800013_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
July 10, 2017
Scott H. Davis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Hwy 152 W
Mooresville, NC 28115
FRROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Scott Davis Farm/Facility 80-13
General Permit AWC800013
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Davis:
On July 7, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality
Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Scott Davis Farm and the permitted waste
disposal system. We wish to thank you for being.present and assisting during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should . you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
IJam B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated July 7, 2017
ib
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
C3 Other Agency
Facility Number:
800013 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWC800013
Denied Access
Inpsectlon Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Rowan Region;
Mooresville
Date of visit:
D7/07/2017 EntryTime: 01:00 pm
Exit Time: 2:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Scott Davis Farm
Owner £mail
Owner:
Scott H Davis
Phone:
704-857-7364
Malting Address: 6935 Hwy 152 W Mooresville NC 28115
Physical Address: 6935 Hwy 152 W Mooresville NC 28115
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:. 35° 34'22" Longitude: 80° 41'58"
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (Unity Church Rd.) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is on the
right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number: 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone : [phone]
On-site representative Scott H. Davis Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/26/17 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.83 Lbs/1000 Gallons
11/22/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.12 Lbsl1000 Gallons
12!16!15 > Soil Analysis
lb
Phone: _70J-663-1699 Ext
Date: .
page: 1

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 07/07/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Caw 200 200
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed,Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond W151 18.00 38.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : ScottH Davis Facility Number. 800013
Inspection Date: 07/07/17 Inpsection Type: . Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine -
Discharges &_Stream Impacts
Yea No No No
No N No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
Structure
❑
❑
■ ❑
Application Field
❑
❑
PAN?
Other
❑
❑
0 ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ s
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[]
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0011
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
YY
No N No
❑ M ❑ ❑
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
❑
PAN?
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?.
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift? -
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 07/07/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection . Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type •5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination? '
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box.below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Yea No No -No
Com (Silage)
Fescue (Hey, Pasture)
Small Grain Cover
Sudan Grass
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
Grass
❑ N ❑ ❑
❑0011
❑ 01313
❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No Na No
❑0❑❑
❑ ME) ❑
0013❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 07/07/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
xas No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
M ❑
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
0 ❑
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
❑
E ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ E
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
❑
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
0 ❑
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ E
❑
Other Issues
Yes NQ NL_Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer /inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

A:?
1F�LE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Scott H. Davis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Hwy 152 W
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Davis:
September 4, 2015
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Scott Davis Farm/Facility 80-13
General Permit AWC800013
Rowan County
On March 27, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Scott Davis Farm and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during
the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated March 27, 2015
jib
Mooresville Regional Office, 610 bast Center Avenue, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Internet; www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Actian Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: ' 800013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800013 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 03/27/2015 EntryTime: 01:00 pm Exit Time
Farm Name: Scott Davis Farm
Owner: Scott H Davis
Mailing Address:
Physical Address
Fac€lity, Status:
County: Rowan
2:00 om
Region:
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
6935 Hwy 152 W Mooresville NC 28115
6935 Hwy 152 W Mooresville NC 28115
0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 34'22" Longitude: 80° 41' 58"
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (Unity Church Rd.) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is on the
right.
Mooresville
704-857-7364
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number: 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone : [phone]
On-site representative Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature: .
Secondary inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
07/21/14 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.82 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/14/14 > Waste Analysis > N = 6.70 Lbs11000 Gallons
04/08/14 > Soil Analysis
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
ib
Phone: [phone] Ext
Dale:
page: 1

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : ScottH Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 03/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
IN Cattle - Milk Caw 240 195
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WPI 18.00 4B.4D
page: 2

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : ScottH Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 03/27/15 1npsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ns
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
❑
Structure
❑
0 ❑
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
M ❑
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
0
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ■
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
You ' No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance,or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Applicatiog
You ' No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs,?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC800013
Owner - Facility : ScottH Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 03/27/15
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Sudan Grass
Crop Type 5
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye
Grass
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents'
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑ ME] ❑
❑ ME] ❑
[IME]0
❑ M ❑ ❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
Yes No Na No
❑ M ❑ ❑
11 01:111
❑■❑❑
page: 4

A
Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
inspection Date: 03/27/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No He
Crop yields?
❑
■ ❑
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
0 ❑
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDPS only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ []
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ 0
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
❑
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
[] N
❑
Other Issues
Yes Na Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? E]■ El
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ N [] 0
page: 5

44y
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
December 16, 2016
Scott H. Davis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Hwy 152 W
Mooresville, NC 28115
PA
'—T MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
• Secre}ary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Direciar
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Scott Davis Farm/Facility 80-13
General Permit AWC800013
Rowan County
Dear. Mr. Davis:
On October 28, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section. (WQROS), inspected the Scott Davis Farm and the
permitted waste.disposal system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during
the inspection..
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely;
James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional, Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division, of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated October -28, 2016
State of North Carolina I avir6iun ntal Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office { 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number" 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(a): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Scott H. ,Davis Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector.
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
06/09/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 6.64 Lbs11000 Gallons
08/20/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.40 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/16/15 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone:4"9�
Date:
Division of Water Resources
❑ Wision of Soil'arid Water Conservation
w
❑ Othei Agency
Facility Number:
800013
Fac, ilky Status: Active Permit: AWCB00013 ❑ Denied Access ,
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Dale:
Reason for VieltI
Routine
County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit;
10/28/2016 Entry Time: 02:30 pm Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident 0
Farm Name:
Scott Davis Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Scott H Davis
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address:
6935 Hwy 152 W
Mooresville NC 28115
Physical Address:
6935 Hwy 152 W
Mooresville NC 28115
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35° 34'22" Longitude: 80° 41' 58"
From the Intersection
of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (!Unity Church Rd.) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is on the
r1�ht.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts
Waste Cot, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number" 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(a): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Scott H. ,Davis Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector.
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
06/09/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 6.64 Lbs11000 Gallons
08/20/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.40 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/16/15 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone:4"9�
Date:

Permit AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 10/28/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions "
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 173
Total Design Capacity: 200 "
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Dislgnated Observed
Type Identifler Closed Date Start DateFreeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WP1 18.00 48.00

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : ScottH Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 10/28/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection . Reason for Visit Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
trees,'severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%1101bs.? .
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Yes No Na No
❑■❑❑
111:10 ❑.
YeaNo Na No
❑ .E ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ 0 ❑
Cl■❑❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
Yea No No We
❑ -M ❑ ❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
❑

Permit: AWC800013 , Owner - Facility : Scott H Davis Facility Number:
, 800013
'Inspection Date:. 10/28/16 Inpsection Type:.- Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
'Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na He
Crop, Type 1
,Com.(Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Sudan Grass
Crop Type 5
Timothy, orchard, & Rye
Grass
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2'
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ . M 111:1
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ a ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?.
[] M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
vee No Na No
19. 1 Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ M ❑
❑ .
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
Cl
Design?
❑
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
❑ f
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑
-:,.
page:. 4

r
r
Perot: AWC800013 Owner - Facility : Scott H Davis Facility Number.
800013
Inspection Date: 10/28/16 Inpsection Type! Compliance Inspection Reason for.Visit:
Routine .
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na -W
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ E
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M
❑
Other Issues'
Yea No Na He
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
11E
1-1
Eland
report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30..Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)'
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes,.check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑
N ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑

`Type of isit: M Compliance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 4' Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: 1`�✓ Region: V" �s►�
Farm Name:'
OwnerName:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �� v" Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
-.1'ki3S.4 s'ft ie
. � a M,P
y} a
R'ST.'� irffi r .�§ti.
a„
■ -_
� nG�pr-�+,N
A "" iii.
iS� �y" "'
� � . --
oz
4. t' ��'nM1 �' H� K SJ
�-
�^ 7
2 ny71 • `A yY -F. i''4 j,i{'�'1'1i f1'
- r . -� " - "1 . � .s.
• 1
i"�
it E' � � F� .!' '� AFI .! � �E
Szµ /
d y
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the'operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: E] Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume'that reached waters of the State'(gallons)7.
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify"DWQ) ❑ Ycs ❑ No.. '❑ N1Er
N -
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Ye A 0 NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yeo ❑ NA NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No �,NA❑ NE
ljinicturell Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard {i
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inte of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental t reat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ YeN ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any'of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yesso ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADylication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Ye CNo❑ NA [3 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus [] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind D ' ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop YP T e(s) :
13. Soil Type(s):
r
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Y o NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable A s ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 4A Yes NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yej.,k4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ YZZ5<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
WUV Checklists Design gree is
21. Does record keeping need impr merit? If yes, check the:ap r priate box below. ❑„� NA C:].'NE
:�=to Application eekly Free d - to Analysis oil Analysis either Code
fal tacking iel 12 Minute Inspections n ly and 1” Rainfall Inspe Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes❑ N NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑:No2n: ❑ NE
Paige 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

. Facility Number: - Date of Ins ectian:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check []'Yes D, No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate boi(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ 'Yes .❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and.report mortality rates that were higher T normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergengy situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, overapplication)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
J
0
❑ res('Sa'No No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes—r&�4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Y NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
i
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/412011

r
Divlsion Uf Water-Qnalltj'M
uFacilityFNumber r '" " 0 Division of Soff and -Water Conservation z .
d
i.. ✓ 'f v 6. f _ 2.1��
gea:;,,OtherAncyr'`i" t _t,.,, .w» '� 'eyzr.,au �ir�r'u. ,r,_»,'r
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: p Arrival Time: Departure Time: eZ: County: "z� Region:
Farm Name: �G� V� (. Owner Email:
-, IG
Owner Name:Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Certified Operator:E . bu'17�s
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: q
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
r;-�� 1 ; Design Current; Design Current, fit: Desfgn Current a
e �f 3 E� �. �.. sa
Swine Capacity Pop "� :Wet Poultry ;Capacity Pop Ga ,Capacity a
Wean to Finish Cow
Wean to Feeder Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean D Cow
Farrow to Feeder Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker
Gilts Beef Feeder
Boars Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
TurkeyPoults
Other *', E r ,{ 1 =' 3 t m
tis
La er =' �
Non -La er
�.,� ,Design�'tCnrrenf
D Poultry Ca aci ' 1?0
Layers
Non -La ers
Pullets
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
4��
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No;kA
A ❑ NE
E] Yes [:]No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass.the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
4k
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes- ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to tie int-dgrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
z
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
wasie management or closure plan?
❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes is ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes fo
❑ NA [] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑Yes [] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application -
10. Are there any required'buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [] Application Outside of Approved Area I�
12. Crop Type(s). �
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? E] Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes "r3:1�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yp ❑ ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes io .[DNA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes check [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
Checklists [] Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements . Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Wage Application _ ❑ Weekl ❑ WasteAnalysis_ rans ers eather Code
❑ Rai° toc11 king ❑ Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes i4ro
NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] NE
Page 2 of 3 214/2011 Continued
I

Facili Number: jDate of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Ye ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NoJ�A ❑ NE
the ropnate box(es) below.
Failure to plete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0ZN-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
ucture(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ hjA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than�n'n .
❑NA ❑NE
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes�J'b� ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of a required by theY ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) IT
3l. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. jYeSNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? A ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comme
nts;(refer to questwon'#):Explain any YES answe 's°an . orany a „d tianal recommenditions or any other coritments A
Use.diawings of facility -to better explain situations a additional pagesIs necessary)..
Co3Ez:V =1_7
=k/Z=Z/t =1> ttA�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

N
� � � ;'�`,�..�.•a��''"' �� ;��" �" a'�. rtDrvisio�n o#'aWater Quality' ,�.r A �rz ��� b � ,,,��.
F�cilfty,�Nr�:� �J � °��� ,'' �, �aDiv �ioa'� of Soil,ad'�Water Car ervation '� { � ��' � ,� �;��k w '�'•, ,a<
'-���..'�..��- �:�'� - � O:Other�.Agency`�, _�,t• _ `� ; ��,� �..t ,�,.�
Type of Visit: @ Compliance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: AD Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 10
d
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Arrival Time: I cl Departure Time: 4Z: County: Region: V i
J �' ► l�V Owner Email:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: L
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes "a or ❑ NA NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [:]Yes ❑ NoVNA
NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued
Design Current
Current ,
Design
Current
Desiga°
�5wineCapacity
P,pp
_.W
gWet Poultry
Capaciiy Pop:
Cattle
Capacty Pop.
_ ....� ;: •.:.. :,m.;`�-.
, M
Ems;..
:, , .
..�
Wean to Finish
La er
ai Cow
'
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
r Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish
Da' Heifer
Farrow to Wean?
1''
Design Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D • �Poultr
Ca aci .: P:o ..
Non -Dai
r Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars "
Pullets
FlBeef Brood Cow
p
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
t 4
Other , Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes "a or ❑ NA NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? [:]Yes ❑ NoVNA
NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

jFac±jX Number: - Date of Inspection:
s
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [DNA ❑ NE
t a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes ❑ o ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structur
7
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes" To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 45--❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 1�e( ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �l�❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes o [] NA [j NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Ycs�00 NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN . ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to. incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑-EEvidenceeoofjjWind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): G6,� a 1i `r �� � CT"Jj Coe /
I-
13.
13. Soil Type(s): /l •k kn,1111K moo,.. "" ✓
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAW -MP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
�S. J4&1_.,d "�
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Z❑f4A []NE
o /Pv&. n�NE
NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes�No _"P5j NA ❑ NE.
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o [DNA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o E] NA [] NE
the appropriate box.
❑ rrovement?
ts Design Maps [] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Do record keeping nee If yes, check the appropriate box belo ❑Yes o ❑ NA❑ NE
ZWast Application Weboard este Analysis oil alysis ❑erste �ather Code
infall ❑ Stoc g ute Inspections onthly and l" Rainfall Inspections udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Za o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 214/2011 Continued
i

Facili Nusnber: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ?No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ NoA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No'
A ❑ NE
Other Issues —
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead
� with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Ye s❑ NA ❑ NE
an norma
and report mortality rates that were higher thl? �k
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes J v ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of eme jr eR � as required by the ❑ Yes f!TNo
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -app ica ion)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes )!giio
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
0 NA ❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ Yeso [:]NA
[:]Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Coniments (refer to'question #): Explain"any YES'ansivers and/or any;additiaiial reco�amendations'ox any other comments r 4
Use drawyn s of facili to,.lietter;;ex lain situations use,aclditfonal, a"es as ne�
is J' P ( P g cessaiy)' ,
Dom.- 1'f
G
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
L
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

w ffl �` <Div�sion of Water Quality w, a ,:�,
i .rice 1 - {v r a z...: . ' A 3 .,s a`# . , ka _ .` i y ' 7 4 t
*; Faci�tty Number �. a O''DNvlsion of Soil andkWater Canservatian
4...
.� �;.�' •n.�. � 5.;- �,OtherAgency � �,at��n„gK,,��.� � r r'=�:. r�k� � � ,
type of Visit: ip Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 4'Routine O Complaint C)Follow-up o Referral 0 Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Arrival Time: 1��ep
Departure Time: County: y
Region:
o
y
Farm Name:�v
,
r� Owner Email:
�' Swine " '�
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: t - Certification Number: L4
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: . Longitude:
.,' L�-, ,T.h
F .¢Y 'S `^.
'y, 3f I0
x`
n
Design ,Current
Design- Current
Design Current
�' Swine " '�
F` Capacity Pop tWetPoultry
Capacity Pop Gattle$,9, >
CapacityW Po"p
Layer
?,
.: Non -La er,
'
ez
] ,,->Desagn; Current
r
D Poulfr Ca' aciPo' 4 s
,,
Tx
Layers
M:.
s
,
Non -Layers
f: Pullets
�u ti� �: ,;: s,b Turkeys
$75,
`;
Otler,. Turke Poults�
Other
Other
�CC
+� Wean to Finish �
Wean to Feeder a
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
'� Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
ai Cow
Dai Calf
Dai Heifer
D COW
Non -Dai ,
s Beef Stocker �
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? �] Y CNo❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ N A NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) []Yes ❑ N ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ,� A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facifi Number: - Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?' ❑ Yes�J!Z. ❑ NA ❑ NE.
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate thrca s o the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yesb<[] NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Wind6w Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outsid f Approed a
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [] Yes No VA ❑ NE
acres determination? Com`
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes_IRlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes��o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ec is s esign ments ❑Other,
21. es record keeping need ' rovement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard �ste Analysis oil Analysis ast ransfers ather Code
❑ Ra all n Stockin�op Yield 120 Manute Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Y s A ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No h1A [] NE
Page 2 of 3 2/412011 Continued

11facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
T
'24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?_!`�/❑ Ye>_R:�C
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check N�'� E3 Yes ] No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
�A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No�:j'A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes:U o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than ormal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of em er enc atiougas required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, Tc
over -app atil` on)~"
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Y5j;No ❑ NA
❑ Yes < ❑ NA
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ Yes o [:]NA
❑ Ye ❑ NA
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
[D NE
❑ NE
[] NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments,(refer to question #)i�Explain-ariy YES.answers:andlor'any-additiorial recomtnendations or.`any other, comments
Use'dra' ings of:.faciltty'to better.ea lain. situations (use additional Oakes as necessary)-,;
EA _70
Reviewer/Inspector Name-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011

C`
w' fit,.*- •. ,d, ., 5 Revision of WaterQuality,," (.�'� 1
' Faetlity Number- - 1 0 Division of.Soil aid Water•,Conservation
Other -
`Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: $ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1b t'-' Arrival Time: D ; ov Departure Time: O = County: Region:
Farm Name: C `� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
4 f[Ny
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: /
Certification Number: 1 L 1
Certification Number:
Longitude: -
;, Design ,Current i Design Current Design Current
;,Swine' �Ca $ce o Wet P altr a a i ,I? Cafe Ca a oY`
P tar Pp o y Cpcty op, pcty Ppr
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
" ,Other ,
Other
Layer -DairyCow
Non -La yer ai Calf
Dairy Heifer
Design Current D Cow
Dry Poult ', Ca eci Po., Non -Dairy
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
��i
❑ Yes,�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No JE�:R ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ;?A' ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No x f, ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [] YeV[O:]
A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YeA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes Lj No
A
❑ NE
2 Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): `
Observed Freeboard (in):
ICA!
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes��o
❑ NA
[] NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes'EkNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yesj]q:�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes*6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Ir -
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? TTTTT�A vl�o
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. [❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside[ ofApproved�ea
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
Cum r� ►� env -ems- o s ��.s ; 't/6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o E:]NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA [] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ec fists Design ❑ Maps ease Other:
21. Does record keeping need im vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard ZWaste Analysis Soil Analysis ��J+Vaste �eather Code
Rainfall Stocking 'Crop Yield J3120 Minute Inspections ,E7Konthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No &A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/201.1 Continued
t

Facili Number: I Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?1 Yes No E]NA ❑ NE
(E
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No �KA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead a ' with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher an normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes' To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergent as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -a scat n
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes�No
❑ YeNo
❑ Yeo
❑ YesXNo
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
1C6mnients,(refef to question #). Explain any YES answers and/or�any additional recommendations or any other comments ;
Use d.rawines of facility. to better explain situations (use additional 6okes as necessary)..:: s
12�aV� z o ► fps l►P�'
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
.,KSI{!1/Q�y -4
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/412011

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: C _ �_ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
a
Certified Operator: -sit
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator: _
Operator Certification Number: -:>-
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0
=t
061 Longitude: =0=, = [i
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
_ ❑ Layer
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Po ion
ai Cow 2WZ5 ksizo
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non-Daiiy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
1 Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes I�Ivr❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ��NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No b;VA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ A ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Condnued

Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection l�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ! ,Wer—❑ NA ❑ NE
1)111�a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [I Yes ❑ No An
NE
Hyl Sttuctur I Structure 2 Structure 3 Stntcture 4 Structure 5 SK
re
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): t
Observed Freeboard (in): LA
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ targe trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure pian?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
❑ Yes
CWEI NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
7. Do any of the strictures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the pen -nit?
❑ Yes 21 -No
El NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste stnictures require
❑ Y❑
NA
ElNE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste_ Application
10. Are there any required buffers. setbacks.. or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/i mprovem ent?.
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Ye❑
��
NA
[:]NE
El Excessive Ponding [I Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of rea
12. Crop type(s) CO'T "\(-�4 Q_e Pk"_
{V L`' �
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
CWEI NA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o [INA
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[]Yes
No A
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ElYes
o [INA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
DVI 2:,7 --&>/\ GeV
AL
"k
t
C, :d Z
E6 %Zt G7Z D:2
ReviewerlInspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

J0
,10 Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ ecis sesign ansOther
❑ Yes ts'_❑.NA ❑ NE
aste Transfers Annual Certification
,IJ-11ainfalltockin Crop Yield 120 Minute Inspections onthly and'I Rain Inspections eather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes )p�O� NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain raimbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No�A ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No +lA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
Nb ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No V ❑ NE
Other Issues
21. Does r cord keeping need improv ment? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application eekl reeboard aste Analysis Soil Analysis
❑ Yes )r—o" ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 44o [:INA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose ofead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑Yes
QO❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were hig eri t�riormal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
N0 A
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of epler eg_ nc�situations as required by
❑Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ OLscharge, freeboard problems, overt o)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑Yes
io ❑ NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments anchor Drawings:
i
w
12/28/04

FacilityNumber,
4&Dlvlslon of Water Quality {
0,DiAsion of Sofl-and Water Conservation R`
Q Other'Agency' 4 a
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit dIl Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ���. Depart ire Time: l2: =9.,- County: Region:
Farm Name: SCS 'N_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: t-
Y_
Certified Operator: S��- �► `'
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Phone No -
Integrator:
Operator Certification Numher:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ c E=]' = Longitude: =0=' 0
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population .1 C9W
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
0:04irycow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifej
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Design Current
Capacity fa�
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge frown any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes v ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No.. ❑ NE
V
❑ e o ❑NA 0 N
❑Ye o ❑NA El NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure -1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the inkgrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeses ❑ NA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the pen -nit? ❑ Yes [:1NA [:3NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YesoNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑;PAN. El PAN > 10% or 10 lbs El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidece of Wind Dritl ❑Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) a'
13. Soil type(s)t1
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes o "SWA El NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElYe o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yeo ❑ NA ❑ NE
� f'�. G. t3, _ _ -,-A.c f1�' �Y
'+,': `'# i.. -1 R »r: "k. ..1. �4 ref i �17t`f '.>k.�i'4kfy+A1
Comments {refer to.gtiestiorr #) Explain any YES answersjand/or,any recommendafionss,or any)othe comments
1>llse drawings of fac�lety.to better eaplam situations y{use addinal
tro,;pages as necessary), fps"
<.
Reviewer/Inspector Name i`r r. - �3 , `, _,', Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

FacilityNumber: — Date of inspection
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
ElNA
Required
Records & Documents
Did the facility fail to properly dispose ofAQjd,auimals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yep' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes i
[INA
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Y No
El NA
❑ NE
the appropiiate box. WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design Maps ❑ Other
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of erne[.tuations as required by
❑ Yes �❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, ov pp ication)
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
rite Application PIreekly Freeboard PWaste Analysis ❑�Sei;'Analysi�ste TransfersM-A-ftnual Certification
❑ Yes
P<ainfall�sto ' Crop Yield pec ton
❑ NE
er
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
F-1 Yes 0 No
tjWk❑
NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Y No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No �A
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ElNA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes [INo�&A
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
ElNA
El NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose ofAQjd,auimals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher'than non -nal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes i
[INA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of erne[.tuations as required by
❑ Yes �❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, ov pp ication)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes❑
to
NA
[:1NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency`?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addttibnal 66'nje6ts andlbr grawitigs:•; - Y3,T.
12128/04

® Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Facility Number : 800013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800013 __ n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Insoecticn Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine ,., County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09I 42 1201 Entry Time:03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Scott Davis Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Scott H Davis Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 69; 5 Hwy_ 152 W Mooresville NC 28115 _
Physical Address: 6935 HM 152 W McorpsvilleNC 28115
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant I Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°34'22" Longitude: 80°41'58"
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (Unity Church Rd.) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is on the right
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number: 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James 8 Phone: [phone]
Ext.21 2
Inspector Signature: Date: X11
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
06/18/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.1 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03105110 > Waste Analysis > N = 6.0 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/04/10 > Soil Analysis
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AVVC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number; 800013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
0 Cattle - Milk Cow 200 100
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 2801000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�Iste Pond WP1 1800 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Cavis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 09124/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed From any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
in
■
o
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n .
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
MOD
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
rl
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management Q
IN
n
n
or closure plan?
T. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Dees any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
o
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
13

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Inspection Date: 0912412010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 800013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
71
PAN?
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
Total P2O5?
fl
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
rl
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Sudan Grass
Crop Type 5
Timothy, Orchard, &
Soil Type 6
Rye Grass
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Cl
■
Q
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Cl
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Cl
n
■
n
17 Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
0
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
1
0
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 0912412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? T1
Maps? fl
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ fl n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard? n
Transfers? In
Rainfall? n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
0
22. Drd the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
❑
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
u
■
o
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
Cl
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ ❑ n
Qua lity.representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 9912412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Other lssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fait to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■nn
Page: 6

aL
�
..^..�r..�.
NCDENt
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Division of Water Quality r--_
Beverly l=aves Perdue
Governor
Scott H Davis
Scott Davis Farm
5935 Hwy 152 W
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Scott H Davis:
Coleen Fl, Sullins
Director
October 1, 2009
Resources
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800013
Scott Davis Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Scott H Davis, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system
in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Scott Davis Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf: Dry Cow: Beef Brood Cow:
Dairy Heifer: Beef Stocker Calf: Other:
Milk Cow: 200 Beef Feeder:
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC800013 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this GOC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keening forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd.. Raleign, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service- 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www rlmaterquality,org
An Equal Opponunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
0111
NorthCaro"a
Naturally/

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site-specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 -foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa. og v/er/g_sn/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
v�
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC800013)
AFO Notebooks

Division of Water Quality
j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800013 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cgmgliance InsDection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine , _ County: Howan Region: Mooresviiie
Date of Visit: 0310512009 Entry Time:04:00 PM Exit Time: 05:30 RM Incident M
Farm Name: Scott Davis,F@rm R Owner Email:
Owner: Qco3Y H Davis
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6925 Hwy 152 W Mooresville NC 28115
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant
Location of Farm:
n Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude: x,5°34'22"_ Longitude: 80°41'58"
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (Unity Church Rd.) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number: 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: .lames Bealle,�.. Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s): �Q
Inspection Summary:
03/02/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.5 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/30/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.4 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/18/08 > Soil Analysis
IS
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013 M
Inspection Date: 0310512009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 84
r_ta: Design Capp il,Ly: 2nD
�u�� ✓caiyu �aNaa.i �y. ���
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond T P1 1-7 18.00 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 03/05/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? D ■ D D
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field D
Other In
a. Was conveyance man-made? D D ■ D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
n
■
n
n
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
D
■
D
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
D
D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from'a
D
■
D
discharge?
n
■
n
n
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
D
■
D
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
D
■
D
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
D
■
D
D
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
D
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? D
Hydraulic Overload? D
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? D
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800013' Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Inspection Date: 03/05/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
l�
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
:Q
Crop Type 1
, Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
'Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
[i
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Q
■
Q
0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
D
D
■
D
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D
■
D
D
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q
■
D
Cl
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
■
D
D
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
D
■
D
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? Q
Page: 4

28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ n Q
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those D ■ D Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air D ■ D D
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5
Permit: AVVC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Facility Number:
800013
Inspection Date: 03/05/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NP
Checklists?
n
Design?
Irl
Maps?
Other?
D
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
D
■
D
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
120 Minute inspections?
171
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■
Cl
D
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? D
000
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
D
■
D
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
D
❑
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Q
■
❑
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n
■
n
Vac
Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ n Q
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those D ■ D Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air D ■ D D
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Inspection Date: 03/05/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector tail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
�l
Facility Number : 800013 f
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
n■❑0
I ■ III 1
Page: 6

USPS - Track & Confirm
,
�''� unrrr�t?sr�rEs
V.w POSTAL SE ?VECEm
Track & Confirm
Search Results
httpaltrkenfrmi .smi.usps.conilPTSInternetWeb�InterLabe]Detaii.do
Label/Receipt Number: 7007 1490 0004 4509 4440
Detailed Results:
• Delivered, October 16, 2008,10:45 am, MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
• Notice Left, October 11, 2008,11:46 am, MOORESVILLE, NC
28115
• Acceptance, October 10, 2008, 5:01 pm, MOORESVILLE, NC
28115
< 8ack Roturn to USFS.com Noma >
Home I Help I Sign In
Track & Confirm FAQs
Track & Confirm
Enter Label/Receipt Number,
6a >
Notification Options
Track & Confirm by email
Get current event information or updates for your item sent to you or others by email. Go>
Site Map Contact_Us Forms Gov't Ser+nces Jobs Privacy Policy
Terms of Use Natonal_8 Premier Accounts
CopyrlghtO 1999-2007 USPS. All Rights Reserved. No FEAR Act EEO Data FOIA
I of 1 10/30/2008 12:45 PM

e `�� V Seems d�2 C-�See1�t Ca�� -e
d'kAe Q�e�

F WArF
9QFILE G Michael F. Easley, Governor
Wifliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
9 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r
—q Coleen W. Sullins, Director
pIlk Division of Water Quality
N<�000 AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
October 10, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Scott H. Davis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Hwy 152 W
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2008-PC-0702
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Scott Davis Farm/Facility 80-13
General Permit AWC800013
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Davis:
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on September 23, 2008, by James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
Facility Operator failed to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60)
days (before or after) of the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit
Condition III.5, 111. 10, and 111. 11, and the Certified. Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by October 24, 2008,
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future.
In responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. BeaIle at the address located on the bottom of this page. .
One
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NplfthCaroljna
rurally
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: http://gw.ehnr.state.nc.us/ www.ncwaterguality.oro Aa

Scott Davis Farm/Facility 80-13
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
October 10, 2008
Page 2
L L �j �� L7—
Jilf!
C
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Bealle at [phone].
Sincerely,
�k_�A
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report dated September 23, 2008
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
Animal Feeding Operations Unit, Raleigh
Regional Files
jb

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800013 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoectson _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09/23/2008 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Farm Name: Scott Davis Farm
Owner: Scott H Davis
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]�64
Mailing Address: 6935 Hwy 152 W _ Mooresville NC 28115
Physical Address:
Facility Status: n Compliant E Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°34'22" 1 Longitude: 80°41'58"
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (Unity Church Rd.) travel approximately 1/2 mile east on Hwy 152, Farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis
Secondary OEC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Operator Certification Number: 20941
On -Site Representativei Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
63-1699
Primary Inspector: James Beak Phone: [phone]
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)
Inspection Summary:
06/03/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 11.6 1000 Gallons
01/29/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.7 LbslTon
03/18/08 > Soil Analysis
21. Failure to conduct Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application, NOV to follow.
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 09/23/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges S Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ ❑ n
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? fl n ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ .n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
n
■
n
n
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
.■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
n
■
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
❑
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
0000
or closure plan?
Excessive Ponding?
n
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste -Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement? .
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
In
Heavy metals (Cu, Zr, etc)?
n
Rage: 3

r
r
'
. Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Facility Number! 800013
Inspection Date: 09/23/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
rl
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
❑
n
27. Did the facility fall to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Mr. James Bealle
Div. of Water Quality/Aquifer Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue
Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Notice of. Violation
Nov -2008 -PC -0702
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Scott Davis Farm/Facility 80-13
.General Permit AWC800013
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Bealle,
Due to an oversight on my part, a soil sample was taken later than
the required sixty days. With a new implemented plan on
calculating the dates in our new system, this should be avoided in
the future. We are focused on complying and sincerely have
worked hard to do so. Thank you for your consideration in this
matter.
Sincerely,
Scott H. Davis

' ❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800013 Facility Status: Active Permit: 6WC800013 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: R w n Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 10/18/2007 Entry Time:Q9:00 AM Exit Time: 10:45 AM_ Incident #:
Farm Name: Scott Davis Farm _ Owner Email:
Owner: Scott H Davis
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: Q9a5__HwY 152 W Mooresville NC 28115
Physical Address:
Facility Status: n Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°34'22" Longitude: 80°41'58"
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (unity Church Rd.) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is on the right
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number: 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Pat Harris Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
oil Samples haven't been taken for 2007
Waste Sample needs to be sent in for fall application.Check records at next inspection.
text calibration due in October 2008
14) WUP needs to include Sorghum if you tontine to grow this crop. See Technical Specialist
Crop yield records need to be available at inspection.
Farm and records look good.
Thank -you
Page: 1

I
G7
Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 1011812007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 200 95
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WP1 18.00 84.00
Page: 2

J Permit: AWC800Q13 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 1011812007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? D ■ 0 ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
0
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that -are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
I]
■
❑
Q
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 3
n
PAN?
Timothy, Orchard, &
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
■
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
D
1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay)
Soil Type 1
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Pacolet sandy loam, 15
to 25% slopes
Crop Type 4
Timothy, Orchard, &
Soil Type 6
Rye Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Pacolet sandy clay
loam, 2 to 8% slopes,
Soil Te 2
yp
Pacolet sandy loam, 15
to 25% slopes
Soil Type 3
Appling sandy loam, 1
Soil Type 6
to 6% slopes
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
■
n
❑
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
V. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
D
■
Q
Q
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
❑
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4
1

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number : 800013
Inspection Date: 1011812007 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WU P? n
Checklists? D
Design? n
Maps? D
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
D
Weekly Freeboard?
D
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
■
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
D
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
D
D
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
D
■
D
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
D
■
D
D
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
D
D
■
D
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
D
■
D
D
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
D
n
■
D
Y..
Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? D ■ D D
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n D
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number : 800013 •�
N
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fall to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■nn
0000
n■❑n
0 00
Page: 6

a~
Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 800013 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800013 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville_
Date of Visit: Q /� 301?b,Q7_ Entry Time:0ZOQ PM_ Exit Time: 03:30 PM Incident #r::
Farm Name: Scott DavisFarm Owner Email:
Owner: Scott H Dayi2 Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: Q93� Hwy 152 W _ Mooresvillp, NC 2Q11
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°34'22" Longitude: 80°41'58"
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (Unity Church Rd,) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152, Farm is on the right
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number: 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Prone: 04"Z)?3S`-72t6Zk-
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
12/22/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.7 Lbs11000 Gallons
05/19/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/27/06 > Soil Analysis
7, Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly.
C.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott W Davis
Facility Number : 800013
Inspection Date: 03/30/2007 Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle - Miik Cow 200 85
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond WP1 18.00 48.00
Page:2

A
Permit: AVVC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
• inspection Date: 03/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
n
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Q
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
n
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
!�
■
0
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
o
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
Q
■
Q
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
fi
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Inspection Date: 03!3012007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 800013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Crop Type 6
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
fl
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Timathy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q
■
❑
Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Q
❑
■
❑
17. Dees the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0
0
Q
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
0
0
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0
■
Q
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P? rl
Page: 4

f
Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 03/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
0
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
00
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
o
26. Did the facility fail to have'an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Cl
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? Cl ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Cl ■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Inspection Date: 03/30/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ro
Facility Number. 800013
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■n❑
n■nn
x,000
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 800011., Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC800013 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed tate:
Reason for Visit: gputine County: Rowan Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 0811712006 Entry Time:03:00 PM Exit Time: 05:30 PM
Farm Name: Scgj, Davis Farm _ _
Owner: ScottH Dwis-
Incident M
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 6935 Hwy 152 W Mgoresville NC 28115
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant - Integrator:
Location of Farm:
I�ZII=k��kl'1:�
Latitude: 35°34'22" Longitude: 80041'58"
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (Unity Church Rd.) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Scott H Davis Operator Certification Number: 20941
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name. Title Phone
On-site representative Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Scott H. Davis Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: tate:
Nj
Secondary Inspector(s};
Page: 1

A
Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
. Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
05/99/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/20/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/27/06 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly. Eradicate rodents and repair tunneling damage.
21. Weather Code must be recorded on the designated form (enclosed).
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in October, 2006.
Jb
Page: 2

Permit: AW'C800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 08117/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 200 85
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aste Pond WP1 18.00 36.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0000
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field • ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0000
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
000
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, '
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4
1

t
Permit: AVVC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis
Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type., Compllance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
1s PAN > 10%I10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift? '
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type e 2
Fescue (Hay. Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Timothy, Orchard, 2£
Soil Type 5
Rye Grass
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0000
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0000
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
■
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0
❑
❑
Records and Documents _
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 0 ❑ Cl ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> i inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
000
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■.
❑
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Yas
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0000
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Cluality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWC800013 Owner - Facility: Scott H Davis Facility Number: 800013
Inspection Date: 08/17/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
�.4__ i__..__ Von Mn NA NF
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? 0 ■ Q 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ 0
Page: 7

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint () Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
/® Count Region: 4n-fi"
Date of Visit: G- 3 ' Arrival Time: ey Departure Time: Y� l}
Farm Name: �r. �,� iQA,�.,.s lD�y Owner Email:
Owner Name: ___. tU�r S Phone:
Mailing Address: I •& 71AL /l1 C Cp t
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =o ❑ 1 = Longitude: =° =, =
DeSign Current '
p Rt
Design �C•urrent' �Dest�n Current
Swine Cap�acaty Populatton
Wet Poultry'
C�ppe bp0 ul°anon
Cattle Capra aty Population
,..
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
® Dairy Cow
❑ Yes
El Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La et
❑ NE
El Dairy Calf
❑ Yes
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ NA
❑ Daia Heifei
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ Dry Cow
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ No
�
ElNon-Dairy
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
El Farrow to Finish
1:1 Layers
❑ NA
El Beef Stocker
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑Gilts
❑Non -La Non -Layers
❑ NA
❑ Beef Feeder
other than from a discharge?
❑ BoarsElBeef
❑ Pullets
Brood Cow
12/28/04
Continued
❑ Turkeys
Other
10 Turkey Poults
❑ Other
❑ Other
Number of eturelvq."
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
1KNo
❑ NA
EINE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
®No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge?
12/28/04
Continued

F
V
Facility Number:d5�0 —isDate
of Inspection
(}No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determinations❑
Yes
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
Dfl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I j Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: WASk
Structure 5
Structure 6
Spillway?: yCS
Designed FEceboa ):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
a No
❑ NA
EINE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not appiicabie to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 191 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside ofAcceptableCrop / r
Window El Evidence of Win ❑ Wind Drifi Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C.� it N 4 U00 ��4 s / ✓iW�- ( � e_Xa,N I
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
(}No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
$jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determinations❑
Yes
19 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ER No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name z ro 2 } y,4,;"° Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records &_ Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ,® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:1 Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No JR NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit'? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
ERNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
)(I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
Z NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
K] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
M NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes JnNo [INA ❑ NE
❑ Yes $allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes rKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;R"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
AddttionaLComments and/or Drawings:
�17),Op t^ so,.� Co C
own f Pie n,4,. [r- ft elel r-Vrk M s
12/28/04

W A TFC
Michael F. Easley, Governor
0�
Q
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
(n
9
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j
'l
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
Scott Davis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Highway 52 West
Mooresville NC 28115
ubject:
R E LAO��, SCertificate of Coverage No. AWC800013
f E s Scott Davis Farm
OCT 1 2004 Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
NC DEPT t* E4%Ro0ERlT Rowan County
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Dear Scott Davis: liR00RESV1LLZRR(;*KALOfF10E
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Scott
Davis, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC800013 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Scott Davis Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certificd design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us NaturiallyAn Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Rowan County Health Department
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC800013
APS Central Files

of W ArE
;q 7
Michael F. Easier overndr` .l.J
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division ofR'ater Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 15, 2003
Scott Davis
6935 Hwy. 152 W.
Mooresville; NC 28115
Subject: Davis Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWC 800013
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Davis:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on September 11, -
2003. Based on his observations the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained, and the files
were complete. Please note the comments on the copy of the enclosed inspection report.
If you have anyquestions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact -Mr. Johnson or
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Attachment
cc: File
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

Yl\ L61UR Ul . V► MCA- MUALU{ i
1 .!.' a r � - • a, - 'y s � .-.ya• }.�Soil in
: •'-v �,L"•,._,�. �'...a�"`�F.r
t'9�. Df► isioa of cl W iter Conserv anon
,�• _y�
A
,, t • O Dther gency
Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 80 l3 Date of Visit: 09111Rt1D3 Time.
___ —] Q Not Operational Q Below Threshoid
Permitted M Cert'dced 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ _ _ _ _ _ -
Farm Name: SL1lD 11,+'.�71iA1................................................ County: RDMA __
(h nerName: SsQ3IAa 1:LY__w..-__w.....-. Phone No: __w._ --
Mauling Address: (> r ] i�hn;d� a2 3'Ye4 _-__ 1Nnaresiille NC.
Facility Contact: .---..._. ......_._._...._._._._.___._.....Title: .................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: S=-R&YI,S-------------------- Integrator.
Certifted Operator: mit$ Davis Operator Certification Number: 20941
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hvvy 152 and SR 1355 (Unite. Church Rd_) travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is on
the right.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude35 - 4 Z2 Longitude 80 -i 58 w
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder- to Finish
❑ Fsurmv to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultn PopulationCattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver ® Dain- 200 85
Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dain'
Other
Total Design Capacity 200
Total SSLW 280,000
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drams Present FO—Lag-on Area Spray riield Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JQAoluid Waste Management S% stem
Discharnes & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagos -m ❑ Sprnx- Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-niade" ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obser-ed. did it reach Water of the State" I If yes. not&- DXVQ t ❑yes ❑ No
c, If discharge is obst r•ed. what is the estimated loo• in gal/miri?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoo n systeni.' i If ves_ noti#i- DWQ) ❑ Yes [:IN(-)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection A- Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spilhvav ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ; Structure a Structure 5 Structure 6'
Identifier: .................. ..................... ..........
Freeboard iinchesi:....,_. (�1_.._....._...._.__

UJ/UJ/UI
r
'Facility- Number: 8013
Date of Inspection 09/11/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
- seepage, etc.) .
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
1.vnteauea
❑ Yes
R No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
R No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes R No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Soybeans
13. Do the receiiing crops differ «•ith those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? R Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? -
❑ Yes
I N. No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
[:]Yes
R No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
R No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
R No
_ 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes.
R No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
R No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
R No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
R No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes R No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You w -W receive no further correspondence about this visit
•..4e- �•. � �-r sr..1 - ,K,
Como�eniii (refer to queshon A) ,Explain any YES ans►vye%s and/or anv recommen atrons or ani other comments.
Use'drii*inga of facilit` to -better eiplam situations. (use additional pa es'ug necessan):
ar ,q ❑ Field Copy_ ❑ Final -Notes
--THE WASTE PLAN IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING REVISED. SMALL GRAIN AND SOYBEANS ARE TO BE INCLUDED.
- WASTE SAMPLES MUST BE OBTAINED AND ANALYSED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF WASTE APPLICATION.
— MORE CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN IN RECORDING WASTE APPLICATION INFORMATION (NEATNESS).
--FACILITY APPEARED TO BE WELL MAINTAINED AND RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan 3oh�on
C
r

o�OF W A rE9Q Michael F. Easley
` Governor
cor William G. Ross, Jr -Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION T - my t I -J4
August 14, 2002
Scott Davis
6935 Hwy, 152 W.
'Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Davis Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWC 800013
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Davis:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on August 13, 2002. Based
on his observations during the inspection the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the files
were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If. you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
{704} 663-1699.
cc: File
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
ID
D. Rex Gl ason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O 0ther ❑ Denied Access
-
Facility Number - hate of Visit: 8/13/2002 Timc:
80 13
=Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® q_rtified ❑ Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ __
Farm Name: Sc.QJ1 ayj5..Fikrm.......................... ....................... County: RQ.lYaA.................................... 1MQ........
Owner Name: SCp-------------------- I?a.Ya.�----------------------------- I'hone No: T94:85?_]3----------_-_-._--------------
ltailing Address: 6t9.kTilaJ:.S2.w4'eSt..................................................................... J.l'xQ:ofr.>rS.Y.i>1C..N................................................... 21U..............
Facility Contact: ...........................................................Title Phone No
Onsite Representative: S�S2T_T�.A�YI-.--------------------------------- Integrator: _ ------------------------------------------
Certified Opera tor: Su.P.QILH.................................. D&As.................................................. Operator Certification Number:2119-41.............................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy 152 and SR 1355 (Unity Church Rd.) . travel approximately 112 mile east on Hwy 152. Farm is
on the ritrht.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 '34 22L Longitude 8Q • 4] 5811
- :Design ?Current
?Swine: ---Ca aci :Population
w ❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
.. _ =Design
Currenty"_ "'':Design, .-k tCurrent .
'Poultry +Ca aci
Ya uiation .`�SCattle ' •J -Capacity aci =Po dlation
❑ Layer
Is Dairy 200 89
❑ Non -Layer
a ❑ Non -Dairy
7El Other
k r �7
:: Total Des>tgn Capacrty ; 200
3•s
v
'f r 'Total SSLW� 280,000
:z a
Discha = S Stream Ironacts
I - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'! (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min•?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (11 -yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IS No
.3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & "Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: --•-----•--------•--.._..._............................ .......................... ........ -................... ...... --------------------- ................ .
Freeboard (inches): 24

4' vJiWivj �.wusrawcu
Facility Number: 80-13 Date of Inspection 8/13/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures ack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type sudex hay small grain
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑-Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records.S; Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did. Reviewer/InspeCtor fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a -follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
FACILITY APPEARED TO BE IN GOOD SHAPE.
t-::.✓: ...... ••,rte.. ..nom F x,'" x `� r z -e^ ��X� Y- :.H� � t ❑a� ..,-i,. .
Reviewer/Inspector Name A3.ANJ4HNSON,�'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 31 t 22

05103101
Facility Number: 80-13 Date of inspection 8113/2UO2
(blur Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on'neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Continued
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes.
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
t}No
❑ Yes
❑ No
Addl,• '+ '�'•�. r '�:r?'a .wrn..q�lr✓. �agrti. 'ad'!. v �,'ir y �. w,
lonEd-ommentaian or ra tom. -� ��.' �� •.,fi�;l: �-�.4x �^:a. �`� .�,. �'..�i

o�oF w A req pG
Scott Davis
6935 Hwy 152 W.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Davis:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
I/ William G. Ross, Jr.,5ecretary
' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject:
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 16, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Scott Davis Farm, Facility #: 80-13
Rowan County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm pian or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collectlanalyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ, .
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
>&
NCD —
Customer Service
1 800 623-7746
Sincerely,
.tom ---
4
Alan D. Johnson
Environmental Specialist 11
Mooresville regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NO 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

.�" Cyt .f
WA r�9p Michael F. Easley
�O G Governor
William G. floss, Jr.,Secretary
> North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 `r Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
February 20, 2001
Scott Davis
6935 Hwy. 152 W.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Certificate of Coverage AWC 800013
Davis Farm, Facility #: 80-13
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Davis:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on February 15, 2001.
Based on his observations during the inspection the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and
the files were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
Be reminded that should waste be applied to a crop, that,crop must be included in the waste utilization
plan. Mr. Johnson noted that small grains were recorded on the IRR -2 form but are not listed in the waste
utilization plan. Because only commercial N was applied to the crop the nitrogen application did not have to be
recorded, nor did it have to be in the waste plan
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone]. '
cc: File
i��rNR- —
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
10,
/ Y-���
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

/pe of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
eason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2115!2001 Time: 11:00
Facility Numhcr 80 13
- - - - - - - - 0 NotO �erational 0 Below Threshold
Q Permitted ® Certified 13Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
arm Name: $g.Q t.tla.Y.is.Fgrm..................... .... CnuntV: Q>ysua................................................ 1i4...........
).vncr Name:s:mtt........................................ QA'yjS ........................................................... Phone No: 7Q9-S.7.-.7..fi4..........................................
....... .........
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:...................................................... Phone No: ........................................
failing Address: 69 S. i�hwax.S2.33'es..................................................................... MQa ny..ii1fY...IN.C................................................... 28115 ..............
)nsite Representative: SQ(Yi T.,>?t#.Y..IS......................................................................... Integrator: ................
'erti(ied Operator:gQ.tt...............................aYIS.................... ... Operator Certification Number:ZQ9.41..
,ocation of Farm:
)n Hwy.152 near Rowan Iredell County Line between Union Church Rd. and Deal Rd. Past Concordia Church Rd. A.
Leading east.
[� Swine ❑ Poultry ®cattle [3 Horse Latitude F 35 • 34 22 " Longitude 1 80 • 41 58
.r�_..1'tis- _rrre Q,- r.cta +rw+ �eP:s.y-,p yr^. •+msv.pf}' r'��nliw 8�1!"ir"!1'tr°^. �nvc' c..fa_' y
u�yw .(, a r� Desigiy x.Current, �~rtDesLgi current yam# rp Desiobri� Current ,
f.1'e 7• i. `sS �y. ...., :7�ryr ..�uyhsayr.^ t-i,n.� .un'1! zLK nr,.
i.: Swine .. •� -; Y Claei Po ulation"PoultrY '` Ca aci Po ulatton Cattle
�R,,• xcr=+„ r ,Ca aci .N,]Po elation
+, .. _
f : 0 Wean to Feeder; [] Layer® Dairy 200 $2
0 Feeder to Finish Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy ti
0 Farrow to Weangnal
0 Farrow to Feeder, 0 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Jh ° 6isy� }Y 1C!� Til ' ?i3 fi•' k'i R
.¢ r'� � -_ �.n�Total Design Capacity � 200
C1 Gilts
0 Boars r".`'r,Tota1 SSLW 280,000
F 'amu
i 1 []Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
��, Number'�ohf Lag°Ons;IMPA ��E
,3Y Holding Ponds 1-�Solld Traps, ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ;
Dischgrees & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon 0 Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed; was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
01/01M, Continued

J•
•ilii Number: 80-13
Collection & Treatment
Date of inspection 2/1512001
;s storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? O Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
SiruL'tul'C ! Structure 2 Structurc 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
,choard (inches): 7�.... ............... .............................................................
Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
i. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelirnprovement?
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
V rite Aanlicalion
0, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) SMALL GRAIN
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ® Yes Q No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16.
is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
17.
Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Is there a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayheld boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
ft
gljjred Records si Document
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ VJUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
26.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
Odor
lssucs
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?,.
❑ Yes
❑ No
01/01101
Continued

ility Number: 80-13 Dale of Inspection 2/15-/2041
s there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
Is the, land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged rill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 2/20/2001
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
DEED TO ADD SMALL GRAIN TO THE WUP
MEED TO PUT TRACT, FIELD #, AND PULL # ON IRR -2. MR. SCOTT MAY COMPLETE IRR -2 ON A "WHOLE" FIELD
ISIS OR ON A PER PULL BASIS, BUT MUST BE CONSISTENT AND CLEAR.
MR. SCOTT WILL NOT IRRIGATE TRACT 792 UNTIL THE WETTED ACRES ARE CALCULATED/COMPLETED:
CLEAN FACILI'T'Y
Reviewer/Inspector Name ALAN JOHNSON
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
01/01/01

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SCOTT DAVIS
6935 HIGHWAY 52 WEST
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Dear Scott Davis:
9W0 �p��t, i& yl
i NATUR Ami. £�3i �•' +i1 i '7
DEC . ;."
MON 07 wrRIYAMM 1,1t1,"1:�NMV
11001MUE UMM 0M
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 18, 2000
Subject: Notice of Violation and Revocation for Nonpayment
Scott Davis Farm
Permit Number: AWC800013
Rowan County
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1OG, all animal operations who receive an animal
waste management system permit will be charged in each year of the term an' annual permit fee. Annual permit fees are
billed following the issuance of the permit and then annually thereafter on the anniversary of that date. Your animal waste
management system permit was issued on 912912000.
Your annual permit fee for the period of 9/29/2000 - 9/28/2001 is $150.00. Your payment was due 11/4/2000.
Because this fee was not fully paid within 30 days after being billed, this letter initiates action to revoke the subject permit,
pursuant to 15 NCAC 2H .0205 (c) (4). and G.S. 143-215.1 (b) (3).
Effective 60 days from receipt of this notice, the subject permit is hereby revoked unless the required Annual
Animal Waste Management System Permit fee for your animal operation is received within that time. Operation of an
animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and is
subject to the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day. Your payment should be sent to:
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Budget Office
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please contact Fran McPherson at [phone] ext. 210.
Sincerely,
1 V
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Non -Discharge Branch Compliance/Enforcement Unit
dLopresvilict'egi arOfficc
Rowan County Health Department
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 1 10% post -consumer paper

J.t,g"
State of North Carolina A71, � FUJ'r: r�
Department of Environment •
and Natural Resources } JUN I ��
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCES
May 30, 2000
Scott Davis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Highway 52 West
Mooresville NC 28115
Subject: Application No. AWC800013
Additional Information Request
Scott Davis Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
Dear Scott Davis:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 29, 2000:
1. The options for best management practices are not noted on your insect, odor, and mortality management
checklists.
2. Please contact your technical specialist to fill out the enclosed emergency action plan. Keep a copy for your
reference and submit two copies to be included with your permit package.
3. Operation and maintenance plan for your facility is missing.
4. Owner's signature is missing on signature page of your waste utilization plan.
5. Irrigation parameters 9application rate and amount) are missing in your waste utilization plan.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before June 29, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
JR Josh'
Non -D' charge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

two
= NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
i•NCDENR DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
f'
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 16, 2000
T' BILL HOLMAN
-SECRETARY
Scott Davis
6935 Hwy. 152 W.
Mooresville, NC 28115
-"KERR'T STEVENS": -
DIRECTORT,*:x..'•-
�r, Subject. DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
= Davis Farm, Facility #: 80-13
Rowan County, NC
- Dear Mr. Davis
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
March 24, 2000. Based on his observations made during the inspection the facility
appeared to be in good shape and the files appeared to be complete. Enclosed
please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
Please note that the pump marker in the storage pond needs to be adequately
marked. Also, schematic of the irrigation layout for Tract 792, field number one is
needed.
_ If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
' . contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
- Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
�.+. �-"
... • y i . �
T
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA ,28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
..-. FT,� ,�,�T-, •_'„•�
AN EOLAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Y .13 Division.of Soil and WaterConservation-Operation Review , ; ti?^ti
13 Division�of Soil and Water Conservation - Com'plianceInspectioa
Division of water Quafiity - CompHance Inspection
i�ency PpeldtiDn Review
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow -un of D«'Q insoection 0 Folioµ -up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility ?slumber Date of Inspection/ G-'
s Time of Inspection ,'U .''.4 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted Gr -Certified BConditionalh, Certified 1] Registered Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm [Name: ..... - 4 �C• 41'x... Counti•• .......-!4tk-1 .......................... .I.......-............
Owner dame:... i Phone No ....... .. ........................
Facilir - Contact: ...................................... ..... Title: Phone No: ............................
`failing Address:.... -------_- 75?.� i . 5 z. '%4 vY�= 5.' e— ....................... l 11
Onsite Representative:.. .G Q........C:Sr-.....5............ lnterrator............................. ............. _.....
i
Certified Operator: .......... ---L.Q0..[.].................... ......... D.Q......1..5 Operator Certification Number: ....^..o..I
Lit
Le,c n of" Farre: — —
�1"
Laf I • j I I Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Sµ'ine Capacit%, Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
j. 'wean to :-ender j j Laver
j] Ftedcr to Finish ! 0 Ivnn-Lave- j h Non -Dairy
I J Farrow- to Wean j I
�J Farrow to Feeder �� Other I
IJ arrO'A' to Finish j Total Design Capacity
I,—, Gilts j I
{G Bo:.rs Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons Li Subsurface Drains Present 0 Laggoon Area Spray Field Are;
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps L �JI No Liquid W'a_ste Management System
Discharges & Stream imnact_e
i. is any discharge obs. --,,ed from any pan of the operation?
Disaharec ari,inaud a.: ❑Lagoon i Spray yield = Other
a. if disch!rL-e is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. it discharrye IS observed. gild tt rale;, Watcr of the State? (If vcti. nodf v DWQ)
1` dis,_!)arp is observed. what is the estimated flow in t*alimin?
d.
Dms discharge bypass a lagoon sysiem? {If vcti. notify, DWQ)
=. is there evidence of oast discharge from any pan of the operation."
_. Were titer-. any adverse impacts or potenItal adverse impa;:is to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
«Vast-. Colleciion L. Treatment
. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm. storage) ie ss than adeauaie? 5zi-spillway
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
idcnii i icr:
Freeboard (inches;: ...........7Z........... .................................... ....... ............................
=. Art there anv immediate threats to the integrity of am of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion,
seepa6P, etc.)
3i 23!99
❑ Yes &No
El Yes ] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
El Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes $I No
(E Yes X1 No
❑ Yes )�] No
Structure 6
Yes .,N o
Continued on back

cility \"ur<,hcr: — ISI Date of 1n5pcctinnPrinted on: 4/24/�p00
5.
Are there any immediate threats to the inte2rity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes ,Vo
seepage, etc.)
6.
Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste manahement or
closure plan?
❑ Yes 9No
fIf any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance!improvement?
❑ Yes 3 No
S.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes X No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate. ;auged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Yes El No
% a.ste Anolicabon
l0.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes �Io
1 i
. Is there evidence of over a plication? El Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes ❑ No
12.
Crop type 1 G.4 4 a
!3.
Do the receiving crops differ with those desig ated in the Certified Animal Waste Nlanagement Plan (CAWIMP)?
❑ Yes Si No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Id.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes �Vo
16.
Is there a Iack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes /RNo
Renuired Records & Dncuments
17. Eaii to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ,-No
S. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste' Management Plan readily available.'
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps. etc.) ❑ Yes LY%N, o
le. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes > No
=0. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 10sNo
? 1. Did the faciiity fail to have a acti;eiy certified operator in chargs? El Yes E ktio
22. ;Oil to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/discharge, freeboard probiems. over application) ❑ Yes IC, No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes .ANO
3-'.. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �SVo
''5. Were anv additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWNIP? ❑ Yes QNo
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes \No
S. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ YeSANo
roads. building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes o
31. Do the, animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? [:]Yes �LNO
3=. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or
liquid level o oon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead anima disposed of properly within 24 hour .
fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during d application? i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property
29. is the land application spray system intake no kited near uid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance proble with the ventilation fan(s) noted. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperab utters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed sto ge bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tagK lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑Ivo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
{ nn
06.
SIW CA1I I -e-C AC- C&-
r
3123199

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Scott Davis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Highway 52 West
Mooresville NC 28115
Dear Scott Davis:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 3D, 1999 N.Q vr't- . or
ZNVntONMFNT. HEALTH
•
NATURAL RE150URCEq
JAN 5 2n00
MIN OF ENV 111!NMOTAL MANAMM
VORE&VILU REGlt'Jllkl RHE
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 80-13
Rowan County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699,1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

lz-�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 29, 1999
Scott Davis
6935 Hwy 152 W.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Scott Davis Farm, Facility #: 80-13
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Davis:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
October 26, 1999. In general, the facilty appeared to be in good shape; however you
need to ensure that the goats used to maintain the vegetation on the storage pond do
not overgraze the embankments.
Please note that during many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that
some farms are often missing one or more components of the farm plan that should
be available for review. The following items must be available for review by the
inspector during the inspection:
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed
areas.
• Waste Application records, with accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan, tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of
waste produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three.years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
40 Emergency Action Plan which must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
2 0 I 0
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone]FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% PO T -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of
Violation or other enforcement actions. AIso, remember that waste applications should be made
during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be
applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
2,- c -LA
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File

1,YI Ionj6:f S6jj!"d'Water COIISCCYatlon Qp-Er AtlOn R�VACW r: ti„e fir ..: M , -;
•:is :; _i$p€ Ail
E „3E.:i�' Ci•'y&t�i,6 }.�`•
r i,a , • , ©, Dinsion�of So ;a'nd, Water Coiise,i• anon ; Com AianceInspectton a F a
�.. r. •2 a E sE'j:E �r .�,. ,.: tt' Pv ..C.:,r�, ';,tt! s`, r➢ tits :i,'.E,',:.,;¢...f r, !ti,• ar7' x rr t €, q L@
1Division o' Water aliY ComtlhanceTns on E • ; r#� ” r f: I�' o�
AWA
�..� h •� i�sef ? ..,g_ +ayirrs er [i f.. if
ec
bL
ja'©}}��er;GnCjra O(Ier8t1011 R@xVIeW �f i €�1 �� r j i,x 7i� 3' (r.- i#t
��I,.x."kf i
Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other J
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[„j Permitted [] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified Q Registered No O rational Date Last Operated
..........................
Farm Name: .............>..l <-.0..1� ...................... County: ............ .................
Owner Name: CcS. T......... ............................................. Phone No: ....7......rr...�6-4....................
.....
Facility Contact: ......................................................... ................. Title : Phone No.
Mailing Address: ..... �p.�l...?.. ,....... j..................... .... e,................................
✓?rra... ,.1..
Onsite Representative:...... G.p..,� . �/: ............ Integrator: .....................
................................................................. //
Certified Operator:. ............ talp'll ................... .... ;3........ ... Operator Certification Number:.....,, ,��, L.......
Loc*15'6on of Farm:
�11=O
.... ....... ............ ...... ................................................................. i
atitude ' =` =11 Longitude • 6 66
Design Current
DeA9&. Current " `` Desi n'` Current
g
Swine . r h
Ca acct .:Po `"ulation Poulfi
" Y.
,.
Cattle , 9rA 2 ��
y : .4
Ca acit` Po ulation.` _ ,,, _ _ Ca" aci " Po'" anon
E] Wean to Feeder Layer
Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish Y�' Non -Layer
El
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other �
I i
., ani, ..�t•s��r
Total Design Gapactty' ;
=A
i
e} 'Total SSLW ,
-Lagos �� r y` ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Ar ea
Number ofon
HoldPonds I Solid Traps
Ing r ❑ No
„ ._ �.
Liquid Waste Management System �::•� } A� _ _�r�,i° �'�E .:
Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ CilhS
Fri Boars '
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon E] Spray Field E] Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d..Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ............. i i,D.......,..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes � Na
❑ Yes ❑ Na
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes API
❑ Yes kINo
Structure
Yes] No
Continued on hack

C
t
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
0
corres�6yideit+'e. about: this :visit: . • . • .. • . • . • . • . • ...... ..................... .
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Coniirnents {refer fo questwon #} `Explatri any•YES answers and/or any,recommendationsiori;any other con meats ,,i# T`�
Use drawings of facility to better''.'xplam'situations (use.additi6naltpag6s as��ecessary)
closure plan?
❑ Yes
)Q No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
C0►'i{{ Grei� D+— &': t' pe_ teak' b12aNtn b-� q �.
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
1� OVA
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
nNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
�Q No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
WNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Mo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Wo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
J4No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
OKNo
Required Records & DOCLIments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
XNo
18. Does. the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
bdNo
(icl WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
KNo
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
4No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
KNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
4 No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
i&No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
&Nci
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
4 No
bio Vlolhtigris:or• defciendic s •*ere hbted during �this'visit: - Y:ou w* •ree�iy0 Bio; i.urthi r
corres�6yideit+'e. about: this :visit: . • . • .. • . • . • . • . • ...... ..................... .
Coniirnents {refer fo questwon #} `Explatri any•YES answers and/or any,recommendationsiori;any other con meats ,,i# T`�
Use drawings of facility to better''.'xplam'situations (use.additi6naltpag6s as��ecessary)
k:M'��
1 aiyyy,
/�
�.Pat,
c, �c `� dex s ke- 0�— e -r- • L
C0►'i{{ Grei� D+— &': t' pe_ teak' b12aNtn b-� q �.
1� OVA
Reviewer/Inspector Name :rg71o<at
i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3123199

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes �Wo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �lo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes,lClo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes-<LlNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Ycs�iVa
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes�o
itiona omments an ,or raw►ngs. ,
• ,,., ..es.. , �.• .� i .., d f'r
3/23/99
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 14, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
_ T C REQUESTED
Scott avis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Highway 52 West
Mooresville NC 28115
Farm Number: 80 -13
Dear Scott Davis:
A61'T?W'A
IT4 0 2
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Scott Davis Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must apply
for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm
has six 60 da s to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance
with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or.
operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department SHALL NOT
OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be returned
within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also
subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated
following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535'
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
zSince
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

l
,��.NC©ENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR "i.;,±' ,
- .OVERNOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 23, 1998
Scott Davis
6935 Hwy 152 W.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Subject: Site Inspection
Scott Davis Farm, Facility #: 80-13
Rowan County, NC
Dear Mr. Davis:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste_ applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the Feld.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE 704-GG3-1698 FA%704-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
en al Recommendations fbTNitroaen M A lication for Common o s:
• Small Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be -applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the com is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (112) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half -(1/2) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -S wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond waspumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventionaltillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely tum around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to $) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
pi6iducer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E. \.1
Water Quality Regional. Supervisor
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

[3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [] Other Agency -
division of Water Quality
W*outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-upof DAV Q inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number -5-5 Date of Inspec6on -
I Time of Inspection I ZzVO 124 hr. (hh:mm)
.................
13 Registered 0-Gertified. [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 10 Not 0ecrational Date Last Operated: ..........................
............. .................
County:...............1 .................................
Farm Name . .............. 5 // ....... � ...........
OwnerName.........: qtf . ........... ��.5 ................................................................. Phone No........ ..................................
FacilityContact: .................................. . ............. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address . ..... ....... . . . ........... ...... ...................................
Onsite Representative ............. L. is ............... 7 ..................................... Integrator: .......................................................................................
Certified J_�Z.14.5
................................................. Operator Certification Number,,2_Q...?..Lfi .............
Location of Farm:
4� ......... ..... /'.;� ... ....... ............................................
Longitude I ;�:w 66
Latitude0 , a�] I g__O_ - A e, - eA s
I
wore
ifie
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
so
Z 0 Gilts
§ 0 Boars
,.Current, Design : Current
Popubtiofi, ",.Poultry :: Population. Cattle
J
EMMI
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: E] Lagoon [I Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galh-nin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
[:]Yes )KNO
0 Yes K"*, 0
[3 Yes 0 No
[I Yes [I No
C1 Yes [I No
• Yes ANo
• Yes 0%N0
E-1 Yes 19 No
• Yes�NO
• Yes IkNo
Continued on back

IX:acilit}:Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
St_ructures_f1 at;oons•,-boldine fonds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes 'o
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ...............1t....... ..................................,.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes KNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes &'o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes KNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes KNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes N0
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Crop type ... �-/ 7_en-yrl........................ ....................................................................................................................
15. Cro a ........... ....... .............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes V] No
❑ Yes @ No
❑ Yes 0 No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yrs gcso
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes Wo
For certified or Permitted_ Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW,MP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0: No.vialutions; or deficiencies. were, no'te'd, during' this: visit..You.will receive no further
Oerespandeke about this'.visit::
..., x ,-..t.. ,,,7 . , .
#& -*v lseeds !b AmLle— c,% e c�C
5 kvC_ COV -V% 5t (aeis
d
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes QNO
LGh ioc 6 e-,
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:r„�.� j� _ Date: F
"
1:5
Ll �t
I t Qin
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes QNO
LGh ioc 6 e-,
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:r„�.� j� _ Date: F

r;
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Scott Davis
6935 Hwy 152
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Davis:
INELM _��z
AV=% Omm"Wooft a
[DEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 25, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Scott Davis Farm, Facility 0: 80-13
Rowan County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on March 20, 1997 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are
indicated in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible.
Your facility was in good condition. If technical assistance or financial assistance is needed, please
contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. Also,
please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day
per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations. If
you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Glon, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Rowan SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, 16 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/100k post -consumer paper

D:DSWC'Animal Feedlot 'Operat>lon Review ` s
MDWQ Animal Teedlot Operation Site 1n5pectiola
h.
Routine 0 Complaint O Follow -u2 of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC reviciv O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection (' Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status: —S_E�_ - Total Time (in hours) Spent onReview
or Inspection (includes travel and processing) Q
Farm Name:»_ o LT....� �'`�'. ..... ......W...».__..... .._ County:..".....u?j...._"..".........._..»........._...._..
Owner Name:.." SGC> ...... GCJr._S ........ _. __.". Phone
Mailing Address: » 1 ...� �....� lel... W ...__ .... Q r SfGlLe............
OnsiteRepresentative: __....... ......».............................. _.... ................. Integrator :........... .__...... _..... "W.... ..... ...._ ...._._....._
Certified Operator: _....._..._."...... ......... _ ..... _ Operator Certification Number: _. ....................... .._.............
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 6 is Longitude 46
© \'ot Operational Date Last Operated : ...... ...... _ .... ".......... ...... ._............. ....... _.....__...... ." ............ ...................
Type of Operation nod Design Capacity
{ $q/Ex. � {K •� •k
� yt .i �f
Swine = { .Number a:IPoultry
xr .Number Cattle
❑ Layer fr 0
❑ Wean to Feeder'
a'
�✓ :ec q x
10 Non Laver ❑ Beef
❑ Feeder to Finish
V_:F
FaiTow to Wean`
Farrow to Feeder
..,,.
�<'- � ❑ Other Type of Livestock <
w
Fa w to Finish
.
Number of Lagoons /Holding Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present,,
e € ....... . x
x �Y�> �tF ;> ❑ :�, � �; ri ��,� >�.� � �� � �x F r � :� Lagoon o n Area R�� ❑ Spray Field Area
eneral
L Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [XNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes &kNo
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. 1s there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back
5e--.

7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 111/97)?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures LLalzoom and/or HoldinL Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Frceboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon ?
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(I€ any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Lagoon 3
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste ARDlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or
runoff' entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 70 crop
15. Crop type . 5..{......._ .............
._ .... ....
16. Do the active crops differ with.those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
,- , 1%.1 026111V
❑ Yes CB:No
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ Yes
[j No
Lagoon 4^
❑ No
y -'
❑ Yes
g No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
D(Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Q No
as e -,--e
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only lV/#
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Pian in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
2R No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comineats (refer to question #) Explain any YES answets and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings .of facility to better ex lain: situatlons- � use additional a espasttieces n =.
4
00er a// uses •'�. ��� s ��,
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3 Zd
cc: Division of ii ate.r Quality, Water Quality Secti , Fariiity Assessment Unit 11/14/96

;e
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Scott Davis
Rt. 3, Box 497
Mooresville, NC 28115
Dear Mr. Davis:
,t f,
1DEHNR
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Scott Davis Farm, Facility #: 80-13
Rowan County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management pian. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street,N%")CAn
FAX [phone]o
Mooresville, North Carolir.c 28115 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 500% recycied/10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. &Qon,
Water Quality gional Supervisor
cc: Rowan SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _,.
Facility No.I-•i S
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �, 1995
Timedb
Farm Name/Owner: SCe L_� PRvI�
Mailing Address: _- &93S— Yk3 a 1.5Z nunjr /,L 10 C 2," -
County: "-
County:
On Site Representative:
Phone: 41V�_ KAXIA&X
Physical Address/Location:T I� Z _L � uN JC�? ,
Type of Operation: Swine--__-Poultry_Cattle .!Design Capacity:�Number of Animals on Site:M
Latitude:
Longitude:
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
'(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: t. ' Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oFg) Was any erosion observed? Yeso<9
Is adequate land available for spray?� or No
w
Crop(s) being utilized:
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 5>r No
100 Feet from Wells ? e or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes 015
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or�
Is animal waste discharged into waters -of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or& If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes,
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name JA v, LesLet, Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit 0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
IDEHNFR
N.G. DEPT. OF
Scott Davis ENVSFONNIFNT, HF,'aT.Tlf
Scott Davis Farm 8a NATURAL
Rt 3 Box 497
Mooresville NC 28115 I)fC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Scott Davis Farm DIVISION DF EN1 iCOdlt[iAl L,A"1,1G[ftEll1
Facility ID #: 80-13 UllORESYILIE REGIMAL OFFICE
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Davis:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files AW
Water Pollution Control SystemNNMf
W0.4 Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certifleatlon Commission C.
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

KEI W
-i- AA
RCDEN R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Qualify
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director D
r
April 27, 2009
Dan A. Hunsucker
Hunsucker Farms LLC
3216 John Daniel Dr.
Conover, NC 28613
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWC 180013
Hunsucker Farms LLC
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Hunsucker:
APA 2 9 =
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has completed a
preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is required before we
may continue our review. Please address the following items within 30 (thirty) days of receipt of this letter:
The name of the owner in your permit application is different than the name on your existing certificate of .
coverage (COC) for the general permit. Please fill out the attached Change of Ownership Form and -submit
to my attention at the address. given on the form. A blank copy'of this form can also. be downloaded
form the following web link: ;
litti)://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ans/afou/documents/ChaiivcofOwnershi135-2-07.doc
D
-Please be aware� that: you are responsible -for meetingall%requirements set�forth in North Carolina rules and _
regulations.-Any.oversights that occurred in the!review of the subject application package are still the. 'S=
responsibility of the applicant.: In addition,. any omissions made in responding to the above items shall result in .:
future requests for additional information.:
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised and/or
additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted to my attention at the
address below. Please note that failure to provide this additional information on.or before the above requested
date may result in your application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Catawba County Soil dnd Water Conservation District
APS Files- AWC180013
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.newaterguality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Sincerely,
Miressa D. Garoma
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
NNo `hCarolina
aturally
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
Customer Service: [phone]

Scott Davis
Scott Davis Farm
6935 Highway 52 West
Mooresville NC 28115
Dear Scott Davis:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Ouality
May 1, 2003
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800013
Scott Davis Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
On April 28, 2003, .the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality. (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Scott
Davis, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number.AWC800013 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Scott Davis Farm, located in Rowan County, with an aminal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
4
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the'facility.
NnEN—R
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143--
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish .to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A namelownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit,.please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000) NCS
. OF ENV"MEW
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section 1WQRESVDA E REGIONAL OFFICE
IVED
Rowan County Health Department ' RECF-
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District' °.
w
Permit File AWC800013 : , WAY 1 9 2003 ?,1
NDPU FilesA

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Renewal of Existing Certificate of Coverage for State Non -Discharge Permit
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please review the information for
completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division, please
answer it to the best of your ability. Do not leave any question unanswered.
1 Facility Number.: 80 - 13 or Permit Number: AWC800013
2 Facility Name: Scott Davis Farm
3
Landowner's name (must match the name on the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan): Scott Davis
4 Landowner's Mailing address: 6935 Highway 52 West
City, State: Mooresville NC Zip: 28115
` -rti
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-857-7364
5 Couny where facility is located: Rowan
6 Farm Manager's name (if different from Landowner):
7 Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):,
8 Number and Type of Animals: (example: 2000 Feeder to Finish Swine)
Cattle: 200 Dairy
Submit a copy of the most recent Waste Utilization Pian with this application. The Waste Utilization Plan must be signed by
the owner and a technical specialist.
I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all
required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,
this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-
215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil
penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Printed,Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a corporation
signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name:S' [d_,�7��/0� - Title: _ r
Signature: �fj��/��� Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
Request for Renewal COC

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Scott Davis
Location: 6935 Highway 52 West Moores of Ile, NC
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy 80-13
Number of Animals: 200
(Dedp amity)
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial. fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates,
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when th
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should alsq/be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste "should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based_ on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 21-1.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and / or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report fiom your
waste management facility.
ty'
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 200 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Lot runoff and urine will be collected in the waste storage pond and land applied with a
hard hose traveler irrigation system.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ftp, tons, etc.)
200 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 180 (number of days) x__D (% confinement
time) = 567,000 gal. of wastelyear.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PANT Produced Per Year
200 animals x 69 lbs. N/animallyr = 13,800 lbs. Total N from lot
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every 6 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
93.7 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Cali the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This operation has 102.8 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation of corn cut for
silage , followed by small grain. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the realistic yields at
the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Rye Grass/Hay: Feb.-May/Sept.-Oct. at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days
before planting.
Sudex/Hay: April -Aug. at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 110 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 Ibs of N/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Parts of Home tract (tract 105) will be irrigated with a hard
hose traveler. The acreage of all irrigated fields has been reduced by 25%. Maintain all
waste handling equipment in accordance with manufactures specifications. The system
should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage and proper system.
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and levet of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to `Buffers" required by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
6

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
F

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement. the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new, animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER:-
(Please print)
Signature: Date: 7 -2,0
Name of Manager (If different from owner): _!r Z_Z�T ,� ,
��
Signature: 45*'
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) 'R:EBr OCE:� i DE D _
Affiliation: P—C
Address (Agency): z-7 Z 7- C_ 01© L' Q&co V__CD 1?0
Signature:
S P, I" 6v 1 , /--)c SBL �
8
: % - r_g 7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his
Waste Utilization System on acres if my land for the duration of time
shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I
also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial
fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer:
Date:
Technical Representative:
Date:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Term of Agreement: , 19 to _ 20
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
0

PRODUCERS NAME Scott Davis
Date 617199
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP
Realistic
YIELD Lbs.N per Ac. ACRES Lbs. N Utilized
Month Appllied
19211 1"
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
19.9
3,980
April - August
1 •
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
19.9
2,985
Feb-MaylSept-Oct
2
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
3.8
760
April - August
2
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
3.8
570
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
3
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
4.0
800
April - August
3
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
4.0
600
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
4
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
4.0
800
April - August
4
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
4.0
600
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
5'
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
7.3
1,460
April -August
5'
Pacolet
Rye Grassi Hay
3
150
7.3
1,095
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
6'
Pacolet
Pasture / Fescue
3
110
4.3
473
March - May / August - October
7"
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
1.9
380
April -August
7•
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
1.9
285
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
9'
Pacoiet
Pasture / Fescue
3
110
2.3
253
March - May / August - October
10
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
2.5
500
April - August
10
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
2.5
375
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
11 •
Pacolet
Pasture / Fescue
3
110
8.2
902
March - May / August - October
12
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
2.3
460
April - August
12
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
2.3
345
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
13
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
1.5
300
April - August
13
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
1.5
225
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
14
Pacolet
Hayland / Fescue
3
150
3.0
450
March - May / August - October
15
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
7.0
1,400
April -August
15
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
7.0
1,050
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
16
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
12.7
2,540
April - August
16
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
12.7
1,905
Feb-May/Sept-Oct

792 1
Pacolet
Sudan Hay 4
200
14.7
2,940
April - August
1
Pacolet
Rye Grass/Hay 3
150
14.7
2,205
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
9
Pacolet
Sudan Hay 4
200
3.4
680
April - August
9
Pacolet
Rye Grass/Hay 3
150
3.4
510
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
TOTAL 102.8 31,82a lbs.
Pasture lands Nitrogen rates have been reduced by 25°%. TOTAL N PRODUCED 13,800 lbs.
18,028 lbs. DEFICIT OF N
` NOTE Field Acerage has been reduced to ,reflect wettable acres under Irrigation

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Scott H. Davis
Address: 6935 Highway 152 West
Mooresville, NC 28115
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE 1 — FIELD SPECIFICATIONS
County: Rowan
Date: May 31, 1996
Field
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Usable Size
Of Field
(Acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop (s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
(In/Hr)
Maximum`
Application
per
Irrigation
Cycle
Inebes)
I
19.86
Pacolet
3-8
Com/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.441.40
5
7.26
Pacolet'
3-8
Com/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.441.40
6
4.32
Pacolet
3-8
Fescue
0.35
.30
7
1.97
Pacolet
3-8
Com/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.441.40
9
2.34
Pacolet
3.8
Fescue
0.35
.30
11
8.20
Pacolet
3-8
Fescue
0.35
.30
*This is dairy manure storage pit wastewater with a nitrogen content of approximately 7.4 pounds of
PAN/ I 000 gallons. Mr. Davis will apply to land prior to planting small grain for silage and prior to planting
corn silage or grain sorghum if he elects to use grain sorghum for his summer silage, but he needs to add
grain sorghum to his Waste Utilization Plan. He can apply 75 to 100 pounds of PAN to his grain silage and
140 to 170 pounds of PAN to his corn or grain sorghum silage. He needs to redo his Waste Utilization Plan.
He should apply the nutrients to his spring silage crop in two applications. He can probably apply up to 120
pounds of PAN to fescue. Apply half the PAN in the fall and half in the spring. Apply the wastewater in
a split application to his corn silage or grain sorghum and also to his fescue hay crop.
DAVTH IFS

DATE: 05-13-19M
Sott Davis
Dairy Waste Storage StnxhJre
Rowan, NC
Design Criteria:
200 Dalry cows at 1,40D lbs. each = 28000 Ibs. live weight
180 days storage
5 gal./day/cow of wastewater
15,000 sq. ft of non -pond Drainage Area
Waste from Freestail area and access allays will be scraped and stored
In the waste storage pond, as well as the runoff from
approximately 15,000 sq, ft of the barns, lot and silos.
1. Storage Volume Required
A. Manure Storage with 75% confinement
200 cows X 14.6 gaUldaylcow X
180 days
52,701 cu. ft
7.48 galslcu.ft.
B. Waste Water from M k Liam
200 cows X 5 galJdaylcow, X
180 days
24,064 cu. ft
7.48 gatslcu.tL
C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 180 days
Drainage Areas =16,888 sq. ft.
1 day CN 98130 day CN 92
Monthly
Monthly
Months Procip. (P) (h;hes)
Evap. (E)
P - E
Runoff (inches)
OGaber 3.21
2.56
0.65
2.37
November 2.94
1.83
1.11
2.12
December 3.56
1.1
2.48
2.69
January 3.72
1.1
2.62
2.85
February 3.78
i.B3
1.95
2.9
March 4.61
2.92
1.69
3.71
21.82
10.48
16.64
16.64 runoff Inches X
15,000 sq, ft
20,800 cu. fL
12 inches / ft
D. Waste Feed and Bedding
10 cu. ft / day X
180 days 1,800 cu. ft.
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED 98,365 cu. ft

- Add to fiquld Volume -
11. Normal (P) Precipitation less (E) evaporation on Structures for 180 days
October - March 10.48 Inches a
0.9 ft.
Ill. 25 yr. storm on Open Area of 15,000 sq. ft.
CN = 95 for open areas
With 25 yr. 1 day strom of 6.0 inches, runoff - 5.41 Inches
15,000 sq. ft X 5.41 Inches runoff
6.763 cu. ft.
12 inches
6,783 cu.ft.
0.4 ft.
15,470 sq. ft. surface area of storage pond
IV. 25 yr. storm on Pond Surface
25 yr.1 day storm a 6.0 Inches
0.5 ft
V. Emergency Spillway
25 yr. 1 day storm - 6.0 Inches
Peak discharge v 3.2 da.
Use ESW with 12 ft. bottom wklth.
3 to 1 side slopes, 0.2 ft. stage
0.2 tt.
V1. Freeboard
1.0 ft.
Vll. Total Depth of Pond 8 feet of storage
10.14 ft.
142,811 designed amount
106,127 amount needed
36,684 amount surplus

SJR- PO..;J
Dairy f=arm Waste Management Ocior Control Cheddist
_tiIII rrc Cause 11hil's Irl 1ltillimite Odill. She Specific prarlires
I::lelltalc,lll- + Dairy produciinu n Vegetative or ►vnnllcd boll' is T
C7 Recomillendell best Ina{r+l;cincoi praclices
VC;ood judgmcnl and common sense
l'.Ivc,l lllls or halo Alley 9 Wei nwoure-covcrcd surfaces R4 Scrape or flush daily
sllrlhces
n I'rnnlnlc dlyiq with proper vemilatiou
n Itouliuc checks and mainien:lllce nn waterers,
hydrants, pines, stock funks
11c1h1c11 Lucas
tIFillc
W
Promote rllyinu wish proper vemilmiotl
•
i'artiul microbial decomposilinll
Iteplace wel or mamlre-covered bcd1liol;
bl,lllore dry bucks
•
Pallial microbial decompositilm
Provide liquid dminal;e ftlr sinred manure
Sloral;u uiuk rir basin
Partial microbial %iccomltosiliml ;
n
I)otlml or mm-Evo loadiuu
sul lace
hfixinL while filling ;
n
'rank covers
+
Agiumil{n when empiyhq;
fl lasin surface teals of solids;
hliuiinirc lol rimolf: nd liquid additions
Agiiall: only prior Io imumrc removal
n
i'niven hiulnl;ic al additives or nxid:u{Is
rSclilHlj; bw ill Sill INces
•
Pallial microbial deeomposllimi
6, draill:ll;e Tom seweii solids
•
klixinG while filhllu
OTipw
IY
Itellinve solids rt'l;lllarly
•
Agium,iii wllell cmplyhig
71.ulnlc• dully Ill ;lndI:l:
•
Agitation when spre:ulint;
n Soil illjeclitun ol'sln{ryZimi es
;p11:,lde{ Iunfcls
•
Volmile Gas ctuissio{Is
l
ilsll n:silliull nl:uuire I'mill aprc:uler aiier use
n
Proven bioingical :nlditives nr uxill,ulls _
11I11AjVCICd ulauulc,
0Volatile
gas emissions while
rl
Soil inieclion ol'shoty/sludl;cs
;lnrr} Ill lll{ IIe1d
drying
n
Soil incorporltinn %vilhin -1l1 his
Sul
f/
Spread in Ibin uniform layers !lir Lapid !!lying;
Proven biological addilivcs nr osidmiN
I'In;ll L,II pl —
Agilaliim ol'lecycled higoon
_n
n
Fhuh gull: salvers;_..-_..._- ..._---•-.....--- -----. ----_ _—. _ ---- _.
IY
blluld while t:ulks are filled;
n
I XICIIll fill !funs Ill heal IllYllitlll 11 I:IIILS With
Ili-Slllholl VL'lltY
Omt.ille lhain enilecii,ill
Agimfloo durinl; wastewmer
1111x Clams
ur juuclilm iinaes,
conveyallce
AN111{' - Illivcmlicr 11, NIlG, Page

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sit [IIe
_ Cause
_ — IIAIi's (u Control Illsecls SUC Specific I'lacliecs
Llquill Systems y�
I lush Guilds
• Accunitilalion ufsulids
G I -fish systent Is designed and operated ---
snllicicnlly to tciMI! accllnrulalcd solids Iloilo
gntlCls is (Icsiclic(I.
n Itcinuve IIIidging ol'accllirlllated solids al
_
(I.SCi((II�C
I-alplolls alill IBIS
f klSlCll �UIIIlS .�_
Maltlmill 11g11ons, scllliug Irisins and pits Micte
1)CSI 1)ICCllillg is appalcnl it) minimize tilt
cfillslin6 IIFsuims 1(1 a (iel)lll of Ito innic Niton G -
1tliclics avcr muic Ihall 30% of CIII lake.
Excessive Ve1;Clative
• Dccay ing veccUlll(Ill
Or Maininin vegelltivc Cunliol almigT Imiks of
Cilowth
lagouns lad other impomit Beals It) plevent
accitimilation ordCClyiltu vcaclativc 11111101'
aloilg lvatcl's C(Ice til illiputlildillclit's 11CI illICICI..
a lot ySylletlls
Frcllels • Fec(I Spillage E'9' lksign, upernlc ankl Inainfain fcC(I syslCllls (c.l;., —�- --- T--
limikeis and houghs) to minimize Ilse
cctimowian orticcaying wastage.
010;111 1111 SIIIII.1RC (111 a IalltmC blsis (e.g., 7 - 10
(lay i11tClvai dkn ilil; suilnlcr; ( 5.31) tlly inlcl v11
tl( ng winter).
Fccd Stmage A11'lmlt1.1lioll5 ul' Iced IcsidtlCS IZCIItlCC 11144SWIC ;Iccnlnulali(III willtin and
around iuutictliatc pci iincler (Ir recd storage
alms by insuring diaillal;c ahoy Frain site
;into/ur Iiovitliig aJcllullc conlihnitenl (c.£.,
cumed bin far bimm's giain aid similar Itigh
aisillic grain prnducls).
Inspcci for and iemove or htcak up accumulalcd
solids in tiller ships,mouitl feed sluragi: is
nMICtI.

11r111 cc
tanlsc I3111Ps lu Cuntrul 111SCCIS - Sile Specific Practices
Animal l luIdill Alclls
_
Accimmlatiuns ul'allimal 5raslcs I:lintinatc ((w atcas 111.11 It'll) llluislulc alum
:Illfl Il'Cd Srasl:It;C tcnces and Ober lucatlllns wheic waste
acC11111111,11cs -Ind dlimlirallce by H1111I1als 1s
Ilit11ltll.
r -V NNinlain kite Iu%vs alai 1111Cr strips alulnrd
animal holding atcas It? minimize
,accutntllatiulls of wastes (i.e.. Itlshccl ror and
1Clttuve or bleak Ili) acc11111111aled solids as
ICCdCfI�,
Ihy N11111111c I lalldlillg
ACCLItllullltiII11s fll :Illil11a1 WMICs CV licmavc spillage oil :I rlrulinc N sin (c.1;.. 7 - 10 �—
Systclns
day intclwd (Ili ling sutnlncr; 15-30 Jay interval
dining winicr} 5vllcrc ulanulc is luadcdfur land
%Illirlicaliun ur disposal,
Cr I'lavidc lily ntictli atc th-.6 age aluund mantic
st kpiics.
Itlshccl For and 1c111uvc or bicak tip accumitlaled
wasics in filler sitips around stockpiles mid
manure handling 111cas ns necdcd,
For nitae illlirnrlaliult curllacl Ilse LullpaatIve Fx1cllstlrl! Sclvice, Dclwtln1cr11 url:nlulrll logy, Ilux 7613, Not Ili Carulirla Slate Univcrsily,
101ci611, NC, 27695-7613,
AMIC - Nuvctnber 11. 1946, Page 2

-Mortality Management Nlethods
(check which method! j) are being implemented)
Burial three fee[ beneath the surface of the around within 3-1. hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 fe;.t from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Renderinz at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-163.7
Complete incineration
A),4 J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
�y approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
maize possible the salvage of part of a dead animaI's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December I S. 1996

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL. RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: Scott Davis Dai
DATE: 7/20/00
A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 93.7 At no time should the
effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 2.3 feet level below
the settled top of dam.
A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the darn and the emergency spillway.
The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back
slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be,
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment ----pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc. ---
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
( 180 days or 6 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ -794
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM o - 1611
SWCD 70 (03-7--.0 j$'3
NRCS 7 - 632-1 & og
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes frorty.our operation.. are leaking,. _.
overflowing, or running offsite. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessiblelocation for all employees at the
facility. The followingare some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application fieldactions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps_
December 18, 1996

'D: Leakage from flush systems; houses, solid separators-actioninclude:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump'.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs_
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators_
e. Repair all leaksprior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump. or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
,submersible pump; and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals"' trap of remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
C. Have a professional evaluate the conditionof the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.:
2.' Assess the extent of the spill andnote any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b.' Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damagZ
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e.- Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?.
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of_the. property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After howl, emergency. number. 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the ,
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and. the. seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters sutface waters,. call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department. .
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996

• 4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the.lagoon-(NRCS,-Consulting Engineer, etc) --
17V ,i
a. Name:
1j) E
b. Phone: 4, O
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

UNFFED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PROJECTIFARM: SCOTT DAVIS FARM
DATE: June 7, 1999
• Contact the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality - Winston-Salem Regional Office at (910)
771-4600 if the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am'and 5:00pm.
If the problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of North Carolina
Department of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of Emergency,
. Management - Raleigh at 1-800-662-7956 or [phone]. Provide the following
information:
—
FACILITY NAME: SCOTT DAVIS FARM
LOCATION: 6935 Highway 52 West
REGISTRATION/PERAUT # 80-13
• if there is danger to human life, downstream residences, roads, etc. call 911 of the
Rowan County Sheriffs Department at 636-1011
• Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond by applying waste water to nearby
irrigation fields if possible.
• Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off-site damage (list
the names and phone numbers of three below).
NAME PHONE NUMBER
1 L. P. Barger, Jr. 633-9693
2 jxLU Powell 278-0527 `
3- Kenny Williams 636-0686
• Contact the Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
at 637-1604
• Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond . If this
specialist is no longer working or is not available, contact another technical specialist
who has design anoroval such as the Area Engineer.
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
L.M. Safley Jr.
919-851-8528
Larry F. Graham
910-673-0487
J. Donald Matthis•
910-592-5519
Ll

j•.tli.i �r � tx `�^S 1w Fl � a� � cir%��i' 1tl-s_.� +•. � �� ��f',I'}V7�•'i � �"�'�,i-�I: �J .'i`i�- r ^'� S •�. ����� ,���J'� tie t, - - '� 1 `�� ' .. ' � •• :. .. .
�7, L. I9I �, t -•'••... �1 T ('� � i• 7 �;: /�/ �� Y'f.' � P' 'f �� ; a%� r. P Cr2 1 �. c' t ImV ' Z
i ! ,• F•'���-•� f�1. �, ,' .�Y" {�i". it �{I+. _Y. �, a) r.J •� -.
EM
�� ,Q A� „a •I' y +,i <1, le. iL�Cv- �veO� a.T fir, i+ ' � r{ 'Lp TA �
g BRAD R0.a "�.: c ! �f-f 1 . • j Y xey woOD p} y
ELEIINota� `sr
v lRE f 4 R SCH.°q��
F
�e g _'& STA. B I: , . `. 1 q�
iSHQ
} �4� BLUFF
%r,.. 1 sf rq! h VIIILSON +.t
i Yin- � Ni �• ,! � �� u'h'f. !�I[� �f, y4���. .H .,�I��y � Ol'��:h. FS L.
4' •' � Vj� `" �+i � �••. / N. ,� d1 �; � ; � 4 � ., "f,�y - �N�,`�• r 1r�� 4�,y� „s '/
l�
�Or•. , ti ,C,+< 4i, t •.�$OUTH N
IdW S H: •
ST.y y,' l rrjj
� 1 � � •o `f�,�i'csoAj?�.t'\'ta#id i+� Ors ir.I i' /� ,G
gc n ER
c
7 1t '- I • 52 \ 1r''� ay.-'�^'`" "r�' VE X21
, < C N INP
m S�H.� �: HI
LE ATW LL o �, x ; ! :v
RILE alzTs °' �'"s Q q (,,,'.1•ROLLINGW p GROVE•
C Lrx y kNiRp(FR O 4 �J� ' `'� i�;t+T�yGREEN 1; X 711 VE: (�
4� TwP. � �1• BAIA y , ,.Q�'. SEECMXASi I
Aj
DRRi1E
FIEL
TRA . C� �' 13;j IIS v } i5C �o .. BO)
A '�" 11' as R l �F
!c^
�+r FIR r
I:�..
Ra 4rag y G �Cp' ;:i` -a Sl SVpiS. o,.DIt
.•
B Ls S a t R; Nlb! z, @pal ' -� .. a,.
KARR+xE ARE EEOC Vllle �� ` c� 85 asr PIER,
ly
C0 RD. ��v Qw arR� ST r : ids j J ; OJ Q. KEYS. -J M`1t►SI
a,2 / �+ x. BCH C{•�. ,
CA ': s OLD .r g
Q'E E y { r'�
c >iY 0�E9 INSET im gyp. b:f y�. `xP � ,I F
tea: �KANNAPOLI
�c
'60CHVILCE FIRE I` ALT; ( -
_ D13T. 29
-- — _
0 ! 2 p
SCALE 'OF MILES -•C A B A i R R
'pyright 1995: Quality Maps, Inc.
CH AD 90 DDS WHITE DR. -....,,]8 CASTLH KEEP AD,...•,SD CORVELIUS ST ........ 9A DIXON DA............ 9B. ERNEST MILLER RD .... 40 FRENCH DELK 00......3C GP
1...........38 SOD WRITE RUN.......Io CASTOR Ao........... BO COAAELL AV .......... DODY DA ...... .......9D ERWIII TEMPLE CHURCH FRONTMA CIA....... •aB GP
YERLY RD.,., 3B UONDIC CIA .......... 3D CATAWDA DR..........4A CORRELL FARM RD ... ,.80 DOCK -SIDE ........... 6C AD......... ..2A PAY ST.............•7D GV
D.......... 10C BOST ST ............. 75 CATFISH RD......... 108 CORRIHER SPRGS R4 ... 7B DOGWWD AV,......... 7C ETHEAIDGE RD........ 2C FULLER CIR........ •• 4P GP
A...........9A 3p STAIN ST.......... 00 CAUDLE FARM RD ...... 4C COUNTRY CLUB DR.... LOA DOGWOOD OR....... 7S,7C F FULTON ST........... 4D CP
R.......,...4A 3AADSIIAW RD,......., 7A CEDAR AV............ 7B COUNTRY DR.......... 9D DOOLEY RD...:....... IA FAGOART CIA ......... SP G GM -
............48 BRADSHAW HOLLOW RD.,7A CEOARFIELD DR ....... BB MUMMY LN .... 4A,7A, 2D DGUBLE'THUKB RD ..... 9C FAITH AD............ 9A GAUIXORE RD........ 4A GL
M LN........21, OREN LN.............4A CEOAAMOOD DO ........ BA COUNTRY MEADOWS TA..BA DREAMFIELD DR ....... 2C FAIIHIE SLOAM RD ..... 3D GAAOEN LN ........... H
T RO........BA JReNTMOOD LH........2C CELANESE RD..........4A COUNTRY VILLAGE PR••4C DREW CIR............4C MAN DA....:........2C GAARICK RO.........•SA at
R RD.•, c, ,,. 4A SRIARFIELD OR.......7D CEMETERY CN RD......3C
Cox RD..............5D OAIP1'iI00D 2'R........6C FARM RD............. YD GATTON RD.........• ]H IB
KLUTT2 RD..SB 9AIARWOOD LAKE DA...4C CENTENARY AD ........ 3A CRAWFORD DR ......... 4C DUKE OR .......... FARMHOUSE•RD........ 4A GENEVA DR...........60 A!
.0........ I OD SRIARWOOD TEO.....,,4C CRAFFLH RD .......... 2A CRAWFORD RD......... SU DUKEVILLE AD..:....•SH FESPeANA11 RD...'.....9C GEORGE BROWN RD....•90 NS
'••5D BRIGGS RD ....... ..,.4C CHANDLER RD......... 4C CRESCENT RD.........9A DULIN AV............ 68 FIBER ACRES 'A' ST..IB GETER RD ............ 2A N!
..........
On......... 9A ERINGLE FERRY RD••.. SD CHAROLAIS DR.:...... 50 CRESS LOOP AD....... UA OUHNS MY" AD.... 5C,24D FIELOBROOK DR.. ... •.8H GIBSON RD.•••••• 4D A!
DR.....,,,.2D BROOK C IR........... 4A CHENAULT AD......... IA CRESS SCH RD........ 9A DUTCH FARM R0.......9C PIELDCRCST..........9A GIFFORD Ltl.......•.308 A:
OR........:50 BROORFSELO CIA OR., .aB CHEZ CHAROLAIS RO... SD CRESTVIEW OR........ EC E FIELDSTONE DR ....... 85 GIR RD ............. •9D R1
Lug AO ...... SO BROOKS RD ......... ,,9A CHI LDERS RD......... 2A CA CKETT LN......... 30 E CHAMBLEE DR ....... 4C FILE RD.............6C GLENN FAUST PP....••IC R.
LAN No ...... 3U SROWN ACRE RD ....... 9A CHILDRESS RD ......... ]C CROMER AD........ 90 E MENDENHALL RD.....9B FISH POND AO. ....... 9A GLOVER RD........... BB N.
AM RD...,'.IH yROWN RD .........
IB,3C CIIINA GROVE RP ...... BC CROOKED OAK LM ....... 7C eARNHARDT RD.....SC,8C FISHER DR ........... 9C GOODBY Ru....... ••••IA N.
N" .........7 9RO�A15 PARD RD ...... 4D CHOATE Ito ........ ••.SC CRUSE CIR...........BU EAST SIDE UR......,.6C FISHER RD...,., 9A GOLO rNOB RD........48 H.
. .....". en nnuxRp {LOOP RD ..... RC CIR DR........'. 4C, 8C •••••
•• CAUSE LN............BB EASTLAND DR .........
FLAT CRK CH.AD.....lOD OOLDPISD RD.........BC R.

. ..:�.+.4,....r±:•--�� _ 'n.. . • q.......�r.-�-.,.�_..r�...+.. ♦ wr .. - ..w,.w�.'� T--_-_ _ -.... �,.,...-r«..+......�:..`rw.+.`--_-�•.+.ww..T.,�i.�.�. �. --•... ^ •, -•T
�s.cCslner�C
• 1 '�fi1i tilSk1F � t�.
ry
- d b� d4.'u '�+'•C`si
P k y.%t8w.lW
!1 �31rc �t1Y! t
qo I
Y`

State of North Carolina Mc I&Y.1
WW'RONH�RNT.
Department of Environment b HaryRAL , ` •
and Natural Resources f/��(-5
Division of Water Quality I OCT 3 2000
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 0th+ is ExAmzw�tstet s
Bill Holman, Secretary 41"
NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURcEs
September 29, 2000
SCOTT DAVIS
SCOTT DAVIS FARM
6935 HIGHWAY 52 WEST
MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC800013
Scott Davis Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Scott Davis:
In accordance with your application received on July 8, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to Scott Davis, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Scott Davis Farm, located in Rowan County, with an animal
capacity of no greater than 200 Dairy cows and the application to land as specified in the Certified
Animal. Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). -
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC800013
Scott Davis Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
. If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in*this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
err T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate. of Coverage only for all cc's)
RoCounty Health Department
ooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Rowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files,
4�3
�
7 4f3
�g 2,3
-4- �, e-1 a -D �tp�,

State of North Carolina Sr
Department of Environment and Natural Resources PJU�, ���i0,v
Division of Water Quality 0 81999
{THIS FORM
Non-Discharge
AZY BEP OTOCOPIED FOR Permit ication Form USE AS AN ORIGINAL) Non D'S�f'Qrgo pp
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations ""'lvv
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Scott Davis Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Scott Davis
1.3 Mailing address: 6935 HighwaY52 West
City, State: Mooresville NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-857-7364
1.4 County where facility is located: Rowan
Zip: 28115
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): On Hwy. 152 near Rowan Iredell County Line
between Union Church Rd. and Deal Rd. Past Concordia Church Rd. heading east.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/89
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 80� (county number); ___L3_(facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Dairy
200- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? Ryes; F—Ino. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum num er or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 1 of 4 80-13

0- <
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system); 55.8 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 44
2,4 Number of lagoons storage ponds circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES orO� please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or O' (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED I'T'EMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and jj
field locations where animal waste is land applied;, /��/
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have peen required at the time the facility was certified but should he added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
33.10 A site schematic.
3.3.1 1 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 2 of 4 80-13

Facility Number: 80 - 13
Facility Namc: Scott Davis Farm
WA TEP
Q � CEO
�S6CTIC),V
foul 0 8 ►99g
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: 1V0n-D,,,har9e pe its
1, p� a 141 ,9fk d/S (Land Owner's name listed in quest'7& 1.2), attest that
this application for Se- 0 & �� r�,`, � j -g,4; � (Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature - �' Date 7 ! `�
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128/98 Page 3 of 4 80-13

I'
Animal Waste Management Plan Certification �
" (pICa5: ::,c or print all in;Crr:atian ti;a docs nc::ec fir_ 2 si c...._.
f6
F-xistin2 or or Expanded (Please circle one)
General information: nn J
Fora: Loc_^;ra1:. Ccu,' rales i5 1Cc_t:d in: '1506� --
c= _nd Lcr.ce 1 BIZ 30
F _. ,-41 3 C L;i:'� ,.: :il ,C+'iii7 C_: QTl ]O ..ti:i2�/ ni / i:_ .. G.'
_ e.'�ts7 S:.=C:J:1C: SV�L
,' /� �eAetJ ��/�SJj�
-Z - -
Ooerotion Desmotion:
;oe or S,r:re :�'a. oi.-ni:.._rs T% -::e or ?�u':.- ,ti'o. vi.:-it-=rs T -pe ai' C�::?r �'c. or -- .._ .�
:0 . -___. _ i fir._ goe
-_c__, 10 . finis.`.
= a to Wt :.n
_
Fa. -70v.' to . Irt:sn C/:Cer !::e
?r2r;aus Des: -r. caoac:,- Alcciroral Desna
o,cI Desi?1: CG. cc;,
,.Cieacp A ±I_Li= for A-aulication: P:Cuire'' A.C:C2c" T T
Numbf-^ Of L._!Zc.C,= / StOiCCt ?ands 1 Tot --i Cacac;c-v -!K-// _ C.] IC F.'.'.: (ii=�
subsuiiacz! 2i,ns present on the IaYES Or 0 (pie—-_ C:rCi-- One)
Ii YES. arc subsa„ace drai.r!s present in the :rca of the LAGOON or SPRAT FIELD (pie=s! circ'.-_ one)
Xf,x..a. a.......=Zxxx. .xX X r a... w%Xxac. .. x..x ..........
Owner/Manager Agreement
I cc=fv that ail th_ abovc inic=atica is corrcc: ar.d will be upon c ar.sir.a ] (-e) undccs=,c, :..c op`.—=on
maintcr=ce 0recc__7-_5 establish-_.. in the aCoroVtd aniaa] Was:_ arias-_ctcnt _� . .the ;arm r,3red above and will
1,—,c1 -_:;teal thcsc prc:cdures. I (,. c) ,pow that =v c ;Car,sion to the ;:sting design caC_c:ty of the was;- treatment and
5:0ra?e st'S:_`t o. :.=5i. uC:ICn of nv; iae:iiiits 'Till L=uirz a .. =-,i :CSticn IC subl-lt]tt^_6 t0 -, :t Divisicn of
M_--..agtm=v tht nvx antmnis —_ iiCcKc... I ('a'e; :r.c_:s'W^C ii.at :i.::C -lIsi no G:sC +2.C_4^_ of=',—_,j
Csie i—Om th� '{- C'; c: it? 5�ra:_ u'Stt:s of ii.. 5:: t-_ _]L^,C; �„__';� t., us a - Cr
s. _ or a�ciica.icn -_-1 :o _h ran-,�. c cstve: t c
:”„ 1 s:Cft'l 1_ -VC^.,. iw s:c=_ arta ii._._ must not '—It ,•vii I,Cm a C'_: f ani:77",,
the cCi: fan o
Wa$:_. I (\1'e, u^ _..:SnQ u7 at ., vi. c 701I'ut_nt5 i7crm Ioun='.^.0 d i.CSvv L'sC a,:_. mt!st Ct rminirijz using =C.^ni=
C�' [he �atL':_. R_sou.ct5 Cense. _.fieri �c^ SCC. li,-_ `C"2rIan a: SC[
`a ' }. ,
k0: J! ..^..Z :� ... C i1SC. _^t: C•Sl .. 1 1;� t. t Sl
5011 an -_ V, ^_tL. CcGserv:,.ion D15i:,_. Crici 10
t0 DE. hi C .\- ._n. _=!:ci.'l: ..._ 2_ `_".. 01_. i$ Ci'•t'it
.._'_ i1Sn vt7 Ca':s
K
L r, :
_ ..IL e-�..�z_��- - - gate: zo
p,b4mP:V ,In:ln..r II ui!,f:e'.!"t :rC; 0 "-ne. 1:
ZZ i'7nn ure:
WATER (fUAL17Y 5 {

Technical Specialist Certification
I.A, a •.:: n:cal SL'C=:alis: by t4C Nomh Car002 5111 ard Nva!=. CcnS[.vn6Cr Co..^.fvyicn Pusw=n '
OMf. CC.:Ii: 1. __^t ihC ani.7.zl wzz:C n-anngtment S.:S._... Icr i'C fzr ❑aC1C:. Ctove has an a_� j �
Civ^ :i ^;l rnftl or sC and
[-�«:1iC«:iC-S Gt l7C LS':1Sicn QC G.nv oii�:._ al �•i JC, 07,t•;t
as in 1_.. NCAC _L'.0_1 and ; _ USDA-NatL':al 1.7:: \;Cr't
C=:vii:: E.ai -nc Wait. Car>t:-,-at!c n Corr ; � t to i=A �C.'.0 __..�=i7 as:c 1_.. NC. -',C 6F .QGGi,H Co ssicn �.tlrsC_r! of. i,•_
wDowng _._:;nCnis ar;! includ:!.:n 11h c1?.P, as uvvllCaci `v hie ._C7 s ezia!is: Co Z-.2"-
SIM
S:Sic_ '_ak :_..:! =dan GD. SI. %VUR W l;. Sine ICC: 4c_al SC -:wil _n'� C_:t:r} Paz in =ASCh Icy of ._ -C:cy
cCM
II. Cel ri' cai o�z of DesiZ)
A) Collection. Storage. Treotrrtent SN'Sters
C,eck ;he Boz -
ZEE ting 13C:tiy- %yiti'iou, (SD or V� 1:P)
Etc:as: :alu„ �c is ac:c_'�ntc fcr CDC:3l:on ccpacity: s:L.ay c _ _iii;, =s:s= v.:' astc _... c_.:cc
r: ircn:cnts.
:1 Xe.,. e;gandz-�- or r,cihty (SD)
scup and Umaxont swcMw, SL'C.^ as to ^.CII C _CGS
i._ C.=.'! CCSiY`"'_..:o .....`. or cawk tt: �.5,:�L.,. s=
Name of T e-hniczl Specialist (Ple2se Pant):
SL�C�
Sianature:
G�cne No.:
B) Land _`.t}Blicntinn Site (Ivup)
At ;On C.'mddti5 ;cr r.1nlnnurn sc a:ation5 (i:L'r:_:s): a==- - . =.v=. of i" --C :cC i:C7 :5
Cr %va5tt ^a"Sa^:^t t; r . :_atiC ar'd :7U=i:^1 land- atcs.
Name of T �I icaI Specialist (Please Print):
aeres<< n ricv
�-L
Siz-tatur}•
C) Runoff ContrnlS from Exterior Lots
Chet the c.. .'oarra:e aa.r.
«C iit" 1,Vithaut eNterior ict; (SD o, W P cr PC)
%,:s ;aciiity docs : of ccn,..in r cx:_.:cr lass.
q(1
rata.
�f =.,-Jiiv -with ]nis (RC)
Nlc...:di :o At nn Wci ?ci w:Ms AM w._—ng and .._a ions to, .__...:C$(ped K'
of T- nnieai Sp_.i:!li�t iPlez;e Print
I HER BRIEN IRS NMI � Kf QV
IL 0 ---Phcno 7<0 Z WE—
W10 D,.. _ ,-2o- T

1 J.111'
:a3Cu -,Jn1Cu r1�
.,_ri.'..:',i• r�IG''_ 4°..�.�'r':� C'jC��0 aLL1Irti
:c4C0
2-,n1�L;�,IS
_l?IJ.> o PUC]
Si:.Q .._:....0 :ii: C CJr _L17CC :;iC .•.uC_ 1.,,x,.1'{ C]1\ ?O _...�_:J:..... ...:= CCt1` •!C,
SC.h :JOU ;C71 .t'.:L' 5i4°:
u.tt0 C".r,
Im, C?Lz S:.^.r0�L:IL:ICI^C [�L (iLiLl :C 01
PDUC_Ni 15cl 1G G;lar,_:SuOC Sl SC.ri uaLl,i%'9661 '1- ;un(' a_iopq iprlq sC.,t =1.i13I `9661
aunj -,a13L Llc;;:r. Isva3 ul`zc :ctil SL::sc3 au�r.s GurouudNa to ,tar: s03 aasr, aq of MLIO 51 N:oiq a_::ll:uu15 JL,.u�io3 auk
LUici aUTA%S ZUIRUUQX2 .10 ju a.Dlluualllu,l.1 (3
aill ]EUMIS
���5e1Da�
L'Oi]%STiI? C
( i 0 ;u.r`
LZI.. ^L_ i]LCC ITiC
SC =7' Ci ::=6 P:.: :S C::q ;ArU S ::SJI (0n CCD Cl
:57g PU£ S'C o _:Cf}� 0? SC- =::` IL:�:oCL:11i :S7C �L IS Si -,7 01 .�:.�571 C1I
S ::5:.1: L SJ2:73 ZIOC 10 sz:w'lLC IICi' - ?L':
'.Z1C .:C l.. :oJ.L::� Le. iS.'1.. ..] L' .]C:.:11 .t..iC•_OI� t .. .
j= -_,CD ..:S::i .v ~5.^�C:�� (Q�-;1 V �LL�`oC �(, :15, M C 5:^.F1::C: ,11i:C S:Lr, J01 LrIC
-10
-GS)
-QS) geld u0110'F :.2L;ao:aL_'3 PUE IL;aL::aoeuel'10_]L1UJ 13aSu1 •lu.::_UJ.UpU (3
Y
:uo1; 1i,1ri.
l=(i.:L\�jL 4Q GLIiC,,,Z
:... :::^Cllc iL..—..-•.0 SLE. __..: �.. - r — iiCC S. _ �_".-,,:. -�S11C ?Si ..:-_ SLS S:. --.. -�
10 11=11 r -;G CCf C: ....^�,SS:'.7,. $C r..L... ..ECC.o C: .,. .;S , - SL:. L�1C ::(1 LIS i.:ii: :CS 1C:�I: 1�:. U.7fILCfIQ::e .:SLY., L'•• _-
�1 IO .�1) 'L'DilZ3'-' t ACJZS ZU S7r 10 L' 5i!iCC�:�j
t7Llcl JO,I 1Le°; L li1Co E J!4:
uL'
1nUL4l.�. .t Ili�ii j 3 �t G 'v�C �� ly
zrmu•••— ;q LIC::::1:' ::1 `;. :Yr STICL:S; C;;,� 7rc
1: 'c 11=11 :?1 :(i, __5 L .5;... _- _Cr Ii�v to _i�CiLJr.1Lhh it _r 5 L'1: C: ?=C5i:3; 1L
;q _. L:.L _. :.L� ___ •_�_— __ IJCI+��Z4 L �: SVti VJ k ._=: i.: _7Q L�_.� i:5—. UI _.
C: r--, 7,id :y: CI
.•__�. Jvl :'.:2'.:iu;-..c L'ili:a".i=tiC 2.`C.:'. OLc::ji`.c 1f�JLrll�'+ .•.:!i!JC; �i.!!:ji\2 J�: 2�L•c•_..2 ...�` rT
CC''L:0ri__ .c - :LLZ., 5:-_i'Ic
-- Sz, SL ;0 a �.L 1 :C :5 C 'S::CJ aUIDCC� 1G7•:I SC JilllLlDn( C:I. _;CS yl C
C? 1C 'LZI
'_-."7CL;.�C.CL :? .. �S'a;��- 5. :.SL....13i.C: 0; :1C r• $: DUL Si1C' CL_ �� G315rD ui.a;i: r L?Lt'. .__ .__*
. !c:ai£:.7 iJ ✓7iL [�C7 D; - .:'v;:' C:7C ScCti' L':iL� 7[j: L:: �.: r'_�: 5 ...r...Cll:. L"Jf:=tel,_.._ .::. t. _�, -
4uaLuc! no3 o"UHPuCH puc uUnCD cia v- ,;{�

111. Certif catiotz of Installat7,011
�j Cnllectinn. Sinraae. Treatment installation
e'.�'. zccande3 cr 7etror3tt.j r2Cji(V (SI)
�.fl:I tai $ie s:�C:fl'_ ad 1�Z3LT.e^i s� c:L':e$. Such as ;,GI nct ::m]t;:: to lassor,s zr.;G �cnds. h: _ S
:ccorc_n.c: 'xim Md :CCr0VCj 4iin to ,,.__. or z: :+ - i,. ,, ,. ...L.,M SLir, 6 r s D s,:-_:IICa1Cns.
For ez SII11? j'0C:!I::c'S }i't 1:DLlf refrof,fs. -o CP^nL: f:on IS
`orae of Technical Specialist (P!ea_se -: ,,t}
Phone N.fl.:
S1�i7�Cui ace:
Bl Land Aooiicotion Site (WUP)
Cr__. the c:;DrcPr:a,,e COS
Th-_ C. Gu,nc Svst!m Is in C. -i _11 I._.. d ass In t.^.= a:1:::a1 vasz.'
Conditional Approval: _? s: _ __ :n :ice. is _.___ .'C.- r ins
as UL:Ii::_.;ei1 -101 but' 1.^.L`
as sc _. in :. aim, b.
!cr wun me :cs:_ dii .^I:Dr clan..
1 c:,!:=:{ this box if ap�rC=� az:-
it ;he C.c00ing S'�s;..,., as 50 _:ISe:. in ,:,e 91:,n can :,c:.._ Cs'LabHsCC.. Cm me•x'i'• C:Carzd I::.^d .,.._.,, 30 &VS
D,' ,^is Iicattcn. t h e o: c:cc ler c.Csicn ccc=c's.
\ame of Technical Specialist (Please r; ): C,r..
_
[")C
nIr) C-�or� yru �/`L(_Phcne NN o 5 7NN- 1,10
Signature: Date:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I C:nii}'th:t I (' C? have c:., um;'ttCd to embfis� t:._ c oCt7ing s+szcm as S%_ .ae, in my (cur) -as;: utliiz:tlCrt :l:•::. =d
11 a_Cr0priatti to cs:nciis i Che :nle'nl c.cz; for eres:cn ccnuol. and will submit to Dell a on of CDr'01e cc 7Dm a
Technical �C,_.:lis: '.t';;i : l I. C=._nda d::s 14vda:e SCC_.,._ in the cnditicral ce::ification. I = '1Ze L4:t
f-iiur_ to Std D1 .,•t is+a Cat; CIi is a vici:[ton of zs,_ .--:.a..av^_m_.. =1W7 and .:111 SL:1c--:.•._ (LS) to am __...,__.......^.I
a--::Cn ;rom
\ane of Land Owner
Si^__nature: Date:
12rne 0f ,12r,, -,2-a i' Ciii-�-ent trom lawn',.-
Sl2r;aI ure: - Date:

f 'C'i Runoff Contrnis frnm Exterior Lnt-s (RC)
'=acilll�' u;ifl 2\r�rlr<r Inrc
Mt"hods to !h-, . z CH of :CilLt2n1S .-cin lCuae iz .:5;! z:: s _s S_
r or fcC:!lllr"S x'ilhoul E_ le, :Dr !Cls' n0 17eC_r55er '
. Name of Technical Spec ialistj:
'.:lCn:
:1-
Ph C!- NC.:
D► ".poiication send Handlir,a =cuiiment Tnstaiiation (_W'l.P or Ii
Crt-..._C
1 .� S •._,^.I -11:_.._:5 :CC: :fC�':C� [0 L^. CV',^,_:i .^C �:::�'.._ 1] - i is _..
in
F-as-,i--^cC:.i �LaS:^z ::::. 1_::L-iiz_::C:1 Vii... ❑15
�_I..._:.v'oiG_S
=-'t ___ FC w :C i;._ C'. 7C:S _=Z; _ :_-- �i._.. as i.I I
—� Conditional 37Droval:..n;
.CRS..... S:__ ar:t 1C5:1_Il- C:
15 _:7C Rta in: was:::_i,
._„"MCR L=a
\ane of Teical Specialist (?'..tase
-t: ,iIatiCrl:
At .n C CJ Ci I 1
2$l 4
Cne No.: ?6
'at--: TSD- '9 7
The Following signature bloc.'; is only to be t'<ed ,vhen the box for Conditional approvai in III D
above hars beet the ked.
I (wt! Ct.aiV that I c'`'-, navc ” :I,—.,ii:__ .to trl_'. anima! was -,2 30oiic_6oil `-.Li aS
SC:C;I1: in -�' {G l'aji: i,:G _�_.::C I^.l i. �:,❑ *-V UI S i_ alt IO 1E�'1 a �'�CitlC�tlCR of fiC: and.
boli! 1 1 .C:1 nlcai C^ _:a115t %wi hin � Ca CaVS f0i oWin2 t"� C._ " lilOr:al
t 1 't 5�__;tled in t,,_ Cors C_tiGl .
%,z) aa1,C` a •:

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Scott Davis
Location: 6935 Highway 52 West
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy 80-13
Number of Animals: 200
(Design Capacity)
Moor-esvi lieNC RECEIVED
J WATER QuA' I i' SECTION
rjUL 0 81999
Non -Discharge Permitting
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, .
leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and / or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 200 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Lot runoff and urine will be collected in the waste storage pond and land applied with a
hard hose traveler irrigation system.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
200 animals x 21 (gal/day/cow) waste/animal year x 180 (number of days) x 75 (% confinement
time) = 567,000 gal. of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
200 animals x 69 lbs. N/animal/yr = 13,800 lbs. Total N from lot
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for ISO days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every -k --MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
93.7 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION.•
This operation has 102.8 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation of corn cut for
silage , followed by small grain. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the realistic yields at
the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Rye Grass/Hay: Feb.-May/Sept.-Oct. at the rate of 150 Ibs. of N/ac no more than 30 days
before planting.
Sudex/Hay: April -Aug. at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 110 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Parts of Home tract (tract 105) will be irrigated with a hard
hose traveler. The acreage of all irrigated fields has been reduced by 25%. Maintain all
waste handling equipment in accordance with manufactures specifications. The system
should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage and proper system.
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy = of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.]
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
b. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils., during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the leaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19.If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
V1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: Sw e ,2212y Zs
(Please print)
Signature:�-c� %V 1`i 9 ;.s Date:
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) 2g x�--R; le
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): Z7 Z7 -e_ oa) O nt ka2[a Qp
NC_
Signature:
8
te:

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
I, , hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his
Waste Utilization System on acres if my land for the duration of time
shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I
also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial
fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer:
Date:
Technical Representative:
Date:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Term of Agreement: , 19 to , 20
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
0

PRODUCERS NAME Scott Davis
Date 617199
Realistic
TRACT FIELD
----------------------
SOIL TYPE
----------
CROP
---------------
YIELD
------
Lbs.N per Ac.
---------------------
ACRES
Lbs. N Utilized
-----------
Month Appilied
-----------------------
19211 1'
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
19.9
3,980
April -August
1'
Pacolet
Rye Grassi Hay
3
150
19.9
2,985
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
2
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
3.8
760
April -August
2
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
3.8
570
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
3
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
4.0
800
April -August
3
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
4.0
600
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
4
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
4.0
800
April - August
4
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
4.0
600
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
5"
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
7.3
1,460
April -August
5`
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
7.3
1,095
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
6'
Pacolet
Pasture 1 Fescue
3
110
4.3
473
March - May / August - October
7'
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
1.9
380
April - August
7'
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
1.9
285
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
9'
Pacolet
Pasture / Fescue
3
110
2.3
253
March - May I August - October
10
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
2.5
500
April - August
10
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
2.5
375
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
11"
Pacolet
Pasture / Fescue
3
110
8.2
902
March - May I August - October
12
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
2.3
460
April - August
12
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
2.3
345
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
13
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
1.5
300
April -August
13
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
1.5
225
Feb-MaylSept-Oct
14
Pacolet
Hayland 1 Fescue
3
150
3.0
450
March - May / August - October
15
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
7.0
1,400
April - August
15
Pacolet.
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
7.0
1,050
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
16
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
12.7
2,540
April - August
16
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
12.7
1,905
Feb-May/Sept-Oct

792 1
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
14.7
2,940
April - August
1
Pacolet
Rye Grass/Hay
3
150
14.7
2,205
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
9
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
3.4
680
April - August
9
Pacolet
Rye Grass/Hay
3
150
3.4
510
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
TOTAL 102.8 31,82$ lbs.
Pasture lands Nitrogen rates have been reduced by 25°x. TOTAL N PRODUCED 13,800 tbs.
18,028 lbs. DEFICIT OF N
" NOTE Field Acerage has been reduced to.reflect wettable acres under irrigation

NP

�d� �.1..:�0�
c�'
�p

DATE: 05-13-1998
Solt Davis
Dairy Waste Storage Structure
Rowan, NC
Design Criteria:
200 Dairy cows at 1,400 lbs. each = 280,000 tbs. We weight
180 days storage
5 galJday/cow of waste water
15,000 sq. n of non -pond Drainage Area
Waste from Freestall area and access alleys will be scraped and stored
in the waste storage pond, as well as the runoff from
approximately 15,000 sq. fL of the bams, lot and silos.
---- -- - ---_- ----- -------__-=______________
1. Storage Volume Required
A Manure Storage with 75% confinement
200 cows X 14.6 gallday/cow X 180 days
7.48 galsJcu.fL
B. Waste Water from Milk Bam
200 cows X 5 galJday/cow X 180 days
7.48 galslcu.fL
C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 160 days
Drainage Areas =16.688 sq. ft.
1 day CN 98 130 day CN 92
Monthly
Months Precip. (P) (inches)
October 321
November 2.94
December 3.56
January 3.72
February 3.78
March 4.61
21.62
16.64 runoff inches X 15,000 sq. ft
Monthly
52.701 cu. ft.
24,064 cu. ft,
Evap. (E)
P - E
Runoff (inches)
2.56
0.65
2.37
1.83
1.11
2.12
1.1
2.46
2.69
1.1
2.62
2.85
1.83
1.95
2.9
2.92
1.69
3.71
10.48
16.64
20.800 cu. ft.
12 inches/ fl.
D. Waste Feed and Bedding
10 cu. fL / day X 180 days= 1,800 cu. ft.
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED 99,365 cu. ft.

- Add to liquid Volume -
H. Normal (P) Precipitation less (E) evaporation on Structures for 180 days
October - March 10.48 inches =
III. 25 yr. storm on Open Area of 15,000 sq. ft
CN = 95 for open areas
With 25 yr. 1 day strum of 6.0 inches, runoff = 5.41 inches
15,000 sq. ft X 5.41 inches runoff
12 inches
6,763 cu.ft
15,470 sq_ ft surface area of storage pond
IV. 25 yr. storm on Pond Surface
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
V. Emergency Spillway
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
Peak discharge = 3.2 ds.
Use ESW with 12 ft bottom width,
3 to 1 side slopes, 0.2 ft stage
V1. Freeboard
VII. Total Depth of Pond 8 feet of storage
142,811 designed amount
106,127 amount needed
36,684 amount surplus
0.9 ft
6,763 cu. ft.
-- 0.4 M
0.5 ft.
0.2 ft.
= 1.0 tt
10.14 ft

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL'T'URE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: SCOTT DAVIS FARM
DATE: June 7, 1999
Contact the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality - Winston-Salem Regional Office at (910)
7714600 if the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm.
If the problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of North Carolina
Department of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of Emergency
Management - Raleigh at 1-800-662-7956 or [phone]. Provide the following
information:
FACILITY NAME: SCOTT DAVIS FARM
LOCATION: 6935 Highway 52 West
REGISTRATION/PERNUT # 80-13
• If there is danger to human life, downstream residences, roads, etc. call 911 of the
Rowan County Sheriffs Department at 636-1011
• Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond by applying waste water to nearby
irrigation fields if possible.
• Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off-site damage (list
the names and phone numbers of three below).
NAME PHONE NUMBER
1 L. P. Barger, Jr. 633-9693
2 Powell 278-0527
3 Kenny Williams 636-0686
• Contact the Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
at 637-1604
• Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond . If this
specialist is no longer working or is not available, contact another technical specialist
who has design approval such as the Area Engineer.
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
L.M. Safley Jr.
919-851-8528
Larry F. Graham
910-673-0487
J. Donald Matthis
910-592-5519

Dairy Farin Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
SollI ce
Cause
IIH11'S IIr Millimi./c 011fll' Site specific practices
E atnulea+l
- fairy production
Cl
Vegetative or wooded hlrl-lcrs
n
lieen1111 ended best rllanagerl1cl11 praclices
Cl
Good judgment and common sense:
Paved lots nr hat It alley
0 Wel ntannre-cowfull snrllce:s
f1
Scrape or Mush daily
slitI',lces
n
Prontn,c drying; wish proper vcn1i1.1ti0o
n
lanoline: checks and mainmenance on waterers,
hydraws. pipes, 5tnck tanks
IlCtLICLI .11C;1
6I Irinc
n
Nolirellc dtying willr proper ventilation
• Partial microbial decomposition
Replace wel or nlamire-covelell Iicllllilll;
Itil.mme try stacks�
~- Partial microbial decomposilion
Provide lirpid drainage for stored manalre
�Iur�11;C I:IIl1: ul b:1,111
• l'allaal II11Cr011ral elCCnlnllnSllllll! ;
(-1
Ilmicim or halal -level loading
S11 I:ILe
Mixing wattle Illllllg ;
n
"Tank covers -
• Agimlion wheel cntltaying
f1
llasin surface mats of solids•
ti�ulinl; h,r ill auI I:Ie:e1 I'arlial nlie:rnhial deconapusilinn
• klixing while filling
• Agilart.lu where emplying
-I:ta11olc, s[,nly+n ;Intl;e Agitation when spreading;
Il,ratcl IInll,:l, k/nlalile gas Clllisslnits
V11lillile I;:IS cnlissious while
J111+}' u, ,hull.e lilt ,kala drying
Dalt l.u:c:�
III.11 r, l,l.-, - - -------
11„t,i.l� 111.,in I:ull�cliun
. ul jolt+a i, 111 hots+:;
• Agilalitin nt'lecycicd lagoon
lillllill while hulks aie lilliug
• Agilation dining wa-.lewaicr
conveyance
A1.1( u' - I IgIVk.I111ILA I I • I')')11, I',11;1: 1
.
1-1 hlinimile Int runnlfand liquid addilions
n Agitate only prior it) m:anurc rcnanval
n I'rrlven Iliological additives or 41xid:ntls
I1 lAtIllid diaivage lions settled solids
F.1 Remove solids regularly
n Soil injectioll ill* sllarryJ,lluh;cs
fl W;I-'Il resilhlal In:lunle lions spr.:ulra alicr II;c
17 Proven hiologic.11 addirivcs or fix ill:ull'.
rl Soil Itllccllnll ofslun}'1slu+ll;cs _ --
fl Soil iocorporllinn +whin •IR his
F1 Sprcad in Main Itnil'ornt layrlS I'ur IaI,iJ 111yinl;
n I'rnvcn hiolol;ic:al ad+liliv+-% ill oxid•nll,:
n 1=11101 I.1111, covers;
n liAleoll fill lines r11 Ileal holtonl +II'I.Itll.s what
alai-siphrltl vents
F1 I1(ih invcls

Source
Chute
Ilh1I's to Millimile Odor Sift: Specific Practices
- 1.111 slalinns -- --
Agilation during sump tank
Cl
Sump dunk covers
filling and drawdown
Fild ul drainpipes ill
Agitation during wasimaler
FI
Exlenli discharge point of lilies tmdemea(h
L,i;nnn
cntiveyallce
lagnon liquid level
l -a(;null sin laces •
Volatile gas clllissiun;
n
l+roper l4goon lujtll(I capaclly;
•
I11ologlcal mixing;
I-1
Corrccl lagonn slartllll procednres;
•
Agitation
n
Minimuin surface arca-til-vnhnue ralin;
•
Minimum agitation when pumping;
•
Nkchanical aeralian;
n
Proven hiningical additives
IlI ig.ltilal slrilil.lcr •
11igh Pressure agimlinn;
n
Irrigate ml dry days tvilh little or uo wind;
"lttllcs
Wind drift
n
hlildli m recommended operating procedure;
n
Primp intake near lagoon lilluid surlacc;
fl
Pomp from second-stage lagnon;
n
Hush residual numure from pipes al end of
slimy/shldge pnmpings
-
11c,13 animals
Carcass 11ccomposillnll
n
I'rnper disposition ofcarcasscs
'it.ur,linl;
hul)ruper drainage;
fl
(4ade and handscapc such flt;il walcr drains
laclliiic.
Microbial deconlposkinn of
away from l;lciliiies
org:ulic molter
f.11+11 IracLla! null, inlhiil: •
i`un[ly nlaiivaincl{ :+cGcss mails
n
l :41411 :IC I'CSS [Ilad Ill:lill1clu lcc
I iV:u I, Illlin Inr111 ala-C'..`.
AJ1lillnn.,l ltllulnl.,linit : Avail,ihll; I�Ilult
-t' illy t`l.,luuc ALru;it;cntcnt ; (1241(1 Itide/HELP Packet X11:51 I, ('utnlly lalewinn ('colli —
1)aily I:iltic;Nitinol I lnil ALuutre f.laulagcrilent Sys(cm - I.al:c Whcelcr Ituad Field l.ahuralmy ; I:1lr11: 241'1-t15 11CSI I - IIAI:
!)csi�n ani! lilr I-ivcslnck hfamire Treatment ani! Stnr:lge ; FAIAli 1111.81 NCSII - IIAli
f.lan,+l,cni.:nl of Dairy %V;I).1Cwaler ; FHAl. 1061-83 t`1('til I - IIA I:
('.+1+1u.+rlltn ill' A1:,nut,::old WaslewalerApplication FiIniltmen( ; FBAI: Fact Sheet I C%1l - IIA Ii
HimLncc (-tmcclil, in Annual Al;iodic Afanagenient: Odills and 1:11cs ; PRO 107. 11195 Collf•crcnce Ill11ceedini;, Hmida ('imperative I mensirin
AP.I( u' m1wr 1 I, 191)6, llagt: `_'

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Snul ce C anse IlAll's to 011311,+1 Illsects Sit Slrccilic I'r iecs
Lirluirl Systems
�I-Iudi (iullcls Acctgl{1 blio++ ofsulids n riuslr systen, is ticsigncd :mtl ol,cralcd
sufficiently to remove accunrulalcd solids Iiorll
gollcrs as desiguc(l.
C`I Itcn+uvc Inidging or:+ccun+ulated solids a1
discharge
L.,. -mous :11111 Cils cIUSIcd Solids 171 Nlainl:tin lagoons, seltliuc basins and frits Miele --- — --
l+csl breeding is al,l,arcnl It) Ininintirc tlrc
crusting of solids lu a dgNlr of IIo nlulc Man G -
S inches over Iuurc III -In 30116 orsterface.
iaccssivc Vcf;clalive l)ccayiuc vegooliun fI hlainrain vegetalive control slung banks of _ - --
Uiu+vlh lagnans and other inrlunmdmcuts to Illevcnl
acctunullatinn of dccayillc vcgelalive mallcr
slung %valet's cdcc an impoonchucni's pee imcicr.
DI F Syslcros
I
-C 15 I:cctl SIIilkige rI Desicn, overalc anti maintain feed syslcnrs—
hunkcrs and Iluughs) lu minimize Il,c
accun+nfatiou urdccayiug.vaslacc.
Cl Clean ill) sl,illagc on n runlille basis (e.g., 7 - 10
Illy incclval Juno]; summer; I5-311 day illlcrVal
during tvinlcr).
Decd Stmate Accumulations ulIced residues Cl Itctluce nu,isiole accumulation ,villein ;III(I
;,round immediate l,crirncler of feed stnragc
areas by insuring drain. -Ice away from site
:nullur 113ovidillg adclluatc canlaiunrcnt (c.c.,
cuvercil tiro for brc►vcr's grain and similar high
Inoislurc grain lulrd,Icls).
O Inspect For and rcinove ur break up acculmllaled
solids in Tiller shills around recd stural;c as
13ceded.
At - .luvem6cr 11. 199A. ,c I

Snnl cc (rause ItAll's ill C:unhrul luseds He tiperilic Praclices
Ali- m I luldinl; A1cas AC'CLIM111;111U11S UI :1111111:11 MISIC.S Cl ISlimillalc low aleas 111;11 trap Illulsllllc 411(mg --
;11111 Iced wastage Icnccs and other locations 1v11cte waste
accullnllalcs and (lislulbancc by aniulals is
minimal.
O Alainlain knee lu%vs and filler strips alnond
:ulillill holding alcas Ill minimize
accuuullaliuns of (vides (i.e., inspect far and
remove or inc;lk tell accumulated solids as
nccrled).
Dly Al;nunc Ifondling Accimmlatiuns of :nlinlal wastes f1 Remove spiltagc on a toutiuc basis (c.(;., 7 - IU
Syslems day incl vol (fill int; shimmer; 15-30 day intcl val
doling Wilder) WITIc 1llanulc is loaded for land
applicaliun or disposal.
Cl INovide fur adequate drainage around manulc
slockllilcs.
Cl Inspect for and ►emuve or bleak ill) accllnnllalcd
wades in liller ships ntoulld stockpiles n11d
nlanmc 11an(Iliug alcas as deeded.
For mole ill rot llialion contact 1110 Cuupewtive Extension Scl vice, I)cp;nhnew or t,wonmi,gy, Ilox 7613, Not III Cmolina Slalc Univcrsily,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AM IC - Nuvcmbcr 11. 1996, Page 2

Nlortaiity llanaclement Methods
(check which methodi s) are being implemented)
�1 Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 3-1. hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public bode of water.
�t Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-165.1
D Complete incineration
D In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of :agriculture
D Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
De%ember 15. 1996

tit t
.0
i, W(I
LD
P Al 'y
4;
RR
IL
AF
.4rf
1 ?
9* -1
1A ;I
N
cc
ST
jr 'ek
) '� 4m, 1,
, v
Q, ST
TI!
V
U4
'4 f
AW_ E L
Az
ORESVILLE ";e
MOTO OU90F. T AGF
LEX t Fe4fift
P.
Ak
1ARH
�1 I 1EI
O'� -TRA
ATWE
FIR
v 6E
Ex
&
-'Dft E INS
t
tips say } E EnOC Ville',
Z s
co
NA oxo 5'..
RIL Eh
INSET to
Jk P
E
IL
R0. o
,LI
FIRE DIST
-A -
A4
RD
F WIACE
KNOLLWOOD 17er,
11, ELEN&OL* Cwu
qr
sciV
W;
g4l
I
7'
VE y
SCH
Y85
4
P
XZ'd
7
E
V
.-ANNAPPO IUI
91i
0
SCALE "OF MILES C A B A R R W
Copyright 1995; Quality Maps, Inc.
TL5T 'SITE CASTLE KEEP RD..... -50 CORNELIUS ST......,, 9A DIXON DR,........... 9B ERNEST MILLER RD .... 4B FRENCH BELK RD. -'•••3C GR -
CT. CASTOR RD ........... Do CORP91,1, AV .......... OB BODY DA ............. 9D ERWIN TEMPLE CHURCH FRONTIER CIR..
ED. -:.....43D CATAWBA DR.......... 4A CORRVLL FARM ED ..... 8B DOCK -SIDE........... 6C RD ................. 2A FRY ST............. C" to:::::::
13'm 3B DOB WHITE RUN
REV LYEHLY JB DON14KE CIR....
CATFISH ....... ­ IOB CORRIHER SPRGS RD ... 7B DOGWOOD AV .......... 7C ETHERIDGE RD ........ 2C FULLER CIE .......... 43) GH.
GER BE ::ilr p4ZI ST ............. I
A 30STAIN ET.......... 0: CAUBLn Z'IA�RM RD ...... 4C COUNTRY CLUB DR.... JOA DOGWOOD DR....... 711,7C F FULTON ST........... 4D OR
01IR DR....:.:., ... 4A 3 D RAW R Li';� - �;: :7A CEDAR AV............ 113 COUNTRY DR.......... 9D DOOLEY RD........... IA FAOGAAT CIA......... So G GF,
GER RD...........
90 BRAADSHAW Ito 7A CED&RFIELD DR ....... 8B COUNTRY LN.... 4A,7A,2D DOUBLE THUMB RD.... .9C FAITH RD IA GALLIMORS Ito 4A GO
l] VIEW 2A SHE . ............. 4A CEDARWOOD DR........ CA COUNTRY MEADOWS TR..8A ORKA14FIELI) DR ....... 7C P-mmill 30 GARDEN R
:::: A ..$A ILA
NjARDT RD ... CA 3ge=OD LN........2C 2C CELANESE RD.�;::::::4 COUNTRY VILLAGE D11..1C D.E. CIR ............ 4C FARM DR 2C GARRICK RD ......... -5A
R HG It 4 9RIARFIELD DR -.;;::_711 CEMETERY CH 3C COX RD .............. 5D DRIFTWOOD TR........ 6C FARM GATTON RD ........•., 313 "A
INGEEEKLB'Ti Z" R'D" :6A Siki"WOOD LAKE .4C CENTENARY RD........ 3A CRAWFORD DA,, ....... 4C DUKE DR ............. 8B FARMHOUSE RD........ 4A GENEVA DR:: ...at) UA
INGZR RD ::..-IOD .9RIANWOOD TER. .4C CRA.FFIN RD.. 2A CRAWFORD RD.......,, 5B DUKEVILLE RD........ 5B FCSPERHAN RD..,,.... 9C GEORGE BROWN RD ..... 90 RA
. ..... :::. SO BRIGGS RDj�.... ;::.-IC CHANDLER RD......... 4C CRESCENT Ito......... 9A DULIN AV............ BE FIBER ACRES 'A' ST, -3B GETSR RD..... 2A IIA
LEAF DR: ....... ::9A aRINGLE FERRY R D CHAROLAIS DR ... m.m..5D CRESS LOOP RO--m-mm.8A DUNNS MTN RD.... SC,24B VIBLDBROOK DR ..... m.80 GIBSON FjDm.':m*­*'
FIE
MOUNT DR.m ... m_2D BROOK Cll_�j�_:::IA 1,1'.ERA.' ED ­ ...... 1A CRESS BCH RD-m ­.8A DUTCH FARM ED. 9C LDCIO!ST.....m.m.m9A GIFFORD LN ...•
...... 9 ID3 Ed,
RIDGE DRm.m.mm...5D BROOKFI ELD DR Oil C E-1 CHAROLAIS ND ­5D CRES7VIEW DH_m.mm..8C E FIELDSTONE DR ....... BB GIN RD­-m­;.m.m..IC 19
_9
OLE CLUB RD ... m..5D 8ROOK5 RD..�;:..,:_,A CIII-EIS ."D;:m:_m:o:1A CRICKETT L11 ... m.m..m3D E CHAKBL99 OR ..... m.4C FILE RD.�..;�::._:_:::C GLENN FAUST R
3
Si
A POPLAR RD ....... U !'RD" ACRE A C ILI) ES R C CROMER RD ....... m-mm9D E MENDENHALL RD.. ...9B FISH PON A GLOVER ED w
VER DAN RD...,_ In SHOWN ED ..... m 133,3c CHINA GROVE RD .... m.8C CROOKED OAK LN .... m.7C EARNHARDT ED ... m.5C,9C FISHER DR.... mm ..... 9C ODDSEY RD...
C 3 CROA
VER LN ....... m_7 HOWNS FARO RD.,...m4D TE RDm.m ...... m.5C CRUSE CIR ........ m..8B EAST SIDE OR .... m...8C FISHER RD........... 9A GOLD KNOB RD ---m"
VER LOOP......,,,On BRUNER SLOOP ED . .. 6C CIR DR ....... m..m4C,SC CRUSE L"mm ....... mm.uB EASTLAND DR.....,. m.9A FLAT CAR CH.RDm .... LOB GOLDFISH RD ...... m" C H;
K BUCCANEER CIR.-mm.m.SB CIRCLE mK" DR...... -4D CRUSE RD_ .......... Be EASTOVER t)R,,m.m .... 00 FLAT ROCK RDmm ..... m8A GOODMAN DR ... m- ... 9A N:
CHWOOD DR .... m. 4C SO
UD LN.m ........... m8A CLARK RD............ 6C CUTHERSON RD........ 38 EASTVILLE DR ...... m.9A rLSmING RD.m.m .... mm9C GOODMAN LAKE AD..... So RI
. - - E.
LINE AD ....... *:4A SuRGRAY RD.m.m.....m2D CLAUDE AV.mm-m ...... 4C 0 EBENEZER RD....... OC rLErCHER LN...,.,, 9C GOODMAN RI) - m CA, 4 - B
B-
Y. RD...... m...m..3C 3URLRSON-HILL RD. 10D CLEAR ROCK OR.......9A 9A D L HARDT RD­.m.9B EDGRWOOO •CTm.m ...... 4C FLETCHER PL-m-­m.m8A GOODNIGHT V11" R0m--4C
_.7n FLINTRIDGE RD..m.m..7p GOODNIGHT RD --m .... m4c B.
M. __

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 30, 2000
Scott Davis
Scott Davis Farm R5fLJ'` EIVED
6935 Highway 52 West E
Mooresville NC 28115
JUL 2 7 2000 Subject:
NATER QUALITY 8LCfl0N
Non -Discharge Permitting
Dear Scott Davis:
ffl�,;W,A
IT 0 0
A&4;1
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Application No. AWC800013
Additional Information Request
Scott Davis Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Rowan County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 29, 2000:
The options for best management practices are not noted on your insect, odor, and mortality management
checklists.
`2. Please contact your technical specialist to fill out the enclosed emergency action plan. Keep a copy for your
reference and submit two copies to be included with your permit package.
`3. Operation and maintenance plan for your facility is missing.
Owner's signature is'missing on signature page of your waste utilization plan.
Irrigation parameters 9application rate and amount) are missing in your waste utilization plan.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before June 29, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
JR Josh'
Non -D' charge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Q. s
Dairy f=arm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
S41111 -CC Cattle HN1113; In M111111t1YC error Site Specific Pracliecs
Fat nule.111 Dairy production n Vegetative or wooded bufli:rs
F1 Iteennunendrd I+cs1 ul:lllagenlull practices
Pf Good judgment and common sense
I1avcd Iuls or bald alley
Wei manure -covered surfaces
w{
Scrape or (lash daily
surfaces
f�Wash
n
Promote dryinc wilh proper vemilatiull
F)
n
Howine checks and rnainlenance on waterers,
Vul:uih: has culis5iufl5 while
r7
5161 injection of 'Hurry/slndl;es
hydrauls, pipes, slack lanks
I1c1111cd lneas
urine
Soil incorporalinn within .18 hrs
1'r01111ule (ityiui; wilh proper vendialilm
• Parlial utierohisl decomposition
Sprcad in thin mulilrm layers lOr rapid +ll )'ilii;
Iteplact; wel or manure -covered 11c111iilli;
Mamie thy slicks
• Pallial rnicrollial decomposilioll
Pr[)ye13 bil)lot;ic:11 addi1iVC% or 11xid.ullr:
Provitic hiplld drainage for stared Illamire
SiuraLe I;u+k 11r basin
11altial microbial decomposition ;
n
Ilottom or mid-level loading
1111 f:+Ce
ruin!; while: filling ;
n
•rant: covers
• Agil:lriun when emptying
n lasin surface mals of solids;
IIMiuimite
Int w1loffand liquid additions
r1
Ai;im1-C nnly prior 14) m;lnure remllval
n
i,mvea 1710h1gical additives or oxidants
Scrllinli basic ;1111,1c:es
Parlial microbial decomposition
F,1 Liquill drainage lionl scldell solids — —
• Mixing while filling
1�1'
Itctuovti sntids rcgtllarl)'
• Agilamm wheli emptying
himime. %holy lir dtid;e
Auitatiun when spreadirlt;
n Soil iniection nl'shItry/s1till 1;cx
,11ie:.ulcr 1n11f1 �s0
Vnlalilc gas L'nlissiurls
f�Wash
residual n1;111111e lioln si,rc:ulcr akcr Ilse
F)
Promi biological additives or ox it Nous
II III,:IIV0,:41 +11MIMC. -
Vul:uih: has culis5iufl5 while
r7
5161 injection of 'Hurry/slndl;es
;hilly ill :.11111Lt till field
drying
f1
Soil incorporalinn within .18 hrs
R/
Sprcad in thin mulilrm layers lOr rapid +ll )'ilii;
F1
Pr[)ye13 bil)lot;ic:11 addi1iVC% or 11xid.ullr:
I'h1a1 Lu1L, Agilation ofrecycicd h9mm
I r li+plill while t:►oks are IillinL
C1ul,ide Thain collection. Agit:uion dm'ing waslewaler
or junction boxes Nconveyance
Ahit W - Iluvenlber 11. 11)9(1, Pa[;c
n Flush will. Covers;
n rxlrnd rill lines In mm, imu11n, 111'Iimi.s tivia,
'Poi-syllon vents
1141a rovers

Snurce
_ Ca115C
n
dlhllls Irl Minialire (blur Sile Specific Practices -
l.iIt sl:uinns
0 Agitation duri11g sunlrl tank;
n
Sump lank covers -
filling and drawdown
11
I'nntp intAc scar lagnnn li(lnid surlacc;
Eng of drainlipVs at
0 Agitation during; wastewater
n
EXIC1111 discharge point of lilies lunlcl ncath
lagnno
cnuveyance
n
lag;nnn liquid level
-ag;uun sm 1'.1Ces
a Volatile g:ls emission;
Cl
Proper lagnon liquid capacity;
I )eaid animals a
• biological mixing;;
fl
Correct lagnnn startup procedures;
Slanting water a111111141 •
• Agimlion
n
hliainluol surface arca-to-vniume ralin;
Fl hlinialmil agilatinn glen pl,nlping
F1 Mechanical aeratinn;
n proven hioingical additives
llriplinn :g4j11 ler 4
High pressure agitation;
n
Irrig;ale nn dry clays wills little or tic) wind;
iiwAes .
Wind drift
17.1
Alininuun reconunended operatinG lxncednre;
11
I'nntp intAc scar lagnnn li(lnid surlacc;
n
d'oml Goal second -stage lagoon;
n
flush residual ruanure from pipes at end of
slnrrylsludge p11n111illgS
I )eaid animals a
Carcass decomposiliou
171
11mper disposition of carcasses
Slanting water a111111141 •
Improper drainage;
17.1
f irirle :11111 I:uulseatle S11C11 Ilial wiper drains
facilities 0
Microbial decomposilion of
away from Iilcilities \
orpoic nauter
M1111 nai1c,l nnln 11111Iic:
I'oruly maintained! ;access loads
F1
farm acc:css 11}111 uiainlen:ntcc
ruaJ� hung r:1ru1 :u:1:�a:.
Addilimud Irllowmaiun :
C;1111c M:oune Marclgerueut ; 0200 ItuleAlml' Packet
Dairy I:llncalional 111111 Mamlre Mallagement System - Lake Wheeler Road field Lahofalmy ; 1:11 11:1-01)-r)5
1.ag11orl I)L:STII :13111 Agan:lg;emcllt JOr Live,inck Mamrre Treatment 111111 Storage ; dibrlli 101-83
manal;cmew of Dairy Wastew:ner ; I:IIAF 106-131
('alihiali11n 411,Ha one :old Waslewaler- Application I:cluillnlcnl '. I:IIAF fael Sheel
1J1is:nrct_ 04111 :euls in Animal AL'rtuue Min agemem.- Odors and flies ; PRO107, 1095 Corticrencc I'roccedinl;s
A NI( lc' Nidwr-W. 199h. Page 2
Availa111c 1:111111 :
M SII, (:ounly lcxwmiuu (:ental
NCSI I - IIAI:
NCtill - IIAF
NCStJ - IIAI:
NCS1l - BA 1:
1:1,11ida Couleralive Iatertsion

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Solace C:rrlsc IIMPS to Control 1115CC15 site c Vinclices
U111011 Sys(_clus—
Hush Guttas + Accumulation of solids n Flush syslent is designed cull operated
Nsufficicnlly to Iculovc accuIIIIIIwled solids Floul
rr �I gultcls as designed,
r-1 Remove hl idging of accuumlaled solids al
" �iscll:ugc
La oohs aro! Pils Ltnsicll Solids 111aiuLlin lagoons, settling basins amt Ails where -- "--
pest bleedilli; Is appalcnl to millimize the
crusting orsolitis to a dcplh ornu mole Than G -
Ilehlclles over inure dum 30% of slrl face.
Excessive Vcyclalive Decaying vegelaliorl Or Maintain vegel:rlive conliol along banks of
Glowth lagoons and olhcr imporoulmcnls to prevent
:lccurlud:Iliorl nrdccayiog vegetative miller
along walcl's edge on iulpuundlilcnl's"pel iurcler.
I)ry Systems
l ceders heed Spilhigc Ocsign, operalc and mainlain feed systems---
hunkcls and boughs) to minimize IIIc
ecun1111aliorl of decaying waslage.
L�1 Clean Iql spillage on a rouline basis (e.g.. 7 - 10
day iulmval dutirlg stlrm er; 15-3U day inlet val
dl ' Ig wilder).
Decd Stot:lsc Accumulations of feed 1esldltc5 Rcdlrcc Illulsfule acclrtlllllallorl %vllhl11.11111
around irm ediale perimeter or recd sluragc
areas fly insuring dlaill.1gc away from site
and/or Inoviding adequatc conlainntcnt (c.g.,
covered dill for Newel's grain and similar high
uislllrc glair plodncls).
Inspect for will Iculovc or bleak up accumulated
solids in filler ships around recd stotage as
liceded.
Ah. lovember 11. I1)96, P qtc

Sorry cc
AiiiiswI I lulling /Areas Accumulations ufmdmat wades "' Flrrrlrrrltc low alcas dint trap moisture along
Mid Icer] fenecs arra ulhcr lucalruns where wade
accuruul:llcs and distrubancc by auiiu:rls is
rnuual. -_-
r hlaintairr Icncc rows mnd filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of ►vastcs (i.e., inspccl for acid
remove ur break up accunurlated solids as
rccdc(l).
Uiy i►lanuic I landlirit; Accnnurlaliuns of aninr:rl waslcsCV Remove spillage on a routine basis {c.1;., 7 - IU
Systcuis day interval dor hig sunrurcr; 15-3U day interval
during wirricr) ►vhcrc rnanurc is loaded !ar land
pplicaliun or disposal.
Provide for adcyrralc drainage aruulyd manure
sl klrilcs.
inspect for and ICnrove or bleak up accumul:rled
►vastcs in filter ships nroturd stockpiles and
manure handling alcas as needed.
Cruse _ 111111's lu C unlrol Insects Site 5 recif is 1'1-:1clices
Fur more infillrlralion contact the coulrcralive Extension Scrvicc, Depaltrncnl ofEi lumology. Box 7613, With Carolina Statc Univcrsily,
Raleigh. NC:, 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1946, rage 2

Mortality N- Janacenient Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground ,viLhin 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-16S.7
Compleie incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
Iv approved by the Department of Agriculture
Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 15. 1996

' Lo
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ - q
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMo - fo3 -Idll
SWCD 701; -S 7- 0 78'3
NRCS 7 e4 - 37-1 re o4
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes frorrtyour operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running offsite. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessiblelocation for all employees at the
facility. The followingare some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add sail to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application fieldactions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
C. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason{s} that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d.' Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-actioninclude:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill andnote any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on oroff of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - After hours, emergency number. 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff s Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name: L.,/� 13AI2 c %2r- v r
b. Contractors Address: 0,-C.5
c. Contractors Phone:
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: • �uC ~ i +b 2
b. Phone: --1 Cv O
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
c3
-7 - ZO-C6
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: r
(Please print)
Signature: Date: ? _42Q�
Name of Manager (If different from owner):
Signature:Xw 2)
Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print) �.F_2
Affiliation: VSD A, - hl u -7-S, _
Address (Agency):_ 4 7 Z I -L o I Z7 Col 1mzco KID _
Signature:
SP, .� DJ /,)c ZS
8
Pate: (, - 7-q I

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
l '
Landowner/Operator Name: Scott H. D a�i5
Address: 6935 Highway 152 West
Mooresville, NC 28115
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE 1 - FIELD SPECIFICATIONS
p 0--
-7
'per,iv
County: Rowan
Date: May 31, 1996
Field
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Usable Size
Of Field
(Acres)
Sail Type
Slope
M)
Crop (s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
(In/Hr)
Maximum*
Application
per
Irrigation
Cycle
Inches)
1
19.86
Pacolet
3-8
Corn/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.44/.40
5
7.26
Pacolet
3-8
Corn/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.44/.40
6
4.32
Pacolet
3-8
Fescue
0.35
.30
7
1.97
Pacolet
3-8
Corn/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.44/.40
9
2.34
Pacolet
3.8
Fescue
0.35
.30
11
8.20
Pacolet
3-8
Fescue
0.35
.30
*This is dairy manure storage pit wastewater with a nitrogen content of approximately 7.4 pounds of
PAN/] 000 gallons. Mr. Davis will apply to land prior to planting small grain for silage and prior to planting
corn silage or grain sorghum if he elects to use grain sorghum for his summer silage, but he needs to add
grain sorghum to his Waste Utilization Plan. He can apply 75 to 100 pounds of PAN to his grain silage and
140 to 170 pounds of PAN to his corn or grain sorghum silage. He needs to redo his Waste Utilization Plan.
He should apply the nutrients to his spring silage crop in two applications. He can probably apply up to 120
pounds of PAN to fescue. Apply half the PAN in the fall and half in the spring. Apply the wastewater in
a split application to his corn silage or grain sorghum and also to his fescue hay crop.
DAVTB I FS

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
L_ OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: Scott Davis Dairy
DATE: 7/20/00%
A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 93.7 At no time should the
effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 2.3 feet level below
the settled top of dam.
A visual inspection of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway.
The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back
slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment—pumping, loading, hauling; spreading, etc. --
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan.. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
( 180 days or 6 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC,Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Scott Davis
Location: 6935 Highway/52 West Moores v; !!e, NC
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: Dairy 8013
Number of Animals: 200
(Daign capnitr)
/lam
APR - 9 2009
Phi; DE-'.�•�� MRO
Uii wr Protection
The Waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and/or groundwater. The.plant nutrients in the animal waste should
be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the
limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown. /
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to
be grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not a ly more nitrogen than the
crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they a different infiltration rates,
.leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per
year. With special precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons
per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters
which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days prior to
planting. Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements should be based on the waste
analysis report from your waste management facility. Attached you will find information
on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to tAe lab
for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with
15A NCAC 2H.0217 adopted by the Environmental Management Commission.
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
Ali Up.r prntpctinn Section
APR 0 3 2009

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage capacity. When
the waste reaches the designed level, it must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent
pollution of surface and 1 or ground water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields where the waste
is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should
be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of the crop grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize
the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner.
Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are important as they have
different infiltration rates and leaching potential. Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than S tons per acre per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters. Wind
conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor problems. To maximize
the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30 days prior to planting. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients and reduce odor problems.
The acres needed to apply animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for this type of
facility. Acreage requirements may be more or less based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility.
2

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The design of your waste management facility is based on the following:
A 200 head milking herd with an average animal live weight of 1400 lbs.
Lot runoff and urine will be collected in the waste storage pond and land applied with a
hard hose traveler irrigation system.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year (gallons, fts, tons, etc.)
200 animals x 21 (gaVday/cow) wastelanimal year x 180 (number of days) x 75 (% confinement
tune) = 567,000 gal. of waste/year.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
200 animals x 69 lbs. N/animal/yr =13,800 lbs. Total N from lot
(PAN from NCDA Test Report) or (PAN from N.C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and have appropriate equipment
to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and surface
application:
FOR APPLICATION RATES SEE TABLE 1
3

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Your waste storage pond is designed for 180 days of temporary storage and the temporary
storage must be removed on the average of once every6 MONTHS. In no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure exceed the maximum operating level elevation of
93.7 . A permanent marker will be placed at this elevation.
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) or
Soil and Water Conservation District office after you receive the waste analysis report for
assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to
applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This operation has 102.8 acres available for waste application. The crop rotation of corn cut for
silage , followed by small grain. Nitrogen will be applied to crops based on the realistic yields at
the rates listed in table 1.
Timing and application rates will be as followed:
Rye Grass/Hay: Feb.-May/Sept.-Oct. at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days
before planting.
Sudex/Hay: April -Aug. at the rate of 150 lbs. of N/ac no more than 30 days before
planting.
Fescue/Pasture: Mar. -Jun. and Aug -Nov at the rate of 110 lbs of N/ac
Fescue/Hay: Mar -Jun and Aug -Nov at the rate of 150 lbs of N/ac.
On fields which will be grazed reduce the amount of N required by 25%.
Waste applied to tracts and fields in Table 1 will be hauled and broadcast with a honeywagon,
tanker or manure spreader. Parts of Home tract (tract 105) will be irrigated with a hard
hose traveler. The acreage of all irrigated fields has been reduced by 25%. Maintain all
waste handling equipment in accordance with manufactures specifications. The system
should be evaluated every year to ensure proper acreage and proper system.
NOTE. The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient rich and will
require precautionary measures to prevent over application of nutrients or other
elements.
4

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, marinade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Environmental Management for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has long term access to adequate land on which to properly apply the waste.
If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he shall
provide NRCS with a copy -,of a written agreement (sample enclosed) with a
landowner who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land
for waste application for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RS) or
an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If an ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be used where
runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to "Buffers" required by
DEM. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 390 (Interim) - Riparian
Forest Buffers.)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing.
b. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. [See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.]
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATION
(Continued)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
B. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when
the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall not be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that no
more than 20 to 25 percent of the Ieaf area is covered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop
on bare soil.
11. Animal waste shall not be. applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. This distance
may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative filter
strips are present. [See Standard 393 - Filter Strips]
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the Iandowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands
by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist." Animal waste should not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge
directly into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
C

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(Continued)
17. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must maintain a maximum
operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event in
addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
18. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be
provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are limited to areas
where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
19. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
20. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist
should be kept on site.
7

; I WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
NAME OF FARM:
OWNER/MANAGER AGREEMENT
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specification and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction
of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environment Management (DEM) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24
hour storm. The approved plan will be filled on-site at the farm office and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for
review by DEM upon request.
NAME OF FACILITY OWNER: TT /�-
(Please print)
Signature: Date:- :2 r 20
Name of Manager (if different from owner): ��' �_ fl `
rr
Signature: _ —A-, - - - Date: 7 - ala D d
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print)_ 1�. oc9EZ?,i DkL2
Affiliation: L,�b & -- ?J 2L..2a
Address (Agency): Z-7 Z?- `L o t D Loh aim L12
Signature:
8

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional land has to be leased, etc.)
hereby give
permission to apply animal waste from his
Waste Utilization System on acres if my land for the duration of time
shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, and other
trace elements and when properly applied should not harm my land or crops. I
also understand that the use of waste will reduce my need for commercial
fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner:
Date:
Waste Producer:
Date:
Technical Representative:
Date:
SWCD Representative:
Date:
Term of Agreement: , 19 to , 20
(Minimum of Ten Years on Cost Shared Items)
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
E

PRODUCERS NAME Scott Davis
Date 6/7/99
Realistic
TRACT FIELD SOIL TYPE CROP YIELD Lbs.N per Ac.
ACRES Lbs. N Utilized Month Appilied
19211 1'
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
19.9
3,980
April - August
1•
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
19.9
2,985
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
2
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
3.8
760
April - August'
2
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
3.8
570
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
3
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
4.0
800
April - August
3
Pacolet
Rye Grassi Hay
3
150
4.0
600
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
4
Paoolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
4.0
800
April - August
4
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
4.0
600
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
5"
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
7.3
1,460
April -August
5"
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
7.3
1,095
Feb-May/Sept-0d
6'
Pacolet
Pasture / Fescue
3
110
4.3
473
March - May 1 August - October
7'
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
1.9
380
April - August
7'
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
1.9
285
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
9'
Paoolet
Pasture / Fescue
3
110
2.3
253
March - May /August - October
10
Paoolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
2.5
500
April - August
10
Paoolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
2.5
375
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
11"
Paoolet
Pasture / Fescue
3
110
8.2
902
March - May / August - October
12
Paoolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
2.3
460
April - August
12
Paoolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
2.3
345
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
13
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
1.5
300
April - August
13
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
1.5
225
Feb-allay/Sept-Oct
14
Pacolet
Hayland / Fescue
3
150
3.0
450
March - May / August - October
15
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
7.0
1,400
April - August
15
Pacolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
7.0
1,050
Feb-May/Sept-Qct
16
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
12.7
2,540
April -August
16
Paoolet
Rye Grass/ Hay
3
150
12.7
1,905
Feb-May/Sept-Oct

792 1
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
-14.7
2,940
April -August
1
Pacolet
Rye Grass/Hay
3
150
14.7
2,205
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
9
Pacolet
Sudan Hay
4
200
3.4
680
April - August
9
Pacolet
Rye Grass/Hay
3
150
3.4
510
Feb-May/Sept-Oct
TOTAL 102.8 31,826 lbs.
Pasture lands Nitrogen rates have been reduced by 251A. TOTAL N PRODUCED 13,800 lbs.
18,028 lbs. DEFICIT OF N
• NOTE Field Acerage has been reduced to.retlect wettable acres under irrigation

r�
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Naive: Scott H. Davis
Address: 6935 Highway 152 West
Mooresville, NC 28115
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE I - FIELD SPECIFICATIONS
County: Rowan
Date: May 31, 1996
Field
Number
Approximate
Maximum
Usable Size
Of Field
(Acres)
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop (s)
Maximum
Application
Rate
(In/Hr)
Maximum*
Application
per
Irrigation
Cycle
Inches)
1
19.86
Pacolet
3-8
Corn/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.44/.40
5
7.26
Pacolet'
3-8
Corn/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.44/.40
6
4.32
Pacolet
3-8
Fescue
0.35
.30
7
1.97
Pacolet
3-8
Corn/Small Grain Silage
0.35
.441.40
9
2.34
Pacolet
3.8
Fescue
0.35
.30
11
8.20
Pacolet
3-8
Fescue
0.35
.30
*This is dairy manure storage pit wastewater with a nitrogen content of approximately 7.4 pounds of
PAN/1000 gallons. Mr. Davis will apply to land prior to planting small grain for silage and prior to planting
corn silage or grain sorghum if he elects to use grain sorghum for his summer silage, but he needs to add
grain sorghum to his Waste Utilization Plan. He can apply 75 to 100 pounds of PAN to his grain silage and
140 to 170 pounds of PAN to his cam or grain sorghum silage. He needs to redo his Waste Utilization Plan.
He should apply the nutrients to his spring silage crop in two applications. He can probably apply up to 120
pounds of PAN to fescue. Apply half the PAN in the fall and half in the spring. Apply the wastewater in
a split application to his com silage or grain sorghum and also to his fescue hay crop.
DAVTB 1 FS

prE rJ 7 rt'� W � � '� . ,! V -_ � r ' � ' i fit ; a v `f t •
z? - �fi L .. r`�:�''r_.• +^'tti ��`+rT'"., �'Y�- �- 7,4 I-�''�. `s f �-r'x'.+,Y' ,�'.
ft
VI
�. 1 -'yti1 '� �ti'- ~ +� h t •v ,'�''_:C I'Z' _ � �'�` �y �
w` _ ,'��� it ,���� ti4F. ':, t i '. t :rI.. ��.1>.� • +-�i'+'kf • �� �, `'� +' �• S.4 � { -r �� �,.r k'r ti, x>r, �,
ir
in
• . � �. "�'', ' Aqr J S. { p . I S r .�. .-: �fr� _ ��,':Y�."4�•^ r s Y_
- - - .'f. '�'R ' • 1 . •si• i ` - �l• '' ;.�' .-i si'�'�'r m ^s J'q�,y` ,7
r.c.• � tiler +. y '� + ?r 'i x. ..a'^�'<m '
r�a trM.'�4�{�ti r � k •- I� .' r•r� syy � r * `��iu- `\�'� 't • tl r+�,
As�3 igar;y 'L5'L�'7�`QI'� ,t.rk•':i•� � ._ ,.y ''•• ,f a�•'�"ir 1 ti ; �``;'
+,:.r,' 1�ft}ls ;•-.a s � �� r @rr ,.M' ,fS 7 !
.,! •».1. , • { • yY n - � ii •L ! /yam ,. 1. ::,•to x '� '•�
,v s.• 5�4 f ,� 'l'i"T. 5,I .- X { P:t, � 1'� y ' `•
� s�'- � �tr.l;r,. x+r\��e �. � � '`• st tori t
.+ I.^.`.tit•+''.,r-, �, .w, +J+.:s � -T., rT�v /x��s , -?�� a;�k�ra
r .rte• '. _i•% �•{!�:• ,'r�TfF�'�� s•�•it '', r r �•�- + c � '` r"i: •�� '� `yam
,i 'r T_r; k?�. t , r,' r' 3• ei'"M ".' , �ti• '' ,tri:
rr '*�! t r r, + } � + T ?: , 4 k y � �.�.�` ' •f h �, ¢ � + i f F 'y .'"' 1J
r.. •.t ars *' �4 : . Y•�t, t, �6 b 4 i ri
.,.,.rr + _ -, � _ . f •: d� +y M$�� _ a + r `� `a. . � r �.0 � •i i �'1 a �T .
, n .• k '+,'+V',5��'w'Mr ..,k -... .. '. '-`'� 1 i..:.vy.t':i ',� ,�' Yr �V.�-.XY'
'Y{', !• �. .. •, , J} : � j: : - •, _ _�.T•.ra�i7i'�7� :: _J.iZ; :`..'r =�, .` i~
r, ' ,..' ' .`.''' n `• mak: �.
f.+• .;y{�Rh ( tel;•+:• ,', '�
rr t.
.t, rL i9JJ}/ ; .' •�.. w�rF,� r { �. •-.;' j b: 1 _:'.%ii: 'Y•=•v`. .:i
.t .r`Ij:', f� � J + rr'ri i F � P: •x'-�''/'�I,.?�i� f��,= }�+5w J`� ',tik;,lfy�� f
1 'S� � k i r'�ri:ti i �•rl'r � � + �•1�'`��,4�i��� �-r 1 :t{, �,4
,1�- ,r (� I jr, ' 4:, ..<•<• �•� � •i a i f'k ilC:SJ� .,. '3' �'` � r '
^y^F, � ,�i��IF+`�:r`-•_�. s�:::'r�:'� a�(-T��Kci *+fA� - �.,N r 0. s'; .�=`;.r'
� M� .�1+ � w e ti. S � 'i r�eir. N Gtl -xrtJ'� y rr )� ; :e,, `•�: .;u.,if 2"t;
' "yl, �• , ,', i -i- T : c-�'r=4' � w�Y. �:i -t3� .. .. t� 5i53,�"+� r � (. 4,'s � ,. k.
•..�'1..'�ry y..s ; F _.r� . , . Fi.: ,i.. Vie.• �I '(-' k%,i'.s :Nie., (r � y.Se „ •s i .,t.. 'rf' Lx.•. �Ir ti 2 _ q ,s'�
17*
a '''y" r' w�f' � ti._. � 14r ;i'g.�3:..v.- rt �' �, .••'r—•�� - " ,�:��:%,i �;tZ + 5 ,r • ' k" _ �+r '
t'1 wla` ' •ik 4�4� 1 RL` j. •'t1 L Y r. •� i
•'^� _P ,��'`� .. ,Iy '�• d ��,,y]y�[[yy lK•y� k4f 4f ;' `may - .l+ • " � a
�{ _ 4u� �� ' � !iF_'r' rtTj.1 l ,R ' il•4M ' �.^I S 5t.

DATE: 05-13-1998
Soft Davis
Dairy Waste Storage Structure
Rowan, NC
Design Criteria:
200 Dairy caws at 1,400 tbs. each= 280.000 lbs, live weight
180 days storage
5 gaIddaylcow of waste water
15,000 sq. ft of non -pond Drainage Area
Waste from Freestall area and access aileys wig be scraped and stored
in the waste storage pond, as well as ft runoff from
approximately 15.0DD sq. ft. of the barns. lot and siOs.
1. Storage Volume Required
A Manure Storage with 75% confinement
200 cows X 44.6 nalJday/cow X
180 days
52,701 cu. ft.
7.48 galsJcu.ft
B. Waste Water from Milk Sam
200 cows X 5 galJday/cow X
180 days
24,064 cu. ft.
7.48 gal&Jcu.fL
C. Normal Runoff from Open Areas for 180 days
Drainage Areas -16.888 sq. iL
1 day CN 98130 day CN 92
Monthly
Monthly
Months Precip. (P) (inches)
Evap. (E)
P - E
October 3.21
2.56
0.65
November 2.94
1.83
1.11
December 3.56
1.1
2.46
.larucary 3.72
1.1
2.62
February 3.78
1.83
1.95
March 4.61
2.92
1.69
21.82
10.48
16.64 runoff Inches X
15,000 sq. ft.
20,800 cu. ft
12 Inches I fL
D. Waste Feed and Bedding
10 cu ft.1 day X
180 days= 1,800 cu, ft
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME NEEDED 99,365 cu. It.
Runoff (inches)
2.37
2.12
2.69
2.85
2.9
3.71
16.64

- Add to liquid Volume -
11. Normal (P) Precipitation less (E) evaporation on Structures for 180 days
October - March 10.48 Inches =
III. 25 yr. storm on Open Area of 15.000 sq. ft.
CN a 95 for open areas
With 25 yr. i day strom of 6.0 Inches, runoff a 5.41 Inches
15,000 sq. ft. X 5.41 inches runoff
12 Inches
6,763 cu.fL
15,470 sq. fL surface area of storage pond
IV. 25 yr. storm on Pond Surface
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 inches
V. Emergency Sp11M'ay
25 yr. 1 day storm = 6.0 khches
Peak discharge = 3.2 ds.
Use E5W with 12 it bottom width,
3 to 1 We slopes. 0.2 ft. stage
VI. Freeboard
VII. Total Depth of Pond 8 feet of storage
142,611 designed amount
106,127 amounineeded
36,684 amount surplus
0.9 ft
6,763 cu. ft.
0.4 ft
0.5 ft
0.2 ft
1.0 fL
10.14 M

Dairy f=arm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
ti1111rCC
Cause
Ilhills m hlll1imbe 011111' "I(C Specific hracliecs
1 iulu�le.uE
Dairy produoinn
n
Vegetative or wooded buffers
n
ItecommendCd !lest nm, MBelli em practices
LST
(;tlnd indgmenl and colll•llnll sense
Ilavetl Il1ts or baa ally
•
WCt 111i111111'l:-covc:rCll sllrfaces
W
Scrape or flush dally -
sllrfilces
n
Promote dying Mill proper vemilatinll
n
Routine cheeks and mainicnanee on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, strict; tanks
I1c1111e11 algia,
0
urine
11romwe (lying will) proper ventilation
•
Partial microbial deeomposilion
Replace wet or manure -covered heddiug
hfamlre dry biacks
I'alti:ll 11licrollial cicellmposililln
Provide liquid drainage for stored mumire
StilrilLe tank Ilr hasin
Eiiiul microbial decumliosition ;
n
llnmun or olid -leve) loadinU
>Ill Gice
•
Mixing while filling ;
n
t'iu1i: covers
•
Agililtilw when eluptying
lasill surface mitts of solids;
ftyliobuin lot rnnolfand liquid additimis
ri
Agilme only prior to manure rcmoval
f-1
1'ravcu hiningiLal iuldilivcs or oxidants
Se111ilin Hamill VIII C.-wes
0
ll: inial microbial llecomposltloll
t11111it dranlagt: front settled scslills
vitemovC
•
Mix111g while filling
Solids regularly
•
Agitim111t when emplying
ALimite, shrlly 111 Oudge
•
Agitation wltlas spreadinU
r�111I IIIICCIrllll lYi $I41{IyI]Illilgcs
stuc:adcl Illlllcts
volatile uas emissions
fV�
;ssh residual maimic tiom sluvader illicr uxe
n
Proven hiologicill addiiives or oxid:uits
11111_llvc1ed I1IMMIC,
•
Volatile gas Collissions while
n
Sntl Intl'CI1i111111'Shll'Iyj5E1111t�Cs —
t.1111.1 y Ill s111111;c im beld
drying
n
Soil iucorptim inn wilhin -18 lirs
iul fal:cs
1/
Spread in dein unifisrllt #nyess for lapid (lying
n
proven hil,hll;icai illllrliyes. oir 11.i1tativ.,
_
l'hl�h 1.u1E.,
Agim ionoflecycicll lagoon
n
blush iiml:Cuvers;
i►�
is
liquid wllile Bolla ilre 6111 ig
n
r),ienl) Eill lines tis nem I►llttunl of tants with
11i-silllluu vents
(hilsille dwin c ollecailllt
•
Agitatiou during wa%luwaier
prix Covers
ur jlmc:tioll lifixes, ,
clucveyance
A NU I( : -. t IIIvcliltler 11. 191111, 11i11,c I

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Stnircc
Cause !)fill's [u Cuills"lrl Inscrls 5i1cSpecific F,acticrs
l,iquhl Syslems
1.111511 (11111CIS • ACCu11111iClliull ufsulitIS Q Fitisll sysiem is ties ig'llc i anti nl1Cralctl
Sufficicolly Irl IC111ovc accullIII I'll ed solids limll
(( �i poilers as designed.
n lWitt1ve hl idgislg lrl accuumlaled solitk al
Lagoons :Ind HIS • {-1-micll Slllllls %-lafillaill higulms, Scllling Illisills amt flils wi1Cle
hest blectliug is allpalcn[ lir minimize 111c
clustblg of solids lu a deplll of nu nmlc than f, -
lVirlches over marc than 30% of sol face.
k:sccssivc ve clalive Decayinf; vegclaliun OV hlaiulain vegetative culllcnl flung hanks of
Glu%vill Ingoons mid other inlpomndinews lu plcveill
accuttlulation of dccayitlg vcgclalivc ntallcr
:hung lvalcl's cclge un hiiputim1mc11I's lies imcfer.
My SySlcnls —_
I ceticls i ccd Spillace {'"-W Dcsign, operalc and iiwinlaits feed syslcros (c.1;.,
Innikcls ami houghs} to minimize the
cammiaiiull of ticcaying wastage.
Clem iip spillage on n Inu[ine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day inlclvni during summer; I5 -3U day inlclval
ell ' 1g hillier).
Decd Sltnage ACci m Ialimis ol'l'ccd icsiducs OVIICCIIICC IlnNsillie accln111llalnlll Ivilhill a11d
alormd himictliale perimelcr or fcctl slorage
alcas by insuring Illainagc awry from silt
:Incl/ur lnuviding adcllnale conminment
cuvcscd hilt for bimm's grain and similar high
uisllnc 8I -lin 1111)(Iucls).
Insllcci frlr and semovc or brenk up ncuimuialcd
solids in filter skills -found feed slump as
needed.
AN. luvemlicr 11, 1996, I'age I

_�- SuIII cc - - - t:n€€se HIM'S 11€ conivul IIISCCIS - Site Sloccillc I'ractices
Aniau,al I1111dilig Aic;v; Accunrult►Iions of inim-11 %Vamcs Eliminaic low ;ucas Ihat hap Inuislurc aimig
;113d Iced woslagw fences;nul a►Ilicr locations where waslc
;lccuuu1lales and distanbancc by animals is ,
naanal.
1W Alainlain Icncc Iuws and filler Strips a€uaad
animal ltuldiar}; alcas Io minimize
accanimimiuus of wastes (i.e., illsl►ccl fur ail
Icnatwc or b€cak up accuIII ltfatcd solids as
_ Iectled).
UIy Rimmic I kuld ila Accun►ul:aliuns ol'anilual waves. CV Remove spillagi: un ;€ Iouliale basis (c.g., 7 - IU —�
Systems Clay inlet val Halling summer; I5-30 Clay interval
dutinl; avialer) where €tlatimc is loaded-flur land
�applic.10un or dispusal.
CW 1'Iovidc titr adqualc tirai€1acc wound tllanurc
st kliilcs.
111spccl lilt marl €cntuve or bleak np accumulated
%vasics in fillet' ships aroamd stockpiles and
ma11otc handling atc;as ns needed.
For tome iafontlaliun contud IIIC cooperNtive Lxlcrlsion Scrvicc. Ucpsntillcuul of linlomalogy, Box 7613, Na111r Calulina Slate University,
Raleigh, FIC, 27695-7613.
AN -11C - Nuvcnlber 11. 1996, I'agc 2

Nfortality lfanagement Methods
(check which method! s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at lza;t 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without, endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 15. 1996

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: Scott Davis Dairy
DATE: 7/20/00
A 4" X 4" treated post, painted white or a 4" diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 93.7 At no time should the
effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 2.3 feet level below
the settled top of dam.
A visual inspection -of the waste storage pond will be performed at least twice a year.
The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency spillway.
The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the back
slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint (ground hogs, muskrats, etc.) burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
• The waste storage pond will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded areas shall be
repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground cover shall be
reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The dam and all
constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of 10-10-10 per
acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment --pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc.—
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization
plan. The waste storage pond will be emptied at the end of each design storage period
( 180 days or 6 months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri -Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM d-fq-1 b it
SWCD 704 x_-037 0-2T3
NRCS 7_D4_-_&32--1 (o 04
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes_frorryour-operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running offsite. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessibleiocation for all employees at the
facility. The followingare some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of darn.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application fieldactions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
-.- - c: incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems; houses, solid separators•actioninclude:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaksprior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent'of the spill andnote any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - After hours, emergency number. 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d.. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advicettechnical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6_ _Contact the tecbnical_specialist who certified -the lagoon (NRCS,-Consulting-EngineerTetc.)--
b. Phone: O
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

UN TED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL. RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
N EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: SCM DAVIS FARM
DATE: June 7 99
Contact the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality - Winston-Salem Regional Office at (9 10)
7714600 if the problem occurs Monday through Friday between 8:00am and 5:00pm.
If the problem occurs outside of those hours contact the State of North Carolina
Department of Crime Control and Public Safety - Division of Emergency
Management - Raleigh at 1-800-662-7956 or [phone]. Provide the following
information:
FACILITY NAME: SCOTT AVIS FARM_
LOCATION: 6935 Highwayj§2 West
REGISTRATIONIPERMIT 9 80.13
• If there is danger to human life, downstream residences, roads, etc. call 911 of the
Rowan County Sheriff's Department at 636-1011
• Begin lowering the liquid level in the pond by applying waste water to nearby
irrigation fields if possible.
• Contact a contractor to begin repair of the problem to minimize off-site damage (list
the names and phone numbers of three below).
NAME PHONE NUMBER
1 L. P. BEger, Jr. 633-9693
2 LAM Powell 278-0527
3 Kermy Williams 636-0686 .
• Contact the Rowan Soil and Water Conservation District
at 637-1604
• Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage pond . If this
specialist is no longer working or is not available, contact another technical specialist
who has design approval such as the Area Engineer.
NAME
PHONE NUMBER
L.M. Safley Jr.
919-851-8528
jEg F. Graham
910-673-0487
J. Donald Matthis
910-592-5519

ti`` ` .' S�. •:�'' 15. Stt• xti:i - * -
si, �'` S
h x �} `y a 1F 1 o�"i *• �_ '
yl n 3rr M�er:;`k
., ���G, $F r � > �e � ! � +e G�0 .��.�l�O . x,al ���'* � � ��, �� kM °�t+f' _ .;� � .• J Q 51� e
a�� g x
61 P q
. cx-•-„�€,. \,'(� �`�.' ;fps ` .� x - � ,!' _ n S
I a�:
hl
p� AOSR W -R0
D a o KNELE11plaD
i -.e FIRE �4��' �, Rp RA Sen.0
ZA
Ts
��r
STA'aDs�`+= aQ\ `f SRF G p kvc�
EO r' 4
BLIIEFi p fit.. ;�♦ST 3s
ohl
�yv ssa x U�J.�KT �/��y�� ;, � �\ � / ��������s rt�;eSC,F /� _� II��i.' a+ ;- � ��{��\��Gar� � ;� ��'� �� � •��
asAl
�. i.•E�1�'r:•SL S'. M :�% f f •' ' 4y~ry
q qc a en 44 C3
SC
i
d �+iri root _ qty, j x:�tPkTty” F
I
I,� 6
», VE,
CHIN m- SCH� H1
RES LL
Moto pATW LL ,s' �cr fRQLL1x6M1 `4`
E7< Y;K� a .�-yyPe� �:k6�EEw Y;R V�E GROVE ..��
Q �- SRI �rr + (All
mit', �' SEE.CNINA s
%AL
IARF1 Qq a . ORpE
REL ��� �S C
MI00
TRA F�j < ae SC t �o Rp
p1 Il�,a r x tiG REDIEAfi
+� ATWE Rp
FIR
caQ� _ SQ RBttEp6E 5EE j
DIt 4�Q`'a,LAND15;
E EIR vide o
..� Q.. 85
y ST x KEYIN ,
lQ fiO. { Ra r'
INA 'u a r, Z`" 22 , n k DCNF��
Tq x S
.� ENO
� RD. 4* tNSEt I4I � ��0• 9 �3: a
-'KANNAPOL!
a LL
'ENOCHVILLEALT
1
RE
FI DIST. 29
0 1 2
SCALE :OF MILES C A A R R
Copyright 1995• Quality Maps, Inc.
.PTIST CB RD ....... 9D 000 WHITE OR.. -.....38 CAST" RREP A ......So CORNELIUS ST ........ %A DIXON OR ............ 9R ERREST MILLER RD .... 40 FRENCH BEL•K AD ...... 3C
.FBER CT........_.. 38 BOB WHITE RON.......ID CASTOR RD........... BD CORRELL AV.......... SB I T OR ............. 9D ERWIN TEMPId CHURCH FRONTIER CIA........ BB
LcBLR LYERLY RO....]B BONNIE CIR.......... 3D CRYAWBl1 LJR..........4A CORREI.L FARM 10..... BB DOCK -SIDE........... 6C RD ................. 2A FRY S'I..............7D
VPBLR AD.......... IOC DOST ST. IB CATFISH NO......... i00 CORRINER SPRGS RD ... 76 AOGWDOD AV .......... 7C ETHERIDGE RD........ 2C FULLER CIA.... -••••-4A
UIGLR OR........... 9A SOSTAIR ST.......... BB CAUBLE FARM RD ...... 4C COUNTRY CLUB OR .... IOR OOG5100D OR ....... 7B,7C F FULTON ST........... 40
U+GER OR.......... 14A DEADSKAW III) ....... ..7A CELIAA AV ............ 7B CODUTRY DR .... ...... 9D OOOLEY RD........... IA FAGGART CIR......... BD G
k"m RD........... 98 BAAOSRAW HOLLOW RD 7A
CEDAAFIELD DR.......BO COUNTRY LS .... 4R, 7A.10 DOUBLE TKUA6 RD.....9C FAIT. RD............ 9A GALLINDRE RD.......•4A
UHI VIEW LH........IA DRE" I11............. 4R CEDRRIIOOD DR........ OA COUNTRY NEADOWS TR..BA DREAMFKELD DR ....... 2C FANNIE SL.OAN RD ..... 3D GARDEN M .......... BB
WNMA;fDT AD........*A DREWTWOOD LF........ 2C CELAHtLSE RD.........4A COUNTRY VILLAGJI DR..4C MEN CIA............ 4C FRRW DR ............. 2C CARRICK RD.......... SR
L•RINGER RD........ 4A BASARFIELD DR ....... 10 CDRTERY CO RD ...... 3C COR AD.......... SD DRIFTWOOD TR ........ 6C FARM AD............ 7D GATTON RD...........3B
IttGER KLUTYE RD..BB SRIARWOOD LULC DR..•4C CENTENARY RD........ 3A CRAWFORD OR ......... 4C DUKE DIS............. BB YARIMUSE AD ........ 4A GENEVA DR........... BD
L'IRGLA RD .... ....lOD SRI ARWOOD TER..... •.4C CRAFFIN RD .......... 2A CRAWFORD AD......... SB DUKEVILLE RD ........ 5B FESPERMAR AD........ 9C GEORGE BROWN RD.. ... 91)
155 RUN............ SO ERIGGS RO...........4C CHANDLER AD. 4C CRESCENT RD.........9A DULIN AV............ 80 FIBER ACRES 'A" ST..30 GET It RD............ 2A
LY LEAP DR..... .....9A dRLMGLE FERRY AD,.. -SO CHARDLLIS pit. SP CRESS LOOP AO ....... BA DUNMS MTM RO.... SC, 24B FIELDSROOK DR_.,._.,
B$ GYBSOW RO...... .....ID
L7NOIIPT DR....,....2D BROOK CIA...........4A CEEWAULT RD......... lA CRESS SCB AD........ BA DUTCH FARM RD... .... 9C FIELOCREST..........9A GIFFORD LN......... IDB
ky. DOE DR.,....... SD BROOKFIELD CIR DA ... EB CHAS CHAROLAIS AD ... 50 CRESTVIEW DR......,. BC E FIELDSTONE OR ....... 53 GYN RD .............. 90
LAS:IZ CLUB ED...... SO dpOOKS RD........... 9A CBILI)CM RD ......... 2A CRLCKETT LN......... 30 E CHAMBLEC OR....... 4C FILE RD ............. 6C GLENN FAUST ILD...... IC
LAI, POPLAR RD...... ]D BROWN ACRE AD...,., -9A CBYLDAEAs AD........ 3C CRONER RD_.......... 9D E LLENDIMMAU RD.....99 FISH POND FLO......_.9A GLOVER RP•••••••• -•-80
CA'JFA DAIS RD.......18 Ipmm RD.......,.TO. ]C C.INA GROVE RD......SC CROOKED OAK LN......7C EARNHARDT RD..... SC.BC £ISKZR DR........... 9C GoDBEY RD........... 4A
7A•JI:A 6N.,......... 7C BROWNS FARM RD ...... 4D CBOATE RD........... SC CRUSE CIR........... 80 EAST SIDE OR........ BC FISHER NO........... 9A GOLD RNOB RD........96
:.VEL L-00 .......OD ERUNER SLAG? 90 ..... OC CIR DR........... 4C,EC CAUSE LLI............ BB FASTImo DR. ........ 9A FLIT CAN CB.RO..... 108 GOLDFISH RD......... BC
:X
MD... ..........�D DUCCMEER CIR......... CIRCLE 'M' OR....... 4D CAUSE RD..._........ LB EASTOVER OR.........EB FLAT ILOCK RD........ BA GOODI" ON..........9A
�'" ...RA CLARK R0............6C CUTNEAEON AD ........ ]B ERSWILLE OR........ 9A FLAMING AD .......... 9C GOOOMAN LAKE ILD..•.. SD
EREIIIEER RD......... BC FLLT'CRER LO......... SC GDODNAN RD....... BA.4D
�•••�-nom.. oe. y ....BA GOOONIGBT FARM RD ...4C