490090_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 3, 1998
Charles Payne
W.T. Payne & Son Inc
392 Guilford Rd
Harmony NC 28634
— _w
?FJ
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RESOURCF-5
Subject:
Dear Charles Payne:
N.C.
!1 NA 3_UPLAL R1�)l'r.(1W
AaR 5 1998
8Wff' E4%U9 f[TdTIu
ftM XUF INK
1Ff lE
Removal of Registration
Facility Number 49-90
Iredell County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water
Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans
are as follows:
Swine 254
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poulgi with a liquid wastes tem 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
OT
cc: ,cMooresville _Water:Quality:Regional:0ffice
Iredeli Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
-
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%a recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

4
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Charles Payne
392 Guilford Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Payne:
ATZA9WFA
•
NCDENR
NORTH CARouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL. RE_SouRCE3
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 28, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
W.T. Payne & Sons, Facility #: 49-90
Iredell County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on October 21, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. As discussed, curbing may need to be installed at the rear of the paved lot. It was also
noted that the vegetation on the sideslopes of the storage pond needs to be cut. Because you contract
for the removal of waste from the storage pond, a written agreement with the persons involved should
be in your files. Finally, some improvement in the pasture immediately behind the milk parlor appear
to be necessary.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that for violations of state environmental laws and regulations, North
Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation as well as
criminal penalties. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D,?nPZE.
D. Rex Glea
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 North Main St., Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
bS�'

�y DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
03-DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection .
_
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
E:
[Dale'Inspection Facility Number
Time Inspection ; 24 hr. (hh:mm)
,.Registered M Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:... 1'4.,...1..........;. /.j.6a,, e...... G .................... County:..,........ .' ..1.......,..,..................................
Owner Name: .......5 ............ ..P,r-V11le............................ Phone No 25 (o ... ....7. -1,11. ..........................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................p................ Title:..............
Mailing Address:..., :i . ..a...........V �.I lz ......... !....
Onsite Representative:....C. ,,/............... �.l!!l.`e.........................
Certified Operator;...... x-.1 .5 ................... yNe........................
............................ ......... Phone No:...................................................
. f' .rt ........................................... anC 4...
Integrator: ..............................................................................
Operator Certification Number; .........................................
Location of Farm: �+p �y
........n"....... a r. ....... w......•.�.. :xc
( l
....:. .......... s..........ot ..:....��......../.................................................................................................................................................................... .
Latitude Longitude �• �' �
M
Design . Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
................
Al
Number of Lagoons,/ Holding Ponds
Design Current Design .' Current<;
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity' Population ,
❑ Layer Wairy IS
❑ Non -Layer I I IEECon-DairyL
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity .�
;Total SSLW
10 Subsurface Drains Present lLJ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General .
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Watet•'? ilFycs, notit\D��'(t))
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in eaUrnin?
il, D,:�es discharge bypass a lagoon systetn?(11 yes, n+:�tify DWQ.)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/liolding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125197
❑ Yes r9tNo
❑ Yes [5No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �YNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes qNo
❑ Yes NINo
Continued on back

)Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes RNo
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes &TNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure fi
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ............................. .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes (IA.
No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? %Yes ❑ No
Waste .Application ��/d!e
14. Is there physical of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMPjj, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type QYG:Illlza'�csrG3
•,earl.T....t!L�°...a..5............s.4. ................. ................................�............
. ... ...................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted'which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q No.violations or deficiencies were'note'd-during this;visit. You.will receive no further
correspondence about this'visit:•. ..'.
cility to better explain situatigns'. (use additio'nglpines asnecessary);
Cur 7 j4p y, � Le_� 105Alltedl
Vey r4p1011 O�'t syDra �hGl OfVoA' e Ae�,5
1 91 Cov��rra �e&w� rt� £,� s 1�G POVIA .
y
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes JZ No
AYes ❑ No
❑ Yes $4 No
❑ Yes 93 No
❑ Yes (9 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
r1W XW
u
Date: