490070_PERMIT FILE_20171231

The following farm does not meet the 214,0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility on the registration databaie.
Facility Number: Taj " `70
C.
Farrn Name:
Own: ,_ L - .,__. vl� L ft -Z.�/
Mailing Address:
NC DEPT. OF ENV1R0NMtN .j .
e ANDNATURACRE66Uk 8 N
County: T Q of .: �l - MMSIRLLE REwoNAL omw
Folk
This Operation is: FEB 13 2003
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation WATR Q TY SECTION
out of busines`slno animals on site
closed out per MRCS standards
-- -- 1e1ovv ale--th=ho]d_(irss_sh., 7 nn lvdna, lam-con5ncd�a141�,� ho�srs�l_8 she p_or
30,004 -poultry with a liquid animal waste management sy%=)
Comments:
I am fully aware that should the number of aaimals increase beyond the threshold limit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for any reason, X will be required to
Dotify and re -register with the Division of Water Quality.
Signature: Date:
�'G 3
Plmo return complewd f to: : DE- NR-DWQ
Wat,cr Quality Secricn
Campliauce Group
P.O. -Boz 29535
Raleigh., NC.27626-0535
�L 7G��vtS c�r� RR -4197
P cC: G�
5�--
[G`�

NE Holly, Directions U
OF W A rF9 Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ 4 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 T Alan W. tQimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 22, 2002
Dorman Loyd
1398 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Notice of Violation (NOV)
Site Inspection Report
Shady Brook Farm, Facility 4: 49-70
IredelI County, NC
Dear Mr. Loyd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on November 21,
2002. A review of your files indicated that you failed to obtain a waste analysis within 60 days of the
April 2002 waste application dates. Therefore, this letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation for
the failure to provide complete records during an inspection in violation of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 OC and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A 2H. 0217 (d).
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by December 15, 2002
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation. Please address your response to the
attention of Mr. Johnson. It is also requested that your response reference the date and subject of this
NOV, as well as the facility number.
Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. If you
have any questions concerning the report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Coordinator
File
N7 MR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]
2 of 2 11/21/02 2:20 PM

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O'Operation Review .p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Facility Number Q9 7U Date of Visit: 11R1/20D2 Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Q Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Sdtadyy. Brno d Urm.............................................................. County: ixe,.d.....--•--•--•--•..............--•--. MQ........
Owner Name: dalesLflXd_._______________._______-_--- Phone No: 7D.4S2�_9T3------------___------------
MailingAddress: d39.8.FrigudsblR.R4............................................................................ SJOICSY1,UC.AC............ .....................................
FacilityContact: ........................................................... Title:............................................... Phone No: .........
Onsite Representative: I�Qa1�iLR1'J?---------------------------------- Integrator:------------------------�___-----------•
Certified Operator: JubjmD,....... .........................LQyd,.................................................. Operator Certification Number:21% 4_.
Location of Farm:
7rom the intersection of Hwy. 115 and Friendship Rd. (SR 1896), travel east on Friendship Rd. approximately.2 mi. Farm is
in the left side of road. General location: approximately 6 mi. north of Statesville.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' S8 10 s
%Design`Current .,, :�esignrCurreni
�._.
::Swine c F Capacity'puptilation Poultrk. .Capacitv'Populatii
<).
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude 80 ' ®i F 3971,
the .
n ` - � Ca `aci ' Po als
Dairy 160 65
Non -Dairy
60
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon . ElSpray Field [3Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it teach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in ga]/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
«'aste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Strucnire 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure fi
Identifier: ................
Freeboard (inches): 48
aCIA .7 nr
J-....•j...—I

VJ/VJ/V1
r
Facility Number: 49-7Q Date of Inspection 111121120021
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of -the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Com (Silage & Grain) Small grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required kecords & Documents
---THE FACILITY HAS BEEN RECERTIFIED FOR 90 MILK COWS.
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General -Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
---FAILED TO OBTAIN A WASTE ANALYSIS FOR THE WASTE APPLIED IN APRIL 2002. NOV TO BE ISSUED.
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
N Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about.thb visit.
0 on
�Y. Y
o ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
---THE FACILITY HAS BEEN RECERTIFIED FOR 90 MILK COWS.
THE MILK PARLOR WASH WATER SHOULD BE DIVERTED TO THE WASTE STORAGE POND.
---FAILED TO OBTAIN A WASTE ANALYSIS FOR THE WASTE APPLIED IN APRIL 2002. NOV TO BE ISSUED.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �% �'� ��, y--� Date:

FA
Ur'� 7i �LiV� E -MR ICH - W0 Fax:S19-715-6048 Apr 21 X97 14:1J
REQUEST FOR MOV 4,L OF REGISTRATI0
F. 02/02
The following farm does not meet the 21-1.0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility oa the registration database.
Facility Number:
Farm Name:
Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
This Operation is:
pasture only Ono confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out ofbusiness/rio animals on site
cLlose'd,. out per �NRCS standards
USIOW —Lill:—�LLii$ill`�SS—Ih3L.25Q YVC1slG.���}�OQ�ACC�G��,��OFSCS�L04=she or
30,000-pouluy with a liquid un+ma] write .manapment system)
Comments:
I am fully swam that should the number of animals increase beyond the threshold limit or the
operation mccts the 2H .0200 registration requirements for any reason, X will be required to
notify and re-registcr with the Division of Water Quality.
Signature:
Please re= completed I= to: DEHNR DWQ
Water Quality Scctica
Cumpliemce Grove
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27625-0535
Date:
CL
zIcS"`
RR -4/97

0`'0� w A rE9QG
O �c
John R. Loyd
1392 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Loyd:
Michael F. Easley
r---:701PV
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Subject:
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
A]an D, Johnson
Environmental Specialist II
�A
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748
FAX [phone]

{�',�:k°;tfx,.i��-.f.?'1$�� Y� J. •'�' ! r" a. � -!. :r �" t.'.�aj}fi, L '"'* _ t .� � a.r�,4P '�- y�.� tii:� 4:�-,� :S,' { - �' mi"4�4_�: ria ;f,
F WArF
0 RQG Michael F. Easley
Governor
c r William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Karr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 1, 2001
Dorman Loyd
1398 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Site Inspection Report
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Loyd:
Mr. Alan.Johnson of this Office conducted a siteinspection of your facility on May 30, 2001.
Based on his review of the files, this letter is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency for the failure to
perform a waste analysis within 60 days of the April 2001 waste application dates.
With'the exception of the above, the records appeared to be complete. Enclosed please find the
inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. If you have any questions concerning this
matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
A9716 —
NnEw
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E,
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 2B115
PHONE [phone]B
FAX [phone]

.yn�, tr�i%'ir"Fiur!?�f"�'d�'i�r:'r.n '�' itis`t?'l.:,i1.��&:«r���;='',��wG '+r � v' �i' .r'ac1:.�.�1:1.�.X� yr.j'' +`,+'' '�' �.`�*x»�`:�4�c��xlfYiMc.��'7�Y.�m��.tiaC,': i'�•+��%tw�'ti�'
-
- � � i- � i �•. i �'",6�+r.'>;.�s4�' "'�`- 4 ~ F
�'�A ��i N�t ����'n
r�e1�'...:5.,3�"��
�� ���.i�'�� • �f�i. '� �
y
�.v,�.�Glir ') i-4 '1•tlr.��., � � 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 • 1 �
`; �'+n �
t�kr 'yI
� ti
� _ ���T iL ,L'. �!� J 1 � P F- '�:5,��
•.i�l{'.T. - � `;FK,�::',_.�:4
A" _. �" �.r. �� �'���'f - <F. �-,i rY .. -��-
•. i5 s .i.t x�. 1GI � 'r � � i'�tr-r' Cr p,..pt"-' �-
Yy S�'n,..:i
y, �yS� r
�i%+"• d'1'-'t=`S- '
d '�,
-2-.Fyy.?}_i.iiType
.'=t=''Y s M .�i�-'� . r., ..-
-.r,,•e`•� ...�s•'Z L
of Visit d&,Compliance Inspection, 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon EvaluationReason
for Visit ARoutine O.Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification
0 Other Denied Access
Date orvisiL• d Time: r
1 10 F'aciIity Number "7
Not O erational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted .[3 Certitifiedl❑ Conditionally` Certified 0 Registered Date bast Operated or Above Threshold: -..--- .
Farm Name: .....L.7C.� L .0 ....2 lF?.............. County: — --- •......... _ ...
.... ..... ..........
Owner Name: , }�....._..... 1
�C� .................. Phone No:.........................................................................
L-� . .Facility Contact: .Title: Phone No: ....................
/ f
Mailing Address: ....... �.1. ... .....
�..t1.�.Sl�i.f .. (!-_. S /7 _ dd
..............................................._JK.....�..--......._.......
Onsite Representative: ...,•• '_ ` .-�,- .8]%, . Integrator
Certified Operator;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:.s:_.SE1—C....... !---N1aw..................................... Operator Certification
Location of Farm:
1`7 Swine ❑ Poultry " ❑ Cattle [:]Horse Latitude �• �� �� Longitude �' ��•'
Design Current
wanon
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer'
❑Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
:'Numb'
ug...
. `:
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
tuber of,La oars � ,� ❑ ❑ P Y
Holdin Ponds / S
g' olid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
- -
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/rnin?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
i
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes allo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes E!FNo
t
01/01101
Continued

Faciiity�Nuiiiber- �� -��'.. ;._....s,.�.,.�`
"' Y 'Daae of inspecfiori -
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes �No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structur: l Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......... ...... ........................................................................I......................................................
Frccboard (inches) 7 Z............
— .ire there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie.; trees, severe erosion.
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or -environmental threat, notify DIVQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding E] PAN C] Hydraulic Overload
12. Crap type -5-1"ce, // I _� vl
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CANVIMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
17. Are outcrops present?
18. s thI er ater supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Reauired Records &: Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available'?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis s": soii sample reports)
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
23_ Did the faciliEv fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit'
(ie/ discharge. _reeboard problems, over application)
2 nec[or fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representa[i:e:
Did Reviewer ins
-2ouire a follow-up vi;:: by same agency?
27. ",ere any ac::aional problems note: '•vhich cause noncompliance of the Certified :=.'.VN1P1
odor Issue.s
2�. oes t e discharge pipe from thece-tinement building to the storage pond or lagccn :ail to discharge at/or below
houid leve! or iasmon or storage pond •xim no agitation?
re there a".. _e:;p animals not disp:: _ _ of properly within 24 hours?
of/l)1/G_
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes KNO
❑ Yes e No
❑ Yes 21�o
❑ Yes �- o
❑ Yes )Q No
❑ Yes 2L.No
❑ Yes [ZNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes KLNo
❑ Yes E j -No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes X10
jo-yes ❑ No
❑'Yes -C No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes R� No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes E�No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [?,,&o
Cnniinuvd

Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads,'building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the Iiquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes kNO
33. Do the animals feed storage'bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes [b No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenUtemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
T n `t - ,'.: .j�:� � .. ` 'U
Reviewer/Inspector Name 5 - �=-' -� `' =
_%sa�� s.sar=�•Te . �_ i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: .�4( /'
1

OPERATIONS BRANCH - WQ Fax:[phone] Apr 21 '97 14:13 P-02/02
REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF REGISTRATION
The following farm does not meet the 2H.0200 registration requirements. Pleasr, inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number-,
Farm Name:
Owner: rX0�j
f
Mailing Address:
WC DEPT. Or
ANDNATU*",�'
022
t:
County: �ed��rl'. 't-:r�lk
-FEB 0 240
This Operation is:
IYSECTION
pasture only '{no.confinement)
"--'dry litter poultry, operation
out of business/n.0 animals on site.
closed out per NRCS standards
30,000-poulrry with a liquid wiiina) waste management system)
Comments:
I am fully aware that should the number of animals increase beyond the threshold IiTnit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for any reason, I will be required to
notify and re -register with the Division of Water Quality.
Signature:-
rezuen-66fiiiietod form to: 1DEHNR-DWQ
Water QU81iry-Section
Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Date:
AACwl J-6 ck ri S 6 P-\
Ct C""
RR -4/97

Cu
C-fjc 0
r '4

:NCDENR
i,tJAMES B. HUNT JR:.<S.
r
;`.GOVERNOR ,:.`k,•.
-- r
BILL KOLMAN '
"SECRETARY
•i'I IN
oy,•c
X3..3 •° 44��
Y' r �. w ti ..•
`4
��G. s` i'.'.."i TS41z`.
Vt I_nj
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL; OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 31, 2000
John D. Loyd
1398 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Loyd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on August 22, 2000. Based on his observations, your files appeared to be complete;
however, the facility appeared to lack adequate maintenance.
Specifically, the storage pond and the pipe (broken) discharging into the
grassed filter strip were in need of repair and maintenance. The excessive growth of
weeds on the storage pond embankments needs to be removed and the groundhog
burrows need to be filled. Also, the broken pipe immediately to the rear of the milk
parlor needs to be repaired.
Because your operation is below the 100 animal threshold you may request
that your facility be removed from the "active" list. With the corrections to the
above noted deficiencies and the completion of the enclosed Request for Removal
form, this office will approve the removal of your facility from the register.
Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely, j((
(J � l \'mow
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County SWCD
Comphance/Enforcment Unit
File
819 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 26118
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

&Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Q Routine D Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Uale of Visit: Coe) Time:13 Printed on: 7121/2000
Facility Number / )
0 Not (? erational 0 Below Threshold
❑ Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified 1] registered Date Last Operated or hove Threshold:
Farm Name S� �s..Cf! z�?f-a.....�>..t Counti:...Pc.l P.l_.....................................................
..................�...� ......................................
Owner Name: J `,v� � 1 hone No• ti-?,, t�........t .7
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Citic:..........................
Mailing Address:...� ..1�'. .. s ri1 .... .!4t �G\ .........................
J ..................................
Onsite Representative:.�.,t....41.. .� ►!� 1.:�±-i1.......... :�'....
Certified O eratorJ,....t�rar:vt2c'..............�. `..................................
P..... .......
ation of Farm:
............I ................. Phone No:..............-..._
................................
Integrator:......................................................................................
Operator Certification Numher:,';>'5-�.. :...................
wr
❑ Swine ❑ PoultryCattle ❑ Horse Lati Longitude
Design Current
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag -in Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Discharges & Stream Im pact~
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? El Yes KNa
Discharge orhuinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharsze is observed, %vas the cunvcyance than -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is nhserved. did it reach Water of the State`! (If yes, nrnifv DWQ)
[I Yes ❑ No
c. If discharLc is obscrvcd. what is the estiinated now in talhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a la,?non system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 5N6
5
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters 4the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
N'aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freehnard plus storm storage) less than adequate? •�j Spillway —]Yes No
Sti'UGLurc I Structurc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..................................... ....................................
Freehoard finches -j: �7/0
ring
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
F1 Yes MNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure pian? ❑ Yes KNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the struCtures need maintenancelimprovement? Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [Rfo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? [,Yes ❑ No
lVaste tkpplication
10. Are there an)' buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes 9�No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes gNo
12. Crop type C_ a v^ tr'\
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ANO
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [�io
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Retards & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? fie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. 1s facility not in compliance with an), applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freehoard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes gNo
l 3Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 5kNo
❑ Yes J9 No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Yes qNo
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes OkNo
❑ Yes ZtNo
❑ Yes [l No
0: �Vfl vibla,Wiis:oi-• iie#iciencies were hated• dur'irtg tbis:visit; • Yoit wilI -t. eedve Citi further' • ;
corres ondence: abaut tkris visiti..:........... ...... ..................... ........ .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Y/&a
7)
�
%i—r� �,,.4.c\ ��e, c.;�v—�'v � 5 ►lam � `� �v � t('�uv�cti U�d -
-Vk -e, y - z S0UI
ca rem,�_ . i
QC '�1 £. L tS�
t
.Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

0 OPERATIONS BRANCH -- WO Fax:[phone] Apr 21 '97 14.13 P.02/02
REOEEST FOR REMOVAL OF .REGISTRATION
7he folloA-ing farm does not meet the 214 .0200 registration requirements. Please inactivate this
facility on the registration database.
Facility Number. T J ~ 7 L
Farm Name:
owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
This Operation is:
pasture only (no confinement)
dry litter poultry operation
out of business/no animals on site
cl -.d out per MRCS standards
--__..`�,.....belOv4'•-�1�t�li'�Si1Dld--(1�.a�tha�25Q��xnti._1Qii,can�r�ca441��7.��gFs�s,_1000_sE���P or
30,00 -poultry with a liquid animal waste management system)
'Comments:
I am fully Swart that should the number of animals increase beyond the threshold limit or the
operation meets the 2H .0200 registration requirements for any reason, I will be required to
notify and re -register with the Division of water Quality.
Signature: Date:
P1aRse return camnletcd form to: DEHNR-DWQ
Wator Quality Sect;=
Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-4535
R R -Q/9 7

t ••➢ � �T� �K ntllr��tAsY`
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL_ OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
John Loyd
1392 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Loyd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
November 10, 1998. In general, the facility was observed to be in good shape.
A review of the management plan indicated that a couple of fields used for waste
application were not listed in the plan. Also, two fields that were listed did not have
accompanying maps. Please contact your technical specialist for this information.
It was noted that a record of the spring waste application was missing from the
records. All waste applications must be recorded.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
1 D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Nan -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
619 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

John R. Loyd
1392 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 9, 1999
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr, Loyd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a kite inspection of your facility on June 2,
1999. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be in good shape.
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review. The
following items must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas must be shown.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Must have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice
of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should be
made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general waste should
be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2811 S
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /APPIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

°i. , 0 Division of Soil and=Water Conservateon `"4pera1lon�Review , 'i',: E.°Ns Er, d h � E�
;' t .0 Division of Soil and, Water Conservation, ,Comphance inspection
� - i , I a ik. d�
®'Drv�sion of Water Quality Compliance Inspectyon
_ , �.
therA enC ',Operation,lk Vv
g, ..y•,... r.,.,. ,>., s,�,,,,u,,, , -•3, uFz .,�; ...,I. .',, ..:..,.i e..i.?),... .,,.,r .un.. .,.r:'kYa_,.� ,.[..�,,
JIR Routine 0 Com faint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 4L.6,0 124 hr. (hh:mm)
El Permitted SkCertified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........... X:LGl.(,C......f. TzM, X ..........lr??erre. .................................. county: �'...... ..e.((.....................
Owner Name: .� G�..�1 / ...................... .................................................. Phone No:... �.Z."`... %. .....
Facility Contact : .................................................. .. Title. I hone No
Mailing Address: .... ��.�.f%.......... �rt �Fc.Gt;!.F4(r �....... k .......................... ...z; -.4m ti3.4.1.��...................................... �.�.0_7>.
Onsite Representative:....< ............. ,�... Into rator ............................
........................................................... #;
Certified Operator:...... ........ 1� .................t6.A..... Operator Certification Number:.....2,1..2:7.. '
Lg,oHtion of Farm:
atitude Longitude u • �� ���
F i�`DCS1gR Current 9iDe51gn Current .Ir ilr° DeSlgn CUCrent
Swine Ga acit Po ulation Poultry`. Ca achy Po itlation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
"
❑ Layer
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
TV AR ;
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
}
Total SSLW
Number 4 Lagoons. ' ' ; , ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Arc
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
`,{
❑ Spray Field Area
E.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes 4 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
cl, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J4 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts,to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? . ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 14 Spillway ❑ Yes PTIo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ..........72.
........................................................................................................................ ........I.............................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ YesNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facilit}►Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes [�fNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ,q Yes ❑ No
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �jNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes WNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes S�No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes RNo
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
C&No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes-
Wo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
g No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[3*No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
.;,Yes
XNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? kYes f No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: Ifo yiolpooso 0eticioaLA9 •were poi;ed. dtrrt> g th#smsit;-'Y;ow wifl•teegiye t}o; fut tag
COMeSbondel & about: this visit:
sc."/
�f�>��� os� �4tr•ti Ile.c�r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Hart .,etz .F
+C. � �c� o� sovtti� ��•e�c� 5_
rFsl� •�►� d••tGe .
Date:
❑ Yes E'No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 3.No
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes RNo-
❑ Yes .® No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes gNo
FNIMw.0 .
so
J

F
outine O Com faint O Follow-uof DWO ins eclion O lwollow-UD of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Registered 0 Certified © Applied ' for Permit © Permitted
Farnx Name: ...ILaj...�......... n. e./....... ................
Owner Name: ................... P..k1 t.-1...........................................
Facility Contact:
............... Title:
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Not Opera . Date Last Operated: ..........................
County:........`r -t .................................................
�tMailing Address:..../.3i..�.�.................... .. .. r.......... &A ............
OnsiteRepresentative: .................................................................................
Certified Operator ;.......�c.�!ter►........b....... ..YA...........
x
PhoneNo: ....... 5...Z..Z..... ... 7AC)-j.........................
TOS -1 Son -Po rvt^a✓'�
.................. I.................. Phone No:...................................................
............a. $ W1 Le- .............................
Integrator: ......................................................................................
............. Operator Certification Number,..,.. ? .,i .q.,`'�,......,...
Location of Fnm.
...... ................ ....... ..t. ......................5......... .. ,t'l'1.. t!� S.. s..fes..... +
f....... Cc. ......................`/... ...... ...... . n.......5R..............��. M. ... OZ77..... fe....... , .............................................................. .
Latitude ' 6 46 Longitude • ' "
tresign - 3 uurreni ri tiesagn u.urrent
SWygine �Cliacity "`Population -Poultry Capacity Population <, Cattle" t..
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
k'o.w..,�....a✓
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
$4 No
❑Division of Soil and Water Cnservation
❑ Other Agency
ER No
+
fir^
+ s Division of Water Quality
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
e. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
outine O Com faint O Follow-uof DWO ins eclion O lwollow-UD of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Registered 0 Certified © Applied ' for Permit © Permitted
Farnx Name: ...ILaj...�......... n. e./....... ................
Owner Name: ................... P..k1 t.-1...........................................
Facility Contact:
............... Title:
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Not Opera . Date Last Operated: ..........................
County:........`r -t .................................................
�tMailing Address:..../.3i..�.�.................... .. .. r.......... &A ............
OnsiteRepresentative: .................................................................................
Certified Operator ;.......�c.�!ter►........b....... ..YA...........
x
PhoneNo: ....... 5...Z..Z..... ... 7AC)-j.........................
TOS -1 Son -Po rvt^a✓'�
.................. I.................. Phone No:...................................................
............a. $ W1 Le- .............................
Integrator: ......................................................................................
............. Operator Certification Number,..,.. ? .,i .q.,`'�,......,...
Location of Fnm.
...... ................ ....... ..t. ......................5......... .. ,t'l'1.. t!� S.. s..fes..... +
f....... Cc. ......................`/... ...... ...... . n.......5R..............��. M. ... OZ77..... fe....... , .............................................................. .
Latitude ' 6 46 Longitude • ' "
tresign - 3 uurreni ri tiesagn u.urrent
SWygine �Cliacity "`Population -Poultry Capacity Population <, Cattle" t..
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
$4 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ER No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
e. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�Wo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
1ANo
5. Does any park of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
�To
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
,,,�,�
bNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
�.jV0
7/25/97

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (%agoonsjlolding_Ponds, Flush Pits, etc._)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes tANo
❑ Yes 0 -No
e
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft) .......................................................................................................................:........._..................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes �LNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes WNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes q&No
O'No.violations'or. deficiencies:were-noted,during this;visit. You:will' eicei�e.n&f rih�er,;-
coerespondeko about .this: visit::....::: : : .
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
a�
g -e_45
use
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
WO
Waste Application
P�
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
%No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
t
15.
Crop type L?1Cd!t...... I ...... W.tLe i((/.............................................................................................................................................
......
lb.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
gNo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
KNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
EYNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
Ri Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
For
Certified -or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
No
O'No.violations'or. deficiencies:were-noted,during this;visit. You:will' eicei�e.n&f rih�er,;-
coerespondeko about .this: visit::....::: : : .
0601 4 C. GCS 17k�
aP p1l e4640K. reCb rdy ,,t the - v4� c6 K%P�' 4' J'pk.~ a
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
a
Date:
G r-0" (e
a�
g -e_45
use
:A � �,,
a
you 1t
P�
0601 4 C. GCS 17k�
aP p1l e4640K. reCb rdy ,,t the - v4� c6 K%P�' 4' J'pk.~ a
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
a
Date:

Nr*4
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
John Loyd
1392 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Site Inspection
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Loyd:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH [MAIN STREET, MOOR SEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 7.61 15
PHONE 704.6e3-1699 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /APPtRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 30% RECYCLE0/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitro_eenn (N Application_for_Common Crops:
• SmalI Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the com is 18 inches high. '
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (112) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (112) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 Ibs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely tum around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
rl Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
October 8, 1998
Mr. John Loyd
1392 Friendship Road
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
Shady Brook Farm
Facility No. 49-70
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Loyd,.
On October 8, an Operation Review was conducted of Shady Brook Farm, facility no. 49-70. This
Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10D, is one of two visits scheduled for all
registered livestock operations during the 1998 calendar year.
During the Review, it was noted that there was inadequate storage in the waste holding pond. Since
failure to maintain adequate storage and freeboard in waste holding ponds is illegal, your operation
along with supporting documentation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for further
investigation and possible enforcement action. G. S. 143-215.10E requires me to notify Division of
Water Quality and the owner/operator' of this observed violation.
It is imperative that this problem be eliminated immediately. You are strongly encouraged to contact
your certified technical specialist for help. You may also want to contact your local Soil and Water
Conservation District Office since they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or
financial assistance to implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental regulations,
animal waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and disposal systems must be properly sized, maintained and operated under the
responsible charge of a certified operator.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 7041663-1699 ext. 276 if you have any questions, concerns or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Rocky D. Durham
Environmental Engineer I
Enclosure
cc: Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files
918 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOR EaV I LLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLE13110% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr, (hh:mm)
p Registered M Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Shady.RraokEarm...................................................................................... County: Iredell MRO
Owner Name: John ........................................ Loyd .......................................
Facility Contact: John.D.Layd ...................................................Title:....
Mailing Address: Li9.8.Exiandship.Rd...................................................
Onsite Representative: d,,.Djarmaa.Layd..............................................
Certified Operator: ,InhnD.................................. Loyal..........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©s®c �u
esign,Cu.
E Swine Capac�ty`�1Popi
li a .....at 4i at_axe....?,.....a
❑ can to Feeder
❑
Phone No: .7.0.4-.592-.9373 ...............
................................................ Phone No:.........
Statesxalie-NC...................................................... 2867.7 ..............
........ Integrator: ...........................................................................
.......... Operator Certification Number: 21974 .............................
Longitude ® S «
esign urren esign urren
ash }Pnulfry �i3 k ', G�apacity'I�PopuliitW Cattle Capacity Populataon
, „E,
!�yk,
p r ayer ® Dairy 60 60
❑ Non -Layer ❑ on- airy
❑Other
fE
Total Design Capacity 69
Total.SSLW 84,00
A: I•
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) [)Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require []Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
7/25/97 Continued on back
Feeder toFORTF—
Farrow to
can
❑ Farrow to
ee er
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Phone No: .7.0.4-.592-.9373 ...............
................................................ Phone No:.........
Statesxalie-NC...................................................... 2867.7 ..............
........ Integrator: ...........................................................................
.......... Operator Certification Number: 21974 .............................
Longitude ® S «
esign urren esign urren
ash }Pnulfry �i3 k ', G�apacity'I�PopuliitW Cattle Capacity Populataon
, „E,
!�yk,
p r ayer ® Dairy 60 60
❑ Non -Layer ❑ on- airy
❑Other
fE
Total Design Capacity 69
Total.SSLW 84,00
A: I•
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) [)Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require []Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: 49_70 Date of Inspection
8, Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush,Pill,Ctc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
pF .. o -violations.or deficiencies*were .mo a nng Is vlsl . as will.receive no further. .
�e Kesj?oAdeUep a4QR� tijiS.yiSi .. .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ..............A.2...........................................................................................................................................................
...................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
H No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ....... C.Ain..(SilagA.&.CTxain.)....... SmaU.Gmin.(.WheaL.Barley.�...............................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in they An9l Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
H No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
H No
For
Certified -or Permitted Facilities Only
23,
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
H No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
® No
pF .. o -violations.or deficiencies*were .mo a nng Is vlsl . as will.receive no further. .
�e Kesj?oAdeUep a4QR� tijiS.yiSi .. .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

:.;:
^•� E I
6�t
ac1�l��vg�I o��r atI
O nl
r-714 t Sa.
tt z
Coun
ireaen
Owner
o n ILoyd
manager
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
anaay isroox r arm
F o�Number
essee
Region
0 ARO 0 MRO 0 WARO 0 WSRO
p FRO p RRO p WIRO
I1�0.1•L,..iro ..a....c.. . ....rre�ra5nip a..go �.mllesfarmis..o..iei....... ............. .
�I
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
A. 00im. QST Date inactivated or closed
p Swine p Poultry ■ Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity �Ri2t1�m
A
ii•:o�: $iJ:::
Total 60 Cattl=
SSLW 84,000
Dairy

Latitude Longitude
•
p Request to be removed ■ Removal Confirmation Recieved
O Irrlgallun ays
p Higher Yields
p Vegetation
p Acreage
p Other
Comments I below threshold - DWQ IBasin Name:lYadkin
Regional DWQ Staff MFJOEM Date Record Exported to Permits Database

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 22, 1998
John Loyd
1392 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: State Register
Shady Brook Farm, Facility ##: 49-70
Iredell, NC
Dear Mr. Loyd:
Because you are below the threshold number of 100 cows, you facility can be
removed from the state register. If plan to remain below 100 cows, you may fill the
enclosed form to request your removal from the register. A request from the owner is
required to remove the facility from the list. Please forward your request to Sue
Homewood at the address on the bottom of the form. Your prompt attention on this matter
would be greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�' _,r`, Z
Alan Johnson
Environmental Specialist II
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 26115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor 1DEEHNF;Z
Jq�lathan B, Howes, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 16, 1997
Mr. John Loyd
1392 Friendship Road
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
SUBJECT: Operation Review Corrective Action Recommendation
Shady Brook Farm
Facility No. 49-70
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Loyd,
On July 2, an Operation Review was conducted of Shady Brook Farm, facility no. 49-70. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215,1 OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was n.4I being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and operated under
the responsible charge of a designated operator. However, the following management deficiency was discovered
and noted for corrective action: failure to install start pumping marker within the pond. This management
deficiency needs to be addressed and corrected. You are encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist if
additional assistance is needed. During any ensuing reviews, this same deficiency will be re-examined to determine
if corrective action was implemented.
In order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental regulations, animal waste cannoS be
discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems
musl.l7g prQprrly maintained and operate under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
Please remember that you are required to obtain and implement an approved animal waste management
plan by the end of this year. The plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 277 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional
information. I have passed your request for removal from the register on to the Division of Water Quality in
Raleigh.
Cinrerely
919 North Main Street, 14, FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 � An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

0
Mr. John Loyd
July 1b, 1997
Page 2
jY
cc: Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
John Loyd
Rt, 5 Box 161
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Loyd:
MIA
IDFHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 18, 1997
Subject: Removal from State Registry
Shadybrook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
Your facility is currently on the state register for animal facilities. Those facilities on the
register are required to have a designated certified operator as of January 1, 1997 and a certified
farm plan by December 31, 1997. The facilities are also subject to two operational reviews/
inspections per year.
The Division of Water Quality has received confirmation that your facility can be
removed from the state register. However, to remove the facility from the register we must have a
request from you. With that in mind, enclosed is a form for you to complete and forward to
Raleigh. The address is on the form. Please send it to the attention of Sue Homewood at your
earliest convience.
Be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and
regulations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Alan Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, Why% FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 N,"f An Equal Opportunity/Afflrrnative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer poper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 22, 1998
John Loyd
1392 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: State Register
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell, NC
Dear Mr. Loyd:
Because you are below the threshold number of 100 cows, you facility can be
removed from the state register. If plan to remain below 100 cows, you may fill the
enclosed form to request your removal from the register. A request from the owner is
required to remove the facility from the Iist. Please forward your request to Sue
Homewood at the address on the bottom of the form. Your prompt attention on this matter
would be greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
AJ
Sincerely,
Alan Johnson
Environmental Specialist II
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
John Loyd
1392 Friendship Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Loyd:
E)aHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 10, 1997
Subject: Removal from State Registry
Shady Brook Dairy, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
Your facility is currently on the state register for animal facilities. Those facilities on the
register are required to have a designated certified operator as of January 1, 1997 and a certified
farm plan by December 31, 1997. The facilities are also subject to two operational reviews/
inspections per year.
The Division of Water Quality has been informed that your dairy facility is no longer in
operation or you are below the threshold number requiring certification. With that in mind,
enclosed is a form for you to complete and forward to Raleigh. The address is on the form. Please
send it to the attention of Sue Homewood.
Be -advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and
regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Alan Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street, 0 FAX [phone]D40
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Nvf C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 744-663-1699 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

L

IT
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
Presently the average herd is only 50 mills cows. The Waste
Storage Pond (WSP) was designed for 60 Jerseys for a period of 365
days. The Waste Utilization Plan is written for the WSP as
designed.
All waste, runoff from dairy lot and milk room/parlor water is
collected and contained in the WSP. When the liquid level reaches
the full level it will be agitated thoroughly and pumped into a
tank or through an irrigation system for land application. (See
Operation and Maintenance Plan for more details).
Table 1 indicates the acres owned with the crops to be grown in a
double cropping system. Since the fields will be double cropped,
the table shows an applicattion to each field every six months to
coincide with planting. The "Lbs. N Per Ac." represent the
required nitrogen for each crop based on realistic yeilds. It
needs to be noted that with the small amount of nitrigen contained
in the waste slurry, you will not be able to apply enough waste to
meet the needs of the crop with one single application.
The "Application by Hauling" table gives an estimated rate to
apply to avoid runoff. These figures are only estimates; the
amount that can be applied will be based on the actual soil
moisture at time of application. Caution should be made to not
over apply passed the point of saturation. (See "Required
Specifications" 07)
13

vel 'Trails
A Trails
�.
g
ze
ging
rs
O
arway

The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown and surface application:
Table 1 ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Useable Lbs. N Month of
it No. Type Per Ac.l Acres2 Utilized Application
:1463:
2b:
CfB2
1N/T
Corn
1 170
5.0
:
850
: March ;
;1463'
2b'
CfB2
'Sm.
Grain
' 96
5.0
480
' October ;
;1524
1 :
CfB2
;Fescue
99
3.7
366
Otober ;
11524'
2 '
CfB2
1N/T
Corn
' 170
' 8.5
' 1,445
March ;
:1524'
2 '
CfB2
'Sm.
Grain
96
1 8.5
1
'
816
'-October
186101,
_1 0 �_
L _
11
—CfB2
:N/T
Corn _
1 70_
27 .0
' 4,590
_L
' March
18610;
1
CfB2
�!Sm.
Grain
: 96
1, 27.0
: 2,592
: October
11519:
1 :
LfB2
1N/T
Corn
_
1 220
1, 26.0
: 5,720
: March
;1519:
1 :
LfB2
:Sm.
Grain
108
26.0
: 2.,808
: October 1
;1519'
2 1,
CfB2
'IN/T
Corn
' 170
` 4.4
'748
March
11519'
2 '
CfB2
'Sm.
Grain
1, 96
' 4.4
422
October
Total
Amount of
; 145.5
N Produced
Deficit
1 20,837
1
:20,251-1
586
1
1
1 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are
applied, they must be accounted for. N must he hased on realistic yield expectation.
2 The useable acres represents the total acreage of field minus the required buffer areas which border
streams or residential areas.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements_ Beginning in 1996 the Coastal Zone.
Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties of North
Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses all
nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen_
Your facility is designed for 365 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
12 MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure exceed Elevation 90.1, as indicated by marker.
10

i
I
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
Application of Waste b Hauling
Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Crop
Application
Rate(loa s/ac)-
Application
Amount(loads)*
1463
2b
CfB2
N/T Corn
5
15
1463
2b
CfB2
Sm. Grain
5
15
1524
1
CfB2
Fescue
5
18.5
1524
2
CfB2
N/T Corn
5
42.5
1524
2
CfB2
Sm. Grain
5
42.5
8610
1
CfB2
N/T Corn
5
135
8610
1
CfB2
Sm. Grain
5
135
1519
1
LfB2
N/T Corn
.5
130
1519
1
Lf B2
Sm. Grain
5
130
1519
2
CfB2
N/T Corn
5
22
1519
2
CfB2
Sm. Grain
5
22
$15,000 gallons er acre was used as a guide to prevent runoff from over application of waste water. If a 03. 00 gallon
UALwas being used, this would equal _loads per acr . At 15,000 gals/ac and a waste analysis of 2.0 lbsN/1000 gals =
30 lbsN/ac being applied. To meet the needs of the crop, would require additional applications later or the application
Of nitrogen from some other source.
11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
.................................................................................................................
(OPTIONAL APPLICATION METHOD)
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.)
1463
2b
CfB2
N/T Corn
.4
2.95
1463
2b
CfB2
Sm. Grain
.4
2.15
1524
1
CfB2
Fescue
.4
1.60
1524
12
CfB2
N/T Corn
.4
2.95
1524
2
CfB2
Sm. Grain
.4
2.15
8610
1
CfB2
N/T Corn
.4
2.95
8610
1
CfB2
Sm. Grain
.4
2.15
1519
1
LfB2
N/T Corn
.4
2.95
1519
1
LfB2
Sm. Grain
.4
2.15
1519
2
CfB2
N/T Corn
.4
2.95
1519
2
CfB2
Sm. Grain
.4
2.15
12

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
John Loyd
Rt. 5, Box 61
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Loyd:
EDE-HNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 25, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on September 23, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. A written agreement is should be obtained with the persons responsible for handling the
waste generated at the facility. You should also .begin maintaining your waste application records.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate cover.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility. Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919
North Main Street, AW,FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 %� An Equal FAX
Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50°; recycled/10010 past -consumer paper

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
Eff-DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
outine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW9 ins a tion O Follow-up of DSIVC review G Other
Facility Number 7 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
-W Registered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted [ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ...... 5 ( eip;�k....... .......................... County:.... ............................ _.....................
OwnerName: ........ .....................,........,.......................,............................ Phone No:...,.? .. %.................................
FacilitContact ........................ Title................................................................. Phone No:...........,..,....................................
y :...............................................
/ I
Mailing Address:...... 13.5.2...........f� �.�rrr�S.h.��a.........�........ ..........:15...?n� ............................
Onsite Representative: ...........-3.I'll ............ r�yG Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator;,.... ............................LU............................................ Operator Certification Number..........................................
Location of Farm:
..r c..,r ........d ............ .....,I,...........4 ........ 5..g ........ L. .......... C..6 -.f,.. -P.. .5.L:%:, ...
............,.-.._.��.....S..�.......jx�.........=`..................-..;....w.....r;...h..........l�x>1�.......~...Si....h.........................
Latitude ' i 64 Longitude ' �� �41
Swine
Design - Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder I0 Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non-l-ayer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
airy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity()
Total SSLW �v
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes WO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes ANo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`' ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed. did it reach Surface Wager? (If yeti, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
I. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systein? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yesy��j
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
&No
maiiitenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
❑ Yes
KNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes �O No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: —
S.f Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures fLagoons,11olding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .........................................................................................
IQ. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes E:No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
MNo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
)QNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
C`] Yes
No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ........C,aM...f. ............................................................. .........................................................
16.
j.....4jx..(1.,e..
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
fi?�No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
91 No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
91Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
MNo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
KNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
;Vo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only AU//
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No.violations or defiCieneies.were noted- during this.visit.- Nou.will receive iso further
correspatidence about this'visit:. .
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;;G: f g
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i Date: 9—�":S—

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
John Loyd
Rt. 5, Box 61
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Loyd:
ALTImowA bc'u
IT 41 0
la
IDEF.HNF:Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Shady Brook Farm, Facility #: 49-70
Iredell County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street.N%;CAn
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Equal OpportunityjAffirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

A
Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
AeX'?tMeo .1���
Water Quali egional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
John Loyd
Shady Brook Farm
1392 Friendship Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Mr. Loyd,
IDEEHNF;Z
N.C. DEE-r. OF
ENV11?0NhJ -,�T^{'. HR -AC TM
& NATURAL, RFSou;;(,,ES
DFC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Shady Brook Farm DIVISION OF INViRlINMENrdl vA4ACE31ENT
Facility ID #: 49-70 gOOAfSVlt1E REEif<ilAl OFFICE
Iredell County
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 1000 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste..
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators; please call
Beth Buffington or Bang Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
/,?,+'' �'-s r -z "" ,
FOR SteveW. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files Imowl
Water Pollution Control System �� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission 1%rf C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

N.C. i7E1'T. OF
ENVIRONMENT' HEALT7 H
NATURAL Ri 5OUJtCr
NOV 8 1995
ITMFE"E
:1 OFFXE
U
J

' 6
Hcedth anci Natural R: Sot~rc elz
11v1croreSVlile RegionGi CliF1 Ze
Janes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
JonaThcn B. Hcwes, S::-creiary
it S.•yS �t�'Y�ir�.•�-i
/ 1
C)
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 1, 1995
CERTIFIE12 LIAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. John Dohrman Loyd
Shady Brook Farms
1392.Friendship Rd.
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
Subject:
Notice of Violation
Shady Brook Farms
Facility No. 49-70
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Loyd:
You are hereby notified that Shady Brook Farms, which has been deemed permitted to
have a nondischarge permit for an animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H
.0217, has been found to be in violation of its 2H .0217 Permit.
The animal waste storage lagoon at the farm was overflowing at the emergency spillway
during an inspection by Mr. Todd St. John of this Office on September 26, 1995. This
overflow is a violation of the 2H .0217 Permit,
The Division of Environmental Management will proceed to revoke Shady Brook Farms'
permit unless the following measures are implemented:
1. Immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater.
2. Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
It is requested that you respond, in writing, to this Notice, indicating the actions you have
taken. Please address your response to Mr. Todd St. John by no later than November 17, 1995.
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Empioyer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 100% post -consumer paper

-Q,
4,�ry ►'cot:: Farm's
+aver e_ 1, 1995
Also, be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Environmental
Management from taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either D.
Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional Supervisor, or Mr. Todd St. John at [phone].
Sincerely,
TBjtvercasdh,P. E
Regional Supervisor
attachments
cc:
John Stephenson - Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ralston James - RegionaI Coordinator, NC DSWC
Compliance/Enforcement File

DIVISION OF-1,JVIR0NM.E:,-i7 AL MraNAC=.�c MEi11T
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OFERA110? S SITE <II —AT A_ T IO;',i RECORD,
DATE: 7124 .1995
Time: '20
Farm Name/Owner: 64jv��s J04p)
Mailing Address: r'i'0A ti W. 9
County:-Wedle`� Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: J, LIAO Phone:
La�yp
Physical Address/Location: S'Voy_
Type of Operation: Swine—Poultry—Cattle L-besign Capacity:!k lumber of Animals on Site:—
Latitude S ° 5$ ' Longitude: ��5 Elevation: fl+Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes o Ioo Actual Freeboard: D Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yeso No as any erosion observed? Yes o Vo
Is adequate land available for spray? e , r No Is the cover crop adequate? lsbrNo
Crop(s) being utilized: �►' SS
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings.' Y or No
100 Feet from Wells?YSr No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oZD
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No 7
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? es r No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: _ 4wrt eowyrewy 5,�d
- :Zd mete.(.. + c _r . V "r ._
Inspector Name ��l'� �• �� Signature
cc. Facility Assessment Unit