
Autry
4023 Vann Sneed Rd.
Marshville NC
28103
704-624-6369
150
Farrow to Feeder
E004047
!1l�j If,
Baucom
9601 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC
28110
704-753-1414
1100
Feeder to Finish
E002066
Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Road
Monroe NC
28110
753-1740
1500
Feeder to Finish
E001107
Baucom
6510 Morgan Mill Road
I1lonroc NC
28110
753-1740
380
Farrow to Feeder
E001106
Braswell
3030 11vvy. 74 East
Monroe NC
28112
233-4404
36500
E003079
n, z 19
01/ s 7
Brooks
3313 Whife Store Rd.
\Wingate NC
28174
289-3764
580
Feeder to Finish
E003091
Broome
2417 Long [lope Rd.
Monroe NC
28112
704-289-5994
200
Farrow to Feeder
E007110
Broome
2909 Weddington Rd.
Monroe NC
28110
704-283-5646
150
Farrow to Feeder
E003093
Cox
3408 Tom Greene Road
Waxhaw NC
28173
704-764-3298
450
Feeder to Finish
E003081
Cox
6409 Raps Rd.
Monroe NC
29112
764-3446
1200
Farrow to Finish
E007343
Cox
6409 Raps Rd.
Monroe NC
28112
764-3446
1200
Farrow to Finish
i
E007088
Cox
6409 Rape Rd.
Monroe NC
28112
704-764-9775
3000
Feeder to Finish
E007087 1
Cox
4009 Stacie Road
Monroe NC
28112
704-764-7239
250
Farrow to Feeder
I
E003087 j

Is Routine Q Coniel int 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 90 15 Date of Inspection 4/27/1999
l'inne of Inspection1 11:30 124 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not O , ational Date Last Operated:
FnrmName: Ja.AutaXetCm......................................................................................... .. Count,),: Jjj%jQ0 ................................................. NRO...........
Owner Name. Jay ..............
Facility Contact: ...............
ARta........................................................... I'hone No: 704A-b3b9...........................................................
Mailing; Address: 4023.XalaR.Sneed.Iid�.......
............. Title:................................................................ Phone No:................................
........................................... MashOle.KC ...................................................... U103.............
Onsile Representative: Jfty..A.ulry...................................................................................... Integrator; ...........................
Certified Operalor:jQy..N,
Location of Farm:
ii mirly................................................ Operator Certification Number.-166$3 .............................
Latitude 34 • 55 . 30 Longitude DKI0 22F-0-071,
Design Current Deslgn Current De'slgn Current
Swine Ca act P.o ulation Poultry Ga sett P,o ulation Cattle Ca acit UP -!&ion
KFarrow
Feeder ❑ Layer ❑Dairy
o Finish 1640 0 ❑Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
o Wean
o Feeder ❑Othero Finish Tl Design Capacity 1,640
Tatat SSLW 221,400
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Sireant Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II'd ischarge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (II' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. Ifdischarge is observed. what is the estimated 11ow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 1 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............24..................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 6/19/2001

eEY9 n
lu f $ f�%
I ri O4, t + ' TOPE P •$ ERD a ']Y N�SIY RO _ a
` .eap7 �' � .I[i_;ESC I �•' 4 i.CRIi �=i I
MA SH V1
il
Yll��4�-
= 'eye m n ,,{� E � DbD � \ ! ��� F= a �' Y �• c �,pP-S `--
F=: �.alA 0''"Z r 3 � �Ltr--��M SN 6CNC 4' 9 MaKM• �I (` / 9
I •/ l.Yf' �.! oa '� RO :' of0� 1 ]iADE � J� -
�t 4^ LAxE ALE G6. 113
Q �1V J LBQp `I
.�t! 6[IN91xc� tiF:paSJ� 1EE ,�pp wi o4
„E=kl S"Gi RNA ePa9 -Re Llj 7T CH RO Wry F p / y.� -7 PSRIOGE �'P p
-�M IS A eE Po i+E a4 / Jam- e' f:s' K / ESL �n ElSC Fn ? co
^F: we ` .+ 4a yr.4' J; 1 �5L90 ` ;• a c �.
3 4► z� � _ E� F � ...' TptyL 7 1 �� j � P T`n..,, �� � � d
iu [m ' � 'YL7t£" Cam. 3 '� ' ; � y �' y QPG� W. f = i P , ' 0 cf" [!; ,
a� Hto-[nE ,coon• .. P NONAQE _ M • �[ =iJ . ,. 7 O _ .r`4_-
LK . 10 1AM5 Q (o Ha51 4 - -� p �( o a�� Rp. 'r }, RrUSMNG
;Gu u5 r RD W4CfOA� lJI `'a o = aa � D
rn 6'Au6 �' s , P s � 1 \ C4AM. l ��
SE{ORT CUT
IE
`'�
Der RD. �A n9 in �' cti • �' CP�4, v PD \ o gti1 \ . y-S--__—�_�p �J�'�Q'oO_„- � G
.l y9p�y rroxr4 207 Lµ VAR' �O4\, A `!° i ¢O 9c 1jz nr ftQi a\ JI.�YH/ �Si�°J I4
a a A,J 4PEENt�EE A� S '{` Di. 0 pJ �! \ �f = ?� ,i5\ x^ - c. a �yj l�! !a%alb
'v z -Y[J _ ,a 9P L SN .p O�,• N • \ p �. ti. [ WHI I iSTORE
- n NS MEDUR R LG
9p 1 L£ Q TROY rT- pr'V4
RD
s� o TI!DW>S J °r} PARK 5
A �T111 o Qyo P° �i gN E5 `/ RpS c i5 C1EM AO 5 R• i / 4,� �, 1 �O ��' y PD
Sfl _srrYt" 9 aEraN '1
! cs uat�S"y� R[99[ Id it
Air p ` (Z (a4; .pp
i9gE�[ [F4 . �tp1
Po p 9s Sq j/'i�, •i- /fn n o �J ��n a4E iP
v Es SA}JO y ° : PIpGE R (+ itan gADD1AE pp RD ChURCH E RD.
JACK( DAVI S
(^ 9 l r
0.D A/G �L+S C Q SS D ellk fb3 v w
RAIICI{ RD 'ti c 4 f�C.�. a4v.' pJ\E EN¢1R9 `O p 1 co I
1.:IRCLE .' Y; \ n Q AVIS 4 s5
c ` 1 1tCK �SOlI O+ 1 PQ F It. r _�
D `4 a >'s C EEK
P TwP• r p "
J 'I.* / p S L G1,�<" [,• PD1
! I Of.R `I• O X,\ � � ^` .p�(f� RO �. a s /. .
T4in.it I a o oYr*i ` �j'
FP , I waLIF 1 e o J s� TYR
L pc,�'I � �V0.yA
• - � G �P0. (( � � is •' ri0 D A � L�9 D' e P /' = Po
SPA
_ GU, EAREA i' a /a-
N/q( 5S0 2� /�� f
5
i\ G ° -w • 4�95Y0 400 a ,1M � y o��� o y y�, � o'�� `�5 � r d N. C.
.
C. S
/
4 C H f 5 T E R F I E L 0 C O U N T Y C S..
f 10 11 12 13 -14
1,--BRKSIDE DR. ........ 00 PRICE ST............ K1 ROOINSUU AV......... L4 SHA-HELLE LN..... ...K9 STIRRUP CT .......... HI TOWNSEHO LN......... R7 WATERVIEW LN••••...NII WINDY HILL LR....... 616
-' .•,AKii000 CIR........R4 PRICE TUCKER RD....K11 AOBINWOOD L11........05 SHADY BLUFF......... K5 STOVE HEDGE CT......R6 TRACY CIR........... K4 WATKItIS AD..........09 WINDY RUSH CT ....... KS
~<—,RKWOOD PRICES DAIRY RD.... 1410 ROCK BILL RD........ K9 SHADY GROVE LJI... ...KB ST014E HILL RD....... 07 TRAILS E210 DR.......P6 WATSON WIRGARD RD....... O6,P1
SCHOOL RD..........06 PRINCE VALIAJIT OR ... 06 ROCK RIDGE PASS ..... H2 SHADY LN......... F2,L9 STONEBRIDGE LN...... 96 TRAIIROILL CT........ L9 CHURCH RD..... L12,M12 WINGATE ST.......... E2
y- 3RTHIDGE CIR...... F14 ?RIVETTS ;D......... L4 ROCKING CHAIR RD.... L2 SHADY OAK LIT ........ 07 STOHEGATE AD ....... 1112 TRAVLS CT ...... ..... K6 WAYIIAW CEMETERY RD..P7 WIIJSI.OW DR ......... 012
F%'..RTRICGE........... 114 ?ROSPECT RD. ........A9 ROCKREST RD........ P13 SHADY RIDGE L14.... .,P0 STONEHEDGE DR....... L3 TRAY14ICK RD....,F2,O13 WAK]IAH CREEK RD.•R6, S6 WISHBONE RD........ P 10
'P`ULA L•N.... ••......K6 'ROVIDENCE FARMS RD.JI ROCKWELL OR.........LB S1IAFTWOOD DR........ L9 STONEWOOD DR-....... 09 TREE BILL RD........ 114 WAXILAW FARMS Ab.... ,R6 WISTERIA 1.1L........ P10
AWUEE TR........... K4 'ROVIDEIICS HILLS OR.K3 ROCKWOOD DR.........06 S1IAGBARK Lit......... 112 STONEY RIDGE RD..... L9 TREETOP I-Ii..........02 WAKHAW IiWY....... P7,PD WITMDRE RD........ •P12
'FACJI OACIIARD DA.... D9 'ROVIDENCE OAK I.N. ..]}j ROCKY FALLS CT......K6 SIIAllEl011 CIR......... z! ST0[IEYBF0OK........ NO TRINITY HA KIIAW INOIAII WOLFE RD............ 09
i -� --._

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MAINTENANCE TRANSFER
AGREEMENT
This agreement is entered into on this the day of c c , 19-F 2,
by and between % a,ve v (hereinafter "Buyer") and To u
(hereinafter "Seller").
Whereas, Seller owns Jo v /y /r 4
Whereas, Seller entered into Cost 8hare Agrii6ment No. 2D4a -44q /4 with the
4460 jeAy Soil and Water Conservation District (hereinafter "the District") on
DGT. a � , 19_2L. Seller's obligations under Cost Share Agreement No.
9D "9a2-0it -/L began on T ,v 2 , 199,7-_ and do not end until Tvve
29 01. (copy of agreement attached)
Whereas, Buyer wishes to purchase T g rI from
Seller. Buyer hereby agrees to assume pfl of Se er's rema ing duties and
responsibilities as outlined in Cost Share Agreement No. 9a -- 9,2•ayy-1,C Buyer
agrees to maintain and continue the cost shared best management practices for the
remainder of the maintenance period. Failure to maintain the practices properly could
result in repayment of a pro -rated amount of cost share funds.
Any future transfer of benefited acres will require repayment of cost share funds or
an additional maintenance transfer agreement.
Buyer agrees to permit access by District, Division and Commission
representatives at reasonable times.
BMPs Installed:
a V Ya T a— e -v
Maintenance Expiration Date: TrrNe_ S
SIGN
(Buyer)
X f � C)Z-
(Date)
X u, _ X )_`Zg-q1
�f f (Seller) NC DEPT. or FgVjnO1,VE1;T (Date)
ANDNATtjRALRF£ 'IJR{;Eg '
JUN 2 6.2001 .
NCACSP MANUAL, JULY 1998
PAGE V1-55

e �
r � J
tic OF ErmRoNT'
l i
r J

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary -
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Joy Autry
Joy Autry Farm
4023 Vann Sneed Road
Marshville NC 28103
Dear Joy Autry:
e��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTIQW-MPT. Q11r
ENVIRONMENT ANo NAT1gg1RWSt4fVJRdr; iEAL'1'"
0 NATURAL RESOUl (F>
January 24, 2000
FEB 4 2000
�i814A Of VKYl;sUMERTAL k1r1E{A6f -Mi
RIflORESYILIE REG160AL flfFltl�
Subject: Removal of Registration
Joy Autry Farm
Facility Number 90-15
Union County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, P.E.
cc: Mooresville Water Quality Regional Office
Union Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%o post -consumer paper

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number - /S _
Farm Name: So;r 67r, IrJ .-u,
On -Site Representative: � h-
InspectorlReviewer's Name: SC!4
Date of site visit: Z 7 f
Date of most recent WUP:
_,,,,__ "Aeration is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E9 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinklersystem wlportabie pipe;
fi. stationary gun system wlperimanent pipe; 7. stationary,gun system-:w/portable pipe
PART]. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, -Part 11, overrides'Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part Ill).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements Iisted below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray,
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, 'or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
_ZF4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of -the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.
?eaC.(ot y Q,C k z S aISZ+

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part 111. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
,NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'S
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS'
V_er`
1
I
1
FIELD NUMBER' - hvdrant. null. zone_ or noint numbers may be used in ❑lace of field numbers
denendinn on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspe---torireviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER' - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

MEMO
TO: KQ sia w
DATE:
SUBJECT: �� f
o PV` ' - - V.!s5w --d IGLU^ l 11! ---. 0
subm
From:
d,. ssui o
North Carolina Department of
Health and Natural Resources
Environment,
09 printed on Recycled Paper

OPERRiIGNS BRANCH - WO Fax:[phone] Rpr 21 '97 14:13 P.02/02
RE ST FOR REMOVAL O'F REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 214 .0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility oa the registration database.
Facility Number.
Farm Name."f
/-��`,,,,_ 1 NOV
Owner: O I u r r
91Y1510,� .Rl' � E;iT
��t l9Fk1E��1 � E
Mailing Address: 2- V, n n' S n e c o ec/ •
County: }�~
This Operation is: [r : _ ` r,
pasture only (no confinement) y r CCM, ' ICIV
C ''f,
dry litter poultry operation
out of business/no animals on site
closed out per NRCS standards
- --� / be3ava-the--Ll�riSlaold-.(1�.Ss.�ar..z50���n�_�D.U:.canfincd cat��a�J,�-hors�s,4�4�0_she=for
30,000-poultry with a liquid animal Wastc MaaagsinMI systCMI)
Comments:
I asn fully aware that should the number of animals increase beyond the threshold Iimit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 registration :requirements for any reason, I will be required to
notify and re -roister with the Division of Water QuaLity.
Signature:
U 0
Please return completed form to: DEHNR-DWQ
Wave Qwlity Section
CU=IPU Ca Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleio34 NC 27626-0535
�. - .•fit. _ _
Date: / 6 "q q
RR-4/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources RECEIVED
Division of Water Quality WATER Otlal-ITYSPrTION
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) MAR 0 9 19gQ
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
Non -Discharge Permitfing
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and male any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
l .l Facility Name: Joy Autry Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Joy Autry
1.3 Mailing address: 4023 Vann Sneed Rd.
City, State: Marshville NC Zip: 28103
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-624-6369
1.4 County where facility is located: Union
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Farm Location: take Landsford Rd. south from
Marshville about 3 mi. to Philadelphia Church Rd. - take right and go about I mile & farm is on left.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's I Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/79
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _90_ (county number); _15 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
ec er to Finish
1640- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Zyes; Fno. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
T eofSwine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
0 Layer
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Dairy
0 Beef
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 90 - 15

Facility Number: 90 - 15
Facility Name: Joy Autry Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
h
/1/,P1<oIt + rV
D toN
1NA��
�p,R p 9 i999
n�yt�ha�B pe��ttin�
(Land OwncVPWame listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for e + r e ' La r- th _ _ (Facility name listed in question ,1.1)
has been reviewed by me and ig accurate/and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date - -q
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 3 of 4 90 - 15

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 20 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 20
2.4 Number of lagoon storage ponds ircle which is applicable): j
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or N (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?I - -7
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item,
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 90 - 15

-Oj
4L
IVN
51,
4
4y
Al
I L
N z
4U
0',
FA
�N Va-
-3 , IL
I'M N
C4
V7,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
w3

WASTE MANAGEMENT
PLAN
W.�
JOY AUTRY
FACILITY NO.90-15

JOY AUTRY
FACILITY 90-15
FACILITY DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
This is a registered swine (feeder to finish) operation with a maximum steady state population of
1640 top hogs. The waste disposal system is in place and consists of a holding pond with
117,000 ft3 of volume. Liquid effluent is applied on 3.7 acres of tifton Bermuda through an in
ground irrigation system with moveable heads. Solid waste is removed as necessary and applied
to cropland with a truck mounted tank. Approximately 20 acres total are available on farm for
waste disposal.

WAjTE UTILIZATIGJ FLAN
Producer: Joy Autry
Location: Philadelphia Church Rd 1-1/2 mile S Dr Blair/ P Church Rd Intersection
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Swine (feeder/finish)
Number of Animals : 1640
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of
surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the
amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before
each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding
capacities.. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per
year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either
of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM
regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this
type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste
management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques,
preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WAOTE UTILIZATI4. r PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, M, tons, etc,)
1animals X • 0 3VAc tV waste/animal/year = 6 6 � 7 p c z Av waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
S'T-7 4r- TAI aUyr. X lbs. PAN/1000 gal = qS`I ! lbs. PAN/year. (PAN
from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)or(NC WASTE ANALYSIS REPORT, see attached)
(circle one)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate
equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month(s)
$G
Bi
0 w
46 0
3,
r{
ec
Yt
Fesca^e
-z m o
2.
a
r.r b No-v
fc
H
tt
,�
ZO V
la
�
,t
sr
Zcrc�
/d
ZrroCs
�/
TOTAL S
=f lv o
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.

WA.JTE UTILIZATI4-; PLAN
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied while meeting the N
requirements.
Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses Nitrogen.
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 2])
Tract Fld. Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of

WAJTE UTILIZATIGJ PLAN
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements.See attached map showing the fields to be used for
the utilization of waste water.
Your facility is designed for days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be
removed on the average of once every days. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed 18" from low Roint In top of dam..
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste
APPLICATION BY IRRIGATION
Field Soil Type Crop Application Application
No Rate(In/Hr) Amount(In.)
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Narrative of Operation:
n D e r p-4 o r � -s E C�-7= f? aC a -a 4 F�c-fi -�a r fps am/

WAOXE UTILIZATIGI i PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are
subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of
Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If
the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide
NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within_
a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the
life expectancy of the production facility. it is the responsibility of the owner of the facility
to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM.
[See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest
Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking.after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated
on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference -
Environment file for guidance.)
(continued next page)

WA.;TE UTILIZATI4_ I PLAN
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause
drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control
conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide unifomuty of application..
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no more
than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with
a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to
a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste
shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may
be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips are
present. (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public rights -of -way.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways or wetlands by a
discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water
courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall
not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25-year, 24-hour storm event in addition
to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.

WAJTE UTILIZATI4�i PLAN
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or
discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be
kept on site.

WA,JTE UTILIZATI6J PLAN
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AGREEMENT
NameofFarm: J'a,r1C�r,�Eac,-1►'i1 x 96 --ls`
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm
named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment
and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to
the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface wasters of
the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be
filed on -site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and
will be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
(Please print)
Signature: Date: O " 9
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print)T a i r" I - 42 a
Affiliation:� IV
Address (Agency)
-4 Lpn./c/1-S /VO4,:.
Signature: <uj Date: �-
L- Z &11 2—

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE ti2tKBERS
D«'Q 7wY-G6-s -1675'
EMERGENCY NIANAGEMENT SYSTEM 203 —Y,54�
SWCD
N7RCS _21§4 — 32L1_C L_x)
T'nis plan wi]I be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to bean to increase elevation of darn.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flov.'s to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor. +
e. Make sure no surface water is enterina lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks p-ior to restarting pumps.
D: L..ak;are from flush systems. houses. solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irri«uticn pump..
C. flake sure no ,1uh0n
u. Sto} all tlow1 " ll:� IZOU��. t:Util1 S%'`iems. 01 =C:!,.i

6: Contact the technical specialist «xho certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc.)
a. Narne: Xd L aKjef , ,,L1
b. Phone:_ 7 4 —
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
December I'-1. 1��6

Mortality Management IMethods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
' Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowNse of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
rJ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animaI's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
Dz...,.�_. I S. 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Suurce Cullsc ilMPs to cordrol tusccts Site Specific Practices
-- Liquid Systems
1'1I1sh Gullets Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remnvc accumulated solids from
guuers as designed_
Cl Remove bridging; of accunlulaled solids al
Lagoons and Pigs Crusted Solids O Maintain lagoons, settling; basins and pill where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting ofsolids to a depth of no more than G -
8 inches over more than 30% of surface.
_-E'$cest'Ive vegetative • Decaying vegetation n
Main(aln vegetative control along banks of
t i,owlh
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accunudatioll ofdCcaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on ilnpaundnlcnl's perimeter.
Dry Systculs
I'c�,l�l > ---- —• Decal .Spillage Cl
_
DCSIgu, ope3'a1C and maintain feed syslcil►s
bunkers and troughs} In minimize the
accuntldalion of decaying wast;lge.
n
Clean np spillage on it routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
(lily interval during sunitller; 15-30 day imerval
during winler).
Deed Slorat;c Accumulations of feed residues f-1
Reduce moistlure accannt1lalion wilhin anal
around immediate perimeter of Iced slorage
areas by insuring drainag u away from rile
and/or providing adeq uale containment
covered bin lilt brewer's grain and similar high
Inoislure grain products).
fl
lnspecl for and remove or break- up accllnualaled'
solids in filter strips around Iced sloiage as
Ileeded.
ANIIC - November 11, 1996, rage

•Suurec Causc liMPs to Control insects. Site Specific Practices
Animal I folding Areas Accumttlalions of animal wastes 0 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and oilier locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
cl
Dry Manure I landling • Accumulations of animal wastes [`1
Spstcros
n
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
clay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter) where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around mamtre
stockpiles.
11 inspect for and remove or break tip accunutlaled
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
tnamlfe handling areas its needed,
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Deparhilent of Entomology. Box 7613, North Carolina State University,
Italcigh. NC. 27695-76 f 3.
N
I
AKIIC inbcr 11. 1996, Pa[;c 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
AMPS to Minilllize Odor Site Specific Practices
I al,luE�ad
• Swine production
O
Vegetative or wooded bnffieTS;
0
Recommended best management practices;
1771
Good judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
a Dirty olaiture-covered animals
C7
Dry floors
Flour smI-ilces
0Wct manure -covered floors
n
Slnuetl floors;
fl
Walerers located over slotted floors;
Cl
Feeders at high end of solid floors;
I]
Scrape manure buildup from floors;
n
Underfloor velltilatinn. for drying
I'Llulllc L'olIcctilln pits
. Urine;
[11
Frequent manure removal by flush, Ilit recharge,
• Parlial nlicrollial decomposilion
or scrape;
Cl
Underfloor ventilation
UC11111.41oll Cx1l;ioS1 I;llls
+ Volatile gaSCS,
I-1
uari maintenance;
Dust
n
f:fliciem air movement
111dour surfs cs
. Dust
177
Waslldowll between grollll5 of animals;
177
Deed additives;
Cl
feeder covers;
177
Feed delivery downspout exlcndcrs to feeder
covers
Flush tanks
0 Agitation of recycled lagoon
n
Flush tank avers;
litpllid while tanks are filling
p
Exiend fill lines to near bouom of WIL'S wills
anti -siphon vents
Hush alleys
_
0 Agitation during wastewater
O
_
Underlloor flush with underfloor ventilation
conveyance
I'll teLiIAZE : 11o1I1tS
a Agitation of recycled Ii1h11011
f7
EX{Clld rCC1171178C hlleS lu IlCilr b0110111 ll! 11115
liquid while pits are filling
with anti -siphon vcnls
1-ih slaliuns
0 Agitation during Su11111 lank
Cl,
Sunlplank covers
filling anti drawdown
t wiside dcaiii co IL04311
Agitation during wastematcr
n
11ox Covers
or jullclioll boxes
conveyance
AN16C - Plovcnlbcr 11. 1996, Page 3

Source - - - - - Cause BMPs to Minimize odor _ -- - Site Specific Pracliccs
Fild of drainpipes at Agitation during wastewater C7 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Laguall Sllflaces Volatile gas emissions; 177 Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Biological mixing; O Correct lagoon starlup procedures;
• Agitation n Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio;
Cl Minimum agitation when.pumping;
Cl Mechanical aeration;
CI Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler 0
Iligh pressure agitation;
fJ
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind;
rlozlles •
Wind drift
rl
Minimum recommended operating pressure;
171
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface;
C1
Pump from second -stage lagoon
Slo age tank or basin a
Parlial microbial decomposilion;
n
Bottom or midlevel loading;
Sulfecc 0
Mixing while filling;
❑
Tank covers;
•
Agitalioll wfien emptying
f-
Basin surface mals of solids;
Cl
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Scaling basin surl,ece 0
Partial microbial decomposition;
Cl
Extend drainpipe: outlets andernealh liquid
•
Mixing while: filling;;
level;
•
Agitation when emptying
L7
Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry lit- slrtdge •
Agitation when spreading;
i-1
Soil iuieclion of slurry/sludges;
Spreader outlets Volatile gas emissions CI Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
I tncovercd 111allulre,
Volatile gas emissions while
C7
Soil injection of slurry/slmlbes
slurry or sludge on II&I
(frying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 firs.;
Sill Lices
f]
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying;;
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead aninrllS
0 Carcass decomposition
O
Proper disposition of carcasses
I cad animal disposal
0 Carcass decomposition
Cl
Complele covering of carcasses in butrial pits;
Ilttti
17
Proper locallon/constrtletlon of(lisposal puts
Incilecl;elnl'S
• Incnnlplete cnnebliStion CI Secondary slack bllritCCS
AM l vember 11, 1996, rage 4 �'

SUrll'Ce - ----- - — Cause I1M1's to Minintice_Odor - _--- --� Site Snccific Practices
Standing; water around • Improper drainage; Cl Grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities 0 Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access roads Q Fann access road maintenance
public roads Iioni farm
itccess
Additional Information : Available From :
Swine Klanln-c: Icianagement ; 0200 I61le/i1M1' Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Dann Potential Odor Sources and Remedies ; EBAE Fact Sheol NCSIJ - BAF
Swine 11roiluction Facility Manure Management: Pit Recliarg;e - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 128-88 NCSU - BAI?
Swine Production Facitity Manure Management: Underfloor Flush - Lagoon Treatment ; EBAE 129-88 NCSIJ - IIAI?
Lagoon Dusilm antl Management for Livestock Manure "Treatment and Storage ; EBAE 103-83 NCStI - IJAI:
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment ; FRAE Fact Shect NCSIJ - IiAE
Coiuruiling Odors from Swine Buildings; 1'111-33 NCSI.J - Swine Extension
Envinmme:ntal Assurance Program ; NI'1'C Manual NC fork Prwlocers Assoc
Options for Managing; Odor; a report !tarn the Swine Odor "Task Force NCSIJ Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies ; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
A Rtt i(-'- 11ovember 11, 1996, Page 5

y Jdr
vT,�y
C' 0 v elvll��
NO 7-
7-0 .�)
------------ — — --------------------
Z- 'C
Kings Manor
3507 Watson Church Rd.
Monroe, NC 28110
704-753-1192

Lq
Kings Manor
3507 Watson Church Rd.
� Monroe; NC 28110
1 ,c7iev . Gorr
'04-7531192
3,35
Z-on j'exT-
y O' 6,.�
j' 75
1�7•0.�
3 r3S
r
d2,0
lD d r
l yop, t
T O#
2,0;2y
'7, 33
6, ;2

' Kings Manor
3507.Watson Church Rd.
Monroe KIP 0 11
1 04-753-1192
7 o 5-6 Tp/y
O 1 7, �"e 07 /" D !g 1il9c le a
y
Goy/�l 365 G
!
/77
V
D/ a, j ,� g c 1 fv/ o U 7 00W p. —I-- plv,
l -
j
c,4g4,�c .
4,971 e,oa ql
M /�

-I-fa �s.�/ "JJ'"'��'.' 4'-�,r /i� f�-gyp/�/ / -ty� � � _ ,p
e17 x
00-1 rc&
`7 174f 10 '5,
-via,
0 L
0A
LOSS
. e I

16
91'
17-�'A l
f6'h
Q �`lI
off.
Df'/L�
rd�OS'fi
O�Wa ON
Pa yA�
o�nuo uosAA loge

_Sdo
,rsqy
—IV J el
1*4
f,,Iz�4�f
61 -X I-P'V,41"0.2 W149W
ffq
C/--V"v
- rl-
ON
*P8 40in4o
Jouevy

PF"10F'O5AL
1'"lEn I in.i ELECTF: I C COMF•tAiq`f
E;7r 10 S 1 F::ES i-i 11_L r- Con- n
MONF-COE , N.C. !;Ra 1 1 0
FF'HONE 753-4496
MOB x LE S= Z-97 1 0
DAI'E 10-17-91
I,tit`IF Jay Autry
ADDRESS
maxato
1900 `
#4 USE
.41 $718.00
600 `
#8 USE
. 28 168.00
1
FPE Z50 Breaker
88.00
50'
1" PVC and fittings
18.77
1
DU32ZRB Disconnect
96.53
6'
Flei< conduit and fittings
14.40
1
Fasco timmer
'28.65
1
Tinter enclosure
6.25
Installation and labor
325.00
Total
$1481.60
TOTAL $1483.60
TERMS: DUE UPON RECEIPT.
If balance not received within 30 days, a 1.5% late charge will be added.

PROPOSAL
Kings ..,anon
3507 Watson Church Rd.
Monroe, PVC 28110
704-753-11 92
Proposal Submitted To:
Name 1
Street
City ((
State
Phone
No. ......
.- - -
Date."
Sheet No._::.:"
Work To Be Performed At:
Street . ArA✓rI Ai* 4114 f X
City _.. State
Cate of Plans
Architect
-- __
We hereby propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of
-T/+Jl / 9.% lAt % C -,AX 0c- •l y /�+!✓ /�R r / a,�i ��h?.�.!
All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and
specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of
y0
with payments to be made as fgls: �.S irf%DnJ flc+47'" 07W 441-4..
Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra
costs. will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an Respectfully submitted
extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent
upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control, owner to carry
fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Work. Per
men's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be
taken out by Note -This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted
within 60 days.
ACCEPTANCE ❑FPROPOSAL
ThIl, :rl;nvr! prir^S, 5i)!u6firro;ions =ird condibuns are ,-ltisfoutury and are hereby arrepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified
t'7yrnent will lie made as outlined above.
Signature
Date Signature
TOPS (P FORM 3850 ORIGINAL LITHO IN u S A

United States Soil 530 W. Innes St.
Department of Conservation Salisbury, N.C.
Agriculture Service 28144
Subject: ENG - Design Approval
Solid Set Waste
System
To: P.R. Loudermilk
District Conservationist
Monroe, NC
DATE: October 28, 1991
File Code: 210
This memo is approval of the design submitted for the solid
set waste disposal system for the Joy Autry farm designed
by Kings Manor. This system is for application of effluent
from a 800 feeder to finish swine operation. The system
consist of a 7.5 hp motor, 3" main line, 5 sprinkler heads
and the other material to make the system function.
There is some disagreement between the waste management plan
and the design prepared by Kings Manor. Kings Manor's
design shows a total of 22 outlets. The waste management
plan has three pumping area for the 5 sprinklers or 15
outlets. The waste management plan should be revised to
shoW--4~ pumping areas and. 11 pumping cycles. Otherwise, the
application of waste would be in the range of 500 lbs. of N
annually.
Also included in this design was a request from Wayne Moser
to approved a cost other than that in the Ag. Cost Share
average cost for fescue for sprigging bermuda grass in the
disposal area. It is my understanding, the TRC will only
pay the cost of establishing fescue for any type of
vegetation the landowner wishes. If a change in this basic
policy has occurred please provide me with additional
information as to the specifics of the new policy on paying
for establishment of vegetation under the NC Ag. Cost Share
Program.
After the system is installed, Kings Manor will need to
supply written certification that all material and work are
in accordance with the design. The data submitted for
review and proval are attached.
Vernon J es
Civil Engineer
Attachment
c: T.H. Wetmore, Jr.
W.S. Moser
Jim Cummings

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 28, 1999
Joy Autry
Joy Autry Farm
4023 Vann Sneed Rd.
Marshville NC 28103
A4 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS900015
Additional Information Request
Joy Autry Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Union County
Dear Joy Autry:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by June 27, 1999:
1. An Inspection of this facility done by the Division of Water Quality on April 27, 1999
states that this facility is currently below threshold capacity of swine (250 animals) and
that the facility may be closed this year. If you are not currently operating this facility at
more than 250 swine, you may request removal from the Division of Water Quality's
system by filling out the attached form. All of your records will be kept on file by the
Division. If you request removal, you will no longer be required to receive a permit from
the Division at this time. if you decide to repopulate above 250 swine in the future you
would be required to receive a permit at that time. Should you decide to return the
attached form requesting removal, you will not have to address items 2 — 6 of this letter.
2. The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) submitted calculates the amount of nitrogen produced
for the number of animals at this facility after treatment by an anaerobic lagoon.
However,.it appears that this facility utilizes a storage/holding pond and not an anaerobic
lagoon., Please have a technical specialist review your WUP and determine the correct
amount of plant available nitrogen produced at this facility.
3. Please submit an Operation and Maintenance Plan.
4. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) list the nitrogen application rate for Bermuda on
Tract 3786, field 6 as 400 pounds per acre. This is higher than currently recommended in
documentation available to the Division of Water Quality. Please contact your technical
specialist to review the Waste Utilization Plan and provide documentation that supports
the increased application rate as shown in the current WUP or revise the WUP to current
guidance. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed acid dated by both the
.owner and the technical specialist.
5. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to be implemented. at this facility should be
identified (check the appropriate BMPs) on the Insect Control Checklist and on the Odor
Control Checklist.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 90-0015
Joy Autry
Page 2
b. Please submit a Mortality Management Checklist.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before June 27, 1999
or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200
and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
erely,
Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

JAMES B. HUNT
NORTH CAROL.INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 29, 1999
Joy Autry
4023 Van Sneed Rd.
Marshville, NC 28103
Subject: Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
Joy Autry Farm, Facility #: 90-15, 25
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Autry:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facilities on
April 27, 1999. It was noted that both of your facilities are no longer housing any
animals. Enclosed you will find two Request for Removal forms which should be
completed and returned for each facility. For facilities that are to be closed
permanently, it is required that a closure plan be developed. Please contact your local
Soil and Water District for assistance.
Should you decide to restock the facilities in the future, you may be required to
obtain a new certified plan and permit prior to restocking. You may also be required to
meet any new rules and regulations that have been instituted since the time of closure.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rey: Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Phil Loudermilk, Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
910 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOREBVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 1 U
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I AFFIR MAT]VE ACTION EMPLOYER -SOLO' RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAVER

43 Dzvzsion of Soil and Water'Conscrvation —Operation Review
0 Dzvzsion of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection r r
rvision of Water Quality 'Compliari eInspection � E < 3 •,�; , ' �
© Other Agency -Operation Review
Ismoutinc Q Complaint Q Follow -tip of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number S Date of Inspection Time o!' Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted (Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not O eratiozaal Date List Operated:
Farm Name: ............
............
.. .��. �
.......................t Yl................................
County .(K.K�..0 ......................... ......................
- A�..
Owner Name:
.d.
J . ,..............................................................
Phone No: ...............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................
Title:
I hone No: 6,
'...-.. �.....
MailingAddress: .......v
3
..........................
k .t'i.......�i.C. ..,� C�!.......................
..................................................................................... ....... .......... I .... ....
OnsiteRepresent ative:........J46.
.......Au—+r.......................................................
Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:........
j .................
' .,..,..,..,..,....,...................... .........
.— Operator Certification Number.:,./ .. ...........
Location of Farm:
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................. ..
Longitude �• �� ���
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE3 Layer I ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish a ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts .....
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons % ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Cmt3acts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If ycs, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated al: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convcyancc man-made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. li'discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/inin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon sysicm?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ........... p� .
Structttrc 2 Structure' 3
❑ Yes )�No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes qNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes %No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5..Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (icl trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
0
❑ Yes VNo
i. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type .......................................................................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
0: NA.v'ioi 'tions Or. dei iCiencGe.s .Were rioted. dU.rin'g .thi's:vi'sit:. Y.ou ►rill.re�ceive no' Ndfieir...:
eorres'Dbgideiice'abbot'thisvisit:''''''''''''''''''''''''•'
❑ Yes P,No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes 040
❑ Yes [; AKo
❑ Yes O%wo
❑ Yes Of
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes EMO
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes J9 No
❑ Yes MZNo
❑ Yes ,&NO
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes &{ No
❑ Yes 16 No
❑ Yes ,J�Vo
Comments (refer4o question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any:recommendations or any other comments t = r1 i:y:'
Use drawhigs,of;facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
i
c.ld
+r"e_9 �•v��crWs�
VW
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
.-� Date: .Z 7 ! j 11/6/99

' " e'� • - ' .0 Division of Soil and -Water Conservation - Operation,Review
t Division of Soil and WaterConservation -Compliance Inspection E
" Division
�oe'�WateT,Qnallty= C". .Ompllanee'Inspc.Ction (1�1
M t
�V Lher L�CnCy'Operation RCVieW. �>�'�� rE.�,
Rontine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection .0 Follow-up of DSNVC review 0 Other
Facility Number[) Dat:e of Inspection 2
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered JE3 Not O crational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 3�/ �`Iz'— .�4 �................ Count u. �.d. .......... .....
..........j ......................... ............. ....................... J"........../...
Owner Namc:.....,.. ,3 .y. ............ .....
... .... ....Phone No: .&. ? `q.-. 3..(�....................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:............................................................., Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: .. y6.Z3. r�ra.�'1 .:...�1�:.. ..................... a I �
Onsite Representative:.......J-�...y......6--k........................
.........................
I.........
Integrator:........:......................................................................
Lf
Certified Operator: ..............Zj t..................../ .11.. ........,.................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................,
Liked n of Farm:
......... _!
ttude Longitude • �° �°
rent
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes XNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
h. It' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State El Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the csumated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes jt�-No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the -State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes I No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4• Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Idend ficr:
Frechonrd (inches):
1/6/94 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. ,Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes. No
seepage, e(c.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes $-No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes QNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes rm No
Waste AiRi2lication ✓�
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ANo
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑Nitrogen ❑ Yes 1;3No
12. Crop type .......�.�1,,.`
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes P5,elo
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
El Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application cquipment?
❑ Yes
a No
Required Records `ti Documents
17.
rail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
D�No
18,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
XYes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
3allo
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
% No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
[:]Yes
�&No
22. Pail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes C o
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes XNo
24. Does facility require a lollow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes g No
N.o.vialations'or. defieiencaes .were no.tted. dririn; .Niis-visit:. Yoti will.re 'eive no further �\
.. etirrespaaidencebout'this visit: .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any,-recorrimendations or any other.
g , :.. p ( � p, ges as necessary) Use dr'awin s;of facility,tEs better ex lain�situations. use additional a
Q�AL
,e-- vlG �tq S oyl S't Ve—, Cti �c.�-e�� R-�11�+� Vn \.
IV
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: --�7r—cj9 11/6/99

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 29, 1999
Joy Autry
4023 Van Sneed Rd.
Marshville, NC 28103
Subject: Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
Joy Autry Farm, Facility #: 90-15, 25
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Autry:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facilities on
April 27, 1999. It was noted that both of your facilities are no longer housing any
animals. Enclosed you will find two Request for Removal forms which should be
completed and returned for each facility. For facilities that are to be closed
permanently, it is required that a closure plan be developed. Please contact your local
Soil and Water District for assistance.
Should you decide to restock the facilities in the future, you may be required to
obtain a new certified plan and permit prior to restocking. You may also be required to
meet any new rules and regulations that have been instituted since the time of closure.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Watet Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Phil Loudermilk, Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN FOUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Draft - Rev scd January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number'nlG, - 1S
Farm Name: �-•- %r rrrn
On -Site Represent tive: 17K134
InspectorlReviewer's Name: aw- �" Zptsor,
--Zoperation is flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part A eligibility items) F1 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: yZ2_7V 9Cj _ exemption - El E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP. / l7 Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. Iinear-move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
fi. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part'l exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an 1 or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an 1 or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part IL Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART If. 75% RuIe.EligibiIity Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
_ZF2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure -to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in .CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Draft - Rcviscd January 20,1999
Facility Number -
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER''
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
bit K
k
i
k
k
k
k k
( k
k
� k
ritLU NUM13tW - nydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers maybe used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBERZ - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres grid having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998)"bf irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

-tb
NCDENR
..v-
JAMES S. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 24, 1998
Joy Autry
4023 Van Sneed Rd.
Marshville, NC 28103
Subject: Site Inspection
Joy Autry Farm, Facility #: 90-15
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Autry:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOREBViLLR, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PNoNE 704-663.168e FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLEO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendatio-T-Ls for Nitrogen CM &plication for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the com is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in maid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

V
Page 3
Waste sa Wiles/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
pr6ducer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely, -(} D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
ui Water Quality Regional Supervisor

c
3
August 21, 1998
Joy Autry
4023 Vann Sneed Road
Marshviile, NC 28103
Dear Mr. Autry:
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service
I-NN lt:r , V:v1liNT, IWALTtl , College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
$ I\,%rORAI, RF.40LJ€tCP.Q
AUG 2 5 1998
SVn.I£ VW,X t
500 Norlh Main Street, Room 506
Monroe NC 28112-4796
Phone [phone]"738
Fax # [phone]
It was a pleasure for me to see you again and to discuss with you some management
options relative to the nutrient management systeni for the finishing operation on
Philadelphia Church Road. Your primary concern seems to center around the lack of
a sufficient stand of bermudagrass, limiting potential nutrient uptake. It is important
to note that even though your primary interest is waste disposal, the Bermdagrass
should be considered as a distinct system, separate from the swine operation. Focusing
on the forage as a separate entity, and applyiiug the principles designed to maximize
forage output, will result in maximum forage yields as well as maximum nutrient
removal. The following recommendations should help in this regard:
-Overseed (volunteer may be sufficient) with ryegrass following your next cutting.
Ryegrass will remove 40lbsfdry ton of nitrogen and under normal growing conditions
will accumulate from 20 to 30 lbsfacre per day.
-Early to mid February, inow and bale ryegrass. Once sufficient regrowth occurs (4-6
inches) apply grannoxone at .25lbs active per acre. Begin scouting of Bermuda at this
point for signs of the plants breaking dormancy.
-At the first sign of growth, begin application of effluent to encourage growth of
Bermuda, suppressing competition of competing species.
-Decreasing the time between harvests will increase exposure to sunlight and encourage
the spread of the existing plants.
We did not discuss in great detail your nutrient loading, but based on the nitrogen levels
from your analysis and your estimated hay production (20 bales@9001bs@75% dry
matter=6.75 dry tons@40lbs nitrogen/dry tau=27011)s of nitrogen). If I recall correctly,
you had only applied around 105 lbs this year, so you are in no danger of overloading.
Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability.
North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.

Bermudagrass on our heavier clay soils is somewhat difficult to establish but quality
stands can eventually be established. Hopefully, this will give you some direction. In
the meantime, if I can be of additional assistance, do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
&4Z �.
Jerry B. Simpson
Interim County Extension Director
cc: Mr. Rex Gleason

J
Alan Johnson
Dear Mr. Johnson;
01, III f� ENVIY',
AUG 2 5 1998 August 21, 1998
34
SUBJECT: NOV
SITE 90- l 5
Concerning your inspection of my facility. I have completed
water application record. I have contacted the man to cut the
hay and he will cut it as soon as possible. It has been cut twice
already. It has rained over 14" in 30 days here and it hasn't
been possible to get the hay off without it rotting. I have had
Ag. Ext. agent Jerry Simpson out to the farm and he has told me
how to improve the bermuda cover and that there is always rye
grass cover in the winter to take -up part of the waste. We have
had so much rain lately that the other grass has outgrown the
bermuda. Jerry told me what to spray with to kill the other
grass.
Joy Autry

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 10, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIP1TED
Joy Autry
4023 Van Sneed Rd.
Marshville, NC 28103
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1 (a)
Joy Autry Farm, Facility #: 90-15
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Autry:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 6, 1998.
Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is being issued as a Notice of
Violation (NOV) due to the following deficiencies:
Bermuda cover crop needs to be improved.
The hay should be harvested in a timely manner.
Failure to have available your completed waste application record.
The noted deficiencies are a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (a) and
Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H .0217(d).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by August 6, 1998, noting the
action taken to address the deficiencies mentioned above. In responding, please address your
comments to the attention of Mr. Johnson. For technical assistance please contact your local Soil and
Water District representative.
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this or any other violations. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
A 4. ���
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Phil Loudermilk, Union SWCD _
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional. Coordinator
AJ
91 B NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFI RMATIV8 ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% R$CYCLE D/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Division of Soil and Water Conservation 13 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
l0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-un of DWO insuc tion O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered [3 Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Sa u. t r Count �` �''�
Farm Name: ................. ........................ y..............{.....5!l'L........................... .... Y�...,....�..y..h�.fl.................. /
Owner Name: ..................v......,................! t ............................................. Phone No:...L.....T......`..(C�.:�f...................................
.
Facility Contact: ...................................................:. .. Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 10.Z3................. 41-7.f'L.....S'<1-e'.r.—d .......................... ....lza'o' :4.�� 1.....................•••••...........-ZP '. .......
6fOnsite Representative: ..........,�v........ � C, . ............ Integrator: ..................
Certified O erator_ r _ Operator Certification Number ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•.,
p........................•••......................................................... p
Loentinn of Farm:
.G1 i..........ts7•.. lr�. ........A2..::. ......-5.. ..........................� to �... .f ..... ...... ..............................................
....c..i.,,... ........ , .(......~ --.. ......SR .................. y ......... ��v,-,...�.��....L .. .
Latitude 0 1 46 Longitude ®• ©' ®"
., Number of Ls{inas I.Holdina'Ponds'::] L::JLJ Subsurface Drains Present JJU Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area ;;;I
. Ski' _ _...._ __ __.. __._ ______ ,
k
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
■ ru ■
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (Po
2, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes KINo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes J&No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 4LNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes Al
7/25/97

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes '�d No
Structures_Magoonsd -olding Ponds Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �, o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ........./.,..:...................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes I5-No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ANo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes VLNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes r2tNo
ante Apolication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes JBN0
(if in excess of WMP, or runo F
entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....... Berfi&... q... .......................... ................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? IRIYes ❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
UINo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
ayes
❑ No
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
C.No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
HNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
For
Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
EJ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
QNo
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
EM
0. No.violationsor defi:cieikies.were,noted;during this.visit.. Yodfiiff. 6ceive,no:furiher;
:. correspondenco ti out Ibis. visit.• : :.. :
caea ":ki
Re-r- AyI erb-%.W+r' CsaD me _s
aR ,_ 4e Q�a1 +C G.� t 1Z�1 `i .CC 6 t4S
tk"-f sled'. ry e s (-e_4
ks A0
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'sia Kre R
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� �7�e Date:

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health. and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
''VRathan B. Howes, Secretary
M
Joy Autry
4023 Van Sneed
Marshville, NC 28103
Dear Mr. Autry:
J Wit A
IDEF.HNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 18, 4 997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Joy Autry Farm, Facility #: 90-15, 25
Union County, NC
A site inspection of your facilities was conducted on July 17, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. In general, the facilities were in good shape. However, it was noted that the application
field for facility 90-15 needs to be cleared of 'weeds to allow for the proper growth of bermuda. Also,
vegetation on the sides of the lagoons at both facilities needs to be cut. Enclosed are forms to be used
for keeping track of your waste applications.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
i
�,D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, 14 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 N Vf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review %%0 Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection 3V.ZL1 —'
oZ
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for I hr .15 min)) Spent on Review C�
Wertilied ❑ Permitted or Ins ection includes travel and processinS2
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:............................................................................................... ................ _...................................
FarmName: ..............�Q Y......y........... r.l��rh.................................. county: ......... 4/.V..r..,�......................... .......................
Land Owner Name:.. ..... —�c�. f Phone Na: �P ....� _............ _.............. ..................
.......� z _f.._..... _ ...r�.._...........
FacilityConctact:.................................................................................. rTitle:............................`.�.................. /Phon ee%No: .... ................................. ......... ..........
Mailing Address: ........�4 .2_3..........via.t'L.........s/7..�i.................................... (. ."_ lfiC�.Lf1. .............................. .. .1..Q.. .
OnsiteRepresentative: ... .. . .................................................... . ..... ..................................... Integrator:.........................................................................................
Certified Operator:......... f�.�i.............................. ...�.T'f.`�.................................... Operator Certification Number: .... .f�,P.A. C.3.............
1 /
Location of Farm:
.,. c` ...... ...... —7.... f.. A...u.2..... ....... ......... i� s.� .. ... i [... .. ...........ZS7........ 4
.:�1G+c .....5►x. .Q�....t ... f f!-�Ik .......5[ .s l �... .,r........� ....1..4.'Z ......4..2!gkS`.....yz....kAl............................ .
Latitude 0 1 64 Longitude 6 A. �a'�"t'` 0��"Z�` .
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Arc there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
X No
❑ Yes
W—No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
V_No
❑ Yes
NVo
❑ Yes
o
Continued
on back

FIellity Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
ti (Lagoons r Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
a, �
...................... _.... ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes %3 No
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes 1j� No
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
'aste AppliCation
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...............3CC1t 4q1_.......................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspcctor fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For!Certifted Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
UP
f-P
12'
Sic45 0
lam oo.,
✓e� e � h �n geedCs o Cu�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
r
............................
❑ Yes 5'No
❑ Yes KNo
RYes ❑ No
aYes ❑ No
❑ Yes 2 .No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 14 No
5,Yes [--]No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes RjNo
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: -7. -- 12-� Z
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

toutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection
0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
EFacility Number
Time of Inspection E= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: registered [I Applied for Permit
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:.i.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
Certified ❑ Permitted
or Ins pection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated : ....... .....
... ............... ._....... ....... ...... ..................................... ........... ..... ......... ........ .................
FarmName: ............. .. 10-) � ... ........���t1.............................................
County:...........b%.i.i�.E.l..................................................
LandOwner Name:..........(.............................................................
Phone No:. f z....'..�P�ir. j..........................................
Facility Conctact:.................................................................................. Title:................................................
Phone .......................................... ..................
MailingAddress: ............... ..... _ U ......... S/1 e.... ....... ........................
%No:
L
..... ,!!(fl..!<•............ ....................... (.U3....
OnsiteRepresentative: ......... .s1........Y........................................................
Integrator: ....................................... . .... . ....... . .......... . ...................
CertifiedOperator: ......,T..l�1-Y.... ...................................................................... Operator Certification Number: ...... s..................................
Location of Farm:
rgtyr�....,%r1 ......1'.S' .............:......1..................... 1........!.... �,.....C.k,.Sc�rxl,a....... .S...........PO
......�'L r+ ru4�,���x�,... , �.. .... .t::,�..�.:.� l.......A.�t.r.. :ia..... C.x}........ ,� ...1. i .2 �....- ,xkts............ t=q r..,:i a.... .s...� ...L e..�...
Latitude �•�+�++ Longitude �•+°+
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 5kNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0,No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 11�o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes �KN0
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes Wo
4/3t)147 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

ncility Number:............... — ...............
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Str cSa tures,{I^a ons and/orHoldipg Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
............... ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes Kio
❑ Yes )!�No
❑ Yes ANo
Z Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
13. Do any of the structures Iack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Valicntinn r14
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For�CertiUd Facilities Onlv/04
22. Does the facility fail to havea copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
anii:r
............................
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes No
9 Yes ❑ No
JkYes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes /tffNo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
a h t �, ca � Okj ell �leecQs ►u��rnv + ex��-; l� �'i� h 4�
r
'"7) oar) dLh �Jkoe.
�10-7 Ak-��, on IG9oah h�d5 c5.J,
Reviewer/Inspector Name l am . l a NX .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7 17— f) %
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Qualit ection, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

G
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A
0
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor AM±�&�l
p E H N
F;Z
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Joy Autry
4023 Van Sneed Rd.
Marshville, NC 28103
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Joy Autry Farm, Facility #: 90-15
Union County, NC
Dear Mr, Autry:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr.storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 Borth Main Street, W�y. FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Nvf CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled /10°'. post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
fj other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to S 10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
1� -i.-V-
-�.t
D. Rex Gleas P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Joy Autry
Joy Autry Farm
4023 Vann Sneed Rd.
Marshville NC 28103
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Joy Autry Farm
Facility ID#: 90-15
Union County
Dear Ms. Autry:
N.C. DF,?T. OF
13NVIRONbtE"41', NEALTIi,
& NATURAL R SOLl=FS
Nov 19 1996
91VISI01I Ur E;jTRGl1lGTAL E'AIIAGIMENT
t'16C ILSKLE RE IGRAL OfrICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Bang Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
Pector
.E. A. Pieston �awara, Jr.,�ir
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, V"�T�i'►
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 - 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

I II ♦W 1 . UJ , VC
Site Requires immediate Attention:
Facility No. _00_—_tf6,_
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE 'VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: -
Farm Name/Ownerz
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: 4 Phone: L;�� `- �
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity:Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM C rdfication Number: , ACNEW_
Latitude:. _" Longitude:" Elevations: -------,Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) es No Actual Freeboard: � t..1= Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or isWas any erosion observed? Yes ol&b
Is adequate land available for spray? es r No Is the cover crop adequate? es No
Crop(s) being utilized: `
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?�e or No
100 Feet from Wells? Qpr No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(�)
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 ,Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes orlrn
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system. or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oA� 1f Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated bn specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
LK
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02