Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout800043_PERMIT FILE_20171231NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Governor Director CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Gerald M. Foster La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 Dear Mr. Foster: Natural Resources r (02 o�p'y .as Dee Freeman Secretary AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION September 30, 2010 Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV-2010-PC-1044 15A N.C.A.C. 2T.1304 La -Faster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 80-43 General Permit AWC800043 Rowan County On September 22, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS), inspected the La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection. As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non - discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 21' .13 04, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows: Violation 1: Failure to conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis. This is a violation of General Permit Condition IIIA, 111. 10, and 111. 11, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Required Corrective Action for Violation I: In the future, conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis in accordance with the permit. The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please submit a written response to this Notice by October 15, 2010. Please include in your response all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future. Division of Wafer Quality/ Aquifer Protection Section] MooresvAe Regional office 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Phone: 704-663-16991 Fax: 704-663.60401 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: www.ncwatemuality.org An ENpual opportunity 4 Affirmative Action Employer One NCaarolzna Naturally La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 80.43 NOTICE OF VIOLATION se"mber 30, 2010 Page 2 Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A. Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704) 663-1699. Sinc rely, 1 Andrew H. Pitner, P.G. Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 22, 2010 cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District Central Permit File AWC800043 Regional Permit Pile AWC800043 jb 0 Division of Water Quality F-1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: KOO-43 , Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWC800043 _ _ ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance InspQction inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: ine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville Date of Visit: 09122/2010 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM _ Incident M Farm Name: La -Foster Dainy Carson Road) _ _ Owner Email: Owner: Gerald M Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Mailing Address: 13210 Cooi Springs Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Physical Address: 1,685 Carson Rd __. —._ Cleveland NC 270139438 Facility Status: n Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°46'48"___ Longitude: $0'37'34" _ FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD. FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Sheibia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Gerald M. Foster Phone: 7C4-278-2596 On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Primary Inspector: James Beall 704-663-1699 Phone: Ext 2162 k I Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: 05/06/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons 07/24/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons 03/20/08 > Soil Analysis 21. Failure to conduct 2009 Annual Soo Analysis; NOV to follow jb Page: 1 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: 09/2212010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Cattle Q Cattle - Milk Caw 500 125 Total Design Capacity: 500 Total SSLW: 700,000 Waste Structures Typo Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard �Iste Pond CARSON ROAD7-7 18.00 48.00 Page: 2 Permit: AWC800043 Owner • Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 09/2212010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ n n Discharge originated at: Structure n Application Field rl Other a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n ■ n n 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a n ■ n n discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? n ■ n n If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe n ■ n n erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n ■ f7 or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance of improvement? n ■ n n 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, n ■ ❑ n dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or 0 ■ n n improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or n ■ n n improvement? 11 Is there evidence of incorrect application? f] ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? rl Hydraulic Overload? n Frozen Ground? n Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n Page:3 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Inspection Date: 09122/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number : 800043 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE n PAN? Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n Total P205? n Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? n Outside of acceptable crop window? n Evidence of wind drift? n Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage) Crop Type 2 Soybean, Wheat Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management n ■ n n Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? n ■ n n 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n n 0 n 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n ■ n n 18, Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment? n ■ n n Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19,Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? n ■ o o 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? n ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. WU P? n Page: 4 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 0912212010 Inspection Type: Compiiance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? n Design? n Maps? n Other? n 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ n n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. ■ Waste Application? Cl 120 Minute inspections? n Weather code? n Weekly Freeboard? n Transfers? n Rainfall? n Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n Waste Analysis? Annual soil analysis? ■ Crop yields? n Stocking? n Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? n 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n ■ n n 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n ❑ ■ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n ■ n n 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ n 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? n ■ n n 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? n n ■ n Other issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additioral problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAVIMP? n ■ n n 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0000 mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ nil Quality representative immediately. Page: 5 Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Inspection Date: 09/2212010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Other Issues 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Facility Number: 800043 Reason for Visit: Routine Page 5 1W FILE kv, 0. j NC®ENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Cole -en H. Suilins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary CERTIFIED iNJAIL AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED September 30, 2010 Gerald N-1. Faster La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV-2010-PC-1044 15A N.C.A.C. 2T. 1304 La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 80-43 General Permit AWC800043 Rowan County Dear Mr. Foster: On September 22, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Nater Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS), inspected the La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection. As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non - discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2T. 1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows: Violation 1: Failure to conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis. This is a violation of General Permit Condition III.4, 111. 10, and III.I 1, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Required Corrective Action for Violation 1: In the future, conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis in accordance with the permit. The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please submit a written response to this Notice by October 15, 2010. Please include in your response all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future. Division of Water Quality ! Aquifer Protection Section F Mooresville Regional Office 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, MooresvNe, North Carolina 28115 Phone: 704.663-16981 Fax: 704-663-60441 Customer Service: 1877-623.6748 Internet: www.ncwatemualitg.org A. G..E I AK -6— n'a.,- NorthCarolina naturally La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 94-43 NOTICE OF VIOLATION September 30, 2410 Page 2 Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of apermit under authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A. Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704) 663-1699. Sinc rely, 1 Andrew H. Pitner, P.G. Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated September 22, 2010 cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District Central Permit file AWC800043 Regional Permit File AWC800043 jb 0 Division of Water Quality F] Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number : 800043 Facility Status: Active, Permit: AWC800C43 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: ComRliianQe Inspection inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Rcutne_ County: Rowan Region: MQoresville Date of Visit: 09/22/2010 Entry Time:01TQQM Exit Time: 02'30 PM Farm Name: La -Foster Dai (Carson Road Owner: Gerald M Foster Incident #: Owner Email: Phone: 704-278-2596 Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Springs Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Physical Address: 1685 Carson Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Facility Status: n Compliant E Not Compliant Location of Farm: Integrator: Latitude: 35°46'48" _ _ Longitude: 80°37'34" FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD. FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Records and Documents Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Secondary OIC(s): Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Other Issues Operator Certification Number: 20945 On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Gerald M Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Primary Inspector: James Beall Phone: 704-663-1699Ext.2162 Inspector Signature: Date: Q k .2blo Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: 05/06/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons 07/24/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons 03/20/08 > Soil Analysis 21. f=ailure to conduct 2009 Annual Soil Analysis, NOV to follow. 8 Page: 1 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 09122/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Cattle G Cattle - Milk Cow 500 125 Total Design Capacity: 500 Total SSl_W: 700,000 Type Identifier Closed Date Start Dale Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard taste Pond CARSON ROAD 18.00 48.01 Page: 2 H Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 09/2212410 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any dischar e observed from an g y part of the operation? MOOD n ■ n Discharge originated at: or closure plan? Structure n n ■ n Application Field ri it ■ ❑ Other n a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ n b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ o c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? Waste Application Yes No NA NE d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n ■ n n 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a n ■ 00 n discharge? Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? I] ■ n n If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? n 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe DODD erosion, seepage, etc.)? & Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management n ■ n n or closure plan? 7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? n ■ n n 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, it ■ ❑ n dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ 00 improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or n ■ n n improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? rl ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below Excessive Ponding? it Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? n Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n Page: 3 Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Inspection pate: 09/22/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number : 800043 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Apqfication Yes No NA NE PAN? n Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n Total P205? n Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil? n Outside of acceptable crop window?' Q Evidence of wind drift? n Application outside of application area? n Crop Type 1 Com (Silage) Crop Type 2 Soybean, Wheat Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management n ■ n n Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ n n 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n n v n 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n ■ ❑ n 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n ■ n n Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? n ® n n 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? n ® U. n If yes, check the appropriate box below. WU P? Cl Page: 4 Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Data: 09/22/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? F1 Design? n Maps? n Other? n 21. Does record keeping need improvement? e ❑ n Cl If yes, check the appropriate box below Waste Application? n 120 Minute inspections? n Weather code? n Weekly Freeboard? n Transfers? n Rainfall? n Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? 7 Waste Analysis? Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? Annual soil analysis? ■ Crop yields? n Stocking? n Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? 0 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n 000 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 0 Cl ■ n 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n ■ n n 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? n n ® n 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? n ■ C) n 27 Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? n n ■ n Ypc Nn NA NF 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ® rl 29. [aid the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0000 mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ®n Quality representative immediately. Page: 5 Permit: AWC800043 Owner- Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 09/22/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine nd-k— Yes No NA NE 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? rl ■ ❑ 0 32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? Q ■ f "! n 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? -gym Page 6 Division of;Water Quality y� f?:•moi' aC�tyi' umber- �' _�:E �. i A r•�` i. `s• 4t ser, i 4.. r a S`, j"" } +` 1�4 i a, N `'0 Division of Soil and'Wat&.:Conservatson � h . :. - 4• ..... sO Other, Agenc3'��-. ��� +VL Type of Visit: Alp Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access O�` Date of Visit: Farm Name: L^ Arrival Time: Departure Time:County: ldsk� Region: WI& Owner Email: Owner Name: 5W � I,4' cl-r t-� t � Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator:sw�4 C;_1 Emn Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: �8�vine �'" 7 Capa Wean to Finish Integrator: L� Certification Number ` Certification Number. Latitude: Longitude: in 'Current `f Design' Current SDcsign ity Pop Wet Poultry Capacity Pop, , Cr le Capacity Wean to Feeder Dairy Cow Non -Layer Feeder to Finish F _ , Farrow to Wean n ,Current;^ ` Dry Caw Farrow to Feeder Non -Dairy ,`.Dry Poultry ;Ca 'a Farrow to Finish Layers - Gilts `' Non -Layers Boars : r : 3.,,•; A '`i •1. Pullets :E ''it `%.. 1 y, ill. i4 �t-:: Turkeys 7 ` -.Ol er Turkey Poults _ Other Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? ❑ Yer_Zf!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE [:]Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes No NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes` — / ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ` 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? CCSS Page I of 3 2/4/2011 Continued Dairy Cow �Dairy Calf a' Dairy Heifer n ,Current;^ ` Dry Caw Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow : r : 3.,,•; A '`i •1. :E ''it `%.. 1 y, ill. i4 �t-:: Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? ❑ Yer_Zf!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE [:]Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [] Yes No NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes` — / ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ` 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? CCSS Page I of 3 2/4/2011 Continued Facili Number: jDate of Inso ection: Waste Collection & Treatment �] 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? - ❑ Yes X01 N ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Identifier: Spillway?: r Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate cats in egrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environipental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [] Yes ❑ NA [] NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yeo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application " 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes , C] NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? A�o I L Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No [:]NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus - ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Ev' en e of Wind Drift Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): S, I 13. Soil Type(s): - --- — 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Ceftif afe- available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CA adil available? If yes, check the appropriate ox. ❑ C-h�istsogn ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Yes o ❑ Yes o ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ Yes &o ❑ Yes ❑ Yes [] Other: ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE *A ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE DNA ❑NE �21D record keeping need i vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yo ❑ A ❑ NE Et Waste Application We iy Freeboard Waste Analysis oiI Analysis �aste Transfers 'SWeather Code Rainfall tocking Crop Yiel 120 Minute Inly and V Rainfall Inspections spections MonthSludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes JEJ.4, ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/412011 Continued ,Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: >ti 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o N NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yeaa-hLo❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NF Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? X NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Ycs No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ❑ Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE 0 N ONE ❑ NA ❑ NE 0 N ❑NE lComments (refer to question #): Eiiplain any YES answers and/or any #dditional. i ecomtuendatlons:or any other comments ". U ;: Us�e'--d'rawi!f'9s,o'f'ficiiiii,to,befter,i'xplain situations (use additional`paR'`es as necessary).. k°�' �- �—,qb� •M --/ ova G-((�,-a 0 A2 r7 - fk y2 'a2 13 S� Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: Date: 2/4/2011 kz IN; C'. Water Resources Environmental Quality August 16, 2017 Shelbia C. Foster La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 P � rapn 1 ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary S. JAY ZIMMERMAN Director Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 80-43 General Permit AWC800043 Rowan County Dear Ms. Foster: On July 14, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, James B. alle III, Environmental Specialist Mooresville Regional Office Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated July 14, 2017 Jb State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 `Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 704-663-1699 0 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 800043 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800043 Inpaection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Date of Visit: 07/1412017 Entry Time: 01:00 pm Exit Time: 2:30 pm Incident # Farm Name: La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) Owner Email: Owner: Shelbia C Foster Phone: Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Springs Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Physical Address: 1685 Carson Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: ❑ Denied Access Mooresville 704-278-2596 Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 46'48" Longitude: 80'37- 34" FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD, FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945 Secondary OIC(s): Onsite Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Shelbia C. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 On-site representative Shelbia C. Foster Phone: 704-278-2595 Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: 09/30/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.96 Lbs11000 Gallons 07/02/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.15 Lbs/1000 Gallons 12!02113 > Soil Analysis lb Phone: 7Q"63-1699 Exi Date: page: 1 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Shelbia C Foster Facility Number. 800043 inspection Date: 07/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Cattle Caine -Milk Cow 500 160 Total Design Capacity: 500 Total SSLW: 700,000 Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freaboard Freeboard Waste Pond CARSON ROAD 18.00 42.00 0 page: 2 A f' Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 07/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges _&_ Stream _ Impacts Yea No Na Ng ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: ❑ Excessive Ponding? ❑ Structure [] 0 ❑ ❑ Application Field ❑ PAN? ❑ Other n ■ ❑ ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ M ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ E ❑ 2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 01111 ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ M ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No Na No ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ M ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ Excessive Ponding? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? ❑ PAN? ❑ 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yea No No No 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 3 v Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 80,0043 No Na No Inspection Date:. 07/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine E ❑ ❑ Waste Application Yea No Na He ❑ ❑ Crop Type 1 corn (silage) Crop Type 2 soybean, Wheat Crop Type 3 ❑ Crop Type 4 ❑ Crop Type 5 ❑ Crop Type 6 ❑ Soil Type 1 ❑ Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 ❑ E ❑ ❑ Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 ❑ Soil Type 6 ❑ 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ N ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ [� determination? ❑ 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ;� ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yea No Na No 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ E ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ page: 4 N Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 07/14/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yea No Na Ne Crop yields? ❑ ❑ ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ E ❑ ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (NPDES only)? 11011 [] 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels 0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ ❑ ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ Other Issues Yen 10 Na No 28. Did the facility. fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ E ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? 11011 [] If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑ CAWM P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ N ❑ ❑ page: 5 NY/ A'&Av NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Governor Shelbia C. Foster La -Faster Dairy (Carson Road) 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 Dear Ms. Foster: September 14, 2015 Donald R. van der Vaart Secretary Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 80-43 General Permit AWC800043 Rowan County On March 26, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection. The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, James B. Bealle 11I, Environmental Specialist Mooresville Regional Office Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources, NCDENR enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated March 26, 2015 Jb Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Mooresville, N6rth Carolina 28115 Phone: 704-663-16991 Internet: www,ncdenr.gov An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made in part by recycled paper Ni M Division of Water Resources El Division of Soil and Water Conservation El Other Agency Facility Number: 800043 Facility status: Active Permit: AWC800043 [] Denied Access Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Other Issues Reason for visit. Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville Date of Visit: 03/26/2015 Entry Time: 09:30 am Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident# Name Farm Name: La -Foster Dain/ (Carson Road) Owner Email: Phone : 704-278-2596 Owner: Shelbia C Foster Phone, 704-278-2596 Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Springs Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Physical Address: 1685 Carson Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 46'48" Longitude: 80° 37' 34" FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD. FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Shelbia C. Foster Phone : 704-278-2596 On-site representative Shelbia C. Foster Phone : 704-278-2596 Primary Inspector: James Phone: 704-663-1699 Exi Inspector signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): inspection summary: 11/14/14 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.14 Lbs11000 Gallons 11/04/13 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.40 Lbs/1000 Gallons 12/02/13 > Soil Analysis jb page: 1 Permit: AWC800043 Owner- Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 03/26/15 1npsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Cattle Cattle - Milk Cow 500 200 Total Design Capacity: 500 Total SS LW: 700,000 Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date start Date Freeboard Freeboard Waste Pond CARSON ROAD 18.00 48.00 page: 2 R Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 03/26/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharnes & Stream Impacts Yes No Na- Ne No Na No 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ Excessive Ponding? Structure ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Application Field ❑ ❑ PAN? Other ❑ ❑ ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ M ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 13011 M ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable Cl M ❑ d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ m ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ M ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection _Storage & Treatment Yes No Na No ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ M ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ Excessive Ponding? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ . trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? ❑ PAN? ❑ 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑ B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable Cl M ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Wide APPlication Yes No Na Ne 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 3 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 03/26/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No Na No 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Crop Type 2 Soybean, Wheat WUP? Crop Type 3 Checklists? ❑ Design? Crop Type 4 Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? Crop Type 5 Other? ❑ Stocking? Crop Type 6 page: 4 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yea No Na No 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ WUP? Cl Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ page: 4 I Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 03/26/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No Na No Crop yields? [] 0 ❑ ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ME] [] 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (NPDES only)? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check the ❑ 1:10 ❑ appropriate box(es) below. Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels [] Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon [❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 0 ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ M ❑ Other Issues Y N� o Na No 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ M ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ E ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAWM P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ page: 5 1 FW PA'MCCRORY I. Governor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Water Resources ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY. S. JAY ZIMMERMAN December 22, 2016 Director CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Shelbia C. Foster La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV-2016-PC-0657 15A N.C.A.C. 2T. 13 04 La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 80-43 General Permit AWC800043 Rowan County Dear Ms. Foster: On October 31, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) and the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection. As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have.a non - discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2T .13 04, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows: Violation I: Failure to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit Condition Ill. 5, II1.11, and 111. 12, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Required Corrective Action for Violation I: In the future, conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application in accordance with the permit. The Division of Water Resources requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please submit a written response to this Notice by January 17, 2017. Please include in your response all actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future. State of North Carolina I Fbvironinental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality ItAgional Operations Mooresville Regional Office 610 Hast Cenler Avenue, Suitt 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 �.... w- ;704 6631699 1 La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 8043 NOTICE OF VIOLATION . Decetnber 22, 2016 Page 2 Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement - action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A. Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704) 663-1699. Sinc rel , Andrew H. Pitner, P.G., Assistant Regional Supervisor 1 Mooresville Regional Office Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of :Water Resources enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated October 31, 2016 cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation via E -Mail Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District Central Permit File AWC800043 Regional Permit File A.WC800043 ib - Division'of Water Resources "Divislon'of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number: 800043 Facility Statue: Active Permit AWC800043 _ Denied Access Inpeection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Dale: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville Date of Visit: 10131!2016 Entry Time: 01:00 pm Exit Time: 2:30 pm Incldant 0 Farm Name: La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) Owner Email: Owner: Shelbia C Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Springs Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Physical Address: 1685 Carson Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Facillty Status: Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Lattfude: 35-46-48" Longitude: '80'.37' 34" FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD. FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone r 24 hour contact name Shelbia C. Foster Phone : 704-278-2596 On-site representative Shelbia C. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Phone: 704-03-1699 Exi Date: 0 Inspection Summary: 09/30/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.96 Lbsl1000 Gallons 07/02/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.15 Lbs11000 Gallons 12/02/13 > Soil Analysis 21. Failure to conduct Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the dale of application; NOV to follow. jb Permit: AWC80OD43 Owner - Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 10/31/16 Inpsection Type: "-Compliance.lnspection Reason for Visit: Routine . Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current prom6tions Cattle Cattle'- Milk Cow 504 178 Total Design Capacity. ' SD0 Total SSLW: 700,000 Waste Structures Dlsignatsd Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard Waste Pond CARSON ROAD 18.00 48.00 i c i I Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 10. Ate there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Inspection Date: 10/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No Na No' Excessive Ponding? 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ m ❑ Cl Discharge originated at: Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? Structure ❑ ❑ .:. Total Phosphorus? Application Field Cl ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? Other ❑ ❑ Application outside of application area? a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ m ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes,notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ M ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment Yes Na Na No 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ W❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑' 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.1 large. ❑ M ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need'maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ ❑ ❑ to roofed pits-, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No Na No 10. Ate there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ ❑ ❑ . maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? Is PAN > 10°/600 lbs.?. ❑ .:. Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? . ❑ Application outside of application area? I-1 Permit: AWC800043 ;Owner - Facility: Shelbia C Foster Facility Number. Inspection Date: 10/31/18 .: Inbsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: , 800043 Routine Waste Application Yea No Na No Crop Type 1 Ccm (Silage) Crop Type 2 .. ._. _ soybean Wheat Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 8 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 " Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ M ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ M ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? . ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No Na No 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permii readily available? ❑ Y M ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WU P? ❑ t ❑ Checklists? Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑, Weekly Freeboard? ❑ u J Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility : Shelbia C Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 10/31/16 Inpsection Type: Complianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No Na Na Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ 110 ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Other Issues Yes Na Na No 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ N ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ N ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ if yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑ Other [❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ N ❑ ❑ page: i u•u- . . �..� W .. W .. .r—p,.n...a.. ..•..-.�-..+�•M...w�.+�..�...:...+.� - ..�.+F. ..r_.-5.�. a _ - r-3. _ ..ti--.. a . RECEiVEDINCG'—NRIt VI rj JAN - 12Dl7 WQRt'AOORESVILLE R,�_GV G-,ONIgL OFFICE Ae— rsU_ s �-d iShePoster D ..., may.,.. -3210,Co prp9s'R. , Cleveiand't3C 27413=9a_ �- F Type of Visit: J* Compliance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 41 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: D Departure Time: County: f4e� Region: Farm Name: Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone; Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: �� c Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: I pie: ruuue: Integrator: Q Certification Number: l (� Certification Numbe . Latitude: Longitude: .�" "t [ 3 :r, 3% .EYar � � 7 ip i.%.d.' tM N - r � 'f, � -.�f�a i s� iJ` � •m -r' • F tl' ' a 1''. -.�'✓ys,�"� _ _'!s. _. 2���'4$Cd�" t, I Sv - G 1 ^v1. 1 1 1 t xC'��A � �� ,,. � 1 � �' 1 •, ,I a�� _; - t � `� ! 1., 1 d Y ■ 1 ■■■■ ■21 • ■ " 1 1 ---"'4��w5 -L. _fes r �'ca Lam'}} rb � �."� � �:�i ,>��x_ � �,f'.rj�+i'7.jTi�-� �. �''' ■ 1 { -� nom' 'n..5 M. ��� � � , - 1* SI ,- ��f1i.,li�l�=�-- �1.� y■ ".11. "1' __Fla'.'_>{•'` Mil i 1C-3 r, ::. .''.. s �,, ,1f1LY' r -__�7: N'3' _ -"i''6$r'f. '�'�.� '4k.y■ -- -e;„ F'.r"-'. +. ,4 " r,i::shy+r� kz !�',■ ; � ■ -- _- �`� it �'.� � � 1 E � Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes�o1 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No I NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? �• d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ❑N ❑NE [-] Yes NA ❑ NE ❑ Y" ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 - 2/412011 Continued • r Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is stora e c � city (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfail) less than adequate? ❑ Yeso NA ❑ NE j a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE a 7\u Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structu ' Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 7k5. Are there any immediate thre*tointe2glity of any of the structures observed?❑Yes E]NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes To 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta reat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes r No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yeo NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Anolication 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes NA [] NE -7maintenance.or-improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Y s No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reauired Records & Documents — 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ Checklists [ l)esig� Maps ❑ Lease oes record keeping need i veinent? If y e A ion eekly Freebo all oc 'ng rop Yield 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a ❑ Yes , -�- Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ _Yes �1 NA - ❑ NE- _ --, _- ❑ Yes ❑ Na A ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Q_Xes ❑NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE b"ox iielo � . "Wog��' ❑NoitAnal ansfers nthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Yes o 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑ No Page 2 of 3 [] NA ❑ NE OAier_code A ❑ NE N ❑ NE 2/412011 Continued Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? es ❑ NA [] NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility f ' ispose of dead animals YLLth 24 hours and/or document [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Offite o��� �j"n uired by the Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? and/or ariy, additional recc 01 - _C Con 4�, ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes '115 NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o' NA ❑ NE Yeq- NE ons�or an�othei• comments � "`4 ' Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Page 3 of 3 214/2011 Oct 1815 04;08p Sarah Foster 704-278-9344 �-r� 7� ray e5 p.1 CL `(D 0 0 LL t m ca U) a O CQ U 0 NCDA&CS Aqronomic Division Phone: 19191733-2655 Website: www.ncaar.Qovlagronornif FY17 WO01 Predictive Client. Terry/ Sarah Foster Advisor: 41s Foster Farms 1685 Carson Rd. Waste ReportCleveland, NC 27013 Rowan County Sampled; 09/2512016 Recotred; 09/30/2016 complatad: 14105/2016 Farm, 80-43 Lln eful Information Sample Information Nutrient and Other Measurements N/trogen (N) (ppm) P (ppm) K (ppm) Ca (ppm) Ma (ppm) S (ppm) Fe (Ppm) Mn (ppm) Zn (Ppm) Cu (Awn) 8 (ppm) Na (ppm) C (Fpm) Sample la: 25 Tota( N 215 614 332 145 91.3 113 6.03 3.32 1.99 0.44 164 Waste Code: LSD Description: Total K]eldahl N 1190 :..... ......... . . . . . ........ . ... . .... ......... .. ........ ........... . . . - - - ... - ..... . Dairy Liq- Slurry Inorganic N PH DM (5.) SS (f0-5S/cm) EC (mSlcm) CCE (%) ALE- (1000 gal.) C:N NH4-N 6.19 Comments: NOa-N Orqanic N Ni (ppm) Cd (Ppm) Pb (ppmJ A/ (aum) So (ppm) L/ (ppm) As (ppm) Cr (ppm) Co (ppm) Cl (ppm) MO (ppm) Urea Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop. (lb / 1000 gal.) Other Elements (lb 11000 gal.) Application Method N P20s K2O Ca Mq S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li I Irrigation 3.96 4.10 6.15 2.77 1.21 0.76 0.94 0.05 0.03 0.02 T 1.37 Broadcast 3.96 4.10 6.15 2.77 1.21 0-76 0.94 0.05 0.03 0.02 T 1.37 Understandin4 the Waste Report • . additionallniormagon, www nca_ L ovlao nomibVlesluwaste.ydf & nrww.ncaar.00vl&QMnQmllpdfftj%s/wstequi e. df Nutrient concentrations and other data on this report are provided so that waste materials can be applied at agronomic rates, thereby supplementing or reducing fertilizer application and preventing environmental contamination. In reading the laboratory Results section, remember that materials with < 15% dry matter (generally liquids) are analysed as received; all other wastes are dried first Values in the Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop section are based on the type of waste and method of application you specify and reflect the fact that only 40-60% of the nitrogen and 70-100° of other nutrients become avallable within one year of application. The remainder mai or may not ever become available. ppm = parts per million; S = siemens; m8 = mlllisiemens; T = trace (<0.005 Ib/unit); EC- electrical conductivity; CCE = calcium carbonate equivalence; ALE = agricultural lime equivalence; pH = acidity or basicity; DM% _ % dry matter [for semi-solid and solid waste samples, this value facll[tates conversion of dry -basis concentrations (ppm) back to wet -basis of original sample]; C:N ratio = carbon. -nitrogen ratio. Ntar�1� Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory-information-monagement system that makes this report possible is being funded k through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission. Imp tilv Thank you for using agronomic services io manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality. TA*(cv Tw%1 Fend Zu-sures m. - Steve Trarler. Commissioner of l) N CL It: It n rn i ao r q U) 0 LL ''0^ V/ F04i,. ,LUR-1 Slurry and Saud( ,,plication Field Record r ( For Recording Slurry Appiicaton Events on Different Fields Farm Owner CA 1 ' ri• I _:' r. Facility Number2 ��-1I- D` Spreader Operator ,-1 Tract & Field # date (mm/ddlyr) ***Weather Code Crop Type Field Size (acres) Application Method' Number of Loads per Field Volume of each Load" (gallons) LI61 5 -lb - 4y /.•t���'2-�i•1�' .. r_'.;' -"ii � _ 7 wl1�, n ! 16 ff _T la d * SI = soil incorporated (disked); BR = broadcast (surface applied) m ** Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a total dealer if you do not have your owner's manual. Weather Lodes_ C -Clear, PC -Partly Cloudy, Cl -Cloudy, R -Rain, S-SnowlSleet, W -Windy 3/142003 0 LO CO 0 0 ra Nr v co 9 00 N Nr 0 r` CIL ch T7 V 0 in CO U 0 F-. _.A SLUR -2 Tract # Date (mm/da/yr) Field Size(Wetted Acres)=(A) Volume of each Load' (gallons) Farm Owner 1, f Owner's Address PAN Applied (Iblacre) (5) x (5)1 loot) Nfuogeri Balance— (Iblacre) (B) - (7) F!= Owner's Phone B �'�.5-'1; - jf, Slurry and Slu, - , Application f=ield Records One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle Field # Facility Number Spreader Operator and Address Operator's Phone # From Animal Waste Management Plan Crop Type Reoommended PAN Loading (Iblacre) = (t3) (1) 12) (31 (41 i f51 (fit fT] (81 *'"Nutrient Source Date (mm/da/yr) Number of Loads per Field Volume of each Load' (gallons) Total Volume (gallant) (2) x (3) Volume per Acre (gallant/acre) (4) I (A) Waste Analysis PAN" (Ib/1000 gat) PAN Applied (Iblacre) (5) x (5)1 loot) Nfuogeri Balance— (Iblacre) (B) - (7) F!= fa!'a�ro' �'�.5-'1; - jf, � �ya� ff`�j(5 n �,r.�� `c'"" � • �'�, �% i. y 5 'i,'Id��;�u. �Q��r 3D p�j p `t . J 31 Crop Cycle Totals: Owners Signatuie Spreader Operator's Signature j/, I!.l r Certified Operator (print) +J`h �� jl !1- �7�;°/-sr-I�• Operator Certification No. �� • �Z? Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual. See your waste management plan for sampling frei uency At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events. —Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event. Enter nutrient source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, On } 12120/2" I. K -.A SLUR -2 1 Tract # CL Field Size(Wetted Acres)=(A) Nr M CD ti v 0 r - a m h 0 LL t� c� rn CL v 0 ao Fann Owner Owners Address Slurry and Slu,„ -Application Field Records One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle Field # Facility Number Spreader Operator and Address r)umoer Phone 9 I 1 Operators Phone # Ia,_pg,_' .(g �� .�,- R y r Cr/op Cycle Totals: I ! Owners Signaturc 2dl //, -__11 ; pY�.� ' Spread+~r Operators Signature 1(10 �'% '', r';, Operator Certification No. Certified operator (print)�--- ' Can be found in operators manual for the spreader, Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual. See your waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events. '—Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event. ""Enter nutrient source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.) 7212UI2/r0D6 From Animal Waste Management Plan Crop Type Recommended PAN Z� C7 �' �r} Loading (Iblacre) = (a) (1) (2) (1) (4) (7) (a) Number Volume of 1•otal Valurne Volume per Acre Waste Analysis PAN Applied Nitrogen Balanco'"' **—Nutrient pate :,i Loads each Load' (gatlons) (gallorrslaue) PAN" (Ihlacre) (lblacre) Source (mmlddlyr) per field (gallons) (Z) x (3) (4)1 JA) (Ib/1 oou gal) (6) x (5)11GOO Ia,_pg,_' .(g �� .�,- R y r Cr/op Cycle Totals: I ! Owners Signaturc 2dl //, -__11 ; pY�.� ' Spread+~r Operators Signature 1(10 �'% '', r';, Operator Certification No. Certified operator (print)�--- ' Can be found in operators manual for the spreader, Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual. See your waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events. '—Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event. ""Enter nutrient source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.) 7212UI2/r0D6 u� CL qqr qq- as N N (D r— N O LL L N N U) CL v O u7 ao U 0 F_ _41 SLUR -2 Tract # Field Size(Wetted Acres)=(A) Farm Owner Owner's Address Owner's Phone # Slurry and Slu,. _ Application Field Records One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle Field # Facility Number Spreader Operator and Address Operators Phone # From Animal Waste Management Plan Crop hype , Recommended PAN ZP Loading (Iblacre) = (B) f ' (1) (21 (3) (4) (5) (61 (7) f8) ""`Nutrient Snurce tate (mmlddlyr) Number of Loads per Field Volume of ouch Land' (gallons) Total Vulumc (gallons) (2) x (3) Volume per Acre (gallonsfarxe) (4) l (A) Waste Analysis PAN" (IbI1000 gal) PAN Applied (lb/acre) (6) x (5)1100f) Nitrogen Balance"' (Iblacre) (d) (7} rj= 3�� L I3PD n �33o C %_ --Z bo soP6lI f 11.8 5 Crop Cycle Totals: Owners Signature Spreader Operator's Signature Certified Operator (print) _ _ operator Certification No. ` Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader, Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual. " Sea your waste management plan for sampling frequer+cy. At a minimum, waste analysis is required writhin 60 days of land application events. • Enter the value received by subtracling column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) folsnwing each application event. ""Enter nutrient source (ie. Lagoon/Storage fond Ip, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.) 12/2012^� 8 m 0 LL t m rn 0- rn �t 0 u7 co U 0 ' F _.A SLUR -2 Tract # Field Size(Wetted Acres)=(A) Farm Owner Owner's Address Slurry and Slu..- . Application Field Records One Form for Each f=ield per Crop Cycle LI 3 5 Field # Facility Number ��: 'r: • ,i__�-c'� Spreader Operator and Address or. Owner's Phone # L—_I Operator's Phone # From Animal Waste Management Pian Crop TypeRecommended PAN Ir rnrd Loading (lb/acre) f13 rat rpt lot rs) f61 m 191 'Nutrient Source Date (mm/ddlyr) Number of Loads per Field Volume of earl-+ Load' (gallons) Total Volume (gallons) (2) x (3) Volume per Acre (galfonsracre) (4)/(A) Waste Analysis PAN— (lb/1000 gal) PAN Applied (Iblaere) (6) x (5) ! 100o Nitrogen Balance— (lb/acre) (13)- (7) a-� �iL oAa� -1' 76'U 3940 r�Dp �r�`33 3,9� a'�'f v�- �p�1ry�5 �l -15 V NO J!! Y Crop Cycle Totals: Owners Signature . f r Spreader Operator's Signature _ Certified Operator (print) _ Operator Certification No. ' Can be found in operator's manual for the sprpader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manuat. " See your waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events. "'Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continua subtracting column (7) from column (B) following each application event. —Enter nutrient source (ie. LagoonlSturage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.) l 12/20/2`^' F, .,d SLUR -2 Tract f r Q- Field Size(Welted Acres)=(A rarm Owner Owner's Address v co rn co r - N v 0 r - m 0 LL L m CIL U") 4 0 u,> OD U 0 a Owner's Phone # 17 Slurry and Slue , Application Field Records One Form io1 Fach Field per Crop Cycle Field # Facility Number Spreader Operator and Address Operators Phone # From Animal Waste Management Plan Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading (lblatxe) - (B) �Z, rn r2~ 131 14W r51 r6i 171 (8) ""Nutrient Source Date (nrmlddlyr) Numbor of Loads per Field Volume of each Load" (gallons) Total Volume (gallons) (2) x (3) Volume per Acre (gallonslarre) (4)1(A) Waste Analysis [JAN— (110 Goo gat) PAN Applied (fblacre) (6) x (5)1 1000 Klruger Balance""' Nacre) 8= 1-q?cn� a� ID ��lSd h ���51Dlsn 12j L1� Crop Cycle Totals: Owners Signature Spreader Operator's Signature Certified Operator (print) Operator Certification No. Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual. " See your waste management plan for sampling frequency_ At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events. —Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event. "`Enter nutrient source (ie. LagoonlSlorage fond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry hlte7, etc.) 12/20l2nois (Type of Visit: (9 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technicals ance l Reason for Visit: * Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up Q Referral 0 Emergency O Other Denied Access I1 Date of Visit: Ci t Arrival Time: ! Departure Time: O County: VDV� Region:y ��6z�� Farm Name: �� ��r2lq� Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: �<Z, Capacity Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder. Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Title: Latitude: Des P;oult ry. Ca1z, 11pp ]Non Layer I J Design 1 TDr ,Pdultr ,Ca ecr «=Other .. „ Other La ers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: ` Number: Longitude: Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ��es es o NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters o ❑ NA [] NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 2/412011 Continued aiEX Cow Calf Dairy Heifer ptnxy Dry Cow V,, Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ��es es o NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters o ❑ NA [] NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 2/412011 Continued Facility Number: -1 1 Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4.�Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Structur ientifier: )illway?: Designed Freeboard (in): ` V Observed Freeboard (in): Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE , ❑ Yes ❑ No [IA� NE Structure 5 Structure 6 ❑ Yes CNo❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environntaI threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA D NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yesfoo ❑ NA ❑ •NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes7NVo___ ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidenc of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area C� 4.--.� �- _ �t� rte_ _ ti , rt ,[ •• •. 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E3zgo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Vo �❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ YesNA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Oth eainfall e ecord keeping need improvement? If yes, check the ppropriate box below. 0 0 ❑ NA NE to Application s� ekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Analysis �a e Tran ers Weather Code ❑ Stockm Cr ield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections❑Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes '®.Pdo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �❑ NoNE Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? *YvsNo NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, cher NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Yes-- ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes b5o�[] NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes❑ `No NA E]NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes o NA [:]NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA E] NE Continents (refer to question'#) Explain any YES_answers, and/or any addltional recornmendahons;o_ r any other comments; Use drawings.#( facility to.lietter exp Eain situations_(use additional`pages es necessary).. x;n z.. t,v = Y ^°r =w Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tV_'<3'x Phone: Date: Page 3 of 3 21412021 s 2,�=Fgc�ltty Number �' ,® ,�� } ,�, 3,„ ���Division of Soil andaWater�Conservation �,�:r r � `'�� � ; '' ��-' - =� C , .., ,. -.: '.. .� � ."a � �.: :�. . r �: �; �-" a .�0 Age Cyti„r ° ni^E��. ��� S s. �i��'..is, �: fi�R7• !� � type of visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance 2eason for visit: 16 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: �ti Arrival Time: ;eV Departure Time: E2 : County: �-- Region; Farm Name:c Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swinel Capacity s I'ol h Finish []jWffianto Feeder eeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts I jBoars Other Other � 9a a` Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: M1 Design. Current Design tCui w Wet Pat<ltry Eapacrty G b e x" a Capacity ^ V1 mum La er Non -Layer I D&igm Current = ry:Pou Ca aci u 4 Po La ers Non -La ers Pullets Turke s Turke Poults Other ai Cow airy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �Noo NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA [ ] NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [� Ye.hle NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 2/4/2011 Continued Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Strl� Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threaiig"-The integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? o ❑ NA ❑ NE 0 No ❑ NE Structure 6 ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 41 ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ ental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes r I ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, set ac cs, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. EDYes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of W' d Drift [:]Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): C� � 1 13. Soil Type(s): ^r— L" ` 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE. 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ E3 NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a Iack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does re�potd keeping need impr ment? If yes, the a appropriate box below. Yes ❑ NA NE ste Application eekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analy is oil sis Waste Transfers eather Code ��Raill ❑ Stocki Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Ye o A ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ N A ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/412011 Continued Facili Number: - Date of inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?� Yes❑ NA [] NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check �❑ Yes o SNA [] NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? El Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher norma . 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency si ' s as required by the ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -app Ica ion) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #) Explain an y.YES"answees and/or any additional, recommendations or any other,comments La I Use.drawin s°a# facili to better ex laid situatlogs use additional a es;as necessar g ty� p ( _ if g y) . Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: V/A_ pl Phone: Date: Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011 i ype of visit: W c:ompnance inspection v operation tceview V Ntructure uvaivation V I ecnntcal Assistance Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referrai O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: O-.� ,f Departure Time: County: Region: KR'6 C�cVA^ Farm Name: L� 'PB Ji b Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative:{ Certified Operator: .2wy- \ ' Title: Phone: Integrator: ' Certification Number: �� y Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: ai w Other 71 Other Latitude: Longitude: .k 7esign Current .: Design Current' d Design Cu. re apacety Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity 1'op Cattle Capacity Dairy Cow O Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer D Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Turkeys - c + � Turkey Poults 4 ir ' Other �r v'a;M- Non -La er Desi ri Currents t`r . d Poul Ca aci Po 4 isI Layers ,, I INon-Lavers Pullets rent n Discharges and Stream Impact 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No XrRA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) s Swine W� ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Wean toFinish =y Wean to Feeder _ ❑ No A Feeder to Finish ` ❑ YesNA Farrow to Wean ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Farrow to Feeder NA ❑ NE Farrow to Finish Gilts = Boars ai w Other 71 Other Latitude: Longitude: .k 7esign Current .: Design Current' d Design Cu. re apacety Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity 1'op Cattle Capacity Dairy Cow O Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer D Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Turkeys - c + � Turkey Poults 4 ir ' Other �r v'a;M- Non -La er Desi ri Currents t`r . d Poul Ca aci Po 4 isI Layers ,, I INon-Lavers Pullets rent n Discharges and Stream Impact 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No XrRA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No Y/ ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesNA VO ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 2/412011 Continued Facil; Number: IDate of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes_�Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway,?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 12f3No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ 'Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside',of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): wr��k-,Vb 1% 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [:]Yes ❑ No �1A ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes o ❑ NA [—]NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permreadilyit available�?� ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [] Yes��6 ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. WLJP aps Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Ye ❑ N ❑ NE Waste Applica 'on �Geekly Freeboard Waste Analysis 1] Soil Analysis aste Transfers eather Code 0tainfall Stocking _E]RKop Yield Minute Inspectionsonthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes IEI<o ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued Jjacility Number: jDate of inspection: %"r 4. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? �,V�Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ N j<A ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non -compliance - 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Y o ❑ ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes 0 No IA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead ani with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes )E�,Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of QZ5_r t ���s required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below D Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes L_§o ❑ NA [] NE E'E�D ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 4 10 ❑ NA ❑ Yes❑ NA Yes NA Comnietits'(refer:to':question #):'Explain'any YES answers and/or any addltional recommendations or any othercombients.. Use drawings of;facility to better explain; situations (use additional pages as necessary). VIA Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE Phone: Date: Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011 0 0 Division of Water Quality Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit 00 Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit * Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: i ��7A�rrival Time: I to Departure Time: ' - County: NNEYL Region: �! Farm Name: ���_1 "C � Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility, Contact: Title: Onsite Representative: sw Certified Operator: C, Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Design Current Swine Capacity Population �[] Wean to Finish _ ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts Other ❑ Other =Latitude: Phone: Phone No: Integrator: Operator Certification Number: Back-up Certification Number: Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Population Non -Layer Dry Poultry Layers Nan -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey 1'onits Other Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? Longitude: =0=4 0=4 Design Current Capacity Pop latiau Calf Heifer U Beef Stocker ❑ Beef Feeder 1771 Beef Brood Cow Number of Structures: b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) C. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ YesElNA [INE ❑ Yes ❑ No lklk ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No4 AA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE 12/28/04 Continued Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? E-1Yeso bj t'_�NE veto I Structure 2 Structure 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5 Struc'Nre 6 Identifier: 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Spillway?: ❑ NA ❑ NE Designed Freeboard (in): ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Observed Freeboard (in): ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA bV ❑ NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ki "' ❑ NA ❑ NE . through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �lo [INA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes v�o I --]NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes' o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? ]L Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesXNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area N�!L�12. Crop type(s) t�h 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes'Sko ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes -1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): AL '1 b =60-V ` * 7 Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /2/28/04 Continued 1 1 .�.Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Required Records & Documents i 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes `—'� ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE aste Application ly Freeboard�Waste Anal sis '�"" Analysis 0 waste -Transfers ua Certification ainfall Stocking ❑ p Yield / to _tions U446niffly and 1" Rain Inspections Q -Weather Code 22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE uipment? Yes ❑ No<VNA in ? Yes o ❑ NA ❑ Yes [:1 No k3A ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No &A Other Issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAW] 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were hig eran n mal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emerFPncv cih,atianc ac required by General Permit? (ic/ discharge, freeboard problems; over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes , io ❑ NA ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ Yes CF ❑ NA ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ Yes�'1o'❑ NA ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ NE Additional Comments and/or Drawings: X11 CF C3 VVV { , 12128104 L Division of Water Facility Number= Q,DNWo'n'of Soil ana WaterpConservati x Q Other Agency Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review . O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit 10 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access Date of Visit: lt�Awl 1 I Arrival Time: 1p�tc� Departurc ime: V` % County. � � Region: Farm Name: L"'a ��` `N r7 ,�?j Owner Email: �G Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Phone: Phone No: Integrator: 9kq Operator Certification Number: Back-up Certification Number: r ---*-1 1) r"""`I . r-----1 .. r ---'l n r ----T, r1 .. )L-ocation of harm: L titude: L_J L_J L j Longitude: LJ LJ LJ Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Other ❑ Other Design Current Design Current Capacity Papulation Wet Poultry Capacity Population ❑ Layer 1 ❑ Non -Layer Dry Poultry ❑ La ers ❑ Non -Layers ❑ Pallets ❑ Turkeys ❑ Turkey Poults ❑ Other Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? Design Current Cattle Capacity Pcran 0-5airy Cow TTO O—Dairy Calf ❑ Dai Heifer ❑ D Cow ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocket ❑ Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Cow Number of Structures: Eh b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NoA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE ❑ YesNA C3NE ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 12/28/04 Continued Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus stone storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NaOA ❑ NE Structur 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 `` Sure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: _ Designed Freeboard (in): Ob d F b•d ' serve ree oar (tn). 5. Are there any imme Ea e t reats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? t, If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes`�Jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? AYe[--] NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application r 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evide cc of Wind Drifl ❑ Application MAL y� \ c 12. Crop type(s) Ga �' 1 S` 13. Soil type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination %❑ yes ❑ No S�A ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Oyesd No ❑ NA ❑ NE ��,," � _ .. _. -•:. :• ,'� ' i' . ]a.; � . - : '... ' ,• : •i i.�dj..i Its- a yr � rYr 7�. +Carumeuts (refer to question,#) Enplane any YES:.answers andlor any reeommendatlons or anynthex comments "s lusse=drrr.ewings of;facrlity:to better explain situations.`(use additional pages as necessary) : r � "� r,•� k d x ;.:: .L,. r * ' Y .� s - 1 7 '(i�a "Y*". } f ? ". ... • :'la .n _ i rr .7'::. ... ... i Reviewer/inspector Name ~' " Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 12/28/04 Continued Facility Number: — Required Records & Documents Date of Inspection 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components oWMP read a le? If yes, check the appropirate box. Checklists ❑ Design g El Maps ❑Other ■ YesNr ■ NJ N' NE EjYes 11;��No 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes _lA ❑ NE rite ApR40ftion ❑ Weekly Freeboard Q-Cste Analysis nal sis rite Transfers ❑ Annual Certification Qa-a-i—rifall ❑ ckingrap Yield _0 Minute Inspections-- Monthly and 1" Rain lnspection ❑ Weather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the peri 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Other issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report the mortality rates that were higher thr an nonnal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of mmergencyituations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Additional Comments and/or' Di•iwings: ❑ Yes o 0 N El NE ❑ Yes ❑ Noo' NA ElNE ❑ Yes � 190 [:INA ❑ NE b Yes ❑ No—jkid'A ❑ NE El Yes 4-79—❑NA E] NF ❑ Yes ❑ No N ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes go ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes I U:mo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NE 12/28/04 r Type of Visit O -Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit & Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access p� Date of Visit: d; �%.Z,�0 Arrival Time: b� :� Departure Cime �� County: Region: V Farm Name: C���� Owner Email - Owner Name: ` `a �`1 _ Phone: --- — Mailing Address: _ Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Design _ Current Swine . ` Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Finish ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts Other,_ ❑ Other Phone No: Integrator: Operator Certification Number: Back-up Certification Number: Latitude: ❑ p =I = Longitude: =0=1 °❑1 Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Population` ❑ La er ❑ Non -Layer Dry Poultry ' Layers Non -L Pullets Other Poults Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other a. Was the conveyance man-made? Design Current COW Capacity P9ao4ation MLDairyCow 1 � ❑ Dairy Calf ❑ Dairy Heifer ❑ Dr Cow ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Beef Stocker ❑ -Beef Feeder ❑ Beef Brood Cow Number of Structures: f b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ W16 ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No J� ❑ NE ❑ YeeNoA ❑ NE ❑ Ye ❑ NE ❑Ye [I NF 12/2"4 Continued Facility Number: — Date of Inspection Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No jj N LJ NE tructu I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): f 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE (ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE through a waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment l threat, notify DWQ 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? I I ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Y�Oecl NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑'PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Applic ' n Outside of Area 12. Crop type(s) C �� 13. Soil type(s) SO�—t 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes_)?&"To ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes .L No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination;❑ Yes ❑ No htg ❑ NE 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Ye io [:1 NA El NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA El NE Comments (referto.tquestion�#) iExplarn"agyrYES answers andlar" any recommendations`or any'other eorriments: ` -i v �,:iY r,� �i yri FJse drawings;of fac�llty, o better.,explainsituatrons {use additional pages as necessary)• 4e, .&, f'..:?(+`''.c�.1.-'3r%.5"F':k.`C�:.:r,�1.,,".+i�'�J�r.:';tsr.,".'„�7�'t,. ZEI cj3 Reviewer/InspectorName r `�s.;'.4 .�Q.�.� �,t,w,,.. �, n7Nr...,r'�..a_s3Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 12/28/04 Continued Facility Number: — Date of inspection Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ YesJ>C—❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El yes', ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropirate box. Checklists❑Design ❑Maps ❑Other 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate b x below. Kes��[]No ❑ NA ❑ NE aste Application 'eekly Freeboard �te Analys Analysis Waste Transfers -0 -Annual Certification mfall Stocking rop Yield linute Inspections onthly and V Main Inspections AD1Veather Code 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �1 N_o ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No_.�K ❑ NE 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes C`a_❑ NA ElNE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE Other issues 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes ❑ NA El NE 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [INA ❑ NE and report the mortality. rates that were higher than normal? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately 31. Did the facilityfail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes [DNA ❑ NE General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Addtt� Y } .«-➢" r r .�; e x �, r - .s : r. 3 dionamlg,Dra<�. An (n A—C� 2 ovq 12/2$/04 Division of Water Quality n Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number : 800043 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWCB00043 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: rgmr)liance 4nsoectionInactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresv]He Date of Visit: 02120/2009 Entry Time:02 00 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM Incident #: Farm Name: La -Fos er Dairy (Carson Road) Owner Email: Owner: Gerald_M_Fosler Phone: 704-278-2596 Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Springs Rd Cleveland NC 270139438 Physical Address: Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°46'48" Longitude: 80°37'34" FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD. FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Geraid M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Primary Inspector: James Beane 704-663-1699 Phone. Ext -2 62 Inspector Signature: r Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: 12/01/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.4 Lbs11000 Gallons 05/22/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons 03/20/08 > Soil Analysis Jb Page: 1 m Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: 02120!2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Cattle Cattle -Milk Cow 500 165 Total Design Capacity: 500 Total SSLW: 700,000 Waste Structures Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard kaste Pond CARSON ROAD 18.00 48.00 Page: 2 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: 02/2012009 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ D D Discharge originated at Structure D Application Field Other D a. Was conveyance man-made? D D ■ D b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) DOED c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) D D ■ D 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? D ■ D D 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a D ■ D D discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? D ■ D D If yes, is waste level into structural Freeboard? D 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe D ■ D D erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management D ■ D D or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? D ■ D D B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, D ■ D D dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or D ■ D D improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or D ■ D D improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? 0000 If yes, check the appropriate box below Excessive Ponding? D Hydraulic Overload? D Frozen Ground? D Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? D Page: 3 . Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 02/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection - Reason for Visit: Routine Yes No NA NE Waste Application n PAN? Page: 4 n Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n Total P205? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? In In Outside of acceptable crap window? n Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? In Corn (Silage) Crop Type 1 Soybean, Wheat Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the ,Certified Animal Waste Management n ■ n n Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? n ■ n n 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n n ■ it 17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n ■ n n 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n ■ n n Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Cerffcate of Coverage and Permit readily available? n ■ n n 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? fl ■ nl 0 If yes, check the appropriate box below. n MID? Page: 4 Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: 02/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? D Design? D Maps? In Other? 21, Does record keeping need improvement? D ■ Irl D If yes, check the appropriate box below, Waste Application? n 120 Minute inspections? D Weather code? D Weekly Freeboard? D Transfers? Rainfall? n Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n Waste Analysis? n Annual soil analysis? D Crop yields? D Stocking? D Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? D 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? D 000 23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? D n ■ D 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n ■ n n 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? D D ■ D 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? D ■ D D 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? D D ■ D Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWIVIP? n ■ n D 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those D ■ D D mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional Air D ■ n D Quality representative immediately. Page: 5 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Faster Inspection Date: 02/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Facility Number : 800043 Reason for Visit: Routine Yes No NA NE n■nn n■nn n■nn Page 6 VSr' r -Ji, °J �o x rriAx. r r .r R �re.e .S .WASTE POND/LAGOON FREEBOARD AND AVAILABLE STORAGE CAPACITY Permit NU.Mber: Farm Name: Owner: Number of Pond/Lagoon Structures: Operator id Responsible Charge: Phone: _ Date Structure Structure Rainfall Initials of person Date Structure Structure Rainfall Initi2ls ni 1. freeboard plus available storage capacity is the difference between the lowest point of n tagoon/sior;:,!t DL)P(. embankment and the level of liquid. Fpr lagoonsistorage ponds with spillways, the difference betwt•.:' tint: level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should he recorded. Freeboard plus available storage capacity must be recorded weekly in inches, :. Recording rainfall iu inclies is highly recommended but not required unless specifically required as condition of the facility's animal waste management plan or permit. Optional: Skctcl) your lagoon(s)/storage pond(s) and the direction the wastewater flows from tht thr ktguons oil the back. , NJCDENR/DWQ: Fb02 forth Oz DO .00 Vift 0; o � ga o F. l,I w" Farm Scrvice A Division of Water Quality j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number : 800043 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800043 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Irsoection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville Date of Visit: 49/18/2008 _ Entry Time:2:0Q 0 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM Incident #: Farm Name: La -Foster Daily fCarson Road Owner Email: Owner: Gerald M Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Springs Rd Cleveland NQ 270139438 Physical Address: Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°46'48" Longitude: 80°37'34" FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD. FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts JW Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents JW Other Issues Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: 704-663-1699 Ext.21li32g Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s)- Inspection Summary: 05/22/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons 03/21/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.9 Lbs/1000 Gallons 03/20/08 > Soil Analysis 7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall be mowed regularly, 21. Weather Code must be recorded on the designated form (enclosed), or approved alternative form. 8 Page: 1 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Faster Facility Number: 800043 t. v Inspection Date: 0911812008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Cattle Q Cattle -Milk Cow 500 140 Total Design Capacity: 500 Total SSLW: 700,000 Waste Structures Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard kaste Pond FOSTER RD 18.00 48.00 Page: 2 M Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: D9/18/2008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n Discharge originated at Structure n Application Field Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ n b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (ff yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n ■ n n 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a n MOO discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? n 000 If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? n 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe n 000 erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n 000 or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ n n n 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, n ■ n n dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or n ■ n n improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or n ■ n n improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? n ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? In Hydraulic Overload? n Frozen Ground? n Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n Page: 3 W Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Faster Inspection Date: 09/18/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility�Number : 800043 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE n PAN? n Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n Total P205? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? n n Outside of acceptable crop window? n Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? I_l Corn (Silage) Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Soybean, Wheat Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management D Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ n n 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n n ■ n 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n ■ n n 18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n ■ n n Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? n ■ n n 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? n ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. In WU P? Page: 4 Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: 09/18/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? n Design? n Maps? n Other? n 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ n n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? in 120 Minute inspections? In Weather code? ■ Weekly Freeboard? n Transfers? n Rainfall? n Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n Waste Analysis? n Annual soil analysis? n Crop yields? n Stocking? n Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? o 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n ■ n Cl 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n n ■ n 24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n ®n n 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? n ■ n n 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? n n ■ n Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n n 29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n n Quality representative immediately. Page: 5 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Inspection Date: 09118/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Other Issues 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Facility Number : 800043 Reason for Visit: Routine Yes No NA NE n■nn n■nn n■nn Page: 6 0 Inspection Summary: 06/02/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons 05/17/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons 10/03/06 > Soil Analysis jb Page: 1 Division of Water Quality n Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 800043 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800043 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Cgmp.(jgnce Inspection _ T Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: RQujing County: Rowan Region: Mooresville Date of Visit: Q3116/2007 Entry Time:01 X00 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #: Farm Name: La -Foster + r Owner Email: Owner: Gerald M Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Springs Rd __ Cleveland NC 270139438 Physical Address: Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°46'60" Longitude: a0°37'30" FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD. FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Discharges '& Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents © Other issues Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 24 hour contact name Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: C'?•,`,t71�3s'"�1 Inspector Signature: Date:'+ Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: 06/02/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons 05/17/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons 10/03/06 > Soil Analysis jb Page: 1 Permit: AWC800043 Owner- Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 + Inspection Date: 03/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Cat#le Cattle -Milk Cow 500 100 Total Design Capacity: 500 Total SSLW: 700,000 Waste Structures Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard �Iste Pond FOSTER RD 18.00 48.00 Page: 2 4 I Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 03/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n Discharge originated at: Structure n Application Field Other n a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ n b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n 000 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a n ■ n n discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? n ■ n n If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 0 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e l large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ 0 erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n ■ n ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? n ■ n n 8. Do any 'of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, n ■ n n dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or n ■ n n improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or n ■ n n improvement? 11. is there evidence ofincorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ n If yes, check the appropriate box below Excessive Ponding? n Hydraulic Overload? n Frozen Ground? n Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? Cl Page: 3 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 03/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE PAN? Q Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑ Total P205? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? Q Evidence of wind drift? I1 Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Com (Silage) Crop Type 2 Soybean, Wheat Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ Q ❑ Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Cl ■ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ■ Cl 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ Q 16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 11 ■ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ Cl n 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? Q ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? I] Page: 4 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 inspection Date: 03/1612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? n Design? n Maps? n Other? n 21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below, n Waste Application? n 120 Minute inspections? n Weather code? n Weekly Freeboard? n Transfers? n Rainfall? n Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n Waste Analysis? n Annual soil analysis? �! Crop yields? n Stocking? ❑ Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? n 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n 0 n n 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n n ■ n 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n ■ o n 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? n n ■ ❑ 26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? n ■ n 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? n n ■ n Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n o 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30 At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n n Quality representative immediately. Page: 5 i Page: 6 r Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: 0311612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Other Issues Yes No NA NE ; 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? fl ■ ❑ Q 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewAnspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Q ■ ❑ ❑ i Page: 6 iA 0 LOAD -AREA METHOD SPREADER SYSTEM LIBRATING LIQUID MANURE SPREADERS USING THE LOAD -AREA METHOD 1. Determine the capacity of the manure spreader. a. -?Ad,Ogallons 2. Spread at least one full load using the regular spreading patterns of the applicator. Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 b. Forward speed, gear, or 4 throttle setting c- PTO speed or setting • ;d...Spreader gate setting . 3. Measure the area of spread, e. 'Spread area width 1 L, f. Spread area length g. Spread area (e X f1 , h. Spread area (g + 43',560) I 4. Compute the manure application rate. i. Number -of loads spread ft ft -�— ft2 acre j. Capacity,per load (a) - gallons k. Total manure spread (i x j) gallons I. Application rate (k + h) -__ gal/acre 5. Compute the nutrient application rate. m. Manure analysis N P205 K20 lbs/1000 gallons lbs/1000 gallons lbs/1000 gallons n. Application rate N lbs/acre (I X manure P 2 0 5 lbs/acre analysis number + 1000) K20 _ lbs/acre 6. If the application rate.is not acceptable, repeat the procedure at different spread_ er settings, speeds (item 2), i or both, until the desired application rate is achieved. _. � n M R n a 17 3-/9.06 11rFMAR 2 1 2001 -Aquifer p�O� co `r• 4 `C CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Gerald M. Foster La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 Dear Mr. Foster: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION September 18, 2006 Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV-2006-PC-0403 Compliance Evaluation Inspection La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 80-43 General Permit AWC800043 Rowan County Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated with the operation of your Facility. Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted on August 23, 2006, by James B. Bealle 1Il, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the inspection, the following violation(s) were identified: Facility Operator failed to conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis. The most recent available results were dated August 11, 2004. This is a violation of General Permit Condition IIIA, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by September 30, 2006, indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future. In responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of this page. Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section / Mooresville Regional Office Phone: (704) 663-1699 Fax: (704) 663-6040 N IhCaro rna 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org Xat!lraii; La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road)/Facility 80-43 NOTICE OF VIOLATION September 18, 2006 Page 2 . Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bealle at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, Andrew H. Pitner, P.G. Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor enclosures cc. North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District Central Files Regional Files Jh 11 Division of Water Quality ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 800043 Facility Status: Active Permit: 6W800043 1 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Boutene I County: Rowan Region: Mooresville Date of Visit: 08/25j2Q06 _ Entry TIme:01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:00 PM FarmName: La -Foster Dairy (Qa(loo Rg1d) Owner: CPsdId U 0,Wt Incident #: Owner Email: [liLb�lb�� I� Mailing Address: 13210 Cool Sorings ltd QIeveland NC 270139438 Physical Address: Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35046'60" Longitude: 89'37'3Q"- _ - FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD, FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Shelbia C Foster Operator Certification Number: 20945 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name - Title Phone On-site representative Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 24 hour contact name Gerald M. Foster Phone: 704-278-2596 Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: —.. t� Inspector Signature: - - ,.... Date: S*P&k Secondary I Page: 1 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facipty: Gerald M Foster Facility Number. 800043 Inspection Date: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: 06/02/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons 05/17/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs11000 Gallons 08/11/04 > Soil Analysis 7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall be mowed regularly. 21. Failure to conduct Annual Soil Analysis; NOV to follow. Stocking records maintained, but must use the designated form (enclosed). 24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in October, 2006. Facility is currently in the process of closure. Page: 2 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Cattle Cattle - Milk Cow 500 70 Total Design Capacity: 500 Total SSLW: 700,000 Waste Structures Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desianed Freeboard Observed Freeboard �aste Pond FOSTER Rd 18.00 48,00 Page: 3 Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type., Compliance Inspection Reason for VlsIt: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0000 Discharge originated at: ❑ Hydraulic Overload? Structure ❑ ❑ . Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ s ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 000 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ MOO discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ or closure plan? . 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? M 000 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ M ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ . Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ Page: 4 e Permit: AWC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Inspection Date: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 800043 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes NO NA NE PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total P2057 ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Cl Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage) Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay, Pasture) Crop Type 3 Small Grain Cover Crop Type 4 Soybeans Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management 0000 Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WU P? ❑ Page: 5 Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number: 800043 Inspection Date: 08/23/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Other? ❑ 21. Does record keeping'need improvement? 0000 If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Transfers? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ❑ Waste Analysis? 0 Annual soil analysis? Crop yields? ❑ Stocking? Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ 24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by'the permit? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 26. Did the facility fall to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 130 ❑ ❑ 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ Q mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Quality representative immediately. Page: 6 . . Permit: AVVC800043 Owner - Facility: Gerald M Foster Facility Number : 800043 Inspection Date: 08123/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Other Issues Yes No NA NE 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewMspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 7 •�S, ava� 4t ll�A (f SEP 2'7 NC DENR MRO DWQ - A uifer ProtecUon Gerald Foster La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources October 1, 2004 Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director Division of Water Quality �Subj'ect: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC$00043 La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, 2004 Storage and Application System 111C DI=F''1;GENT Rowan County AMC) NATURAL RESOURCES Dear Gerald Foster: MOORESVILLIE RE61ONAL OFFY- On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28). In accordance with your application received on January 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Gerald Foster, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800043 which expires October I, 2004. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road), located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 500 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay _careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One NorthCarolina Phone: 919-733.3221 I FAX: 919-715-05881 Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us Awmally, An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility. Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (704) 663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at (919) 715-6698. Sincerely, for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section Rowan.County Health Department Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File AWC800043 APS Central Files o�'C)F w A 7 �9Q� G) Mr. Gerald Foster 13210 Cool Springs Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Dear Mr. Foster: Michael F. Ea e , Guvcrnor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary Norzh Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director Division or Water Quality Coleen H. Suliins, Deputy Director Division of Water Quality WATER QUALITY SECTION September 25, 2003 Subject: La Foster Dairy, Site inspection Facility Certificate of Coverage: AWC800043 Rowan County, NC Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 24, 2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. cc: File Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor �, WCDE—NR Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street Mooresviile, North Carolina 28115 Phone 704-663-1699 Customer Service Fax 704-663-6040 1-877-623-6748 M Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access 1 Facilih' N utnher 80 43 : Date of isit: 09I24Izl)03 'FI Itli': O Not Operational O Below 'Threshold ® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Duce Last Uper :uetl or Aboyc "Threshold: Farm Nanie: ............................................ Coun(y: Kocean.................................... IMQ........ 0% ner Name: C_U_ald------------------ Foster ----------------------------- Phone No: 794�7$:?�25.--------•--- - - - - - -•--- .Nt:tihrtg .address: 13.Z1.0.GQOL.SAria$S.RQad............................................................... Ckyd;wdAC ....................................................... 2,7.013.............. Facility Contact . ................................................ .......•Title Phone Nu: ....... Onsite Representative: GZI3r1U.,F1D,T_FJt�--.------------------------- Integrator:._-------- --- - -------- - --- --- - - -- Certified Olterator:Shelbi;..C.............................. Fast.Cr............ ..................................... Operator Certification Number•:20.9,45... Location of Farm: FRO,NI INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON 21). FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. :W ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry IN Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 •F 47 00Lon¢itude 80 • 37 34 Design Current Design Current ID Division of Water Quality •.. * Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population .. O Division of Soil and Water Conservation r _ y_ yt F7,r x'14itifF:. "�] _ `,; _L'.., .'-.�„" , ,.- .. .. O Other Agency ... ,,. .d •,r,;. .r" _. -"f .. ,-i,y� .,: •o�u,K�;;+- {, :'� ,+��c�.CB�Ri '��J��r{r %�4 �7 >s�� Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access 1 Facilih' N utnher 80 43 : Date of isit: 09I24Izl)03 'FI Itli': O Not Operational O Below 'Threshold ® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Duce Last Uper :uetl or Aboyc "Threshold: Farm Nanie: ............................................ Coun(y: Kocean.................................... IMQ........ 0% ner Name: C_U_ald------------------ Foster ----------------------------- Phone No: 794�7$:?�25.--------•--- - - - - - -•--- .Nt:tihrtg .address: 13.Z1.0.GQOL.SAria$S.RQad............................................................... Ckyd;wdAC ....................................................... 2,7.013.............. Facility Contact . ................................................ .......•Title Phone Nu: ....... Onsite Representative: GZI3r1U.,F1D,T_FJt�--.------------------------- Integrator:._-------- --- - -------- - --- --- - - -- Certified Olterator:Shelbi;..C.............................. Fast.Cr............ ..................................... Operator Certification Number•:20.9,45... Location of Farm: FRO,NI INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON 21). FARM ON LEFT ABOUT 300 YARDS. :W ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry IN Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 •F 47 00Lon¢itude 80 • 37 34 Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer 500E]Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer EE INDairy Non -Dairy ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other ❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 500 ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Total SSLW 700,000 Number of Lagoons �� L Subsurface Drains Present IIJ Lagoon Area JU Spray Field Area Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Dischar•+yes S; Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is obsen•ed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. It'discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State:' (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated tlo%v in oalimin? d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure i Structure 3 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G Identitier: ........................... Freeboard (inches}: 72 uri uri u i Facility (Number: 80-43 Date of Inspection 09/24/2003 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? 11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type Fescue (Hay) Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, 1 UI11old" ru ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Reuuired Records & Documents 17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. :'.i�!�fM�"`�'. r �Y -•. ^1 �.`C7.% il.'kl 1`�3Jy' 'fro-+.Y••..�i++t.^;F:: `r�VS7���.`�'w+.... .:. •a - r - .. Y _ ' y "'rt � F i,�.: �hY'%i 'r��i�'w��, �r r� '°i, �p C entsi refer, oF,question #} Explain any YES�answerrs andlor,any recoknunenda ons or Usp or a s o fa�Wty to better eiiplain situations. (use'additional pages as necessary}: �'" � �t�� ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes „Sn W .A�.i�tY�� MYY,i�¢j�.;•µl r,�a� ���M�t�it'C. ����.a3n�� A-;�.�"4�iS�bc a,YfJ'P�P �Sllih,i +ti �k�?P�'Y.a�.v TMS/�.�:. e«w••+s,,:rr.+^�c'n�>•.-n�srr.s�.wr.�:•�;.�*+rvsw•�`sv, k THE FREEBOARD RECORDS SHOULD BE NEAT AND LEGIBLE. THE FACILITY WAS WELL MAINTAINED AND THE RECORDS APPEARED COMPLETE. Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan Johson Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Z [i-3 Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143- 215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. If you wish .to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration. This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (704) 663-1699. if you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at (919) 733-5083 ext. 363. Sincerely, v for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000) cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section Rowan County Health Department Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File AWC800043 NDPU Files NC DEPT. OF ENV" AND NATURAL RESOIJRCF CE W OMSSVILlg pWMNAL OF BRAY 1 9 2403 1r All VIER tvAM SECTION A r�9pC, D 'C Gerald Foster La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 Dear Gerald Foster: f . JP Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director Division of Water Quality May 1, 2003 Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800043 La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road) Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Rowan County On April 28, 2003,.the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the Division of Water. Quality (Division) -to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit. In accordance with your application received on January 22, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Gerald Foster, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800043 which expired on April 30, 2003. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the La -Foster Dairy (Carson Road), located in Rowan County; with an animal capacity of no greater than an annual average of 500 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. If your Waste Utilization Plan has, been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed. The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property. Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility. �� R Non -Discharge Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Customer Service Center An Equal Opportunity Action Employer Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu Telephone (919)733-5083 Fax (919)715-6048 Telephone 1-877-623-6746 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper 0 - WASTE WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Producer: Gerald Foster- Law Foster Dairy Location: 3765 Foster Rd., Cleveland, NC 2703 Telephone: 704-278-2596 Type Operation: Dairy Number of Animals: 500 (Design Capaciry) The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrie,:-. and reduce odor problems. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 21-11.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Your animal waste managernent facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and / or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the anzotuit of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste Should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of' facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your w"Iste management facility. 1) WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN The design of your waste management facility is based on the following: A 500 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs. Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.) 500 animals x 21 (gallday/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days time) = 3,832,500 gallons of waste/year. Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year 500 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 38,000 lbs. Total N Total Nitrogen produced/yr. . 38,000 lbs. Total N (PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633) Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface application: FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Your waste storage pond is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every d MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of 98.5 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation. 4 Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. AIA RRA TII✓E OF OPERA TION: This operation has 730 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year system of corn cut for silage in the first year, followed by small grain cut for silage and sudex hay in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied using a honeywagon to crops, based on the realistic yields at the rates listed in table 1. Timing and application rates will be as followed: Corn silage: April -flay at the rate of' 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting. Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 120 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting. Sudex hay: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting. Fescue/Pastnre: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 110 lbs of N/ac Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac. On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%. Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon. tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage and proper system. NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. 4 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Cllegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues. 2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder- that the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide MRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions; and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict .the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management Systeln (RS) or an Alternative Conservation Systern (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest Buffers.] 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.] 5 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATION (Continued) 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application. S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no niore than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered. 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in tall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil. 11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips] 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14, Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of- ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. D WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS (Continued) 17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard. 18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. 20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 21. NOTE: Buildings adjacent to feed lot will be guttered to prevent roof runoff from Mowing across the lot. 7 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT NAME OF FARM: 4.1_ - f—��;' f �,,, jam, /;,o OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24 hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Nater Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request. NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: (Please print) Signature: 0' Date: Name of Manager (If different from owner): Signature: Date: Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) fZ G tr l . Affiliation: U53 D N_ - X P—C-S ^ Address (Agency): Z 7 Z_ 7- � O ID C o �CO2a SP,,1Is- Signature: Date: 1:-s- y 7 �� 1N ArFR • Michael F. Easley \ct QG Governor [q William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary j North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Q `C Alan W, Klimek, Director Division of Water Quality WATER QUALITY SECTION August 9, 2002 Gerald Foster 13210 Cool Springs Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Subject: La Foster Dairy, Site Inspection FacilitV Certificate of Coverage: AWC800043 Rowan County, NC Dear Mr. Foster: 6"12=1 Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 7. 2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the records were complete. Please note the comments on enclosed inspection report. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. cc: File VAM NLbENR Customer Service 1 800 623-7748 Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE (704) 663-1699 FAX (704) 663-6040 if ,. niW u'"ra"IHy h , . ;, -E i��Di sion to,ol0 d' ter�Cyonset�vation���a��,,� µt�..1.r , . � p(+,+rUther�Agei1C3'�`"'+a{�:�r�" "�1 �•w�y'�t, � �' Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number I)ate of Visit: 8/7/Z002 Tinic: 80 43 Q Not Operational Q Beloyr Threshold ® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..- Farm Name: La Fj)xtar.Pairy..(C= ora. toad) ............................................ County: R,at1an.................................... MRQ........ Ory°ncr Narnc: G�xaid.-----------------os>ter----------------------------- I'hone No: 7D_478. -?,524------------------------------ ,NIailiug .address: 1310.C.QAL riU9a.Raad .......... .............................. ................ .0cu1,ans'Ac....................................................... 2.710.13 .............. Facility- Contact: ...........................................................Title:..................................... Phone No Onsite Representative: ----------------------------- _._--------_-_--- lntegrator :-___-_-_-_____-_-_-_____-_-_______._._-_-_-. Certified Operator:Shg1b.1a..0 . ........................... EQater:................................................ Operator Certification Number:2QQ.45............................. Location of Farm: FROM INTERSECTION OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), TRAVEL SOUTH ON CARSON RD. FARM ON RIGHT ABOUT 300 YARDS. ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 35 • 47 QO Longitude t30 • 37 30 .Design, Current . :swine-Canaeity -Tanulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design- "Current;Design • Current ?Pot try -Ca aci -Population 'Cattle °Ca •aci l -Po ulation' :` . ❑ Layer ®Dairy 500 370 ❑ Non -Layer . ❑ Non -Dairy ❑ Other • :Total'Design,Capaci#y; 500 :T61a1�SSLVL' 700,000 Dischar•2es & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a, if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ElSpillway Structure l - - Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Identifier. ........................... ................... --...... ................... --..... -•- Freeboard (inches): 72 neinomr ❑ Yes ElNo E)Yes ❑ No [-]Yes R No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes R No Structure 6 r _'�✓i v_4v of Facility Number: So -4,;_7 ]late of Inspection 8/7/Z002 S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ' elevation markings? W'aste Ap_plicalion 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload 12. Crop type Com (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay) a.viuuu c" ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Document~ 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency -situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Ec'-soe _-:,yf � ��' ��'".`�a :..�7t -� *�"' .3��ae ..�'. {a?��� ��t�'��TG' �i�r�� s��""�''.r,.:.,--fir'-�•_-^s.s�E�r.a-.-..?c•er•�a`"��: . ---WASTE APPLIED TO TRACTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE WASTE UTILZATION PLAN. CONTACT YOUR TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TO HAVE THE PLAN REVISED. ---RECORDS AND FACILITY WERE IN GOOD SHAPE, Zj Reviewer/Inspector Name Ar OHNSON'_" Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: % GT 05/03/01 Facility Number: 80-43 Date of inspection 8/7/2002 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Continued ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes W No ❑ Yes BNo ❑ Yes ❑ No Addithli omments an or ,ra Ugs' r' State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources kri Mooresville Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary 4 FZ DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY December 31, 1997 CERTIFIED MAIL RETM RECEIPT REQUESTED Gerald Foster 3765 Foster Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Subject: Notice of Violation Improper Expansion NCGS 143-215.1 (a) La Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-43 Rowan County, NC Dear Mr. Foster: Concerning your telephone conversation with Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office on December 30, 1997, this NOV is being issued for the animals held at your facilty on Carson Rd. in excess of the 250 animals for which your certified farm plan has been approved. Understanding your facility may be able to accomodate a larger herd, a modified waste plan should have been completed before the stocking of any more animals at the facility. This expansion is a violation of your permit status pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143- 215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (a) (H) (vii). It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by February 15, 1998 indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson. Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for this or any other violations. Also, be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state environmental laws and regulations. 919 North Main Street,N%`*C y♦ FAX 704-663-6040 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 AnEqual Oplcorfunity/Affirmative Action Employer Voice 704-663-1699 50"o recycled/10"o post -consumer paper Gerald Foster Page Two If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either D. Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional Supervisor, or Mr. Johnson at (704) 663-1699. cc: Rowan SWCD Compliance/Enforcement File AJ Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason, P. Acting Regional Supervisor sx 1 JAME5 B. Hu NTJR4 -4+-J NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE WATER QUALITY SECTION July 20, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL Return Receipt Reguest_ed Gerald Foster 3765 Foster Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Subject: Notice of Violation DWQ Animal Operation Inspection Certificate of Coverage #: AWC800043 La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 8043 Rowan County, NC Dear Mr. Foster: Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July 13, 2000. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) for the following: Failure to have a liquid level gauge installed in the waste storage pond. The gauge must be visible and the level of waste must be recorded weekly and kept on file for review during an inspection. Installation of the gauge should be completed within 60 days of the date of this letter. Failure to have available the 1999 soil analysis. Soil analyses must be taken annually. Failure to meet the conditions of your permit is a violation of your facility's Certificate of Coverage (#AWC800043) and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.10C. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by August 5, 2000 indicating the actions taken to address the noted violations. Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Johnson. Your response should reference the date and subject of the NOV and the facility number. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, n 1 � D. Rex Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: Rowan County SWCD Compliance/Enforcement Unit Regional Coordinator 919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115 File PHONE 704-668-1699 FAX 704-669-6040 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED1109E P09T-CONSUM9R PAPER 1 .;. IL/ rV =OF W A rF9pG Michael FEs Governor C7 William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary j North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources O Y Kerr T. Stevens, Director Division of Water Quality WATER QUALITY SECTION February 7, 2001 Gerald Foster 13210 Cool Springs Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection La Foster Dairy, Facility #: 80-43 Rowan County, NC Dear Mr. Foster: Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on February 6, 2001. The facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the records were complete. In review of your records, it was noted that the SLR I/II forms were neat and easy to follow. However, the file needs to be better organized and maintained. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: File NCDENR Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE (704) 663-1699 1 800 623-7748 FAX (704) 663-6040 Type of Visit 4 -D -Compliance Inspection 0 -Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation OC -'5-00013 Reason for Visit OPRoutine O Complaint .O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: � Not O erationaf � Below Threshold 0 Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:............ Farm Name: ....... Gi .. Count}•: ............ ^.G��uCLr:I................................ Owner Namc:.................Phone No: .................................................. -...... .................. FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:.................. .......................... ng Address: ................... nsiteRepresentative: ......................................................... 4 .............. 66 ............................... Integrator:....................................................................................... Certified Operator:.__, 514 _ � i ............... al;� .__.._.. Operator Ccrtif5cation Number: ,. --:--_---_-- .. ..... Location of Farm: ❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• � Design Current Swine Canacih- Pnnulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer I iry ❑ Non -Layer PE01fri-Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity Total SSLW Number of Lagoons JED Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps �.J ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharees R Stream Imr)acts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes VNo Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [I Yes ❑ No h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If dischar<,e is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin? d. Docs discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ?. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes tZNo 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes -No 01/01/01 Continued Facility Number: — J Date of Inspection'. - waste Collection'& Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? gzspillway ❑ Yes KNo Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Freeboard(inches): ............ ...... ......... .......... _...�' ....... ...•..... ............ ..... .......... ................ ............... .... .....m.....W............. 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ^QNo seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑(No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an - \ immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ENo , 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ANo 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes &No Waste ApOication 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes RNo 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Crop type Lic5v^ n , `f- _5 C_ P. ✓ if -t r" C� 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes A No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [:]No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? . ❑ Yes ENo 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes E�No 17. Are rock outcrops present? ❑ Yes [I No 18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No E] 4n -site [-] Off-site Required Records & Documents 19. Fail to,have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes RrNo 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? Yes I�TNo (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ 21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes F,No 22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 4iQ No 23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes QWo 24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes Q,No 25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes RNo 26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes SNo 27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes &No Odor Issues 28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes Emo liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes KNo 01/01/01 Continued Facility.Number: R Date of Inspection _ , - .» •, printed on: 1/412001 30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application?_ (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No 32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (.e. broken fan belts, missing oi- or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 0No 33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 5? -No 34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? []Yes ❑ No ❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comments (refer to ar any�other` comments`,] gnesivoo).piain�ny"YhES-answ+a1'n�loryccammenaat�ons [ br, KN Use drawings oflfacility to'betterfexplain s�tuatlons z(usedihonal pages as necessary? ❑ Field Co Final Notes t 17 �, � f 1�e c o J5 fieed in kt k en Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I III inYm7 ramity Number - --- Lagoon Number _.W _ Lagoon Iddntiffer... p Active O Inactive Latitude Longitude �.� ...._. �{... aoo By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ❑Map GPS file number: 35. Surface Area (acres): 36. Embankment Height (feet): 37. Distance to Stream: 36. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon? ❑ On-site ❑ Off-site 39. Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 40. Overtopping from Outside Waters? 41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards? 42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent NRCS Standards? O less than 300 tt O 300 it - 1000 ft . O greater than 1000 f O Yes 0 No 0<5 05-14 Q>10 Q Yes 0 No O Unknown O Yes 0 No O Unknown O Yes 0 No 0 Unknown 43. Was groundwater encountered during construction? Q Yes Q No Q Unknown 44. Depth to Groundwater: Q Unknown 45. Spillway? 0 Yes 0 No 46. Adequate Marker? 47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure? 48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches): Q Yes 0 No O Yes 0 No State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director GERALD FOSTER LA -FOSTER DAIRY 3765 FOSTER ROAD CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA 27013 Dear Gerald Foster: NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AN4 NATURAL RESOURCES July 20, 1999 JUL 212 199 Subject: Application No. AWC800043 y, Additional Information Request La -Foster Dairy Animal Waste Operation Rowan County The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by August 19, 1999: 1. Please provide lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable. 2. Please indicate the application method in the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP). 3. The WUP agreement must be signed and dated by the owner and the technical specialist. 4. The WUP submitted calculates the amount of nitrogen produced in one year. However, it appears that the WUP uses a two-year crop rotation. Your WUP should be revised so that the nitrogen produced and the nitrogen utilized by crops is calculated for the same time period. Some options for revising the WUP include: calculating the amount of nitrogen produced for a two-year period of time, revising your WUP to show waste utilization for Year One and Year Two of the two-year rotation in separate tables, or showing a two- year crop rotation with corn and soybeans on half the acreage from each field. 5. According to the map provided, the acreage for tract 469, field 6 and tract 1170, fields 3 and 4 is unclear. Please provide a clearer map that identifies (outlines or highlights) and shows the acreage for these fields as listed in the WUP. 6. The permit application indicates that the certified design capacity is 500 dairy cows. However, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan is for only 250 dairy cows. Please consult your technical specialist in order to have the facility certified for 500 dairy cows. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Application No. 80-0043 Gerald Foster Page 2 Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at (919) 733-5083, extension 546. Sincerely, a^-/ S san Cauley Environmental Engineer, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit cc. Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Permit File State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director GERALD FOSTER LA -FOSTER DAIRY 3765 FOSTER ROAD CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA 27013 Dear Gerald Foster: IT 1W 1 � • NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES October 28, 1999 e . ♦YI^` �'` # rNov '2 1999 Subject: Appli Wormat*ioneqWuest Additions i. La -Faster Dairy Animal Waste Operation Rowan County The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by November 27, 1999: Please provide a map that identifies (outlines or highlights) and shows the acreage for tract 3505, field 5 and tract 435, fields 1,2 and 3 as listed in table I of the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) for waste application. 2. Your facility has only been certified for 250 dairy cows as of May 31, 1995. According to the permit application submitted and the WUP, there are 500 dairy cows at your facility. Please consult your technical specialist in order to have your facility certified for 500 dairy cows. Your facility can only be permitted for the maximum number of animals as certified. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information, All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before November 27, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit. Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at (919) 733-5083, extension 546. Sincerely, G�� /san Cauley Environmental Engineer Non -Discharge Permitting Unit cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper eraDNM up JFALTM & NATURAL RESOU'RMl AUG 1? 2000 MOD OF MIMM1A1 VOCENER "WSKII WMAI U' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURGEs MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE WATER QUALITY SECTION July 20, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL Return Receipt Requested Gerald Foster 3765 Foster Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Subject: Notice of Violation DWQ Animal Operation Inspection Certificate of Coverage #: AWC800043 La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-43 Rowan County, NC Dear Mr. Foster: Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on July 13, 2000. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) for the following: Failure to have a liquid level gauge installed in the waste storage pond. The gauge must be visible and the level of waste must be recorded weekly and kept on file for review during an inspection. Installation of the gauge should be completed within 60 days of the date of this letter. Failure to have available the 1999 soil analysis. Soil analyses must be taken annually. Failure to meet the conditions of your permit is a violation of your facility's Certificate of Coverage (#AWC800043) and North Carolina General Statute 143-215. IOC. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by August 5, 2000 indicating the actions taken to address the noted violations. Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Johnson. Your response should reference the date and subject of the NOV and the facility number. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason, P.E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: Rowan County SWCD Compliance/Enforcement Unit Regional Coordinator 919 NORTH MAIN STREET. MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 16 File PNoNE 704-669-1 669 FAX 704-663-6040 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACT10N EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER Facility Number F 3 Tante of Istspectian t Time of Inspection 24 hr_ (iil::mm) Ej Permitted Verfified G Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not Oper ationad Date Last Operated: Farm Name: ..... z�c.......... 51 t.�..... ........��r County' ............ ��!�� ....................... .../ .. f ..../.......................................... rte ...........^ c....... Owner Name: .............._&7,ez r<.1�........ ........ ./t'— . ...................................... Phone No: .7 ... _.. z.S....7..k...-. Faciiin- Contact: ..............................:...............................................Title: ....... .... Phone No: h'iailing Address: ...�.7k--f ......%`c?. ..!G''........f:c......................................... .....�1.�-W.P1.[ 14.r ............ .................. .... .?L.?.1. .... [[ t Onsite Representative:... >°.I-�i�C1--..-._ ? ......eL: ....................................... lnterrator:........................................................... .... Certified Operator: �.,( r Operator Certification dumber - Loc tiafi of Farm: L de �•• - Longitude �' �` �• Design Current Swint Canacitr Ponulation [� .,X can to FeedCr I [� Feeder to Finish [] Farrow to Wean I I [] =ar 0 to Feeder I I [:3 Farr w to Finish [,:D Gilt., I I I!J Boars I I Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population I� Laver I� Non -Laver I I T Non -Dairy Total [� Other I Total -Design Capacitc, Total SSL' Number of Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present D Lagoon Area 0 Spra.- Field Art Holding Ponds / Solid Traps [ �] No Liquid 'Waste Management System Discharges b Stream, imnacts . Is am, aisci:argt observed from anN pari of the operation? Dis--harcr ori_,inatcd at: ❑ Lagoon 7 Spray Ficid =13 0iher If dischurce is observed. was the corivcvance man-made? h. Ii'discnar!2c is o'nscrvcd. did it TC:il2h Vn"atcr Of 01C State' (Ifycs. notify DWQ) If disc11ar11is observed, what is the estimated fire in galimin? d. DucS dischartc bvpilSc lapoon system:' (1'. y,-%. notify D%N,Qi =. IS there cvidtm--, of pari discharE!-2 from any nary of the operation" Were lhcrt anv adverse imnawLc or potential adverse imnacts I() tht WaterS of the State other than from ; discharge? Waste Collection S- Treatment Is storacc Canazity (freeboard DIUS storm storagt) 1'ss than adeouate? )7 Spiliway SIrtlClurc i Structure = Stru: ture Siru::tur2 4 structure 5 'rcL-boNL Ilnchcsl: -7.2- ... - .......... ....................................................................... . _. .Ar" them:: an%' imrnediate lhrcats M the int_gHiv of ani' Of tht SIrU:.tUr-2F observed? (lel Lr.'xs. severe erCsl:)P.. set'DaCe, etc.I 3/au rt El YC' 'RNo Y C s i , N-) Yes [] No , Yes D No J Yes A No Yes 5kNo L Yes L No Structur: 6 Continued on back titinNumber'. Date of Inspection I Printcd on: 4;24/2000 Are there any immediate threats to the integyrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion. ❑yes XNo seepage, etc.) Are there structures on-site which are not properly -addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan'? EJ Yes V No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered ves, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (�N0 Does any part of the waste management systern other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes CgNo Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? [Yes ❑ No �;1Stc :�nplitatinn ). Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 1� No is there evidence of aver application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yesto Crop type L' Dr L1 i`e Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (C WM, P)? ❑ Yes <No a) Does the facility Iack- adeauate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 9 No b) Does [he facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [],No Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 91-10 Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes /No 'quired Records & Dncumenz•_s at to have Certifica[e of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste ylanagement Plan readiiv available? (ie! WUP, checklists, design maps, etc.) ❑ Yes �CNo Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports) ( Yes ❑ No Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes '61140 Did the facility fail to have a acriveiy certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes '9fN0 Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie., discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes QNo Did Re•: iewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes No Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? KYes ❑ No Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No or Issues Does the discharge pipe from the confinement buiidingto the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Po Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ��io roads, building structure, and/or public property) Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No Were any maior maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes 0 No Facility Number: CJ- Date of inspection ,A,dd�honal Comments and/or Drawings: '` y N 1 � 1r LcLJ7�1 ] �i KA- Y\C�:t C,Lvk CP411-7�r(i77 !,ti%t�s{c Ccf2G/SfS( j� 7125/97 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Mooresville Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Gerald Foster 3765 Foster Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Dear Mr. Foster: BVI DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY December 31, 1997 Subject: Notice of Violation Improper Expansion NCGS 143-215.1 (a) La Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-43 Rowan County, NC Concerning your telephone conversation with Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office on December 30, 1997, this NOV is being issued for the animals held at your facilty on Carson Rd. in excess of the 250 animals for which your certified farm plan has been approved. Understanding your facility may be able to accomodate a larger herd, a modified waste plan should have been completed before the stocking of any more animals at the facility. This expansion is a violation of your permit status pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143- 215.1 (a) and Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (a) (H) (vii). It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by February 15, 1998 indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson. Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for this or any other violations. Also, be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state environmental laws and regulations. 919 North Main Street, ,�� FAX 704-563-6040 Maaresville, North Carolina 28t 15 �w�C An Epaal Oppertuniry/Affirmative Action Employer voice 704-663-1699 509'. recycled/10% post consumer paper Gerald Foster Page Two If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either D. Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional Supervisor, or Mr. Johnson at (704) 663-1699. cc: Rowan SWCD Compliance/Enforcement File AJ Sincerely, D. Rex Gleason, P. Acting Regional Supervisor State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director ! 0 • NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES December 30, 1999fM;:'':. ►' ` �r ""� Gerald Foster La -Foster Dairy 3765 FOSTER ROAD CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA 27013 Dear Gerald Foster: JAll 5 20010 .11% 4F V• 80:'jJMTAJ k�iiFAWI 0 e y X�1:11 t'NgGRkSA-LL nEfd,%ft tli'�r- Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping Animal Waste Management System Facility Number 80-43 Rowan County This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers. Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR], IRR2, DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2, SLD], and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an appropriate enforcement action. Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting requirement. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the DWQ staff at (919) 733-5083 ext. 571. Sincere] , Kerr T. Stevens, Director Division of Water Quality cc: Mooresville Regional Office Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District Facility File 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919.733-5083 Fax 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director CERTIFIED MAIL RET CEIPT REQUESTED eerafd oster La -Foster Dairy 3765 Foster Rd Cleveland NC 27013 Farm Number: 80 - 43 Dear Gerald Foster: IT — — V_T 1 � • NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES April 6, 1999 =4MW7; Umm",T APR 12 1995 NM LC tW!!Mt C"'V'30' wagawMM47; You are hereby notified that La -Foster Dairy, in accordance with G. S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has six 60 da s to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application. The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Post Office Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at (919)733-5083 extension 364 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at (704) 663-1699. Sincere d for Kerr T. Stevens cc: Permit File (w/o encl.) Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.) P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper �1!�.fJ,C1!1K yd, JAMES B. HUNT JR. GOVERNOR Gerald Foster +y 3765 Foster Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Dear Mr. Foster: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY April 7, 1998 Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site Inspection Report La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 80-43 Rowan County, NC Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 2, 1998. In general the facility was in good shape. However, your land agreements should indicate the associated land tract numbers. Also, your files should include a site diagram of your facility and the general information (narrative) regarding your operation. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, s� D. Rex Gleason, P. E. Water Quality Regional Supervisor cc: Rowan SWCD Non -Discharge Compliance Unit Regional Coordinator 91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 261 15 PHONE 704.663-1699 FAX 704-663-6040 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLIW/1 Oryx POST -CONSUMER PAPER Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency , .00 Division of Water Quality�t Sq3" � a JQI Routine 0 Complaint '0 Follow -u 'af DAVQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other Date of Inspection Facility Number �� Time of Inspection Illi 24 hr. (hh:mm) 13 RegisteredCertified [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 1 13 Not O erational Date Last Operated Farm Name:..... ... ............�i......................................... County: ......... ?, Z�tea v� .............................,........,............. .......... I............ Owner Name :........ ..`.-C ....... Phone No:....7.."...zea...................................... FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:....... r II ,p Mailing Addresa:.... ��,7.f� i�R ....... ,1tat�.... Onsite Representative: ......... /..tICf... ................. `—r Certified Operator;,..:; S c7� Location of Farm: .................................... Phone No:................................................... ....... .114171 ......................................... :, ...... . ....... Integrator: ...................................................................................... .... Operator Certification Number ;..... 41.r�.�f.S............ I ac��..`l ane.......f.�........ ..tin ...... Q.......... ..... 102.!�........ C.f m ....5 �.i.r�iS..... 51�......�i`z. .................. i ........- 5 [�70..........' `......�Q ... .........�x�r�,-...�: ..o. r..r`.. . Latitude • ©1 ® G' Longitude ®' 3 7 ° 46 General 1. 'Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (if yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require maintenance/improvement? 5. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 7/25/97 ❑ Yes KNo Cl Yes Wo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes �d No ❑ Yes 4No 4. ❑ Yes IS,No ❑ Yes �id No Continued on back I: acifity N umber: — 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures (Lagoons.Iloldittg Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Cl YesN0 ❑ Yes v�No Structure 5 StrLtCture 6 For Certified or Permitted Facdrhes Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes D"O 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 000 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes K] No [] No.violations'or de'ficiencie's.were-noted-during' this:visit. Youmill re'ceive�no further corr6p6ndeh0 a4oiet this'.visit.:: ': . : Ks Fcz, nen • 4 C_ 5 ",C 7�r V1t✓ t'14 CrCa ser lin ALkvk �5, g, ( I �Je— 140d ?ycevbte_w�5 +- 14kc Oe- SL LeL[ h2�a�K� OA jt- � SL 7/25/97 Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��`(/�y.®� ,4-1151t— Date: Identifier: '... ................................................. Freeboard(ft): ............. .................... ............... ........................ ......... ........................ ..,........... ................. I................... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 14 No 11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No '1 (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? Yes ❑ No Waste :Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ Yes 19i4Yo excess o entering waters of the State. ( g e, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type .WCM� ��unoff )Q Q.... l .......... ..... ...............................................,......•............................,......................................... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMI')? ❑ Yes No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 1'No 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes i No 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with oil -site representative`? ❑ Ye.sNo 22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes (, No For Certified or Permitted Facdrhes Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes D"O 24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 000 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes K] No [] No.violations'or de'ficiencie's.were-noted-during' this:visit. Youmill re'ceive�no further corr6p6ndeh0 a4oiet this'.visit.:: ': . : Ks Fcz, nen • 4 C_ 5 ",C 7�r V1t✓ t'14 CrCa ser lin ALkvk �5, g, ( I �Je— 140d ?ycevbte_w�5 +- 14kc Oe- SL LeL[ h2�a�K� OA jt- � SL 7/25/97 Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��`(/�y.®� ,4-1151t— Date: ' State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Mooresville Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Gerald Foster 3765 Foster Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 Dear Mr. Foster: [DEHNR DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY September 15, 1997 Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations La -Foster Farm, Facility #: 8043 Rowan County, NC The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, I997, and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection. As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following information, and need to be available for review during the inspection: Certification forms Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones Waste application records/forms Maps of acreage and irrigated fields Waste utilization plan Waste and soil analysis records Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/ hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified. For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9 inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the storage pond/lagoon, If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified. 919 North Main Stree`,)oy�C FAX 704-663-6040 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal FAX Action Employer Voice 704 63-i699' 50%. recyc!ed/10°b post -consumer paper Page 2 The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may be issued for the following instances, among others: a) inadequate freeboard, b) inadequate land for waste application, c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage, d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility, e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or f) other minor deficiencies. Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the application records not being filled out properly. Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, D. & Qon,.; Water Quality gionaI Supervisor cc: Rowan SWCD Facility Assessment Unit Regional Coordinator ON - t -, 15'D - �3 ---------- La-Foster Farm 'r � y , � y l Gerald Foster 13210 Cool Springs Rd. Cleveland, NC 27013 s Facility Nos. 80 _ 43 y 9 / g y Rowan County, North Carolina / Certified Animal Waste Management Plan I (0200 Certification Plan) r For a herd size of: 500 Milk Cows y j I y 4 y / y In Cooperation with the 5 Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District f November 21, 2002 , is.rsa.-.r.r.-----iiis.��.....rr............r.r.....r....,....r.r.. .. .. .. s.. s.r ------------------ ..,.------------ -- s -,-t RECEIVED f DENR 1 DWQ AQUIFFR-PRnTFr.TION ;FCTION LIAR 2 0 2009 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governer Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOuRcF-s February 11, 2000 'r,)F FTVZD GERALD FOSTER I LA -FOSTER DAIRY 3765 FOSTER ROAD CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA 27013 Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800043 La -Foster Dairy Cattle • Waste Collection, Treatment. Storage and Application System Rowan County Dear Gerald Foster: In accordance with your application received on May 21, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Gerald Foster, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the La -Foster Dairy Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 500 Dairy cows and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall.be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste,. production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919.733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Certificate of Coverage A. _800043 La -Foster Dairy Pate ? J This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in'this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (704) 663-1699. if you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Perm=it, please contact Susan Cauley at (919) 733-5053 ext. 546. Sincerely, cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) RowanCounty Health Department Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District Permit File NDPU Files AaMtAL WASTE HASACEMHT PLAN C3RTIFICATiON. FOR NEW OR =PAI-MEb FEEDLOTS 1 21eaae return the eampleted foam to the Division of SaViroz:mautal 21a.nagamaat at the add~eas on the revexae aide of this fora. Name of f (Please print). Address �d_• 1'1 j- ? C //,!9! //. 1/�`t �r.l . �• /la✓,�I��1 �� //.rn�;e�, ) 'Phone.I�i,o.: '/4:/-�� _'-A'5 --- County: tib u=a•-n3 Farm location: Latitude and Longitude:? '' W QVI 30'/(required). Also, please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified. Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): Design capacity (number of animals): � Average size of operation_(12 month population avg.): Z „� Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres), /32 acre lVa 'aaaa�asarrraaaarmaraararaaaarrararrrsrarrraaaatsaaasszaaasasarrraraaaaasrraaaa� O Technical Steciaiist Caxtification 00 As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Sail and Watok E Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new a expanded animal waste management system as installed for the faxen named ahog4 has an an3.ma. ; L,aGte ?nana.gt=ent rlr•n that meets the design, construction, operation ana maintenance stanaards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Corunission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following e7,ements and their corresponding minimum criteria -have -been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. :era of Tec`saical Specialist (Please Print) Affiliation: +0 1 Address (Ag Phone No. SignaCure: Date: -r' Sl aaaaa=aaa=caaa�aaraaaaaaaaaaarr3:a=aaaaaaaaraaaaaa��asaa�aasaaaaarsenna Owner/Hanagew Agraaaeat I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the faxm named above and will implement these procedures.- I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of F•.nvironmental :lana-ge-ment before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state eiLher through a max. -made' cnnveyancd or through runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District_ �^ N&=e of Land Owner (Please Print) : Signature: eo��_ Date: Name of Managar, if different from owner (Please print): Signature: ' Date: RoT%: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Manage-ment within 60 days of a title transfer, D&I USE ONLY : ACN I;!€� .-animal Waste Management Plan CertiFic3i c'n kp!casc i. c or ariol al! in:�r"-'ion -. mac; not r.__ir: a sIC- !1~.\:Silas or �2�s or (_Etponded )iplea_se c;rcle one) r z^erzIrm:irinn: _.�� . I: L. - 4 __:. `C._ X45-.2Zr � na7l.�S Or -:i01:: CcL'mvFa.--7;is loc2iLJ in:_- �° �_ 4 �� �a 7Z 4M :c,t m2o Eoc=.!o:i anI CeS:;.�_ lv'•L' �u: >C_:ii.'C' _� 11'Der3lio�� Desrrioric�n: r'7e 01wire No. 01.-ijiJn:cis - We an i0 !nuSh G:::Cr 7.,..: e : _ :cc: 01 EDS, _r: e' o:'. -.... _._. I j != cr.s:n; OpercRor Oil?� I Des;=-�" 4/ Gr I��.'1l5'_rta Ac:���':� ! !• �� Ci J[or 2ca PCnds i 1 ota.l Czr,2,:;CV:- •S I . � % _ _ C'bic subs:.',;ace a; ins prescn[ on [he [:r;m: YES or c;;L:_ ane) 1 YES: yrc sucsuF ac_ crus presea[ in [ire `.rea o[ tike LAGOO\ or SPRAY FIELD a z x Y x i Y w Y i x .. 54 ................ x ......... Y. ....... k ,X a. x Y x.. x x x x Y Y ..­ ­ a Owner l Manager Agreement _) Vll-�lfv lh]I ]'li the abovc inic-rl]tio❑ is cor;:c'. Z-, � wa be toC I: Loco c'Jraine. I oc r :ic: w._ _...._.,�.._ �roc__'ures cs.ab!ishc. in the _t cro ca a:.imJ Lasa man-oc-meal c I_ -I ;_ m r,]-._; a'oov:..._ .! _...:nc ;hese rcc_cu:es. f (u'c} !{fou. lea; sicn ;o , : is.. c's:2n .__:!C;i�'or S: '1 or :.^SC C:ICn Of nr'.4' .i iaCi!:t.CS :li i'_ ] .,_ C_.11:_-ucn ;C Su,bm.inc., lC ,._•.Y an;.. _—!` -7:u5i_..._— .�;,':! L`1C S:Cf:^` 0, CHC_'tjOn S'•'5::"n IJ SCr-.a:_ %%21=-S Qi Sl?I_ _:L^._. ."LL_...:JL'E..h ] ..L... _—.._.— _.._. Of L: —j n i m,, Z us:r:� f.fsourz=s L_GSC.- 1.._Z z :C SCI{ znc �'' mit. CC..__. :n D:C .i �iC-._-.__.... .. _ :n :1 r.,._.:�� - - . r —. :c V _ ....��I,^. C!J:._°'•'S :.; = I;.._ _. L Lind u tier AOd(.l�o���1°Jl]�n-1 r :'ice: ';E: - ...1L TechnicaJ Specialist Certification �� �.,ter Cunscr,': t;un Cor,lmniicrr, ou �u�:': 1 . =•,.; � :_.`.inrcai SCCt;ziist LIC.;i9nate'.1 byrtlz �ortli Cafcnlina Suii � ,nL1 .,, - -.L 5f Ky. + C..'aI ii',al me nnimai '.Masa rnon _ .^ cnE 5:•'°wm Or me i.;J-1 :i`.n :nnat :1= or cncz 15 S'OlLICS and :C'...:C1SICnS O[ of •i! is :pC'_:i:e 3 :n if AY NCAC 1 and L:.e Re.OurC_S ConSe--•'aAn 07"e Z., _.. �W= C_NO2 50ii and Walt' C,)nser,-at[on Cummiss;on ^.UrSHIM fO `C,.!,C:.*..-::17 anJl .=.y tr- C 7i= ^..'..S "^CIICible. ATA _^-Ca CY21C7 =1=1 .=l°S a 1=0W _._. -7c n2w ;gn _a= ..MnCwcn i5D. SL vL?. RC. D. ..�::nIL'a1 S�C•_::1t5:.'Gui� JG:. - ._ :" � --- __...,:Cn:Om V. Cerr2yz QPOIZ Of Des".) 17 C)dec!ion. Stor:iLe, Treatment SvFzern _ anlrrcarrare W, Emmy vawrnC is ac:quace for ge uon cqwon worn_ wpar0r..' '.t im ::... �.... .=mmy! %'asw srurast and treatment sL7=ure....Uc^ as but = :irn1::'.::o woiiC_,. ,. _,_,..-. Qn= :no -_.._ ..'nT been Cwgnc to altn of e'Ce.:S :""le "^.In:^,U::'. I:L: �arnE of nnical 5oec:ZIH51 (P!e2Se :;.,Ci, LLQ..._._ . -._0v_ t. x., . -G C �..7Vg a7- /GCS` 3.' Land Aoolication Sice (WUP) 7-,e pian ::rovi�.s for minimum secamuons Ic :::r;;. _aecua[r auir,; ::t ._.. ;�' '• '�;: t::: L r.. __.__.. _: _ :' _..:orbic .Cr ••tiwa :n';.^.gC2ow byc'-- L;IC lnL: nL._.�•,. ;CaU1n� �[1., Vill 1 &- N2me of T C;1nIca[ SoeCi3li5t{t���''�S� P:`:nr.' 77) C C, C Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots :. ;i;e a,.Prcpr1(;re Jc.: wite r a narior Inc- (SC or `.l UP or RC! - r:5 : t7;. ahca(icn and Hau onL-11�, Em :ment jj J C'1c; 1114 'i r•. ^.l Rdln') i.iC:I IS': u'1111 C ;crl zl '.,'.lSiC 7pII<_71fn11rai'tnMCni '''•5• L' ;r .r '•va�tC acpiiCz(1Un CCu1D(T:Cnt �cC;::r;C'.: '.n Uie pian nas br=n C::::C: :rc:'� ..lDfalC'{ Or at:cordanC. wiLn Casiln: des(°n cnanu 1.nd oi[ ,.nd Is ably to zipoiv as (C ?CC Waste m2r.aeer_ne:l[ flan (txis(ino aoolicatlen . u:omcnt C21,4COVer L;;e a::. .ne pic.n t::cet!:� _. "C' me 5zt_..ICC '1vLLr3uhC Dr n !L !Calm, rata. a :or ^O OC CI:CaL'Ci._ zs�bii;ce . re'c'.j;-.,cur[z can be m-'nLltnr^ ­.L-:,ibraucn and acijus;.—:C.'. - lepa..n1. -ind'lj nr ' ing rnc:ii(v '.v1Ll`.rw ,nimai wase ^piica(!un pian ^a✓ brt.^, dt_ ,^.C. :U--___-- aCcommc� 1atz Mt m1nagP71C..m, pian: {flCi USC i aeciic uun ecuicnn• ._t can. D 'C' lle alta _ - plan at _tdsnot to z -Ce_^_ c her unt 1:•C.5auliC or nutJ-lt.^,t !C,%ir, .caz. u z _ aDpiic_uuns �as ,ten .s ablisn:d: ,_ ucd bu:fe:s Can be ma.,maint^_: C_i:c.:1uL:n _n Sc:usuatnt- cun,inc..' as pal: of ;ile clan}. \e•,v •-,nnt!eri nr 'cr'na �nc:iit•. :iL`1n':( ?.c;,rlo ,S'a r2 lr Itl:!Ilrin :Ulf'.11`.,I ,r '�^tl ..�1� �-im1n. (\'Y'L? or 1) .-.nim:li w 5(e 2Dpkca6cn e2uipment SprCiCcJ in 'jle plan has bc_ 1 se;c_a_ a.:i '.caste �c - accommodate tae wzl.,:(e manage-mv,11 piall: (PrucuseJ aopiicnuon eauiome-:t :-1 C.c _%-:1 :)Ian at —a!CS not to C :L'eCS C',Lle.' L"e sccc:ned 'ivdraullc or nuL'Z n( lcnc:^q aDelicaLicns bas been tsmb!Ished: reouircd bu:Ic-s can be ma:ntaincd: C= iCraCun anJ ?Ciu_LMC^: conLainrd as par. of the pian). dame of chnic3i Speciaiist (Pleas r. -int): _ ::iattion o� ���C, Utz `�`� o.:: Corn�:e:e� .cress L29c,,�7- G o F or.e �o. 7- E; Odor Control, Insect Control. :Nfor:aiitv tilona<zement and Emer2encv —\C -ion P13n S[. WUP. RC or Il 1 he wa-s(C .manj2tmcm plan for Lhis facility lnc!udrs a \vaste `laii3gu-rem C..CUr Cur of C?lC��:.�:_':. Control Chec!t!IsL a \-IUr-,ZJkV NlanaLcmcni C!lCL!:!I:t and all I1C.'OCn ': .^.0::vn ?!_. EJurcts of CL:t ;nsCC:.s have DCCn :':2JL'a(C' wim iCSCC to mis Sitz: and BCst. NI:na2'_mC^! _:r'�Cs i) `11n1C11ZC L• Manzep-ne^t ?rac:ices to Ccnuol [nsecLs have bc_:i szie:-xd and inc;uLic.i :ra :.n, :.'as;: r^.anar^lt l(, MortJi('. ,`isnaacDltnt ?.an and the crzrn4 =c on ?!an a.�c compic!_ W u .. , ic^1c:1(c� D'• _.._ :__... carne of TI nical Specialist (p!I': se Print): K :ii:: tion St.�G Date Wur:: C0fn�i�';,; F'1 W ["hien Notice of :New or Esnandin, Swine Form si,n:lture block is only io be used for new or e: Do indin, s%vine farms :hat 'pr_iit corlsrruc:ion 1999). If the fac'.iity -as builr befnre June 21, 1996, -hen -:is it crlrlstruCred or !u�t a[;_. � alt 1;1 •'P, rot;C^ lCCaiC'.f a::0`_S 3 ^UC!!c rOaC.:11- %L,1v IrOrn "115 n . Or a:-. i. .._ .�... _ .. .. of NCCS. IG6 -JSP5 -. COP%- OI L[]C noUCt anU _ '.:st OI L2_ . _. 0V,'Ll C'.:1Ct_: �e of Land Owner: J �i'�na[ure: D 1(,': Ill. Cernyicarion of 1115rallari01r -riiccvinn. Sinmyc Tommy lnsrojohn rnE:''-l.i 'XLSLC SLOE lav 1n11 LIe. urntnt SL".lc"Ir:S. aJC:1 :--< OCL ROI Firm!:'j :O 13'700P.S awor..: nu '.v;1,'? L1C ]T OfO '". Pian :0 1711.. Of w0hous rur01:1, no i'r'e c 7011 is neceflarn. Nnne of Technical Soecialis: (P ewe ?AA - `F, 3i Land Aoolication Sife (11':?) :ec': :,:e rppropri.:.0 bay woocing Symm is in iiW w A .z�. s s :.,.:x : I .aa '.'.r:..��. '.v"iC 7.In. Condidonal Aporoval. zI: ,_^ __ ..-i(j 2< qecnk in ult PAn :s.: M=2 0 _7upp1: _ as SCCc:i:CC'. ,n L1C 'i2S 'IC: Cct.. e7�:zucn as _:tic in :r.e n^orocr3,.. for -3m.i;_rc_ I2 z:i J :�, so c:1Z,:C Ln:S bL)x if apgr vpr..-,tz2 :f W C'OCOiny 5'•'SWM 3s SCC:.-,.,, :n L1C P1 —.-I __n :701 CC Ai.]CiAKA un ncoly ..___.. ._::L "Q= 11 or MIS VnIAC30OW Lilt 4wRC. in 0OM 11: .. ;C :F.:3I3 N 3P ==M COP icr _.e5:....: 1rli 0 J 0— ..me of Te 7nlcal Spec,aby , .aws ...., . rC,,✓ _ T 1i5 following signature block: is bnl.%to be used NNteri the b'o, for conditional yproml in HL c above has been cheAed. "nal I ('•vC) havC cOClr, 111:d i0 C530145 L12 capping S;'SiC ?5 S4CC.iIC :1 ?' ',OJ':, ..'nuonaw to nj,wnn we .:11C.nm c:0o juF _: sln cDr1u& and "A SJbmA IU - c ox-.: ' a _...h w".'...I SCCWSSL %"Ulm I_ c1cm! nys [Oit0wL'I'-1 i:4 We SPOEM M (21c ti:,EL:..JII_ __.:1:,....wn . -. to SllL'C51L IZO VC'lra]L'on IS 3 '-'il wdun of at '• rias! 211I13_9c71c:1( P1 -:1l ^i:l'. ',vii! i uz: :.. ]C�un :yarn IDEM. / A Au_'a�,i ! ,1,1- Woe: J C) i unoff Cnntrols fron .tenor Lots {,R(w} ,1:: :t , `LICuIUUi iU Gl1nIn112C I!1C run utt �3l rUilU(an[i :rUnl Mun^_In+? and Anvy >e "'S �',:: :n`.L^.+i�L�ZE :J;_':;;;._ ICS '_7C pOn. ^t1r rcc:i:nes wi'i otrr ever or !ofs. lio Pr Name of Technical Soecialist (?!_:Lse F7r,0: . 0110 D) Aoolic2cion and Handling* Eauinmen[ Install3cion (W! P or I) J!e 1� _l �[' -7C"cation :.nd hars!lln^ ,-u;priLn: ireL:i: d in = C �" '.s �:: ii:c and .� .4:• .zr .afl0r: Lon and wiusunwi mannob ha1Y W1 U 1::. J'• "S .....:_MA us pin o. an..... Awm a! '•ti'=.[. ncpiication :ar.Ll i�ewov in vw On in not l;l.i:.. IVS „u. wit VA7=- hzs pruru,e.i !easing or third pawav apr kzuun and has rrovlLe•! me ,on[,_C: agnts %viLl [h. rc_uir--menu J( Lh.- oijn: ;euuir;d Jut..— > .Zr, oc ..!a:nu.i11C.J: 2uiL: ,lc: hav bWn r'rovWw [U Mc 0 -WS 3r.d -L—, conditional aogroval: .-nimal -a-c'. aC7ii,:z[mn 3rd :•xrd"ne dame of T ___.. and W! be on to and ir.s[:-i1A z`.6 j q<-. -•t=om• rear:. :s Q____:._ Si;:ra ::, 'zui� -. z! anti _.: xwot 2 "MAI'•_' snd 5:_ An o: ._::U - Ns_ ... Jc_orC,::.,,_ -i;<-1 Ul. C:Wp ng s,:sum AnL'J W :n Lhc plan: and 'Dctn pro iu.'.: tJ Lne owntrs and a.,e 'ionk1j.25 -[ of _h: ?isc:. tnical Specialist (P!,c 'It). WCi icy I -c OIJ The following signature biock is only to be uszd when [he bo\ for condirional aoflroval in IN D above has been cnezked, �' Ca .r• :a Z[ 1 (Uzi ihuve t:Jrnrnttte`..i to uc.hnne urie 'anini:1 `,ball a,,�iic:'u-�;n s--ec:tied in ny (our) :, anaee"nent Dlari and will s;,,bmi[ to DEM a vZr torn a'Im4rovi Sce_Sis: %yMn 1_ cJzada_� cap follo�vin,, th t4 's t G SCeL tL edit:C�i ,.1 Ce to 5ubmi[ i,bsne':llu_Lon :s a :ioL.-Con ot'm.- waste -!,."."_wz! :t riln �-,nd ius] [v !n i' om DEM. - �:tme of Land 0wner: Sionature: Name of tilana2er onacure: Date: C,! - 9. YP Dale: E'! Odor Control. Insect Controf and Mortality Nlana;ernenc (SD. Si. WLT. RC or 1) to c:,,nU31 oucrs and irse�:s as sv. z!Oet in wo Man il2ve ba i,^.5i._tle 1:: :.r2 7-._ as s .'.:Ptt'd in le � n',-,as 1as also ben ins:a.ile'-_ —,ne :5 Hanle of T lRleai'�!� SDeciallSi ( 2 ._'.Ac r c' 7- 12P Farm Location Map 17 Lir-Foster Farm 1321 (� Cool Springs Rd. ' 1979 / Cleveland. NC 27013 CLEVELAND , a / R.F.D. RT. I 1003 ,. � �' •�- 1980 / 1972 �7O 1979 c rruRc 1981 1981 SOUTH ^ RIVER CLEVELAND R.F. D. RT %COTC IRISH FIRE DIST. / cn 1982 1972 ! 1979 \ 1003 1984 .r NEED 1 Fire R 1 I 1981 ROWAN-Mo,Q Sta. a 98 .� IREDF I. ` La -Foster Farm " �'� 1984 NEQDMQR STEGE F.S. c� Facility'vo.80-25 -C ;72,''Ra 6,72 oNee more 972 198.E i Q M �a Mount Q . ; � 1957E �.Vernon S p;R1 s o. � ,,: Ro. OCJ� a,4 Ry 1978 Y \ O Lit Foster F.�rrn Facility 7o.30-43 1971 �1 1972.; 'Woodleaf R1 •1 hh�]] _ 2004 �tf08S ~19'77 .... ; , // QUARRY RQ:' j 07 1977 po Sta. : 1963 w 1964 1973 .....-.. ':�' ,� ice. I.e'vefand R,FA.._ �� cc o 1957Rt.1 �Q ;' �m 1975 i` WEST C, AND .R :WAN FIRE DIST. �+it 9 �' `� i ", ` �O i R. F D. R T. I 1974 CLEVELAND ,. GODBY ROWAN / 1959 1952 JR. H1. 1961 1960 Q. 0 1744 lj1�A3 1 1957 r. \ a I i sbury z C EVELA S ch Barber 19b� R ,1 D. �� 1951 x 1001 E SN, r SPG Ra. ABBE Rt, 9 Z �p n ` 1 ;9 La -Foster Farm Carson Road Dairy Farm Site Map Facility No. 80-43 C,.•ss ABV�'�'w Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization This plan has been prepared for: La-Fosler Farm Gerald Foster 13210 Cool Springs Road Cleveland, NC 27013 704-278-2596 02-11-2003 This plan has been developed by: C. Lipe Barrier, Jr. Environmental Spec. II NC DENR, DSWC 444 Bristol Dr. Statesville, NC 28677-2942 704-873-6761 Ext 112 r ��" _'� za'~ ) Deve oper Signature Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan. Signature (owner) Date Signature (manager or producer) Date This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Plan Approved By: t "Technical Specialist Signature Date Map and Tract Is Location Nlap La-Foster Farm ' CLEVE_4.40 a i.=.0. R'. I ► 19BG / 1972 �O I Q ,979 P "D CHURCH, , ba o `LTi r 1 l9a1 SOU7R R r V O 41� 4ao 4 1933 : 1 167 98COTC ISH IRE F.7 , .! 19 B•� �` 3 gr l ✓' Fire 1991 f �. O,Q� Sra. a 1983 mO _1 ROWAN- a NEtIQMoR A ! �,�,e ecrmore 4 4 ; 1 1972 '�� 9 "457 s z 3 0 441 �r f on s� t Gs �a RD. -� 'y31� 1 G . py r97B Lu -Z 2 0 �, 1971 oodIeaf ".9 7?- 2oo4 Ot IARRY RQ:,` '^ Eire 977 , . O sta. '. , i r 1963 gyp_ 1559 Q: 41 k \IJ1x3 1964 6'veIind RJAI, �X 1957Rt.1LC 44C�CI`rAV0 1975 a RaN FIRE DIST. 97�1 WEST .ra' Of � �� . CLEVE LAND,, _ Gooey \ Ro Vl. ROWAPI 19:9 1951 JR. HI 196! t c BSE:' / A3 1 1957 aIisbur/ t7441:1� z C EVELA s— �e�sP� Barber 195i� R .F .0. r r�O1 — r E,.. G SC .1 a� -7R9� . R 9 1739 Field List for Waste Application Fields not included in Animal Waste Management Plan Page 1 La -Foster Farm Field Number Acres Land Use Tract 435 Hugh Lyerly Map 7 l 12.8 Cropland 2 3.8 Cropland 3 23.1 Cropland Tract 440 Hayden Foster Map 2 1 8.0 Pasture 2 10.5 Pasture 3 8.0 Pasture Tract 441. Snyder Home Farm Map 3 1 17.0 Cropland 2 15.4 Hayiand 3 15.0 Pasture 4 36.0 Pasture Tract 442 Beaver Map 3 1 17.5 Cropland Tract 455 La -Faster Farm Map 2 1 9.5 Pasture 2 3.2 Pasture 4 3.7 Cropland Tract 456 La -Foster Farm Map 5 1 6.6 Wildlife 2 6.8 Wildlife 3 7,4 Wildlife Fields not included in Animal Waste Management Plan Page 1 Field List for Waste Application N La -Foster Farm Field Number Acres Land Use Tract 457 La -Foster Farm Map 1 14.8 Pasture 2 15.1 Pasture 3 8.6 Cropland 4 2.7 Pasture 5 12.4 Cropland 6 2.3 Pasture 7 7.5 Pasture Tract 467 Fred Foster Map 6 1 17.0 Cropland Tract 469 Fred ,Foster Map 2 1 2.8 Pasture 2 15.6 Pasture 3 10.3 Pasture Tract 481 Tonya Foster Map 1 1 7.6 Pasture 2 1.0 Pasture Tract 505 La -Foster Farm . Map 8 Dairy Facility No. 80-43 Tract 506 La -Foster Farm Map 7 1 12.9 Cropland 2 13.6 Cropland 3. 5.2 Cropland Tract 507 La -Foster Farm Map 2 1 12.0 Pasture 2 3 31.5 3.0 Cropland a —Pa it ��� �a� 4 8.6 Pasture Page 2 N Field List for Waste Application Page 3 La -Foster Farm Field Number Acres Land Use Tract 623 Pence Farm Map 4 1 2.0 Cropland 2 4.3 Cropland 3 69.1 Cropland Tract 1167 Felix Cartner Map 6 1 2.3 Cropland 2 5.3 Cropland 3 7.8 Cropland Tract 1170 Harold Deal Map 6 1 34.0 Cropland 2 8.0 Cropland 3 3.0 Hayiand 4 4.0 Hayland Tract 1201 Snyder Farm Map 8 1 5.0 Cropland 2 4.2 Pasture 3 33.7 Pasture 4 4.3 Pasture Tract 1234 Coleen Belk Map 9 5 34.6 Cropland Tract 1260 Alfred Lanus Map 7 1 26.2 Cropland 2 21.8 Cropland Tract 4754 Tonya Foster Map 1 1 8.3 Pasture 2 9.2 Pasture 3 3.1 Pasture Page 3 Field List for Waste Application Page 4 La -Foster Farm Field Number Acres Land Use Tract 18870 Map 6 1 21.3 Cropland Tract 19300 Current Farm Map 8 2 3.0 Cropland 3 3.1 Cropland 5 9.0 Cropland 6 10.4 Cropland Tract 19301 La -Foster Farm Map 3 1 48.3 Cropland Tract 19337 Cartner Farm Map 8 1 6.7 Cropland 2 30.0 Cropland 3 6.3 Cropland 4 6.6 Cropland 5 3.4 Cropland 8 6.9 Cropland 9 19.7 Cropland Tract 19560 Harold Deal' Map 6 2 7.6 Cropland Page 4 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality 0 James B. Hunt, Jr., Governer Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director 1 � • NCDENR 6 NORTH CAROLINVJi I 7 ENVIRONMEWRA BFWA'!J AI �q S & NATURAL k . February H, , 2000 FEB 14 2000 GERALD FOSTER pSlgN 9F 10'diflHURTlil. MRt1A6E LA -FOSTER DAIRY tl~siMI BF4 3765 FOSTER ROAD CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA 27013 Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800043 La -Foster Dairy Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage and Application System Rowan County Dear Gerald Foster: In accordance with your application received on May 21, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Gerald Foster, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the La -Foster Dairy Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 500 Dairy cows and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals. Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief. Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Certificate of Coverage AWC800043 La -Foster Dairy Page 2 This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership. If any, parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding. The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staff may be reached at (704) 663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at (919) 733-5083 ext. 546. Sincerely, cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's) RowanCounty Health Department lvlooresv_ille--Regional_Offi"d-,Water-Qua]ity Section Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation -- District Permit File NDPU Files State of North Carolina Department Environment of and Natural Resources Division of Water QualityQN James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor �s�hd�ep 999 WayneMcDevitt, Lorry rr KeT. Sten, Director July 20, 1999 GERALD FOSTER LA -FOSTER DAIRY 3765 FOSTER ROAD CLEVELAND, NORTH CAROLINA 27013 f D NORTH CARMi, � � PARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE=S FEB 1- 2000 wsla of l;w?NrK[4TA1 fdAlaA69-4 %00WJ$VtttL AMBRA1 OEf14 Subject: Application No. AWC800043 Additional Informaiion Request La -Foster Dairy Animal Waste Operation Rowan County Dear Gerald Foster: The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by August 19, 1999: 1. Please provide lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable. 2. Please indicate the application method in the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP). 3. The WUP agreement must be signed and dated by the owner and the technical specialist. 4. The WUP submitted calculates the amount of nitrogen produced in one year. However, it appears that the WUP uses a two-year crop rotation. Your WUP should be revised so that the nitrogen produced and the nitrogen utilized by crops is calculated for the same time period. Some options for revising the WUP include: calculating the amount of nitrogen produced for a two-year period of time, revising your WUP to show waste utilization for Year One and Year Two of the two-year rotation in separate tables, or showing a two- year crop rotation with corn and soybeans on half the acreage from each field. 5. According to the map provided, the acreage for trwct 469, field 6 and tract 1170, fields 3 and n is unclear. Please provide a clearer map that identifies (outlines or highlights) and shows the acreage for these fields as listed in the WUP. 6. The permit application indicates that the certified design capacity is 500 dairy cows. However, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan is for only 250 dairy cows. Please consult your technical specialist in order to have the facility certified for 500 dairy cows. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical. specialist. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-715-6048 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Application No. 80-0043 Gerald Foster Page 2 Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at (919) 733-5083, extension 546. Sincerely, Gtr/ ca -11 S san Cauley Environmental Engineer Non -Discharge Permitting Unit cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Permit File DATE: 815199 Gerald Foster Dairy Wastd Storage Structure Rowan, NC Design Criteria: 500 Dairy cows at 1,400 lbs, each= 700,000 tbs. live weight 180 days storage 5 gal./day/cow of waste water 2,548 sq. ft of non -pond Drainage Area Waste from Freestall area and access alleys will be scraped and stored in the waste storage pond, as well as the runoff from approximately 2,548 sq. ft. of the barns and loafing lot. ------------- I. Storage Volume Required A. Manure Storage with 75% confinement 500 cows X 14.6 gal./day/cow X 180 days --------- 131,751 cu. ft. 7.48 gals./cu.ft. B. Waste Water from Milk Barn 500 cows X 5 gal./day/cow X 180 days 60,160 cu. ft. 7.48 gals./cu.ft. C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 180 days Drainage Areas =2548 sq. M 1 day CN 98130 day CN 92 Monthly Monthly Months Precip. (P) (inches) Evap. (E) P - E October 3.21 2.56 0.65 November 2.94 1.83 1.11 December 3.56 1.1 2.46 January 3.72 1.1 2.62 February 3.78 1.83 1.95 March 4.61 2.92 1.69 21.62 10.48 16.64 runoff inches X 2,548 sq. ft. 3,533 cu. ft. 12 inches / ft. D. Waste Feed and Bedding 10 cu. ft.1 day X 180 days= 1,800 cu. ft. TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED 197,245 cu. ft. Runoff (inches) 2.12 2.69 2.85 2.9 3.71 16.64 - Add to liquid Volume - II, Normal (P) Precipitation less (E) evaporation on Structures for 180 days October - March 10.48 inches = III. 25 yr, storm on Open Area of 2,548 sq. ft. CN = 95 for open areas With 25 yr. 1 day strom of 6.0 inches, runoff = 5.41 inches 2,548 sq. ft. X 5.41 inches runoff 12 inches 1,149 cu.ft. 15,470 sq. ft. surface area of storage pond IV, 25 yr. storm on Pond Surface 25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches V.. Emergency Spillway 25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches Peak discharge m 3.2 cfs, Use ESW with 12 ft. bottom width, 3 to 1 side slopes, 0.2 ft. stage Vt. Freeboard Vii. Total Depth of Pond 10 feet of storage 247,531 designed amount 198,394 amount needed 49,137 amount surplus 0 0.9 ft. 1,149 cu. ft. 0.1 ft. 0.5 ft. 0.2 ft. 1.0 ft. 12.65 ft. TABLE 1 PRODUCER NAME: Gerald Foster DATE: 814/99 Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic PAN Acres lbs. N Type Yield Utilized 469 1 ZeB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 2.8 280 1 ZeB Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 2.8 280 2 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 14.4 1,440 2 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 14.4 1,440 3 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 1.2 120 3 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.2 120 4 PxC FescuelPasture 2 Tl Ac. 100 4.1 410 4 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 4.1 410 5 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 Tl Ac. 100 0.8 80 5 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 0.8 80 6 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.6 160 6 PxC FescuelPasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.6 160 7 PxC FescuelPasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.9 190 7 PxC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.9 190 505 1 CeB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 8 800 1 CeB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 8 800 507 1 CeB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T / Ac. 100 13.1 1,310 1 CeB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 13.1 1,310 2 McB2 Com Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 30.1 4,515 2 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T 1 Ac. 120 30.1 3,612 2 McB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac. 100 30.1 3.010 3A McB2 Com Silage 15 T/ Ac. 150 4 600 3A McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T / Ac. 120 4 480 3A McB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac. 100 4 400 313 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAs. 100 10.2 1,020 3B EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 10.2 1,020 1170 1 McB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac, 150 35.5 5,325 1 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 35.5 4,438 1 McB2 Soybeans 25 TIAs. 100 35.5 3,550 2 HwB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac. 150 9.4 1,410 2 HwB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 9.4 1,128 2 HwB2 Soybeans 25 TIAs. 100 9.4 940 3 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac, 100 3 300 3 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 3 300 4 ChA Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAs. 100 4.0 400 4 ChA Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 4.0 400 Gerald Foster Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic PAN Acres Lbs. N --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Type Yield Utilized 481 1 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAs 100 9.6 960 1 HwB2 FescuelPasture 2 T1Ac 100 9.6 960 2 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T1Ac 100 1.2 120 2 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 1.2 120 362 1 HwB2 Com Silage 15 TIAs. 150 18.4 2,760 1 HwB2 Small Grain Silage 10 TIAs. 100 18.4 1,840 1 HwB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac. 100 18.4 1,840 441 1 NIeB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 23.9 2,390 1 NleB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 23.9 2,390 2 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2TIAc. 100 11.6 1,160 2 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAs, 100 11.6 1,160 3 ZeB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 10.5 1050 3 ZeB Fescue/Pasture 2 T1Ac, 100 10.5 1050 4 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 12 1200 4 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T1Ac. 100 12 1200 5 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 0.8 80 5 EnB FescuelPasture 2 TIAs. 100 0.8 80 6 ZeC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 10 1000 6 ZeC Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac, 100 10 1000 7 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 17.3 1,730 7 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac. 100 17.3 1,730 i r 454 455 1 EnB FescuelPasture 2 TIAc 100 15.4 1540 1 Eng FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 15.4 1540 2 PxC FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 8.6 860 2 PxC FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 8.6 860 3 McB2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 12.4 1240 3 McB2 FescuelPasture 2 TIM 100 12.4 1240 4 . PxC FescuelPasture 2 TIAc 100 3 300 4 PxC FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 3 300 5 PxC FescuelPasture 2 TIM 100 6.6 660 5 PxC FescuelPasture 2 TIAc 100 6.6 660 6 McC2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 1 100 6 McC2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 1 100 7 McC2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 4.6 460 7 McC2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 4.6 460 8 Me62 FescuelPasture 2 TIAc 100 1.5 150 8 McB2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAc 100 1.5 150 9 McB2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 3 300 9 McB2 FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 3 300 10 McB2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 9.2 920 10 Me62 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 9.2 920 1 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 TIAs 100 6 600 1 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 6 600 2 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 2 200 2 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 2 200 3 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 TIAc 100 3.7 370 3 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 TIAc 100 3.7 370 4 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 TIM 100 3.4 340 4 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 TIAs 100 3.4 340 5 Me62 Fescue/ Pasture 2 TIM 100 0.6 60 5 McB2 Fescue/ Pasture 2 TIM 100 0.6 60 456 1 ZeB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 6.6 660 1 ZeB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 6.6 660 2 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 6.8 680 2 EnS FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 6.8 680 3 ZeB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 7.4 740 3 ZeB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 7.4 740 467 1 HwB2 Cam Silage 15 T/Ac 150 17 2,550 1 HwB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 17 2,040 1 HwB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac 100 17 1,700 1171 1 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAc 100 3.2 320 1 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 3.2 320 2 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAs 100 0.6 60 2 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 0.6 60 3 EnB FescuelPasture 2 TIAc 100 6.1 610 3i EnB FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 6.1 610 1201 1 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 8.8 880 1 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAc 100 8.8 880 2 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 3.8 380 2 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 3.8 380 3 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 7.3 730 3 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 7.3 730 4 E EnB FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 4.2 420 4 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 4.2 420 5 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 7 700 5 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 7 700 6 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 6.8 680 6 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 6.8 430 7 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 4.3 430 7 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAc 100 4.3 430 8 EnB FescuelPasture 2 TIAc 100 5 500 8 EnB FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 5 500 4754 1 EnB FescuelPasture 2 T/Ac 100 8.3 830 1 EnB FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 8.3 880 2 Hw132 Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAs 100 11.5 1150 2 HwB2 FescuelPasture 2 TIAs 100 11.5 1150 3 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 TIAc 100 2.3 230 3 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 2.3 230 19300 1 HwB2 Corn Silage 15 TIAs 150 1.6 240 1 HwB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 1.6 830 1 HwB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac 100 1.6 160 2 McB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 3 300 2 McB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 3 300 3 McB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 3.1 310 3 McB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 3.1 310 4 HwB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac 150 3.4 510 4 Hw132 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 3.4 408 4 HwB2 Soybeans 25 TIAs 100 3.4 340 5 McB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac 150 13.7 2055 5 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 TIAs 120 13.7 1644 5 McB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac 100 13.7 1370 6 McB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac 150 11.5 1725 6 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 11.5 1380 6 McB2 Soybeans 25 TIAs 100 11.5 1150 3505 5 HwB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac 150 34.6 5190 5 Hw62 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 34.6 4152 5 HwB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac 100 34.6 3460 Gerald Foster Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic PAN Acres Lbs. N Type Yield Utilized 19525 1 McB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac 150 10.2 1530 1 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 10.2 1224 1 McB2 Soybeans 15 T/Ac 100 10.2 1020 19560 1 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 4.2 420 1 EnB Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 4.2 420 2 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 7.5 750 2 HwB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 7.5 750 435 1 McB2 Com Silage 15 TIAc 150 12.8 1920 1 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 12.8 1536 1 McB2 Soybeans 15 TIAs 100 12.8 1280 2 McB2 Com Silage 15 TIAc 150 3.8 570 2 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 TIAc 120 3.8 456 2 McB2 Soybeans 25 T A/c 100 3.8 380 3 McB2 Com Silage 15 T/Ac 150 23.1 3465 3 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 TIAc 120 23.1 2772 3 McB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac 100 23.1 2310 Total 716.6 154,815 2 year rotation Number of Caws 500 X 76 lbs of N/cow amount of N produced lyr 38,000 Amount of Nitrogen produced in 2 years 76,000 Deficit of N 81,495 19300 1 HwB2 Corn Silage 15 T1Ac 150 1.6 240 1 HwB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 1.6 830 1 HwB2 Soybeans 25 T1Ac 100 1.6 160 2 McB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 3 300 2 McB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac t00 3 300 3 McB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 3.1 310 3 McB2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/Ac 100 3.1 310 4 HwB2 Corn Silage 15 T/Ac 150 3.4 510 4 HwB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 3.4 408 4 HwB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac 100 3.4 340 5 McB2 Com Silage 15 TIAs 150 13.7 2055 5 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 13.7 1644 5 McB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac 100 13.7 1370 6 McB2 Corn Silage 15 T/Ac 150 11.5 1725 6 McB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 11.5 1380 6 McB2 Soybeans 25 T/Ac 10u 11.5 1150 1234 5 HwB2 Corn Silage 15 T/Ac 150 34.6 5190 5 HwB2 Small Grain Silage 10 T/Ac 120 34.6 4152 5 HwB2 Soybeans 25 T1Ac 100 34.6 3460 • ,�,a �_ Ece+vE� WASTE UTILIZATION PIL.r"N- TION . 17 1999 Producer: Gerald Foster- La- Foster Dairy ""- loew Location: 3765 Foster Rd., Cleveland, NC 27013 la-FnsJer Farm Gerald & Shelbta Faster Telephone: 704-278-2596 13210 comet Springs Type Operation: Dairy Cleveland, X.C. 27013 Number of Animals: 500 (Design Capacity) The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and. to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis. This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 21-11.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission. WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and / or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. N WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN The design of your waste management facility is based on the following: A 500 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs. Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.) 500 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days time) = 3,832,500 gallons of waste/year. . Amount of Plant Available Nitro en Produced Per Year 500 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 38,000 lbs. Total N Total Nitrogen produced/yr. . 38,000 lbs. Total N (PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633) Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner. The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface application.: FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1 M WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Your waste storage pond is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of 98.5 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation. Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste. NARRATIVE OF OPERA TION. This operation has 730 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year system of corn cut for silage in the first year, followed by small grain cut for silage and sudex hay in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied using a honeywagon to crops, based on the realistic yields at the rates listed in table 1. Timing and application rates will be as followed: Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of Nlac no more than 30 days before planting. Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 120 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting. Sudex hay: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting. Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 110 lbs of N/ac Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac. On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%. Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon, tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage and proper system. NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. 4 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues. 2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall provide MRCS -with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in. the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict .the rate of application for other nutrients. 4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to `Buffers" required by DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian Forest Buffers.] 5. Odors �an be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when. the wind is blowing. 6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.] 5 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATION (Continued) 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered. 10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop on bare soil. 11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips] 12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells. 13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by the landowner. 14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of- ways. 15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to. prior converted wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site. 16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system. ,T WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS (Continued) 17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard. 18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge. 19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan " which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion. 20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site. 21. NOTE: Buildings adjacent to feed lot will be guttered to prevent roof runoff from flowing across the lot. 7 WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT NAME OF FARM: OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24 hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request. NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: (Please print) Signature:/Grp �_ _Date: - Name of Manager (If different from owner): Signature: Date: Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) -_�._Bis oct . --R i ipf=�e . Affiliation: Address (Agency): Z 7 Z 7- �-- O I D C o 4C0e Q `I -0 Signature: S f,,- I i.s L u Q.4 -r , N� ZA 14 8 te: -�-- WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT (Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.) hereby give permission to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System on acres if my land for the duration of time shown below. I understand .that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer. Adjacent Landowner: Date: Waste Producer: Date: Technical Representative: Date: SWCD Representative: Date: Term of Agreement: , 19 to , 20 (Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items) (See Required Specification No. 2.) E 0tate of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Geld Foster La -Foster Dairy 3765 Foster Rd Cleveland NC 27013 Farm Number: 80 - 43 Dear Gerald Foster: NCDENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND aIS&E r4E,-DRCES April 6, X19.q9, an WATER OUAL11TY SF-CTION qN-V? RONY. F,NT. H&AMI-1 N,*,"j,UR.AL RF.•SOURCK FED 14 2000 �€ iriiiYllidEt,TAt #AKA094 V101500.1 1101aAdow �FF1i'l MAY 2 1 1999 Non -Discharge Permitting You are hereby notified that La -Foster Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the application. The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Post Office Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at (919)733-5083 extension 364 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at (704) 663-1699. Sincere for Kerr T. Stevens cc: Permit File (w/o encl.) Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.) P.Q. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge Permit Application Form (THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave any question unanswered. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION: LI Facility Name: La -Faster 1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Gerald Foster 1.3 Mailing address. 3765 Foster Rd City, State: Cleveland NC Telephone Number (include area code): 704-278-2596 1.4 County where facility is located: Rowan Zip: _27013 1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): INTERSECT OF SR 1003 (COOL SPRG RD) AND SR 1970 (CARSON RD), SOUTH ON Carson Rd. FARM ON RIGHT ABOUT 300 YARDS. 1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): 1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): 1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): 2. OPERATION INFORMATION: 2.1 Facility No.: _80 (county number); 43 (facility number). 2.2 Operation Description Cattle operation Dairy 250- Certified Design Capacity Is the above information correct? =Yes; [ , no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er for which the waste management structures were designed. Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals 0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy 0 Feeder to Finish 0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow) 0 Farrow to Finish (# sow) Other Type of Livestock on the farm: 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef 0 'turkey FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 1 of 4 80-43 No. of Animals: 2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application system): ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 132 2.4 Number of agoo / storage ponds (circle which is applicable): 2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or O (please circle one) 2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or O (please circle one) 2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only) ,% r NO (please circle one) What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? 3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each item. Applicants Initials 3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal Waste Operations; - 3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and field locations where animal waste is land applied; 3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the CAWMP for permitting purposes: 3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility. 3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.) 3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application. 3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field. 3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field. 3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP. 3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field. 3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP. 3.39 The required NRCS Standard specifications. 3.3. 10 A site schematic. 3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan. 3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted. 3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted. 3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to your facility. 3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan. If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal. FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 2 of 4 80-43 Facility Number: 80 - 43 Facility Name: La -Foster Dairy 4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that this application for— (Fac ility name listed in question 1.1} has been reviewed by me an is accurate and complete tq the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required sup orting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. 5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner) (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this application for _ __(Facility name listed in question 1.1) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned as incomplete. Signature Date THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY SECTION NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT POST OFFICE BOX 29535 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083 FAX NUMBER: (919) 733-0719 RECEIVED WATER QUALi�SE'C-WN MAY 2 1 1999 Non -Discharge pennitiing FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 3 of 4 80-43 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (II98) Adeville Regional WQ Supervisor 59 Woodfin Place Asheville. NC 28801 N63251-6208 Fax(eze) 251-6452 Avery Macon Buncombe Madison Baft McDowell Caldwell Mitchell Cherokee Polk Clay Rutberford Graham Swain Haywood Transylvania Henderson Yancey Jackson Wilson Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor Wachovia Building, Suite 714 Fayetteville. NC 28301 (910) 486.1541 Fax (910) 486-0707 Anson Moore Bladen Richmond C) nbcdabd Robeson Harnett Sampson Hone Scotland Montgomery Washington Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor 533 ..':a-5btocr 5tr.: Winston-Salem, NC 27107 0.:W 7714600 Fax OIL) 7714631 Alamance Rochngham Alleghany Randolph Ask Stakes Caswell Sorry Davidson Watauga Davie Wilkes Forsyth Yadkin Guilfard Washington Washington Regional WQ Supervisor 943 Washington Square Mali Washington, NC 27889 (as) 946 481 Fax (9&� 975.3716 Beaufort Jones Babe Lenoir Cbowan Pamlico Craven Pasquotant CMmrt Paquimans Dari Pitt Gates Tyrell Greene Washington Hertford Wayne Hyde Wilson Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 (104) 663-1699 Fax (704) 663.6040 Alexander Lincoln Csbarms Meckleuburg Catawba Rowan Cleveland Stably Gastan Union hadell FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 4 of 4 Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor MW Barrett Dr. Raleigh. NC 27611 (919) 571-4700 Fax (919) 733-7072 Chatham Nash Durham Northampton Edgecombe Orange Franklin Person Granville Vance HsW" Wake Johnston Warren LAO Wilson Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 (910) 395-3900 Fax (910) 350-2004 Brunswick New Hanover Carteret Onslow Columbus Prader Duplin u+ A ROWAN COUNTY �'4 rn/! JY1 G r K e� I rg7 i NORTH CAR CLEVELANO F CAROLINA loci` / A.F.O. AT.I ! 1580 / / ❑❑ 1972 90 CHURCH-` A i�r�EE•it{c}.�•. ESUURC'� 19d1 °a ./• `` (� NA1'CiRt:aLt. '•� 'r CLEVELAND 1981// SOL7iJ 777YfA `'- Rp r 3 - D.RL1 / / W9SCOTC 1R1SH FIRE DIST. f��j j� 1979 7003/ N72 - FEB'J (.Q��/ \ 1981 m" J wa9tllea .F,D. S \ / —Ep • Fi1r O ,R 1. I OWAN- 'Fp Ser. 4 r9B 19d! 1157E �IA E S L . \ _. '� ...' S-.: i`• ' 1984 MED � OhEORf' RO / � aor ow of gfirt H[RThL WAG � 9foleemee ; � � 8 —•:.;c' ' po Nee more �` �,\ r 4 i o 197T�r .I p _. Q• 1986 ._ 19 ` 4 iJ�ad l Rat R r 1 1977 ; M / a Qo trS Mount \sa Vernon - `~"Iy/ 2 RA RY / / ` 4� / GCOL road I 003 0} N `♦ F' h _ 1 .. r r978 P ,I n / .i'.. p 1990 P9. _ r/OZFLEMI 2 d f SaV; shury R.F.p J ,�. 1971 `� ..; q0. 7pd ,..- RI. i F6NxWOGQF, lC 1 ,972[. + 'Woodled �• 1449 i'� COURSE 2004 1948 PO. . OW RRY RA ❑DODLEAF p07'NE'C,r- 19 8 % O. I 1977•W_.,. /:-•.. 90 1 /F7,Sto 1702,E +949 p i 17 ,. / ; 947 .�:..-. .. - / W ODL FIRE DIST'` / % - �;, ,939 t V / E , 73 q mA,9 eL CLEYELAkP %rA.F.D.RT.t —k f / Sar,sbLrv.R,F.p7984 ,973 ......[RR•f.D.P\ ; r1i 1931.__ 0 7Q 7975 t �. AND 1702 d WEST R WAN FIRE DIST. ,, y1 CLEAT. I / yw 19N \ / + 1532 ( 946 ti= i CLEVELAN DDDBP_ Sa s. � 1946 RED 801 Rr 9 R.F.D." r' 7744 A3 1937 + \ al lsbuty - M7� W - �..�'. �-•' r7J7 s4 1� C _VELA f{ F N.,�. Barber x961\ R.F.O. �y 19.51 'JO iJEeD 1915 Rt. 1 ¢ ECiJ., 5r / "G 4RBE RI.9 ii'' �. \ s 743, 19341 +973 rppn 1746 - 1 ;L f - a ; A i r s9 ' ¢ : i / r9s3 UlWqunY „r'ER n : ' y Q ?1747 - r n7lxsDSE aL y.aANKL1N ti +mr sours '.: t rJ , i, A Alf 7�1 NR. F.D. RT Ili " j 1 RED MQND . 1740 ILDERBR4 lzi7/$ t78A FRti 70i '•` P RC 9 RD 1739 f 9 " RV MT. U RD. U." \. q.F.D. flT.I T. 1347 ➢Ds5E1ti 1 Salisbury oa 732 E >49 N n WEST ROWAN t i,.._. u9 R m Sal's % 14 '371 774 } -' 1 3 RD K L ST-E� ? 776 141fGH nl J ! HI'SLH.i. HIL RED R HURLEY 1<£ `�+ J1 \ 5HE x776 9Q 9 r7JB; +72BRt6� w C a 5,-,lisbury 1 �Lq CL m, RD I i �I( / 03 I A n97 q 1774 EL.M.5 A.F.E). R[. 1737 1 1347 J _ I i Sahchurv� �% I a m x I URD. ' BEA R$ L' R ' AT. 11LL Fp Iia ) 7 R.F.o.. �, i 1 RD t z tn 1722 MT '40 BDR CH RD 1766 } } + FIR n"3 I _` 1 /81.6 % 7�,// I v O fr I 1 D ► S I EEL_ I ,IJYJF Y R: q'QRISON R Je 1 ;` LacxE FIRE DIS nsa 34ly 1 t a.. 7 I 174! r 777'j,.0. i733 !7734 ^' _ ,731 } 1710 . M1'. _t �. ��_TF WP r Bear yl.- --- .:'�' d ��° I a �, ^� ,6ali bury 14 Is L. ,773. Vr r Q r7y0 s 9,Y, �1 my �' Fir. Po 1Qr , .r ' I -177 e�X, 11 134 J 1 ; SIr. 'Poplar � $ I G O GNT RD ' $ 941ir y 17 Sal ish-vlR.F.D•' SA.LI �� I R.F.D. i NSS,� 1Jt r7J1 1 - - 1 II 735 1 3 RI fi i 1724 7�w y - t1�78F1 sr„iM1 A 1753 Qp ♦ i1 Ly�RL I $-i shury 1 =� $ I Salir F 1 =<Y 150 I 764 .•t- ~L---' I { / R,F.[7. Ri. 6 4 d' " I � R.FD.: IYL� FS.� �91� ULLA %.'qtr; 1763 G ,i°i a / f I I RO. 803 C R16 n X737 ! t ,326. w.: nafLEM. t 0 13611719 r 4 I nq sc1,' N F 2 .- YT. ULLA A 7S p Rowan. 801 Us 1 int. Fir Qo� ,. an69R.�0.4411 7>d z� ns7 x rr5s5alisR�FYo.Rc.2 Mills Ulla v na3 - "o s RD. t B� !SCIS IRES ` sal':sbu7J D 1 vs li x ,��` n 1347 17.1 �' '1l C' C` 4 is ROWAN COA.F.U. 1733 y 1 } r 4 Se li sE,',rr 153! 1 C 1509< fre" tq� E E d ISJRDRT R1. 11 .KI2'_R 739 Millbr dge R.F.o: 4 s Iir;56d 1 E 2` V Ii761 t 1766 r7Gs.7gnl 150 Rt. 2 • L, ...'.l'- � MIL R.F.�.RL2 t" ti $ G f.tNNIE• 1333 - All fq EMAREL 514 oIA —267 1546 S O co E,p 1114 ¢ - Atr 1394. P 6� .'• i' 15;3 c $ r7 1;60 S . fat 1760 \� $ j1' 1341 550 . 1 R0. 1 v ¢ 1706 '., >•- fl�l p' 5�'. 1537 CE - N FIRE DIST o �. 1 ! 40 / ss4 3alis' 761 4 ,7 R F. D, s zs99 7` 1737 IF VL A A7.1 3 el `� 4O 1., BOS7 rp 81.'2 W }� t, ��V 131 �r,qQ 81500 Cy�b l 4 4 / �'TZaJ / ro :1`-. 0• 1335 � I LO cx;s n41- � \/GAS 'a3yr.3 2544.n39 "spurs .1309 FIdR R' x 303 2334 9 150 Millers �er.o:NA e6. \ 34 9' A F.O. LWODo a+ 4yt< RD- ` — 11 21136 ISIU'ELENSII W6— 5..l is 1717 i,r E `1 �Rirporl i rss9• o r5 �B'6.4p / �RHtNA. GROVE @ H ` R Balis 1541 I i5 •^ e; ";sl 5d, \ •, •�'RI., \ LDN00N 1 4 / �}Zs�,`.' �,,m 4r�L QP 1 •4 3!9 y-r542,p RD >$ 1 5,I.11u1v A.F. / b G1 111 7 LI 1311 x 1368 1 1556LE�E" +3y34 1573"D 1340 E o wr 1 - \ , / 1'.as (Y �- ••.. _.`� J ., O •, Y� VAKE Sf. ,rod li 1 _� ,552, 1335 •� RD.p�'!,7' 1so6 / 9U5. �T' wEAveAs j$4 152 nn N - HSr��� LL rreCAAM7 1 Co +ISP \ ¢° o ' •� H IM 29 RD 7309 a 7541 r o L— 1557 Ehlnr Cr6r�\ ,�, rz10 a rot) I1 " ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR NEW OR =PANDED FEEDLOTS Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the address on the reverse side of this fox=. Name of fa (Please print): Address. l_ Phoneo .: County:_ KbWO-►t] Farm location: Latitude and Longitude -35' 47' j�W /$U Ir 7_6' (required) . Also, please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified. Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.): Design capacity (number of animals): IS Average size of operation (12 month population avg.): Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres): re �aaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagaa�aaaaaaaaaaa�aaaaaaaaa�aasaaaaaaasncaaaaagaamaaaa��O Technical Specialist, Certification co As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Wat� Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC. 6F .0005, I certify that the new. -j expanded animal waste management system as installed for the farm named abolp has an ani.mF�! %jayte management plan that meets the design, construction, operation and maintenance stanclards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria -have -been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; adequate quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print) _ F_ Affiliation: V -- t S _ Address (Ag ey) • 4! ctitiCofD la Phone No. 0 -7 Signature:-��i- • Date-. S -31 Sr saaaa�aaaaaaaap7xaggaqaaaasaaaaaaaqaqaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaasaaaa owner/Manager Agreement I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the strata either through a man --;Wade convPyance or through runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. tt Name of Land owner (Please Print): 0. a Signature: Z �' Date: Name of Manager, if different from owner (Please print): Signature: Nste: A change in land ownership requires (if the approved plan is changed) to Environmental Management within 60 days of ` Date: notification or a new certification be submitted to the Division of a title transfer. DEM USE ONLY:ACNEW##I KJ OY �g 9 J�w M'OL' Ir mo Whomvi" '7 • 43R, z 7%7 1 'ti A L t ATTACH2-1E'NT A Page i WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN Prod ucer����> Ems _County k Address J o Kind of Operation 1041'/'!4 C 1��e1 �� Nc_ �,-7o 13/ �} Type of Waste Facility �g��e S�r4 'e rO,1d Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capaciy . When the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates and leaching potental. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils ore -)n land when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems. The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your waste management facility. - The design of your waste management facility is based on the following: Amount of Waste Produced _?eZ Year: �pQ(� animals x_ 14 gad/�' Z %animals%yr = Ae66L6C4 g4�otal waste produced. PRODUCER NAME Gerald Foster Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Type Yield Per Ac. Utilized 362 1 2382 Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 18.4 2,760 1 23132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 18.4 2,300 1 23132 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 18.4 1,840 441 1 55132 Fescue/Pasture 2 V Ac. 100 23.9 1,793 2 508 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 11.6 870 3 61B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 10.5 788 4 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 12.0 900 5 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 0.8 60 6 61 D Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 2.5 188 ' 7 508 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 17.3 1,298 454 1 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 15.4 1,155 2 63D Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 8.6 645 3 55B2 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 12.4 930 4' 63D Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 3.0 225 5 63D Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 6.6 495 6 55D2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 1.0 75 7 55D2 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 4.6 345 8 55132 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 1.5 113 9 55132 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 3.0 225 10 55132 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac, 100 9.2 690 455 1 5562 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 6.0 450 2 55132 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 2.0 150 1 3 5582 Fes4ue/IJasture 2 TI Ac. 100 3.7 278 4 5582 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 3.4 255 5 5582 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 0.6 45 .456 1 61B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 6.6 495 2 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 6.8 510 3 61B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 7.4 555 467 1 23132 Com Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 17.0 2,550 1 23132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 17.0 2,125 1 23132 Soybeans 25 T / Ac. 100 17.0 1,700 PRODUCER NAME Gerald Foster Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic Lbs. N 350 Type 280 Yield Per Ac. 469 1 61 D Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 1 fit D Small Grain Silage 2.5 T / Ac. 125 1 61 D Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 2 50B Com Silage 15 T/ Ac. 150 2 50B Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 2 50B Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 3 63D Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 4 63D Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 5 63D Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac, 100 6 63D Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 7 63D Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 505 1 311132 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 Acres Lbs. N 8.0 600 507 1 Utilized 2.8 420 2.8 350 2.8 280 14.4 2,160 14.4 1,800 14.4 1,440 1.2 90 4.1 308 0.8 60 1.6 120 1.9 143 8.0 600 507 1 31 B2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 13.1 983 2 55132 Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 30.1 4,515 2 55B2 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T / Ac. 125 30.1 3,763 2 55B2 Soybeans 25 T / Ac. 100 30.1 3,010 3A 5562 Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 4.0 600 3A 55132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T / Ac. 125 4.0 500 3A 55B2 Soybeans 25 T I Ac. 100 4.0 400 36 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 2.2 165 4 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 10.2 765 1170 1 55B2 Cum Silage 15 T/ Ac. 150 35.5 5,325 1 55132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 35.5 4,438 1 55132 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 35.5 3,550 2 23B2 Com Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 9.4 1,410 2 23132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 9.4 1,175 2 2362 Soybeans 25 T I Ac. 100 9.4 940 3 23132 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 10.2 765 4 4 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 10.2 765 I PRODUCER NAME Gerald Foster Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Type Yield Per Ac. Utilized 1171 1 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 3.2 240 2 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 0.6 45 3 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 6.1 458 1201 1 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 8.8 660 2 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 3.8 285 3 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 7.3 546 4 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 4.2 315 5 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 7.0 525 6 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 6.8 510 7 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 4.3 323 8 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 5.0 375 4754 1 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 8.3 623 2 23132 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 11.5 863 3 23132 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 2.3 173 19300 1 23B2 Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 1.6 240 1 23132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T / Ac. 125 1.6 200 1 23132 Soybeans 25 T / Ac. 100 1.6 160 2 55B2 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 3.0 225 3 55B2 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 3.1 233 4 2362 Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 3.4 510 4 23B2 SmW Grain Silage 2.5 T ! Ac. 125 3.4 425 4 2382 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac, 100 3.4 340 5 55B2 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 13.7 1,028 6 5562 Com Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 11.5 1,725 6 55132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T I Ac. 125 11.5 1,438 6 55132 Soybeans 25 T / Ac. 100 11.5 1,150 I PRODUCER NAME Gerald Foster Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Type Yield Per Ac. Utilized 19301 1 2382 Com Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 45.0 6,750 1 23132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T / Ac. 125 45.0 5,625 1 23132 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 45.0 4,500 2 2382 Com Silage 15 T/ Ac. 150 5.8 870 2 23132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 5.8 725 2 23132 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 5.8 580 19337 1 5562 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 6.7 503 2 23132 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 30.0 2,250 3 2382 Com Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 6.3 945 3 23132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T / Ac. 125 6.3 788 3 23132 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 6.3 630 4 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 6.6 495 5 23132 Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 3.4 255 6 23132 Com Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 1.8 270 6 23132 Small Grain Silage 2,5 T 1 Ac. 125 1.8 225 6 23132 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 1.8 180 7 23B2 Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 0.7 105 7 2382 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 0.7 88 7 23132 Soybeans 25 T / Ac. 100 0.7 70 8 23132 Corn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 6.9 1,035 8 2382 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 6.9 863 8 23132 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 6.9 690 9 2382 CJrn Silage 15 TI Ac. 150 19.7 2,955 9 2362 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T / Ac. 125 19.7 2,463 9 23132 Soybeans 25 T 1 Ac. 100 19.7 1,970 19524 1 5562 Com Silage 15 T/ Ac. 150 17.5 2,625 1 55B2 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T 1 Ac. 125 17.5 2,188 1 55132 ..Soybeans. 25 T ! Ac. 100 17.5 1,750 I PRODUCER NAME Gerald Foster Tract Field Soil Crop Realistic Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Type Yield Per Ac. Utilized 19525 1 5562 Corn Silage 15 T/ Ac. 150 10.2 1,530 - 1 55132 Small Grain Silage 2.5 T / Ac. 125 10.2 1,275 1 55B2 Soybeans 25 T / Ac. 100 10.2 1,020 19560 1 50B Fescue/Pasture 2 T/ Ac. 100 4.2 315 2 2382 Fescue/Pasture 2 TI Ac. 100 7.5 563 TOTAL 657.5 128,348 lbs. of N Number of Cows 600 X 76 Ibs of N 1 cow Amount of N produced 45,600 lbs. of N } Deficit of N 82,748 lbs. of N On fields where corn silage is planted apply 150 lbs, of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting. On fields where small grain is planted apply 125 lbs. of N / ac., no more than 30 days before planting. On fields where soybeans is planted apply 100 lbs. of N I ac., no more than 30 days before planting. On fields where fescue is grown apply 100 lbs. of N I ac. if field is used for hay and 75 Ibs. of N I ac. if is used for pasture. Waste applications should be made in the following months for each crop. Corn - April - May Small Grain - September - October Soybeans - April - June Fescue - March - June / August - November EMBIT A-8 WASTE LTTILIZATION PLAN REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. 2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals, method of utilization., or available land. 3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, - available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of annlication for other nutrients. a. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more tons, but less than.l0 tons per�acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 391 -Filter Strip) 5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the irrigation field. G. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.) 7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to control odor or flies. 8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen. 9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively crowing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered. Page: B Vol A as T VIA "NOT: r7 lot We" Ah "f on, - QT- - 007 .j 44 SAS own n Opp J h, tis .r J r ;J '� j:+RQr.r.3..: Ski+''.• `t: 3 ;"' :Ztr'�,'-=: �:i _ ••y � ? � rte .. _ •�•� • - .r�.,+1 ' �b J J • - s �,.. ' �' •} ` � /K""' '" -..fir• � : .. _ r,' . y 4,. � '� .I•"i •k b •rr r• "•! r Fry y!�4 Art y_ f�S 1 :'• 1, . 9; �. '. ,'ri ��;` i�- ': -;y 'i Je' :•�• , � . l i1�(.1/• •+,• .�{- •1 r' tel' - ,.1 rS �l�i�r �v �: `Y�F'�'1 •'� �u r_•w � ,` -'. •j, �'' • �•}ti '�', .f_ ; , ••'ate +� 7 . � - ,� : , ��`• . , � f - rl • 7 , ��;' ,..#, '�•�,� ,�.� >� `� , 'tit • � `" �. :, r i �J �' � r�� ,� � ��! Ji r . I � �. � irk` '% _ X ZL � t h� '%'-h. r f.:' .xlr'� _ I 't -+t.; .•ter "' � y t :5rc� ," •i i .1 FC +1�:: -{^ ,:;!`f•1�?C t i �s �' !' •Fy„�:?,♦t.''�'f•?. �{.�y_sa. �,rr ri '.'� ' :','{y��.V S�"�`%'%'. 1 �� ► j � J = titer. ��r� .-,h'Y: i ?••+ +�, r'X rj� r��, j<:, � •�Fi� 4 - t ' ��'� M1,�{S -•{,. - r •� t �^ ��. '�1 . '{Cr ., J- r r r''t, .s ',w_: •.''” �,- � r L. I r r •]r J er S ,rte �� tr l t;:[ � „�:'� r�Ir, ♦ , , e , }.. i N , ` r r ti-�tti�jS< t tr �� 1 V !sat ,kt /., r t l� r l { ►•il r / � ,� . f..a { -t. n.1 ?' tixYl, •fr�+i .�, �f � r#if��, y" SFr r t, =':J r'r N, �'�� - �,`�' r� ..�' � 'i�� r ' kt>, tit-- • -r T. ..� •�: ':; �r �• .;• ', •�. -y /v -.Sy:.` .fir. +k `^'.,'f.-` i;;•__�• •.r +--��7+ y� r t �,.� :-L.• hs -•Y vv /'yam, -,� i I "{ �•�� f"+:, Iii-• _ r, w 1'' +" ���Y�r� �. ', {,t. Y `✓ -1 Y ice: � +e,- .. 14 t 1` r �-� t -1 4 �+It'i`�'.'. { v1'+ '- •, t9'/ �"� ~`},mow 'rK.�V.t,Jf�, rI . ; t: .1�� '.aj,..1.7 ��� _s `Rti �.� ',• :l^''•. e�...tir r_ r!ti'�Y <a +r.� � ••�J� `�.�:'. .:�N 'i4: ``''ti,i V''Y� 'J..•y�' - _ N' ,•T •"./�,';;J/�,��S�y,�[ "y -S •�.' �;r t,r ti '. •,rsl�.Aj� .r•.Y [ { t - '.�:.'�t'=��'Zr�Ja.��ir :�'v r ^'��•yT'j�y J`w• � �r '.'. � r` � '� • �'--�`��1�'11. J, :5}r,�"'}�.3 L• 'r..'t `JC�G�.�• S'-0. � �e�'d h'�;, ` ~.~ '" 1-,+`�' i i. y:, i,Si4� if.:�. '!, '1 �hJ'�`:. '�5i1�w C3l"'.",.'. � "'1 L 7 •r•.rJ: -ik � +:tSs,t+C�j��^'!� ''•.+ . •.1 �� � a y,'y,�'1�t,� �+"tx'''i'rr 'a'� "ar •r ',.;` , r J fr��:% • ti r�t�rt }.! .a. -' J.'�"rfx �•_ r� '-r �71'Jr`�r z�`Alji•:.,r.,v ,l L{��f _:. �"y .p`S .r•T{} �.=i •�� y Z�! �1 r r s_ - �+ '/°• • �a•+i;.•i.! � x�j�a �j ,. �% • �;:r�' '€: � r r1:,,1 [ y �- { . it r � r! � �-e."e � �r ,_•i:. t t .4.;f����rf:.��-�U/fi ,r � ' ie�i;� r :,r' •a�: �•af r.,;::�..r.r. 7' •. - � ! � -" �'J'�[ F�Y�'" �-. V `- ; j� { .. I: T� _ •r: • 't,-. .•'r,•t v-. ,.r+aa � f�'"s; *: Frlti: �.j:, r�i 1 J, ti. i J'Irx :`�.;,._- Frjt '• ,.+-«...� ,`.. :'1�.i�,,y'i��. d= t y •.. •ja•r�4z:�. t, ^iiw� , �/.r.t "G"' „�� tj �� } �,�' •s,'�%Cc!' � � ru r. i��?Cy3 i4 "� I •r�v� :'r.: ,ter'` - - '::�y"4 - . +r-, a �} •'='t_�..: fir, � . _ ; 1 1ri.r . s.��{•,t ' ' 1^ } .`'y 'f�J,y+., ,:+1�,- r &j'- r,�'� i.}-+•�14z)ti 1,. -i �kty: r. ate: L; f 11 t, �.,,■,.�ta�`` 7 •+•k r� J" �\ •Y+I' fes. + \ f .s>^ •...... , t . ,y { \. K t Z ) •'� k(• Q, +'� .,V • "�1� t }•' � i � '' s y.\+ la R :: <,. � �} _.L ,'3 'yj �!: �jiS ... •. 1� .�: J•.. i•�^ r�SSr�"d4 �-T:f�•' %:� '.w \� `�., r,. .� � ��rt•. '�� �•: F•:.\tid a�+.tib Y. :''�w ';� + _ 1^ hL + '. �h;�: �:�' Ytt .=� � i �Jf Y -, ,GGai:�wZ'4J'r' • , r '� }'■ ( r !- r� , .�,1 t /' ''] %! r4� ?r i .: �•.I��iyy,..jji,,__"�.j t' l m � t•,Z� +,.•r-i '} ! 1.1 ''{ '"� � ;..^r !,l l , � �a< . � {ft ..? � ,!�`57 r:�� � ;y:C .1•`••.ti+\ + ,.'• r iiY -t \. � may.,. ti ,'• -,'•�,.'_i` Y 7 ... 'IN +'IN •��s.ev�r." '"'!!f'i- .f� 4 �- �, e r= rtrr _:14' I t• '� +�f �i. \4 � ' - �,r"i(. l-)`��•r: '� ) �Y Y.iy.w.•;.r s.� t a"�,KSR J••� .t :'h t - ''i: {_•' �{�•'S ie.r ,i'.IJt j.f ]��rl.�. ��" �yhl :� .. �':u-!i=�::���1.4�.5 - ,+' '•iL�'1�- r-1 ��: '� � r ~� , rk i �,, !';.. moi■ � .. s .. tib' .' • Pr _ ,4.NX' 1 1 , ,.fti �% ,` rr'': 1,}7R�L, s � J ° � • '`�y..•,fi,' , Ale �Mm fir,' � :;a � •.l rr Fi '�, _ f by ;t �� }�' Lr �• .� } t.. ` ,'v :• .. Lis `� :,i'• - �'� . � .•'f r 1is;:=:'•:r:.,5•_ Y.f ._.�:'; . ,- f � :� vx .+.. ..f-'. .�:'a1:T. a S•991MM - t .,s .. Ft { � .�, � ' '' V. .. 1�� tea. .� �+ '•�-,• ,�v.' ;Y ' , Y .. " . ✓4 of / ' IC it ,t., � .. I A � 1 11�, ��f,• F\. ^(' a :,Y _ •+ Jsi"�%IC{•i:1.S::.i.. e(7.2 �attlk��r +K �' �,� �� ' •. . \41 -ter ,.-.:y •_.'. ....-: ,.:.,�•, .. 11 i r r ��r �rs� � /�•' r, d� l )'; tlSikr'� � r ' t "�i e;'�' ' p• , � .•�•• . • . i ` 'r „�,- .•� 1.%"a• ^'�� �'y - A y ry' y `�+1;�!"<!-:''��3 � 1'.:if �Y- �,���'S yY' ' '' :',"fir' ;• •1�.. s '• • .} �:,•k- � .�� • '`',:� �v.C'.S j�rr ��g � -.S •) .r �•„fir ,.� , . , :i s ri ':���-%` • •^• S•' _ ` i ; � y , Nk 5'w'� U”, pg 114 'r-,�c'J...' rr }!d} '�j ::Y�:s•1i�'[•ff'Y ..t' '"5� - . �'�. 'I.r31 . r ' .A!.y.: .'L'�!"�T �f' 1.�`,':�'� iYT'1,'L"f• Yl: '� :��r'r�,",'=7,'':�;> .rly ` !'•"yzf''.r•!iyj.,'r 'bu+" 'yyAs�i :;!•>,� ?"•.�+ ^�;i.-'� Ei'�`� �'�' f �. s. e�1 , k� 'a ry J- .,sr' Y i' ,$�' L s . ,{Lpj s r'• r. � r f f ``.;.:?'�' • �_ J�. iiiGGG°°°ccc J, '~ � ��ti.l!'I ; �- .. 'rIr'• .`<�ti !1 cc+ ,ys.-.'r 'r ! .., .,• r 1r. \ y' a'LY[�-YL�`s 1• '!. 'rc 'y1. �i j, .., _ r,r.. ' r i �- •i �F'e .- sl• •'!~,,'TYryT��: i.. " y� ( iDY r � r•"s E � -i " {n _ r ,..; til. ^"": �.. .1V , r � t `,N I'�: :.,�c • r• sr "y�� �{.. '•�� .•.L. ,'i: r d. .0. � a'Ei 3', 't� ,.: r<<,�, m 3AP v 4 41 .41 Ps r Lo wra .Y t-. ,A "ar ;OW : :.• Yui`:` i J�` v C.ti. -. �,,.a. oiSFi. r'�` �f / e f?' , - y it�•� l:e..' d ❑ ri,. S. ; w . .i�:.. v • z �.yFi j{ y' 'ts '� it r: • - -c`�%'/f•I �,..1• J - .Z ..t # .yju 1;•:7. ..`moi' �'a'vy'y. V4� •7q;. .. _ ':F iS�f ?tip,: ,';•�'r:,. .i•-y �l'i;�`. ',�`,`•� is\•� �. •t, t S�r'� ' �r }"'` _ .i �`.�.'r. f "7%' --.! r:� �'a. +�risi ~�•' ♦. fw ,�: ..,�: '~• •�'i"j� - .1-q:f iii%7: •., , •:i 7 ,11 k i h.?r:; , Vii; ""7r ,--' .,. .,,�,�,r_' .��,,.. • �•: � 1 1 �yN� - •-' r � - L�. '•' - _ _ w .! ry/ i t 1. y,;� _ ! � _ :yam • ' ,; .`i' • 1' �cj til[�+ .:• .•l;:! ��".` .' - '1 \,i' - `." �H � � _•-_o, tii r��� tic_ •"_ •` �•••�` � .' .`. �}��� •K4 • "a�i:.,�r ,.F .' .�:`y� � �."; • � �' Vii-. •' ��. *i�il ' - \ 'l _ � - tis # �)�' •. +. �r _ \ •.i ' Vii- r' '. ��_ 1, eel c��; 1 t ,Y`�y"�',►a � , � �".,i. -. ^-\Y �1LT,l F �. � 2 hal l � 4• " ,`l.' � � , .Jl,,l � �1•.1 obi474rte,. ;,r i w'�w ' ^•0. T a] y is 7"T t Yt ,fir• ;'`i" '.fgt X< g}•.�,,.r:.:;rT< 4s �•s� f , iii: yr.. `fJZ r % - _ •• ' _ n Y� •� r 'y ,r � 1 F.i'"—aG,.l ff'C'r_ �•i' r''�� 'h���^� 4 � Q'e;j'�•' �n .''� '� . ` 4 �,s' •♦ , ^:�' d �" •��; � ' , I �.ai • :r }.L :- '• �ti • t y�- ' f . ' ^,.f v ,t ti r , , .+r. :`"- �''" Y� i , '!j'1+ �,k `f u ': �`r'� 4 { � t;�{4Q f'f'/'��• ` ''�-�A 'r. ti 'ti 1� 4�`.+t �]�� � .1 +�' • r � �;��.�i� • `�Fi �jy%�y. •S� ��wprv't3� j ,`•: •i, y'J�g'�j � `}� •!YA' ' _ � r�`a '�y l.-�\�.i; �n','k '' �i ;ti ;.e��� �.Li;� �j P '`:;""�vs'j'�R :f`�L_":� .� i'�}:�S 13` , •.rL y , `S; ,I, f R.'Y •k{ `, {r(FYt;�„` •r +;.w [ n�4•=+2• 1�'"��1 `y /�r� y'F,ro' cI,f c kk ” •• �� f �,: ^� `�' ��.�'��• .. a1' -R •�' �a� h. w �l�lfi �' r ,' %�,"'�Jw�,r "11tt �,f�]}CP���`•�`..r��fi ti�f I �y i e d a {• / {:, y- t,-'. i ��•�' t 1 Y y 4`Y r .i- '1��'.t .`� r , �.F,.ti��:! . ,. •', ,. .� -• ._ ��i - ,ib':��t-'.. r. •?5•�it� ,.f�':7'"'� . .41 IL 44 • .. 'y 4�`;"i � •�r ♦ Z�(', •rt �..t. '' Y'}1,y�:Y •�' •i�,�' �+ •-; ' •-ir'�,•i l ', , � ' v\\` �, '� , _ 1 y � _ '�•�,•f ;. tiff• r:` ', �•, ._�k..- ' � rf _ � — •. ♦ `+.. +F � +, .ti's E` .� - ��' �'ha '� � Ii��i+: . ♦ "'+ �,� _ :r-' Y ,y •CS. �1.,.•1,. ,�'i��, R i, •r ✓ {, rit.,,'••,-•' Z��L!:r;►^� �Y ++t, ' �` '' ( :� tom• ���'•'_��;��.' ',' 11��".r •�:Y�-�.:,•�J =... •_'.� .;� ,�•` •- - -, lam; �r •J •- J � r is r. �`` t�r�,r`,1� e . ��� '� :F ; -+ ` •:�•,: \ �, . , �'��,?\ ,. :7 � � •' -h •., ,. -'•+... ,i •� �~ � f?� r� .r �(�hl.,'?;7-i;l'''J•"'r''�• -a. `� `��:. `�i .r•' Y ' wt•: -.. . w ry. '' -♦ t,.' i sl 'j•.� „Ii t ]}1 [[- 1¢• �.' -e'fi` y '�. •,, J i'- .F '+. � •1 y „ •• �+..`.a, r` �•. � ,i,., tY: r• iso' �.��r, f�,',: w- :r...�: '�'f;r.k Vol 'w �. _ M Jam, • �' it 7 a =t' ^- u ''tjay. •k»= ♦}�W ,1,, .. - -�4 `•r�";'ny.t�ff � •_ Jy r�}:.-. ,�•�. . .� .. , 7�':',+%fYT' {'1S '' \' •p'+ .i'l�;t,, n ,,:. ,_ -L s+ � �� ._ "'+e �' '. ,,.( ., N�.. -`F � ,f `� it , p:,} #.. .,.♦• �a•1 s ".'d'"' ' 7r- •+ i•. l�'. .t'+�l"ti' .•nl i• �.! •� 1'i ",LJ _ i�l 'k �- I�w �•f.•.e r u 'rx.jj.•';•�r• ;•ie."�' '�'�' i ' ` * a ��' • �^ � � <� yi 7 / � ''4 �! sir: �� .•-. ti' * '�. •r' ` ,111 t a . �`y^•'�, `♦ \��. .i ..4 'T' i3:•�i�� :� tr � r - _ ��. 1, .^'�1d�? 'y' ,,. •._ .. �' � f 7 - � ��" ,- •t, ��'r as - ' .••: • 1, - r 1. .::..'r' H '1 %' it�SRs K �< �'♦i�= _ � �t ;�-��4Zi]r' , +- " + ,"-y 5�l��i J �1.� .. `i � k r,it�Z*+�n j �{r •n .. . ' .�._ !S ''�' `�T rfi: • i:. •Y 1 ► r t`. j'y r] i , r ...t+ tr.+Sr.,' .c� i•x}. r•. �. '..S• 'rat(' '•�• �i j.. 4 sd I;t ? . I 1/ +. 11 ,_r .t r �,,1 ' 7 r � �,. p. �,, , 7. •.;`'s'i'rs+. a:. �tM �% . fir. , 1 , ' • �!� 1 d l� I t , y� } Cf ''• f 4'1 f I'T � ' � r 4 uIl �• , s.�,1 .��. t_Sa ix � µ� .."rf Z J S ♦ .t �/ ' 1r-bTY it Y , `ii ' ` •' ,��r� ri �I IW JW 41 Ia � �1 � / ,. p •,r J ,l fir-.. i x,y`�f �aas��-g-'�4i,• i ./h♦,,,rs�z ,.y�.� !''Q` 'y'1 .. ,s ., . � ' ••� "� t�� >t F��i I Lfa��t;`+ i,�,:r ��zi.� �yy:1' . �,, ;!` •' - � l.�,` .�� f.sr .��. y ^'s.� .'/ 4`:��"-��yd ��r.'r'd .'ss:{�' �/! x•r� J 7 "� I l i L, � d• TM�y,� �at ° ° �`} �' w�ry'1 � wig` Y �' ��? � Pt��•4r4 � °r�., r.' _ ir'` � l �;a sr, �`Er�T;'•M�`' Iv e !�'•' , ^ ""1�Ti`G�; i;"���„ S �lj r�'K -. � � '. (� ci r ♦ s ! .sii"Gr FSF Ir��'+�i �•/;��� i !�. ,/��7�rs�A�.,{_s ' 1 t" � yrti�, �h ' i ! 5!(, .hit h Y �l � N ! Y,." S � \ C� '2.4"x, 4 44 �'.I ✓ �I ' �.'. A � i � 9a s x t ! f. � �' C•i �r ��'a., ^ sS ; . s, I. �1. f ,. ••��r/ .y_ "`` r 1'�'�' 3t 3S.' 'F!i �..wC� � �� � 4 � .�, �x r f . . ?1'»' F- ry"4�'�1y�" J ,.•!a �} wig `I. � .f3wA �- _ � a1"^ .., ., • �,.�{,' .r'i� (,r"f�� . i e} r �! if ,tj e � Sz. t. fl�fve ,r '!� t' ��'t� ,' !- l� t 1- s •T Ok �',�, 1' rf;°0{ ^'tATI Fr � iia-lt`�ai `t` ,~ -•� � ` �;"� Cr'0. ��� '. x".i -` �$�. �^ ��� ,xsyd� y���l f' G�.e .�-�� '� ..f - r jrt• �� ,. . ,:�( ♦ e r.i MSH �+r< ��l � i M lsa tl'` �L '! ��' .' S �' � w - •`' "� "'7 S i � x •+l .. t I' � Af y V "AAAr�i' �� T.0 I' I !ki �F'�MY * J i'%`•� -� A� l•,:Y �� r ➢s *N(rt�_ �» sr ��M`i�}a�.�7 4} :� li�i<'�ci� � yea y fT i,� a�i�y� s � � } ��� i ���' ! � y T'. � �';f� ��q�, rye' •�r' � ��t � � �L".;� � -r i„r+3' �.. �anrxn rra w,,,.:... .5 .•Ya �v'>•� - A ..r-. i, x : !` f . l '� Y?.. f EMEII(iENCT ACTION PLAN PHONE NUMBERS DIVISION OF WATER OUALI`1'Y ( D` O ) 704- 663- 1699 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES ( EMS ) 704 - 638- 01)11 ROWAN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ( S WCD ) 704 - 637 - 07113 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE ( NRCS ) 704 - 637 - 1604 ROWAN COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE ( CES } M - 633 - 0571 This plan wil1 be implemented in the event that waste from your operation is leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until waste reaches surface waters of leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the facility. The folloN;ring are some action items you should take. 1. Stop the release of waste. Depending on the situation, flus may or may not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below. A. Lagoon / Waste Storage Pond overflow - possible solutions are: a. Make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon / waste storage pond. b. Stop all flows into the lagoon / waste storage pond immediately. C. Pump waste to fields at an acceptable rate. d. Call a pumping contractor. e. Add temporary soil berm to increase elevation of dam. B. Runoff from waste application field - actions include: a. Immediately stop waste application. b. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff. C. Create a temporary diversion to contain the runoff. d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff. e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where nmoff occurred. C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers - action include: a. Stop the imitation pump. b. Stop the recycle pump. C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge. d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators - action include: a. Stop the irrigation pump. b. Stop the recycle pump. C. Make sure no siphon occurs. d. Stop all flows in the house, flush system, or solid separators. e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps. E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon / waste storage pond. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks - possible action. a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon / waste storage pond. b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil. C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon / waste storage pond bottom as soon as possible. 2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages. A. Did the runoff` reach any surface waters? B. Approximately how much was released and for what duration`? C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage'? D. Did the spill leave the property? E. Does the spill have the potential to reach any surface waters? F. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach any surface eaters? G. Are potable water wells in danger ( either on or off' of the property) ? H. How much reached surface waters? Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations cause HAll's to cunirol Insects Sile Spccilic Practices Liquid Systems Flush Accunudalion of solids ❑ plush system is designed and operated sufficiently to remove accuuullalcd solids Bunt gillicts as designed. Cl Remove bl idghig of ncccunllaled solids al discharge Lagoons and fits • Uustcd Sol ids j(J/IC-lainlain lagoons, scilling hilsllls and Mils whete hest hrccding is al'I'ryrcnl to Minimize the crllsling ofsolids to a depth orno tunic than G - 8 niches over more than 30% of surrace. ENcessive vcgd;dive Decaying vegelaliun Cl Maintain vegetative conlrot along hanks of UuwIll lagoons and other impuundincnls to prevent accumulalion ofdecaying vegetative matter• clung +valet's edge on imputnldlncal's perimeter. DI -V syslems Feeders Decd Svilltlge ❑ Ocsign, operate and mainiain feed systems (e.g., hunkers and Iroughs) to minimize the accumulation of decaying wastage, O Glen up spillage nn a routine basis (e.g., 7 - IU clay imcrval during sunlulcr; 15-30 day inlcrval during winter). Deed Slorage Accurnllaliuns ul'lccd residues Cl Reduce llluishllc acctlmulalion xvilhin and around immediate perimeter of recd storage areas by insuring chainage away From silo andlor providing adcqualc containment (e.g., covered bin for bimm's grain and sintilar high moisture grain producls). 0 hrspecl for and remove or break up accurnulaled solids in Wier strips around recd sloragc as needed. AN. lovember 11. 1996, Page I ;unrcc C:ause ..al's lu E11inh"ke chim- Site Specific Practices Lill stations Aj:ilation during sump I;nik ❑ Surllp tank cuvels lilf;ng:ul(I drawdown End urllr:airapipcs ;11 Agitation during lvaslciv 11c r ❑ E:x(Cn(I disclhaigc point of pipes Ilrldcnllcalh — laguunl Conveyance lagoon liquid Icvcl Lagoon sun lacca volatile gals emissions; ❑ !'roper I:Iguon liquid cnlmcily; • Biological mixing; ❑ Corrccl lagoon siailup proccchrres; • Agilatiuil ❑ Nliililiinul surliICC ;uca-la-vo111n1c ratio; ❑ rvlininrinll agitation while pulnpiang; ❑ Mccll;ulical aclatitm; 11 I'rovell hiolugical additives Irrigaliuil spa inldel. 0I Eigh plcssulc at;ilaliun; ❑ lrr;gacc on (Iry days with little or nu wind; nozzles a Nita(! drift ❑ Mininlllrn recommended 0pclaling proceduic; ❑ l'unip hitake 11C;1t- Iag0011 11(Illid Sinf;ICC, ❑ Purnp front sccond•stage lagorm Dc;ld birds • Uncass dccuinp(lshhni. CI III-Oper disposition Of carcasses Dead had dlspus;ll Ails C.11 -cars decolliposillUll ❑ Complete cuvcring orcarcasscs ill hlnial pits; ❑ I'loper locatioll/COns(Ilictioll Ordisp(1W IVIS; ❑ Dnspusal hal covels light lilting Standing 1vaicr 11101111(1 • 11tiplopel di;lnnlage; l) Glade and landscape such Ill -.11 lviltcr (h';lllls -�— -- lacirtics Microbial decomposition of away From Facilities organic matter +•dold backed tilt! public 11ourly nnlhanined access itlads ❑ Farm access road maintenance ('(lads 140111 Faint access Additional Infilnnaliun : Available Flom .Irriii I) , Ki, uurc M;It—wI ruacllt ; 11211(! ltule1111v1II Packet NC'SIJ, Calmly Eix[cilsiult Ceillr.r - Ponitly Layer PIodIICIitIII FaC;lily M.IlH re hlan;lgcrncnt: 1IiI;h ItisC, I) CII Pit ; f?11A1, 131-38 NCSU - nAIs Poultry Layer 1'roducliorl FnCilhy l'I;IIH re WIFIgemenl: Undercage Flusll - Lagomi SeMmm! ; EBAE HIM NCSU - BA F, Lagoon Design and ILlanagclnclat fol' Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage ; E13AE 103-83 NCSU - HAE Calibrat;on or manure aini Wasiewater Applicadun MWipuicill ; MAE Ncl Slievt NCSU - IIAE Proper Disposal of Dead Poultry ; PS&T Gliidc No. 19 NCSU - Poultry Science Nll;sancc Couccrris in Animal Ivl:nnne Management: Mum anal Mics ; PROI(17, IM5 Conference 11ioccedings Florida Cooperalivc Exlcnsiolt ANIOC - November 11. 1996, Page 7 Source Cause - 111v11,5 It) Control Insects �- siic specific Practices nliimal I lulding Areas Accumulations of animal wastes tri—rlimim-1lc low areas hilt u-71)1110islin-C along and Iccd wastage Iences and outer locatimis where waste accunullaics and dislurbaoce by animals is minimal. CO,'Mainlain fence rows ane] filler sirips aromid animal holding areas to inininlize accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and remove or break up aeC111]1L1lated solids as heede(l). Dry Mmimc I11111(llilig • 1�CCIn11111 Hl[II15.Ut i1111111a1 wasles ❑ Remove spillage UII a rotitinc basis (c.g., 7 - 10 Syslclas day inlerval during suitinler; 15-31) day interval during %vinter) where manure is loaded For land applicatiun or disposal. C) Provide for adcqunte drainage around manure siocklli les. O 1iisllecl for and rcnlovc or break up acclnlm haled %vasles in filter strips around stockpiles and mai1ure handling areas as needed. For more infornrltion conlact lite cooperative I:xtellsion Service, Uepartu{enl of Iiniomology, Dox 7613, NotIh Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613. AMIC - November 11, 1996, Page 2 z y Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist Source Cause llh'll's to Minimize Udor Site Specific I'racticcs I arnlslccld Dairy producliutl ❑/Vcgetalive or wooded buffer -s ❑ Rccommended best managcment praclices © Good judgment and connnon sense Paved lull or barn alley Wet manurc-covered slirlaces ,D--Scl-ape or flush daily " surf'lccs Cl Promote drying with proper ventilalion ❑ Routine checks and maintenance oil walerer:s, hydratits, pipes, clock Irmks Beddcd ru cas 12-1'ronlole drying with proper vemilallon • Partial microbial decomposition Replace wet or manure -covered bedding Matime dry slacks 0 Prutial microbial decomposition ❑ Provide liquid drainage I'm stored Amarine .S101"tg'e tallk or basitl • Pal'lial microbial decomposition ; ❑ Bollrml or mid-level loading stn race • Mixing while [ilrlig ; ' Cl Tank covers Uncovered manure, 0 • Agilation Micrr emplying ❑ Basin surrace mats of solids; slurry or sludge on field drying ❑ Millimirc lot runoff and liquid additions Sul faces ❑ Agitate only prior to manure removal ❑ Cl Proven biological additives or oxidan[s Settling basin surfaces 0 I'aitial micrubial decompositiun Q Liquid drainage From settled solids liquid while tanks arc filling • Mixing tivilde filling ❑ Rculove solids regularly • Agitation when emptying anti-sipholl veils Manluc, slurry or sludge • Agitation when spreading ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges spreader outlets 0 Volalilc gas emissions CI Wash residual manure from spreader aflcr arse Proven biological additives or oxidants Uncovered manure, 0 _ Volatile gas emissions while _❑ ❑ _ Soil injection of slurry/sludges slurry or sludge on field drying Cl Soil incorporation Ividlin ds Ilrs Sul faces --t Sprcad in thin uniform layers for rapid drying ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants Flush links • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush tank covers; liquid while tanks arc filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of links wilh anti-sipholl veils Outside drain collecliurr Agitation during waslewaler ❑ Box covets or jurlclian boxes conveyance ANIOC - November 11, 1996, Page I Source Cause BAIPS to Rlimillize Odor Site Specific Practices Litt stallions Agitation during sump lank ❑ Sump tank covers . filling mid drawdown End of dlailylipes at lagoon Agitation during waslewater collveyancc Cl Extend discharge point of pipes undertaealh lagoon liquid level Lagoon Stll"laces Volatile Fats cllllssloll; O Proper lagoon liquid capacity; • Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures; • Agilaltian O Mininnutl surfacc area -to -volume ratio; ❑ Mlnllllmll agitation whell pulllpilig; Cl Mechanical nenation; ❑ Proven biological additives Irrigation sprinkler •. I Iigh pressure agitation; ^ O Irrigate on dry days with little or no wild; nozzles Will(] drift ❑ Minimum recommended operating procedure; ❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; ❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon; ❑ Mush residual naanurc front pipes al eud of slurry/sludge pumpings Dead animals Carcass clecolllposition Proper disposition of carcasses Standing water around 0 Improper drainage; Grndc and landscape such Ihat waler drains ! facilities 0 Microbial decomposition of away from facilities organic matter Mod tracked onto public • Poorly maintained access roads V Farm access road maintenance roads from farm access Additional Information : Available Front : Cattle Manure Management ; U200 Ru1e/BM1' Packet NCSU, County Lxtension Center Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System - Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory ; EBAE 209-95 NCSU - I3AE Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure -I-realmcnl and Storage; EBAI: 103-83 NCSU - BAE klanageincnt of Dairy Wastewater; EBAIs I06-83 NCSU - BAE Calibraliull of Mitltlre and Wastewater Application Equipment ; EBAE Fact Slice( NCSU - QAE Nuisance Concerns in Animal Mamlre Management: Odors and flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension AAi0' 'uvember 1 1, 1996, Page 2 Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist Source Canse UA'll's Io Mininliae Cidor Site Specific I'1 aCffCCS Farms(ead •' Swine I,roduction ❑ Vegetative or wooded buffers; ❑ Recommended bCs( 111a11ageluctif practices; ❑ Good judgment and conlnlon sense Animal bully surfaces 0 Uirly manuic-covered animals Cl Dry floors `1'lool su1f:ICC5 • WO IIIallmC-Comed Illool's ❑ Slotted floors; — ❑ WatCCC15 IUCa(Cd over5lutlC(f floors; O Feeders at high end of solid floors; Cl Scrape manure boildill) 11.0111 I1001 -s; ❑ Underfloor ventilation for drying 1bfalmle Collection hits + Urine; I ❑ I-re(luerlt manure removal by flush, pit recharge, • 1'016:11 1161.301A.11 flCChlllfl(I5111(1!1 01' scralle; ❑ Underfloor mililation Ventdalion exhaust falls • Volatile gases; ❑ fall ma,rlten.-mce; oust ❑ Ffficicn[ air movement Indoor Surfaces Dust ❑ Washdown between groups ofaninlals; --- �- ❑ reed additives; ❑ Feeder covers; ❑ Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder covers Flush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Mush lank covers; licluid while tanks arc filling ❑ Extend Fill lines to near bottom of tanks with anti -siphon vents Flush alleys Agitation during wastewater ❑ Undcrfloor Iltish with underfloor ventilation conveyance I'll lechalge points 0 Ag1(ation of recycled lagoon ❑ Extend recharge Mlles to near bottom of Nils liquid while pits a!'C filling with anti -siphon vcnls Lill Sultiuns • Agitalion during sunlll lank ❑ Stomp lank covers filling and drawdown Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater ❑ flux covers or jullc(loll boxes conveyance AN10C - November 11, 1996, I'agc ] r Sonrcc C::ruse Ifl11l's to A-11iiihnize Udor Site SpeciiIC Practices Und of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend dischiit-ge point of pipes underneath lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level Lagoon surlaces a Vblatile gals emissions; . ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity; • Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures; - • Agilalion ❑ Minimum surface Arca-lo-volunic ratio; i ❑ Minimum agitation when bumping; ❑ Mechanical aeration; ❑ Proven biological additives Irrigatrun sprinkler 0 1 ligh pressuic agitation; ❑ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind; nuzzles 0 Wine[ drill ❑ Minimum recommended operating pressurc; ❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface; Cl Pump from second-stage lagoon Storage lank or basin Partial microbial decomposition; ❑ Bottom or midlevel loading; surface a Mixing while filling; ❑ 'tank covers; • Agitation when cniptyiiig ❑ Basin surface mats ofsolids; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants Settihig basial surrace • Paillat microbial decomposition; ❑ Lxlend drainpipe Outlets underneath liquid • Mixing while filling; level; • Agilalion when enlplyinb Cl Remove settled solids regularly Mmitire, slurry or sludge • Agitation when spreading; ❑ Soil injcclion of slurry/sludges; spreader outlets 0 Volatile Sas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after usc; ❑ ProVen biological additives or oxidants ljncovered Ili- 0 Volatile gas emissions while ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges slurry or sludge on Field drying ❑ Soil incorporation within 48 los.; surfaces ❑ Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying; ❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants bead :lninials a Carcass decomposition ❑ Proper disposition of carcasses Dcad 111111:11 disposal • Carcass decomposition ❑ Complete coverhig of carcasses in burial pits; pits ❑ Prober location/construction ofdisposal pits Incinerators 0 Incomplete combustion ❑ Secondary slack burners AMC - November 11, 1996, Pagc 4 vlortality Manacrement Methods (check which method(s) are being- implemented) J Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 21 hours after knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing / stream or public body of water. Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7 C! Complete incineration :a In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the Department of Agriculture Q Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached) December 15. 1996 I 4 Gerald Foster Dairy Dairy Waste Storage Fond Rowan, NC Design Criteria: 250 Dairy cows at 1,400 lbs, each = 350,000 lbs. live weight 365 days storage 4 gal.lday/cow of waste water 2,548 sq. ft. of non -gond Drainage Area Waste from Freestall area and access alleys will be scraped and stored in the waste storage pond. }taste crater from the milk barn will also be stored in the waste storage pond, as well as the runoff from approximately 2,548 sq. ft. of the barns and lot. I. Storage Volume Required A. Manure Storage 250 cows X 14.6 gal./day/cow X 365 days ------------------------------------------ = 178,108 cu. ft. 7.48 gals./cu.ft. B. Waste water from Milk Barn 250 cows X 4 gal./day/caw X 365 days ------------------------------------------ = 48,797 cu. ft. 7.48 gals./day/cow C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 365 days Drainage Areas = 2,548 sq. ft. 1 day CN 98 1 30 day CN 42 Months Rainfall (inches) Runoff (inches) ---------------- ------------- January ------------------ 3.7 2.8 February 3.8 2.4 March 4.6 3.7 April 3.4 2.5 May 3.7 2.8 June 4.2 3.3 July 4.6 3.7 August 4.0 3.1 September 3.6 2.7 October 3.2 2.4 November 2.9 2.1 December 3.6 2.7 45.3 34.7 34.7 runoff inches X 2,548 sq. ft. -------------------------------------------- = 7,368 cu. ft. 12 inches 1 ft. D. Naste Feed and Bedding 20 cu. ft. 1 day X 365 days= 7,300 cu. ft. TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED 241,573 cu. ft. - Add to liquid Voluae - II. Normal Rainfall less evaporation on Structures for 365 days Jan. - Dec, rainfall = 45.3 inches Annual evaporation 39 inches = 39.8 inches Excess = 6.3 inches 0.5 ft. III. 25 yr. store on Open Area of 2,548 sq. ft. CN = 45 for open areas With 25 yr. 1 day strom of 6.0 inches, runoff = 5.41 inches 2,548 sq. ft. X 5.41 inches runoff -----------------------------------------= 1,149 cu. ft. 12 inches 1,149 cu.ft. ------------------------------------------- - 0.03 ft. 37,224 sq. ft. surface area of storage pond IV. 25 yr. storm on Pond Surface 25 yr. I day storm-= 6.0 inches = 0.5 ft. V. Emergency Spillway 25 yr. 1 day store = 6.0 inches Peak discharge = 3.2 cfs. Use ESW with 12 ft. bottom width, 3 to I side slopes, 0.2 ft. stage - 0.2 ft. V1. Freeboard = 1.0 ft. VII. Total Depth of Pond 8 feet of storage = 10.23 ft. ks 16,3 r U. S. DEPARTMENT Of AGRICULTURE HC ENG 413 Soil Conservation Service Rev. 7/91 PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT Date: i county: �. . Address: / LEKGTH r - � 61 DE SLOPE ^ t0 t / 1 , / w / AVE. TDP ELEV. , i rl ,1 -- -- —��`�— --- /oto ♦� t 77,0� AYE. 80TTDY V. / LENGTH AV—) J (See back for voLLm calculations) Use of facility:_ v)n 5 � e- r2G!L= Capacity: Gallons 2 7, La 1 _ Ft3 Soil Type: Bench Mark Description Bottom Normal Liguid Level Storage for normal Precip. Maximum Liquid Level 25 yr. Storm Storage Crest ESW Max.Flow Depth Freeboard Top of Dam Elev. Elev. qP.•r� (+) C�.LZ:7 Ft. Elev. 9 G, S (+) I (-- Ft. Elev. G �-f, {+) D Ft. Elev. VOLUME OF A TRAPEZOIDAL PIT One equation for calculating the volume. -of I trapezoidal pit is: Volume = death [(area`p} + (area 6-V*tom} + (4 * area 6 of midsection)] = Z Ft3 Another equation for determining the volume of a trapezoidal excavated pit with constant side slopes is: V = wdL + Zd2(4/3 Zd - w - L) where: V = total volume of the pit in ft3. w = width of the pit at top in feet. d = depth of the pit at top in feet. L = length of the pit at top in feet. Z = side slope for 2 to 1 use Z = 2 for 212 to 1 use Z = 21/2 NOTE: Dimensions used must be constructable. Always check for narrow, deep pits. For correct results the following must be true. w must be greater than 2Zd L must be greater than 2Zd OPER f`T 117`•; A{,ir rFrA;dl:� 1=,1 4r.i �rL-r:_.Id Fist= -r -tc7,racre -tru tu:-e T`ie purpose o" this 'r.ac to atr-jr _-C;e structu r -e is to -;CId 'dal ry 4•: :rate, waste water, Eind lct r`_trol-. from a I.00} co -,j na2-ry op rcttion for- eriod -f 18a_i days. The sts-U�tU ,E a•iill be emptied ever%,� si:. rnon'ths cr n ] a:nd b" Routine 'nain'r anance is, '.-:eepie^s to kz-c'p the Str-LlCtUrc• operation as r'1 =.=,ned T he r0Ll tir-IF ir'.airlt n =e Cif - hUCt.ure i mvo:. Ve= ten.tnce of th:e a:Fe et_.te n:: the dam, err:erger.:_y cpry _ S:Ja,, ctn ur!rCI_ir r w =t.' T 'c: cel Z reS czLir? 1 rJeiT: g C.r='� 1. ul _:rl -:ese ":-,... « and ... 1�'�-_7 ' ���`. -Y '-.'" F=_1 '„ "ee' - t' tic- rc:.,_l'{.'.:..'r^ i_ be 'or, eq-.,.,.�_ r .-C= ......�n'�z',ll' ri 'y c. (-F r.er';-:,,on. moi.. -1 _+ MJF.,-_.; .. ..._ _ .. Vic•= «t. T `- n ar �c.e zienc;' i 14a� _ ... :s^c b: �:_.-; �-1u spa-=.: ir:,a c' - i.: -A E. cr.eats`: k/_ar ani. i.7t.'. +_• in y F_ ."cam- - E 1 - _ c: of veQet-At.-i m rarT' ar�d _net' CrC� be C' -a gut '_.. {'i C r 1... tJ t tn;- /egetst. damage fr=.e,stc'_.: UJFm'= and soft . i"sin tE n3. e inspe-tl.Cns _- 1i_. struct-ut - 1__ i l be !Trade R1Dr,t' y du' '=nr '..he initial filling wit'n ea:_`, thereafter-, . ger every major .-::torr,. ltQST:s -to bW ChorL_ad will inClUde. E'.sa the followinq: 1. The embankment and e-nerggency spi'_? via•; will be checked sc!- Settlement. Cracking, n:- holes: sidF: slope stability- -- =',m.! ps cr 1'Lilaes; =rasion; ru.d—Ir.t see,=eae, or other leakag;=; and cfl'.:!ition of the 2. Fences and gates will ',e c'hecY;c=d as to their general condition. A, s-1a:,irT.um operating rev:_.; -:ark r 11 bj� _:-:stalled and mo^, - _.:-,r-ed 1 -'St -1y after th-:e middle =" th,? 5tcra•:ie rre'riod until ;LLtmr:.ir;_i is 7sederd. This is beCE.Luse Ste'tE-• and Federal 1avj5 _--c^ibit 4�.n; of cnwr.;ai •jam.{._ t::,e +. zL. r_ _ :eUnited itac�s. ;-^.n :.':+lFr,:f?i: `% EPi1lwr j is ::s:"i_', id ed c 'C.`: -.L }r u, --curer bLIt ' 5 ---.._ irltEDn'1c_ to .the str+_ic"ur:- : ier se V.=re st: ,-.- conditions. The :,arid application of lra:_tste fror: this stl-UCture will be p armed wet; in advance so that openland anri eG_i, anent is available durir-,g optimum. dispcsal. periods. Attachment A, Waste Utilicat.ion Plan,. lists the land that will be utilized for proper disposal, and the associated