840023_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason far Visit aRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ® Departur ime: `v County:
Farm Name: 1 r Owner Email:
Owner Name: G Phone: _
Region: *—�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: _ Phone
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certifi ton Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =0 = Longitude: =0=1 °=1
Design' Current =;Design,.,,,,.:Cpurrent ;Design Current
Swine ~ Cancirity Pnult
nntatinn Wet Pory . "Ca acit Population Cattle Capacity Paiiiiiati6n,"i
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
fq,Fa-r—row to Finish
Gilts
Boars
❑ Other
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
"Ty routtry .
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
EE11 urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Da Cow
❑ Non -Dai
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ED NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection\
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structur I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identitier�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify WQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
W. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
in aintenance/improvement?
It. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑PAN > 10% or ] 0 lbs El Total Phosphorus Failure to corporate Manure /Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evide e g Wind Drt ❑ plication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) /
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ N
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ E
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'![] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ E
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
Reviewer t r 3Kn.. +gid x.:1> - a e`'i • i n "+G ' F;"F.t tie �!� '�
K nspector Name :.. n'v, :...... .;r�..z Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection u
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑jNE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Cei
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? .
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
n
NE
NE
NE
NE
NI?
NE
NE
NE
NIS
NE
NE
c.
ation��ea.x f ,. e W ,,�; r, �: � � ar w�f'�'i r a �. �:n,•- � � �,ac-. � , �• �--.-sY y�wr,;•,:°"a�'--.,, e � ., i
Addai
12128104
12128104

�QF W A TF9p
�O
� r
4 -c
January 25, 2008
Nevin Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 McLester Road
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Rescission of Animal Waste Permit
Certificate of Coverage No. AWS840023
Stanly County
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
Michael F Easley, Governor
William G. Ross ]r., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coieen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
D 9 W
JAN 2 5 200$
NC DI NR MRO
DWQ -Aquifer Protection
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit Certificate of
Coverage. Staff from the Mooresville Regional Office have confirmed that this Coverage is no
longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage No.
AWS840023 is rescinded, effective immediately.
If you again wish to operate an animal waste management system you must first apply for and
receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal waste
management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will subject the
responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 if it would be helpful to discuss
this matter further.
Sincerely,
loleen H. Sullins
CHS:tlbltjs
cc: Andrew Pitner, Mooresville Regional Office
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
APS Central Files
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office
NWS Carolina
Natmally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet: www.ncwaterqual4.org 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50°% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

Nevin Huneycutt Farm 84-23
Subject: Nevin Huneycutt Farm 84-23
From: James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:03:49 -0400
To: Jaya [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
"additional correspondence to follow" issue #4...
ib
James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
ws840023070518.pdf Content -Type: application/pdf
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of I 8/7/2007 2:16 PM

y. Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 84QO23 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS840023 Oenied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Stanly Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 05/18/2007 Entry Time: G4-00 PM-- Exit Time: 05:30 PM
Farm Name: Nevin HunevcuttFa_rm
Owner: Nevin M Huneycutt
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 16422 McLester Rd Oakboro NC 28129
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone: [phone]
Longitude:
From intersect of SR 1115 (Liberty Hill Ch. Rd.) and SR 1975 (McLester), travel South on Sr 1975 about 100 yards, on Left.
OR ...... SW of Albemarle, about 1 mi East of Red Cross on Hwy 27124 , Sout on Liberty Mill, back Left on McLester Rd. , 100 yard
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number.
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Nevin M, Huneycutt Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Nevin M. Huneycutt
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:Cn+��s'�i6�.
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors}:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS840023 Owner - Facility: Nevin M Huneycutt Facility Number: 840023 �
Inspection Date: 05/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
6. Facility Operator advised to coordinate with Stanly SWCDINRCS to develop and implement Closure Plan <or> maintain Permit and
applicable records as per discussion.
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Lagoon embankments, and vegetation shall be
mowed regularly,
10., 11., 14., 15., 17., 18., 19., 20., 21. No records maintained since 2003; additional correspondence to follow.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
25. Failure to conduct Annual Sludge Survey; additional correspondence to follow.
26. Failure to designate an actively certified OIC; additional correspondence to follow.
jb
Page: 2

Permit: AVVS840023 Owner - Facility: Nevin M Huneycutt Facility Number: 840023
Inspection Date: 05/1812007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Finish 200 0
Total Design Capacity: 2C0
Total SSLW: 283,400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon LAGOONI 18.00 20.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS840023. Owner - Facility: Nevin M Huneycutt Facility Number. 840023 ;
Inspection Date: 05/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
t. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Q
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
Q
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
n
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
Q
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural Freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ■
n
n
nl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
13
Q
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
❑
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
i]
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
n
n
■
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
F1
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Q
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS840023 Owner - Facility: !Nevin M Huneycutt Facility Number: 840023
Inspection Date: 05/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? rl
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? n
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
n
n
■
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
■
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
Cl
■
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
n
■
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
■
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
n
n
n
20. Does the faclity fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■
n
❑
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
■
Page: 5

Permit: AWS840023 Owner -Facility: Nevin M Huneycutt Facility Number : 84DO23
Inspection Date: 05118/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
■
Design?
■
Maps?
■
Other?
■
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
n
Cl
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
■
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
■
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
Q
❑
0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
■
n
n
Q
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
o
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AVVS840023 Owner - Facility: Nevin M Huneycutt
• Inspection Date: 05/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 840023
Reason for Visit: Routine
n■nr0
Page: 7

(Type of Visit * Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance i
Reason for Visit m Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: P OG Arrival Time: • Departure Time: bl : d A County: Region: M"
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: �U�rr1 1 •, . �of�Q'4 C.t�- - Phone:,..... --
Mailing Address: 4a -a. CRe-L Ls�F-Pt RoA p [)aKb �k��C.. 'a% 119
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: NOii2VQ_Qj[ Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: iV F-vAmr\_ A Ofd L.d C u I) _ Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: [=0
=.
Longitude: ❑ ° 0 d
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑
Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [% No ❑ NA [:INE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EINE
[]Yes
❑No
[INA
CINE
❑ NA
[:INE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
14 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: 8q — a 3 Date of Inspection / O
❑ Yes
1.2 No
❑ NA
Waste Collection & Treatment
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
1..8 No
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
❑ NE
Structure 6
Identifier: i -.A9,00 n
DQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): a�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[4 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
[5rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[.Z No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
U(No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
Yes
ElE
,,--
X No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Dritl ❑ Application Outside
of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
1.2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
El Yes
1..8 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination' ❑ Yes
bkNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
DQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: CIS -'-133 - �13� a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j 310 {o
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: gLA — a3 Date of Inspection t l oi'
R_eauired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [X NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [XNE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP [3 Checklists [I Design El Maps [I Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NNE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
['XNE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
INE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[X NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[3 NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
W NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
D� NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
10 NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
EX NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[' NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
tic)C�i1>4, LJ AS Cin- ST-'��- �Jlr►I:n �. Cbr� C}� O Cc\% T.RSp E-C}ion
AL
V'M- VAO opE,(ka*Xo'r\S oR �+�`=�,a1s A� +h=s Fwat•�. "Y'11�. L-sa►�oarJ
%lY.�.os -i' Cairn r� c v O� h�Av •i v E C rL-kW) Mu& °C
Page 3 of 3 12/28/04

r
w
Type of Visit X
Inspection
0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation
0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
,�CC6ompliance
1Routine 0 Complaint
0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency
0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time:✓� Departure Time: County: Region: lj v
Farm Name: /UGv'r� �j�,^ACyEkH_ /�/" Owner Email:
Owner Name: #eu /j/f �(� Phone:
I,��
Mailing Address: �y ��� k5zi 'Z P-4• dh�Zd /�2C
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: GtJ•4�' & yC"Af " Title: nWaelC Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ o =t ❑ Longitude: =0=4
°❑4 = 4{
Design Current
❑ No
Desrgn Current
11�1156
i Design $Current
Swine @opacity Popuullatron
et Poultry
Opacity Paulatton
Cattle Capacity Popn� lotion
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La fir
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La fir
❑ Yes
❑ Daia Calf
© Feeder to Finish'`
;9 No
;y��o-
El Dai Heifei
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
�.
❑ Da Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
.,_€
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ La firs
El Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
Non -Layers firs
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
Numher of Structures:
❑ Other
❑ Other
�a
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
i c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
i\3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
� other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes t® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
;9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes � No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes '%No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
kNo
❑ NA
Facility Number: C6 Il— A3 Date of Inspection
t5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[:]
Yes
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes "2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes [ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: CAz oer
❑ NE
Spillway?: o
Designed Freeboard (in): f6
Observed Freeboard (in): 20,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 1K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes '%No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
t5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[:]
Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ee $4, 4-., keep l 1'e...15 4/0w 1<< &,"a
\ ector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Ins
p
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
11/28104 Continued

Facility Number: ec — 73 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No © NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected; did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I . Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No [;RNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [!9NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [RNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 1Z NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 NA ❑ NE
Addrtionai Comments
12/28/04
12/28/04

OF W rF9 Mich l F. Easley
O� QG Governor
Cp 7 William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
] y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
March 27, 2003
Mr. Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Permit Renewal
Certificate of Coverage: AWS840023
Stanley County, NC
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
It has been brought to our attention that the Division's central office in Raleigh has not
received the permit renewal application for your animal facility. The application for renewal
should not to be confused with the annual fee notification that you received in November
2002. Please complete and return the enclosed renewal form immediately. The submitted
information must be process before your current permit expires on April 30, 2003.
The renewal application should be submitted to the address at the bottom of the form.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
e►w�
CusNCDEPiitvice Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT_ REQUESTED
Nevin Hunevcutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
February 24, 2003
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage under the State Non -Discharge General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation General Permits. These permits expire on
April 30, 2003. The Division of Water Quality (Division) staff is currently in the process of renewing these permits and is scheduled
to have the permit reissued by early April 2003. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would be eligible for continued coverage
under the reissued permit.
Although you have informed the Division previously that you are not currently operating your facility, the current permit issued to you
requires that the permit remain active until the animal waste management system (lagoons and/or waste ponds) are properly
permanently closed. Therefore, it will be necessary for you to submit the enclosed form.
The Division has published a public notice regarding these renewed general permits. A copy of the draft.animal waste
operation general permits and fact sheets are available at the website http:11h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/
or by writing or calling:
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], ext. 574
Enclosed you -will find a Permit Coverage Renewal Application Form. The application form must be completed and returned within
60 days from receipt of this letter. You must include a copy of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan with the application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the draft general permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel free to contact J R
Joshi at 919-733-083 extension 363.
Sincerely,
Kim H. Colson, A.E.
Cc: Stanly Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Division of Water Quality
Permit File AWS840023
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
NC DEPT. OF ENVIRONUM
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NOORES111.1"""411 OFFICE
FEB2 6 2003
yt . _
w;.
M '
Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 NcLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
A
• T417i
EL
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Water Quality Section
October 23, 2000
Subject: Wettable Acres Determination
Status & Notification
Nevin Huneycutt Farm, #84-23
Stanly County, NC
You were sent a letter requesting that you provide me with the necessary information to
complete the evaluation of your facility with respect to a Wettable Acres Determination. The result
of this evaluation and the required action to be taken by you is indicated below.
tVBased upon the new information your facility is exempt at this time from undergoing
a Wettable Acres Determination. No further action is necessary at this time.
❑ Information that was provided was not sufficient to exempt the facility from a
Wettable Acres Determination. The Division of Water Quality will notify you at a
later date by certified mail detailing the requirements of a Wettable Acres
Determination.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at the
Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan D. So
hh son
cc: Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 276919-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Nevin Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
A 0-4 ON-% OOM f
NCDEN.R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE5
August 1, 2000
tm.c imri'. L*
WMCNMENT, 1ZAvj
NATURAL R BOURCY
AUG 7 2000
MOD OF Ti11m,MPT4 HANAGEIIED'
UNDE801111 1ENINAt CFRtr
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Facility Number 84-23
Stanly County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited iti the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Alan Johnson on 8126199 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
X The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Alan Johnson the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Alan Johnson, at 919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, NC 28115, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions please contact Alan Johnson at [phone]. If within 90 days you are
unable to provide Alan Johnson with the information you are automatically required
to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within
180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AMrmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
StanIy County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

STANLY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE
26032-C NEWT ROAD
ALBEMARLE, N.C. 28001.
Date: February 18, 2003
Subject: Nevin Huneycutt Pig Farm
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
I, Nevin Huneycutt owner of Nevin Huneycutt Pig Farm Facility # 84-23 request to be removed from the
certified animal operation register. I no longer have hogs at this facility and don't foresee going back into the
business in the future. I plan to maintain the lagoon as my waste plan instructs. There will be no more
Nitrogen added to the lagoon.
-
Signed:
: 7 Date:
,na c
Witness: _ 1 �L�f4� — Date:
.�, -/g-65
FEB 19 2 ;0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
PlMhW'A
E)EEHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 25, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Huneycutt Farm, Facility #: 84-23
Stanly County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on June 20, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this
Office. The facility appeared to be in good shape. However, you need to double check on your
certified farm status. Also, ensure that you have all the required forms and that all records pertaining
to the application of waste are properly filled out.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex GleXson, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Stanly County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, OC FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115Nv*An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 _ „�,_ 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

s
❑ DSWC. Animal Feedlot Operation Review
®-DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site.Inspection
fGIinutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow -ug of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 23 Time of Inspection 3,07 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours �
Farm Status: � Registered El Applied for Permit (ex:.L25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review �.J
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel androcessin )
❑ Not Operational Dante Last Operated : .................................. _......................................J........+........................:....................................
Farm Name:.................. l t. �� ...Ce.�!......... mr �. ..................... County:.......?..T�!. ]..1..............
,..................
......
,.................
Land Owner Name: !l.l ............�/e_A..TT.......................... .. Phone No......... ............ ....1.........................................
Facility Conctact:.................................................................................. Title: ......... Phone No:
MailingAddress:.{.............�..�.L..�ire.'......t.� .............................. S..K............................................. ..`?..�.��.....
OnsiteRepresentative: Integrator:......................................................................................
....... ll
Certified Operator: ,.,,11r. �r�t................ . .. Operator Certification Number: ,C
Location of Farm:
r..:,tz...dr.7......::.isC....:...L .............�. .....�f... L ..........S,L. Xx c .�/....�l .ell a..7 -_... %..`.c . s �: 4
.. ...... ..... .
42
rt;i.u�: ...... :.....44? .......... .'1. ..... ....... is......... � �.a,; ............f.. :.......S.<. c...r....L:,c�.....fF.................... ............... 4 ...........................
. �y
Latitude �'�� ��� Longitude �' �� ��•
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
GenerAj
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4130197 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
M�Vo
❑ Yes
5�No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ Yes
RNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: ...... . ..... —.............
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
allo
R 7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
Q No
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
1KNo
Structures
(Lagoons end/or Holding Ponds)
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
JI No
❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
❑ Yes
...... W..... _ .... ....... ........ _......... ............................ _ ....
............................
❑ Yes
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Wo
21.
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
I No
For
22.
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
E}j No
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff ntering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type � s.� ............................................ ' t" !�.rte.............................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
IgNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
I,No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
(4 No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
R No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
I No
For
22.
Certified Facilities Only
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management flan readily available?
❑ Yes
E}j No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
IR No
Comiments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other. comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): z
t !
t'� ���� Sc�;�y 1n t1U5� 3 Z �� a c� rc.�.� a►� Cxc ���
4
aA-
��eV,�,c 5 G����- �5- Lv
� 1 %
c Zet1l �. �,1• 3 ur US 'C�,,
p P
r 1'�vv►<YC��<<s SG;k �C�� i.uti,t Y`C`iSt�i C�AVL Te
C.r
r
.fur -et(_e
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:Z—
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, F ci ',y� Assessment Unit 4/30/97
Ck %'t

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENVIRON .ENT, EMALT8 ,
& NATL IRAL P179OURCE9
AUG 9 9997
NATURAL RESOURCRO NV ESUE REAL 4Ff1S2-C NEWT ROAD
CONSERVATION eLTEMARLE, NC 28001_
SERVICE 704/ 9B2-691 1
DATE:7-15-97
NC DEPT. OF HEALTH & NAT. RES.
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET
MOORESVILLE, N.C. 28115
Dear Mr. Johnson:
In response to the inspection of the Nevin Huneycutt Facility oe4--23
it appears that there is an error in the stated numbers on the inspection
report. The operation would not be a 200 sow (farrow to finish) + the 600
open ranged hogs. The open ranged hogs are the product: of the 200 sows not
in addition to and are subsequently contained in the on farm steady live
weight of the 200 sow (farrow to finish) operation. See attached letter
from Sue Homewood.
I you have any questions please contact me at the address or phone #
listed above.
Sincerely;
Richard E. Ping
Conservation Tech.
cc: Darryl Harrington
Nevin Huneycutt
SWCD Files

V
State of North Ca, na
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
�.v
I DEHNR
June 5, 1997 r
Subject: Registration Correction
Facility Number 84-23
Stanly County
The Division of water Quality has received your letter requesting a correction of your
anirnal operation registration form. In your letter, you indicated that you dict not correctly register.
the number of animals at your facility. Upon review of the facility tile, the total capacity of this
facility has been corrected to 200 sows, farrow to finish.
If you have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to dill rile at (919) 733-
5083, extension 502.
Sin�:er�:l v.
Sue 1-lonu:wood
I�nvir�nrrirental Engineer
cc: Facility File
Mooresville Regional Office
Rick Pigg, NRCS
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
qr-

03/12/2002 17:02 7049826301 USDA STANLY FSA NRCS PAGE 01/PJ2
*PAM% old ❑ AOhM «V*W o V—u"uOO --"U p --'AGM -MA © Pgz&mn d
[OwBij adiq pus wa4 )pr!`Jl 4= Ixw }a pefgns e(U) pue woo diol MU
cad •a pagwim Quaid ,..� uosuyor uDN 304
Xpj

FoRm WR -2
Y
is
Trac[ rf
Field We (acres) - (A)
Fane Owlrer
Owner a Address
OWj10r's Phone rf
rr�an
Lagowi Irrigation Fields ReCDTd
One Forin ftir Each Field tsar Crop Cycle
o,' I •► ti ,
many Ilritullcr I
h1LJIlJS t, ti-�
irrlgatlnr Operaior 141&,iA/
kdptbn Operelor's ,,e, g 2Z ,N 5 .d m,
AddressC, _ ^'
Operaloes Minor, # 1 07-0c-- ?/ ]'
Frrnn Waste Ulllizallall plarl p
COOP 1 r/ Il90DnrneruleJP� = W
l
- T M ftI t [N1 111 m
[tale
A4
. - Itrlgaliur
VJ"eAif*slsl'AIJ'
lhrl M T.4
P1UrARAW
cuvft rl
AM N (21—
Mara,, .;hv,ce'
i1lOMn)
1131-410)
SM T bw
Erd71rr8
310
Tway
l llrl8!DPMftepHonj
U
/ of Sph+Jllare
Trial Vd ene
WWII@
PM AM
(Inuauc)
! o
/ �8
3
.�
Tom_
,
Crop Cycle Totals I I
owners Sianalure Olvtabi's Skpelme
Cerllfled Opaialor (rldll) Opelelar's CerGrcalkur No.
t NCDA Wasla Anaylysis or Equivelenl ar NRGS Cal mate, Tedrr*xf Guide Seaton M3.
= EMer the voW secelved bysn6hadirrgeoft m (IQ ftm (a). coaltnuo sublredbV cokmu, {1al Gorr colunm (11) r000ww each f4rkM&M rs+rerd.
##NOTB-. Field Sa will be Irri{aled in 2 liekrp6 consisting oil sprinkler heads per setup for a total of 1`4 he di, Tech schip trill gxxole for 180 rlrirnues or MA) minutes low
nwtinn. Each head will operate fora fatal of 180 minft per application cycle. Fack cetop ooven I . s5 acres fora Met of 3.1 acres in The nnctl ed arca
C
U)
d
3>
Ln
i
D
z
r
M
W.
D
G)
C9
N
N

o�0� w A r�9Q�
C
O -C
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 Mel -ester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J, Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
March 11, 2002
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Site Inspection, Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Certificate of Coverage: AWS840023
Stanly County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 7,
2002. Based on his observations made during the inspection, the area around the lagoon and
nursery requires maintenance. A review of your IRR -2 form revealed that the values in the column
titled "# of sprinklers" were omitted when calculating the nitrogen balance. It was also noted that
the value in the column titled "total minutes" should be 180, rather than 360.
It is request that a corrected copy of the waste application records for the past year be
submitted to this office by April 20, 2002. The records should be mailed to the attention of Mr.
Johnson.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
N D EN -1 R
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex G eason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3/7/2002 Time:
Facility Number 84 23
=Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
Farm Name: Nr.Yi.R.B.UtlfY.ClLU.F79 M............................................................................. County. Stwa ................................................. MQ...........
OwnerName: N>~Yun....................................... Huncy.cutt................................................. Phone No: 704::4.85-.4.I&7............................................................
Mailing Address: X6422.M~hlc5jCr.jRd. ............................. ...... t?,�f�bctr�t.�C......................_...... 2�124..............
......................................... .................
FacilityContact:.---............................._............................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: NEYjN.HI.IMXCJUT1.......................................................... Integrator: .................................... ..................................... I............
Certified Operator:NeARA RumaclutUr.......................... Operator Certification Number.
Location of Farm:
From intersect of SR 1115 (Liberty Hill Ch. Rd.) and SR 1975 (McLester), travel South on Sr 1975 about 100 yards, on Left. +
OR. ..... SW of Albemarle, about I mi East of Red Cross on Hwy 27/24, Sout on Liberty Mill, back Left on McLester Rd.,
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� ��� Longitude
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish 200 96
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design . :Current _
C anar_ity Panulation
Design Current u :Design 'Current':
Poultry.. Capacity •Po ulation .',Cattle Bpacllq 1po elation t
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer a
❑Non -Dairy
IQ -Other I I -
;Total Des's'ign=Capacity: ` 200
TOW SSLW'.283,400 '
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 113 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds LSolid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges b: Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: [3Lagoon [3Spray Field E]Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [:]No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other, than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... .........................................................
.......................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 26
05103101 Continued

i�
acility Number:_ 84-23
Date of Inspection 3/7/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered, yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Rye
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑,Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
--ALL COLUMNS ON THE IRR -2 FORMS NEED TO BE PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
--THE VALUE IN THE COLUMN TITLED "TOTAL MINUTES" ON THE IRR -2 FORM SHOULD BE LISTED AS 180 RATHER
AN 360.
--THE NUMBER OF IRRIGATION HEADS USED WHILE APPLYING WASTE WAS NOT USED IN CALCULATING THE
NITROGEN BALANCE. HOWEVER, NO OVER APPLICATION OF NITROGEN APPEARED TO HAVE OCCURRED.
Reviewer/Inspector Name K�OHNSON %� r;,� y
ReviewerAnspector Signature: Date: 7
05/03/01 / Continued

4'
Facility Number: 84,23 Date of Inspection 3/7/2002
Odor U5=
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
05/03/01
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes ❑ No
r'q
J

of wArF9
Michael F. Easley
�O Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Sm
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 16, 2002
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Operation Review/Compliance
Nevin Huneycutt Farm, Facility #: 84-23
Stanly County, NC
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a teminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Pian, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm pian must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must he adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm pian. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
4 -
Alan D. Johnson /
Environmental Specialist II
iiCDFqR-
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
1 800 623-7748 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

r
l��
of WarF9 Michael F. Easley
Q, Governor
C� r William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
4 `C Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 11, 2001
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McL.ester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Certificate of Coverage: AWS840023
Site Inspection Report
Stanly County, NC
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July 10, 2001.
Based on his observation made during the inspection, the facility appeared to be properly
maintained; and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which
should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or
me at [phone].
Sincerely, ,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PRONE (704) 663-
1699
1 800 623-7748 FAX (704) 663-
6040

Type of Visit A-C.,ompiiance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit )t_Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
1 10 Facility Number Date of Visit: c� Time:
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name A4:2.0........ 141./..71:'.C:.i<�.�1'
1,1,124 ................ County:..... -.--.......... ...............................
Owner Name: ................. T41-1 K
Phone`Io:...........5~/...........�c...........................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: A-�ZZ
...�................................... 1 c �C bG ..............
Onsite Representative:.....
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: .........................................
jq Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• C�` �•`
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer " ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JC3 Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars IJUta1:SSIW.
Number ofI;ago .: A:,
ons : ❑ Subsurface Drains PresenLJIEILagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holdrttg Ponds / Solid Traps. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If' dischar-e is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharve bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Z. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes As No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes - ❑ No
❑ Yes ,95 -No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ONO
01/01/01 Continued

�f acility i'�ujnucr: —
'�Vaste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection Q
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ...................... I ................................... ...................................
Freeboard (inches):/i ......
—14 ............................................................................................
❑ Yes �LNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pondine ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes
R No
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ Yes
J,No
❑ Yes
�, o
❑ Yes
,®.No
❑ Yes
9� No
❑ Yes
9No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designatedinthe Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes &�No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes )E No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
J8 -No
17,
Are rock ops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Is thereter supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
98.No
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
J!J-No
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
JB -No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
A94No
23.
Did the facility fail to have a activeiy certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
Z_No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes &No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? Cl Yes B -No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Bdyo
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �Wo
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 0-PFe
01/01/01 Continued

I
l Facility Number: _ f Date of Inspection 0 Printed nn: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes $2_No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �rNo
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
01/01/01

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Nevin Huneycutt
1642.E NcLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE=SOURCES
Water Quality Section
October 23, 2000
Subject: Wettable Acres Determination
Status & Notification
Nevin Honeycutt Farm, #84-23
Stanly County, NC
You were sent a letter requesting that you provide me with the necessary information to
complete the evaluation of your facility with respect to a Wettable Acres Determination. The result
of this evaluation and the required action to be taken by you is indicated below.
Based upon the new information your facility is exempt at this time from undergoing
a Wettable Acres Determination. No further action is necessary at this -time.
.El Information that was provided was not sufficient to exempt the facility from a
Wettable Acres Determination. The Division of Water Quality will notify you at a
later date by certified mail detailing the requirements of a Wettable Acres
Determination. -
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at the
Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
7
Alan D. 3ohAson
cc: Non Discharge Compliance Unit
File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax 919-715-G(148
. y - • VZ�_..., 44_ A �f.,.. Vmn1nvPr 50% recaclec00% post•comm nler paper

^':1AME9eH.'H&NT JR.
S _GOVERNOR —
"BILL HOLMAN
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVIL,L,E REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 23, 2000
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Huneycutt Farm, Facility #: 84-23
Stanly County, NC
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on October 17, 2000. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency for failing
to maintain a record of the waste storage pond's freeboard levels. However, the
facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and with the exception of the
above note deficiency the files were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection
report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
T
JzST0 I U
910 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 213115
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER — SO% RECYCLEO/10% POSTCONSUMER PAPER

•
d(Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit WCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
t Faciiity Number t�
i
Dale ur visit
I -lint: CKJ Printed un: 7/21/2000
i
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Mi'ermitted QZ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified L7 Registered
Farm Name: ...............Fa�:1.�t��.4r.... �......p........ ��? C.. �?........�..[..........................
Owner Name:............ I ' �llC.r?.............. .! �+.r.�.>`' {..G.c�...l.!............... ........
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County: . ...............................
Phone No: ..,._4,�.7 ......... ­zf.!.r.7 ....................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................'Titic:................................................................ Prone No: ...............................................
�laiiin� Address:...... r.(�.�`...Z.........f%�.L�.S t..... ..............c.l`� �..�.Z..i.......
....... ............................................... ..........
OnsiteRepresentative: ............. .............................. ................................................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ,,,?',i%/I J✓, Operator Certificatirrn Number: I�.
................... P .................�t'�..
Location of Farm:
b Swine Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �' �s<
Design Current
Swine Canacity Pooulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrnw to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
] -Farrow to Finish7� �;''p•
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Caaacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Nun -Layer. JE1 Non -Dairy
�❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons ED
Number Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holditnc Ponds / Solid Traps No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Diseharues & Stream Imi)actr•
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes/ No
DischarL,e ori__inated at: ;] Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convcyanuc man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If ditchame is observed, did it rcaL:h Water (if the State'' (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
L. lf' dischar,•c is observcd, what is the estimated flov., in <Lalhnin`'
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system:) (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of4he State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes VNo
Waste Collection & TreatmLnt
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes i@ No
Structurc 1 Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:...................................................................................................._............................_......._........._..._...........................
Freehoard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Faeijity Number: , — Hate of Inspection 1� Printed on: 7/21/2000
'5. Are there any imm,-diate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancclimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management. systerri other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. !gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
NA, asle Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN E]Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
��
❑ Yes
9; No
❑ Yes
,C No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
,4 No
❑ Yes
ZZNo
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ Yes
B�No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rettuirt!d Records & Document
17. Pail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design. maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? he/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports}
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
,(ie/ discharge. freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
: Ia M61biti6nis'oe. difflcier ies -Were h6 ted- dtt-z;ing this'visit' .:Y:oii*ill-feb6*ce Bio; fufth& -
carresporide' 6e' ab' this visit:
El Yes j�No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes QNo
❑ Yes [�,No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes O.No
,® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes NLNo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ®-No
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes q,No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other: comments..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
k: {� ���a,>,!
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector signature:
Date: A6 /7_ J 5/00

Facility Number: i — Dale of IItspection 0 Printed on: 712112000
Odor Issues
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 0
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 1
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
2& is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 2,No
roads, building structure. and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes UkNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan biade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) []Yes ITSNo
_31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submersed rill pipe or a permanent temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
A.
qF
5100

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT
AGRICULTURE
October 18, 2000
Alan Johnson
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Alan,
NATURAL RESOURCES
CONSERVATION
SERVICE
26032-C NEWT ROAD
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001
7041982-6811
giz .'ow, o7
ItONMENT. HEAL IA
& NATURAL gMOURCES
OCT
wiffou o1 am
Attached is the information we discussed for Nevin Huneycutt. I have measured
the wetted area as installed and completed the D1, D3 - D6 sheets. D2 did not apply since
it dealt with a traveling gun. Mr. Huneycutt should be keeping records for field 5a which
is a portion of the total field. Any surplus waste will be applied to the remainder of field 5
and other fields listed in WUP if needed by means of a honeywagon. Let me know if you
need more.
Tha
nks,
ard. Pigg
Soil Cons. Technician
REPldlu
Enclosure

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 1, 2000
CERTIFIED MAUL
RETURN_ RECEIPT REQUESTED
Nevin Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
AW
NCDEN.R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
D� 19 Com; L1 Er -Si [I \19—
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Facility Number 84-23
Stanly County
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Alan Johnson on 8126199 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X".
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Alan Johnson the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Alan Johnson, at 919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, NC 28115, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions please contact Alan Johnson at [phone]. If within 90 days you are
unable to provide Alan Johnson with the information you are automatically required
to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within
180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%a post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her,conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to taste appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit. revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Stanly County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

f
Landowner/Operator Name:
Address:
Telephone:
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
/G 42Z 1K* SrEr ed(
e
log 49s-- V87P
_
County: !c�
Date:
EXI®IT D-1
Field'
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Fleld2 Slope
(acres) Soil/Type (%)
Crop(s)
Maxtmum
Application
Rate3
(Whr)
Maximum
Appllcation
per Irrigation
Cycle3
(Inches) Comments
ISee attached map.
ZTotal field acreage minus required buffer areas.
3Refer to N. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section U G. Atmual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

y'y
EXHIBIT D-3
TABLE 3 - Solid Set Irrigation Gun Settings
Make, Model and Type of Equipment:
Field No
and
Line Not
Number of
H drants
Wetted
Diameter
feet
Hydrant Spacing (ft)
Along Between
Pipeline Pipelines
Application
Rate
In/hr
OPERATING PARAMETERS
Nozzle Operating Operating
Diameter Pressure Time
inches Gun ( si) (iOH dram hr
Comments
137
.57
-5-0,64
7-
I See attached map.
ZShow separate entries for each pipeline with hydrants in each field.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

TABLE 4 -Irrigation System Specifications
I
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
Desiener may nrovide thrust block details on separate sheet,
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION AREA (sq. ft.
90° Bend
Dead End r
Tee
ISee USDA -MRCS Field Office Tecluiicat Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-13D.
MIt:1 WM.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996
Traveling
Irrl ation Gun
Solid Set
Irri ation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
171
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
i
Design Precipitation Rate (In/hr)
Hose Length (feet)
xxxxx xx
Type of Speed Compensation
XXXXXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
EI,ce- X�. G
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
l
I
TABLE 5 - Thrust Block Specifications
Desiener may nrovide thrust block details on separate sheet,
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION AREA (sq. ft.
90° Bend
Dead End r
Tee
ISee USDA -MRCS Field Office Tecluiicat Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-13D.
MIt:1 WM.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

ENJUBIT D-5
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name- if GUa11
Company: a,�
Address: '`�7`C .� �t7 .i % 2--� /v(O�i�!
po
Phone: 7 6 �Zj7Z
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
I. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources and/or calculations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of thrust blocks and illustrations of all tlrnist block configurations required in the system.
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s).
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA -MRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Teclwical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430 -DD.
A. 'Ihe information required by this form are the minimum requirements. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as
appropriate,
9. Irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of (lie designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip 50 feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

EXHIBIT D-6
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe the operation of the system in the space provided below or on a similar sheet most convenient to the designer/supplier.
Include procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
I ill / t 1fPF
ran
/ r
../ — • �iAll lll;i1JJ1:d 561iii /
�Z
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Nevin Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd,
Oakboro NC 28129
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
T U1W
/ • •
NCDEN.R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 1, 2000 22D ''..�� n /�7
L5 @ E J, `J -�
AS r 7 2000
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Facility Number 84-23
Stanly County
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part of your
plan.
An evaluation by Alan Johnson on 8126199 was made to review the actual number of acres at your facility
that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of the
following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X". -
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Alan Johnson the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Alan Johnson, at 919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, NC 28115, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any
questions please contact Alan Johnson at [phone]. If within 90 days you are
unable to provide Alan Johnson with the information you are automatically required
to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within
180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Afririnative Action Employer 50%a recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her`conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and .the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
1$0 days. If the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWO will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit. revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWO and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should. be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Stanly County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

e�l
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 5, 1999
NEVIN HUNEYCUTT
NEVIN HUNEYCUTT FARM
16422 MCLESTER ROAD
OAKBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 28129
101?0WA
IT 0
A&4 12
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWS840023
Additional Information Request
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Stanly County
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by September 4, 1999:
The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists the application window for Bermuda as March through September.
The Sixth Guidance Memorandum to Technical Specialist dated August 18, 1997 states that the last
application of animal waste is to be applied to Bermuda prior to August 31 and that an additional 50 pounds
per acres of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) can be applied to the small grain between September 15 and
October 30 and also from February to March. Please have your technical specialist revise the application
window on the Bermuda to April through August and the small grain to September through March.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before September 4, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincerely,
2san Cawley
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Nevin.Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
e��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NgT{dRa�Z�SQURGES
MMRONMENT, HF A1;Th
P NATURAL RggoUkr.t�
December 30, 1999
NJ 11 200
MWV7' Gf RIG M' , MT41 MANA AMU]
"311-1IfE REM% Uffigf
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 84-23
Stanly County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectorsand Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to.contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Stanly County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyeled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North'Carolina
Department of Environment
and Nat 'al Resources
Division aater Quality
James B. tYnt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr -T. Stevens, Director
December 10, 1999
NEVIN HUNEYCUTT
NEVIN HUNEYCUTT FARM
16422 MCLESTER RD.
OAKBORO NC 28129
601?WA
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS840023
Y �
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Stanly County
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
In accordance with your application received on February 5, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Nevin Huneycutt, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Nevin Huneycutt Farm, located in Stanly County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 200 Farrow to Finish and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

MCI M.
rANqR0NMF N1 V,
P 'IIA URA➢, 'Mg'(JI•�i l y
Certificate of Coverage AWS840023
Nevin Huneycutt Farm f1 11)99
Page 2 KY
b
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application rfiuftiboFs te&fo
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If an arts requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have' right to
YP � q � P ,Y ,. g
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Since r y,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Stanly County Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Stanly County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources RECEIVED
Division of Water Quality RECEIVED
Division
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form FEB Q 5 599
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
.General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
wort-UISCharge Permitting
The following questions have been completed utilizing information�an;fle��Yth;{he 141 ��is,iotn. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections yvl ieh.Vl are a1 1pprop_`rgpte. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Nevin Huneycutt Farm __ __ ;:;;,;; • ��t�y r,..K
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Nevin Hunevcutt
1.3 Mailing address: 16422 Mclester Rd.
City, State: Oakboro RTC Zip: 28129 -
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-485-4187
1.4 County where facility is located: Stanly
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From intersect of SR 1 115 (Liberty Hill Ch. Rd.) and
SR 1975 (McLester), travel South on Sr 1975 about 100 yards, on Left. OR ...... SW of Albemarle, about l mi East of Red
Cross on Hwy 27/24 , Sout on Liberty Mill, back Left on McLester Rd. , 100 yards on left.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): 1
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/84
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.; `84 (county number); 23 (facility number).
es
2.2 Operation Dcription Swine operation
F—arrow to Finish
200- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct?yes; j__J no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num ear or which the waste management structures were desi;ned.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean'to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98
Page 1 of 4 84-23

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 54.4 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 3.1
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or O please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
q/9
oNO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? ,`07 .3 - -
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? .3
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied -to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3. 10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3. t2 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3. 16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 2 of 4 84.- 23
Applicants Initials

Facility Number: 84 - 23
Facility Name: Nevin Huneycutt Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
RECj=jVED
V.jATER Cit pjw SEC71 IC'd
rtd 0 5 '1999
Nor, -Discharge Petmitling
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for {Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed me and i accura and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature %&� "n, Date /_ % / �_ 9
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
If fftinN,�ru_'71�/ar (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for. Alp-y,4eKzl"�l ,C¢4W_ __(Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returnedas 'ncomplete
/ �
Sign ature^ Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 3 of 4 84-23

j
o
�-1
-A
`
�
'
8
\
----__---'__—_—__---'— '___—/-
`

t, a WASTE— UT I L I ZAT I GJ PLAN
Amount of TsTaste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
Q animals X104 A (amt.) waste/animal/year = � (am /)
waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
.2QO animals X_ lbs. PAN/animal/year = ,� lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 533)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown and surface application:
Table .1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tct. Fld Soil Crop RYE Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# _No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
Total a
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such -as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned• that -P and K may be aver applied
while meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations"may y
require that operators in some areas of North Carolina have' a r- }`= r<• : �?'
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients: -.0 Thi§p1�i r •` syr
only addresses Nitrogen
! fs rnea. S o -f /V aoc�IeAe Ox/ `=
oZ So jr�ca v _ 3 SA,tAr- /�esc e ~ 3Ty�� C

f, k, WASTE. UTILIZATI4.-. PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land (see Required Specification 2))
Tract. Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I ! I I I
I I I I I I I I I
Total ! I !
*. See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
L'Ll
Table 2
Total 80
Amount of N Produced I RS,�fI.O I
surplus or Deficit I .247=1
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Paan roust contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
Vill be nutrient rich and vill require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
3

0, Its
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land appEcation of sludge at
agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and willrequire precautionary measures to prevent
over application of nutrients or other elements.See attached Wrap showing the fields to be used for
the utilization of waste water.
Your facility is designed for QC days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be
removed on the average of once every 3 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed Elevation / "
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste
APPLICATION BY IRRIGATION
Field
No
Soil Type
Crop Application
ate(ln/Hr)
App cation
Amount(In.)
7 v1,��y�' �i�laxiAi�crrr o . 9S �'�e�es
fie," a�0/�'�.cr�i!�J>
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION,
HOWEVER A SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Narrative of Operation:

�7rye LAGOON LIQUID PUMPING SCHEDULE
JAN
Cycles/Month_____
Cycle 1 Date___—____
Cycle 2 Date ---------
FEB
Cycles/Month___
Cycle I Date --- -----
Cycle 2 Date_________
Cycle
3 Date ----------
Cycle
3 Date --- -------
Total
N Applied_________
Total
N Applied ___-_____
Depth
below overflow- „_
Depth
below overf lowA8"'
Cycles/Month____
Cycte. I Date_-_—____
jCycle 2 Date__----_-_
Cycle 3 Date ----------
Total N Applied -----------
Depth below overflow_ 5L -
SEPTEMBER
Cycles/Month---0 -_
Cycle 1 Date --- —____
Cycle 2 Date_________
JUNE
Cyc(es/Month_____f
Cycle I Date --- —____
Cycle 2 Date ____-____
Cycle 3 Date--
Total
ate_Total N Applied----------
Depth
______Depth below overflow___
OCTOBER
Cycles/Month--'_ -Z
MARCH
Cycles/Month-__ _.2-
Cycle I
Cycle 2 Date ---------
Cycle 3
Total N Applied---------
Depth below overflow 30
NOVEMBER
Cycles/Month___
APRIL
Cycles/Month___ 3r
Cycle I Date___—____
Cycle 2 Date -------__
-ycle 3 Date
Total N Applied--__---
-
Depth below overf low S __
AUGUST
Cycles/Month-.
Cycle 1 Date------__
Cycle 2 Date ---------
I
___-__-_
,ycle .3 Date___--_____
Total' N Applied_________
Depth below overf low
DECEMBER
Cycles/Month___ ? _
Cycle 1
i U; Y ,.
Cycles/Month_
Cycle I
Date_______
Cycle 2
Date___—____
Cycle 3
Date ----------
Total N
Applied
Depth below overflow "V
NOVEMBER
Cycles/Month___
APRIL
Cycles/Month___ 3r
Cycle I Date___—____
Cycle 2 Date -------__
-ycle 3 Date
Total N Applied--__---
-
Depth below overf low S __
AUGUST
Cycles/Month-.
Cycle 1 Date------__
Cycle 2 Date ---------
I
___-__-_
,ycle .3 Date___--_____
Total' N Applied_________
Depth below overf low
DECEMBER
Cycles/Month___ ? _
Cycle 1
Date --- -----
Cycle
1
Cycle
Cycle 1
Date___—____
Cycle 2
Date
lCycle
2 Datey---------
Total
Cycle 2
Date ---------
Cycle 3 Date ----------
Cycle 3 Date -----------
Cycle
3 Date
Cycle 3 Date
Total N Applied_________
Total N Applied
Total
N Applied_________
Total N Applied_________
Depth be low overf low1e___
---------
Depth be low overf low_3 "
Depth
below overf low /-)---_
Depth bet ow overf low -J,
•1-- Each Cycle
contains fes_ lbs of Plant
ava i table
n i trogen /acre 6PR/V) -tee K�
2 ---Above cyles
and depth below overflow are
an estimate, Adjust cycles and depth os operation
dictates to
allow for adequate fIushwater
and storage depths to prevent overflow,
u

v04
J411;
Vle
r

u

~ � U.* C. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICIMUlt
Soil Conservation Service
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT
,
county: S2�0 �y�
Address:
8 LENGTH
NC -ENG -40
Rev. 7/91
to : 8 /7,93_
l ; SIDE BLOPE .?_TO 1 /
AVE. TOP ELEV. dot.
��O 1
j97
AVE. BOTTOM ELEV. I
'� --LENGTH
• io3'
(See beck for voluble calculations)
Use of facility: T�
Capacity: r Gallons
Soil Type:
Bench -Mark Description
Bottom
Normal Liquid Level
Storage for normal Precip.
Maximum Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm Storage
Crest ESW
Max.Flow Depth
Freeboard
Top of Dam
Elev.
Elev.
(+)
Ft.
Elev.
(+)
Ft.
Elev.
(+)
Ft.
{+)
Ft.
Elev.

VOLUME OF A TRAPEZOIDAL PIT
One equation for calculating the volume of a trapezoidal pit is:
Volume - depth [(area of top) + (area of bottom) + (4 * area
6
of midsection)2 Ft3
Another equation for determining the volume of a trapezoidal
excavated pit with constant side slopes is:
V - wdL + Zd2 (4/3 Zd. - w , L)
where:
V = total volume of the pit in ft3.
w - width of the pit at top in feet.
d = depth of the pit at top in feet.
L = length of the pit at top in feet.
Z = side slope
for 2 to 1 use Z - 2
for 21/2 to 1 use Z - 21/2
NOTE:
Dimensions used must be constructible. Always check for narrow,
deep -pits. For correct results the following must be true.
- w must be greater than 2Zd
L must be greater than 2Zd

SCS- EN C-539
Re.. 5-74
U. S. OEPARTMENT OF ACRICULTURF
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
WATERS1i&-q%REA K�EA:S�ME
�
'' '_At�4" STURE-AiRES.- ... /i a RME
••• • • . • •
SKETCH OF PROPOSED PO�"HqWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (Approz. scale lot- --feet).
■
■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■
ONE
■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■E
NEON
...ter
■ruffiss
ON
■■■E■■■
EMEMIMMEME■
ON
■E■%■E■E'Lat■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■ice
:: �■■■■■■■�
■
■■■■■
■■■
■N1■'."!*'
-TI ■MOM -■11■■■'
■■■■■
NONE
■■EN■E■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■
MEN
■■N■■E■■■■■■■■■■E■■■■
■■■■E■■■EEEEE■■■■■■■
■■MINE
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
BORING NUMBER AND..
_-.1Cortionued an bdrA uAvro mooLuarvi Show motor table alavoila"s on darn -saw boringir.
2MPi��I■I■i■■'■I■■I■'■1■lflII■i■i■f■I■R■'■I■1■I■I■
�m�l■1■`■i■�I
�■}■I■'■�■�■■f■
vs©E �©�r■�oo�m�m�m�m�mE®mimim�mioGmioi:
■'■■I■1■i■I■'■I■1■i■I■�■I■I■I
■■�■■I■ ■I■'■l�I�■SCJ ■I■�
BORINGS MADE BYA&A6,3:29& SIGNATURE & .�.
qy&1-21 10,4v

TYPES OF MATERIAL ENCOUNTERED IN BORINGS
(Use one of systems below)
UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION
USDA CLASSIFICATION
GW -Well graded gravels; gravel, sand mix
g - gravel
GP- Poorly graded gravels
s - sand
GM -Silty gravels: gravel -sand -silt mix
vfs-very fine sand
GC -Clayey gravels; gravel -sand -clay mix
sl -sandy loam
SW -Well graded sands; sand -gravel mix
fsl-fine sandy loam
SP -Poorly graded sands
1 -loam
SM -Silty sand
gl- gravelly loam
SC -Clayey sands; sand -clay mixtures
si-silt
ML - Silts; silty, v. fine sands; sandy or clayey silt
ail -silt loam
CL -Clays of low to medium plAsticity
cl-clay loam
CH- Inorganic clays of high plasticity
sicl -silty clay loam
MH -Elastic silts
scl -sandy clay loam
OL -Organic silts and silty clays, low plasticity
sic -silty clay
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity
c -clay
1. Suitable materiai for embankment i+ available rVlYea o Na ff..dimrr mMn 1r,wrwe on fA. �tehM o�
ki'
r�,ers� andel
REMARKS:
2. F.xpla,in harxrd■ requiring special attention in design r ..ma.. ,v+rno,..out oft)
GENERAL REMARKS:
24 26 26 27 281 291-30 3I 32 33 34 35 361137
jj 38 1391140 41 42 43 44 45 j 46 1 47 48 1491150 151
Ij
i
I
R

' GENERAL
These specifications are to be made a part of detailed engineering plans of the pro-
posed embankment, spillway(s), and reservoir.
No changes nor deviations from these plans and specifications shall be allowed without a
written amendment, in advance of change, from the responsible technician of the Soil Conser-
vation Service.
All facilities for impounding water shall comply strictly with all state and local laws
regulating such activity.
The Soil Conservation Service makes no warranty, expressed or implied, of the impounding
structure or the water holding ability of the structure.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF:
A. Landowners:
The landowner will acquaint himself with the provisions of these plans and specifications
to determine that the completed structure will fulfill his present and future needs. Inspection
during construction will be the responsibility of the landowner.
He may request inspection by SCS employees during construction and upon completion of work.
where benefits are to be received from Government agencies, or when the dam falls under the
Dam Safety Law of 1967, inspection and approval by SCS employees are mandatory.
B. Contractors:
The contractor will acquaint himself with the provisions of these plans and specifications,
conditions at the site that may affect his schedule of operation, and the location and meaning
of all stakes on the site. Failure to do so will not relieve him of the difficulties and cost
pursuant to satisfactorily completing the work in compliance with these plans and specifications
and any written or verbal contract with the landowner. All bench marks, grade, and line stakes
will be left undisturbed and protected by the contractor to facilitate construction and in-
spection.
The contractor, weather permitting, will schedule his work so that he will start on the
agreed date and work will be a continuous operation until satisfactorily completed. All
damages occurring to completed work or materials, by the elements or otherwise, during con-
struction, will be the responsibility of the contractor. Partial`ur damaged work and/or re-
placed materials damaged from any cause will be paid for by the contractor. Absence of in-
spections during construction will not relieve the contractor from completing the work in
strict compliance with these plans and specifications.
Upon completion of the work, before moving his equipment, the contractor will request a
final inspection by the landowner and an employee of the SCS. The contractor will then receive
approval that all work has been completed satisfactorily and/or he may complete those items that
vary from the plans and specifications in order that a final inspection will result in approval.
C. U. S. Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service:
The United States and its employees are in no manner a party to any verbal or written
contract between the landowner and the contractor. SCS employees, within limit of personnel
available, will inspect and advise on techniques during construction to assure satisfactory
compliance with the plans and specifications.
SCS employees will, upon reasonable notice, conduct a final inspection for strict compli-
ance with all plans and specifications concerning this structure. Inspection will determine
the satisfactory completion of work so that (a) approval may be given for the eligibility of
the landowner to receive benefits from any Government agency concerned with this structure,
(b) final payment may be made to the contractor, and (c) the pool may be filled under the
provisions of the Dam Safety Law of 1967.
-2-

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NC -ENG -13b
Soil Conservation Service Rev. 5183
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PONDS AND RESERVOIRS
Clearing: All trees and brush shall be removed from the impoundment area before any water is
impounded. Whenever practical, this clearing should be delayed until after the dam is built to
hold erosion and downstream sedimentation to a minimum. Stumps may be removed or trees may be
sawed off as low as practical and stumps left standing.
'file foundation of the impoundment structure (dam) shall be cleared of all trees,
stumps., roots, brush, sod, and debris. All stumps and all roots exceeding one (1) inch in
diameter shall. be removed to a minimum depth of one (1) foot. Satisfactory disposition will
be made of all debris.
After clearing is completed the foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly and
roughly leveled, with suitable equipment, before placement of any embankment material.
Cutoff Trench: A cutoff trench shall be excavated as shown on the plans. The cutoff trench
shall be backfilled in thin layers, not to exceed 8 inches in depth. All standing water shall
be removed from the trench before backfilling is started.
Embankment Construction: The material placed in the embankment shall be free of sod, roots,
stones over 6 inches in diameter, and other objectionable materials. The fill material shall
be placed and spread over the entire fill in layers not to exceed 8 inches in thickness. Con-
struction of the fill shall be undertaken only at such times that the moisture content of the
fill material will permit a reasonable degree of compaction.
Fill Materials: Borrow areas will be designated on the plans and assigned priority (1, 2, 3,
etc.). All fill material shall be taken from these designated areas. SCS technicians will
advise the contractor regarding the maximum depth of cut in each borrow area. The contractor
will not exceed this depth. In the event this depth is exceeded in the impoundment area, it
shall be the responsibility of the contractor, without additional cost to the landowner, to
cover the exposed area with a minimum of 2 feet of impervious material.
Riser & Conduit Pipe: When it is indicated on the plans that a riser and conduit pipe a
quire 'trey -m stalled as a complete unit. The inlet of a protected.
by an inverted bucket -type, or an o trash rack.�Theconduit shall be
placed on a firm foun ackfill material s a d the riser and
n avers not exceeding G inches and each successive layer ghly compac
S
M
rr
Vegetated Spillway(s): Spillway(s) will be excavated in undisturbed earth to the dimensions,
grades, slopes, and location as shown in the plans and as staked upon the ground.
Pollution Control During _Construction: Stripping of embankment and borrow areas shall be done
as they are needed in a normal sequence of construction. Use temporary mulch protection on all
disturbed areas that are subject to erosion and will not have substantial additional work per-
formed for 30 days or more. Temporary stream crossing structures will be used where fording of
streams will cause excessive sediment pollution. Protection against pollutants such as
chemicals, fuel, lubricants, sewage, etc., will be provided during construction.
Vegetation: A11 exposed embankment, spillway, and borrow area shall be seeded to an adapted
type of vegetation as soon as possible after construction.
Special Provisions:
(continued on back)

-2 -
Design Capacity for Anaerobic Lagoon Treatment and Odor Control
Use cu. ft./lb. or 5;02 cu. ft./animal
1. .302 (lbs) or (animals) x yTQ2g__(cu.ft./lb) or (cu.ft./animal) _
/70 _ cu. ft.
If
2. Estimate size of lagoon: e�, x o2 x (o w/,e? ss =
length width depth
cu. ft.
Design for Holding Pond
Design period days. (Longest anticipated period before pumpout)
25 -year storm inches. Normal precipitation less evaporation
for design period -5 inches.
Waste production = ..Oe lbs/day/lb. live wt.
3. Volume of waste = / 7D� lbs. live wt. x . D_lbs. da lb.ly. wt.
62, bs cu. t.
x GO days = 078.5 cu. ft.
4. Volume of waste water = 11'Q al/da /animal x animals
7.5 ga cu.ft.,
x days = 129 cu. ft.
5. N =
12 in/ft .. length width
6..Normal precipitation less evaporation on holding pond surface for design period =
.,5
inches x ft. xft. = x.30? cu. ft.
12 in/ft engt width
7.—.Storage -requi^^a,-w-e.-�� dear sEetao.:—lagoon surf-aee--�
12 in ft T—ength width --
8. Storage required for 25 -year storm on holding pond surface =
in. x / ft. x ft. .31V51cu. ft.
12 in /ft length width

�• USDA -SCS
Raleigh, N. C.
Rev. 2/82
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Engineering Design Work Sheet
Field Office _�}� ate --/e _ Design byDate_8-? S3 _
Owner's Name Z
Location
(attach watershed location sketch)
Population (est) within 1/4 mi. 40- l g No. of inhabited houses within
1/4 mi.` Distance to nearest inhabited house other than
operator's 8.�0
Type of livestock _ Type of operation (check one)
Farrow to finish Farrow to feeder pig k"*' Finish -Other
I
Type of confinement facility (flush, pit, number of houses, dimension.of
houses, etc.) �/) �r16xloo "
m
Type of
waste treatment: Anaerobic
lagoon & holding pond
,-Anaerobic
lagoon
with holding volume
holding pond
pit or tank
other
i
Method^of handling waste when design capacity is reached (i.e., pump & irrigation,
honeywagon, etc.) �Sc'c✓Scszlc AA�7z-
Lagoon_ & Storage Resign Data
Type, number, and sizes of livestock:
sows x al bs= ( 70 z lbs
boars x lbs = lbs
pigs x lbs lbs
— pigs x —lbs -- lbs
Total No. for.design or: Total lbs for design /�� 704- lbs.

9. Total capacity needed for holding pond (add Vs 3, 4, 5, b, 7, & B)
7 cu. ft.
10. Total capacity needed for treatment lagoon (add Ps 1 & 9 when treatment
lagoon & holding pond are one component) _ % cu. ft.
Planned Capacity for Treatment Lagoon -
,-12f ft. x d ft. ft. w/ :_� ss =
avg. length avg. width avg. depth
_Z?W0 cu. ft.
r4 jr,1/n XP -0' 6 ; .Z 21.34 o
Planned Capacity for Holding Pond
ft. x ft.
avg. lengt avg. widtF
_ cu. ft.
x ft.
avg.ept
W,45T,F UT-rl,.�zR,z.4=041
w/e_:ss =
y sc,4e Zoo /6s 4 ac
SCS C33 -/O
. AC
.:-7 D, �ac

M
operation and Maintenance Plan
For
Waste Treatment Lagoon
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for
carrying out the routine maintenance work needed to keep the
lagoon operating as planned. Routine maintenance is
considered to be normal good care of the lagoon and the
surrounding area. Good maintenance adds to the usefullness
and permanence of the facility.
The routine maintenance of this lagoon involves but is not
limited to the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment and
the surrounding areas: is being established on
these areas. Beginning in mg--_ and each year thereafter,
the embankment and surrounding areas should be fertilized
with BOO pounds of ,(O—/d10 or *-0� inch of effluent
from the lagoon per acre to maintain a vigorous stand.
2. Control of weeds, brush and trees in the grassed si3illway.r
e-nd on the embankment: This may be done by mowing, spraying,
cc chopping, or a combination of all three. This will be
d:)ne at least once each year and possibly --.twice in those
y(+ars favorable to a heavy growth of vegetation. The local
Extension Agent or SCS office can supply the latest
information on spray materials and the best time to apply
them.
3. Protection of the grass on the embankment and surrounding
areas: Uncontrolled vehicular traffic can create trails or
ruts. Runoff from storms can enlarge these ruts into
gullies. if ruts appear to be forming, stop the traffic
doing the damage.
41 The lagoon should be precharged to app'ro.xi.mately half its
capacity prior to initial introduction of waste to assure
that the proper anaerobic waste treatment processes are
setup. The precharging also provides water fok recycling
flush systems, and helps reduce odors during start up.
5.'When the' lagoon'has reached its operating level it will
be necessary to periodically dispose of the effluent. This
will be accomplished by applying the effluent onto
dkisignated areas as noted on the Waste Utilization Plan Map.
Spring and early fall applications will maximize the
fertilli.zer benefit of the effluent. Markers will be used in
the lagoon to show when to start and stop pumping.
E

6. Maintenance inspections of this laci.lii
during the initial filling, at least annul
every major storm event.
1. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" hi
b. side slope stability— slumps or
c. erosion and/or wave action
d. rodent damage
e. seepage or other leakage
f. condition of vegetative cover
Z. Reservoir Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. undesirable floating debris
c. check liquid level to determine
disposal of effluent is needed
3. Fences and Gates
a. loose or damaged posts
b. loose or broken wires
c. open or damaged gates
i. Additional specific .items of importance
maintenance this structure are:
r,
Ji
Cr • 1{.711
c1
E_ } .
i

llJIAUnEo E;iCr('�iTi vs
DF-lF74HPTlT41EINT
A��11 I�U�L itll!r7.�
14EV 1 N HUNEYCUI T
16022 McLESTER ftp.
OAK SORO , N.C. 22127
RS1Fr�±fiiJRML RESOURCES 26032E m114 UT- RI
CMUSER o IAT II ON O DALE , X-C- 00001
SERV I CE k7041 -6®Il I
MR. HUNEYCUTT (wevin)
Enclosed is the Waste Utilization Plan we discussed. This plan
accounts for all the waste produced on your farm. The land application area
needed -is fused on total confinement of hogs. Presently you confine only 32
sows with litter- in a farrowing house. You have stated than you eventually
plan to convert your operation to total confinement. The present storage
facility will accommodate approximately 120 days of waste and fresh water
flush from the 32 sows/litter. If additional confinement is to be installed
on farm you would need to (a) install additional storage facilities or (b)
reduce or eliminate the fresh water flush presently used. As additional
confinement is added contact us for assistance with proper waste handling
Facilities.
This plan requires you to (1) exclude the hogs from field 5a or waste
water irrigation area & re-establi=sh area to Bermuda grass, (2) exclude
)hogs from "draw" or low area in fld 5b as discussed and establish this area
to fesuuo, (3) wal"tain all buFFers, pastures, and cvopland as outlined on
the attached Waste Utilization Pla" & Plan Map_, (4) All highly erodible
crupJand (HER_) must by maint;ai"e d in accordance with the Food SMUrity Act
(FSA) 'plans for which you presently have, (5) additionally, all aspects of
the attached Waste Utilizatiun Filart, Plan Maps, along with the previously
designed waste Application System must be adhered to in order to be
certified . to tate D9par toren t of Ehv i ronmen to 1 Management.
As always it is a pleasure to work with you and Junior-. Continue to
let us know if you have questions or need assistance.
Sincerely;
Richard E. Ping
Soil Conservation Technician
I

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: lVeUitv, /ktney caill- 1 I
Location: /,"; SW p � /Vbema,� C @ CI C� 0',4�G.6Cr]�y �i f 1 c y Xd.
1,WIXsla - c�
Telephone:
Type Operation: -SW/Al C -- ��-row — 414i'S /) J
Number of Animals: goo SoujS
(Design Capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where -the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization
plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are
strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as
they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation
exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than
5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is.frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff
to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind
odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not
more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based,on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
Proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management. Commission.
1

. V, WASTE UT I L I ZAT I QN PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
Q animals XZQ f78 (amt.) waste/animal/year = &V (C --,amt.)
waste/year..
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
,(j00 animals Xgj;�_lbs. PAN/animal/year =—.5 00 lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown and surface application:
Table I: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil
# No..'Type
Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
Per Ac.* Utilized ApplicationZ
'r,Mk 1 300 1 3.1 1 _930 1 MAY --5-e,074. r z8
1;z.B
1,2.9
12.0
1 a.8
1 zo
12.8
3.0
130
1 -�2
130
1
1
1
Total 1 I 1
* This N is from.animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
ti Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan thai agsses
all nutrients. This plan only'addk7esses Nitrogen.
r Esc�� Soy�S a s a.m cam s o N;oy��•� u�� 041Y
C�� ',1�z- P/Q.ri tcJri�ell �rlflr' y1p /TglGj`�C� �jG Give � h�Gf� h��s�
//r3/ slaw exc,�

�1
•• WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land (see Required Specification 2])
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
Total I I I
* See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1
Table 2 1 I O I
Total
Amount of N Produced I Sid 0 I
Surplus or Deficit I 3718 1
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
perio,dic.land application of sludge at agronomic Fates. The sludge
sill be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
see attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization
of waste water.
Application of.Waste by irrigation
;Field Soil Type ; Crop Application Application;
No. Rate (In/Hr) Amount (In.)
t i r r r r
i i r i r r
t r i r r r
5 r t r t t
r t i r r i
t i t r t r
i i r i r r
i T t i r i t
t t t r i r
r r t r t r
r r r r r r
i r r t t r
i r r i i r
THIS TABLE IS HOT NEEDED IF NUTS IS NOT BLIND APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SXWMLAR TABLE Wnz 88 NEEDED rOR DRY
LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for ?49 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
3 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation/,$;6,n
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
conservation .service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
Narrative /hof Operation: /i -c C 6L M-7 __Z4
S�2�LQ��1I(�•rmGL:r1�r� f?oT s LU'z � ct����,r�cd _�����.5_ 7 Sr . �a D 61!:a7""
t� A ! / ♦ 1 C /! ! I r

•. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQU/REC)CSPECIFlCATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state
by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application,
or direct discharge during operation or land application.
Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the
discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design
folder that the producer either owns or has long term
access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of waste, he shall provide NRCS with a
copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing
him/her the use of the land for waste application for the
life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an
update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a
change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals; method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed,
the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil
type, available moisture, historical data, climate
conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of application for
other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource
Management System'(RMS) or an Alternative Conservation
System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate
filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field.
These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers"
required by DEM. (See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips
and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest Buffers.)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking
after waste application. Waste should not be applied when
the wind is blowing.

• WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
{condwedl
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally
tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided
the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in
the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liauid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the
soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur
offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control conditions
conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of
application..
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils,
during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops
in such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the
leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter
for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential
for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils
should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover
crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall
_not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on bare soil.
1
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters
that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present., (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips)
12. : Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer- than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.

• • WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
1.4. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other
property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands.by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that
discharge directly into water courses, and only then at
agronomic rates provided the application causes no runoff
or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged
into the animal waste management system.
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures
must maintain a maximum operating level to provide
adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
16. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments,
berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation
shall. be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited
-to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and
structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility o'f an illegal discharge, pollution and
erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc.,
should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent
breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept -6n site.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed oalr Lf additional land has to ho leased, etc.)
I, hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer: Date:
Technical Representative: Date:
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: ,19 to
of nfaunA of 'ran Tears on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
, 20

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from
a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will
be available for review by DEM upon request.
Name of Facility Owner: A(f Iljn Awzifa
(Please print)
Signature.6 r, %, Date.
Name of Manager(If different from owner):E?,
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print)
Affiliation: a5D/Q — dAZXCS- _ _/ - - --
Address (Agency) : - o�lo3Q,2'/YeWl' /Q[ ----
A/zem ate-/ _ N. C • 2 POO /
Signature:e Date:
0

R'

/1�� 't'', Ct!',f r t,ti i`F'• ,!!P'J� f.. 1�?; sRs� ry. �rx fi .•Sr „+�i i'.' �•L,� 3. , 11y i1[(�' 11, L
+ �`� • ` F it a,= .r. .!i -. r iJ J,1 • i�+ ' +'i''�:�s.: l;,; 5J
lot-
iA y f 1 i ..:.. r '1' ' .��:•`-si ve i�kF I� Ya 7 }:`eirt• r � 1,4p t }r� '1 S
.y �'rri -/LI� r.�•y I; `I` U�' r � ��}��yy v1� i -s > 7' -y-G� }f 7 �f �.s�1,4 ' i'1I
'•.f:L':ic.��r7r•ri.��}.!`'yfie�S}��" ~]:}'• �� , 1 r 77iiSS 1' 'j•3�1��+�!'J ° 1+ i'T:•�'• � 41 i.
l i...
1 ` 1• i O +�+�'3r. St'-tJ� i* J�9 4v y+r} r+Kl�h r�+^ +k f�1,1 T" - 7. ,�!ti rti W, r t fki ..S
i ` (/ r j -J V i4FSiF� f riJ .•,� fiy t I ra ♦ r!'aA �i.'.,- ij iyfg�♦/ ar.< k'', 1- \f ti r
h,r, r' O�� �'�,•'�V}" '�' SI %JC Y��L: ��.- Y �i�lll�S�f �,'J����'v'1. �:. �"7',
F P ffrr .' YJ/pr �s?si.'y�ly{ ySl]f
• h P> 1,�•�rf s.�'�'� 3�rf11I ./ 1 lr4T-ti� r! -J rxt�• `
tits f u 11�i ,tiles �,: - �' ''`''V
•`/ :� !� ! X � 3 • e :?1`�:� +V 1 �' � tj � i.i R � *� }`ly'}y'"�,i' C �, nyT ;� r 1 1SYet _ ;r -
f A s e It�[' eS�/ r�t'^ /t►N aI _. r 3l y ! ey4< , �! i�.-^l ,Jj
.r-- } L ' � ,� !rr t,,, � T':FyK,. .. ,.�, j4:_� rf `� Il a�� ... - , 4` ��y F��, rc,�/ 1 ./1 �i rr`L�'.•.
. �+' . h%.1. � � •� r 17i �}r 'P� ,i s .,� 7 /i -• R..P' - a � r �l'1 l _
) i -a r•� ',l - ,Yi r {s "�� 7 f + ,Y1 � f v{ri k �, y >Ir� �A _ .�� .�I' #:rM, r7:. ,sr
,��' 1 � .1 �. �: iSn�� s 1 I r r 4 -,f,,� G'��'lr t��r • yc ��� y��J',F J' R r 1 t' ti i �,.'f`�•i .�_>.,�i
.• 1 f t J I'+, -..t ,{Jrf"j'�+ir Y,'ro j.� ,, �, ':� -' l •. :J r.?',� err _ niy 14
h� h%> - J�;r j t f F'd 1'i. /''j,+ i7N - .f•r-y+ a ii%{'t, i1;i i; r.{v " �,�_`" /• ,q .r
-Y1„ 'N ,,Ilr dl'Y'rr11 I ''r��lr �f,�,�:►C.,1.sfr M
•r� [, I/.. ley Ff.try'-.if? a.r.i 1 �F lY I : i �j lr�`'`f '.a4 �Mt�. f' ii 1".t::�r•
!_ ..I. f4 .�•J >t w(Y �.. r.SJ •r•1" {�'•' ,s.'.d •1� ' 'C i "'r J �rr41 EYfi"r 'J ' ',• /'It - J �t •yJ'
t `:i- 1'i1`�'• / yfir 4 7 / . > i i 1\ij4y't:• I f w
r' 'rT' •-�F1j�_J.'� 7. !,'� ,.r. `-;:;.K•l�.r.�..f. �• ,�•�a-4 �•,' •:,T e-�,; vy:i3 +�V” .. ••.�1
� T�7•"PJRf+�I -:�'�= 7 :�{ u:��:i. l=� :,'�%t •.y i r ;.'-+•r} � S•. ' J
w` i� • " rii i :. "I �a GA�, p it 5:;4�i. .9..� �;•N �r�r,�l �C�f•� r/ :;i, ;\.
'.y. ::,+. .y �? 1 / ,•,r t..,,� '•7.�+:; r r 1: J:: �� ,Ci •�'/ ' h �r'�� :,„1 ` .tire
rh �''s � j����a:�'J,�i'; ��i'i;i+l�"��.�`';_� +y;' '�.'►f'!�. '� J' ,:;;' 'i '` 1�
' i'.i - , .1 y , r,� i;'•'.' f 7 .r ry�.�" ~�. ! j UY``5f ,'• }+'�''}y' a y ,•
-r_ . J�r§�ex4'•� �y .. > >• •'i _ € 'P`' ' ' �,;� f•;tr;;�, s;rr,�'! T;. }C'3�;= .��r n � r ,
J , <f .r`� Y i� 2 l 1�.�I,'•��,,1 �. r r Y• -" �Y� • � �r , t i � lr� r _ '��lr L1'� f � ,•.�' / . ` 4-�r'e�'���• r � t
.{,.`_ !':'i '4 :: ;` it i �w'�'' "�- Jl,+ 3.jP-: .r•" 1V ` L �' .. f rE�J ' i
$ {( �, !•• � . + � „ : r i�'*u'tt���''a .i . l . ,�' r'", ' ' " � 'f1(� i (j�(�]�'�� r : I r ,� a�+, •�1 ' .
'� +t "? 1 _ �! � i "~� � . �' \'� '' , � }ice �3' �'. ,r•-,�,_„�� �,� ` r { '� �` ` f 1 j;. V `/� ' - ? � �..e ' �!
+�t :li+ ,C '�r'.� �'i •��..ii \,. ! �' r_,�,J rf-. I fr+ I�s�� .• „}.: M1 ':. � ��i' i .. Fes,.• '
a_Y,_ t!.+J � r il'.; t� It Z'�.';• tti+' ,'R' ,
i-�•,•,1 , !yy,f;�•• ,2•'rr-'F ..K�'ld dfr J t j'r iL-r, �';•,� ,..
r+�i 1 fi �� ' +••• Sr YAw1 iJr-IS in►.:law,Ji ti �, +!li�i , j¢i�b�/I.tt, }�l,,+
i�s >+4t +r -_..T "•1 � 1'F '� i � n J, _ ���' � /r } .xrt f�. _y5 r. '�f +,�,+'' y r � , '
l }�,,� r i i ', i. 4 ,rif,�l'�7�af�1 r,. '•+ i�i�i �� y' � l 3 1 -...1
i� l`'�� y tL r' Y ii„�r �1•'.� rl ��J, r°rn.. I frWsrt.�l' oil
J /Y'.'�+"''.f,r:.'a r r� '•' ._:4
`4. FP �r 1 �• . v •� •� r 1 r -`l`{, .I°" t J . :Y- E ' It ' P+4 � ti
} r � ' J ,i •.. {�r J1' ��.11�!e ;1 �: �rp � � +�� ��tn� S � �!a• '..t� �• fr •. �-•y 0.y��:.1+ - t _+�
t� � f�j, �} �' !l Y1� •�:, X11 lrr��. .�ri V• r,vrl. xrMK .ter Y �X 7,'�y�i,a, Ss � M .'�'.
'T � r��j t� �4 •i: f `y j'- V.JU7 r�'�, i ` /1 �`'^��. ty �1 ,� V � 1::' *�irfl� ,ai^� l , Y„w r Y 1�'r � .rG �; �~ `� ! ' t
it
I .li ,[. t•`� .. ,c r r, ���fti,.,'.��ri��` :o��� J•� r. r., 1` %eCIJ���'�
si„1i a+4 II F r'�J'9Lr+ l•l3rg • y�*b�.�y_,raf:1�)�f,� t
•i rr , 'r.�.��j. .'`j7 : 1." 'i l "'i• .d• r :I!.;iw `'^'�N r .� „
y', .SIS a� ' :!x , . c , i "S /, i'�a s• c �' tiL C "r, r i v >� ..
,:. .' �.� �g ` I •?f�.yY. ,l h>•'. >, '�I �.ri'�fa�r�/+[]`�� y?tri. ,\- 7 I �fi tr, r/� ✓ •�kJ
r'i vl' 1' _` .+. / � ! , i tl � � f.,?• + :•�. Y 4VV ."�i r .y � � - \�a•j 4 r.i �3,.x K'�'• V r
''4� P+ '!�1♦f �'•r: E..., ny�r`v' ty
`� •I.r•� �:•���'r'�� %•' �•.: 'ti
Any,, ' + �%°:rte,: �rr•;''r,.;r �r ,y:a
Yfh: j:Yf�.. • _ . " 7+' , `Y�i'°. ., r:,C ''x.
'7 F � - •rj' ?�' +, .t' '\ \ t f 1 `^' � ... _,.- ,yy ,♦ <t� J .� Y ,:., , r tli i r+r', :,�y a
.,:.t�'�srti •�� +t 1.1 •�\ �1 "�:• d;r r I j��, ,f 1 �•.1 .�Z ,�+yyJyt�->•_ r � f�.:
�.i.-,l' i Y; •+� �' _ t. �',�"_ ' �/,�.+�! t. J� J,B `• r '�. r �'•. i;',`1�r �!�!'-•�::`", �4-:t
ttY+�'� 1' .<; I if ��. �:.• ..�' ,.;:/ t - iv'a 1•••', J,4-<.rY:.i,:: "� ?t.<1 :����V r.. .ilrr.
':L �,..•� �.'f _... 1: /:+�' �3/' f;� -r' _� ,
.r,A� F I
r,s�.t' KIN
'~ti�r,�i'�t � •`�, s. - f
'�'• �.• r "tia �•i. r. J f }:� Z,J �' .Jaal.i SSP,=? ^.yJi.'�:i�irlf'�•,'+.
;�.^.�:•-'. i��l: r`:.I �5� 'I % r"'!�� ��:�,f'. ��''rY
s li11J ,r`:'
r `yi rs �rj• „'r h i 1 A j•r ,,Ja "� � ' PfY ., {, '7.t� e:'} �,il.. , �.
�A•�•
,I/a: i�:h t� • r ;, ,.Y ".r l; '
•-.. F y:'s' .. 1 wt�,j / y 1i tyjs' r
,•rr l� rY .t: JyN J� ;.J r}� \s�' •�' ' ,:_d ea'1-r••��t,: rr,I ixi ��i "r! .r'- 1.1N'..
<. }fi "p1 ,,..�;� 1: f�; ` , t, r•.'�" .} �- ;. ``; r a I i •f". r f r
i4L4l
.1� S ' �1� `,.�'►).'•t-�� J,JA „}s ' �' '� + ,y "1 Z' r ` i, i' }'...�' j'.:i:!'r •Q'„�`”'
I Ir v '�+"�•# 'J �'•)r•�: }. r. ..tit i r Y{ .+'�l�4ii� �y• /_
''�,• rY roi
.i it.J'J' ii .y{ f`r'::'�-`•eiy''s�' / j1 '�l � �a , =1h
F'
'Sl�:I:F-' j3Tt�r7. ��4 •f-r� J� :+ � i w.c v }E
+' 1 i Icy 1 ^ • ....: '.t yP i�

VT1 '[ � � '� ",11' .� ( � [•�,, �I r�', ,i�/'I' ��� �I '� ♦�1�:�%�� �� ��}� I i ����( / [ �.1',//r�rr ,��� �� �'�
�� 1•` }V1� /l, -V"i}li Z�,�. �yli�• 111 �y'•If.r l�','i .-�/!I r'"/.:•��� I � - If I � [. �� rr �! 'I )` [
{ r ---
7)�• I I r \i �'I I/ ''}`�`' I {���I. ,�'?!/'�'r t �,1 �, � rr I � J!. �7 �� .i :t I) .1+
,.�, 7 r
I '{ ; � :, I + � } �' ;':` nrr, 1� 1lr .`•' ,✓.I f' ,. l-'.:_.. r !'iG, / „'�/� �rl� ', r._- •�(titi
_ ' �[ i,r� �ri �{ •r
' Ir r. � I -I• �'/t: �' /';moi ��\\ r r i r �� yi4r r _; S`,�5�'{\III+ ,'�I �1:, I � •,. •'I` i' � ,Ir, {�
� _/' { � � ,. ' ; �i?/.� � j •I ,rl ;! �i ;, J �� 11 ' 1'' f (• ,;� ;��1J` �J � � .,I ",', �� .,� iI � ` 1� a
J r�
' �: �� •' :;\'' 1 I - _' ' 111,1 �• �, r t 1 ;:
��• l � 1f�, '� ' 1 1f r�� �j7 � 'r, '111�f1 �I'�I / )I I )'r � l.0`1
z ;, t � (. J y y'r�. t•` _ j !�. �� I 1 ,/�J+�iJ� .1�• .�� • � I`4( iK � J �y -� ' i, /! r ? •-�..1�1:, j
��'f71—J �� .`1' f l� //� r ! ' I LI•-- !I
fi�a�I Jti - �/I� 1( /// )J), .'! �1 ,� 1 / I •7. /!� I DI
,I(, t,•,1 }�1 JI �, { j "Sc{1� !'i
,�� I r , �, I i [.,% .�j�l ,�yy } f �� r,r.�; t l� •. '' �' � 11' I' 7
Ili: •
� t
r.
' f/ ;;'/�\„ �'• — I �i I o���:, 1,1 �' ,I rt 71 �,.���i. �y (- ^�1^ �{,� t r�e l' � � , l ' :rr
Alr
i. ' I I.(k ` ' �. h 1 r• ,�,�� �I , ) , � (,' �., � , 1 ;' ' SII- � . �..� I ; r, � J;.
ta
! "� \., II �S _5 ],:�.. _r. e. ,1 T�',r' •n`. .. r.. Jl� �!
'� '�=-�f, ,. �_'� ��.• '''��' -�,'�,,�1�;;; i � �� �' , r �j �{ rl" i� �,I' {r _71`\.I�i . li''/ ��r-'
•l{..,, • r ; � [ ` � -' I' ��r+xite i rd.t' ``,,J ` �A �, 1 `I • � 1 � j I., J ).
if
i.r1
"•''i'�y ii'�' n 1_ r .� � .: ��i 1 I ��•� ,1 'r��, �'/r'1���11 `,��y'vhi�' r� II rfr`.��1 li 'rr'�l" /// '�Ij%{ � (�pr��
_ ,,_ } 't I � `�}j�,` r (II19� l ;�; s ✓•`' 11 '!, {I \ F [i, ly i .. !rte/,/I.IL� 1, l
r r }'/ �`•, ter, f /: �' \ , (, } 5 174C`�%
l- )} @^ /, rr� 1-,1t�,� r Ilvtk [5' !��• 'i 1 r),}; 1 �y ��"
(
/.'
' y ..� 1 �t��� f - rt . •R [fiiw S" J f �'.- • t .'.' � 1 ., ' �� 1
-i' }1 i,' •, w.. �,y s�,. - ,���c.; 1` _ _ O •cam,
I .., Ici,t�� j � � �) r,flt ` •�IJ�s+l -y ',�. !��J I '.". _ r • � ! l- 1 1 � i`�� � 1(' �4 i• • I , �l . r /`� � �_ !� �+1�
,. 1 •�: t•// [!,' i 1���; `, � ti�� ; II+^+ :.� .;, r �19ietiy 4 �i ( r ' lr I. I
I I � %-,' .1 '`�� !,1} r•i 'jl � r 145,1 (r,'.',f� )1,��1 II t 4/f�, ��-��%1,�1 ��/`\ �� � �,1�' i�'�:! 11/�(
I �{� /i'f `/.,I,.i )�t i..fy1l,rl�. .� ) �� [1 Sal rif.`�ti�l 1�4 ' 511 I I •�_. 1-''11��� s:� ��r/.' � `7
,.�'
,` � l t )• rt 1 1 '�� �I I l�•5 �' � 1• _ '�.'ri � -•��...I r
• 'I'r ,, ( I r -!J `. •,. ;, i rr •�F_' Z`:�\fit \':(.y (_ !] �1! - �.1\1- _w 11 y J
' ,t[ 1xl �• 1 f r ^/�-- �l i I •li i lel/ /41 ( h���� il- /��.r �� � 1� -/
}1 � .�r' '.� (j / `7j .I��'r r'F � I!5 I G.,,• 1 r'\ � i'' _ �/�., fI f. I 1 �j` -
15a(r
1 � ���' ! I �-.��-\ ,•r ���\'}'"�•,��-�Il'}��I'• ,1) }j j'�I'�_`�.':,' �� - ''If ! J� I � ie�, y:' -,f `�'� ,.1• � ( li�� �.��� \
•,' ;. -;�`� .( \�,���',��11J•' [��!�� � - J S � 151 �' � 1.. )�1 ., f , S• •' `.� -��, r
l)lr, t� a7Z /�' / rl, �;/ �/ i All J:
.FEET ;I�.I----a � �-` �''-�'�' ..�'--".,. •�::��.....__1s�i{..c:f..�.� 20' 161 '62 fonxa rtl•---�:�'�.ti. '.tf: �� 63 "
.rf�::l.tr_•6d ..1 .17 30"��:__.
- �o!
4s541 Of nrE
SCALE 1724 000
� I } 0 1 MILE
!All ,DDO 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 8000 70r10 FEET -
1 5 0 1 IfILOHEIER
s D:24- ' CONTOUR 114TERVAL 10 FEET
I�7 M14S

, t� " , I..=

EMERGENCY CY ACTIO PLAN
P::0N- E +UMBERS
Dw� �'a4-"3y/G99_
EtiEERGENCY',V1A .A.Gcy1EyT SYSTEM
SwCD
N"RCS - g
This plan will be isnpierneated in the -vent that wastes from vour operation are leaking,
o� erflowing. or running off site. Yo
u should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave Your property to consider that you have a probie n. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all ernplovets at the facilicy.The following are some action item, s you should take.
1. Stoo the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or m ;v not be
Possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm. to increase elevation of darn.
b. , Purno wastes to fields at an acceptable :ate.
c. Stop all tIows to the lagcon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. '.,Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-acticas include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a ternvorary diversion to contain waste.
C. Ineorror:.te waste to reduce runcff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reasons) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rntes far the fields where runot; oc::ured.
C: Leakaet from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irr•',eation pump.
c. Close valves to elirrunate further cisch:r_e.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: L-.akaCe from flush, syszems. acus -es, soiid separators-ac:.on inc!ude:
a. SCOP recycle purnp.
v. SCCA M7'�Zat:cn wl:Trlp.
C. Make SUIL". ,-Lo Sichor. t?CC
�ii.0 �a tie ;JCL 5C. Ca:SIZ Ste ? a, Cr SCl:C _ ':'-tCrS.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting, pumps.
E: Leakage frorn base or side:vall of lagoon. Cfte:i this is seepage as oocosed to
bowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small surno or ditch away from the--mbank- ent to c;ltch all=eccaze.
Put in a submersible purrp. and pump bac` to lagoon. _
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or re.-nove : rilmals and iil
holes and tomcat. with a clav type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible. -
'_'. Assess the extent of the spill and note anv obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Accroximately how much was re?eased and for what duration?
c. Anv damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills. or proper- dama�ae?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
Cr. �-re potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the properly)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normad.business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Qualitv)
regional office; Phone - - Afte: hcurs, ernergencv number: F�
Your prone call should include: your name. facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of riovement of the spill. weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. • If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local ENIS Phone number
c. Instruct EENIS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES. phone number - - , local SWCD office phone nunber
anL local +-RCS ctricc for advice:Jtec uiical assistance t none number - -
If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Lepartmeat and e:.plain your
probiern to thein and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
S: Contact the contractcr of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site
damage.
a. Ccntmc,ors Name:_
b. C;,ntrac:ors Address:
c. CLntrac:ors Phcne: ��

6: Contact the te:.hnical specialist ,vho certified the lagoon ONRCS. Consulting
Engineer. etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone: 9A2 --4A//
7: implement procedures as advised by DWQ and tec;inical assis.ance azt—icies to
rectit�the damage. repair the systern. and reassess the %vaste manavernent plan to
keep probierns with re!ease or wastes from happening again.
96

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Opuations
-- ,5tlurcc Cause �HNIPs to cunlrul Insects— -- – Site Specific I'rstelices
- — � L I—ph Syslcrtls r
1']IrSh (itlllCIS * Acct mutation UI solids U Flus 1 sysicin Is designed and opciald
sufficiently to lemove accumulated sulills fionl
plucl s as desilmcd.
V*'Kcarove bIitlging of icclrandaled solids, al
dischalge
Lagoons and Pils Ciuslcd Solids IF -r hlainlaia laguuas, willing basics and (tits where
pest breeding is apparcral to millimin the
ciusling of solids to a depth of nu Imine Ulan 6 -
8 inches over more Ihaa 3U"/o of sue face.
^Lucssive Vcgclalit'e Decaying vegetalion
Glotvtl
Maintain vcgetativu cunlrul.110118 hanks (If'
lagoons and other impuundtimits to prevent
accunudatiorl of decaying vegetative Matter
alum; %vatcr's edge un impoaadnterll's pel inrckx.
Dry Systems
Fecdels Feed Spillage Design, uperale :and mainlaia Iccd systems (e.g., � �---
bunkcis -md Troughs) to larhdmize the
accuandation of decaying wastage.
pr Clean up spillage un a loillille basis (c.g., 7 - 10
day inlet val dmr ing shame[; I5 -3U clay inter val
(lllrim! winter).
Decd Slut:age Accumul Burls of Iced Icsiducs Reduce aluistme accumulation rvilhiu and
aroulld inmrrcdialc perialcler of Iced slutage
areas by insurinl; chaiaage a►vay Born site
Iuld/ur providing -IdctpratC cwllainrlcetll (e.11.,
covered bin fur- bcewec's grain and similar high
moisturc grain products).
IKlaspcct liar antl remove ur bleak up accumulaled
solids in filter sil ips around feed slurage as
nccded.
AN -11C - November 11, 1996. page I

(1111 cc C:ulsr 11511's 111 Culltl-ul Illseds Site Specilic I'lnclim
Animal I luhlirlb Alcan Ammudaliuns ill alliln:rl wastes v Eliminate lute alcas Ihtd twill Inoishlle aluli — — -- - - --
and feed waslalc Icnces and other localions wlicle wade
acculuul;ries and distill bance by auilnals is
ulillimal.
OKI'viaill Milt 1ellcc lows alld filler Stl ills :uuIII Id
annual huldirlg 111C.13 IU IIIIIIIIIII7.0
accuunllatiuns urivastes (i.e., iltsllect lar and
rcmuve ur bleak nil accumul,dcd solids as
heeded).
UI y Maltulc I handling Accurnufaliwrs of mimal wades C€ 1lrnrove Spillage oil ;t routine basis (e.g., 7 - I U
SySICI115 day inlet val dill ing summer; 15-30 day interval
(Itlling willtcl) wIlcle 111:IIIl11C is luaded fill. land
application or disposal.
U Illovide for adcquale (Iminage arutuld ulanule
SluckpIles.
wlnspect I'M and I cinuve or bleak ill) acctrnndalcd
wastes in liller strips mound stud piles and
nlamlie handling :ticas as needed.
For nunc infirinlation cullInd Ilic coliperldive lixlcusion Serviec, Dcp:uhnenl ul'I nttrntulogy, Ilux 76 13,11mIll Cmulina Slate University,
Ralcil;h, IdC,-271195-76 13.
/1MIC - November 11, 1996, Page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Ordor COwrOI Checklist
Catise -- _- UR'll's to Minimize UI_iur Site Specilic l'laeliees-
-I�atmsIcad •�S+vine Illoducliull - - W' Vegelalive or %vuuded bullets; .--.----._..._ ..._ ...
10 1(ecomincuded besl 111111 agemcid piaciices;
P-7joud judgment and CUllamoll Scose
Animal burly sill laces Dilty mantlle-comet! aI]int.als pr Dry flows - ---- -
- l`luur Sul laces •---IVct inannic-cuvcrt:d lfuols F_)t•Slullcd
W Walelcls located (Ives' Slotted 1](11115;
U Feedels at high cnd uI solid Ilu0rs;
LN''*'SCrq►c ntalltllc buiklllp 110111 Eluuls;
12r Undcriluur vcnlilaliun for drying
N't wtut: CVllCCIJ1ri1 I1ils U•ilre; i Hequent 111.nlule rcrlruval by Ilus11, pit ledialge, --- - -
* I'al1i,11 nliCIUt11Itl dccunlpusilitIII ur sclape.,
W*ulidellluur ventilation
Vcntilatiun cxhatlsl Gans Volatile gases;
(Just
Indoor sill Faces a Dust
Hush tanks Agitativat oftecycled lagom
liquid while tanks arc filling
Flush ;alleys • Agilatiorl during wastctvalcr'
cunvcyancc
Pit 1ccll;Ilge puirlls Agilatiull of recycled Irlguun
liquid.while pits are filling
Lift staliorls a Agilatilm during stilly gunk
filling and dlawdun•n
QUIS dC da;tin cullcctioll • Agitation this wastewater
ur jtntction boxes c011vcyaucc
ANIOC - i•luvcmbu 11, 1996, Page 3
ff - an maintenance;
R"*Ellicicnt air ntoveurcnt
GR' Washtluwn bctwecn groups of animal
U Decd additives;
W�Fccdcr cuvels;
IlKlIced delivery downspout extenders to Icedcr
Covel s
Cl Mush tank covers;
Cl I:xlClld till lines to nciar bullwll of l,atlks with
anti -siphon vcrlls
9'Underlloor MIA with mide111our ventihlti0n
U l"Mend recharge lints to near bull0m of pits
tvith anti -siphon vents
O Swap lank covers
U [lox covers

AMOC - November I I; 1996, Page 11
SU itITe
Callse
11A -11's W Minimize {)dol' Site Simcilic )'I110ims
-
And V1 dmillpipes at
• AgilatlUli t{Ill itig wastelv:Iler
-i44 - - -
❑ ^tSXlClll{ lllSClialgC p(llll(uC1T111C5 tnl(1CI[ICi1111
Ia-gooll
CUIIveyallce
Iagooll liquid level
f{.ai�tlUl1 SI111a1l'S
• Vb1alile. fills c11115sions;
❑�I'roper 17113oull liquid Capacity; — -- —_
• Biological mixing;
Er Cull ecl higoun star{up Inocedutes;
• A�IliltlVll
❑ 11'11nUp11lll5ll11aCt';ll'Ca-tU-VUiU11TCIGlt1U;
1
0' Milllllltl111 7lgi17111011 %VIIC111T111111TIIlZ;;
❑. Much:nlical aelatiull;
i'ruvcn biological additives
^IIIlt;:lllhll spiiiiklcr
• high p1mille agitaliol1;
�❑
(17 �/ Ittigale oil (Iry flays wilh little Ul. 110 Will 1;
11(1/.7.11'5
• Wllld thin
Mi1111Um11 fl'CUIIriTICIIdCII UpCI;111t1g 111CSSt11C;
6r"Pump intake ncar lagoon liquid surface;
❑ Plllllgl li'um secolid-Slage Iagooll
Stulage lank or basin
0 Palti:d Illiclubial decomposition;
❑ l3utlulll or midlevel loading;—
st1lLne
• mixlllg while filling; '
❑ T4.111iC GVVCIs;
• Abllatlull LY1iCll C1nlTlylhg
❑ Basill stllflCC 111:11s UI solids;
❑ Ploven biological addilives or oxidants
Sculirlg b asirl Sill face
a Pallial Illicloblal decomposition;
Cl Lmertd dini11pipe outlets underneath liquid
• Mixing While lilliug;
revel;
• Agilatiori when emplyllig
❑ Remove settled solids legulm ly
Manutc, Outry or sludge
• Agitatiuu when splCadiul;;
❑ Soil illjecliull Ufsluuylsludges;
sillC:t(Icr outlets
a Volatile gas C1llissiulls
Cl Wash residua{ manure {rum spreader allcr rise;
❑ Proven biological addilives or oxidants
J~—�
_01-I manure,
Volatile q;as clllissions wlliic
❑ Soil injection ufslurrylsludges
slurry or sludge on lield
dlying
O Soil inculhuratiun wNhin 'I$ ins.;
surfaces
❑ Spread in thin uniform layers lur rapid drying;
❑ Pruveu biulogical additives ur oxid:nds
{)Call 71111111115
C.alcass 11ccomposilioll
W Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal
• C.alcass decollipusilivil
Q Complete Covering of catcasses ill b11r171l pits;
pits
❑ Pluper location/cunslruCtion of disposal Ails
•� lncirlelahns
9 Incomplete Combustion
❑ Secondary slack bumci
AMOC - November I I; 1996, Page 11

Source Clime Illill's lu llliuiluiTc Udur Silc 4lrccilic I'1:tirlirrs
Blanding water altill nd 0Impo11cr thainagc; fd- (jlailc :Ind laudscnpc such 111:11 wnicr drains
Iacililics micluhial dccumlxlsitim, of away Mont facilities
OI'g,llliC lllallCr
rMMMIC (1-'%dCl1 01110 • Pum b, In,6111,lincri access luaus W-- faun access I'uatl ntaigicna11ce-
1111llic ul,uis 60111 Icurlt
1CCCSS
Adtlilitmal hlfimmalion :
swine Adanulc Mamigculcul : 0211!1 Il.ulc!! MI, I'aCKC1
Swi0e Ihuduclion Fill n I'utenlial Udur Suutces and Itcmctlier, ; 1-"IIAI; Fad Shed
Swine 1'Ivdncliun Facifily Mautrrc M.111agcmenl: I'it RUCIlargc - 11a8ounTrcatmeW ; 1?13AI; 129-83
5wille I'lothIOUll F,lcifity Iviauutc Mauagculcut: Undt:rlloor F111511- Laguun Treallucul ; VAME 129-8$
hippo 1 Iksign and Management For Livestock Manurc'1•rcalnlcnl and Sloragc ; UDA E 1113-83
Calibration of Al,unuc and Wastewater A1lftlicstlion Equipment ; L?13A13 Fact Shed
conlrullinl; Odors hum-5wille Buildings ; I'll 1-33
11--11vilunmcnlal Assmauce I'rogiam ; NfTC A1au0al
O1lti0ns fur ASau:rging Utlur ; .1 1 c11ot I liunl Illc Swine Udur Task Furse
Nuisance Cnl1CC111S in Animal Mannre M,ulagcmcnl: {blurs and Flics ; PROW, 1995 Cun1Cl'CIICC I'rucccdings
ANIOC - I-fu+cnlilcl 11, 1996, Page 5
Available Horn :
NCSU, county ItXICli5ioll I:cutcr
14CS1) - BAI:
1.1CSU - IIAI:
NCSU - ME
NCSQ - 11AF
NCSU - IIAI;
HUSU - Swine 11"Xlctt.si0n
NC Palk Piuduccts Assoc
NCSU Agri Communicaliuus
1:101ithcuopelative I;Xlensloll

v C4.•n ,.
v ,
Mortality Management 'Methods
(check which method(s) are being* 'Implemented)
Burial three fee: beneath the surface of the around within ?-4 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at feast 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Renderina at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-153.7
Complete incineration
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
�! Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value _without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval or the State Veterinarian mus_ t be
attached)
De.embe:- 1S. I9Gb

A"�l,� ,
C
United States Soil 530 W. Innes St.
Department of Conservation Salisbury, N.C.
Agriculture Service 28144
Subject: ENG - Design Approval DATE: April 29, 1994
Solid Set Waste
System
File Code: 210
To: P.R. Loudermilk, Acting
District Conservationist
Albemarle, NC
This memo is approval of the design submitted for the solid
set waste disposal system for the Nevin Honeycutt swine
operation designed by Gra-Mac Distributing Company. This
system is for application of effluent from waste treatment
lagoon for a 32 sow farrow to feeder swine operation. The
system consist of 31' main line, 7 sprinkler heads, 14
outlets, 7.5 hp motor and pump, and the other material to
make the system function.
After the system is installed, the installer will need to
supply written certification that all material and work are
in accordance with the design. The data submitted for
review and approval are attached.
Vernon Jo s
Civil Engineer
Attachments
c: -T-H. Wetmore, Jr.
H.J. Pate, Jr.
R.E. Pigg
J.D. Almond

t
United States
Department of
Agriculture
Soil
Conservation
Service
530 W. Innes St.
Salisbury, N.C.
28144
Subject: ENG -
Design Approval
DATE: April
29, 1994
Solid Set Waste
System
File Code:
210
To: P.R. Loudermilk, Acting
District
Conservationist
Albemarle, NC
This memo is approval of the design submitted for the solid
set waste disposal system for the Nevin Honeycutt swine
operation designed by Gra-Mac Distributing Company. This
system is for application of effluent from waste treatment
lagoon for a 32 sow farrow to feeder swine operation. The
system consist of 3" main line, 7 sprinkler heads, 14
outlets, 7.5 hp motor and pump, and the other material to
make the system.function.
After the system is installed, the installer will need to
supply written certification that all material and work are
in accordance with the design. The data submitted for
review and approval are attached.
/t4�'If
Vernon Jo ks
Civil Engineer
Attachments
c: T. H.
H. J.
R. E.
J. D.
Wetmore, Jr.
Pate, Jr.
Pigg
Almond

CE, --'J' EL, I
t V. "D
s: ct Y' td i� r'! "D 0 C: Cl YtO
I Ek 3 V
e r I u s t 6. rr; i i-, i. -I ck 1 c vi -; s ee, (:i sl
n t%- ca�'t I P-1 C. "-N� 4; u 'n e C.�- IJ
41
.1-'.3 L', i d ff Iil�' u:'
T E, ��5 L
c E�f Ls Ci -F
F IZ, I
ct
1,1:� L i I'- I -r—,
u f.� 1. 1 . .....
Q E fr: =!':T:
- 11 1- 2
. � -.1 V 0 1. U. f.11 El E E-_ -� i _-f �?' .; � -� -. c 1 a . & t =t ; .r C' r, :)Cil
:C'2
c 3 F
:C, f� � E'2 s Fl. E- Y h J e 3 Za t; I Vf ell
. I "::', C ,, i .-i eA--!' /V.f..' -,, t'j-frjl
�.j
-i" - --- -
i.: t I
4
T -
t h E' &, C t: Ll I
c,-' er.
a t -.t. C' 3-1
1 1 0 U
at V V Y" V Er, Ex Lr V" Cr t -i:
e t fT E' c-:,
Cr v., r
a L) ED V C-
L� C- t C:l Ol
I ll 6 r .! U i
I
kj jLS
EL fftt� S-; "C.
Vj j I - f--, ci .- t ,L e--
t1
v s t e r.

LI
oi D
fr
mid; i
\
� �
�
..
,
�
�%s
L - j
, �
6 QF
^
f
/ \ \ /
z
`
-
J1
-'(f fjr
Lf.,
Lu 1
-M
LI

manuis pinbim
WNWHIM 37MIMAV LN47d MIOL
I Pon want no, qZVOW pow"0§002 al !!In sajoin 8uldwod L isidwsm-
A,_; _t
ACA spalwad q;mcid anns." 1E 31004unz on, salvo ;uajs;nu
SO�OAV "OlaesT,01 auvYwlym Gprj7nj 171M WaIWO :m 'F'
an 1,10 a7d,MG als—,
as hu"Smassul
01.0- punij JT.� OnTAmid Q2 mazitlin Eq jKT& so -we E
in quonw, sq, bKVISImiso U; pas- aq *4 one sxr7VA 00w;
--------
,%ql GaR
E
MY W
------------
MUNN
!Wlwim
53,OV
WMA
NOI!VAI1ddV
3003
E033N 1431415N
1OH2
111ML
OAlsm 00C
jArml-mq
S"-,
x M!"MT/suc
to �':4
A"Sm q;T
VA/-UT-sy
eq-,
x 'UT/'Mw/5qI
9E
SAIsm aGe
so',
x 'wT/'=T/SqE
go
manuis pinbim
WNWHIM 37MIMAV LN47d MIOL
I Pon want no, qZVOW pow"0§002 al !!In sajoin 8uldwod L isidwsm-
A,_; _t
ACA spalwad q;mcid anns." 1E 31004unz on, salvo ;uajs;nu
SO�OAV "OlaesT,01 auvYwlym Gprj7nj 171M WaIWO :m 'F'
an 1,10 a7d,MG als—,
as hu"Smassul
01.0- punij JT.� OnTAmid Q2 mazitlin Eq jKT& so -we E
in quonw, sq, bKVISImiso U; pas- aq *4 one sxr7VA 00w;

n "SOT-
- -D
IS a:e Ujl'i"wTs"ej
T
. ..... ..... ..
'T T.

0 G....=3 1=_ -":90 .
'DI-, T -1 1 G, U I'=', -A 'n 'I CI 1 'D t in "I S in G J
. , s I Ui L c% 1, 0 Z 17', •:I? J- ;.2.-k k=-
'��,V?
r Y
!,.I C: 'rk T c- r
7� �D , J',1Y". 7
Z?
1:
7� �D , J',1Y". 7

a
73
ui
fo w,Fli
Lit
17i
LI
JT
fl,
Tj
ul
a

I
r -
m
ilj
0

..... . . ..... . .....
.. .. .... ... .
. ..... ..... ...
M7117-,
.. ... .. . ... ... .. . ..
ILJ .,k
... ..... . . . — — —
�kj
S t 7 T I",
rj u� r,
5
.. . .. .....
s; ,:.g i
74
I
e
0 S ;Hi L
D S iL3 i
i A i-.
7-,-D j
o -t'r, %GT
1 f U 3".
..... . . ..... . .....
.. .. .... ... .
. ..... ..... ...
M7117-,
.. ... .. . ... ... .. . ..

GRA -MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
GJ/0 [9101 998.3232
rr (9191 898.3800
3-r-94
ROUTE 2. BOX 212
MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
�' l e�l tl o-. u► � i � na.•�2 `b �.,.,,,u,,,f.�l,, ma,�,w�.-� s�RA`tr..�. ! rQco ca•�..a:5�� � `�:tiaA.
�) 1Y1cCRor,e°�w. MT�o3 a" LZ) --11- WG: — 14
is 7% qP 1 p2--
.4
2--
.4 P1
3) C- + -4-7 Ps z /3 9 'z)
50"-� LS 8a � X 8 0 013 7, x (o o%
• Iq.l h 9�3
J) ;,A4 so xeo = x,
lol0GPol Q-So'-3"9Alrw /nAJw Ps=
47 PST
t,c6 't;a `XA�
mg's G
�y oSZ
�' l e�l tl o-. u► � i � na.•�2 `b �.,.,,,u,,,f.�l,, ma,�,w�.-� s�RA`tr..�. ! rQco ca•�..a:5�� � `�:tiaA.
�) 1Y1cCRor,e°�w. MT�o3 a" LZ) --11- WG: — 14
is 7% qP 1 p2--
.4
2--
.4 P1
3) C- + -4-7 Ps z /3 9 'z)
50"-� LS 8a � X 8 0 013 7, x (o o%
• Iq.l h 9�3
J) ;,A4 so xeo = x,
lol0GPol Q-So'-3"9Alrw /nAJw Ps=
47 PST
mg's G
�y oSZ

GRA -MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Route 2 Box 212
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
[phone]
S
0
L Mr. Nevin Honeycutt
D 164221 McLester Road'
T Gakboro,' NC 23129
0
S
H
I
P
T
0
INVOICE 4t,Z] k."JNVOICV'
`DATE GE
t e 1
0�N
-V
ITEM -DESS CIP ON...
C S
P
`fay
F
�UJ"
Nl-
EAS
ORDER�N MBER
it 3 0 1 9 4
-*922!22
1364.817
1
1) a-li -y-E2 r -1AS A P Upon rQcej.Qt
-V
ITEM -DESS CIP ON...
Ik'P
`fay
F
�UJ"
Nl-
7 �
Berkeley 91 1/21'PMS 40 HP
1364.817
1
1,J64.20
I PZ PUMP & Motor
1 1
Pump Table
45 .0o
1
45 .00
1 1 SM30C)X200ECC-C
3 -, 2 Eccentric
32.00
EAC
32.('-)0
Reducer w/Coupling
1 1 PTZOA
3" Adapter
10.B9
EACF
10.e9
Thd. Female NPT
1 1
3" X 25' Rubber Comb. PT
190. 0(-.)
1
190. 00
SUCtion w/ Foot Valve
1 .1
1-1/2" x 25" BE Nipple
1.25
EAC
1.25
tG150XZN,
1 1 62X150B
2" 1-1/2" BS Bushing.
2.4-3
EACF
2.4;r
1 1 G 3 X 121 B
3" 2" BS BL[shing
8.e1
EACF
8-.81
1 1 (33T
3" BE Tee
26.60
EAC P
26.60
1 1 63X,0500
3" ;-, 1/21' BE BUshing
5.06
EAC
5.(.)6
1 BC200#2. 5
200# Liquid Filled PSI
15 - 00
EACF,
15.00
GUage
4 4 GZX5NG
3" ,, 5" Balv. Nipple
7.2'x,
EACF1
28.92
1 1 WEB1o509
3" Bronze S'Swinq Check
74.29
EACF
74.29
Valve
1. 1 WEB10159
3" Brass Gate 'Valve
45.98
EAC
zi-5.ee
(150/::00)
2 2 GZX7-1/2CF
3 x 7-1/2 Thd Companion
15.67
EACF
31.34
Flange
I I G3FFFG
3" Full Face 1::'1anqe
.90
EACj-
.90
Gasket
B IB058-3
5/13 -, 'P Bolt
.6e
EAC
5.44
E) IBQ5E3N
5/6 Nut
.33
EACI-
2.64
I
Macrometer MTI( -)3 Water
5 1 B. ()o
1
518:033
Meter 3" MIPT
(Continued)
SALES AMOUNT
MISC. CHARGES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
TOTAL
r
-TAYMENTRECD
- te"BALANCE--DQE,�

GRA -MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Rose 2 Box 212
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
(910) 9981232
S
0
L Mr. Nevin Honeycutt
ID 16422 McLester Road
T oakbora, NC 28129
0
S
H
T
0
INVOICE
5'
01/01/V4 Quote 2
rry,M
QUAK�-'ATEM'DESCRIPTIC
OEM
1,Nltittlli
US
1ASEQ
NO
T
1
3 ST Female Ad p t
muote
03ZDIZ94
*99999
PVC Sch 40
receint
rry,M
QUAK�-'ATEM'DESCRIPTIC
1
� ER
F. T T
$
IJN1TtPRICE-,-.4+,
Am 'bu
1
3 ST Female Ad p t
2.08
EACH
2.08
PVC Sch 40
2
2 S417-030
3 x 45 SS Ell
4.39
EACH
8.7e
PVC Sch 40
3
3 PC1209QT
Qt. PVC Glue
9.28
EACK
24.64
3
3 PC1214QT
Qt. PVC Cleaner
5.04
EACH
15.12
1
1 S447-030
3 S Cap PVC Sch 40
1.66
EACK.-
1.66
3
3 S401"030
3 x 3 ZZ SSS Tee
4.96
EACH
-14.82
PVC Sch 40
8
8 S401-335
3 x 3 x I SSS Red. Tee
5.39
EACH
43.12
PVC Sth 40
3 5437-338
3 x 2 SS Red. Bushing
1.65
EACH
4.95
PVC Sch 40
6
6 S401-249
2 x 2 x I.SSS Red. Tee
1.23
EACH
7.38
PVC Sch 4o
2
2 S401-020
2 x 2 x 2 SSS Tee
1.15
EACH
2.30
PVC Sch 40
1
1 S417-020-
2 x 45 SE Ell
1.09
CAC
1.09
PVC Sch 40
1
1 S06-020
2 TS Male Adpt.
.60
EACH
.60
!
PVC Sch 40
1
1 S447-020
2 S Cap PVC Sch 40
.48
EAC K
.4e
1
1 S2612-020
2" PVC Ball Valve
14.72
EAG I
14.72
(Blip x Slip) EPDM
28
28 5406-010
I x 90 SS Ell PVC Sch 40
.32
EACH
6.96
1
1 C160eB&C
& Econo Valve Box Body
5-313
EAC 1-
3.38
& Cover
I WM048-01-000
Waterman AV 150
29-05
EACH
29.05
2" Air Valve
(Continued)
SALES AMOUNT
MISC. CHARGES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
TOTAL
1M
IALANCIVDW�'.

GRA -MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Route 2 Box 212 -
MOCKSVILLE, NC 27028
[phone]
S S
0 H
L Mr. Nevin Honeycutt I
D 164.;'�-2 Mc Lester Road. P
T Oakbaro, NC 28129 T
0 0
c:l3 01 94 Quote
M046W-WERSON
IJIRCHASE41�,�,l
F—
MY
E 8 M 4�gttt-' L
0 Lk 0-t e
03/01/94
1*9999,
1
Lel i -ereH
ASAP Upon receipt
.EM70F
14 14
Webster 9 -1( -.)()WDC Quick:
17.^9
1
"x`42.06
Cpl Valve w/ Cap
7 7
Senneger 70251RD-1-1"F
35 .0(:f
1
245 .00
Sprinkler w/ 1" Riser
E32o E320
ET300
.1j" PR200 PVC Pipe
.82
672.40
600 600
ET200
211 PR20C) PVC Pipe
.35
2 1, 0 . I -W .)
6C) 60
1" Sch 40 PVC Pipe
.26
1
15.60
Q U 0 T E
SALES AMOUNT
3,977.7o
MISC. CHARGES
FREIGHT
SALES TAX
39 . 78
TOTAL
490.17.48
MrBA-
CA N C EDUES

Y r M
U. S. DEPARTMF_NT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
REQUEST FQii JECHNICAL_ASSISTAN9
NC -ENG -Z4
REV. 8 / 91
Landuser's Name: District Cooperator:Xes No k
Fi_!d Office: Location Code:
Practice For Which Assistance is Requested:
Name: Code 31,? --
Fund Allocation: CO -01 ACP LTA LTC RC&D OtherwC/ 5p
Type Assistance Requested: (Survey, Desig ,Approval Etc)_
Estimated Job CIasOII III IV V Other
Highest Approval Level For This Practice By Requesting Office: I & E: J /
Design: 40 -ler Construction: -0M
Date(s) Assistance is Ne
Reason(s) For Requestir
Narrative of Site Conditions or Special Circumstances:
Requested By
District Coalseff,adonist
Approved Bv• 1 _
Area Conservationist
Priority. H M L (Assigned by Area Conservationist)
Date:

Animal Waste Management Plan Certif icatlo q.. vnn' . car
't.�'rr~ti.indh4�:i•d'1'.
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signaE}tr)A�.�i�Ra �sv�t Jig
Existing or New or Expanded . (please circle one) 5yt}'
Name of Farm:'aC,,�T 1. td Qrvi�i fdRiF:
Owner(s) Name:j&k&Phont No: ~
Mailing Address: � a&&" ?-,q z.&_
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:Or
�ir O�i�il7
Latitude and Longitude: / County:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): !222 Qcz- z / Z62"/= r7r& 0/ --
Operation Description:
O Wean to Feeder
-D Feeder to Finish
Z Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ZrIarrow to Finish
-Pe - Poultry
0 Layer
0 Pullets
No. of Animalo
Type of Carrie
❑ Dairy
❑ Beef
Ivo. of Animais
EIF1Rndln� Opetadbn _
Other Tjpe of Livestock. Number ofAnimnls:
Only
Previous acity Additional Design Capacity z�
ToraI`DesiJ' C/gyp
P 'la act
'hi' '; a :.rYY� aTau w zu a i+ s ' a.c,rc w
Existing and F_rpand�ng; operation s Only
y,
Regt,ttratcoit Date (Date on wlitch faun applied far regtscatton}
Acrea;e Available for Application. Required Acreage: 3•�
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds Total Capaci _ �� l� Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or N (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Aereement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm n -amp -A a.b�ve. anti will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DE.Ad or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner:
Sienature; !��
Name of Manager(if different from ESwner
Date:��%
Signature: Date:
A%VC •- April 2.1, 1996 1 QUA
FACILITES ASSESSMENT UNIT

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission
pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm
named above has an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications
of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to I5A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical
specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only
certify parts for which they are technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
Gd�Existing facilrity withoutretrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with
waste utilization requirements.
❑ New, expanded -or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storace and treatment structures, such as but not Iimited to collection systems,
lagoons and ponds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and
specifications. !, _
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print):.
Affiliation: --gZ, 2Z2 S
Address (Agency): v2o:�4.3 G f 00I Phone No.:
Signature:Date: 1401 Z 7
B) Laj2d Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste
utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print): i`c Xsrrz' E. i0e;
Affiliation: .S
Address(Agency) C g4O Phone No.:TO4�;��,21
Signature: �_s S� .�� Date: �✓�/97
Q Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
�cilitv with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
designed in accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print):
Affiliation: 05424 _ /y CS
Address(Agency) X00 �'
Signature: "
AINC -- April 24, 1996
e No.:

D) Application and Handlin gEauipment
Check rite appropriate box
5r" --Existing facility with existing waste application equiament (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
❑ New or expanded facility�-or existing facility without existing waste appcation equipment (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the pian has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):�fj[��i_� w -
Affiliation: - C'S
Address(Agency)•C DO Phone No.: -
Signature: Date:
IIh Certification of Installation
A) Collection, -Storage. Treatment Installation
New. ea, r retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste stormand treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,
have been installed in accordance with the approved pia o meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing
Name of Technical S
Affiliation:
ut retrofits, no certification is necessary.
(Please Print):
Address (Agen cy):_ _ T Phone No.:_
Signature: Date:
AVVC -- April 24, 1996

B) Land,Application Site (WUP)
Check rhe appropriate box
V The cropping system is inp lace on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is clearcd for planting; the
cropping system as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the
owner has committed to establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by
(month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for compliance with the waste
utilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared
land within 30 days of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim
crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ _ ,
Affiliation:
Address (Agency). Phone No.:,�
Signature: _ ,, rs_ .._ Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste
utilization plan, and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to .
DEM a verification of completion from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date
specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a
violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:_
Signature: Date.:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Q Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
acility with exterior Iota
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
installed as specified in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certifca#orr is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency):
Signature:
AWC -- April 2a. 19'96
hone No.:
Date:

D) 12PLication and Handling E ui ment Installation (WUP or .1)
Check the approprraie block-
al
lock
al waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready
for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
❑ 'Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been
installed but the owner has propose leasing or third party application and has provided a
signed contract; equipment specir d in the contract agrees with the requirements of the
plan; required buffers can be ma' tained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been
provided to tke owners and are ontained as part of the plan.
Conditional appy al: An' aI waste application and handling equipment specified in the
plan has been purchas a will be on site and installed by
(month day/year); there i dequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed
and until the waste can b l applied in accordance with the cropping system contained
in the plan; and calibra on and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and
are contained as part the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prin
.affiliation: J:&�
Address (Agency):
Signature:
•
Phone No.:
Date:_,
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in IIT D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling
equipment as specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of
delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified
in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the
waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner :
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Sign2ture: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the following
address:
Department of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources
1 Division Of Environmental Management
1 Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files -with your Animal Waste Management PIan.
AWC -- April ?.l. 1996

WASI-c UTILIZATIOA PLA�v�,,,�&EwEo
Amount .of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons,�fTyg Q�O�
Waste Storage Volume 1ee y+
32 sows (farrow -feeder) X 3180 gal. waste/ hd. /year = 101, 76'dUJlZ 1999
waste/year.
Dry Lot Volume hargepa
• o�Dl�
168 sow x 4.2 tn. waste/hd/yr.= 705.6 tn. dry waste/year �rtung
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen(PAN)-Produced Per Year
Liquid
32 sows X 22 lbs. PAN head/year(irrigated) =704 lbs. PAN/year.
Dry
168 sows X 34 lbs. PAN/ animal unit/year (soil incoporated) =5712
lbs. PAN/year (Dry Lot)
NOTE: The dry lot waste is spread and incorporated by animal
traffic, therefore this volume will not be included in the
application records. Grassed buffers will be maintained to prevent
movement of waste from the dry lot.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. Irrigation will be
accomplished by means of an underground "set" waste -application
system.
it will be the responsibility of the clean out contractor to abid
by N.C. Law pertaining to application of animal waste.
The following acreage will be needed for annual waste application
based on the crop to be grown and surface application:
The acres listed below are for the application of liquid waste
only. Waste produced by the 168 sows will be incorporated into the
livestock paddock by swine. Buffers are in place around the
perimeter of paddock to prevent discharge of contaminants' during
rainfall events
Table I: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Fld Soil Crop Lbs.N F1d. Tot.N Month of RYE
# Type /Ac.* Ac. Appl. Application
*NOTE: The original plan & the irrigation system were installed
prior to NRCS "book value" RYE as the standard. Actual history
indicates yields much higher. Operator agrees to keep records of
PAN output and hay tonage. Plan will be revised if waste increases
or tonage decreases 20% or more.
(Continued Next Page)-`

' WASI-c UTILIZATIOA PLAN
Table 1 (Continued): ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Fld Soil Crop Lbs.N F1d. Tot.N Month of RYE
# Type. /Ac.* Ac. Appl. Application
Total N Utilized
Int -al N
De f i c 27t- 41 ar��us
Note: Rye will be overseeded into the bermuda in the winter months
according to the attached NCSU Memorandum titled " Crop Mgt.
Practices for Selected Forages Used In Waste Mgt.".
Note: This N is from animal waste only.. Zf nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yfield ex ectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: Fields 1-3,6,7 can be used if additional acres are needed.
Owner must obtain a revised waste utilization plan -crior to
aonlvina waste to these fields. Current waste analysis indicate
nitrogen levels lower than the enclosed stated book values.

4f WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer:Nevin Huneycutt
Location: 6 mi. SW of Albemarle (& jct. of Liberty Hill Ch. Rd. &
McLester Rd.
�ArER �C EI,V,E �
Telephone: [phone] Troru
APR 0 91999
Type Operation:Swine (Farrow -Feeder)
Number of Animals:200 sow (32 confined,168 on dry lot)`�'�� �'�mtitng
Design Capacity: 32 sows on a waste storage pond
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater.
The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the
fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization
plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are
strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more
nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as
they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation
exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities..
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than
5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not
apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff
to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind
odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not
more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or
disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
4/j1971
Qla

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ftp, tons, etc.)
Waste Storage Volume
32 sows (farrow --feeder) X 3180 gal. waste/ hd./year = 101,760 gals.
waste/year.
Dry Lot Volume
1.68 sow x 4.2 tn. waste/hd/yr.= 705.6 tn. dry waste/year
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
Liquid
32 sows X 22 lbs. PAN head/year(irrigated) =704 lbs. PAN/year.
Dry
168 sows X 34 lbs. PAN/ animal unit/year (soil incoporated) =5712
lbs. PAN/year (Dry Lot)
NOTE: The dry lot waste is spread and incorporated by animal
traffic, therefore this volume will not be included in the
application records. Grassed buffers will be maintained to prevent
movement of waste from the dry lot.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. Irrigation will be
accomplished by means of an underground "set" waste application
system.
It will be the responsibility of the clean out contractor to abid
by N.C. Law pertaining to application of animal waste.
The following acreage will be needed for annual waste application
based on the crop to.be grown and surface application:
The acres listed below are for the application of liquid waste
only. Waste produced by the 168 sows will be incorporated into the
livestock paddock by swine. Buffers are in place around the
perimeter of paddock to prevent discharge of contaminants during
rainfall events
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Fld Soil Crop Lbs.N Fld. Tot.N Month of RYE
## Type /Ac.* Ac. Appl. Application
*NOTE: The original plan & the irrigation system were installed
prior to NRCS "book value" RYE as the standard. Actual history
indicates yields much higher. Operator agrees to keep records of
PAN output and hay tonage. Plan will be revised if waste increases
or tonage decreases 20% or more.
(Continued Next Page) l/%1i%�
. !!a�`p

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 1 (Continued): ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Fld Soil Crop Lbs.N Fld. Tot.N Month of RYE
# Type /Ac.* Ac. Appl. Application
Note: Rye will be overseeded into the bermuda in the winter months
according to the attached NCSU Memorandum titled " Crop Mgt.
Practices for Selected Forages Used In Waste Mgt.'s.
Note: This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal.
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
NOTE: Fields 1-3,6,7 can be used if additional acres are needed.
Owner must obtain a revised waste utilization plan prior_ to
applying waste to these fields. Current waste analysis indicate
nitragen_level_s lower than the enclosed stated hock values.
� Rid
0- - �.. 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soil TypeI Crop I Application I Application
No. Rate(In/Hr) Amount(In.)
_.� � CSC ...__ � � . �2 G � • 95 ,_ �
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER -A
SIMILAR TABLE WILL BE NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
Your facility is designed for 90 days of temporary storage
and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once
every 3_MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed 18" below top of dam or the high
water mark as established.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service or Soil
and Water Conservation District office after you receive periodic
waste analysis reports for assistance in determining the amount per
acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the
waste.
Narrative of Operation_
a e2OO sow � w - �rcafer
691; /V 2.2 soLt)5 a,r2f
SG}:LLJ�S Qre a� an CZ r�rs/ � ! �C. V kZ C A271—! ewe -C S_
Q 6�an-ly
Aan i.S 1v �e 'In d; S e
�'rlClu��G� i � /i��d�4�•
-9/x/99

d3�
11)�2X.71V1W Y -CA
PY 'Ho
10
o Xe

State of North Carolina
De0artment of Environment
and Natrai Resources
Division W Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 18, 1999
Nevin Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE5
Subject: Application No. AWS840023
Additional Information Request
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Stanley County
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by March 20, 1999:
The lagoon capacity documentation provided indicates that there is a waste storage pond with a capacity of
21,159 cubic feet. This volume is not adequate for a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation. The lagoon
appears to have been designed for a 32 sow Farrow to Feeder swine operation. Therefore, the facility
cannot be permitted as a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation. The facility can only be permitted as a
32 sow Farrow to Feeder swine operation according to the permit application information that has been
submitted. Additional lagoon capacity documentation is required if you would like the facility to be
permitted as a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation.
2. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists the total amount of nitrogen utilized by Fescue or Soybeans on
Tract 1414, field 6 as 2700 pounds. This total should be 2520 pounds (140 lb/ac. x 18 ac.). The total
amount of nitrogen utilized by Fescue on Tract 1435, field 3 should be 585 pounds (150 ]b./ac. X 3.9 ac.)
instead of 878 pounds. Please contact your technical specialist to revise the Waste Utilization Plan or
provide justification that supports the increased yield as shown in the current WUP. Please note that all
WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before March 20, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request. please call me at [phone], extension 545.
Sincerely,
usan Cawley
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNT
GOVERNOR
' WAYNEMCDEV
'SECRETARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILL.E REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 30, 1999
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
N. Huneycutt Farm, Facility #: 84-23
Stanly County, NC
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August
26, 1999. The facility and waste application records appeared to be in good shape.
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review. The
following items must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection.
Certification forms.
Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas must be shown.
Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
Waste and Soil analysis info: Must have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Cbecklists must be completed.
Certified Operator renewal card.
"-
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice
r
of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should be
made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general waste should
be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
or-` D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
� Water Quality Regional Supervisor
N
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FA%704-663-6040
C'C' File AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 5094' RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

:Division of Soil'ti
alri MOConservation,�-Q pera ow evieWv,!TJ
-CiDivisiono ofl'and:,Wat'i�'irC6iL�i6'r"vauon;- �c omp ance, lnsp'ec-166h�,-,�
'1 5
f S
nil
ff Division of WateiiiQWdity,C 1i
!,
0111F 8131crJasOctiob.€ itq.1,-,;,,
€�
4 "-1
T
th c
.110 dir: A
1� gen y-; ce pejrati6fiR`W
�:Jew
48LRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ insEection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection EZ=- 24 hr. (hh:rnm)
[] Permitted V1 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..........................
n P��4
Farm Name: ......... .......... 44r. tt.. e7-6.re ... ....... onin ......... Cou tY: ......... .................. . .....................
Owner Name: .............. 4�41 ........ ..... rx-
C
..r ... b-' . .............. : ........ I ........ I ....... I. -I .............................. ..........
. ............. Phone No
FacilityContact: ........................................ ..................................... Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ........................ ..........................
. :r - - a
Mailing Address: ..... Ap. 4f ........ A., ...... ............. r) .......... ....... ........................ . ..............
Onsite Representative: ...............
............7i
..
Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator . ..... &-efwx4 ...................... lrll�,.Iax.y.cick..I� ........... Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
A
..................................................... . ...... ............. .................................................................................... I ............... I ...............................................................................
....................................................... ...... ................................................................................................................. I ............ 11 .............................................
Latitude 0
Longitude
e ren
D' sign Current;"" l' -11' Deslj&11 Design
�Currie-n'C'
Stene lF. Ca acit Population
�c on�_;Cattle,
apicity`�,,PopulatiiCapacity
Population:',
❑ Wean to Feeder
FE] Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
K] Other
VIVI
P. V,;��, ip, 0?
TN't al DeCapacity
Design o!pq'y
FarrowtoFinish
El Boars
j,
k v
Subsurface Drain Area 10 Spray Field Area
4 N��iber*� of liig6ons, s Present
Roldq� stem
fiiiftiids Solid T ii!IF[5 No Liquid Waste Management Sy
iid' raps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q 3o
Discharge originated at: M Lagoon C] Spray Field ❑ Other V
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance tnan-made'? El Yes El No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water or the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) E] Yes [] No
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/inin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [I Spillway
Jrc
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: qi
Freeboard(inches): ................................... .................................. ; .................................... ................................... .....................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
0 Yes [-I No
[] Yes E] No
F1 Yes Wo
❑ Yes No
Structure 6
.. ...................................
1\ I
C1 Yes No
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Dale of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those d1signatedtin the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes >C) No
❑ Yes JQ No
❑ Yes 12No
❑ Yes Jallo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes < No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes 59.No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes &ZNo
❑ Yes �lo
❑ Yes 'RNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes D,,No
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes )� No
❑ Yes R.No
❑ Yes �1, No
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes J'No
NO.0olatigrijs vi- dgt}ciencies -were jnpfe0. 46ng Ois•visit, Yo will-tecciye iiti Cut�titcr
CO. res otiden& ab6uti this visit: '
�,; """'.i A 9 ,,, Vi[i V. » .',1 .;r.:i 1 1E,: '•' 3 'f.�..fi+j;! ,�I� e. Y • > I+S .i; €1 U., E:. } l,Pa,..IP 7i-[ �,f�t�,- fFiE.E .E V §t<L. ,.S>-:j,ill3i. Ff:Itig: »fff[Y34F..1 E. -".i1 3P .fFR[§E4'f,>6fl �.EC75.'..
Comments (refer to question #\) Explain any YESEanswers and/or any recommend at tons or,any5other� commehU.L"Pj,,
:,.E.. $...�_ �r€� i'f8 6.P fi ,.>>':S�i f' F€ Si: �' 3': E �.fl, c '.pV'e�ls tt ; ! f h! f - 6' ^ei((j Iry 8` �
{ s i E' g' }(r s li 3 Ed r °ti §3 �i-2 9 f.l ',t...l F. P 9 �.� V }P�P [ {i �� € - IE I•d °'� �I - �: dirr. 1� i
lr . y '
Use drawings of facility to better exp a n situations {use addrtrortal pages as,necessary) ;MI , , ! 1 Er E
.I_r. ` if�!'r h, N 'N.
!�"� �t+t Cc-►ai'r'e.�; W c'� �-� u�v'�G L�('s l S
�
1'P2y r !1 fl
Name,a'i} �'$ f{F
Reviewer/InspectorMM f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
V
3/23/99

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number' YL 2 Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representatives Y r, Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
J
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Agve Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
Date of site visit: exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP:__22F�—F_ Operation pended for we le acre
ce �6ne 4e,&tec-�- P��� determination based on U11
P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe.
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an 1 or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part 111. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part ll - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part III).
PART 11.75%Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails -one of the -eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in overapplication of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according -to farm's -last two years -of -irrigabonTecords.-..
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 . Obviousfield limitations (numerous. ditches; failure to -deduct -required; .
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage .identi iied.in:CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than -5 -acres fortravelers-orless than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits feld(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part lil. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD I COMMENTS'
NUMBER NUMBER',Z IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
�I I
I
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBER- must be clearly delineated on -map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acresand havingTeceived less -then 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the,farm's previous two years' (9997 & 1998) of irrigation records,:cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in -the comment section and must be'accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
P1 Plan lacks -following information:_
P2 Pian revision may satisfy 75% rule-based on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to -below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ie/in process of installing new irrigation system):

gtate of North Carolina
Department of Environment
/'and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Nevin Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
17TIF r
M,qR 24 1999
NCDENR
°II�JSf1tN Gtr F�r,'P
wPr�✓" "� ic,"�ifli� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANC) NATURAL RESOURCES
March 22, 19�9`t'{
Subject: Application No. AWS840023
Additional Information Request
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Stanly County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 21, 1999:
The lagoon capacity documentation provided indicates that there is a waste storage pond with a capacity of
21,159 cubic feet. This volume is not adequate for a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation. The lagoon
appears to have been designed for a 32 sow Farrow to Feeder swine operation. Therefore, the facility
cannot be permitted as a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation. The facility can only be permitted as a
32 sow Farrow to Feeder swine operation according to the permit application information that has been
submitted. Additional lagoon capacity documentation is required if you would like the facility to be
permitted as a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation.
2. Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists the total amount of nitrogen utilized by Fescue or Soybeans on
Tract 1414, field 6 as 2700 pounds. This total should be 2520 pounds (140 lb/ac. x 18 ac.). The total
amount of nitrogen utilized by Fescue on Tract 1435, field 3 should be 585 pounds (150 ]b./ac. X 3.9 ac.)
instead of 878 pounds. Please contact your technical specialist to revise the Waste Utilization Plan or
provide justification that supports the increased yield as shown in the current WUP. Please note that all
WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before April 21, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincerely,
S s{� an Caule
Y
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-4535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Nevin Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
Dear Nevin Huneycutt:
67,?WA
IT 0 0
NORTH CAFiOLINA$QPfF�A TM
ENVIRONMENT ANNATL.IRAL RESQEJRCESrCt,
February 18, 1999 FEB 22 1�,{.
Imsia 01; t
"'ar.at
Yid :.ic j, -A. ufN�
1 R�....�q .. ,
Subject: Application No. AWS840023
Additional Information Request
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Staniy County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by March 20, 1999:
The lagoon capacity documentation provided indicates that there is a waste storage pond with a capacity of
21,159 cubic feet. This volume is not adequate for a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation. The lagoon
appears to have been designed for a 32 sow Farrow to Feeder swine operation. Therefore, the facility
cannot be permitted as a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation. The facility can only be permitted as a
32 sow Farrow to Feeder swine operation according to the permit application information that has been
submitted. Additional lagoon capacity documentation is required if you would like the facility to be
permitted as a 200 sow Farrow to Finish swine operation.
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) lists the total amount of nitrogen utilized by Fescue or Soybeans on
"Tract 1414, field 6 as 2700 pounds. This total should be 2520 pounds (140 Ib/ac. x 18 ac.). The total
amount of nitrogen utilized by Fescue on Tract 1435, field 3 should be 585 pounds (1501b./ac. X 3.9 ac.)
instead of 878 pounds. Please contact your technical specialist to revise the Waste Utilization Plan or
provide justification that supports the increased yield as shown in the current WUP. Please note that all
WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please mote that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before March 20, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincerely,
usS an Caule (J
Y
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

A*A
NCDEN.R
JAMES B. HUNT JR. -
GOVERNOR
>.. -
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 24, 1998
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Site Inspection
Nevin Huneycutt Farm, Facility #: 84-23
Stanly County, NC
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your Iocal agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2811S
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLED/10 POST -CONSUMER PAPER

I
Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen MAppiicatian_ for Cornmon Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
.
half (1/2) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows beim held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

<i
Page 3
Waste samples/analyte ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These 'can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: Stanly SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
� r
D. Rex Gleason, P. E. \f
1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor

Division of Soil and Water Conservation [] Other Agency y
u: vision of Water Quality
JQ-lZoutine O Complaint '0 Follow-up'of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other I
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
2
Time of Inspection r 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered _6<ertified [3 Applied for Permit [j Permitted 113 Not O eratirma] Date Last Operated: ..................
County.Farm Name: ......F4r w.........../r�i..
..............................................
Owner Dame: h .................
Phone No: `aS �'[. St .
FacilityContact; .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
G / ( � i
MailingAddress:...... . .......... e! .....11 S...f ...........A'.. .... .........Jos, ......................................
Onsite Representative:. w.P 1.4 ................ .............. Integrator:................. / ....
Certified Operator:....//8"..Aq......................... ....... le"Ar .2.e°.ve-L,1 ......... Operator Certification Number:..... [ .{pw ..
Location of Farm:
:...R..l.i.l.�:...... t: SK.....1..7s-....1�!!.�.L.� a-....
i`l7ktf ... j4a ct ....:... .,r..... r ...................... [....�'f-.. p........�......+ ...................
Latitude •
Design {. Current
`t'aoacity `Pobulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
EffTarrow to Finish Qv
❑ [felts
❑ Boars
Longitude
Design ^: Current
'::Poultry cit', ' Population Cattle::;
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dah
❑ Non -Layer I I; ❑ Non
❑ Other'
F:
Total Design Capt
Tofa1.SS:
. .
Design y C
Capacity ;tPo
iry
v , ozov
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in-at/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? Of yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125/97
❑ Yes 'KNo
❑ Yes �Vo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
{
❑ Yes `F440
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes V, No
❑ Yes 1-0 No
❑ Yes�No
Continued on back

,7F�fit Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'
Structures (Lagoons.11olding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2
Idend tier.
Freeboard(ft): .......................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes XNo
Structure 5 Structure 0
............. ................... .... ..... ......... .............. ........ ....... I............................
❑ Yes KNo
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
�No
12.
,Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
'o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes; and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
OfNo
Waste_
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
*o
(if in excess of WMP, or ru ff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type �f.......... . ....�.�......I.
...
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management flan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
'\
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
t9.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes.>
O
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
o
[� No.vio'lations-or deficiencies.werenoted-during this:visit.-.Youmill receive no further
' � correspondence about this: visit.• : • :: - . � : , : � .: , : , :::. � � .. ; : ; ::. � : ; . .::. �::.:.::.. � : , .:: ,
,a
Use drawitsgs*of facility to better explain situations (use additnnal`p
x
4,r. x2cll
s
Reviewer/Inspector Name x�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
as necessa ry )ii1
� RAY` 11 LenSe-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources `
Division of Water Quality
� J
� T
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p E H N F4
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director MC. DEPT OF
June 5, 1997 er NATURAL ttlr3�iLI2C:f;{;
Mr. Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
,JUN 10 1997
MUNI] 7 M4:la*:t2 [NIA1. "ANA]L 81t
Uf}lsf
Subject: Registration Correction
Facility Number 84-23
Stanly County
The Division of Water Quality has received your letter requesting a correction of your
animal operation registration form. In your letter, you indicated that you did not correctly register
the number of animals at your facility. Upon review of the facility file, the total capacity of this
facility has been corrected to 200 sows, farrow to finish.
If you have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to call me at (919) 733-
5083, extension 502.
Sincerely, 4
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
cc: Facility File
Mooresville Regional Office
Rick Pigg, NRCS
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
- �-' Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
e0
E:)[HHNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 25, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Huneycutt Farm, Facility #: 84-23
Stanly County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on June 20, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this
Office. The facility appeared to be in good shape. However, you need to double check on your
certified farm status. Also, ensure that you have all the required forms and that all records pertaining
to the application of waste are properly filled out.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely, /
D. Rex Glelson, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Stanly County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, SAW FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NV* C An Equal Opportunity/Afflrjnative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

�� ❑ DSWC�Animal�Feedlot Operation Review � � f � � � ��`
s r p a
zi
•..s. • ».y1'E c � � n,b.. z An�mal Feedlot Operation Site �Inspect' 't •: N>,�, {� i�&i°yb to a .k
4-It`outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 23 Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: WRegistered [I Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:......_ ........................... .................................. .................
r............................................................
Farm Name:.................. &[ sr..5e .....Z/�...................................... County:...... .f................
..................
..........
............
Land Owner Name: .,t!r!1..L!L.... ...... �r.................................._ Phone No:........�7 '. g...�........................................
FacilityConetact:.................................................................................. Title:................................................ Phone No:.........................................................
Mailing Address:. 7.. .......... ..... 3. .... ....... ................ .....�........... ........ ...... ... ............
�.g.i.Z��,...
OnsiteRepresentative: ...... Ami/.iA.................................................................................. Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.., P�,l.......................... .....�f.. �*.�.C7. ............... Operator Certification Number:... 1 , ��.................
Laration of Farm!
..rz�'-xz....crt....tree....�....a...........5.K...... ..: ..... �.. .......1..... ......
...
rz�. .......�.....4..........I:R......1.�...75........ca► ..��`..........f(�Q.....�s �...�....� �,n.....1� .............................................................. �
Latitude 0 4 Li Longitude ' 4 «
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
C5,No
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[--]No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ Yes
KNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: ............... . ...............
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
ANo
No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
Z No
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
KNo
5tructures
(1,agoons gndjor Holding End.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
J4 No
14.
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
§4 No
......... C.1............ ............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
............................
ti.Q + ccv��e7
"we'
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Wo
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
M No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
§4 No
VCA
(If in excess of WMP, or runoffntering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
ti.Q + ccv��e7
"we'
fire' -k'vws .a oC
15.
Crop type .G'Gl�c.�x . �rr..... ............ ........ .......................... ....................... _i q_t�r5C.....................................
J3
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
JWNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
RNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
W No
19. Is there a Iack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
R No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ta No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
J4No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
M No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
V No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
rR No
:ndlor.'a
_Zob ke4 .sow, �ouS�
3Z
4
P%95
RiV1r �wKt,�C�� �wS SCOL --e-
�
©� � V"ex— 1'X:1r�
Ye-b
VCA
ti.Q + ccv��e7
"we'
fire' -k'vws .a oC
KM -1-
J3
�
Reviewer/Inspector Name gM
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: i!� 27
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, F ci ' y Assessment Unit 4130/97
are

"4 State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresville Regionol Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor A d a MAN EDE-HNF;Z
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Nevin Huneycutt
16422 McLester Rd.
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Nevin Huneycutt Farm, Facility #: 84-23
StanIy County, NC
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, &A�� FAX 704 F,63-6040
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NNNCV C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 503% recycled/100,10 post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Stanly SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Nevin Huneycutt
Nevin Huneycutt Farm
16422 Mclester Rd.
Oakboro NC 28129
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Nevin Huneycutt Farm
Facility ID#: 84-23
Stanly County
Dear Mr. Huneycutt:
1 �
[DFEHNFR
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENVIRONNIFNT, HFAL'Uh
& NATURAL RItSOU:.CES
Nov 19 1996
41VISMI OF ENVI00NMUL r1ANAGE1,11ENT
401m1ISVILtE REGMAL OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on-going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 9191733-0026.
Si2Preston
AHoward, Jr., ector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, N
��,
Roleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 .:-9 V L_I 50°10 recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

- Site Require Immediate Attention:
Facility No.: 84-23
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE:Se tember 29, 1995
T me: :30 PM
Farm Name/Owner: Nevin M. Huneycutt, Jr.
Mailing Address:.16422 McLester Road, Oakboro, North Carolina 28129
County: Stan Integrator: None Phone:
On Site Representative: Nevin -Huneycutt Phone: [phone]
Physical Address/Location: East of jct of SR 1115 & SR 1975, on north side of SR 1975
Type of Operation: Swine X Poultry_ Cattle Design Capacity: 32 Sow
Number of Animals on Site: 400
Latitude: 350 16' 02" Longitude: 800 18' 25" Elevation: N/A Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm
event? (approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches)
-
D
Or-No Actual Freeboard: 2 Ft 6 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(e)? Yes or QDO
Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? Ye or No
Crop(s) being utilized: Soybeans
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Yes or No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line?
Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or
other similar man-made devices? Yes or No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land
applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No*
Additional Comments: *Waste Management Records will be developed b the Stanl Count Soil
and Water Conservation Service. The facility has an irrigation system.
12
Inspector Name: Gon -Ts@h Chen Signature:
cc: Facility Assessment Unit

NEVIN HONE- YCUTT
OAKBOP\O, NC
o PUm P
® GATE VALVE
2 WATI ER METER
Q 8-100 WDC {LU I CK COUPLE N G
VALVE -
A AUTOMATIC AIR VENT
�Ip MANUAL DRAIN
GR_A-MAC DISTRIBUTING CO
b„Ram 2z Banc 212r s
j` INOCKSY111 £ NC 27028
psi

NEVIN HO NEYCU T T
OAKBORO, NC
D PUMP
GATE VALVE
WATER METER
Q
B-100 WDC QU I CK COUPLI N C
VALVE
A AUTOMATIC AIR VENT
MANUAL DRAIN
GRA -MAC DISTRIBUTING CO.
Route 212 _
} MN SLE C M28:
a-
r