490089_PERMIT FILE_20171231

w J J. �.; J�'�'�.P y p��{�y 1�- •a _ z r �2) y it
' a
S77Yy r.,-';Jr�'�:♦ - L J � xjslr1j,�ly �♦'' S -0 �'.,
ir
Y�x J '•fir ,••:,1 �. !, Jr�tA y� '4. '�rsF��� � .
atop.
.,. "':;,.:� .-' '�'' � +. •'r'!¢iF�LYtt?e`r,',:� �,,, ;4.�� 1� � �yTFf lr+%.
k;, r rJ 4 rx' a r i
Ay. �'r
nrs �i1 s} f e r,�. ••! r�tp+�� K. -�3 j r �'i �y r ��'�
F A j x •�~�.+r�� ky`; �*r 41is = --'i7 r-�ri��,rr r ti.+ ,�`+
's�'i'ry 4•"s,
w J J. �.; J�'�'�.P y p��{�y 1�- •a _ z r �2) y it
' a
S77Yy r.,-';Jr�'�:♦ - L J � xjslr1j,�ly �♦'' S -0 �'.,
ir
Y�x J '•fir ,••:,1 �. !, Jr�tA y� '4. '�rsF��� � .
atop.
.,. "':;,.:� .-' '�'' � +. •'r'!¢iF�LYtt?e`r,',:� �,,, ;4.�� 1� � �yTFf lr+%.
k;, r rJ 4 rx' a r i
Ay. �'r
nrs �i1 s} f e r,�. ••! r�tp+�� K. -�3 j r �'i �y r ��'�
F A j x •�~�.+r�� ky`; �*r 41is = --'i7 r-�ri��,rr r ti.+ ,�`+

J Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
05-13-2003
This plan has been prepared for:
Harmony Acres Dairy
Wayne Smith
325 East Memorial Hwy
Harmony, NC 28634
704-546-7327
This plan has been developed by:
C Lipe Barrier, Jr., Environmental Spec. H
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873-6761 Ex . 3
�? Z
IV�-
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that -are included with
this plan.
34) -03
S ature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the in standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
10�3
Plan Approved By: elx.2L at4- r�'
Ir
Technical Specialist Signature Date
- - - ----------- -- - ------------- ------------------
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-13-2003 Cover Page 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres
of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realisticyields of the crops to be grown, their Nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being gown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the
total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic. I
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fort
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs'A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
App he.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
App tied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gallA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
245
TWl
U1
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Small Grain, Silagelllay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
139.05
0.00
245
TWl
UI
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22, l5
0.00
374.26
0.00
245
TW2
Ul
Lloyd
26.10
26.10
Small Grain, SilagdHay
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
194.67
0.00
245
TW2
UI
Lloyd
26.10
26. l0
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19.69
0.00
513.78
0.00
245
TW3
Ul
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad
52
8.00
0.00
74,37
0.00
245
TW3
Ul
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad.
140
21.53
0.00
200.23
0.00
5246
T1
Ul
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Com, Silage
20.0
21t5-6130
218
0
20
Broad
198
30.45
0.00
602.91
0.00
5246
Tl
Ul
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad,
14
8.23
0.00
162.91
0.00
5246
T2
Ul
Cecil
14.20
14.24
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
811-7131
I51
0 1
0
Rroad.
76
11.61
0.00
164.88
0.00
5246
T2
U1
Cecil
14.20
14.20
Com, Silage
19.5
2115-6/30
213
0
0
Broad,
213
32,76
0.00
465.I5
0.00
5246
T3
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Orchardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
811-7131
155
0
0
Broad,
78
11,92
0.00
54.83
0.00
5246
T3
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Com, Silage
20.0
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
33.53
0.00
154.22
0.00
5246
T4
U2
Cee il
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
4.OTons
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0A0
30.93
0.00
463,95
5262
HA I
Ul
Cecil
15.50
15.50
Orchardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
811-7/31
155
0
0
Broad
78
11.92
0.00
t84.74
0,00
5262
HA 1
Ul
Cecil
15.50
15.50Com,
Silage
20.0
2/15.6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
33,53
0.00
519.65
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 1 of 10

Waste Util ion Table �� ,Year 1
Trail
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
App tic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(Ibs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
App fied
(lbsrA)
Rcs
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Mann;
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5262
HA 2
U1
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
426.30
0.00
5262
HA2
UI
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9,6 Tons
911-3/31
1 107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.231
0.00
tis.191
0.00
5262
HA3
U1
Cecil
6.50
6,50
Com, Silage
20.0
2/15-610
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
197.93
0.00
5262
HA 3
U1
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tans
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
53.48.
0.00
5262
HA 4
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Corn, Silage
19.5
21115-6/30
213
0
20
Broad.
193
29,68
0.00
614.40
0.00
5262
HA 4
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, Silage(Hay
9.4 Tars
911-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8,00
0.00
165.54
0.00
5262
HA 5
Ul
Madison
10.10
10.10
Com, Silage
17.0
2115-6130
185
0
20
Broad.
165
25.38
0.00
256.29
0.00
5262
HA 5
Ul
Madison
10.10
10,10
Small Grain, SilagelHay
7.7 Tons
911-3131
85
0
0
Broad.
43
6.54
0.001
66.01
0.00
5262
HA 6
Ul
Cecil
27.00
27.00
Com, Silage
20.0
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
822.16
0.00
5262
HA 6
UI
Cecil
27.00
27.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
222.15
0.00
5262
HA 7
Ul
Cecil
15.40
15,40
OrchardgRass Hay
3.6 Tons
811-7131
160
0
0
Broad.
80
12.30
0.00
189.4
000
5262
HA?
Ul
Cecil
15.40
15,40
Com, Silage
20.5
2115-6/30
223
0
0
Broad.
223
34.30
0.00
528.14
0.00
5262
HA 9
U2
c6l
19.00
19.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
587.6
5262
HALO
U2
Cecil
12.30
12.30
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
380.44
5262
HAI 1
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Orchardgrass Hay
3.2 Tons
811-7131
142
0
0
Broad.
71
10,92
0.00
46.95
0.00
5262
HAI 1
U1
Cecil
4.30
4,30
Corn, Silage
18.4
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
30,91
0.00
132.92
0,00
5262
HAl2
U2
Cecil
40.00
40.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0,00
30.93
0.00
1,237.19
5262
HAl3
U2
Wilkes
12.40
12.40
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tans
811-7131
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
331.62
5262
HA14
U2
Wilkes
2.00
2.00
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tons
8/1-7/31
115
0
0
Broad
115
0,00
26.74
0.00
53.49
8427
M 1
U1
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Com, Silage
18.4
2/15-6/30
201
0
20
Broad.
181
27.84
0.00
47.32
0.00
8427
M 1
UI
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, SilagQfHay
8.8 Tons
911-3131
98
0
49
7.5
0.00
12.81
0.00
8427
M 2
UI
Lloyd
I3.80
13.80
Com, Silage
19.1
2/15-6130
208
0
tLB
188
28.91
0.00
398.99
0.00
191165 Database Version 2,0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 2 of 10

Waste LTti( .ion Table Npar 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regri
(Ibs1A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res
(lbsIA)
App he.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gallA
Tons
I000 gals
tons
8427
M2
Ul
Lloyd
13.80
13.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
D
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
102.93
4.00
8427
M 3
Ul
Lloyd
4.20
4,20
Corn, Silage
19.1
2115-6130
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28,91
0.00
121.43
0.00
8427
M 3
U1
Lloyd
4.20
4.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
31.33
0.00
8427
M 4
Ul
Lloyd
11.00
11.00
Corn, Silage
18.7
2/15-6I30
204
0
20
Broad.
184
28,30
0.00
311.27
0.00
8427
M 4
Ul
Lloyd
11.00
11.00
Small Grans, SilagelHay
8.5 Tons
911-3131
94
0
0
Broad
47
7,23
0.00
79.51
0.00
8427
M 5
Ul
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Com, Silage
18.7
2115-6130
204
0
20
Broad.
18
28.30
0.00
169.78
0.00
8427
M 5
UI
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tons
911-3131
94
0
0
Broad
47
7,23
0.00
43.37
0.00
8427
M 6
Ul
Cecil
1.60
1.60
Com, Silage
19.5
2/15-6/30
213
0
20
Broad,
193
29,68
0.00
47.49
0.00
8427
M 6
Ul
Cecil
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad
52
8.00
0.00
12.80
0.00
8427
M 7
Ul
Cecil
7.70
7.70
Corn, Silage
20.0
2/15-6130
218
0
20
Broad
198
30.45
0.00
234.4
_0.00
8427
M 7
Ul
C061
7.70
7.70
Small (.Train, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tans
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
63.35
0.00
8427
M 8
Ul
Cecil
1.40
1.40
Com, Silage
20.0
2/15-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0,00
42.63
0.00
8427
M 8
UI
Cecil
1.40
1.40i
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
.0
0
Broad
54
8.23
0.00
11,52
0.00
8427
M 9
Ul
Lloyd
5.00
5.00
Com, Silage
19.1
2/15-6 30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28,91
0.00
144.56
0.00
8427
M 9
U1
Lloyd
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad
49
7,46
0.00
37.29
0.00
8427
M10
Ul
ewacla-P
22.00
22.00
Com, Silage
28.0
2115-6/30 1
291
0
20
Broad.
271
41.68
0.00
916,89
0.00
8427
M10
Ut
Chewacla-P
22.00
22.00
Small Grain, Silage1Hay
•9.0
911-3131
195
0
0
Broad.
48
7.31
0.00
160.71
0.00
8427
Ml l
U1
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/I-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
458.41
0.00
8427
M12
U1
Cecil
5.10
5.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0,00
112.9
0.00
8427
M13
U
Cecil
11.90
11.90
Corn, Silage
19.5
2/15-6/30
213
0
20
Broad,
193
29.68
0,00
353.21
0.00
8427
M13
Ul
Cedl
11.90
11.90
Small Grant' Silage/Hay
9,4 Tons
L911-3131
104
0
o
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
95,16
0.00
8427
M14
Ul
Cecil
20.60
20.60
Corn, Silage
19.5
2115-6/30
213
0
20
Broad.
193
29.68
0.00
611.43
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 3 of 10

Waste Uti� ion Table F/Year I
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 4 of 10
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res.
Manure
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fat.
(Ibs/A)
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
App fied
Applied
Reqd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs+A)
1000
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Applic.
Tract
Field
ID-
Soil Series
Antes
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
8427
M14
U1
Ceti!
20.60
20.601Small
Crain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131 110410
0
$road,
52
5,00
O.OD
164.74
0.00
12,428.93
°`
1,262.00,p
.:.
-11,166.93
3,054.36
�' �° � � 51
-
337.44
ffi�KK
-2,716.92
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 4 of 10

Waste Util ion Table Year 2 !.
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs+A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs+A)
Res
(lbs/A
Applic.
Method
Mann:
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
'Pons
1000 gals
tans
245
TWl
Ul
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9,6 Tons
9/1.3131
107
0
0
Broad.
'54
8.23
0.00
139.05
0.00
245
TWI
U1
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
514.61
0.00
245
TW2
Ul
Lloyd
26.10
26.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad,
49
7.46
0.00
194-67
0.00
245
TW2
Ul
Lloyd
26.10
26.10
Com, Silage
19.1
2/15-6130
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28,91
0.00
754,61
0.00
245
TW3
Ul
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8,00
0.00
74.37
0.00
245
TW3
Ul
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Com, Silage
19.5
2115-6130
213
0
20
Broad,
193
29,68
0.00
276.04
0.00
5246
T1
Ul
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911.3131
107
0
0
Broad,
54
8.23
0.00
162.91
0.00
5246
Tl
Ul
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0,00
438.48
0.00
5246
T2
Ul
Cecil
14.20
14,20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Broad.
140
21.53
0.00
305.73
0.00
5246
13
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
101.87
0.00
5246
T4
U2
Cecil
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad,
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
463.95
5262
HA 1
U1
Cecil
15.50
15.50
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu,
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
1
22.15
0.00
343.26
0.00
5262
HA2
U1
Cecil
14D0
14.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
115.19
0.00
5262
HA 2
Ul
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
310-04
0.00
5262
HA 3
Ul
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tans
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
53.48
0.00
5262
HA 3
UI
Cecil
6.50
6,50
Soybeans, Manured, Doable Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad,
144
22.15
0.00
143.95
0.00
5262
HA 4
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
165.54
0.00
5262
HA 4
UI
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1.9115
140
0
0
Broad.
140
21.531
0.00
445.68
0.00
5262
HA 5
UI
Madison
10.10
10.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
85
0
0
Broad.
43
6.54
0.00
66.01
0.00
5262
HA 5
Ul
Madison
10.10
10.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
29 bu.
4/1-9/15
113
0
0
Broad.
113
17.38
0.00
175.52
0.00
5262
HA 6
Ul
Cecil
27.00
27.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
222.15
0.00
5262
HA 6
U1
Cecil
27,00
27.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu,
411-9115
I44
0
LO
Broad.
1
22.15
0.00
597.93
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed. 04-15-2003 WUT Page 5 of 10

Waste Util ion Table l Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APPlic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(R&A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsrA)
Res.
(lbs/A
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Manure
App tied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5262
HA 7
Ul
Cecil
15.40
15.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
341.04
0.00
5262
HA 9
U2
Cecil
19.00
19.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tarns
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
587.67
5262
HA10
U2
Cecil
12.30
12.30
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tarns
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
380.44
5262
HAI 1
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
411-9/15
132
0
0
Broad
132
20.30
0.00
87.29
0.00
5262
HAl2
U2
Cecil
40.00
40.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
t33
0
0
Broad
133
0.00
30.93
0-00
1,237.19
5262
HA13
U2
Wilkes
12.40
12.40
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tans
811-7/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
331.62
5262
HA14
U2
Wilkes
2.00
2.00
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tons
811-7/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
53.49
8427
M 1
U1
Cecil
1,70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
9/t-3131
98
0
0
Broad.
49
7.54
0.00
12.81
0.00
8427
M I
U1
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
411-9115
132
0
0
Broad
132
20.30
0.00
34.51
0.00
8427
M 2
Ul
Lloyd
13.80
13.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad
49
7.46
0.00
102.93
0.00
8427
M 2
Ul
Lloyd
13.80
13.80
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bus
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad,
128
19.69
0.00
271.65
0.00
8427
M 3
Ul
Lloyd
4.20
4.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3/3I
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
31.33
0.00
8427
M 3
Ul
Lloyd
4.20
4.20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19,69
0.00
82.68
0.00
8427
M 4
UI
Lloyd
11.00
11.00
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tons
911-3131
94
0
0
Broad
47
7.23
0.00
79.51
0.00
8427
M 4
U1
Lloyd
11.00
11.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bus
411-9/15
124
0
0
Broad.
124
19.0
0.00
209.77
0.00
8427
M 5
Ul
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tans
9/1-3/31
94
0
0
Broad
47
7.23
0.00
43.37
0.00
8427
M 5
U1
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
32 bu.
411-9115
124
0
0
Broad.
124
19.07
0.00
114.42
0.00
8427
M 6
Ul
Cecil
L60
1.60
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
t04
0
0
Broad.
52
8,00
0.00
12.80
0.00
8427
M 6
Ul
Cecil
1.60
1.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Broad.
140
21.53
0.00
34.45
0.00
8427
M 7
Ul
Cecil
7.70
7.70
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad. 1
54
8.23
0.00
63.35
0.00
8427
M 7
Ul
Cecil
7.70
7.70
Soybeans, Manumd, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
t44
22.15
0.00
170.52
0.00
8427
M 8
UL
Cecil
1.40
1.40
Small Grain, Silageliiay
9.6 Tons
9/i-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.I.,
-- 54
8.23
0.00
11.52
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 W UT Page 6 of 10

Waste Util, )on Table l Mear 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
App 6c.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fat.
Nutrient
Applied
(]bs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gats
tons
8427
M 8
U1
Cecil
1.40
1,40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad
144
22.15
0.00
31.00
0.00
8427
M 9
Ul
Lloyd
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad
49
7,46
0.00
37.29
0.00
8427
M 9
Ul
Lloyd
5.00
5.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
4/1-9/15
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19.69
0.00
98.43
0.00
8427
M10
Ul
Chewacla-P
22.00
22.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
*9.0
9/1-3/31
•95
0
0
Broad.
48
7.311
0.00
160.711
0.00
8427
M10
Ul
Chcwacla-P
22.00
22.00
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
46 bu.
4/1-9115
177
0
0
Broad
177
27.22
0.00
598.85
0.00
8427
M11
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad,
198
30.45
0.00
630.32
0.00
8427
Mil
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, Silago/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
170.31
0.00
8427
M12
Ul
Cecil
5.10
5.10
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
1 Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
155.30
0.00
8427
M12
UI
Cecil
5.10
5.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad
54
8.23
0.00
41.96
0.00
8427
M13
U1
Cecil
11.90
11.90
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
95.161
0.00
8427
M13
Ul
Cecil
11.90
11.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad,
140
21.53
0.00
256.21
0.00
8427
M14
U1
Cecil
20.60
20.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
164.74
0.00
8427
M14
Ul
PCH
20.60
20.60
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Broad.
140
21.53
0.00
443.53
0.00
10,188,85
l'
1,262.0
Z;-4-
-8,926.85
w`
..
3,054.36
:., � V�
_
�
337.44
-2,716.92
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 7 of 10

Waste Util ion Table
Year 3
Tract
Field
Source
1D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(lbs(A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Rea
(lbs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
245
TWI
UI
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Small Grain, Silage/Bay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad,
5
9.23
0.00
139.05
0.00
245
TW 1
U1
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Soybeans, Manurod, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
14
22.15
0.00
374.26
0.00
245
TW2
UI
Lloyd
26.16
26.10
Small Grain, Silagelliay
8.7 Tans
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
194.6
0.00
245
TW2
Ul
Lloyd
26.10
26.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19.69
0.00
513.78
0.00
245
TW3
U1
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Broad
52
8.00
0.00
74.37
0.00
245
TW3
U1
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Broad.
140
2L53
0.00
200.23
0.00
5246
Tl
U1
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30,45
0.00
602.91
0.00
5246
Tl
UI
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
162.91
0.00
5246
T2
Ul
Cecil
14.20
14.20
Orchardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
8/1-7131
151
0
0
Broad.
76
11.61
0.00
164.88
0.00
5246
T3
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Orchardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
155
0
0
Broad,
78
11.92
0.00
54.83
0.00
5246
T4
U2
Cexil
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
463.95
5262
HA I
U1
Cecil
15.50
15.50
Orchardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
811-7/31
155
0
0
Broad.
78
11.92
0.00
184.74
0.00
5262
HA2
Ut
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Corn, Silage
20.0
2/15-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30,45
0.00
426.30
0.00
5262
HA2
Ul
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Small Grave, SilagelHay
9.6 Tans
911.3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
115.19
0.00
5262
HA 3
Ul
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
197.93
0.00
5262
HA 3
Ut
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/L-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
53.48
0.00
5262
HA4
UI
clecil
20.70
20.70
Com, Silage
19.5
2/15-6/30
213
0
20
Broad.
193
29.68
0.00
614.40
O,OO
5262
HA 4
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
165.54
0.00
5262
HA 5
U1
Madison
10.10
10.10
Corn, Silage
17,0
2115-6130
185
0
20
Broad.
165
25.38
0.001
256.29
0.00
5262
HA 5
U1
Madison
10.10
10.10
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
7.7 Tans
911-3/31
85
0
0
Broad
43
6.54
0.00
66.01
0.00
5262
HA 6
U1
Cecil
27.00
27.00
Com, Silage
20.0
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30,45
0.00
822.16
0.00
5262
HA 6
Ul
Cecil
27.00
27.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons 1.
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8,23
0.00
222.15
OAO
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 8 of 10

Waste Uti1 .ion Table L I enr 3 �
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
ApPlic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(IbWA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(ibs/A)
Res
(Lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
5262
HA 7
Ul
Cecil
15.40
15.40
Orchardgrass Hay
3,6 Tarts
811-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
80
12.30
0,00
189.47
0.00
5262
HA 9
U2
Cecil
19.00
19.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
1 133
0
0
Broad
133
0,00
30,931
0.00
587.67
5262
HA10
U2
Cecil
12.30
12,30
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30,93
0.001
380.44
5262
HAI l
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4,30
Orchardgrass Hay
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
142
0
0
Broad.
71
10.92
0.00
46.95
0.00
5262
HAl2
U2
Cecil
40.00
40,00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30,93
0.00
1,237.19
5262
HA13
U2
Wilkes
12.40
12.40
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tons
8/1.7/31
115
0
0
Broad,
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
331.62
5262
HA14
U2
Wilkes
2.00
2.00
Fescue Pasture
3, I Tons
811-7131
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0,00
26.74
0.00
53.49
8427
M 1
Ul
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Com, Silage
18.4
2/15-6/30
201
0
20
Broad.
181
27,84
0.00
47.32
0.00
8427
M 1
Ul
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
911-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
49
7,54
0,00
12.81
0.00
8427
M 2
Ul
Lloyd
13.80
13.80
Com, Silage
19.1
2/15-6/30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28.91
0.00
398.99
0.00
8427
M2
U1
Lloyd
13.80
t3.80
Small Grain, Silage flay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7,46
0.00
102.93
0.00
8427
M3
UI
Lloyd
4.20
4.20
Corn, Silage
19.1
2/15-6/30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28,91
0,00
121.43
0.00
8427
M 3
Ul
Lloyd
4.20
4,20
Small Graaf, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
49
'7,46
0.00
31.33
0.00
8427
M 4
U]
Lloyd
11.00
11,00
Com, Silage
18.7
2115.6130
204
0
20
Broad.
194
28,30
0.00
311,27
0.00
8427
M 4
Ul
Lloyd
11.00
11.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.5 Tons
911-3/31
94
0
0
Broad.
47
7.23
0.00
79.51
0.00
8427
M 5
Ul
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Com, Silage
18.7
2115-6130
204
0
20
Broad,
184
28.30
0.00
169.78
0.00
8427
M 5
Ul
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tons
911-3131
94
0
0
Broad.
4
7.23
0.00
43.37
0.00
8427
M 6 1
U1
Cecil
L.60
1.60
Com, Silage
19.5
2/15-6130
213
0
20
Broad.
193
29,68
0.00
47.49
0.00
8427
M 6
Ul
Cecil
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tots
911,3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
12.80
0.00
8427
M 7
Ul
Cecil
7.70
7,70
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad
198
30,451
0.00
234.47
0.00
8427
M 7
Ul
Cecil
7.70
7.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
63.35
0.00
8427
M 8
Ul
Cecil
1.40
].4o
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0,00
42.63
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 9 of 10

Waste Util, jon Table .Year 3
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APPlic•
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fat.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs+A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
APPlic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ihs/A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tans
1000 gals
tons
8427
M8
Ul
Cecil
1.40
1.40
Small Grain, SilageJHay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad,
54
8,23
0.00
11.52
0.00
8427
M 9
UI
Lloyd
5.00
5.40
Com, Silage
19.1
2115-6130
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28.91
0.00
144.56
0.00
8427
M 9
Ul
Lloyd
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.7 Tons
911-351
97
0
.
49
7.46
0.00
37.29
0.00
8427
M10
Ul
Chewacla-P
22.00
22.00
Com, Silage
28.0
2115.6130
291
0
.
27t
41.68
0.00
916.89
0.00
8427
M10
U1
Chewacla-P
22.00
22.00
Small Grain, SilageAlay
#9.0
911-3131
•95
0
.
48
7.31
0.00
160.71
0.00
8427
M11
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, Silage/Flay
4.6 Tans
411-3131
107
0
.
5
8.23
0.00
170.31
0,00
8427
M12
Ul
Cecil
5.10
5.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911.3131
107
0
.
120BroacL
54
8.23
0.00
41.96
0.00
8427
M13
U1
Cecil
11.90
11.90
Com, Silage
19.5
2/15-6130
213
0
.
193
29.68
0.00
353.21
0.00
8427
M13
Ul
Cecil
11.90
11.90
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
.52
S.DO
0.00
95.16
0.00
8427
M14
Ul
Cecil
20,60
20.60
Com, Silage
19.5
2115-6130
213
0
.193
29.68
0.00
611.43
0.00
8427
M14
U1
Cecil
20.60
20.60Small
Grain, SilageJHay
9.4 Tons
911-3/31
104
Q
52
8.00
0.00
164.74
0.00
10,269.7
1,262.0
-
-9,007.7
3,054.36
'.
337.44
-2,716.92
Nates: 1. In the tract column, --- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 10 of 10

A�
�ja
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and N
Pat McCrory
Governor
Wayne Smith
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Drive
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Wayne Smith,
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Thomas A. Reeder
Director
September 11, 2013
r-al-Resota 66 - -
SEP 16 2$1TI.
C:: LIE'. r4F: MiiCJ
- Agliiif%'r Prate
Subject: Permit No. AWC490089
Harmony Acres Dairy
Animal Waste Management System
Iredell County
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste perrnut with the
submission of a completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form on
September 11, 2013. Staff from our Regional Office has confirmed that this Coverage is no
longer required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage No.
AWC490089 is rescinded, effective immediately.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management system you mint first
apply for and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal
waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will
subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] if it would be helpful to
discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
or Thomas A. Reeder
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office —Please waive any overdue fees.
Permit File AWC490089
1636 Mail Se:vice Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phcne: 919-807-6464 l FAX: [phone]
Internet. www.ncwaterguaiily.org
An Equal Ooportunity � Aft:mrlive Action Employe:

Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: Harmony Acres Dairy Facility No:L4 � _--•g--
Owner(s) Name: Wayne Smith
Mailing Address: 325 E. Memorial Drive Phone No:
704-546-7401
Harmony, NC 28634
County: Iredell
Operation Description (remaining animals only):17I^
�flj fix,
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this Farm after lagoon closure.
if there will still bes'ai►irlrsn•the
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will
remain.
Operation Description:
U U JUN 2 7
2013 Lil
Type of Swine No. ofAnimals Type of Poultry No. of Animals
Type of D�iry �o. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder o Layer
o Milking Q . _--------�- - --
o Feeder to Finish o Non -Layer
o Dry
o Farrow to Wean Type of Beef No. of Animals
o Heirs- 0
o Farrow to Feeder o Brood
o Calves 0
o Farrow to Finish o Feeders
o Gilts o Stockers
o Boars Other Type of Livestock:
Number ofAnimals: 0
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the G.S. § 143-215.1
OB threshold? Yes o No o
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes?
Yes o No o
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: 0
(Name) James Bealle of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's Mooresville Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on
(date) for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to
the start of closure, which began on 9120/12 (date).
I verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. 1 realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North Carolina
General Statutes if 1 fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land Owner (Please Pr t): Wayne Smith
Signature: ) Date:
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Jonathan Creason
Affiliation: lredell Soil And Water Conservation District
No.: 704-873-6761
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC - 1 May 4, 2007

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
+bt:
Date of Visit: jP51'j/Q>j Arrival Time: Departure Time: ounty: L� Region:okfz
Farm Name: ��,/ —� Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: uks V ` -�" "'
A-�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
�` a w Design Current '' Design
5wi�ne a Ga ac Po Wet Poult ' Cam c
P fY P• „�'3- P �'
Curarent
Po p•
. ,.
Cable
Design Current
Caaci X1'0
P h' P•
_
Wean to Finish
_
Layer
❑ No
Dai Cow
Weto Feeder
Non -La er
Da' Calf
8r
Feeder Feeder to FinishDairy
F'
Heifer
,' Deslgn
Dry Poult , Ca aci
'Curtenf
I'o
Dry Cow
<, Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
P
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
.1
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at. . ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the -discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑. NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
2/4/2011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment �.
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify WQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
I0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence of Wind Drift [] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application. site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable []Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA NE
Re, Aired Records_ & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑Yes
❑ No
❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weatherode
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [3 Monthly and 1 "Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Sury y
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
[—]No
❑ NA ❑ E
Page 2 of 3
2/4/2011 Continued

Fhcili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
Fj Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:]Yes ❑ No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ❑ No
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes C] No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes [] No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ NANE
❑ NA ENE
❑ NA NE
[] NA NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA NE
❑ NA NE
❑ NA NE
❑ NA NE
❑ NA NE
❑ NA NE
Eomments (refer to question #):'Explain any°YES answers�and/or=any�adtiitfonal`:recommendiitions orariy,'other:comments �_;„ ,,� �,'y`
Use.drawings_of;facility toLbetter,
�IA situ ations.(useadditioii+al.pa, g.e:s.'a..s n.ecesasary)?
kc
Aww C
�S
Sc
J
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
2/4/2011

Conse`rvation_c.
Type of Visit OD Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: t Arrival Time:Departufe Time: County: _ Region:,'" " {'
Farm Name: � Owner Email:
Owner Name:�dr Y T L Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: _
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: 2___tHa
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0
❑ ' =1 Longitude: =0=1 °=1
Swine
Wean
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow 2-D
❑
Dairy Calf t
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yesy No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No IVA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yestoo
[3NA C1 NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued
� Tii�nvli4xr l�T,....l.e..- L tit
�� •�
®:Division of Water
°ns]Rii�i�. nf.Cn:l nr
Conse`rvation_c.
Type of Visit OD Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: t Arrival Time:Departufe Time: County: _ Region:,'" " {'
Farm Name: � Owner Email:
Owner Name:�dr Y T L Phone: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: _
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: 2___tHa
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0
❑ ' =1 Longitude: =0=1 °=1
Swine
Wean
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow 2-D
❑
Dairy Calf t
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yesy No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No IVA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yestoo
[3NA C1 NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Ilk
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in): 27 ( 1ZD1­
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 . Structure 6
❑ Yeso ❑ NA [1 NE
❑Yes El NA El NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Ye 1 �-o' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [:1EvidpnceofWincLDrifl P Application Outside of Area
t
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
❑ No [:INA
❑ E
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
[TRE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑E
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
ED]E
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

1 Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all co�Checklists
ar a e? If yes, check El Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropirate box.
❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ We aste Analysis ❑ Soil Anal sis —❑ Annual Certific tioi
❑Rainfall I-1 firnr.k�„n [R�r is rnuteInspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Cod
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ 14E
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ 1
4E
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pen -nit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ I
IE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? '
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
El No
El NA
NE
General Pen -nit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
. ❑ NA
NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
E
Additional Cartenteufs and/or Drawings:
CJZ7� `-\Ne VV
L
�p 1
12/28/04

I
tealle, James
From: Creason, Jonathan - NRCS-CD, Statesville, NC [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:41 PM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: RE: Closure
Attachments: sludgeamountsPAN.xlsx
I've attached a copy of it, James. I thought for sure I had included one in his package, but I could very well be wrong.
Jonathan
From: Bealle, James [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:38 PM
To: Creason, Jonathan - NRCS-CD, Statesville, NC
Cc: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: RE: Closure
Jonathan,
Wayne Smith stated today that he has not received a copy of the Closure Plan. Since I have scheduled an
inspection with him on Friday, would you please send a copy for my records? I will provide a copy for Mr.
Smith. Thanks.
jb
E-mail correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
James Bealle <iames.beallenncdenr. 7ov>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
-----Original Message -----
From: Creason, Jonathan - NRCS-CD, Statesville, NC [mai Ito: ionathan.creason ric.nacdnet.netl
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 8:12 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: Closure
Good morning James,
I got a call a couple of days ago from Wayne Smith, Harmony Acres Dairy, informing me that he will be ready
to start closing his pond soon. I have worked up a closure plan for him and he has a copy of that. What do you
need from me?
Jonathan Creason
District Ag Cost -Share Soil Conservationist
Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District
phone: [phone] ext. 3

fax: [phone]
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any
unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the
law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. if you believe you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.

Harmony Acres Dairy (Wayne Smith)
Waste Storage Pond Closure
4/2/12 SLUDGE
FTract:
Field
Acres
Usable
Soil Type
Rusle
Soil Loss
PLAT
rating
Last Crop
Next
Crop
RYE Next
Crop
N reg1A
Total N
Req
lbs NI
d Gals in
m
ow
Total P in
20
120
1680
***Liquid waste will be applied to other crop fields according to the Facility's existing Waste Utilization Plan.
The geld listed above is in the existing WUP on file in the Iredell SWCD office.
Estimate
lbs NI
d Gals in
Total N in
Total P in
NfAcre-'to be .,,
P/Acre to
Sludge
Gal
lbs Plgal
WSP
WSP (lbs)
WSP (lbs)
Arces
appliedm--- -
be applied
***Liquid waste will be applied to other crop fields according to the Facility's existing Waste Utilization Plan.
The geld listed above is in the existing WUP on file in the Iredell SWCD office.

Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: " t Arrival Time: t ;� • Departure Time: OV-44YR County:
Farm Name:Y�G� `�Owner Email:
Owner Name:�f �`� " V1`�►!� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Region:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: r
Certified Operator: _ t�.� ��'S 0 % V Operator Certification Number: �� v
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
�� ► 2-11
7
Swine
10 Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
Capacity Population
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =]' ❑' = Longitude: =0=& °=
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑
Layer
❑ Non -Laver
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
r
G
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Populatign
Mairy Cow
t-2-0
airy Calf
Ca
ai Heifer
'S 3
ry Cow
2t7
❑ Non -Dai
`
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NoA [:1 NE
El Yes [:1 No ❑ NE
❑ Yes No E] NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA I:] NE
EJYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
_JM
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
h
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ YC NA ❑ NA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) !
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
[f any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ yes o E3NA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 5
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
,L�ITIo El NA El NE
maintenance or improvement? r- �'`
Waste Application 5
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yeso ElNA• ElNE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN'> 10% or 10 1 b ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)°�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ,Q<NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination: ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yeso NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
7,: .i f _ A_t... —... _.. . k :.._.. {';T.57 -7-7757F-
5
:Tr, u.F\^�('.`.'L=1 +v.r':ir 7-....:r :;A .4:�'-'_t`,' r-�h: •3 "F.?-;_:. -cT�r. e4c-Y•.... .-•.. ,'.c.r-�.ry•.:�-.-.t.w.�: n.s>u .:, .-..:...._Rt.--_: •.a 4., 11 _'fYy.-:s;�L�L::w
d'~�/�o/ t � � �. d.S C_�,� It �"'`� (�-►••�d'�-�
Reviewer/Inspector Name r f '»,� Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued
I

Facility Number: — Bate of Inspection
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ec iaps
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis,,E Soil Analysis aste Transfers Annual Certification
ainfall ocking top Yield Minute InspectionsMonthly and 1"
Rain Inspections �ther Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes Ko ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No A
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No JKA
[—INE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes` ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were h' r an normal?
34. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes� ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer enc ns as required by
❑ Yes >5� ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Perniit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
Additmoal Commeiits "and/or brawiii s:'
12/28/04

.If
I Type of Visit ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
I}Reason for VEsik ©Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑Denied Access
©ate of Visit: /a4P�A o I Arrival Time: O t:4'O a2'-�
1 Departure Time: © County: Region:
Farm Name: S Owner Email:
Owner Name: — S Vy_c WL _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _ _ Title: _ _ Phonc
Onsite Representative: Integrator: �-{
Certified Operator: 1 rL � r vv"" Operator Certification Number: -2` fZ
Back-up Operator -
Back -up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: =10 =1 =11 Longitude: =0=1
°❑r ❑
ag
ii v,�... .. ,'9.�,raxt.G'Sp.,:+3C'"rf " -r �' _' :1. �� �, ¢ ~ r'''afs,.-r:M1-.h, ; a:�r.r,: �4�' '�.Y;3'r=',-, .- •tea: k`�
41 Sti �.x•''. ) - °a j5yiz o-4 t rf p
Desi n Current M t Desi nCitrrent Viz. ri Desi n Current-
�� �� .r is. ;-^rf%+k, -, -a?ar� ,lt; g'a. rt. ti 1ecixa�,� lygt s"iys' `F 1 x bk t�'j,y _57
Swi esCapacity Piipulattoii� Wet Poultty.C�pac�ty Population CattlehCapac}ty"1Po`'"}l Ei n
..� s"cc,-z"5.if. ,ba - -iY' +swa - f_� .Nu ci. Ea ,x„s?
❑Wean to Finish . P r „� , , J b
❑ La er
❑ Wean to Fceder ❑Non La er -
❑ Feeder to Finisha�d-Rz wtk y y „ ti �t�rVxyM'.r�b,
❑ Farrow to Wean Ir
zDy Poultry'x” r
Vtin. ., k _e �;c zy t 1{ f
❑ Farrow to Feeder,
ve ❑ Farrow to Finishx ❑ Layers a
n
El Gilts
<s ❑ Non -La ers j
sw ❑ Pullets
❑ Boars u
a,ns cy,�rYx�
Turkeys V 'fU,. 5.?`� ty �,c� a-e,+.a.' 1�,.�.lV DQE
'S. y. - 'J"7 i{,& ,t 'x .mss.
rOttl?+r9y s3, ` u+ Z.j r 1 $rtrtpk�`z wiU •*'fei 1"VtT- t. .e i � �: �'t 3
it'' w., Tc -A .,;m4'.+ :�.- ... ❑
Turk
e PDUItS `..'r.sF
� ❑Other a
❑Other Number of Structures k�
i1p_.:. 1:,.ax." .r �. w'. - � ^.x tai. ra' i •;'1� .. �`c ry. ` sFr� i y {r Nay ,,. ',
�": ✓sir x: ., 'fin- .V ..h. .�9: z�,. �. :?�: t-� .�'�„ �r ,. ">5. r �. .:•u.. �u.
Disc._ •h_ _ arp-es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed From any part of the operation? []Yes �NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No �] NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ Ne SCACI.NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ yes �❑ No� ❑ NE
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes L+d� ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State ❑ Yeses❑�N NA ❑ NE
other than from a discharge?❑
12/28/04 Continued
El Dairy Cow (_
.C� 1 I S
❑ D'ai � � Calf S
❑ Dai Heifet S l Z
❑ D Cow '�c7
❑ Non -Dai
El Beef Stocket
El Beef Feeder
El Beef
Brood Caw

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:// ~
Designed Freeboard (in): / =C70
H
Observed Freeboard (in):
'
5. Are there any immediate -threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
t, notify DWQ
environmenIZE]
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'?
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste P=tures require
❑ Yes
��IoEl NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste—Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or dompiiance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑IPAN.>.10% or lO lbs El Total Phosphorus; ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
1/i"{ti`;1) of "!` 11 . i
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ EvidenceGWind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12: Crop type(s) �C� 1 \ C " ` 6A 61\� ire-(z4� 4
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAMR? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need impro? ❑ Yes '8:�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, [I Yes ❑ No LSA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 0 NA ❑ NE
f�--
p ��r°`a $xa; 'SMrcx�isa'_ _ ice. tx
Reviewer/Ins ector Name ,
�� .� �`� �. :: Y �: .. ,f. Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature Date:
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
J ,
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP adiiy available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [INE
the appropirate box. �UP ESC ecklists Design ❑fps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need impr ment? If yes, check appropriate box below. ❑yes [INA El NE
aste Application Weekly Freebo Waste Analysisoil Anal��ysi''saste Transfersual Certification
❑ Ra' !I ❑ Sto g ❑ Crop field ❑ 120Wil'ute Inspections []monthly and 1" Rain Inspections OwKercode
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes_ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other issues
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No ZTA ❑ NE
❑ Yes,121�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No 1W❑ NE
El � -1 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes Lia ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dQa a within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o El NA
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of -the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes )5eo ❑ NA
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with anon-siterepresentative? Cl Yes ,L�`%Tp ❑ NA
.31
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? w ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
j-'ef'ir••v S-"si':°1i LMS i i F $x S°i �c3.. i Y'x .., �, trzkP ,011 :! � • . x ": L z. -. j
Addi�innalLComments nd/or Draweng�t�
12128/04
12128/04

# t ,
0 Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490089 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490089 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Com[Aance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine .. County: Iredell Region: Moore Ole
Date of Visit: 0 810 712 0 0 9 Entry Time:02:30 PM Exit Time: 03:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Harmony Acres DQry Owner Email:
Owner: Thomas W.5mi h Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 325 E Memorial Hwy _ Harmony NC 28634
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°57'13" Longitude: 80°4 '1 "
On Hwy 901, 1 mile east of Harmony, on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Thomas W Smith Operator Certification Number: 21442
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Thomas W. Smith Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Thomas W. Smith Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beal Phone: [phone]Ext 216
Inspector Signature: Date: -7 -,-,cC>c1
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/20/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.6 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/17/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.5 Lbs/1000 Gallons
07/10/09 > Soil Analysis
8
Page: 11

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith
Inspection Date: 0810712009 Inspection Type: Ccnrpliance Inspection
MI
Facility Number: 490089
Reason for Visit! Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Dairy Calf 15 2
Q Cattle - Dairy Heifer 45 20
Q Cattle -Dry Cow 20 3
Cattle - Milk Cow 120 120
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 246,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP-7 27.60 46.00
Page: 2

I
Permit: AVVC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 08/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges 8._Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n Cl ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
In
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
00
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
In
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
00
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
00
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
Cl
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
In
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

V
Permit: AWC490089 Owner- Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 08/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manuretsludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? n
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
o
o
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
n
■
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 4

f
Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 48/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly f=reeboard?
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately
Page: 5

t
Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith
Inspection tate: 0 810 712 0 0 9 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490099
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
n ■
n
n
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
0 ■
n
n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n ■
n
n
Page: 6

' Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
c.
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490089 facility Status: AQjive Permit: 8WC490089 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 05/07/2008 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time- 02:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Harmony Acrea-Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Thomas W Smith
Mailing Address: 325 E Memoriat Hwy Harmony NC 2 634
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
On Hwy 901, 1 mile east of Harmony, on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Thomas W Smith
Secondary OIC(s):
Phone: [phone]
Latitude: 35°57'13" Longitude: 80°45'18"
jj Waste Collection & Treatment IN Waste Application
a Other Issues
Operator Certification Number: 21442
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Thomas W. Smith Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Thomas W. Smith
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James 6eail Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date: 2�
Secondary Inspector(s): Q_j
Inspection Summary:
04/16/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.7 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/15/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.6 Lbsl1000 Gallons
01/28/08 > Soil Analysis
U
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith
Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 0510712008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf 15 2
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 45 18
Q Cattle - Dry Cow 20 3
Q Cattle -Milk Cow 120 120
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
200
246,250
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Laste Pond WSP 27.60 48,00
Page;: 2

-! Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number:
490089
Inspection Date: 0510712008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
Cl
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
Cl
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
Cl
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
fl
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
n
n
If yes, is waste levet into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
n
■
❑
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy -metals -(Cu; Zn -etc)
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith
Facility Number : 490089 t
Inspection tate: 05!07/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
o ■ o n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n n ■ n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
-�..
Page: 4

t Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number: 490089
Inspection pate: 05/07/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? R
Design?
Maps? ❑
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n■nn
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to instal3 and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■ n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n ■ n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n ■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith
Facility Number: 490089 t
Inspection Date: 05/0712008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

if Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 490089 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490089 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: Q,g/21/2007 Entry Time:02:30 PM Exit Time: 04:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Harmony Acres Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Thomas W Smith Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 325 E Memorial Hwy Harmony NC 28634
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°57'13" Longitude: Q0°45'18;
On Hwy 901, 1 mile east of Harmony, on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Thomas W Smith Operator Certification Number: 21442
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On-site representative Thomas W. Smith
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Thomas W. Smith Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
03/30/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.9 Lbs11000 Gallons
11/08/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/07/07 > Soil Analysis
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490089 Owner -Facility: Thomas W Smith
Inspection Date: 09121/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490089
It
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Dairy Calf 15 5
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 45 30
Cattle - Dry Cow 20 5
Cattle - Milk Cow 920 115
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 246,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 27.60 49.00
Page: 2

• Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number : 490089
Inspection Date: 09/21/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) D D ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
D
D
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
D
■
D
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
D
■
D
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
D
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
D
■
D
D
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
8. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
D
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
D
■
D
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
D
D
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
D
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
D
■
D
D
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
D
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 09/21/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? 0
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Small Grain Cover
nolo❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
00■0
0000
D a 0 0
Yes No NA NE
0ECl0
n■Qn
Page: 4
s

r
Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number : 490089
Inspection Date: 09/21/2007 Inspection Type: Ccmpliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
Q
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
ID
22. Did the facility fail to install' and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■ 00
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■ n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n ■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n ■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■ n
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■ n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■ n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 09/21/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q In n
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhnspection with on-site representative? n ■ o o
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■ Cl D
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490089 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490089 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: &Utmag County: IredeIt __ Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/07/2006 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: Q2:00 PM ___ Incident #:
Farm Name: Harmony Acresi Owner Email:
Owner: Thomas W Smith Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 325 E Memorial -Hwy Harmony NC 28634
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°57'13" Longitude: 80°45'18"
On Hwy 901, 1 mile east of Harmony, on left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Thomas W Smith Operator Certification Number: 21442
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Thomas W. Smith Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Thomas W. Smith Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: .fames Beal Phone: C'fra�`-,�,1�,3�j'7.�feZ
Inspector Signature: Date: ��`�"�"� ��'��
Secondary Inspector
Inspection Summary:
11/08/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/28/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.3 Lbs110O0 Gallons
03/27/06 > Soil Analysis
C.
Page:1

Permit: AWC490089 Owner -Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number : 490089
Inspection Date: 12/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 200
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Tvoe Identifier
Closed slate Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
rite Pond WSP I 1 1 27.60 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 1210712006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar esg s & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (i€ yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
❑
■
❑
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
r l
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
000
❑
■
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.eJ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Applicatlon
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
Cl
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490089 Owner • Facility: Thomas W Smith Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 12/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? l]
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Smatl Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop- Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0000
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16- Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
■ ❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
C] ❑
18- Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ Cl
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith
Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Dale: 12/0712006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
it
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
0
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the faciiity fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
�..
❑
V-..
❑
11-
■
\lA
❑
\IC
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ Cl Cl
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ it ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490089 Owner - Facility: Thomas W Smith
Facility Number: 490089
Inspection Date: 12/0712006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
0000
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑
■
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
0 ❑
Page: 6

\-0 W A
D �
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Highway
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Smith & Mr. Galliher:
December 10, 2004 JAN 0 6 2005
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DWO-GROUNDWATER SECTION
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490089
Harmony Acres Dairy Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredeli County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for animal facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate
Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on November 30, 2004, 2004 and in accordance with the
directive of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued
to Wayne Smith & James Galliher, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The
issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC490089 which expires
October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Harmony Acres Dairy Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity
of no greater than an annual average of 120 Milk Cows, 20 Dry Cows, 45 Heifers, and 15 Calves, and
the application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit, Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit one
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 ao hCarO�ina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc,us ��'r p�1/;
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper !�i` L

The issuance of,this-COC does'fiot bicuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards;"and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
vy- .n
under this permit coeY anY property
ro artYrights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or; depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
11
documentation to`the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC',,ristr2Hy0225(c)�'a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall`be couc'tcd within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in -this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Duane Leith at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490089
APS Central Files

n
(Type of Visit r1compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 45Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 5 ; P1*1 1 Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: ATOwner Email:
Owner Name:
Phone:
Region: -A/0
Mailing Address: s,�611 Amil r. f {7�• /" ` �� 6.��
Physical Address:
i
Facility Contact: Title: G Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
/iyH?
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
E]o
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I _=l
�� ❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude: = 0 '
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
IMairy Cow 5,�-
Dairy Calf If
❑ Dairy Heifei 041-
0
tS❑ Dry Cow 7.0
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes x No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28104 Continued
1

t
i
Facility Number:'/I Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Iwkk Pr -J
Spillway?: ye s
Designed Freeboard (in): a.%
Observed Freeboard (in): 150
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes XNo
[INA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes "LA No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ;ij�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[l Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
IN
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes %No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ANo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu,
Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > l0% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
CoQ <14y P"ite- l
<46
12. Crop type(s) i Z Try t�,e.c (/lt`Ai''
.o7e
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes , CNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[]
Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(0.-7,05 J-30•.05 la -Ir - o
ReviewerlInspector Name'"� Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1j_ V
12/28/04 Continued

• Facility Number: y Date of Inspection - 1 —o
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes )(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ yes (No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes *o ❑ NA EINE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No )C NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes F No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No
tKNA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes "KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28,
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes '4'9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem?
❑ Yes %No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes %No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes ISNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes $No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Conii�nents and/o'r`.>Drawtrigs .sx-„r
Wo
copf&4 .
12/28/04

\ (u-�6
Michael F. Gr, )y Cvovcrnor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r
j y Alan W, Klktwk.11, E. Director
Q Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins. Depot)- Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 28, 2004
Mr. Wayne Smith
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC, 28634
Subject: Harmony Acres Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC 490089
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
Mr. William Burke of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on June 24,
2004. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be properly operated and maintained and
all records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be
self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Burke or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleon, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
A►*b
NCDENR
N"o,� Carolina Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
dvaturally 1-877-623-6748

v
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Dale of Visit. 6-24-2U04 Time:
Farilit}� Number 49 89
._.. - — -- 0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered I)atc Last Operated or Ahove Threshold : .........................
Fartn Name: Ha1C1IlxQay..a9 reSMa1,ry................. County: 1.ta:dtijl.................................. .............. AJRQ...........
.............................................................. .
Owner Name: W.ayne.................................... 5Mitkt.,ScAAMCS.GW111xer..................... Phone No: 7D4-S.46:.7,3Z7.at 401.. .... ..................................
Mailing Address- $.,.G7I;IRIC1aiI)17........................
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:..
Onsite Representative: .W.ayme,,Snlitb..................
Certified Operator: sjwl;h•...............
Location of Farm:
On Hwy 901, 1 mile east of Harmony, on left.
......... 1brmumx..NC:............................................._ x> UM..............
PhoneNo:.......... _ ..................................
Integrator: ........................... ................... . . . .. . ....... . ....................
Operator Certification Nuntber:214_4Z
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry 0 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 * 57 13 Longitude F 80 • 45 • 18
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify D%VQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: ................1................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 60
12/12103 Continued

Facility Number: 49 -89 Dale of Inspection 6-24-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Com (Silage & Grain)
[3 Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [] Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
IS. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Co en u o
an or n�, ecgMN a
I U onLia d-ld x l es �n#ee
a rco
❑ Field Copy E] Final Notes
Farm appears well maintained.
Records appear very well kept.
v
Reviewer/Ins ector Name.'
Reviewer/Inspector
24'"t yy
¢Will,Burke'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 49-89 Date of Inspection 6-24-2004
Re(mired Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage $ General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27.
Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

Type of Visit `,Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access I
Facility Number Il)ate of Visit: 6'] 4-o y Time:
Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted 41 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ... HAN"!?Msl...4M:n.... IM'y......... ............................ I ...................... ... County: ... Rr24Z4....................................... .......................
Owner Name: ... wAra ... (! ! ?....................................... Phone No:.............................................
..........................................
Niailing Address:. Hw,/ ...................................................... ..... ......... `b 63 .. L
Facility Contact: .... !N ........--.�1f1, h ........................... Title; ........................................ I....................... Phone No: .......................... .....................
=
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:------•---......•---............................................................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry JgCattle []Horse Latitude • 4 " Longitude • 4 49
Discharees & Stream (Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:......... �
........................ ............................... .............................................................................................................. .......
Freeboard (inches):
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
12112/03 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection ay
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
❑ Yes IS No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [:]Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ;@ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes E) No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes fl No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
1-"' I"S;hIG.. �}i.- M e: - t4:',"" S't'(" ^" !�';;�i[A, iE. - }'n2":si"' n}yt•"'S<'i.fr ? ie., h.h' S�t61 'i....e.te'.; la d E •. . M`1, A [:.{.4. a'.K:°i� ..i.r, i S y H.`4-; 31;ie 1 S: i .
Comments(refpr,'to.question.#) Expla�nanyiYFS'au�srversand/or,any,recommendationsorany,other�comments.�
..,,i.. Eli 1,{{sF.t} 1 ".... $6". ..4 - .t�?.+P.t. }e l i4?.}Fe'. `t? 3 SS+iSSf:nwE $e :1..F�1 ii>9d. •.. i 5�F:11 [.95x}...E, 3i[:{'{:
uUse drawingsoflfacaLtytolbetter�explatn situations. {ase adalxanal pges7 as necessary 0 Field Copy ❑ FinalNotes
i.
��!;... �"d3r
Recafzjs Well AePt
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ` Date: L DD 4 -o V
12112/03 Continued

Facility Number: //f
Date of Inspection y 'o
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPI)ES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall [:]Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes J@ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
j; No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
•i°* K+4P M .i 'f h3 G !Y '� I �- 3 t t
�� 7i �re
dditicinal;Coininents-aitd/or,iDittw�n'. m ,-r` � rvl
ii3pa>wtsc.FelYd.::qFt�}i?7:;d'�J3?az�tfi7R�3�7t119,4'-eidl�t`tiriEdtlf.,tY.d�.�,,.'E3w�1a��'.,?�e=t�•�.�CFk�=ti tEtgi�9i?$.'�#if?!( �@,..i1b�;;ia�F�iasEllt�li4ki.:<��..1,i�.-��b�,�`���r!w'•P+�:»ia�iiY�e.ri%.;b3F�M'1�.,��.aih'��.i�.,+�:�'�n
L
7
12112103

Mr. Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Smith:
t -u- /7t -
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director`.
Division of Water Quality`
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director'
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 3, 2003
Subject: Harmony Acres, Site Inspection
Facility 4 49-89
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 28,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
AMA
NCDCN—R
Customer Service
1 877-623-6748
Sincerely,
J
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Division of Water Quality
t- ` Division of Soil and Water Conservation
t. Agency - rn1
Other ♦,a a 1 t �,- �
IrYyd� ♦ 4Y2h$+ �- i 5 ME
i '' + ray ci t a,y -.'r �zr; .^'f V..�.,,, .e_..�. :..,.:::tri v;.: !'��' v t' ��, ♦ t�`h��w. 'Y;. �..
i.?~�i.a..
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
j Dale of Visit: 10129!2003 'Time:
I Facility `umber 49 89
.Not O wrational Q 13clow Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered pate last Operated or abnvc "I'lu eshold: ..............•..........
Farm Name-. LLaxJlihQfAy..t>►.C1Ccs.L?.aJ.t:x...............................................................................
County: Lredcu................................................ ?JRQ............
Owner Name: 1'.1'.ayue.................................... .................... Phone No: 7.04-S. kk 7.327.AX..7.4.0X..........................................
:Mailing Address: �25.��.�i��Jtilarla�.LL}Yy .. ................. kL3JCJIT3.aay',N.c................... ..................................... 2SOM ..............
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:............. Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: WAY
L,, ..................................................................... Integrator: .................
Certified Oper•arot-:;L.hmmas..W........................... SxWjtj ................................................ Operator Certification Nuniher.-ZI.442 .............................
Evocation of Farm:
)n Hwy 901, 1 mile east of Harmony, on left.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 57 13 Longitude 80 • 45 1$
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ® Dairy 200 96
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 200
Total SSLW 2$0,000
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges S Streant Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon [ISpray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen ed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [I No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach 11'ater of the State'' (If des. notify DWQ)
C1 Yes ❑ No
c. lfdischarge is observed. what is the estimated Ilow in gal/min:'
d. Does discharge bypass a ]auoon system:' (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I 5trucn►re ? Structure ; Structure -I Stntctnre 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches!: 96

VJ/VJ/!//
Facility Number: 49-89 Dale of'] nspection 1 10/29/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
t 019441u4cu
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
Reviewer/inspector Name Alan Johson 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G%: ' ✓, �—� Date: /C/1 X
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
1.�y�'-TM.�i+8:'iL4i �.. v.'h�`ehaY t�'.ttc33i.a. Ve.�t t nYit�Ae`.'{�"rai9H'w}`n,}^s'�7tiq,1%:Y�X'$d.�,Jin h.':r�4. N�'Yk?n4 W , •.�,�.
Co en ts ret A getes on ) �E=plain aay YES answers andlor any recommendations or.any�othentomments.
`x �3�' �.i r3.1 eS..�Y;.".Yr�Vil; `73�}�"" •• •- ,."':yr�rt. .�..xea .a�+ • x r�� � q�
:Use drawin s, f acility to'better-e=pIZM situations: (use addluonal pages.as necessary)• El Field Copy El Final Notes z
�ir���€�. ..��.v`A �1{St�' '�fw)n*� .ci:ru�4i,�i..7. � . _.7�`+.� � _..{;.�+.x.` 'vY .�. �.carom:ur.,x.:�:+'a:-->..r..nxirar..&•'lrm�,w:.�. �?s .i..Y'.
FACILITY IS PROPERLY OPERATED AND THE RECORDS APPEAR TO BE COMPLETE.
Reviewer/inspector Name Alan Johson 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G%: ' ✓, �—� Date: /C/1 X
=

SOF Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of )=nvironment and Natural Resources
a LIMU� wi Wiflwavamlp
March 28, 2003 k
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED APR 0 1 2003
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634 WATER }���: j�tl u' SMON
Subject: Application No. AWC490089
Additional Information Request
Harmony Acres Dairy
Animal Waste Operation
Iredell County
Dear Wayne Smith:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. Additional information is
required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 27, 2003:
1. This office currently has a waste utilization plan (WUP) for this facility that was dated 3/412000. The plan and nutrient
calculations were written for 120 dairy operation. A recent site visitation made to this farm showed that the farm has a
waste plan that shows 80 milk cows, 15 dry cows, and 30 heifers. The facility was certified for 125 dairy animals. Please
clarify this discrepancy. If you have modified the WUP since, then please submit a copy of most recent WUP that reflects
certified number of animals with correct crops grown, fields utilized, and has f eld maps with acreage clearly marked on
the maps.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before April 27, 2003 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in
accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a.
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi
SoilScie st
ha
Non -Di rge Permitting Unit
cc: IG)~ndresvflle-Regional Office, Water Quality
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http:/m2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu NCDENR
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 5096 recycled/101/6 post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634
Farm Number: 49 - 89
Dear Wayne Smith & James Galliher:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N.0 Dt3:f'-t'. UP
March 15, 2000 eNVIRONMFa`T. HEALTH
& NAll 3R&,x R 5oURC?A
MAR 17 2000
1111SI911 OT 13141gn�llE i,1l IdAN,1&EMtY#i
HIRAIESBILLI IrEl;il;llilt OFFM
You are hereby notified that Harmony Acres Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215. IOC, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] to sion 363 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
/'cercly��
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Wayne Smith:
IT1 • •
NCDENRf
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
May 31, 2000,or
oi�>llrrr, �nJE-'�
V 114A'R'LMAi.. RESOOURCTS
JUN 2 ?nrc
Subject: Application No. AWC490�089 1dAEttFe,
Additional
Harmony AcresLIDIME 11FOROA1 OfOr'
Animal Waste Operation
Iredell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 30, 2000:
Apply months to tom silage as given on Table` 3 of your waste utilization plan are incorrectly noted as September to
March. Please consult your technical specialist to make necessary corrections.
The waste utilization plan also mentions the use of soybean double crop but is not included in the tabular format. Please
indicate the fields, N application rate, and application window for the soybean crop if it were to be included part of the
rotation. Please be aware that when utilizing soybeans in a crop rotation, residual nitrogen should be accounted
for in the next crop.
3. Please provide map for Tract 5246 Fields T1 and T2 that identifies (outlines or highlights) and shows the
acreage for each field to be used for waste application.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before June 30, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H,0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
cer
JR Joshi
Non -Disc arge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

o�0 w A
7 i
NC DEPT. OF EWROMATMichael F. Easley, Governor
AND 'ATIRALRsE�RCEOvilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
t WR
Nort aro i V? Lr int and Natural Resources
r r o
Alant., Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
JAN 1 4- 2003
January 13, 403
Wayne Smith & James Galliher n �t1 ATR=. UTy ty Number 49 - 89
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634
Subject: Public Meetings for Draft Renewal of State Non -Discharge Animal Waste Operation General
Permits
Dear Producer:
Your animal waste management facility is scheduled to be issued coverage under the Animal Waste
Operation General Permits in the near future. The Division of Water Quality (Division) staff is currently
in the process of renewing the Animal Waste Operation General Permits and is scheduled to have the
permit reissued by early April 2003. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would be eligible for
coverage under the reissued permit.
The Division has published a public notice regarding these renewed general permits. A copy of
the draft animal waste operation general permits and fact sheets are available at the website
hftp-.//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/
or by writing or calling:
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], ext. 574
The Division will be conducting public meetings regarding these renewed permits. The following is a
list of dates, times, and locations of the public meetings:
February 3, 2003; 7-9• p.m.; Kenansville — James Sprunt Community College
February 4, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Williamston — Martin Community Coliege (Bldg. 2 Auditorium)
February 6, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Iredell — Iredell County Center
Further information can be obtained by reviewing the Fact Sheet available at the website and address
listed above.
Cc: CM6 resville-Regional-Office, Division-ofiWat re Quality
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Application File 49 - 89
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
GO&
NCDENK
Internet http://h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

F wAT� f J
_O�0 9pG ichael F. Easley
Governor
Cp William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 27, 2002
Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Harmony Acres, Site Inspection
Facility #: 49-89
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on November 26,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and the records were
complete. Please note the comments on the enclosed copy of the inspection report.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
NC'DENR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection, O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 49 gg Date of Visit: I1/2tifZOQ2 Time:
i0 =Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: _ __
Farm Name: Hairmaa.Acxes.J? im.......................................................... County: Ixeddl._................................... &MQ ........
Owner Name:gypg_-_-- Sutith&.JRu1Si.�fliheL--------- Phone No: 794595x7327.or_741t1---_-----------------
14ailing Address: 3.25..$a.lY�e[�19�1A�.X113......... ...............................
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title. ............................................... Phone No:
......................................
Onsite Representative: WAXN&1lLITS------------------ Integrator:. -------------
Certified Operator: 1halit s.j? ........................... Smith .................................. I............... Operator Certification Number:214'�...... .
Location of Farm:
)n Hwy 901, 1 mile east of Harmony, on left.
IF
rd-"
Q Swine Q Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 57 Longitude F 18 L,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
., ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
5+..
Mme ❑ Farrow to Finish,
�:='' ❑ Gilts
11. n Boars
1
Design w Cuirrent" Y:. Design: = Current.'..-""'a'aci Po+uiation ':Cattle -..y 4 .: Ca".aci ' Po ulation
=Y ® Dairy 125 120
❑ Non-Dairy
Other
a Tot$
���.�,*•� ��..- .:tet: -.sr - _�,.:,;.�.L ...;,vim•
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ No Liquid Waste Managemem
125
175,000
Lagoon Area 1[j Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: E] Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [3 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system:' (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ? Structure 4 Structure y Stricture 6
Identifier_._........... ........................... .......................... -•--•--•--•-----•--•--•--............................. ...........................
Freeboard (.inches): 48

VI7bJ/V1
Facility Number: 49-89
Date of Inspection I I/Z612t102
5. Are^there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions -4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AnnheatiOn
l.Vllll7lllC{l
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required Records & DoeElments
COWS HOUSED AT THE FACILITY. THE NARRATIVE STATES THAT THE PLAN IS FOR 120 MILK COWS. HOWEVER, IN
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name
P ALAN='JOHNSON-_.. `
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
—^.._+xw�wti�^:.a�•-r.�yym-,i�rpr.?+tu„,�+;.wgittit
�omraexwts re%r„foyonS.ansve�rs'anr an� yecpmm nsar aer�conameutst.€��r:
8 ms's= r-'+Tt.r .a..acww-e7+w...ze+•_ac�.�-....rR :r.� %rte
'
jbe itu use flops/e pry: ,y
i ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
-FACILITY AND RECORDS APPEAR TO BE IN GOOD SHAPE
PLEASE CHECK WITH YOUR TECH. SPEC. REGARDING THE AMOUNT OF WASTE GENERATED AND THE NUMBER OF
COWS HOUSED AT THE FACILITY. THE NARRATIVE STATES THAT THE PLAN IS FOR 120 MILK COWS. HOWEVER, IN
THE SECTION CALCULATING THE AMOUNT OF WASTE GENERATED AT THE DAIRY, IT SHOWS 80 MILK COWS, 15
DRY COWS AND 30 HEIFERS.
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name
P ALAN='JOHNSON-_.. `
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

0
�0F WAT E9QG
D �
Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject:
Dear Mr. Smith:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr -Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Harmony Acres Dairy, Facilty #: 49-89
Iredell County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permii, Certified Farm flan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual sail analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Sail and Water or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson'
Environmental -Specialist II
Y -t
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 213115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623.7748 FAX [phone]

CO0� WA�t9p�
9
[.
--I
❑ 'C
Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Smith:
�Lb (IJ
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 23, 2001
Subject: Harmony Acres, Site Inspection
Facility # 49-89
Iredell County, NC
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April
19, 2000. Based on his observation made during the inspection the facility appeared to be
well operated and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection report,
which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
WNW
11]ENR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

Type of Visit (Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit E,Ioutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: Time: •G�
Facility Number
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
13 Permitted © Certified [3 Conditionally Ceerrtifiedl ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold.
Farm Nafnc:........r: 2.�...�. �......... .. �r:cr /. q.0 `t. l' ............................. County:..... �: ..!4....... •................
Owner Name: .........LC_'..yru�..................1?7..:..�'�1.................... _..........
7
✓l Phone No:.............._.............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title................................................... ....... Phone No:
Mailing Address:... .Z `......%[F .......... T.......... ...............................
Onsite Representative: �.........�..................
.
. T
Certified Operator: ,: ...... Operator Certification Number: �................S,�/,r�,t
Location of Farm:
.. I •r
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry MCattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �• �_�' Longitude •
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle .Ca acity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JEI Layer Dairy-
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer PO Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
El Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of •Lag oohs ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding:Ponds / Solid -Traps _ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes JUNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other.
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Suite? (Ir yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ❑ No
c. If diszhar«c is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (.If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ipo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Q Loo
0I/0I/01 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? u9spillway ❑ Yesy*O No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...._.. ...
Freeboard (inches) ........_ l'S.P........... ..:.........
............... ....... .............. ............... ..... ...... .......................... .................... ............... ...... .............. ................
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 4!] No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?❑Yes �No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [ebb
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [Q No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑'Yes i�PNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers -that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Ye$,PCNo
]L Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes 45 -No
12. Crop type ` r {•� vim! ��r r i _
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 2No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ %-
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes [7lo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes -ENo
17.a rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Is e a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes. >ZNo
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes Z No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes E!lNo
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes Q No
23. 'Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes Z No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?.
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes <Q -No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes ,Q No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes " No
27. Were am, additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes _M_ No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yeo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes -0 No
01/0I/0Y
Continued

Facility Number: / _ Date of Inspection 0 Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yeses No
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? [:]Yes -n No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
77
r
Reviewer/InspectorName
..D.. _.IJ�vF'Y_x�"^r�.3.a. -.J� .V:..�'r_•��� �,:.. ._*t, _r,. 4.;..As..� ..i-=�`i�.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:l Date:/�%i
V
01/01/01

Tom Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28638
Dear Mr. Smith:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
September 11, 2000
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Harmony Acres Dairy, Facility #: 49-89
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on September 6, 2000. Based on his observations during the inspection the facility
appeared to be well operated and maintain; and the files were complete. Please note
the comments on the enclosed inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 60% RECYCLED/10% PORT -CONSUMER PAPER

M
QrDivision of Water Quality
Q'Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit kGompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit kRoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Dalt. 41f visit: Tienc: I Tom/' (/ I Printed on: 7/21/2000
# Facility Numhcr
r 0 \ot O 'rational 0 Below Threshold
[3 Permitted [3 Certified ❑Conditionally Certified ❑Registered Date Last Operated or Above
(Threshold . .......................
Farm Name: ........... � L�Yt.C�.L .................1..G r..:.. Countv-. ..- y'-L�C,�.1� ............ .......................
t,l... 4 t ..........r .............. ..... ..
Owner Name ..( . ........��i�rt.�........... Phone \o ......... ..
. ..............................
Facility Contact:
................................................................... Fitle:........................................... ..................... Phone \`o:
.NIailins Address: r Y 1 w qO Lam/
o -�r 1!ti!. .. ........(.......... .
Onsite Representative: ........ dd..`i'l-......../+./.....1... 4.. Integrator-
....................................
Certified Operator:..... ........................... ,��j�. ................................ Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm:
_y
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude L.� • ` Longitude
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry PopulationCattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy Z 5
❑ Non -Laver ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE3 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lago-n Arra❑ Spray Field Ares
Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Strcam ImpacLS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yesy� No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. [f dis0wr2c is observed, Was the conveyance man-made'?
El Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed. cid it reach Water of the State! (If yes, notify DWQ)
E-] Yes ❑ No
L:. li'discharge is observed. what is the cstimaied flow in galltnin?
d. Dees discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 19 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than From a discharge? ❑ Yes PSNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storag=e) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 09� No
Struclurc I Stl'auturC 2 Structurc 3 Structurc 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identificr:.................................................................................................
Freebe>ard (inches): T
�._ .. 5100
Confinued.aa,back

lFacility Number: — DaLt' ul' lncpcctiOn Printed on: 7/21/2400
5. Are there an}immediate threats to the MEL:2riw of am, of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ves, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do anv of the structures need main tenance/improvcment? ❑ Yes S? So
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste st,-uctures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Z�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ejNo
Waste Apl2fication
10. .Are there any buffers that need main tenance/impmvemen t? ❑ Yes 'RNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ill PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes EZ.No
12. Crop type yt ci / ei"! C r
13. Do the receiving craps differ with those designated in the CertifiedAnimal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes dR-No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes L�No
h) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 21 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �No
Reouired Records & DocumcnLc
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
CR:No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Anima; Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
�5No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps. etc.)
❑
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis d_ soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
tO No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
RNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge:'
❑ Yes
-No
221.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
RNo
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
?�N0
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
CNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
ffrNo
: Nb •yioiafifgris:or• def de dines Were patecl- diWifng #his visit' - Y;oh will-r.•eeeive fie; further
rorres�oiidehe'. abau( this :visit' • :::: :.. .:.......:.
c' .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
cc,, 7ua. yo6",- t'eGI(%.VL,4A,( -5 e-4 i, t3
-VZL e�c� e-1
I
ZZ �ci-acs
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date
I

FagilityNumber: y -9 Date of Inspection l� Printed on: 7/2112000
Odor Issues _T
25. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or helow ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Flo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes j_No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes { No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes %ZNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an or rawings:
w
t
5100

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28534
Dear Wayne Smith & James Galliher:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
r'
December 30 1999
' larVIAONMF.NT, 1PE�tI t
d NATURAL
MN 10 7AN
00,4 pi 101jRg01A1V, qAAOE1J
ljogaiSlIUL liGi SAL 50t
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 49-89
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY], DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
!/
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16I7 'Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

71WJL6_11
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 27, 1999
Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Harmony Acres Dairy, Facilty #: 49-89
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May
18, 1999. In general the facility appeared to be in good shape. However, it was noted that
some information was missing from your files. Be reminded that the following items must be
available for review by the inspector during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, feed areas must be shown.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Must have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of
Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should be
made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general waste should
be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2611E
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - EO% RECYCLED/1 Ory POST -CONSUMER PAPER
A

00 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number cDate of Inspection
Time of Inspecliun LZa.'.k)—f 24 hr. (lih.mm)
[3 Permitted 17Certiried [3 Conditionally Certified
tionaly [3 Registered
INJE3 Not 0 �erati�orrjl Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName: ......... HCA. -t. ........–a ........................... ...................... County . ............ .............. .. .....................
Owner Name: 6I. -e . ..... ... Phone No: 7.
...........
FacilityContact:...................................................... ........................ Title: ................................................................ Phone No . ...................................................
Mailing Address: ....... ��2.5.. N .......
1
" *L�.......................... I ................
Onsite Representative:.... ..'a-" .. Integrator* ...............................
............................v.A
Certified Operator:. LQ'.e!.k.Ak C Operator Certification Number: ...... 7
.............................. ......................................
Z .
Location of Farm:
................. .
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
-�p Latitude Longitude
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
D Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
E] Farrow to Finish
[] Gilts
0 Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
[I Layer I I Dairy
JE1 Non -Layer I n -Dairy
JE❑I Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains PresHnt�j�ag .. �Area ❑JCI Spray Field Area
Holding
diiij Pon- ds Solid Traps - No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field M Other
i, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (IF yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ........ . 7'
... *7R .............. ,*,,* ................. * ....... ' ... .................. ........ ......... .............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
"PACA1121
El Yes 0, No
E] Yes [3 No
El Yes El No
El Yes
E3 Division of Soil and Water. 'C6merV2tion, -Operation ReAew
E] Yes
E] No
.13 Division of Soil and t onserva in ce'_�pec on
XNo
El Yes
.Water
13Tivision of Water Quidi i inspection
Structure 6
-
IN
13 Other Agency -0
w
.. perAfid6,Revie"
00 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number cDate of Inspection
Time of Inspecliun LZa.'.k)—f 24 hr. (lih.mm)
[3 Permitted 17Certiried [3 Conditionally Certified
tionaly [3 Registered
INJE3 Not 0 �erati�orrjl Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName: ......... HCA. -t. ........–a ........................... ...................... County . ............ .............. .. .....................
Owner Name: 6I. -e . ..... ... Phone No: 7.
...........
FacilityContact:...................................................... ........................ Title: ................................................................ Phone No . ...................................................
Mailing Address: ....... ��2.5.. N .......
1
" *L�.......................... I ................
Onsite Representative:.... ..'a-" .. Integrator* ...............................
............................v.A
Certified Operator:. LQ'.e!.k.Ak C Operator Certification Number: ...... 7
.............................. ......................................
Z .
Location of Farm:
................. .
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
-�p Latitude Longitude
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
D Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
0 Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
E] Farrow to Finish
[] Gilts
0 Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
[I Layer I I Dairy
JE1 Non -Layer I n -Dairy
JE❑I Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains PresHnt�j�ag .. �Area ❑JCI Spray Field Area
Holding
diiij Pon- ds Solid Traps - No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon El Spray Field M Other
i, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (IF yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ........ . 7'
... *7R .............. ,*,,* ................. * ....... ' ... .................. ........ ......... .............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
"PACA1121
El Yes 0, No
E] Yes [3 No
El Yes El No
El Yes
El No
E] Yes
E] No
E] Yes
XNo
El Yes
qNo
Structure 6
IN
.......... I ........ I ....
El Yes *0
Continued on back

1 1
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
• 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
Li
mi
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintcnance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Anmlication
[]Yes JZNo
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes X1 No
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
19 No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
J4 No
12.
/❑
Crop type , S c2 c. // Fe, < r r 1
❑ Yes
:R No
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
4No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�T- No
19.
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
gNo
24.
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N10
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RNo
Required
Records & Documents
l� tdrawtags of:fa�ctIttyAwbettenexpW I s to h°�ns'a{use ti spages as necessaery) � '-
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
:R No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
AYes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
K No
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
E2�No
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
;No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
<No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
P1 No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
%No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
QjrNo
. . . . yIOIaEtQ1. .fl. dgfe e,Ii. . . . . hQt@d�prin 4bjs'vlslt: • ;Y:oit wiil•�°eb�iye' lja further' '
comes oricfeitce: about then visit. ' • ...
ry9
C 'tf` .C;`=' k i. P3�:' .-i':.-}a&�"i YEf135 'efyeki: i'�'vt-` >w••.<"•.°81sE$•e;�:1�7RM^.•.•13[".ffi+P3�3.. 4.v,°:.a4"'..b xz%z.NtihiY%14:4g1E'.:' ''>� �.i. �.f
Comments {refer toque�}s,by¢�o�qn #} �Explarn:an.eiiy�ii&&Y'tFS;answers and/oyr any recommenda�tMa�oas or ayny other comments ?jxs ,e
':' ijY9C' S y�i.�. lfii ' .iiCfl,•af�#!�'k
`' i
l� tdrawtags of:fa�ctIttyAwbettenexpW I s to h°�ns'a{use ti spages as necessaery) � '-
Te
QGe ph Di'l blarzift? 0ACV 11,eeG bltiG
`
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
v 3/23/99

Facility Number Late of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted Certified [] Conditionally Certified [] Registered JE3 Not Operationall OperationalDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........ �.e��.e)..........e4i.'..f...5................................................ .
County: .......... .1 'Q 1°..4..........................................
Owner Name: ..... W-444.'.0 Phone No: .. Ca.'- .`fQ......................................
Facility Contact: .......................................................... ........ ............ Title:................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: .......�........%ea.�ra.�J�o��..�.4.:..........................%.tTtr�!1!'.?.!!tl,(........................................... ..��..
Onsite Representative: ....6S..l.F.t:r,/,/1 �............. ;5;rzt,.:-A................................. Integrator:..................................................................................
Certified Operator:, Vj e - "�t,,a„ �., J„� Operator Certification Number: Z ti��
............................ f ................... .......... (..........
Location of Farm:
--:�p Latitude �a��' ®•
Design Current
Swore
,,.,..._ ....E..,. `._.i,i • ; : Ca acity Po ulataon
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
F'
Longitude L V I • ®' ®"
Dela Design Current
' a g Current .;E x , E t:;
Poultry` Ca sett Po�' ulation Cattle Ca acct Po ulatton'
❑Layer Dairy.;: f Zsr
❑Non -Layer [] Nan -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
R IJ�I�t'i i T`
is ' iidta;TotaUSSLW.
11, a r A ''{
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.'? E] Yes E] No
Fs4 b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes '%No
Waste Collection & Treatment
A. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes /qNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):.............................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [j Yes )CNo
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued on back

73
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
e
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[]Yes %No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes )C No
❑ Yes )9 No
❑ Yes 44 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 4No
❑ Yes 5No
❑ Yes PLNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes MTo
❑ Yes KNo
[]Yes A No
XYes ❑ No
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes �AIo
❑ Yes [Wo
❑ Yes XfNo
[]Yes K No
❑ Yes kpNo
❑ Yes (Vlo
�'Vo yio.aticjns'or ii.fcie'ncies wire �gte� ct>4rritng this'visit: Yoit will >reeoiye 1jo r thor •'
•�•ctirres' tiric#ei�ce:a�out:this:visit:• •�•� � :�:�:�:�'-'� •:•.•.•.•.•.
8E! S' ,
i bSEif. b '9,. ..E.9r ...:->... �pgEM%Y#ti!€§i4;P:S€cifdttquPY" ;.; :EeE E 6, .t�:,:%
Comments- (refer to(�u, s,s n[[j#{ .:Ex lam ,an SAES answers ani organ recommenaa' Pion smr any, er commentm.:;� �TTi11 1}
E>t€dEt�1 9p\\ffsa? FH tt41 P! i iii "6�9:'ypp'3F:sE;>g 1' 'u4 a'ett4d?94SpfeFFti..YFS y6
b..e� 9i.,t it2a 3t�.lE:.F�E FE§ . _�.1�:E., .Et,Si�. .�,.J $. �RS.....�L¢.. d • '.��.5� i,.� 8.. ,. � ... ..,•.8-.: ISE E' "f �� %1�% �1 . � ��E $i E. a� i� � 3 61� N,'{ �3
i
6;;
Use drawings of facil�tyito betterexplain situattons(use_addtttonaLpagesras�necessary) # �r1,[h �; `;� ; d
E ..:, t,-5>;-.n,r..'. S , ....,u.., ..�; xF.;..�.� i..,,,.-. 4 . t .. ,,�}- n��, 'a>.i...
/�-...
V afe fev �4 d vi S ��C_ ?oh It eeC fid C �.-v �t�/i GC
AL
I vte-A'. 'tom OG rte ' CIO "At 1_e t- `k -c- D c64. i ws e -c t c-, A rz 1 k
{ I
Reviewer/Inspector Name t ;' -,..� ' }� `t _ ti;
€. Er 1 S,:..;. ,L: Alit, .. s. � 4 !� '€�l d o.i', 77
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: - —
U
3123199

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Site Inspection
Harmony Acres Dairy, Facilty #: 49-89
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
91 9 NORTH MAIN 5TR61LT, MOO RESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 26118
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EgUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POSY -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen Application for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Sal analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

9
Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

4
_y
A71
NCDENk
JAMES E. HUNTJR.,
GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDCVITT
SECRETARY
�J
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October I4, 1998
Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Harmony Acres Dairy, Facility #: 49-89
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
October 13, 1998. In general the facility was observed to be in good shape.
A review of your files indicated that a record of your chemical nitrogen
application and harvest date of your hay was missing. Please keep a record of these
activities. Also, information regarding the total recommended nitrogen application
rate (N/ac) should be included in your waste plan. Contact your technical specialist
regarding this matter.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
w
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
-
•
Regional Coordinator
i
.
-
•
- - ri�-�• _wwya
PIS NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
-
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

.r
Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agencyi
rt ,k ,-Division of Water Quality
z
Routine O Complaint O Follow/ -up of DWQ inspection O Follow-tip.of
off DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection "O
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 3 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0 Certified 13 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........
``—Aza 2yl..............!.f . ,,..JJ......................
Owner Name:...:W.:.........................?�it7. r..T�h.........
County: ............. 1-,-t dte i 1.... ..
Phone No:........ �f ...-... ���./.....................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:.......................................''...../.................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:. .z.5.......+C�kpv.?n'......* 4w �fT
.........I ....... ........ .. .r ht?,clE r.:��/.. ..7...
Onsite Representative: .....G!}l1lf.:.......... r:..'�. ... Integrator: ..................
Certified Operator;..........! if'1�,............... 5 ... T .................................... Operator Certification Number ...... Z„i.. .' f Z..........
Location of Farm:
...:............. OW:......5.................. ...........N�A?1r71Yr.....a/c........... 0vt.......w.v.. ............t�rflra�
r
an....fc ,rr.... .... ........
Latitude • ' " Longitude • 6 r_�46
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes kNo
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gm/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes R No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 5'No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes No
7/25/97

Fbcility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes A No
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds—Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
..........
Freeboard(ft)' Ll..............................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes MNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes J4 No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop h'Pa ,,,,,,,,,,,, .5� �(�.... ,......................................................................
,
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management PIan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q No.vialations-or. deficiencies.wver'enotedduring this:visit.' You:r'i11 ie'M'Ve•n&furth.er
: corres'pQndeitce about fhis:visit::
Yyt CCi� s1�'T'•';• 1'�'�Q1Y►atir►�' i't-• ( Wt 'cci
+riJ�g C a K �a - w •r lC t7 e-
ild�e r ,
t Y
6 f P
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /���/� _ �� �„� Date:
❑ Yes C�No
❑ Yes $1 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes 5iLNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes FNo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes fig No
❑ Yes 14No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
re
7125/97
5,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NIEM0RANDUNI
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
NCDENiT%%
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL- RESOURCES
Kc UMPT.
ctwiRommENT, NIZAI;'L&L
& NATURAL RESOURC$S
MAR R 1998
alINS gx gr 4iEVva"T" �f 3ilQNT
"'Ali M
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number -,1I 9— g
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581..
ATTACHMENT
.� /b>y7
to ,
A10 er6 J-5
a5�� �
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
(INFORMATION REQUIRLU FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEMENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility):
2. Facility No.: _._ 49-89_
3. Facility Name: Harmony Acres DaiZy
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Wayne Smith - Partner
5. Mailing Address: 325 E. Memorial Hwy.
City: Harmony � —State: NQ Zip: 28634
Telephone No.: (J04 ) 546-7401
6. County where facility is located: Iredell
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): Cattle
8. Application Date: 3-2-9H� -
I1. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not.
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
Aug. 1, 1996
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page I of 4

2. Efforts made siaice February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made witli technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
—on -IQ -77-97 met with TredR11 Soil X Watt -r Canservation - Larry
the plans were developpd by Iredell Soil & Water and were
_ accepted by myself - Wine SMith.
On 6-26-97 completed the Animal Waste Operator Training Course.
On 8-27-97 was issued my certificiate - Certificate # 21442 - Copy attached.
On 12-11-97 received my Renewal License - Copy Attached.
On 10-29-97 submitted to lredell Soil & Water the cost of a tank and pump.
On 11-10-97 requested cost share on my waste untilization plan.
On 11-19-97 3he apj2lication was apEroved.
n -4-97 my waste utilization plan was prepared by J. Ben Knox, NCDA
_Regional Agronomist, and signed and approved by me on 11-13-97.
In Dec. 1997 completed and mailed my soil samples.
Agreements for leased land signed by leased landowners.
On 1-8-98 I was notified by the Iredell Soil & Water Conservation that
NC funds were available to complete the cost sharing and sincer,that
time no funds have been available.
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
_At_ this t:.j►ip- 1 am csait-incathp- IredialI gnj_I & Watt --r ['nnGPrvatinn_
for my final plan approval and the final plan itself.
Please see attached copy of the specific things that are being done
at my facility to implement the waste management plan.
All specific things that are listed will be completed as soon as
possible after receiving my final plan - working around planting and r
harvesting crops.
Applicant's Certification:
I, ;fit, , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the E1` C has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required parts of this application are not comoletgd aid if
(his document removes my responsibility and liability for complying with all North Carolina
General Statutes rand Pegulations. I understand that the failure to meet any -dates -that are agreed
upon by m > clf and the EMC will result in . nropriate enforcement actions be�tg, taken by
EMC.
Print Name of Owner
?=1-�'t-6 - Date
SignatuVe of Owner
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 3 of 4

Required Items:
One (I) original and twol.2Zcopies Qthe_completed and appropfjatel�recuted
applicationLorin. alone with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 4 of 4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Wayne Smith & James Galliher:
1•�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Harmony Acres Dairy
— Facility Number: 49-89
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (I 5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
CerliIication Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
/lie subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996'and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
11.0. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%o post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H,0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit, Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
l
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

LANDOWNER ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL
OF PROPOSED PLAN
I have read the detailed plans for this waste management system and have reviewed the
construction drawings and -specifications developed for this system by representatives of the
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and approved on It 1 ,
iI
The components shown on the plan represent the alterative of my choice and is acceptable as
a waste management system on my farm. I understand the requirements of the plan and
agree to implement, or cause to be implemented, the details of this plan to the best of my
abilities with technical assistance provided by representatives of the USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
I have read the "Operation and Maintenance Plan" and the "Waste Utilization Plan" and
fully understand both of these documents and agree to follow these fans. I understand the
North Carolina Cost Share Program Contract signed by we on N/A requires that I
maintain this system according to the "Operation and Maintenance Plan" for a period of no
less than ten (10) years from the date of final cost share payment. Failure on my part to
follow this plan may result in prosecution by the State of North Carolina under the terms of
the Contract. H I find any part of either of these plans is not workable, I will contact the
z-ewel SoU and Water Conservation District so an acceptable alternative pian may
be developed.
I am fully aware that modifications to the proposed pian may be required after construction
to insure that the system operates in the manner and with the efficiency for which it was
planned. Changes in this plan may not be made either during or after construction without
the mutual consent and cooperation of myself and the S edc // Soil and Water
Conservation District. I agree to cooperate with USDA Natural Resources Conservation
Service representatives in an effort to maintain and operate this system as effectively as
possible.
The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service representative has thoroughly reviewed
with me this comprehensive waste management plan and the associated cost share
reimbursement provisions. All questions have been addressed and answered to my
satisfaction.
Landoll
andow Name
L'SDA-MRCS or SWCD Representative
// -- /5/ - Y �7
Date
¢ - 47
Date
USDA -MRCS December 1993

Milk and Dry Cow - Filter Strips, Heavy Use Areas and water
Tank Cost Estimates
Vegetation - Seed 1 acre
Seeding - 1.0 acre @ $216.00 per ac = $216.00
Fencing along filter strips, heavy use areas, etc.
Wire - 3,300 ft @ $0.90 per ft = $2,970.00
1 gate @ $65.00 each = $65.00
$3,035.00
Heavy Use Area = 45' X 45'
Grading - Job @ $250.00
Gravel - 96 ton @ $12.00 per ton = $1,152.00
Filter Cloth - 225 sq yd @ $2.00 per sq yd= $450.00
$1,852.00
Heavy Use Area = 100' X 12.5'
Gravel - 59 ton @ $12.00 per ton = $708.00
Filter Cloth - 139 sq yd @ $2.00 per sq yd= $278.00
$966.00
Water Tank on Lot
2 water tank @ $500.00 each $1,000.00
150' - 1" PVC @ $1.50 per ft $225.00
$1,225.00
Diversions for Clean Water Exclusion
325 £t @ $2.00 per ft = $650.00
Concrete Curb on lot
Concrete - 200' X 8" X 8" = 3.3 cu yds
3.3 cu yds @ $250.00 per cu yd = $825.00
Steel - 270' @ .668 lbs/ft @ $0.74/lb = $133.47
$958.47
Stream Crossing - Culvert Type
40' - 241, asphalt coated CMP @ $21.30 per ft = $852.00
125' X 12.5' stock trail -
gravel - 74 ton @ $12.00 per ton = $888.00
filter cloth -174 sq yds @$2.00 per sq yd= $348.00
fencing cost above
Grading 362 cu -yds @ $2.00 per cu yd = $724.00
$2,812.00
Total = $11,734.47

Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
201 Water Street, Statesville, NC 28677
Telephone: [phone]
January 8, 1998
Mr Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr Wayne Smith:
This letter is to notify you that all available funding through the Iredell Soil
and Water Conservation District for the North Carolina Agricultural Cost
Share Program for Fiscal Year 1998 has been exhausted. We are aware that
funding has not been allocated in your name for Fiscal Year 1998.
The Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors has
been in contact with the Division of Soil and Water Conservation in Raleigh
expressing the urgent need for additional funds to be reallocated for Iredell
County. We have received word that when additional funds become available
they will be allocated to Iredell County in order to allow livestock producers
to meet the .0200 criteria.
Please rest assured that the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Board of Supervisors and the office staff is doing everything within our power
to alleviate this matter.
Please feet free to call the office at [phone], extension 202, if you have
questions.
Sincerely,
Wade Carriga
Chairman

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF TEN (10) HOURS OF
ANIMAL WASTE OPERATOR TRAINING
TYPE OF TRAINING (A OR B)
Please type or print legibly:..
STUDENT'S NAME (first, middle, last)N f Sh► I h
STUDENT'S SOCIAL SECURITY # C� v — a —'Td- %0
STUDENT'S MAILING ADDRESS JJ6 f7'1 ,P
P-100,uV, X-16 c�A63
STUDENT'S HOME PHONE # (76
r
DATE(S) OF THIS TRAINING .I Lt Ae Z i(e- X4 If � 7
Kenneth L... Vaughn, Director
Cooperative Extension Service
INSTRUCTOR(S)' NAME(S) Box 311 201 P- Water
a esville, AC 28677
ORGANIZATION/COMPANY
INSTRUCTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS
I certify that the above named individual has completed the required ten (10) hours of instruction in the
operation of animal waste management systems which qualifies him/her to take the Animal Waste Management
System Operator certification examination for the type listed above.
-� 7
(date)

NORTH CAROLINA
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM
OPERATORS CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
P.O. BOX 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535
Please use back of this form for corrections and
address changes
Ihmas W. S -u' to
1110; t eat,he�, Road
:armory, Nr 281635
SEE REVERSE SIDE
HERE IS YOUR NEW RENEWAL. CARD
(Detach and Retain)
N.C. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS
E
CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
Vit.'li kh
GRADE AW3 - ' CERT. No., = 21 4Y2
is a duly Certified Water Pollution Control System
Operator under provisions of Article 3, Chapter 90-A ;
of the General Statutes of North Carolina for the year:
SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR CHAIRMAN t
(SEE REVERSE SIDE)
20

State of North Carolina '
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality .
James B. -Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, .,Secretary
Steve W. Tedder; Chairman
August 27, 1997
Thomas W. Smith
110 Feather Road
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Water Pollution Control Systems Operators Certification Commission wishes to congratulate you
on passing the Type B Animal Waste Management System Operator's Certification examination you
took on August 26, 1997. This letter is your official notice that you have been approved by the
Certification Commission as a Type B Animal Waste Management System Operator. Enclosed is
your certificate, wallet card and a summary of the regulations pertaining to your duties as a certified
Type B Animal Waste Management System Operator.
If this office may be of assistance to you in the future, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Group
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2762$-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 501/1. recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

The -State of North,,Carolina
The Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
hereby certifies that
Thomas W. Smith
has met the requirements for certification established by the Certification Commission
pursuant to Article 3, Chapter 90A, of the North Carolina General Statutes as a
Type B
Animal Waste Management System Operator
���. ' � .f•r' ' � _ " . • : r - -
Certification
CERTMCATE NUMBER
_ � r µ:at , t... �v _ �_ �' _ • -' � `i = '. " , :. : ;
j :.� u, ,s CERTMCATE ISS
UED Au�sc n�i9m
:i-- t R-.' . 4
9

x
Waste Utilization Plan
Harmony Acres Dairy ; ` e
Iredell Co,
5.::
Waste utilization plans (WUP) are designed to protect water and air quality. There must be a
balance between amount of waste nutrients applied and crop utilization. Land application of
organic waste from agricultural operations at agronomic rates are a proven way to insure
environmental protection. �--
The WUP has been designed for a given storage capacity. When the waste level in the lagoon
reaches this level it must be land applied in order to insure protection of surface and/or ground
waters.
The waste utilization121an for HgrlMQny Acres Djiry is based on f 1 wi
The waste utilization plan for Harmony Acres Farm, Mr. Wayne Smith and Mr. James Galliher
owner operators, is developed using 120 milking cows contributing to the waste storage pond.
The storage pond is designed for 125 cows and 180 days storage. They will need to apply
464,940 gallons (4649 Lbs. N) manure slurry two times per year. They have 246.4 acres of crop
land that is currently receiving manure slurry. Their crop rotation is corn silage, 200 acres,
followed by small grain, 70 acres, and doubled cropped soybeans, 70 acres. They have several
fields of orchardgrass hay, 45 acres. The orchardgrass is left for 3 to 5 years and then brought
into the crop rotation of corn, wheat, and soybeans and then another field will be established in
orchard -grass. They also have 19 acres of alfalfa that does not receive manure. Once the alfalfa
is taken out of production the field is then put into the row crop rotation and another field will be
rotated into alfalfa. Most of the acreage in the farm is in strip cropping. In writing this WUP, it
will be difficult to list fields individually since they. are strip cropping and rotating strips in fields
each year, therefore this plan will give amount of manure slurry to apply per crop and -soil type
rather than by individual fields. The manure slurry will be applied only where corn, small grain,
and orchardgrass crops are grown. There will be a standard application rate of 2 loads per acre.
This application rate will equal 6500 gallons per acre or 65 lbs, nitrogen per acre.
The WUP is written with these realistic yield expectations (RYE): corn silage, 15 tons per acre;
wheat silage, 10 tons per acre; and orchardgrass hay 3.5 tons per acre. With two manure
applications per year (4649 Lbs. N), to supply all. nitrogen for a corn silage crop it only requires
25.8 acres, 38.7 acres wheat silage, or 26.5 acres orchardgrass hay. It takes only one of the
crops grown to utilize all manure slurry produced in 6 months time. Harmony Acres will have to
utilize commercial fertilizer to provide the remaining nutrient requirements for crop production.
There are three predominant soil series on Harmony Acres Farm. They are Cecil fine sandy
loam, CfB2; that is well drained on gently rolling slopes of 2 to 6 percent; Lloyd fine sandy
loam, LfB2, that is well drained on gently rolling slopes of 2 to 6 percent; and Madison gravelly
fine sandy loam, MdB2, that is well drained on gently rolling slopes of 2 to 6 percent. All these
soils are well adapted for manure application. There are areas in some of the fields that are 6 to

10 percent slope but are not the predominant sail series and will not present a problem with
manure application. -
The fields with Cecil,CfB2, soils are: F1, TR, HAI, HA2, HA3, HA7, HA8, Tl, T2, T3, TW1,
TW2, TW3, M3, M4, M7, and M11. The fields with Lloyd, LfB2, soils are:MI, M2, M5,
M8,and. M9. The fields with Madison, MdB2, soils are: HA4 and HAS.
The fields that will receive cow manure will be highlighted in yellow and set backs will be
highlighted in green. Fields that have several houses near them have been eliminated from
application. All fields will be outlined in red Note: The alfalfa fields will be highlighted but
will not receive manure slurry. All fields meet the setback restrictions for manure application
contained in the attached ACS required specifications.
Harmony Acres owns their manure tank and Larry Galliher leases them a pump. They plan to
purchase a manure slurry pump and new tank in the near future.
Amount of manure slurry produced per year:
120 cows x 7749 gallons/cow = 929,880 gallons /year
Amount of Nitrogen produced per year:
Waste Analysis (NRCS standard) contains 10 lbs N/1000 gallons
229,.$$0 g@,tons produced x 10 lbs. Nlgal, = 9299 Lbs. N per year
1000
Amount of manure slurry to be a_ ppligd 1&r acne 6500 gall2ns
Table 1
Application for Small Grain Silage
SoiLTvwe
RYE
Lbs. N
Month
Lf132
IQ-MIacre
10
Amt.to apply
6500 gal/acre
applied
65
Apply
Sept. & Oct.
CfB2
10
6500 gal/acre
65
Sept. & Oct.
MdB2
10
6500 gal/acre
65
Sept. & Oct.
Total acres 70 x
65
Total N used
4550
Table 2
Application for Corn Silage
RYE
Lbs. N
Month
Sot__ ff T_ vne
LfB2
torts/acre
15
Amt.to auuly
6500 gal/acre
a12121jed
65
to Annly
March to May
CfB2
15
6500 gal/acre
65
March to May
MdB2
15
6500 gal/acre
65
March to May
Total acres 200 x
65
Total N used
13,000

Table 3
Application for Orchardgrass
RYE
Lbs. N
Soil Type
tons/acre
Amt. to app -]_y
applied
Lf132
3.5 tons/ac
6500 gal/acre
65
Cf'132
3.5 tons/ac
6500 gal/acre
65
Md132
3.5 tons/ac
6500 gal/acre
65
Total acres 45
x 65
Total N used
2925
Total N needed per year
Corn 200 acres x 180 lbs. N/acre = 36,000 lbs. N
Small brain 70 acres x 120 lbs. N/acre = - 8400 lbs, N
Orchardgmss 45 acres x 175 lbs. N/acre = 7875 lbs. N
'rota I N reqUi red = 52,275 I s. N
Amount Qf Nitrogen dficit
Total N required for crops - Total N produced
52,275 [_,bs. N _ 9299 Lbs. N =
PREPARED 13Y: 11,4L.
J. Ben Knox
NCDA Regional Agronomist
FAC[LITY OWNERS: V
way � Smith
James Galliher
Month
to apply
March to Sept.
March to Sept.
March to Sept.
Total Nitrogen Deficit
42,976 Lbs. Tota_I_N Deficit
DATE 111y
DATL-
DATE //-- / '/

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 24, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634
IL"AA
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
r�y 1Nc. rt Fk.�: }�qV
8W1Xi. "x �. out rrALlft
dr tfAi°Ir9 L RTWJU1tG'a-
JUL 28 1998
ul11sfaN OF wwwT E a I
UMAE1=ft Wq
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Pian
Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility Number: 49-89
Iredell County
Dear Wayne Smith & James Galliher:
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for Special
Agreement which was received on March 6, 1998, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Wayne Smith & James Galliher in
order to allow additional time for Wayne Smith & James Galliher to obtain and implement a
certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley' at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates and
conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties,
injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Ms. Sonya Avant at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
-DW,QzRegio-al`Office-
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-89
WAYNE SMITH & JAMES GALLIHER
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Wayne Smith & James Galliher, hereinafter referred
to as "OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an
agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred
to as the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997:
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the Commission
as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to develop
an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed
all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a
contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-89
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

0
Farm Number: 49-89
Special Agreement
Page 3
7_ The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Harmony Acres Dairy
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 4,
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT_ REQUESTED
Attn: Wayne.Smith.& James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634
1 � a
NCDENR
NOR11fl CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AAN/D� ,ALFfiE$OURCE5
1998 V NATURAL R
'SEP Y no 1`
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number: 49-89
Harmony Acres Dairy
Iredell County
Dear Wayne Smith & James Galliher:
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
-10�
A. Preston Howard, J .
ATTACHMENTS
cc: M` _Regional_0ffic�
'
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Central Files
Shannon Langley
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OFIREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-89
WAYNE SMITH & JAMES GALLIHER
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Wayne Smith & James Gallaher, hereinafter referred
to as "OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an
agency of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred
to as the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the Commission
as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to develop
an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed
all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a
contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-89
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-89
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Harmony Acres Dairy
Print Name of Owner
Date _ �^
Signatu of Owner
For the North Carolina Envir nmental Management Commission:
Date 4Y .,3/.-74Y
Chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
` and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality.
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Wayne Smith & James Galliher:
Mu"RXA
A,*
AON% 00=%
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
Ka
is NATU-::A , rF%%J4KC1M
FEB 2,s 1998
Y2S1IPtF ftlV#3it;��trar,^tilif
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility Number: 49-89
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be'issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below cerudn thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 sxine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 21-1.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your inunediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

-'� State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
/J� Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
TURN RECEIPT REOIMST7ED
Attn: Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 East Memorial Highway
Harmony, NC 28634
June 28, 1996
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES
Animal Waste Management System Registration
As Per 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c)
Harmony Acres Dairy
Iredell County
Case No.: RL96-05
Dear Messrs. Smith and Galliher:
This letter transmits a civil penalty assessed against Wayne Smith & James Galliher for
failure to register an animal feedlot operation in compliance with Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217 (c).
This assessment is based on the following facts: While the Registration Form for Animal
Feedlot Opgrations has been submitted, it was not received prior to the December 31, 1993
deadline. I conclude Wayne Smith & James Galliher violated or failed to act in accordance with the
requirements of 15A NCAC 2H.0217 (c). Therefore, I hereby assess Wayne Smith & James
Galliher a $100.00 civil penalty, jointly and severally, for this violation pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A (h).
In reaching this decision to assess only $100.00, I have taken into consideration that the
registration form, while late, was voluntarily submitted. If you had been found operating without
being properly registered, a civil penalty of up to $10,000.00 could have been assessed.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must choose one of the three following
options concerning the civil penalty assessment:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not
foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
P,O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request.
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing
and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You must
execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14313-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Envirorunental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with
the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the petition must be served on the Department as
follows:

Page 3
Office of General Counsel
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days as evidenced by a date stamp
(not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that this assessment does not prevent the Division of Environmental
Management from taking enforcement actions for past or future violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either
Roger Thorpe, Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our Washington Region at [phone]
or Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Rex Gleason - Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ralston James - Regional Coordinator, NC DSWC, Asheville
Compliance/Enforcement File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor [DaHNF;Z
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 16, 1997
Mr. Wayne Smith
325 East Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, North Carolina 28634
SUBJECT: Operation Review Corrective Action Recommendation
Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility No. 49-89
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Smith,
On July 14, an Operation Review was conducted of Harmony Acres Dairy, facility no. 49-89. This
Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was 1141 being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and operated under
the responsible charge of a designated operator. However, the following management deficiency was discovered
and noted for corrective action: failure to install start pumping markers within the pond. This management
deficiency needs to be addressed and corrected. You are encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist if
additional assistance is needed. During ensuing reviews, this same deficiency will be re-examined to determine if
corrective action was implemented.
In order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be
discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems
must be properly maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
Please remember that you are required to obtain and implement an approved animal waste management
plan by the end of this year. The plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 277 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional
information.
919 North Main Street. W ;6FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 N'Vf An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Wayne Smith
July 15,1997
Page 2
cc: lredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division:of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
Wayne Smith and James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 W. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Mr. Smith and Mr. Galliher:
4••
KIM
ar NATURAL RM)UR(.7 °5
JAN 15 1998
OIVI',�' L aF NMWINTU glMft�W
VW MH IF IEt "MSubject: 'Classification of Animal Waste Management ystems
Facility: Harmony Acres DAiry
Facility ID #: 49-89
County: IredelI
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge (OIC) by January 1, 1997, for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more
horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management
system. Our records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets
the requirements for designating an OIC.
A; training and certification program is available for animal waste management system operators. For
information on the training programs please contact your local Cooperative Extension Agent. Operator
certifications are issued by the Water Pollution Control Systems Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). For information on the certification process, please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit at [phone]. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each
system is based on the nature of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat
the animal waste. There are two types of animal waste management systems, type A and type B. Type A
animal waste management systems are generally used to treat waste generated by monogastric animals
which produce a low -fiber waste. Type B animal waste management systems are generally used to treat
waste generated by ruminants and other animals which produce a high -fiber waste. The type of training and
certification an operator receives should correspond with the type of system(s) they intend to operate. For
more information on the classification of your system please contact the Technical Assistance and
Certification Unit.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation 1orm to the WPCSOCC. If you do not
intend to operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or
engage a contract operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge,
whether yourself or another person, must possess a currently valid certificate of the appropriate type.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cd/AW OIC Designation
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Compliance Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Smith:
�Apw% M0P%%WPPL1A
IDENR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 9, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Harmony Acres Dairy, Facilty #. 49-89
Iredell County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on October 2, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. In general, the facility was in good shape. Curbing may be required on the paved Iot
immediately behind the silo. Also, on the eastside of the storage pond there is some erosion occuring
that may need to be addressed by the technical specialist. Finally, it was observed that there was some
seepage from your silos.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P, E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
LIN
Regional Coordinator
919 North Main Street, W 0 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 �C Ari Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-443-1499 i 501%recycled/ l010 post -consumer paper

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
g]DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
I43,Kitutinc 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of MVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DS WC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection RE—i—IM Z. 3 a
Time of Inspection 0= 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Megistered © Certified [3 Applied for Permit ©Permitted [3Not O erational Date Last Operated:........
County:-�(..............
Farm Name:,ltrr..,t.:(lb.L.+v?..�i.i�9'.5..._.......G�1.......�
Owner Name:.. sfl.i.e ..,.st?7aI .... .... s%cur.!;�...... �11�i. 4r�. Phone No ..........
Facility Contact: ..................................... ...... Title: .... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 3.;Z5 ... .....,.,�,rl. e/ /'i j(. /
OnsiteRepresentative:.......C�.k' e5...........l.G..l..!.!.:!............................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator;.._..,,. ��r,Ix" .. _ .................. Operator Certification Number ..........................................
Ax
Location of Farm:
cf.....� ..................................... .Vta...... ...alr:W.n0f&y. .............. `�.aF.�1 ....�t.t .....1.e....................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ i
Latitude �' �� �« Longitude
Design.. .Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design CurrentDesign ':'Current
Poultry Capacity' Population Cattle Capacity, Population
❑ Layer airy I ZZ,5--
JE1 Non -Layer I I JE3 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity-. � �
Total SSLW /7S 707
Number of Lagoons /:Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area IDSpray Field Area '
❑ NO l..iquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ElNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes K No
Discharge ori-inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (11' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes XNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes `gNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ANo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'? ❑ Yes IqNo
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures La ot)ns fioldin = Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):.1111.......(a ......................
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
.......11.1.1.1 .....................
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes .W No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes DQ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? 5d Yes ❑ No
Waste Application W/A`
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WIMP. or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 1,�.✓.f1.
r..... 1 .:5,1. e4-zr ►. . '1 er.. .. .J. ..toa............................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW;MP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
gNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
/19 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
D:No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
ZNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only (///L
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Y.:s
❑ No
[ No.violationsor' deficiencies were noted during this visit..You.WiII recei:ve'no further
correspondence. a4out this.visit:
;S SC -Dee ID itr�I74�01 YW�S 4D f44je& 1A ST A)SO
dI 1 � ere i5 sau,�. c►r�stb�. G ace Al 46 `�e. s6Yv.Se. aohI n,
!
7/25/97
Reviewer[Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 6?_V41 Date: /X

,4 `i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Alan R. Williams
294 Gethsemane Rd.
Olin, NC 28660
Dear Mr. Williams:
r�
IDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FEBRUARY 14, I997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Twelve Oaks Dairy, Facility #: 49-89
Iredell County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report for the inspection conducted on February 12, 1997 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. The report should be self-explanatory. If problems or deficiencies are indicated
in the report, please take the necessary action to address the problems as soon as possible. Also, please be
advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation
as well as criminal penalties for violation of state environmental laws and regulations.
The facility appeared to be in good order. We would like to remind you that you should currently have a
temporary certified operator in charge of the facility and that a certified farm plan should be in place by
January I, 1998.
If technical assistance or financial assistance is needed, please contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover. If you have
any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704) 663-
1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
GJ
919 North Main Street, Vy* FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699: - 50% recycled/100% post -consumer paper

�Itoutine O Cam hint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-uof DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status:.._. .L?.��4.rL5..r ............................._ ...
�At
�I Farm Name:. _&L,a c.....�4�.....!��. Cy ........ ....... ...... _............... County:.........: _..... ......... .._.............. ....... ..
Owner Name:...... �Ra.....� oz.._+r<.I..irs. .� .. .... ........ Phone No:..—..w �o �_ .. � � ........ _...._
Mailing Address:.... 2f. 11 :! S.S ..-------------------- ...... . � � l ..t ] .................._...._
Onsite Representative: _.....1J-c'.4..�..... .......... Integrator: ........... . ................ . . .... .... W.. __....._...... .... .
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
W__....,_ ......................._ ........... - Operator Certification Number........................................
... _........ A,:�S.Gs.I.r2c' err vu i, rn s.._.. . ....... ........... _............. ._.... ....... 4
._ .... _._..... _............... ......... __....... ........ .......... .................. ...... ._._....... .I ..... ............... .
Latitude iC Longitude ' 9 11
10 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ............. . ....... . ....... . ...... . ....... . ...... . ......................... ........ . ..... . . ......... . .............. . . ..... . . .....
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
SwR'e� " Y.. Number Poultry
Nuaibet,Cattie x fi ;Number
a'ry
Von
❑ Wean to Feeder❑
La er
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -La er;
,' ❑ Beef
El Farrow to Wean,
j
`o- R171 5 a
Farrow to Feeder<x.
JE"...
Farrow to Finish
,
❑Other Type of Livestock
;
W: if l
Nt�sntber of l.a oaos ! Ho1dEa Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area ' ❑ Spray Field Area
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observcd, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWt)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
,Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ANO
❑ Yes No
Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes Nn „
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 0 N
Structures Lagoons and/or Holding. Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes XNO
Freeboard (ft): Lago��o__n{{ I Lagoon ? Lacoon 3 Lagoon 4
.T`C....._ _ .... _....._ ...... ....... _................ ......_. ..... ......................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes hs No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ZNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ,K No
(If any of Questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ`)
15. Crop type . . ......................... ..._..... ........... ............... ..._...... .... ......... ........ ............ ..!!.?,�:✓�....
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? LvA LtLo_"}
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Certified Facilities Only, ,t//j7
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes i kNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:(refer to guestiori #}� Explain any YES answers and/or any recommeadations or auy other,comme'nts
Use drawtngs of faciltty to better explain situations (rise additional pagesFas necessary) t=.w
r
`+ate �►�.-- ; � �� � C_� �� P�``n ��� �� ;,t" iAcLce Tom..,
+.�
1/ rn� ��i`t di` mak - + I. �-�/ tkere i5 0. Avr,,v"C-5,2- &-,k,►'L 1 iY%#-emsN'1%�$K�
o�
dS) 24-^'�.7ect✓3 %i.o�J ��crb;v�5�y atir2e�s klw 1c� t'el GA.'3 o �s��e j5f_
4' l" ' A P— "1�', �c( J „j �`S'T� S � �'� P4_ Cl { l
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Revirrer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc: Division of Water Qualirv, Hater Quality Section, Kacilitp Assessment Unit 11/14/96

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt. Jr., Governor
Wayne Smith
325 E Memorial Hwy.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr, Smith:
A Y!WA
IT 400
[D[F.HNF;Z
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Harmony Acres Dairy, Facilty #: 49-89
Iredell County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, AK 4 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NvcrcAn Equal Opportunity4Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-169950% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
M��

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
M1
Sincerely,
D.ex Gsote
`'��
Water Quali egional Supervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
WA
Health and Natural Resources ` • 0
r
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E H N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Wayne Smith N.C. pr -r. or=
Harmony Acres Dairy LNVIPONhtEniT, HEAI.Tr.t,
325 E. Memorial Hwy & NATURAL rzsc�u;;�f;s
Harmony NC 28634
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation QFC 1,V 1996
Facility: Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility ID #: 49-89 DIVISION OF ENVIRONUENTAt UJAGEMENT
Iredell County MODRESVUE REO11+lIAl OFFICE
Dear Mr. Smith:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
let, ze(-f.
FOIRteve W. T
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System �� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission NVf CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
e��
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor C
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
N.C. nLt�'T. 01?
ENY1I10tq-m, :Nr, r,EAT.ra-f,
t I+�t�'I'iJIUt L
June 28, 1996
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Wayne Smith & James Galliher
Harmony Acres Dairy
325 East Memorial Highway
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES
Animal Waste Management System Registration
As Per 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (c)
Harmony Acres Dairy
Iredeli County
Case No.: RL96-05
Dear Messrs. Smith and Galliher:
At 'A FM
MW U %1':��;r61rfl. KKTKIINT
MA'SYNE Umarm
This letter transmits a civil penalty assessed against Wayne Smith & James Galliher for
failure to register an animal feedlot operation in compliance with Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217 (c).
This assessment is based on the following facts: While the Registration Form for Animal
Feedlot Operations has been submitted, it was not received prior to the December 31, 1993
deadline. I conclude Wayne Smith & James Galliher violated or failed to act in accordance with the
requirements of 15A NCAC 211.0217 (c). Therefore, I hereby assess Wayne Smith & James
Galliher a $100.00 civil penalty, jointly and severally, for this violation pursuant to G. S. 143-
215.6A (h). -
In reaching this decision to assess only $100.00, I have taken into consideration that the
registration form, while late, was voluntarily submitted. If you had been found operating without
being properly registered, a civil penalty of up to $10,000.00 could have been assessed.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must choose one of the three following
options concerning the civil penalty assessment:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not
foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper '

Page 2
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request.
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such
a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing
and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You must
execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a
detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.I(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
or
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with
the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27611-7447. A copy of the petition must be served on the Department as
follows:

Page 3
Office of General Counsel
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirt days as evidenced by a date stamp
(not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being
referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that this assessment does not prevent the Division of Environmental
Management from taking enforcement actions for past or future violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either
Roger Thorpe, Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our Washington Region at [phone]
or Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Rex Gleason _ Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ralston James - Regional Coordinator, NC DSWC, Asheville
Compliance/Enforcement File

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _
Facility No._&-Zy
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIO SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �/�( , 1995
Time: , 57O- X( "
Farm Name/Owner:_-- (;�e rC�Vlao 14 -q -1,6014C.
Mailing Address:
County: 'Zl-y�eQ6'11 integrator; Phone:
On Site Representative: J0016'5 (--acl def Phone:
Physical Address/Location: _ sa:me- 6,5 a&f"e% L (4.5 t
Type of Operation: Swine_Poultry_
Latitude: Longitude: 80 ° K'-2 "
35 5
Capacity:?Number of Animals on Site:
Circle Yes or No
Elevation:—PO Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) �e�or No Actual Freeboard:__Z,_Ft. d inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or` - as any erosion observed? Yes oD
Is adequate land available for spray-<90W..Is the cover crop adequate?Ye or No
Crop(s) being utilized: (�rc� 55
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?es r No
100 Feet from Wells? es r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? r
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or100
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o(No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: d / 011 —
_egInspector Name -914Signature v ��
cc: Facility Assessment Unit

r
o�OF wArFgQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
—i
Q , Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 6, 2003
Wayne y Ac ryRECEIVE
Harmon Acres Dai
325 E. Memorial Hwy
Harmony NC 28634 - JUN C, 9 2003
NC DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT : Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490089
APED NATURAL RESOURCES `' Harmony Acres Dairy
W00RE6W_LEREQ10N+kL0FR2 Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Wayne Smith:
In accordance with your application received on April 10, 2000, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Wayne Smith & James Galliher, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval
shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from
the Harmony Acres Dairy Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater than annual
average of 120 Milk Cows, 20 Dry Cows, 45 Heifers, and 15 Calves, and the application to land as specified in
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the
required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future
samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will
need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable laws,
rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance. of a COC to operate under this
permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation
to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any
wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the
CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through
143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General
Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
MOM
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet http:Hh2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27599-1617 Telephone [phone]. Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Eaual Qoportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to the
Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for
an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a
request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J. R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490089
NDPU Files

` State o(North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources �0
Division of Water QualityOn JG2 pG�
Non -Discharge Pennit Application Fonn% ° s ��,o
(7111,5' FOIZAI AL4 Y BE 1'110TOCOPIED FOR U,,SE R,S AN OI?IGINAL)
General Permit -
New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP) Certification Form, Part It, must be included with this application
prior to the application being accepted as complete.
THIS ONLINE APPLICATION CAN BE FILLED OUT USING
THE TAB KEY TO MOVE THROUGH THE FIELDS
Application Date: 5-13-03
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Harmony Acres Dairy
I.2 Print Land Owner's name: Wone Smith and James Galliher
1.3 Mailing address: 325 E. Memorial H�yv,
City: Harmony State: NC Zip: 28634
Telephone Number: ( 704) 546-7327
1.4 County where faun is located: Iredell
1.5 Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Statesville, NC, take 1-77 North, turn Right on Hwy
US 21 and travel North to Harmony, NC, turn Right on NC 901 and travel 1 to -2 miles to first dairy farm on the left.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land (Nwner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable'. please circle which type is listed): None
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No:
2.2 Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. ofAninials"
should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 200
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Farrow to Wean (4 sow) ❑ Turkey I20 Milk Cows
® Farrow to Feeder (4 sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow)
❑ Other Type of Livestock on the fann:
Vr1131%,r. A«rn r NrVur -- Vvu 17r171n0 n--- t -rc
No. of Animals:
20 Dry Cows
45 Heifers
15 Calves

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 444 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 65
2.4 Number of Lagoons: , Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3), Required Capacity: (0)
Number of Storage Ponds: 1; Total Capacity: 60,010 (f,3); Required Capacity: 55,482 (0)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. Applicants
Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed;
3.3 Three copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for
animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC -CPA -17 or equivalent.
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required.
3.3.3 Documentation showing that proposed swine facilities meet the requirements of the Swine Farm Siting Act
including a site map prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed 1 inch =
400 feet. At a minimum, the site map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to
occupied residences within 1500 feet, schools, hospitals, churches.. outdoor recreational facilities, national
parks, state parks, historic properties, or child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500
feet, water supply wells within 500 feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries, and
perennial streams or rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners, all property owners who own property located
across a public road, street, or highway from the facility, the local health department, and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination.
3.3.5 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features that affect facility design, the
dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities, the fields used for waste application, and areas where
surface runoff is to be controlled.
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design.
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required.
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design.
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility.
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field.
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field.
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field.
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moratoria on Construction or Expansion of Swine
Farms, if the application is for a swine facility.
Ud"%D 114r- A 11LIn !' I►T 0111 __ U V D 17117100 D--- I .,r e

If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this'list, please include the additional
components with your submittal.
4. Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the appropriate DWQ regional office
and included as a part of the project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow
toward) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DWQ
regional office. Therefore, you are required.. prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, n,itlt
items 1 through 7 completed to the appropriate Division of Water quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see page 5 of
5). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5" by 1 V copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which
shows the location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located.
Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the
classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and
submit the application package.
4.1 Farm Name: Harmony Acres Dairy
4.2 Name & complete address of engineering fine or technical specialist: C. Lipe Barrier, Jr7Environmental Specialist
NC DENR, DSWC
444 Bristol Drive
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
Telephone number: 704-873-6761, Est. 112
4.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Long Branch to Hunting Creek
4.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters arc located: Iredell County
4.5 Map name and date: Harmony - 1993 and Calahaln - 1969
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified un the attached map segment(s): z
Name of surface
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management
Proposed classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel
(All attachments must be signed)
S .=
GV1D1►4. AIII" r X7 VIII 10V TIP7/a(% a....,. 2 ,.rz

5. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1. 2), attest
that this app cation for(Facility name listed in
question 1.1) has been reviewed by me an is accurate and comple to the best of my knowle I understand that if all required
parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this
application package will be returpierd to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date J <3,/) - 03
6. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in
question 1.1) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required
parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included this
application package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS;
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1671
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
cnn NA. % 117h 1� xrc'.xr Uvo "T»!nn n,,,,,, n ..re

(!-ro/7
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water QualityW RECE!
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form A78RQV4LJnV j0N
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) APR `
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operatipns 2000
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the DtviAii Rl ease
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Harmony Acres Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Wayne Smith & James Galliher
1.3 Mailing address: 325 E. Memorial Hwy
City, State: Harmony NC Zip: 28634
Telephone Number (include area code): 704-546-7327 or 7401
1.4 County where facility is located: Iredell
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Hwy 901, 1 miles east of Harmony ON LEFT,
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: ulm
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _49 (county number); 89 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Dairy i n c /u d t7 -r-/s
125- Certified Design Capacity Is, -30 a -r d I -1C; fe r-1
Is the above information correct? Qyes; Qno. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Tyne of Swine .
• Wean to Feeder
• Feeder to Finish
• Farrow to Wean (# sow)
• Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
• Farrow to Finish (# sow)
No. of Animals Tvne of Poultry No. of Animals
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
• Layer
• Non -Layer
• Turkey
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page I of 4 49-89
Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
- Dairy
• Beef
No. of Animals:

V
Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number �`�" �4 . Facility Name /lar G r'C 5 b4I r U
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for / Z 5 Date of Certification 9-11.- 98r
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking
JOD
Dry cows
T_
Heifers
Calves
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS
/-Z D **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Does Now Ex Lewd /.75 1!�_,
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature
/V -/A
Date
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature Date
Technical Specialist
Signature Date
Phone Nuinber ( }
N.C. DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER.
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA. 27699-1617

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): : Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): �ftf [oil
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable): I
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (jNO�(please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every Iand application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.39 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3. 10 A site schematic.
3.3. 11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity, documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 2 of 4 49.89
Armlicants Initials
A Z

Facility Number: 49 - 89
Facility Name: Harmony Acres Dairy
4. APPLICANT'S�CERTIFICATION:
I,
war REQ F�
4PRI G, oN
MOO-p��ha
'9a Pe
((�� ` l �r /� (Land Owner's name listed in question�!��ttest that
this applicatitln for _ 17� /l/J (�� D����_1 (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date 3 7 1- 40
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I,
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: (919) 715=6048
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 3 of 4 49-89

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
�~xistine or New or .. Expanded -:(olease circIe.one}
General Information:
Name of Farm: Harmony Acres Dairy Facility No: 49 -- 89
Owner(s) Name: Wayne Smith and .Tames Galliher Phone No: 704-546-73
Mailing Address: 325 E, Memorial Hwy_,_ Harmony, NC 28634WATER CE'VTY EDIfl
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: jr
IC
Latitude and Longitude- 35 57 13 / 80 45 18 Integrator: None MrK 2 2 2oo.3
Please attach a copy of a county road trap with location identified and describe below (Be specifi#age Permito"
names, directions, milepost, etc.): From Statesville, NC, take I-77 North, turn Right on
US21 and travel North to Harmonyl NCs turn Right on NC901 and travel 1 to 2 miles
to f irat__d&i ryfear on the Left,
_Operation Description:
Type ofSwine No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
• Farrow to Wean
C3 Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
U Layer
a Pullets
Other Type of Livestock:
Type of Cattle No. of Animals
* Dairy 125
O Beef
80 Milk Cows
15 Dry Cows
30 Heifers
:: 14
o eratlun onr .,� a
{ ;a
g y
,
Previous Design CapQcrty ---;
_,:!Additional Desrgn:Capacitu.
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage:_- _.40
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity: 60,010 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
1 (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner : Wayne smith
Signature:
Name of Manage
Signature:
AWC — August t, 1997
different from owner):
Date....
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .4005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 211.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F.0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
H. Certification of Design
A) f WIgglion. Storaeg, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
AGI Existing facility withqut„retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
❑ New, gxpanded or rgtrofitted &614 (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry Hendrix
Affiliation USDA—NRCS _ _Date Work Completed: 12=2-97
to No.:_70k 873-676 1-3
. Al -14-03
B) Land ARRIIt; tion n Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lipe Barrier, Jr. —
Affiliation NC DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed:.. 4tl 1-03
Address (Mencv):444 Bristol Dr., Statesville, NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761—
Q Runoff Colrols From Exterior„Lot
s
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility withgal exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry Hendrix
Affiliation USDA. NRQS _. _ Date Work Completed:_12-2-97
AWC -- August 1, 1997 2
e No, :704-873-6761-3
-/6 -09

Ll).-%UUI.L..i I�jII .A44,� .u...... .....�.....
Cfeck the approPriate imx
Existi o r nr , nding to •ill l Wftb e�isf'n2 ^.v, s` li ' n (%V'UP or I)
,animal waste appiicadon equipment scccrfied in the plan has been =-cher tier- calibrated or a'-aluatzd in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necssswr to accotrunodace the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the pian at rates not to
e ;c_ed either the sceci:ied hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for Eiming of aociications has been
established: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjusunent .uidance are C.;nLUned as part of
the plan).
J
Ne-. expnnded. nr t-isEinsfatlity :vitt out _zi -tiny .�'1 (� 3ocliClEinn rouiPrnznt fa,r ;r,r t� irrQat+an (I)
,animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has beta designed to appiv :vasa as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed aoplication equipme^t can cover the area required b} the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibr don and adjustment quidanct are
contained as part of the plan).
Nei.v, :xpand4d. nr_.=cisdnQ icjlity without dYis-tin; waste any&ncion tauiCment rof land ;ereading not g--rtu
scr v irriyidim (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can corer the area required by the
plan at rates - not to exceed either the specified. hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
-contained as pan of the plan).
i+iame,of Technical Specialist (PIease Print): Lam c� c�►=r x _
Affiliation USDA - N C5 Date Work Completed: /Z -z -f7
Address (Agency : �'E�er• .sT� vii i✓. C .7 7 Phone No.: Z - �. 76
Signature: Date: iz" �7
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Ylortality NtanaQernent and Emergency Action Plan (SD
SL WtrP. RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist. an insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this faciliEv.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larr 1k, +-ix
AffiliationuSDA - IVR C- S Date Work Completed: 7
Address (Agency):a Q
Sionature:
F) WrittenNoticeof New or„ExRanding Swine Farm il///;
Phane No.: 07-x' G 7G
Date: /7 - 2-- q7
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine rarms that begin construction after June
21. 1996. If the facility was built before June 31. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road. street_ or highwav from this ne•.v or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of vCGS 106-305. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land O%vner:
Signature:
:came of .Nlanager (if iifferznc from owner):
Date:
Signature: Date:
-k%Vc -- Au-,ust 1. 199

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facili (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): NA
Affiliation Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency):
Signature:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
hone No.:
ate:
M The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lipe Barrier, Jr. _
Affiliation NC DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 4-�-11-03
Address (Agency): 44 B Phone No.: 704-873-6461-3
Signature: � � o _a r'(.0 __ _ Date: i`' d 6
This following signature block is only tote used when the box for conditional approval in Ill. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. t (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner: NA
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- August 1, 1997

L) Kunotr t_nntrois irum c.tzct,L L,k,
Fac'hi v t-vich dxt r lo(i
Metlt d.i to riumntize the run off of pollutants 'Nal 10un2in! lied ht_ 11;e ^,:�Ma ,tate brei installed as ;pecittel
in the plan.
For facilides without e.rterior lots.. no cer
Name of Technical Specialist (Please P: -int): Lara, /4
cation is necessar_..
drt)c
Affiliation usdA - N/t' d S Date %Fort Comoleted: ?- / F- % Y
Address (Agency a4/ (,�4'te� ,S-Te1vi%��� N C' Phone N. �7Z-67G/
Signature: Date:
D) aoolicadon and HandlingEquipment Installation (WLp or T)
Check the aApropriare block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the pian is o:: site and read;: for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to Lbe owners and are contained as put or. We plan.
..1 animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not beea installed but t`te owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a si4ned contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adjusunent guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the pian.
J Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (momblday/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be [and applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of theplan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): _ Larry e4&rI1C
Affiliation IW50Y �'
Address (Agency):
S ienature:
Work Completed:
Phone ,sro.: RZ - 6 76 /
Date: ti -i G - 7t
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEyI a verification of delivers• and installation
from a Technical Specialist within I5 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Fame of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
=Fame of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. insect Control and Mortality Nfana-zement (SD. SI. WUP. RC or i)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are ooerational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): - I-ai-r y, �`�'� I GI r i x .
Affilia6on�usLA - ty,QC 5 Date Worl: Completed:
Address (agency)- -',Ul W � �� f�����ic 1v C Phone No.: �7x , &7G /
Signature: Date:
-Ovc -- .au"ust t. [997

' Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
"(Please type or erint all information that does not require a signature)
Existing or New . or Ex ended lease drele one
General Information:
Name of Farm:_ Harmony Acres Dairy _.. Facility No: 49 -- 89
4wner(s) Name: Wayne Smith and James Galliher Phone No:704-546,k--73
Mailing Address: 325 E. Memorial Hia. HarmgDy, NQ 28634
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: ire P 'L ✓G G /G
Latitude and Longitude: 35 57 13 /80 45 18 Integrator: None cs"��
O�
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be sp% : r* py
names, directions, milepost, etc.): From Statesville, NC, take I-77 North, turn ]ti n
, o
US 21 and _travel North to Harmony, NC, turn _Right an NC 901 and travel. 1 to
iniles to first Dairy on the L
Ooeration Descrintion:
TvpeofSwine No. of Animals TypeofPoultry No. of Animals TypeofCattle No. ofAnimals
• Wean to Feeder U Layer 3 Dairy _200
0 Feeder to Finish ❑ Pullets ❑ Beef
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder 120 Milk Cows
• Farrow to Finish Other Type ofLivestock: 20 Dry Cows
❑Gilts 45 Heifers
❑ Boars 15 Calves
Acreage Available for Application: 444 Required Acreage: 65
Number of Lagoons/ Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity: 60.010 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we)verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named -above and will
implement these procedures. 1 (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. i (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Olner : Wayne Smith
Signature:_ J'I
Name of Manager(if
. Signature:
AWC — August 1, 1997
fferent from owner
1
Date: S'30-0_3
Date:
_ I itlniq
f 1
i iYoi ilr _, Eli li
-[ h
Erpa dlN$ OperatlQn Qfti}� _- +'
_ ..� t l l 1 L
-
- ....N-_
rs
��'- 1111
1 iri 3
.,r 4- r
x:.1
14� 1 I.
i i
y
1 .,
�i t FT
':', �°TL
Previous Design
Capacrry 1251.
AdditinnglDesign.0046ty:
75.. ,_'
Toral Desigrt.Capaczty:..200
Acreage Available for Application: 444 Required Acreage: 65
Number of Lagoons/ Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity: 60.010 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we)verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named -above and will
implement these procedures. 1 (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. i (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Olner : Wayne Smith
Signature:_ J'I
Name of Manager(if
. Signature:
AWC — August 1, 1997
fferent from owner
1
Date: S'30-0_3
Date:

Technical Specialist Certification
L As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to I SA
• NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 211.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
A Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate hox
❑ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity, storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
W New, expanded or retrofitted facilitX (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry_ Hendrix _
Affiliation USDA, NRCS Date Work Completed:
Address (Agen y) Phone No.: 704-,173-6761 -
Signature: Date: S- Z 7- a 3
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lige Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC DENR, DSWC _ Date Work Completed: 5=13-03
-_ .,__ Address (
Signature
C) Runoli t onrrois horn r xrerior lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
e No.: 704-873--6761
❑ Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry Hendrix
Affiliation USDA, NRCS Date Work Completed: 12-2-97
Address (AgentV: 444 uiritol Dx. Statesville, NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
• Signature: Date: -r- Z 7' a 3
AWC -- August 1, 1997 2

'D). Al2plication and Handlin Equipment
Check the appropriate box
10 Existing or expanding, facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or 1)
. Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
•
❑ New, expanded, or existing facility without existing waste, application equipment for spray irrigation. (1 )
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either, the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established, required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
9 New, expanded, or existing, facility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not usin
spray _irrigation. (WUP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Li_pe Barrier, Jr._
Affiliation NC DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-13-03
Address (Agent ): 444 Bristol �� Statesville, NC 28677 _ Phone No.: -
Signattlre:4� ".Z �� d44,( Ze C Date:
) Odor Control, Insect Control, Manage, Emergency ion Pian (SD
E meat and_E_mer enc Act,_,_,_
Sl, WUP, RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Pian. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this Facility.
Name_of-Technical -Specialist _(Please_Print): C . Lie Barrier ._._Jr ___..._.... _ _ __ ---
Affiliation—NC
__
AffiliationNC DENR, DSWC_ ._ Date Work Completed: 5-15-03
Address (Agency): 444 Bristol Dr, , Statesville, NC 28677_ Phone No.:704-873-6761
Signature: fb ,K34. A '� -- - Date:
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996, if the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that 1 (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail at l adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Siinature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
. Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry Hendrix
Affiliation -USDA, NRCS .- _ Date Work Completed:
Address O
Signature:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
No.:704-873-6761
S= 27- a
0 The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilization pian.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print):- C. Lipe Barrier, Jr
Affiliation NC DENR DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-15-03
Address (Agency): D -.—Statesville, NC 28677 Phone No.: 704--873-6761
Signature: i�_' _ Date: 6,
This following signature block is only to be use'd when the box for conditional approval in Ill. B
�- above has been checked.
•
I (we) certify that I (we) have conunitted to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erasion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. 1 (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature:
AWC -- August 1, 1997
Date:

C)_Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
. For facilities without arterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Larry Hendrix _
Affiliation USDA, NRCS _ Date Work Completed: 9-15-98
Address (Agent ): 444 Bristol Dr., Statesville NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873--6761
Signature:a n-1 Date: X-7-7-03
•
D) Application and Handling Equipment Installation (W[JP or I)
Check the appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use;
calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing -or -third party application -and has provided a -signed contract; -equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with
the cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to
the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Q. Lipe Barrier, Jr. .
Affiliation NC DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-13-03
Address
Signatur
(Agency): 444 B l D e C 2 Phone No.: — —
e: Date: L-5� v7
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
1 (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. 1.
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature;
Name of Manager (if different from owner
Signature:
Date:
Date;
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality anagement (SD, SI, WUP, RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The mortality
management system as specified in the flan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): C. Lipe Barrier, Jr.
Affiliation NC DENR, DSWC Date Work Completed: 5-13-03
Address (Agency): 444 Bristol Dr. Sta e lle, NC 28677 Phone No.: —
Signature: �. ,�,� _ ��� -- _ Date: ..
AWC -- August 1, 1997

- Animal Waste vlanajement Plan Certification
tP tyoe or Dant .all ijifortnation that does not 'tire a si-znatur�:l
Existing or ,_ New or Es prided ( [ease circle one)
General information:
Name of Farm:_ _ .Larrq bn.r Accts IW;—y —y _ Facility No: 411 S 9
Owner(s) Name: Wayne JS_n;' k I- Ln►es 6411;Acr Phone No: 769-5<-73a7
Maliiin¢ Address: 3Z5 F. n1"6rr.Ll /&, G,-r�,e � , ll/ C ,. .7,94,34-
Farm
k4,3¢Farm Location: County Faun is located in: Etc do
Latitude and LonJitude: 3S sZ, 13 1 0 Integrator:
Pease attach a copy of acounty road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names. dire -c: -.ions. milepost. etc.):Fro•, (Jgb�!le, re,- �r-77 A/ nater 1 .-x zl, 4.-4=1_
Operation Descriodon:
Type of Stti•ine No. of:lnhnals
:1 Wean to Feeder
Z) Feeder to Finish
ZI Farrow to Wean
• Farrow to Feeder
• Farrow to Finish
• Gilts
Z) Boars '
b 1. a. l— 2. '1 - A fir
Type of Pouirn•
-2 Laver
Pullets
r,C /.d, -s
No. of Animals
Type al Caule
�M Dairy
Z Beef
r•,�r,(�;�� f d -r cu -'r
'Vo. of �nirnals
/zS
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: r 2 V 41 ., 7 Required Acreage: 3 9, 7
Number of Lacyoons / Storage Ponds : / Total Capacity: G Z ! Cubic Feet (f 3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or (2)(please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
ik ria ae .a a� is iia as sa i,� ale M alt yt �a �!a �µ �w i.� as ya W as � as ya Aa ra # x ns is �e .,e �!t x is is is xe is k1 is it is is x as �!t rt is is �Y i� �k ii is is re ala iia is is ra ra is is ap ie M ae sa i+ �a is +G x :i a. i,+ to r.� is ae
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verity chat all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and :will
implement these procedures. i (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or cQpstructiun of new facilities will require .a new certification to be submitted t4 the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animal, are stocked. l (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly tltroueh a than -made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Marne of Land
Signature:
Name of Mann
Si -nature: Ddfr, O
AVVC -- Auuuat 1, 199;
t�:6osi b

'Pchnica.l,Specialist Certification
I. A; a tec;inical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and ovate; _„nservatinn Commission pursuant to 1�.�
NCAC 6 .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the Farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specitications of the Division of E:tvironntentai ManaQeme:it
(DEM) as speciited in IjA NCAC 2H.0217 and the 'USDA—.Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) andlur the
North Carolina Soil and water Conservation Commission pursuant to ISA NCAC 2H.0217 and IJA NCAC 6F .0001-
.000j: The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist
who may sign each certification (SD. SI. WUP, RC. I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
II. Certification of Design.
?.) Collection. Storarre. Treatment System
,Cheek ,tl:e appropriate.bo.r -
lZl' Existing facilicv.withtsuc retrofit (SD orWUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: stora_ae caaabilitV consistent' %V411 %Mute - utilizatfon
requirements.
J New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum sLin dards and specifications.
Mame of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L u r r y end rt x
Affiliationu52)A NPC 5 Date Wort, Completed: 1z- z- 7 7
Address (Agency): U S�� - N'c5 Phone
Signature:
�z- Z-'77
B) Land nglication Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization: chosen crop is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation.,/VC-1>4 �4�--,��1-„ �y_v.s: Date Work Completed: /v %
Address (Agency):V-ay/?�� y CP�tk �l-s� •�� Phone','o.:-7,,,l ��-��z�
Siunawre:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the approprfvfe box
:1 Facility without exterior lots (5D or WUP or RC)
Thia facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by N'RCS. Y
Name of Technical Specialist (Please P -int):
Affiliation U 5,D o9 - /I/,Q C 5 `1 / Date Work Complet57,7
ed: /Z ` z -
Addr--ss (Agency): -ZOI Wc?tcr .S� � JCtiie sai /V C. 2S- 77 Phone u.: I'72- e74
Si�znaturC: Date: �z' Z' %7
AWC -- AuguNt 1. 19. r

D). �aooiieation and Handling Equinm�nt
C'teck the appro.priate i)ox
PM ;iSting Or f N -lndina aci j y with existing w'J.5te itirfliCatioll equipment (W t:P or 1)
Animal wash aop6cation equipment specified in the plan has been zither twid calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading races. a schedule for timing of appjjcadons has been
established: required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment zuidance are L.;ntained as part of
the plan).
D New. expanded. nr exJ.icingafacility MLgut exisrins waste a eitt� 'cation egtiinmenr for ;Pralirri°ltion. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to appiv waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can corer the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specitied hydraulic or nutrient leading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established. required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of dhe plan).
;J `%y.v.;xpnnded. or exisdris! Eacility-without_zYistinc wn, to apdicadi to eautnnte:tt tier !;end�?readinLnn
snrac• irri}„ t't� on. (WliP or 1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates •not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for tinting of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance: are
"contained as part of the plan),
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Lar -r cn d
Affiliation_ USDA -_N?CS _ Date Work Completed: !Z- z - f7
Address (Aaencv): Ra t ofAer -cTe via C . Phone No.:
Signature: Date:' `r- - 97
E) Odor Control. insect Controi. 'Mortality Management and Emergency .action Plan (SD
SL WUP. RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Nfanagement Odor Control Checklist- an Insect
Control Checklist, a NfunWity ivlartagement Checklist and an Emergency action Pian. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Nfortality Management Plan and the Emergency .action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): LGrr,yc�dr�x
Affiliation U50A - IV C S Date Wort: Cumple[ed: /z' 7
Address (Agencv):-16 L-�t•- SY i , &?c v 4 /V- C • Phone `O.: 6 76/
S 4 nature: � � _ Date: x - z - ?7
F) Written Notice of New or EsgandinlSwine Farm A1119
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
31, 1996. If the facility was built before June:! 1. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road. street, or highway from this new or expanding swine faun. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-303. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if different [rom owner):
Signature: Date:
ANVC -- august 1. 1997 3

111 Certification' �71nstallation • _
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
yew, e,cpsnded or retrofitted [acilicv (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. suet as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existin facilities without rerrofcts, oto t erttfcativit is necessary,
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ La r� Ilen d tl X
Affiliation Lf5DA - AIR f- S Dace Work Compleced:
Address (Ageric•r):.201 Lw41i, Phone No.: ff77 -6761
Signature: _D�tcz: q`
B) Land A plication Site (WL:P)
Check rite appropriare bor
7Y The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste mana�_ement plan.
J Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year), the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteudlization plan.
Z] Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
AffiliationA C� .-V.� .z �i�• -�- _ _Date Work Completed:_, Z- ?
Address (Agency): ?M Phone No.: 70V12,7 S6�
SiSnature: ,�� �,�,; - _ Date: - - ��f �r -7
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certifv that I (we) have committers to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waltz udlizadon plan.
and if appropriate to e;mblish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DEMI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification iss-a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM_
Name of Land Owner:N/A
Si -nature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):_
Si;nature:� _ Date:
AWC -- Au-Ust t. I'Jv.

C) Runoff Controls rrom Exterior Lots ,•(RC),
Fa�slity with ext r lets
Methods to ruininiize ale run off of pollutants froni lounging and 7t._ u;e ; rtes hf�: 5rea in�t111ed as SpeLinea
in the plan.
For facilities without e.rterior lots.. no c/errtification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Pnnt): Larry %/end r't x
Affiliation - 411? d 5
Address (Agent a0/
Signature:-,...�, -
Date
N e
Wor< Completed: 9- / f-- 1 JV
Phone No.: X74 -(,7( /
Date: 9- /6 - 9,r'
D),Ap�olication and Handling Eguioment installation (WLP or I)
Check rhe appropriate block
Animal waste application and handling equiurnent specified in the plan is o:: site and read;, for use:
calibradoa and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
_1 .animal waste application and handling equipment .specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained. calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
:D Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/daly/vear): there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of th plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L,a-r r y r X
Affiliation U5M- iVeC -5
P►ddress'(Agency): 201 !NG'ttcr S-�ji
Signature: c��
Date Work Completed:
N C. Phone No.: ?72- - G 76 /
Date:
The folIowing signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit. to DEM, a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification- I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management pian and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DE.I.
`'arae of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Mame of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. insect Control and XIortalitY �lana,ement (SD. SI. WU-P. RC. or I)
titethods to control odors and insects as specified in the Pian have been installed and are operational. The
mortality manasetnent system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ,Larry
Aft-iliation 615.04 &,Ld 5 _wDate work Completed:
Address (Agency) --201 W f�e.- �7�G?r�t�i//c. /il (! Phone No.: I1T ' 67G/
Signature:, _
.k%VC -- .august 1. 199
Date: 9'1G- rf

Please return the complete(. Corm to the Division of eater QualiL_ at the foilo.-vin; address:
Department of Environment, Healt , and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 39535
Raleigh, NC 37626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
N[anagement Pian to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC .- .August 1. 1997 6

State of North Carolina °
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Permit Application Fonn 0 G� 9�L
(I17I,S F016f AIRY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE ASAN ORIGINAL)
General Permit -
New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
This application is for new or expanding facilities only. The design portions of the Animal Waste
Management Plan (AWMP) Certification Form, Part II, must be included with this application
prior to the application being accepted as complete.
THIS ONLINE APPLICATION CAN BE FILLED OUT USING
THE TAB KEY TO MOVE THROUGH THE FIELDS>
Application Date: 5-13-03
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Harmony Acres Dairy
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Wade Smith and James Galliher
1.3 Mailing address: 325 E. Memorial HRti,
City: Harmony State: NC Zip: 28634
Telephone Number: ( 704) 546-7327
1.4 County where farm is located: Iredell
1.5 Farm Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): From Statesville, NC, take 1-77 North, turn Rig,1,1t on Hwy
US 21 and travel North to Harmony, NC, turn Right on NC 901 and travel I_ to 2 miles to first dairy farm on the left.
1.6 Print Fane Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): None
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No:
2.2 Please complete the table below as it applies to your facility using the certified design capacity. The "No. of Animals"
should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Tyne of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ® Dairy 200
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
❑ Farrow to Wean (4 sow) ❑ Turkey 120 Milk Cows
® Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
❑ Farrow to Finish (#E sow)
❑ Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
TillDNA. AWn 4' ATT+"111 .... V V D +71^7 100 D...... Y ..rC
No. of Animals:
20 Dry Cows
45 Heifers
1 S Calves

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 444 Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 65
2.4 Number of Lagoons: , Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3). Required Capacity: (0)
Number of Storage Ponds: 1; Total Capacity: 60,010 (ft3); Required Capacity:55,482 (ft3)
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. Applicants
Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for General Permit -
Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is disposed.
3.3 Three copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), If the facility does
not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application for
animal waste operations. The CAWMP must include the following components:
3.3.1 NRCS Site Evaluation Form NC -CPA -17 or equivalent.
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required.
3.3.3 Documentation showing that proposed swine facilities meet the requirements of the Swine Farm Siting Act
including a site map prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map sltall not exceed 1 inch =
400 feet. At a minimum, the site map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to
occupied residences within 1500 feet, schools, hospitals, churches, outdoor recreational facilities, national
parks, state parks, historic properties, or child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500
feet, water supply wells within 500 feet. The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries. and
perennial streams or rivers located within 75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners, all property owners who own property Iocated
across a public road, street, or highway from the facility, the local health department, and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination.
3.3.5 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features that affect facility design, the
dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities.. the fields used for waste application, and areas where
surface runoff is to be controlled.
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design.
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required.
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design.
3.39 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility.
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field.
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field.
3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field.
3.3.1.4 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.15 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.16 Emergency Action Pian.
3.3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted.
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moratoria on Construction or Expansion of Swine
Farms, if the application is for a swine facility.
envT%r. Arxfn d— NAIL/ Vvo ^7M100 n..,.,. 1 .,re

If your CAWMP includes components not shown on this list, please include the additional
components with your submittal.
4. Surface Water Classification. This form must be completed by the appropriate DWQ regional office
and included as a part of the project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow
toiv'ard) in which this animal waste management system will be constructed must be determined by the appropriate DWQ
regional office. Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with
items 1 through 7 completed, to the appropriate Division of Water quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see page 5 of
5). At a minimum, you must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which
shows the location of this animal waste application system and the dov nslope surface waters in which they will be located.
Identify the closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional oti'ice has completed the
classification, reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and
submit the application package.
4.1 Farm Name: Harmony Acres Dairy
4.2 Name & complete address of engineering firth or technical specialist: C. Lipe Barrier, Jr, Environmental Specialist
NC DENR, DSWC
444 Bristol Drive
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
Telephone number: 704-873-6761, Ext. 112
4.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Long Branch to Hunting Creek
4.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located: Iredell County
4.5 Map name and date: Harmony - 1993 and Calahaln - 1969
4.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
�/
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segnlciu(s): l i
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management
Proposed classification, if applicable: �^
Signature of regional office personnel
(All attachments must be signed)
UnIDN4, A%x71% 1` %TV111 — T, VD 717100 D--- I ..PC
3

5. APPLICANT'/Y CERTIFICATION:
1, (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest
that this ap kation for (Facility name listed in
question I , ) has been revidwd by me and 6/accurate and compleo to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required
parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this
application packTgc will be returyd to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date Ke -03
6. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, _ (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that
this application for (Facility name listed in
question I.1) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required
parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this
application package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1671
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
V/ Ovv. 4%U" r� 1 TrVAJ VIVID '7/11100 D...... A ..Pe

Harmony Acres Dairy 325 E. Memorial Hwy
Wayne Smith & James Galliher 704-546-7327 Harmony, NC 28634
4-17-03
J. R. Joshi, Soil Scientist 11
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Non- Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Joshi,
W14 Re del vF p
t","6,oN
OR 22
43 3
ale Pem�i�9
Enclosed is two copies of revised Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
updated Animal Waste Management Certification for the Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility Number 49-89.
The Certified Animal Waste Management Plan is complete, including all support
Information.
If additional information is needed please let me or the technical specialist know.
Sincerely,
Wayne Smith, Pardner

}/1/�/f Jf/J/Y/f/F //!F//H///F %'YY'% A'H/F/!!F/F/!M/+//n'/!/�///l .Y /I JIN//////J/!f/F/ IN/f% //'J/'% Hfi'!/'.N/FJ/////N!-!/Jl/J/////f /Y vY I////f N'H /.^J!/r !J//•/% /F'!/�
i
4
/
� g 5
fHarmony .Acres DEIVED � AJLITYSECTION
01/
0.
JUN 0
2003
P t /
a 0 Wayne Smith and James Galliher Non -Discharge Permiffin
325 E. Memorial Hwy g
Harmony, NC 28634
i
/ 9
. i 4
° Facility No. 49-89
a t
lredell County, North Carolina
10/
10
Certified Animal Waste
«11 1
Management Plan
a '
/
/ f
1
z i
[ r F
10
/ J
(0200 Certification Plan)
01
01 For a herd size of:
s y
i
10
i
120 Milk Cows
20 Dry Cows
01 45 Heifers '
10 15 Calves
T
R
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
/
May 13, 2003
A
1AfiY/.['//wWN%MJF.I'4fI.KN/fbY".I'lFN4M.YlXN:v .: MN.XlLX4,iHIiYN. .�.tw% F[flYN.aI3: XNX.kv Gu"/�miaPY/�.'Y h VW1ZR

ria
M �ON11NG .0
is w P, N
1P I Farm, Location Map 1P
F `
Harmony Acres Daisy
D ti s
rn
o Facility No. 49-89 �v vo ^'
NN
r
o r S44Qr o
RD.,�^
f
n
59 i Houstonville ! '�\\ t��ti. sPRl,y�s
C i E. HOUSTONVIL: REAVIS 2
�pL eft 2115RO H 4.p,N.0
NY !FIRE
1833 N 2iig RL
� � � �pL �Evc
DHAM A$BE fOALE4����Z -
:R. N MILL 135 SCHOOL
RD. RD, %" Rp MAYBERRr
RO `� !
47 � 5B z=
CL
A M L E T y
x �
�F
$R1 DG E 2122 RD.
• MzN1AHON FARM 4fl��`� IZO 1
RD j CHIGGER I
O U
cRiST
TRANQUILI 1 R4V
LN p 1
'��a_iw_y SNEFFpL�
a 904 Ea aY ' `� 2125 BIALER ; �•f ,rL'�t•tti j a*�y.� _ /
Lfa oNY TDY ON
N 43A:t '~M 7 P Q
28625 1��a t++F4RC, �! a y MON
GP GROSS ,
�C P
LOMLIN Rp S o S� �' ��1►'`' ' �r a '' w Eloy bC� I s x
1843F. w ai
TTON OR,
x a MAF ONr Z 12
3 o s l EAR
Y ts.
U 6R. C' SOF 4yt� SK1VtE cr
WINDMILL = m ! o AL ,r'4N0 ys+ 4+ z ti Dy1[� j
CT I�
Z �� 4 y' 9� R14 o y,: PINEY GROVE
GALLIHER RD �` �7J Q. 2 - z ' 2130
GLENWOOD VALLEY P JS +u �46
v DR. 0 -r
• 9E� o�� {2} 1 L LN,0. Qv Q
r��� I � � � � 4�`�'hZ ' ORD RD.
� aM
OGEP � O z' �q
r
U
�p �� O �.>•.S `I Y f
,� 21 I a yq� j R0. <S;1;NWAY RO.

i Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
05-13-2003
This plan has been prepared for:
Harmony Acres Daily
Wayne Smith
325 East Memorial Hwy
Harmony, NC 28634
704-5.16-7327
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, A., Environmental Spec. H
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Dr.
States7,ille, NC 28677-29.12
704-873-6761 Ex. 3
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
r d� DJ
Si ature (mvuer) Date
Sigriature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By. lo,3— "� - �
��-
Technical Specialist Signature Date
-1-
] 165 Database Version 2.0 Date -P- d--
rii2ted: OS -13-2t103 Cover Pae 1

0
Tract and Field Listing
Page 1
•
Harmony Acres Dairy
Field &Tract No.
Acres
Land Use
Tract 5262
Harmony Acres Dairy
Map 1
HAI
15.5
Cropland
HA2
14.0
Cropland
HA3
6.5
Cropland
HA4
20.7
Cropland
HA5
10.1
Cropland
HA6
Tract 3995 27.0
Map 2
Cropland
HA7
15.4
Cropland
HA8
10.6
Cropland
HA9
19.0
Pasture
HA 10
12.3
Pasture
HAI l
4.3
Pasture
HAl2
40.0
Pasture
HA 13
12.4
Pasture
HA14
2.0
Pasture
•
Tract 5240
W. F. Mackey
Map I
MAI
15.1
Hayland
Tract 5246
Robert Tharpe
Map I
TI
19.8
Cropland
T2
14.2
Cropland
T3
4.6
Hayland
T4
15.0
Pasture
Tract 244,245
Sadie Smith
Map 3
TW I
16.9
Cropland
TW2
26.1
Cropland
TW3
9.3
Cropland
Page 1
•

Page 2
Tract and Field :Listing
Harmony Acres Dairy
Field &Tract No.
Acres
Land Use
Tract 8427
Mayberry's Store Farm Map 4
M 1
1.7
Cropland
M2
13.8
Cropland
M3
4.2
Cropland
M4
11.0
Cropland
M5
6.0
Cropland
M6
1.6
Cropland
M7
7.7
Cropland
M8
1.4
Cropland
M9
5.0
Cropland
M10
22.0
Cropland
Mayberry's Store Farm Map 4
M11
Tract 57 20.7
Cropland
Mayberry's Store Farm Map 4
M12
Tract 8426 5.1
Cropland
Mayberry's Store Farm Map 5
M13
Tract 59 119
Cropland
Mayberry's store Farm Map 5
M14
Tract 60 20.6
Cropland
Page 2

v.� �'f`..t��q r�{'i` +phi �. �. f9y` s4" ;t� �r � �`� - }S -1 :_:1,.•�.w�'.. W r �•'� s��'r ��'�,
,+•+ 5rf 1xr'.'
e,s
Field Location Map
Harmony Acres Dairy
FRci[ity No. 49-89 .;
t� J! { �}+ Vii+' �fl r I • + "� - � i �kr,� �. J �� ��
��`��jJO '� f. I+kr- t.�' {ir d .a• F�� Ny ti .1� d�°L.7�c�`•` � : 4-��
_;
�+y,.V I, �, 'G "
,• ' r.-s1w rw �.rr , =`"4y,, ., 6.` `{r ,.� Jc; r.c�" ; a J
�Wu ; a�;•�� � ,.� ija:� 1�• x �� 4 '�F, sJr k V 'Y f' t.�'��'4 y�1�•�.S�rr� ��# T"� r ��
a r ft,r G t;7
j-rrsMv{u $r
/,;'f
.T,y "•' F Ys ,7r 1 a is ,,�°x 4 is' /
!44.�y dk'r rr, y s>c r w t;y `F`" '�%-.S.`" ` ;Y'a r '' i1 •''*;��7 A^.+�1 F i,:.,
�i.�5^ � �a,�,4 ti •;rhe � S� riT � R a !��'?' ', rr;d :' `iP�
�Tw'R f ���zi$k�?.+p.Y � i ��kb'r � �i! � ,� , s,� r J... � '�"{� �"�Jro'"-a�"�E��,�t,°,��'•°`p�� rsr �r„ .
� a �
AW 4,
7 .
7-1 CW,.- ''=�"�t'�� s��Y3r J e ,t f' a�'�"i!- 'F``�t'�`^seJFa •'s7f�' .:.#1'r� '" t y 3�,iX:`I�r1���•+�p'' a�'_lti�ai'r�'? [f � ., ai'Sj
• �� + I ., ,r - i , ! rt`�.,,'1�.�33
`` ,�• e �'�§'+`�°��1���"�. � r=I'�`rh�T;1�. r,� I'����y" ,. � L ' '�' �I j. y�1" • . Il. ti•�
ip J �"'� y }�t ' �.�s'•��`�r`�'9c. t�w r �i ^*�� .L /t � - Y.. �•"' 4 r ; C• "'F .'y, y�'�."S{Y, ::i-„�` F.,
}"'� U � •„ 9:'�ki�'x �ysrt +„' �, „� -.l I fir. � i � .F -{�
, +r." X • � �W'�` .,l'����}^ � r :11 {.r s r" 'r; � ,+��1����y,V I t, a'+7r')Y i'"'��- Y ��,.� Jr
� 3 #-rX F. 4rky.. �S� S '�'�•L' ,€��" t�.�� i� ' � ��li s „'j'+'r ;� r-� � �. ! -ti-K -x'.
��� �'.. •y .�ra'6� �'#��'� �ti- "r a��F„^ 1 ��, i "J Y �'���� .. `h iu'�v i�� � �' r r ,A
T
C
'�1f r. #A L1 .�� is '. ' ':`kid} kr �� ♦ ,�� i a. ¢TTi4 �x7 } rcl }s''",. .S'i' '"�"��f � ��^xb[ �i-3� �'•
a`-`41 r _a�• A a•' c f' �' .i,.; i�� I' A`, +... a.
y - r"� b.E.°R'2+.' -_ •r _ i '''J ' ,,.tl� rR , ' w..�^` �•'r '�.f,.� r
k..r"•4 t . r ��:� � ij �4 •JM 'X4 '} -' ..^ }fir 1`�`i!.• k �'.
� ...�,.c�� M�� � �rr��-i'� �rr���((�j��«i ��y�, �� r, ►. r.,2 \�r i'�r'r� -.1 �; . � `4a�"� '�,� .,Y r; r ...
Iti �'�� L .,r � ,�+ i-.ira. `F,�, M ° nry � ,� � ,.. • *-' r.�,�,, �' � j''J” 3.
, "il"'1~�7\ _ v�� 'f;7 .t i;Pifi ,ice ii •- ' �r°'-.} �G.... � l.. l,h�'g�� +,.Z�c."' : � ,f �•t�' �1p
y' g �'EiC` ,�}3 w .,, ''j;�„_yt•• r 1 _ is J -4• ��” l i s (+ +s�'•;' } r 'i�`•.
� a tr��, ' xi.- x-'�t�r� r: � - •"t',r �F -0 �,�. , � _ ar - ra .Y. "s�i rA..y, r •�r !• ',
�.
'J��s'� -over' 1 l n,, ,<,�"}, n y,..f
1 1 f 1
„' � Fk 4i i' iA � l 'E'ir r, '•14- ���h' `j 6 � � � Vo i r
�:' .: i5 ,1; ae`&• s - r L.t.Fr-r ``rye � ' �•}"y ,,. t � - �F�' �
.41}F�p i h„5 r „-. MAW
S,f
Y � S vr.7•" �y,. 77"Hr 4 A M.r7fP Y � � - �Ni.4 .eW ... - 1I �p
�. �.L +�•� '�s r• S }
�-
'. a�-rT';FJAs~M�^
`�' �r a Y t'^r >< m �xt •ts � .,-. �� � Y� ��� �.' �'_ dw'"�`'•
aEl a v,��
..�a.Skri, '�"..µ� �
How ���V����u F. 't' A •�"� r
" ��hLfa w�. ,,�,rA=xr><,A.lkr �i �� srr. ..� '`t7��r � i ��t'lh •'� ``�.SrY�+ �`.-r J'.tC ',?i. ��;?i..
f�, s•'�.. wse I,rya4 =.i* r..•,...r'+ri;r . Ifj '.f .�'� 4.,H- �' .n q J' ik
ti� ;rrK a 1"{ }} yrs
r j S7E ni �s`y ilt
�,4..'e
f % ' w�.•�'" , '. y,y,G {J r t'_ ; - -- ��ti � _ i lfr'S',t- 't���.Ts-, ysr�i�!@ii ?� �,
'�{f}•�j3'A, x'4 �t�r„a�� 'h�i a � t � �s.��� +'s �'2'}"�ts T.. ! Cn ,.,.'� -
' '; „ '�4 I Lrjy Se ��''�r�, � � r�f � i N 4'.�wfi� c �` •fir � a �J� ����'} 'e�4,� '-� y�y', Q
rt'r•T g y +j;7� J 4 i� �.r�: •1'Ir. s yJ tea- Y.. , -. _ 'd i"w S�"'S, Q r 1�r•� Fi :: £ ?sf'^Y.J�= ,.7 'Y!. I C � }..
4 x �� `�a•S'y 'a4' �' ° �, :7�, t�4 � �: ¢{ � ' �'� - ! �,,(� � a'Li a �„
11,9 �
Ai,C,�`M.. Y` ! "V , y�Lr'"`t, - r 5�'"2��,s5
x r'�
+�'`
ffl,"RE
ry� ,f� .
t4_'j�
���w k rVFY.T•e^'` r u3� .ri` .. yy '15 J M1'1,3�' ':++r.rr....
' �s u. �• +fir. � .1. � T t# r
CJI a p 2
MY
iL
�Y �ItR .�, 'S H 4�ti !4 i1 '•:{�� M�, x �rL/tL�. � _ _..
w- X `'TAS` '. .k.r--�• 1 �4"[_w. req- � i,.f•'i. k: `_ enP+r.x"°"'lsR �c�. .'^� �� P _

j''TrR""fisW w.7?'`ii✓%f� CI{�zi w
V
. ;.
e,r
` 3 iKk"_44 T'J
Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility No. 49-89
�, ✓ rt
,4.
C
j''TrR""fisW w.7?'`ii✓%f� CI{�zi w
V
lAiW r r ..i.�c
"+gr
1
�- t L 1, � 4 y 1� ,i'v `r^� � ��rKzn"w•-..��`'•""^ti, W ;
�M 4
to �,� - -�, ��.i". ✓ i €reY�;s#a -
�
. r ;- �i�,^y 11 M,,����♦'YS4 •r ;yy3�['r Nf1Y �YR 1,'•� . �!''C}`fEA}� :;�}�jp;i �}, M��y��i'�4.Y1+�����+sr,.vyy� f �(j�;�'(�j
� 1� Y. !aY f �Y♦ it . K� iYhrrr.� A7d d', f ter. �•�� 4 ��� 1��� "•'r:�gj��,��i
.....j
y�'
d �-fl'I�� , r...�, �r f.t'f �Ft�,y 5�.�'�Atii:,}�lj�` X �d�t'.9��'��H,•{er �,��
, ''A e¢�, i` e n v L . w' !� i?paSI"u4C„ : L.�►P*, .r, iih.
. ;.
Field Location Map
�T
Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility No. 49-89
lAiW r r ..i.�c
"+gr
1
�- t L 1, � 4 y 1� ,i'v `r^� � ��rKzn"w•-..��`'•""^ti, W ;
�M 4
to �,� - -�, ��.i". ✓ i €reY�;s#a -
�
. r ;- �i�,^y 11 M,,����♦'YS4 •r ;yy3�['r Nf1Y �YR 1,'•� . �!''C}`fEA}� :;�}�jp;i �}, M��y��i'�4.Y1+�����+sr,.vyy� f �(j�;�'(�j
� 1� Y. !aY f �Y♦ it . K� iYhrrr.� A7d d', f ter. �•�� 4 ��� 1��� "•'r:�gj��,��i
.....j
y�'
d �-fl'I�� , r...�, �r f.t'f �Ft�,y 5�.�'�Atii:,}�lj�` X �d�t'.9��'��H,•{er �,��
, ''A e¢�, i` e n v L . w' !� i?paSI"u4C„ : L.�►P*, .r, iih.

Eit 1 L`.
hsr+Lr:
i'k �ii�,'''r r '•
E��rvY�
Field Location Map
ffarmony Acres Dairy
Facility No. 49-89
I
.ti f.yr�

. Narrative
HARMONY ACRES DAIRY
Wayne Smith and James Galliher
200 Dariy Animals are managed on this farm. All animal waste is managed as slurry, scraped and stored
in a Waste Storage Pond. Aniaml Waste is tank hauled and spread on cropland and hayland. Animal
Waste Solids are collected from around the hay feeders and spread on to pastures. Calves are
maintained at other locations and no waste is collected.
CROP NOTES
This plan uses up to three year cropping systems ever though the systems with grasses or Alfalfa will go
on mush longer.
This plan refers to PAN on most pages. PAN is Plant available Nitrogen. Nitrogen in animal waste is
not all available at time of application as is fertilizer. It become available at slower rate, so is referred to
as
Plant Available Nitrogen. Animal Waste takes three or more years of breakdown to get the available
the nitrogen. Each years application continues to add to the available PAN.
Small Grains, Orchard Grass, and Fescue Grass have nutrient applications in both the fall and spring.
This plan shows 1/2 the allowed amount in the fall and ill the spring. For record keeping purposes,
remember that the maximum application is twice the fall or spring amount.
The PAN applied to crops following soybean must be reduced by 201bs.due to the Nitrogen carry over
in the soil. This plan makes those adjustments where crops are managed in the sequence
planned.
All corn in this plan is planned for silage. If the corn is not needed for silage and is harvested as grain
the PAN must be reduced by 45%.
If Small Grain Silage/hay is not needed for silage and harvested as grain, the PAN is nearly the same and
no adjustment is needed. If small grain is used for cover crop, only 30 Ibs. of PAN can be applied and the
PAN for the following crop must be reduced by 30 lbs. as well.
----- ---------------- - ---------- - --------------------------------------------------
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed-. 05-13-2003 Narrative Page 1 of 2

0 Narrative
ANIMAL WASTE SOURCES
Ul- Harmony Acres Animal Waste Slurry
120 Milk Cows 75% Confined
20 Dry Cows 50% Confined
45 Heifers 50% Confined
1,262,000 gals. of animal waste, waste water and contamifiated runoff are collected each year from
these sources.
8,838 lbs. of PAN (Plant Available Nitrogen) are produced from these sources.
For reference see Waste Management System by Sameul C. Bingham, Dated 05-5-03, Section III,
A, and B and Section VI, C., a.
U2 - Harmony Acres Animal Waste Solids
Solids collected around hay feeder
120 Milk Cows x 17 tons/year x 10% confinement = 204 tons
is 45
Dry Cows x 17 tons/year x 15% confinement = 51 tons
45 Heifers x 12 tons /year x 15% confinement = 81 tons
Total Animal Waste Collected 336 tons
336 tons collected x 4.3 lbs. PAN/ton = 1445 lbs. PAN
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: -05---1-3 -20-03 Narrative Page 2 of 2

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U1
Harmony Acres Dairy Slurry waste generated 1,262,000 gals/year by a 185
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 120 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
8904
Incorporated
12141
Injected
13760
Irrigated
8094
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
80,818.09
12,428,932
-11,166,932
Year 2
66,252.15
10,188,845
-8,926,845
Year 3
66,778.30
10,269,765
-9,007,765
U2
Harmony Acres Dairy Solids waste generated 337.44 tons/year by a 185
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1451
Incorporated
1923
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Quantity Applied
(Tons)
Surplus/Deficit (Tons)
Year 1
13,133.90
3,054.36
-2,716.92
Year 2
3 3, ] 33.90
3,054.36
-2,716.92
Year 3
13,133.90
3,054.36
-2,716.92
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG -439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on-farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
------- --- - --- --- - ---- -- ------ - - -- -- -------------- --
Note: In source 1D. S means standard source. U means user defined source.
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-13-2003 Source Page I of l

• • •
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres
of cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the
total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Seri'-
Total
Acres
Use
acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs'A)
Comm.
Fat
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsrA)
Res.
(lbs'A)
App lic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs+A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
{Field)
Solid
Manure
,applied
(Field)
1i
ti
IN
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
245
TXVI
UI
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Small Grain. SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad
54
8.23
0.04
139.05
0.00
245
TWI
Ul
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Soybean&klanured,Double Crop
37bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
374.26
0.00
245
Tta'2
UI
Lloyd
26.10
26.10
Small Grain. Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad
49
7.46
0.04
194.6
0.00
245
'M12
Ul
Llovd
26.10
26.10
Soybeans. klanured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19.69
0.00
513.78
0.00
245
TW3
Ul
Ce6l
9.30
9.30
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
1D4
0
4
Broad
5Z
8.00
0.00
74.3
4.00
245
TW3
Ul
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad.
21,53
0.04
200.23
0.00
5216
Tl
Ul
CeLA
19.80
19.80
Com. Silage
24.0
2/15 /30
218
0
20
Broad.
J140
30.45
0.00
60291
0.00
5246
Tl
UI
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Small Grain, SilaoHay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
8.23
0.00
162.91
0.00
5246
T2
UI
Cecil
14.20
14.20
Ordiardgrass Hay
3.4 Tons
811-7131
151
0
0
Broad.
761
11.61
0.00
164.88
0.04
5246
T2
Ul
Cecil
14.20
14.20
Com, Silage
19.5
2115-6130
213
0
0
Broad.
213
32.76
0.00
465.15
0.00
5246
T3
UI
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Ordtardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
811-7131
155
0
0
1 Broad
78
11.92
0.00
54.83
0.00
5246
T3
Ul
Cecil
4.60
4.60
Com. Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
33.531
0.001
154.22
0.00
5246
T4
U2
Cecil
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
463.95
5262
HA I
UI
Cecil
15.50
15.50
Ordrardgrass Flay
3.5 Tons
811.7/31
155
0
0
Broad.
78
11,92
0.00
184.74
0A0
5262
HA I
U1
CL,i1
15.50
15.50
Com. Silage
20.0
2115.6/30
21$
0
0
Broad.
218
33.53
0.00
519.65
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 1 of 10

Waste UtAtion Table a Year 1 0
"Iraq
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA-
Nutrient
Regd
(lbs'A)
Camra.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
llbs'A)
Res
(Ibs'A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs'A)
Liquid
,Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
A
Pi
N
K
1000
gal/A
Torts
1000 gals
tarts
5261
HA2
U l
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
426.30
0.00
5262
HA 2
UI
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
U
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
115-191
0.00
5262
HA 3
Ul
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-630
218
01
20
Broad,
198
30.45
0.00
197.93
0.00
5262
HA 3
UI
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Small Grain, Silagc/Hav
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad
54
8.23
0.00
53.48
0.00
5262
HA 4
U I
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Coat, Silage
19.5
2115-6/30
213
0
20
Broad,
193
29.68
0.00
614.40
0.00
5262
HA 4
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tats
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
165.5
0.00
5262
HA 5
UI
Madison
10.10
10.10
Com. Silage
17.0
2115-6/30
185
0
20
Broad
165
25.38
0.00
256.29
0.00
5262
HA 5
Ul
Madison
10.10
10.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.7 Tons
911-3131
85
0
0
Broad.
43
6.54
0.00
66.01
0.00
5262-
HA6
U1
Cecil
27.00
27,00
Cont, Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
822.16
0.00
5262
HA 6
U I
Cecil
27.00
27.00
Small Grain, Silage Hav
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8,231
0.00
222.15
0.00
5262
HA 7
Ul
Cecil
15.40
15.40
Orchardgrass Hay
3.6 Toss
811-7/31
160
0
0
Broad.
80
12.30
0.00
199.47
0.00
5262
HA 7
Ul
Cmil
15.40
15.40
Com, Silage
20.5
2115-6/30
223
0
0
Broad.
223
34.30
0.00
528.14
0.00
5262
HA 9
U2
Cecil
19.00
19.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
587.67
5262
HAIO
U2
Cecil
12.30
12.30
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
380.44
5262
HAI l
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Ordtardgrass Hay
3.2 Tans
8/1-7131
142
0
0
Broad
71
10.92
0.00
46.95
0.00
5262
HAI I
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Com. Silage
18.4
2115-6130
201
0
0
Broad.
201
30.91
0.00
132.92
0.00
5262
HAl2
U2
Cecil
40.00
40.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Totts
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
1,237.19
5262
HA13
U2
Wilkes
12.40
12.40
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Toss
811-7/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
331.62
5262
HAM
U2
Wilkes
2.00
2.00
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tans
811-7/31
115
0
0
Broad
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
53.49
8427
M 1
Ul
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Com, Silage
18A
2115-6130
20I
0
20
Broad.
181
27.84
0.00
47.32
0.00
8427
Nil
U1
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Sntall Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
911-3131
98
0
0
Broad.
49
7.54
0.00
12.81
0.00
8427
M 2
U1
Liovd
13.80
13.80
Com, Silage
19.1
2/15-6/30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28.91
0.00
398.99
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 2 of 10

Waste Uilftion Table a Year 1
Tracy
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs'A)
Comm.
Fort.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res
(Ibs%A
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsiA)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
9a11A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
8427
M 2
Ul
Lloyd
13.80
13.80
Small Grain. Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad
49
7.46
0.00
102.93
0.00
8427
M13
UI
Lloyd
4.20
4.20
Cum, Silage
19.1
2115-6/30
208
0
20
Broad
188
28.91
0.00
12L43
0.00
8427
M 3
Ul
Lloyd
4.20
4.2Q
Small Grain. Siiage'Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad
49
7.46
0.00
31.33
0.00
8427
M14
Ur
Lloyd
11,00
11,00
Com, Silage
18.7
2/151130
204
0
20
Broad
184
28.30
0.00
311.27
0.00
8427
M 4
U1
Llovd
11.00
11.00
Small Grain, SilageUay
8.5 Tans
911-3131
94
0
0
Broad.
4
7.23
0.00
79.51
0.00
8427
M 5
Ul
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Cum, Silage
18.7
2/151/30
204
0
20
Broad
18
28.30
0.00
169.78
0.00
8427
M 5
UI
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.5 Tons
911-3/31
94
0
0
Broad
47
7.23
0.00
4337
0.00
8427
M16
Ul
Cecil
1.60
1.60
Com. Silage
19.5
2/151/30
213
0
20
Broad,
193
29.68
0.00
47.49
0.00
8427
M 6
Ul
Ceci1
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
12.80
0.00
8427
N17
Ul
Cecil
7.70
7.70
Com, Silage
20.0
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad
198
30,45
0.00
234.47
0.00
8427
MI 7
Ul
Cevil
7.70
7.70
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
9/t-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.2]
0.00
63.35
0.00
8427
&18
UI
Cecil
1.40
1.40
Com. Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
42.63
0.00
8427
M 8
U1
Cecil
1.40
1.40
Small Gram, SilageJHay
9.6 Tans
911-3131
107 1
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0,00
11.52
0.00
8427
M 9
UI
loyd
5.00
5.00
Con), Silage
19.1
2/15-6130
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28.91
0.00
144.56
0.00
8427
N9 9
U i
loyd
[hcwacla-P
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
9/1-3/31
97
0
0
Broad
49
7.46
0.00
37.29
0.00
8427
N910
U
22.00
22.00
Com, Silage
28.0
2/151/30
291
0
20
Broad.
271
41.68
0.00
916.89
0.00
8427
M10
UI
hewacla-P
22.00
22.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
*9.0
911-3131
*95
0
0
Broad,
48
7.31
0.00
160.71
0.00
8427
Nil
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Soybeans, Manure, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
458.41
0,00
8427
M12
UI
Cecil
5.10
5.10
Soybeans, Mlanured, Double Crop
37bu.
4/1-9/15
144
0
0
Broad
144
22.15
0.00
112.94
0.00
8427
MI13
UI
Cori1
11.90
11,90
Com. Silage
19.5
2,15-6130
213
U
20
Broad.
193
29.68
0.00
353.21
0.00
8427
11913
U1
Cecil
11.90
11.90
small Grain,SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
521
8.00
0.00
95,16
0.00
i,8427
M14
UI
Cecil
20.60
20.60
Com, Silage
I9.5
L7,1/3D
213
0L20
Broad.
193
29.68
0.00
611.43
0.0Q
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 3 of 10

Waste Ut&ion Table * Year 1 •
Notes: 1, In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 4 of 10
Nitrogen
Comm.
Res
Manure
liquid
Solid
Liquid
Solid
PA
Fat.
(lbs!Aj
PA
Manure
Manure
Manure
Manure
Nutrient
Nutrient
Nutrient
Applied
Applied
Applied
Applied
Regd
Applied
Applied
(acre)
(acre)
(Field)
(Field)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbsrAl
Source
Total
Use.
Applic.
Apphc,
1000
Truce
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
8427
X114
UI
Cecil
20.60
20.60
Small Cram_ SilageIHay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad
52
8,00
0.00
164.74
0.00
12.428.93
<`F
1,262.0
jy44'
ax,,.: ,
-11,166.93
.N"
3,054.36
k�
337.44
€
-2,716.42
Notes: 1, In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 4 of 10

Waste Utiflon Table . Year 2 0
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use
Acres
Crap
RYE
App $c.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(ibs1A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs'A)
Res
Obs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(IWA)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gailA
Tom
1000 gals
tons
245
TW I
Ul
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Small Grain, Si[age/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
139.05
0.00
245
TW1
U1
c'eil
16.90
16.90
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
514.611
0.00
245
TW2
UI
Lloyd
26.10
26.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad,
49
7.46
0.00
194.67
0.00
245
TW2
u
Lloyd
26.10
26.10
Com. Silage
19.1
7/15-6130
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28.91
0.00
754.61
0.00
245
TW3
UI
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hav
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
74-37
0.00
245
TW3
UI
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Corn, Silage
19.5
2/15-6/30
213
0
20
Broad.
193
29,68
0.00
276.04
0.00
5246
T1
U1
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8,23
0.00
162.91
0.00
5246
TI
U1
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Soybeans_ Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
1
22.15
0.00
438.48
0.00
5246
T2
I Ul
Cecil
14.20
14.20
Sovbeans, Nianured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad,
140
21.53
0.00
305.73
0.00
5246
'1'3
U1
Cearil
4.60
4.60
Sovbeans, lllanured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
iOl.87
0.00
5246
T4
U?
Cecil
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
463.95
5262
HA I
Ul
Cecil
15.50
15.50
Soybeans. Manured. Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
343.26
0.00
5262
HA 2
Ul
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
115.19
0.00
5262
HA2
Ul
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Soybearrs. Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad
1441
22.15
0.001
310.04
0.00
5262
HA 3
U1
Cecil
6.50i
6.50
Small Grant, SilageJHay
9.6 Tons
94-3131
147
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
53.48
0.00
5262
HA 3
Ul
CLvi1
6.50
6.50
ISoybeans. Manured, Double CrW
37 bu.
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
143.95
0.00
5262
HA 4
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
165.54
0.00
5262
HA 4
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Soybeans. Manured. Double Crop
36 bu.
411.9/15
140
0
0
Broad.
140
21,53
0.00
445.68
0.00
5262
HA 5
U1
Madison
10.10
10.10
Small Grain, Silage)Hay
7.7 Tons
911-3131
85
0
0
Broad.
43
6.54
0.00
66.01
0.00
5262
HA 5
U1
Madison
10.10
10.10
Soybeans. Manured. Double Crap
29 bu.
411-9/15
113
0
0
Broad.
113
17.38
0.00
175.52
0.00
5262
HA 6
1 Ul
Cecil
27,00
27.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tans
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
722.15
0.00
5262
HA6
Ul
Cecil
27.40
27.00
Soybeans. Nlanured Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0 1
Broad.
1 144
22.15
0.00
597.93
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 MJT Page 5 of t0

Waste UtAion Table a Year 2
Trail
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres I
Crop
RYE
APpbc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs1A)
Comm.
Fat.
Nutrient
Applied
(mslA)
Res
{Ibs(A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs'A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manux
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gats
tons
5262
HA 7
U1
Cecil
15.40
15.40
Soybeans_ Xlatmred, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
p
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
341.04
0.00
5262
HA 9
L12
Cecil
19.00
19.00
Fe&ue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
587.67
5262
HA10
U2
Cecil
12.30
12.30
FesLue Pasture
4.0 Tans
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
380.44
5262
HAI I
Ul
Cecil
4.30
4.30
Sovbeans, Manured. Double Crap
34 bu.
4/1-9115
132
0
0
Broad.
132
20.30
0.00
87.29
0.00
5262
HAl2
U2
Cecil
40.00
40.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tans
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
1,237.19
5262
HAl3
U2
Wilkes
12.40
12.40
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tons
811-7131
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
331.62
5262
HA14
U2
Wilkes
2.00
2.00
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tars
811-7131
115
0
0
Broad
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
53.49
8427
hl 1
Ul
Ceefl
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.8 Tons
911-3131
98
0
0
Broad.
49
7.54
0.00
12.81
0.00
8427
X1 1
Ul
Ceril
1.70
1,70
Sovbeans, Manured Double Crop
34 bu.
411-9/15
132
0
0
Broad.
132
20.30
0.00
34.51
0.00
8427
R9 2
U1
Lloyd
13.80
13.80
Small Grain. Silage/Hay
8.7 Tats9/1-3131
97
D
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
102.93
0.00
8427
111 2
Ul
Llovd
13.80
13.80
Soybeans. Manured. Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19.69
0.00
27E.65
0.00
8427
X13
Ul
Lloyd
4.20
4.20
Small Grain, SilageJHay
8.7 Tons
9/t-3/31
97
0
0
Broad,
49
7.46
0.00
31.33
0.00
8427
X13
UI
Lloyd
4.20
4,20
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19.69
0.00
82.68
0.00
8427
M 4
Ul
Lloyd
11.00
11.00
Stuall Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tons
911-3131
94
0
0
Broad.
47
7.23
0.00
79.51
0.00
8427
M 4
Ul
Llovd
11.00
11.00
Soybeans. Manured Double Crop
32 bu.
411-9/15
124
0
0
Broad.
124
19.07
0.00
209.77
0.00
8427
Xl 5
Ul
Llovd
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tars
911-3131
94
0
0
Broad.
47
7.23
0A0
43.37
0.00
8427
X15
U1
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Soybeans, Nfanured Double Crop
32 bu.
411-9115
124
0
0
Broad.
124
19.071
0.00
114.42
0.00
8427
X1 6
Ul
Cecil
1.60
1.60
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
12.80
0.00
8427
X! 6
Ul
Ced]
1.60
1.60
Soybeans Xlanured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad,
140
21.53
0.00
34.45
0.00
$427
X17
UICecil
7.70
7,70
Small Grain. Silage'Hay
9.6 Tans
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
63.35
0.00
8427
XI 7
UI
Cecil
7.70
7.70
Sovbeans. Manured Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9/15
144
0
0
Broad.
1
22.15
0.00
170,52
0.00
8427
X18
U1Cacil
1.40
1.40
Small Grain. Silage!Hav
9.6 Tats
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
11.52
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 6 of 10

Waste Utaion Table
• Year 2 •
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(lhsrA)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs1A)
Res
(Ib9A)
Appllc.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
]Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
{Manure
Applied
(aero)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
'rolls
1000 gals
toes
8427
M 8
Ul
Cecil
1.40
1.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
411-9115
144
0
0
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
31.00
0.00
8427
X19
U1
Lloyd
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hav
8.7 Tons
9/1-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
37.29
0.00
8427
X19
U1
Lloyd
5.00
5.00
Soybeans. Hlanured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19.69
0,0011
98.43
0.00
8427
X110
Ul
Chewacla-P
22.00
22.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0
911-3131
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
7.31
0.00
160.71
0.00
8427
M10
Ul
Chmacla-P
22.00
22.00
Soybeans. Xlanured, Double Crop
46 bu.
411-9115
177
0
0
Broad
177
27.22
0.00
598.85
0.00
8427
M11
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad
198
30.45
0.00
630.32
0.00
8427
X111
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
9YI-3131
107
0
0
Broad
5
8.23
0.00
170.31
0.00
8427
X112
Ul
Cecil
5.10
5.10
Corn, Silage
20.0
2/15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad,
198
30.45
0.00
155.30
0.00
8427
M12
Ul
Cecil
5.10
5.10
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
9/1-3,31
107
0
0
Broad
54
8.23
0.00
41,961
0.00
8427
X113
Ul
C061
11.90
11.90
Small Gram, SilagelHay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
95.16
0.00
8427
X113
UI
Cecil
11.90
11.90
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
140
0
0
Broad.
140
21.53
0.00
256.21
0.00
8427
M14
U I
Cecil
20.60
20.60
Small Grain. SilrgelHay,
9.4 "ions
911-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
164.74
0.00
8427
X414
U1
Cecil
20.60
20.60
Soybeans. Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad.
140
2].53
0.00
443.53
0.00
10,188.85
rye
1,262.0
a;r3
-8,926.85;`4
V,
- W
3,054.36
337.44
-2,716.92
Notes: 1. In the tract column.. - symbol means leased othenidse, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 7 of 10

Waste Utaion Table . Year 3 •
Traci
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
CropRYE
Appbc.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(ibs'A)
Comm.
Fera.
Nutrient
App bed
(Ibs1A)
Res
(Ibs/Aj
Appbc.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslAl
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
245
TWI
UI
Cevil
16.90
16.90
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
U
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
139.05
0.00
245
fWl
UI
Cecil
16.90
16.90
Soybeans,Uniured,DoubleCrop
37bu.
411-9115
144
0
O
Broad.
144
22.15
0.00
374.26
0.00
245
TW2
UI
Lloyd
26,101
26.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
194.67
0.00
245
TW2
U1
Llovd
26.10
26.10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
411-9115
128
0
0
Broad.
128
19.69
O.00
513.78
0.00
2.15
TW3
Lit
Icecil
9.30
9.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad,
52
8.00
0.00
74.37
0.00
245
TW3
UI
Cecil
9.30
9.30
Sovbeans. Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9115
140
0
0
Broad.
140
21.53
0.00
200.23
0.00
5246
"1'1
U1
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Com. Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
602.9E
0,00
5246
Tl
U1
Ce6l
19.80
19.80
Small Grain, Sitage)Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad
54
8.23
0.00
162.91
0.00
5246
T2
UI
Cecil
14.20
14.20
Ordrardgrass Hap
3.4 Tons
811-7/31
151
0
0
Broad.
76
11.61
0.001
164.88
0.00
5246
T3
U1
Cecil
4.60
4.60
(hdiardgrass Hav
3.5 Tons
811-7131
155
0
0
Broad_
78
11.92
0.00
54.83
0.00
5246
T4
U2
evil
15.00
15.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tans
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad
133
0.00
30.93
0.00
463.95
5262
HA 1
U1
Cecil
15.50
15.50
Orchardgrass Hay
3.5 Tons
811-7131
155
0
0
Broad
78
11.92
0.00
184.74
0.00
5262
HA 2
(_i I
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
426.30
0.00
5262
HA2
Ul
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hav
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
115.19
00
0]0.GO
5262
HA 3
U1
Cecil
6.50
6.50
Com, Silage
20.0
2,'15-6/30
218
0
20
Broad
198
30.45
0.00
197.93
5262
HA3
UI
Coil
6.50
6.50
Small Grain,SilagelHav
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
53.4$
5262
HA 4
U
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Com, Silage
19.5
2/15-6130
213
0
20
Broad,
193
29.68
0.00
614.40
0.00
5262
HA 4
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Graig, Silag&flay
9.4 Tons
911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8,00
0.00
165.54
0.00
5262
HA 5
UI
Madison
10.10
10,10
Cam, Silage
17.0
2115-6130
185
0
20
Broad
165
25.38
0.00
256.29
0.00
5262
HA 5
Ul
Madison
10.10
10.10
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.7 Tars
9il-3131
85
0
0
Broad,
43
6.54
0.00
66.01
0.00
5262
HA 6
UI
Cecil
27.00
27.00
Com, Silage
20.0
2115-6130
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30,45
0.00
822.16
0.00
5262
rHA 6
Ul
Cecil
27.00
27.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hav
9.6 Tons
9A-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8,23
0.00
222.15
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 8 of 10

Waste Utsion Table
0 Year 3' •
Tract
Field
Source
Il]
Soil Series
"rota]
Acres
Use
Acres
Crop
RYE
App lic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ihs'A)
Comm.
Feat.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs1A)
Res.
(1bs/A)
App Sc.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs�A)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Nfanure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
NN
N
1000
gal/A
Tones
1000 gals
toles
5262
I'lA 7
UI
Cecil
15.40
15.40
Ordiardgrass Hay
3,6 Tons
811-7131
160
0
0
Broad,
80
12,30
0.00
189.47
0.00
5262
HA 9
U2
Cecil
19.00
19.00
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tats
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30.931
0.00
587.67
5262
HA10
U2
Cecil
1230
12.30
Feseue Pasture
4.0 Tons
811-7131
133
0
0
Broad.
1331
0.00
30.93
0.00
380.44
5262
HAI I
Ul
Cad(
4.30
4.30
Ordeardgrass Hay
3.2 Tons
811.7/31
142
0
0
Broad.
711
10,92
0.00
46.95
0.00
5262
HAl2
U2
CL -61
40.00
40.00FeswePasture
4.0 Tons
811-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
30,93
0.00
1,237.19
5262
HAD
U2
Wilkes
12.40
12.40
Fescue Pasture
3.1 Tons
811-7/31
115
0
0
Broad,
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
331.62
5262
HA14
U2
Wilkes
2.00
2.00
Fuseue Pasture
3.1 Tons
811-7131
115
0
0
Broad,
115
0.00
26.74
0.00
53.49
8427
M 1
UI
Cecil
1.70
1.70
Com, Silage
18.4
2/15-6/30
201
0
20
Broad.
181
27.84
0.00
47.32
0.00
8427
h1 1
U1
Cedl
1.70
1.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
49
7.54
0.00
12.81
0.00
8427
M 2
Ul
Uovd
13.80
13,80
Com, Silage
19.1
2115-6/30
208
0
20
Broad.
188
2891
0.00
398.99
0.00
8427
1412
Ul
Lloyd
13.80
13.80
Small Grain. Silagemay
8.7 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
102.93
0.00
8427
M 3
Ul
Lloyd
4.20
4.20
Corn, Silage
19.1
2/15-6130
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28.91
0.00
121.43
0.00
8427
hi 3
Ul
Lloyd
4.20
4.20
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7 Tuns
9/1-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
49
7.46
0.00
31.33
0.00
8427
1414
UI
Lloyd
11.00
11.00
Corn, Silage
18.7
2115-6130
204
0
20
Broad.
184
28.30
0.00
311.2
0.00
8427
M 4
Ul
Lloyd
11.00
11.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.5 Tons
911.3131
94
0
0
Broad.
4
7.23
0.00
79.51
0.00
8427
M 5
Ul
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Corn, Silage
18.7
2/t5-6130
204
0
20
Broad.
184
28.30
0.00
169.78
0.00
8427
h15
Ul
Lloyd
6.00
6.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
$.5 Tars
911-3131
94
6
0
Broad.
47
7.23
0.00
43.3
0.00
8427
X16
Ul
Cecil
1.60
1.60
Com, Silage
19.5
2/15-6/30
213
0
20
Broad.
193
29.68
0.00
47.49
0.00
8427
1`16
Ul
Cecil
1.60
1,60
Small Grain, SilageMay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8,00
0.00
12.80
0.00
9427
M 7
Ut
Cecil
7.70
7.70
Corn, Silage
20.0
2115-6/30
218
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
234-47
0.D0
8427
144 7
Ul
Cmil
7.70
7.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9,6 Tats
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad,
54
8.23
0.00
63.35
0.00
7 8427
1418
U1
Ceril
1.40
1.40
Ccnn,Silage
20.0
0
20
Broad.
198
30.45
0.00
42.63
0.00
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 9 of 10

Waste Utision Table
. Year 3 0
Trail
Field
Source
Il)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/Al)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res
(lbs'A)
App Sc.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(UA)
Liquid
Manure
App Bed
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
I\
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
toils
8427
X18
UI
Cecil
1.40
1.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
11.52
0,00
8427
X19
U1
Lloyd
5.00
5.00
Corn. Silage
19.1
2115-6130
208
0
20
Broad.
188
28.91
O.DO
144.56
0.00
8427
X19
UI
Llovd
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
8.7 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad,
49
7,46
0.04
37.29
0.001
8427
X110
I U1
Chewacla-P
22.00
22.00
Com. Silage
28.0
2115-6/30
291
0
20
Broad.
271
41.68
0.00
916.89
0.00
8427
X110
U1
Checcacla-P
22.00
22.00
Small Grain. Silag fHay
*9.0
911-3131
*95
0
0
Broad.
48
7.31
0.00
160.71
0.00
8427
Nil 1
Ul
Cecil
20.70
20.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hav
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
170.31
0.00
8427
X112
U1
Coil
5.10
5.10
Small Grain. Silage/Hav
9.6 Tons
911-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
54
8.23
0.00
41.96
0.00
8427
4113
U1
Ce6l
11.90
11.90
Cont. Silage
19.5
2/15-6/30
213
0
20
Broad,
193
29.68
0.00
353.21
0.00
8427
b113
Ul
Cecil
11.90
11.90
Small Gram. SilageJHav
9.4 Tons
1 911-3131
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
95.16
0.00
8427
X114
UI
Cecil
20.60
20.60
Corn, Silage
19.5
2/15-6/30
213
0
20
Broad.
193
29.68
0.00
611.43
0.00
8427
X114UI
Cecil
20.60
20.60
Small Grain. Silage'Hay
9.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
104
0
0
Broad.
52
8.00
0.00
164-74
0.00
10.269.7
17262.00
-9,007.7
t p
3,054.36
337.44
-2.716.92
Nates: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
t91165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-15-2003 WUT Page 10 of 10

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
•Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
0
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Us�mbl
e
Lcacliing
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
245
TWI
16.90
16.90
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Rouble Crop
37 bu.
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
245
TW2
26.10
26.10
15.0
Lloyd
Small Crain, SilagelHay
8.7 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
Com, Silage
19.1 'Pons
245
TW3
9.30
9.30
15.0
Cecil
Small Gram, SilagelHay
9A Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
Com, Silage
19.5 'ions
5246
Tl
19.80
19.80
15.0
Cecil
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tong
Small Grain, Silagelflay
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
5246
T2
14.20
14.20
15.0
Cecil
Ordiarcigrass. Hay
3.4 Tons
Com, Silage
19.5 Toms
Soyb=13, M2nUr4 Double Crop
36 bu.
5246
T3
4.60
4.60
15.0
Cecil
Ordiardgrass ]lay
3.5 Tons
Com, Silage
20,01'ons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
5246
T4
15,001
15.04
15.0
CM-il
FcswePasrure
4.0'rons
5262
HA 1
15.50
15.50
15.0
Cecil
Ordiardgmss Hay
3.5 Tons
Cum, Silage
20.0 "Cons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
5262
HA 2
14.001
14.00
15.0
Cecil
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bu.
5262
IIA 3
6.50
6.50
15.0
Cxil
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.6 'Cans
Soybeans, Mariured, Double Crop
37 bu.
5262
ITA 4
20.70
20.70
15.0
Cecil
Com, Silage
19.5 Toms
Small Crain, SilagelHay
9.4 'roes
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
5262
HA 5
10.10
10.10
15.0
Madison
Com. Silage
17.0 'cons
Small Gram, Silage/Hay
7.7 Tons

0
i
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useabl Leaching
a Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence RYE
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 29 hu.
5262
1 HA 6
27.001
27.00 15.0
Cecil
Com, Silage 20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay 9.6'1'ons
Soybeans, Manure, Double Crop 37 bu.
5262
HA 7
15.40
15.40 15.0
Ceeil
Orchardgrass flay 3.6 Tons
Com, Silage 20.5 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 37 bu.
5262
5262
HA 9
HAI O
19.00
12.30
19.00 15.0
12.30 15.0
Cecil
Cecil
Fescue !'astrrre 4.0 Tons
Fescue Pasture 4.0 Tons
5262
HAI 1
4.30
4.30 15.0
Cecil
Ordrardgrass Huy 3.2 Tons
Com, Silage 18.4 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 34 bu.
5262
HAl2
40.00
40.00 15.0
Cecil
Fie Pasture 4.0 Tons
5262
HA13
12.40
12.40 9.0
Wilkes
Fescue Pasture 3.1 Tons
5262
HA14
2MI
2.00 9.0
Wilkes
Fescue Pasture 3.1 Tons
8427
M l
1.70
1.70 15.0
Cocil
Com, Silage 18.4 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay 8.8 Tons
Soyb-mns, Manured, Double Crop 34 bu.
8427
M 2
13.801
13.80 15.0
Lloyd
Com, Silage 19.1 Tons
Small Grain, Silago/Bay 8.7 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 33 bu.
8427
M 3
4.24
4.20 15.0
Lloyd
Com. Silage 19.1 1,01151
Small ('gain, Silage/Hay 8.7 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 33 bu.
8427
M 4
11.00
11.00 15.0
Lloyd
Com, Silage 18.7 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay 8.5 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 32 bu.
8427
M 5
6.00
6.00 15.0
Lloyd
Com, Silage 18.7'rons
Small Gram, SilagelHay 8.5 Tons
Soybeans, Manured. Double Crop 32 bu.
8427 1
M 6
1.601
1.60 15.0
Cecil
Com, Silage 19.5 Tons
Small Grein, Silage'Hay 9.4 Tarts
Soybeans, A4anured, Double Crop 36 bu.
8427
M 7
7.70
7.70 15.0
Cecil
Corn, Silage 20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay 9.6 Tons
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop 37 hu.
8427
A4 8
1.40
1.40 15.0
Cecil
Cam, Silage 20.0'rons

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useabl
a
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
�- 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
Small Grain, Silagelllay
9.6 Totts
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other cote-xv'vation practices that
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 hu.
8427
M 9
5.00
5.00
15.0
Lloyd
Cont, Silage
19.1 Tons
practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
8.7'rm%
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
33 bu.
8427
14110
22.00
22,00
9.0
Chewacla-P
Com, Silage
28.0 'tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
Soybeans. Manured, Double Crop
46 bit.
8427
Mil
20.70
20.70
15.0
Cecil
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
37 bit,
Com, Silage
20.0 Toms
Small Grain, Silage/flay
9.61'ens
8427
M12
5.10
5.10
15.0
Ceeii
ISoybeans, hianured, Double Crop
37 bu.
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.6 Tons
8427
Mia
11.90
11.90
15.0
Cecil
Com, Silage
19.5 'rolls
Small Grain, Silage/[fay
9.4 Tons
Soybeans, ,Manuretl, Double Crop
36 bu.
8427
M14
20.60
20.60
15.0
Cecil
Corn, Silage
19.5 Tons
Small Grain, Silage/ttay
9.4 Totts
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
36 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 437.80 437.80
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below 81e root
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
�- 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other cote-xv'vation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below the
improve the soils available water holding capacity mud improve nutrient use
> 10
root zone.
efficiency should be considered Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge
nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field
practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
0

. The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
is
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage C',anacity
Source Name I Harmony Acres Dairy Slurry
Desi n Stora a Capacity Days
Start Date 9/15
1
120
Plan Year Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
89
1
2
120
1
3
120
1
4
90
1
5
59
1
G
120
1
7
89
1
8
58
1
9
28
1
10
120
1
11
90
1
12
59
2
1
28
2
2
120
2
3
120
2
4
90
2
5
59
2
G
120
2
7
89
2
8
58
2
9
28
2
10
120
2
11
90
2
12
59
3
1
28
--- - ---- --- - ------ ----------------
-1-9-1-
)1165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-13-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 2

E
Availahle Wioe. gtnrapP Cpinacity
Source Name Hannon Acres Dairy Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Daly
Start Date 9115
120
Plan Ycar Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
3
2
120
3
3
120
3
4
90
3
5
59
3
G
120
3
7
89
3
8
58
3
9
28
3
10
120
3
I1
90
3
12
59
* AvaiIable Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
`------- - ---
191 165 Database.Version 2.0 Date Printed: 05-13-2003 Capacity Page 2 of 2

. Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
n ut rients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
d. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
----- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1911b5 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5113/)3 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fail or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
• with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be aunlied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
191 165 Database Version 2.0 Datc Printed: S/13103 Spccification Pa�,e 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,.and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
-20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation -that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------_------------------------------------------------
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/13/03 Specification Pape 3

. 21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
------------ ------
191165 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 5/13/03 Specification Pape

(Joins sheet 12) _
r 1 rte• ,,��,++,��yy r r' z Ira-.., .,,- - r r- -yp.� � L - ---., , �•,
� C ? ° ;tn F.'TL'Cs [I i"' .;' ��, _ �°+ CS5— •' �[j� ,��`,^'j� ,. Y y� t..'.'-•'[+' 'S.Ij a _ �,
/ r. r ..+ Lr \s' + Li��'""' i� II. Mf "C,pr,„ i Ad 7 �'+ " 9 A ?'t � t .4! a,._�i•i,' ^" ^"^- � ` G i ii`f . \vi cf•` �• .
",ar n • fll{.2 t In �fC2'r . Cf Cs C2 s )
t � irF'-'es' ��,� Ij,� Fx '1> � • #J r.: „•. f {?'' 4�'. N,dD7 r,.r. u iX = p •
f �!•r0 s � "l: ti t�+ .1"ko 'Y� v r3k1',tE2- . ts' htdD7 #"�;v " �_ r p r .13 f t". �l�-r
r 7�,[� f � }sr�� i'A �'�,Al '#t'� �� 5 �„Md62 � c .f .' r,}qtr ay' Cres !: � .�• ��q;6�'S - 7.�•,.a
C€G� �r � 1 S C L.` � r! ( v ^! � ^• � t y 'r� r r F P , •' a �' r + �r• _�
} ` a� � 4 M' r �A tier �j�` Cf�s •• •�I` .rr..,J �-*' t,a xi`
! °EirL fiw.fli Y.c *, ��1CZ�
rrs� �r, � x {i ;a F-'�, � r fxs 7E S. = yF.ti 2 ,ix CsE2 �•, A C1D2 �CICZ � , `t• 4 ' ,< �� . �f ' � ���' +C
,_1 �F : nCfC r �•1 Ci62 U s G , �, y � � � � 1' h" , ¢� •f �t 3�: .
wf tYG " Cj. ' 6r r a k '� �';��> -r�ti1` : U� ,:: r y• C 2 `` ' Gf cyt,t�
r. � ly.' '."'•,- �' vr� s� t ,I; �,� �i�5 �• ..r' � H.,. tt %� 1. Las s'1 ,� y} �-. � "Gf6?
'���T�e�`/ 1� , r � •' k+ ^ �: �.w s4 ;- 6 , r •..f F 3 e 9{. 4 r
r• -�� Qty � t x s ri , r 1=� a: Md82 a 1�4 r �O. i f
ir%a = �.a C�82 �:z��.t �!r i,L r' 1. x' �•y.: i L • rs y���s �S'�-� / �'P't r oc' S ' �'"._ t +..;w�^ .6 .7 f,� ^I`�f�t� +•`: N°. .•r; ., . � CIC
C � ��' "�?�rp!,�� 3 _ s,i � ; ;r x Lf B2 � !i ., . � a. *� , xr^�. fG "V+lkF t AsC • ~ - I
�_ �• �t� r�F r�ti,� .; ;. � r,zm�_ d y�U t.r j�_ s, }I:� �"}Ar r �,. -,�. -.i 'J
s C i' 1 � 901 ;,, �rrti'�s \a �•„ .1 c}. - j •xc;�� _��! --• 1� � .c'A:� .,� !IL' j r�'�'�a� aC. � q, r el � CIC2 �'k+
�l -, 'r .� '�lr•� ! ns, , >w+"$ C�CZ�y ��rrrr rhe � 4 I r .CGQ'� `r Cjp, � V •
� ° y,! �5"Gs '' S , +' Y f• a0 rsti'l:: �+II r f �` � + rm :...�•' . f,\x's �
�-! as +.r e[^ � ,1't/�'�•^��r �°g} FA ti }r-�� ,� 11 , i '. r4 •' � f' - i
Soil Survey Map
w ✓ y �tfr 7�: z ,� �, yi "Ft ti- ;. �%' ° ! Harmony Acres Dairy
f1','cFacility No. 49-89 L
{l,�, �' 'katiR [g;irX � `'rt - �,f'� Y� , d e3-L .'1fs :`n i' -ti � � 0 ti• Lr' c"` � � �'�
hk-
'�^'�` l:tl {'r.-c � Y•�' .. .Cif t.Z 1 r Y a.. _ .J �'. � ��i
i.. �' r � w� i•'i • 4 ''�''•„ ilr: £eft.. 1r 1 Cf $2a � � a _ _
�G � � i� � t �'`- ¢. CsEZ�1 Gp"i' 1 � F11 h� � • � '•4'' }, Y. i+', � r' •5i4a 1 �I� Cip . t +
r (,,+ : � s, d •a;�x; _ " . e:`Z.' ; �'. 'e.+ � P � D r F , ''^�.r- � �•• d` ' G�C''L � "L.
�s,Ls.!` �, �t �?' S �. + e `M. F �}. � ' :' r a"A S •e r . .�, r -f, ui ff���,, j rf•^ h ��.t � .
1i � •r, _ Lv► : , ��. 'age C(� �f '^�" F u � 3 �r � ci +� a� L l' �. � � + �,� t �'' 4 `• �1 } y �--_
an Y, ,� �fQ •- F � ��'�' �'fe � �: .. { {d� +' c: �rbt. 1 Irdr: n Cf$2
•-
osy �'C5E2� . C^ sh ale f • a ur .5 ,} r�i LfC2 +rx r t h r Yf':.
r _r •1 }^ "i C�fOR i S 1??'y-t At! � s, ttK Cs
6�3 ICfD2 + +r(B2 v ktt' a '� r a CfC2.
, .•, tFFS-r'`�,� 1': �` - _ rx s _ t+ _:,'�` A �' s P:, '� klw � r ,ry '}. -,^ - ..•x d y
}s �qi} p G�. C1C2 i 4 5' - •C 3 +� . 3 'x..�c s' rr ,r i,'4 �,',S • Ci$ �i�"
eT1:5 .�ZSL. Y w•hk 1f `^ 1 i 7 s ^� i :.'Y' 1.. �. + N �5$2" 5�' n+ .
Ci r i'-; -" 'N t 4 +�.j �}" x h9 f��is�r .I� _� � s�F'�+��n�• V �� r � 1 C F �' ��y r,yyt S v<� `�s � ASE:+: ems,.%ti - �
��r. r - G R b�� �. '$t �� V��F � [�'' .,'�` n �i:E�rfra v < • + a' -0.. 1, F, 8s `' � 1 � + C T-
�f .� ! 'o<.mhhl,�' sYs•: C4fCnO�x �,!r. � ^IS.� .> >}' ' ~ ,.�_� .!� .''..^Tr`' . f=�' f?l° M ,e��f�l �s ���_ _•�n r ro tClp+$ Js..'•r��i'r�,`.
q �4rC{82ry� p ! µ _ €)Cf$2: 5 ^� 6r a� ffi " :ra:`ar•,.�
C a w 8 �' • r y, F C102
o . 'F• •��, r, cF �-' r F ; , r .dr �% 5 ^ � � � a �,. `' s.Rt / xYdyS .filo t�' 4 ��� r+��i ��iL lCn
2 s r r d yi 4 ak 1 1rs r . Cfc2r
hhapf `f7 s �},j .• CTD CfC2 °'- rLTB2 rr%€'{t '� ;: � i �' 'b .+. k,�a*;.. � �•S w6 g",;„}res .+ � s ": i Ci62 e c .
y tit'` r:� 1 s "�+�'°r "^x`� ;�+ i� � r'4 ii' � lar"' �s� , r ,+ . iigEtiE� r �9 t � � y,-��,•... �1rE � �, '.4 k !'
i ` • , '^ f i�E1�� 11 5y , { eY Lr rt art s 3 ' D3r ? kN A4,5 sA, a 1 s 34w1 ?r �vta a, L.
t`9•
�#� ?1 �p 7wear �+,� r§�•' '. � \�-
y FF-1 �,"it�1� „k• 'rS,J,{�y M..�3"
s �fy :._,� R ate- t, x , n - 9r;� F •5 4, Y a n `L � "
H- r >8 r • 0, 1 spa' .i f 6r; r
a f,.a•}' }'^uS-'..4 �x 1,. i`%'"„+b. CT_C2r+r.-` ^3 }C a ,v.LfC2.?`,..-a•^xr'�,i4
b t K.. ,• cx•^��.y W vr. -^�� - r;.,:+.7 4� _ r�'y^d. -0, LfB2 x �, �r tr �"- " i�fC�'�' i- ✓;" r t;.\
! } � •�?: 0� . �r y ��i � a � /� t f .r", 4�,. . v � ff' i�/'.i.", `+f,r','�t„'iu� .•- r :� '� + r
q,1:t, C+,It.p 63R _ ��'f�` ;'wi ..3* �F �¢'r -i�••5" ..l:isY. ti
cC.i
d„ � +' • �, � .F�. :'" � "� f!`','4• "i' =r > � .r \7- -"' tti ' kF ,r• S lr��t+.«r�r.- - c jai;
LcC3
r- t• r ci - i Yi'F 4 r i � :i"� w � s ��
' + + �� d•vr ° � .���5� . ; ��LfB� S.- ..+ �•i���" \ ;1 ��g 3 '{�+y_ Myyp��`+�`. . O �.,, �f$2. c. � ��,�
-''e �' ' c+ +�• Y f Sr � - - '� e' f � 3`4 f., :G' i { - ;i a I 0 ��, , r� •-, o 'ka
�?. �.. r,..,�� r+ .}��r 4 t - r a *r �' ? r e � ;,krr' tiw �''M..,1 r�;f^ �;i+< , i' n k R •.� ,i�, �,.
fq2• *: _ `•" F, - ,� � ,,: r"'' I,z+"' t J�` i �i` r��[js rr��i's 4th k.ti p"' spr°Ii � �= LfC2 �,G;�t ��
at a. - � CfGt c �'.(t �' .➢" � st, � _. u 4 ,i M '`r �. �+ ., �t '^dr �'s�, CICc •;
l
¢--j i4�r I �r 4s-LFn BY $•�f ri)�,�, I .�a i4 r' -•rit �.s - C+� ¢` trh .1�•k`i�rti i..t,,,sr�4r �,r LfC2' 's'•hi fir. � � !' t- "
fCz;`, CfD� �1 t.ysf`e. •�� sr f F r' �i, 1+' G 4•' _ .! ,.t xl s r LCD3 '�L16 } _ L 7y�tt z i ?' •, • y�yf C
irr f n ^ f F a r + - E• .w tx `k i• G�.I' {"75 r - Y " `` D;rT .r c R t 1 tnt
r _
LIC2 t, � •
� �" � '�`�'� } •�rcSr ktlx .� Cln C2 _ ..,, sr � .f �, lr<. �.� r - - { t�e iSi�' �^ tis+ 71 ,{ �+v
' �fi y s .9 - � '+w r a,.. s' � :['., • t-r y � #, � 'i:i' » S f}�,. �. .a� - .x d♦ is �
Lt92 Lf02r S F� kF1 y X + fG+� fd'. I'f t.11H ss� F'
i, LfBz 1v r
�, •0 0 t *- �.:.;- �}. y::h s ' W�� k _..ti• i k. � lr:�" 4 V _ � �P� , � � is - f� 's.-v-pra_
� 'i ri€ r � �, ;,rs} ^ � § h # i (D2 , •, �- r� .: ��}'' !� S � ,(1 ' �+,yt w,,� {'S�rt C �t3 f�
CcE3
Y "
' .tr 'k CTQ a °: - r fds' r• f a s th r`
C2 Lf D2 r, �•; ::.G !LG r - t ` � � . V ✓ r 4a - +j _ s r
s;r � �� a �, y�2' .CfC''` � e:� r L F ^'' Asir �€ rti '• + 3,y C� 1 kT`rf �
}-• 'Lc r. yrr. -r t :- rr Cyy Cj r 1. FI' ' I r �t � i s tf,3� "�'�C •
f•� ,j� , �,Lta2 \ fir: s '� sCz� _ ,+- :: Sh+ - �•,. Y ,= •7�* d } „rye r
r • U Q3 � ;,3 ' n v r, t � ,'.'L! , � ,`�;,i S • •; r _ � � y<` �� ,xi�!'"T.
41
UB:rie�`�
(loins sheet 20) ;�,

EET NUMBER 15 Soil Survey Map

CAROLINA — SHEET NUI,/,BER 16
Soil Survey Map
Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility No. 49-89
WU
iL
mdc2 6
X

WA,
,fC2,WL/;411
W." Idxlk.v
(Joins sheet 8)
CIC2
.�, 4
Lf C2
IREDLLL
Soil Survey Map
rmolly Acres Dairy
.1.
n.,
1.Xp Ha
Facility No. 49-89
I
C'EET. ,411-
�
C:
Gw
Icz
t
O'N .fD "'
CgI62
mo
CIG"
V
UC
(Joins sheef 76)
c1c
WC2
r
12
Cf
CIC2
.�, 4
Lf C2
IREDLLL
Soil Survey Map
rmolly Acres Dairy
.1.
n.,
1.Xp Ha
Facility No. 49-89
I
C'EET. ,411-
�
C:
Gw
Icz
t
O'N .fD "'
CgI62
mo
CIG"
V
UC
(Joins sheef 76)

(loins sheet 3)
(Joins sheet 4)
(Joins sheet 12 )
(Joins sheet 1 t J

0 • •
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checkfist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production I Vegetative or wooded buffers
L� Recommended best management practices
Y( Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces d//Promote drying with proper ventilation
M' Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial Mr"Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks
Partial microbial
decomposition
❑
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or
Partial microbial
0
Bottom or raid -level loading
basin surface
decomposition
❑
Tank covers
• Mixing while filling
❑
Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying
❑
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
❑
Agitate only prior to manure removal
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
•� Partial microbial T
❑
Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces
decomposition
❑
Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
Y • Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or Agitation when spreading 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader Volatile gas emissions I?ash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets [;� Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC -November 11, 1996, page I

i
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Cheddist
_ Source
Cause
❑
BMPs to Minimize Odor _ Site Specific Practices
^
Uncovered manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
• Agitation during sump tank
L1
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
filling and drawdown
G20"Proven
biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
Flush tank covers
lagoon
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emission
❑
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain
• Agitation during wastewater
❑
Box covers
collection or junction
conveyance
boxes
Lift stations
• Agitation during sump tank
❑
Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at
• Agitation during wastewater
❑
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emission
❑
Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing
❑
Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation
❑
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
❑
Minimum agitation when pumping
❑
Mechanical aeration
❑
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler !
• High pressureagitation❑
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles
. Wind drift
❑
Minimum recommended operating procedure
❑
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
❑
Pump from second -stage lagoon
❑
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2

0 0 •
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals a Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water a Improper drainage 2' Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities a Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto a Poorly maintained access Or Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System ---Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU--BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension

i • •
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Svstems
Flush gutters + Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
❑ Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids ❑ Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation a Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svstems
Feeders • Feed spillage IJ Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
lY( Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10 -
day interval during summer; 15- to 30 -day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page l

Insect Control Cheddist for Animal Operations
Source Cause
BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed
Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
�/�'roducts)
C>a Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed Stora a as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
M/ Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needd _
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal
® Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes
7- to 10 -day interval during summer; 15- to 30 -day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
m Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
19 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Mortality Management Methods
40 (check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 .feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
5Any method which nl the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
•
0 December 18, 1996

�p :ED
I U14 Clan, Uffl...", a
N ��
Oil
CATEGORY
EXAMPLES
ACTION
CONTACTS
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
Sheriff — 704-878-3180
full or partial loss of a Waste
property, contact 911 or Sheriff's Dept.
Storage Pond wall resulting in a
release of waste
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704-878-
problem, time of spill, phone number for
5353
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor — Brent Galliher Grading
373 E. Memorial Hwy
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
704-546-5521
contain the waste on the farm
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
4. Contact the technical specialist who
certified the Waste Storage Pond
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-663-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or After Hours Emergency at 919-733-
from base or sidewalls of Waste
3942
Storage Pond; waste discharging
from underground tiles
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
2. Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
Failure to immediately address
reinforce weak area of structure until a
Local Contractor — Brent Galliher Grading
these may result in complete
technical specialist can assess situation
704-546-5521
structural failure
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as for "Impending Threat" category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
Lack of Storage
Anticipated single stoma events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker

Waste Storage Overflow
* Add soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam
* Pump wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate
* Stop all additional flow to the
lagoon (waterers)
* Call a pumping contractor
* Make sure no surface water
is entering lagoon
Runoff From Waste
Application Field
* Immediately stop waste
application
* Create a temporary diversion
or berm to contain the waste
on the field
* Incorporate waste to reduce
further runoff
Leakage From Waste
Distribution System
Stop recycle (flushing
system) pump
* Stop irrigation pump
* Close valves to eliminate
further discharge
* Separate pipes to create an
air gap and stop flow
Leakage From Base or
Sidewall of Storage Pond
* Dig a small well or ditch to
catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
back into Waste Storage Pond
* If holes are caused by
burrowing animals, trap or
remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type
soil
* Other holes may be likewise
temporarily plugged with clay
soil
0 0 401

Operation and Maintenance Pian
for a
Waste Management System
Prepared for
Harmony Acres Dairy Farm
Iredell County, North Carolina
i
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
and
USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service
March 2003
0

0
Table of Contents
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
System Overview .................... .
Waste Storage Ponds ................ .
Milking Parlor WasteWater piping .................
Waste Hauling System ...................
Clean Water Collection and Piping System .................
Concrete Curbs .. I ......................
Vegetated Diversion ......................... .
Livestock Exclusion ........................
Filter Area Planting ............................. .
Stock Trails ..............................
General Comments ................... I ..........
Additional Considerations and Responsibilities ........
3
4
5
5
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
9
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN 13
Odor Control Checklist 15
Insect Control Checklist .............................. 18
Mortality Checklist .................. 20
2

SYSTEM OVERVIEW
• This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following major
components:
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPING
3. WASTE HANDLING EQUIPMENT
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
5. FILTER AREA FOR LOUNGING AREAS
and the following associated components
6. CONCRETE CURBS
7. VEGETATED DIVERSION
8. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
9. FILTER AREA PLANTING
10. STOCK TRAILS
All waste is scraped from the lots and freestall barns and stored in the WASTE
STORAGE POND. Waste is hauled from the WASTE STORAGE POND and
spread at agronomic rates. The WASTE STORAGE POND are designed to
. provide storage for the wastes produced by 120 milk cows 20 dry cows and 45
Bred Heifers.
Also, contaminated runoff flows into the WASTE STORAGE POND. The waste
storage pond is designed to provide storage for normal runoff from the drainage
areas and waste water from the milk barn and provide storage space for the
twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm runoff from the drainage areas.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of
Animal Waste Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year,
twenty-four (24) hour storm, as required under the Non -discharge regulations.
Runoff from lounging areas and small feed areas is diverted through 100' or
greater of vegetated filter area. Vegetated filter areas are located below
lounging areas near freestall barns and all gravel heavy use areas.
0

1. WASTE STORAGE POND
• OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store manure, runoff and
wastewater. Additional storage space is included to contain the twenty-five (25)
year, twenty-four (24) hour storm runoff from the feedlot. A post will be installed
with the level of the top of post indicating the level of storage available prior to
infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity. The WASTE STORAGE
POND consists of earthen dams and concrete push offs for discharging
contaminated water and manure into the structures.. The maximum storage
level below the emergency spillway elevation is shown below for the pond. The
design storage period is also shown.
OPERATION
The service life of the WASTE STORAGE POND will be determined by the level
of management for the entire system. Once the manure and bedding materials
. have reached the WASTE STORAGE POND, how effectively the waste is
agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the WASTE
STORAGE POND.
i
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WASTE
STORAGE POND. Poor management will result in the rapid accumulation of
solids, which will reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to
the point that some form of dredging will be required. If a large volume of solid
waste is allowed to wash from the lot and/or if inadequate agitation is performed,
this dredging operation could be required in a very short period of time.
4
Max. level below ESW
Design Storage Period
Pond at Milk Cow Freestall
Barn
1.3
120 days
OPERATION
The service life of the WASTE STORAGE POND will be determined by the level
of management for the entire system. Once the manure and bedding materials
. have reached the WASTE STORAGE POND, how effectively the waste is
agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the WASTE
STORAGE POND.
i
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WASTE
STORAGE POND. Poor management will result in the rapid accumulation of
solids, which will reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to
the point that some form of dredging will be required. If a large volume of solid
waste is allowed to wash from the lot and/or if inadequate agitation is performed,
this dredging operation could be required in a very short period of time.
4

MAINTENANCE
• The concrete in the WASTE STORAGE POND should be inspected periodically
for major cracks. Vegetation on the dams should be inspected periodically and
reseeded as needed to maintain a vigorous stand. The dams should be mowed
at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place
only when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a
height of less than four (4) inches at any time. See FILTER AREA PLANTING
for further maintenance requirements. Any evidence of sloughing or seepage
should be reported to the lredell Soil & Water Conservation District office.
2. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPING
OVERVIEW
The milking parlor wastewater piping consists of a pipe from the milking parlor to
the waste storage pond.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the pipe components for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or
replace as needed. Inspect the structure regularly and remove accumulated
solids.
3. WASTE HAULING EQUIPMENT
OVERVIEW
The waste hauling equipment consists of tanks for slurry manure. Slurry tanks
are loaded with an agitator pump system. Sand/Manure accumulations will be
remove from pond by mechanical loading on side slinger manure spreaders and
spread on application areas.
OPERATION
Manure spreading should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full
storage level marker in the waste storage pond. When the liquid level in the
WASTE STORAGE POND reaches the marker, liquids must be removed by
spreader tank for land application. Do not spread in such a manner as to cause
runoff or erosion. Do not spread on frozen or saturated soils.
0

iThe initial step in each spreading operation is to properly agitate the waste in the
waste storage pond.
MAINTENANCE
Soil tests the application fields annually. Vegetation in the fields should be
inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand.
Fields may also need to be limed and fertilized annually.
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
Clean water collection and piping consists of piping clean water under stock trails
and diverting clean water around lounging and feedlot areas and waste storage
ponds.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the components of the CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING
SYSTEM annually for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as
needed. Inspect annually and remove accumulated sediment.
0

0
5. CONCRETE CURBS
OVERVIEW
The concrete curbs constructed around the feedlots and freestall barns are
required to divert water and waste into waste storage ponds.
MAINTENANCE
The concrete should be inspected periodically for major cracks.
6. VEGETATED DIVERSION
OVERVIEW
VEGETATED DIVERSIONS are located above the WASTE STORAGE POND
and will convey non -contaminated runoff around the structures. Diversions will
also be located around the feed areas to divert clean water.
MAINTENANCE
• The vegetation in the diversion should be inspected periodically and reseeded as
needed to insure a vigorous stand. It is essential that neither vehicles nor
livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within the diversion. The diversion
should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. The diversion may
be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take
place only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or
mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches. If sedimentation has reduced the
capacity of the channel, contact the lredell Soil and Water Conservation District
for technical assistance in correcting this problem. See FILTER AREA
PLANTING for further maintenance requirements.

i
7. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION is installed at locations as indicated on plan maps.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or rot.
If fencing wire becomes loose, re -tighten. If fence posts are rotted or damaged
in any way, replace damaged posts.
8. FILTER AREA PLANTING
OVERVIEW
FILTER AREA PLANTING applies to seeding 1 00'of grass below the lounging
areas and seeding diversions.
MAINTENANCE
• Soil samples should be taken at least once per year. Fertilizer and lime should
be applied at the rates recommended as a result of the soil test. Fertilizer and
lime should be applied either during September -October or February -March.
Vegetation should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a
vigorous stand.
The filter area may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing
operations must take place only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should
not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches. All FILTER
AREA PLANTING should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth.
-Mowing operations must take place only when the soil is dry and vegetation
should not be mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any time. Do not
mow cool season grasses during periods when plants are showing signs of
drought stress.
The number of cattle allowed on lounging area/pastures is critical to success of
the filter areas. Cattle housed exclusively on pasture should be limited to a lower
stocking rate during wet winter months. A stocking rate of 4 cows per acre
during the winter is suggested as an acceptable rate. Actual stocking rate
should be based on how well vegetation is maintained in pasture especially near
• drainage ways.

9. STOCK TRAILS
0 OVERVIEW
Stock trails are located as indicated on plan maps.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the stock trails periodically for damage and wear. If gravel layer
becomes thin, gravel shall be replaced to maintain a minimum of 4" of cover over
the filter cloth. Manure accumulations in broad-based dips on stock trail shall be
removed at regular intervals to prevent overtopping.
GENERAL COMMENTS
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable
vegetation, especially that of the filter area, diversion and dam, is not adversely
affected. It is a violation of law to use any pesticide in a manner not permitted by
. its labeling. To protect yourself, never apply any pesticide in a manner or for a
purpose other than as instructed on the label or in labeling accompanying the
pesticide product that you purchase. Do not ignore the instructions for use of
protective clothing and devices and for storage and disposal of pesticide wastes,
including containers.
REPAIRS
Notify the lredell Soil and Water conservation District if repairs or major
modifications are required for any of the components of this Waste Management
System.
Additional Considerations and Requirements
The collection, treatment and storage facilities shall be properly
maintained and operated at all times; this also includes the land
application equipment and sites.
2. A suitable vegetative cover shall be maintained on all land application
sites and buffers in accordance with the Waste Utilization Plan. No waste
may be applied on fields not approved by or prepared in accordance with
a the Waste Utilization Plan.

3. An acceptable pH of the soil shall be maintained on all land application
. sites to insure an optimum yield for the crop(s) being grown.
4. The plant available nitrogen (PAN) application rates and hydraulic loading
rates identified in the Waste Utilization Plan shall not be exceeded.
5. Application of animal waste on land which is used to grow crops for direct
human consumption (e.g., strawberries, melons, lettuce, cabbage, etc.)
shall not occur within 30 days prior to or during the planting of the crop or
at any time during the growing season, or in the case of fruit bearing
trees, 30 days prior to breaking dormancy. For fiber and food crops,
which undergo further processing, application of animal waste shall not
occur within 30 days of harvesting. If waste is to be applied to bare soil,
the waste shall be incorporated into the soil within 24 hours after the
application on land.
6. Domestic wastewater from showers, toilets, etc. shall not be discharged
into the animal waste management system. Wash vats required to be
connected to the animal waste management system by the Grade A
Pasteurized Milk Ordinance Part 11, Section 7, Item 5r are exempt from
this requirement. Wash -down of stock trailers owned by and used on the
dairy only will be permissible as long as the design accommodates the
additional wastewater and as long as detergents and disinfectants are
used which have been labeled as readily biodegradable by the
manufacturer.
7. Disposal of dead animals shall be done in accordance with the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) regulations and the Waste
Utilization Plan.
8. Grazing of animals on application sites shall be controlled in accordance
with USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service Standards.
9. Solid materials such as, but not limited to, bottles, gloves, syringes, silo
covers or any other solid waste from the dairy operation shall be
prevented from entering the waste management system and shall be
disposed of properly.
10. The facility must have either adequate animal waste application and
handling equipment on site, a lease for the use of necessary equipment, a
contract with a third party applicator or a contract for the purchase of the
equipment. In all cases, the equipment must be capable of applying the
waste on sites specified in the Waste Utilization Plan and at rates not to
. exceed agronomic and hydraulic loading for the sites.
10

11. Animal waste shall not be applied to wetlands or surface water or shall not
. reach wetlands or surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances (pipes or ditches), direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste, which
reaches surface water, is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to the
assessment of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation by the
Division of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
12. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding at less than 5 tons per
acres per year. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding at 5 or more
tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen. When animal waste is to be applied on
acres subject flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation -tilled crops or grassland, the
waste may be broadcast, provided the application does not occur during a
season prone to flooding.
14. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water.
This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided
40 adequate vegetative filter strips are present.
15. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
16. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet to dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
17. Waste shall not be applied on other property or public right-of-ways.
18. Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
19. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils
shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excess levels. Soil test and waste analysis records shall
be kept for 5. years.
20. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate. No ponding shall occur.
0

21. Records of waste application shall be maintained to establish actual
• application rates. The records will include date of application, amount of
waste applied per acre by tract number and field number, most recent
waste analysis and soil test report, and the realistic yield expectation
(RYE) nitrogen rate. Waste application records shall be maintained for 5
years.
0
22. Proper calibration of application equipment should be done to ensure
uniformity and accuracy of spreading rates.
23. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should be
considered also.
24. It is the responsibility of the owner of the dairy to secure an update of the
waste utilization plan when there is a change in the operation, number of
animals (increase), method of utilization or available land.
12

•
HARMONY ACRES FARM
WAYNE SMITH
& JAMES GALLIHER
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION: LOCATED HYW got near
Harmony
LONGITUDE - o80°45'29.0" W
LATITUDE - 035057'07.9" N
JOB CLASS: III
DAIRY SIZE: Milk Cows — 120
Dry Cows — 20
Heifers — 45
Day old to 200 lbs -- 15
Other heifers and cows are confined to pastures away from
the main barn facilities.
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel -Bingham, Ci J1 Etgineer
APPROVED BY: L 2C
: t DATE:
This -revision on May 5, 2003 increases cow numbers on the
farm.
r:

0
•
•
INDEX
I. Waste Production
II. Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
B. Heifer Housing
C. Clean Water Exclusion
D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
E. Waste Utilization
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 120 day period
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
5. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
6. Waste Volume
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
V. Lounging Areas, Heavy Use Areas and Filter Areas
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrient Content
VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan

Appendix
Copy of USGS Map showing Site Location
Aerial Photo
Old Waste Storage Pond Design, Filed in FIELD OFFICE
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dam
Drainage Area l�
Operation and Maintenance Planf
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Drawings
Plan View
Curb Detail
0
I of 2
2 of 2

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Production
120 milk cows, 20 dry cows, 45 bred heifers and 15 day
old to 200 lb heifers are housed on Harmony Acres Dairy
farm. Manure, milking parlor wash water and polluted runoff
are stored in a Waste Storage Pond constructed in 1984.
Manure is presently truck hauled to cropland and hay fields.
All other heifers and cows are pastured on other parts
of the farm.
Cattle are fed in a concrete feedlot. Some freestalls
are available at barn. A lounging.area located behind
milking facilities is used every day.
Day old calves to 200 lb calves are housed in calf
hutches near freestall barn and milking facilities.
II. Waste Management objective
The system will economically as possible handle all the
waste described above in a manner that does not degrade air,
soil or water resources. The system will prevent discharge
of pollutants to surface and ground water by recycling waste
through'soil and plants.
The following design and plans are required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A waste storage pond is located near the feedlot and
freestall barn. Waste from the milk herd, dry cows, and
bred heifers is collected in the waste storage pond. The
storage period is based on current cow numbers and drainage
area.
The pond is emptied by truck haul.
B. Heifer Housing
All heifers other than bred heifers are on .other parts
of the farm.
C. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water is excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage pond to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering are used where practical.
0

D. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Livestock are fenced out of the waste storage pond.
Fencing creates 100 ft. vegetative filters below lounging
areas. The filters infiltrate part of the first flush and
filter sediment and organic particles. The filter also
provides a place to dump clean water around the farmstead.
E. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land is available to properly spread waste
at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains air,
soil and water resources. Waste application is based on
soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan has been
prepared.
F. operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner is responsible for operating and maintaining
the system. An operation plan is attached.
0
0

Try 4 months:
November through February Surface Runoff Depth = 7.8"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 2.58"
Surface Runoff=7.8"* 15,453 sq ft = 10,045 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= "* 2,000 sq ft = 430 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
14.31 minus 6.7 = 7.6" = Use 0.8 ft/4 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4-91" * 17,453 sq ft = 7,141 cu ft
12"/ft
III.
Waste Storage
Pond
for Manure, Milking
Parlor Wash
.
Water and Polluted
Runoff
A.
Design Volumes
1.
Normal Runoff
for
120 day
period
Use average runoff
values
in Ag. Waste
Management Field
Manual
for Iredell
County.
Mac
Edgerton measured
lot area
in November, 1997.
Drainage
area checked on
aerial map in
May
2003.
Drainage Area
= 17,453
sq
ft Surface =
15,453 sq ft
Unsurface
= 2,000 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH RAINFALL
%
DEPTH
o DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20 0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25 0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24 1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25 0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23 0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27 1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26 1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31 1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32 1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30 1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25 0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23 0.87
1.7
Try 4 months:
November through February Surface Runoff Depth = 7.8"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 2.58"
Surface Runoff=7.8"* 15,453 sq ft = 10,045 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= "* 2,000 sq ft = 430 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
14.31 minus 6.7 = 7.6" = Use 0.8 ft/4 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4-91" * 17,453 sq ft = 7,141 cu ft
12"/ft

0
•
C�
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = 5 ft
5. Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.0 ft
6. Waste Volume
Milk Herd
120 milk cows are typically on the lot area
approximately 75% of time. The estimated manure collected
is 75%.
Volume = 120 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 120 days * 75%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 20,214 cu ft
Dry Cows
20 dry cows are typically on feed area 50% of time.
The estimated manure collected is 500.
Volume = 20 cows * L * 120 days * 5096
7.48 gal/cu ft
2,246 cu ft
Large Heifers
45 bred heifers are typically on feed area 50% of time.
The estimated manure collected is 50%.
Volume = 45 heifers * IQ gal/may/cow * 120 days * 50%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 3,610 cu ft
Total = 20,214 + 2,246'+ 3,610 = 26,070 cu ft
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water 100 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 100 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water 150 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water 50 gal./day
400 gal./day
Volume = 400 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
= 9,626 cu ft

B.
Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
10,045
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
430
cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
7,141
cu
ft
4.
Manure
26,070
cu
ft
S.
Wash water
9,626
cu
ft
TOTAL
53,312
Cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
0.8 ft
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5 ft
B.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
Stage
1.0 ft-
tTOTAL
TOTAL
2.3 ft
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
AS BUTLT� Volume
112.8' X 103'
& 1.5:1\ 110.0 /2.243 :1
• 55' X 55'
Volume = 10.0/6[55' * 55' + 102 * 94' + 4(78.5'*74.5)]
= 60,010 cu ft Close Enough
Some storage available for sand accumulations in waste pond.
Normal Pump Out Volume =
10,045 + 430 + 26,070 + 9,626 + 0.8 * 113* 103
55,482 cu ft per 120 days
= 168,758 cu ft per year
= 1,262,000 gal per year or 421 - 3000 gallon loads
Maximum pond level
0.5' + 1.0' + 7,141 cu ft/(103' * 931)
2.3' below top of dam elev. or 1.3 below ESW
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage volume. This
elevation is 2.3 below the top of dam elevation of the pond.
The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.0 foot below
the top of dam elevation.
r -I
L

0
0
•
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions are constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot. Diversions are designed to carry
the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store some
sediment. See drawing.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Heavy Use Areas, and Filter areas
The heavy use areas consist of 9" of compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. Runoff from
heavy use areas and lounging areas will be directed across
well maintained grass sod. Vegetated filters shall be
maintained between lounging areas and drainage ways.
Filters shall be 100 ft wide. Swells or diversions shall be
constructed and maintained along fence lines to kick water
into filters at frequent intervals.
Milk Cows, Dry Cows and Bred Heifers
Cattle have access to lounging area located behind the
freestall barn. Vegetative filters at least 100' wide will
be maintained below the lounging areas. See drawing
attached.
A heavy use area, 45' X 45' is constructed at upper
corner of lounging area to feed hay. Runoff from heavy use
area flows through a grass filter. A heavy use area, 100' X
12.51, is constructed at entrance of feedlot and milking
parlor. A grass filter is established below this heavy use
area.
Milk cows are fenced from grass filters, farm pond and
the stream. Two water tanks are installed at barn to water
cattle.
A culvert type stream crossing will be located on the
stream below the farm pond.

VI. Waste Utilization Plan
0 A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for herd will be stored in a waste storage pond
for approximately 4 months and is truck hauled.
During the course of one year, this facility will store
1,262,000 gallons per year of slurry waste. Daily scraping
of waste is required to move the waste into the storage
facility.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off from the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from heavy use areas and lounging areas will be
diverted through 100' vegetative filter areas. Grass sods
will be maintained all year round. Weeds may require
chemical control or periodic bush hogging. See plan map.
C. Nutrient Content
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
. and manure analysis.
a. Waste Storage Pond
TOTAL NIIT$IFNTS nISpnSAL LOSSFS
(nutrient availability)
N 20,086 lbs. 0.44 8,838 lbs.
P205 12,593 lbs. 0.70 8,815 lbs.
K20 18,921 lbs. 0.70 13,245 lbs.
7.0 lbs per 1000 gal
VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage pond and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
Before the waste storage pond reaches a point 2.3 ft.
below the top of the dam or 1.3 ft below ESW, the storage
pond shall be emptied. A post will be set with its top at
this elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage pond shall be mowed
annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be checked
. and repaired as required.

U. S. Department of Agri(Allturc
Soil Conservation Service
• HAZARD CLAiSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner County
Community or Group No.- Conservation Plan.No.
9
NC -ENG -34
September 1980
File Code: 210
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam— /;-z Ft. Length. of Flood Pool /,/,� Ft.
Date of Field Ha4-Lard-Investigaticn__,.�-/.'et,�p.;
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Describe Potential fcr loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach
17
Hazard Classif icatic;,r- of lliqii b, c) (see MEM -Part 520.21)
Dam Classfficaticn ill, TV, kf)--
Byr
(name (title
Concurred
NOTE'. I or ra".'ar',e S!,:10
Date
Date_ 3-'6
Est Elev. :Est. Elevation
Kind of
:Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length;
Width: Slope-..
!.arid Jse Improvements
Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft,
Ft.
F Ft.
77,
No i
2
-7
3
Describe Potential fcr loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach
17
Hazard Classif icatic;,r- of lliqii b, c) (see MEM -Part 520.21)
Dam Classfficaticn ill, TV, kf)--
Byr
(name (title
Concurred
NOTE'. I or ra".'ar',e S!,:10
Date
Date_ 3-'6

:•
o
40
uyne Smith
Da Wr"Ially Acres Dairy
ge Area
UnsurfaCe area
Surface Ar Around Aond
ea - 15,453 sq ft 2,000 sq
0 40
sa
-
-r-Qie I"
40

Waste Utilization Plan
Harmony Acres Dairy
Iredell County
WATEO p ALITY E D
ON
APR 1 u 2000
Non -Discharge pemtiiting
Waste utilization plans (WUP) are designed to protect water and air quality. There must be a
balance between amount of waste nutrients applied and crop utilization. Land application of
organic waste from agricultural operations at agronomic rates is a proven way to insure
environmental protection.
The WUP has been designed for a given storage capacity. When the manure level in the waste
storage pond reaches this level, it must be land applied in order to insure protection of surface
and/or ground waters.
The waste utilization plan for Harmony Acres Dairy is based on the following:
The waste utilization plan for Harmony Acres Farm is developed using 120 milking cows
contributing to the waste storage pond. The storage pond is designed for 125 cows and 180 days
storage. They will need to apply 464,940 gallons (4649 Lbs. N) manure slurry two times per
year. Their crop rotation is corn silage, followed by small grain and doubled cropped soybeans.
They have several fields of orchardgrass hay. The orchardgrass is left for 3 to 5 years and then
brought into the crop rotation of corn, wheat, and soybeans and then another field will be
established in orchardgrass. They have a field or two in alfalfa that does not receive manure.
i Once the alfalfa is taken out of production the field is then put into the row crop rotation and
another field will be rotated into alfalfa. Most of the acreage in the farm is in strip cropping.
The manure slurry will be applied to corn, small grain, orchardgrass for hay and fescue pasture.
The predominant soil series are Cecil fine sandy loam, CfB2; that is well drained on gently
rolling slopes of 2 to 6 percent; Lloyd fine sandy loam, LfB2, that is well drained on gently
rolling slopes of 2 to 6 percent; and Madison gravelly fine sandy loam, MdB2, that is well
drained on gently rolling slopes of 2 to 6 percent. All these soils are well adapted for manure
application. There are areas in some of the fields that are 6 to 10 percent slope but are not the
predominant soil series and will not present a problem in manure application.
The fields that will receive cow manure will be highlighted in yellow and set backs will be
highlighted in green. Fields that have several houses near them have been eliminated from
application. All fields will be outlined in red. Note: The alfalfa fields will be highlighted but will
not receive manure slurry. All fields meet the setback restrictions for manure application
.` contained in the attached NRCS required specifications.
i l
ti Harmony Acres owns their manure tanks and Larry Galliher leases them a pump.
Amount of manure slurry produced per year:
K ,;, 120 cows x 7749 gallons/cow = 929,880 gallons /year

Page 2
Amount of Nitrogen produced per year:
Waste Analysis (NRCS standard) contains 10 lbs N/1000 gallons
929,880alg lons produced x 10 lbs. N/gal. = 9299 Lbs. N per year
1000
Table 1
Application for Small Grain Silage
Soil
RYE
PAN/
PAN
Month
Tract
Field
Acres
Tyne
tons/ac
acre
utilized
to Apply*
244
TW2
22
CfB2
11
132
2,904
Sept. to Mar.
1W3
12.4
CfB2
11
132
1,637
Sept. to Mar.
245
TW 1
24
CM2
11
132
3,168
Sept. to Mar.
3995
HA6
22
CfB2
11
132
2,904
Sept. to Mar.
5246
T1
5
CfC2
10
120
600
Sept. to Mar.
T2
15
CfB2
11
132
1,980
Sept. to Mar.
5262
HAI
14.8
CfB2
11
132
1,954
Sept. to Mar.
HA2
12
CfB2
11
132
1,584
Sept. to Mar.
HA3
7
CfC2
10
120
1.200
Sept. to Mar.
HA4
15
MdB2
8
96
1,440
Sept. to Mar.
HA5
10
MdC2
7
84
840
Sept. to Mar.
HA7
15
CfB2
11
132
1,980
Sept. to Mar.
HA8
10
CfB2
11
132
1,320
Sept. to Mar.
8427
M1
16.7
LfB2
11
132
2204
Sept. to Mar.
M3
4.7
CfB2
11
132
620
Sept. to Mar.
M4
11
CfB2
11
132
1,452
Sept. to Mar.
M5
6.6
LfC2
10
120
792
Sept. to Mar.
M7
8.2
CfB2
11
132
1082
Sept. to Mar.
M8
5.9
LfB2
11
132
779
Sept. to Mar.
M11
15
CfB2
11
132
1,980
Sept. to Mar.
Total PAN utilized
32,420
*Manure not to applied January to Feb. 15
Table
3
Application for Corn Silage
Soil
RYE
PAN/
PAN
Month
Tract
Field
Acres
Type
tons/ac
acre
utilized
to Apply*
244
TW2
22
CfB2
21
252
5,544
Sept. to Mar.
TW3
12.4
CM2
21
252
3,125
Sept. to Mar.
245
TW 1
24
CfB2
21-
252
6,048
Sept. to Mar.
3995
HA6
22
CfB2
21
252
5,544
Sept. to Mar.
5246
T1
5
CfC2
19
228
1,140
Sept. to Mar.
T2
15
CfB2
21
252
3,780
Sept. to Mar.
5262
HAI
14.8** CfB2
21
252
3,730
Sept. to Mar.
HA2
12
CfB2
21
252
3,024
Sept. to Mar.
HA3
7
CfC2
19
228
4,332
Sept. to Mar.
HA4
15
MdB2
17
204
3,468
Sept. to Mar.

Page 3
HA5
10
MdC2
15
180
1,800
Sept. to Mar.
HA7
15
CfB2
21
252
3,825
Sept. to Mar.
HA8
10**
CfB2
21
252
2,520
Sept. to Mar.
8427
MI
16.7
LfB2
21
252
4,208
Sept. to Mar.
M3
4.7
CfB2
21
252
1,184
Sept. to Mar.
M4
1 I
CfB2
21
252
2,772
Sept. to Mar.
M5
6.6
LfC2
21
252
1,663
Sept. to Mar.
M7
8.2
CfB2
21
252
2,066
Sept. to Mar.
M8
5.9
UB2
21
252
1,487
Sept. to Mar.
M11
15
CfB2
21
252
3,780
Sept. to Mar.
Total PAN
utilized
65,040
Table
4
Application for Orchardgrass Hay*
Soil
RYE
PAN/
PAN
Month
Tract
Field
Acres
Tyne
tons/acre
acre
utilized
to apply
244
TW2
22
CfB2
4.0
200
4,400
Aug. to May
TW3
12.4
CfB2
4.0
200
2,480
Aug. to May
245
TW 1
24
CfB2
4.0
200
4,800
Aug. to May
3995
HAI
22
CfB2
4.0
200
4,400
Aug. to May
5246
T 1
5
CfC2
3.5
I75
875
Aug. to May
T2
15
CfB2
4.0
200
3,000
Aug. to May
5262
HAI
14.8** CfB2
4.0
200
2,960
Aug. to May
HA2
12
CfB2
4.0
200
2,400
Aug. to May
HA3
7
CfC2
3.5
175
1,225
Aug. to May
HA4
15
MdB2
3.0
150
2,250
Aug. to May
HA5
10
MdC2
2.5
125
1,250
Aug. to May
HA7
15
CM2
4.0
200
3,000
Aug. to May
HAS
10**
CfB2
4.0
200
2,000
Aug. to May
8427
M 1
16.7
LfB2
4.0
200
3,340
Aug. to May
M3
4.7
CfB2
4.0
200
940
Aug. to May
M4
11
CfB2
4.0
200
2,200
Aug. to May
M5
6.6
LfC2
3.5
175
1,155
Aug. to May
M7
8.2
CfB2
4.0
200
1,640
Aug: to May
M8
5.9
LfB2
4.0
200
1,180
Aug. to May
M11
15
CfB2
4.0
200
3,000
Aug. to May
Total PAN
utilized
48,495

Page 4
Table 4
32,420-
Application for Fescue Pasture
23,121 PAN Deficit
Corn Silage
65,040-
Soil
RYE
PAN/
PAN
Month
Tract Field
Acres
Type
tons/acre
acre
utilized
to apply
5262 HA10
12.7
CfB2
4.5
169
2,146
Aug. to Apr.
HA9
23.8
MdC2
2.5
94
2,237
Aug. to Apr.
HA 11
4.1
CfB2
4.5
169
693
Aug. to Apr.
HA13
8.9
MdC2
2.5
94
423
Aug. to Apr.
HA14
2.0
MdC2
2.5
94
188
Aug. to Apr.
HA 12
30.8
CsC2
4.0
150
4,620
Aug. to Apr.
Total PAN utilized
10,739
Amount of Nitrogen deficit
Small Grain Silage
32,420-
9,299 =
23,121 PAN Deficit
Corn Silage
65,040-
9,299 =
55,741 PAN Deficit
Orchardgrass Hay
48,495-
9,299 =
39,196 PAN Deficit
Fescue Pasture
10,739-
9,299 =
1,440 PAN Deficit
The crop tables are written so that any field can be in corn silage, small grain silage or
orchardgrass hay any year. The PAN deficit shows that they could apply manure to pastures only
and utilize all the nitrogen. They will have to supplement all crops with commercial nitrogen.
The fields that receive manure will have commercial nitrogen recorded on Form SLR2. All other
fields will not have to have nitrogen recorded.
F9 R-0'::Tff J
FACILITY OWNERS
J. Ben Knox
NCDA Regional Agronomist
Wayo Smith
DATE -3/
Amended
DATE -D

-oo-I
IL
MCI

s. �a.�, `..ti_ - ....:' '^ ��• • •_ -. �'^�`-�a 1'f4f•rf ••f�•�. :4',f��y l� `'...wNFr� yy'--�� - -�.
:,�'•.' �� y�_u�i�.yv�_ •. 'S !""• � .. ^ r►• :' J: w•:' N �: may, '{.« r 4.�� rR.� �.
�.� 'stir y.. ��g �� S�a i `i ,�+4 .i• ..
.• meq• r{ 1�/�'. �. 1 *_�� y` /) Q �/ .A,•. i.
�r {, �'^� �1 ' L yY.i„�r_/[ r•l' I 1� ...,\\\WWW...•••iii... rr..►�.
�,' r r- �, /. ,�1 1 Yam �"�'• ��{�t „~ �- ` "��•• r
rr � � :, a .,E��, �, �".,i�. . _'1 .` � w••
let
7;i.`� .S;i•� �t -4 .+ q�.-�,S;�x.,. r.,. ...rr,� a -• � �y t.^'` -` -
j 4f . ; '� 11f3., w +"C+.=f a • �•a ,fin „ri ,i
1r �,.• z �. �. + ,y'*r" LM,',.a r #.. i .:. ?M.'.-.rt•'-�
NK
��-.f' 1 .'pllu. n,' `'� ter.. ✓,4.f w .kyr jsea
:��*^n
­ JdL
qprl .7i
t� `�. y'• �h . n t. - 1� r_ 'ir�'r�.�yC,�M��:n���"' � �:" `4. ,s; ' �" i�
• '`1. ' �,` � 1s, n \ _ � 'Itis.:. •.':n-�:r. {•` i'h2~^." '•�4,.?+��1 -� -fir � v
..^" �'iir Y � ' {"�l) � �� i, �ti.�rs.•s.•.:.`w- ��,,• •y, � /��-%J �x ��� .�vai�nF r.•'r
I'-� . `i� 7 L,t� u"�,• ��.s '� -, <h qr•. 'Y'.�c f `i �� AJ
FR �• "r:[•'� +e+'.
S: + • ti v ,y CXTL. i,_Y.l r ' L1 v S -.N' • ,+rL �. i, . `- ..�f f'My —06
+ I+'L� - =l. v� .. T�r �h�1.45 v.'!'r y+ .J tx �. �+ r� l� r-•'� :Y Y r�,�►'-''1- �,� +4 �i
j�4 .� 'Yti :. -7 j iiarr'. It��*j,;�-.�iY 1. 1` y �} . t,•' � �
7 -r,.� ,tiv'1.�?t+tl".sn, ^A-. vysk'3• •��' `' . •r. 1�, 'S? -a a.
�� I.G - :, �' .. y,"' U. � i a 'r �� +-`•s+'�' Vis" .,. �l. .,,fir* t �•
i1. -�{I � �• ,�".rk"�s�1..-.v.�� '�daii'':"'��-��.��* �is'� � .��i'-���a7�t�•-�-�.�.r.. F _
i+yi ' •`^ ' _ ! 'i'/Y . ' r. �'`L3rypf�*. .
_r• --r \r �fy -{ '�4' '1^':' {�•` .r <'y Zh• !� - 7 •. > �Z�:.'+[4•pti-r. y1f•�
-•L rte' •�. w�`:''� ��� �..� �"".. �1� ''�•^��i'��.4. .1. _ -�- v' 4 �Y S�'�{•ltli/� 'y •�-r•.�.,..,pyi
OR,
/ip��n�f'..'.:";'��..T'Wt�t" ry :p- ^ .�..r��� •' .�Trr.�h���r�:rf,:?I� r "� Iy,z,�r':,�
c L �1'ty.. ,, y n:�'y�,`�Y.-L uir� .17, i•a�
n � .%•'. rt� slice\A Ck.�►r � +'- J•
!s!+t1i+�y,+.'�-. •":L-',�I'•4 7�� I _ �{ �"�1+�-z- yt
y�A r`n'.�°'.-�w+� -+'. �"•J.••".!r :�3. �I +�+c ''9.v,!^`,'a :�14�rl"
�..v_� art• � / _ :r y�-+�.�r.� -. N ;r��: Jj:r, , ��%� :�y��-r..��� •:: .J. '.
•�yrr, � iii _'1'.�.r!r '� �r �f� i•''l` �',r`t7� JW�V
'-Y �'24Y•7. tel. � '}rr "+::J' }� �r>!�'.�..•...
✓ y�S��. fir' ;,;.• awx� -:' a '�.w31f...--•�,�j•.1!r�, � �.�",-� 1�� Y' • •R �-
ci7 semis r. -..�•� , iJ: . v.. ti.
/ ,; :: �--�Zv..�✓ "'•f ice"; �`r'�y'• 'r`�i'"�rti^-. 1-+- y+,t...�`�r ..
ti '7
1 - � - - - Ir • Icy. ''��.' ' T�+•:.�. {

J. 2 J
�. 4
•, ids: _ � :� ;
Ito 230
: �.
E y J Vii Al�lll
r` �'+•- Ciel - r.i+v
��ri�, ,r1..o-� �< •JC; � }CTrr� rr , ;� . �f'' �`', "P.?(a'e.�', i r ..y'.
'a�—..mss; S"'�• - y1 5 1 y�'j �.' �J 4 f 1{' �. y�. � Y i�� HM� • / ���. _ .
fig .r'�'• r f i� 1 s i? . v�'b t tr �►L1 °° i
/s�
{y, -,+.. �r
•?•^. 1 �f•�� Q + [yIPS .. w /+► ..r��Y .f r Ix���� ! ail
r• r - "� �`L 1 � �7 ,Is
+� �.�•Ffi�' ���� ! , � ^��. �. 'T. �. .. �• r iii l �':1.:' �� iii;��1 , -
.y `'• �p.+� _ �3.`� ;� � !�� # ���• 337 .�; � ;�,'� .� {
� � � •► _ � "N ! � ' � �-' �,. �J�� 1 'riffs � F � .� p�j�„�:y” „�r�y�
j ? .• '� Q`r/J� ' T jy .�f/�'� -,N n 1Yy.}�L � /� 1 �_!•, ,[• R Y L
- 1 �. YY •h
.15 7.7 - •�f. rte:-.c;7p� 7�µ !!
`.. ', ..• r1' i � ' �ia:: F. Z•s y ..-1 rel

r'+R1Ks�r !(. �� tic'' Jf��"'S= ¢� � fir" 3\ 12��Y ,"j�� 1;`-`�� 'K.. •.�i P \ �+•�,,,s ! {� .4r i = ,_ = i .
a. �r:,w �,ctif-A �'� t e f [� `x,. -ay .'�•�,�, Lyy �� lr �!'Sry !!�{'"y �'
^. �t,,:Y-,"s'lx!!{'��'il"t5�it t -a �.` 4 1• � _ (�5{x.� j � p.t � �, .'�' �. Far 1 4..:1' .Y�.. •
• � G ti�
x i
'i " -
- • 1F� 1(%
k {(F "+�Y ,�rr.F � �y", f'4 -err ♦! ti-, ,rl �, f 1-�,.. `.A:
s
r• r ^ YY►t,+ta} %. t k +g�, r`rl}t !1 zACF�i�'. �,�`, i # �
man
r ` ' i .�°�..:}. '"".��' r ar ���.�,�' �� ��.� �tis•fi )%( hE; � r�`: s 44 M�t�7� �`r W
p t i { r i ,y�y¢+�,�" �kiE ,t� �'y�'✓3- irk � � s 6 i.
\., �� ti , - " 'E 41, � •� �8y r'3�'j-�.i� i.��p,.
-,3
�'�+:•�'"Sr;"'`(
i y. � {... Amt t �I ii �r Tt• A'6 !,A rf !i �k �:4`y � �. 'S .v r ' - n
V{ r ��p•ry ^rh(i i!' �1.i ;A�Yyrl rlr S�3 �, 7'' to t Mi t
At1. ,^rLt. r.t t'Ln + {!L tS` q rr'i c r •' !.,(x,
s� t
"
ri`•(,
,'ffi`(}.�i5, �klf; e• i{(,'a. ?r 5
h v.
-1 '� 7 • i e • ct :!!A (_, c ►5 r • tiA a Q+s %. �"N '
d,Ft ra
r�5 �� ��f �`+�pr � a �``r �tE� "�. �, � � 'g'��{�1. �{` T.'� '�.�'r�7 (t}�,�r ✓�lr,"�h�� t
MOP
ilk% 1i{:rZtizr..j s �,-�Gr'ti`L' h" ts�i, H• E
• r :i31:: Rt:r'>' r-" s+' i :� Y '�{� t � + � �a'a, 7+ �, r
1 MR
aka a _ • ..
Amf+,� rtkSr p
� 4 �Sy � tt yyV{�64'F,�"r�'•�'1� y1 +r•ss Ig��+,�?he
NQ r j� A 4t8
y;•7 tr 5r r ' a + .+ d- �:3- ! �.K4,� �..� i d '` "' •�'( icyr +
^t�.�A �'t�� S: r. a .fir �- ..4_�,•ts E} s,+q� +'.:.• -1rY '.313! �.� iriL. ��as
` gra � x f i-�`i'� � tq, �a:d•�w t.� } 7 t�
a ak�'bt ti �t ahhr�i• (i� t�•A � i �.�� �� �'� i r
lE1L`i�
,i'' 8tlj*`'» 'l,7. ' ::';�-�''r-...4.. JJ'�.�'.3x<. r••---�Ftz.
L
i
! k`r• "
!«a�n
"M tit Is
pr- t � r'�tr,.'�'�' tk, �' �i� P t�"{ffL a'�";ti �'�L� ��`''�,'N � r s 1+^t, '�•
& .t,..II `��<."�G �p�,, s �r V. �•� `�,"!Sr,,;,r .L (� � � :yis':1�s,Et4� �L", n.1.
� ~"r�'�' t fit, '*• �� 4 rc t'.� �i.� �� `tiit � k� � No Nap
�,,4

I- M.L W.-�tPo
e
irp

CONSERVATION PLAN MAP
Owner Wa r rn a n k r-4�j Gi r r Operator
County Statc Date
Approximate Acres Approximate Scale
Cooperating with
Plan Identification Photo Number
Assisted by
t
Gt° r)e-r-,1 ( . 4 D C-4 �r'a.-. ti) <P

Rl
3"PIESE,
r '� ---- , •s it :; :; r . ' r al
:Cx

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FARM
SKETCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . III
SYSTEM OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .. IV
1.
WASTE STORAGE POND . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 1
2.
AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM . . . . . . .
. . . . . 1
3.
CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM . . . .
. . . . . 2
4.
VEGETATED DIVERSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 3
5.
VEGETATED BUFFERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :
3
6.
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 4
7.
HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 4
S.
STOCK TRAIL (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 5
9.
TROUGH OR TANK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ... . . 6
10.
GENERAL COMMENTS . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
. . . . . 7
11..
EMERGENCY , ACTION PLAN . . . . . .
12.
APPENDICES (Waste Sample Collection Information,
Specification
Sheets) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . (END)
__

�_•..J. I JP. .,, v ,% 1 1L/.'I r L, ..,L,'I It, ,'1.
Owner Haz=rn, Acres Daini Farm . Qperator ?•Tavne Sri -In �.c' J& -.es Galliher �
County Iredell State ��ort . Carolina Date L cn ,1998
Approximate Acres 223..2- _—, Approximate Scale 111-=660 tt
Cooperating with Treliall Scil azH-Telar-ers rvation District
Plan Identification C. 0200 Water Cuality Photo Number _
Assisted by Larry Hendrix DC LNRCS
Tract 5252
t30
.15N �
� V
LF
_.;� `�, tom�' "'..''��`" iC � ,7 � � �, f - J.� � �,�.►�'�', i
PIP
k1�
' � } : +.':, • � � � J ' 7 -tea+
. I

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
KWelt"- _;A_Ai
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
4. VEGETATED DIVERSION
5. VEGETATED BUFFERS
b. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
7. HEAVY USE AREAS
8. STOCK TRAILS
9. TANKS
10. WASTE UTILIZATION OF COLLECTED WASTE
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and stored in the WASTE STORAGE
POND (WSP). All contaminated water (wash,parlor and runoff) will be piped Into WSP.
All waste contained in WSP will be land applied at agronomic rates. Follow the Waste
Utilization Plan prepared and approved by Ben Know, NCDA Agronomist. The WASTE
STORAGE POND is designed to provide 180 days (6 MONTHS) storage for the slurry
and parlor waste produced by 125 head milking herd.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal
Waste Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24)
hour storm, as required under the Non -discharge regulations.
=v

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
TE 5TE POND
• Alf i• ,'
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot runoff
and waste water from the milk barn for a 6 Month (180 day) period. Curbs will
be installed along 200 feet of the existins concrete lot to force contaminated
runoff into the pond. A permanent marker will need to be set indicating the
level of storage available prior to iriftinging on the 25 year, 24 hour storm
capacity. This elevation is 2.3 feet below the top of the dam. The emergency
spillway is planned 1.0 feet below the top of the dam. The WASTE STORAGE
POND consists of an earthen dam, clay liner, and curbing for discharging
contaminated water into the WSP.
OPERATION
The service life of the WSP will be determined by the level of management for
the entire system. Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in
the WSP. The accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity to a
point which requires removal of the solids for many years IF adequate waste
agitation is maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid
accumulation of solids which will reduce the usable capacity of the WSP to the
point that some form of dredging will be required.
MAINTENANCE
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as
needed to maintain a vigorous stand. The dun should be mowed at least
annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place only
when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a
height of less. than four(4)_inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or
seepage should be reported to the Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District
office.
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists ofroperly agitating the
slurry prior to each pumping of animal waste. Have certified operator complete
proper records for all waste applied to land identified in the WASTE
UTILIZATION PLAN. Waste will be land applied using slurry spreader.
See WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN for additional details.
1

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
OPERATION
Agitation of the slurry should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the
full storage level marker in the structure. When the liquids level in the WSP
reaches the marker, liquids must be removed by pumping from the structure to
a spreader tank for land application. Do not apply in such.a manner as to
cause runoff or erosion. Do not apply on frozen or saturated soils.
The initial step in each application operation is to properly agitate the waste in
the Stora a Pond. If application equipment (spreader) is owned consult owners
manuals for recommended operational procedures.
MAINTENANCE
Fields that receive waste application should have soil tested annually. It is .
recommended that waste and soil sample results be used in conjunction with
each other.
OVERVIEW
The CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM consists of installing the
200 feet of 8 inch high concrete curb along the concrete lot and will be used to
force the contaminated runoff into the waste storage pond. After installed daily
scraping of the waste into the pond will be needed. Existing parlor pipe
currently carries waste'from the milking parlor to the waste storage pond.
Grass will need to be established below the curb so that runoff water can be
filtered through the grass. f
MAIIVTENANCE-
Inspect the concrete components of the CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION
SYSTEM for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed.
The Lumber Pipe Cradle and Bent Support components shall be inspected
seasonally for rot and mechanical damage and repaired or replaced as needed.
Inspect the drop structures seasonally and remove accumulated solids.
Annually inspect the pipe coating, and clean and recoat as needed.
2

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
- In periods of cold and subfreezing temperatures, inspect the pipe for
accumulation of ice by CAREFULLY removing the cap of the cleanout. Caution:
If liquids have accumulated in the pipe above the cleanout, the force of these
Iiquids tends to "blow" the cap of the cleanout off during removal. Remove any
ice manually or by melting with hot water.
4. VEGETATED DION
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED DIVERSION will be located above the WASTE STORAGE
POND and may be installed at entrance to the freestall barn and will convey
non -contaminated runoff around the structure.
MAINTENANCE
The vegetation in the diversion should be inspected periodically
and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand. It is essential that neither
vehicles nor livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within the diversion.
The diversion should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth.
The diversion may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing
operations must take place only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should
not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches. If
sedimentation has reduced the capacity of the channel, contact the Iredell Soil
and Water Conservation District for technical assistance in correcting this
problem. Only,contaminated water needs to drain into the pond.
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED BUFFERS serve a two fold purpose, they filter sediment from
exposed feeding and lounging areas andprovide the necessary set -backs for
waste application operations. Their width is based on slope of land and
proximity to streams. These areas can be control grazed or mowed for hay to
prevent unwanted growth. These buffers are used in lieu of storage structures.
Proper maintenance of these buffers must be followed or a storage structure
will be required. See the plan map for the location of these areas and their
widths. Where lounge lots are bare of vegetation for more than 45 days per
year these buffers need to be a minimum of 100 feet wide. These buffers need
to be established below the milk cow lounge lot and hay feeding areas. In order
3

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
to establish theggrrass, fence along the stream and below the stock trail will
need to be instaIled.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within
the buffer. If grazing does take place caution should be practiced to prevent
overgrazing. Grass should be a minimum of six (6) inches. These buffers
should have at least 80% ground cover. Specified width must be maintained.
• a -A f
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed according to NRCS standard 382.
(Fencing), where recommended by the technical specialists. LIVESTOCK
EXCLUSION will be installed at locations as indicated on plan maps. It needs
to be added to the milk cow -'lounge lot field 5 along the stream above and below
the farm, pond. They should also be excluded from the grass filter above the
waste storage pond and just below the stock trail leaving the milking parlor.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or
rot. If fencing wire becomes loose, re -tighten to original specifications. If fence
posts are rotted or damaged in any way, replace damaged posts with a post
which meets the
original specifications.
4

..........................
ANDD L WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
•
12"W&I L\_L • • ,
The HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION will be placed at locations indicated on
sketch. It consists of an area graded, covered with a geotextile material and
gravel placed on top. The areas where these are needed are in the milk cow
lounge lot field 5.
The area that needs to be protected should be graded if necessary to allow
proper drainage. A geotextile material of adequate strength will be placed on
the soil surface. the geotextile material should be overlapped a min. of 18".
The depth of gravel will need to be calculated for the particular area to be used.
Refer to the specific design for the amount of gravel needed. See the cost share
contract for this information.
Inspect the HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION periodically for any soft spots or
damaged areas. If the gravel gets thin, more should be applied to the
recommended depth. The designed depth should be maintained over the entire
area for it to remain structurally sound. Careful attention to this maintenance
will be necessary as waste from these areas will need to be removed whenever
it begins to accumulate.
N

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
OVERVIEW
The STOCK TRAIL(S) improve access to forages and water by means of a
stabilized trail which reduces erosion often caused from such walkways. The
STOCK TRAIL(S) will be placed at locations indicated on sketch. It consists of
an area graded, covered with a geotextile material and gravel placed on top.
These areas are directly behind the freestall barn in field 99 (100 feet) and in
field 5 to be used to cross the small stream in milk cow lounging lot (125 feet).
•• !R
The travel lane should be graded if necessary to allow proper drainage. A
geotextile material of adequate strength will be placed on the soil surface.. The
geotextile material should be overlapped a min. of 18". The depth of gravel will
need to be calculated for the particular area to be used. Refer to the specific
design for the amount of gravel needed. Each trail should have a broad based
dip across it to prevent runoff from running down the trail -for a long distance.
Inspect the STOCK TRAIL(S) periodically for any soft spots or damaged areas.
If the gravel gets thin, more should be applied to the recommended depth. The
designed depth should be maintained over the entire area for it to remain
structurally sound.
9. TROUGH OR TANS
OVERVIEW
TROUGH AND TANK consists of (watering tank) to provide drinking water for
livestock at a stabilized location.
OPERATION
The location should be such thatproper surface drainage will not cause
ponding and all wet areas should a avoided. The site should be as level as
possible. The tank or trough should be sized for the type and number of
animals that will be using the facility. The site needs to be over cut to the
depth of the gravel (torovide drainage) and a Geotextile material (Mirafi 160N
or equivalent) will be paced on the ground and Crusher -run gravel will be
placed on it at a minimum thickness of 9 inches. Tanks are presently
planned in meld S and 99 and cost share is presently set up for their
installation.
MAINTENANCE
6

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
Inspect the TROUGH OR TANK area periodically for any soft spots or damaged
areas in the cloth and gravel. If the gravel gets thin, more should be applied to
the recommended depth. The designed depth should be maintained over the
entire area for it to remain structurally sound. Inspect the tank itself along
with the base for damage and repair or replace if necessary.
GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
If 'Mr. Stephens decides 'to move certain cow groups from the Redmond farm
the planned measures in these particlar fields will not be needed. They will
also be omitted from the cost share contract.
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that
desirable vegetation is not adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any
pesticide in a manner not permitted by its labeling.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District if repairs or major
modifications are required for any of the components of this Waste
Management System.
Upon completion of all items involved in this plan, your operation will be
certifiable. This plan is for only the number of animals and acres listed in this
plan. Please notify the TECHNICAL SPECiALIST(S) that signed your Waste
Utilization Pian and Certification form if operational changes take place.
_ -x
7

• EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 704-663-1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 704-873-5353
SWCD 704-873-6761
NRCS 704-873-6761
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your
operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not
wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to consider
that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This Vlan should be nosted in an accessible
location for all emRloloyees at the faeility. The following are some
action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may
or may not be possible. Suggested responses to some possible
problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the, application rates for the fields where runoff­­.:--
occurred.
unoff­.:.occurred.
C: Leakage from the. waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
a

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
D: --Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid -separators -action
include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as
opposed to flowing leaks. Possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and
fill holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and
lagoon bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property
damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
gg. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
fi. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water
Quality) regional office; Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency
number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your name,
facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above,
the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement
of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that
have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone
number 704-873-5353.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 704-873-0507, local SWCD office phone
number 704-873-6761, and local NRCS office for advice/ technical
assistance phone number 704-873-6761.
=ctple —
oct 8. 1998
9

EMERGENCY ACTION PIAN
4: If none of the -above works call 911 or the Sheriffs 'Department
and explain your problem to them and ask that person to contact
the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem
to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name: Brent QaUiher
863
b. Contractors Address: -273 E. Memorial HI&—w-al.-Harmony. NC
2 4
c. Contractors Phone:- 704-546-5521
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage
structure (NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Rame: La= Hendrix
b. Phone: [phone]
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the system, and
reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with release
of wastes from happening Again.
=
Vlgn,d,lx
. 19
.1
10

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Suorcc Cause UNIPs to Minimize (Odor She Specific I'raclices
farinste.sll • Dairy production Or Vegetative or wooded buffers
la Recommended best n)anagesueul practices
FW Goad judgment anti common sense
I"IVCd lilts of harn alley Wel n+am+re-covered slrrfaces R Scrape or flush daily
sill (:Ices rT Proulote drying wilt proper ventilation
rI( Routine checks anti maintenance on waterers,
hydrants. pipes, stock: lanks
Iicdlled alcas
0 Urine
• Partial microbial decomposition
W
Prol)lolc drying with proper vellfilation
Replace wet or maunre-covered hcddiog
htmmi-e h y ,racks
• Parlial nucrobiul decoalposilitin
n
Provide liquid drainage for slored manure
.]Illtaue t<<uk ur basin
• Partial microbial Ileconiposition ;
n
notion, or tuid-icvel ioadillg
sill lace
Mixing while tilling ;
n
Tack covers
sill laces
• Abitalion whell cmplying
rl
Basin surface Mals of solids;
0
"Minimize lot nultlffanti liquid additions
I bn11 h
Agil-lion ul'rccycic+t lat;uon
n
Agitalc°only prior to manure removal
lltilild While lallks are filling
n
Proven biological additives or oxidants
—Seining b:uill Sill f.ices
• partial microbial decomposition
Il
liquid drainage from seliled solids
owt.idu drain cullecliun
• Mixing while filling
n-
Remove solids regutariy
• Ag11amm ►Yl1Crt e1111)ty111g
HalI+uc, slinky ur sludge
Agitalion when spreadilig
n Soil injection'of slurry/sludges
alucallcr Ilwlcls
. Volatile gas emissions
n
Wash residual tuanure (ruin spreader aficr use
n
Proven biological additives or oxidailis
I Iocuvcrcll nla+illre,
0 Volatile gas emissions ►visile
n
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry III slollt;c 9111 liclll
drying
fel
Soil incorporation wilhiu,IK hrs
sill laces
n
Spread in thin uniforin layers fpr rapid drying
11
Proven biological addilive5 lir +IA idaws
I bn11 h
Agil-lion ul'rccycic+t lat;uon
n
flush lank covers;
lltilild While lallks are filling
I-1
r-weilti ftli imcs it) near blllloll+ III'lallLs wills
allti-slpliolt Vents
owt.idu drain cullecliun
Agilalion during wastewater
n
Ifox covers
IIr lnrlction boxes conveyance
A 1,11 W - I iovuliticl 11. 19 96. Page I

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Sauter C'nuse IiMPs to G1111ru1 IIISCON Site Specific Practices
1.111:31 [ 1uticts Accunutlatiott of solids 17 blush system is designed and operated
sufliciClllly to reutave uccnnl111alul solids !mill
gliders as designed.
nl Helnove bridging of accumulated solids Ott
discharge
—1.agu„us and Pils Crusled Solids nl Maintain lagoons, settling Basins :Ind pill where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize lite
crusting of solids In a depth of no more than fi -
H incllcs liver more than 30% of surface.
I:><cr»ive Vegetative • Decaying vegdatitm If Maimain vegetative control along hanks'i►f
I it towth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative muller
alollg walces CIIg;e twit ill 1pol111dlllenl'S perillleler.
Dry Syslculs
Decd Spillage Fr Design, uperate and maitllain feed systems (C.&.
hunkers and troughs) In ntininlize Iltc
acctmudation of decaying wastage.
(4- Clean up spillage nn a routine basis (e.g., 7 - 10
day interval (uring; sutunler; 15-30 day interval
dltriug wimer).
Fret Stul��gc Accttnullaliorls of feed residues M Reduce nuoistllre acclunulalion within and
arotlud imulediaue perimeter of feed slurage
ureas by insuring drainage away !ruin site
untllor providing adequate containnium (e.g.,
covered hin Air l)rewef s grain azul similar high
moisture groin products).
fl inspect liver duel rcntcove or break np accunudatud
solids in filler strips aroltn,l lixd sleorag;e as
needed.
++ ......I..-. I I I+I+tr, t+„..• I

Mortality Nlanaoement Methods
(check which methods) are bein_* implemented)
J Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public body of water. r
d Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
l:6 Complete incineration
J In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of'the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
DeLember LS. 1996

PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT -SYSTEM
OWNER: Harmony Acres Farm
Wayne Smith & James Galliher
JOB CLASS: III
DAIRY SIZE: 125 Milk Herd, Dry Cows and Bred Heifers
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
APPROVED BY: C. -
DATE : l ZZ �/ 9 %

ti
INDEX
I. Waste Production
II. Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
B. Heifer' Housing
C. Clean Water Exclusion
D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
E. Waste Utilization
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 1.80 day period
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
5. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
6. Waste Volume
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
V. Lounging Areas, Heavy Use Areas and Filter Areas
VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrient Computations
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping System
b. Nutrient Balance
C. Disposal Calendar
VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan
..

y
pendix
Milk & Dry Cow - Filters Strips, Heavy Use Areas and Tank
Cost Estimate
Truck Haul Cost Estimate
North Carolina Archaeological Site Form
Copy of USGS Map showing Site Location
Aerial Photo
Emergency Action Plan, 3 sheets
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Mortality Management Methods
Old Waste Storage Pond Design, Filed in NRCS OFFICE in
Iredell
Drainage Area
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dam
Vegetation Specification
Fencing for Livestock Exclusion
Fabric Filter Cloth
Concrete Specification
Operation and Maintenance Plan (by Field Office)
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Drawings
Plan View
Curb Detail
1 of 2
2 of 2

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Production
125 milk cows, dry cows and bred heifers are housed on
Harmony Acres Dairy farm. Manure, milking parlor wash water
and polluted runoff are stored in a Waste Storage Pond
constructed in 1984. Manure is presently truck hauled to
cropland and hay fields.
All other heifers are housed on another farm.
Cattle are fed -in a concrete feedlot. Some freestalls
are available at barn. A lounging area located behind
milking facilities is used every day. Clean water
management is needed to minimize amount of slurry manure
hauled.
II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A waste storage pond is located near the feedlot and
freestall barn. Waste from the milk herd, dry cows, and
bred heifers will be collected in the waste storage pond.
The storage period will be determined based on current cow
numbers and drainage area.
The pond will be emptied by truck haul.
B. Heifer Housing
All heifers other than bred heifers are on other farms.
C. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage pond to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.

D. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Livestock are fenced out of the waste storage pond.
Fencing will be changed to create 100 ft. vegetative filters
below lounging areas. The filters will infiltrate part of
the first flush and filter sediment and organic particles.
The filter will also provide a place to dump clean water
around the farmstead.
E. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
F. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.

III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Milking Parlor Wash
Water and Polluted Runoff
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 180 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Iredell County. Mac Edgerton measured lot area
in November, 1997.
Drainage Area = 17,453 sq ft Surface = 15,453 sq ft
Unsurface = 2,000 sq ft
Try 6 months:
September through February Surface Runoff Depth = 12.45"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.4511* 15,453 sq ft = 16,032 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.5711* 2,000 sq ft = 928 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
21.57 - 12.3 = 9.2" = 0.8 ft/6 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 17,453 sq ft = 7,141 cu ft
12"/ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
%
DEPTH
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27
1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.60
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 6 months:
September through February Surface Runoff Depth = 12.45"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.4511* 15,453 sq ft = 16,032 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.5711* 2,000 sq ft = 928 cu ft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
21.57 - 12.3 = 9.2" = 0.8 ft/6 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 17,453 sq ft = 7,141 cu ft
12"/ft

r
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = .5 ft
S. Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.0 ft
6. Waste Volume
Milk Herd
80 milk cows are typically on the lot area
approximately 75% of time. The estimated manure collected
is 7516.
Volume = 80 cows * 14 a1 da cow * 180 days * 75%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 20,214 cu ft
Dry Cows
15 dry cows are typically on feed area 50t of time.
The estimated manure collected is 50%-.
Volume = 15 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 180 days * 50%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 2,527 cu ft
Large Heifers
30 bred heifers are typically on feed area 50% of time.
The estimated manure collected is 50%.
Volume = 30 heifers * 10 gal/day/cow * 180 days * 50%
7.48 gal/cu ft
3,610 cu ft
Total = 20,214 + 2,527 + 3,610 = 26,351 cu ft
7. Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water 100 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 100 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water 150 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water 50. oral. /day.
400 gal./day
Volume = 400 gal/day*l cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
= 9,626 cu ft
'� or
!k(u A we fto 49 .
S4 Cazurr x ��``I�fi1 C�
7, 9 Sr
-7 32- G' 4t-
�G q 4(2z
zd. �

Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
16,032
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
928
cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
7,141
cu
ft
4.
Manure
26,351
cu
ft
5.
Wash water
9,626
cu
ft
TOTAL
60,078
cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
0.8
ft
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5
ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.0
ft
TOTAL
2.3
ft
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
"AS BUILT" Volume
2.4:1
112.8' X 103'
55' X 55'
Volume = 10.0/6[55' * 55' + 102 * 94' + 4(78.5'*74.5)]
= 60,010 cu ft Close Enough
Normal Pump Out Volume
16,032 +-928 + 26,351 + 9,626 + 0.8 * 113* 103
62,248 cu ft per 180 days
= 126,226 cu ft per year
= 944,000 gal per year or 315 - 3000 gallon loads
Maximum pond level
0.5' + 1.0' + 7,141 cu ft/(103' * 931)
2.3' below top of dam elev. or 1.3 below ESW
D. Pump out'elevation and ESW elevation
2.3.1
2.4 :1
The waste storage pond should be emptied before the
water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr storage.volume. This
elevation is 2.3 below the top of dam elevation of the pond..
The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.0 foot below
the top of dam elevation.

IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot. The District Conservationist will
design all diversions. Diversions shall be designed to
carry the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store
some sediment. See drawing.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible'by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Heavy Use Areas, and Falter areas
The heavy use areas consist of 9" of compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. Runoff from
heavy use areas and lounging areas will be directed across
well maintained grass sod. Vegetated filters shall be
maintained between lounging areas and drainage ways.
Filters shall be 100 ft wide. Swells or diversions shall be
constructed and maintained along fence lines to kick water
into filters at frequent intervals.
Milk Cows, Dry Cows and Bred Heifers
Cattle have access to lounging area located behind the
freestall barn. Vegetative filters at least 100' wide will
be maintained below the lounging areas. See drawing
attached.
A heavy use area, 45' X 45' will be constructed at
upper corner of lounging area to feed hay. Runoff from
heavy use area will flow through a grass filter. A heavy
use area, 100, X 12.51, will be constructed at entrance of
feedlot and milking parlor. A grass filter will be
established below this heavy use area.
Milk cows will be fenced from grass filters, farm pond
and,the stream. Two water tanks will be installed at barn
to water cattle.
A culvert type stream crossing will be located on the
stream below the farm pond.

I. Waste Utilization Plan
Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for herd will be stored in a waste storage pond
for approximately 6 months and will be truck hauled.
During the course of one year, this facility will store
944,000 gallons per year of slurry waste. Daily scraping of
waste is required to move the waste into the storage
facility.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off from the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from heavy use areas and lounging areas will be
diverted through 100' vegetative filter areas. Grass sods
will be maintained all year round. Weeds may require
chemical control or periodic bush hogging. See plan map.
C. Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Waste Storage Pond
TOTAL NUTRIENTS_ DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 13,940 lbs. 0.44 6,134 lbs.
P205 8,485 lbs. 0.70 5,940 lbs.
K20 12,728 lbs. 0.70 8,910 lbs.
6.5 lbs per 1000 gal
D. Solid'Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
CROP UNITS ACRES YIELD
Pasture tons 68 3.0
b. Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED lbs applied/ac
CROP ACRES N
Pasture 68 90 (135)
APPLIC. RATE
• 13,846 gal/ac
(lbs. used/ac)
P205 K20

C. Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Pasture 68 NNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNN
N = not a recommended disposal period
VII. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage pond and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
Before the waste storage pond reaches a point 2.3 ft.
below the top of the dam or 1.3 ft below ESW, the storage
pond shall be emptied. A post will be set with its top at
this elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage pond shall be mowed
annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be checked
and repaired as required.

NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM
FOR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE USE ONLY
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY/DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
STATE SITE NU%iBER:
1. SITE NAME(S):rmorti
J ✓
2. INSTITUTION: USDA :SCS 3. DATE RECORDED: 11Z1 l
4. RECORDER:
S. PROJECT NAME:
5. COUNTY: _ - jxedg I 7. USGS QUAD MAP: Y ,1
,,
S. DIRECTIONS TO SITE:
S�
9. DESCRIBE TOPOGRAPHY: Ail
10. Sou. Mar UNIT: C ec{ , h < sa ►. 1 og �- �,
11. DESCRIBE VEGETATIONIVISIBILTTY: as
IZ. SITE DESCRIPTION/DIMENSIONS: 4-S �X45-1
13. LIST ARTIFACTS:vel-0-
PkMK
gbxt
14. CULTURAL COMPONENTS- (check) PREHISTORIC: HISTORIC
15. OWNER AND/OR TENANT; C4FOR:YIANT:
ADDRESS:
!uYw,Iarti_A AIC— w ;799 3 PHONE. ( ?
> > > ATTACH PHOTOCOPY OF THE SECTION OF USGS SHOWING SITE LOCATION < t <

V � -
-
IWO
�%
��^- ✓--•� O ^-'� r a!CSS-� i. • 111• _ `, 1 C, `I( l 11 \�.\ - 1�
V ~ , Al
`-' _ 6 • ,4/\/O/^III �}� ` \ 1,� i ,.'
Eb
bl� a � � ��'�x• h
,• ref �I ,�� ,' ,� .
� � ` ll JS •
_ a _J
l(�1lrc_
� j±r,
Ji17 so T�.1`11 ,41i1��� �� J-�`� `-��`� �f��.p5� _\�`^\i� �.! !i,--I�..-, r� �. - 1•.�-=

U. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC -ENG -34
September 1980
File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
County
7
Landowner �,
Communi.ty or Group No. - - -
Conservation Plan.No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top' of Dam— /23. Ft. Length -of Flood Pool � Ft.
Date of Field Hazard.Investigaticri_
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. - sT. Elevation
Kind of :.Improvements: of Breach
Reach: L6ngth, Width: Slope:: ),and dse. Improvements Above , :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Plain
F
Tt Tt. Ft
L
NO
141
Rn4
2
Wt:
3
Describe Potep-tial tcr loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach
_/%-Yyy l'_�%'� 1� Z
Ayre,
7- C14 --
Hazard Classification df [),)m b, c) (see MEM -Part 520-211
Dam Classification TV, v)--
na Tie
ByDate
Concur -red By Date
n.dme) i E!)
NOTE.- I (r:..6'.r or, r e s -.1p
7 Ati.,-.:h clheats a needed.

W �7t R TA N KS f v1
Z
0
%S'te
Gres:. Po,,,,1.
jD�'X IZ.�► aoc�
Qw Gut b
N�Aw USE
AREA
45' X 4s'
Nea .3 Use Ayew
9or Feed Ra�l
Wociftr Dir ;o s
Ex: s#. -nes Fewtce
��� PipnneA Fence-
:
pond
��r Creek
l6RA5S 5TREA N;
51 i_TER C R 0 5*51 NG
5F -p- DESJGAI
es
SCALE i "- 2 oo'
f{AR aNY AC.Rts DAIRY
Y
.Iredell Co•4wt Nor+k C'ar•l;�a
• plate �i cw
WASTE MANA6EMEN-r. SYSTEM
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATIONS VICE
bti
Orr--
J i- ----------
t--------------------
- ------- -----
SCS -ENG -313A REV 8-75

g„
w No. 4 horizontal loan
„
° No. 4 Bar on 2' centers
g
Existing Concrete
NEW CURB DETAIL
Harmony Acres Dairy
Iredell County, North Carolina
Curb Detail
Waste Mana ement System
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
f NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVA71ON SERVICE
Sam Bingham 11.07"'peid°'
c,... SCB TM
Too
s.r� o� � Now
a2

0
11
TANKS
tr
zoo'
New curb
45' x 4,S,
Heau Use AyecL
SCA L E I "� Z 00'
SCS -ENG -313A REV 5-75

a
• r
Farm Site Map
Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility No. 49-89
Creek
Pard
IDRA5S STREAM
51 �r�.-rER C R °SSING
Z WATER
ZIE = DI: 51GA/
o
M�aste.
0
4 . Geis P. L
zoo
)'Vl0' l� � Z.� r �YeW•C4T6 -
rrr ��A R � A
1701
---w Cle&A W64e,. I}ive ;, s
�xisT�+►q Fe"Ce
PlollneJA Fence
4,5'x 4s' . ��as
HeA%; Use Are0.
Feed R tj
SCA L E I - Z C�0'
OAR DNY ACRES DAk:R Y
�rep�el�
TlT[,1p•.n1 Nar'1�+'j �.A�I•�;r�a
ah ie -i
WA57E HANAGEMENT SYSTEM
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
o n
Tgif ,
Troc•l.... __.._.._... ---------------------
----------- -----» � + O• M•
of
SCS -ENG -313A REV B-75

0 0 0

L�
TANKS
)oo'x rz.S,
HEAYY USE
AP,9A
4i t --q- C It-, %, waTtr D IV!
�x;s'ng Fence
Pla,,,heA Fe.,cv-
Farm Site Neap
Harmony Acres Dairy
Facility No. 49-89
d
Pond Cree
l�RASS STREA M
l st ER CR�551NG
o -41 �= DESIGu
w4S+C
zoo
New Gur b
HeAu L)se Aye*-
awy
qor Feed } auJ
S
mos
SCALE t 'i - Zoo'
e
}BAR DNY ACKES D&kRY
TredQ{k Co-vt Norsk Cay, -1;+\R
P1ar, �, eu.r
WASTE HANA6EMEHT SYSTEM
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
g SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
D h
- ------------------------------
TlKfA.......--.._...
CMtae.-..------• ----..----..._--...__ of 2
SGS-ENG-3tU REV 8-75

z R -TANKS
dna
Aste.
zoo I
)00')( ! Z . 5 f N e-+ Cup. b
HE AYY L3 SE
`+5' x 4s
f �eZlRatj
Use AYecL
Fe
w4t,. Div; a S
Ex: sf;.� Fewce
P1anKed Pencc
OD
STR EA t.
C R o551NG
SEE DEs)G,v
SCA L E I n, Z 00'
t{ARMoNY ACRIES DA41RY
T-vecleit Ca..vnt Nw+k (:.kw1.y,a
Plav% L%Aj
WASTE MANAbEMEN-r SYSTEM
U. S. DEPARTIVI M OF AGRICULTUR]
SOIL CONSERVATIONS VICE
oti
c..K,,.e x .�B.l1 Ani J1f9 ,mo 7n -- --- -------
�t---- --
-- TM..

14
_ 4 ii'.riL. l +t. rrr � L •1' .r�Y Lr 3 � t yr ;!"'y�'..,�'�:� -�L '`7
I i i 1 h
r ' ; 7.4' S � h1 r -•lY�1 L;'F.li�•F"� -dr��� a - .1 +>7 �'... t � ,
'r ,: /w�,'J rpt. i ,r,`j r� 1 � �'.Es;yy,, - �' a��•�t :, * -L4� '°ter �Fy1 �rj' .:.}� M1 - S 1 'f '
t s, iP' �y. + „ I r t +tl" i., .�- ia4�• _ F ,.lc !'?..�-.r.753r '.�nw.,� `"i ' � r�'' I
.'[-. _ ( :1513"'.7 1.'-ss:•,Y ,1r t �j��- tai-wr ��9Jfl+,a5' r_'yr yG'• qtr , ++fie "' r -�a•�. t ,. 4 -xi- �
d -�.`. �•L .71 i��: rii 4 s ^+:.a 1{Yr ,r �,y SI_'s' Ft 1 iit`�;,� ^°i s.S ,{ ,,: �,
� I�l� � t��. �i ie����7 ' [i St�� °� � .t�•4 M1�!-��-r �lC �*a;l7ti �p r.,� � h s�v,�*.. �,� � "'" ,
Y1 rr y ', A..i frE'� Egg d + r ➢^r"t �:t � �•�,c{t,� /`4 � '1'kt c V sZ4�x. . •! � 5 .
' r r,;. � Y •,,rs • �+liL "a , � �^;y', i 1S. Yj � s r,�.- r i IV' .J I'r' t
z � - , vf- .J • s.K„ i % y�°."`�€x 5� f; "ri �� 1. �t i 5 i° t ` M'y'r �l�[�_- .." a -. '� tW�- 7zk."�;hkpppp.,!''''' - Jw rk i "+.
+:1i ■• v " .^' �,Sr 7 �(.-NE,fir'8 5"I Si �r 3`�,_ „t.7l 7 u.,;A i {r.1 '.N+r V r'k:y! 'z •' ;gip' n yr. .xfi. �i Ifxju ��:, �.;, wYl9• }q.� •- '., °� rr '>ti4 �.�ts"^'�kYw Is risk l'.r� r{ly�'+rr�r1 lhS moi.,•-:�i ' ';51� tit: .,..rr srl���F%% 'ti _i.. ti� ' �••�'�' :"..�:
�,` ' ::. .k F�t.f+^ 7 Kit A� rtp j;�3 , r"-;. ,,u �_',� -, + t z�1 .rt,q -"'"t -..�• fr -
1, k� _ Y4 °.: 5 { �7rX r i 1 i., �_ , - �y' •"}'S: s1i �IT itfv 'Kw'r" y;; r + • ��'
J 5 kr,y; Jtil:'
e�`y', Vc !.' - �t'i= I r �� 'r�9 r�' Y ; �T r.p .`• - , i S.?iS t 's ! " 4 .�7 �' ..�,. 1+' 1":. pk ! at Y��'s'u1 • y' ° I«
.et� �' •' � ,� +'��,i �1=1�' s' E. -� t'S',M ����rry��erynl7f<., tlx d, rtrR��t Lusw, Frt,°f '!� �- k ,1�. ..' 'L`'
shire ; _ ✓�-'� ! K'IL,��,,� : t�rrl" Y :'• }ar 4s.�,«' r �. - i. I' .. 1 ,f y5� •'4 i�'�r 'Y* "" "5 Y'�' �.y 7�` `1 ,y ,7',1,.
- , y' +yd! �7r ° �.Yi. )y *'4•Y- t ! ,�2 ., {.1P rri^y t 1 � j 1 •.`a. f r' • z
.'{ � * y� L I� , ''�,: ' !s D f s�ii n, JS L ' i� j� * j, y x 1 F �•- + yt J 1 ' - Cy
', ,Jt �i �. SA ;py��, F'�:. I ry _�• I x'7 ' x,..'4' i�p �L;1 �F 5+. .!, s �3� j:: s NV�t sok t 41 { r' +v �`rr,� %'. � :r�
s' = K•fs a J r•y 45)�,.•�r �-I si s f t"r �sR -�a f'! t/ti 1 r 3 +J��, ?:.r , :•( �
r» [ S. '� 1•"o�x� OY a .._ ,.p:sL�s ".R.,�n�res.�''w` k'P., .'�.. ''..!
r
y4r lr hN4 -y.,w {J•Z ;, I -s i �y�.`}S'�' k+1
��� sr�v""� r�.�+7��}, r 1 '" S-�' "'.r�+' _'.. Lr }7 Yp i�-4, o k fir l ! - - r r•�
Y*,''f��'Lar���t '� � p.! t #� t }{ -3 r .kyr 41, y' y+ . �a �'°�}1i tl 4 s t � ay�r I #v6s. �wyxk .\ � r 11 Ixy� t.: , ' +._ •Y.r` �
~ r '4.i�iYF7 { ` les 4 �! f: f z� �r •� n vL r+ ' S{ ;
4'tr �
ati r r(` 1 '' fTi 7 , : I nrl ! � •T 4 r �w,+'.,- r11 •�' �1 7 � t , �'�"
«` �b'!fi,u•,� �� f�.-'k,S- ,, ,�,, r.s'ft -.L.. 1r°�..I }' L, � �p�^X`i. L it r
y�g�r, y A _Iii• ys w+Y;r+r
.KV1'Ep Fi�Jt.��l,��,{i:•�r '�i M1�'� ,rtyl _ �'•,L i' � ti��� i+;,;! 6 u{�:k,:'
r r �,11�:J. ir,• G'Yl}' • i� ,"" a .',rY F , .`ff +r l+S'''r�•Wk - <
k i ,• •r.1Yp p, J 1x1 � !
J I� r' `�� .s .,L '/ ci'>+ ;.i wre,ba. ' : ,`�".ck. 1 i;�a., 9r „r i . 3I.. s 5 rk n 1 ::t, r .ti'• i ° : r. �'
rr. r, r- a . .tik r 3; 'rY.�• S.L ij �5, s..«�y-K, +.• .y+,.�?. '.y. y-'i� ,}'e+t' :,at •_ h', S_ ''u.. r,:'a" f •,,t _ 1..5 a.'-
Ri ;u ,f 'r 1• .rl F c- ''d --r ',� J4�i� '�, ,.kyr .. �'- K'F-,L::...;I'�I .Iti: S !;r t'� ..7,.,, ,�, �F .s .�. .� I ��_<.r�
�se ` r , "I x{ , -�!, 1 :. +,, 7'' � S # f c ` �4' ' r• r I �"4 �r . 1 ,$w��� � � •r ,,. •,K
&�+_.. �.'' _F,r k., ♦ ''1Ypr 5�, rf i,4+t ''�'T�!''n id`rrf .yy s+'�dv +'Y'�•y�'f,''`S"'�'^' a',*,r�,y ',',i [ 9'r .'7+,t _ �r Wr'. y�i "t: ..
di.Ey, � f i, 'G �„k'� /I1/ _�•�u. -! +�I rS.. .}°��,• 1y=, '� ,n .vs. _.+�,s. �5 a.. 3,,r .x',15.
,L;II'.r�fi �11i 1� r 1^r .»r`• C 11 -- e i� r : 11A. Z
' t t 1 ,' ,`K, 4k�4. f (,al I °S Y r ✓r•.. - :i' °., f•" f•(1 , �'- vs. �' n,. II}iK'�� K' -� R i-, r'
+4+. t r i- r 'y d,.. Yi °-ti?'Ik.�- ,:�r: .t:R'-)! t= ;�'�'- 1 .4p 1d3•� ,µ r • t•.i+ i t Y(y �"," ., .h Y+ ° r _ •�
ir'
•r- •',+,fl?' •� rj y:!r'I• s�P �-+,r �'- � "i$S''•rir'1 :�' L�r!'';.,5 W�t+d.+ �=,} ly{ ,;'}:-. �•r,'alai'.. �`-' Vii',:, .tj. '°'
.t'�` 1'. f y,q6 ;1 it Y, '1 •k,='i^ !s r.,l,y 1471y...�5, '`�' :4�� t�r�•'i'^Yr� �r� �-`, �il�•, r .� i �- •>(µ
r,l ! , . r t 'l 75".; 'Tr,',.. 1^r1�Y i "i nP 4' I� R'ar.r',. W1�R 1, �'tx1 5 ., st - y 4 �, W Lv ,:. -� • . F. rx 4pst',�'
Ill�!+ , r 1 ,.� a 1 r ..J• f rwy9.Y -F rl,,,.:*{ -R;I rr ;.1`'�T ,s'�t'W.''� ;,y14!;'a. �, .S._ r .,� r rt -
'
"r #,ttr are {;i : .L~�M1 ,. #r' l !-.. 'f ; ,y '',t,, .� r J7't 4;T " EI': r1 F.>!^�;1 > .:.Y� $'f. .'� r 1' r 4� "s -+Y.� r\ �f ••t` - M 4^��r 1 I� Yr:,Y �� •�.'.,
,T iy r 1 e sY i- 4 ! � s °.. x r , +y ry4 I'' (�,+ ,. -1.lti•k,t` j ? :.Ifi f} -T ' � 1' �''.'..# �'L 1' 1 7 1'r'I _ ''i � '� v TS '.� ! Ir'. Ir {�L"tl I -
0....'i{ 1 ri, .• �;. ip ,� y,•)s1 �' �L '£T'rr ,d<I�• a { � !f 1r, -. ,�"Rl�?,s, r t � tl I C
1 ''r, , 1 ��• � " 4 ;r Y r� '�'I. ..=r.t, .rte'. � �Rr f � {�'�'C s � ° .5�,•1;M`� i -r iy
i� + " i! } r 7 � 5 r. y i t'+' ,x ,�� �,c 1 V+n s y x !;' .rti. >'s's r { • r 1 �. .
�Y%'.::.rre� r 7' '$ �•. - �' �eF�r .,r� 5 ,;�' s, ,yr ita y'`
..�•,N` I ...k}., 't, "[, s � N' i .s .5: .'}':X•b„ s:..�ss�� �. '.w � .•- . +•t.Lr,-i. _:, 7 �z.. •.1 '. _ rs � ai'^'✓,' � r.'. `
,-y$r1s
r° a+ `� V -. >a ,, p r � A. �.: •� a � �,� �f,+�' 1 �� wir• f �,`"li� i :.� .+',a,s, •`� y, 's
F °' t {" I + i "1,�5`" i,,,,y;•�'•'i1z'} �s,;a4•,"Y'" 51�r H J EA 7 r`.. +7F', rsn 1 4
'" ;zAd�t.
y; t fS j �'x 5qy, �.ef L� �,�s•��o r}* VVr �����ps''SSS'',,j�h�� � r .a 't ! s A Mrli i F 1'Ji `, a r u r h
r.f M� - K ° 4�yr��`I .•.,l �'y�'s�Sr$�` 'pg�'7+�h�t7. x �� YW s.�,. "i�� '- i� r"�; J'-1+,.�, ,c'
1 i •^ + 1 s 1--,+°PVd s i ° r � "� i A '�^ .,•. i 17• ,i"rf 1 i-
+ �,: � rt,1r rs 7 ',-nt r Adt' �� !�•"t�^.,�i r � � + r�y,i O� x a a , e +. .tY
y vl•,
IN:• 't
J fI 41 w,�y� . < a,r s 2 .i i�.°�. •{ ''F•''_,ti-`o .,, as' } r'� r.,� :. � `A�� ¢.
y 5,, t 'r ti.F-, y?t•'r4', pf � 1�7 �'�f !''°- r �- fit`..;} ,� 1 {3•�k r �
-5FI
rv, + r r s .g• r s: - a ,--jSI? `,y-1 e, i F'tl r1 r e r i Y I.a x f Lx
Y� '�*°5'-}4..;ysf " r•�s4 - r'. it ' §4. r r r 1 -r 4 - rs :,•tc:n r �:, t,. r�c+-' t .r7' �.R +.
Kl
-* y "s}���, " f 17.1"Y.7' 4'^ 'i ,-,} R S,+ ,.:, a `�.?,sN 7"� , E, � ., �. �� �> '7 •,Y t �"yt r f" L _sv,.
zpr „¢°cr•-_"A "ir' °r I r 1` r ttb L l,a ;}j 4.'' F 2.:
1 7.'`�+*ra. •is, ! p - } r' y,�� 1^ ar1� `�4'�`i� 1C•ir*r -I ,:I. 7 ' y'; , t- °y�7: /�'t {!S ^ �"`a„ 6 r I •?, f tl, - �`mT'.�i
'i'r=. fl 7 w a : ' $� 1• t,:.rw,- z '$.ti.,..r �! �:. e - 1. i..r;k
+'-+;,�r.R'IF �fi' r t + r 5 � � I • y I I . '.• � 17�,I�y, i W :�,j 1 !,p r +all � � 'y� s',� 'z� � y�y -.
:I.v+. �„ _ hr iii r+t'r 1 '�I�• ,i ,�� y •1w Y' 4i.v X'i s+" 'J t. arfi er'h r.{: s
� e..N'�,k, - .. ' f : • r f1; r�sl II e`„{,a. rp711r k}, { y. of + g } a J I r "'Ct �J.� r•a � 5
'k;
. Ll ¢+ rS '� , jjF} ,F- + �!r•,�y,-�—'_ 1 V..�� � ( � f-' 4J14`�rI •�' 5
�,.fl .xj � � K"rt--.fr7 �.L'i a' , -F r 1 �Ax Y l�r .sa.. a ' r. c _ K,''4 •., "fir'' i s: s4r rt-,
F.pr Y 1, 7
�y�y: '{- e< _ ' l 1(rps rY �Y "J 1 "r,.. •i. d -F wl
1 .5-k'4rr"# _.a{ I �,i �E�SJI' t f e�+lViL'.Vf'Irn r• R I'r ''1. I. i , l5 jt, �'_� Y Y ,Kft r- r''. I,
i{�' �'� �' �� ,�• � 1 � 1 �+r{rs 'r' i � 't?btj snyl",yr,r i ur ll k j' ' y +T's �s 'q + 7 r.s �,
'? ''+la ,f e, z-tl�*'� •' r �Itir r Y. r:tl t r f 1 t:.3x- .'-,t*..j: s •,,,, y ' k -w' r =4 , x f 1 I'I F �, ' f �1 _ - i '+� �s'
�,} :1t' .`.- k-1, ;F �.h 35v,r H .,1A y •:; �`M r _ •'R. {:' r �t,,< '�#ln
v
yf'� -
,.(-:
4_Y-'.�-5r; 4:y7'� ,�+�5 w7', s 71 ~�••Il 1 -4 i {it.1F
. >v.•• 1 , , i � k ,gyp .�.. .i._ , i
y r'y' �', 1 •1 :,�+h l - � tk x �' - ' �. -.'1 i' 1.7'r'Lr,�'�aS 11 (,. A+rPM j r +jq��t
i ) f. •- ': ,�-�f)�+`Lra t
' �. ;• rr ,t.w ,1 `Y +'r 4 r.! .'{tl' al k..
r. 11 J
w,�
'.; �.. 7+7'�1-�, x '•.4, ) r, _' Z 1 S •rr wi s .1-'-•�x� � #T ` }I#_ ,r r r r C
dp� ',--7! �• 117 +�? 4 .,�•. �,,.�``.` ry;"�'="� a ° v'1a Y' I ,t. ! v�
.j {: Yfr 7 ,� �' �i� � . .' .4 •' rrE'� s r �} r a� o v F 1''r ^ F,%+
q t L
..+i....il e r J '�Ir x Ir, r� �, r+ . rt ;t �'•.r�g���. � I -
ur r �.� t 1 C 1� I 4' t 7 � f•`� s7�1"'7 r ., � 5 I t 5 ri , I I °E r 1. :1 �", v +� "
r� l �7- M1�IiY�'y it -I� i hA {f.'` ,a1;`� P.!'i : ;r 'I .`i1, i`W �.r _ eM !�•
r 1 �+ -f ,! .,.tr.+:a rl �'_,' �, .+� - .'x! �•r ,t. ',av, ISr'r��.� I ; t� �. r. .,�.
-
'
1
, •�' 4 R
+t :eyl",�tMl`� ',P•eq rJ' r N �,r 1 r rt' s �,�r J. y• y r rl
r i "e r •. �p^ J s -. S%• •• rr ! v t�"N
L i� 7E9,,' •1<s •
fj
h,m•� r' fl '��' 7.��'� y r<.,t rF�h ``"�"ft✓,,•y,�Gr •Y ,,•�r+ '� f f � � r rr° tiK,� 5 '�.,. _ i r,.' r
i 5 t t r57
k " � �� ° '� 't11�� t ,,• „rP" �r Ar :rye f . x � ' 4 ::;
4d:L� �4{'� .U^7:ark,K, .#r K � F�,. - f�. ;'� w si,, ;-',, e, ,,, ,�' ,� r�r •t; �"�`1"wp ^^ 1 .
i.i - + s :% ,, ';i � i •y�7.Kr L'�y�i i :-:;J - ;J /".i+t^" .:Rl�'1A- 4 y.�v �,. s
�. ,n'. '�•.} ,.F� -,S i*-<Y.-rlt��rt� '�'r{ ..r. .rr;'s,: q h.W.. �° y .:,M,r,�5' ry`�yftl
S - 3 'sr J ��f 'r '17ii ,.P nr 1:-. f&�f �1 � U a a , y..W sr�: n ,�,.j .� y ,��r - a �<r. S'J•". :;; -, e r,., %
q' •',r 11'1\x,-.F""'i�� 51'. �„T [. �t: r .•. e�t �5�''Lr Ar < 1� n� .zL�''i�w tt:[ :r. + N�;. Y'�.+1 �o- rrY it r
rri r,. 'Y :�. r.+- fT ilr 7?�' �. �G rr}�. •�' S r d ;. rly - .•rS�, :l;� r Y'1 'i 'r, ,aJ l+..'
r �`; 1 ?Y ?' i• 1 r� r 'r �..f 5 ° z p + ,Jk.- ` ! * t,, .,:� I � i
y '9:r t�"�� 'ra � ',+Ivr°r �i L J1 � s�41 a A 7r )..u��$t� i+,i,L� {-�:. _ •. •�:n •r ,t^
"1. ! r;t.A ii''.� , 7- '.I F�+''li; I ,"'” k r �1 l.f . - u ,.i1 \ ,:� ' ''.:t'r'- . r S '•�
=+G.1'�'4 Nf�rA�yF �kY:p. ,'1J�°.r r '•�{YR:-gyp .fir r, 74Pf�x-,� 'ye� ��i�`'iFi9+� 1.,.,..�K }4�'^ �s !�-f`iL�'�1+•N L. 'fy
,Ea; e. ! '� t-.., ,"'a ,y+�$K;':p SY •..a� r,X�f'•. f ?�r- �{ lr t`. .S S6 i =4~ n rtr �sf- � e°�'r `tii°'. �b•� r rfy+�s�,,: _sT& �'f'ar� -05' y '.+v3'�M .':
.yr ' - r r' t� i ilr' 'sap�� I L ' 7r'�j,y�yLrl` ltey.7-: a' s :--1i%'� .,.r.yL%C'T•j,y,r./��, x,t
. �y�y`�['� � a,;'+'i:''d '-5 y1-{ •J11 r'r �'y °:y,Y �T1�'1. jL{��i�j,ll, .�r r �3° > d'Ir }{'��'1y'•Y+Sy.
R. r' i`.. _ r • 3 i yl �,y ��1'�r �yL� 'i d CI�' rs�' r .'t r'..H 1 .V'f,�S%` J ..
�„3�dr"�'}k`t .' 7s'L-a �.� •rj1�e rtt;.lt�r': �k G � �r'e`a�; ^?;'� �] ":r�' �.
;1J,,"_7
sy 1
t
r IS
;1J,,"_7

OM
, p�,z!
I,tu IS",
V51,
110 �,3 11,
7q,
YV-
So,
41
v:R
Fv,
1," 0,
" e -.t ':.,
_ q!g ?
NM —,
1T,
RY7
IN
Ar
ZIN
Af,
"Nn. T ".4
0 1-�,
11---1 �W, I., -li
I INN AV
VNI,
Q2