800028_PERMIT FILE_20171231

o
TE UTILIZATION PLAN
APR 2 2009 L ',< � 3 �Il - L L 14
Your waste rag pond is designed for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary
I��stt}tre oved on the average of once everyMONTHS. In no instance should the
DV` O - r _- ���,4
---Ra---VolUffiYoff WaSIE betng stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
92 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Your feed lot' has sufficient area to store manure from 50 heifers for 60 days and will be
stockpiled and hauled as needed and weather permits.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARR.4TIYE OF OPERATION:
This operation has 284 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
system of corn cut for silage or harvested for grain in the first year, followed by small grain cut
for silage and soybeans in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the
realistic yields at the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Corn grain: April -May at the rate of 100 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 96 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sorghum silage: May -Jun. at the rate of 280 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting
Soybeans: April -Jun. at the rate of 100 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting.
Annual Ryegrass/Pasture: Mar -jun and Aug-Nuv at the rate of 94 ibs of N/ac
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 113 lbs ofN/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs ofN/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
On fields which follow soybeans in rotation reduce the amount of N required by 20 lbs/ac
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and .proper system.
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
4 RECEIVED I DENR 1 DWQ
AQU4Fr_R-QPnTFrTlnt4 fiFCTION
MAR 2 7 2009

WASTE-UTILIZAT101.1v- PLAN
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This operation has 284 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
system of corn cut for silage or harvested for grain in the first year, followed by small grain cut
for silage and soybeans in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the
realistic yields at the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Corn grain: April -May at the rate of 100 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 96 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sorghum silage: May -Jun. at the rate of 280 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting
Soybeans: April -Jun. at the rate of 100 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting.
Annual Ryegrass/Pasture: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 94 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 113 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of Nlac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
On fields which follow soybeans in rotation reduce the amount of N required by 20 lbs/ac
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and proper system.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
5

PRODUCERS NAME Bill Waller
Date: 6112100
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
REALISTIC YIELD
Lbs.N per Ac.
ACRES
Lbs. N Utilized
990
1
ApB
Corn Silage
17
130
13.4
1,742
1
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
13.4
1,273
1
ApB
Soy Beans
35
100
13A
1,340
961
1
RnB
Com Silage
15
110
1.7
187
1
RnB
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
1.7
128
1
RnB
Soy Beans
30
100
1.7
170
2
ApB2
Corn Silage
15
110
20.6
2,266
2
ApB2
Small Grain Silage
8
95
20.6
1,957
2
ApI32
Soy Beans
30
10D
20.6
2,060
3
ApB
Com Silage
17
130
25
3,250
3
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
25
2,375
3
ApB
SoyBn/ Sorg. Sillage
35
100
25
2,500
1068
1
ApB.
Corn Silage
17
130
7.7
1,001
1
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
7.7
732
1
ApB
Soy Beans
35
100
7.7
770
2
PcB2
Com Silage
15
110
34.1
3,751
2
PC82
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
34.1
2,558
2
PCB2
Soy Beans
30
100
34.1
3,410
.1570
1
PcB2
Com Silage
15
110
16.7
1,837
1
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
16.7
1,253
1
PcB2
SoyBn/ Sorg. Sillage
30
100
16.7
1,670
1571
2
PcB2
Fescue, Pasture
3
113
14.9
1,684
3
PcB2
Fescue, Pasture
3
113
4.4
497
4
PcB2
Corn Silage
15
110
9.8
1,078
4
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
9.8
735
4
PcB2
Soy Beans
30
100
9.8
980

TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
REALISTIC YIELD Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES
Lbs. N Utilized
1573
1
PcB2
Corn Silage
15 110
14.2
1,562
1
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
14.2
1,065
1
PcB2
Soy Beans
30 100
14.2
1,420
2
PcB2
Com Silage
15 110
10.2
1,122
2
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
10.2
765
2
PcB2
Soy Beans
30 100
10.2
1,020
3
PcB2
Com Silage
15 110
4
440
3
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
4
300
3
PcB2
Soy Beans
30 100
4
400
6A
PcB2
Com Silage
15 110
12.5
1,375
6A
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
12.5
938
6A
PcB2
Soy Beans
30 100
12.5
1,250 ;
1586
1
PcB2
Corn Silage
15 110
8.8
968
1
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
8.8
660
1
PcB2
Soy Beans
30 100
8.8
880
2
ApB
Com Silage
17 130
7.8
1,014
2
ApB
Small Grain Silage
a 95
7.8
741
2
ApB
SoyBn/ Sorg. Sillage
35 100
7.8
780
1587
1
ApB
Com Silage
17 130
15.2
1,976
1
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8 95
15.2
1,444
1
ApB
SoyBn/ Sorg. Sillage
35 100
15.2
1,520
1588
1
CeB2
Com Silage
15 110
16.6
1,826
1
CeB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
16.6
1,245
1
CeB2
Soy Beans
30 100
16.6
1,660
3
PcB2
Com Silage
15 110
2.4
264
3
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
16.5 75
2.4
180
3
PcB2
Soy Beans
30 100
2.4
240
4
SaB
Com Silage
15 110
31.1
3,421 f
4
Sas
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
31.1
2,333
4
SaB
Say Beans
30 100
31.1
3,110
TOTAL 278.5
77,120
TOTAL N PRODUCED per 2 YEAR rotation
24,200
NOTE:
When Sorghum silage is planted 280 units N/ac may be applied.
52,920 lbs. decift of N
(based on RYE of 7
tans/ac and 40# Niton)
N requirements for double
cropped soybeans has been reduced by 200

C d 7�d f�-
1 ` V V
7
3-f(—dI
;e-IG�
G£?�NW
L. L5 Al 64 c g0�j
OS I� s
X51
064011
1, 5
90
X5'7/
/570
S
9a
(5 17
/
Piz
C d 7�d f�-
1 ` V V
7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: William Waller Date: January 19, 1999
Location: 2975 N Enochville Ave
Mooresville, NC 2811.5
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 200
(Design Capacity)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your `waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based' on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste ori saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also bo
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution„ the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and 1 or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
Greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
N

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 125 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs. and a feed lot for
75 Heifer with an average animal live weight of 1000 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
125 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 75 (% confinement
time) = 718,594_ gallons of waste/year.
75 animals x 1.1 ( ft3/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 50 (% confinement
time) = 15,056 ft3, of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
125 animals x 76 lbs. Nlanimal/yr = 9,500 lbs. Total N
75 animals x 52 lbs, Nlanimal/yr = 3,900 lbs. Total N
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 13,400 lbs. Total N
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE STORAGE POND:
Your waste storage pond is designed for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every -!--MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
92 , A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
FEED LOT:
Loafing area beside free stall will be used during good weather and nights for approximately 125
milk cows. Feed lot beside heifer barn will be used to feed approximately 75 dry cows and
heifers, This area has sufficient area to store manure for 60 days and will be stockpiled and
hauled as needed and weather permits. (See enclosed site diagram for details)
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
L,

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number 7-- • y lt'Y? f /�-f .1 `/r
Facilit Name „ _
r0-
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for Date of Certification % ' .-3 - -7
y`" /Z.`.� CZ✓!: � Ps1. c'Etc�g• J 5C:7 /1 E'/J{ �'s
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking
Dry cows
Heifers
Calves
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS�U
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate. u
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature ��. L� Date � -/
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature .��G�c�.,,-✓�L��i� Date
Technical Specialist
Signature /UDate _ ~1 t �� a
Phone Number (]�) (D_= t 0 7 ��

Animal W-aste Management Plan Certification
(Please t,Te or Drim all information that does not recuire a signature)
Existing or dew ::,:Or Expanded . 4please circle ane}
General Information:
Name fFr:,:_/t;i11t;' t _-FacilirvNo: -- '
Ov'n,27,s` Nam.-: !t -a Phone No:
lvla lir:_ .address7- _�' �-7c r ll 1L1/t=. A
Farm Location: County Farm is Iocated in:
LatirudaLndLongitude: <35 3 .�cl �/ i.'°. 4/1 Integrator: N� 'k(f�
Please amach a copy of a county road reap with Iocation identified and describe below (/Be spz..fic: road
na-nes. directions milepost. etc.): /��l�t�. I`- l�1'!'? :�.- LC7 iZ= 17�� ! ,?rzi
Operation Description:
Ttiae c) -'Swine No, ofAnirr'.:Is
_1 'Xea.n to Feede:
to Finish
_ Jaz c•.. to Wean
�rrc' W Feder
r r o'• to . finish
Type of Poultry
1i_ayer
u Pullets
lr'o. ofAitimals
Orher Type of L.lves:ocli.
T rte or•C.:.::'e No. of-.. i„_._
•`•:r,:�s �.' =C' r '�� A DG�? �'C)
c- - l�,i,: r;07,.• SLI(} Reoui.red c:-3�,. C)
.. . _ .. _ � �Gr �clica �.
Lagoons r SL, rage Ponds _7 Tota] Cacacir:: I`t Z.1 22-3 Cu ,ic F2"
s .; ce t~-,.. n. present or. tht fatut. YES or -or) (plzasz- circle ane)
If YES: Lr! subsW:_ce drains present in the area of the LAG00N or SPRAT- F ELD (please ciUc!e one)
+� H xa� �� a as of In Ra[aax H Hr HTS Ht HH at i[s1 �sYYF.. t. }., .....^ ... is as...... n,4.- ­M --------nH.wxr—:a
Owner / Manager Agreement
i (.:e) .ems:_: tb i zl the above information is correct and will be updated upon cba_*tging. I ('tee) unders=d Lye ope a_c
L'Id in:e ace procedures esiabiished in the approved animal wasie management plan for the fain na_ ed above and "ill
Lnpiemenc these prc-zedures. I {t.'e? 1., -tow that any expansion to the existing design capacity- of the wa_<ie uea=eat and
storage s;.,stem er consuucdon of ne%w facilities will require a ne x, certificaLion to be submiaed to the Division of
En'..iron_:e-Lal Management before the new animals are stocked. I (w'e) unde:-stand that t`.ere must be no discbarse Of
w;te from tee storage or application system -to surface eaters of the sate either directly trough a man -=i ade
c:n•:e.: .i._ or f,oa: a siorut e•:eni less severe than tb� 2i -year. 24-hour storm ani tbere must not bt roan -off from L�e
a_ciica _n of ani:.21 waste. I Ove) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavv use areas ears; be
�in!mize•_' using te::bnical standards d -z eloped by the Natural Resources Consen-ation ser -:ice. Tne approved. pia—n will be
%iLd ai ire fare and at the office of the local Soil and water Conservation Dise-ict. I (we) lonow th::t an,,tnediiicar of
mus: bz a vroved b`. a techeical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conse:-:auon Dist,;ct prop to
it piement_�tor.. ca ange in land ownersbip requires written notification to DE -M or a ne•. ce:Litication (if tcz approved
olai is _ham- tt) "itbin 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner : L�,II ! � 1ayrn W,< f iE.w—
Signature: r✓�1 ���_✓.. L �U- - Date:
Name or) Lana<,2erjf dif. Brent crom owner):
Signature: Date:
WC -- .august 1.

Technical Specialist Certification
.1 As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and water Conservation Commission pursuant to 1jA
?'CAC 6i= .005. I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal A,as e
managemtnt plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Enviror=ental ;`la_-tagemeat
(DE�f} as specified in ]55A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Se: -,-ice (FRCS) andlor the
Nona Carolina Soil and water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .6001-
.000f. i Qe following elements are included in the plan as applicable. Vvhile each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certificatzoa (SD, SI, WI., -P, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify pa_ -s for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certs; fication of Design
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Svstem
Che,k the appropriate box
EziStina faciliry without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
reauiremenu.
:1 `vx. ecoanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Anima] waste storage and treatment structures. such as bun not limited to collecdcu s.. stects, lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
\ame of Techniccal Specialist (Please Print):. E a UC_'` ; i )z, f-
- ►VDate �;'or:1 Cam-Lleted:_
til -C._ c i ����� 2a ��D Phone No.: OIA 7-U 1 fi 5
Sisnanare: Dare: 3-
B) Land Anolicarion Site (ZVI.-P)
Tae :ian rrovides for minimum se-a.ations (buffers): ad -.c=. -.amount, -,f lama for w---;te uLIiz--_pn: CSO e i c.o-L :5
suit_bie fcr waste man-:, ,zmenu hydraulic a-md nut--ient leading rates.
`
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): E IC3 1 -\UC
:Ifliliation t IS ON C Date Work Corwpleted. 3- )9
L. a .
.ACCT {.•,a =tc Z� � �. i , � t✓u�_ Z 14(0 Phcn'e No.: 70-q -. (C 37 -6 P-33
Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check ;h.e aporooriafe box
=�Facilir;• vvithout exterior lots (SD or `�27P or RC)
This faciEty does not contain anv exterior lots.
' F36i1R with exterior fors (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and hea%- use areas Lave been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by N -RCS.
r -
Name of Technical Specialist (Plea54 Print):_
Milia:ion %�D - 1J D_ Date Nj c r 1, Corooieted: - ! `7 - C
L-7 — �t -u
Ad`re5, (A�en-v): ���� i � s u.2 l`� e_ � 1 �i � Phone 1o.: 204 - 7 ::L? rCy
Dano:_ - (C-ci
A W C --
�u_ust 1. 199 �

D). Aoolicarion and Handling Equipment
Ciirrti ,re aapropriare box
,s( E 6sin.; nr ex­andina_fac;litv wit existina wa4te a; iicatinn egwi=enc (W7 -P or 1)
_i mai waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field ca.libried or eva!uattd i:1
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessar; to acc=_modlate t -,.
waste Management plan (existing application equipment can cover the area required b�-'the pian at rates not to
exceed ei ber the specified b,.draulic or nutrient loadine rtes. a schedule for LL-iin2 of applications has been
established: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance a:e contained as pan of
the plan).
Ne.�. ex-a_nded. or gxiscina facilit<without exLSlitlz wastea-'rlicz6izm eeujpment fnr Strs� ir-i2at;na (I)
A.ti,man waste apclication equipment specified in the plan has been designed to accl•: waste as necessto
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover Lte area requu-ed b,.L�e
pian at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for t_.minl, o;
apniications has been established; required buffe s can be maintained: calibration and adius=enc guidW:ce art
contained as part of the plan).
�i `ea. moan:de'd. or existingfatlir� wirhnut eiistir.g waste arriicatior equipment for land �Zireading norys;mac
7rn'. fir- -�;nn. (V�Z'P or n
.knLnal waste applicadon equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as ne_esc=; to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cove*: the area re^u e- b`. tie
clan at rates not to exceed eitber the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for t=::rte e;
ar^licat'ons has been estabiisbed: required buffers can be maintained: caribraclon ar•d ad;us—_ent _zuni ce a:=
ccnLined as pa_, of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Pleas_- Print):
:coo: tiJ f7l� Date 1;-orti Corat,ietee:
Z 7-C v c: c L.
add:e_s nC !�1 t 7C4
Ej Odor Control.. Insect Control. Mortalit-• Management and Emergency action Plan (SD.
SI. NNI-P. RC or I)
•.­ze management pizn for this faciliv includes a :Waste Llanaaement Oder Concol
Cen_ol Cbec ?i<_t. a Mor -.alit'; Nla_naa:.!me.^.t Checivi a. -id Ln E-n.-rgency Action P::=.. Soucti of bol. C_40 -s 1--t
base been v.-Luated with resrvct to this site and Best Mana,eme::: Practices to `lir.i_~ fixe OdOrS Ez<_:
``_.?gement Practices to Control Insect; have been selected a -*id included i.n the %vas:e mana:ement plan. Both the
ala_^.a9emzat Plan and the Emer Qenc_v Action Plan are complete and can be by this rax fill
tiam,e of Technical Specialist (Plz?5.- Prim): � �c r
Date ' r- C or -D let
Addres_ (.�cenc�'}: s - lQ - X 44 (L- Phc.r,e `o.: 04 Co 3 7
Dat
i�-:, e: a"
S._
F) Written Notice of Ne%%• or Exoandina S•i-ine Farm
The follow!. -.2 signature biock is only to be used fur new or, expanding swine farms that be -in construction after June
'_1. 1996. U the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded _
I (•::c) that I (%%e! bave attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoiningopropeny ov.-Ders and a 1 FrQpzr ;•' o'•:,:ers
,,;-bo c-ri F7o7,d located across a public road. sweet. or highwav from this ne'A' or z.CpandirT s%vine fa, -m. The notice was
In coL.r�l:a-.ce wit Lhe rewu r.—md is of ,,CGS 106-50'5. A copy of the notice and a list of Le proper:••' notir:ed Is
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of �12naZer {ii di;feren[ from ov�'nzr):
SiZnatLire:
A C -- .AuQust 1. 1997
Date:
Date:

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
Ne,x- etoanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
-knimai waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been inst ailed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessan:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
-A-
A-ffiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (AQencti): Phone 'o.:
Sian 1_:e: Date:
B) Land application Site (IN -UP)
Check rl:e appropriate bax
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the a—airna1 r.a;te ma_nage._ e: i plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for pl`nr-nc. the c:-op!:ir.c
a. specuied in the waste udiization plan has not been established and the 01.1.-ner h�-S comzaitted to es `bush tie
vege:aton as speciiied in the plan by (Mont: %dav"vear): tr2 proposed coyer c -.-cc is
a^oropr'.ate for compiiance with the wasteublizabon pian.
Z A_o c teck this box if appropriate
1: `e erop_ins 5':Si2:1 as specified in the plan can not be estabiisbed on rle'vi- c'.eared land ca..'S
Ci tis cc-i:lcation. the owner has co=iaed to establij%i an irate:.Sl rop for erosion cor+t,'ol:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): K
.+y Aft L r\,12� Date �ti orti Comr, 12,ed: -�—�`l -01
A4dr-z-ss ('Aa,znCv):
Sizna:dre: �}�3
Phone No.: I&Z' Lao -c-,
Date: a- fit- of
This follo�sIna signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) Ce i_, that I (a'e:! have cotanitted to establish the cropping Sy5tem a -s speciried in my (oL'*) waste uta:izacion p!an.
and if appropr:aie to establish the interim crop for erosion control. a'nd will submit to DEM a ve�flcation of complztion
from a Technical Scczc:alist within 15 calendar days follov--ins the date sceciffed in the conditior:al ce--uflca:icn. I
re line that failure Io submit this Verification is a violation of the waste management pla ti and %,v, --,l subject me (us) to n
enforcement action from DELI.
Name of Land O«-ner:
Signature:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- Au--'Ust 1. 1997
Date:
Date:

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
with n:enor lots
.viethods to minimize the run off of pollutanrs from lounging and hear: use areas have been instailed as
in the pian.
Far jaciliries without exterior lots, no cen, ficarion is necessan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): l� ���?C i� 7F-•
a on L'4: C) N- NL C_S Date `L"or Completed: 3 - .4-Ui
`-1',-JC-0L-'D
Phone No.: -7c:4 - w'3 7 c "7 &:--j
12 --Cf
D) Aoolication and Handling Equir)ment L-tstallation (WLT. or n
Cr,e: rre orocr =e biock
Animal was,,- application and handling equipment spe�:ir-led in the plat is on site and read.: for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the ou-ners and are conra.ine- as pa. � of We plar.
vitae wa_<,e aoolicaUon and handling equipment specie.ed in the plan bas not bean ins �i?ed but the ow e
Las proposed leasing or third parry application and has provided a signed contract: egLpu,eat saeciu�ed in
the cont -ac: agrees With the requirements of the plan: rn-quired buyers can be maint`ned: calibralt on and
adius.:.tent El ddance have been provided to the owners an are cc•atLred as parr of the pity..
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handti_ng equi^neat apec_:ed in Lt'- r!a-7 tea_'
bed:; purc:,a_ed and will be cn site and installed b,,(a or.:�'d /�e � .: mere is ad:c are
stamge to told the waste umil the equipment is inst;'led and until the waste c n c� land ?.;�_iied i^
ac",rdznce wilt the CoppL'7£ system contained in the pian: and %alio a -Lon ar.d adlus`;e:%guiC_.C!
been provided to ere and are contained as pzm of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prim):�,_�-'�cx
1 -Cr4 Nit-C'_.a Date Work Cor.le'ed:
Phcr:- No.: '7L:LF - C, 7 -C� 1c 3
Dat' ' 3 - .1 c - U 1
The foflo�n_ signature block is oniti- to be used when the box for conditional approva! in LII D
above has been checked.
I (�be, i are cJrnmiaeC.. to pt_rchase the a:-dn--' wasi,- c plic3L'on Z'_d l7.2n' __n Z.q":-,::' i .�
s_eci::ed in my (ot!-) war<;e rzazagement plan and will submit to DEN1 a ve ,Ecation or z^,d ins:alador:
CM a Ter` ica, Scecia;S: kviL`ua 15 calendar days follo,.ving the dZie spe- 'ted in the condition,—' I
,«'Zt re?'!Z-2 Lnaa r °lLLr2 to subrndttll.is ve:,ncation is a viol2ticn of L`]e w'asie mana2-tm-,,: plan z .-. will sutli--::: nie
(Errs) to an action from DEM.
Name of Land O«-ner:
Signature:
Name of `Tanager (if cifferent from owner):
Slgnature:
Date:
Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and_'.1vIor-talit-v Management (_SD. SL NN -UP. RC or I)
to control odor= and insects as specified in the Plan have be. -n installed and are oc-eraLor',a,. Tn.
r. r.a.1it:- - nagement 5. -Szem as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is oce.ation !.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Printf: c , , L
'�. liw or �% � . �-,-- Date Work Comclzted:) _{C - L'r"
At:dr��S (.a -
-AWC august 1. 199
Phone No

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
Illegal discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day bN
the Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he
shall provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of'
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) 01-
an
ran Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
6

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event ill
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
1$. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
0"3

WASTE UTILIZATIO "PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a stonn event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER:
(Please print)
Signature: �tii �C , „ �/�/��y , Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print)
Affiliation: V > - N� P—CS
Address (Agency):_ n , ,- ti C -k C-5
Z_ `7 Z7- C'_ G t J Cr,3 C o z i) Q L2�
.S r�_ iLc Z. sr��
Signature: Date:

j,'�- 1 4 � ! L!?vth� ....i.�dL�{}:��g �ia.r�iir.:>:• 'i." ".iGt :t� „ s'e ..G
' w"r" r ham' F• ; ��. *i - n '.
Ar
c�
�� Y4 .Yfr �' ii. i Ws 41i'w• 3 ry
�x a nT m
c 4
`ri€
� 3 F �n.•�i 1 t � '� .:y
hid:
,'-
-�;• �.
s�,�i�'.'
+f
' � RgP J � ) � L' 1 ' a�, _ p���i d 1 •
+�rRY F� il•ci^',
-�'�- � � �", €L � lig �• €, i , ; � � �m i�r �.
i � Th � � 1 •. /` ia► � -t�4� t i �liftNF [� S ,4 �% v S �
aYr'
�xi si
•s �sR S'..7"i f.� i' � N ���y � - i' � t�Hl� 4',�` 9 �P ♦ � .mac'- ; � } i„r .„g �. `
WK}'ctr
xi�y, , h 4 P •.I j liL. pi! S*a �€ �� —T
•a;- J� �i'. i �� C, V� x t- -j. rs, } ai.E€r,t€� ' �� � r. � � �•, /
�' �'.`Y• �•i', i9,a, �. Y ,t.� `jai 3;}. i .sr� i .,h. ii ii. a i -..Ply-3s 4 ,yr •r
� ! ��Y� ����• � �� s�, - ��' # � '} � �€r } •s ; 1��. i'a*} ���ls �'fi ��� ��'j i � ` tiC'� - r€.. F•� �R�tyn �,
� � �i s J Ar '� s°i. g •M it {� h i � hid �sj y ii ` 1 R �.I ri.�� � ,
: 4 d E ( .�€Y 5�"'Lj 2 �S.i'3 ➢ F E {• ° '
"T d b�W �s��,� •.���., r ' ; , is �P$� � r ��� a i ss` €t s � $, , � P �t , 4 .a� '� � "�i`3.•
r �`�,by� lr s°,5: � € �' �fii 7� j �• E, 3 ,} g�#:q3, � 'tEb ' � ii#���, j. 8! E •, s 3 t9 ° S � �. ,
N' i it •.-f
gg !• , � , i { 5€ � ti P..:�� €E € chi `” ji r s i 4t aE I r d�� S
----
1
��r �:1V p 1• { M P i Y 3' F [tr i 3 € ^1P�.48 i� }+ #
g - t �ri?f-�.ky+� --LSap•r •.t - f , �°'�`' SG �' �1'}!�iti�' �,. `i} P�" ='4 �'•'�i ��lip � dy ! !ill Rt t i +` �d�� �i �L�%y si-''
A2" Sa�rT€ e§' • �' d `§t,+ ft i ta..1e E tP �•�'y7 e a -�4�wi €. k t`ir •',f�� :�� 1
r€
y���• � �z �' � �F` t'.�,�`g "i r 'sr'1p'r �ij/,t ld �t ; r �lt`1�, � � =t a�,Y 1 �€ ,, w+ ,� �� - �1 � `• f 1..
• = t'4 yk-:" .'� e '' 1 P'
.. ni . �!'i. i�i3Y.•�si��kp:�"w`-1;.7'n.°Wi`�`�.'���"�ek��-..�,�t. �,fx:.iP ^.`:i:i��si e:a>t.•�b, r. !€-€t. _ F � .�wKp �.i
;i

EMERCiENCT ACTION PIAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER OUALI`I'Y ( DWO )
7W - 663 - 1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES ( EMS )
704-6311-09
ROWAN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
( SWCD )
704 - 637 - 07113
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE ( NRCS )
704 - 637 - 1604
ROWAN COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE ( CES )
704 - 633 - 0571
This plan will be implemented in the event that waste from your operation is
leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until waste
reaches surface waters of leave your property to consider that you have a
problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen.
This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.

3. Contact appropriate agencies.
A. During normal business hours, call your Division of Water
Quality regional office.- Phone 704 - 663 - 1699. After hours,
emergency number: 919 - 733 - 3942. Your phone call should
include: your name, facility name, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the
facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have
been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
B. if the spill leaves your property or enters surface waters, call the
local EMS phone number 704 - 638 - 0911.
C. Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department.
D. Contact the Rowan SWCD at 704 - 6:17 - 0783 , the
NRCS at 744 - 637 - 1604, or the CES at 704 - 6:13 - 0571
for advice / technical assistance.
4. if none of the above numbers work, call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that person to
contact the proper agencies for you.
. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of the problem to
minimize off - site damage.
A. L. P. Barger Jr. Grading 744 - 633 - 8693
B. Parks Hubbard Grading 704 - 278 - 4876
6, Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon / waste storage
pond ( NRCS, SWCD, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
Name:
Phone:
- 7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste
management plan to keep problems with release of waste from
happening again.

NCDET�IR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. i _ i.�,-; 'DeeTreeman`
Governor Director j .3SN f... _ .......__..,. Secr`etaryr
JAN 30
January 20, 2012 202
William Waller
William Waller Dairy
2975 N. Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115-7287
Subject: Rescission of Animal Waste Permit
Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800028
William Waller Dairy
Rowan County
Dear William Waller:
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit Certificate of
Coverage with the submission of a completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure
Report Form on December 30, 2011. Staff from our Regional Office has confirmed that this
Coverage is no longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of
Coverage No. AWC800028 is rescinded, effective immediately.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management,system you must first
apply for and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal
waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will
subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at (704)-663-1699 if it would be helpful to
discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Rowan County Soil & Water Conservation District
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office — please waive the latest dues.
Permit File AWC800028
1838 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 612 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet:
An E4ual Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
One
N Carolina
Itura!!�

7I
k
Facility, Number`::
@ Divis
4tlie
of WaterQnallty� s
of Soil andMater Codservationy
,ency
Type of Visit S Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: < < Arrival Time: Departure Time: Region:
N
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: V a/C. fPhone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ` " �\"w�' L C V t+ i` i _ Operator Certification Number: L
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =0 ❑ Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
Rbait
y Cow t �S
❑
Dairy Calf
W—Dairy Heifei
DEX Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
12/.28/04 Continued
❑ Yes
❑ No tkA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No k1TA
❑ NE
No A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
1111 Yes
NA
El NE
C1 Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
12/.28/04 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection \
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Ye' "4
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure I Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 St tur 6
Identifier:"
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): i C
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ yes No ❑ NA C1 NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Fo
❑ NA [3 NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes El NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes `3�No [INA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift Applliiccatioonn Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
`A�
ElYes `6 Vo
❑ Yes �, �
El NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes�;Col
�A El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes b -L ❑ NA ❑ NE
rcevmilts {refer to uestina # KE lain�an ~YESFanswers and/or any �ecotn�mendaHons otanynther onia. F
� >k } gyp , Y,;' f .� y� z ag s Z AN'
se'drawings"'d ,ftc *ty ta'better explain situations .(use additional pages=as necessary)
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' y j' u -:. ;, a` Phone.-
hone:Reviewerllnspector
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date:
12128/04 Continued

;! Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
the appropirate box. ❑ WCP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certi
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather C
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pen -nit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
27.'
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA .
.
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑
NE
NE
NE
lion
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
12128104
�C-4
C
12128104

C aJ Zhr 't i � t!% i nYi ti cT. w � v : �' (y 1 i. nit x• 'r v'w f ,=i ` i , .rte a 4s�+ "k n r r
a�=N
W"Tz-,
umber-ivisin tSoilsnd Waer,' IR'IENIIII
tj Al
:'C'�r a `ix#�':1'?"•"i '�"e".;w i",�i.:n"..+.� .C,.SJ`:.:. :.r,.En�.it4 le`:. .!'Sa .v7 .w14 _t_5.^�'�."�., .aae'.'� t�;: v�si;rr"''�"F >x ,vt�-k_risi�•. v+.•. ..I
Type of Visit #-Compliance inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit #Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Referral O Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: OL/07/W Arrival Time: � �dt7 Departure Time: County: R� Region:
Farm Name: "� (,_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: _\W-_ � C _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _ "`� " y �W4 c Vv
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
_.Title: Phone No: _
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: Z) do
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0
=&
Longitude: = ° = i s
Design Current - Design 'Current
Swine ; , Capacity Papulation , - Wet Poultry Capacity Population
[Layer
Non -La er
Diy Poultry
• ❑ La ers
❑
Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
" ❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity PgVyrMQn
nVairy Cow I tip."""
❑ Dairy Calf
54�airy Heifej %
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: .
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Ye Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
ON �NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NoA
❑ NE
❑ No -->&A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
-�� 'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
I ❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: �� Date of Inspection
Waste Collection. & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
11
Struc Structure 3
Structure 4
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Cl Yeso NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes�No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soi
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop
`Window /�❑ Evidence of Wind
�D�riif[t� ❑ Application
hOutside of Area
12. Crop tyPe(s) ____ _ cp � " 1 t ? � vV v k `0 `1 �/►�1. C"
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Y2M
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes W10
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination', E] Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes to
❑ NA ❑ NE
[INA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
El NA El NE
�
A C-1NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[j NA [1 NE
Reviewer/ins ector Name ryr�f^�
A . F 4 r ,'r'F t . .G a. . t.: t u 1.�„t� ye.•ni,. k i�ra.ti Rhone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128/04 Continued

le Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box.
DesignMas ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ ion ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Anal sis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Annual Certification
❑ Rainfa__T=
tocking Crop Yield-` ❑'t2{�-pima etions ❑Monthly and 1"Rain Inspections ❑Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 'DM�o ❑ NA ❑ NSE
23: if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No �A
❑ NE
❑ Yes >Q ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 4t&
❑ NE
❑ Yes �loNA
El NE
❑ Yes El No A
❑ NE
[--INA ❑ NE
[I NA El NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA El NE
El NA [I NE
-t v=-.:+� � }h �i '� � � � - Y�' �'- �� i �' 2'. 4 ' S•'ix"�: 1. x,#'¢s
Addityonai Comments xnsllor,Draw�n s F a �r ti d =mow
�boe�aa ci cA0
V y
a 15/o l
Vv ��
t
�" �"u i " ` V�
�J✓
r —
12/28/04

Waste Storage Pond Closure Plan
November 2010
ACSP 80-10-12-16
Tract: 1571
County: Rowan
Latitude: 35 33' 29"
Longitude: 80 41' 02"
Facility Number 80-98-021-16
HU Code 03040105020040 Irish Buffalo Creek
Owner:
William Waller
2975 N. Enochville Ave
Mooresville, NC 28115-7287
Plan Prepared By:
Chris Sloop
District Soil Conservationist- Rowan SWCD
2727-C Old Concord Rd
Salisbury, NC 28146
704-637-0783
Location: Hwy 152 west from China Grove, NC; Lefton Deal Road and travel .75 miles; Turn
Left on Enochviile Ave and dairy is 1.0 mile on left.
General: The dairy was closed in March 2006 and the waste storage pond was built in June 1996
for 200 cows and 180 days of storage. The farm has not received a notice of violation from NC
DWQ.
Note:_ Rowan County NRCS_or SWCD personel must be onsite
while waste stooge pond is being closed for them to certify the
Proper closure of the structure.
Note: Producer must contact NC Division of Water Quality to
notify them that lagoon is to be closed. NCDWQ Form PLC -1
must be completed in order to certify that la -goon has been
closed, inspected, and producer removed from active list.

SPECIFICATIONS:
The closure of the waste storage pond will be completed in accordance with the standards and
specifiactions outlined in the Closure of Waste Impoundments, (360) Section IV of the NRCS
Field Office Technical Guide. The liquid waste will be spread at agronomic rates in accordance to
the facility's existing waste utilization plan. The remaining sludge will then be scraped to remove
any existing sludge. This sludge will be land applied in accordance with the attached nutrient
management plan. The material is to be hauled to the application field in dump trucks and
uniformly applied with cooperator's manure spreader.. If slude is piled for drying it will be
protected from runoff by staking straw bales around perimeter of pile.
After the sludge is removed, the dam is to be breached and fill dirt from the existing dam will be
used to fill the WSP. The WSP is to be filled to an elevation that will allow drainage of all areas
within the treated area and graded to prevent any waters from being impounded. Will attempt to
fill the area to original elevations prior to constructing WSP. After grading is completed, all
distrubed areas are to be seeded with tall fescue, fertilized, limed, and mulched with the following
materials and amounts:
Tall Fescue Seed 60lbs/ A
2 Tons Rime/ A
1,000lbs of 10-10-10/ Acre or Equivilent
60-80 Bales of Straw/ A
After grading is complete, certifying technical specialist will determne the acreage to be seeded
and total amount of material required.
REMOVAL OF INFLOW DEVICES:
All pipes draining into the waste storage pond willl be removed prior to certification. Parlor pipe
entrance will also be capped, preferrably by filling with concrete.
DESCRIPTION OF BUFFERS & SETBACKS:
The applicator will be informed of all applicable buffers and setback distances to insure that water
quality and closure procedures are properly followed. The technical specialist on site will review
that closure plan with the applicator and discuss locations of fields to receive waste. Setbacks
and buffer distances are as follows: no closer than 25 feet from perenial waters, 100 feet from
wells, 200 feet from dwellings not associated with the farm. Waste is to be applied in such a
manner as not to reach property or public right of ways. See existing Waste Management Plan
for setbacks.

VOLUME TO BE REMOVED:
Refer to attached calculations on volumes on the respective waste storage pond. The volumes
are based on site conditions at time of plan development and are subject to change based on
climatic conditions..
Land application of animal waste
The waste liquids will be applied to crop fields in accordance to the facilities existing waste plan.
The sludge will be applied to adjacent crop fields in accordance with the attached Waste
Structure Closure plan. Waste is not to be applied while it is raining or when soil conditions are
saturated. Applying waste prior to a predicted rainfall is also to be avoided. The Phosphorus
Loss Assement Tool (PLAT) has been applied to all field receiving waste in the attached plan to
insure that phosphorus is not being over -applied. Since application field is in continuous no till,
soil erosion is not expected to be a concern.
Gradin Around Existing Drop -Box Inlets
Due to the large volume of surface area of adjacent barns and storage buildings, a
significant volume of surface runoff is to be expected. Runoff water needs to be
collected and diverted to the drop boxes using a berm/terrace. Grading around these
boxes will ensure that water is collected and diverted adequately to prevent erosion
problems during the establishment of the critical area. District and/or NRCS staff will
advise grading with an on-site visit.
Producer Signature:% Date: r o(- .-
'��
Technical Staff Signature:t�—e. Date:'

Waste Structure Closure Plan
12-02-2010
This plan has been prepared for: I This plan has been developed by:
William C. Waller Dairy
William C. Waller
noc vt a ve
Mooresville, NC 28115-7287
[phone]
Christopher D. Sloop
Rowan Si['CD
Salisbury, AIC 28146
[phone]
Developer Si nature
Type of Plan: Waste Structure Closure Plan
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this closure plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
/ --1 _.. f - / L
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date
46207 ...... Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 12-02-2010 Cover Page 1

GENERAL LAGOON CLOSURE INFORMATION:
Closure Start Date: 12-06-2010 Closure End Date:
Closure of existing lagoon on Mr. Waller's property.
CLOSEOUT CONDITION:
06-30-2012
Existing lagoon in excellent condition with no evidence of erosion and vegetation present was also in
excellent condition.
Contained approximately 550,000 gallons of liquid. Contained less than 2 ft. of sludge on the bottom.
Sampled in May of 2010 and sample results used in development of this plan.
Waste to be applied by Mr. Waller on surrounding hay and crop fields.
REMOVAL OF INFLOW DEVICES:
All infolw pipes to be removed and inlets capped in the barn
INSTALLATION OF SPILLWAY:
Spillway to be removed and dam material used to fill existing hole. A diversion will be created, and
vegetation established to route water around lagoon area to facilitate grading during closure. Final
grading of area will be performed to meet NRCS standards. See attached topo survey map.
DESCRIPTION OF BUFFERS AND SETBACKS:
462037 Date Printed: 12-02-2010 Info Wage

SOURCE: Closure Lagoon Liquid
Date Measured: 05-26-2010
Lagoon Dimensions: TOP - 0 X 0; BOTTOM - 50 X 150; SIDE SLOPES - 2:1
Liquid Depth: 5.00fl.; Liquid Volume: 550;000 gallons. Waste Sample 4. W085201iq
• ■- i I L II c: i
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Applic. Method
(lbs A�/1000 gallons)
Source Total (lbs)
Broadcast
0.08
46
Incorporated
Q,1
71
Injected
0.14
77
Irrigated
0.09
48
Maximum PAN
Available (lbs.) *
Actual PAN Applied
(lbs)
PAN Surplus!
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
46
535
-489
6,464,685
-5,914,685
.. ............. .... ....... .. ......... .... -.. ......... .._......... ....
* Maximum PA's Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 12-02-2010 Desc. 2

Waste Storage Closure Source Description
SOURCE: Closure Lagoon Sludge
Date Measured: 05-26-2010
Lagoon Dimensions- TOP - 0 X 0; BOTTOM - 50 X 150; SIDE SLOPES - 2:1
Sludge Depth: 2.00ft.; Sludge Volume: 53,147 gallons. Waste Sample #: W08520
Estimated Plant Available Nitrogen
Applic. lvlerhod
(lbs N/1000 gallons)
Source Tota! (lbs)
Broadcast
22.39
1190
Incorporated
30.54
1623
Injected
34.60
1839
Irrigated
20.36
1082
Maximum PAN
Available (lbs.)
Actual PAN Applied
(lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
1,190
7,133
-5,943
318,506
-265,359
• Maximum PAN Available is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 12-02-2010 Desc. l

Land Application Table: Closure Lagoon Sludge Source Type: Closure
S
Source Volume Available: 53,147 gal:
Source Volume Applied: 318,506 go
Excess Application Capacity: 499.3
462037 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 12/2/2010 1 LAT Page Page I of 2
Manure
PAN
PAN
Liquid
RegA
Applied
Manure
Crop
lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
Applied
A
Source
Total
Use.
PLAT
APPIic•
1000
A
(1
App lic.
Tract
field
II)
Snit Series
Acres
Acres
Rating
Crop
RYE
Period
Method
N
N
gal/Acre
1570
1
U I
Pacolet
19.60
19.60
NIA
Com, Grain
104 bu.
2/15-6/30
Broad.
115
105
4.69
t
1571
1
U I
Pacolet
7.80
7.80
N/A
Fescue I lay
3.9 Tons
811-7131
Broad. 1
173
163
7.28
t
1571
2
U 1
Pacolet
12.30
12.30
N/A
Fescue I lay
3.9 Pons
811-7131
Broad.
173
163
7.28
t
1571
1 3
U I
Pacolet
4.60
4.60
1 N/A
Fescue Hay
4.3 "Pons
1 8/1-7/31
1 Broad.
191
181
8.08
1
1571
4
U 1
Paailet
9.20
9.20
N/A
Corn. Grain
104 bu.
2/15-6/30
Broad.
1 l5
105
4.69
S
Source Volume Available: 53,147 gal:
Source Volume Applied: 318,506 go
Excess Application Capacity: 499.3
462037 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 12/2/2010 1 LAT Page Page I of 2

Land Application Table: Closure Lagoon Liquid Source Type: Closure
Source Vol e Available: 550,000 ge
Saurcc Volume Applied: 6,464,685
Excess Application Capacity: 1,075.4
NO I"1:: " indicates user defined value
462037 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 12/2/2010 I,AT Page Page 2 of 2
Manure
PAN
PAN
Liquid
Rcq'd
Applied
Manure
Crop
lbs/A)
Obs/A)
Applied
�
Source
'Total
Use.
PLAT
APplic•
1000
n
Applic.
Tractrac!
Field
it)
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Rating
Crop
RYIi
PeriodMethod
N
N
gal/Acre
(1
1570
1
U2
Pacolet
19.60
19.60
NIA
torn. Corwin
104 bu,
2115-6/30
Broad.
1 15
10
120.84
1571
1
112
Pacolel
7.80
7.80
NIA
I-escue 1 lay
3.9 'bons
811-7131
Broad.
173
10
120.84
1571
2
112
Pacolc!
12.30
12.30
NIA
Fescue Iliv
3.9 Tons
8/1-7/31
Broad.
173
10
120.84
1571
3
012
Pacolei
4.60
4.60)
1 NIA
I Fescue Hav
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
1 Broad.
11 191
10
120.84
1571
4
U2
Pacolet
9.20
9.201.
N/A
Corn. Crain
104 bu.
2/15-61301
1 Broad.
11 1151
10
120.84
Source Vol e Available: 550,000 ge
Saurcc Volume Applied: 6,464,685
Excess Application Capacity: 1,075.4
NO I"1:: " indicates user defined value
462037 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 12/2/2010 I,AT Page Page 2 of 2

i.aglxln sludge olieil coolants 1111!11 Cl�I1CCnlratk[�ny of%1nC and l oj]1]Cr. High levels r31 tl1( SC nletaiti in soils call adversely afTcct plant growth. Z'hC following table provides a
Conservative (nlaxinium potential) estimate lol' increase in Still index Valdes.* Dile it) inherit variability of waste and soil sampling, it is reconuin ndcd that Conservative soil
target Icvels he set for coiner (e.g. Cu -1 < 700-1000) and zinc (e.g. Zn -1 < 300 for land where peanuts may he grown, fior other cropland 7n -I <700-1 000). Alicinative
application sites should be selcctcri if the following lahle indicates that conceniml ions of these metals may approach excessive levels. For maximum copier and Zinc soil index
limits- see the i RCS Nulrient Management Standard (Corse 590).
Estimated Soil Metal Concentrations
Tract
Field
Soil Sample
Crop
Source
ll)
Applic.
inches
Waste
Cu ppm
Waste
7.n ppm
Soil Test
C11-1
Soil Test Cu -I
!.n -I Arli•
Zn-1F-Tii,
Adj.il
Number
Date
Talew
7.'
1,970
1
.39996 VI
05-29-10
Coni. Grain
UI
0.17
10
65
325
657 10
3S
335
692
1570
1
39996 11
05-29-10
Corn, Grain
U2
4.45
1
1
335
692 19
19
354
711
1571
1
39999 F1
05-29-10
Fescue Nay
U1
0.27
10
65
338
676 17
56
355
732
1571
1
39996 1.1
05-29-10
I'esciie Ilay
U2
4.45
1
1
355
732 19
19
373
751
1571
2
39999 1:2
05-29-10
Fescue I lay
U 1
0.27
10
65
129
948 17
56
146
904
1.571
2
39999 F2
05-29-10
Fescue Flay
U2
4.45
1
1
146
904 19
19
164
923
1571
3
39999 F3
05-29-10
Fescue I lay
Ul
0.30
10
65
115
743 18
62
133
805
1571
3
39999 F3
()5-29-1t1
Fescue I lay
U2
4.45
1
1
133
905 19
19
152
824
1571
4
39999 F4
05-28-10
Corn, Grain
u 1
0,17
10
65
310
637 10
35
320
672
1571
1 4
39999 F4
1 05-29-10
Corn. (:irisin
U2
4.45
1
1
320
672 19
19
339
691
............ ............... .... ........ _ ..-.. ..... _.. ............................... I
* NOTE: The equilibrated post application soil inrlcx may he less than the proiected maxiinum value. Practical melhcAoiogy lbr more precise estimation
is riot available.
462037 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 12-02-2010 1 Metals Pagc Page I of 1

General Information:
Name of Farm:_ tiLlb
Owner(s) Name: L/%,
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
C , to"t, llA.—
acility No: st --moi$ - LZl - It
Mailing Address: _Z `i' 7 S V. 6,% Gt k : �1r A c`,e", i -L r' _ . Phone No: '76 Y - `i 3 2T Z ` i T
Mier r`s ltar , AJC $�1S— -720 County: Z.,9 .
lease check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, piease provide the following information on the animals that wiill remain.
Operation Descrintion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
Tvpe of Poultry Vo. of Animals Type of Cattle AV of Animals
o Layer o Dairy
o Pullets o Beef
Other Type of Livestock: A'umber of Animals:
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the 2H .0217 threshold? Yes o Now'
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes? Yes o No el
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?:
(Name)'.S"e5 3er rte _ of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water QuaIity's &crPsc:(r _ Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on
(dare) for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24
hours prior to the start of closure which began on _ (date). Je`f 2 35-2I LZ
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan which meets all
NRCS specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of
the North Carolina General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print):
Signature: '�� ;;� ,''!L' 4,_. - --- Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical
Guide Standard 998. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste
liquids and sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been
removed, all slopes have been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality—Water Quality Section—Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
PLC - 1 May 3. 1996

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web site: www.ncagr.gov/agrenonii/
Report: WQ8520
Cromer.
Waller, William
C-
Copies to:
l Ns
WasteAnalysisReport
Wei
2975 N. EnOthville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Farm
Received: 05/26/2010
Completed: 06/01/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Rowan County
Sample information
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID:
N
P K Ca
Mg
S
Fe Mn
Zn
Ca
B Mo
Ct C
SLUDGE
Totat 17283
4196 2901 13504
4833
1535
1921 177
183
27.6
17.9
A=N
Waste Code.
14N4
ASD
-NO3
Na Ni Cd
Pb
At
Se Li
PH
SS
CN DM%
CCE% ALE(tons)
349
35.29
Description:
OR -N
Dairy Lagoon Sludge
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/ton met basis
Other Elements
lbs/ton met basis
Application Method
N P205
K20 Ca Mg S Fe
Mn
&n Cu
8 Mo
C!
Na
M Cd Pb
Al Se Lt
Broadcast
4.9 4.8
2.0 6.7 2.4 0.76 0.95
0.09
0.09 0.01
0.01
0.25
Completed: June 1, 2010
Sample information
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
sample ID:
N
P K Ca
Mg
S
Fe Mn
Zn
Cu
B Mo
Ct C
52110
Tata! 21.1
11.1 71.6 92.5
25.7
16.3
2.71 0.20
1.34
0.67
0.28
IN -N
Waste Code:
-A-H4
LSD
-no3
Na Ni Cd
P6
Al
Se Li
PH
SS
C -N DAL%
CCE% ALE )
18.4
7.91
Description:
OR -N
.Daig Li. Slurry
Urea
Recommendations:
I
Nutrients Available for First Crop
Lbs/1000 ealkns
Other Elements
lbs/loo0 allons
App&cation Method
N P205
K20 Ca Mg S Fe
Mn
Zn Cu
8 Mo
Ct
Na
Ni Cd Pb
Al Se Li
Broadcast
0.08 0.15
0.57 0.54 0.15 0.10 0.02
T
0.01 T
T
0-15
North Carolina Reprogramming of the taboratory4nformation-management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
lobacco I rust 1-und Commission -Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

;WNCDABLCS Agropo nic Division ;Phaue (919)733wZ655 Weti}sIte wwsv it. '� d f
Report Na ` ;.39999,
_
_
Grower;
Waller, William C.
Copies To.
2975 N. Enochvil3e Ave.
!ti
SoiiTestReport
Mooresville, NC 28115
x..•ry,*':.
Farm: 1571
SERVING N.C.
RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Received: 0$10212010 Completed:
06/09/201 0 Links to Helpful Information
Rowan County
Agronomist Comments
Field Infot,��atton ;:.
Applied'Lime s'Reoomineadaf3ona
' F,
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr
T/A Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn See Note
F2
1St Crop: FesnOGRim,M
0
120-200 0 0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$ 12
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS% Ac pH P-1 JI -1
Ca% Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-Affl) Mn-AI(2)
Zn! Zn -AI
&-I
S-1
SS -1 NO3-N AWN
MIN 0.27 0.93 19.0
95.0 0.9 6.7 614 304
64.0 23.0
81 55
848 848
129
37
Iaforitioa�ion
Appi}ed
Lime
Recatltbetendations
?y
a
=pield i y
,
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr
T/A
Cmp or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Ca
Zn
B Mn See Note
F3
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Fim,M
0
120.200 0 0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$ 12
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC
BS% Ac pH P -I K -I
Ca% Mg%
MO -1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2)
Zn -1 Zn AI
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1 NO3N NH4-N
MIN 0.27 096 18A
95.0 0.9 6.6 610 287
65.0 23.0
74 52
743 743
t 1
37
;Field lafortnatioa'�� �.
Applied Li�nte
" Recatmmendatioies F =
k
�
Sample No. Last Crop Me Yr
1'IA
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B Mn See Note
F4
Ist Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 0 0
0 0
0
0
.0 pH$
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil Class HAT% W/V CEC
BS% Ac pH P -I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mx -1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2)
Zn -I Zn -Al
Cu -I
S -I
SS -,f NO3-N NH4-N
MIN 0.32 1.13 12.4
96.0 0.5 6.8 403 98
70.0 22.0
204 127
637 637
310
39
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory4nformation-management system that makes this report possible is being fw
~` through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commis:
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental qua
-Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agricu.
Tobacco Trust Fund Commis%kin

NCDAB[:S`Agronomic Division Phone. [phone] Web situ www.govlagronomi/ ..'._
, =Report No '39998 ;. ; ,
J+x
-
Grower.
Soil est Rpot
Walier, William C.
2975 N. EnochOle Ave.
Mooresville, NC 2811.5
Copies To.,
'+ V,,,,, ��''
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Farm: 1578
Received: 06/02/2010
Completed: 06/09/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Rowan Court
Agronomist Comments
Field Inftiirmation _ "�
Mg.
; Recotntiendatons
Sample
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime
N P205
K20
Mg S
Cu Zn
B Mn See Note
Fl
1st Crop: SG/SB- DC 0
80-100 0
0
0 0
0 0
pH$
2nd crop: corn,sllne 0
180-220 0
10-30
0 0
0 0
.0 pH$ 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2)
Zn -1 Zn -Al
CU -1 $-1
SS -1 NO3-N NH4-N
MIN 0.32
1.12 13.1 96.0 0.5 6.9 4o4 99 70.0 23.0
219 128
135
676 676
338 41
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratory-information•managernent system that makes this report possible is being fur
Y `�z through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commis;
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental qua,
- Steve Troxtet, Commissioner of Agricui
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission

;?NCDA&CS`A�on'omic Division Phone ;(919)733=2615 - Web site:_wtivw:ncagr guv/agronomi/
':'
Report No 39996:
Grower:
Waller, William C-
Copies To:
2975 N. Enochville Ave.
x
b
Mooresville, NC 28115
oil Tat Re ort
SERVING N.C. RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS
Farm: 1570
Received: 06102/2010
Completed: 06/09/2010 Links to Helpful Information
Rowan County
Agronomist Comments
ormaRon '
;`Applied 1i,ime xeoommendatio is ,
=
SField
7 ,.,
�,.
Sample No. lost Crop
Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year lime
N P203 Ked
Mg S
Cu
Zn B Mn See Note
Fl
IstCrop: Cotton 0
50-70 0 0
0 0
0
0 1.0 pH$
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil Clara HM%
W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K -I Ca% Mg%
din -1 Mn-AI(l) Mn -A[(2)
Zn -1 Zn -AI
Cu -1
S -I SS-! NO3-N NAo N
MIN 0.36
1.12 12.6 95.0 0.6 6.8 401 97 70.0 22.0
216 12.7
657 657
325
39
North Carolina Reprogramming of the laboratorydnformation-management system that makes this report possible is being fur
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commis:
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental qua
- Steve Troxter, Commissioner ofAgricu
Tobacco Trust Fund Commission

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit *Routine 0 Complaint O Foiiow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit., Arrival Time: Departure Time: D I t _ County: =. Region:
Farm Name: __I �� Owner Email: _
Owner Name;_-.---.._ �l�%• ` C'. t ----..---- Phone:__�------
ii-lailing Address:
r v v
Physical Address: _....• _,.�...._-�.m_.-,-• �....._ _,,,_—____--_ ___--
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: _[[_
Certified Operator: _ Ft-
\A—
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feedei
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No: _
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: _
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ o ❑ ` Longitude: =0=1 o❑1
Design Current . Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle CgAea_city Population
�I r.
■ � ►���91!--l""M
■ :IM
■:
INC.
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream impacts
1 Division of Water Quility'
x
.[
Facility
Number,
❑ NA
❑ NE
Z$
D"��€
D iiviision of Soil and Water Conservahon
Vv �•
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
O Other Agency`
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
�A
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit *Routine 0 Complaint O Foiiow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit., Arrival Time: Departure Time: D I t _ County: =. Region:
Farm Name: __I �� Owner Email: _
Owner Name;_-.---.._ �l�%• ` C'. t ----..---- Phone:__�------
ii-lailing Address:
r v v
Physical Address: _....• _,.�...._-�.m_.-,-• �....._ _,,,_—____--_ ___--
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: _[[_
Certified Operator: _ Ft-
\A—
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feedei
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No: _
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: _
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ o ❑ ` Longitude: =0=1 o❑1
Design Current . Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle CgAea_city Population
�I r.
■ � ►���91!--l""M
■ :IM
■:
INC.
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yeso
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
�A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
E --
d. Does discharge by the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
5A
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yesl�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12/28/04
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structte 1 �Struc ur Structure 3 Structure 4
a.
Identifier: C�4
Spillway?:f X1
Designed Freeboard (in):
A
Observed Freeboard (in): } ``
❑ Yes 20 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NoWA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes -Ztgo ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ic/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ NE
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes �❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Ye sJ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ` RVo
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
❑ Yes�RNo
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?, If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �!�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12, Crop type(s) / C &,�- V-\ "' ' i � 'l C_J" v
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those design ted inthe AWMP?
❑ Y N
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application sitrovemant?
❑Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acre determination'![]Yes ❑ No_�MNA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ` RVo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes�RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
0� �`� C�� C� 12' L�✓ice`'
�S; a�/0
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Name?
�.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

i
fIFacility Number: — Date Inspection
J y�
Xy^4
of
s
o <0
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Ye
❑ NA
❑ NE
20_
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ yes �10
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. UP 0 Check s ❑ Desi n
g ❑ MapsOther
2l.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes-�FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Appliation ❑ W I�F"reeT�oard ❑ Waste is Soil Analysis s e sfe
ification
Crop ❑ 120 s ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes 0
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No,�A
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 4
El NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
�A
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fait to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes ❑ N
A
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes "�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ yes ) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes <)Eq;No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
_�5
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yeso
❑ NA
❑ NE
33,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes �NA
❑ NE
t .�� 1 ...., •s -' F :-5 ': `._ t e' ` -. �' 'fir 4 { :a - f 4 g-, [ h 4>' - 4 a *g :: i fyt i +4.!.: �• r� .f y 4 M y4.
A ddtt!gnal Comments and/or Drawings:,f i, 3S prt 'x a y L T C y'» Y1 yrs r y
J y�
Xy^4
s
o <0
12/28/04

Type of Visit 40 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine () Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: b$l :Arrival Time:= _ Departure Time:'IBJ County:. Region: `w
Farm Name: aAOwner Email:
Owner Name: I �` C... ' Y� Phone:
-------------------
NIailing Address: it A
Physical Address: _
Facility Contact: _ _. Title: _ Phone No: �y
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: C' "" - Operator Certification Number: z� _
Back-up Operator: _ Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =10 ❑1 =11, Longitude 0[=A
[=A = «
Design Current ~Design Current :Design °Current`
?-Swine a Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity, Pppulation Cattle' Espacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Other
❑ Other
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
Non -L.
Pullets
E
Poults
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters, of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
airy CotZ
❑
Dairy Cal
ai Heifet 7
El Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA EINE
❑ Yes [--]No )�,rNA
❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No9!iN1
❑NE
❑ Yes No A
❑ NE
❑ Yes ' ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 � Structure 2 � Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _ �-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 49Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 13A ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
g
❑ Yes 47sz. ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No El NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) vv
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes i<O ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes " ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of. Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application
nOutside
sof Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
CEJ vl Y, � ( -s ---
14. Do the receiving crops differ from tlhose"need
`� s❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land appt? Yes NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[:] Yes ❑ No A EINE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes -LVO ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

IQ
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of thipCAWMP readily availab ? If yes. check ❑YesGS�CJ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. UP ❑ cklists esign aps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the ropriate box below. ❑ Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
aste A plicati Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis ❑- i Analysis aste Transfers Annual Certification
mfall ❑c ing ❑ Cro 'e d l20 ute Inspections ❑ y and I" Rain Inspections Cather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were highet"t}� a;n normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No A
❑ NE
❑ Yes�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
EJ No WA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
❑No)E�rA
[I NE
❑ Yes,
❑ Yes 13�slo
❑ Yes,�Wo
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA [I NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA 0 N
El NA El NE
o>1 .,�n.1,tsN. a, _nwd /o°.,..,..,_-�.. ..ol�a r.1iµ • :.�.w> '
A.... d.�..h...o:nItral- `60> 11
h
&A-1 -:1) Q&
t cry
12/28/04

CNMP revisions Bill Waller Farm (Rowan County)
Subject: CNMP revisions Bill Waller Farm (Rowan County)
From: "Hendrix, Larry - Salisbury, NC" <Larry.Hendrix @nc.usda.gov>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:54:02 -0500
To: "James Bealle" <[e-mail]>
James,
Bill Waller has contacted me regarding your recent inspection. He
indicates that he only needs to have cotton added to his plan. Until I
have time to revise his plan please accept and allow Bill Waller to use
90 lbs of nitrogen from manure and commercial fertilizer for cotton
production on his farm.
I will be sending him a copy of this email for documentation in his
records.
As 1 have discussed with producers requesting our assistance technical
service providers and other specialists are available to make the
revisions.
Thanks
larry
1 of 1 10/2/2008 5:47 PM

l
■ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 800028 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800028 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine _ ___ __ _ County
Inactive or Closed Date:
Rowan _ Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 03/30/2007 Entry Time:04:00 PM Exit Time: 0500 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Waller Dairy_ _ Owner Email:
Owner: William C Waller
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2975_N Enochville Ave , _ Mooresville NC 281157287
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: latitude: 35°33'12" — Longitude: 80°40'60"
FROM THE INTERSECTION OF DEAL RD (SR 1353) AND ENOCHVILLE RD. (SR 1351), TRAVEL APPROXIMATELY 1 MI SOUTH
ON ENOCHVILLE RD. FARM IS ON THE LEFT,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues
Certified Operator: William C Waller Operator Certification Number: 21000
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative William C. Waller Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name William C. Waller Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: C1"413 Q3 __'Zt6a
mspector Signature:.��,,�ii1 _ Date:
Secondary Inspector
Inspection Summary:
01/09/07 > Waste Analysis > N = (1)0.18 (2)0.13 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/25/06 > Waste Analysis > N = (1)5.7 (2)0.43 Lbs71000 Gallons
02/07/06 > Soil Analysis
Facility is currently in the process of closure,
Jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800028 Owner - Facility: William C Waller
Inspection Date: 03/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
f
Facility Number: 800028
Reason for Visit Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle - Milk Cow 200 0
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Hate Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
POND1
18.00
48.00
aste Pond
WASH POND
18.00
41.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800028 Owner - Facility: William C Waller Facility Number : 800028
r
Inspection Date: 03/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n In
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? nl 0 ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 1 ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
I]
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
0000
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or' improvement?
❑
■
❑
Q
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
Q
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
Cl
0
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0000
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800028 Owner- Facility: William C Weller
Facility Number: 800028 t
Inspection Date: 03130/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com
(Grain)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Cover
Crop Type 3
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
❑ ■
Cl
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC800028 Owner- Facility: William C Wailer Facility Number: 800028
i
Inspection Date: 0 313 012 00 7 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ 0 Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections? n
Weather code? n
Weekly Freeboard? n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections a€ter> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
In
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPOES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PIAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800028 Owner - Facility: William C Waller
Inspection Date: 03/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
�4
Facility Number : 800028
's
r�
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

N Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800028 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800028 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cga3nlianc e_ Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: 13aWling County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 08/17/2006 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:30 EK _ Incident #:
Farm Name: Walle-r-Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: William C Waller__
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2975 N Enochville Ave Mooresville NC 28115
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°33''12" Longitude: 80°40'60"
FROM THE INTERSECTION OF DEAL RD (SR 1353) AND ENOCHVILLE RD. (SR 1351), TRAVEL APPROXIMATELY 1 MI SOUTH
ON ENOCHVILLE RD, FARM IS ON THE LEFT,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues
Certified Operator: Wiliam C Waller Operator Certification Number: 21000
Secondary OIC(s):
Onsite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative William C. Waller Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name William C. Waller Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: .1oZ odD6
NO
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
04/25/06 > Waste Analysis > N = (1)5.7 (2)0.43 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/21/05 > Waste Analysis > N = (1)4.0 (2)0.16 Lbs/1000 Gallons
02/07/06 > Soil Analysis
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in October, 2006.
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
13
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800028 Owner - Facility: William C Waller Facility Number. 800028
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 49
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
POND1
18.00.
48.00
aste Pond
WASH POND
18.00
48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800028 Owner - Facility: William C Waller Facility Number; 800028
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
-If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
,dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit AWC800028 Owner- Facility: William C Wailer Facility Number: 800028
Inspection Date: 0$/17/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? .❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3 Sorghum, Sudex
(Silage)
Crop Type 4 Soybean (Silage)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑ ■
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ©
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page; 4

Permit: AWC800028 Owner - Facility: wlliam C Waller
Facility Number: 800028
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■ ❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
■
❑
Va Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0000
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800028 Owner - Faciiity: William C Waller Facility Number. 800028
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0000
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? 0000
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 110110
Page: 6

A
Type of Visit X Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit X Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure'rime: County: Region: Wlea
Farm Name: LOA 11 4_X � G io-, jt,,, ,,, Owner Email:
Owner Name: LJ: 11.1wrl, W AMez Phone:
Mailing
Mailing Address: ,r2- gi7_S Al - 6 NocA V � e. 19d,!< _ /�Iodks� e "C __a ft S
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: t-/ ���✓` l�w��-� Title: oZG ����r` Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: dl_firJJ
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: [=c =d Longitude: =o =,
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑
Layer
�� ❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
i. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
® Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: ,
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

i
(Facility Number: -to — Aq I Date of Inspection (a -,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: W,oyk A, -d to,41A pow J
Spillway?: Yrs „j
Designed Freeboard (in): 1 / $'
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes R3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ® No [--INA ❑ NE '
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ yes
191 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of
Area
12. Crop type(s) ;AKo Ajay a !C
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[]
Yes
93 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[B No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/inspector Name [ '�jij�-r,'bu t �'k't r;,' t Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:W`41&,, Le— Date: b 'Of
12128/04 Continued

_i
Facility Number: qo — 14g Date of Inspection
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA EINE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. © Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfali R Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
© No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
,® NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
CR NA
EINE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
,® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
if yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Irawings:
S�k'y
12/28/04

4
WArE9
4
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
William Waller
Waller Dairy
2975 N Enochville Avenue
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Waller:
December 10, 2004
JAN 4 6 2005
MOOR GS ILLE OUN WATIER S� TION
OFFICE
DWfl-
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800028
Waller Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for animal facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate
Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on November 22, 2004 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to William
C. Waller, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800028 which expires April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Waller Dairy farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 125 dairy cows and 75 heifers and the application to land as specified
in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please_ pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX; 919-715-05881 Internet: h2o,enr.state,nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer -- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
ont
NhCarohna
Awmally

The issuance, of, this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules;,' tandards;_and;ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit'convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentati`aiy to the!IDNision demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per l5A,NCAC12H .0225(c)aic9mpliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
shall all be e6n6t6cted-within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is Iocated in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800028
APS Central Files

.r
Type of Visit oCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation i
for Visit qLRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
FFacility Number q Date o[ Visit: © Time: t�
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
,,,Permitted M Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ... WA4kt� R.............Dat f.................................................................. County :.....1`�................................................ .....................
OwnerName: ..... Lel,�t�............................Iviam............................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Mailing Address: �d.175..... ... �%No Ij u�.��f...........604 ............................... ..I.!�."!�G.....................NG..................... . r�4flS........
Facility Contact: i... r �.. i..(...Ad .CR ............. Title: ................................................ Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: .................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:..,... .. ......... Operator Certification Number:,,,,,,............,
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry 19 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' F77-11 " Longitude 4 «
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes J�j No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [�,No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............. r................... ...........c........................................................................................................................... I. ....
Freeboard (inches): 3 1 y
12112103 Continued

P
Facility Number: 4:;Ro — iv:] Date of InspectionT--.1470`!
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes j No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes 51 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes [N No
elevation markings?
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/itrtprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding [IPAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type !<MAfI &-KA;u t
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes Is No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes R1 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [a No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes &] No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes Q No
Air Quality representative immediately.
''Cornments�(refernto; uesttan�#) �,Ex Iarn�'�n YFS Eapswvers and/or aia ' recantimentiahniis;ar an ` iotiReregrttnients.':��!'�P; �i�E!EF€s-it+° �' �, , ` �,!
,,'
B� 3,1Hrlii,- .�+4}t {a3ti,i•� a.L33 °? -;- YPd1:"S � §fi�;E B?8ei.,�w .'��S;t "# s,:�,>.l:3 J:I' � .'t 't,Y. "i'W •.•.. _t i �;3
U}}se dfhWi5iigs oft fad' lit to better explain sttustrons:a(use aclrlit�onsl pages as ne{ceslsary): ! ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes °; Pied, iii
?�y:99. ��:. �P"]`} }33a{,; i ie._s{d,9y1 p7�
�� ' , �I', 1-.�I ".• �i�v �1.. ...-�i,�:.�31. �� T..�. S,. 31s&E�-?:i.�',Ke",'SYfdi3.s"?i?i?�dlP3z.!S'.�;s�M 3:�.P€4u��a€ �b.',�'W 7 i f,.a§t�e:. i�':•� s..i:�..ud2, � §P... i �1�r!9.�Si- �Or�..��if�; 111 E'llt+li:'Il�':'S 7��.;!ti :1f: R(3 A ?iii;�Ii3.bka�_li:�:>•ii1L 3s4f.3jk�,3iT r,��?
— flied e-s"O. ' Cor, i- pemm; `
--6'ro& (akX) rwut Fy
wplf Prf Rceot�f
Hv
P'
n lll:= {✓ i'11i- �3!;. rs�E �ReviewerlInspector Name Las r€
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Y� O
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: gc7 — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
25. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES. Permitted Facilities
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes }] No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes p No
❑ Yes ® No
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No.
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
,yiti6n"' g. ., ffi'.�� e^ ffits.'>>..' idI ':.> .2t.,'l3'pe. �y
dd�tconal�:CUmments;and/ar�DraWin #, ;iE4gp'{:.:. ?a¢Es€.?.3q ( l¢¢,y'➢°.'e i¢�-f€E� �'gjy7 `� if[��'ylilf('p[
� 0 ,i b;6�°€ l il�{IOil
12/12/03

F\NAMichael F.Easicy,Govert
William G. ]toss Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Dcpartmenl of -Environment and Natural Resourccs
r -
j =1 Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
0 -[ Division of'rater Quality
Coieen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September .15, 2003
William Waller
2975 N. Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Waller Dairy,. Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage 4. AWC800028
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Waller:
Mr. Alan Johiison of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 11,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the
records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
elfexplanatory.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.'
r F - ^z - 3- f �: K � r+i: $- Y ➢� a,.l F �-. f. � � iL:. �.ft - �+ +r �%j "t. '�
- :�. i ., �.3+'. s�- r��.S.' .1� 'f� "2-. ,;i r,� t:.�. tr4ti-¢:!•1� aH :.� a-_- z3se! �J �'� .�xr� s�� j'4.c . 'k s;7''�'.*. �. ,��''4.;�
Sincerely,
Attachments
cc: File
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

* --c<;p ��"�'�'.aE�F�,a,:��nF.rn��;',,. �'it � n #''�S. a ;�re�n.;j.,�1•� ra�avu va_ r�waea-tiCuuua • -a. � ir"'s -�x•rt- n,� r v, :4y�c.r. yy..,;� C"{� s•» �� -1` .�9 u..c,i
y� � � r i - .�+ - } �:•a'+ .-.�,;i•�*-wr rs" - ,d'S i,: .}" � r.J 3+ � -lr^ "' M,.d +Yx, �• J- { ,r ,,
ys''{ �,A#rowR d��n F2z'�* _ - �1'< ]. "if`�r 4 ^c 'd. � i- h,'R s'�s-r3 �� fit. t�w' 1�. Y cc" y�'� •r 1--,- +� .e f
0
f '�}� k�%¢ f. "F'J, s 'i't -:�C. xi a (.. w c �..ti t'sw k'ib+p:� i•fl {p 4.. r, .t� tt 'a
*" : rf'. ° 77 -. Y s 1Y �r�, - .. •• �! - a s OOther AgencYr! � � .. "� �� �' s.-��n. i�r � - •!. ,�. J k. � y � -r{ -� i_ J s,r.
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Nnml►er 8tl 2$ Date of Visit. Titre:
l}9111P_0133
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted E Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - — _ _ _ _ _
Farm Name: S'SAkrJDAik-L._..._-__.-........................................................ County. RQnWL_� ___ MRO .. _
Owner Name: YYitliait>a______ ,,.___ :l�4'tt1 ..______—---____-- Phone No:214a$------___---
Mailing Address: 22 N EngjCbz-ille Ayr _ MWM=iU"_C ------ 281151
FacilityContact: .......................................... Title: .................................. Phone No: ..........................
Onsite Representative:$.IIJ.1'1'�L�LF.�--_-------------- Integrator: __---------------------
Cerfdyed Operator: I -ill m C -- - -_ Waller Operator Certification Number: 21DRO
Location of Farm:
FROM THE INTERSECTION OF DEAL RD (SR 1353) AND ENOCHVILLE RD. (SR 1351), TRAVEL APPROXIMATEL A
I MI -SOUTH ON ENOCHVILLE,RD. FARM IS ON THE LEFT.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 33 a 1? µ Longitude 80 ' 1 • 00
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Ca acitri• Population
Poultry-
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Laver
I
® Dain, .
I 2{)D $5
Feeder to Finish
10 Non -Laver
❑ Nun -Dain
❑ Farrah• to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
• 200
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
280,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 2 J JLJ Subsurface Drams Present 1LJ Lagoon Arra P Spra.- Field Ares
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps � ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Diacharas & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made"
b. If discharge is obsen-ed. did it reach Water of the State'? (If )'es. notify DWQ 1
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated th xv in izal)mui?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system' (If yes. notit�- DWQ )
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the Stats, other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 9 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Dom ....... T�1JU.-._. ..... -_ .... ._ .._._._._ ....... ......... - -.... .... .-.
Freeboard (inches):

acilih- Number. t34-28
Date of Inspection 09/1112003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?,(ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there'structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat:, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
t,onttnuea.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ -Aith those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. hail to have Certificate of Coverage &' General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
:.19.. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
- ® No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You rill receive no further correspondence about this visit
-any ,y• '^-
4,1,'j'
_,�+.�.+•,. -�. ?:i. ^s'E: :r'++ey+2:: - -" - ,. ,. �.,.e,-„?_"S'=�,'i'.�'' - > �` "/' �.::`:'-:..,• --t
Co>�entsr
.(refe'iluestion #,� �Eaplain' ani YES'ausa-eis andlor anti recommendatiions or anti other comments.:,�'�` 5 '-;
..a re 'y i °...h -,r t"{ Y. ;.'r . 1' _ r _ ;;.r-.� +" :s. °+:f `.�.-$.:chi •.t'.:_,.-e-.r'n3w...r. ..1«.,. w. +Stix sj-*
Ilse drtt�ings of facility Ito better eaplam srtuations. (uae s►ddrhonal pages;as necessar})r s +y 0 Field CcYpv ❑Final Notes f . .y
THE FACILITY WAS WELL MAINTAINED. THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE
rReviewer/Inspector Name Alan Johson -r s

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
WILLIAM WALLER
WALLER DAIRY
2975 N ENOCHVILLE AVE
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Dear Mr. Waller:
1 � •
0 MENET
R� `
NC K
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 12, 2001 .'JUN 1 $ 2001
Subject: Application No. AWC800028
Additional Information Request
Waller Dairy
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
Thank you for sending your additional information. Everything I received was satisfactory, except that I
am still missing your updated Waste Utilization Plan for 125 milk cows and 75 heifers. Can you send this to me
by July 12, 2001? Please note that all WUP revisions must he signed and dated by both the owner and the
technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All
information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below.
NCDENR-Non Discharge Permitting Unit (attn: Theresa Nartea)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
The information requested by this letter must be submitted on or before July 12, 2001 or the Division
will return your revision application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility
will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of
the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], ext. 375.
Sincerely,
eresa M, Na
Soil Scientist
Nan -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresyille.Regional_Office,—Water•Quality�
USDA-NRCS-Bruce Rider, 2727-C Old Concord Road, Salisbury, NC 28146
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

o�oF W Ar9oG Michael F. Easley
Governor
f William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretery
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O 'C Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of -Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 21, 2002
William Waller
2975 N. Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Waller Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage #: AWC800028
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Waller:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 20,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the
records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
elfexplanatory.
The certification amendment forms obtained from you (for the increase in animal numbers)
have been forwarded to the central office. If further information is needed, Mr. Johnson will contact
you.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.
cc: Nile
AM
IN
Customer Servioe
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
,),/q, '
� "
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE (7D4) 663-1699
FAX [phone]
1

4
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 812 5-2 1'imc:
Facility Number 80 28
, ,,... NNot Operational Q lielow Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _.....-
Farnt ?dame: WAller.J.?auy.................................................................. Count•: RRIKRA.................................... MR0L.......
Owner Name:1'E'iUism�------------:_._Sllet:--------------------------- Phone No: (2R4� 9211J1�---------------------------
Mailing address: 29.7...N.1EudtyjUR,,X9..................................................................... Mpur>rS.Y.1111:... NG:................................................... 7.81U ..............
Facility Contact: ...........................................................Title: ............................ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: %AUjjAAJ.hV.A.LLE&----------------------------- Integrator ...------------------------- -----
Certified Operator: 'alliallU. ............................ 1'i.R11er............................................... Operator Certification Number:2llljQll.............................
Location of Farm:
FROM THE INTERSECTION OF DEAL RD (SR 1353) AND ENOCHVILLE RD. (SR 1351), TRAVEL
APPROXIMATELY 1 MI SOUTH ON ENOCHVILLE RD. FARM IS ON THE LEFT. •
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 33 12 Longitude 80 * 41 00
Design ,.Current _Design -Current Design Current
:Swine Capacity Population j Toultry, ` --Capacity population 'Cattle ;Capacity Yo ulation '
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 200 110
El Feeder to Finish ;: ❑Non -Layer " El Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean y `
tJ: ❑Other'
[I Farrow to Feeder
E] Farrow to Finish - '.TotsilDe iign!Capacity 200 3
❑Gilts � r +..,;�,� „x� � � .,. - • , = ;�. ••,
❑ Soars P -Tot lssib:'W f 280,000
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
«'ante Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Stnicture ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure �; Strucn:re G
Identifier: __.-MILK.C0_i5'_.... ....... HEIFE-...... ...........................
Freeboard (inches). 54 80

Facility `Number: 80-- ZS
Date of Inspection 8/20/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
{..f nt"a"CW
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
NVastr. Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Sorghum
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Re( mired Records & I)ocuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes .®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further. correspondence about this visit.
'�3°7msc�ssC�xsae'k=��*'�'rP�4-C�"�:�9nry:
Comnaentsrefer�to�uegtloti :. �Eiplainrauy��'ES answeretantUbr�arry�recommendattons,ar�apry then omments.
��• T c:�.-L
rill:> etter a Ialn%situations ,{use aiiditional�ages�asmecessaryj: "''" �.
-�,.�. :� x�. s [� ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
_ ��
�
ACILITY AND RECORDS IN GOOD SHAPE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name A'I:ANJOHNSONr_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 21sT O
U

05/03101
Facility Number: 8628 Date of luspection 8/20/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Continue
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
4 M 1114

",08/19/2002 09:10 919-715-6948 DWQ NDN DISCHARGE BR PAGE 01
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William Q. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
FAX TO:
D E N
Division of Water Qualify
Non -Discharge Branch/ Permits & Engineering
Location: 512 N Salisbury Street Sulte
Raleigh, N.C. 27604
Mailing Address: 1617 Mall Service Center
Ralelgh, N.C. 27699-1617
FAX: [phone]
FAX NUM
HONE: %,T12X 5&95 �;
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 5
Alow,
? #,t a sic rGrrf4v -tke. a z ,s
r* COTT D WCAIr W0 -s W-
revoi4j, i4- sw%di , •
�e►..a 1E� .
3keah. ,
ro
19
M R-0
If you receive this fax by mistake call Non -Discharge Branch 0 919 ?33-5083. Ext. 566

f .06119/2002 09:16 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR _ PAGE 02
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD, Acting Director
February 7, 2002
Division of Wabr Cudity
Hon-018charge Permitting Unl1
Locatim, 512 North Sallsbury street. Raleigh, N.C. 27604
Maling Addrew:1617 Mali Service Center, Rolelghr N.C. 27694-1617
FAX: (919) 71
Z
1 ro%^ rv: ucwav raavr I FAX NUMBER: 704-647-9714 1
A(
Re: Waller Dalty (AWC800028)
Bruce,
We received a status call on this permit that was being handled by
has since left the Unit. I reviewed the package and It appears that
waste utilization plan needs to be signed by the technical specialis
former. This is required for all amendments to the waste pian. Pleasi
signed coples of these amendments in order to proceed with revie
Thank you for your assistance.
4\
heresa. Theresa
he latest portion of
as well as the
fax or mail us
of this permlt.
If you receive this fax by mWake call: J R Josh] at (919) 733-W84 ext 363

.08/19/2002 09:10 919-715-6048 DWQ IDN DISCHARGE BR PAGE 03
Natural Resource conservation Servite
2721 C ow Concord Road
Salisbury, North Carolina 28146
Tel: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Fax Cover Sheet
DATE: December 12, 2001 TIME:
2:30 PM
T0: Theresa Narbea PHMS:
919-733-6083 X-375
DWO FAx:
919-713.OD48
FROM: R. Bruce Rider PHONE-
(704) 537-OT63
District Qonservationl3l FAX:
[phone]
R2: Bill Waller WUP
cc: [Names]
Number of pages including ca vor shoot: 5
Message
Sodoscd is the information you requested concerning Sill Wailer Dairy Rowan County,
#opo W3 helps.
B race
TO"d VILG-L*9 VOL (]OMS uvm01J jd9V= LO ZO-ZL-�a0

N
O
d
3
W
z
91
3
0
oe:
Q
0
m
6
M
0
1
Im
rl
I
U
O
@
F-�
W
m
CD
1�1
m
LD
I --
CD C4
UD
I
V
r
U1
I
Q7
@
4h,
CD
E7
Q
Z
Co
N
U)
D
m
W
X
D
r
@
41
TABLE 1
PRCD110Efl NAME:
W4ftM Waller 80.23
HAIL
TMCt
12f1ml
FW4
Sal
CMP
Renk
Lbs. N per A4:.
Ame
Lbw H
Type
Add
UtTind
sw
1
APO
Gara Gibme
17
19D
1314
1,7I2
1
APB
Small 9ein Silnpe
6
95
114
1,279
1
AA
sulbom
33
100
19.4
1340
961
1
RO8
CarnSiw
is
11n
17
187
1
RUB
and 4 oir4 Shape
BS
75
17
118
1
ROB
SOtbeals
30
t00
17
t70
2
ACM
Com SUP
t5
ISO
2m
2286
SrsaOm
9520A
1X57
2
APER
30
100
2413
2,060
a
APO
Cpm aurae
17
190
260
3,250
3
AW
ShctaO p> bS11ape
9
95
25.G
2376
3
Aw
SoVbOM
35
100
210
2AW
1009
1
APB
Oan Sib a
17
130
77
1,001
1
APB
small0rahnswe
B
95
77
732
1
Ap8
35
100
7.7
770
2
pd12
Cam some
15
110
9l7
3.791
2
Pt$2
seal OwdnslaBe
6.5
75
Ski
2.555
2
r4cm
gip
90
100
34.i
3x410
1579
1
PcC`,2
Corn SbW
15
170
1d7
1,897
1
PCCZ
3mallCarabsslmpe
0-5
76
167
1.253
I
PCC
Sayllmswpsup
30
100
117
1 m
1671
1
PC82
stye, pgswm9
113
12-8
1,446
1t8
4A
497
4
PCM
Cam sbw
i5
110
E.8
11.078
4
PtE2
eme Drain -qaw
a6
75
1t8
735
4
PC82
SOAMM
90
100
9.6
lm
@
F-�
W
m
CD
1�1
m
LD
I --
CD C4
UD
I
V
r
U1
I
Q7
@
4h,
CD
E7
Q
Z
Co
N
U)
D
m
W
X
D
r
@
41

r-1;
01
OL
U
3
TrAd
fief
Sail
Crop
Realistic
LCs. N pei AG.
Amies
Lba N
Type
Yhm
Utilized
Ism
1
PC82
ccm 3RIP
19
110
112
1.56E
1
Po82
.small Grab] Slogs
6.5
75
14.2
1,1386
1
Prat
Soybeans
30
too
14.2
1,420
2
PrB2
Cb" S 4m
15
110
2
1,122
2
Pe82
swap Qrat3a Sftwa
6.6
76
1"
765
2
Pae
S
3D
100
1D2
1=
8
Fd2
GOD Silage
15
110
4.0
440
3
PC82
Smai Grain Shope
6.5
75
4.0
300
3
Pda
Saydaaea
3D
100
4.D
4O0
9A
PCm
(',err! Sam"
18
110
12.6
1.3T5
BA
Pkat
Send Grain Silage
6.5
75
125
909
SA
PCO2
Sgiiearss
30
100
126
1.2.50
1+�8
1
Pr&2
Cam Salm"
is
110
8.t1
969
1
PM
5moti Own Sllga
U6
7S
8.a
890
1
Pcffi
Saypee118
SD
100
8B
aW
2
AO9
C.OMS&M
17
130
7.8
1M4
2
ApB
& Rd Chale She
8
93
1.11
741
2
ApS
Swo-6 mg S111pa
35
100
TB
790
1587
1
ApB
Cam SAsps
17
130
WL2
1.5m
1
ApS
sma8 arch mw
8
95
15.2 '
1,444
1
P49
scyb tswlg� $6age
95
100
18.2
IAM
1688
1
CeR2
Cant Shape
15
110
18B
1.29
1
cde
smug arwo spap
6.5
76
16..8
1.2"
1
11,417
S"bw-
30
100
18.6
1,[130
9
PCM
COM SAW
15
110
24
254
3
Pt82
&TOOK Sao&
1G5
7b
24
t8O
3
Ps$4
SWAMMS
80
IOD
24
244
4
SIB
Com S22pb
15
t 10
31.1
3.421
4
8aB
Snm Gran Silva
a.5
78
31.1
2.383
4
so
S&Am is
30
100
41.1
9,110
%lal 284.0 1$963
�..—
Ddiat N 5299 1C5.deW d N
NM %%h3-- claps is ptarAed NO -b !}Fac may to apfiae.
Comd an RYE of 7 tooafac and AW hRm
M faqu1MMnte fa doable capped eapbeans Iles 13eCn induced t1y z m
1>
- m
m
U1
�r

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number �(� �� Facility`N'amc
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for I E Date of Certification -
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
a�commodatc:
Dain, Milking
Dry cows _
Heifers
Calves
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS -10
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the res; of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your te:.hnizal
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum lesion
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should bc the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
amended Certification, (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certificarior: did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature r���e��, ,,_•4 �- ��!1 � � _ Date
,_
7= manager (if applicable) S
Signature Date
Technical Specialist �
Signature ����-�t'U _ Date = (�� c f
Phone Number

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
7acl1: tt'lIh AXie- ](IL5
Ve'dtocs to Mi^.'M;Z= the run off of pollut lilts from loun?inC and bex.-I use areas ha•:e been is sLalleu as spec';:ed
t.be wizz.
For facilities without exterior tots, no cer:ifca on is necessarti•.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Pr:r,t):.=LKy"..�
C) Da -2 VY or_ti Corupl?.e =;� =i -c:! -
.�" S 5 t. °wriC'j._­o i.iG_ -Phone No.: 7c- Cti 7-c ] :�
Da:e! �- IS -C=(
D)' .s,tanlication and Handling Eotsipment Installation (WUP or 1)
C^e. fre Ooro daze bice:
4'as;_ apclication and h2odlin, equipment specined is [he pL*1 is on site aad rt -adv f;,r tuie:
c-WL,ration a_.d adjustment materials have been provided to the ov-zers and are conuinet zs pa of LL'e ? ,
alai a'asie application and bandlino equipment specified in t=e plan bas not been ins �!!ed but e o tee:
his propose_ leasing or third parT application and has provided a signed coci.dct: e_u::v_:en; spec ed .
[Lill cont:—.c. aQre_s wires the reauircmenrs of the plan: r--auired ULi ers can be m2 nL2�ne�ca?'brat:or azt
adi::s`ient bate been provided to the 0 -n?n and a_re cca r.ed as pan: of the pian.
�! Conditional approval:,1-i.mal write application and ha.i`_'ing eau; -=e -t stvc' :ea in the
bet. :urcZ_eet a.id will be on site and iiisL�iled b%-
cc)
t[O tcit L_ R'?Sie L:.^:'.'; the e •L:pm nt 15 lnsi:—l. `".„ L'n11 rLd can t. 1: �.0 .-. •-•- ...
h CL ��^. s:siei: con[lined In rhe r:Z a]4 :_ :❑ = vi. �'
bz_n prop iceti tc L.e ov,lers ---d are con[ained as pan of Lne pi: -r.,
N a m e or Technical S Decialis: (P1-zas
tr. Cr_t CaL" �r ^LSI
Pho No.: '7 c:c� - ,, 7 -� 1C3
D a ? i[ 0 r ,..
Tne following si?naiure block is only to be used when the box for conditional approve! in ID D
above has been checked.
! (t'•'-, C�.__ Ii cc. 1 (1t-� '.�. L •C.�:.' it1, p t:d:S� the
vv sae - -t' t �"_.. _ _-.-...it
7tT.L �iic_ ior. a-. n.
c. ! M (ou:') wa-s:2 m-2—nace-neni pla-iL anc, will subrL I4 D�tl a '.: T c- ion of deliv ln.._
z.' j al ar g c cii i rh;2 ,
--o:` _ T :=._..c?' S ...._--- t• :.^.ia 1 c eaL d is follott'in th� �2Ie s�•'.� 'iC tl .i... t: .^,G�!L7E'ri
. .- .7 t':ar..` il_� [0 SL'. P.if s 'ca Ylol r I �� tt'�ct_ ° $'^ e._ o - tt'
Li 1 Yom' L tion is a a,1on o u z:a :)Ian 2-.t 111 su Jl CL m
r m r S DEM. _
Name of Land Owner:
SihnaIure:
Xame of Manager fmn, owner):
Si�natUr e:
Dace:
Date:
Odor Control. Insect Control and Nfortaiiry tilana"ment (SD. ST. 117P. RC or Il
ccn:-- 1 cd rs Lnd insects as 5oeciIitd in 11he Pl= helve beta ins:311et F-nd ?Sl- ocCe-a-Lior-L. i
�•, ;?''`T 34'...-:,: s. 7-2m. ?c soeciiie- !I'. Ch: Plan: has also bGz n 1P.5t?11_ and. is or_2.-:t.iolla1,
\a-ne of Technical Specialist (Please Pnntl:,�;'� - _ L L�-�_ -
--.-:i:�rcr: Nz? e c' Date �� er'.; Cor
no.i?:ed' _i C cr
2-
_ i a.rC
mow-� _ (.�,rte.
T�k) r�.�

III. Certification of Installation
.A) Collection. Stora?e. Treatment Installation
\'ew. exoanded or re'rofizted facility (SI)
�lima-I wa_Stz sioragz: and Lr_1= CM Structures, such as bpi not li.miuzd io Lagoons c.'.t pCnds. ba' e ttt:'.
in accor; nce with Lbe approved pian to meet or exceed the minirn= s'.ancrrds and sem_. cations.
Far existing facilities wirhaut retrofits, nD certification is necessary;.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 1/4—
A -*I -IL a'_i C n
Date Work Comoie12d:
Address (AQtncv): Phone No.:
Sign -D.:''' Date'
B) Land AD1)lication Site (i'N-C.-P)
Cnec� r � �p�r;,ircre bcx
Ti-,- C-occL.na syszerrl is in place on all land as sozcff-,ed in L -it a_nLm, all
Conditional Approval: ail required land as sceciflet in to plan is civ red for r a:i.>:.ing:
Sz :ie :?^ in Lhee w'asEe uLiLization plan has not be= esLabiisbet ant L'1: to
?? aeon as sx tea in the plan b,.(mont dal -rye r): t_> propo_z: eo .. = is
for ccs :iia ce with the wasieuLi lization pian.
n.
lSo c-ec.K Lis box if aooropriaie
> -- �c a sizcitled in Che -Ian :n P ..�'St. n i ar'.d ! _ :•'c
CC'. _ j�: ate 1 Z �. C.. POE � e5i.:.�i:.. ,. Gne':.�!•: Ge... ;.-nt ' 'i�.t_ - .
C. C? ,':li3livn. the O%vncr has com—illat to es'3biis". an is e-;=:'. c:cp for erosion _ ,.� •1:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): � . � �C����, i ` 02
Dare V,ork Cori^ie_e�• _-2-i9 -0
Z 7 7- U t, Ol- . u
.z'dreS; (-',J�n� ' � 5 ;7 G_ P; or:? No.: D 6'_ — �L-6 b _'D
This follo%N inp signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
(wej
Ce -Z'.- that i tc'e} ha'.•: co=lcted to establi5h dne Cropping systea: a spec_ried in my (ot_') wast. utilizaton
a".d if a==ro7-.atc it LL l l[ Crop for erOsian ConLOI. a_rd w':?1 submit to DEM a ver I:cadlun of coG piLuz' n
a 1__nnical w'iLhin 15 calendar da%'s foLlowins the d=t: srecified is Lb!! conditiora.! cz- ca'_;on. I ( -e'
-';:Z: aha: `t;lLr to Submit Lhis ve=iileation is a Violation of the waste marase�:ez+t pica and w�l subj.ct : (L'S) to R.
Name of Land Owner:
las
Signature:
lame of Manager (if differe:-it from owner):
Si Enature:
A %` C -- a _',,;; I. t 9Y 7 4
Date:
Date:

Di.Aoohcation and Handling Eau.inment
capropnC.le ba;.
Fxk-,!^^ or ex^"trine fag;liiv with existing anniicatinn e^Uj^n'!'ri( CWLT-. Or 1)
4.ni.mal k'a.ste appiicaUon equipment specified in the plan ha.s been either field caiib,sted or eva-luzated in
accorda..'ict with earring design charu and tables and is able to arpiv ;vzs:z as necess2: to accom nodzte Lb,
v.•aste tranapement plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by Lne pian at rates not to
exceed ei her the specified bydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for LL—in_ of appiica:iens tz. —, been
estrblisbed: recuir:d buffers cz-n be maintained and caibraftr and adjustmtm vid nce a e c3nm-ned as pa.^, of
the plan).
.J 'z:y. e~-a-n•'ded. nr exisdnc fatjlir WitbOut eXiSting Wa<te 2ynlication ecui,tne�t f[r r r3 r--jC�tiCn. {I)
A-nimai WFste apciication eouipment specified in the plan has been d --signed to appiy waste as nezessz:- to
accommodate the Waste manabement plan; (proposed application equipment can coyer tae area required by Lie
pian at rates net to exceed eiLiae- Lbe specified b%-draulic or nuL'ient loading rates: a schedule for Lmin2 of
a''^licadom has been established; required buffe:-. can be mamtaEned: calibratioo a.nd adius=ieot fur; .ce a e
conuned as part of the pian).
\z^' e-ma-^.de'd. or ex15C[na f3cilir�- a'ithnut Cxiltino G''xzie aT_'r'licaU?n eoui.Pmn!ni fr+r lan* , c-rtgd, s io± usinr
metal
waste appucarion equipment s-,%ecified in the plan has been selected to a -ply was:.. as oecessz : to
accommo; .te Cie wasce m.mag=meat plan; (proposed appUcadun eouiumenf cam cove. t~t ?r -,a recuired b': fye
Tian at rates not ro exceed eiLber the specLflied bvdraulic or nutrient loading rtes; a sc]edule for ti -_ins: 0;
a:�niicaLons has been esLaonsb Te^u�SOd buffer Can be maIcLained: c�tiCrcL'on and '� e� gUi
- c-1ua I � Ca`-..
cor.La�tned as pan �� of the plan').
Name of Technical Specialist (P1� �� Pant}:_�--
=,` c P, v:D 1-�,la - N_ >C?L Date 1j'cr - Comcie:e-;:_.— 1 C`l
Z.
P:,cn- N0. 7 04 (O 3 I- 2 7 -
Dare:
Z) Odor Control. Insect Control. Mortalin• :%lanaaement and Erner2encv .-fiction Plan (SD.
SI. WL -P. RC or D
;a: -'e t: _ ,t plan fort s facilir. includes a `4as:e Ma.naeem.nt Ocor Con.:.cl Ch:= !is.. ar. l^Sec;
Cbtcic!1S and an e.'trenc': SOLt.--es of n0,_- a:id
lave bet k' e n ar e _ vices tc �fi•_..� Odors _27C es:
'd it:� r s,._ t t� I.�is site d Best �Ia.naseme-' i'� -�
to COnL of Ins zct h ave been selected a_rid included i t.Fs'. rya_,_ Fr',?n:v7? a,�.^.0 L'In.. DJL i=e
plan and Lhe AcEon dla_, arz complete --id can Lie b v C_'n is fc-
Nam, e of Technical Specialist (Please Prini):
Date Work- Cot .p. Ie:e --' - G l
Si�r�ary.7-
Phone No.: &A. - 7-C)IR"LD
Da,z: - n- C'd
F) «Vrirten Norice of New or Expanding S%N ine Farm
The followirs sibnature block is only to be used for tieµ' or expandirL sine farrrss that be_:in construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June ?I. 1996. -ben was it constructed or last
e.,vpanded
ce7`�. mat I (ave) have audmrted to cor.uct by verified mail all adjoining o%.-aers and m°! trope_. c-wners
,;,-LIC own Frpery located a=os5 a public roar! sa ee:. or bighwav from thi5 ne'x' or expandi^5 5'•yine fa'yl. !ne noL:ce 'was
In cOC:_ l:ar'.C:: wiz -h Lbe r'._uire men,is of :,,'CGS 106-S05. A Copy of Lbe nodce and 3 Ilse of L-�e OV:it:2rs nvl!':e,i :5
3C:�cded. I 1 1 ,f�
Name of Land Owner:
Sicnnture:
1arne of ana2er (i cif;erer,t fr0M 0W7L,rj:
SijnaIure:
Att'C -- Au_,1S5 1. 19Y7
Date:
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
I. AS a [e-Zhnica! specialist desiEnated by the i~onh Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission rursuz:at to 15�
NCAC oi- .0005. I ctrtif•; that the animas a•as[e management system for the farm .ate* tied above haS a_ -i ani --:al asie
mznare= ent plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Enviror=czt_
(ll -`f! as soeci::ed in 15A `C.aC 21:.0217 and the L`SDA-'natural Resoures Conse:-;auca Service (tiR,CS} ::, 'Dr the
cra Card - u a Soand water Conse:-`•adon Commission pursuant to 13A NCAC 2W.0?1r and lea itiC.aC o� '000 5, Tae following eleysent.s are included in the plan as applicable. while eacb cate20r. desi-an2te5 a
'sign each ce titication (SD. SI, [P, RC. I), the technical specialist should only' c!'tiIv pari for v bleb [be.' a_-_
teCtl-IiCally Competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storage. T_ reatment Svstem
C^ --C.- ill; box
E7.is:i7g faciliry withou[ retrofit (SD or `VL -P)
Storage volume is adequate for Dpe.-adon capacity; storage canabil-ky cotLisiem
recl=rImencs.
ex'nandz'l or ret_rof4}[ted faciliry (SD)
�Iy cl Waste sicrage and LS�-acmeat sLrUCrU25• such as but no[ liai[ed 10
h-ve been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standrrds and s Lecu.cauons. -
Name or Technical Specialist (Please Pr��nt): �' ur_'. - r �". �7
Da. e V,'or_l- Ce -Clete,.
z!a:e_s �,��c j: `- tea1 �, z., ���- L, P' -o- No.C_.�`"' 7 Z>
Da_
E' Lwnd Anofieation Site (WULF)
z rc'•:des for m.in [�`. se=amour„ C -i la,,cr -m—z-,2 uf�ii� _ -. c= _.. ;. _ is
b%•d:-aullc a::d nuL-lent loading -Cfz-s.
\arne of Technical Specialist (Please Pr•_nr):_ 1�.uZ
Da Co-�le[ed:
41" Phe a No.. 70-g
�Da[.-: C,
C) Runoff Controls from Eiterior Lots
Circ.; the G:Prcar ,;re bc:
li[v w'zhoLt exterior log (SD or ZZ2--P or RC)
T bis L,ii•: does not cont: in any eTt.— -ior lots.
r :riiir� u- rFy IotS (RC)
^gds to minimize the run off of polluta*:LS from lovn2in and use a::as L_n e been desirnLc in
h
L.orcance wi[b tecnical s�ndards developed by N -RCS. y V V
Name or Technical Specialist (Please Prin[): LZ r_ a �1� (7-
C
2eD N - +J QDile Work
y• -ess ( ,�;): ���a r 5 b�, 1.� c_. �=' I `l �� Pin L, No.: 7 04 - f.—CD
Alt C -- AucUsc i. 1997

Animal Waste Manacrement Plan Certification
Mease n7e or orint all information that does not reouire a signature)
Ex?srine or New ::or :' E,13a ed :``{>,lease`'circle
General Information:
\`.ane of Fa. -m: /.L?71/t �' j i'�! _ raciliry NO: --
Phane I o: 4117 2. _2Z4
N1- ling .address: -Z1 7 t'_-_/- c rh /- c,- Al6,rrr�
Fa, -m Locarion: Counry Fa— is located Ln: ;7(%Iclil 1�1
La�uirude and Lonzimde:
Integrator:
Please anacn a copy of a county road reap with location identified and describe below (Be specY.lic: road
names, directions milepost, etc): /41Z�.114k�n�:
-
�:
Operation Descrindon:
T ;;e cj�Swire No. of:!rir^_:Is
I Nean to Feeder
D 't is Finis,
to V4 can
tO :cede:
0':•' to Finish
Crib
Type C(Foulrn'
Laver
�r PuLlets
No. Gf �nirr�^ls
O:herType of"Lives:o•ck.
Tvpe or C_ -.!f ,Vo.
ADai •' /Z S.,�,'r k ; 7G /�- r-, 1.-
i Be_:
GT�[!r'IOA Gr./'
.�i.:.....rnr.�:; D_S:Pr O..U.4 - �.. Yi .rs.°-^�r..[.'rC
-.— abl� rC•r .—��i1C_�o
o: i aeoor.S , Storaas Ponds 1OL 1 Car-aCit_• �Z C,,+ -lc
-.
a e s,....�._ce d. -. s present or, t.: fes. YES er (plea.z cycle one)
If YES: a=e subsL :ace dra ins present in the area of tie LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please C.rCle one)
Owner / Nlanager .agreement
Ltzz al: Lhe above in`orLiation is cored and will be upd::ted upon cha_n,in,. I (we) the cFe �r}on
and pm cedLLres estabiished in the approved animal waste manaaerneat Flan for tie farm na_zied above an,: will
implennent Lbase prctiedures. I (w,-) 4.—iow' that anti' expansion to -Lbe design canacit`, of the waste trea=ent and
storage s.• stent or constructson of ne,x' facilities will require a ne C,.—LMCation to be sLbL_;ned to the Di•: isiar. or
'E,•:i.ro=en,_> >ta_n=g?ment befOre the new animals are stock -ed. I (»e) understand that L.�ere must be no discbar3e or
zrL--nal waste frt,rl L^.e sioraee or anCliCation SVSLCM 'to SLLiaCe eaters of the state either direcdv t,;oucb a Ma ---ad:
con•:e..•an::t cr froc: a storm e-,ent less sever! than the 25-vear. 21 -hour storm and there Ltust not b} run-off. frc:, ,r
a.ciicati::: or a-nLmal wasie. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from loumzmn acid beavv use 2r22J r"u_: ce
r r.:Mize•d wins tecani al sprach rds dL- e!oc:d by the Natural Resources Conse^:arson Ser­.­,c.-. The accroved c!�� ... be
filed at th- farm a --d at the oftic: of the local Soil and ``eater Conse^, adon Diss ct- I (we% Imow
twat an., L ct+ificzr-on
must bz a_croved by a tezbniC31 sFecialist and submitted to the Soil and ''r'ate: Conse:-,adon Dist-:_: pr -Cr to
L.n -i- -'_Jon. ,: Ch3n�e In 12 U ownershl^ requires uTaen notific_tion to DWlf or ane:, cenificaL'tn (if LC a: -roved
Dian is coan;ed) within 60 d ays of a rade trartsr_.-.
Name of Land Owner : Lt"I l I ►GLY✓7 l.Vz't I lc -tom' ---
Signature: (_.a�
.Name of Manager,ir diffe:e:t: frern olvner):
Si�nature:
Date: 3 . 1T- �- %
Date:

fiJ
4�v NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 13, 1998
William Waller
2975 N Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Notice of Deficieny
Animal Operation Site Inspection
15A NCAC 2110.0217 (d)
Waller Dairy, Facility #: 80-28
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Waller:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 7,
1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is being issued as a
Notice of Deficiency (NOD) for exceeding the number of cows allowed in the open holding
lots. 5�B &7
Specifically, Mr. Johnson was informed thaK cows (dry cows and replacement heifers)
I were being held in the open lot behind the milk parlor. Your certified plan states the
maximum number of animals to be held in this ar Is 50 a certified farm, your facility is
found to be noncompliant pursuant to Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2H
1.0217 (d).
It is requested that you provide this office with a corrected copy of your waste
application records by April 26, 1998. Please mail the copy to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
Also as discussed with Mr. Johnson, the additional land tracts used for waste application and
=3 cover crops (corn, wheat, etc...) need to be added to your waste utilization plan. Please
contact your technical specialist for assistance.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
M.
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.0 BOX 29578, RALEIGH, NC 27626-0578 - 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, INC, 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX 919.715-O5ae
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50%p RECYCLED110 POST -CONSUMER PAPER

o�oF w A rF9pG
r
William Waller
2975 N Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject:
Dear Mr. Waller:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. RosS, Jr.,Secratary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 16, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Waller Dairy, Facility #: 80-28
Rowan County., NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspeetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions, If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
466
411'-'D�1�t
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson
Environmental Specialist II
Customer service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE (7D4) 663-1699
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

State of North Carolina LTZRWA
Department of Environment RECEIVEIT 00IA*
and Natural Resources _
Division of Water Quality MAR 0 9 2001 � w
Michael F. Easley, Governor AND NATNC DEPT.� AL RESOURCES
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary MOORESVILLEREGIONAL OFFICE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Kerr T. Stevens, Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 7, 2000
WILLIAM WALLER
WALLER DAIRY
2975 N ENOCHVILLE AVE
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Subject: Application No. AWC800028
Additional Information Request
Waller Dairy
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Waller:
Thank you for your call this morning, I can understand your confusion regarding updating your
Certificate of Coverage (COC). I have reviewed your past application, inspection records, and COC,
and it appears that you will need to complete and send me the following items to update your COC. I
have done my best to highlight items for you to complete and have put sticky notes to help guide your
progress. As soon as you send us this updated information, we can process a revision to your current
Certificate of Coverage AWC800028.
Please address the following by May 7, 2000:
1. Please complete the enclosed form called, "CERTIFICATION AMENDMENT FOR
CATTLE FACILITIES." Make 2 copies. Keep 1 copy, and send the original and 1 copy
to us.
2. Please complete the enclosed form called, "ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
CERTIFICATION." I have enclosed a copy of your OLD form, to assist you and your
technician, in completing the NEW form. Make 2 copies. Keep 1 copy, and send the
original and 1 copy to us.
3. Please provide 2 copies of your NEW Waste Utilization Plan (WUP).
4. Please provide 2 copies of the waste application field maps used for ALL the fields listed
in your NEW Waste Utilization Plan. These need to be clearly marked, by highlighting
each field and writing in the field number and field acreage.
5. Please write me a note regarding the confinement and pasturing times for your both your
milk herd and heifers. For example: "Milk cows -100% confined -12 months of year" and
"Heifers -3 months confined, 9 months on pasture. " Sign and date this note. Make 2
copies. Keep 1 copy, and send the original and 1 copy to us.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 80-0028
William Waller
Page 2
Please reference the subject permit applicationgnumber when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed; sealed;+and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the
nArlracc halnw
NCDENR-Non Discharge Permitting Unit (attn: Theresa Nartea)
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid
permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, and will subject you to the
enforcement authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
-Also, in my review of your past records, I found a copy of the June 20, 2000 letter regarding
Aian Johnson's inspection, where he noted that freeboard records and your COC were not available for
his review. As a service to you, I have provided you with a freeboard record keeping sheet and copy of
your COC. This is to assist you with complying with the weekly monitoring of your storage pond
volume levels. Also, you will need to keep your COC copy with your Waste Utilization Plan records in
the future. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], ext. 375.
Good Luck. Look forward to seeing your farm information. }
Sincerely,
Theresa N a�
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc:/IVloory,esville Regional.Office,._W.ater,_Quality,?
Permit File

=OF W A Tipp II+IIcFia l . Bagley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
> North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 6, 2001
Waller Dairy
2975 N. Enochville Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Waller Dairy, Facility #: 80-28
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Waller:
Mr, Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on January 31, 2001. Based
on his observations during the inspection, the facility appeared to be well maintained; and the records were
complete. However, sorghum needs to be included in the farm plan as one of the crops receiving animal waste.
Also, be sure that the soil analysis of the waste application fields includes copper and zinc. Enclosed please
find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
As discussed with Mr. Johnson, please contact your technical specialist to have your permit and certified
farm plan indicate the correct number of animals that are to be maintained at the facility. Currently the forms
indicate that the maximum capacity is 175 animals.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
663-1699
1 800 623-7748
663.6040
PHONE (704)
FAX (704)

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit �9 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or Visit: I 3LjLCf_z) Time: /P; G
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted © Certified E3 Conditionally Certified El Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
s!�Farm Name: .�'.r� .....................1..!:.................................................... County: ......... . 7 --Ci ..................... .......................
4
Owner Name:..........ir .�.1 ...... � L'4� .... Phone No:..........`Z.......z21s . .............................
FacilityContact: ................................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address:. Cl... ,.�_- �.....sK`12.�?L..L2.�r:.��1�------- a.k................��.i�?..%�.�.4..►..L�� ........................... �...�.�5........
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................................................... Integrator: .......................................................................................
Certified Operator:......(,. + :: ......... ...... Lu��„ ........ Operator Certification Number. �
Location of Farm:
❑❑ y ❑ ❑ Latitude 1 • 3 • ��� Longitude U • �6 �•4
Swine . Poultry Cattle Horse
Design - Current
Swine' Canacity Ponulation -
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current DesignCurrent
Poultry_ Ca acity Po pulation CattleCa acity Population
❑ Layer JaDairy I ij i 5
❑ Non -Layer I JE] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ; ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &: Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. If dischar�: e is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If _yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 9_N0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? . ❑ Yes E2Wo
01/01/01 Continued

Facili N .. "Date�of Inspection
Waste Collin & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes PNo
Struure 1 Structure 2 ' Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: -f - ----------- ........ ...... ................. . .. ............. .................................... ..... . .... . . . ......... . ......... . .................................
Freeboard(inches)_ - ............St..... ................ ............ 4 ....... ........... .............. ............. ........ ....................... ............... ................. .................... ................................. ...
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
RNo
seepage, etc,)
❑ Yes
&No
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ Yes
tl4go
closure plan?
❑ Yes
OXNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an.
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
B Voo
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
FLNo
B. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
0No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level
Yes
�` No
elevation markings?
❑
;ED -No,
Waste Application
❑ Yes
;PLNO
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ YestZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
RNo
12. Crop type b Al u
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designat d in the Certified Animal Waste M agement Plan (CAWMP)?
Yes
�No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
&,No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
AS No
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
KNo
17, a rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
&No
18. there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
tl4go
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage. & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
B Voo
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? .
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
L No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
Din
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
;ED -No,
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
;PLNO
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
Ef No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
j$.No
26. Does facility require afollow-up visit by same agency? ❑YesNo
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AMP? El ®,No
W
/jNor Issues
2
'Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ENo
0I/01/0j Continued

Printed on-,--1/4/20C)1--
30.
n: 1/4/2001-
30. _15 there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue an neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
Toids, building structure, and/or public property) .
31. 1s the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shuticrs, etc.) ❑ Yes 5jrNo
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 4No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (referio quest+on#Z. 'lain'an Y $Fanswers nc7/or niysecammendabons r anyloilie� commentsk e� '
� y r
Use clrai Ings of facjliwto better�explain sr#uafaons (use ddibonal pages
k r,. Field Copy ❑ Final NoteA.s
z
h -e ✓+e a r t IZ�3 d 14 C r"5 Z d`�-
cQ�s�`�nin. C -r
�i
%l C er Lx 'cam /`� �►-1 ��'� ¢ f ,, ; - 17
vrn � t�-r- `Zug Co w f> t' S re�-ti►+r�� ��t-o✓
nn l/ PP
�
1rf�` G
v
J d C I"` Yl ee� S � b � c� c � �-'1 ; •J (•, r 5 h c�cU
wc�.S
i s,\ 4x -e— l -1 S a vi,
A' OIL a Le,
■ 1 �.� �C1 4 ✓� f• ] •
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: a. _ Date:
•
M1011nr

Facility Number, — 2�. Lagoon Number_ Lagoon Identifier "r,
••S..
ctive O Inactive Latitude 00� ..Longitude
-
9
By GPS or Map? UGPS ❑ Map GPS file number:
35. Surface Area (acres): _ /9, 1 4
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream: O less than 300 ft X300 ft -1000 ft O greater than 1000 t;
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
❑ On-site $Off-site
39. Distance to WS or HQW (miles):
40. Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent -
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater.encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spillway?
45. Adequate Marker? -
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
O Yes ►A No
0<5 b5-10 -010
O Yes S(No O Unknown
O Yes O'No O Unknown
O Yes RNo O Unknown
O Yes PNo O Unknown-�-----
kUnknown---------
Yes O No _ 11 O
Yes O No
Yes O No
If
3s 3 z 71 -
�0 qca s(.c,
.P%
R 19 `'
Ln � 33 27
65

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 30, 1999
WILLIAM WALLER
WALLER DAIRY
2975 N ENACHVILLE AVE
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
N C
NORTH CARO INA DEf+AR1 .q, y }
E=NVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURi&l
Oran 6 1999
Subject: Application No. AWC800028
Additional Information Request
Waller Dairy
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
Dear William Waller:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by October 30, 1999:
1. Please provide lagoon capacity documentation (design, as -built calculations, etc.). Be sure to include any
site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable.
2. Please provide an Operation and Maintenance Plan.
3. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to be implemented at this facility should be identified (check
the appropriate BMPs) on the Insect Control Checklist and on the Odor Control Checklist.
4. Please indicate the method by which mortalities will be handled on the Mortality Management Checklist.)
5. Please provide an Emergency Action Plan.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before October 30, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincerely,
Su an CauIey
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

i�
�FK.y1 St u el- C
' JAMES B. -HUNT JR..
GOVERNOR
nrh
William Waller
r;
2975 N. Enochville Ave.
.
"8I LL'HOL MAN
Mooresville, NC 2$115
SECRETARY
Dear Mr. Waller:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 20, 2000
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Certificate of Coverage #: AWC800028
Waller Dairy, Facility #: 80-28
Rowan County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
June 15, 2000. In general the facility appeared to be in good shape and your records
complete. However, it was noted that the Certificate of Coverage and records of the
storage ponds liquid levels were not available for review. Therefore, this letter is
being issued as a Notice of Deficiency (NOD). The permit requires that the waste
level in the storage ponds be monitored and recorded weekly. Please refer to Section
III of your permit for more information. Enclosed please find the inspection report,
which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Regional Coordinator
File
VA. N CR'1_A`Ey
2 D 1 D
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

13 Division _of Soil and Water.Conservation - Operation Review 2.
Yi�L"
3Divssioiavf Soil and Water Conservation- CompliancelCaspeebon r-�� �-• `'
Division o'f' iter Quality - Compliance 3nspectiota
—O em o eyr`=�1> �. mss:• x . L
Q Other Age�cY lP. n Re -6 _; ��y::�*•�in
kSLRoutine OComplaint O Follow-up of'DNA'Q inspection O Folioµ -up orDSWC review O Other
Facility Number Dateuf'inspection
E Time or Inspection /,3'Or} 24 hr. (hh:mm)
-'Permitted .Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ['j Registered ❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm \am:':......................+{L
am./................. .................---•--.--........ Count) :.............. +-CL�..
.................. -........... .........
Owne.. dame- �. L L `L Ct.lc`-.�� t.Phone No: .....ns -- .Z _...........
..
FaciiitrContact:...--•........................................................................Title:........-...........--......................--.................. Phone No:
-
i 'taiunj! Address: ....... jj ....... II ` ......
Onsite Representative:... ``.1..............5,, .i Integrator: ...................................................................................._
ell.........
Ce: ifted Operator: ..... ��?.t..f L.1. `L"4 ............. ....................... Operator Certification Number:....
............
Loxff!Ion of Farm:
atitupe 1• ,' �" Longitude k�• �' �`
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Cavacity Population
j� N can io Fecdcr I I ?J Laver
1❑ F eget to Finish I I ILI Non -Lase- I 1
Farrow to Wean 1
I� Farrow to Feeder 1
rJ F� ow to Finish I 1
I:D Gilts 1
IE] Boars I I
Other I I
..................................................................t t
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
ate. 1/79-1
![] Non -Dairy I I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons Q Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Ld000n Area 1❑ Spray Field Area
Roiding Ponds / Solid Traps 11:3 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges S: Stream impacts
1. is an_, discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge orizinatc� at: ❑ L moon j i Spray Field 71 Other
a. if discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
o. If dis.aargc is oscned, tiid it rcac . Watc- of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ)
Yes ❑ No
z, 1' dis,_-harue is observed. what is the estimated flo,,AT in tal/min?
c. Does aischarrtc bypass a lagoon svctcm? (if v;a. T106 I'%, D«VQ) Yes ❑ No
Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the vp-_ration" ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were :mere an' adverse imva:u5 or potentia] adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 71 Yes ❑ No
V astt• Colleytion & Treatment
=. is sic -ane caoa•`ity (freeboard oius storm storage) less than adeauate? `K Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure i Structure 2 Stru:iure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
iucnti f Fc-: 01 k J
Fr:ci�c� r i im:het;...........'`..f...l7 .............................7 ............. .............. .................... ............. ........................ ....... _............................ ....................................
r. Are .a_.e any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,Yes No
seepa_e, et--.)
�;3�rcw Cnnrinued on back

f•
.cility dumber: �tj .?� _– Date of Inspection Printed ()n: 4/24/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, []Yes NNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? - ❑ Yes ZNo
(If anv of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes gNo
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, eauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
♦':ratite Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9LNo
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
J, No
12.
Crop type — G.i �Ertir cci)c­', �� 5 tum
-
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
�No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
13.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
(*No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JkNo
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
EkYes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, en maps, etc.)
Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard; waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
gNo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
0 N10
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
O'No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
K o
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
R1 No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�I0
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWIYIP?
❑ Yes
KNo
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building -to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
J�;4No
28.
Is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
�ANo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
0 Yes
)K�No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
KNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number: G — 2S Date oHnspectlon
Odor Issues
26. Doe discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or iahon aTt io discharge at/or below ❑Yes ❑ No
liquid leve on or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals no i osed of properly within 24 ho
2$. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land app ' n? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public propert
29. Is the land application spray system i x not located near the liquid surface ia�-oon?
30. Were any major maintenan roblems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken ran be ssing or
or broken fan blade(s) i operable shutters, etc.)
3l. Do the animal ced storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes '9,No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Ycs ❑ Nu
❑ Yes %Z�J No
❑ Yes �aNu
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
k
`
ie P to,- r G C O
3123199

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
WILLIAM WALLER
WALLER DAIRY
2975 N ENACHVILLE AVE
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Dear William Waller:
rvd:. I1Eer. ts;b
ENVIRONMENT,
& NATURAL R,F,�_A1AKR3
JAN 24 —
MrslD -b 1�fViR tHAEMMiII IarlHnsr �l�
1100RE�YILiE RNCDENR
�0101At OFF1f;
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCES
January 18, 2000
Subject: Application No. AWC800028
Additional Information Request
Waller Dairy
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by February 17, 2000:
1. Please provide a clearer map that identifies (outlines or highlights) and shows the acreage for each field to
be used for waste application as listed in the Waste Utilization Plan (WUP).
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before February 17, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a vio!auon of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
;n4y,san Cauley
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
William Waller
Waller Dairy
2975 N Enachville Ave
Mooresville NC 28115
Dear William Waller:
4 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONiVENT AND NATLB&f.R URCES
t4LGONM, 117'Nu Y-4
December 30, 1999 ATu�.1 R��ir�c
04 5 ?qac
ol514o Of FoRO 0111 mom l 4 k
oa
s44WSMII
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 80-28
Rowan County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional�Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
WilliamE: Holman, Secretary
William Waller
2975 N Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Waller:
1 � �
��-•k -�
__ - __ __ k
NCDENR
I�-�
NC* n'M CAROUNA DEMWMEWr Or
F wkammEwr AND NA -URAL PXBOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 13, 1999
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection .Report
Waller Dairy, Facility #: '40-28
Rowan County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office coisducted a site inspection of your facility on;October 12, 1999.
In general, the facility was -in good shape. Please note that during many of:Mr..Johnson's inspections he
has noted that some farms are often missing one or more components of the farm.plan that should be
available for review. The following items must be available for review by the -inspector during the
inspection:
`Certification forms.
• :Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
• -Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and'irrigated fields.
Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number , usable/wettable acres (not necessarily total
acreage), ,Iist.of crops, PAN:required, and amount of waste produced -by livestock.
Waste.and'Soil analysis information. Must have three.years of,data.
Itis suggested that.this,be maintained in a single -folder.
• Emergency Action Plan, which must be posted.
•
Insect,: Odor -Control, and Mortality -Checklists mustbe-completed.
Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have.the above components available and complete.could result ina Notice -of Violation
or other. enforcement actions. Also,.Temember that waste applications should -be made -during .the time -the
crop can utilize the.nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be applied no earlieuthan 30.days
prior.to planting. .
If you .:have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson -or
meat [phone].
Sincerely
D. 'Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: -File
919 -North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%.recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number Date of Inspection
L— Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:m
13 Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated:
Ak 113 Not Oper ..........................
FarmName: .... . ... ........... ................................ ...................... county: ........................ ......................
Owner Name: ...... %..Ck-Vk .. .......... .... k�.A..-'.'AcAel . .......................
... J�," Phone No: -132.= .... 2-.qJ'V
FacilityContact:............................................................................... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
- 4
Mailing Address: ... ...... ...... ed4 ...... ...MauceI4.uate.............................. g...ko
Onsite Representative: ... P. 1 1114. 0.1 ............ A . . ................................. Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:, ........... •...................... Operator Certification Number:,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,•„•,,,•,•„
j-1w"Iro-n of Farm:
L......................................................................... : .......... .......................... ............................... * ............ * .......
..................I............ ............................ . . . . . . . . . . . ...............................................
u d-e
Longitude
DSign Curr�it:-��'l�
1,1���Desi gnC
urrent
j.ADesign,. Current ,1
Swin Capacity Population.
,Poultry''�CaOacity-poptdation
Cattle -Capacity Populal ion
Wean to Feeder
❑E]
❑ Layer
Da iry
Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
0 Farrow to Wean
E] Farrow to Feeder
Other
❑ Farrow to Finish'
Total Capatity
Gilts,
W
❑ Boars
Discharee- & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? D Yes k No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field [I Other
41
i. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-made? E] Yes E] No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifycs, notify DWQ) [] Yes [:] No
c. - If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (Ifycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: 61 A kj e--3 tal
;V%4k PW —
Freeboard(inches): ........... ............... ................ 6-'e ........... .................................... ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
[] Yes ❑ No
El Yes No
El Yes �lo
❑ Yes � No
Structure 6
E] Yes AND
Continued on back

904
V
I
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes J( No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ja No
❑ Yes 54 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes t No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes XNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes X.No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes %�P No
[:]Yes ljo No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes RjNo
❑ Yes Z No
[-]Yes ).No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes fR No
❑ Yes FONo
Ell,
?9b .yiolatiggs'or- dg#jciencies *ere h(A.ed• riot g 4 is'visit' • :Y;oi� willl �eetriye fid, fu�tit�r... • .
icorres oriderrce. aoulw this visit
oraF :e E 'yoerrcamments ,.Vp
Gomments�(referttoEquestrint#) , Explam�ariy'YFS�ansrvers'and/riy,reconxmendat�onsry ork:any th'�,415
i �.� t �'. ...�:.- {�•.iy x. �..._ €;-.. 9li t$:.i• ,'h �S€111'x:1 iIEj !{11 ivi §'':t
Uselurawings of facility to,better,,explain stttiatl-On$ (use.additi6nallpages as necessary) .rt1,,1> tt Is4p taljl,. ,a 11g1� 4 K=i::E'1 E3I },i g
;' �
. �..�.iilix,'. 1i. ..!•ten
E t ..,:' t SSE S i,." - 14 F - i a.,i JM1I,F Y'� U "I!x k. -.4 _. !t'..�1
ril ar 4IrM1<Si n1: 4 $:,3.
,�/ /
�e-,-* k� wv. Gil GX 0" v.42- te— J L r �..vy PJ- +-,b
�
12,n-e,,7e_eiey C1 GA11)IL (C- it
`1)
J, c7 h
ReviewerlInspector Name
Reviewer/11 nspec tor Signature: Date:
3123199

Facility Number: — 2 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues wo 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atfor below E]Yes'.
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ANo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes�'�V0
roads, building structure, and/or public property) I ,,
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes A No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes J&JNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes -el No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes -0� No
itiona omments`and ar ruwtn s 6;' k ,
t
J
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 14, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN REC IP REQUESTED
William Waller
Waller Dairy
2975 N Enachville Ave
Mooresville NC 28115
Farm Number: 80 - 28
Dear William Waller:
1916f,WA
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE50URCE5
You are hereby notified that Waller Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply for
coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has
six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
for
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
Sincerely f'
r'
Kerr T. Stevens
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

:NCDENR
. JAMES S. HUNT JR-,.,,
.GOVERNOR T" ��
eY _
WAYNE MCDEVIrr
•:7. -SECRETARY �C?'.'.:}. ji: -.._.
William Waller
2975 N Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Waller:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 23, 1998
Subject: Site Inspection
Waller Dairy, Facility #: 80-28
Rowan County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MoOREsVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 18
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNIYY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/1 0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Ib
Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen M A=lication for Gammonroes:
• Small Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (112) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (112) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453;000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analvsis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
. Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

LI
Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the intern et. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to $) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should.be refrigerated if it isotot going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
pi6aucer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
C
D. Rex Gleason, P. E. \S
til Water Quality Regional Supervisor

r
w '
s'rm SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
q�lilo 6 g Field # -�
--;- 5- Al 0 C, K P I'J (-e— 4 v
N4 r e- ,'l t e ^J G'" SJ/�
Facility Number
Spreader Operator . , " ' .� " l e
Spreader Operator's
Address j
Operators Phone # 5 x�
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (Ib/acre) = (8)
(11 (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
rut
(8)
Date
mrTVdd/yr)
# of Loads Per Field
t
Volume of Loads
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gal/ac)
(4) + (A)
Waste Analysis i
PAN(lb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
x (ib/a+)
l(5) (6)1 1.000
Nitrogen Balance 3
1 lblac)
3- /D
C,
35c)
70,600
5-0
r.
" 60
ao0
5 00 d
5 6 a0
�7
!08 00
00
a5--9$
v a
a 8 a
s d o 0
3-3
�. a
6-1 7
DO
o D
� r �Oil
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Vj M - // -eo-\
Operator's Signature
J,, L1
Operator Certification # p
:an be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
:ee your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required within 60 days of land application events.
anter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (13). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

Form IRR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
/3— !' Field #
' GmoGA V Ile-
- 9 3�- 9-9 /
Facility Number I q c>
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address S
Operators Phone # �1-A i �
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Recommended PAN
Crop Type �� 5 Loading (lblacre) = (B) / o — _,00
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (n (8) (9)
(10) (11)
Owner's Signature ice' u:c.�, , „. C .
Certified Operator (Print) �/ / f /�/�t C.
Operator's Signature
Operator Certification # -2/ p p d
See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each application event.
Irrigation
Date
(mmlddlyr)
Start Time
(hr. -min)
End Time
(hr:min)
Total Minutes
(3)-(2)
#'of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gal/min)
Total Volume
(gallons) e
4
O O (6)
Volume Per
At 7 + (A) c)
(�) {A)
r
Waste Analysis
PAN (Ib/1000 gal)
PAN Applied Nitrogen Balance
x (Ib/a}) (lb/ac)
I{8) (g)) 1,000 (B) - (10)
— 31-97
i; oo AM
; 6 pbL
3o D
3•
/ d h
o
S
/S
3 11 9�.�
n
^•' vA
.OD/Iv
33®
3
/Op
Dr70
E
i
E
Crop Cycle
Totals
Owner's Signature ice' u:c.�, , „. C .
Certified Operator (Print) �/ / f /�/�t C.
Operator's Signature
Operator Certification # -2/ p p d
See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each application event.

r
'IV NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
April 13, 1998
William Waller
2975 N Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Notice of Deficieny
Animal Operation Site Inspection
15A NCAC 2H 0.0217 (d)
Waller Dairy, Facility #: 80-28
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Waller:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 7,
1998. Based on the. observations made during the inspection, this report is being issued as a
Notice of Deficiency (NOD) for exceeding the number of cows allowed in the open holding
lots.
Specifically, Mr. Johnson was informed that 80 cows (dry cows and replacement heifers)
were being held in the open lot behind the milk parlor. Your certified plan states the
maximum number of animals to be held in this area is 50. As a certified farm, your facility is
found to be noncompliant pursuant to Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2H
.0217 (d).
It is requested that you provide this office with a corrected copy of your waste
application records by April 26, 1998. Please mail the copy to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
Also as discussed with Mr. Johnson, the additional land tracts used for waste application and
cover crops (corn, wheat, etc...) need to be added to your waste utilization plan. Please
contact your technical specialist for assistance.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex GIeason,P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
AJ
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O Box 29578, RALEIGH, NC 27626.0578 - 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC, 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
EDivision of Water Quality
ff-Routine O Complaint '0 Follow-up of DIVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC' review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection :
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified [3 Applied For Permit © Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name:............tr....... i County: ...... Q]..r�!'1s...... :::.................... .......................
.................... ...............................
Owner Name: / �'3L — 9 (.......................................
...........�..�.�./.���x-�..........��1„�..........................................: Phone No:...........,.................,�-:.........
Facility Contact: .. Tit.le: ...................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address - /
Onsite Representative:_ ,W J116 Gi�l`........... C�-� At'r...................................... Integrator: .............................................................................
Certified Operator:.........1,&.-am...... ................moo J. E�.... ...... Operator Certification Number, .......... ......... .
Location in Farm. 7
,r,crtiZ....r�.,• e� :.,rXh/l ...�a ...........,: 1.7.g rl ../.. .. ........ .,c-� . t<t:l. �......
� e ....... 's . ,................. ..w�.�.......:ca.� ...................../...
.......... ..I....s�.a ...../....... - ...................
Latitude �Sf • �6 =11 ;' Longitude ' ©' ="
me
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Soars
;n CurrentDesign °` ,Current r. E Des
ity ;Population, Patiltry :Capacity Population Cattle fiCap#
❑ Layer airy / "7
Subsurface Drains Present Ji[J Lagoon Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon' ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagpon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ,
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125147
❑ Yes [],No
❑ Yes . p.No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes �R'No
❑ Yes 'E}IVo
❑ Yes Vlo
Continued on back

Facility Number:
• 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding funds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
_Structure. 1 Structure 2
Identifier:
..... ......
Freeboard (ft), ........... ...............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes < No
Strucun•e 5 Structure 6
Yes `� No
❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes J� No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste _App l ica t i on
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? ❑ YesX No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ,�.11 1.4........ f t.l./ 1.................................................................................................................................................................... :..................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Wastc Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes luNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes )ONo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ANO
No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes XNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes XINO
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes y No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? El Yes ANo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only'
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ONo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW,MP? ❑ Yes ( ] No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes No
0, No.violations-or deFciencies were'notedduring this.visit..You.W'ili receive no further.'
correspondence iib:oiit this, visit'..'.",
Cotiiittxents (refer to; question #) glExplain any YDS answers andlor any recotnmendaftons or any other conments ,
UseArawings dfie to;t etter`eieprrlain situations {usc additional pages as.necessary) F t
r �Gt n ee�5 �z3 vt tr atni rrvta� ��h art' - pkG V
SS ��n.1• r.1-� ,
S �\�� ©�T� Cc�.+rrc,��y �� i � A �p�}�. `ire �1k►n1l
.�-
r
sLw�
lk
J
wq, m � ✓` J. �ffe, r { oCJS
{
t e Zct, c�/l \QVC !/I� CCS f'e1Jt S� G\ krl er ` c 4 T ct7A
4. S �
7125197
Reviewer/inspector Name . �.. F a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
William Waller
2975 N Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Waller:
1D1HHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 27, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Waller Dairy, Facility #: 80-28
Rowan County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on August 25, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. The facility was in good shape. However, you need to ensure that all forms pertaining to
the application of waste are properly filled out.
Please contact the Natural Resource Conservation Service to modify the acreage and identify
the crops used for waste applications. Also, request that it be made clear which waste utilization plan
is for the replacement heifers and which pertains to the milk cows.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Rowan County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex GIeason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Main Street, N0 A FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 f An Equal Opportunity(Afrmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
N
2 ��DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection f
totltine O Complaint Q Follow -u2 of MV0 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date 01 Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection. 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:......." ..................
Farm Narne.. W CJI -e r ....... County: csy.N .. ................I .......................
Owner Name:........�.t.. �f ........... (���Y...................... Phone No: ...............................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:.,................ .................................... Phone No:...................................................
N. -tailing Address:.. 7.s .......1: e ...... . ........ ,�.,I. ,z C>.s,fi. . �le.................................. ° ..g .��. s......
OnsiteRepresentative ............................. .................................. grator:......................................................................................
%............................................ Into
Certified Operator;....1................... .�'................................. Operator Certification Number :.....,-2.j.�.C?.�1..............
Location Of FSrm: v4Lj S-2
..,r�4.,rt.�l.....:c,l•......t.'.l... �s...�'.�:..........tr?...........�.1.......3..5�....`....�.��..�,cxL...P,d�........�....�.a�....>3.�..1.......I��.z4�.�:.�.i.►.�
...........fr- �.......... .......Y....1n!�s.........a....I:Z......i.s.l..�...............�� t� ...c........? .........................................
Latitude LTJ• Longitude �• �' Ut]
Swine Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver Dairy %
❑ Non -Laver I❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design CapacityI /,7 s
Total SSLW f ;>qS 6rzT)
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ID Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon.�rea ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation" ❑ Yes KNo
Dischanze originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischar_e is observed. was the convevance man-made' ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If dischar-,e is obscned. dill it reach Surface Water'? (lf ycs. notify D%VQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. Ifdischaree is observed. what is the estimated flow in alhnjn?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a dischar4_e'?
Cl Yes
Wo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding, ponds) require
❑ Yes
54 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
❑ Yes
'tA No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
❑ Yes
UkNo
7125/97
Continued on back

b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
%fructltres (Lagoons and/or Holding. Pouts)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I tr e 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes ['kNo
❑ Yes [,TNa
❑ Yes .IgNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure S Structure h
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
R'aste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters
of the State, notify DWQ) f
15. Crop type ?Ylc1..,_.... .......... NY r.6../.r. i�.l........... 1�..�� C...t�'?.............—..'.V...b.�G.:.^....
15. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
Fgr Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes U No
❑ Yes [3(�p
❑ Yes P(No
P Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 1�(No
❑ Yes [*No
❑ Yes QQio
Q Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
qNo
❑ Yes
W'o
❑ Yes qNo
❑ Yes Q'No
EkYes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
"rAi
(0) 14�� 11kII d.j P;�e-1a'S �1ci ��r'h
I4
re ce4z fir �-11�
' � 6. .
t/ CldJ.
CV -V 'Ir-ek ire. s{�C'C,�iec�
it c�^t� eLc"v%c`
'Ir6L'e.Y'� Qf 't_V �i �CvnS -�+ WCiJ�
7
kTa li GCC.+1 S4i1
©11`i rG�, Lc[4�t/1-2 it��'y �.is
Cna�net sws J
f�
p Xer- r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewerllnspector Signature:
Date: y—Zlo—j-�>
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, FaWty Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
William Waller
2975 N Enochville Ave.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Waller:
e�
�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Waller Dairy, Facility #: 80-28
Rowan County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes'(but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 !North Main Street, If
�
� FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 C An Equal Oppertunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 500/6 recyc!ed/ 100% post -consumer paper

A
Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Rowan SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D.
Water Quality gional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, FA
Health and Natural Resources0
7 &71 i
A0ft% 20
James B. Hunt, Governor
BHowes,Q E H N
Jonathan , Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
N.C. DEPT. OF
William Waller ENVIP0N.v1T:,N `, HEALTH,
Waller Dairy 8l NATURAL Rf S, )Ui; (-,[%S
2975 N Enachvdle Ave
Mooresville NC 28115
DEC 17 1995 .
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Waller Dairy DIVISION OF ENYIRONP.19TAl
Facility ID #: 80-28 MOORESYD.IE REMNAI OFFICE
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Wailer:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. if you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
Ulf
FOR Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System ` WiMA � Voice 919-733-0026. FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commisslon% V An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Ralelgh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
yr Facility No.�jl
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: JJCf , 1995
Farm Name/Owne
Mailing Address:
Time: 1 D
County: P&tkO04, Integrator: --- phone:
On Site Representative: f2;11 jal/44 Phone:
Physical Address/Location: 6 cr fiL d. S' e2de
Type of Operation: Swine—Poultry­ Design Capacity: l?SNumber of Animals on Site: lt)
Latitude:
Longitude:
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: -L -Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or6� Was any erosion observed? Yes or(9
Is adequate land available far spray? a or No Is the cover crop adequate? r No v
Crop(s) being utilized:
G
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 9br No
100 Feet from Wells? *es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? fes of
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or l�
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oro If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? ff-w'or No
Additional Comments: Gaed .. 6 Aaee ra,
Inspector Name �D Les Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit

aFwarF
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
� f North Carolina Department ott�Qorlment and Natural Resources
g v�rc�t�ttl;�Af(i
O Ai4fr0l�n`+Ar=Kiuri; ,Director
S f�LE5f, sla�l; Vl�1 11t uality
P"` b
January 17, 2003
William Waller
Waller Dairy
2975 N Enochville Ave
Mooresville NC 28115
JAN 2 2 2003
l�
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800028
Waller Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Rowan County
Dear William Waller:
In accordance with your modification request received on July 17, 2001, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to William Waller, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval
shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from
the Waller Dairy Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no greater than 125 dairy cows and
75 heifers and the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC800028 dated May 17, 2000, and shall be subject to the conditions and
limitations as specified therein.. Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in
conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this
COC, with no discharge of wastes to surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the
required monitoring data and operational information must be established.for this farm. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number
authorized by this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COG's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWO prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http:/lh2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu N ENR
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NG 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone 1 B00 623-7748
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10%, post -consumer paper

4�
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality Staft
may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
RowanCounty Health Department
",,MooresvilWRegional=Office,_Water-Gt�_ality_Section_
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

Sep - 13-01 08.07A Rowan SWCD 704 647-9714 P.01
1
Natural Resource Conservation Service
,727 C Old Concord Road
Salisbury, North Carolina 28146
Tei: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Fax Cover Sheet
DATE:
September 13, 2001
TIME:
TO:
Theresa Nartea
PHONE:
D W O
FAX:
FROM:
Bruce Rider
PHONE:
USDA-NRCS
FAX:
RE:
Hill Wailer WUP
CC:
9:50 AM
919-733-5083 X-375
919-715-6048
704-637-0783
704-647-9714
Number of pages Including cover sheet:
Message
Enclosed is the information you requested concerning Bill Waller Dairy. Please not that waste for milk
cows was figured on 75`7: confinement rather than 100% since they spend time out in the lot and on pasture.
Hope this helps
Bruce

5
� Sep -13-01 08:07A Rowan SWCD 704 647-9714 p,O2
ri '
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 125 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs. and a feed lot for
75 Heifer with an average animal live weight of 1000 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
125 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 75 M confinement
time) = 718.594_ gallons of waste/year.
75 animals x 1.1 ( W/daylcow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 50 (% confinement
time) = 15,056 W, of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAtD Produced Per Year
125 animals x 76 lbs. N/animaVyr = 9,500 lbs. Total N
75 animals x 52 lbs. N/animaVyr = 3,900 lbs. Total N
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 13,400 lbs. Total N
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
91

CA
WASTE
Ul'I LI ZATION PLAN TABLE I i
to
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
REALISTIC YIELD Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES
Lbs, N Utilized
N
1573
1
PCB2
Corn Silage
1S 110
14.2
1,562
1
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
14,2
1,065
1
PCB2
Say Beans
30 100
14.2
1,420
coG
2
Pc82
Corn Silage
15 110
10.2
1,122
2
Pc82
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
10.2
765
0
2
PcB2
Soy Beans
30 100
10.2
1,020
coD
3
PCB2
Cord Silage
15 110
4
440
3
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
4
300
•
3
Pc82
Soy Beans
30 100
4
400
0
6A
PcB2
Corn Silage
15 110
12.5
1,375
W
6A
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
12.5
938
7
6A
PCB2
Soy Beans
30 100
12.5
1,250
In
f
1586
1
PC82
Corn Silage
15 110
8.8
968
n
1
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
8.8
660
0
1
PcB2
Soy Beans
30 100
8.8
880
2
ApB
Corn Silage
17 130
7.8
1,014
2
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8 95
7.8
741
2
ApB
SoyBn/ Sorg. Sillage
35 100
7.8
780
1587
1
ApB
Corn Silage
17 130
15.2
1,976
1
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8 95
15.2
1,444
1
ApB
SoyRnl Sorg, Sillage
35 100
15.2
1,520
1588
1
CeB2
Corn Silage
15 110
16.6
1,826
1
CeB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
16.6
1,245
1
CeB2
Soy Beans
30 100
16.6
1,660
3
PcB2
Corn Silage
15 110
2.4
264
V
Q
3
PCI32
Small Grain Silage
16,5 75
2.4
180
;a
3
PCB2
Soy Beans
30 100
2.4
240
4
Sao
Corn Silage
15 110
31.1
3,421
'
4
SaB
Small Grain Silage
6.5 75
31.1
2,333
J
4
Sao
Soy Beans
30 100
31.1
3,110
V
TOTAL
278.5
77,120
F+
TOTAL N PRODUCED per 2 YEAR rotation
24,200
NOTE:
When Sorghum silage is planted 280 units Nlac maybe applied.
52,920 lbs, decitt of N
(based on RYE of 7
tonslac and 409 Niton)
N requirements for double
cropped soybeans has been reduced by 200
U
Q
CJ

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN TABLE 1:
PRODUCERS NAME Bill Walter
Date: 6112100 12 '81",
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
REALISTIC YIELD Lbs.N per Ac.
ACRES
Lbs. N Utilized
990
1
ApB
Corn Sllage
17
130
13.4
1,742
1
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
13.4
1,273
1
ApB
Soy Beans
35
100
13.4
1,340
961
1
RnB
Corn Silage
15
110
1.7
167
1
RnB
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
1.7
128
1
RnB
Soy Beans
30
100
1.7
170
2
ApB2
Corn Silage
15
110
20.6
2,265
2
Ap82
Small Grain Silaue
8
95
20.6
1,957
2
ApB2
Suy Beans
30
100
20.6
2.060
3
ApB
Cum Silo(V!
17
130
25
'x.)!5()
3
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
25
2,315
3
ApB
Soy13n7 Sorg. Sillacle
35
100
25
2,500
1068
1 .
ApB
Corn Silage
17
130
7.7
1,001
1
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
7,7
732
1
ApB
Soy Beans
35
100
7.7
770
2
PcB2
Corn Silage
15`
110
34.1
3,751
2
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
34.1
2,558
2
Pc82
Soy Beans
30
100
34.1
3.410
1570
1
Pc132
Corn Silage
15
1110
16.7
1,637
1
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
16.7
1,253
1
PcB2
SoyBn! Sorg. Sillage
30
100
16.7
1,670
1571
2
Pc82
Fescue, Pasture
3
113
14.9
1,684
3
PcB2
Fescue, Pasture
3
113
4.4
497
4
PC82
Corn Silage
15
110
9.8
1,078
4
PCB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
9.8
735
4
PcB2
Soy Beans
30
100
98
980

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number O � Facility Name A'11l /e'. 621
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for Date of Ceniiication 7 "- / ` �,� 7
7e'yf �
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking �L
Dry caws
Heifers 7:�
Calves
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS�U !**
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicantn
Signature - �4�"!��1 Date
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature ✓ L Date
Technical Specialist [�
Signature /r� ( Date
Phone Number (ry-L)

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please t, -De or print all information that does not reauire a signature)
Existine " area = or E�Iiande":<.{171ease.crcEeane)
General Information:
Name of Farm: A)a t ✓ Faciiiry \o: �--
Ow•ner(s` Name: 11611-114 Il? vGGzJ{'�i _ Phone tio:
Mailing Address: 7S 2!�;i o c 17 l -4V Al6&)rz- V c
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: R6wR4-7
Latitude and Longitude: 35v 3� 30 f"I 'p° ref _.Q_0_ integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road ]nap with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names. directions milepost. etc.):
5
ODeration Descrintion:
Type of Sx•ire No. of Arim :ls
Z) Wean to Feeder
D Feeder to Finish
Zi Farrow to Wean
D Farrow to Feeder
J Far—,o%— to Finish
Z Gilts
s Boars
1� Z
Type of Poultry
Layer
u Pullets
No. of,#nimals
Type of Ca..le
'3 Dairy
..t Beef
Aro. of Animals
k , -75 hei!- 4-
Orher Type of Liverock: Number of Arirr.:ls:
F-7=+ opera.Plat& OKn :
De
Des:vr C,-�a rL.'
Acrea_ = A•: ailable for Application: 4100 Required -Ac eaM, 1 0
N=,ber of Lagoons ! Storage Ponds: Total Capacity: 147-,)�12-3 Cubic Fee: (ft-)
Are sub5ur`azce d,— s present on the farm: 1 ES or a (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurace drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAT' F ELD (please circle one)
* .. .a. a. a.... ... .. a. a. . a. .. .xx:...W .aea.--a.
Owner / tilana2er Agreement
1 ve_ify that L the above information is cored and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maincenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (tve) L -now that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage s stem or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Enyirom ental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) unden;,and that there must be no discharge of
animal wa to from the storage or application system "to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conve ante or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
apelicacon of animal .vaste, I (.ve) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging a -*id heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the -Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) 7mow• that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
impiemenu-tion. A change in land o%%mersbip requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is chinked) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner � �i�11 � � iar4 XVA
Signature: ) Date: _
Name of Manager(if different from owner): '
Signature: _ Date:
ANVC -- :august 1. 1997

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005. I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management
(DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) andlor the
North Carolina Soil and water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD, SI, W UP, RC, n, the technical specialist should only- certify parrs for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design
k the appropriate box
jF Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
I iNew, exnanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
-Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ 1R. -Ra?, �L
Aifilia.ion 1.15 D - NP r �S - Date `''ori
1 L lc�a Completed: -3-19-01
Phoeo.:��07rddress (.Age"ICY): C1- Y
63
Si��r:ar�re: Da:=- 3-- [°1-01
B.) Land Ayulication Site (`'k- P)
The plan provides for minimum sepal-adons (buffers): adequate amoum of land for waste utilization: chosen crop is
suimble for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): +t�C
Affiliation US DN —NPQCS Date Work Completed: 3- )9 -O �
T 4 -(037
Address (A. nc Z -7S A t i D O ! �4(� Pho :e tio.: 7d -6783
SicnatUre:_ Date: _x`19 4i
--C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate bee
r l Facility without exterior lots (SD or `VUP or RC)
This faciiity does not contain any exterior lou.
Facility %•ith exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by tiRCS.
tiame of Techrdcal Specialist (Please Print):�.t D ar a— _
1 :affiliation OSD I l Date Work Cor+cleted:
.�+ddress (. sen y): ��� I i 5 �UQ L l4 ro Phone No.: -704 - 3 7 -0� $
LSignature: Date: Z- d -b1
J
WC -- Augtist 1. 199%

L
D?. ADDlication and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriare box
Exirtinc or exnudim facility w•iLb existing waste ayvl,jeatinp eouioment (WEEP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing 'application equipment can coyer the area required by the pian at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient Ioading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
.I New. expanded. Qr existing facility without eyisting_wasZ g12plicauQ11 eauirstent fcr stray irrigation_ (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
pian at rates not to exceed either the specified bydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as pan of the plan). .
:J Ne-..extzanded or existing_facillLr without existinia wasta agglication eauirmept for land :preading_not using
4; -1 imzadon.. (u'-l•°P or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for tinting of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained. calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as pan of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print.):UC
Affil atlon US D1�- QCS Date Work Completed: 3-12—q
a s r_ �a •—r•� e+t r xt•4r•-t+ri�-e�--rt---
Adc cess G
1Q .aruri:
Phone `o.:7 04 " (o_37- 018.3
Da:'' —O
-E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Mortalitl NIanazernent and Emeraencv .action Plan (SD
SI. NN'L-P. RC or F)
Tae waste u:a-nagement plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Cbecklist. an Insect
Control Cbeck ist. a Mor -,alit: %Ianas=mint Citzcl:li_t and an Eameraency Action Plar.. Sources of both cdors and
ins, -,Ls have been ev.-='uated witb resect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Ma ^:einem Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included it the waste manazement plan. Both the
Mortalir: Manage-ment Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):, j 4CX Cr_ 'i c� GJQ
4L.fiLHaLonUsJb1tN_— NV -Cs Date Worti CompleLed:_ &
3
address (A¢enc�t s Phone
SiRnamre: _t -01
F) Written Notice of tie«- or Ex'aandina S%iine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expandirig swine farms that begin construction after June
31, 1996. If the facility- was built before June 31, 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (w•e) cen fv that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property o%,mers and al1 property owners
who ow -n property located across a public road. street_ or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of N'CGS 146-505. A copy of the notice and a list of rhe property owners notified is
attached. ► 4 i ,n
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of 1lanag-er (if different from owner):
Date:
Sicynature: Date:
WC -- August I. 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
Newy. expanded or retrofitted facility, (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, bare been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and.specificaLions.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Dame of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
/-A-
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B,) Land Application Site (VVUP)
Check rhe appropriare bar
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Z Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared forpianting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (moniL,day/vear); tte proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the waste u ti lization plan.
check this box if appropriate
cic in4 system as specified in the plan can not be established on nz'x'i-• cleared land withiz =G days
of r_his ce—Uflicadon. the o«ner has committed to esmblisa an interim crop for erosion control:
\apple of Technical Specialist (Please Print):- � IZUC1�� 1 Ex;4L _...
Afilliation U SrL> N •- NQ C S Date I;Vork Completed: -ig -01
Address (:�aencv): Z 7 I`]� Phone \o.: -164 ` (42;�;7-6 83
SignaZre: Date: 3— 6— al
This follo,,Ning signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above teas been checked.
I (we) cerdfy that I (%-e) have committed to establish the cropping system as spec'uied in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion-cont-roE. and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 1-5 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional cen.i.fication. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DELI.
.-Name of Land Owner:
Signature: ' Date:
Name of Mana,er Of different from owner):
Signature:
A%VC -- August 1. 1997 .4
Date:

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Faciliw with exterior Ions
Llethods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas hate been installed as specified
in the pian.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Marne of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ta. j� rZyC I_i D;eo _
Affiliation c.LS DA- N P—C-S Date Work Completed:_
Address (AQ nc �I Z D Phone No.: 104 -�-7-67 &3
Signarare• Date: _d
Anolication and Handling Equipment Installation (titi-LP orl)
eck thpropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as pan of the plan.
...1 Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been ins;art!ed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in
the conu-act agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adiustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
J Conditional approval: Animal waste application and h=ndUng equipment specifflled in the plan has
been purchased and. will be on site and instalied by (mondi/davlvers1; there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is instated and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the pian: and calibration and adjus=enc guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as pan of rhe plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): r i-�?c.x G,
Aft: `a• cn CSS D X - Date Work Corny leted:
Address (A
hone No.: 7 CA - Ce3-1 =6 7r"3
Lsi�:.� Date: 3-
The folio•,ina signature block is onl,,- to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) ce.tifti' that I (we) have commined to purchase the anim:z waste application and han%f2n_ equipment as
specified in rnt (our) wa.e management plan and will submit to DENT a ve::fication of deliver: and installation
from a Tec :ricwt Specialist xvithin 15 calendar days followinn the date spe ned in the condidorall certification. I
(n•a') realize that failure tc submit this ver-Ificat.ton is a violadon of the %vast! management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement acai n from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: _ Date:
Name of Manager (if differ. nt from owner):
Sionatture: Date:
E) Odor_ Controi._Insgct Control and MortaIity 1Ntan3zement (SD. ST. NV P. RC or I)
Methods to cont'ol odors a_nd insects as specified in the Plant have been installed and are ope:adanal. The
mortality manasernent s stem specified in the Plan has also beet installed and i5 operational.
\afne of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 1-)E2
Aff11a-icn �-�� -N P -.S Date Worlk Completed:_,
Z
Address (As nc ): - 5 Z7F%[ 6 Phone No.: .70,� - 37-67T3
Si2n:aur1-: Date:
AWC -- .august 1. I997,

hF y O
\I ' 858
ZONE b
A4 I
` SOD �is� ST T
190 o RM55
ro 1$
§'.ate
Rd.
1354 f Gi r4 u
•----� m START OF
DETAILED M 56
` h 57
LIMIT OF 76
STUDY ED �q
r�
/ /
ZONE C � �/ - 75
Zc
Q
S� tiw.
o/
J
.D 9
1360 Slot
U ti
B �
cRa In State
c; 1 3 5 D
4C==v
''c
CL o ` 110.
CD
Rd. 136E a
C
�ENOCHVILL
N ,
�3s9 N ��
V -
e s f �
o �7
P fPqj Q,LJQ zc
s, ❑ Q
c ie Rd, wesr
1 3 63 1124 a
l "'

�.. '�
l �^� ;y
lip
rill I) %/�• tl ��"J l� �� �'�:
�f_ �^...-S �' �' • `�.! �� / � H� � a .��44� ( )"`/� } I��`- �- - may' +• �j
All
,,gg/ � \'�!1Cbd•` _��1� � �\moi/ •� �-..:7 ry,�[ �\r'�`✓' I�1 � �'. �.i. �OB6'
\ _ �^ , � a _ !,� / /% ` i `� _ `• , � y tip..-"
�,� �� � -� :.a - �-� �� � lig`-� ,,� :, �ii �� o�J ,,�,�": ("� "-� ... •��� 1
�� °�� �i.' /'� L � •' � - �� � 111 %% /�,, :.� �ti' �\ ,I
ISE p 4�_ ', �� oy0 /r--- �, �•�� � `-// % -_' '+� �� V•
[� ,•� ,� `�,\`. ,`- � � f Laos (`-�; /' �;r �; � ' �..\.' 1 � � ��
D � \ .gym �1 ��:� ` / `� ,:'� •r fr.r �+�
1
n �' �s, , r, y ��� - ..�. �� $ �. � /rte �-----�,; r.l� �1,•' 9I� ':v��-� \\:

13Sl
t3
1
x_
L L
oI�
6,S�a S oca-�G
,JGC1�
n14
��1� � arty
13Sl
t3

4
March 29,2001
NCDENR
Theresa Nartea
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Theresa Nartea:
RECEIVED
WAT R O UALITY E TION
APR 07
N 0180wrge Pofmit6q,
We have 125 milking cows that are in total confinement 12 months of the year. We also, have 75 dry cows
and heifers confined 30 to 60 day a year. The remainder of the year they are on pasture depending on the
weather.
My general permit No. is AWG 200000 and my Certificate of Coverage (application) No. is AWC 80-0028.
I hope I have all the information you need. If not please let'me know. Thank you very much for all the
hard work you did to help me get this information corrected.
Sincerely,
William C. Waller
2975 North Enochville Avenue
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115

777-1

'All
01"
is�"el
16 f
i
rYi
I
t."IJ
rYi
I

71'
0
6
4e
I mmmm"T"11W, I i-4—
"o, �io
1, L r
. -J,

fan;
Jim/4,r ",,,L
I A
4P ......
T-�
&M-4
aj

640 i
tit
o1l
1v
ef
4o

J11 I=' Own
Rx"
-Fip"
qw
1. 14"
My a
t. W11
X'V
-1�, MY,
;l 4
�Nli E'4,:
OUT
Af.
74.
t�k"M- MI
xT
10-0;
pit" V
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
A
14
SO, dy
W.
it,,
VFW
j�
.7,
v.:
"a_6` C ..'+i� I �� � t , „ _ t t 'r t j ;ti4r
=5 OEM t-
..........
Poo:
RN
. lv

',Ifi-": [- - ' ih�. ;i•+:. <� ••f` iJ' ii�,/ !f 7rC �+[I Y t r� ?�� 4 L
1e7�t;[�..r r,� ,,t 6 ''l til; (- {4•i't � !1 ~l }1j I � ,.! fi1t4 r • ..
'1t.,�`+: rar.. r a' :...1*��+`t 5i? t r?•r.Ty+ :;,'•;f .;,.-i}'s-(�.� lYil�`�y�- 5 .+ N
1y.-„f'ftF'"• y. iir �. �'- 1. `t= 5,.� ,, ,' iG:f 7 s*l. §•ri'f,�$tF. •�:.{•,1 .�
[ C � I :•' tY 5 t
I •1 4. i 1 r 1 \r '�.1. i' ,;'f ��y� 11 h�� III i ry 'T-, j.'.!.i':'la:-.
,j Sr- 1 \ � YI �,� , •� L• j F ,t I x
r � V r CI �L 7i. 4. }bJ* •V i.M' rr 11 r t+ 1t. t 1 - r �. r _( s• a•• - / ':i.• Ir �" 4 t%?`�J
X! I ,'� , s rf I '• 1 i llf� rS I .� � r � s. f . uS.i.� �1 }�ia_t{�
Fr as .'C,,q x r xn1{i” t.S�,ti
trj' tl ", I + �; iii figr� g�{yr 1 4.� � � It �lr3.f 1y i+_ t , .... � ! r f• V!�j �]
5 4' - w: rr - GI I l .} j �i ''y' �! Y � ,1 �r jiR, r> �. r , , t , � 7 y. �I t,•�
�((,�ti•.'�
4Y VY r7. ��•-y• -Y •.r 5 -= y ,t � r�rSr9xi 1
+ `�. r it • f I 5 , r r 1 � fi1. _ •'•�'
� ; "�swl ,,.•1.h h `rq it `` '��:, y ;,:', � • ■ � i�si,�{—
i 1i :,- r J !t�-1}r. r iy 4 �a,'I � ..f Yy�•Jv tit �. � rY; -L����
j n yt �.� rjl I+{ .t•r '.[( S ,: ;i . 7 I r: z 1~iµ l h riot>f'v: � ,��
* r7 a �{ '}� k 4r 1 �,'P- yi' f ! kl ' n,,, ter;„ �Y 7 .! \ 7 rr Ali - rp•�
l(J/ 'r Vt ;. �1�J 5: \t< Lr ,': !., i,,` t t k, /F r ��• _1 i/Z 7J _,'
-yk� ;r L?Y�r.}�1
4 ;h-Irir{. 't F '+ S I�r• t1 ! .1 + ;, '1 6, 1, [ - r " 3 k.
�} �l •` [ 1 h�r, �•i I 1 i 1 r� i r I� 5 c � y ; 3
Y r lrli3'T �-� t r r • f r f a t i. t4 t' -. f t _, '•ry ', i F 'I
ji
'la�rr 1fn.�rt -I I, � [_::.,r '' J •I.ii ;. 1 KJ 1 �- '
.err ' . J• S, i. - F, rti -h. , �•
Z�t� r�rr f *:•�! r7 i r 2'.4 + � t l,� I i�•�' I"�k. V•��'.
a V X11 •.. IkWA�• �.
' Y Jrl4 i,4 �'s r J r rii; / C 1 , 1 � k�t t`� ' =-•
� 1� ��i a'. ) ?,I�:I':*�•�1, a .. ,w�:
tG � ! ,, t h J � , SLIti.�7..�•' � , 5 k1 5'`xtf ",r,�' ♦ 1 ` ry r,f G � •
Et' TS,ar �i'• ' .t`r r S r;`•• ?'tett t P'i I A
Ittiti-;1'r[.t, :_r ; o-I(J r � \ L �•� ;_� !�!#.;1�',,.-.,.
•t t K , a,; i l r 1 l �} � tPoG � �.� 1 r. c'' . I„ � �
''�' � �t�J�i Iia rl :+ 'r ^. li \ „ ..,,rnr!�rl � int '�� •'•• r f }'' 4""�%•, • �ySp►.1. r µ, •clri I
! E; ..� r , }' '7+�.,,��,,y�(?! sii3 f�G„��''r �ri I •vs•:yr`,..1�F^7j;i't�, '� js1�I f i .
•t.` nixj
'�r11+,a qhs `i����:���,r �i.��j �;'=4#:k r f ry``I�j,'li� r?`•�• � ��3>.}1• AYE
�,.�.�*'.�r ;'r �IrY�Ka--, M11F `'�,t,, /r'f tis" 7 C't r•a�' -iia,?. .� l 1�r'Et�,S{
—�
t' � Y'j` t F` � :' 'r� � i- Y �r•rs-t � t .11�T� J iL + r
�.[Ib).A .trr;
rn, 7 , t';5`�y- •?„r ..¢` �'Y �f t�`�•i 7r� 'r. r J�re�. l �t '.1• r�4
�•+ �•}? ' t i 6 Ys• r t 1 i F : ' �' v � t '•. ro t -t. ( t «
+ F 3 t 7 4 �•
y, +\ r t � y, � J r� fir; � .i � � .x,41, Zk~ �.• .s i~s«
1r s..'l- i . '' r \ , \ •�_':�' ^ter I r r.
1
art � • '?'. � ""�'•:'` ..•c5 �< �
���. �,2r �• ', � \ �,i �rj t � �L' ,h t+ z�-�"flr �ti;Y�, r
�■''.` r
Al
�,;�+r r�tt +, - .,'r{I: '{,1 . ��'� � w \ •: }r ;. �. Z+' ',+ •..'ti;
rr .� r 4:�;'r 5� ) .•I,t� •�`
liS' yyi�i rk° ' _ R �! • ° t � : �;n -c�, 7•�"t s r y"�rik"•:;,
�r ..��rrh I��sl • th ,1��'r „, 'Yt �'4f, _ �kr�� j� r •�i ^ 'i,1Y
°��1#�4`+ti.73,� �['�J�F I � r \�1�- In. •1 �Kttf� ^"i��.fi4.R`�p.�v�•, �1��j I+ 7 A�k'
t! '� y '(.� i. }h e •. \r •�f ;9.:h r a y
f : _? • ;.� r1 {%e, '1i" �,dr``r" f i ry,
?i JV Z 7QL" r •f :ri�`"y7}.r..,.:' r
�'Tfpt%�' nn i < i s ��L` iJ',! ice,• -t •4 �•..{ f - [ �,Y.dr :{`
R a.�` ���'���`�'> �p��;¢114 •�if !�'�� .S � '�t'.� y"" r t, '"! tF.•yv 5t �•�� , • .•�? ss; r ,�:��c''''
li`i.y&r,� !.'!flit �y ;�i,�/� \ 't4'? �`���� ���.+r. >.�'{. r++.: \` r �' i'A•;,�.
��"1-�{l�J* -jZ /ii�•t (;,�:f�%a '\•'. ��;r'�ti.'i�t,� i4�n � j s .; r+t � �'-'�,
.. � �•ryr, 4r �, r'� ,y `' s"iry Rra �i'ti�t, ^7�r�; t � 'r 1 i L.. w <
4 'i,"S^-73,'7 _..�.:tirvv"� � �•.,.. �,,ct;' ., ..... t'^r ..�'.`''.. I. .;>„'':V€)..�;- �'c.`tf7..

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources 1
Division of Water Quality J
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
WILLIAM WALLER
WALLER DAIRY
2975 N ENOCHVILLE AVE
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Dear William Waller:
e��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Eta T)$FT- OF
SaIMONMENT. HEALTH
March 17, 2000 o NATuxAL gLrsouROPS
MAR 24 20DO
=10 4t "i--WMGT'Xol
Iw((CsmI.L�F�li
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800028
Waller Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
In accordance with your application received on July 8, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to William Waller, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Waller Dairy Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 125 Dairy cows and 50 heifers and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC800028
Waller Dairy
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership chan=ge application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
RowanCounty Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
=11110RUMUS] 771CI] 7ul�I�ll�
1.1 FacilityName: Waller Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: William Waller
1.3 Mailing address: 2975 N Erutchville Ave
City, State: Mooresville NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 932-2918
1.4 County where facility is located: Rowan
Zip: 28115
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): OFF HWY 152. RIGHT ON DEAL RD, RIGHT ON
Enachville Av., 112 ON LEFT.. 2 MILES NOR.HT OF Enachville School
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/47
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.:__80 (county number); 28 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descriton Cattle operation
wry
175- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? El yes; F-1 no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 1 of 4 80-28

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 400 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 89.5
2.4 Number of lagoon s/ torage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 hoes this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by lignin; your initials in the space
provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
V,/, 6- k/
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). if the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
C4 WMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
33.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3. 10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3. 13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 2 of 4 80-28

Facility Number: 80 - 28 'JUL 0 3)
Facility Name: Waller Dairy
4. APPLILCANT'S CERTIFICATION:
I, % �/ % _ ti (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for - :�.,r��.� f (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and corn lete to the best of my knowle ge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
—�/g �..�.. �.•�ti `���✓ Date •� .7
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has beer reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best ofmy knowledge. [ understand that if aii required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 80-28

+ ti ` � • rS +.fir + � •�.'���, � '�-_. _ K _ '>. f 'r�� M ��� ��Y3v
'�;�1,.� ,. ' ! ,•,, °rJy � 1 �% - � ��ir'• � •�� .. S �`�, ��F3 lid .:i' _.�p—, � v- A"�'� •�
1�� r ~ 'L 1 r . l,Sr'?� i; } S � u �•-�_..., f }.,[+.. t�'�1 � �+4 � .
r1 r fT -fit 5. 5r. � :k-.�>•1 ,�-�y'�s7! = 1 �l �: �. _ r�r 'J�".",r',
f + • t" N
• ••, a FJN 1 �' �/ �. -`• Y +�, ,L�°4 • � . '. ,• .- ~ _ l.F v i tia j� _r j�.� Sy E,
' t � - - 4 )Sr r� !» a . v. `i•:t; ;•s- -r r �� + i '7t; L`� -.• „tS �`j �J�-..:�.
e :�-:;-���Y,�� 4 � �y �;�d 1 �: f � l ! y �� •�L y r, f i �, r f # fir, � e �;� � rtil
.t :��' ` .. 1 •�' :.''aka;;''♦�4.•:� _E+�r� iSyi' - • �.�5' ,*;
n ,: '•.i'',, .�.a� 1;d a J� 1`. f� �. f � x . r"�� Rm se;,
•' S a ail. � .��•�'�.st lr �y . v t i f,�, � 1 2 ���� � ff ,�Xv� � �� y,Y
v�F -1, +�. T3 F % i tij" :;; r1 i; � ��r- -J S'� ,7= �-•" v' �:[.�
. ; p� �wC.i cc •x ., t i . _i � F'l'rui 11 ' v '�� i .s,r � !� �
�+'z�t�lrri_ {.i`'u��r ..-x-�'" .r�� +'{• •: r�Y �'+ �� F. `c�#�.�+ s:- �;x f \ � 4t �.
Tr.• .�- a.. -. _ ..4,tn. .+._.' .i.: ! r v � v s1{ l Y,; • t j r 'r
114
ij
�l � v ,• ^,f �' .t ° •.rr � �w-. �i"d1' r R,'it•
u7
�' -, S r ' r"' � : � r 1 i K w� � a1, t",�r:r � C�. j'?r'�'^�-•i�'.. i
27
,iJ y ^s :�1 ' Z._i� ,/'ts`� •y, ,� l'.y.� , �,��y •�yY �•k:7.y � -
r . - F:y•. � �, _ _rte � 1 ` ` � '+•"v: 4' r ?+ k "=.pP �- i = y.•, _ ;'�.
' L� +. +�7 - R A i} [ ; _ .. o..' rr ny�.7 : Lk� • �.� 'l� ^ t r?. , '
,�.;1-r :�: n'_ � .� � , :.•^�.r `- :; xYK.!li. l+:t��,,, � is
�a . .} y. . 1'r � : �.� Id _' : a� .lry ,. � 1v-r� ,A� 1,': 1�>fi►• a y+> T.e
!,' aI r- i �Ff�' vl.-•. ~•~ ,y �^\�, •v!"N r i 4 _ ;t / 1 �tir
11 + 1 1 ys :.S t�`..•• ,..� tti., y.; _f �5 �, l ± ff rte, � 'G
i . _ r .ti`'s19* i3 7.,- ' u � ' 1.... Z•' f 4y{r. J ,
c if.•.�n`. •.c :w�_' ;la •' -,"r: •::1. t : Yk�r >,���...-'' tC{? ; i'•.:i% • `••�','�'*^.ti\.y. :'i_
t �4Y•0� .�t :.
^� ��J^ +. �c 'fir, +•� 1 + J., f� : 1, i• 4tFl;r o -f Xrf rt. FJ L
:•!, ,} :v:,'•�.. +. 'l ' i,�+f:.-� v �� f" t -1s i4TO
`' !'ry ? , •t• -. t' .1l• :i.4• i. _ �..1^ vk�+.r ,'r71S iF�
,. f Y K �j�y L� ••• 1 , i , � .T
��.� Jr 1, 3 •- f,'1 4'f lir t J,'7��'R, ti��• j '� j . �h 1,
}. '+� ; '•cam
-� Cep J1f R ..c , ,N,,,�,..,• ., �- �,,'..,
•" JY a ��r+� 4i; d ��rtis f �a •"� '�';y �"y ,ro -''� +Ta4y�'
�+�� � Y ! r �.+;�.�1 � � �''r r -, ("-ter { .�,} x , �'t 1 �` .�� •�'•���A+',
+ i ;2• �,it- ,.i .r�?'.t,�� ,•°4w'� .c `Y *':•i;�'.� l:_ f t + iy

1..". �,o :. �',1 '. ,r :i"! i " ,�, ^"hi, ��t�' t `'' i s�=`•`; sy3.�� i� �"'r-'r
0 log
_ l' .. ^"a , _ - `��h �� ,1•' I� , ` may, . 1 ,S`•y � � a.
NN��-I � �,�- _ t y X11; �, �r 'ti '" - •�<•� �r4y ,`;�y jt•� �y� � _
~• '- �jj/�L - rpt• Y' `•�.
�`a- .'�f Irl 'i '/ »i '�7•<i'f. ,.<E-t'S ••i �t
r. J , r Sr S �I S nY .>'.' ti) �s�i ) ..�>>;Y. _ h T•• I l'l� - . - •. �'.
oft
VtF
Vi] _ r fl -•:1 kt.:a l''�� -.'j .� J' iiY 'k• w ��1�.t�r�'ti 'L wS - K
.�.l,il C�tnlrf��f-if. fip X
�`• ,1}���Tr', rn� y r
E '?�
Kf �•4 , •IY •}�i'�,
.�r� f rf ti • '
.,4 gra
I
.-k.''i� j: .- :♦ y. :yam•
I s 7T�lir� r.�
� F4s^ 1 e ,+, 11'j • ,'� "lY t'�"" ter �,
�l�y�yi �•I Vis: 'Fri";:ir�•..'•�Yi!A,i%•'+�!�'l'1�'1�. ',i•'•.''•i''. n_ r
•t `,'••.r
,L1i'�•
M�y� A F) ��;� ,s r r i it k •,''1 . .fir., ,�':
� C V. ^,
5• �i
� y,Y
L�^
-
'
•ti 1�..t� ,•. .ISR;,
V/,'.

� '�•KSN Jr'r� , k� 1 �•�•'� �t.-L'N�* ��} }�, � rpt \ -'t+•.. !Y
- fl h C �'•'- .L. � • a. 1C
�{ �4 �;• t 'mit' .. , _ r r w - '�.�i i • ;, �, J
,r ; ..'�.,., ` 'tet,':•. �.. - 5: �. ±�� �'-
, � I Ald"
',�A, ','4 P ^bis.,•'.- - .. '•
MWW, .: ��,�✓>Si`-.� , 4 Y T.� ;-:,+''.
•• s g�,.. '- ill +. ' s S1 I�ur+�
IN
f ♦='v
Xl
i
?�;.• - - :..nil•-- Fc'`•: e'FF: A'� •}TQ ..'.- -
1 4S` p
`�'4"7Yt+ .r r,?'�=J� i'1`��1•,'--;4. ,T/. 5• •� ` .- ' fi�.�jssk �5� �-' �
��� �S w N �. [ ec s� s, •.tail Y � .
�' ,� i ���."i.r ti� '. *���. , .. Jif � `'•:
r• SWfj rJ ill rk S.,, `i . •t `�r41. � /. �' t
E.�r ,� '+.• -� �+:,. .•1. , .. .� / d yr fit: \ •\.•�
71
�}� --�'' � `i.^3 Y.. ,rr]� ♦f `.P�!• r •�F:C�•.� ��-'�}�tf ��`r •`•
\• P '�
t e�
r
e �
,�
;tit ]r
-�f� ��4•��r�,
M♦♦
SI: '
Int :fti�t1 �
1 4S` p
`�'4"7Yt+ .r r,?'�=J� i'1`��1•,'--;4. ,T/. 5• •� ` .- ' fi�.�jssk �5� �-' �
��� �S w N �. [ ec s� s, •.tail Y � .
�' ,� i ���."i.r ti� '. *���. , .. Jif � `'•:
r• SWfj rJ ill rk S.,, `i . •t `�r41. � /. �' t
E.�r ,� '+.• -� �+:,. .•1. , .. .� / d yr fit: \ •\.•�
71
�}� --�'' � `i.^3 Y.. ,rr]� ♦f `.P�!• r •�F:C�•.� ��-'�}�tf ��`r •`•
\• P '�
t e�
r

"fyjYr rt i k• � a.i�'. X111 ?•t,, x"� .. I� :�� yt; � r - ���J 'c
a y 1Y To- "'�' �'V" "'-� � S� .^ � � .., �+a .r�� _ t� r t4 _• + h
�r t+•y, ` r•S � : �r' .y:.f � t Sj' r`W « _ -1i�G� a+/y y + irr� * , J.S
,Jy���f z. 4rti �, � �' Y ... •rr i ;k ` $ `••S �Y�s. - a,.^ . _.: } '!r Y E lllr%
_ Y•tt' y14'� 7 • �� +r � i�j 1 � r
i �,y� •.•7 � � f .q rr G r S R
"U 5 :3' I �ys` 'tt= 1• r. �' 1 i . �*�� r 1 ,rr'{� Ys ���; _ ° n � •"T
� Y74") +ti.} !f � a +ry' '. 7 -�^y '.� +� f^r��'r i,' ���•'. t,�4 -�. �F-f, :' .. fU
u. �Y "ti'c'k 7I' ' � � 1� - I _ .• y � ,�a, � � T r�T{ 1 -r '`•�_� ! h . M F � x+• �``
Biu N•'=: • } I r � f ,+� yr 7 { 1 ' 1 f3 •i,rr •� � iL: .
�,�y;1��.'.j�..y r I •�a '�� - f ' � � a 4 t��'! � Y 1i i �K y� `[ - j' l�- �'� `..°..: f � � -: � � \.: - L?
`�� .+ e" ~�' .'"�fr 1 • F `± '+ [ 5S - rl 7. �1 rCfr L Y r
{f S t .. "t•' ,.��. ff 1r •''y - fir- ? .r- �' _? ' -,+�*�y�;- •{�:. c ��-� y''
s
trk s rh `4�t��j�'�' .+ 1 • t.
nl
•s•�,�. �-�;�,�•,�'-:i • '[ • ;r;:•�,,t � t � : Lr: ' K� t r '.syL'::r:.r `:r .. 1'#rl : _ �. �� ��:: i /�'j� .�f� 1 4'� �+�
it- -IN n 3 mm
Tl
' S1+, e �FZ 1 }[ F 4 y��'�a r r��1is t r+ y -� + "• -
� . • ;. .i � --j � L. }'�il+` y', lTi � `5 !xl`��ni ,y.'�
+,I a `f,�r� r�.:l rte �=7: -t 't- _ • 1 ' ..
w �-• ��t `'i •.�f;�'�T+ _ �{yid%;
t
.n
f
' o r t y"
� r'� 5 [ 1 7 •� 11•
31.'r
t, a v, t -r .L�F,1S' {'ifidt .F .r �,/ry ��•.

4
1' '4-
j,;l k.

JL_
y � 1< I i. + t �r', ��� f N� / I "� /.i `y ���4-J�i�ty�;,� •fir +)yf Ory ri
' �3 f Yy� ,J, 1 • ._� J ...r .Z ra 1 /41 F� Tr RRA
- i3• 'r
,'.. .{. �. P k i •r i s,F a� '�Sty`LzJ r' r:... �- t
q I. { t z Jyi � i.��.�e�'�-s ti`s sr �,J f �� �� • , k �,� az -y,.
� tf- `'� -,, !• .r•i � � ,, ` a � r ,���",.'r'J r* 1,, r tea iC � 171 � :�
'{;� 1�.�+4 S• I• _ .t.- ! .�i:. � �rt�r J.,;i,�.�.F + iF-yi �•] lrljr-_a'ti=.�' ! J;� 1�'z
•Iii' r,���s / '�• r �i' .� •+1•';, Ft i rF/ J, P+� �:, �,r � 1 ��. s �.!`-1;�r1¢nf
+,' ' \ ^"� ,+i �t' + - rS.;� J1 F(' �,� :.h' , Y y;41•a' 4 i w ,i i`, Y� _ `✓,, rrl"
���'� T +ffl�i � .1 r� t k .. •i Z :f ,. " a_,�f-� i�YY�� 1 {1 -f� r .�i}��Id aJ fy.J
Y .tel a� r •.i �t1 •� C' t'} r!rJ.. L'q3''T
i:•r,.• t1 y's ti. � � k�' , f r'.} �k S.� � r s #* � r J �'_-1 - � t;
1,4
�io- -, {s'x 'Yf,t, i. .l,..:►` i i•r .: / -�y y/ ��i �L r .} l.'�'�ti '.
,. � 'j'�'4 •• i '4� r t� ri, .ti i d -,F �i .• .�i ;��i�� � tilt
�` t � k � i •_ it tJ roe.,rJ s Y _ � jj
.i ' r`,y . .i: `S. ,' _f � �'•tiYJ�: !f �---•..•' s,.;� Ih . .i •:Jtrr ••-iS.L^�
' I � f � e iril `<S � ,� �S v � 4J ° •,. �'�Y'T.'r,,, _
I 7n.Y 7 t�:'- .jly r IJ Ac �S~I s ' r ••.a `.
rtl �ii l i-� i7t i!}>,�e�•�r ��"���^�rFij♦ .. - F
��.- ., • �^*,all � I �) �S qit t �t7
� s +.ate, J = �,r41 • : T , i � y„ �
ct, i •. v� 'L7,' trr I � r' - R. _ 4 7•ti ^ r«
'.n aal3. ��`hi}1- tills w' S ,, _' •;
.� ` J � •,• ' , Y .•6 `'rF�i J � ' Jt t �' 1 r r ti �i = ���;ii
2,,"r' y ' tom, - '.r_ ��� - a •'c''
/� `., `Gr •{ � , 1 !, .,,ter •. -
_ of {moi -.i!] ., � ��� .-4.i 1' ir. '�►_

_k ��. rf i l .i - i '. r.. �t .- �-�' - ..+--_"•.• 1 .1 {� I !!Y rI�-,��� •- k i. I � n
��,`� � a'l1, 1 � . i,rf �. l � ,.T,.• .:F'�'•~ /�.7 lr' "f ! �, i.' ,,• r j/,F
�}} Tye r � "' rY � 'ty!!!!`I•, ,1;� ti '«R`1r' Y •, ' d J f f:%-•. - ',r,' Lr .
,,��S-T-1+� l\ •r +- } ' r '' •L _-Jrv`,i .1 ' F ,,f )`�;. rt J;;4'tias� � ': :'Cj�.x rr.
(�� n/�,4 S. i r•r ,+_ ]� •� r. 3' "• •Ll•�r ^S •' ,' :K. Ir� %; l; '.
Y Ir�� _ y_ Q.. r7:r 7 •: . r + t'� ' + ,J 51 :, V 1 -dry s r � T ,yr{r �.i -,: ,y� ` �+• ' +=
'1 F 'y ff>_ .1 ••• a �. r ♦ � ri� r ,f r'. ..�- f
:,+,,Syd •,.� t •S��• ✓, ', t,'' l.i : c� Jf •ti Z �i'fl -•}. � � iyf + l '#. s -
.'' �Y � ': � � � _ _ '` •i'Y g _ - �: ir+ s - v r f f r,.yr�j �� r�/``!�, y�f��yr S,Y - ��1' � �y .�� � ' `.
/ +J{ -•`r 'xr� y �� �!J �. Mfr ��i'� � ' Y.�f r F r5 �-fc + � .,
ym
r F '�pp� i�r' � t �. ! r j{i , ,� v . �' ' �i ;fit ` r� r �",{� 1 , 1 ,; r ,, ,• - t
`F ?f!'+ �.< !• 1 �' J f- 'i r ,Ir' T R.T :Tr '1 i+Ci l I1v' / I
S'xa,#'J,.• ;r 1' F e �,�' } !" TI � 'r r.r + � r -3' •` � +•-�� 'F t} fyi r:� ftisy
� a(yv, r �-e7'a�l r �. f, f v -b �f ••r� J,.i -!ip ff�` i 1". �1
��-j'�,- Y- + ' ' .i� s - ! �} •''•• • ; 't �'\.,:._o �?'?'t+ ".w.w'H ..7Y s, 7 •4 t,4
�,iki,
r 7 f�
'{�: ,'(;`; •',Wr-+ ' 6. � /,I/' 't�s i i::"- i'?;, ?.,'�:. It q. .1.*1,`�. -�,,�, ..i?�•.i'�>�!. j; Vii,{.;'?la
'<^'� rs-.rjs�' f .• y�'..,. [ >�:.�'.,. .fit - r,.+: f;•, L'+�•.- .,
•Y�' ^..ps-+,•_i:� .j' I• t, �/ ' f c.:} j..\.�^r .rf :pr iti:.�-. ;. •�_ cr: o{.'a
r: / �• '\ _ s_..: Sr - '.\'.- �, � i ' . �� /a n, -•qtr .
e:'+ . ,ray t ..• ti ''�• ! , • .i � _ �i x
-`� y.?�:� �S�r "'_ -' ,, � :r"\ `� -�: �a� +•� ,4 • �. '' e + ICS` t„Ts�S .�,
'.:'`•S•• �• ,4'11•}1 RJ _ �• 1 J 7�f�1y�.
• 13A.. ii •• rr .f� jy77 ^-7` C*"^" ti„-�' .^' [k��k•
• r`4 ri .i� stir :���15r +�:k t frit' a Y, 1 � r 3
_ t •Sr : {::f 4.•Y f _ f�'•:.•_:• -rte..
J '.+��, r •• f.:+,: f + 1. -'� r •,
i'
•Ai yxt S,
;S- irx :Y,.r lftTiT y..`-
+. _l � � s• w-�• - i �'�.ti . r 'fir f i... t` �»
+ / - '�' X14 i1- C..� 5'-..::✓ �J
:ty ,'.r`4 •� _ _' it .,r .. -1y 4'• `. ;\ :'S•IZw. y''`,:
:w' i :��- :" •e,"•1—•�.-`- ''_ .�j� ' `;;-.:..3 .� ' �.,� ,„ ems;:'.,

.,. ..-.'� 1�Ckca.-::ix�'}.aL..� _.. _. ., n `f /��1 s i•' k� >.I-sd..
J�py� - . 1.:.,;..-`-• . ,.,!«i rr-,� it
c.
��� R,..'u' , j • � � � ,� '�, a. � i'• � L��.}A tR:.k x ki, �.:.i'iL.1a S�;i r C'
SiU
PPA
"J � ' `: i' '�.� .. ' • s -Y � ��;—,� l�,�rrr •��•=' pi's
'Allr'.
- _ ,�i' �•E '{�.: Com' ..
r' - �+•f� �;rF'i �r -L�rr � ,;1 .. 1.
It%- a - ? ��Y• � �• .'-. � � t � �~'S

—. i Vii;: � . , � �.. '�'",.., �,•
'vA
k. Own
�� 4;�,� .tea,. Y, y F� ;��� ,•� '�i .a. ``-
;,„� �.�. •\� ��' .tai � �:^' .- i.
�L��}.,1i��' _,r til; �r M;�iy� -.. z - Vit• � '�y}� €a
l`i•Y.�+1,,�_ '�Y' 'r k"^{'++ F fr1 «L :r�"i:` ,,>:•
41 �T, �%ir� 'e."i �•�
-- �' »r�; - ti �r �ktrY { C��j��,v.�'er.�:hr.•., .�-:4'; � - .�r' •.,�j �.a.'
�a`,q�� t�:c�.- •ry'St b '�'��. �� �[ 'ivF��fi.'.'; t+hJi' til � - 't..� i r- �� r.a '
��' � �. . n �� 3`+r .. ;.0 ,��� �,,ty ..} ,ti ��'•!• � .� tom;' _ '7#
.. r, * •f N \(��'. Y ,! �:4' �f�' 'I• ', :• '': l'w{Nim' i j`
,k. 1 a
�` },til •.y„� ',.�_ w [, I '� ; rk,�rry.9 - .l` r �f .3 '.�K -it ''".s,7L �. r.'�," ` ,i`}zi
Mn
t+7 .. �.Y�� ` y~y ?' ''� a"� �� i�`wPi , ' � •� " 1 .t• .aw'�. � '"'" , _ ,��t'.� . 11 r r ' t 1 "r � �a�"eY �ra •` 4):
t:• i
,r . ,�: a{,Iti,i � 1. • 1 �-� � ' - � � 7
star
�•�"n��,1`;�,��yS•y�. i'�� 9r`c./�F�?��.' '1' .,. �.Kji .,•tom .� �.� :-�'.",_:`C*, �4`.y'"'�.
.\, •f''twti; �.�"'r4Ci 'pis. 1Fi.r�sit"iti^ /� •�W'��,.�y :?Q\ Y. (, i�� -s
�� '[ a�i'� 'f � ivakM,r�,""13"•Y(h.�C'�yik��� � �� ,Y
is ��' ►rds�� w3 ^`� 44. ' x� �,,,i��1,`'� ,,. i; , " ` rJ
p,
U I
Al
��`' S \ r qL'z 1 • J
0. .Yif 7 ir...
Al
... 4^`• rte• j - \�
A4- l .. •,may
' ,� '.iw � .`� i • � - 1. A ti ice. �M10, t
I

W-7
'. Xl�
- 114:21,
Oki
jo

r
I
IKI
2

1
' I .. •' 858 r�Q\ f • � � _�
ZONE
0 A4
0
i \ 600 riff 5 T F
190 0 RM55
S!ote \
Rd.
135,
START OF u
u� h 5o PILED M56
ti ` h 57
1 / f LimIT of 76 0
STUDIYEO �n
h
I r�
D / 5
ZONE C 7
� Q/ i
zc
o��
01
QC
� tea• �
4. 1360 shot pd:
a
a Rd cl fn S!a! e
1 3 5 0
'_1 1
"r State
� d
C
stote
Rd. 1361 aQ
E N 0 C H V ILL
N 4\\ f Ica
N CD \ U
w: 1
n
�D00
Rd a Es r
13 63 t2q a
rn r

` ,10.5'CG �C.000.�G L4�1
Nousc,
U)00) s
v

y
PRODUCERS NAME Bill Waller
Date: 1119199
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
REALISTIC YIELD
Lbs.N per Ac.
ACRES
Lbs. N Utilized
990
1
ApB
Com Silage
17
130
13.4
1,742
1
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
13.4
1,273
1
ApB
Soy Beans
35
120
13.4
1,608
t
961
1
RnB
Cam Silage
15
110
1.7
187
1
Rn13
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
1.7
128
1
RnB
Soy Beans
30
100
1.7
170
2
ApB2
Cam Silage
15
110
20.6
2,266
2
ApB2
Small Grain Silage
8
95
20.6
1,957
2
ApB2
Soy Beans
30
10b
20.6
2,060
3
ApB
Com Silage
17
130
25
3,250
3
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
25
2,375
3
ApB
Soy Beans
35
120
25
3,000
1068
1
ApB
Com Silage
17
130
7.7
1,001
1
ApB
Small Grain Silage
8
95
7.7
732
1
Ap13
Soy Beans
35
.120
7.7
924
2
PcB2
Com Silage
15
110
34.1
3,751
2
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
34.1
2,558
2
PCB2
Soy Beans
30
100
34.1
3,410
1570
1
PcB2
Com Silage
15
110
16.7
1,837
1
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
16.7
1,253
1
PCB2
Soy Beans
30
100
16.7
1,670
1571
2
PcB2
Fescue, Pasture
3
113
14.9
1,684
4
3
PcB2
Fescue, Pasture
3
113
4.4
497
4
PcB2
Cam Silage
15
110
9.8
1,078
4
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
6.5
75
9.8
735
4
PcB2
Soy Beans
30
100
9.8
980

R
TRACT FIELD
1573
1586
1
1
i
2
2
2
3
3
3
6A
6A
6A
1
1
1
2
2
2
1587 1
" 1
1
1588 1
1
1
3
3
ti. 3
4
4
4
SOIL TYPE CROP
0
REALISTIC YIELD Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES Lbs. N Utilized
15
110✓
PcB2 l Vc-
Corn Silage
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
PcB2
Soy Beans
PcB2
Com Silage
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
PcB2
Soy Beans
PcB2
Corn Silage
PcB2
-Small Grain Silage
PcB2
Soy Beans
PcB2
Com Silage
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
PcB2
Soy Beans
PcB2
Com Silage
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
PcB2
Soy Beans
ApB Com Silage
ApB.
mall Grain Silage
ApB
Soy Beans
ApB
Com Silage
ApB
Small Grain Silage
ApB
Soy Beans
CeB2 1
���
Com Silage
CeB2
Small Grain Silage
CeB2
Soy Beans
PcB2
Com Silage
PcB2
Small Grain Silage
PcB2
Soy Beans
SaBCom Silage
SaB c,,�
$Small Grain Silage
5aB jSoy
Beans
at
120 ✓
REALISTIC YIELD Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES Lbs. N Utilized
15
110✓
14.2✓
1,562
6.5
✓
75✓
✓
14.2✓
1,065
30
100
14.2'
1,420
15
110r
102
1,122
6.5
30/
75r
100✓
10.2 ✓
10.2✓
765
1,020
15
110 ✓
4 ✓
440
6.5
75 "'�
4
300
30✓
100 ✓
4 `
400
15.
1101/
12.5✓
1,375
6.5
30 ✓
751/
10p
12.5/
12.5 J
938
1,250
15
110-1
8.8J/
968
6.5
30
75/
100 ✓
8.8/
660
17
130✓
8.8/
7.8/
880
1,014
8
95Y
7.8
741
35 ✓
120 ✓
7.8
936
17
130 ✓
15.2
1,976
B
95 ✓
15.2 /
J
1,444
35
120;/152
1,824
15
110 ✓
16.6✓
1,826
6.5
75 ✓
16.6
1,245
30
1002
16.6/
1,660
15
110✓
2.4 /
264
16.5
75 J
2.4✓
180
30
100 ✓
2.4/
240
15
6.5
110 /
31.1/
3,421
30
75
31.1
2,333
100
31.1
3,110
TOTAL
278.5
78,502
TOTAL N PRODUCED per 2
YEAR rotation
24,200
54,302 lbs. decift of N

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: William Waller Date: January 19, 1999
Lcation: 2975 N Enochville Ave
e'' Mooresville, NC 28115
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 175
(Design Capacity)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based. on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in -runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. -Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

f•,
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and 1 or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the'waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
2

WASTE" UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 125 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs. and a feed lot for
50 Heifer with an average animal live weight of 1000 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
125 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 75 (% confinement
time) = 718,594_ gallons of waste/year.
50 animals x l.1 ( ft3lday/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 50 (% confinement
time) = 10,038 ft3, of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen�(PAN
)_ Produced „Per Year
125 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 9,500 lbs. Total N
50 animals x 52 lbs. N/animal/yr = 2,600 lbs. Total N
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 12,100 lbs. Total N
4 (PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time end have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every4 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
95.2 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Your feed lot has sufficient area to store manure from 50 heifers for 60 days and will be
stockpiled and hauled as needed and weather permits.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION.
This operation has 284 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
system of corn cut for silage or harvested for grain in the first year, followed by small grain cut
for silage and soybeans in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the
realistic yields at the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Corn grain: April -May at the rate of 100 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 96 lbs. of N/ac_no more than 30 days before
planting.
Soybeans: April -Jun. at the rate of 100 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting.
Annual Ryegrass/Pasture: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 94 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 113 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs ofN/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
On fields which follow soybeans in rotation reduce the amount of N required by 20 lbs/ac
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and proper system.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
5

WASTr UTILIZATIOP' PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of -dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
n

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
14. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
7

WASTE ITTILIZATIOP' PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER:
(Please print) Q
Signature•,/_ ��-� �� C - /_,f���,_/ _Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print)
Affiliation: N - N) CICS
Address (Agency): A - Cv S C_5
Date: -
z-7 7-7- C 0 t .o Cti CoeU DD
Signature:

M
Animal Waste Mana;ement Pian Certification
kFlease (eic or print all information that does not require- a si=-atu::)
Existine or dew or Expanded (please circle one) _ 1
General Information:
�aTTle of Farm: W qA e_i� I _'Ci11IV No.
0«•nerts) \ar;e: P':one No: Vq - 9-32
`lailina Address: Z
Farm 1 Ocaiion: Ccun ty Fan is located in:
Laucdde 2nd Lomc',de!. S
P[ea_se attach a cocv of a counry road map with 1Qcaiion identified and desc::ce belo.t.''(Ee specific: road 1
na;—tes. directions. mdlepost. etc.): L�4. /6�2 41jra <1G�_44��
noeration Descriotion:
', ape of5«•ine ,Vo. ot.�,nintals
= w
-=n to iced
_ _:__- :o Finish
Far ox' (o Wean
_ Farrow to FL -:d--: _
J Farrow' to Finish
Tv Pe of ?oul:n• No. Of Arimcis
La�c.
Other T,•pe or Lf'.'eVocK':
T ,7e of Cor:1e No.
0D� -LZ 6r
Vur,_:er or ar,rr_rls:
E_-JandEn. Operarion Onlr
Previous Desiir. Ccaacin: Addirioncl Desri;rt Ccveci,-y
Focal Desi?rrCa,ccTn•:
%creast A%aiiacl_ for .gip-ohcation:_ 9O� Required Acr.-:iEtS
Number Scorns.- Ponds : Z- Total Capacity:__ 173, 27,3 Cubic Fete: (ft�)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: ITS or ti0 (Please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAG00\ or SPR_kY FIELD (please circ?e one)
X%%?� YXK?iR�?M]FX%%YS SX s;[�XX1L 91YY%iRYSi YSCiY X]L s}[%a{si[%mss �[%s;aiXYfiYiRs%Y�ia y�Y%�[fi atXYXJ[sX XiiXX1![ii X1i
Owner / Manager creement
I («•c) yc:ifV that all the above information is correct and will be updat:.d upon changing. I (w--) understand t a operation and
maintenanc: procedures established in -the approved animal waste manaacmc:tt eian for the farm named above and will
imolcm;:nt these prcc:dures. I (we) know that anv vmansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storm: SN -stem or censcuction of new facilities will rccuire a new c:-uncation to be submitted to the Division of
E-t;•iron;r._atal Marac=crit beer: the nc•.v animals ar_ stocl_d. I that the:: ,must be no discharge of animal
hate from the stnran: or apoiication system to surae „•ate:s of -'ht state ci(hcr directly .1y :rough a man -;rad: convevanc: or
from a storm eyert'-ss seve:c than the 2 -4 -year. ?--hour storm and the:: must not be run-off from the application of animal
,yas:e. I (we) and:rstand that Fur-o;f of pollutants horn lounging and heavy use are_: must be m.inimizrd using L=hnieal
st_ndards dcyelec.d ey the Natur_€ Resources Ccns.—­: icn Seryic The acpryed _;_, ;rail be fiicd at the fare and at the
oiticc of she local Scii and eater Cons.:'.•ation District. I ,•ye; kno•.r tha( any todi;icat:_n ;rust be a technical
sccc:aii:t and suer jutd to the Soil and «Vater Corse vziien Das:riot prior to imcic-c =:ion. A chane in land own::. -ship
rea'Sir.,
"%'-'k%n nct::t.ation to DEM or a new :if the acc:c�.5 OLIn is within 60 da -.-s of a title cans;-.:.
Nara ± of L
'-i' =urQ:
Name of visna+f:r;ii di:fe~e-t rc ov.,ne
Si',nature:
Dute:
t FACII_ITiEB F,SSESS1hENT UNIT

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a :c_ tical spc_iahst designated bV the \*orh Carolina Soil and Watt: Conservation Co.nn ission pursu= to
N&kC 6i= .0005. 1 ccrtii•; that the animal waste management system for i! : farm oamed aoovt has an ar=al
mariac=. t', :ian that me_:s or :::,,c=is standards and specifications of the Division of Env ronrncatal Nlanagcrncnt (DE..,,
as svcciticd in 115.x, NCAC 'H.021- and the USDA -Natural Resources Copse -ration Se:%•ice (\RCS) andlor the Nor -,h
C rolina Scii and Consza anon Comnilssion pursuant to 1 `A NCAC1-p:.01-17 and 1:.1 `CAC 6i= .0001-.00015. 7h::
foileuir.g c._:-ents are included in the plan as applicable. Whiie eaca category designates a ._ ..nical spc�;aiisc ono rla�
sign each c_•::ftcation (SD. St. WILT, RC. I). the tec;,nical =ccialist should en1,; ccrtifv pars for %;nich the.; a:,-
11.
re
1I. Cer-ti, fication of Design
A) Collection. Storaie. Treatment Svstem
Check rive covrovriate box
ZIi=xiscinsr tac;lits: without retrofit (SD or tilyZP)
4�terao_ volum: is adequate for ooc:ation capacity: storaLc c__ability consistent with wase utiiiaticn
rt:;ui re:n cnts. r
.J Nex. expanded or re�rofiaed facilitv (SD)
nirral waste storage and trtatmeat structu:_s. such as but not lir.cd to collcctio t sys:cros. laaocns ar-d poCds.
r.r:e beet dcsig::_d to mr:.t or excr_d the minimum start -arils and sac,:t;cat:ens.
Name of Tem' pica] Specialist Please Print):
Afr iliaticn: r, �� �(,�C l] - - -
Address( . p cv)
Sianatur_
,ione tio.: 71 y- 7- 140
ate 3—Iq-
B) Land .aaolicotion Site (1~~ UP)
Tit plan provides for minimum separations (buffc:s): acecu_t- amcu:t or land fcr was:- utilization: c=osea creo is
sui:aclt for waste management: hydraulic and nua-icnt loadinz rates.
Name of Te�hnical Specialist (Please Print): C" s����
AFili
Address,•'.
SiEnatur-I
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check he arrpropriare Dox
�t raciliry wirhout exterior lots (SD or %%--UP or RC)
i his faei'sity does not cone:in 3nv cxt;!:ior lots.
Phone No.: y w 7 /
Date: 31L --D
Facility with dy'!6or 1.0ts (RC)
Methods to rr rinszc the run off of pollutants from lounging and uic `seas h: c i _cn designed .n
s; :ndards de elcccd by MRCS.
Mriit' oC T.,.hnical Specialist (P;ec_z Print): .0641-'1 L.2 Z - R-Ep*fevl TJ
nilsii::tiLn:
Sig:�•_t::. "��
k`-*(- -- !--....._r% 1. 1'?') -
T
Phcne No.: -/
Date: �7--

Armficotinn and Handling Equipment,
Check the appropriwe box
X-2 E-�icnng or expanding facility with vdctinQ ware aoolic3tion ecu1�r7-ent (W -UP or I)
Animal %ante a.pli:ation ceuian-cnt spe:if:.-d in the plan has been cithcr ,2.-!d caiicratcd or valuated in
a::orca,c: •xit!•t :istM d=sid:i c:;ans and tables and is able to apply waste as ,e::ssary to ac:omrnodatt the
waste rna.;act:nent oian: (existing 3Cpllca(lon eouipmcnl can cover the area re_air3 by the pian at rates not to
:sct_d rah:: the sec:iFi:d hvdraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule fcr :irain-_ o. applications has bcca
esLablishrd: re�uircd bu,''fers can be nain3ircd and caiibratio❑ aad adiustmc : z'�:� tcc a _ .ani in-� as par
Cf
:he Dian t.
.� New. expanded, or g-6sting faciii[t' acr--F :!fin ec ::c'mt.-)[ for cirg
Imea[ion (1)
.animal .east: acplication =_uipmcat sre_:paszn
ed in the plan has desigr.e_ :J applywas:: as rcctssar.:o
ac:0mzmCd1L' the waste martaac,, e^t plan: (proposed application uipment :ate :ovc. 4.: arca r:.cuimd by t:.:
➢ISR 11 .'attS not IO ..+ ed e:Ll er the i7ydrltlli: QC ❑uL.� 3t ]OSG:-i ::.�5: 1 s:`t�uIt for [ioung of
avvlic:doos bas be:n asiablishe-l; re: wired 'puffers can be maim iced: calibratico and adiust=:rt ouidancc arc
coc"Drd as par, of the plan).
_t N _ x. e -,panded. or txistlnr tac'._lity without e,is_tinv %y2. 5ie a!`^=!_3ti_on couloment for land
scorea+dins not using rumv im ation.� or 1) - --
Animal wast.- application equipment spccaied in the plan hs „_cn'se!ec:c- :0 301,31V waste as nc�-Ssary :o
ac:orm Iodate the wastc manag.-me t plan. (precosed anolication equipment :an :over the area required by t1;e
plan at rtes not to _xcecd tithe. the spc:istc� hydraulic or nutrient leaf'_ing Zits; a sc e_u!: fcr timing of
a-pplicaticns has be:m cstablisll_d: rccuircd buffers can be-maintain_a': and _guidanc= ars
comaired as part of Lhc plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
A --iliiation:
:address(.-Xepcv): -G Co Phone No.: 4 -/Gd
Signature
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Mortality Nlana.-ement and Emergence- .fiction P13n (SD.
S1. %VUP. RC or 1)
The 'xa;te mana2e:ne-m plan for this facility incudes a waste Nfama2cment Odor Corzol Chc.:tiisL. an Inscct Centrcl
Che:klist. a Mortality \,lanagc-neat Che6dist and an Emergency Action Plan_ Sou -:::s of both odors and insccs
havc be:a :valuated with respect to this site and Best N-4anagc:•nent Prac:ices to 41inimt zc Odors and Best
Manae_ment Practices to Cont:ol Insects have been sct.cctcd and lociuded in the was:c tnanag: —.m plan. Bct_5 the
N-forulity Management Plan and the•Batcr;cacv ac ion Plan are comialc c and can m imple:nenmd by this facility.
Name of T chnical Specialist (Please
Af ihation t_�ct,r, c
?,d(
Sit
hale `o.:_7Qq-637-142)
)alt: 3_/y- 7
F) Written Notice of New or E.cnandin,; Swine Farm
The follo%%ing si;nature block is only.to be used for nes or expanding stone rarms that be_in constriction after June
21. 1996. Ir the facility was built before June 31. 1996. when was it constructed or last 2s::anded
1 t•.�•e::crtiiv that aucmcted to ccr.L:t by c_ .1-5td mail all adioinia_ p,.oe:,s o;: -c -s and ail o%t'ne:s
tit ;,o o«•n :ror_rn lC=,td across a _ublic road. strrc:. or hi:h'xzy from this nvx or cxpand:n; ;. i;.e far . ice notic: was in
comphan.t:.c::h the gt:irtm_. its of NCGS 106 -SQ:. A copy of the netiee and a list of the _ n
ao«r.crs lotii"icd is
a_:hcci. i n
Name of Lond Owner :
5i',nature:
Name of o r
Si' -,nature
k"'C -- JSnuar. 1. t`i't';
Date:
D11(e:

111. Cer-fz-cation of Installation
A) CnIfection. Storage. Treatment Installation
tie,x. exoanded or retrofitted facility (S3)
minimal wast. szora:c and treatment structures, such as but trot litrit:� to lagoons and ponds, have been insL:il— in
accordance with the approved plan to mce: or exceed trc mini -mum standards and spccincations.
For ezisrin faciliries xialiout retroftrs, no ceri5cation is necessarn•.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please P:int):
ffiLanon:
Address(Aaencv): Phone L io.:
Signature:
B) Land .3,polication Site (S3°L:P)
Cite - the approprivie bo.:
ate:
;�t The trooping system is in place on all land as sFecitied in the animal waste manaSe:ne:it plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as s;.c_:ied in tl:c :flan is clean:; for pla.atina; the crocrins s-:ste=
as spcz:Iced in the waste udlization plazz has not bcen cs aclishcd and the owre: has cart,-vtted to establish the
vc,ecation as spc_it5ed in t:^c plan by (rr OJdaviverr): u". precosed cove: cion is aorrcuria+.c
for compiiance with Che -;;asmuttllizt1on plan.
0 :also cher. this box if ar)vroonate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be estabiishcd on acwly c!cared land within 30 days
of this c.:tiftcation. the ow-rcr has cz,, itz--d to cstaotisa an ism. im c.-cp for erosion coacel;
Name of T finical Specialist Please Prnt S�
. Q ( ) �� L��Zckr— C
affiliation: cL��� ,,,�� `]
Addrt- ss(. �cvW27_ e- 0f � C,nom s 1, �b�r-. n C Phone No.26q—
Signature:
This following signature block; is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) cerif•: that I (w,-) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan. acd
if aLproeriate to est :biish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DE\1 a verification of comple:iea from a
Te:finical Seccialist within 15 calendar days following the -date specified in the conditional r_ ,ification. I (we) re_]izc that
faiiure to suorrut anis v..:ication is a violation of she waste manager hent pian and will sui ject r-ne (us) to an cpforcc:neot
ac:icn from DEM.
Name of Land Oivner :
Signature:
Name oIana2eri'iI different from owne.'t:
Signature:
Date:
Date:

L1 Runoff Controls from E.\terior Lots (RC}
Facillry wir11 exierinr lots
`lz:hods to .; ininuzc the run off of pallut_nrs from lcuncing and heap'.: use ares `a�a bet t iost�il�,d s spc:it:e�+
in :h: plan.
Forfaciliries wiiliout exterior lots, no certi�-icatio�r is necessan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please PL,n['}:��t%_-/�� ��'1_CZ/1/-Q
a Jc:_ssfAgancv}:-97A7-6
S: attar-.
Phone No.: — -/
batt' 3 -),q -c? 7
Di Aoolication and Handling Eouioment Installation (Wi:P or I)
Cite:. rice oropr-me .iock
Animal 'mast: at?plica:ion and handling :uuipmcnt s.cc:,`itd in the pian is on si, and read' for use: calibration
and ad"ruszmcnt Mat:.:a!s have men zrovid:d to t'._ ow -,.-.-s and a:: cotaraine,. as gar of the pian.
.� animal wast.- appiic=on and handling _cuipm-ni sce_ificd in µhe pian has nct bc_:t ins: !i :!d but L< -. own=.
has prcrescd !basin2 or third pare application and bas provided a signed ccn:raze: eau-tt:mcnt spec:: d in tate
centrsc: aerecs with the r:auirements or the pian; r:ouir:d buffers ca„ :c mainta:^:C:: calibratico and
adiustrlc:lt suidanc: have been -.3rovid--n to t:^.c ownc.s and arc contained as of the Dian.
:) Conditional apororal: Animal was:_ ppik:ition and handling =uipm-,::1 spccirtcc it :h: 'az bas �cp
purcres:-. ani' will be on site and installry b,- the._ is storage to
hold the 'Waste until the eauipricnt is and until the wast: :an be land applied in aczordancc with the
croopiZc s} -sten contained in the plan: and calibration gad ad}us-,meat guidance have bc:a provided to the
owners and a:: contained as parr of cite pial t
Name of T(e_jhnical Specialist (Please
P;n[):
A iliiatlon: [1n W- cC-'n -S6A dLe.d l �1Y
Addr_ss(.
Si�naiure
n No.: 74� G 37' 1604/_
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I Ov;:! certify that I (w::, have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
spt:itied in my (our) waste manaetalent plan and will submit to DEN-- a ve.itication of defiyc,-v and inrallation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date sp_cifted in the conditional ccnitication. I
Ove) realize that faiiurc to submit this verificationis a violation of the wasie manasze-:eat plan and «viii suc_ie_: me
(us) to an eniorc--meet action from DE.M.
Name of Land Owner :
Signature: Date:
Name of \Iana?eriif difi-_re.nt I= ow-ner.l.
Signature:
Date:
Et ndnr Cnntrnl. Trisect Cnntrnl and �Inrtalitti Management SSD. Si. Z�.t"P, RC or Il
11: ;,JAS to corlt'ol odors ar,d ...---!5 2--: =�•'-iii-d In ?lsn have �.0 1 1n$iall�L' ani art C �"zticr�l. The
_.:It� ill the �Rn ..=s _1517 {):�' :C?: ane is cc .a€er al.
L
\Wile of Technical Speci2hst !Please
,'j: -'.i, %.
r:rz�
1l� la::ulr' t. t ".
y y
D;llz:3 r�`_L7

,v, ..4 1,.
ply. 11e
krto Are. pis �` V6ti1T'�
°
K
�
1d
�t1,Y �
✓ t F i
y
VoL9,67(0 cow
V bLO
Vow M IF G5-rwgEN
F-Lr-VAnDNS 93.3 f 103.3
V. Lotjp
7;ftZ4 'I
ply. 11e
krto Are. pis �` V6ti1T'�
°
K
�
1d
�t1,Y �
✓ t F i
y
VoL9,67(0 cow
ion
134 -
5�-j 2/7 cm -f�
30 0
S1rP ],
ply. 11e
krto Are. pis �` V6ti1T'�
°
a 92 1 dZ 938¢
1d
U
/e
VoL9,67(0 cow
TZI 7-A VIJ/-/z 13F�0✓✓ _ s-9� 09 3
,F�-E✓A TION Joe, 3
SL1 h^FPCr A -P EA A -r E1,EKA7-16N

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL_,RE
Sail Conservation Service
LOCATION CODE
NAME
8 J1 L. wf� Z_ . 2
3.3. fS
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE POND
ACP DATE
r
DISTRICT
_ LENGTH r P
1 SIDE SLOPE g TO 1 /
i o , , AVE. TOP ELEV. a4.
MID SECTION
\%i-
u /
0 lr �x J
y J o AVE. BOTTOM ELEV. I
# 1
LENGTH !So J
NC -ENG -40
5/83
Irq, 9,24 7 Soo `, 3, 8,2 4
Volume depth [(area of top) + (area of bottom) + (4 x area midsection] _ x.3.30 Cu.Ft.
5
Use of facility
Capacity Gallons
Volume Cost-sharing Cu. Ft.
Soil type
B. M. description
Elev.
SUMMARY
Bottom Elev. g 4. O
Maximum liquid level Elev. 9A, o'
Storage for:
25 yr. freq. precip. (Ft.) +
Crest ESW Elev. 9
Stage (Ft.) + %. O
Freeboard (Ft.) + /• O
Top of Dam Elev. C/6.57 ---

SCS -ENG -539
9-. 5-70
U. S. CEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
S[lIL INVE*I(A01N TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
WATERSHED AREA MEASLTKN0ENTS--
.•
WOODLAND—ACRES TOTAL—ACRES
SYLETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE 1APProx. -&Ia 11' - feet)
■E1��■■7■■tE
m
SEEM■■■■■■■■■
'S`._.�M�E■■■■ESM■■■■■■■■■
■■
■!� '!!�■
■E
NOME
■ME
■!l1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■
■i1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■Q■■■■■�©�■■■■■■■■■■m
.
BOPrNG NUMBER AND PROFILE
(c R"-4 on back �Aerw mdc"sarw SAow water table elevatio"t am Iturn-siff bortftes.
0��01©�i'�l�Ol■Imi®Im�ml®'ml0lmml
'-iml��

7'
U. S. Department of AgriCLI]ture.'- NC -ENG -34
Soil Conservation Service September 19BO
File Code: 210
HAZARD f.LASSIFICATION DATA SHEET -FOR DAMS
Landowner 4 4 L I- County L9 al AJ
Community or Group No: Conservation Plan No.
EstimatedDepthof Water to Top of --Fjiam_J2.!. Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Dates of Field Hazard. Investigaticn.
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Hazard Classifir--atic.r. of Dam! ;at b, C) (see NEM -Part 520.21)
Dam Classificatic!) I-, !U, TV, V)
By 096,xw�, a Date
(name) L I
Date 5-95
Concurred By
r!dme
• Pte,
-
1.O E: I I r.,: t L e
-:hz-2ts zi.: needed.
Est. Eley.. :.Es t. Elevation
Kind of
-:Improvements:
of Breach
Reach: Length: Width:
Slope: --Land Use
Improvements
Above .:Floodwater
Above
Flood Plain:
Flood' Plain
Ft. Ft-:
t..
Ft.
CRO PX,9AtP
2
3
Describe poten�ial -I;cr
loss
of life and damage to existing
or probable fut
re downstream
-s from a sudden
improvement
breach
e
IL .71
Hazard Classifir--atic.r. of Dam! ;at b, C) (see NEM -Part 520.21)
Dam Classificatic!) I-, !U, TV, V)
By 096,xw�, a Date
(name) L I
Date 5-95
Concurred By
r!dme
• Pte,
-
1.O E: I I r.,: t L e
-:hz-2ts zi.: needed.

3. 3. 1(1
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND -MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: Waller Dai Is o
DATE: 10/12/99
• A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 99 . At no time should
the effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 2.7 feet level
below the settled top of dam.
A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway.
The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back
slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
• The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion.. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment --pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc.—
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
( 180 days or 6 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

3.3.10
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES COVSERVATION SERVICE
II OPERA'TIONAND-MAINTENANCE PLAN _
PROJECT/FARM: Waller Dafty Znd Po✓ucl
DATE: 10/12/99
A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 92 . At no time should
the effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 4.5 feet level
below the settled top of dam.
• A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway.
The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back
slope and at the toe of the darn. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
• The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment—pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc.—
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
(_120 days or 4 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ )
704 - 663 - 1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES (EMS)
704 - 638 - 0911
ROWAN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
( SWCD )
704 - 637 - 0783
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS )
704 - 637 - 1604
ROWAN COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE (CES)
704 - 633 - 0571
This plan will be implemented in the event that waste from your operation is
leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until waste
reaches surface waters of leave your property to consider that you have a
problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen.
This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of waste. Depending on the situation, this may or
may not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are
listed below.

` A. Lagoon / Waste Storage Pond overflow - possible solutions are:
a. Make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon / waste
storage pond.
b. Stop all flows into the lagoon / waste storage pond
immediately.
C. Pump waste to fields at an acceptable rate.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Add temporary soil berm to increase elevation of dam.
B. Runoff from waste application field - actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
C. Create a temporary diversion to contain the runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the
runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff
occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers - action include:
a. Stop the irrigation pump.
b. Stop the recycle pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators - action
include:
a. Stop the irrigation pump.
b. Stop the recycle pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush system, or solid
separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon / waste storage pond.
Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks - possible
action:
a. Dig a small sump4or ditch away from the embankment to
catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump
back to lagoon / waste storage pond.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove
animals and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side
walls and lagoon / waste storage pond bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
A. Did the runoff reach any surface waters?
B. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or
property damage?
D. Did the spill leave the property?
E. Does the spill have the potential to reach any surface waters?
F. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach any surface
waters?
G. Are potable water wells in danger ( either on or off of the
property) ?
H. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
A. During normal business hours, call your Division of Water
Quality regional office: Phone 704 - 663 - 1699. After hours,
emergency number: 919 - 733 - 3942. Your phone call should
include: your name, facility name, telephone number, the
details of the incident from item 2 above. the exact location of
the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that
have been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.

B. If the spill leaves your property or enters surface waters, call
the local EMS phone number 704 - 638 - 0911.
_ C. Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department.
D. Contact the Rowan SWCD at 704 - 637 - 0783 , the
MRCS at 704 - 637 - 1604, or the CES at 704 - 633.0571
for advice 1 technical assistance.
4. If none of the above numbers work, call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that person to
contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of the problem
to minimize off - site damage.
See Attached Contractor List
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon / waste
storage pond ( NRCS, SWCD, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
Name: R. Bruce Rider
Phone: [phone]
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste
management plan to keep problems with release of waste from
happening again.

CONTRACTORS
CCUNTY --- ;?O; -I --AN
L.P. 2arc?r, jr.
- - :Graz '! i:;
Sal �:C ?e
~
Gr ... & Cor. r acto_
�i rc: :7
ell NC
C'.:10 C-o-Structi0'1, F^C.
C ?;_-
7. _
�c__5�1-r
ai -
_
- 7- - - - _
"2 _CGC...a.. ..-
`.0 2S 146
P
_ or. CZ
_ 4

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
SnurrcC'uusc IIAIE's (o Cuulrnl luscels Sift tillcrifir. I'rarficrs
----• I.iynid Systems -----����--
1:111sh (ittucrs Acctiuulialian of solids E71 Flush syslcnt is designed :11111 o11ermol
s111licie1111y to remove acc11n1111aled solids liorll
[;tillers as rlesignecl.
rJ Remove bridging ofaccluuulalccl solills al
discharge
k1gou11s .11111 NIS C'I11sled SolidsMailimirl lagoons, scillinli hasins and Irils wllcrc
�1csi hi -ceding is apparent Ice minimize Ittc
carllslinu nfsulirls to a Je111h of110 more diad ( -
8 irrch'es over morc 113an 300,10 of surlacc.
IAccssive vcgoalive Decaying vel;el:nionfviainlai11 vel;clalivu conllol idorll, hanks or --- i
c iluticrll lagoons and other impormclnlellls l0 11revcnl
crnn111:rliort nl'dccayin(; vegelalive maucr i
alnnl; water's edge ort impouuclmerrl's petimelcr.
Iced Spillage
yFCCII SltMLLe AeCI1111111a11UllS of feed residues
AMIC - Noviumlicr 1 I, I1196, I'agc I
I)ry Systems
iI )esil;rl, operirie Mill u1:1in1:1in Well syslcots
Inmi;ers and [roughs) to minimize IIIc
a c11nt111aliti11 ordecaying waslage.
(Mean 1111 sltill:lgC on a 1 1111611c Iasis (e.g., 7 - 10
Ivry imcival [Irving s1111uoer; 15-70 Jay interval
dorinl; winter).
I IZcchlcc
1l1oisl11re :Iec11111ulaliun wilhio smd
�;'roond ilnnlcdi:rle Ilerinrr;ler 111 iced sloral;e
�reas Ity insoricll; drainage amly linen silt
and/or 11rovidiiig adccl11als confaimuccll (C.[;..
covered Ilio fnr llrewcr's grili11 and similar hil,h
Inuislure grain 11rodticls).
Inspect filr and Icnrrrve ur 11rc:1k till acca11111)alel)
sr►licls in filler. drills .1rurlild lied slurage :1s -
necJcd.
If

5nrerrc Cause 11MI's to 011111-411 Iisccls title Specific 140ctices
Animal 1141h1ing Atcas Accumulations of anintal w;tsles `(:fintinale low areas that trap moisture along -- and Red wastage ices and other Incadnns where %mule
accimlu NOS and disuuhance by an hinds is
minimal.
�Mainlain fence rales and filler strips trround
nintal holding areas In miniinize
acculnulalions of wasles (i.e., inspect fir and
remove or hrcak up acctuinhaled shirts as
needed).
try klanurc I landling Accunu+lalinns of animal wastes 11 Ite"Mvc spillage au a rMawe Iasis (0g•, 7 - 10
Spstent5 clay interval during sunuueq 15-3n day interval
during reinter) where manure is loaded for Kurd
application or disposal.
fl lhnvido for adorprale rhainage anmuul Main=
f slnckpiles.
11 Inspect Air and remnvc or hrcak up aca"nuh+led
wastes in litter sli ips around su41ekpiles and
nrunue handling areas as needed.
For inure inl+tnnarinn cnMam the Cnnper;uive Emensinn Service, IZepar mens of Enunnningy, Ilii; 7613, Hnnh C'an?na'laic I Inivm0y,
Raleigh. 144. 276'15-7613.
e
AkIIC •thcr 11, 1990, Page 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
S++trl'ce Callse 11hil's to Milllllll-Le 011ol. %ilc Specific 1'r:+cllccS
Farmstead 0 Dairy productinla 0 Vegcialivc nr wooded llui,l*cfs —
Tl l(econ►lllcndell best marulgeecnl pracliccs
Good judgmlcnt and common sense
Pavel! Iuts tir b71111 alley a Wet nlamurc-covered surf Icesrape ar 11ush daily
5110-aces("1�1:Fnutnlc dtyulg %villi proper vemtila[in11
Rotlliue checks and nlailltcnance oft walerers,
}Ilyelrauts, pipes, stock tanks
licdticd areas 0 Urineliunutic drying %villi proper vewilalit+n
• Partial microbial decomposition tcplace %vel or matutrc-covered bed+lirag
Alannre dry snicks a Pallial elicrtibial decomposiliun - Provide liquid drainage for slared manure ---
suurlge utak ur basin 0 Partial microbial dectimposilion ; fl noiloma or mid-level loading
I'm I'ace 0 Affixing while filling ; Cl Talik covers
• Agitalitlu when emplying Cl Basin surface orals of solids;
tvfuumizc lel nuloffaml liquid addititius
^ giiaic only prior to mtmerrc removal
f1\1 'rovell biological :addilives of oxid;ells i
Sculinc basin surraces a
Parlial microbial decompositimi
n
l.i%luid (1r.tivagc li-unl settled solids
•
Mixing while filling
Remove splits regrllarl)'
•
Agitali,m when emptying
Alamorc, slurrym- sln+lge •
Agilation when spreading
n
, nil injectionorsimry/sludges
sl,tcader malcu 0
Volatile gas emissions
Wash residual mcmttre from spreader aflcr use
Cl
'roved biological adtlilives ur nxiglarw;
I hlcuvae+l nl:+nnle, -
Vldalile gas cnlissiurls while
rl
.Buil imjeaialt ol'slurry/sledges
slurry fir Silidge till lichl
drying
rl
soil incorpnrltinn wiillilr tx hrs •
:.tic 1-.ILe5
Spread III lhnl tmil'urIn layers ltir rapid dr)'lllg
rl
I'ruvctl hinitil;icul additives lir ncidanlS
I I+rlr I. LS -
Agilalion clfiecycled Iagtiun
n
I:141sil I;lld: covers;
liquid while larks are lillilug
fl
Emend ILII lines to near btitltirll all -%:elks with
:Inti-sillholl vents
(lu%Sitic drain cnllecti 111
Agilalion during w-Newater
fl
Ilox rovers
or jenrtitin boxes
collveyaece
.1NV A: - 1.luvcmber 11. 1990, Page I

Snarec Cause IIh11's In h1fllimice dnr SiteSprcif7c hr-:ICfiCVs
Lift slulinns a Agilation rluring sump tank n Snmp (unk covers
filling and drawdown
FIId 01'CIM4111ipes ill 0 Agit:tlinn during wastewater Cl Extend discharge point of pilles lulalcrueatll
I rt;c,nu conveyance lagoon li(Illid level
I.aLunn sul1'.LCes a Volatile gas emission; Cl Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• Mological mixing; Corrcct lagoon startup procedures; t
• Agitation fl inimum surface arca-lo-vnlrtotc ratio•
AAI()(' m1wr 11. 1991r, l':Igc 2
,
n Mitiintunt agitation when pumping;
n Mechanical aeration;
C1 !invert biological atlililives
IrrigWicln Sprinkler I ligh pressure agitation;
f.7 Irrigalc on dry days with hole or no wind;
a
ntiu.les Wind drift
Cl Minitnum remninctided operating procc(lure;
C7 pimp inlake near lagoon Ii1111111 surlacc;
n I'uulls From sccntul-slabe lagnmt;
Flush residual nunlure from pipes al Cull of
slurrylsllldl;c pnntpinl;s
1leacl :olio❑dS • Carcass decomposilinn
Properdisposition nl'curcasses
5lanrling +cater arutuul hnproller th-ainage;
irulle and landscape such that water drains
lacililies lilicrnlaial decomposilialt cif
a► ay front facilities
organic mailer
thud iracl.erl nntu 1nd,lic Poorly maintained access roads
Fill-in access Iruatl mainfcuallce
coads final f'lirm access
Addilional Inlirrmalinn ;
Aw,liliilrle From
-e ;citta NI.moic hJumigunitaft ; 0200 hole/I]MI' Packet -
---
NC.S11. Cuonty I.mcivii(m Cenici
Ilaity Educational I.Illit hlatnlre Management System - Lake Wheeler
Road Field Laboratory ; FBAF 2119-95
NCSI I - BAF
I.agun,l llesif;u and &i:lnllgculenl Cur Liveslock Manurc Trealincnl
and Storage ; EBAF 1113-93
M(a[1 - IIAI:
Alanageulent of Dairy 1UaStewaler ; IiIIAI: 106-63
N(.StI - IIA 1;
(%ilibraliun nl•Millnlre and %Vas(ewaler Application liynipmeul ;
FIIAE Fact Shcd
NCSI I - I1Ali w
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Mtulagenlcul: Odors and Flies ; ITO1(17, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Florida Coigleralive Exlensiun
AAI()(' m1wr 11. 1991r, l':Igc 2

T
Mortality Management Methods
(check which me:hed(s) cre being imrlement_d)
J Bu,Tial thre_ fee: b.neath the surface of the around hot:;s aft.-
:ii0'•�''.edre of the d:.ath. The bu^al Must b�- 2t 1.'._,]i ^100 r;!e: I:om an" :1OWNIQ
str.-am or public body or .vaie-.
Re:ndt-ins at a de-i,n2 plant 1:cen-ea under G.S. 1 C5 -16S. i
�.� Cei;�aie:e incine:aticn
In the case of dead aeult,-v or.],, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
auurovcd by the Deoarcmzrit of Asriculture
Any method which in the prefes-ional opinion of the Staie %'e:e:in:..rian Would
mzL:= possible the salvage of pan of a dead anirnal's value without endans:t ing
human or animal health. (Wriiten aooroval of the State ;i:ust 1�e