800017_PERMIT FILE_20171231

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations
Branch staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operations, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central Pile (Pen -nit No AWC800017)
0
T-

..r..1 A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Lonnie F. Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
3'11
Dee Freeman
Secretary
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
January 7, 2011
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2011-PC-0023
15A N.C.A.C. 2T. 1304
Amity Hills Farm/Facility 80-17
General Permit AWC800017
Rowan County
On December 3, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Amity Hills Farm and the permitted waste disposal
system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T. 1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to maintain the required Waste Application, Weekly Freeboard, Rainfall, and > 1"
Rainfall/Monthly Inspections records. This is a violation of General Permit Condition 111.1,
II1.2, 111.3, III.6, III.11, and III.12, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, maintain the required Waste Application, Weekly Freeboard, Rainfall, and > 1"
Rainfall/Monthly Inspections records in accordance with the permit.
Violation II:
Failure to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of
the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit Condition 111.5, Ill. 11, and 111. 12,
and the CAWMP.
Division of Water Quality! Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresvitio Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Cpportunity 4 Affirmative Actien Employer
One
e
NhCarolina
AdThlrally

Amity (Ft -h F'afuf/Fatility 80-17
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
January'7, 2011
Page 2 1 . _ 71
Required Corrective Action for Violation II:
In the future, conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after)
of the date of application in accordance with the permit.
Violation III:
Failure to conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis. This is a violation of Qeneral Permit
Condition IIIA, 111. 11, and 111. 12, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation III:
In the future, conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis in accordance with the permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by January 21, 2011. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the_future.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated December 3, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC800017
Regional Permit File AWC800017
ib

N Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 800017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance InspQc {Qn _.„ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routines _ _ _ County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/03/201C! Entry Time: 03-30 PM Exit Time: 04:30 PM_ Incident #:
Farm Name: Amity Hills Farm Owner Email: ahfcowsrowan(cDaol.co
Owner: Lonnie F Hoffner Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 2035 Mt Tabcr Church Rd Cleveland NC 270139200 __
Facility Status: n Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: °4 Longitude: 80°45'59"
From the intersection of Umberger Rd. and Mt. Tabor Church Rd., travel approximately 2 miles west on Mt. Tabor Church Rd. Dairy
will be on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowanllredell line.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Lonnie F Haffner Operator Certification Number: 21596
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Lonnie F. Hoffner Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Lonnie F. Haffner Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone:
704-663-1699
Ext 2162 ��I'°
Inspector Signature: Dater ,
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
10/15/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.4 Lbs11000 Gallons
03/28/08 n Waste Analysis > N = 3.7 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/20/09 > Soil Analysis
21. Waste Application, Weekly Freeboard, Rainfall, and > 1" Rainfall/Monthly Inspections records not maintained; NOV to follow.
21. Failure to conduct Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application; NOV to follow.
21. Failure to conduct 2009 Annual Soil Analysis; NOV to follow.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hof{ner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 12/03/2410 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
W Cattle - Dairy Heifer 150
LW—Cattle - Milk Caw 300 0
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond POND1 19M 48.OQ
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner . Facility Number: 800017
Inspection ©ate: 1210312014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Irnpacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Other
I=l
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
Cl
■
0
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
0
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
01
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
000
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
C1
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
0
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
0
0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload? 0
Frozen Ground? fl
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? fl
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner facility Number : 800017
Inspection Date: 1210312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection, Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? Q
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1 Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0
■
0
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
it
❑
■
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
On
0
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
l"l
Page: 4

Permit: AVVC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F HDffrner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection date: 12/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
Q
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Q
■
n
In
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
I!
❑
■
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
In
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n In
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AVVC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner
Inspection Date: 12/0312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fai! to discuss review/inspection with.on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
Lagoon/Storage Pond
Other
Facility Number: 800017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
D ■ n n
n ■ n n
0000
F1
C3
C)
Page: 6

f 'off7f
WDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H, Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED January 7, 2011
Lonnie F. Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2011-PC-0023
15A N.C.A.C. 2T. 1304
Amity Hills Farm/Facility 80-17
General Permit AWC800017
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
On December 3, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Amity Hills Farm and the permitted waste disposal
system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T.1 304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to maintain the required Waste Application, Weekly Freeboard, Rainfall, and ? I"
Rainfall/Monthly Inspections records. This is a violation of General Permit Condition 111. 1,
111.2, 111.3, 111.6, 11I.11, and I11.12, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
Re uired Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, maintain the required Waste Application, Weekly Freeboard, Rainfall, and > 1"
Rainfall/Monthly Inspections records in accordance with the permit.
Violation II:
Failure to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of
the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit Condition 11I.5, III.11, and 111. 12,
and the CAWMP.
Division of Mater Quality /Aquifer Protection Section I Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] ti Customer Service: 1.877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterqualiq.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
No �hCarolina
Aahzrally

Amity Hills Farm/Fncility 80-17
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
January 7, 2011
Page 2
Required Corrective Action for Violation II:
In the future, conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after)
of the date of application in accordance with the permit.
Violation III.
Failure to conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis. This is a violation of General Permit
Condition 11I.4, I11.11, and 111. 12, and the CAWMP.
Required Corrective Action for Violation III:
In the future, conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis in accordance with the permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by January 21, 2011. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Beaffe or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated December 3, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC800017
Regional Permit File AWC800017
jb
JL

® Division of Water Quality
(--� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 800017 Facility Status: Arg _ Permit: AWC800017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: VllgnrPsville
Date of Visit: 1210312010_____ Entry Time: :.get EDA Exit Time: 04:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Amity Hills Farm _ Owner Email: hfcowsrowan a I.co
Owner: Lonnie F Hoffner Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2705 Cor0er Spriras Rd Mooresville NC 281158399
Physical Address: 2035 Mt Tabor Church Rd __ _ Cleveland NC 270139200
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant N Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°40'55" Longitude: W45'59" _
From the intersection of Umberger Rd. and Mt. Tabor Church Rd., travel approximately 2 miles west on Mt. Tabor Church Rd. hairy
will be on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowanllredell line.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Lonnie F Hoffner Operator Certification Number: 21596
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Lonnie F. Hoffner Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Lonnie F. Hoffner Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date:���0
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
10/15/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.4 Lbs11000 Gallons
03/28/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.7 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/20/09 > Soil Analysis
21. Waste Application, Weekly Freeboard, Rainfall, and > 1" Rainfall/Monthly Inspections records not maintained; NOV to follow.
21. Failure to conduct Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application; NOV to follow.
21. Failure to conduct 2009 Annual Soil Analysis; NOV to follow
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 12/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Desigh Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 150
O Cattle -Milk Cow 300 0
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard observed Freeboard
este Pond POND1 19.00 48.00
Page: 2

~v
Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 12/0312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
In
In
8, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste !A,ppliication
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800017 Owner -Facility: Lonnie F Haffner Facility Number : 800017
inspection Date: 12/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection. Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? D
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre detormination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Corn (Silage)
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Small Grain Cover
n■D❑
D■DD
D■DD
n
Page: 4
o.

Permit: AVVC80DO17 owner- Facility: Lonnie F Hrffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection pate: 12/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? fl
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ n ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ■
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code? ■
Weekly Freeboard? IN
Transfers? Q
Ra'nfail? ■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ■
Waste Analysis? ■
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
fl
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■
❑
0
23. If selected, did the facility fai€ to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
■
0
0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
Q
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Q
■
❑
0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
Q
■
0
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner
Inspection Date: 12/0312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with.on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
Lagoon/Storage Pond
Other
Facility Number: 800017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n
n
n
Page. 6

A.
Water Resources w
Environmental Quality
Daniel L. Knox
Amity Hills Farm
550 Knox Road
Cleveland, NC 27013
Dear Mr. Knox:
i c�op�
ROY COOPER
_. Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
August 21, 2017. qd lAd-v
CX, �tw
FaW1,
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Amity Hills Farm/Facility 80-17
General Permit AWC8000I7
Rowan County
On July 19, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Amity Hills Farm and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during
the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated July 19, 2017
Ib
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

4
I
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
800017 Facility Statu:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for visit:
Routine
bate of visit:
07/19/2017 Entry Time: 02:30 pm
Farm Name:
Amity Hills Farm
Owner:
Daniei Luke Knox
Mailing Address:
550 Knox Rd
Physical Address:
2035 Mt Tabor Church Rd
Facility Status:
E r, ­ _1;__f n Kim
/Active Permit: AWCBQDD17 Lj Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Cleveland NC 270138817
Cleveland NC 270139200
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 40' 55" Longitude: 80° 45' 59"
From the intersection of Umberger Rd. and Mt. Tabor Church Rd., travel approximately 2 miles west on Mt. Tabor Church Rd. Dairy
will be on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowantiredell line.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Cal, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Harry Phillip McLain Operator Certification Number: 991884
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Daniel L. Knox Phone : [phone]
On-site representative Daniel L. Knox Phone : [phone]
Primary. Inspector: James B e Phone: [phone] Ex:
Inspector Signature:Date: 1
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
12/15/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.09 Lbs/1000 Gallons
02/02/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.16 Lbs/1000 Gallons
02/04/16 > Soil Analysis
14. Waste applied to fields/crops not included in the CAWMP by Registered Manure Hauler AWH490002 as perthird party
agreement. Associated waste application records reviewed following the inspection.
C.
page: 1

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility : Daniel Luke Knox Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 07/19/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
160
Cattle - Milk Cow
300
Total Design Capacity: 300
Tates SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste pond POND1 19.00 42.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility : Daniel Luke Knox Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 07/19/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
Structure
❑
❑
M ❑
Application Field
❑
❑
PAN?
Other
❑
❑
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
El
-011
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storacie & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
.
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? ,
❑
PAN?
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
[]
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
El
-011
Elto
roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
[] M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
[]
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC800017 Owner- Facility : Daniel Luke Knox Facility Number; 800017
Inspection Date: 07/19/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
I
Waste ApRlication
Yea No b!a N
Crop Type 1
cam (silage)
N ❑
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
❑
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
WUP?
❑
Crop Type 6
Checklists?
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
❑
Soil Type 3
Maps?
❑
Soil Type 4
Lease Agreements?
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
❑
U. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
0 ❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑ E
❑
determination?
.Waste Application?
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Ne No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ .
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
.Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

I
Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility : Daniel Luke Knox Facility Number: 800017
Inspection. Date: 07/19/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
01313
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0 ❑
(NPDES only)?
0 ❑
❑.
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
1:10 ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Other
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0 ❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Na
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑.
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? ❑ ME] ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ [] ❑
page: 5

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
July 15, 2014
James Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2035 Mt. Tabor Church Rd
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: Additional Information Request
Amity Hills Farm
Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800017
Rowan County
Dear James Hoffner:
John E. 5kvarla, III
5 2014
,ii[nr Protnotion
The Animal Feeding Operation Branch of the Division of Water Resources (Division) has completed a
preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is required before
we may continue our review. Please address and submit the following item within fifteen (15) days of
receipt of this letter:
The owner name for this facility in our records is different than the person signing the application package.
Please fill out the attached change of ownership form if there has been a change on ownership of this facility.
A blank copy of the Change of Ownership form can also be found at.-
http://www.ncwaterguality.orgZweb/wq/al2s/afo/apl2
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed and dated to my attention at the address below. Such
information can also be submitted electronically at [e-mail].
Miressa D. Garoma
Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Branch
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Central Files
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone: [phone] Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — Made In part by recycled paper

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL, QUALITY
January 17, 2017
Daniel L. Knox
Amity Hills Farm
550 Knox Road
Cleveland, NC 27013
ROY=COORERm
c ,ru„oa•
WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR.
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Amity Hills Farm/Facility 80-17
General Permit AWC800017
Rowan County
11MUU 1M I'MM
Duvetar
On December 2, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Amity Hills Farm and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during
the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated December 2, 2016
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

k
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 800017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800017
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit, Routine County: Rowan Region:
Date of Visit: 12/02/2016 Entry Time: 03:00 pm Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident e
Farm Name:
Amity Hills Farm
Owner.
Daniel Luke Knox
Mailing Address:
550 Knox Rd
Physical Address:
2035 Mt Tabor Church Rd i
Owner Email:
Phone:
Cleveland NC 270138817
Cleveland NC 270139200
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 40'55" Longitude: 80° 45' 59"
From the intersection of Umberger Rd. and Mt. Tabor Church Rd., travel approximately 2 miles west on Ml. Tabor Church Rd. Dairy
will be on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowanllredell line.
Question Areas:
Dischrge 8 Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
❑ Denied Access
Mooresville
704-278-2135
Certified Operator: Harry Phillip McLain Operator Certification Number: 991884
Secondary 01C(s):
On-Slte Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Daniel L. Knox Phone : [phone]
On-site representative Daniel L. Knox Phone: [phone]
Primary Impactor:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
02/02/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.16 Lbs11000 Gallons
08/20/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 12.8 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/04/16 > Soil Analysis
Phone: [phone] E�
Date:
14. Waste applied to fieldslcrops not included in the CAWMP by Registered Manure Hauler MHC000023 as per third party
agreement. Associated waste application records reviewed following the inspection.
lb
page: 'I

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility : Daniel Luke Knox Facility Number; 800017
Inspection Date: 12/02/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
170
❑ Cattle - Milk Cow
300
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond POND1 19.00 48.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Daniel Luke Knox Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 12/02/16 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar. ems &-Stream Impacts
Yee No Na No
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Structure
❑
❑
❑
Application Field
[❑
Other
❑
❑
0 ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ E
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
110
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
0
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yea
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e.l large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
Cl
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes N9 Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Daniel Luke Knox Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 12/02/16 , Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
yes
No_Na-Me
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
M ❑
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hey, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
❑
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
❑
Crop Type 6
❑
Soil Type 1
❑
Soil Type 2
❑
Soil Type 3
❑
Soil Type 4
❑
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
❑
■ ❑
❑
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
M
Cl ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the faciiity fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21: Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

1
Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility :. Daniel Luke Knox Facility Number:
800017
Inspection Date: 12/02/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes_ No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and,1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ 0
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
01111
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yea No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M Cl
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
if Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ M ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ M ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ M 1:1,1:1
page: 5

A
��
RUM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Naturae Resources
Pat McCrory RECEIVEaiN(0~R JFWn der Vaart
Govemor ecret
SEP 23 20i a ry
September 18, 2015
Daniel Luke Knox WOROS
Amity Hills Farm MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
550 Knox Road
Cleveland, NC 27013
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800017
Amity Hills Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Daniel Luke Knox:
In accordance with your Notification of Change of Ownership receive September 15, 2015, we are hereby
forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Daniel Luke Knox, authorizing the
operation of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for Amity Hills Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf: Dry Cow: Beef Brood Cow:
Dairy Heifer: Beef Stocker Calf; Other:
Milk Cow: 300 Beef Feeder:
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC800017 dated October 1, 2014. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this hermit. Record keening forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site-specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show. that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone, 91M07-64641 Internet: http:/Awm,ncwater.org
An Bud 0noodunity 1 Affirmative Action Emolover — Made in nart by recvcied oxer

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per NRCS standards a 100 -foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS' 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/Warning information for your county by calling (he Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather . Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
htip://www.weather.gov/gsr)/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 704-663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
Lor S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWC800017)

t�-------------
Reason for Visit: 40 Rgu9ne, O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: ` `� County: �~� Region:
Farm Name: ` W N 00kOwner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
C Laid
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:-
Title: Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
fy��S.)''r�r "�.��n ,�ky��� � r t �, ._ �� :y
�i.���y�, 'a, r A'.n "` r`
rte�;;. � .' ; :'�.' .'fir
p- a .�t���y}"� ;.�'�j �
r �,._li .� i •
[:]Yes ❑No
A
[] NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [:]No
N❑
NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State'(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste managementsystem?'(If yes, notify-DWQ)
■ ��
■
❑TIE
=71 Cc
M -MI, M1
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters .
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
s ■ - -_
=�l+r ;4"'4�7r rs_r - of
f.
fl.
..
■ ,
■ ,
i/ .'��
-��� � . ,�
� ; ��y° "'.5-�.�4��-"Sim �J-
a
' ■ • -® �"%.
Discharges and Stream Imaacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
D' h *-A.+ ' ❑ Stru tur ❑ A lication Field ❑ Other
isc arge ong�na . c e pp
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[:]Yes ❑No
A
[] NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [:]No
N❑
NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State'(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste managementsystem?'(If yes, notify-DWQ)
❑Yes ❑ No
A
❑TIE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Ye o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters .
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page l of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: ' - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes- 0 ❑ NA ONE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NE
SVcturf
" Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): .
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate a tntegn
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Strucwz e 6
of any of the structures observed?
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes jj;�NA [] NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or environ t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [] Yes . NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o A ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ' ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste -Application
10. Are there any required ers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes �oO�XA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ED Yes o �] NA [] NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑'Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Ouiside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Wft ❑ Application Outs' a of Appr e
12. Crop;Type(s): ' - G
13. Soil Type(s): S
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? IV�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?. Yes No A ❑ NE
y
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Ye ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Ye NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes \[YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Re uired Records & Documents��
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certi 1 overage &Permit readil�availab�le?��[_] Yes 1�3'�O NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropria box.
Checklists Design ps Lease Agreements O
X
es record keeping need im ment7 If:yes, chec .appropriatebox be ow _ _... ❑ Y � .❑ NE
:..... -
ste Application Weekly Freeboard aste Anal Soil Weather Code
all [] Sto Crop Yield ❑ 120 nspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install. and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No JK4A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/201.1 Continued

iT
.t
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes o E]N/A� E] NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o �'NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? []Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead a 'xnaL
ith 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higheran t norma ?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of a ns as required by the
permit? (i.e., di cs harge, freeboard problems, over-ap on
❑ Yes CNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes . . ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ s
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Y�
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Y
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Y
❑NA ❑NE
7
�] NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Co ma/ �6 -stR�
cv�)
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

I
Type of Visit: W Compliance Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: *Routine O Complaint O Follow-ue Q Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: d$ A al Time:
icz Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: ----
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ' -
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
��e rAiti)�>4
Cs w� Latitude:
Certified Operator
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
ft
Design
'Current
Design
Current
Design Current.
rpacityp.
pFP
Swine "
.:
' Wet Poultry
Cap city
p.
Cattle
Cap ctty. Po .
Wean to Finish
La er
Non -La er
�'
D . Poultr
I,�. ?
Design;
Ca a ity,
'
Curren r -
Pop..,
ai Cow
Dai Calf
Dai Heifer,
Non -Dairy
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean.
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
lip
Other
_Turkeys
Turkev Poults
'��
r . '�'
... 1,i:.•r.•r0th.e+rrr�_.;ve.is�.,..wr,x�mOtil»ewr :... ea,x:., msnzacw�.v.:r;.,u,me��es,i=�:;aaxaxwic :c•mw,a,,V
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 'jEkNA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
21412011 Continued

Date of Inspection:
4. Is storage capacity (s I plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
P a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Stru ture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes ❑ No -1 NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
i
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area Qv
12, Crop Type(s):�'b
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
�eyes- '&V O ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes -)B;.'Po ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ YeslerlA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents -
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 70t . ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.! qC
❑ ec fists Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements e�'►•►
21. Does record keeping need im vement? If yes, check th propriate box below. es ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]}Juste Application Freeboard aste Analysis So' Analysis ase ran ers eather Code
nfall tockingtrWee_kly
op Yield 0 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspecti;;�o
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑No �A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2021 Continued

Faclli Number: - Date of Inspection:
1 24. Did the fadility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? E] Yes _Flor7 NA 0 NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes L_. o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes. ❑.No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher th rm
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations p required by the
ermit? (i a di -char a freeboard roblems over- a Hca ion
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [DNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �_ ,O NA
[] NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Ye o A ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer.to-question #) Explain any YES; answers and/or any�additi6nal recommendations!.or any, other comments. '
Use drawings°of facility'ta f etter explain situs"'ons,{use additionai'pages as necessary):.�.' �P4
F: _
z
D4S
SLA
G �y o')"_ -V
of
LQ rc
VVI-
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

t -[BCDA�CS�Agionorriic:Dirision'�=Ph�ane [g19?f733-2655. Z Website:': wrvw��caA�:govla�ironoinil: Fl!:15=W006543
tit
_
Diagnostic Client McLain Farms Inc. Advisor., Daniel Overcash
964 Snow Creek Rd 1830 Wilkinson Rd
Statesville, NC 28625 Mooresville, NC 28115
Waste Report
'Z Iredell County
sampled: 04/02/2015 Received: 04/22/2015 completed: 04/28/2015 Farm: Links to Helpful Information
Sample Information
Nutrient and Other Measurements
Nitrogen (N) (ppm) P (ppm) K (Rpm) Ca (ppm) Mq (ppm) S (ppm) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm) Zn (ppm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm) Na (ppm) C (Fpm)
Sample 1D: 362127
Total N 1340 3010 3220 963 752 475 28.3 24.4 5.02 4.14 256
Waste code: LSD
Description:
Total Neldahl N 2860
Dairy Liq. Slurry
pH DM (%) SS (10-5S/cm) EC (mS/cm) CCE (%) ALE(1000 gal.) C:N
Inorganic N
NH4-N 7.42
Comments:
NO3-N
Orqanic N Ni (ppm) Cd (ppm) Pb (ppm) At (ppm) Se (ppm) Li (ppm) As (ppm) Cr (ppm) Co (ppm) Cl (ppm) Mo (ppm)
Urea
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop (lb 11000 gal.) Other Elements (lb 11000 gal.)
Application Method
N P205 K20 Ca MQ S Fe Mn Zn Cu 8 Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast
9.54 25.6 30.1 26.8 8.03 6.27 3.96 0.24 0.20 0.04 0.03 2.13
Agronomist's Comments:
The waste contains a large amount of nitrogen and phosphorus. Be careful to apply the waste only at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement. The samples that we received were
not clearly labeled. Please label future samples clearly so that we can ensure your test results are correct. Kristin A. Hicks 4/28/2015 8:30 AM
North °Carolina.
E
:Ta6goro7rusi�tarad Tam's
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler. Commissioner of
L;

NCDA$CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.govlagronomil FY14-W
in Pac
ormation
Nutrient and Other Measurements
Nitrogen (N) (ppm)
P (ppm)
K (ppm) Ca (ppm) MQ (ppm)
S (ppm) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm)
Zn (Ppm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm)
Na (parol
345613
Total N
447
1290 1330 429
255 549 26.3
16.2 4.07 1.80
865
fe: LSD
n:
Total Kjeldahl N 2670
--•-----------------•------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------------
;lurry
pH
DM (96) SS (10-55/cm)
EC (mSlcm)
CCE (90) ALE(1000 gal.)
Inorganic N
NH4-N
7.34
NO3-N
Organic N
Ni (ppm)
Cd (ppm) Pb (ppm) Al (ppm)
Se (Ppm) Li (ppm) As
(ppm) Cr (ppm) Co (ppm)
Cl (PPM)
Urea
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop (lb 11000 gal.)
Other Elements (lb 11000 gal.)
a Method
N P205 K20
Ca Mg
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo
Ct Na Ni Cd Pb
Al
8.92 8.54 12.9
11.1 3.58
2.12 4.58 0.22 0.14
0.03 0.02
7.21
ormation
Nutrient and Other Measurements
Nitrogen (N) (ppm)
P (ppm)
K (ppm) Ca (ppm) MQ (ppm)
S (ppm) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm)
Zn (ppm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm)
Na (ppm)
346614
Total N
735
2150 1620 479
457 274 17.5
14.7 3.87 2.62
225
fe: LSD
ri:
Total KjeldahlN 2160
..............
......................... ......................................................................
I.........
Murry
pH
DM (qb) SS (10-5S/crn)
EC (mS in)
CCE {90) ALE(1000 gal.)
Inorganic N
NH4-N
7.07
NO3-N
------•...........................................................................................I..................
Organic N
Ni Wrn)
Cd (ppm) Pb (ppm) Al (Ppm)
Se (ppm) Li (Ppm) As (ppm) Cr (ppm) Co (ppm)
CI (Ppm)
Urea
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop (ib 11000 gal.)
Other Elements (lb 11000 gal.)
n Medwd
N P205 K20
Ca Mg
S Fe Mn Zn
Cu B Mo
Cl Na Ni Cd Pb
Al
7.22 14.0 21.5
13.5 3.99
3.81 2.29 0.15 0.12
0.03 0.02
1.88

qBealle, James
From: Phillip McLain <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 9:02 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: Knox Samples
Attachments: waste samples knox.zip_renamed
The corresponding cover sheets match the samples with the report number at the top
Phillip McLain
McLain LLC
704-871-6151
[e-mail]

Bealle, James
From: Phillip McLain <[e-mail]>
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 8:22 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: Spring application
Attachments: Tran 1 Knox Spring 14.xls; Slur 1, 2 Knox Spring 2014.xis; Screen Shot 2015-09-20 at
7.51.40 AM.png
James,
The one pdf cut off 346614 sample info. I have inclosed a better pdf
Phillip McLain
McLain LLC
704-871-6151
[e-mail]

FORM SLUR -2
Tract A
Field Size(Wetted Acres)=(A;
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Records
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field # Pasture
60 Facility Number 80 F 17
Amity Hills Farm Spreader Operator CAWS
ws and Address 964 Snow Creels Rd Statesville, NC 28625
1 704-202-0475 1
Operators Phone # I 704-871-6151
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Grass Recommended PAN 220
Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
i I
111 f2l (3) (4) (5) 161 (7) (8)
—Nutrient
Source
Date
(mmldd/yr)
Number
of Loads
per Field
Volume of
each Load'
(gallons)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume per Acre
(gallons/acre)
(4)1(A)
Waste Analysis
PAN"
(lb/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Iblacre)
(6) x (5) / 1000
Nitrogen Balance***
(Iblacre)
(B) - (7)
B= 220
Lagoon 1
6/13/2014
67
8,000
536,000
8,933
7.2
64.32
155.68
Crop Cycle Totals: 1 536,000
64.32
Owners Signature Spreader Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (print) Phillip McLain _ _ Operator Certification No. AWB - 991884
Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual.
See your waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
—Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.
—Enter nutrient source (ie. Lagoon/Storage Pond ID, commerical fertilizer, dry litter, etc.)
12/20/2006

FORM TRAN-1 Knox Spring 14
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Animal Waste Transfer Record
Record Each Transfer of Waste Between Lagoons or Third Party
—:::Facility Number 80 17
Amity Hills Farm I I
550 Knox Rd
Cleveland, Nc 27013
704-202-0475
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
Phillip McLain
515 Fort Dobbs Rd
Statesville, Nc 28625
Date
Time
Nutient
Analysis
Transfer From
(lagoon ID)
Transfer To
(lagoon ID or third party)
"Volume
Transferred
—Third Party Information
Permit #
Name
Phone #
6114/2014
all day
7.2N 14P
1
CAWS/McLain LLC
424,000
AWH490002
McLain Farms
704-876-6667
424,000
*Volume Transferred must be recorded in gallons, tons, or cubic yards.
"Third Party must be provided with nutrient analysis.
Waste Transfers over 4 cubic yards must be accepted by a permitted facility or a field in the permittee's WUP.
7114/2014
0

i
-Bealle, James
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Phillip McLain
McLain LLC
704-871-6151
[e-mail]
Phillip McLain <[e-mail]>
Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:31 AM
Bealle, James
Fall Transfer
Tran 1 Knox Fall 14.xls

FORM TRAN-'i Knox Fall 14
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Amity Hills Farm
550 Knox Rd
Cleveland, Nc 27013
704-202-0475
Animal Waste Transfer Record
Record Each Transfer of Waste Between Lagoons or Third Party
Facility Number 80 7��l
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
Phillip McLain
515 Fort Dobbs Rd
Statesville, Nc 28625
Date
Time
Nutient
Analysis
Transfer From
(lagoon ID)
Transfer To
(lagoon ID or third party)
'Volume
Transferred
"Third Party Information
Permit #
Name
Phone #
1211512014-
12/16/14
all day
7.2N 14P
1
CAWS/McLain LLC
172,000
AWH490002
McLain Farms
704-876-6667
1211512014-
12118114
all day
9.54N 25.6P
1
CAWS/McLain LLC
544,000
AWH490002
McLain Farms
704-876-6667
716,000
*Volume Transferred must be recorded in gallons, tons, or cubic yards.
**Third Party must be provided with nutrient analysis.
Waste Transfers over 4 cubic yards must be accepted by a permitted facility or a field in the permittee's WUP.
3/14/2015
7

r `
,.v Division of -Water Q'0
;.
Facility Number k .®- Division of:SoiE and'�Water Conservation 3 ?: a
Q; Othei Agency �.
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:m�i; ,r Departure Time: County: Region: 1M
Farm Name: , t I S� 1 w~ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Y—s v S L� Phone: OC '7a- 2 2.t 3
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Bach -up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: ~ - Phone: .
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
t..����
Certification Number:
Longitude:
-_ Design 'CurrentDesign Current Design Current
c.�;.:o° r. •+.. -nn:, _.W t'P If C P C ttl C P
- ,�' -'-r--,- ✓ r
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
.Other
Other
q e Olt xy apaClty Op. a e . -.,. apaClty-
i
La er
Non -La er
:Design 'Current'°
"IM©
Other
Poults
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
n , iir.: Imam!
IMF . —�
❑Yes ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
4§MA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
IWA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No -A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? 5�fo
Page I of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: 71
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ YeNa_]NE
;"'7D
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: __L
Spillway?: �T+�
Designed Freeboard (in): U�
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �& o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,'etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Da any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
0 Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes o
[] NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes ' o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑o ❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
w
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of kind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Are
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): a I Acok/
❑ NE
I4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?ZE
go
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?"y1�� ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes20�o ❑ NA . ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 7t<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes g 0 NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes' ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
r7- nUec is ❑Other; ��
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes o ❑ NA [—]NE
�aste Application Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis '1 Analysis ste Transfers e'Weather Code
�ainfall Stocking �'C op Yie 120 Minute Inspections 6��onthly and V Rainfall Inspections �fudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes--I!J.Lllo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No Zg_NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412��0111 Continued

�1,acility Number: - Date of Inspection:
1 24. Did the facility fail to c i raale_waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Ycs o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
A E] NE
the appropriate'box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon .
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes jn5blo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No _�VA ❑ NE
Other Issues T
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes j:ao ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than n m i?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ;�<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of elns as required by the ❑ Yes )<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑Yes o [DNA [] NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? E] YesNo ❑ NA C] NE
Comments (refer to question #):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional irecotnmendatiotis or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better.'explain situations (useadditional pages as necessary).
� 3—V 1 �
0/10/1 r ., , � - W I i�, -A'-' Q Wvv-e-
l3
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
C j
2c
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 1/4/1011

I
I
I
i
4
Z
Ifff � I
r i I

May24 1310:45a Knox Contract Seeding Inc
7042783839 p.2
Animal Waste Management Systtm Operaltur Designation Form
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A 8F.0201
Facility/Farm Name: W ! �'
Pcrmit #; facility TD#: - + -7 County: �?O.UJiq A/
Operator In Charge. (01C)
Name: pllr f 11
Fir.vl ,Nidrl/r I +r+sf Jr,.Sr,e+r.�
4 5
Cert Type I Ntu kf: /T��I�n - �I g $ - Work Phonc:
Signature: / -, , T1�-- 1Jc+tr.; 9'/7
//3
"T certify th;u T agree to my designadon IS thC. 0pera1or in Chart:r. Cor I he facility rioted. I understand and will abide by the rules
and regulations pertaining te+t.hc respun%ibilitias tie[ liarlh in 15A NCAC 088.0203 and foilir+k tv L.10 so c:m Tcsuij in Disciplinary
Actinnr by the Water P011U60n Control Systarn Operwors Caul icurir n r rn1i11i5Fi611_"
Back-up Operator In Charge (Back-up 0IC) (Oplional)
NTrrf - — - --- Mio411r lfi.r+ ---- . Jr, SO%
Cert Type. / Number:
Signature
Wa,k Phone:
Date:
"I certify that .l tlbrve u) ,riy ddNilgaaucsn as Back-up Operator in Ch;trg4 fc+r the 1.'11614V noted, I widettitand and will abide by tho
rules and regulations pertaining to dw. respansibilitiar scl forth in 15A NCAC OHF .0201 :tnd tailing u. rin NO t':rn rrsull irr
Disciplin: ry Acl.iofis by the Water P011ution Control System Operator5 (;cndi �cutitin Coinolisgion."
I
Owner/Permittee Warne:
}hone #: Fax#: (_
$ignafure.:
(Owner or aulborim) oge,u)
Mail or fax' to: 'WPCSOCC
1678 Mnii Service Center
Raiciph, N -C. 27699-1618
Fax: [phone]
(Relaid ,t Copy o(titin form for yon, records)
R,w;, (pJ'An(07
Date:

Notification of Change of Ownership
Animal Waste Management Facility
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
In accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2T .1304(c) and 15A NCAC 2T .1305(d) this form is official notification
to the Division of Water Resources (DWR) of the transfer of ownership of an Animal Waste Management Facility. This
form must be submitted to DWR no later than 60 days following the transfer of ownership.
General Information:
Previous Name of Farm: Facility No: -
Previous Owner(s) Name: Phone No:
New Owner(s) Name: Phone No:
New Farm Name (if applicable):
Mailing Address:
Farm Location: Latitude and Longitude:
County:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified, and provide the location address and driving directions
below (Be specific: road names, directions, milepost, etc.):
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Type of Poultry
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
No. of Animals
Type of Cattle
❑ Dairy
❑ Beef
No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds: Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for the farm named above
and will implement these procedures. 1 (we) know that any modification or expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a permit modification before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application
system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm event less severe than
the 25 -year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we) understand that this
facility may be covered by a State Non -Discharge Permit or a NPDES Permit and completion of this form authorizes the
Division of Water Resources to issue the required permit to the new land owner.
Name of Previous Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of New Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Please sign and return this form to: N. C. Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Animal Feeding Operations Branch
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
.lune 23, 2014

Type of visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit, 0 Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I 0000 Departure Time: County: T � Region:
Farm Name: b YV 4 Owne Email:
Owner Name: L— <e � t' L)x P one: 7
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
W
Facility Contact: Title: �c Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
1 ; DesAgn Curr eSl$n CUr e t =
Design Currents ,` ent• x D r n 3
Suring Capacity. Pop Wet Poultry Capacity Pop y Cattle L Capacity '� Pi ` 7
..si', 5 ._ :r., e� "S, ,'�,�, k- S' ,, u r :: .l n,.> ..rte, .r
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Layer
Non -La er
q Design Current
1) Point Caacs -Po
Layers
Turkeys
Other. r =
Turkey Poults
Other Other
�airy Cow
Ijairy Calf
�K,Vairy Heifer
Da Cow
Ndn-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
d i•
..ti
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
N.Division4P.Witter Qei' ality
❑ NA
[] NE
Facility Number
® ��
O Division Water Conservation �`
r
xis" `h
❑ Yes
❑ No
WA
of Soil and
../ R" }
t'.p
rr
C• "j - Ja
❑ Yes
❑ No
a.%.� (3 ♦�, g T
O Other�A ene 4'Y: CtTT C E va ,k% 'i"Y"f Jit
❑ NE
,,.
.01
Type of visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit, 0 Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I 0000 Departure Time: County: T � Region:
Farm Name: b YV 4 Owne Email:
Owner Name: L— <e � t' L)x P one: 7
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
W
Facility Contact: Title: �c Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
1 ; DesAgn Curr eSl$n CUr e t =
Design Currents ,` ent• x D r n 3
Suring Capacity. Pop Wet Poultry Capacity Pop y Cattle L Capacity '� Pi ` 7
..si', 5 ._ :r., e� "S, ,'�,�, k- S' ,, u r :: .l n,.> ..rte, .r
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Layer
Non -La er
q Design Current
1) Point Caacs -Po
Layers
Turkeys
Other. r =
Turkey Poults
Other Other
�airy Cow
Ijairy Calf
�K,Vairy Heifer
Da Cow
Ndn-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
d i•
..ti
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
[] NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
WA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
STA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
.01
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
nA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes�]V
ED NA
ED NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
gro
❑ NA
[] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page l of 3
1/4/2011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
471dentifier: ty (stfuctural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes � o 0 NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? �] Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
T _
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1 s
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inty of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes�To D NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the siivation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes jallo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes f;�Mo
D NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
'No
❑ NA
❑ NE.
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, e4
❑ PAN [] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
Circ
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? L\ es ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? G �1'►"� ❑ Yes J;no ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [:]Yes ❑ No j5j:VA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes t!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ is sM ITe-s—igil''''Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
record keeping need i ovement? If yes, the the appropriate box below. Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Sli�nfalltocking.[�Krop
ste Application Weekly Freeboard to Analysis of Analysis
_4�as raps ers QVeather Code
Yield 0 mute Inspections . 1 --monthly andel I" Rainfall Inspections 'Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No �kKA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

crhty Number: - Date of Ins ection:
`r ..
f 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? *sNo
E].NA
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec "A
the ap ropriate box(cs) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
on -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes 4!g::�o D NA
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes No A
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document E] Yes :B�o D NA
and report mortality rates that were highern nHl' ormar?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emer enc si ' ns as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -app is ion)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ' ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
NE
[] NE
D NE
❑ NE
D NE
I Yes
o
NA
❑ NE
QE�R
❑ NA
0 NE
D Yes �Wo DNA D NE
D Yes )52:"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes[] NA D NE .
D Yes D NA ❑ NE
Coinmenits' refeir;to uestioa;# : Explain :any Yl�5 siisrvers and/or any additional recomnnendations or any other"comments.'
Use drawings of,facility to better euplainsituations (use additional'pages.as necessary).
Vq L,20L, K"(
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Lai
F
Phone:
Date:
2/4/2011

1 Division of Water Quality
F�Ciility Numberr O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
`' O Other Agency
Type of Visit 7A Compliance inspection Q Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency Q Other [I Denied Access
Date of Visit: t l Arrival Time: 0` . CiD F. Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �( �%l Owner Email:
L6 V`iA
Owner Name: Yti � Phone: `
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Q
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity .Population
❑ Wean to Finish _
❑ eanto Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
==4 = g =o=, ❑{l
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er 77
LD Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poul is
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity PpgUI"ign
§Vlry Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
CLLkda Heifej
D Cow
ONon-Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: E{ I
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of (lie State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes '�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No �E6A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No �fi1A
❑ NE
No NA
[INE
❑ Yes
E] YesNA
eNo[]
❑ NE
El Yes
El NA
0 N
12/28/01 Continued

[Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
s
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
rue re 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
dentifier.
�2 Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
k'
Observed Freebo r (in):
5. Are thea an ediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large s, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 5 Struc re 6
❑ Ye�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ YestNo
NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ElYesNA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require❑YesNA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADniication z
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes - o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/ improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals,(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or to lbs []Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑..Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
�Is El No 0 N 0 N
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? C V,�W_ [] Yes -93FI�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[-] Yes � No A ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Zlt1 NA ❑ NE
1 S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. ;
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
=7/62%2 V7, t_ �
�$/ cfx G
b�l�lb t�
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail'to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Ye ,��Eo [3 NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes/L'XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. Desi M Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box bel ❑ Y s ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application .Weekly FreeboarWaste Analysis oil Analysis �O Waste Trans ers _ Annual Certification
''Kainfall StockingCrop Yield 120 Minute Inspections �W
Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 6ather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? �� ❑ Yes 5Z&o ❑ NA
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0 ❑ Yes ❑ No WA
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose ofead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were hi an normai?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer en required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems,o er application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
El Yes.- To El NA
❑ o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes:_�Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Ye El NA El NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
� v
17
�./
12/28/04

t.
Facility NumberfE
�;;
'off WAter QUalltyt .f��=�` :'
,ofSo1Fa6dpWater Conservation''
Type of Visit 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 48 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
I�K 011
Date or Visit: Z S/l t I Arrival Time:' i Departure Time: DS;v.{O^^ County: ' Region:
Farm Name: --PrIIAA�"h'-A"- 1. v' V Y Owner Email:
Owner Name: _L�+1j� �� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: �� V__Vt
___T Yc
Back-up Operator:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator: _ C�
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: . Latitude: =0
=6
=46 Longitude: =0=6 = "
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pq#Wttfl�n
airy Cow
❑ Calf
Wairy Heifei 1' I
iviiry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?,(Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
El Yes 1:1 No ❑ NE
❑ Yes,'[:] No)9A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA .❑ NE-
❑ !!oo
NA ❑ NE
.12128104 Continued

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes gNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NE
Structur 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): x ;
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes �CONA El NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6,were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?❑Yes , 0 NA F1 NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?. , ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Y4Ro NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes, NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type�
s) �a C C
13. Soil type(s) f CAI Y _ C ' `
9 o the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? - No ❑ NA. ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes ❑ No .TA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Ye❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
meet..+.'"i -`h. ?:,�,r„-'.� "`i---
sf(refer to gaestion�#}: Explain any YES answers.°andlor any recommepdations oranygothercammenta. �'
R�- 3 3 .s41.4�R'S <. '
S wings of facllityto better explain sitpatiods: (vse additionsl6pagesas!neces�sary)�j.�,ti�.,.
C,
=VSV/67�)
ax/11
Reviewer/Inspector Name F - ` k 5 ' " � Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to'have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. Checklists ther
21. Owaste
ecord keeping need impr vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Application Weekl eboard Waste Analysis Ooit lysis aste Transfers L7 Annual Certification
ainfall tockiii Crop Yield Minute Inspections Monthly and I " ' nspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NO--- A ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ,l ,o ❑ Yes
N ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No` VA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1<""6 NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ N4:�XNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes),j4io ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer s as required by ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, r application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [p NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Addtdonal Corumetats andlor Drawangs
12/28/04
12/28/04

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 40 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ► /sem Arrival Time: Departure Time: ."4: County: _ _ Region:.,"
Farm Name: _ � YAW � I 41A � _ Owner Email: _
Owner Name: a h�, �17- 1— - Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: LJ 'y� Operator Certification Number:_ �, SaG_
Back-up Operator: _ _ _ _ Back-up Certification Numbe .
Location of Farm: Latitude: ° Longitude:kA
°
F +.v
� y
>a.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other t .3: f
LJ Non -L
❑ Pullets
ILJ Other - I,_,,,....,....__ I_ I-I1LJ Other
VDischarges & Stream Impacts V v "� ► `�
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? /
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Pouhs
Design Current s
Capacity,. Population's _
(_J Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Coyd
F � _
;Number of Structures,
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes�Vo [INA (INE
E] Yes El NA [INE
12/28/04 Continued

I
Facility Number: Date of Inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes>qNo NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in).
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yea�No [:INA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes '*�-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6.were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do, any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ yes _)UNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ YesElNA
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
❑ NE
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
,❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Ye
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN • ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window . ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12: Crop type(s) �� Ct�CVA .
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
�l❑ Yeio
❑ NA
El NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
CVvTZj- *4, ❑ Yes ')�JZo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre­termination,❑Yes ❑ No
Z&KA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ YesElNA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name .,.k � .-s;kK +,-•.r�gt.ac?�:7:e
� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date:
12/28/04 Continued

r
f Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection 0
�! Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yqj check ❑ Ye� ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
e e�sign Maps❑ Qther
21. Does record keeping need ' vement? If yes - ck e appropriat e ow. s ❑l No
❑ NA ❑ NE
e Applicati kly Freeb ste Analy m�il as ysis aste Transfers__4!!j`7kal Certification .
ainfall _OStocking Crop Yield 20 Minute Inspectio s onthly and I" Rain Inspections Bather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and ma' in a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o [INA ❑ NE'
23.
If selected, did the facility fail instal and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ElNo><A
ElNE
24.
Did the facility fail to cal' at ase application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes )?t&p ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to condu t a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to hav an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes )Seo ❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to s ure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification'?
❑ Yes ❑ No2: A
❑ NE
Other issues
28. Were any additional roblems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
,�
❑ Yes )Aro ❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail o properly dispose of ad an als within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the moi lity rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a gional Air Quality representative immediately
31,
Did the facility it to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ YesN&I'No ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, ove" —r appp kation)
L>
32.
Did Reviewer) Spector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ YesIo ❑ NE
33.
Does facility r quire a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
:'v -�
Addifional Cont �� tts` ifil/kcDrawings (. .'
12/28/04

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: Departure Time: t% County: � Region:
Farm Name: _1 S ��� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 4 _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �� _'S A" _ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: _ _ Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: e ` �" Longitude: =0=,
"
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Non -
Dry Poultry
Layers
Non -L
Pullets
[_,J Turkey Poults
❑ Other _
Design Current ;
Capacity Pnpuk lii
Calf
Heife)
Non -Dairy
Beef Stockei
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: _
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes l o~ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ' ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ Na � ❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o El NA [I
NE
12/28/04 Continued
<, Q'Dtviston Water
Factl�tyNuinlier�
$�
-
of
1. - ,-.-:: _.. - -,pA a ».� i Q2h;taw ;.
visaon of Soil and'W ater Conservation ' f =�z
QY ;yY ,
t �,,
her A enc` Y v
n1tV.tJfI'.�..?aNt
g
1
wtr,._ -�", .: 7:.f :', :.,,'.�:'..-.i
.. ,. •" ,-. >-. ,i96., z%f
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: Departure Time: t% County: � Region:
Farm Name: _1 S ��� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 4 _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �� _'S A" _ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: _ _ Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: e ` �" Longitude: =0=,
"
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Non -
Dry Poultry
Layers
Non -L
Pullets
[_,J Turkey Poults
❑ Other _
Design Current ;
Capacity Pnpuk lii
Calf
Heife)
Non -Dairy
Beef Stockei
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: _
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes l o~ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ' ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ Na � ❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o El NA [I
NE
12/28/04 Continued
Factl�tyNuinlier�
$�
-
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® Arrival Time: Departure Time: t% County: � Region:
Farm Name: _1 S ��� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 4 _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �� _'S A" _ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: _ _ Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: e ` �" Longitude: =0=,
"
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Non -
Dry Poultry
Layers
Non -L
Pullets
[_,J Turkey Poults
❑ Other _
Design Current ;
Capacity Pnpuk lii
Calf
Heife)
Non -Dairy
Beef Stockei
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: _
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes l o~ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ' ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ Na � ❑ NE
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o El NA [I
NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: -
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Ye No' ❑ NE
tv�%
ucture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 t�ructure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes7Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen al threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ ;g7EIN
[INA [03 NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require A ❑ 1
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application I .-
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Aro ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑PAN ❑ PAN �, 10% or lO lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare S '
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind rift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) d ' Y� C�� h gCkt4l_ -AZ
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? / es ❑ NA [:]NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? G ❑ Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre etermination`❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
I8. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Y to ❑ NA ❑ NE
�i
Reviewer/inspector Name , `.t�,',k ' , sr; j :y 5r ,!iar�p Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
1/128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check ❑ Ye[] NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ecklistsTn
❑ Desig
21. Does record keeping need impro ent? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Applicatio W ekly Freeboard aste Analysis �il Analysis ante Transfers Annual Certification
ainfall ❑ St � ng ❑ C field 0,11le- mute Inspections ❑-MoT l y and I" Rain Inspections atrer Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yeo ❑ NA ElNE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?,,� ❑ Ye No�A ❑ NE
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? %)S � Y ❑ NA [:]NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ElYes No�A El
(ti?yV 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Io ElNA El NE,
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NZEL5A ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Ye�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yeo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ yes § o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/ Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Ip ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additio•nal - o�m. :m. < 'eu-. s ra.� .-
A�,z'..�
ct
Qj$
o q-T�
12/28/04

Type of Visit JO Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
cy Q Othe
Reason for Visit ® Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergenr ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ® _lrrival,rime: Departure Time: 02: County: Region:
LLh
Farm Name:'" 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: �^7'-�-M `}}'�- - - -L Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: . Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Nu
Back-up Certification Numlkr:
t
Location of Farm: Latitude: =0
=,
❑ 11 Longitude • = o = i 0
Design Current , resign -`:,Current T:: Design Current
c � {� �. W` • '.-,'_ C ttl
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
e ou ryCapacrty, �opulahon a e . Capacity P
❑ Layer
❑Non -La er
Dry Poultry
Pullets
Other
Poults
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
airy Cow 2-2-a2 JH Z.o
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dai Heifer
❑
DrySow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of structures
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes a ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued
❑ Yes
❑ No L+1A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No %Nt
❑ NE
` ❑ Yes
❑ No �S'"A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
kNo [INA
❑ NE
❑ Yes a ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: %0 — Date of Inspection 0 r.
Waste Collection & Treatment F
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
StructurellI Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ��1 --
"Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):. 2.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZI No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Phone
Date:
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
12/28/04 Continued
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ',)�o ❑ NA.
❑ NE
8. Downy 6f the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
,. (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes To ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes o El NA
El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is incorrect ❑
there evidence of appl' tion? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ydraulic Overload rozen Ground [, _Hbavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
D-11�AN ❑ P 1 > 10% or 10 lbs 0 -Total Phosphorus ❑ l3o ure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
[side of Acceptable Crop Window ❑J�ence of Wind Drift Application Outside of Area S�
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops ciiffer,f;off, th Cdes' d in the CAWMP?9��
"`es ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving cropand/or Eand Ticar t� i rte need improvement? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination' E] Yes ❑ No )&A ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
A-4 M4
cn C,
Reviewertins ector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone
Date:
12/28/04 Continued

i Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all co rents e CAWMP re dily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ 1P , Checklists esign ❑�ps 01 her
❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need impr vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes [INA
[INE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis.DS'oil Analysis 11,W ransfers Annual Certification
❑ NA
ainfall tocking Q.C4,ap Yield ❑ l'lvlinute Inspections nthly and V Rain Inspections Bather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes � El NA
El NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? .
El Yes ❑ No 'CkQA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes io ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No �MA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? tl�
❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
El NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No �19A
❑ NE
Other issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes 15k�6
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher ormal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes �E o
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emgILuLcy situati ns as required by
❑ Yes �To
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problem , over application
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes �Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
-.. :►nti gs ^�, .:,z-;.3�,�b'fi �w.r xis r '.,71b'4..�-�,.x�`&,�trr �
rklk,:. till ?�„
dnrDavAdditotnaf'Cymant"s��•, sn _
E
V_F/
A�
ripC�� o� OVA
12128104

n Division of Water Quality
■ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number 800017 Facility Status: Acle Permit: AWC80001 7 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations ReviewInactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 1112007 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Amity Hills Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Lonnie F Hoffner Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2705 Corriher Springs Rd Mooresville NC 281158399
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°40'55" Longitude: 80°45'59"
From the intersection of Umberger Rd. and Mt. Tabor Church Rd., travel approximately 2 miles west on Mt. Tabor Church Rd. Dairy
will be on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowanllredell line.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Lonnie F Hoffner Operator Certification Number: 21596
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Lonnie Hoffner Phone:
On-site representative Lonnie Hoffner Phone:
Primary Inspector: Cindy Safrit Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: 8/29/2007 - 5.0 IbN11000gal
6/26/2007 - 6.2 IbN/1000gal; 4/2/2007 - 4.6 IbN/1000gal
28 & 14) Tract 73 fields 2 & 5 are now fescue pasture. A new plan is needed to address changes on Mr. Hoff ners farm (i.e.) combined
fields, crop changes, additional field "Larry Freeze". Ask technical specialist about allowable PAN & application windows for fescue.
24) Next calibration is due Oct. 1, 2008.
7) Broad leaf weeds have been sprayed, new vegetation is coming -up, looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner
Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Hate: 11/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 300 155
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond POND1 19.00 60.44
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Haffner
Inspection Bate: 11/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number: 800017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
n
Discharge originated at:
❑
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
Structure
❑
❑
discharge?
Application Field
❑
Waste Collection, Storage Treatment
Yes
Other
F1
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
❑
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
n
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

M1
Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 11/01/2007 inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? In
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Fescue
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Cecil
Soil Type 2
Pacolet
Soil Type 3
Chewacla
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management .
■
n
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
n
■
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
n
Page: 4

r� Permit: AWC800017 Owner -Facility: Lonnie F Hoff ner
Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 11/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine '
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21 • Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
Cl
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
®
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
■
n
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ ❑ n
mortality rales that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

r
Permit: AWC800017 Owner -Facility: Lonnie F Hoff ner
Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 11/01/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n ■
n
n
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
o ■
n
n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n ■
❑
n
Page: 6

Lonnie Hoffner Dairy (Rowan County)
3
Subject: Lonnie Hoffner Dairy (Rowan County)
From: "Hendrix, Larry - Salisbury, NC" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:03:21 -0500
To: "James Bealle" <[e-mail]>
James,
Lonnie Hoffner has contacted me and requested a revised Confined
Nutrient Management Plan. I am presently assisting him with dry stack
storage but he has not proceeded with installation of this structure.
If and when this is installed I will develop a plan for applying this
waste.
Regarding his requested_ revision to his present dairy CNMP; On September
30, 2009 Lonnie agreed to supply me with the fields and maps, tract
numbers and crops being grown on these fields. When this is received I
will begin work on this CNMP plan revision.
I will be mailing a copy of this email to Lonnie for his records.
He asked me to send you this email to document our understanding.
larry
I of 1 10/2/2008 5:47 PM

QF WAr�q Michael F. Easley, Governor
OCA QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
FILE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
0 Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
April 25, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Lonnie F. Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2007-PC-0304
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Amity Hills Farm/Facility 80-17
General Permit AWC800017
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on March 28, 2007, by James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
• Waste applied to fields not included in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) in Fall, 2006. This is a violation of General Permit Condition II.2, and the
CAWMP.
Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by May 11, 2007, indicating
the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future. In
responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of this page.
Division of Water Quality I Aquifer Protection Section I Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Noe
hCarotina
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: wm�w.ncwaterguality crg(rtura!!l,/

Amity Iiills Farm/Facility 80-17 L'
NOTICE OF VIOLATION X11
April 25, 2007
Page 2
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Bealle at [phone].
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report -dated March 28, 2007
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Animal Feeding Operations Unit, Raleigh
Regional Files
Jh

1
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency I--�
Facility Number: 800Q17 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 03/28/2007 Entry Time: 10.00 6 Exit Time: 12:00 PM . Incident #:
Farm Name: Amity Hills Farm Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2705 Q',orribQr.SDrinas Rd Mooresville NC 281158399
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 25°40'60"_ Longitude: 80'45'15"
From the intersection of Umberger Rd. and Mt. Tabor Church Rd., travel approximately 2 miles west on Mt. Tabor Church Rd. Dairy
will be on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowanllredell line.
Question Areas: ,
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application,
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Lonnie F Hoffner Operator Certification Number: 21596
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Lonnie F. Hoffner Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Lonnie F.. Hoffner Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:L� PE� -g? �7
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
11/30/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.1 Lbs/1000 Gallons
07/06/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.7 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/05/06 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shalt
be mowed regularly. Eradicate rodents and repair tunneling damage.
14., 21. Waste applied to fields not included in the CAWMP; NOV to follow
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Haffner
Inspection Date: 03128/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 800017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle -Milk Cow 300 160
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond [PONDII 19.00 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoff ner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 03/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2, is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
000
If yes, -is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
000
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
000
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3
:A

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Haffner
Inspection Date: 03128!2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn
(Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
■
❑ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
❑ ■
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
00
❑
0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WLIP?
❑
Page: 4

29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5
Permlt:.AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner
Facility Number:
800017
Inspection Date: 03/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
■
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
Cl
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
Cl
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 03/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? OMOO
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0000
Page: 6

Amity Hills Farm
Lonnie F. Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville, N.C. 28115
D E C E 0 W E
MAY - 9 7007
NC DENR MRO
DWQ - A uifer Protection
May 7, 2007
Dear Division of Water Quality and Mr. Bealle,
After being in violation for applying waste to a field that is not listed in my WMP,
I will he more attentive in making sure that the waste will be applied to land that is in my
plan.
Sincerely,
Lo 'e F. Hoffner
ity Hills Farm
80-17
Nov. -2007 -PC -0304

.p�p� W A T �9QG
6
>
676:.;- ii i I , I �t - "
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Lonnie F. Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville, NC 28115 ,
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
September 18, 2006
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2006-PC-0392
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Amity Hills Farm/Facility 80-17
General Permit AWC800017
Rowan County
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina 'Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on August 18, 2006, by James B. Bealle III, Environmental Speciaiist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
• Waste application rates for Spring, 2006 were greater than 10% of the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) values for receiving crops listed in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP). This is a violation of General Permit Condition 11.4, and
the CAWMP.
Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by September 30, 2006,
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future.
In responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of this page.
00
Division of Water Quality / Aquifer Protection Section / Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NorrthCarolina
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: www.ncwaterouality.oralJffllCQ��F/

Amity Hills Form/Facility 80-17
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
September 18, 2006
Page 2
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Bealle at [phone].
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosures
cc: North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Files
Regional Files
ib

5
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC80001Z __ LJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine County
inactive or Closed Date:
Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 0 811 812 006 Entry Time: 11-30 AM Exit Time: 01 400 E
iii=l1"I t
Owner: LonnieEHafner ---
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2785 Corriher Springs Rd Mooresville NC 281158399
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°40'60" Longitude: 80°45'15"
From the intersection of Umberger Rd. and Mt. Tabor Church Rd., travel approximately 2 miles west on Mt. Tabor Church Rd. Dairy
will be on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowan/lredell line.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Lonnie F Hoffner Operator Certification Number: 21596
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Lonnie F. Hoffner Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Lonnie F. Hoffner Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: ,fames Bealle Phone: Ctj� �3r'Z16Z
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Moffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 08118/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Roulfne
Inspection Summary:
07/06/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.7 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/05/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.9 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/28/05 > Soil Analysis
11. PAN > 10%; NOV to follow.
21. Weekly Freeboard, Rainfall, and Stocking records maintained, but must use the designated form (enclosed), Weather Code must
be recorded on the designated form (enclosed).
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in September, 2006.
jb
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 08/98/2006 Inspection' Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle -Milk Cow 300 192
Total Design Capacity: 300
Total SSLW: 420,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond POND1 19.00 22.OD
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Haffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 08/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0000
Discharge originated at:
Structure
a
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0000.
c. Estimated volume reaching surfaoe waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Stora a & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑
■
Cl
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
000
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Page: 5
Permit: AVVC800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner
Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 08/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 101/6/10 lbs.?
■
- -- - 7"' - . . ..
Total P2057
. --
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑ .
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Soybeans
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑. ❑ ■ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

i=
Permit: AWG800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner
Inspection Date: 0811812008' Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
■
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AM800017 Owner - Facility: Lonnie F Hoffner Facility Number: 800017
Inspection Date: 08/18/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine•
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on-site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

October 2, 2006
Dear Mr. Bealle,
At the August 2006 evaluation of waste
records, I was found to be in violation of
exceeding nitrogen limits on two fields. As a
dairy farmer, I am very conscious of my
land and its proper nutritional qualities.
However, in this incidence my check was
lost/stolen while at the lab in Raleigh and a
report was never fled on this waste sample.
Due to the many other daily activities I have
on the dairy, this slipped by my attention. I
intend to be more diligent in looking for the
prompt return of my reports from the lab in
Raleigh in the future.
D.wE C fig. .-.�...E
OCT - 4 7nr�F
DWQ -
Sincerely,
Lonnie F. Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
Facility 80-17
NOV-2006-PC-0392

Steve TrUxfer North Carolina. Department of Agriculture pr. Colleen
Commissioner and Consumer Services
Agronomic Division
June 26, 2006
To: Lonnie Hoffuer
r:om: !. Ben Knox, Regional Agronomist
Subject: Lost waste sample
This note is to confirm that I picked up a waste sample from Lonnie Hoffner on April 12,
2046 and mailed it to the Agronomic: Division PWS Lab. I am resampling Mr. Hoff was
waste storage pond today. These results will be for the lost sample of April 12.
If you have any questions please call me at 71gi278-9414.
1040 Mail Service Cerner, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1040
[phone] 0 Fax[phone]
An Squat Opp onurifty Affirmative Action Employer

1
16
Division of Water Quality
Facility l�Iumber ® Division of soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure 'rime: �.J County: V=424rQ Region:
Farm Name: ._ 9 # _Yf- S Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ y &ft f Phone:
Mailing Address: r�r io,al*sS �+ NC. �gil
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �� /4 ffi"ert 'title: _ ID,",T ,/0. L _ _ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: p
Certified Operator: G vNN No ff U.12Z Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certitieation Number:
Latitude: 0 0 =I
= Longitude: =0=. °=.
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
i ❑ Layer
,r ❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a, Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
RDai Cow 0t?i Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
EFDEY Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
I
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:)No
❑ Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

n
Facility Number: Q — Date of Inspection
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes
04No
❑ NA
❑ NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
StructureStructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
1I
Identifier: ii
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): q
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Arc there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 09 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes C9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs []Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window❑Evidence of Wind Drifl ElApplication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) Cora k; ; YeScvti PA).S l � APuC
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP7
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
04No
❑ NA
❑ NE
t6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[]
Yes
(9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
ReviewerA nspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

r
IFacility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [29 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP E3 Checklists El Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
[K No
[INA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[INA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3l.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative'?
❑ Yes
00 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
1N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
1
— k ep e y— _,N 6,_ /7_;. L is V--(5
12/28/04

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 1, 2004
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville NC 28115
OCt 2004
MpT OF ��^i Odd RCVS
yapTURA1-P-FSOU
Dear Lonnie HoffAEGRF-gyM.L1i R1EeVC*'ALOFFtCF
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800017
Amity Hills Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 7, 2003 and'in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Lonnie
Hoffner, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800017 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Amity Hills Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 300 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show* that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state, nc,us NaturallyAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and -any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
U
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800017
APS Central Files

II
]Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation ]
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 11)atcorvisit: -r> -a tF Time:
Q Not O erational O Below Threshold
1UPermitted ®Certified ,(3 Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ... !11'.. f ..... f..'..`.,Ef.�..J.r4................................................................. County:....,..'w..........................................................
OwnerName: .4 �}jf......`.... A/Ciz....................................................................... Phone No:....................
MailingAddress: .�r/` 0 _.........��i gn...... f....... ............................................................................................... ..........................
Facility Contact: ,,, 9.,,, (...,,..,,....,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Title:...►!Z Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative:................................................................•........................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... .............................................. I .............. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry [9 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 46 Longitude • ' 49
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..............1................................................................................................... .......:
............. ........................................ .......
Freeboard (inches):
12112103
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
29 No
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 9V — /P`f Date of Inspection Rr -11-0
1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes 9No
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 19 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes © No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
10° Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JR No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type l OecN . G-Ibl, ys , 's ^*J/ /rrr A:.o- S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14,
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
gj No
Odor Issues
17.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
[] Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18,
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
KI No
19.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
>, i ' irlI j� t. r r� : r � ,uuara,ry_°
Comr encs (refer;to question # )Faiplarn any�YES a>aswelrs€an i/or an recorn dations or any Other, comrne
Use drmngsyof facilllty to better, explaan s>IWat�oriss (use additronal,pages as;necexsairy) Field Co Final Notes
A,'[]9 : Copy ❑
a e � ,, - "E €... • "4s} r, s€�E. ;¢,:e� > ¢:i; tl 9r< rc€ttt}3 3-�€3;R ,, E }� t �� k.,g';.: 6.) �! tl,@€P ;;. j' +•5 � €: �., >•t i R ,,t 3 , � su
r*AJ` 4-- Readr t -44k -pt
• T
Name ?i l r � Fir f r E 1 s � � �,
'x, r�..,��
Reviewer/Inspector
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: kAz&&= Date:
12112103 Continued

I
Facility Number: ft,— I r% Date of Inspection 1' a'f
Required Records & Documents
21..
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
34.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
Q No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
jS No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
59 No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
52 No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
j No
3I.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I " Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�ddltianal� CommeAtS'Sndlor Drawtn •'0E£��,.}hvi; 3,�,I§iiNbi 6 � .��:3j. �Aje �l,i,t�as�a•3y,�igEjt.j��>jLySliiL���Y � hF�irSi4jEt[���i`'��F�r ��l1��$ .}aIii{3, i� .§3 Yy ?1�(iS � � i�?yt .i r
`iE P'.�'9iE71Pl.�. SµVl
ti3.Fss.��.s.-i.i.ts�ass'_-t.:SiF=.s�...zML.,iv:�t3•rtr:d:u:..,.�C.:::;t:5`W^_,-8a7:.>;Ir`i.fra3;['&,iv..itae:.si .':r��ii«�i'Slid'iiru:.i:Sj.�u'�i!E.s��i.iGk,.,�Aja a';�ae trii'i ii.9i,.♦AS3'3�A
12112103

0� W A T-1 Michael F. Easley, Govern w
p William G. Ross Jr., secreta ij
yG7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> 1 Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
0 Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 29, 2003
Mr. Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Coniher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Amity Hills Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC800017
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September
23, 2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records
were complete. Enclosed is a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
Be reminded that in emergency situations your local Soil and Water Conservation District
can be contacted to temporarily approved sites (for waste applications) that are not currently in your
waste utilization plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
X), /I � �4
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

Q Dt� tslon of Water Qualth
+i 4 "� 3�} i� � w�' z� �itL-' '� r '�u � Dh isioni of So11 tttnd Wutcr Conserv ution ,„ x f.
�' a re.���iS 3s' -r �. ,�i-,,�ipie �r'�7}T"� �.��i��l'���'4-'ry'+i:,'F:tFi��'"4'{.kcV�'{�'R�`lw-y:t �M s-. f� Sr�iF'�ik�a%'thiw''��x +7`',_ �C�"� 'i• •�.
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection OO Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency !Notification ()Other ❑ Denied Access
i
Facility NumberRU 17 Dart, of Visit: Time:
ill/t812t1113
QNot Operational O Below Threshold
2 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionall1v Certified ' (3 Registered Q;ite Last Operated +)r :1ho%a Threshold: --
Farm Name: Aj)alit}:NiUs.Earjuts :........................... ................................................. County:
Owner Tante: iy------------------ tAnleJr------------•-------------- Phone No: 71t�:27i�J G!!-------------------------._..
Mailint, Address: ----- — -------
Facility Contact: ._.-....-.-....-....-.- .......... ..........-.....Title: ...-.............. ....- - Phone No: ......................................
Onsite Representative: Lattait�HUllner. _______ _ [nt<< razor
Certified Operator: ........._..... Operator C'ertitie:ttion Nunthcr: 11 `?.G_.—•---._..
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Unther;er Rd. and hit. Tabor Church Rd.. travel approximately 2 miler west on Nit. Tabor Church �
Rd. Dain• rill he on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowanllredell line. �
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3a 4 i ii Lum1itude ill 1S i3
Design Current
Svfine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farm -k- to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ (_silts
❑ $narti
Design Current Design Current
Poultn PopulationCattle
tCapacity Population
❑ La'ver ® Dain ,I H) I j
❑ Non -Lai cr ❑ Non -Dain
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 420,000
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Are -TIE] Spr v Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traits 1 10 No liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? 1 Yes X Nc,
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagxk)n ❑ Spray- Field � 1 Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the cnnvev ince coact -made:' ❑Yes ❑ No
b. U'disch;trge is obseri ed. did it reach W.,ter cif the ytate? t ]i <s. notit�- DWQ) 7 Yes J No
c It•discharge is observed- what is the estimated tion in gal/inin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon a1'steni" (If ves. roti& DWQ i I i Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I� No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? s Yes 2 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? IZ Spillwax L Yrs :9 No
.tnicture i Structure Mructttre , '�trucwre 4 Structure StRicture {�
Identttier. .......................... .......................... ............

Facility Number: 80-17 Date of Inspection 09/23/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
ib. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes OR No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during, this visit. You rill receirve no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Ficial Notes
UE TO EXCESS RAINS, AND TO PREVENT WASTE FROM DISCHARGING FROM THE STORAGE POND, WASTE WAS
PPLIED TO UNAPPROVED CROPS. IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, THE LOCAL SOIL AND WATER DISTRICT SHOULD BE
ONTACTED TO ASSIST IN LOCATING WASTE APPLICATION SITES.
EXCEPTION OF THE ABOVE, THE FACILITY WAS WELL NLAINTAINED AND THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE
LETE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
[:]Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
ib. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes OR No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during, this visit. You rill receirve no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Ficial Notes
UE TO EXCESS RAINS, AND TO PREVENT WASTE FROM DISCHARGING FROM THE STORAGE POND, WASTE WAS
PPLIED TO UNAPPROVED CROPS. IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, THE LOCAL SOIL AND WATER DISTRICT SHOULD BE
ONTACTED TO ASSIST IN LOCATING WASTE APPLICATION SITES.
EXCEPTION OF THE ABOVE, THE FACILITY WAS WELL NLAINTAINED AND THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE
LETE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name

O�OF WA7-,6, Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
❑ 'C
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville NC 28115
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800017
Amity Hills Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Lonnie Hoffner:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation. General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date -to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 7, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Lonnie
Hoffner, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800017 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Amity Hills Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 300 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
AWA
LMR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/rdpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
[Mooresville Regional Office, Water'Quality Section.)
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800017
NDPU Files
NC DEPT, OF ENIARONNMT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
MAY 19 2003
DATER WALITY SECTION

Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Coniher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject:
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 22, 2002
Amity Hills Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC800017
Rowan County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 16,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the
records complete. However, be reminded that a waste analysis must be conducted within sixty days
of the waste application date.
Enclosed is a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. By copy of
this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local District Soil and Water
Conservation, the Division of Water Quality is referring this facility for technical assistance, if
appropriate.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Rowan County S WCD
File
NCD EN.
Customer Service
[phone]
1 800 623-7748
[phone]
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE
FAX

Date of Visit: 81161Z4t)Z Thne-
FO Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - .. __ __ _
Farm Name: AJ j1Y.HM.1F81:tt1.................................................................. County: RID.IYaia.................................... DMQ........
Owner Name: LtZII>aie_---------------- lEf'x--------------------------- Pho�se No::7J8-�551Z----------------------------------
Mailing Address: 2IU�..�orri,f�Z:.�pD:mugs.�.ioaf...................................................
..... Mo.Qrrs.y.jUc.AC ................................................... zojj{ ..............
Facilitv Contact: ...........................................................Title:........................................ Phone No
Onsite Representative:IDIYNIRHQF�iYF�R_----------------------------- Integrator: --------- ----------___.__ _--------------•
Certified Operator:LgmjcY ............................... Hpffacr ............................................ Operator Certification Number:215Q(........ -...................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Umberger Rd. and Mt. Tabor Church Rd., travel west on Mt. Tabor. Dairy is approximately 2 mil
on the left. General location: southwest of Cleveland near the Rowan/Iredell line.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 41 • ®�� Longitude 80 •F-45-1-
-Design
45 -
-Design -Current
-'Swine °.Ca aci Y.o ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Narrow to Finish
❑ hilts
❑ Boars El
'.Design
,Current_ :Design • •Current
,Poultry Capacity
1�o elation �,Ca aei 'Population
❑ Layer
®No
',
® Dairy 300 250
Structure G
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
Y
❑Other
Total'DesignOpacity - 300 '
a-
• ..
'Tota1:SSLW
.. ._ ._� -i- ..
420,000
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes ®No'
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5
Identifier: --------•--------.__.----_.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure G
Freeboard (inches): 84
nCIA ain r ._.�_..,.a

Facility Number: $0-17' Date of Inspection $!1612002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Aanlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Graze) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
2.4.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
IN No
113
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
AILED TO OBTAIN A WASTE ANALYSIS FOR WASTE APPLIED IN AUGUST 2001.
FOR THE ABOVE, THE FACILITY AND RECORDS WERE IN GOOD SHAPE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date:

03/03/01
Facility Number: 80-17
Date of Inspection 811612002
Continued
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
36. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
�I

o�oFwArF9QG
Michael F. Easley
Governor
T— �! r � , f William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.. Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 16, 2002
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Operation Review/Compliance
Amity Hills Farm, Facility #: 80-17
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
XVIA,
KLIF
Sincerely,
Alan D. JohnIon
Environmental Specialist II
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623.7748 FAX [phone]

OF WA rF9 Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ -4 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
4 `C Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Duality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 5, 2001
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Notice of Violation
Inadequate Freeboard Records
Amity Hills Dairy, Facility #: 80-17
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this- Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on February 1,
2001. Based on his review of your files this letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) for
failing to maintain a record of the waste storage pond's freeboard level. Failure to maintain
adequate records is a violation of your Certificate of Coverage AWC800017 and North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.10 (c).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by February 15, 2001
indicating the actions taken to address the noted violation. Please address your response to the
attention of Mr. Johnson. It is requested that your response reference the date and subject of the
NOV and the facility number.
Enclosed is a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. By copy of
this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local District Soil and Water
Conservation, DWQ is referring this facility for technical assistance, if appropriate. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
1
D. Rex'Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Coordinator
_ File
NMMR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28116 PHONE [phone]
1.8D0 623-7748 FAX [phone]

Type of Visit compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit j90 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Facility Number i Date or Visit: Time: %
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
❑ Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated
or Above Threshold: ....... . ................
........ ........Farm Name ............... ....................... Count}...................�........ ...............................................
Owner Name: r...
r
............e� .a�:l.11..!...�.�.....................:....:.C.'............._:................. Phone No: b
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title: ....................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: .2.77.d.S............ s-.- T...... .. .. E
`............................
4
Onsite Representative: ............................................................ — ...
epresentative:..................................................................................................... Integrator:.............................................
!� Operator Certification Number:
Certified Operator: ...
3.Y .............. :.. C...............................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry t5 -Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �� Longitude �• ��•
Design Current
awzne Capacity acity Fo ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
[3 Layer
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLI . =
W
01
❑ Non -Dairy
ent
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Pres ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps FE]NoLiquid Waste Management System
Discharees R Stream lrn 2acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [IYes�No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑ Spray Field E] Other
a. If discharve is observed. was the conveyance man-made? [I Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (If yes, notify DWQ)
EI Yes El No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) El Yes El No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑. Yes] No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes b No
/01/01 Continued

Facility Number:Date of inspection, ,oa', s'.•. �• ,. - t�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less thariTad'equate? Spillway ❑YesIN No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _.... ...._._ _.:........ ..__ ._ _......
Freeboard(inches):z ....,__......_............_..............................�-..............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ETlo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which -are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or.
closure plan? ❑ Yes E5No,
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require mainteriance/improvement? - ❑ Yes J91 No' '
9.• Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes X1 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes &No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 6No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 61-N0
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes [N,40
16. Is there'a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
17. Are rock outcrops present?
18. Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary?
❑ On-site kOff--site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
.Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes cEg-No
❑ Unknown RYes MNo
❑ Yes Q No
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
$No
21.'Does
record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
10 No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
L,No
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
ff No
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
,
'❑ No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
EJ -No
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
SNo
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑-No
Odor Issues
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
-0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no -agitation?
,29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
®,No
01/01/01
Continued-

•,=:,'}.:• r"t. +Xffit'i1.',3y i'.��r% E:•...: - - 'r-.<�,i_•1-a.f_..,.�
•moi - _ ^^ ',�•,� ':y.��,7 t i•;. :S�O�..:..F .
Facility -Number. ... %.O_. =,-Date of'Iisspection.,.•Priii{ed''o"n':�`314/2fl41
�.._..
30. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application?-(ii.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, andlor public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ven_ tiiation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Ye�No
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes CORO
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
01/01/01
Date:

racnity NumDer. — / 7 Lagoon Number Lagoon Identer .-. .
Q Active O.Inactive Latitude ® Longitude ®�
By GPS or Map? JED GPS [] Map j GPS file number:,
35. Surface Area (acres):
36. Embankment Height (feet):
37. Distance to Stream:
38. Water supply well within 250 ft of the lagoon?
On-site ❑ Off-site
39. Distance to WS or HQW (miles):
40. -Overtopping from Outside Waters?
41. Constructed before 1993 NRCS Standards?
42. No verification of adherence to 1993 or subsequent
NRCS Standards?
43. Was groundwater. encountered during construction?
44. Depth to Groundwater:
45. Spillway?
45. Adequate Marker?
47. Immediate threat to the integrity of the structure?
48. Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
lble--Ss than 300 ft O 300 ft- 1 ODD ft O greater than 1 ono ft
Yes O No
4<5 @L-5�- 10 0>10
O Yes o No O Unknown,
O Yes O No O Unknown
O Yes Z No O Unknown
O Yes E�No O Unknown
Unknown
Ryes O No
O Yes O No
O Yes kNo _

NC DEPT. 4F ENVIRONMENT
AND NA1TIURAL RESOURCES
� GiONAL OFFICE
Amity Hills Farm `
Lonnie F. Hoffner FEB 1 Q 2001
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville, NC 28115
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Attention Mr. Johnson:
In response to the February 5, 2001 NOV for inadequate freeboard records at Amity Hills
Dairy #80-17 Rowan County, NC, the following will take place:
On or before April 30, 2001, the,waste storage pond freeboard level will be installed (we
have to wait until the lag6on is emptied).
Sincerely,
Lonnie F_ Hoffner

S. HUNT JR....
GOVERNOR '
L BILL-HOLMAN
SECRETARY
.• .rKERR'T,�STEVENS ,—'',-
L:af, ". .J i �- �
l�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 28, 2000
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Amity Hill Farm, Facility #: 80-17
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
June 27, 2000. Based on his observations made during the inspection the facility
appeared to be in good shape, and the waste application records appeared to be
complete. Improvements to the lounging area and storage pond embankment
mentioned in last year's inspection were noted. Enclosed please find a copy of this
year's inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
In the future be advised that the SLUR -I form must still be completed when
waste is applied to a third party waste application field. Also, a site diagram of your
facility should be obtained. One may be located in your files.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
� fN-hAW CKILAY�
2 0 7 0
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLE33/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r
Divisioii:of Soil and Water:Conservation - Oper tion Review Yk-�c'"�""""`
r U Division.of Soil and Water Conservation - CompLail a lnipeoon
Divisionn ofWaterQ uaiity - Compliance Iuspection
3Other �$ency Operation Review'`_:�;-
Routine oComnlaint Q Follow -uv orDNVQ inspection d Fohow-up of DSWC reriew Q Other
Faciiity Number `�(� Date of'Inspection
i Time or Inspection ,' l5 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Et-Pe-mitted Certified J0 Conditionalh•�CCertified j"j Registered [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farr. !came: .......... !Tt!'�.A..�`.�( .........f��.�C ..................................... Count}':............Q ......................................
1." ........... L
OwnerName: .............. ko-nai.:e ......... .... Z.S7 .!1 .................................. Phone No: .......r�. .R..._`..- ., ?. 1-.........-.......................
cel( (G S+ o -- Z q z q. A) fl 57 — 55 0 H
FaciiinContact:........................................................... ........•--.... Titic:................................................................ Phone No:
tiiaiiint A
ndress: .......,-,........ 1 I .. ........... .....
h.�. ............... ZZ L ..
RR
Onsite G ,,,,,,,,,,,„,, . Integrator: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,....................................................... ................................
Ce-tified Operator: .......... 40,Ak:l.,l..r............... .......... .................. Operator Certification Number:.._. ... r�.. .........
kation of Farm: n2)6 z -7 13 &
I �.
............... .................................................... ................................................................................. qr
t�.ati#tide jr 4 ;, 1 L. Lon^]ttlde [ Ji �• ��•
Design Current
Swine Capacitv Population
1iJ 'W can u, .F _edcr I I
iEl eller to Finish I I
I? Fa . ow• to Wean i_ I
I_1 Farrow to Feeder I 1
t� Farrrow to Finish 1 I
1� uiit; I I
Boars I I
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
1:1:1 Laver i
i
1[^] Non -Laver I
Other I
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
airy '4 Z Zi 12 -5 l
10 Non -Dairy I I
Total Desigm Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I I❑ Subsurface Drains Present © Laruon Area I❑ spra'. Field Are:
'folding Ponds /Solid Traps I� No Liauid Waste Management System
Diseharees be Stream imnacts
1. Is am disrharee observed from any part of the operation? _Yes �.No
Dischar2c originated at: ❑ Lagoon U Spray Field ❑ Other,
a. 11 discharge is observed, was the convevance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. li' discharge is ohscrved. did it rcaci•. VY�ater of the State' (If ycs. notify DWQ) _ Yes ❑ No
z. If discharim is observed. what is the estirnated flow in uzl/min?
v. Dues cischargc bypass a lay*crap svctcm'? {If'vcs. naliry J«'Q} ❑Yes D No
?. Is there eviden:e of past discharge from any pan of the operation” 0 Yes ZLNo
Were there any adverse imoacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other, than from a discharge? L7 Yes No
Waste Collection S Treatment
'. is storage canacin (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adeouate? Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 ]�
1d.ntiFier:
Freeboard 6nc:hcs;: •'
_. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of anv of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion. ❑ Yes jNo
seepage, etc.)
3,'23199 Continued on back

0
,cility `umber: t3U — r �7 Datc of Jospcctinn Printed on: 4/24/2000
5. Arc ,here anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (€e/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes No
seepage. etc.)
6. .are there structures on-site which .are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste manarycment or
closure plan? ❑ Yes V;"No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ves, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [�4No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? Yes ❑ No
Waste A nplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes DK4Vo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes IQ No
12. Crop type
CO 'r, V\
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA�VMP)? ❑ Yes )<No
14`. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�10
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
R�No
ReQuired_Records & Documents
(ie;' discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ;.No
17, Pail to have Cenificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
X, No
S. Does the facility faii to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
3.. Do the #lush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes ❑ No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
❑ Yes RZ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste anaivsis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes "L4 -N0
30.
Is faciiity not in compliance with'any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes *No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charQe?
❑ Yes 4tj No
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie;' discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ;.No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes 5?�N0
24.
Does facility require a follow-uo visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWivIP?
[:]Yes No
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement buildin4 to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no ao-itation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes No
2S.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation. asphalt,
❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes ❑ No
30.
Were any maior maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes )jQ No
3 i .
Do the animais feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑Yeso
3.. Do the #lush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes ❑ No

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Additioi ail Comments and/or Drawings :.
4
CW
t I
�eec� s � �� � t ` L t�" �"'� yltic, }z; v►��..w. � ys :.�� �� U
y
0 ■
4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville NC 28115
Dear Lonnie Hoffner:
11 1 0 �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIR,PNMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999 �'7�r•MF ti S' Il�� J�'
JAN 5 2000
W�IP�II 6i di+llllt!lf�'"?!!i i'+s1;,4�t:
u i,It1C�,tf !two;'", MIMI
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 80-17
Rowan County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or pennitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

APIA
A:
-- f�*
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL CFFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 29, 1999
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Rd.
, Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site Inspection
Amity Hills Farm, Facility #: 80-17
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on
October 22, 1999. This notice is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency due to the lack
-< of maintenance on the storage pond. Inspection of the pond was difficult and visibility
of the pump marker was poor. It was also observed that the southeast corner of the
"heavy-use".area should be fenced off to increase the buffer for the clean water
drainage ditch and to prevent further erosion/gullying.
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review.
The following items must be available for review during an inspection:
Certification forms.
Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas.
raw=-
:,,::� Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
acreage Maps of and irrigated fields.
p g g
�-- Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number, usabletwettable acres not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of data.
r It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
Emergency Action Plan, which must be posted.
Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
Certified Operator renewal card.
4 ln
• '- '- T, ,`kt:7: NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA ZB1 IS
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ! AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLE0/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
'

Page 2
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a
Notice of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste
applications should be made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the
waste. In general, waste should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at {704} 663-1699.
Sincerely, %
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection i 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name : ...................Y1r,1 /,7iS �f....�.'?%1.............. County:....,,..�C`'n................................................
Owner Name:....... �/? i ��� �...:................
...................f'!'.................................... ..... .......................... Phone No. ....... I Ste'. .....................................
Facility Contact: . Title: Phone No
,II
Mailing Address: �` 7d S �.�+L�I.kt Pte....... s.� �i ✓`�. � :..��!�z�.�..� ��' , ................. .�X.1 .�
............. .... ... ......
OnsiteRepresentative: ....................................................................................................... Integrator:...................................................................
Certified Operator: ,,,,,•,,,�,(�„t1, ,t,C�............. „•.10.4,Pt/ operator Certification Number 21 I 2 ...............
Location of Farm:
s
............ ... .................
Latitude r_-�a 6 •° Longitude • 4 ”
Design Current"'
Swine' Ca acit Po ulation `Nul
" ❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
"�Numher of i agoons,
HoldttigPonds /,So1rd,Tr
�r.,
.,�,.::� . .u: x....,
iDesign Current Design Curr
Ca pacity „Po PUlatiori�.:Cattle capacity Po ulo
' Dairy QV oL �
Non -Layer
Non -Dairy
Other
' k Total Design3 Capacity . L
Total SSLW C
Subsurface Drains Present 11❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area I
No Liquid Waste Management System''
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes] No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 51 -No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? M.—Spillway ❑ Yes W-0
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ........... ........ ........................... .................................... .................. I—............. ......................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes j►�'No
seepage, etc.) 7�
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number — Date of lnspection 0
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 11P No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? AYes ❑ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )Q No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? KYes [:1 No
Waste ADnlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )K No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes JO No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes P�No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [:]No
'
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes (PNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? P Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ANo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) [-]Yes Dgyo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) [:]Yes ,-No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes g No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes RNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes [RNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes f&No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ER -No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes Z'No
o violaEitjris;or de>Ficie;ncies mere n�tetl ilirririg �ttis.v, sit: • Y;op wiij •eeeeiye iio further.'
corres• otidehc' e: abouts this visit:.. ....
.Explain any YES answers d/or anylrecommendatronsloriany other comments
Comments{refer to question #), arl
! t.l
".:i
i `c:.i, l . .3:: !' _-. ,i. "<<[:, iiez'. s...1 .' ,' .1. "....3 1. i@ 1... ;'abf�.' �. �f rll�•, "€tit�6 , l..ii. EES 89 [ ��5y ,3 ! ! E6 {i i 9� i..y ;� .
a e.i bet
Use:drawrngs-offaciltty'to betiiereaiplatn"sttuattons (use additronal.pages as necessary') �; �`�� ��,i t;� , }Ar � �;I:s'� kis ' � t
�.
3.3-i l , 3... -7.. - i "� ..9-'k. ;. E ., i> ek ,9t.'%:47 3 S •
�
�a's� S��e� po K -P-45 ck" Neh« O -A-
'
7t�.w� aha.•—��•e� V��s a P'� t�� r + � ����� 5 '�o i � C�+i^ec5f� u i 5 i � � � t
o � t4-�1� w�a•�f-�c�sr 1
AeNds �O fie_
xre,i,L cA i o ;o r A r%kvx.
T"'gR i f �•r'1 '�`—Ee T'"i g _^ : i `�F 9y i p 7 S.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Z.Date: Z—
3123/99

Facility Number: Elate of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below F_] Yes (0No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Jallo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes © No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes KNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ;3..�o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes CEMn
,Additi6na1.0omments an or rawmgs :,..: ,i '„ �`.a1 �',�,€I' iE �E'f°s a1�ri' . �.>l'�°�a.r''PP TII
A,
3123199

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURNMCE-In REQUESTED
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corrifer Springs Road
Mooresville NC 28115
Farm Number: 84 - 17
Dear Lonnie Hoffner:
IT16", V T
0
A&4 *&�
on -��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
April 6, 1999
a hi
AFA 12 1999
You are hereby notified that Amity Hills Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty 64 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. if any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Dianne Thomas at [phone]
extension 364 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

w
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 23, 1998
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Site Inspection
Amity Hills Farm, Facility #: 80-17
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
Permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -509,' RECYCLED/10%POST-CONSUMER PAPER
JAMES B.
FillNT JR;
:GOVERNOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 23, 1998
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Site Inspection
Amity Hills Farm, Facility #: 80-17
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
Permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -509,' RECYCLED/10%POST-CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General_ Recommendations for Nitrogen_M Application for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder mi late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that primp and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
� ee half (1/2) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results. _
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
pr6idtcer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date:
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
�1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MAR 1-9 19`'
FROM: Shannon Langley
)122R 6
-i IT "`r
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number.
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
ul
r

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resou ue11dwoo ON040s'Cl•uch
Division of Water Quality N01103S A111Vnt) b31VM
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT 9661'.1 1 80
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMEN.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION: (33 1I30J
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): L.010 C "r Ae-f4rr
2. Facility No.:-!2WO / 7 —
3. Facility Name:
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
5. Mailing Address: o?765 40,rUt
city: M60,:4S1);11r State: N C—- Zip:: /�_
Telephone No.: (20V) .�7 9
6. County where facility is located: R n _� ✓� _
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): r, �e_.- a;r
8. Application Date:
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal -waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 1 of 4

n
2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
%vaste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity,
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Applicant's Certification:
attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has Wti reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all requiredparts of this application are not completed and if all
�-
Print Name of Owner
Date 3 -S-26"
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 3 of 4

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Cnivision of Water Quality
Routine 0 Complaint '0 Follow-up of DIVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection !`
Facility Number
Time of Inspection EZ� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated: .... ......................
FarmName:.... r/ .....�T.!/./.,.r........................................County. ............................................................., .....
Owner Name:......:....+!Q.rr x.rx c. ........... .1���'i'f .�
............. e.al...................................... Phone No:..............�...�......:`..............................
FacilityContact: ............... ................................................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: aZ d 5 2 Sri S„
..............r.�.t--ire.in-e
�:..�?II`t..(.5...,........ ....
Onsite Representative:.... 4t1/2 � . ................P�t... Integrator:.........................................................
......................... .............................Certified Operator:...... r�.rt�..±-............ l ..�....................... Operator Certification Number --..,r (.... p
Location of Farm:
......... D"..,f..............S..R......f.7..rY . A resp' �.. �
Latitude =• 1 011 Longitude [.�• =' Eff"
Design Current '. , . Design Current, - De<
SwineCi3pacity Pop:u anon Poultry Capacity Population ;Cattle Cap
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
� av
Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management
General
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes )�No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'kNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes al�No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes $ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes JR -No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Z�Slo
7. Did the facility fait to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes N:'�To
7/25/97 Continued on back
P

Facility tiUmhcr:
o1I insx V%e►X,-- ` S4t�M5.
V ���iCl� o h s lb✓ � C_ 410
1 4
8. Are there lagoons or Storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
❑ Yes
.Ile No
Structures (Lagoons,IfoldingPonds. flush Pits. etc.]
7/25/97
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
XNo
Stnrctur'e l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 0
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .......... Jam ....................... .................................... ................................... .................................... ....................................
.............. I .....................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
6_4No
It. 1s erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
KNO
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
XYcs
❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
❑ Yes
)9 ­',No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff enterin aters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...............Ir—
.......�E'c.......................,,..................................................................................................,.........................................
15. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Pian (AWMP)?
❑ Yes, IANo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
PfNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
DINo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
. [&-�o
21. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative`?
❑ Yes
WNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
a No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑'Yes �tNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes `�No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑Yes _12 -No
7 No.violations-or deficiencies were noted during this:visit.- .You4ill receive no further
: 0er6'pb6dence atiout-this.visit'.-:. :
Cattunents;(refer toyuestion #) Explain any YE5 answers and/or anv recominet:idattans or any ercuntnents. "�
oth
. :i xa ^fYw.a 1 r. •.1•. '" kip h ' z'.Yf Y' f✓`
Use.drawtngs of'facility to better explam'srtuatiiriins ff use additioriaTpagts as necessary) s
o1I insx V%e►X,-- ` S4t�M5.
V ���iCl� o h s lb✓ � C_ 410
CGI✓Ll J Q j�CcLlvllCc� 5 �Lla`>> �' \iQ 1►�5 �\
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
V

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corrifer Springs Rd
Mooresville NC 28115
Dear Lonnie Hoffner:
Pon
Owft% Won" M�Ika
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
N.C. [)E" C)tf
fitltWtl74�=!i'r_:�'f', HEA1,Tth
& NATURAL kEsO)UIt(,F
FEB 25 1998
AIVISIgN OF ENVIUMENTI1 t-!AV,1SEWEN1
afk31 nALE r,0frHL a.FfR
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan .
Amity Hills Farm
Facility Number: 80-17
Rowan County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility, Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

I
_It
Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
belo�N• the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to brine your facility into compliance. '
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the subnuttal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc; Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 2953:, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626.0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 5, 1998
Subject: Operator -in -Charge Certification
NCGS 90A-47.2
Amity Hills Farre, Facility #: 80-17
Rowan County, NC
As of January 1, 1998 all facilities must have a certified Operator -In -Charge. A review of
the database does not show this to be the case for your facility. Failure to have a Certified Operator -
in -Charge is a violation of NCGS 90A-47.2.
If you or the designated operator for the facility have not taken and passed the required exam,
an interim certified operator should be obtained. If you have already taken the exam, you may want
to contact Ms. Cindy Dudley of the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification
Commision (WPCSOCC) at 919-733-0026.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Rowan SWCD
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Mcin Street, N��� FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 ' An Equot Opportunity/Affirmative Action Empicyer
Voice 704-663-1699 - - 50% recycle/10% past -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _
Facility No�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ` Z '1995
Timer
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: 2 �JC Z 7011
County: KLr,,) m,, Integrator: __ink LP -0& haZ JZPhone:
On Site Representative: Law ,re j� Phone:
Physical
3
Type of Operation: Swine_Poultry_Cattle Design Capacity/Number of Animals on Site:! 7
Latitude: 0 Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
*(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) 6e r No
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)?
Is adequate land available for spray? fep or No
Crop(s) being utilized: c1� _ , CC
Actual Freeboard:-IZ—F#. Inches
Yes or 1&Was any erosion observed? Yes org
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?r es or No
100 Feet from Wells? es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yeso N
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes 0 1�
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? -Yes OCT) If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? T 0
Additional Comments: 4 21a n s�r> �.[A�vn �r�i�N _ C�(Qy�c/ Ai 9'0�
Inspector Nam Signature
:���4/,-4,4 _-7
cc: Facility Assessment Unit / LI), /

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corrriher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
MA
(DF.=HNF:Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 10, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report"
Amity Hill Farms, Facility #. 80-17
Rowan County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on June 9, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this
Office. The facility was in good shape. The design capacity of your facility was checked by Mr.
Johnson and was found to be listed as 300 animals. Be sure to double check this number with the
person responsible for designing your certified farm plan.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning the report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Rowan County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, f10C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

hk' '�.T¢ ��. #F"eE E
x ❑ 4 �i yk.Ar%k k
DSWC�Anlmal Feedlot OAeration Revlew
,g'a"O0'0 ,'�0',
€Axi.r`""
t ws g„# S.M- '�9f; •,;� R, .s,e&^;',£i4''T' -, '"°$`- '� - '"s -- ,'V.
"°°
CO-
%[ DWQ AnitmalFeedlot Operatlon Sate Inspectton� ", x
gm
TW7
WX
�A
Routine OComelaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status:Registered ElApplied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
MICertified ❑ Permitted I or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated : ...... ........................ ..._.... .......... ................. ...p............. ........ ........ ................ ........ ...................
ot
FarmName: ......... ISRX../�....//,(//....... W. .....:5 ........................... County:.........'.1�r-{�2.............................................
Land Owner Name: ........ ..ef. .............................. Phone ......................................
Facility Conctact:.................................................................................. Title:...................(.. ....................... Phone N/o:
........................................ ...............
....
Mailing Address:..... ........... L?Y..rr..i. : ......S. r.(. 5............."1F5........,t'Y..1.4./14............................. izyg, .......
OnsiteRepresentative: Ap ef.�........................................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator: ............. ............ ....................... ....................................... ...................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
r,natt•:..*,,n. [c. �t ,.....m ...�.........E75....... ... %. z!c..... .x...................:.�.K,.....k1.7.......... .:.. txs.... �Q
.!J t ...... ........ 4&...m,l ........ 1i. ..... le ............f.... ..rr.�e�i .�.w�.�x.....� l.!— .........
Latitude Longitude �• ���
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes PNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �kNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ga.Umin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes VNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ®,j,o
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
Continued an back

Facility Number: .....
6. Isifacility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes O(No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
J
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes %'No
Strwhires (Lagoons and/or Ifolding onds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes sp No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
,�l� ............. ............................ ............................ .......... _................ ............................
14. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes Zlo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [RNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �flo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? S] Yes ❑ No
Waste Application AN
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes &r No
Of in excess of WMP, or runoff entering `waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......6.r�. l�t.�i. (/.. /.. ..............................................1 �iI5`6 ....Anrr5...........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes MNo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
FNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
qNo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
JR[No
For
Certified Facilities Only
14114
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to questior► #) Explain any. YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explasitiiattons -;(uadditional pages as nxxecessary) Z " m r t
�. in se k..�,
r
lez
Ho
Reviewer/Inspector Name.: �4 j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: — �1 z
4 iLse:==
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, F ci ty Assessment Unit 4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Lonnie Hoffner
2705 Corriher Springs Rd.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
Aa
IDEEHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Amity Hills Farm, Facility #: 80-17
Rowan County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm,your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For Iagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, C�y4 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Caroline 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Af
Voice 704.663-1699 50% recycled/ 1(r/e pest -consumer -paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. J).x Qon,;�
Water Quality gional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
F.%

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corrifer Springs Rd
Mooresville NC 28115
Dear Mr. Hoffner:
IF
A,
10 00:1A
AMEN k
E)EHNR
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Amity Hills Farm
Facility 11) #: 80-17
Rowan County
N.C. 17l --.PT. OP'
ENVII'.C�NIM,NT, IIF,ALTH,
& NATURAL RE',cjU:,t:1,.S
DEC It 1996
91VISI911 OF ENVIRGN11EVAL I ANAGUAW
MOORESVILLE REGIOIIAL OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOgteve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control 5 stem �
y NVf
� ' O Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators CertNicoilon Commission An Equal Opportunity/Af irmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Ralelgh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NS ROt �p�1 �r iT
WASTE UTILIZATION Prial
RESOURCES
r GIONAL OFFICE
Producer: Lonnie Hoffner -?
Location: 2705 Corriher Springs Rd., R MAY 3 0 2003';
Mooresville, NC 28115 WAVA QED r
Telephone: [phone]
T e O eration: "n A��AWY SECTION
YP P �`Y
Number of Animals: 300
(Design Capacity)
wif," ,a
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
he used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization pl4n uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling. techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.02.1.7 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and / or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 300 bead milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
300 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 75 (% confinement
time) = 1,724,625_ gallons of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (EAN) Produced Per Year
300 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 22,800 lbs. Total N
Total Nitrogen produced/yT. 22,800 lbs. Total N
(PAM from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1

WASTE UTILIZATI(1N PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every! MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
93.9 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRA TI VE OF OPER; i TION:
This operation has 335 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
system of corn cut for silage or harvested for grain in the first year, followed by small grain cut
for silage and soybeans in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the
realistic yields at the rates listed in table I.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Corn grain: April -May at the rate of 100 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 96 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Soybeans: April -Jun. at the rate of 100 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting.
Annual Ryegrass/Pasture: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 94 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 113 lbs of N/ac
Fescue(Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
On fields which follow soybeans in rotation reduce the amount of N required by 20 lbs/ac
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and proper system.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
Ell

. . WASTE UTILIZATIG)N PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there- must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: _Zbw,;"L
�Cr
(Please print)
Signature• Date:. 2_s _ez
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print)_ i? c �c: c� I
Affiliation: ,.6 0 fa - LJ I CS
Address (Agency): Z_7 Z 7 - C-- C>L
P"[ ,
Signature:
8
61
Date: 3._ & - 60

State of North Carolina VWr. 7 "MWA
Department of EnvironmentJ. �cO.._ LT• 0
and Natural Resources AA 094 f
Division of Water Quality g ?�!l'�now
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 00an%Ws4NCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary sept B10
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 31, 2000
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville NC 28115
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800017
Amity Hills Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Lonnie Hoffner:
In accordance with your application received on June 1, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of
Coverage (COC) issued to Lonnie Hoffner, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Amity Hills Farm Farm, located in Rowan County, with an
animal capacity of no greater than 300 Dairy and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This request
shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC800017
Amity Hills Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information e
ation conc_ rning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
ZSincer
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
RowanCounty Health Department
Mooresville -Regional=Office; Water=Quality=Section�
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files

1
2
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resou eF E C E I V E D
Division of Water Quality ATEP OUkIn'SECTfON
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form JUN U )
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) ��9�
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Wasterations
n-pisch'rge Permitting
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Amity Hills Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Lonnie Hoffner
1.3 Mailing address: 2705 C-orrikr SpringsRoad r ^
City. State: Mooresville NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 278-9560
1.4 County where facility is located: Rowan
Zip: 28115
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Hw . 70 at Cleveland - left on Amity Hill Rd. 5 .
T41c;(
miles to Umberger Rd. left 2 miles to Mt. +al'er Church Rd. Right 2 miles to Dairy on left 2035 Mt. Tabor Church Rd,
Rowan/Iredell line.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): James W. Hoffner
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/61
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _80 (county number); 17 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description Cattle operation
airy
300- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, torrent below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean (4 sow)
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle
0 Layer <ZED
0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Turkey
No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 1 of 4 80-17
Nn of Animnlq
300

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 349.5 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 156.0
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the' lagoon(s)? YES o NO (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the follo%ving required items by nign,'n; your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9. The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3. 10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 2 of 4 80-17
Applicants Initials
C /�
L14
t

Facility Number: 80 - 17
Facility Name: Amity Hills Farm
RECEIVED
WATER O'_,ALITYSFOPON
vm 01 1999
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: Noll -Discharge pe
1, d/7E c �aGr- (Land Owner's name listed tr PRion 1.2), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be r,Ftumed to me as incomplete.
Signature
5. MANAGER'S
1,
Date S112 7 `5 7
TIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. i understand that if all required parts oi° this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 3 of 4 80-17

o Third R-�LEV�e.'
r
4 J� 4*1 MPSON
DLE
N O 9THER.
-IRE S"_ OH 1SEE
zy G" y CLEVELAN 3 POW AS be Ou�
Or T i Y mP.
\
�D. r
R DM ILDEBRAND
pF
G Creek
SHINN RD. v Withrow
�.
WESTROW
J �� swo'L"uS ���G C SMF RD I Hi SCH. RRA S % tl
I i SSE � � •
x
# J, MT. TABO �Gt1• PD � z� c i1 Gseak 801 x
dL o� STEELE '� °4� TSV:
x ti+ fif+ hSTN.x V EW
MT. ' OLL4 TWP Bear °`�
,yERR� � TFITIE A Raw.
r
~a�}j a r "' LEN RD. � I LN. DR.
I
NithrowRE �\ COUNTRY
Gr�tK oN r �� GE DR, • OF
F� T y GOODNIGHT + �p
Ll 0,14
� R � AQP � �•_w',, =.::- ° I i`IE4�L'{ � ,� �cIR Jt.
� t
801
RD/ "
. i
k, C
GRAHAM 1 _ - =,i1i
LOP RD. o I 4 /r^•q \ \;
ANN!
5
��L' ' SL'OAN 9au COOPER �Q
RU`
1 RD
mOOPS
o Nry/ EMMA gip'
150 aR —�
ops ANHAW RD. o
Cl c m S J
a� 8 ; e�04 z 884
1 n n r �O RQ cr
1 LDND �4� C'Q � 8Ll1EFl LDS DEAL
RD
ca 5 7¢ /
MCLAkAR GHLIN RIM
fi ? FARM RD \_erx , ON 1
%� �Q o 4 Z UpRIGR w
4 y sv yr SPR4�JGS o
�I \�o McC SRTNSMpft4 / %0 0 0
tic
152 ! off. __jI o o
57 A I o RAY
P:
152 ~
Q1
'+ c '� ! CHINA
-o 'AOOREIVILLE ATN' LL ^sem A I ROLLINGW 9 'GRA
� t,lDiOR , ORTS 'y_F �' GREEN• !!!� _W
r2 o Cot LEX 1 + �RRIKER �O' TWP�� z CR 0. BRIA a fl-
ms
!
153 . A
MS RD. " vb �F o�
a 2
J 8RIARFIE r 2 O' .�.� h�,+ Cc to

Anim;il Waste Nlanage.rnent Plan Cer.._icaiion
r?ksc use or orint a!! lnlc)rT;',!1:7n L ni ifots norequire n si•;^.;i:Jr.!
NSUna or New or E nand& (pleve dr de one)
(:energl lniorrnatfon:
:,�L- m2 0f _. is f5 Rr:!'si'v 'No: 0) V -�
6 L2 12 -
Form LacwNon:
'_a i[' k and Logan c/t//� �O�.L liii�`T'
�i
it._.�L) a r Jcv -:a.T.�.:loc._a,n lie:sd and e MOW (3d SiU Z
;a;),
Oneration f4scriotion:
1jeof "Ire IVO.
] Min to Facie-
-'
acret_ :o Finish
_ rarG•.v Co -=0-
F17:w Co r.^tsh
_' ?silets
C.
Z Dair
:i ?Cat
0wher 0I =1:i na.S:
,^xn.-z.•�� Q;,rr� ion iinlr ' .. .
?�:IS.'�iE.r'?^ C�,•iQ,~ ti(IPili101:C: �_S;uY; CG'i;' 'P fCl,^.! f''t'Si?R rGDJCfr•,
-...._ans =vOiabit for;IppRabon: 1�.�.ci L �__L'lr_'#.Ac-_=YP �Co SG.
�,u: C'_.:3 _ancons / SEc :gt PcnCS 1 oml Ca -. Cubic Fee (ft-")
-. _ s'„ts :.___ dr :'hs 7r_Mnt Crl := Y Ts Gr 0 ""tease one.,
If art subsurface d _ins presen: in f�,.e area of ;e L.a000.N or S?RaY FIELD (-,Kase ci.rc:e one;
........... ...... ....... ­,.. ...,,.,.x..,.�
y
Chvner 1 [anager Agreement
t' 'e.^.:v U.7t all Lhe abo i J �, and _ 0 j f ! ...-• i tti
: L•e ntL�; .titian is c re ::� ;:, 'cuate:f upon c^an_�.i:_ t �r'z uri�_.,,�rc! ,l:e
and maintenan e r •i m l' ej in t approved aninha! c'a;te managea:ent San for tii, farm r. a �•e a :i
c � eco grog es b saw to .. � arh_.1 abo nd •' it
!mpiemant these procedLu--s. l (w=! know Ghat an., tx ansiun to L` e LWing design cap:!city of die %vaste treatment an'_`
jfora` t s'•'sterz or consumcdun of new fatalities OR mquire a n. -,.v c.—OfIcadon to be submitted to the Division of
Wnvinunmenml `lanagmcm before the r,;:'.v animsls are stec:ked. I (w•e) unda-sLand U` at there must be no disc'.tar5e UC
i"im:l wa_;te from the storage or appilca6on S.vstem to st pace w'at_r5 of the ;tate _dw: dIrecil•: through a man -.Tilade
c3nvd ance or from a storm e•:eat less severe than the ?f -Fear. 2 --hour storm -md there trust not be run-off from L:e
aoolic_tiun of animal wa5t_, l (we) undersi.a.nd that run-off of pullutants from lounging and heavy use ares must ce
minimiz!d using tc,bnic_l standards de':e!ut'ed by uhe ``at_rci Resources Conservation S,: icr. The approved plan will 'cc
:fled at Lnzt farm and at a offic.- of the luc:d Suii and Wate; Cunser-:anion District. I ('•ce; know that any modification
Aust be approved by a tecanical specialist and submitted to Lbe Soil and 'Vater Conservation District prior to
Lmplemant,zdon. A changt in land ownership requires notiticadun io DENI or a n_w certification (if the a_pruvdz
pian is changed) within 60 Sys of a title transfer.
Name of Land •ner `G r•��%�/,ems
5'sonanfre:• .'l
`Name of `lanager;i ..__er_^t
�i�nattlre:
Date:. !g_
--
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
-�Decinhst dc;ignated by the Nortel Czsoiina Soil and w'aLer Cunier::,[iun Corn:mi�si()n pursuant to 1.
`C.,C -r= .000-4. I t animal 'xasze mann: _ ent s:.5LL:.-n Cor L:':_ farm n.ti led nc-L)vz as an ar.imai
M=aEtmnt ?!-In hat al=e's •)r _::ctt s s=dards and _CC'_::IC [1UR5 Of Lha Division of .....+i;onnic ual
(DEND as = C_:lsed In lJr. '�C-.0 ?=.0 1i and L::C 1;SDA.-`atura1 Resources Conser%-nil ri Szc":icz (''ii CS) a d,'-lr Lht
No; CW"ol:na Soil :rad Vva:t: C'nsc:--tion Commission 'L'rsuam to laA NCAC and 15ANC.-'.0-5F.UCQi.
:olloins inc!uded in Lhe pian 7is -� iicaole. `vhiie each a to=:^. kcal sp_ci 11;L
r0 ...-. Sl2ri !t2c3 _. i'.. [:C. ICD..`.l. RC. 1). ..._ :C_. ^.iCJ Scdc:a isl5nould Ori' _..ILs '0,-
H.
vr
H. Cerrijzcall oii of Desiun
A) Collec:ion. Stora!2n. T-eatment Svstern
:he a.7prcD7'ra:e vG.i
Sior:n.,c vo1L'fiC Is for ocitranon cnruL:w-: .i orn_it capunlliv.
reuuireRl_^s.
Y New. ex-,,andd ,,--e'rofitted facility (SD)
Animal wast,, siums•'_ and LrCaL-nent >trUC:UreS. such as but not limited Lo collcc:ion 5.::i:^;;. la^coni and pone-,.
aaye beta d,siC's"; Lo ante, or e-ceed ;he rnin-..—num s;an,!arts and Sce_i%cations.
Name of Technical Specialist (?!ease
DLlte We r% Co��.tli�._ ..
C.
Lc-ess c..) - c �o f C Phcrte Vic. ray ��� L)
S ..:_-p Dat• j 20- qt
E) Land .application Site (IVUP)
oC plan -rovit ;ts for mLnL':tuM 51.::= ons (buf°t:1): a0dQUa[c aMUUn[ Of land for Wast LillZatiUn: C!1Us_:: C;UC) i5
ui a0it f%r 'x''S;_ ..'il a�C.1C 3t: a�'d aullc and n:!-i.^t lcadiR r [es.
.Name of Technical Specialist (Ple'Se Print):
CJ Date Wor'.c Coanpieret:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Ciro;.,' rhe anpropriare box
Faciiiiv without exte-ior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This fac;hts' dces not contain any exterior lots.
PhOn�-
Dat?•,��-��-9�
raciiiiv with e.me-ior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize nae run off of pollut_ris f -Om lounging and heap•.' use ar.—= havc be::n deli --,red in
accordance with technirl standards develupe•i by ,N -RCS.
`arae of Technical Specialist (Plecse Print):
Date Work Cor,nle!-d
::uL r:!ss
si2Fia.t=.Ire
AWC -- A�i
!tone `o.::Zq- 07-Q
'ate: --�M- CTK'

D;. Aughcation and Handlin- Eauinment
Check Me npprophn, bo.-,
1qy n ?

Ill. Cemy-kation ON Installation
�) Collection. Storace. T. eatrnent Installation
;'.nima-I '•v2Sie SCC::?ge and as 'J es- _::c`t 1 but li innlagoons and ponds t
tr� Lrl�at stnsc.� r.. .a � [ :tot . tn.._.. to _ ottn ,..;,`.i!_,
ac=c' once . E:72 ^10i1 to :rust_ ... _..:__,. me ArAmurn '-Lan[? ds . ,.t1
For �-a� rl� trc ilres w.,': lou: . evor::s. no cor-�,�c�^ort is ,: or. sar,'.
"Name of Technical Soecialist (PI-.2-se,:'::-�;':
Date WON COMA21
s: nac r v
J) Land anolication Site (NV7U;?)
;i!c oppropri::ie bo::
Du1:!:
Z The c-opping sys ern i5 in ol'ace an ad :'and as sped led :n me animal wa-z',_ t: an,.,_'2:•1 n: plan.
Conditional Approval: 'll rcqui t::J :-. Z3 >Te_ir.eC in the Pian is WarN for planting: U._ '•� capping -Unpin 5ys;_•-
a.5 s4 _ ed in oe u:i..cation pian ,: 7.c: be_rs _smbiis7ed and L^_ o« -r._. ;,:as cori':mit:r l
,J t0 eSIO%i:_il
2t. -=.:un as ._� In -fit {{Tp,,l'�.n b (S �o iLl CS`'I'. ..e proposed C7'. �. C.0 is
a" ril^.NJ:.a. .Cr CO :ar= %Wb It nwW......__. Gn sn.
Aso check Cis box it 2. WOvr ..r2
if t,te s;ste n as sc__iti.d V. flan not be essKis;:ed a Y_.v':; :'.e.zea !ai,.t '.ciLhi:
Of lis :_rJticadum we ow=r hM :..^.C.^.` and a emkii h ani Wien al C70p Ivr _ O&On :Ont:ol:
"N^me of Technical Soecialist {Please POO:
-._...._.icr. .. C-3s�tp.tL tJCr _ Da = V orK Co e:e .
....... esu (.
- „rz:
?sone `o.:_7l q- dz 27 /elOy
Dare: _ 1-20.-9-5._
This folio" ina signature bloc: is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in IIT. E
above has been checked.
! %ve? t:crtii%- gnat l (w.-) 'nave committt.1 to esLabiis:l lne zropning system as spec-.i1td in my (our) Wa..t_ udh=iun Alar.
a sc if appropriate tp=stabiisa Lie interim crop for _rasion conuoi. and will submit to DE NI a ve�itscadon o[ com_ole:ion
i
.-Orn a t ccdnical SpC::�iis, wnin I` t:Jent:ar t:ays toilowim Lae date SpeCiI1C'I in Lhe L:Ond."-Ur.J' C:'tillc.uion. I ('.�'e)
that failtiCt [0 SUbmit i,7iS ':tr1S:ClLion i5 a' 1VIatiUn O[ Lil= tt'a5[2 CIt3Ctae.Ol.n( plan a1:4 will. SISD:t InC (us) E 02,1
r_e�eat action irom D -—=`•J, 1 /]
Name of Land Owner:
i2nature:
dame of Manager :Fctn
Signature:
-\"%'C -- AU'rUit 1. 1997 -
Date:
Date..

r
C) Rurioff Controls from —terior Lots (RC)
IU ..l L,^.11Z_' did run Of of polllli:iw worn lounging OW heny Un ^.i ; i'•. ..._^• ::1>,i_': wo as
in l C.`1 p I .z..^, .
^lrjcc::: TeS 1v'i:hour exlerior !otS. n0 necessar,:.
Xame of Technical Saeciaiist (P!2 ;2 Paint):
_.
.._.::iatic'n
Kd7ass (A anC:,'
Daae .'v'cr:: C,D,'-,i_._...
D) Aooiication and Handlin? Eouio[nent Installation (NVI P or I)
Oak the C7�ruDrf :2 7t7C:i
. ho!'. No.:
Dan:
.1.. Ca(:an ind G..l:Li1n_ yuipPle'ii :i--`' :fle:.l In .tit ^S::n is L.. sii: ..411j r.. Cy iv"C I!�t:
nu a�Li �ai ri.ai Kah 110 .,.. n .^.rovid-t'� :U L e woe ...C.0 me con'mine 1 as wi ?,n
;' 0 :s P Ol:il gm
in.
. 'n :al :p 'Ca : n ha,1'lln_? e ,aprlcru .i�Cc `+� ': pl 1 0 S e �;�
.l: `.:]L: 3' i. r U ,end (,: '..' 4 •l:�J in 4.'v 141 .i ] not Le:l n. w-11IL�d LLS. Utt-nc.
has lt2si.^._4 or didd pmay a4pkuuun and hal provAd a i1S.%J c:mu.%:: equiCnient Si ezi iCd :n
L:o :on'.= a2rz�tS '•t•1L1 L:= r.-Lulr.—.menu of W p1n:.euuired buffers can be nLainmined: Cali0nuciun and
adjusuven: uidance hwe ban provided :o :hc ov,-ners and air; ccrLair ,i as Carr UP L:o plan.
-:1 Condidona.l approval: .;-nimal xis:e appiica:ion and handling .':uiFMCnr :pe--iiitd in die plan has
_aased and 'affil be on Site and MAW Q is adequate
smm Wm Nord L".e w:s:d unL'I We tqui_mLnt :s ins-Laildd and unci :she can b-- land acuiiCd in
a 'r"- c_ 'm ln_ mal con:alned in Lho plan: and ahbrz i n and ZdjU5t:.1dnt EL'iU nCe 1::
CCS �.�:. � I L CropD 5', 5� C 0
Wen ;= iL e'd to Vie own=s and : �C L'o�i wj as Pa.. of i.11. plan,
Name of Technical Soecialist (?iea,e ?:int) r�C�C �7cr��wv1
......:anon Date Wor ComDie:e^
P`lone No.:20�-637 -AG
D�l
SDat.�
The follo«ving signature bloc; is only to be used when the bot for conditional approval in III D
above has been chez`ked.
1 , s[ 1 committed to .purcJ.,:. uP..,?_ 1:,lrnal '.vas; -z appiicabon ar(i ::nLl1n4 euuiorncat =5
so wined in :Ti:. {o' . , :' .i.?':ag' :1i ^,i plan and QH subrM m DEM a vehric'adon DI dAvery and in5i:a11?.ilw.
&M _ l eC;] MS Sct--.:E''i_s: '•t;L':in 15 ca zmix�= day's i3111owing [he dace speCiiie'd in Uie cor'2dona.i =Wcadon. 1
"4' re , � ,•,baa
�'•� i1Z u:... f�'lti„', tJ 5i1Cml[ [his t'e':fi�'_'ilOn is .. AMR of r.�� ��'.st_ ..� _=^]�nI JS:iIl and '•Fill sil'i71t_. i^t
(.a; ,o an earorc_r~;en[ ac: --or. from DEM.
dame of Land Owner:
Siznature:
Name of Manager (i: Jif e:e:tt From owner):
Signature:
Date:
Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and Mortality' Nlana!ement (SD. SI. �V'U-P. RC or I)
ate; .ccis to ccntroi ccdt:r-.) Lod irsecw as specified in ne Plain have been irst:i & and are operauonal. i ne
-70nalicy manage!mtru sysie n :s specified in the °;Wa has also been installed and is operational.
Name of erhniral Specialist (Please Pnm): � ——QQ c--
r T
f-iliation Date Wo-,: Comple:e;::
Siu,n [ur:
--OC -- Aul;ust 1. 1997
Pticr.e M.: —X�-±
DaL2 f --- ?.o' CW

Please return the completed form to the Division of «Vater Quality at the following address:
Deparzrnent of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
`eater Quality Section. Compliance Group
P.O. Box 3`1;=;
Ralei,zh. NC'76_6-0-53-
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete .-animal Waste
%lanaaement Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your Files «vith your Animal Waste Management Plan.

V
�t �4�i� rA � iygkeL � "i� ��tr,,,r b t ' � 'ia�'�t''� � 4�� �.i�. �+ � j • ray r • S r:tA G = a %n,� f '•^� ''!= h�• 'd ;�'��r
ATTACHMENT
j r age I'
WASTE.'UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer County
Address 263/��.�„r��rclt Mand of Operation
Clue)g►1df; & 274 Type of Waste Facility gw/
Your animal waste management facility has been designed fora
given 'storage capaciy,;. When,the waste reaches the designed
level,xit must be land-applied'at a specified rate to'prevent
pollut'io'n of surface and/or ground water.' The plant nutrients
in the animal waste"should be 'used to reduce the amount of
commercial fertilizer,required�for the crops on the fields
h
were'the waste is to -be applied. This waste utilization plan
uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be
analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests
are encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for
realistic yields of,the crop to be•grown.
4.
Several, -factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plAn in order to maximize the fertilizer value of
the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
'environmentally safe* manner. Always apply waste based on the
needs of tie crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste.' "Do not. apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates and leaching potental. Waste shall not be applied to
land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not
�t apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the surface is
frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to
avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value
of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential
for pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop or
not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems..
The acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical
nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis
report from your waste management facility.
The design of your waste management facility is based on the
following:
Amount of w ste Produced Per Year.
306 animals x 2i total waste
produced.

4""
�•r ? ,'i '.`� ! f1 a E r� q'yi .A a t 7` -x -. z
x y
ATTACH21FM A
Page 2
Amount'of Nitrogen Prodyce er year:
&0&—animals x 71P_lbs N/animal/yr total N
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should
,plan.time'and.have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in
a timely manner. Your facility is designed for Jg'4- days of
storage.` Therefore, it will need to be pumped every �^
months`:
The following.acreage for waste application will be needed
based.an the.crop to be grown and surface application:
Feld Soil Crop Realistic lbs. Y Acres lbs. M Month of
'Type Y(eld Per Ac. Utilized Application
Narrative of Operation
Call the Soil and Water Conservation District office after you
receive waste analysis report to obtain the amount per acre to
apply and the irrigation application rate prior to applying.
waste.
Prepared by
Concurred in
Proauc
(Copy to producer and copy to case file)
Date
Date

PRODUCERS NAME Lonnie Hoffner
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE
5/25199
CROP REALISTIC YIELD Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES Lbs. N Utilized Month Appllied
49 2
Cecil
Com Silage
15 TI Ac.
150
36.6
2
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T I Ac.
125
36.6
2
Cecil
Soybeans
25T/Ac,
100
36.6
73 1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
15.3
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T 1 Ac.
125
15.3
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
15.3
2
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
9.4
2
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
9.4
2
Cecil
Soybeans
25T/Ac.
100
9.4
3
Pacolel
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac.
110
11.2
4
Pacolet
Fescue/Pasture
3 TI Ac.
110
2.7
5
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T! Ac.
150
15.4
5
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T /Ac.
125
15.4
5
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
15.4
6
Paoolet
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac.
110
7.6
7
Pacolet
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac.
110
16.7
8
Paoolet
Fescue/Pasture
3 T/ Ac.
110
1.9
9
Chewacla
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
10.5
9
Chewacla
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
10.5
9
Chewacla
Soybeans
25T/Ac.
100
10.5
10
Chewacla
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
2.1
10
Chewacla
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
2.1
10
Chewada
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
2.1
11
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
14.8
11
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T ! Ac.
125
14.8
11
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T 1 Ac.
100
14.8
12
Cecil
Fescue/Pasture
3 TI Ac.
110
2.6
A 1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
40.8
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac_
125
40.8
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T /Ac.
100
40.8
5,490 March
4,575 September
3,660 May
2,295 March
1,913 September
1,530 May
1,410 March
1,175 September
940 May
1,232 March - November
297 Manch - November
2,310 March
1,925 September
1,540 May
836 March - November
1,837 March - November
209 March - November
1,575 March
1,313 September
1,050 May
315 March
263 September
210 May
2,220 March
1,850 September
1,480 May
286 March - November
6,120 March
5,100 September
4,080 May

PRODUCERS NAME Lonnie Hoffner
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
REALISTIC YIELD
Lbs.N per Ac.
ACRES
Lbs, N Utilized
Month Appllied
B
l
Cecil
Cam Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
4
600
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T /Ac_
125
4
500
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25T/Ac.
100
4
400
May
C
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/Ac.
150
3
450
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
3
375
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T /Ac.
100
3
300
May
D
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
4.5
675
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T 1 Ac.
125
4.5
563
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
4.5
450
May
E
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
5.7
855
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
5.7
713
September
3
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
5.7
570
May
F
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
10.7
1,605
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T /Ac.
125
10.7
1,338
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25T/Ac.
100
10.7
1,070
May
G
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
3
450
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T 1 Ac.
125
3
375
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T 1 Ac.
100
3
300
May
H
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
6.7
1,005
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T 1 Ac.
125
6.7
838
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
6.7
670
May

PRODUCERS NAME Lonnie Hoffner
TRACT
FIELD
SOIL TYPE
CROP
REALISTIC YIELD
Lbs.N per Ac.
ACRES
Lbs. N Utilized
Month Appllied
I
i
Cecil
Cam Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
19.8
2,970
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
19.8
2,475
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T /Ac.
100
19.8
1,980
May
J
1
Cecil
Fescue/Hayland
3 T/ Ac.
150
4
600
March - November
2
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
3.1
465
March
2
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T 1 Ac.
125
3.1
388
September
2
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
3.1
310
May
3
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T1 Ac.
150
9.7
1,455
March
3
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T I Ac.
125
9.7
1,213
September
3
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
9.7
970
May
K
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 TI Ac.
150
13.4
2,010
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
13.4
1,675
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T /Ac.
100
13.4
1,340
May
2
Cecil
Fescue/Hayland
3 TI Ac.
150
7.5
1,125
March - November
L
1
Cecil
Fescue/Pasture
3 TI Ac.
110
16.9
1,859
March - November
2
Cecil
Fescue/Pasture
3 TI Ac.
110
16.1
1,771
March - November
M
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 Tl Ac.
150
5.8
870
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
5.8
725
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T /Ac.
100
5.8
580
May
N
1
Cecil
Fescue/Pasture
3 T1 Ac.
110
2.1
231
March - November
O
1
Cecil
Com Silage
15 Tl Ac.
150
30
4,500
March
1
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
30
3,750
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T /Ac.
100
30
3,000
May
2
Cecil
Com Silage
15 T/ Ac_
150
9.8
1,470
March
2
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T / Ac.
125
9.8
1,225
September
2
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T 1 Ac.
100
9.8
980
May
P
1
Cecil
Cam Silage
15 T/ Ac.
150
21.6
3,240
March
I
Cecil
Small Grain Silage
2.5 T! Ac.
125
21.6
2,700
September
1
Cecil
Soybeans
25 T / Ac.
100
21.6
2,160
May
TOTAL
385
107,446
300 cows X
76
PAN/ cow=
22800
Lbs. N/Yr.
Lbs. N 12 YEAR
ROTATION
45,600
61,846
Deficit N

n , Y• r ` ,! - � }fail + j r t� 1 � 'z -
�. , �� � r.C�'t y' '�J •f :� ' � . +ll.':,u; [ %l{��J' ''�i Y. lih. R 'J'' � :'
,.qx1'►•.. 'K,+y� � r'�: s' F�yr'.�� � yr�: �'i;yi,� ; i' - r � J � , j!
Y. !V,
i •- V i.
•t,.z lf,l!" x•r! is }. {,�, "• fir' A -
5>e'.5 I�.}f,' ,rtd•M 1 '1 - ,.r' r., • F/ 1 i F11.:iti?rf•�
4`�: �•r r- .1 ,Sl� '`! Y�•. �,-f�'f 't �,1• (.,� r�. �, �,+,`�ts! ,,/ ry -"•
' -, f r:, 1 j .i' tf r •.., S r rt ' +.� Jr9- e '� - r !♦ tk'��
�i'-x7plyrr{ `' i 1 : 1 ' (� Y�� r r 4!'Y.,� �`' � h f ff �• yr ti4:$. y ,. , ''• l _ter t �'�'
1•i .r tt.'tJ{ _` } �' ,{ S),} Ir �(.t�i� 4T }• ,�y,f 'ri � � p f{ � 1�:. . -s ��°�-'!
pp z j' t
'Nd!C _ �• ry, r� ir� � eY ��l`j r�, Id �A, i -�1 Cyd €zqi�� i i~ r!•'
IV
r• rlf .�3k rL!� + r W t-• `1 �•` � y F t i `yI [�T'�' �� � �� +•rr S�y�°°'r y
} � � �tk� 1, l .. f "�� t� fel at+y� KR �'' % v l,� � , i��i:; . � '1 •'' •*�
�rrs � •}^i� 7 �'+)k�v.t?.,1'ta tir�i r i ,,Fye �` t{3�,, '1- r tai,'d} 'r�A�J `!� Y5.• �i' ��,t,�'• 1 r. � �'-�.' fa �3 .
5-• _ �'o- .�:'i•l �.i �, �} ,• '•�4'� �{.;hr:i-t, '�.la'i- �r'•' t. ��'�5�.y�,ti :^;. j:�Fr r �"
- A�r•'r�t r. � � y i , C�, b� ��it �.:.�"•r�. � - �',�4' {'�,•�1'.•'l` t :�! , �':^'• I '� •.� � N;.R�' 'fi
�' ' .y. •r::,-..(: i� 5:�%ir?.- +.• ` ! :�.::;;r:��ki'� Ori.`` ' i �,'i.✓
`Y•L;.C.f l` ! .<jt • arc r.;�'I �' y ',N
'.Y'•`'r
c
c tl+, - ' i �� � ate, -� t {, +`,t`:•; r ...�,_: s n . !•.
i' i .1 I i � J' .it �� Vii' i rf -. fK'. ��a•�pvK;" rl
;s . ;' ) jet; i �„•'=�'• •, "'.�$� �_f � .. r �
• .! r. tam" s
�`% "-.. A;r ii <". , I C. } rs..a f.-. T r 3i• rs`, J
.'` J :Y a �Ri:P•rp� �w.Y++,la I� ���` w r',,�: :� `I,{ .. •\
It
PK
41
,r , ' } / r• I r+'"' .� _ rev. ,'
41.l
- •�.�••.. + .;.fir, i�1• ,- •;�yl. `` S
• +• , 11 :. tr'�°Y s, r �'1� •"�,•t♦�'yY /'.i�� � 1is� IFffi1J� +
1�T¢�r• �ti7
'll iii ._ , •� "+•�' }�3'i-1 - -• •� .t :%:• i
�'( t,•i � r' "�i-prlr Lfrf,f,'�1' ` i l%�'4-,�.; "� � e::fi� i,�.. .it� - 'Y
r`'. j U
��t r . ; ,�� '� ri�ri SJ" yFY•',t�'g S' I 1� t f
�: Ci' 4(. •' � .. ti'i £L'k "•��•' tom" �+ -r. i
��v�• �.5�rr X77ti11 'i rrr � - • A''•� r , ,. ,i . :' '� t15'
y�f�ii'11�r�•�'Li •y F X,11' y'{C4.z•; ��,\` K
-'r {`• ,�.,�F.f9,� � �� t<%4 :.r - •' I fi/ 1 ...D1. Y s? , 5•
�+ �M J _ •-_" rfit; LL's Y i �_i. �{% r
4 � �' �•I •+� r'.`,� �' • 1, Sf • , 1 � I � s �tf.1'�' j)il SF. �+'

K
0

r sit xs �► x �Y
. � n r. 14. M•. tri ..
+TAY ,y� d.. ~x'
woo
f _ I •' j d
7`4w 1C
Y ) •!�.!'M .y -W - tll}�` � r\� w��•, 1EA
4 y7 Sy{.�• E�
Y 'L ii Y��•y n1
��> �S;}� L,r 7l. r �4 i'� �I( �I ! �' hP I.y3A t.. �• a.1.���
! Y � � +'" 1; � 21+1 i' �.-- •d �'+h-as- 'i
t
` ni6' .e `ep` l''�, - ° ' .j �;R ��•�.• 1 1 �i �oC� n °`trLa �'�°; i!�Y �F ��i.'��',• � u
�y
.a
T�.N'! -=al�Y �f I I.� y L Z�. �'�! !� 1` '��?" ,-- 1•f � • '} � rb.- }�
k..• ��k ? •�1 1 } 11 � 1 T"17 }J'�. +-• Q.�e}$5' ir., i (( .
�f ����„_ 'i r •:�,�I _r ��� �� *�' a`�.� ,,d�®+�,�i'>ti' ; �. -= z�' a,�._ 'sit•
y'°•`G Q* !' �y.• L � l !. ,� r� � +TA►” I � m • t,,a:u �' E '+t f �j��, �� f4 �a �'�r !
.�.'+gyp L�c . V!: t' Y Y.� f'{rl '�a °mak" r moi° :d` 6'✓u ,R ' .� �- �' •f'r 7
.s •C . � K �� "r�j o� ± R \ r „f' . �" .p � Y� •r .tL-;:� ' i �.� a H. � < .� � � �.•^'
. _• , T � J li `t P" �� 'yi' 7^� ��•. � y1�i �'�k.'��� dv _^^7 '.� .fJ!
� �$ \1 1
f i1T 1 ti's+ r A » � r A 4 5[1SIY ` t!' ell
4�'9�1�.
'ABC
:•S V ,��,,ey� � ir!"may, �� °�s. a r' r y .�
j ° .o. F �t"g - •'i # R'i�.' Fh �� A if a Q �� a l ' _ W • q ` r
r! �F743 /! _ 7ktFr J 7a •' 1'3w I f F4.• o . i
,.r_A ,
i►r'+.TtNFR'. 7t, ♦ 1n,A� k7�+'��1- r�J• 1 i• % + "<��1.t y/
MIT
_ � ' 4 �111,,,;, K.ti9.,►q.° ...2; � a f.r � .V �/ �0.•// fJ!/ JJ/JJ//��/,//.��' �iy b � � a L
0. b
y d two
` ni6' .e `ep` l''�, - ° ' .j �;R ��•�.• 1 1 �i �oC� n °`trLa �'�°; i!�Y �F ��i.'��',• � u
�y
.a
T�.N'! -=al�Y �f I I.� y L Z�. �'�! !� 1` '��?" ,-- 1•f � • '} � rb.- }�
k..• ��k ? •�1 1 } 11 � 1 T"17 }J'�. +-• Q.�e}$5' ir., i (( .
�f ����„_ 'i r •:�,�I _r ��� �� *�' a`�.� ,,d�®+�,�i'>ti' ; �. -= z�' a,�._ 'sit•
y'°•`G Q* !' �y.• L � l !. ,� r� � +TA►” I � m • t,,a:u �' E '+t f �j��, �� f4 �a �'�r !
.�.'+gyp L�c . V!: t' Y Y.� f'{rl '�a °mak" r moi° :d` 6'✓u ,R ' .� �- �' •f'r 7
.s •C . � K �� "r�j o� ± R \ r „f' . �" .p � Y� •r .tL-;:� ' i �.� a H. � < .� � � �.•^'
. _• , T � J li `t P" �� 'yi' 7^� ��•. � y1�i �'�k.'��� dv _^^7 '.� .fJ!
� �$ \1 1
f i1T 1 ti's+ r A » � r A 4 5[1SIY ` t!' ell
4�'9�1�.
'ABC
:•S V ,��,,ey� � ir!"may, �� °�s. a r' r y .�
j ° .o. F �t"g - •'i # R'i�.' Fh �� A if a Q �� a l ' _ W • q ` r
r! �F743 /! _ 7ktFr J 7a •' 1'3w I f F4.• o . i
,.r_A ,
i►r'+.TtNFR'. 7t, ♦ 1n,A� k7�+'��1- r�J• 1 i• % + "<��1.t y/
MIT
_ � ' 4 �111,,,;, K.ti9.,►q.° ...2; � a f.r � .V �/ �0.•// fJ!/ JJ/JJ//��/,//.��' �iy b � � a L

1
R F
X41 e� �`✓� ��
1
1
� f
1
R F
X41 e� �`✓� ��

• '•_ � �t fn'• 4f"3��� f}tftt r .♦ ��;+,r•�:t;i'r.;i T.y s., r- �.{}•ri; '-:�
r. • .N :�" {+!�' ir-.'V f r it •; s'A +' ♦t i 's
• ,- - ''4; • � y•'4;;� �' tee,-�.•--, '
•�'� l.�. i . d •• �^�' .r •
3, { n. : r ' '�}4•rY r hr' 1it i�' w • " J".ti _ Yr •1 i + •1
RIK�r
VW
47
i� .�' •�• •f, 1ii� r{I<''11 ;-. .+1: �_p�j.11t F�i,�, _ - .)_
�. '�,•t 1 r ••i.'`�fM _: +i gtr/,±:5•> ~ yl." - jn. 4a �{i".}:r}'
•� , 1, ' 'r• i t s ..'• Y � ��; k': -.r'. i � ti. L
• �rJ'f� - '��; .! ••'�-'. erg' "�'- ya-K :. jr:`Y ,
me
s• it i� ,`3y �~F 1 rF f r e� i I _ � I'n � r'Jlt`j •' •� ` y�.
' 3t�},, TFri ! �- ••( � r YTS ���„a Y,M:y�• } '3i i J � rr �.
Y r `y4'. :: ' „,..-r C�+f '”' ` , �%�1 ' . r' •l+ri f' r- !f r:' !i .
xi11.; f tea. _ ^ t•. t ..,')r' Jt, r+• r t
t �-' ,�r r4. � phra.r'�•r�j..w?'• K ;tr ••' i -+ ..� � `"" h+h' { : ]
T�1 Y� .�� ' i i � r �'r} 7�I� �S .is ,p�r"ii {+4.;..•. _ � ...., � e p r, k 7 �'-�� :t
it OF
`T` i •.' :'; , : `i,' � 3 'F' ,t- -i �. �,,�;F,y3 `v �,� �v. ..'�'S �. N'y •� �r '114 - Z r 4 u
r yrs: •;=:f�" r k R t>°,trti�°+,l''i�ax )�. `T. � :`"'�F yFSi�.k� 1'�
�Z t.•r,•- 'r's r, t � -� i����'.{, �� iR•- v i'"fir rl „{ r�4�'►.
'�.� fir; .rte' 'K. S .r::�r-`'!,.'•- ` r �- �"� .��`+! '1r� I .4.�:•,y
j., Dt1; iii' 1' `' r �,. •'' 3 � ) i,'.t'�;a •w...,•..�= ,
�,tr 'ii, �yfL~ 'S:+�� r ^ ,tyt1 w -�1 ' x• th ^' 'r �-' "��';'%f•�tlfn ", .; - ' ..r
TMLY 1;
f]p,. f � is � �� ?' 4}�{'•,r� y - r f7 +ter s'• r� .
.� 't_' 11 •.i" . 4 {rf�'4�h,.�. 1 - �. ` .� f .w: r�fyY� e , r•, _
�••,� �'.�i -• " cif �i;y4f '• � rl1 i y • 'y ��'. f � .
�'� •_t . �'J .S- :7 ., .. y, 1 _. , _•` ..I_�•' , J' - �'7' 't' it -� '_�...h 'fin �+
:' »I .=fir• '•� � 'r r, � .z,'tti �� {.�:: ' :' � r�,
� -S '' 1 • rr + t4''� t'r '� f 1+f� � �'a'F
f,+ r ' -. }' I• 'h` �,f .q k" ';fir r]�� .' t i4 Stle� i?,� '
.:r� "• �` i - . - �t i. - fir. c:
y �
9

a

y• • v 4 3 t}, �` 1 � :•YV+ti� 1 '���� r ,.�� ',` ,•*� ky 1•.•'.� 1 11(
�• �J. f►.1y. � I c � fAIt.".� ryF
i �ti f
No
t N-.
� �-.a <.;t�� cul, � ��',�• . ' i f ��t• , • r�n�?r"�sp',
!
9i�"�t,{. Y , 11/��` r �: r,+1s +ti''.-,;'.i•h� ' �A3yp�ye, - r14
� y�'Yr jar 4 `;�i '� ti '' •' �:;. �V���4t'�i��,;�
,00.
7�+1UV y Q
Coo
�� a r eN Styr° .':,1 �N �.• - , _
S ,r 'i r. Ko Y. 6
yi'i it—r�*-p+ g- ,�+' �,x� :i `,u4}• �E•' = ��; rqr. �-x.., ,�:. �.`�
C 'q ➢ aF. �..� , / y ." YPI +•O .
� :r r e G,ra � 3;�f � 4r'���"' �,�a�i` .q�� ' 'A �' ���1r.';?g7� •;:�{`>+f_ri - 7,.
.?M -1
'� . !• ���3rnx' 1
-
r
� 6V a N�b - 'ayY,r ,p � - '• � i � ♦ ray _ •�i(��, ' 4 i ! 7 r
LO y4 'A ,,F +J y .dy +,' ' ,t;�'^ i ,y. `�ty�'d4 apc� \'y�11"' w
_4 a. ! a r `^F+� air
to
�wAf F�Qpy�e��' V �� t 1✓' e ° qq r'', :ilj�jgr �e ! .r ; '`i r
mat 1Y or a; aa4 w o $ �+e i`,"*
"yO
'�f ." i1 i .,. •,. t,r,
moi Qdx.� d4 r e�4 3�yi�yyyfl'� i q s ` r�
�' :��Q � � 1. iL � b f k • � $ '� ' ' RTA ' ;�
y, i.
.�•s tur�
` ZI rya k. 7 P
'Vil , ,f d,c
a Zr
f �,t•RP A.Ov lr� �hLpp , �1 `{ip4°°Atc l.�,.�t *'►+,f L n a o ..
._�
, �rr � ,e'� .° rt $,q•4:;•pp o�o pa � �� j•,C�` ��.•1 ��r `
5 +,.. a` 5 1 u� qq � t ,r , .ti ,,.,,p Ch. ♦ `� ri rV, � � . �.�
• p fn r ' i1
fc,
t a
,F
11R,5`1A I
A4_ i'• I .
r'
y• • v 4 3 t}, �` 1 � :•YV+ti� 1 '���� r ,.�� ',` ,•*� ky 1•.•'.� 1 11(
�• �J. f►.1y. � I c � fAIt.".� ryF
i �ti f
No
t N-.
� �-.a <.;t�� cul, � ��',�• . ' i f ��t• , • r�n�?r"�sp',
!
9i�"�t,{. Y , 11/��` r �: r,+1s +ti''.-,;'.i•h� ' �A3yp�ye, - r14
� y�'Yr jar 4 `;�i '� ti '' •' �:;. �V���4t'�i��,;�
,00.
7�+1UV y Q
Coo
�� a r eN Styr° .':,1 �N �.• - , _
S ,r 'i r. Ko Y. 6
yi'i it—r�*-p+ g- ,�+' �,x� :i `,u4}• �E•' = ��; rqr. �-x.., ,�:. �.`�
C 'q ➢ aF. �..� , / y ." YPI +•O .
� :r r e G,ra � 3;�f � 4r'���"' �,�a�i` .q�� ' 'A �' ���1r.';?g7� •;:�{`>+f_ri - 7,.
.?M -1
'� . !• ���3rnx' 1
-
r
� 6V a N�b - 'ayY,r ,p � - '• � i � ♦ ray _ •�i(��, ' 4 i ! 7 r
LO y4 'A ,,F +J y .dy +,' ' ,t;�'^ i ,y. `�ty�'d4 apc� \'y�11"' w
_4 a. ! a r `^F+� air
to
�wAf F�Qpy�e��' V �� t 1✓' e ° qq r'', :ilj�jgr �e ! .r ; '`i r
mat 1Y or a; aa4 w o $ �+e i`,"*
"yO
'�f ." i1 i .,. •,. t,r,
moi Qdx.� d4 r e�4 3�yi�yyyfl'� i q s ` r�
�' :��Q � � 1. iL � b f k • � $ '� ' ' RTA ' ;�
y, i.
.�•s tur�
` ZI rya k. 7 P
'Vil , ,f d,c
a Zr
f �,t•RP A.Ov lr� �hLpp , �1 `{ip4°°Atc l.�,.�t *'►+,f L n a o ..
._�
, �rr � ,e'� .° rt $,q•4:;•pp o�o pa � �� j•,C�` ��.•1 ��r `
5 +,.. a` 5 1 u� qq � t ,r , .ti ,,.,,p Ch. ♦ `� ri rV, � � . �.�
• p fn r ' i1

i

b
'r, I ,:a `'gin �a�° o- � � °y o .�4� ��•� i e. ` >yr
a
�7.-,, r "e � f.�, • �'i�'aI���v°d',. � d°,c�r'.r��:-r,. '' "}a ���� "��"�+� � �° p �- �� o
R .,.. } cr ya ro F
q a ,
�gd•b
r 4;c � 3j}` YR�t�
ti�- -4' r FF�� e o Ef� �` �.•�.o +. c'c,°A�e"•cw__E `�..j '4.,.
C���• +N: 'Q -$o '. O�Mg V � a^� �h ° ° p''� � ocQ ,Y � •..
1A
�; ': I.�i � :.fid l d •v��`' s �-. � p o .,.x a
.411 71
�� 6 fit. 1 V t �-.L ,� 1• f �• p -P ,. S � X47 A ° O
-airs _ �y .T.� ].4 ��A� :• � a! (� `�'�k.r i �rj.�' €1
f1 of - •� � ` �..� { #, § ` fo a+', �,..�
4aiv
Ob
gsy,3iF',
IMN!
y^ + �'i4 lac' jarr
o ` °e�9° 1S^O t L-FP,yy4n a,b' ;!` < 3fy ry o�y t„r;� ' kyr• b Y• f }t'� '.6 { e g6t.,
i eg- � M , '�6`,cs. •,,��'dF_ ;o � r +.^ t � • .d � �' " �' '9�` �Y�.sy� � a" �`f a
° o.)):t- a�'a .. t"ii° �rV�� � q � _l j � fey rV;.f�'� f fi' ••>�,�' 'a+a y{� � ? r� F �� y
��o. Y+F- �'�v.��}'��� u �♦�'+.+�' d b `•4 JY�,�' Jr,V ; iM � .,��' 1:�WT-�� le,, �.�o
t� r ����1 /l. °�'•__ 6 1. ` c' - .j' tiT.'jy4 '�% �F r n r i„p � 4[.
'' `l � 0i�y��yyy0� n fey �.r e g ° 3g3'j 1 • � . }� ° j �f+4 q� o i o� ': 'i
Ap
i � ��A y+�tly] "°' � •.Y. ',�• � � P � ° a ? 91 h � s E�oyc "L i+`� 9 'A•' '� o o:
#• n' ° 1111 -1-ria M a - i ),� e', ��#' k:�? i i';,'ety ' aogY°o
VoVkk
f O
ttww..
.iib. � a .� F ''•o dY ^^• ,�' -t„ ��ty.'p':'"a"bc�.��S f��� F�. R,,.y� p ,
le6Q�p��7�' N� d,•y a,_ l� `Y 1, � ��y - Dy •¢�,y, x .•
CALM
' r'' "�., L'F '9f.� aU'.. t :�� M i'. Y :Jif•_R O�.. •' -. t� AYiR-� . h. 1<' a

a
•��,+ AX
i":;o
4P

EXHIBIT C
Waste Utilization - Third Party Receiver Agreement
I, y r. t sr_ 1 na ICg rr y h �. , hereby agree to apply waste generated by �. �y q cr in a manner
that meets the Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste Utilization system that has been
accepted in wTiting by the Division of Environmental Management.
Third Party Receiver: %f Date: z2z�
Term of Agreement
Oiinimurn Ten Ycars on Cost•5hued Items)
to
Notan•
v
MRCS, NC
]UNE, 1996

� Ct cY 4 l 1
°-L 5 �1
rn �
73
i 0-7 Ntt( 1`
l W71W
1ti
1�
1�
•ll
/ar,Y H.7)'hH
N�i.vNv7

C : %
LMERC'FENCT ACTION PLA
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY ( DWO )
704 -663 -1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES ( EMS )
704-G3))-0911
ROWAN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRicr
( SWCD )
704-6:17-0111;3
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE ( NRCS }
704-637- 141104
ROWAN COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVILE ( CES )
704 - 633 - 0571
This plan will be implemented in the event that waste from your operation is
leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until waste
reaches surface waters of leave your property to consider that you have a
problem. You should make every effort to ensure that this does not happen.
This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facilit),. The following are some action items you should take.

I d'
l . Stop the release of waste. Depending on the situation, this may or may
not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are
listed below.
A. Lagoon / Waste Storage Pond overflow - possible solutions are:
a. Make sure no surface water is entering the lagoon / waste
storage pond.
b. Stop all flows into the lagoon / waste storage pond
immediately.
C. Pump waste to fields at an acceptable rate.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Add temporary soil berm to increase elevation of dam.
B. Runoff from waste application field - actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
C. Create a temporary diversion to contain the runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the
runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff
occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers - action include:
a. Stop the irrigation pump.
b. Stop the recycle pump.
C. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators - action
include:
a. Stop the irrigation pump.
b. Stop the recycle pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush system, or solid
separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon / waste storage pond.
Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing leaks - possible
action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to
catch all seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump
back to lagoon / waste storage pond.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove
animals and fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side
walls and lagoon / waste storage pond bottom as soon as
possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
A. Did the runoff reach any surface waters?
B. Approximately how much was released and for what duration`?
C. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or
property damage'?
D. Did the spill leave the property?
E. Does the spill have the potential to reach any surface waters'?
F. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach any surface
waters?
G. Are potable water wells in danger ( either on or off of the
propel') .?
H. How much reached surface waters?

3. Contact appropriate agencies.
A. During normal business hours, call your Division of Water
Quality regional office: Phone 704 - 663 - 1699. Auer hours,
emergency number: 919 - 733 - 3942. Your phone call should
include: your name, facility name, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the
facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill,
weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have
been taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
B. if the spill leaves your property or enters surface waters, call the
local EMS phone number 704 - 638 - 0911.
C. Instruct EMS to contact the local Health Department.
D. Contact the Rowan SWCD at 704 - 637 - 078:1 , the
NRCS at 704 - 637 - 1604, or the CES at 704 - 633 - 0571
for advice / technical assistance.
4. if none of the above numbers work, call 911 or the Sheriff's
Department and explain your problem to them and ask that person to
contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of the problem to
minimize of - site damage.
A. L. P. Barger Jr. Grading 704 - 633 - 8693
B. Parks Hubbard Grading 704 - 278 - 4876
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon / waste storage
pond ( NRCS, SWCD, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
Name: N'e� 5
Phone:
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste
management plan to keep problems with release of waste from
happening again.

Insect Control Clleciclist for Animal Operations
tinul i c C'utuc IIAII's In (:nnlrol lll!,c •ls Site Sll:rilir- I't':IClll't•j
---------- - __---_ I.hluill Sysicnls -- - -----•----------
—1: F11,11 r illucls Acculmllatinll of srllills CI I'Illsll Sy5IC111 is fles11;1icll will 1111clalcll -
snllicieolly In Ie:nlnvc acctilnitlalecl Snlitls 1,1nn1
J:ullrls HS 1lt:Sil;ncll.
1,.1 Itelllnve Ilrilll;ing of OCCIIIIIl11atUll sulills;It
Ilisr.11arl;e
[.a I;I SIMS autl I'itS • ('I oslet! Sulills r^1 Ivl:Iiolaill 1agmills, ScIIIilig llasilli and Mils Miele ---
ltesl lucellilil; is appal enl iu Iltinillflic the
cnlstilig al'snlitls Io :1 11clull nl-1111 mole thall 6 -
R itichcs liver n1n1c lh.m 311:'u of sa1lace.
liA:e1,1�: VcG[lnlivC �• I)ecltylnl; vt:;clalilln 1-I itlai111:r111 vCI;etalive C01111u! alllnl; IMIlLS rtf ----- - - -
[ i1,Itc111 lal;anns aml nlher inlllnunllmcals to IIIemil
ttct:11I1Iulation o!-ciccayirll; VUEUNrlivc maticr
alorll; waler's edge tin impountlntcnl's Itt:rirncler.
ccdc1 ..__.. I ectl spill:tl;e
I,CL;1I l„I,11; — Act:IlnnllalutuS 01' fccll resitlueS
ANII1' - 1`14-culh:r I I, 1111}{i, 1'al;c I
]lry �)'Sll'lll5
rl I1csigil, ollclale :Inti mairllain I,ecll SySlcnls
horll.els anal Boughs) II) Illinilllire lilt:
aCCll11111lalj1111 nl•11CCayllll; tV:I]lal;C.
(71 CIC:tll III) sllillal;e no a Intilinc lrlSis (c.g., 7 - Ili
ILI)' illlcl VA tinlinl; 511111111el; I5 -]Inlay imelval
IIoI iol; ti►•ilrlel j.
t -i 1(e11oee rlleliSILlle i1t:Cutiilllalinn wilhin soul
illt)llllrl llnmulliote IleIilliclo.III lee:ll51111;11;4
alcas by instiliul; Ilrainagt: away I'Ilull site
and/or Ill lividinl; aticllrlatt: cnotailuncnl (e.g.,
cnvcrtal bin I'nr hlewel's I;1ain--.md similar high
Itiltisttile I;rclin lontlncl::l.
A hvgiect Carr wilt[ iomwe or Isrcal.- till ;rrtalnlell,'11:t1
solids ill 1111er SII ills ;11111141,1 1,0:11 51111 ill;e .1'i
nrrllell.

5��111 cc Game
unIPS to C411111-411 I111cets silo Specific ri Lclicc�.
Aimilill 1111111mr Aicw; + ACCIIIIIIII:1111111S of alllnlid %vasles
I
I:Inlltnale 1111V alcas that trap lnrllslllic illling--�--�� —
a11111 f1:i:11 1Vi1S1iil;e
ICIlces and olher IIICaItIIIIIS where waste
accllrlllllales and dlsluchanee by allillials is
Cl
Maintain fence rows and filler drills alronnd
Animal holding; areas to nlillinli/c
accimmialions of wasles (i.e., hispect for mid
remove or break till nccnlnulated solids as
IICCtIed�. -
111 y 1.I;II1lIIC 11:1111111III, • AccII11 ulatrnlls of animal wa sles
f]
RCIIInVC spillage on it imitine basis (e.i;., i - 111
by stents
day itilerval during summer; 15-313 day inlerval .I
1lnlinl} williel') XV11CFC 111MIllre IS loaded 1*Ilr Lind
application or disllnsal.
FI
Provide for adcipiate draimigr arinmd mamire
stockpiles.
fl
Inspal for and rcnlnve or break rill acctimid rlcll
Lv11sIcS ill lillcr sllilis mminll !.mckpilcs aml
malime handling aleas as Ilcelled.
For w1lle inl'm-111,llinn colimcl the C:ooperalive Fxtension Service, 11elmitnment of I:nlnnlnlogy, Box 761 3, Nrmh catolina illllc 1 Inivvimly,
II:IIcij;ll, HC. 217I111i-761.11
AMI1: -lh1:r 11. 191)(1, [`al;c 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
tiuurcc Cause IIAIPS Irl Millilnicc 011111• Site Specific Pr•aclit:es
I :unnlc.u! - Dairy prodoclinit n Vegetalive or wooded ImI1eu
F1
Itecnnlr entlell hest 111;111;IueI11Ct11 p acriccs
L1
Onad jullgntcitl and common sense
P.IVC11 loll Air I3;1111 ailey •
Wel nt;nitn-t:-covered snrrlccs
n
Scrape or llllsh daily
soulaces
n
Promote IllyiuG with proper venlilalion
F1
Itouline: checks and lrtaintenanee nn walefers.
-
- - -
Ilyclranls, pisses, slack funks
- -
Iletldcd .ucas
thille
n
Promote (shying wills proper venlilatinn
•
Martial nlicrollial Ilecnnlposilion
Iteplace wel or ruantlre•covetcll heddiog
MMIllrc Illy S1,IckS -
Pallial Inicrullial Ilccutnllnsilion
Itlovidc Iiflnitl Ihainage f[Ir slofell inanure
Slttrlge lull; Ill' haSin 0
Pallial microbial decomposition ;
fl
IZnll11nl or mid-level Inallirlg
Sill lace
Mixing while filling ;
n
Tank covers
•
Agilalitut when emptying
n
Ilasin s,lrrlce mals orsnlills;
Cl
Minirni'.l: 1111 rtfnuffanll lilluill adllilinns
f-1
Agitate only prior Io nt:tnore removal
-
f-1
ItInVCll billhIgical all111live5 [1f oxidallls
%Cluing hat -in nlllfaces
Parliai microhi;ll decnntp11Silillll
n
I.icinid drain;Ige prom sensed solids
•
Mixing while filling
f-1
Itcnlovc snlills legularly
•
Agilatloal ►vhcn cllipLyinl,
NhIlnle, SIM II' 111' ;11111gt:
Agilalimt when sllreatfiul;
f7
Soil injeelinn 0l'Si1llry/SI11aIj;eS
Sftteatler uullel;
Volatile gas clltissiolls
n
Wash resilloal mannle lionl spreader alicr use
n
I'rnvl 11 hinlnl,ic;Il ;ultlilivcs of tWILwls
I tlle11VC1CII 111;1111111:, •
Volatilc gas elnl5siolls whsle
r -I
soil illfeclinn III' Sill] Iy/5llll ge5
Shirty ul SItltlge 1111 hells
Ihyirog
fl
Soil irlcnfporalina within 'IH Ill's
Sill laces
n
Spread ill Illifl nnifill-In layers lilf rallill dlyiog
n
Proven Iliolol;icul a111lilives or Ilsitlawu
Agitatttul UI ICcycled lagomi
n
I:lllsh tank covers; - -- - -- - - -- - --- ___-�
liquid while tanks are filling
n
I:xICIIII 1111 lilies 1[Y Ileal' brlthllll tdiallks Mill
;II111-siplton vents
0111Side th;Iin Cnllccliurl
Agil;Ilion Illlring wastewater
n
Box covers
Air jullCllnit poxes
Collvuyallcu
/t f,'lt t(. - I JoVe'111IIL•I I I, 191)0.
Itilge

tinurcc Cuuse IIh11's III AIillitttize Ortor Sile Specific Practices
Lift slalions AUimlinn during; sump lank 1=1 Sural} Junk covers
filling and drawdown
1,1111 of drainitiltes m Agilatin11 ].luring waste water n I:xlertti discharge pmol of pipes ltrtiderueatlr
hgoorl eortveyancc la(;nnn liquid level
L;t�ow1 Sill l*.cCcs V01;11i1e I;as cmissiutt; n Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• 11i01ctl;ical ntixirtl;; n Cnrrcct IiCnntt slartup procethtres;
• A1;it;11inrt Cl Mlinimnut surface arca-In-volume ratin;
Cl Minimmit agitalinn when pumping;
F1 Mechanical aeration;
0 Proven hioingical attditives
In i11;u600 spriokler 1 ligh prossure agir►fnn; n hrignit: mi dry d;lys wills liule or no wind;
nozrlrs Wind drift n kliarimuult recnnunended nperating procedure;
C-1 Ihurllr irtaake near 1.11;0011 liquid surl'ace;
n 1'111311) from secntul-slage lal;nnrt;
fl I htsh residual manure: from pipes at caul of
slurry/shnlpc pnnlpinas
I1c;,cl anirluds Carcass decolnposhintt n Proper rlispositinn nl'clarc;Isscs
Slurdiul; %+•alcr airrnncl Improper drainage; n Crade and lamiscape such Mutt water drains
Iacililies hlicrohi;ll rlecnnlpnsiliolt of ;1tv;1y from f.tcilities
urpnic matter
M1111 r1;lr.1:e11 will, ptildic - I'onrly ot;lintaincal ;1CCes5 Ioacls fl 1:;.1111 oucess Iuacl III;tinicnsrnce
rn;lik I,1411s1 I;ont aI:CL-%%
Addilirm;cl Availatcic: Flom:
J('aule hLunue hlanal;curcnl ; 112(1(1 I(nte/11111' Packet I4(:5t 1, ('ounly I:xlcnsinn (:enter
Ibir)' VC111c:;lti+real t.lrtil hlanure 14magntlenl Syslem - Lake Wheelcr Road Field Lalmralmy ; 1:11A 1i 2N19-95 NCSIl - IIAI:
I.al;,rnn Design and Managcmcnl fur Liveslnck Mannre Trealmem and Stnrage ; t:11A1: 1111-81 N(al I - IIA1:
hkmagcmew 1)r hairy Wastcwaler ; FIIA I: IM -83 MCN I - IIA1:
( %J1011;].Burt III'M;urole:11111 Wastewaler-Application 1:(lni1nrent ; 1:IiAl: Fact Sheol NC.StI - 11A1:
Hlilo mt:c (-'ortccans ill Animal Hauure Mallageutenl: 0111)].s and Flies ; 1'1(01117, 1995 Conl'crellce I'roccccii11l;s Fitilith Cimporalive 1:x1ensiun
ANVIL tugger 11, 1999. lal;c2

c:i.]S vi;] 10 [=.\0]C'C4 (:�i1:i ]I%oI) €i,"tll'c ]0
c (4rrr(uz p%ep C I0 ].•oC 10 .tf%5 ;L(1 ?Ic::soc
r;C;S Zu: 10 UCiuI00 JrLiC(s3;!C)]3 ;:Ul Lr1 L:)IL.%% 00Gi�""
r=1.5 E 10 ]IU' [ESJ14_S1J C lf[ aL:IOi,IC '.iiuo --;rood aErO 10 SSE:, °u2 L:
0L':,, 1 „L'_ 'L'nir --: rr^l. ] hrtr - r•
��[ ] �.'� $Il 1L:.: iIQ ;LiT �1� ' �L, 10 vJ'.�e�, •r
rLt] 10 e:)E 1-7 17.5 -vul u;%1i:I'D .00I ve]U;
��i::'.:�L:�[CUSI ai;:?q ar {S)D0L[;2r�I [:J(ll^.•. �;�i:UJ)
SPau�aT� ivarr�a�>;u�I� .tirl�a�oI�
_—A

07/12/96 0$:14am 704 633 6519 ROWAN co USDA
T�'6 9CA��� /09
z ce-e-, atz�
Pg. 02
/9 p/
-2.
7S(J�y��
- TQTR i P)ArJ v RE. C3 O Z4- C-0.

i 07,12/96 08:15am 704 633 6519
ROWAN CD USDA
Pg. 03
/7�- 2
D" fL - "? o�, D 0,3 , !
� 35,og0
fa �'
J
AIM FALZ-
ONGF"F
8
MAR.- 4 (1
3 . -7 I
2, 53
M,Y - 3. rd6
z . -7 R
4.zo
3u Lk. �, r
3 . i
-3. Q-7
3. o9
2 L�. L+-
� 35,og0
fa �'
J

07/12/96 06:15am 794 633 6519 ROWAN CO USDA
Pg. 04
3
�ZL,zl - /,P -
4-�z V, -5 ��
401
cj. FT.
iz „)/FT. '
10,5G0 cam. Fr. �� J
✓F.szT, F't. f 0.5 Fr aW
T. 7aoh1D St1f2FACE — T:s(0. , . CJ SE
F \. �._.
/ D .

C3
n.
0�h
\1n
�o
0
n

s. t� �f...�� va..�s� -d� F'�'. ix�,,� s�f�s'� sa �� ""�' r���yy ��R +:� rp L�� ��` Y. ��#�'i, °y r ark N:.i.� yN 1..ti e� rS � � s --A• k `fir -•+t --' a S,�b.� � � riesf..';eynl+;,
� ri r , ''t. � y.,Y�.�y+T �� �� ��,�',Q' "- s ��: �_ J"�•-����i �.ts i` •C. a � 3 +� t� ♦ 't ''�s•��';�s�'4. t vk �¢��`I•G
•"r � '� � �r�'�u{. j�e»''� s rrr� a r-. �lr-.•-r � � _ r .'«•- %_1:. -. ''`'s s ;:. afli
U�: t S.,',DEPARTM
1 s, NC -ENG= 4 U J
,` Sot1;.Co ser ation:Servic'e'";��'` ` • 5183
LOCATION CORE•+''_�,
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE POND
NAME W4 4t i &L� ACP
DATE DISTRICT /�p {,u ptiv�� ' . ;• ``
LENGTH �bd
al DE .ELOPE TO A. /
a
AVE. TOP ELEV.
1 t4
w -Y/ 1 � j_ __/—�Y MID SECTION
/ 1
ti Ir q A
/ f
i
AVE. BOTTOM ELEV.
LENGTH
DD
� �20000-i24.1� .. •'�3 j q36 1
Volume A depth [(area
, of top) + (area,of bottom) + (4 x area midsection 128
-69 Cu.Ft.
6
Use of facility a,a /4A,' , c./ W 4"
Capacity Gallons
Volume Cos[-shariag Cu. Ft.
Soil type �G c,i
B. M. description
�e GCd Lc l e, Q- 740
�Ir
Elev. /oy.Od
i
Bottom Elev.
Normal liquid level Elev. � 3
Storage for normal precip.(Ft) + 6
dTP -7/9
,.5
Maximum liquid level
Elev.
Storage for:
25 yr. freq. precig.
{Ft.}
+
Crest ESW
Elev.
5.
Stage (Ft.)
+ d�
Freeboard (Ft.)
+
Top of Dam
Elev.
L

UNITED STATES DEPARTMEn OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROXCUARM:
DATE: _ 6-AO- 9-7 -
• A 4"X 4" t vatcd post, painted white ora 4" diaincter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevationg 3.`� . At no time should
the effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 2.7 felt below
the settled top of darn.
A visual inspection of the waste storage pond or Iagoon will be performed at least
twice a year. The inspector should check the coitdition of the dam and the emergency
spillway. The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the
back slope and at the too of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy mintalI events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attcntion of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
• The waste storage pond or lagoon will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded
areas shall be repaired and stabilized. Arcas that do nut have an adequate ground
cover shall be reseeded to provide a vegetative cuvcr sufficient restrain erosion. The
dant and all constructed slopes will need to be rerdlized annually with 500 pounds of
10-10-10 per acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling cquipment- pumpuig, loading, hauling, spreading, ctc.--
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond or lagoon will be pumped at the end of each design
storage period (/_ days or -- months) or as needed due to execss rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville NC 28115
Dear Lonnie Hoffner:
4 •
IT V
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 17, 1999 -
Subject: Application No. AWC800017
Additional Information Request
Amity Hills Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject
application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the
following by September 16, 1999:
Your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) states that there is 180 days of temporary storage
available in the storage pond_ The storage pond volume documentation shows that it was
designed for 180 days of temporary storage for 150 dairy cows. The storage pond
volume appears to be adequate at the current population if the temporary storage period is
decreased. Please have a technical specialist review your WUP and storage pond
volumes and correct the temporary storage time available as shown in your WUP.
2. The application window for Fescue pasture is listed in your WUP as March through
November. This window is longer than typically seen for Fescue pasture. Please have a
technical specialist verify that the grass will be actively growing and able to utilize
nitrogen from March through November, or have the application window revised in the
WUP.
3. Please submit the 23 NRCS standard requirements for a WUP.
4. The Third Party Receiver Agreement signed by Grassy Knob Farms, Inc. must include a
term of the agreement (date that agreement expires). Please have this information
completed and signed by Grassy Knob Farms, Inc. and resubmit the Third Party Receiver
Agreement.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 80-0017
Lonnie Hoffner
Page 2
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical
specialist, and you may submit only the pages of the WUP that have been changed in lieu of
resubmitted the entire WUP. Please reference the subject permit application number when providing
the requested information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my
attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be submitted on or before
September 16, 1999 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit
is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement
authority of the Environmental Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
Sue Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

1 1
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Lonnie Hoffner
Location: 2705 Corriher Springs Rd.,
Mooresville, NC 28115 RECEIVED
Telephone: [phone] WATEP 011AUTYSFC'70v
Type Operation: Dairy r`NOV 12 1999
Number of Animals: 300
(Design Capacity} Non -Discharge Parrrtitiing
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and / or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the Iimiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 300 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
300 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 75 (% confinement
time) = 1,724,625_ gallons of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitro en Produced Per Year
300 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 22,800 lbs. Total N
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 22,800 lbs. Total N
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big jab. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every_4 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
93.9 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre .to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERA TION.
This operation has 385 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
system of corn cut for silage or harvested for grain in the first year, followed by small grain cut
for silage and soybeans in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the
realistic yields at the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Corn grain: April -May at the rate of 100 lbs of Nlac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 96 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Soybeans: April -Jun. at the rate of 100 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting.
Annual Ryegrass/Pasture: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 94 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 113 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
On fields which follow soybeans in rotation reduce the amount of N required by 20 lbs/ac
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and proper system.
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
4

DATE: 9116199
Lonnie Hoffner
Dairy Waste Storage Structure
Rowan, NC
Design Criteria:
300 Dairy cows at 1,400 lbs. each =
120 days storage
5 gal./day/cow of wastewater
2,000 sq. ft. of non -pond Drainage Area
Waste from Freestall area and access alleys will be scraped and stored
in the waste storage pond, as well as the runoff from
approximatety 2,000 Sq. ft of the bams and loafing lot.
1. Storage Volume Required
A. Manure Storage
300 cows X 14.6 gal.ldayloow X
7.48 gals.lcu.ft.
B. Waste Water from Milk Bam
300 cows X 5 gal.ldayloow X
420,000 lbs. live weight
7.48 gals.lcu.ft.
C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 120 days
Drainage Areas 2,000 Sq. Ft.
1 day CN 98130 day CN 92
Monthly
Months Preop. (P) (inches)
December 3.56
January 3.72
February 3.78
March 4.61
15.67
12.15 runoff inches X
12 inches/ ft.
D. Waste Feed and Bedding
10 cu. ft. 1 day X
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED
120 days
120 days
Monthly
Evap. (E)
2,000 sq. ft.
70,267 cu. ft.
24,064 cu. ft.
P -E
120 days= 1,200 cu. ft.
97,557 cu. ft.
2.46
2.62
1.95
1.69
8.72
2,025 cu. ft.
Runoff (inches)
Z69
2.85
2.9
3.71
12.15

- Add to liquid Volume -
IL Normal (P) Precipitation less (E) evaporation on Structures for 120 days
December - March 8.72 inches =
III. 25 yr. stone on Open Area of 2,000 sq. ft.
CN = 95 for open areas
With 25 yr. 1 day strom of 6.0 inches, runoff = 5.41 inches
2,000 sq. ft. X 5.41 inches runoff
12 inches
902 cu.ft.
15,470 sq, ft. surface area of storage pond
IV. 25 yr, storm on Pond Surface
25 yr, 1 day stone = 6.0 inches =
V. Emergency Spillway
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
Peak discharge = 3.2 ds.
Use ESW with 12 ft. bottom width,
3 to i side slopes, 0.2 ft, stage =
VI. Freeboard =
Vli. Total Depth of Pond 8 feel of storage =
135,760 designed amount
98,458 amount needed
37,302 amount surplus
0.7 ft.
902 cu. ft.
0.1 ft.
0.5 ft.
0.2 ft.
1.0 ft.
10.48 ft.

EXHIBIT C
Waste Utilization - Third party Receiver Agreement
s
1,0 -,, Knob , I a r m s I_Fz+L hereby agree to apply waste generated by'A W'11 in a m ler
that mee e Waste Utilization Standard (633), or use an alternative waste utilization system that has been
accepted in writing by the Division of Environmental Management.
Third Party Receiver: lir.-1 (, IA- Date: 1011,/Arf
Term of Agreement: U n - -' I � �- vc n ,`cc- to L e -&%t c
(h4inc um Ten Yean on Co"hared hared Items)
lv ota R'
MRCS, NC
NNE, 1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
February 9, 2000
Lonnie Hoffner
Amity Hills Farm
2705 Corriher Springs Road
Mooresville NC 28115
1 � •
-NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE5OURCE5
Subject: Application No. AWC800017
Additional Information Request
Amity Hills Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
Dear Lonnie Hoffner:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by March 10, 2000:
The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) submitted on November 12, 1999 was not signed by the owner of the
facility or the technical specialist who developed the WUP. Please have both parties sign the WUP and
resubmit it in duplicate.
2. Please submit the NRCS required specifications for a WUP.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter, must be
submitted on or before March 10, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 502.
Le
'rely,
Homewood
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NO 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
MAR, 2000
BIT A-8
1 . Animal -wa)'l--I-EPisslh'aFl�lanmbtg reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
lard on which to properly apply the waste. if the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, -
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of aoolication for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
dancer of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be anolied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See. "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from•
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be ap'clied cc saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste Shall be applied on actively growing crops _ such
a manner that the crop is not cover=t, wi:.h waste to a dept that
would inhibit growth. The potential fo, salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Pace: 8

EXHIBIT A-9
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a hick potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates -on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or a= --ter October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than z00 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be annlied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly inton water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runofz or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as tees, shrubs, and
other woodv so_ eci es, etc., are limited tc areas where considered
appropriate. Laccon areas should be kect mowed and accessible.
berms and structures should be i nspectec regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharce.
Page:

EXHIBIT A-10
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and eresion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A recular maintenance checklist should be keot on
site. y
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21.' Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment laccons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the -liquid level between the markers. A marker will-
be
illbe required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and capper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when thes
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed o -f in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 10

INS 71Ff?QUAL In
Producer: Lonnie Hoffnerscrlov
Location: 2705 Corriher Springs Rd., 1-44R -1 S 200Q
Mooresville, NC 28115 Non-Discharga P��rt�n
Telephone: [phone] g
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 300
Pmip GP"r)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for' compliance with
15A NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
'' •� .. �
-
Sz;..:if 'l
WASTE
UTILIZATION
PLAN
INS 71Ff?QUAL In
Producer: Lonnie Hoffnerscrlov
Location: 2705 Corriher Springs Rd., 1-44R -1 S 200Q
Mooresville, NC 28115 Non-Discharga P��rt�n
Telephone: [phone] g
Type Operation: Dairy
Number of Animals: 300
Pmip GP"r)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for' compliance with
15A NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

�1.., �a+ .mit "CriY.il� � y�' di{'� +-��•
WASTE'UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and / or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be_applied. Thus waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that. all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff' to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.

The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 300 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, W, tons, etc.)
300 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 75 (%confinement
time) = 1,724,625_ gallons of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen Ah Produced Per Year
300 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 22,800 lbs. Total N .
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 22,800 lbs. Total N
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tccb. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage % ill be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:.
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
�'W.UTILIZATION-
WASTE.
PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 300 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, W, tons, etc.)
300 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 365 (number of days) x 75 (%confinement
time) = 1,724,625_ gallons of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen Ah Produced Per Year
300 animals x 76 lbs. N/animal/yr = 22,800 lbs. Total N .
Total Nitrogen produced/yr. 22,800 lbs. Total N
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tccb. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage % ill be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:.
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every4 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
93.9 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This operation has 385 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation will be a 2 year
system of corn cut for silage or harvested for grain in the first year, followed by small grain cut
for silage and soybeans in the second year. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the
realistic yields at the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Corn silage: April -May at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Corn grain: April -May at the rate of 100 lbs of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Sm. Grain silage: Sept.- Oct. at the rate of 96 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Soybeans: April -Jun. at the rate of 100 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before planting.
Annual Ryegrass/Pasture: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 94 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 113 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
On fields which follow soybeans in rotation reduce the amount of N required by 20 lbs/ac
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a hone}wagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Maintain all waste handling equipment in accordance with
manufactures specifications. The system should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage
and proper system.
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
4

....WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
.�h1, 71►d : ► lL :Illi of DIV 1040"
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled onsite at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER:��d,�pLL�77�
(Please print)
Signature: Dater ?j -z- a
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) Dom_
Affiliation: 'L)5.Q PA- - K-) 2C.S
Address (Agency): Z 7 Z 7 =C 0( JD Co 0 'n
Signature:
8
Date: