600001_PERMIT FILE_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Envirenmentaf Qual

-D4
t-C
'17
N xv- Af
. . . . . . . . . .
1)

J.� [ r '. � C�C :� • � � ,%• /'jam'' U�� 1 ✓ �, V' + � 1 1 '♦ - In� �' � - J �.. � _ r
.l I 'moi• I l 1 1
r 4vn1? odo,1 ShSn�Jr�,
��+'�\ 1� '• N � y41 - V r4r y„ f•~♦ OC (� S �� 11,t�
', � 1 � .�� C�L� •,1 r*-.__ :" i i' I r yti � j � . \} � �� `'',��} � � moi'':'.-•' �fc'}'? � f
4 '�- �\' ��`1 � 'y't` \�`. �� ��� "' `` ,,.ly,S� JAS ,....� �I �-'�`l ���1 1 �j�l S ��^ �'��`-'� #,d`�ryl jt\\`v}yJ" ,; � • `• � w
`}11� ,:.: (`�'`� �i , '� _ `-t � i���/ � (� ( � n �r� ��� �. j; �;," �-:. ,ti,,., sr, t�`�t)i�t'�' � 1 � r,, ♦:
i' "y., '�.• ��. ♦,rr�- rr{ � .(�`-, U .tt,,i °r"�� /� r r1.
r,•y, 1. � ���' f i`i"i �::. � 1.-y i' .:1 �:y� r,� �_ 1���\'t, .' ���� i i� • � '� .-�'.] 11 � r }.
inv
`s��•1� t _..r q` .;' f \.' ��� ��� ' +'� �5�� � 1J�J 4 I` � J ��1 tom' .•�l ��k} ir,;il �, l•_' "% �'t_
�., i'Fi'1'E. ✓: 1 �:f� � 4 � ,It C:.; � t �l', `1 use �, '� �_ - �.-`./` �J �- ('. \�!� -1,t�;
� C ,.:_.�-. _fir ^• f
- !'� ! , y � � /,i i •� L ^�'l�lil rrl i 1 I �. ��',11 ,� + ,''i � I `�!� }f;' I � !I
ir
SII �r `�3ad
NQLIYL)LJIW V �� �)j�'" •'� Ir. _
099
. � � ,� � �/� , � / I �,,`; "\�^fir. - 1��' (/�r°'i�- �1,♦ �,
y.0 x 1 }� .I A =. 1" E;1
�r� 1ZL �} r(. ♦ ()I Ir ,� '�.
.. ��. �: , \: =• 1- - � : ; � '�� ��ws ., '�. `4 ✓ 1��. 1.ri j�-.moi � ! /'�'- y- ' . , �1 , /. LL.��4''� 1
•I. \ � , � r Iii �.%�+-' .'l '-��� � ''� !Il'4` � ��.�,,'��, , � rc '� 1� fr•[.,�.
11
vill" j
NIL
qztz
i � ��b 'y � ti� �� \ \ '� ca \ � 44 { - i • i' V •I �'-1 \ y _ r� �J.- ;i `, � �"< 'i ..`'�
r�-

s4k/
N1
. �67

SLu-J"n3 a jyi5 X
40
443
y } V f''apVMS
'� lis .�`• -r5', "v + ` • z : -�'' �' -
AF�r !��.�� � ..°J����'r � � !• ,#} ,�/� � iso 7 �
��.' r . •,t f ` "' KKK V � i `-'Ciw�f� '' ' t`y . � ,;, ° •�� � 4 ... � � t .
7,0 s Sd, r}► '•, ' � .. � try `k .
17 IV
A ',. �� ;P � I � _ 4� 13 A� k` � �� '� •�.. f .� :a�-; ' .A���^ "V ��t t r.�'�'
j7.4
S
�
h ` 7
t l .♦ b 'tib. ..I
�ro a:. 4'�.�' ►' ti � mow, 1 i
,,.oft
aF
. . ` k,t r•� � sa
�. of
. f 4 „� '•shy � . �� -• '{� f . �� `�' ' � � � ,
f .` lr'r �. F+ {y 4 � '�� •hli,-yj' k : �,�'; � �,x - 1
ow
Jig .*t -•loj �`w,. `.'�d�7.�'x , f.v '•.'.d rt,
1" ,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
John Wallace Sr.
Wallace Farm
14324 Eastfield Rd.
Huntersville NC 28078
Dear John Wallace Sr.:
i A&TZ_11W,A
�
NCDEN'R­...,.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT or ,
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 20, 2002
Subject: Removal of Registration
Wallace Farm
Facility Number 60-1
Mecklenburg County
FEB 2 2 2002
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H.0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
-Poultry_with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant at
[phone] ext. 571or Steve Lewis [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely, ,i�
,Gregory J. Thorpe,
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Mecklenburg Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

TIGNS ERRNCH - UQ Fax:919-715-' 48
r 1 00 -,Lr 21 '97
P-02/02
REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATTON
el /
County: flier fd-rel_ LLL "c-,
This Operation is:
pa=T-- only (no coafmemert)
dry litter poulry operation
out of busincssizo animals on site
closed out per NRCS staudards
30,000 -poultry with a liquid unitna] wastc management systent)
Comments:
I am fully aware that should the number of a=irnals increase beyond the threshold limit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 -registration roquire=ents for any reason, I will be. require'd to
norify and re-revista with the Division of Water QuaLitv
7
Date:
Signature* -
?"e -ase return COMT)]`e&A form to: DERNR-DWQ
Wet= Quality scctioa
CvnVlianct Group
P.0, Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 276216.0535
RR -3/97
WC DEPT, OF EIMRONMWr
The f61lo-%x-ia& farm
does not meet the 2H
.0200 regi;traticn requiremcnts.&Mftww"Cee I
facility on the registration database.
E DIONAL OFFICLP
Facility Number;
loci
Farm Name:
V-
owmer:
X C �, r -f
n r -Pii
iiaQ;�'AlUTY SECTION
Maiag Address:
14 3 Z q E7
County: flier fd-rel_ LLL "c-,
This Operation is:
pa=T-- only (no coafmemert)
dry litter poulry operation
out of busincssizo animals on site
closed out per NRCS staudards
30,000 -poultry with a liquid unitna] wastc management systent)
Comments:
I am fully aware that should the number of a=irnals increase beyond the threshold limit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 -registration roquire=ents for any reason, I will be. require'd to
norify and re-revista with the Division of Water QuaLitv
7
Date:
Signature* -
?"e -ase return COMT)]`e&A form to: DERNR-DWQ
Wet= Quality scctioa
CvnVlianct Group
P.0, Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 276216.0535
RR -3/97

MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION'OF WATER;QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
April 26, 2000
TO: Bobby Lufty
Solid Waste'Section, Raleigh
FROM: "Matt -Heller
SUBJECT: Wallace farms
14410 Eastfield Road, Huntersville
`Mecklenburg "County, N.C.
�On `September 17, 1999, you forwarded a report tome for Wallace Farms. The report
identifies.nitrate atconcentrations.above 10 mg/l in groundwatenat the site. After reviewing the
report, I scheduled asite visit .to Wallace Farms. Based on .my visit, .I suggested that additional
monitor wells :be installed .and sampled .at -the site in order to determine the source of .the
contamination. On March 29, 2000, I received a report, containing the results of this -additional
sampling. Thave attached azopy"of this report for your review.
Based on the.analytical results, Phil Thompson, an environmental consultant for Wallace
Farms, suggests that the elevated nitrate in the grouridwater is related .to:the former dairy operation
and not _the •current -composting operation. His conclusion .is . based -upon the ,distribution of the
nitrate with respect to areas of different land use, both former -and current,.at the site. I agree.that
the groundwater data collected to -date is consistent with an agricultural source for the nitrate, via
leaching'from the former"lagoons".and/or the former -cow ".lounging" areas.
As a responsible party for'.the nitrate :contamination, 'Wallace Farms is required .by 15A
NCAC 2L .0106(b) -to -"terminate -and control.the discharge:[and] mitigate1azards resulting from
-exposure to the pollutants." Responsible parties for .groundwater .contamination related -to
.agricultural activities are .not .required .to perform specific .assessment .and corrective .action
requirements outlined -in 15A NCAC 2L .0106(c)..Since the pits'bave reportedly been excavated,
:the lagoon is -out "of .use and ".the dairy is no longer in operation, :the initial corrective action
requirements of .0106(b) appear to have been .met. Existing water supply wells in .the area are
potential exposure pathways and -need to be sampled.

1 believe that periodic groundwater monitoring is needed -at -this site. Ideally., I would like
to :coordinate with your section inorder -to develop a,;plan ,that would monitor the iekisting
contamination aud satisfy -the requirements ,of a.permit issued for,the ,composting:operation. �
I look forward to hearing from you. If you -have any questions about this matter, please call
meat (704) ;663-1699, ext. 241.
Attachment
i
cc:Phil Thompson - Thompson Geological and Environmental `Services, Indian Trail
Alan Johnson - Water-Quality:Section,`MRO
Rick Doby - -Solid Waste. Section, 'MRO
Eric Wallace Wallace Farms,14410 Eastfield-Road,,Huntersville, NC 28078

,: ^" .� � � t%'"Di�•isiu`n^'of Soft Hni
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection ® Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation 1
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
I Facility Number 1 Datc of Visit: 9/21/2(Hltl Ti rie: 1Salll
O Not Operational. O Selon- Threshold
13 Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name:W..itllace.LH:dt'.tul.....................................................................
Owner Name: ,tu m................I.........:............. N.'AMAKX.,Sr,...................
Facility- Contact: .............................................................................. Title:
Mailing Address: 1.432-11oatu1d.Rd ..............................
Onsite Representative: ............................................................
County: MecbJt21 thu rZ................................. MRO
PhoneNo. .Ill:k,B.7.2P.U5..........................................................
................. Phone No:
.. Kwdgrt' x-i1ttNC................................................... 2.80.78 .............
Integrator:....
Ccrtificd Operator: ................................................... ............ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Huntersville , on MecklenhurglCabarrus Co. line . Hwy 115 to N. MecL High. LT on Alexandria to Eastfield Rd . LT on �'•
Eastfield (SR 2459). About 4 mi on Left
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry {M Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude I.1 3� 4 23w.14 1 00 « Longitude L Kfl 7 ' _oo .1
Design Current
Design Current -
Design Current .
S"Ine Capacity Population
Poultry
Ca acity Po ulation Cattle -.- .
Capacity Po elation
❑ Wean to Feeder
Q Lave
Lair)
1 ;fat i:►
❑ feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Late,
❑Non-Dai17'
��.
❑ Farrow to Wean
Q Farrow to Feeder
❑ Otiler
❑ Fal-l'{11t to FL711Si1
-
_ • ,
- , -C
Total rDe'sign Capacity
■w�r,rw
1,300 1
❑ (;ills
F
To SSLW
1,820,000
❑ Boars
Number of Latgorras5 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present D Lat;LLLm Area 10 Spray FiclLi ArL:L
Holding Ponds 1 Solite Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S\'stem „
DiwharZ" & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`? []Yes ❑ No
llisctl,lr e c>ri illatecl t;l: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spra)' Field Q Other
Il. I1'discharee is observed. was the conveva.ncu man-made" ❑ Yes ❑ No
br 11'dJSJ1.r l;;e iS obscl-tcd, did it ivach W<Itcr of the 51atc? t if [acs. rintjliv T)%VQ i
[]Yes ❑ No
li tilliild['kC Is i,a;4C[-CIS, wiiai Is the CA11naled in k4a11,116u•'
d. ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
�'�':1,V:C x..il.le3'tEtFly aS4 l'3'L`,iSaIS:4`3rt
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav ❑ Yeti ❑ No
sh-LiC011-C l S1ructurt 2 Structure 3 stracturc 4 titrUCtL11C 5 SOLI 111.0
ldcntltler:...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Rr, .F, h,,,, r.1 f i„•t,F�al

-- .. _................................................................................................................................................ I............................
3100
Facility Number: 60-1 Date of luspection 9!2112{}tl{I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel Lrees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Wastt Appiicatioji
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re4iuired Records &- Document,
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have at] components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. hail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
.No''vfolations or.deficieticies'were.noted.du'ring this -visit:. You will receive n*o Nkher
correspondence'ab6tit his.Vkit::
Continued on back
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Nig
❑ Yes
❑ Nig
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yeti
Cl No
❑ Yes ❑ Nig
❑ Yes ❑ Nig
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ Nig
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ Nig
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ Ni �
acitity is no longer in operation. No cattle or milking facilities onsite. Need to remove this facility from the active database. This was �►
ientioned last year as well.

me,iewerltnspector tvame Rockvburham
Reviewer/Impector Signature: Date: j/pp
Facility Number: GO -1 Date of Inspection 912112-005
;fdw- lstucs
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yeti ❑ Nig
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
A i, i. ona ommentsan nr rq%in s•-_

State of North Carolina
�\ Department of Environment
�C and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
John Wallace Sr.
Wallace Farm
14324 Eastfield Rd.
Huntersville NC 28078
Dear John Wallace Sr.:
AfflI?6WAJ
r4i 2
mg�- - ��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL REsOURCEs
December 30, 1999 Na pIC'PT •i*
.ONRRNT, Up �,TR
RAX, kF.SOURCRg
4 2000
Won OF WA4Ai,ifrit OAA BEND,
Subject: Fertilizer Application RecorBiltet"'VMh "CIONA, 0' mcr
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 60-1
Mecklenburg County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning ,January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. 1RR1,11RR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRYS, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
IiabiIity for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Mecklenburg County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-161.7 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources )
Division of Water Quality �A4
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 18, 1999 mac, oF'M OP
Johnny Wallace, Manager 41 MRONMEN_1-. I-4EAt T11
Wallace Dairy Farm a, NA't'VP-4.L RF-Sc U I(Ct0J
14410 Eastfield Rd
Huntersville, NC 28078 ® 1999
Subject: Applicitlggl{4ralie'WQ007i7�Sg.
Return of lxniit'Aprli'�atiorFl�t
Wallace Dairy Farm
Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Wallace,
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has received an application for a Non -Discharge Permit for the
Distribution of Animal Residual Solids. Since the purpose of the facility is the composting of solid waste,
the Division of Waste Management is responsible for issuing a permit for the distribution of your product.
We have contacted Ted Lyon in the Division of Waste Management and were informed that you currently
have a permit application for the composting and distribution of solid waste with their Division.
Therefore, we are returning your application. Please contact Mr. Lyon at 919-733-0692 extension 253 if
you have questions regarding your current permit application.
Mr. Lyon did inform us that the Division of Waste Management requested that you contact the Division of
Water Quality to determine if a stormwater or wastewater treatment and disposal permit is necessary for
this site. Please feel free to contact Mr. Bradley Bennet at 919-733-5083 extension 529 regarding any
necessary stormwater permits or Sue Homewood at 919-733-5083 extension 502 for a non -discharge
wastewater treatment and disposal permit.
Sinc y,
Kim H. Colson, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Brent Lockamy, E&A Environmental Consultants
Bradley Bennet, Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Ted Lyon, Division of Waste Management
Mooresville Regional Water Quality Office
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/] 0% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Johnny Wallace, Manager
Wallace Dairy Farm
14410 Eastfield Road
Huntersville, North Carolina 28078
Dear Mr. Wallace:
4 •
SEP Is 1999
�7YI5? � ?i?5 �:;,•'°�:�-^f it ��}
September 9, 1999
�j
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
o �-
Subject: Applications No. WQ0017389
Wallace Dairy Farm
Distribution of Animal Residual
Solids
Mecklenburg County
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on September 3, 1999. This application has been assigned the number listed above.
Your project has been assigned to Ms. Sue Homewood for a detailed engineering review. Should there
be any questions concerning your project, the review will contact you with a request for additional information.
Be aware that the Division's Regional Office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the
Regional Supervisor _ - _ }uat'bi n for this project, prior to final action by the division.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Sue Homewood at 9191733-5083 ext. 502. If the engineer is
unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail and they will respond promptly..
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRES ON
THIS PROJECT.
Since ely,
Since
c
1M. Kim H. Colso�,P
. .
Supervisor, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc:. Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources cC)
Quality
Division of Waterr - ��1
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL
DISTRIBUTION OF ANIMAL RESIDUAL $OLIDS��,��r�P��'�
This application is intended for facilities which distribute materials which have been procecsed,with animal waste
solids with NO domestic sewage contribution. +
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Ap
pl
ican
t's name (please specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc.):
Dn.fl!3rm
2. Print owner's or signing official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
ha d 0�11� rJ 1haCQe.r
3. Mailing address: 1 �rLslF. u. iA Rd._
City: M iA a iL, c yl i I Q_ State: Zip: Q80zR
Telephone Number. ( 7o t(- ) 7
Q. Application Date: 1 Y _
5. Fee Submitted: $ — �7,S o C, 1The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).l
b. Specify how these residuals will be distributed: / sold or given away in bags or othez containers; —L— lawn (bulk);
home garden (bulk); other;
7. Latitude:
Longitude: of animal waste process facility (if in North Carolina)
8. Specify whether the process facility is owned by:
federal; _I- private; state:
local govemrttent;
9. Specify the source of the animal waste product:
poultry; swine; —,/— cattle;
other (explain):
Estimated volume of waste product to be processed annually: (dry tonstyr.)
11. Is the animal waste process facility also the generator of the waste? Z Yes; No.
If NO, please list the generators name and address:
12. County where animal waste process facility is located (if located in North Carolina): i'7') e c 1 e ri 6k . ram
11. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application No. (will be completed by DWQ):
2. Specify whether project is: new; renewal"; modification
" For renewals, complete all sections included in the application. Engineering Signature and Seal not required for
renewals or if there is not any construction involved with the subject project.
3. if this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the existing permit
number' and its issue date
FORM: DABS 01/97 Page 1 of 4

III. 'RESIDUALS INFORMATION:
I. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. The analysis must include a minimum of the
following parameters and any other known and suspected contaminants that are tributary to 1he system.
She► Arsenic Cadmium Copper lead �
A4aLhrnt,C� Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Splenium '
Zinc
2. Wastewater residuals cannot be sold or given away if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the Ceiling
Concentrations p,E the Monthly Average Concentrations specified in the table below on a dry weight basis (mg/kg).
Specify the pollutant concentration of the residuals (attach ail lab analysis):
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceiling Concentration
Dr Weight Basis (mglke)
Pollutant Concentration
Dry Weight Hasis (tnnika)
Monthly Average Concentrations
D Weirtht Basis (m_ R)
Arsenic
75
41
Cadmium
85
39
Copper
4300
1500
Lead
840
300
Mereur
57
17
Molybdenum
75
----
Nickel
420
420
Selenium
100
36
Zinc
7500
2800
3. Provide all applicable pilot studies and any bench scale tests performed on each residual source and the results, including the
approximate fertilizer equivalent.
IV. PATHOGEN REDUCTION INFORMATION:
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0200, pathogen reduction can be achieved using either 40 CFR Part 257 or 40 CFR Part
503. Eiillu Part a or Part b and one of the options in Part c must be completed (please submit all lab.analysis, test results and
calculations). Please check which of the following applies to the subject residual:
a. A E,cal coliform density less than 1000 Most Probable Number per gram of total dry solids, or
b. A Salmonella sp. density less than 3 Most Probable Number per 4 grams of total dry solids.
c. 'In addition to Pari a or Part b being met, one of the following alternatives must also be completed. Please specify
which of the following alternatives below will be met:
I. Alk�,aline treatment - the pH of the residuals is raised to greater than 12 for at least 72 hours. During this time,
the temperature of the residuals should be greater than 520 C for at least 12 hours. In addition, after the 72 hour
period, the residuals shall be air dried to greater than 50% total solids.
Composting - using either the within -vessel or static aerated pile composting methods, the temperature of the
residuals are raised to 550 C or higher for three days. Using the windrow composting method, the residuals ttre
AiO`�hrneil�' raised to 550 C or higher for fifteen days. During the high temperature period, there will be a minimum of five
turnings of the windrow.
FORM: DARS 01/97, rage 2 of 4

3. Heat Drying -residuals are dried by director indirect contact with hot gases to reduce the moisture content of the
residuals to 109a or lower. Either the temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals exceeds 800 C or the
wet bulb temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals, when the residuals leave the dryer, exceeds 800 C.
4. Heat Treatment - liquid residuals are heated to a temperature of 1800 C or higher for thirty minutes.
' ,
5. Pasteurization - the temperature of the residuals is maintained at 700 C or highgr for at least thirty minutes.
VI. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Please provide a brief narrative concerning materials handling, including the following:
FOR NEW TREATMENT FACILITES TO BE LOCATED IN NORTH CAROLINA:
QjQas9. ve-How will the waste product be handled and transported from where they are produced to where they will be treated?
See,
o,Wc,t d Where will the residuals be stored until processed?
. What will be the duration of treatment of the animal waste product?
Where will the final product be stored?
will leachate collection from the raw product stroage, treatment facility, and finish product storage be handled?
long will the Final product be stored before being distributed?
N1A g. if new facilities are to be constructed in the State of North Carolina, please submit three (3) sets of pians and
I specifications with the application for approval by the Division.
:FOR ATMENT FACILITIES DISTRIBUTING IN NORTH CAROLINA:
How will the final product be distributed (packaging)?
eL -C'10_ '%_.le fl ,'_. - f`1--dor'r,le ev,r,rlr..Lir1 ,- k -.Lk i
2. Please attach a marketability statement detailing destinations and approximate amounts of the final product to be
distributed. 8A Soles JP. Fmmt ownecst lc�ndscapec4t 1. a,occ {W5/ t,
Suqq sale Nome. Dep,l-, local bnrd.�utes ¢ cclen cetiktcs
3. Please provide e5ther a label which shall be affixed to the bagged processed residual or an information sheet which shall be
provided to the person who receives the processed residual. The label or information sheet shall contain, at a minimum, the
following information:
PleaSQ, a. The name and address of the person who prepared the residual that is sold or given away in a bag or other container for
See Qtt_ , f application to the land.
�W °g 0' 10gp b. A statement that application of the residual to the land is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions on.the
label or information sheet.
fl c. A statement that the residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded, frozen or snow-covered.
d A statement that adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any disposed or stored
residuals into any surface waters.
e. A statement which identifies that this material shall be prevented from entering any public or private water supply
source (including wells) and any stream, lake, or river.
FORM: DARS 01197 Page 3 of 4

NOTE: )Engineer's Certification required only for construction of new treatment and/or storage
I facilities to be located in North Carolina.
Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm: `
City: State: Zip:
Telephone Number: ( }
f
Professional Engineer's Certification:
attest that this application for y
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge
the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of this submittal
package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have
reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent wialt the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Seal, Signature, and Date:
a
Applicant's Certification:
1, /ki�gun. ce , attest that this application for W a lha ce . f
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete. i
Signature Date Ya,
r
PLEASE SUBMIT THREE (3) COPIE$ OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, ALL
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, AND ANY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO THE
FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
ti
FORM: DARS 01197 Page 4 of 4

WALLACE FARM ,
SOLID WASTE COMPOSTING FACILITY
PERMIT APPLICATION
February 19, 1998
Prepared for:
Wallace Farm i
14324 Eastfield Road !
Huntersville, North Carolina 28078 !
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Prepared by: i
E&A Environmental Consultants, Inc.
1130 Kildaire Farm Road, Suite 200
Cary, North Carolina 27511
Phone: [phone]
Fax:. [phone]
E & A Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Mixing is conducted in the manure pits. Wood waste is pushed into the pits with a
bulldozer. An excavator is utilized to mix the manure and wood waste. The goal is tb obtain a
mix in the 30% to 35% TS range. The mix is then removed and placed .in a dump truck for
. r
transportation to the composting pad.
The mix is placed into windrows. A front end loader is. used to better form the windrows,
if required. Cotton mill waste is then placed on top of the windrow with a front end loader. The
windrows are periodically turned with a towed turner. Windrows are constructed approximately
12 feet wide at the base and three to five feet high. The temperatures will be measured in each
windrow daily until PFRP is achieved. PFRP will be achieved by maintaining temperatures above
or equal to 131 °F for 15 days while turning the pile five times during the same period. Vector
attraction reduction shall be met by maintaining. pile temperatures above 104°F for 14 days or
longer, and the average temperature for that time shall be greater than 113°F. Material will
remain in windrows for approximately six to ten weeks during the active composting period.
7.4 - Curing and Storage
-cam..
After active composting, material will be stored in a static pile for approximately one
month prior to screening. Final curing and storage capacity for approximately 18 months of
compost production is available on an open pad. Additionally, approximately four months of
storage capacity is provided under a roof.
HIS
The material will be screened to approximately 112 inch to produce a more marketable
compost product. The overs (> 112 inch) will be recycled and mixed with the fresh manure.
19794 Wallace Farm Permit ApplApt.
E&A Environmental Comultanu. Inc.
DRAFT
Sq umber 0. 1997
PASO I I
mm
0

u
Air emissions from the facility will be typical of farm type livestock operations and consist
of low concentrations of odorous compounds. The low concentrations frorh these type of
operations are generally accepted to be below any health risk but may cause puisance problems.
Operational procedures such as maintaining aerobic conditions within the pile will be followed to
r
reduce the generation of odorous compounds.
2.7.7 - Leachate Treatmeflt
All runoff from the facility will be collected as outlined in Section 2.3.6. � e, ne-4 ?age.
2.8 - PRODUCT LABEL
A copy of the Wallace Farm product information sheet and product labels is included in
tht Appendix. The product is registered with the NCDA as a soil amendment. It is routinely
tested by the NCDA Agronomic Division, and'a copy of a sample result is included in the
Appendix.
2.9 - ENGEW-ERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Minimal additional work is planned to the site in order to meet the requirements as
indicated in the North Carolina Solid Waste Composting Rules. A site plan with the modifications
to the site drainage plan is included with the permit application.
Manufacturer's performance data for equipment utilized at the facility is included in the
Appendix.
_.._ — T._._............ .
Ct3'78� Wallace Farm Permit Appl.Rpt. - ... __.. � ., .. --- �- September 19,' 1997_ ...
E&A Environmental Consultants. Inc. DRAFT page 11

FIGURE 1
WALLACE FARM SOLID WASTE COMPOSTING FACILITY
FLOW DIAGRAM—— ... .
4 I �
'•9750 Wallace FarmoPermit Appl.Ppt.
F,&A Enworonmenui Consultant:. Inc.
DRAFT
September 19. 1997
Page 10

d edited in 1996.
2.3.6 Surface 3Jater1QgUlity,5tandards ,
All storm water runoff from the composting facility will be collected, There are -currently
two collection ponds located on the site, and a third one will be const�tcted. All of'the storm
water runoff from the site will be directed into one of these three ponds. Thtse ponds are capable
of storing precipitation in a 25 year, 24 hour storm event without discharging.
r
2.3.7 - CIosed-Out Disposal Area
The composting facility is not located over a closed -out disposal area.
2.3 .8 __AdeqLate Aceess
A 25 foot minimum distance will be maintained around the compost area to allow adequate
access by fire fighting equipment..
The compost facility will not discharge into waters or wetlands as described in Section
2.3.6.
11.10 - Groundwater RequirCmentS
The facility utilizes natural soils for pads. The depth to the seasonal high water table will
be kept greater than 24 inches. The soils at the site are mostly clay, and leachate is not expected
to enter groundwater. Wallace Farm will monitor groundwater from the existing well that
services the dairy barns and compare standards listed in Groundwater Standards 15A NCAL 2L.
[Insert standards and Wallace Farm Test Data]
2,3. LL- Nblic AccUS
The site will not allow uncontrolled public access. A fence surrounds the facility to the
west, south, and east sides. The north side of the facility is -surrounded by fence or access roads.
19780 Wallace FArm Parmit Appl.Rpt, Sep tuber 19, 1997
E&A Environmcnta! Consultants, im, DRAFT - Page;

N
3.2 -Laharatilry Sheets
Laboratory sheets are filed with monthly data sheets and indicate bacteriological, heavy
metal, and nutrient concentrations. Compost samples are taken at least every Six months as
outlined in Section 3.1. These samples are used to verify that the product meets the requirements
listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1
Wallace Farm Compost Facility
Semi -Annual Monitoring for Grade A Compost Requimifients*
Parameter
Unit
Limit
Foreign Matter
%
< 6%
Cadmium
mg/kg dry wt.
39
Copper
mg/kg dry wt.
1500
Lead
mg/kg dry wt.
300
Nickel
mg/kg dry wt.
420
Zinc
mg/kg dry wt.
2800
Fecal Coliform
MPN/g dry wt.
1000
Total N
%
None
Phosphorous
%
None
Potassium
%
None
Calcium
%
None
• NC DENR Solid Waste Compost Rules .
!9780 Wallace Farm Composting Facility O&M Manual January 6. 1948
E&A Eavimnmamal Conaullan[a, Inc. 12 pP_IkFT

ononitc}ivisienk:� 30a Reed Csfee !>oa'Ralei -N?60-fi4t"Ism 919 ''73 =Z6S.=
Grower. Wallace Dairy Farms Copies To: County Emmiotl Director
14324 Eastfield Rd- USDA NRCS-Merldenburg
s is Huntersville, NC 28078 Wallace, Eric.
.rJ'VL
4e n.�ZS" V e Farm;
y. .
12/31/97 _ Mecklenburg County
le [nia��=`'' Laborata " R�su[ts` aiulliou unies oiecovi$e.tot :'
xe 1n14
l.aborato
Resu[tc' arts r iniiiioQ unless: otherwise noted
', x F
x
a '_ a " ` -
--
r, c -
pie ID:
N
P
K Ca
Mg
S Fe
Mn Zn
Cu 8
mo Cl C
Total
14181
4185
8797 13533
3479
2378 8187
595 104
103 10.3
143561
;.
IN -N
I. fa 90
. 4LQ 9,;"
. $8
'e Code: CpW
-NH4
Na
Ni Cd
A
Al Se
Li Pff
SS C -N
DM% CCE% ALE loa►s
ANanLCQ,
-NO3
1980
6.95
381 10.12
72.37
riptio++:.
OR -N
vested Daim Waste
Urea

NCDENR
M
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
June 18, 1998
JAMES B. HVNTJR: : ` ; CERTIFIED MAIL
GOVERNOR
E WAYNE NICGCVITT
SECRETARY
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Arlen Buttke
5796 Walker Mill Rd.
Randleman, NC 27317
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation For Enforcement
NCGS 143-215.1
Wallace Dairy Farm, Facility #: 60-1
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Buttke:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
June 16, 1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) and a Recommendation for Enforcement
for the unpermitted discharge of waste. Also, please note the change in item four on
the corrected copy of the enclosed inspection form.
On June 12, 1998, while conducting a wetland inspection, Mr. Samar Bou-
Gazhale of this Office observed an excessive amount of waste in a tributary to Clarks
Creek below your storage ponds. On June 16, 1998 Mr. Johnson observed animal
waste in the clean water diversion ditch. Also, during the inspection your waste
application records were not available for review. In light of your deemed permitted
status the noted problems are in violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.
and Title 15A NCAC 2H.0217.
If you have an explanation for this unpermitted discharge that you wish to present,
please respond in writing within. ten (10) days following receipt of this notice. Your
explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate,
your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for
his consideration. Also, it is requested that a completed copy of your waste
application records be submitted to this office. Please address your response to my
attention at the address shown on the letterhead,
North Carolina General Statute 143.215.6A provides for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state environmental laws and
regulations.
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MQORSBVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50'x' RECYCLEM/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

,i
Page Two
Mr. Arlen Buttke
Wallace Dairy Farm
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Mecklenburg SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
John Wallace, Sr.
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Acting Regional Supervisor

Aj
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
JULY 1, 1998
TO: Dennis Ramsey
FROM: D. Rex Gleason, P. E., Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Yzc_,�
PREPARED BY: Alan D. Johnson
SUBJECT: Fast Track (DD)
Mr. Arlen Buttke
Dairy Operation, Unpermitted Discharge
On June 12, 1998 Mr. Samar Bou-Ghazale of this Office, was conducting a wetland
inspection at a potential housing development site near the Arlen Buttke diary (john Wallace Sr.,
property owner) in Mecklenburg County. During his investigation Mr. Bou-Ghazale observed a
Iarge amount of animal waste in a ditch that flowed approximately 1000 ft. to a tributary of Clarks
Creek. Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office contacted the diary operator as well as Mr. Wallace
regarding the problem. On June 16, 1998 Mr. Johnson performed the annual inspection of the diary
operation. During the inspection Mr. Johnson located the source of the discharge. Mr. Harold
Buttke (dairy representative) informed Mr. Johnson that a bucket had lodged in the clean-out basin
below the trench silos and blocked the culvert through which the waste flows to the storage ponds.
The clean-out basin overflowed and the waste flowed into the clean water diversion ditch, thus
bypassing the storage ponds. At the tirhe:uf the inspection waste was still observed in the clean water
diversion ditch however, the overflow from the clean-out basin had been terminated. Mr. Buttke
was informed that a grate should be placed over the top of the basin to prevent a reoccurrence.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
IN THE MATTER OF ARLEN
BUTTKE DAIRY DISCHARGING
WASTE TO THE WATERS OF THE
STATE WITHOUT A PERMIT
FOR VIOLATIONS OF PERMIT
15A NCAC 2H.0217
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DD
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6a, I, A. Preston Howard,
Jr., Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Mr. Arlen Buttke operates a 1300 head dairy operation in Mecklenburg County,
NC.
B. The dairy operation was deemed permitted as a nondischarge facility on February
1, 1933 in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217.
C. On June 12 and June 16, 1998, DWQ staff observed evidence of a discharge of
animal waste from a clean-out basin via a clean water diversion ditch. The
discharge entered a tributary of Clarks Creek, which is a Class C water in the
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin.
D. Mr. Buttke did not have a valid permit for the above described discharge. The
discharge was not the result of a 25 -yr., 24 -hr. storm event.
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled
$298.41.

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: DD
Violator: Mr. Arlen Buttke
Address: 5796 Walker Mill Rd.
Randleman, NC 27317
Responsible Party: Mr. Arlen Buttke
Regional Office: Mooresville
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations:
No harm has been documented; however, the discharge of inadequately treated
wastewater can be detrimental to aquatic, as well as human life.
2. The duration and gravity of the violations:
The duration of the bypass is unknown. However, the discharge was large enough
to flow approximately 1000 ft. to the tributary of Clarks Creek. Waste was
observed in the creek approximately 1500 ft. downstream.
The effect on ground or surface water quality or quantity or on air quality
No adverse effect is expected on groundwater quantity or quality or on air quality.
Surface water was likely to have':been impacted by the increased levels of fecal
coliform bacteria that could present a human health hazard. Untreated wastewater
would also increase the oxygen demand in the stream, thus affecting aquatic biota.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage
No damage has been documented.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance:
No money appeared to have been saved by allowing the discharge.

6. Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally:
There was no indication that the discharge was intentional.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
There is no record of any prior enforcement against Mr. Buttke.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Central Office Review and Processing —$100.00
7 hours by investigator for investigating and
drafting report(s) Qa 17.92/hr. — $ 125.44
1.0 hour by Water Quality Regional Supervisor
for review Q $37.35/hr. _ $ 37.19
1.0 hour by Regional Supervisor for review
@ $25.18/hr. _ $ 25.18
1.0 hour for clerical support Q $10.60/hr. _ $ 10.60
TOTAL $ 298.41
Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e. individual vs. large
corporation):
An individual who operates a 1300 head dairy operation.
10. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore) or
recalcitrance:
The dairy was notified on Friday, June 12, 1998. During the inspection on June
16, 1998 the problem had been corrected. Mr. Harold Buttke (the dairy .
representative) informed Mr. Johnson of this Office that the problem was resolved
following notification by Water Quality.
11. Mitigating circumstances:
The basin where the overflow occurred is not easily seen. It is downhill from the
trench silos and a direct view is prevented due to an accumulation of soil and
concrete debris. However, a grate covering the top of the basin or a routine
inspection of the wastewater system may have prevented the incident.

12. Owner of property where the discharge occurred:
Mr. John Wallace Sr.
13. Pictures of discharge (optional):
None available
14. Assessment Factors:
a) IWC: NA
b) Receiving stream: Clarks Creek
c) SOC/negotiations: none
d) Damage: unknown

CERTIFICATION PAGE
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT IS TRUE TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
Alan D. Johnson

5N09
.C. r-,��.
ENvlpzr­
& NATC
Animal «'ante ]Management Plan Certification
Im
(Please type or print all informs ion that does not require a signature) JAIJ 0 2 1,998
[Exisdn2) or 'New or Expanded (please circle ane) Dwr,, C:; c 1 I
General_]nformafiQn:
;lame of Farm:___ WALLACE FARM
Faculty No: 60 - 1
Owner(s) Name: JOHN W. WALLACE Phone No:[phone]
Mailing Address: 14324 EASTFIELD ROAD, HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28078
Farm Location:
Count`- Farm is located in: MECKLENBURG
Latitude and Longitude: 80 46 07 / 35 23 50 NIA
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions. milepost, etc.): Highway 115 to Eastfield Road. East on Eastfield road.
(SR 2459). The farm is located approximately 4 miles (at the Cabarrus Mecklenburg
(Operation Description:
Type ofS►rine No. of Animals
D Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
D Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
Type of Poulin'No. of Animals Ttine of Cattle No. of Animals
Layer ' j Dairy ISIDD
M Pallets ZD Beef
Other Type of .Livestock-_ Number of Animals:
Expanding Operation Ont
Previous Design Capaciry: Addirional Design Capacity:
Total Desi,2n Cavacin•,
Acreaze Available for Application: s3 Required Acreage:
` Af fPaxlowlel
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : S Total Capacity: .�T�,, 4�;,1(ZCubic Feet (ft3)
m
Are subsurface drains present on the far: YES or 1V0 (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPPUY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner/]Manager agreement
1 (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage sYstem or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Ntanazemcnt before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that these must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application systern to surtact waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year. '_'T -hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be tninirrized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The appr^ved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
orrice of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved -by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and «Vater Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DEQ or aannew• :.-tificatier, tit the approved plan is c�an,edi within 60 dayS Of a title, transfer.
Name of Land 0)t-ner : a 7 r �� 10 0 C L GI ;L G- A C e.,
Signoture:
Nome of �
Signature:
�' - _ .att■ttttttt�
NVC -- Janu:ar, i. 1U97

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the Nordi Carolina Soil and Nater Cunservatit)n Contmission pursuant to I5.a
NCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm n.uned above leas an animal wasr�
manapemem plan chat meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Nlanagtm.
(DENO as specified in 15A"NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA-Vaturat Resources Conser•atiun Service (NRCS) anctlor u.,
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A LNCAC 2H.0317 and 13A NCAC 6F 0001'-
.0005. The followine elements arc included in theplan ns applicable. While each carezory designates a technical specialist
who may sign tach certification (SD. Sl, WUF, RC. 1), the teChnical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent, ,
11. Certi�caaon of Desia n
A) Collection. Stora,e.
,_ Treatment System
.
Check rhe appropriate box
J Exigina facility without retrofit (SD or WU-P) I
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: stura4-le capability consistent with waste wiiization
reuuirements.
.J New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
animal waste -storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection Systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meetorexceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Matthew J. Kinane
Affiliation USDA/ NRCS Date Worn Completed:
Address (Agency): 745 CABARRUS AVE. W. CONCORD _NC_ 28027 _Phone No.: 704 788 2106
Signature: Date:
B) Land Apolication Site (WUP)
The plan provides for. minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization. chosen crop is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Matthew J. Kinane
Affiliation USDA/ NRCS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency); 745 CABARRUS AVE. W. CONCORD, NC 28027 Pone \=0.:[phone]
Sii nature: . Date:
Q Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate bo.r
ZI Facility without exterior leets (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not conwin any exterior lots.
.J Facility with exterior la (RC)
,I[ethOd5 to tnini.nrize the rut off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by iNRCS.
,lame of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Matthew J. Kinane
Mfiiiation_ USDA/ NRCS Date Wart: Completed:
:address (Agency): 745 CABARRUS AVE. W. CONCORD NC 28027 Phone 1\70,:[phone]
Signature: Date:
ANVC •- .-ku--u>r 1. 1997,

D). A alication and Handling Eouinment
Check the appropriate hos
EXiitiw nr C'�rnndin;,rnciIl w with e,6S11nlz wide arnlicat!oil etluirment (`VI:P or[)
Animal waste application equipment s¢rctfivd in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
acCord:ance with existing design three and tables and is able to appy waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existin; applicatiott equipment can cover the area required by the plan at races not to
exceed either the specitted hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for Liming of applications has been
established: re wired buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidancx are c.;ntairted as part of
the
plan). a>es i4 M b4 oV%-es , N of usM - N".
_1 New. expanded. nr existing facility without exiging -.3ste anylicltinn edUinm4nnt fix irrigntinn (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in Lhe plan has been designed to appi%7 :waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can corer the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed efdaer the specified h�'draulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as pan of die plan).
New. ernrtnded or t cistinF f tcifitt .vi out rYis ina w1 e ttislicatinn ecauinrtitaLfor land spreading� not using
spr iv irriwicm, (WUP or I)
Animal waste appfication equipment specified in the plan has been selected to appiv waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application- equipment can'cover the area required by the
plan at races not to exceed eitiaer the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibr bun and adjustment suidance-are
-contained as part of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): lyatrhtew -T. Kinnn
Aff liadon USDA/ NRCS Date Work Completed:
Address (
Sienature
hone 1N0.tB4)_ 788 2106
ate: - -7
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. "Mortality Management and Emereencv Action Plan (SD
St. ` UP. RC or n
The waste managemeac plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Acdon Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best -Management Practices to Nlinimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and incfuded in the waste management pian. Both the
N-lortality �Mameement Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete Brad can be implemented by [his facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Matthew J. Kinane_
Affiliation USDA/ NRCS Date Wore: Completed: 7 � �-N'97
Address (
S i4_nature
one `o.:( 7U4) 788 2106
ce: �o�-13-
F) Written Notice of New of Esnanding Swine Farm
ollom-ing si_nature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin cots truction after June
21. 19 the facility was built bcfare June 31. 1996, when was it ennstructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that ! (we attempted to contact by tcerdfied mail 311 adjoining property owners and all property owners
who Own property located acros ub[ic road. street. or highway from dais new or expanding swine farts. TIae notice was
in compliance with the requirements=
of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached. /A -
Name of Land O%vner:
Si;nature:
Name of Nlana;er Of diffcreni from owner is
Signature:_
AWC -- Au_ust
1997
Date:
Date:

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment installation
Vew._expanded or retrofitted facility (Sl',
Animal waste storage and treatment suvctures.:Lcb as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installer'.
in accordance with the approved plass to met: or _zesed the minimum standards and specifications.
For�fing acacilides without re:roji:S, ,to cerriftcarion is necessary.
``ame of Technical Specialist (Please Print): &aatthea J. Ki.eane _ _ -
Affiliation USDA/ NRCS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): 745 CABARRi1S AVE. W. CONCORD NC 28027 Phone -No.:-[phone]t
Signature: Dale:
B) Land ADoiication Site (W P)
Check the appropriate bar
The crop Ing system is in place on ail land as specified in the animal waste management. plan.
OsA y Pv� Ltgw-d wAsjF. SL -6 SoLxi� Wilarr Qt,w {OA, SDI -ZD ranee. Cp�tpa4lsivy ROq
Z! Conditional approval: all required land as specified in the plats is cleared for planting: the Cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has nct •leen established and Else owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the, plan by (mondVdavf_.ear); the proposed cover crop' is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteudiL-stion pian.
Z Aisa check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land aitbsn 30 dr
'of this certificadon. the owner has committed w establish an interim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Matthew J. Kinane
Affiliation USDA/ MRCS Date Work Completed:
Aaaress (
S ignature
Phone tio.:-t• 704) 78s 2106
Date: - -9
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked. � +
i
I (we) cerdIv that I (eve) have committed to establish the =piling system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plait.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion .ontroi. and will submit to DEM'a verification of completion
from a Technicai Specialist within 15 calendar days foilo%ing the date specified in the conditional certification. I (eve)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a -,iolatioa o{ the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner -
Signature: Date:
arrEe of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: . _ Date'
AWC -- AU!Zust I. 1197

C) Runoff Controls rrntn Exterior lois (R(:)
Facility .vith e ucrior lots
Nlctllud.5 i0 ntiaimtze Lie run off Of POIIUU tS front hwn:tn�g and Iicavv use :trees have been InsiilIed as .ipecitled
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessarv.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Matthew J. Kinane
Affiliation USDA/ MRCS Date Work Comoleted:
Address (Agency):
Signature: �
745 CABARRUS AVE'. W. CONCORD, NC 28027
P! one No.: ( 704) 788 2106
Date: 12-01-3 -
D) nolication and Handling Eauitamen_t Installation (« LP or I)
1...
Check the appropriate blact
l .animal waste application and handlin2 equipment, specified in the Plan is e:: site and rend,: for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to die ovmers and art contained as p:ut of the plan.
Ai SA -za r l*a4 T.iu6' er, 0rrw¢ 4-TT,&4 .
J A nial waste application and handling equipment specified in (lie plan leas rim been inimlled but the
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contact: equipment sNcified in
the contract agrees with clic requirements of the plan: -required buffers can be -maintained: calibration -and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the am.-ners and are contained as part or the plan.
J Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the pian has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (mondddav/near); there is adequate
storage to bold the waste until the equipment is insta iled and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Matthew J. Kinane
`arae of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation USDA/ MRCS Date Work Completed:
aggress (
Signature
Phone \o.: 004 Zen 230
Date: la •a3��
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in IIF D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the- animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will Submit to DEN -4 a Verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DE44.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
dame of ylanager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control._ Insect Control and 1•tortaiitv NlanaUement_ (SD. SI. WUT. RC or 1)
klethods to control odors and insects as specified in "e Plan have been installed and are operational. 7ne
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also be -_n insr-Itled and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please P"int): Matthew j. Kinane
Aitiliation_ vi, tyRr� Date 1Vork Comale:ed: ?- -
Address (Agency): 345 CABARRUS AVE. W. CONCORD, NC 28027 Phone yo.:(704) 7
Sign pure: Dute: 1d- 23-97
AWC .- August 1. 1997

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following, address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Ralei-h. SIC 27626-053=
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete .animal Waste
tilana;ement Plan to the local Soil and Nater Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your animal Waste Management Plan.
-kWC -- A woust 1. 1997 �

Sf � t _` I Y pAi\ afl[OOI. RA. lOC G,LPI'.41ilLL A71\F A0. HAFiR15-HUt'af V., n.•. •,u ••..•-.........
r,rf
S[ f1AK]HOR::E. L."V. !6 0.tAR1•L`a pa. -
~~ (•,ARAIC:. RD, 1274 ii r.AnF:H$w; COS ASS, }T MATHMON' AV, rc
2 ,J e:ArLaUN 7.1 HICKORV ^AB MAT71I£N',4
2471-,.•_,..•� 3 GATIIY RD. aD ILICHRCAY PL. 'IA HILL R0. rs
2JJy -.7 'C.}.DARD510CM IAD. 16A I11PP AA, ' SC %ICAI.WAY mm
+ CnIGxPlI / q CI:NI RA I. AV. 41 1v01.HROOKR Rn, 2D S,C At; I.KY RD.
°w CI[OATr CIA, lip 1100P Fen, LD MC CHFYNAYle I '
JD1 Coll �r oiO P4., /. • f;i l(TV (: F; AV. - At: IIDi?F: lint in(,. %It, rORn AD.
ja �1 2457 2471 o•r7�e 14 ;IllilS'i'i7NEfU iEY I'll, 5D 1IC)4Kw q 1111, PI7 %14 COY RD.
r
rON RD. HA HOV;A RP. SD %I(: t)owr. LI. 5.1 N
146 l % ,-ee -¢LRr� Imo- \ 17B '}l '" Ool.OXY RD. Rh I,UpDARII RD. •.0 :IC li.x'A[:T At ,
11 2427 , - +423 l;a[MONw X:ALiIi AV,0A MCAIN R15. Sp diC Y,EE RD. li
r ` ksFU::'I F-p3Vl:.l.F:- 1 , J.F:AN PT).
coCCSM \1Uf:IYY HCIUSF: .l (
2r J1 1 ~2145 �' �+
RD. lit)GONCORII RD- Cn M43.SIAVI:N DR, i
C. ORA AV. Sr' HU\TI,;:Y RP, aH MILTON Alk •+
I 2434 ` 1421 1 \ COUN':Y' pU: IaR IIU7f.IISNSOY• MINERAL SPRF Fr.
11 dl'I' 143e ,Y 14 '*•'F 2 ` .1Sr: D(a\AI.D AD. 5D
0 741 p 1415 1 »D•• :11RANtDA IID. 5
ti 2435 _ a0 7a 2024 , 1 PALE AV. s -,T„ - M0:lAor RD. ll
_ Yw' •l�' DA1.1'gN Ar. NL4 SD LewI1,D xb.. nC MOO Re`• CHAP' ,.'
It - `�'-•�' \ DA VIDSON 5r. NK .fDLI:R'11.7 RD. N, nP-\4OiAEH F.Aa S:. c
141 5A ,pry". - cR,a DF.'AR,11ON An. AA LM1DF.i'f.'NaE::CE llI.VD. 'MORRIS FIt LC
•2740 .`"" \- L - DFA,TA AIR EASE RP, ¢p PA -A MOSS RD.
2437
L5 [phone] .i 11116 • DIKIr pl VLphD. 70 INDIAS : Ili. AD. 136 MWN'T HARM
4 1442
_ r / DORY CREEK RD. F,C IRVIVC •aa 1)
77 'r -r ^� '1 _ , DORN AN RD. I2A 1S I,ANR POIN; RC1, 'O 110"T HOLLi
H trs¢nUt : r„ MOL•N'T HOLL,-
24 W, RHA Ie D. !LA
!.39 � r Ch, srh:rna,.r \� .� � , Dl:RI1.4y I.N. 5D •,3„ _ 11L1!JT�RS vI I.. U.'•
zls6 .- g illill LL •', - F'A4� r. A• SAME.S R0, nR - MOUNT OWVF: +[I
11 .e i 1✓', "E" IBTION Iln.` iA RD,
MI z, 7_ 44 '° n , r"''}' EvcT 1FLt•D_ 8B JIAF N[DP RD. 2C
vA j1 1 .,i_ �1 y t.G /F I1 i.�r'�O ��OF�{,/ EA57-L'IFLTi RD. 5R. A JOHN FMSSELL RD. 6D "SI" '•t
4 i ! ¢ ;� 030 VI F/J F�AS'I Iv,SY nc, �,A .70fI1..ON-n EI1LF.R RD. NA1: r. F. RD.
CD 6Rfm-%n aD" 7[3 ,,A NATTNS YOW I;
F.LM LN, W. tali 1011%57 ON RD. 12n NF:AI, RD,
2448.-'- s °1 74 / 7439
`� N Fars lM1�- s /�/rf o° v�{L� •r! .
1\ 11`P
_ � I R° 2461 \\
�• S �1 ' 7 - 1Y. _ .J 7460 t \
It
u Arewdn - .
,5 14 Ri ah 11 2J'y
2fr: 5L 1I• t' 24 ?442
\ \� re r { • r I26J5\ / �:/ 1�. a R 4 °4r
O
76 /1
lflt ` ncr:n„�[q Pyr Rarla Mnk. 245 re" .� may. ' 2aT8 V''
2!1f 1 High S _. 1439 2 Yn , 0 243 •, 2AS _
• �' . �OP � 7!!5 � �. ° 24,4'• •.p16s ' �"
1n117oof5 5'
,LP r -44F-
46 467
76491 21 V466
-`l q 7113 - , Li �o-e.c . 1 y .� ... _ \ • \' r r .. , ..
oI R: - 2483 2475
7rvJ '. 2e6 ` .• r '
0 �O c�'pyE 2dt0 tdfi8, •r
2f10,,` 11 `*c�•p,- CfnSlt"r129 1
/�`J
7r.UT�� /D/ll� jieJ 74.i5 r�arsOM IJll ! [Or m. � 7f67 LiRD CAfIr V,4.D
1 1A`F';+111I' ; 2!7 2lRJ
2
i 4'1
°013 eo fp �° .490 2487 2468 r°Pr 2463 ftYk 'CH11F F63J h '
1 alt
7l Mfr I'� r9aY art¢r0,gh� :/,i � - ;�� � _ .r - •' 1
s LDM9 ERCF
to -
LU" 115 .+ it480 ",16;
>"�-•k,F` f,.r� 24 / [ 4� 1• •�
��-• �!-�' _
,?17 VF:D2801)
1e1f
-1 ♦ •N!1 u 1
2212 _. 4 ,•,�'llfW e��rr it JI! 2K3? 2494 � e to Rr i �� ` 10170
/ 2110 t • �'a\wti RQ 'r¢f v` . /-.. 1933 .
SWI C ai �: r' f•^" r!.--._,_.
C IInC •— ,.r
?,o;a 21c9 1:; .y1a r� 231,6, �R7i R - '
S�,�SrOB C
2raa Ran, R,qR ' 7 „ 2a67 4'c al ��hyyart re BLJq'
r4 v
fist
zrer tune1 i 2 rs a o'"d UWE v.r,D.
�3!DerIf0, 2 Of
{7573 alt'reaa .v�e� 2•t3! 2�9 f * •112' A f a. 'A C')
� vst. +,oz u_R� d4 4•a "� { T2
EAR SY1LL RA rlih
r{,:a;1 2aru4 � Qea
A'I v 15P5F,2`10 571 rr .?7rA i 18:
2080 PAN ',i 16sr r•• !I �,
-
r,\ ;�•, "'' r1II1r+;''4w+fr57Yy!fs B n.I 5C_!.5r1.,, .Ik 1 1t- 1 !` °1L 25'„e,r ,yI5 ta' o./ • ,11 5,...t-emae.,k 1 1nM BYP
7n4 5817 s�r8 4n ,1,14 'y Ir 8r4,,z6, •,41
AhILt7Lx
t FtldJb,w,,•eJ I +�00C Lr� i5R0C2S
'
5Newell 1973
548 zl v)F
,
1
R
17'9 r, ` ✓ pl lief 1 R4rcti 1 W V6p
1W5�' ��
Hidden BEY
1111hII„h 6A 1rNe, ;irM 6R tl,e
1
! 1 rerD I. i 5 re4:.re�
4lr rhrrrl ti t, NIlII p , �j 99 ��•-
J1v*. ti 6rs:i e r Llnceln y!.�� e;6chig � - �, i� F -I'ereirrrr .7801 /
4y ! Dnvlryi w _
t
'Bri6rx6ad Sch'.;''. .•' Me
&a, ,A/1. ,8e Sen r, Sao r rNf i
Ptdap �¢ rune• 1' z r''
r 'sF ?80_ � F1! � 2°2• \ 28, `t 1
///t.rt� 11.
ze 51
```a -
1!i i ~ m d riry i4 - , e47v - 1 a SCh, tat' h ,PN29 L*2822 P
?AUS
Ae X+qN, l 4`pOGR OR.•�rr
I xlPel `, Fi r 4Tr A. P tr4
i! a Shomratl j ?B5 zver t.. 2e * 1 E9
511wn Fae 5 Garde AS SCh �"� L r- .�•,
a Y4.lEUM � "t- t
CpARLflTY COnNF CLUB `,, -t'- r.. . 1
CHARLbTT �,� 1 nrr -,_ - _ a r•Sr
- - ••/. °�- - (,\i°' a - M a,, ��° .abQ iW1141 N. �I 4pp DACw�F vral e=��•, , \. M^ '2F7U

w
BUILDING
L.} �DwRr
9ARN$ '
OFFICE C>--C—)7,—MANiIRE
BAGGING ^ /
LINE L }' I BLOC I
P / y C
STORAGE �
SCREEN B�LQLDENG \ �nf\ p
r RECENIN I IY6i1
/
AREA COMPOSE
PRODUCT AREA
. \ STORAGE
/ \/ COMPOST `.�.
AREA
/ 1:7SI5T: COMPOST
!PONb ! i
i ! _ AREA `. OINO i
I /f
NEW –•
/
rr PON`'/� PROPERTY UNE
e r r NEW DIVERSION DITCH
COMPOST f /
AREA /
r
NOTES
1) PROPERTY LINES TAKEN FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TAX LINE MAP(BOOK 29, PAGE 24 REVISED 9-19-95)
21 ARROWS INDICATE APPROXIMATE SURFACE DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS
3 AREAS SHOWN INDICATE APPROXIMATE SIZE AND LOCATION
OF PROCESSING AREAS AS DETERMINED DURING SRE
VISIT -
a ALL NOTES NOT NOTED `WW" ARE EXISTING -
5 COMPOST WINDROWS CONSTRUCTED PARALLEL TO DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS.
GBAPMC SCAM
apo �aao
lm Is -23 q R R, � Y
�r
WALIAtl
FACILITY
SITE PLAN
www
�1

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Operator: ARLIN BUTTKE County: Mecklenburg
BUTTKE DAIRY ENTERPRISES
Telephone: [phone] Kind of Operation: Existing Dairy
Facility: WALLACE DAIRY FARM Facility Number: 60-1
Address: 14324 EASTFIELD ROAD
HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28078
Operator in charge: ERIC WALLACE
Owner: JOHN W. WALLACE, SR,
Telephone: [phone]
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
This is a 1700 dairy cow operation managed by Arlin Buttke. Mr. Buttke
owns the cows and dairy equipment and leases the dairy facilities and land
from the Wallace Dairy Farm, John W. Wallace, Sr. owns the land,
machinery, composting equipment, and buildings. The Wallace Family
operates a composting and bagging facility (Wallace Farm) adjoining the
dairy. Wallace Farm currently has a solid waste composting facility permit
application pending with the Division of Solid Waste. A draft plan, dated
October 1997, for meeting the requirements and set backs for solid waste
was submitted by E & A Environmental Consultants, Inc. to the Division of
Solid Waste for review and approval.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION:
This dairy operation has �- a;ge manure pits for solids on the
east side of Eastfield Road (behind the milking parlors) and t�h aP Wa e
storage ponds for liquids, surface water runoff, silage runoff, and
milkroom flush water on the west side of Eastfield Road (below the silage
pits). The milk cows and dry cows are confined to the lot 24 hours per
day. The dairy also maintains heifers and replacement cows on pasture.
The dairy operates around the clock with 12 milking sessions in each of the
two milking parlors. All of the animal solid waste is pushed into one of
two pits. These pits are cleaned out on bimonthly schedule by Wallace Farm
for use in the composting facility. The surface runoff from the dairy lot,
dairy buildings and the milkroom wash water is collected into 2 below
ground storage tanks. The solids are allowed to settle out and the liquid
is piped'under Eastfield Road and discharges into the upper most waste
storage pond. Surface water from around the silage pits as well as any
runoff from the silage pits are also collected and piped to the storage
ponds. The solids from the below ground storage tanks are periodically
removed and piped to the holding pits for use by the Wallace Farm
composting facility. The 3 storage ponds are in series. The first pond
fills and discharges into the second pond and the second pond fills and
discharges into the third pond. There is no discharge from the third pond.
The majority of the surface water around the waste storage ponds has been
diverted away from these storage ponds. As solids accumulated in the upper
ponds, the dairy operation contracts with the composting operation to
remove the solids from the ponds. The solids are used by Wallace Farm in
the composting operation. The third pond has very little solids present
and is used for irrigation and recycled flush water. According to Mr.
Buttke, approximately 70,000 gallons of water is recycled daily from the
pond by the milking parlors. The water is used to flush the holding pens
and the parlors. Also, during the spring, summer, and fall months, this
water is used on approximately 20 acres for fescue hay and 33 acres of

BUTTKE DAIRY ENTERPRISES
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
Wallace Dairy Farm - FACILITY # 60-1
PAGE 2
DECEMBER 04, 1997
fescue pasture. The water is applied by a solid set irrigation system to
the hay field, and it is applied to the pasture with a tractor pulled 4600
gallon liquid manure tank. The solid set system was designed Hughes Supply
of Charlotte, NC.
WASTE MANAGEMENT:
Your animal waste management facility has been designed for a given storage
capacity. When the waste reaches the designed level, it must be remove
from the holding pits and holding ponds and then managed/applied according
to the waste management plans to prevent pollution of surface and/or ground
water. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops on the fields
where the waste is to be applied. This waste utilization plan uses
nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. Waste should be analyzed before each
application cycle and annual soil tests are encouraged so that all plant
nutrients can be.balanced for realistic yields of the crops to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan
in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that
it is applied in an environmentally safe manner. Always apply waste based
on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the waste.
Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have different infiltration rates and leach potential.
Waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre
per year. Do not apply waste on saturated soils or on land when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in run off to
surface waters. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop
production, the waste should be applied to a growing crop not more than 30
days prior to planting.
The acres needed to apply the animal was is based on typical nutrient
content for this type of facility. Acreage requirements may be more or
less based on the waste analysis report from your waste management
facility.
The scheme of your waste management facility is based on the following:
Amount of Waste Produced Per 180 days:
I. Solids per 180 days
a. 1300 head x 11.23 gal/day/head x 180 days = 2,627,820 gal
All animal waste solids go to Wallace Farm for the composting operation for
bagging and wholesale/ retail sales. Wallace Farm has a solid waste permit
pending with the Division of Solid Waste.
II. Liquids per 180 days
a. 1300 X 3.366 gal/day/Cow x 180 days - 856,440 gal
b. 1000 gal/day of fresh water X 180 days 180,000 gal
c. normal runoff/ (261,360 sq ft) - 458,251 gal
d. Total waste liquids = 1,314,871 gal

BUTTKE DAIRY ENTERPRISES
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
Wallace Dairy Farm - FACILITY # 60-1
PAGE 3
DECEMBER 04, 1997
All animal waste liquids are managed by the dairy facility. Liquids are
applied to hayland by a solid set irrigation system and to pasture by a
tractor pulled 4600 gallon liquid manure tank spreader.
Amount of Nitrogen Produced Per Year:
(from NRCS Technical Guide -- Waste Utilization, pg 633-26)
2.5 lbs N/ 1000 gal x 2,629,742 gal/ year = 6,574 lbs total N/ year
Managing the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time and
have appropriate equipment to move and manage the waste in a timely manner.
Cooperation between Buttke Dairy Enterprises and Wallace Farm is essential
to avoid mismanagement of the animal waste which may cause a discharge.
Since the Wallace Farm composting facility will be receiving all animal
waste solids from the dairy operation, the solid waste plan for Wallace
Farm developed by your engineer and pending approval -from Division of Solid
Waste should be followed to manage the manure solids. The liquid waste
should follow this plan.
This animal waste utilization plan requires a minimum of 34 acres of hay
land for animal waste application. The dairy operation has available 53
acres of suitable land for waste application. The following acreage for
waste application will be utilized based on the crop to be grown and
surface application:
Fld Soil CropRealistic Lbs N f Ac Lbs N I Month to
I
Type Yield Per Acl I Used Apply
T227
5A
Iredell
Fescue
5 tons
250
20
1 5000
Sept- Nov
Feb - A r
5B
Iredell
Fescue
4 tons
150
17
2550
Sept- Nov
17
Iredell
Fescue
4 tons
150
16
2400
Feb - A r
Total 53 9,950 lbs
Amount of N Produced Annually 8.34. lbs
Pounds of N Surp+wa-er Deficit 1,609 lbs
* Nitrogen application will be based on the current waste analysis.
The dairy has enough suitable land to land apply the liquid waste. The
irrigation plan developed by the irrigation contractor should be followed.
The maximum application rate (inches/hr) and the maximum application per
irrigation cycle should not be exceeded. Waste irrigation water may be
applied to fescue hay, Field #5A on Tract 297 or to fescue pasture Fields
#5B and #17 during the growing season (February -June and September -
December) when needed for nitrogen benefits as long as nitrogen limits and
infiltration rates are not exceeded. Note: The waste in the pond must be
maintained at or below the maximum liquid elevation (2 feet 7 inches below
the emergency spillway).

NCDAAgronamic Division r 4300 Reedy Creek Rd �` .;;Raleigh, ,NC 27607-6465 [phone]
`w
Understanding theeste Analysis Report
Waste products must be disposed of in ways that protect soil and water resources. The keys to proper disposal include analyzing the waste product and planning application
rates based on crop requirements. The Waste Analysis Report provides information necessary to use these materials as a resource while protecting the environment.
Sample Info This section contains sample identifiers, specifically the sample identification number, waste code and waste description. These data are
'lissentiial Elements
supplied by the grower on the information sheet submitted with each sample.
li Boron
Calcium
Laboratory Results This section lists concentrations (parts per million) of elements found in the waste. These include elements that are essential for
Cl Chlorine
plant growth — major nutrients (N, P, K), secondary nutrients (Ca, Mg, S) and micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B, Mo, CI); as well as elements
:-Cu Copper
potentially harmful to plants (Ni, Cd, Pb , Na) _ This last group can permanently damage the soil if allowed to increase to toxic levels. DM% is reported for
Fe'` ` . Iron
solid samples. CCE is reported for waste products that have neutralizing value..
,'.? . ,:Potassium ;
Mg,., : Magnesium
Nutrients Available for First Crop These predictions are based on estimates of mineralization rate and nutrient loss, depending on application
.'.,Mn " Manganese
method. Estimates are reported in lbs/ton for solid wastes and lbs/1000 gallons for liquid wastes. "T" indicates that an element is present in a "trace"
Mo...., Molybdenum
quantity (< 0.005 Ib per measured unit).
" N' Nitrogen
Within the first month after waste application, 50-75% of the nutrient quantities listed will become available for the crop. Therefore, plan to apply
;_P Phosphorus
wastes near the time that plants will require nutrients. The remaining nutrients gradually become available over the next three months.
S Sulfur
Nutrients not available for the first crop are mineralized to available forms over time, usually years. Significant quantities of nutrients call accumulate
Zn Zinc
in soils that do not leach readily with heavy rainfall. If waste is routinely applied, take soil samples at least once every two years to monitor nutrient
accumulation. Some cropping systems and metal levels may necessitate annual sampling.
Potentially Harmful Elements
An ALE value is reported for wastes that may have a neutralizing value. This value indicates the amount of the waste product required to equal 1 ton
Cd Cadmium
of good quality agricultural lime (90% CCE). If waste materials have significant neutralizing value, apply them only at rates necessary to optimize pit,
Na Sodium
For flexibility, the information sheet provides two choices for application method. Predictions of available nutrients are based on the type of waste and
'Ni Nickel
the method of application. If you decide to change the application method after the analysis is complete, contact your local Regional Agronomist or the
Pb ,. Lead
Agronomic Division at [phone].
othcs Determinations
Other Elements Quantities of the potentially harmful elements Ni, Cd, Pb, and Na indicate their potential for build-up in the soil. Like nutrients, they
'ALE Agricultural lime
are reported in lbs/ton for solid wastes and lbs/1000 gallons for liquid wastes.
equivalent
CCE CaCO3 equivalence
Recommendations This section provides general information on the waste product and emphasizes unusual characteristics that must be considered
DM% Percent dry matter
for safe disposal. If the analyzed sample is a composted material, values for pH and EC , or soluble salts, are reported here. Special notes are included
EC Electrical conductivity
when heavy metals or other elements are high enough to warrant special care in applying the waste. For diagnostic samples, site-specific recommendations
pH Measure of acidity
are provided based on information sheet data. The more thoroughly the problem and its unique conditions are described on the information sheet, the
or alkalinity on a
more pertinent the recommendations on the Waste Analysis Report will be.
scale of I to 14
10,000 copies of ibis public document were primd al a cost of $ J 1N-22 or $0.02 per cup}.

r
' '. .:.�raYr ."-.-- ..may., �'SC.w. 'k' sn �'� - 3- "�f'3Y' "S£k5' N 1 ♦ i
'NCDA'� nflII11C`D[YISiflII�p,'300Reed zCreekRfladRale� NG27b07465 919733655 "�;�Re r`tNo;WQ2t188W w<:r
„ . , :. �► Grower.-. Wallace Dairy Farms
Copier To: County pension Director
:14324 Eastfield Rd.
HuntersviUe, NC 28078
USDA-MRCS-Mecidenburg
SWCD
il
SWCD
ort Faresy700
aste nal sis
North Tryon St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
12/16/97 Mecklenburg County
mac.
a"s r.�us._ .ara�ra.
low-
ion unless Ott O �'
Sample !Il
N
P X Ca M9 S Fe Mn Zn
Cu
R Mo CI C
Tolal 217 M
26.8 114 111 40.3 30.9 8.74 0.59 0.53
4.30
0.00
"
IN -N
L L M M L M M M
M
VL
Waste Code: - --
NH4
—_
Na Ni Cd A Al Se Li PH
S5
CN DM% CCE% AffgLa
ALD
NO3
74.7 7.52
cripum
OR-N
DairV Lagoon Liquid
Urea
L
Reeomiimeridatioas:3:s
� h' i a` yC 'JW-;' § - yn;- AY 3i,A� sMt;n
NtitEiea#sAvailabtefo�r�i CroYbsI100Q: altos' m
-_ .wW.sfee...arY "•`� r i
tltlecFElements1?is/10" alliirrs �.:
sca7ian `�et6�od ` .•P2175' . 1rz4
Q&OQ6 'v'°'^ o •�1g lY 1 o0o c�a�ia,�s N ff(,(M1 fAA--tc I.� t o-�I
V,),L wA5�e�`��4 0 aQ o pow � Q 9 to A,, p oej
Aches 09 1404 is M�ctPci
vq a Acja�

BUTTKE DAIRY ENTERPRISES PAGE 4
MECKLENBURG COUNTY DECEMBER 04, 1997
Wallace Dairy Farm - FACILITY # 60-1
The holding pond will be pumped down prior to December to allow for storage
during the winter months when the ground may be saturated or frozen and
crops are not actively growing to take up nutrients. The pond will be
pumped as needed to provide adequate waste storage or as needed for
irrigation water on the growing hay crop during the times listed in the
chart on the previous page.
Soils for the fields used for application of liquid waste include:
IrA - Iredell fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slope
IrB - Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slope
Recommendations and calculations are based on the NRCS Technical Guide for
waste utilization and the current pasture/hayland system. Wastewater must
be analyzed within 60 days of application. Yearly soil samples are
required on each field receiving animal waste to better utilize the
nutrients in the waste with the nutrient needs of the crop. Refer also to
specifications guide Exhibit A6 and A7 for additional specifications and
recommendations. Notify the Mecklenburg Soil and Water Conservation
District (704-336-2455) or the USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Office (704-788-2106) before making any changes in crop rotation or in
tillage practices.
Application Considerations:
Special weather conditions should be noted when planning on irrigating.
Wind, soil temperature, soil saturation levels, predicted rainfall events,
etc. should be considered. Applications must be managed so as not to
create runoff.
THE CLEAN WATERS ACT OF 1977 PROHIBITS THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS INTO THE
WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES. THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL
RESOURCES (NCDENR) DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWQ), HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY
FOR ENFORCING THIS LAW.
If you have any questions concerning your waste analysis report, call the
Mecklenburg Soil and Water Conservation District office (704-336-2455)
happy to assist you.

BUTTKE DAIRY ENTERPRISES PAGE 5
MECKLENBURG COUNTY DECEMBER 04, 1997
Wallace Dairy Farm - FACILITY # 60-1
Owner/Manager Agreement
I/we understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved waste
utilization plan for the farm named. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management (DEN) before the new animals are stocked. I (we)
also understand that there must be no discharge of waste nutrients from
this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe
than the 25 --year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on-site
at the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by DEM upon request.
I (we) understand that I must own or have access to irrigation or other
equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in this waste
utilization plan. This equipment must be available at the appropriate
pumping time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon in a 25 -year,
24-hour storm event. I also certify that the waste will be applied on the
land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no
runoff occurs.
Plan ml-
Prepared by 1� �ci CortSuu+.s�
me Title
USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
745 CABARRUS AVENUE WEST
CONCORD, NC 28025
704-788-2106
Concurred in by tA1)11a_-1V
Pro cer
Concurred in by (1 . T" h% p_
Operator in Charge
Concurred in by ��,r��` 2�e� /)�/a.,L .
own
1 Ll
Date
Date
Date
Date

ENIERGENCY AC'T`ION PLAN
PHO` -E NUNI LBERS
DWQ
E.fERGENCY �1-k,NAGE:v1F-N-T SYSTEM! 36 2412
SWCD (M) 116 2455
NTRCS S ZQ43. _ZSR 2106
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from'vour operation are leaping.
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait.un(O wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should matte every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. pump wastes to fields at.an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Cali a pumping contractor.
e. Nlal;e sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinkiers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close v lues to elirrunate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush s}sterns. houses. solid separators-ac,ion include:
a. Scop recycle DUMC,
b. Scop irri�_aucn pump.
c. duke sure no Siphon occ+ar=.
j. Stora _J1 tic,«v :n the house. tsu_h sy_terns. or .epzlraton.

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1=: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowtna leaks- possible action:
a. Dia a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay n,pe soil. -
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spi.I1 and note any obvious damages.
a. Dili the waste'reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Anv damage noted, such as employeedrijury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters'?
Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, cally our DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919 -733 -3942 -
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location of
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number
c. Instruct ENIS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - -
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
": If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask: that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
a: Contact the contractor of Four choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site
damage. 4
a. Contractors Name: (U6 WALJ-ACE--
b. Contractors .address•Orf (4-oAC>
c. Contractors Phone: (01 E15 -1a27-5

6: Contact the technical spe;.ialist who certified the lagoon (ti RCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.')
a. \ame: A W J WtlM rJS
b. Phone: O -v O 2�
7: impiement procedures as advised by DW'Q and technical assistance agencies to
rectifx' the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste manaeement plan to
ke_p problems with release of wastes from happening again.

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Suorce Cause IIAIPs to fNirti>;rti[e Offor Sitc Specific Pracliccz
Faroulearl Dairy production Vebelative or wooded buffers
/
GYItecorntncrtded best manageutcnt practices
W--1Good judgment and common sense
Paved lilts ttr barn alley •. Wet awnure-covered surfaces2roffinte
rapt: or flush daily
surf=aces drying with proper ventilatioi[
itorttine checks and rnaintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, swce tanks
Ilcddcil .teas • Wile la' Promole [frying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial decomposition Replace wet or manure -covered bedding;
Hanure dry stacks • Partial uticrobial decomposition provide liduid drainage for stared manure
stur.lg;c gull: or basin 0 Pamal microbiM Llecouupnsitiars ; ❑ Iloltom or ntid-lCYel loading ' 60 � R ?�/ SOt 11� Ly, T�
aur face • 1�lixing while filling; l-1 Tank covers �}� n �� j
« Agitation when cmlttyiatg Cl Basitt•surrace mals of solids; RAY
❑ Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions.
CI Agitate only prior to manure removal
❑ 11 en biological additives or oxidants
ScE[lint; h,asin sat face}
htautu'c, slurry ur aluIlgc •
aprcadcr uullcts
I fnurvcrctl ilrarrure,
ahrriy lit shrclg;e'uo !lead
sur f.re e 5
HuNla l:rnl.s
Partial microbial decumposkion
Mixing while filling
Agilauou when emptying
Ag;italion when spreading
Volatile gas emissions
« Volatile gas emissions while
drying;
• Agilatiuu O'frecycled Lagoon
liquid wbilctanks.are filling
will drainage from settled solids
Remove solids regularly
❑ Soil injection ofshtrrylshulg;es C VF-RtD YY J44 LI
n Wash residual manure from spreader slier use
❑ Proven biological additives or oxiehrttts
f7 Soil injeclitstt ofslut-ry/sludg;cs CO "P-9 kV LrU �
f-1 Soil incorporation within 'I8 hrs �7
177. Spread in thin unifurn layers for rapid drying;
n Proven biological additives or oxid,urts !
W11—Tish liurlt trovers;
U-ILtend fill lilies to near bottont or larks with
anti -siphon vents
Owside [!rain colieclion • Agitation during; wastewater t1 Box covers
Of juuerlinn ITnxes conveyance
AM( st' - I•lovcnOws 11, 1996. hire I

Source , cause (1h1Ps to Miuitttice 0dnr Site SImcifc Practiecs
Lilt slalions • Agitation during sump lank [] Sump lank covers
filling and drawdown DQLJ )y l
End of drainpipes at
a Agitation during wastewater
❑ EXttnd discharge point of pipes 1111dernealll
/
Ia1;r7nr1
conveyance
lagoon liquid ICvel
1_agunll Strrfaces
aUnlalile gas ent4sion.,
Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
• llioingical mixing;
a,---C—Orrect lagoon startlip pracedltres;
• Agitation
, oMinitnuin surface area -to -volume ratio;
04Ibl-inimum agitation when pumping;
n Mccltanical aeration;
El Proven biological additives
lrriplinrl sprinkler
0 1 ligh pressure agitation;
Irrigate on dry Clays wills little or no wind;
`
nn[xles
• Wind drift
0 Mininuetu recnnlmended operalillg procedure;
PAI
Dnpintake near lagoon liquid surrlce;
r'�+`` '
_ Pump front second -stage lagoon;
0 flush residual manure from pipes at enol of
sh�rylsludge p11111pings
Dead animals 0 Carcass dccompositioa Pr per disposition of carcasses
Standing %Vale( artlond 0 huproper drainage; Grad and lai1d.scalm.so.cli Ilial waterdrains
Cacilities • Klicrobial decomposition of atv:ly from liicilitics
orbi1111c matter
Mod smacked onto Imblic Poorly maintained access roads - 1=a1,11% access road nlailllrni111CC
r+1a11s liunl farm access
Addilinrtal lulilrm:lliou : Available From
('alae Manure h-lanagclnent ; 0304Itule/f1MP_•Packet NCSIf, Comay Extension Center
ouiry Fthicational Unit Mamire Management Syslerti - Lake Wheeler Road Field laboratory ; p13AE 249-95 NCSII - HAI:
l-agoon Ilesi1,'n and Mallagemem for Livestock Matinre Treatment and Storage - EIIAli 103-83 NC511 - IMF'
Wnagcmcnl of Dairy Wastewater ; FIIAE 106-83 NCSII - ItAF
Calitlr,lliun of Manwe and Waslewaler A pplicalion Equyuuenl ; FBAl- I -act Sheet NCSH - BAI.
Nuistulec Cnncenls u1 Animal h•lannrc Aganagcnlenl: O{lors incl I.iies ; 11RO107, 1995 COHICr4ILCC I'IucCCdingS Florida C411111Crallve Extension
ANIM: - Normo er 11, 1996, I'at;c 2

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sualt h'C
Cause (IMPS to Coult'ul I nsctls Site Specific Pructid-cs
Liquid Systems
1-I11ah Gollel s 0 Accumulation. of solids
I.iagonjls and fits
l7xCC151VC Vegetative
t 4.1%vtll
• Crusted Solids
If . Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accultaulated solids from
ters as designed.
ftclnove bridging of accumulated solids at
Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding; is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6 -
ti illcl►es over more than 30% of surface.
Decaying veg d:tatiou fid Maiwain vegetative control along; Gawks of
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accunutlation of decaying vegetative matter
along water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
His
Feed 5g1illagc: I)csjgit. operate 111111 11milltain. flail sysmus (c.g.,
bunkers and (roughs) to minimize the
f/ccumnlation of decaying; wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
(cry intc:rvc( during; sunlmer; I5-70 day illlcrval
Airing %vinter).
Fecd Sttu-age Accumulations of feed residues Reduce moisture ,1ccu1urllation within and —�
around iulmcdiate I)urime10' 01711 4:d slarag;c
areas by insuring drainage: away Ilam site
and/or providing adequale coulainlnrnt (e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
i isture grain producls).
01 Inspcct rur-and remove nr break up accwnnlaled
solids in filter strips around! Iecd stur:lge as
AN11C - November 11, 1996, Vage I

Suurcc Cause BMPs to Coalrol Insects Sill: Specific Pracliccs - - -
Aminal I loldinb Areas ACCnnitila[iOliS of animal wastes Eliminale low areas that [rap moisture along
and feed wastage fcnces'and'otlter locations where wasle
accumulates and disturbance by aninials is
animal.
O Mainlain fence rows and f Iter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes (i.e., inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
-
hry Manure l Icurdlin6 Accuntulalions of animal wastes _ Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
S�'te'us clay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
daring winter) where suanure is loaded for land
6plication or disposal.
r4/ I'r ide for.adequale drainage around manure:
tockpiles.
Inspect for and remove or break tip accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
nrHnure handling areas as needed.
For Inure illCOntratian contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of.rintomoiogy. Box 7613, North Carolina State I lniversiiy,
Raleigh, NC, 27695-7613.
AMR.' - t iovcmbcr 11, 1996, I'al;e 2 . S

1' Jortality Management N•lethods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
_] Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within ?-: hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
axRenderinaat a rendesinplant lant licensed undo: G.S. 106-163.7
_ .,
'] Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only, piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of .Agriculture
Any method"w-hich in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's valve without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
ENTERPRISE RENDERING_COMPANY
28821 BETMLEMEM'CMURCH ROAD
oAKBORO, NC 28129
704 485 3018
E

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Arlin Buttke
5796 Walker Mill Road
Randleman, NC 27317
Dear Mr. Buttke:
1•�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENTIOF;'. to
ENVIRONMENT AND N&ul RAC( RESOURCES' V,a,;,'! �
December 28, 1998
DEC s z 1998
idl ION 4f ENVID"Ifilft U0040'
IMAM 1 tE1;t3�At fCFfIC4
Subject: Enforcement Action
Wallace Dairy Farm
Case No: DD 98-005
Farm No.. 60-1
Mecklenburg County
In a letter from the Mooresville Regional Office dated June 18, 1998, you received notice
that the Division of Water Quality was considering an enforcement action against you for
violation of N.C.G.S. 143-215.1. After reviewing the enforcement case, I have chosen not to
assess civil penalties for these violations at this time. Please be advised that this letter does not
preclude the Division from assessing civil penalties for other violations at a future date.
Assessments may be levied for additional violations should they occur.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Shannon Langley at
[phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Preston Howard, Jr., P. E.
cc: Enforcement File
Mooresville-Regional=Office,
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

OPERRTICNS ERRNCN - WO Fax:[phone]
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG
Aug 31 198 13:51 P. 02110
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENYXRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No, DD 98-005
IN THE MATTER OF )
BUTCKE DAIRY ENTERPRISES, INC. }
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATION OF } AND ASSESSMENT OF
15A NCAC 2B.0217 AND } CJ VU- PENALTIES
N.C.C.S.143-215.1 }
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, I. A. Preston Howard, Jr., Director of the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), make the following.
Y. FINDINGS OF FACT.
A. Buttke Dairy Enterprises, Inc. is a corporation vrgardzrd and existing under the laws
of the State of North Carolina.
B. Buttke Dairy Enterpris , Inc. leases and operates the Wallace Dairy Farm, a dairy
cow operation In ]Mecklenburg County.
C. The Wallace Dairy Farm was deemed permitted as a nondiseharge facility on
February 1, 1993 in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H _0217.
D. On dune 12, 1998, DWQ staff observed animal waste in a diversion flitch that led to
an unnamed tributary of Clarks Creek. Animal waste was also observed in the
unnamed tributary. On June 16, DWQ staff observed animal waste in the ditch. The
unnamed tributary of Clarks Creek is Class C waters of the State within the "Yadkin -
Pee Dee River Basin.
E. Buttke Dairy Enterprises, Inc, had no valid permit for the above-described activity.
F. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures In this matter totaled $248.41.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following;
i.I. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.,
A. Buttke Dairy Enterpriscg, Inc. is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A
pursuant to O.S. 143-252(4).

QPERRTIONS BRPNCH - X14 Fax:[phone] Rug 31 198 13:51 P.03/10
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in accordance with
7 SA NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The diversion ditch and the unnamed tributary of Clarks Creek constitutes waters of
the State within the meaning of 03. 143-21$.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
D. The above-cited discharge is a violation of the nondischarge permit.
E. Buttke Dairy Entcrpri=3, Inc. may be msecsed civil penalties in this matter pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten
tbousand dollars ($14,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person for
failing to act in accordance with the terrns, conditions or requirement of a permit
required by G.S. 143-213.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this shatter may be assessed against Buttke Dairy
Enterprises, Inc. ptnutnt to G.S. 7.43-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B -282.1(b)(8).
G. The D rwor, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, ba.-, the
authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, l make the following:
ft�
Accordingly, Buttke Dairy Entwpriscs, Inc. is horeby assessed s civil penalty of:
$ for discharging waste to the waters of the State in violation of
ISA NCAC 2H .0217 and G.S. 143-215.I.
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is _ percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A,
$_ �- 298,41 Enforcement costs
$ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S_ 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of tho penalty I have considered the
factors listed in G. S. 143B-282. I (b), which ate:
(1) The degree and extent of barru to the nature] resources of the. State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or rwrface water quantity or quality or on air quality;

OPERATIONS BRANCH - W0 Fax:[phone] Aug 31 '98 1352 P.04/10
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
('n The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(S) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date)
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.B., Director
Division of Water Quality

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Johnny Wallace
Wallace Dairy Farm
14324 Eastfield Rd
Huntersville, NC 28078
Dear Mr. Wallace,
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE80URCE5
December 18, 1998
Subject: Return of Permit Application
Wallace Dairy Farm �—
Mecklenburg County
The Division of Water Quality (Division) has received an application for a Non -Discharge Permit for the
Distribution of Animal Residual Solids. We have contacted Ted Lyon in the Division of Waste
Management and were informed that you currently have a permit application for the composting and
distribution of solid waste (including animal waste) with their Division. Therefore, you are not required
to apply for a permit from the Division of Water Quality for the composting of animal waste, and we are
returning your application. Please contact Mr. Lyon at 919-733-0692 extension 253 if you have
questions regarding your current permit application.
Mr. Lyon did inform us that the Division of Waste Management requested that you contact the Division
of Water Quality to determine if a stormwater permit is necessary for this site. Please feel free to contact
Mr. Tony Evans at 919-733-5083 extension 584 regarding any necessary stormwater permits.
y
.h 1�lff C�
Kim H. Colson, Supervisor
= ,� Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
c Y &kPI
�
cc: Mooresville;Regional Water Quality Office
Y
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

No�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 28, 1998
Arlen Buttke
5796 Walker Mill Rd.
Randelman, NC 27317
Subject: Response to NOV
Animal Waste Discharge
Buttke Dairy Enterprises
Mecklinburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Buttke:
Your response to the Recommendation for Enforcement regarding the waste
discharged through the diversion ditch at your dairy in Mecklingburg County has been
misplaced. Would you please fax/mail a copy to our main office in Raleigh. The fax
number is [phone]. A copy can be mailed to: Water Quality, Compliance/
Enforcement Unit, Attn: Steve Lewis, P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC 27626-0535. If
you like, you may also mail a copy to my attention to the address at the bottom of the
page. I apologize for any problems this may have caused.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan D. Jo on
Environmental Specialist II
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 26115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

db
S,� rAAY
*� ^Net r7F r77b
QUAM
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
VIN-VRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
From: f J c7 �IVtS O
Division: ] 1�
Section._
v
Date-
To:
Fax number : Sa ( —' f7 �( — 7v .� .
• Lr
Number of pages (including cover):

I'
A�
�A
NCDENR
JAMES 13. HUNT JR. CERTIFIED _MAIL
GOVERNOR RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Arlen Buttke
5796 Walker Mill Rd.
wAYNr McoeVITr Randleman, NC 27317
SECRETARY
.' .j �• ti^." Dear Mr. Buttke:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES '7
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 18, 1995
Subject: Notice of Violation
Recommendation For Enforcement
NCGS 143-215.1
Wallace Dairy Farm, Facility #: 60-1
Mecklenburg County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of you facility on
June 16, 1998. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV) and a Recommendation for Enforcement
:fir for the unpermitted discharge of waste. Also, please note the change in item four on
the corrected copy of the enclosed inspection form.
i r �•� On June 12, 1998, while conducting a wetland inspection, Mr. Samar Bou -
1. Gazhale of this Office observed an excessive amount of waste in a tributary to Clarks
Creek below your storage ponds. On June 16, 1998 Mr. Johnson observed animal
-_� ��.... ,� : ' `..�:•.- .fir.
waste in the clean water diversion ditch. Also, during the inspection your waste
application records were not available for review. In light of your deemed permitted
status the noted problems are in violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1
and Title 15A NCAC 2H.0217.
If you have an explanation for this unpermitted discharge that you wish to present,
please respond in writing within ten (10) days following receipt of this notice. Your
explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate,
your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for
his consideration. Also, it is requested that a completed copy of your waste
application records be submitted to this office. Please address your response to my
attention at the address shown on the letterhead.
North Carolina General Statute 143.215.6A provides for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state environmental laws and
regulations.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORksVILLH, NORTH CAAOr_INA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/I 0% POST-CONSUMEA PAPER

Page Two
Mr. Arlen Buttke
Wallace Dairy Farm
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Acting Regional Supervisor
cc: Mecklenburg SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator t
John Wallace, Sr.
AJ

Diviskon of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection Irg /La ->Ju -
Facility Number ()
Time of Inspection � 2a hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 1E3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:.........
Farm Name......... wQkd.i.Q..G........... 1>aL�. County :............. ...
S_ Sr ......................... "1
Owner Name: : f'Oi 11l.......... W G-� ac ...... �[e-hone No. $ .7 -..2, /.7.5 1
Facility Contact:.....gr.1-.exn..........8tjk:. r ........ ....... Title:....... S ...................... . Phone No:...... ......r,. ..
Mailing Address: .... ly. .T............ s. .t;..1 ...... ......................... ..itli .... Inf-5.U. (k.........................
Onsite Representative: ... A".1ZI.....k kz..ZZ&6h/Weintegrator:..................................................................................
Certified Operator .......
p,tE.t21.x ...................�'t.% 4 a.tw.�-.................................... Operator Certification Number:......"244I&................
Location of Farm:
r�st.....:,v.... t-...�c...rJs1..........d. 5... 5.....,ge
!:.T .......��..... �.t~ ............... ;
.u. j .........= ....ff .�.' ............. ....L meg r....... {
i
Latitude Longitude �• ©©;�
- --- Design,; • Current
Swine Capacity .Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
)pulation `
�5
:
Number of Lagoons / HoldtngPonds:l
Design 'Current,
Poultry,',_i.,_7,. ,,.Capacity
Population Cattle
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
❑ Yes
❑ Layer
2.
air;
❑ Non -Layer
>4,N0
10 Non
10 Other I
I`.
,
F
Total Design "Capai
T
'Total SSI
❑ No
)pulation `
�5
:
Number of Lagoons / HoldtngPonds:l
10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Field Area
Spray
1.
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
❑ Yes
XNo
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the,operation?
❑ Yes
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the,operation?
❑ Yes
>4,N0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Cl Yes
❑ No
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
XYes
❑ No
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
j Yes
No
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
%f&yes
❑ No
mai ntenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
�To
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
ANo
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Nurn er:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) A///�
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier .
Structure 3 Structure 4
Freeboard(fl):................................................
..................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes ` i '\,0
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure ti
........I ............. ...................................
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the. State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Fe -S. .......................... ........... .................. .................. ......... ....................................... I ........
...
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWM13)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certii�ed or_Perntilted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
5No
❑ Yes
MIN
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
...........................
❑ No
�] No.violations or deficiencies4ere'noted during this:visit..You.will receive no further
: coeres'pondence about this. visit'.• :. .
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes fikNo
❑ Yes J4 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Comments (refer'tq question #) Explain any'Y'ti5 answers and/or a: y recommendattons.or any other conunentsw t
Use drawings of facthty�to,better explain situatioti5 (usti additinrial pages"as nece5tiai=v) ;�
».�
. SJe..rte co,r� Vt,e fdi �. be [o w. a 1e 1�rJl� Cl C O sk4�x
5 ��
be, s eK �.e.._. v-ee(,,k CC -P,_ trk,L a�-.o�.�.�- CcLtk 6Q_ act � t r r
Q 9 wt,4.s J- be. late A o111 e� `� c,,U �a s i tti
� f
n G. j �s rho. Q b�n��e bast A ca,�se.Ck CKVL OU _r#'1
tok.� -
l -7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name t _ .^ �W f'a
ReviewerAnspector Signature: Date:
1W

,i� Q Di�+ision of.Soil andl Wd t'er'Conser`vatfonE' C)peratiod� evievr;�llry}�{vm'(r
�.., .. x, 3E�u n-M�tEliGil! 1nr„ii%r:,t i•rr; IilddE.r
�E t !r �r..li Division of Soil and water,',,
e: � '�. - .Y..v �!-'. *Y �;V.�"i•"�dl4N�iS7;:.�IYnN�VS.::I'
qm 1V]S1oI1 of iVALeC V�u"alts`.''},r�(111i Il$i1CC ISR on
L .iter,,r`!'_� knN'' �..�`_- i .,i E t ri F
»ra 4 t I!t ! ' 4a t .�1 .sr• �" i 7AK; �.. �:,14[fF ! � t ✓311 . =
C�btAgency,-kUper$tiottlRe�rewrh'; ?q �$
l-'
outine Q Com saint Q Fotl(jw-upofDWQ inspection Q Follow -u of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Bate of Inspection
Time of Inspection r 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted C3 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
1
Farm Name: .................�.............. ....................... .. County: .......... M1c. .
... ...............
Owner Name: ................:,.acS.. xv. ...................V na. .`...1...L��.,,,...................... ["hone No
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:..........:................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: .......�.. {.c ...�:.4. ............!—riS. 4.0 !...:.... .......:.i'#` rrn '`�r..V..4..11e...................... .PS. �2.ti
.............
Onsite Representative: �6L..C......Integrator:..... ........ ... ............¢ ........................
Certified Operator: ,,,,<„<„<,<<..
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude Longitude
Design Current.'' y < a S Design Current Design Carr`eiitt `
Swine
Capacity Population Poultiry ' .: ;Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population <'
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts!
❑ Boars
FE -1i
I❑ Non -Layer
L
J
.
❑ Non -Dail
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
T©tai SSLW
RON
-'N'umber-of Lagoons ' '.. i4. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area '
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ,� ❑ No Liduid Waste Management System 5
� 'i :
DischarjZes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection! & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes ANO
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [�JNo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I
Freeboard (inches): ....<........` dvV.+r....... L� ......:.......................-,,...........................
.......
................................... ....... ................... ...... ..................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc:)
3123199 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Data of Inspection 0
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? X Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P—(.No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crap type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ' ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & DocttmenttiAd-
17
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management flan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?.
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: �'�io yio�a tt?ns:or t��fcienpips rrE re ted diFrfng {hjs'vjsjt� Y©if with ee iye o' #'u thtr
'CO suoric�eizce: �iuiat this :visit: ' ...:........ I .... ' ........ ' : ' ::: ' : ' :... .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
'.
Use -41
drawrngs of facrlttyr td better explatn'sttuattiins (use°addrttonai pages, asinecessary) a,`
Ct S I �I L5 S,-r�ri� G�..i� rlo
r e s jr. `#�..� w.`. �k lac,-visr e
i
�� r t� 4t `4 C `e., W ca. 5 � t� T p tr-�r•�, �a.T' e� 1\ S � � c� e� �C� � Vlt eU
AM, b e_ +ro CXt c_\C>s e_& OUJ- r,— /UK C--5 -S fi.o s
Reviewer/Ins ector Name
r,7
� b iA .� l° ti 3 iE1 4 t y
p t ✓� z �. 4h 5 Y: "I? {{§ .4 .h lit x .a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� '4 Date:
3/23199

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Odor lssfees
26 Does the discharge pipe from the confinernent building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 4,No
28. Is there any, evidence of wind drift during land application? (i,e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes j�j No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
.29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 4N
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes T!!QNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes <No
ttiona omments an or rawmgs i � �' u'� I' u _:.'i t o°'` ' (� ;1 "� #,�,'i r � � Its �' ' ; � �
:H. , �. , .
AL
r�
3123199

1011outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up or DSWC review O Other I
.� Facility Number d � I Date of Inspection UD115M
(4 Timc of Inspection rT47 O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
(3 Registered Certified d Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: .............. ...........
Farm Nalne:.....Q G�� ��//...I1?'/........................................ ........................
County:.... Mcc edL[i'�................... .........
Owner Name:...,'a.� h..... VY,G�.i i t:t L1P.�................................................... Phone No:.7a)...675— ...... Za.7 `r...,....................
Facility Contact: _Arli�r1 -.... l4 kP✓................... Tit1e:..... LGL S. a.. ............................... Phone No: �7°'0...075--(aZ33
Mailing Address:.... �,?. .'T....� 1.. d.....,R;DCS;...................... 1'iif1'S1! �, ..}.. �................ p7..t................
Onsite Representative:..-.r�G•�Q-G� Integrator: .....................
., ..
Certified Operator:..... -�... ..L.... Q.e�......---.............................. ........... Operator Certification Number.. r�y.�,. .'3....---•
Location of Farm:
;%rf+jeae
Jes r 5+6'e Id • Fkrrn is o a7 . .:...........
Latitude 1=• =1 Longitude ®• =1' =11
KSYY
�Swin�
�� IleSignGU
urrettE ,��
<r
a 'Destgn�CvTrenE Currettt
If
l
YU ia11 Et011 '
44' i 51k
51*t
❑ Layerairy '3OD 140eder
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non Dairyrrow
�?.E
an to Feeder
to Finish
to Wean°
LJ
Farrow to FeederEl
J❑ Other
�:... r
f
Farrow to Finish
4�, Total Des>ignCapacity ) 3 D O
�
:G ilts
?� �' � ��' ' � `� �° ?Tvtal'SSLW I SZO b p O
❑Boars
. , �� .
t�.
Ntttidtler{111�g0AS£/ I u litigji'"ondS ' ❑ Subsur€ace Drains Present HE] Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
d i -
_ a
,
` . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
} f „�„ ,�'
General
11� 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?I'10 AL~fII ,es ❑ No
gNVIR��MIdN= �uOl.tl�CpS
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? & ;tAL ❑ Yes [R'fqo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [] Other 2 2 1998
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Yes [I No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notifyQWk .,Q)IT U; "" y� L (y; t,E ❑ Yes Q No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
T Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible'charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes E3'No
❑ Yes �Q-No
❑ Yes 92'1 o
❑ Yes Ci No
❑ Yes 0 No
Continued on back

4
Facility Number: 60 —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes Ef"N' o
Structures (Lagouns.11olding Ponds Flus Sts etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes (<o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 pp Structu e 4 Structure 5
Identifier:•QL�OO.h..........UVI
o Oh.Z.....�.LtGj00n..3.....[.011d
Structure 6
...........•......................
............ .P�...r'�.........
Freeboard(ft): ...........:Z., �... �..............Z.:. ,..........................7. ..................................................... ........3..,.....,.................................................
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
E,wo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Lf No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[;'Ko
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
21,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
No
22.
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
9N0
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...O. •Ird.SS •1 A SCLC:C......................................................... ............ I.......... --•---••............ ................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMW)? ❑ Yes G No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
RrNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[:]Yes
ErNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[2"No
20-
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Ufgo
21,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
,[9
M Ivo
For
Certified or Peradtted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
U(No
24.
r
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
ONo
25.
ere any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
[R No
No:vialatitins-6i de ideild6. were'iioted'dudng this:v sit.- Yoit:vt'10 i iceive•ino•farther :
-
:.
co&6000dejlce dboid •(Ills: visit: • :..: - :. • ; , : .: • ::. .. ' :::.. . -, ; . • :.. • . ' .:: .
3 ...... .. Co ta4t�efrAo u o, larr�.arjy osvv nrllar arty wmertdatt v any -ca
�aiin of fac�G"ty to (tet• laixt sltait ire -80 ��grlal"►ages�as=lt +- y,.
9. - V4& u ffXv- l a- b b vl (.OP +- 16 3 btruch�r�,5 a.tXa 5s 5.,.: awl t{n a rrY40.
vjecct s 4-v be, tvt tp-i�-e. ck. OK. 5i + C_ rep Has +nn art e h�ol-r 1�5 flea i s
Witt 1It 60V1e 600 VL_ .
' e, arc a- (aGvuSS 41t, 60 Vre 'C I� vr�rv+ I.l� t'►'�;6 s4yikt�my
) aJG (Vit u�- avtc�i cc}
vte.c.d s i -o Ion cavi e �vurn --4 Inc, s fist t^c Q.reCL o -�I
0 , Tits ave -.a- has k7e_,r," dearc.d ani waske �t.c�- l� �
lo(• e -c por+�oYl n ticJ�XSi0r1 T u.pper'pmr't' Ylceds GlAtK+l'OvL.
so ld WQSihC l4, s l'lt 4M PYaC[SS b Issui PC,rM'7/IT 19N
25/97
Reviewer/inspector Name �( ' 1 a r�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: a I5 9 8

}State of North Carolina a
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources rm Mooresville Regional Office ;
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDEHNI=;z
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 5, 1997
Eric Wallace
14324 Eastfield Rd.
Huntersvilie, NC 28078
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Wallace Dairy Farm, Facility #: 60-1
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Wallace:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on June 3, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this
Office. In general, the management of the waste and the setup for handling surface runoff at the facility
appeared fine. But as was mentioned, some buffers may be required adjacent to the drainage areas.
Because of the uniqueness of your operation, it is suggested that all persons/agencies involved in the
operation of your facility be informed of the certification process.
I have enclosed a copy of the general guidelines for waste products sold in bags. The person that
should be contacted concerning the composting of the waste generated at the Buttke dairy is Rick Moore,
919-733-5083, ext. 527.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover.
AIso, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
1
D. Rex Gleason , P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Mecklenburg County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, it 14C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

;,...
[! DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review.
3.
J'DWQ.`Ainimal Feedlot OperationSW'Iispection
,.
toutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number U Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection F7/73F)l 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Stu -glk Ste ❑ Applied for Permit (ex: 1.25 for I hr .I S min)) Spent on Review
fed ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...... . ........................ . . ..... . ...... . ....... . ...... . ..... . ...... . ....... . . ....... ..... .................. ........... .....
Farm Name: _.....�(.� � � .......... ........f lvJ'J............................. County:..._22"' 4. '„ ......................»...
Land Owner Name:. s} S:t%sra ._.... ;rL �G4. ,t .... S Y ............................ Phone No: ._...`L .�� S. .... .. �a.........................
Facility Conctact:�t6a'.ti'� L_.... C---
Title: .. .......W .... _,... _ .._.. Phone No: .__ ..
Mailing Address:�d.......R�.............. .. ........ ................ ... �t�! �.�f��.����..........w.....................�.�.�...7.A....
Onsite Representative:...... ..... . :::...........(.N.... �7�,( .... ..... .................. _....... Integrator :.... ..................... ......... ......... ................... ........... ......
..._.
Certified Operator:...... !..1..i ...........L.:' ..I �....... .................. _........... Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
.._:.'Yx?•.Y.1.._i.�].. .�r,...:lt:�1....�....,... �i�U.....G1.�.:...... .....�a�.._-�....��..`a.....4. ..�(5 . ;: ........ ... �t,�ik...L........ �....... 4
.........r�. 3.....:., i s �...........1... k k! 1....15...... kL..C1. .3 `...S, C � �....c ...,CZ � ................... .................................. �}
Latitude • ` " Longitude • 4 C.
I ype of operation and tlestgn l::
Design
Swine f� �.., ;`
., : Capacity ]
❑ Wean to Feeder I _+
❑ Feeder to Finish
['Elother.. � t3� �� �l otat aaLvv
7 17 77-
z Number of Lagootfs / balding Pods ❑Subsurface Drains Present ,
r
Lagoon Area t; ❑Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any bu[t'ers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30197 maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes CNo
❑ Yes RNo
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes 4,No
AYes N0.
Continued on back
0

Facility Number ..............................
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes Xo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 05.10
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? 0 Yes 5'No
Structures (Lagoons and/or llolding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7
4
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes k -No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes O�No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste
Application 14L//k
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .._. _....... .............. ................. ........................... _.....................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For
Certified Facilities Only /(i74
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. —
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
-c c . 1,5 u sec
�O �t ` _ A/ 1�c c,nA
_c,'T
t
;i27 F? �i n ems' iNlc:� V1�' 11t'J
c� {r.ctS,
Reviewerllnspector Name
Reviewer/luspector Signature:
Date: ' 6 /--1/
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Qualit3, Secds*, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

11,
S ��y
1. For a waste product of exceptional quality to be sold or given away in bags or other
container for application to the land, the following must be satisfied:
The Ceiling Concentrations (Dry Weight Basis) and the Pollutant Monthly
Average Concentrations (Dry Weight Basis) must be maintained:
Ceiling Monthly Average
Concentrations Concentrations
r deters _ wmg&& mg&g
Cadmium 85 39
Copper 4,300 1,500
Lead 840. 300
Nickel 420 420
Zinc 7,500 2,800
2. A label shall be affixed to the bag or other container in wl-d--h residuals t'ha are sold or
given away for application to the land, or an information sheet shall be provided to the
person who receives the residuals sold or given away in an other container for application
to the land. The label or information sheet shall contain the following information:
a. The name and address of the person who prepared the residuals that is sold or given
away in a bag or other container for application to the land.
b. A statement that application of the residuals to the land is prohibited except in
accordance with the instructions on the label or information sheet.
c. Information on all applicable buffers including a 10 foot buffer between application site
and any public or private water supply source (including wells) and any stream, lake,
or river.
d. Residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded, frozen or snow-covered.
e Adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any
disposed or stored residuals into any surface waters.
rIO 11ORI<NG -AND REPS RING RE4UIREM=
1. Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, residuals, soil, or plant tissue
analyses) deemed necessary by the Division of Water Quality to insure protection of the
envirorunent will br established and an azeepable sampling and reporting schedule shall be
followed.
2. Proper records shall be maintained by the Permittee tracking all residual activities. These
records shall include, but are not necessarily limited to the following information:
a. source, volume and analysis of the poultry waste product
b. name of residuals' recipient, volume received, and intended use
E

3. A residual analysis shall be conducted annually from the date of permit issuanc
Permittee. The results of all analysis shall be maintained on file by the Permit
minimum of five years. The residuals analysis shall include the following paramete
Cadmium Nickel
Copper Zinc
Lead
Aluminum
pH
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Calcium
Plant Available Nitrogen (by calculation)
Magnesium
Potassium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium
% Total Solids
TKN
4. Three copies of all required monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in
conditions III 2 and 11113 shat be submitted annually on or before March I of the following
year to the following address:
NC Division of Watei Qualiky
"Anter duality Section
Facility Assessment Unit
PO Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
7. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office (as
outlined in attachment 1) as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the
next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of
the following:
a. Any occurrence with the distribution program which results in the land application of
significant amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic.
b. Any failure of the distribution program resulting in a release of material to receiving waters.
c. Any time that self-monitoring information indicates that the facility has gone out of*
compliance
f-
compliance with the conditions and limitations of this permit or the parameters on
which the system was designed.
d. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility
incapable of adequate residual treatment.
e. Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system during transportation of
residuals.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter
form within five (5) days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must
outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur. _
IV. INSP,ECIMS
1. T c,e Parmr ttee or his designee shat; inspu t the residuals storage, transport, and treatment
facilities to prevent malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which
may cause or lead to the release of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a
nuisance. The Permittee shall maintain an inspection log or summary including at least the
date and time of inspe .ion, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective
actions taken by the Permittee. This log of inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee
for a period of five years from the date of the inspection and shall be made available to the
Division of 'Water Quality or other permitting authority, upon request.
3

2. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water Quality
may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place ora
or related to the treatment site or facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept
under the terms and ' conditions of this permit; and may obtain samples of groundwater,
surface water, or leachate.
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the distribution activities are carried out in
accordance with the conditions of this permit, the supporting materials, and in the manner
approved by this Division.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of residuals described in
the application and other supporting data.
3. This permit is not automatically transferable. In the event that there is a desire for the
facilities to change ownersl^.ip or a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request
must be submitted to the Division of Water Quality accompanied by an application fee,
documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be
appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits and may or may
not be approved.
4. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the
Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality in accordance with
North Carolina General Statute 143.215.6(a) to 143-215.6(c).
5. The annual administering and compliance fee must be paid by the Permittee within thirty
(30) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause
the Division to initiate action to revoke this permit as specified by 15 NCAC 2H .0205
(c)(4).
6. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and
all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government
agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
7. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
8. This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to incorporate- any conditions,
limitations and monitoring requirements the Division of Water Quality deems Necessary in
order to adequately protect the environment and public health.
Permit issued this the 27th day of January, 1997.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
A. Preston H6 tml Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Wat& Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0013380
4

11
-�obs
WC Alnimal Feedlot OperativnReview ,s 4,.
,��:� �^ s
UWQ Animal Feedlot Uperatlomill ite Ins ecdNg
tlon
toutine O Com laint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Sta *Registe ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
ed ❑ Permitted or Ins Lection incindes travel and rocessin
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated:......_ .......................... ............... .......................................I.......................................... ..............
......
Farm Name: ........ .�L,16,/C. 'ce.............-C..J�.... lN'I.. w _ .............. County:...... 27 1410. .... ......._......
Land Owner Name :..10`Lus.(........ S�/{" 1��.LL��1�`...�....5.X............................. Phone No..........`.i�.�'5..... ....a�. �.............. I.................
Facility Conctact:�: 12MA.......Ta.....,P3�..1 /.... t Title:...... .......................................... Phone No:............................I....... ................
Mailing Address: L.. .7,x..7...... ,itL.... ��..................................... v v�. 1ak ....._ __..... .... a. d. fit.
Onsite Representative:......v'!-...........�x,(.G..F, r........... ............ Integrator:
Certified Operator: ..... .Ee.h.<.............. � A J., //.?.1..`�...:'....... ................................ Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Form:
1-5 rn�:rl....ZJ2 . ec .tit _.. ..,. tl....L .51 .._ ...................a i.ujte.,....... --....... 4
.........'....Y� f ........... 5�.....3,c 5 ...d........ ....................................................... �y
Latitude Longitude �• ��
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
wDesign� Cuts eui3.;,- DesigCunt�.r� ,` ��, d Design Current
a, ,�IN- tv. Ca gcl ?P,opulation '.Poultry Ca "aci - o Kulatlnn� a Cgttle y w Ca' aei� ` P utatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ La er k:' a'UY
. ❑ Feeder to Finish I . ❑ Non -Dai
Farrow to Wean " S
al Des; n pacrt3'
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other r
r
Number ofLagoans+/ Eioltdiing Poads � '—�- ❑Subsurface Drains Present '
� .� � � � �� _ �y � �`" � ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area x�
p
s 3,E.., ...�€ ,:� - �'o-'i`, '.� �,�rs,k,xE�',v �i .ui., hyo --x �.• a;3` ..
r�www
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes kNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water! (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 11—INo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ANO
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require Yes IVNo
4/3{1!47 maintenancelimprovement?
Conrrnued on hack

Facility Number: — ..........
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
A10
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
Owo
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
RNo
,StrugtuEgs
(Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
APPlitatiou
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No 7
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
0
Freeboard {f}): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes k, -No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes j9,No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste
APPlitatiou
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type........................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
I7.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For
Certified Facilities Only 1410
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ Na
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name .% { : 9,WX V41Reviewer/Inspector Signature: !-Gw Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Seem, Facility Assessment Unit 4/34/97

State of North Carolina /�
Department of Environment, Y/
Health and Natural Resources ,1 •
Mooresville Regional Office
000% 00W&FAEOPM
James S. Hunt, )r., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
John Wallace Sr.
14324 Eastfield Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Wallace Dairy Farm, Facility'#: 64-1
Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Wallace:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline, With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance, The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the Iagoon, Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, N���C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, Borth Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-563-1699 ! 50% recycled/1091,, post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. JDx ' wW'gVione—al—SupZrvisor
- I -
Water Quality
cc: Mecklenburg SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Eric Wallace
14324 Eastfield Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
Dear Mr. Wallace:
147A
Ad
1DEHHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 7, 1997
Subject: Compost Operation Permitting
Wallace Dairy Farm, Facility #: 60-1
Mecklenburg County, NC
Enclosed is a non -discharge permit application for the distribution of residual solids. This permit
is required in addition to the certified farm plan and subsequent permit for the operation of the dairy. For
further information regarding the enclosed application, please contact Rick Moore, 919-733-5083, ext.
527 or Andy Oakley at 919-733-5083, ext. 533. Regarding the dairy, the certified farm plan should
encompass the storage of the manure generated, the waste from the milking parlor, and surface water
runoff from the dry cow lot(s).
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and
regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Mecklenburg County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 North Main Street, N'Vf
';&C FAX [phone]
Mooresvifie. North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunfty/AtJlrmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
John Wallace SR.
Wallace Dairy Farm
14324 Eastfield Rd.
Huntersville NC 28078
Dear Mr. Wallace SR.:
MW V
lei
Awi
[DEHNR
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Wallace Dairy Farm
Facility ID #: 60-1
Mecklenburg County
N.C. DEPT. ON
ENVIPONMENT, HEALTH;
9 NATURAL, RIsS(71Jit(:}rS
DEC 17 1996
111=0II OF INVIR29MERIAL VAlidgglElli
NORES'li l;I,ILML OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system.' Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste. .
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System W 4. Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission a CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
T. M_ Westmoreland
T.M. Westmoreland & Sons
13434 Westmoreland Rd.
Huntersville NC 28078
Dear Mr. Westmoreland:
NIT?
[DEHNR
N.G Df?p
ENVIRONht N'p, 1A F, A t,'i'K
NATURAL RF—!io :,CES
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation QFC IV f996
Facility: T.M. Westmoreland & Sons
Facility ID #: 60-9 DUN OF [NVJ�!?SI�Elf1Rl rlAl{,16EdfENT
Mecklenburg County
idO:�i51t1l1E ItEOiiHAl OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confuted cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed, To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31. 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
//?, t' - ��' f, , "�' � �
FOR Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System Ni
Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission f CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P,O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

JUL--14-1995 15:19 FROM DEM WATER QUALITY SECTION TO
MRO P. 02112
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.^�
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SrM VISITATION RECORD
DA'Z'E: � , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner-
Mailing Address:
County:
�'.
Integrator. '`=,� _ Phone:
On Site Representative: Iosr �+��c2 _ _ Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: �W% Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW, ��
Latitude: fLongitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) esr No Actual Freeboard: 4_ - Pt. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or&Was any erosion observed? Yes a No
Is adequate land available for spray?
e)r No Is the cover crop adequate? or No
Crop(s) being utilized: :� le
Does the facility meet SCS rxiinimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? �& or No
100 Feet from Wells? e , r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes
Is anima waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes oiw
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or&P If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? YrTar- i Qp�_ .
Comments:
2 � :�;2L-
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02