900007_PERMIT FILE_20171231

[Fwd: 90-7 Bill Braswell Farm lagoon closure]
r
Subject: [Fwd: 90-7 Bill Braswell Farm lagoon closure]
From: James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:07:05 -0500
To: [e-mail]
fyi.. .
Jb
Subject: 90-7 Bill Braswell Farm lagoon closure
From: Andrew Pitner <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:05:57 -0500
To: James Bealle <James:[e-mail]>
JB,
Got a call from Mr Braswell that they are going to start lagoon closure next week.
He said they'll probably start agitating on Monday and start spreading around
Wednesday. He's been working w/ Union Cc SWCD on this project. Apparently this is
an inactive facility that we aren't currently inspecting. I told him thanks for
letting us know and that I'd pass the word on to you and that, if you have more
questions, you'd give him a call.
AP
Andrew Pitner, P.G. - Andrew. [e-mail].
....
............._............
.._._......_......_...._._.......-_........_................................. _.-
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office (MRO)
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
MRO Main Phone: [phone]
Direct Phone: [phone]
MRO Fax: [phone]
James Bealle <iames.beallePncmail.net>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
.............. . ......... ....... .............
90-7 Bill Braswell Farm lagoon closure
Content -Type: message/rfc822
Content -Encoding: 7bit
1 of 1 2/25/2008 12:07 PM

Braswell Lagoon Closure
J
Subject: Braswell Lagoon Closure
From: "Pigg, Richard - Monroe, NC" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:10:01 -0600
To: "James Bealle" <[e-mail]>
Just a followup. You did receive a message that Bill Braswell Eggs in
Union County had started his lagoon closure didn't you? He called the
Mooresville office on Friday Feb 15th. And left message on answering
machine. He has and is following a USDA/NRCS closure plan. Work is being
performed by Atlantic Dewatering Services out of Clayton, NC.
Sincerely;
Rick
704-233-1621 Ext Ill (Monroe)
704-982-6811 Ext 104 (Albemarle)
email [e-mail]
"Only when the last river has been poisoned, the last tree cut, and the
last fish caught will man understand that we can't eat money"
1 of 1 2/25/2008 12:07 PM

90-7 Bill Braswell Farm lagoon closure
Subject: 90-7 Bill Braswell Farm lagoon closure
From: Andrew Pitner <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:05.57 -0500
To: James Bealle <James.B eall e@ncmail. net>
JB,
Got a call from Mr Braswell that they are going to start lagoon closure next week.
He said they'll probably start agitating on Monday and start spreading around
Wednesday. He's been working w/ Union Co SWCD on this project. Apparently this is
an inactive facility that we aren't currently inspecting. I told him thanks for
letting us know and that I'd pass the word on to you and that, if you have more
questions, you'd give him a call.
AP
Andrew Pitner, P.G. - Andr-ew.Pitner@n_uma.i.l.riet
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office (MRO)
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
MRO Main Phone: [phone]
Direct Phone: [phone]
MRO Fax: [phone]
1 of 1 2/18/2008 9:59 AM

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number- / Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: 3' acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representa ive: IS,`tt g e�1 Zoperation
Parf 11 eligibility items) F1 F2 F3 F4
ins ector/Reviewer's Name: Mgo _ � ►.,��. not re uired to secure WA
P �4
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit:— 1 1 exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: Annual -farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - -circle #: 1."hard-hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
/ wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
1/ E4 75% rule exemption as verged in Part Ill_ (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part Il - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part ill).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination.
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.
<-f E0 /(

Draft - Revised January 20, 1999
Facility Number fo
Part III. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
tb
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBEW-2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYST M
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS-3
r
1
FIELD NUMBER'- hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD NUMBER - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

� -7 -1 1.) f
oN 7A+IY T
�t fah
0
Z o oZ rv" sv7 �1
J t
f T�
roSr o
s 1
8 Z
2 fV
�...X.. _ �. - ti �,, '_ _ - it — . _ _ -. -,
..� __. __—...»..,, .4i .1 .�..2 i;i 7 f-"•+-t.- i�. 1:.Lia�
a...3_::S
- _ "_ _ _ - -�.v .x .c•rs :�_--# -"^ �*'="� ''""�'
T' 9 k �t'sG Mrtir�..d' :53:�w�:�w���i�..e.+ ���:TaCW^GbF.����-_i

o�oF wAr�Ro�
r
o -c
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy. 74 E
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Michael F. a y
Go mar
William G. Ross, Jr -Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 13, 2002
Subject: Braswell Farm, Facility: 90-7
.Site Inspection Report
Union County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 12,
2002. Based on his observations, be facility appeared to be well maintained and the files were
complete. Attached is a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
At such time that the facility ceases operation, please notify this office or the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
•If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Attachments
cc: File
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Dale of Visit: 9/12/2002 Tine:
Facility Number 7
NNot Operational O Belovv Threshold
M Permitted ® Certified [3Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: -.. _.....
County: U�ouom.................
Farm Name: Bill.Rxasmcll.Farm................................................................-----•--------.11' lvt........
Owner Naine: B1kl----------------------$TIl15�Ye11-------------------------- Phone No: T94-3334Q9--------------_____------
MailingAddress: !} Q. YXy.,. 4. x.............................................................................. ManneRM ............................................................ 28112 ..............
Facility Contact:...........................................................Title:.................................. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: BILI�SA�}'4�I�It-------------------------------- Integrator: ----------------------------_-------------
Certified Operator:Bi11.G...................................... BraS.W:ejj........................................... Operator Certification Number:2145:4...... ....... ..........
......
Location of Farm: _
East of Hwy 200.On Mills Harris Road, 112 mile south of intersection with Lawyers Rd. East. On the right side of road.
[:]Swine ® Poultry []Cattle []Horse Latitude 35 o O1 45
-Design =Current„ ` Design ' %Curreni
Swine" ouation Poultry Capacity Pc_eilatii
® Layer 36500 31000
❑
❑ Wean to Feeder Non -Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
�❑ Other
Longitude F 05 •'
r. M" ,Design ..:Current;:
e ;Cattle, 'Ca 'aei ='iPo ulatton
❑Dairy
t' ❑ Non -Dairy
:4-.fin n•f.. ..
146,000
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
«'ante Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................. .......... .......... •-....... _-•--•-.......................... .......................... ....... ...................
Freeboard (inches): 48
O!/A./Ar

- vrv,v.riv�
Facility Number: 9U-7 bate of Inspection 9/12/20 22
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9.' Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay)
wrwrraru
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14..a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rewired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspectoi fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
.24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes .N No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
C] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
APPLIED IN JUNE 2000.
3 OUT OF BUSINESS BY END OF JAN. 2003.
ATING BELOW CAPACITY. FARM PLAN INDICATES THE FACILITY IS FOR 60,000 BIRDS. THE OWNER IS
TTLY AT 31,000 BIRDS.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;A7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

O5103101
Facility Number: 90-7 Date of Inspection 9/12/2002
Continued
Odur Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ,® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pemlanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No

JAM CS B. HUNT JR...
�J
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OF'F'ICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 7, 1999
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1
Braswell Eggs, Facility #: 90-7
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on
May 4, 1999. During the inspection it was noted that the bermuda harvest from the
previous year had not been removed. This problem was noted in previous inspections.
Failure to follow the certified plan is a violation of North Carolina Administrative
Code 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (d).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by May 21, 1999
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address the response
to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review.
The items below must be available for review during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, feed areas.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Should have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan should be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHGNE 704-663-1699 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a
Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste
applications should be applied during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in
the waste. In general waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
/D--c��-°' ,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 27, 1998
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site Inspection
Braswell Eggs, Facility #: 90-7
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
August 25, 1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) due to the following:
• Excessive growth of vegetation on the lagoon embankments.
• Hay left on the application field. This needs to be removed.
• Lack of soil/waste analysis.
• An error in the waste application records.
It is requested that a completed copy of your waste application records be
submitted to this office by September 18, 1998. In responding, please address your
comments to the attention of Mr. Johnson. For technical assistance please contact
your local Soil and Water District representative.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerel/eason,
D. Rex.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]o4O
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

I
{JAMES'D.4F UN7 JR.
'GOVERNDR -
L
_,t
AJ
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 19, 1999
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
Monroe, NC 29112
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1
Braswell Eggs, Facility #: 90-7
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on
May 18, 1999. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) for failing
to perform a waste analysis within 60 days of the waste application date. During the
inspection it was noted that the August 1999 waste applications did not have an
accompanying waste analysis. Failing to perform a waste analysis is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10C and North Carolina Administrative
Code 15A 2H .0217 (d).-
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by June 5, 2000
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Also, it is requested that
your response reference the date and subject of this NOV, including the facility
number. Please address the response to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gl ?,on,P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ r
Enc.
m®!
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOo RESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 1 S
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER . 50% RECYCLEOl10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

F w A rc 1�
9oG Michael F, 6sley
Governor
r! 7 William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 22, 2002
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: Operation Review/Compliance
Braswell Eggs, Facility #: 90-7
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irreguiar, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspection.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson!
I
Environmental Specialist II
Ww
r- FT---
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment `jrA
0and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, GovernorN C DM William G. Ross Jr., Secretary hA ►'1��� F � W 1
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NOR-rH CA40LIN.K''%Nt�`C%9URCES -
ENVIRONMENT ANiMwy4'1L6A1ALLJk696ly k9FFlCE
July 12, 2001
i.
JUL 1 62001
BILL BRASWELL f
BILL BRASWELL FARM F'
3030 HWY. 74 EAST
MONROE NC 28112 A s :�, ` :sEC 'CTION
Subject: Application No. AWP900007
Additional Information Request
Bill Braswell Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Union County
Dear Mr. Braswell:
On December 13, 2000, your original reviewer, Ms. Susan CauIey and your Technical Specialist,
Mr. Phil Loudermilk were engaged in an email correspondence..,.�.c.,,.l lR�1iregarding using Your
manure records to calculate PIant Available Nitrogen (PAN) for your farm. However, this issue was
never resolved. Since this time has passed, without a resolution, your application package has now
shown up in the Division of Water (DWQ) Quality database as INCOMPLETE.
Ms. Cauley has since left our unit, and I now have the responsibility of reviewing your
application. I have checked it for completeness and there are still issues that need to be addressed. I am
listing them from "easy" to "not so easy to get", so you will not be more disheartened at this
unfortunately long permitting process! I am certain if we put our heads together that we can get this
figured out, okay? So here are the items we need to get done, so you can get your permit:
1. Please have your technical specialist verify on your certification form (see Attaeanent 2)
Section III. B. "Land Application Site (WUP)" was accomplished, it was never checked off.
Have the specialist, sign and date this missing information. Replace this page of your
original certification, and send me two copies of this corrected page.
2. Please read and fill out the highlighted sections and sign and date the more detailed
Emergency Action Plan r(see �1.ttachrr ,3 . Keep a copy at the farm office, near the lagoon.
Send me two copies.
3. Please read and sign and date the more detailed Operation and Maintenance Plan isee
At4 . Keep a copy at the farm office, near the lagoon. Send me two copies.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 90-0007
Bill Braswell
Page 2
4. Please send me two copies of the NRCS engineering spreadsheet calculations that figure out
the "AS -BUILT" storage volume for your lagoon. It should also indicate if you have any
sludge storage, but it seems that you are agitating the manure in the lagoon as you apply, so
you may not have sludge accumulation or "storage," in the technical sense.
5. Please write me a brief explanation of the actions you have taken on your farm to address the
issues brought up by DWQ inspector, Alan Johnson in his May 18, 2000 site inspection of
your farm. �5ee'tac merit;5}.
6. Adequate manure analysis records will not be obtainable under the Division approved NCSU
guidance see Attaeffien 6 , therefore you will need to amend your Waste Utilization Plan
to use the NRCS manure Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) book values. Since this will result
in a PAN production amount of 3,066 pounds of PAN per year (for 36,500 layer operation -
see Attachtnen , you will need to consider how you will change your crop management
system to accommodate this value, UNTIL you can provide the following documentation:
*Three years of manure samples, taken seasonally, three times per year
*Three years of irrigation records which match the same years that the manure
samples were taken
I have reviewed the documentation you provided to Ms. Cauley and you only have
complete manure analysis data for the year 2000. You'll need to do the same for the
years 2001 and 2002. I also looked at an illegible copy of an irrigation record print out
seeAtC n that I could not reasonably figure out. I suggest you provide your
records using the IRR-1 andd IRR-2 forms sce ttachmeiit;91. This will really help you
to validate the manure PAN trend towards four pounds of PAN per 1000 gallons.
If I do not receive these items by August 31, 2001, I will sadly have to return your package to
your farm and it will be considered INCOMPLETE. Please note that if the Division returns your
application as INCOMPLETE, in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200, your facility will be
considered to be operating without a permit.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the
technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in DUPLICATE to my attention
at the address below.
NCDENR-Nan Discharge Permitting Unit (attn: Theresa Nartea)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before August 31, 2001 or the
Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your
facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.

Application No. 90-0007
Bill Braswell
Page 2
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the
enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], ext. 375.
Sincerely,
eresa Nartea
Soil Scientist
Nan -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc:-Mooresville-Regional-Office-Water-Ouality—t�lD-&— Ua .a
USDA-NRCS, Phil Loudermilk-604 Lancaster Avenue, Monroe, NC 28112
Permit File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
BILL BRASWELL
BILL BRASWELL FARM
3030-HWY. 74 EAST
MONROE NC 28112
Dear Bill Braswell:
MG. DFPT. C*
�gONM EENT, HBALT1% 41 02
r4A'IU'4TAL RESOURCES.
SEP 200d
N C D EN R
InISIAA of 1 viftogagiltl. NNA690,
IMMENIE (IMMIR QM NOR-rH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES,
'September 5, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWP900007
Additional Information Request
Bill Braswell Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Union County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional information
is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by October 5, 2000:
1. The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must be singed and dated by the owner and dated by the Technical Specialist.
2. According to the permit application submitted the total number of animals at the facility is 72,000 layers, however,
the WUP and certification form are only for 36,500 layers. If you wish to be permitted for the higher number of
animals, the WUP and certification forms must reflect the changes in the facility population.
3. Please provide lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any site
evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
4. The Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate in the WUP was generated based on the total volume of the waste storage
pond. The current recommendations for establishing PAN rates is using NRCS standard 633 "Waste Utilization."
5. Please check the appropriate box in Section III. B. on page four of the Animal Waste Management Certification and
have the Technical Specialist sign and date the section.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please reference the
subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted
in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before October 5,
2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0260 and your facility will be
considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincer y,
Susan Cauley
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Union Soil & Water Conservation
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephorie:919-733-5083 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Empioj er 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 11, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Bill Braswell
Billy Braswell Farm
3030 Hwy. 74 East
Monroe NC 28112
Farm Number: 90 - 7
Dear Bill Braswell:
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Billy Braswell Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 502 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
for
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
BILL BRASWELL
BILL BRASWELL FARM
3030 HWY. 74 EAST
MONROE NC 28112
Dear Bill Braswell:
614vtA9NhY1tGNT. HEAL'FR if
�r NATURAL RESOURCES IT
1 0 • 2
1MCDENR
t691,ilgA 4f t�31>i�`. �'
�+o�N�l�,I.E tIIFJl1Er��. qil
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 8, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWP900007
Additional Information Request
Bill Braswell Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Union County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by December 8, 2000:
The Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate in the WUP was generated using waste analysis of the lagoon
liquid. According to the current standards, the nitrogen concentration of the waste shall be determined
using a minimum of -three waste analysis records for three years over a range of seasonal variations for a
total of six waste analysis records. Please provide copies of the waste analysis reports (from NCDA &
CSAD or other reputable private laboratory) used to determine the nitrogen concentration of the waste.
Please note that all WUP re0sions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before December 8, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N,C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request. please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincerely,
usan Cauley
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Union Soil & Water Conservation
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 'telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

;; 0� wArE9 Michael F. Eas "'d
Gover
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`r Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
March 23, 2001
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy. 74 E
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject: Braswell Farm, Facility: 90-7
Site Inspection Report
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 22,
2001. Based on his observation made during the inspection the facility appeared to well maintained
and the files were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
Please be advised that once your facility has completed the permit process and has received
its certificate of coverage, a weekly record of the lagoon's freeboard level must be maintained.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
NME' Nam#
ustomer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PRONE [phone]
800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

-a_. ['�..:'• rY' 4 •; "�•1sy' DiAsi A li —'MGM' _ .. •e': — :;.:'*:a•,!P ..'<•�,_�
o
.•���" :i- - 7', .!.-:•• - ,� .ri• _ .J .ti .1 ••�:�• .r tom+ - . {
.`;':- _ :�; _ "i'-+ -•- ;t !-'�• ivi e ^ aL•oII -i'' •t� ' .x../i�ri•lY.T '�• ryi
={.._t shin-ofSo� and.Water,Cops ry y _ ,
".��Y r � ���1^,?��jM� � J•�li� 4Rli� Rn�l1 � ;w.-N •y ��jt�.._^..:. � ..�..••7. � 4
O ,Other Agency +',Yr'.; ` ,.�. ° ,. ` n,{_
y'. ,. fir` e`..• •: �.": _ � }
!r. ,' ..."�"-�, r. � i.�Y[•4637!:'i, r%1•... '.:.�•:; ."!Ls 81�, a��"r•R:i''C_.r: :�}-;, := rt.`V i 'ie �..� •� rr - •7..1 « may+; ; � : •`�y �''
Type of Visit -=EP6ompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation.
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number '� Date of Visit: T i 'Time:
o Not O erational O Below Threshold
❑ Permitted )p Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
l . /...G./�......................
Farm Name: ................P.,:4 :. ............... . 4' 5.................................... County:.. ..�.
Owner Name. Phone No. ••
Facility' Contact: ...............................................................................Title:...................................................................................... Phone No:......................-.............................
1
tIailingAddress:......... G..- 1..y.... 0..�1..1'vQ— .............. ..l.�...... �r-.1.
Onsite Representative: -•••„ .......... _ , . ................................
/ Integrator:
Certified Operator: .................. 6--JL....,............. ... .0 ." ..... Operator Certification Number:..,........... .
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine [313_1oultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• Longitude ��• �
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ayer �lfz) l,-S ❑ Dairy
Cl Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons �� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Nlanagement System
Discharges R Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated au ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Irdischarge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hvp-,ss a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes )j No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 52-12
01/01/01 Continued

IFacility Number; - I
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection I
IF
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ONo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard{inches}: .......... 4a .............. .................................... ................................... ........ I ........ I .................. ................... .. I ............ I ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes �TNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑Yes �Na
immediate public health or environmental threat,•notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
0,No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
EL'No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
[:]Yes
[two
Waste ,application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
,®.!'Jo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
3QNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the ertified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWHIP)?
❑ Yes
21-'Z�o
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
AEI_No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
jl�,No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
!W�No
,4w-__�e rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes.PJEL�LQ_
1$. ere a water supply well within 250 feet of the spraylield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19= Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
f!�No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
.QNo
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
9�No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? _
❑ Yes
No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
\
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
RNo
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
&LNo
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�Io
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
cG; No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
EgNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes Oallo
01/01/01
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/17/2001
r130. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes !�qNo
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan bladc(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑.Yes ,§,No
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes �LNo
34 o the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Iuspector Signature: Gtv Date:
01/01/01

- - ............... - .J - _ . .............- .....................................................................
O Active O Inactive Latitude Longitude
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑ Map GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
39. distance to WS or HOW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spillway?
46. Adequate Marker?
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
O less than 300 ft O 300 ft - 1000 ft O greater than 1000 ft
O Yes O No
0<5 05-10 0>10
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Unknown
O Yes O No
O Yes O No
O Yes O No
a;

f
JUN 0 2 2000
3030 Hwy. 74 East
Monroe, NC 28112
June 1, 2000
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDENR
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Notice of Violation
Braswell Eggs, Facility#:90-7, Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Johnson:
I have taken the below steps to remedy the problems noted during your
Inspection:
1) 1 mowed the dam and surrounding area of the lagoon.
2) 1 completed the checklist of procedures in my manual.
3) Soil and lagoon water samples are In hand and currently in effect
Thanks,
Bill Braswell
N

r
NORTH CaROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
- AMA, ENVIRONMENT AND NAruRAL RESOURCES
:NCDENR DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY'
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
JAME5 .B. -HUNT J R.
GOVERNOR May 19, 1999
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
$ILL HOLMAN
4SECRETARY
Monroe, NC 28112 --
�: =...
Subject: Notice of Violation
KERR :T.'ZTI4VENS
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1
Braswell Eggs, Facility#: 90-7
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
r„
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on
May 18, 1999. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) for failing
to perform a waste analysis within 60 days of the waste application date. During the
inspection it was noted that the August 1999 waste applications did not have an
accompanying waste analysis. Failing to perform a waste analysis is a violation of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10C and North Carolina Administrative
Code 15A 2H .0217 (d).-
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by June 5, 2000
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Also, it is requested that
your response reference the date and subject of this NOV, including the facility
r number. Please address the response to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
,, contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason; P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
s AJ,
1° ~' 919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 IS
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
- AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ! AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER . 50% RECYCLEW10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

10"Utine oCum plaint 0Fofiow-u1)ofDWQinspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 00ther
ciiin Number Date ol'Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (iih:mm)
Ej Permitted � Certified 13 Conditionally Certified C1 Registered 1[3 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ............. ... . .....
Farm Name: .............. 1.1,11 ........ . ................ County: ........ U r
......................................
......................
y ..............
Owner Name: ... ........... lLtt ................ ......
Phone No: ....... z .3=., ... I....._..._.... ........... . .................... Te
FacilitvContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...........................................__....
MailingAddress: ..... . ....... ...... -_ ....................... . ........ .�... ............... ...... ............ . .....
OnsiteRepresentative: .................... . . ............. . . . ................................................................ Integrator: ....... ..................... .............................. ........... .. ...... ...
Certified Operator: ....... . ................ . .. .......................................................... Operator Certification Number:.... zj 3.�L..L
cation of Farm:
I_ff6itude Longitude =. =. =-
Design Current Design Current �Design -rCurrent i
Swine Capacity �Populatiim PoultrN ulation "Cattle Ca welly Topulation
Ca Po
E] Wean to Feeder , P0
JE:) Non -Laver I ;Fj N!,FD_airy 4
[3 Feeder to=Fi=nish
Farrow to Wean
17 Farrow to Feeder I Zil Other
,10 Farrow to Finish ToW Design -.Capacity
�171 Gilts
tIE3 Boars ToWSSLW.
-Nuniberof Lagoons- j=-)Subsurfac,- Drains Present 11LJ1,agoonArea IDSprai-FieldAm yj
jHl
6ldingJ1onds,/ Solid'T=PS No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar_rnes & Stream Impacts
Is any discharge observed from any part oftheoperation"
Discharge oneinatc-dat: EjLagoon EDSpravFiclC r-10ther
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance min -made?
b. If dischar-ge is observed, did is rcacIi N:aLC-. of the State? (.11 vc%. notify DWQ)
u, If discharut is observed, whai is the estimated flow in gal/min
d. Doc.; discharge bvr)a;.s a iapon SVSteln.(li Ves. 1101ii-N, DWQ)
IS there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation'.'
3. Were IbCTC any adverse impacts, or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State Miler than from a discharg'U?
Waste Coliectiaon & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm stora!!c) icss than adcauatt'
StrUCILITC I Structure 2 Structure Structure 4 Structure 5
identifier:Z/yR
Fnccboard (inches:: ............ 7..V ............... ..........
.......................... .. . .............................. ........... ....................... I ..................... . .
5. Are there am, immediate threw to the integrity Of any o: the: struCLUTCS OIDSC�.ed7 (iC/ trees. Severe erosion
seepage. etc.)
E, Yes tl*40
:1] Yes E] No
E] Yes [3 No
E] Yes E] No
OYes t No
1 Yes I1 No
E)Yes t5No
Structure 6
Continued an back
Y23/99

Facili4y tiumher: -- Date of hispvction
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Closure plan" y ❑ Yes Wo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7- Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes fNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
waste Armlication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
CjQNo
11,
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ' ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12.
Crop type -Pi�M w r
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
jg.�Jo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes
;;�Nd
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
Cl No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�R No
M.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes S;LNo
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
;ZNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUR checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
RNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design.'
❑ Yes
allo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
, No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
0,No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
b5-wo
24.
Does facility require a follow -up -visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
. 5c No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�Vo
Rio yi6hi ioris'or• ilef cit?rtcjes mere poted dirrirtg #1�es;visit: Yoir will reoerve fW #`urther'
roixes� o� rideirce. A' f th' :visit~ .. . .
Comments (refer to„guestidn #) rExplain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to Fbetterexplaiti situations }(use adcirbonal pages.as necessary)
..o �*
i��CtSCC Cw1Gt1Y. C[0
� 5 � � a. � : t ��•-� +,7 � �1� - C.ti1k 1 S i S �� t^ t-,ti� �; i vL I�1 a (� ri �1 � wG:S
no/ C-�� d �� i'j `E-Z✓l CJIi F1 C L"1"4 E L '�'C+J�.. "VCR YJ E' . t%Ql l�C�-. l 1tie.C'�rY+� (J i�t+• ^y
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l� ,y�� Date:
3/23199

Facility Number: — Date of Iitspeetion
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ElYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of' properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes []No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [IN o
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged hll.pipe or a-permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Bill Braswell
Billy Braswell Farm
3030 Hwy. 74 East
Monroe NC 28112
Dear Bill Braswell:
109WA
IT 00
A&41
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND�%Fy.,L RESOURCES
ZNVIRONMENT, HEALTR
December 30, 1999 & NATURAL RESOURCES
JAN 11 2000
01YISION Of 5i1VNl{1flERiAL MA#ASEMUT
WORESVILLE RMANAt WIGS
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 90-7
Union County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY], DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely
Kerr T. Stevens, Directo
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

6/
3030 Hwy. 74 East
Monroe, NC 28112
May 26, 1999
Mr. Alan Johnson
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
19.117ZT A I t11;-.
In response to Mr. D. Rex Gleason's letter, I am updating you on the following
actions I have taken at my farm on Mills -Harris Road (# 90-7) since your visit.
1)1 have posted emergency phone numbers and procedures.
2)1 have prodded the hay farmers and have their assurance that the hay will be
cut today (May 26, 1999) with raking to follow soon.
3) Fans and ventilation equipment were cleaned May 25, 1999.
4)1 have written NCWPCS requesting a 1999 license.
5)1 have received a waste analysis report
Sincerely,
Bill G. Braswell

i MFg2.il.lJ 1
i r► r ?, ti.l t c:'� 'r1C: it't � i` 1�! 3�+ t1 .� ' auzj {i ^glt2G'
►� E �l31AC b:'1,tQGQ t.!JS }J3°4 t9W! A? u;jq !JS ,3 38CtILVUL
1 I ;1»''t�3 '� � �+..!, ^I!^?, ► 1:?,l�3 'f1'crrR2 bic:`;gpr ram'.
..:11v�tij FXJ Sj ►.lJA r:ili:i Ulf Mif-R-H Ri.io ';0'r�i � � L _,, �i{; fLl Aim-,
t, i !.S3,mit tG uJiv ❑' yex ;,'"--'OLt,V iLr+ -E,l.; I!J'3 i,ZI, L I l! t� �Q,J—A: i:.
r)C,FIL tA,11 • }Viili. 20w.
C 78$
Au.l=, WILI'
is '

f
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 7, 1999
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
NCGS 143-215.1
Braswell Eggs, Facility #: 90-7
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on
May 4, 1999. During the inspection it was noted that the bermuda harvest from the
previous year had not been removed. This problem was noted in previous inspections.
Failure to follow the certified plan is a violation of North Carolina Administrative
Code 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (d).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by May 21, 1999
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address the response
to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review.
The items below must be available for review during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, feed areas.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Should have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan should be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a
Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste
applications should be applied during the time the crop can Utilize the nutrients in
the waste. In general waste should.be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D /?-� -1 ,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

[]:Division of Soil acid Water Coi4servatiori .Operation Review , ,
i v r.
n ,
Division of Soil and Water to - Compliance Inspection
ivision of Water Quality 'Compliance` Inspection
0 Other Agency _,Operation Review,
outine O Complaint Q Foil ow -up of DW2 inspection Q Folluw-u of DS%VC review Q Other
Facility Number Q Dzae of Inspection
I'inle of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted © Certified [] Conditionally Certified [3 Registered JE3 Not Operaational Date Last Operated: ..........................
l �.r�
Farm Name: .............. s.Slll�.f� �1' Y' lr%�kl.l.(J.✓�..............
.. t.............. Count ............,.
Owner Nante: �F �..S..lr(le!/ Phone No: ...........3...3.. .. .�. '..........I ...............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title. Phone No:...........................4.......`.................
Mailing Address: ,.... ..,�.�.. s�.,.... L kcs.}
//.......y�........% ` .....................I... ............�a.Yi.1w........,..,.........,............................-2..C�.�.1.�.1........
Onsite Representative:........ .Il........ 1.L.{.%L`tL./.................................. Integrator: ......................................................................................
......... u5 ✓ Operator Certification Number: Certified Operator: t,,;�........... ea�
,ocation of F•artn:
.................................... ............................. ..
,atitude 9 4 �4 Longitude ' + 64
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity, Population Cattle Capacity Population
10?Layer �l�u ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (Il'yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Othcr
it. li'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ........,
1 /6/99
Structure 2 Structure 3 1Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes `5(No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes V.No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
................................
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. -Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes (<No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes Wo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? El Yes XNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top ol'dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? IvLyes ❑ No
Taste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ElPonding El Nitrogen ❑ Yes K No
. �w.................................................................................................................
12. Crop type ...............................................................,. ....,.,.. .
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes .91No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint) ❑ Yes ANo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
Yi Yes
j❑`Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
, ® No
J�
Required .Records R Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &General Permit readily available?
Yes
No
I&. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
0-Y-es
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigatic7n, freeboard, waste analysis &soil sample reports)
SLYes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
9INo
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
Ak�;o
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
`E9,No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Wo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
allo
0: NA.VlalatlonS:Or. CleflCleT1C]PS .WE're nRted dat In .thes:YlSlt:. Youll.reeive n� ftirtlier .:.
ecjrrespoiidence... ..this is ... .. ....... .... .. ..... .. ... ... •
Comments:(refer tb questron #) ' Explain any YES answers and/or any;recommendations or any other comments
3€
s e addttiona!Use draw'ngof.facility situations. (usa es as necessary): '
oJA t r— q� Olr CCU t'� t 3 rl
tYr+1Iah vl��� 5L�b br✓ poste
l
/JeA , "nn 6w'e- OtZC ,4�,cC v.j �Z�r- wcab t�
Vh� � V i5 r bl� WLQ wyGGr t t i S h P 1�e t CV - NV' 01.,4A `11 i �C?, wl c, p _
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:— frr' 1 1/6199

yNCDENR
JAMES B. HuNT JR.�.�"Ji,
.GOVERNOR �•-
`-'•hWAYNE,MCbEVITT�' t:5,._
s�,l;_.�,cn:..�- _� �:+� ter_:•,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 24, 1998
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: Site Inspection
Braswell Eggs, Facility #: 90-7
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or Bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA2B11S
PHONE [phone] PAX 704-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYRR - SO% RECYCLED/I 0%n POST -CONSUMER PAPER
a `dEyilri�i�`

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
max lie nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen A fication for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 401bs Nlac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
crenerating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

I
Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
2 i u,L%, 1, 'L�
1 D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
`1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 27, 1998
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site Inspection
Braswell Eggs, Facility #: 90-7
Union County, NC
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
August 25, 1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) due to the following:
• Excessive growth of vegetation on the lagoon embankments.
• Hay left on the application field. This needs to be removed.
• Lack of soil/waste analysis.
• An error in the waste application records.
It is requested that a completed copy of your waste application records be
submitted to this office by September 18, 1998. In responding, please address your
comments to the attention of Mr. Johnson. For technical assistance please contact
your local Soil and Water District representative.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Union SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Film
Sincerely,
D. Rex eason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

€k ��.. p,• ��. ' x r,.r,':��'.u,,..",.�,'«'xi3�,'«�aT, w:�.�f,�..m w »„�i,,, n�>,.,a � �.,:'�x`�:;�'�Oo-vu.' ",'. ..,:;'„A&a s� _ � -�
�] Division of Soil and Water Conservation [ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Fotlow-uE of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered ,TCertifed 0 Applied for Permit [] Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated
Farm Name:..............r �. ..1............. (/..... !/................. County:....... i ..l: ?.1............................................
// ter/ 2
Owner Name:..........................a.,...C.................(r.........1.............................. Yhone No:............�7....................`................................
Facility Contact: ....................................... .. Title:................. . Phone No:
MarlingAddress:...... .L)....... .......... ..�.............. ................... lz�l�Z1................................................... �..�. .......
Onsite Re resentative:..... '
p ..r.. �........��,.S�.S.x-�?.�........................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator ;..... 31.(.% ............................. .+ c:i.fe,1..�r.�............................. Operator Certification Number:..Zj. ;57�/..........
..ocation of Farm:
jn.n........5-P._............Ae..`.�................................ ,
.nuuc L 1 1 ! I I /:a I a..vugltuuc i O v 1 I'- 1- F�_,a t
Desi Current
;;
Design""' Current ,t, Desi n` Current
g
y Swuie �Caiac�ty Population
Poultry ;.
,.
Population CaEtle Capacity I'ope�lation
,`Capacity
❑ Wean to Feeder
Layer
`p7�
atJ>5
❑ Dairy
E
0.Feeder
to Finish
..
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
•fi.
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
Y U
El Farrow to Finish
4,'
TOti Desigli Capacity"ti
Xf
Gilt";
F
k a r
` TotalSSLW
R
❑Baars
e .
k
mber of LAgo�oiis 1 Holding Ponds ��
[r
--
Subsurface Drains Present
❑ S
n Area
❑ Lagoon
p Spray Field Are a
�.J0
Ei
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes,
D�No
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
ElY(es
;9No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system! (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Z No
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
�fo
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
maintenance/improvement?
b.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
j No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
0kNo
7/25/97

Facility Number: --
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes PKNo
Structures (Lagoons,Ilolding Ponds, Flush Pits, ete.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 9No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):.............. /.................. .................................... ................................... ....................................
......................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes %dNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes W No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? NYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............ B.4v..rt!lM.trf.��R.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a Iack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes 9 No
.......................................
❑ Yes ).No
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes )ELNo .
❑ Yes No
_/Pes ❑ No
❑ Yes 29-No
O Ndviolations•ordeficient:ies.were'noted-duringthis:visit.-:You:rvillreceive•no-ftirtlier•:,
ctirresporidetce atiaut this:visit:: :.
4k e"O'•61v pzrA W4.sf�
AYes ❑?No
❑ Yes ,�g No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes VNo
e A nn`mvl L i+�c�.�. v► eic. � lam, �
he.� 4b be, re-,rtixe,X fir,, j(��r,�\ 1
fleea� be repo W 1'Mov-4_- ea("Lt s-
11r, At rcasw_ "lW
SOc-t wG Svc— ft-d-?>
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: Wol

County
Eneon
Owner
Bill IBraswell
Ivitanager
Address
Hwy. 74 East
Monroe
Location
Certified
Farm Name
iiiiiy nraswen r arm
Phone Number
233-4404
Lessee
Region
milifo rill
asto wy pu MillsHarris. Road, 'mile' sou -of intersection witaysrxers. East.On, .t e. •
.........................................
Certified Operator in Charge Bill G. Traswell
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
:.... .X. Qpe toy:: a oqA.: Qs
Date inactivated or closed
p Swine ■ Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity

Latitude
Longitude
Startdate14------ - ----- - -- �� -
i3?i3k'r
ee a cres .
echncal car egg
Speeiaiis -
ntegrator
p Request to be removed p Removal Confirmation Recieved
...........
Comments •
�i
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Expoi

3�
1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E.
Monroe, NC 28112
Dear Mr. Braswell:
A��
[DaHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 8, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Braswell Farm, Facility #: 90- 7
Union County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on August 5, 1997 by Mr. AIan Johnson of.
this Office. The facility was in good shape. However, for all waste applications the volume of waste
applied and the crop nitrogen balance must be recorded. When cut, the grass must be removed from
the application field. Otherwise, the nutrients removed by the crop are returned to the soil.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Union County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, * FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NVf An Equal Opportunity/AfFKmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 : ,�,^ 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

10-Routine C Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of :DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection i 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for I hr .15 min)) Spent on Review
"Certified ❑ Permitted
or Inspection includes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operational Last Operated:..................................................................../................................................................................
/Date
FarmName: ....... :'�.1..:M...(r .. �1.............7� X.t.`,1............................................
County:41-11a.................. ...................... .......................
Land Owner Name: ... .t.-114 Se-6 Z eVeill............................ Phone No: _.Q.B.3.=.4 '�
Y ...........................................
FacilityConctact:.................................................................................. Title:................................................
Phone No:..........................................................
MailingAddress:. D. 0..... &Qsf .. .. ............................................................
01 11/............................ ....,.................... �.Xz ..........
Onsite Representative:.,,,,,. �,,i.�,. 1. £� �.....,.... ���n,...,.1..............�-..�1�
c/ .
...... Integrator:
Certified Operator:......&.// ........................... ..................
Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
rn.....[�t.. :C c?rn. :....T� ..........{rx..�.......... :x.1�5,..... ...... ........................... 4
d.71s.... r'�'iss.... i,,F ed..... t ......=` ..yr...kM............ .1&5:............ ... Ls. ... Qn... 6/m
r—I
Unuiuue I - Lam.1 .. i,ongitune U- 1 11 ..
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General '
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ONo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [9 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed,.did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I�No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes KNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes [INo
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

Facility, Number :...............................
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or HoldiLlp, Pao ,dsl
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure j Structure 2 Structure 3
.!. ....... ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes CiWo
❑ Yes (?iVo
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Waste Applicaatt'on
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.6.e%ri!i%i�.!"�:�.�........................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
9'uv�
in°any
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes P$ No
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes P!�No
❑ Yes )&No
❑ Yes tkNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes f5ZNo
PlYes ❑ No
❑ Yes J9 No
❑ Yes k3 No
❑ Yes J.No
❑ Yes �&No
❑ Yes d o
.Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: = S' '--�j 7
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality SecteW, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Bill Braswell
3030 Hwy 74 E
Monroe, NC 28112
Dear Mr. Braswell:
A"fe 0
PA I
AdbWANNOMN
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Braswell Eggs, Facility #: 90-7
Union County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, W���
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 r� CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704- 63-1699 500/6 recycled/100% post -consumer paper.

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at(704) 663-1699.
cc: Union SWCD
Facility Assessment -Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary.
A, Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Billy Braswell
Billy Braswell Farm
3030 Hwy. 74 East
Monroe NC 28112
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Aa
April 3, 1997 &r NATURAL 10'- . :
'APR 7 1997
DMSMD,flF EN1FI1lOMEEiAt F, "{- u
118liAIS1111.11 11=111A1 44-"f
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Billy Braswell Farm
Facility Number 90--7
Union County
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator. Our records indicate -that these
completed Forms have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Application Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47,2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If -you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
[phone].
Sincerely,
'm`7�
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosures ���.
P.O. Box 29535, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 �� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
NTelephone 919-733-7015 50% recycles/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Billy Braswell
Billy Braswell Farm
1709 Mills Harris Rd
Wingate NC 29174
Dear Mr. Braswell:
Allo,A
1DEEHNFZI'
N.C, DJ':I'7= OF
$NVIRO;Vrvil IV T FIE, LTri,
NATURAL,
DEC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Billy Braswell Farm aIYISlaN OF
Facility ID #: 90-7 gaRlsitkLE REG,'�tlAt UFFICE
Union County
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997, A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR Steve . Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files 4�
Water Pollution Control System 0 Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission Vf An Equal OpportunitylAifirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% Post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immcdiate.Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , �- 1995
Time: _ ►�;2,�
Farm Naame/Owni
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: C 1 z-W Nr
Physical Add ressii.xcatiop: 1 `
Type of Operation: Swine — Poultry _�L Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW______...�,
Latitude:,Longitude: Elevation:_Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately l Foot + 7 inches) &r No Actual Freeboard: 2! kt. —Inches
_ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(RDWas any erosion observed? Yes orL.o
Is adequate land available for spray?<L;�r No Is the cover crop adequate? & or No
f
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?42&br No
100 Feet from Wells?` Yr No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes WA
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a iJSGS Map Blue Line? Yes ofF )
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
&`)
similar man-made devices? Yes ` If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? �r No
Additional Comments: — - -- —
�=-
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TrITni P P