490065_PERMIT FILE_20171231

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Oren Stout
View -La Dairy
281 Harris Bridge Rd
Stony Point NC 28678
Dear Oren Stout:
1 � •
OM
f
NCDE NJ
r t
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT:bF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 20, 2002 FEB 2 2We
r'= Sr:T
OFFICE
WATER QUALITY sEm4i
Subject: Removal of Registration
View -La Dairy
Facility Number 49-65
Iredell County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $25,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poultry with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant at
[phone] ext. 571or Steve Lewis [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Water Pollution Control System Operator Certification Commission
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Coleen H. Sullins, Chairman
February 19, 2001
Wayne P. Stout
281 Harris Bridge Road
Stony Point NC 28678
Re: Animal Waste Management Certification Renewal
Certificate Holder: Wayne P. Stout
County: Iredell
Dear Stout:
NCDENR
Senate Bill 1217, enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1996, states "a certificate holder who fails to
renew their certificate and pay the renewal fee within 30 days of its expiration shall be required to take and pass the
examination for certification in order to renew the certificate".
You were mailed an invoice in October 2000 notifying you that your certificate would expire December 31, 2000, and
that a $10.00 annual renewal payment was due by that date. The 30 -day grace period ended January 30, 2001. Since
your payment was not received, your certificate expired effective December 31, 2000. Therefore, you do not possess a
valid animal waste management certificate. Please note that without a valid certificate, law prohibits you from
performing the duties of an Operator in Charge of an animal waste management system.
The next available opportunity to retake the Animal Waste Management System Operators certification examination
will be June 14, 2001. An examination application is enclosed for your use. Please note that a completed examination
application must be postmarked 30 days prior to the examination that you wish to take. If you did not intend to renew
your animal waste management certificate or do not wish to get recertified, you may disregard this letter and your
animal waste management system operators certification will remain invalid.
Please call Beth Buffington at 919-733-0026, extension 313, if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
J�
Dwight Lancaster, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
enclosures
cc: TAC Files
Mooresville Regional Office
1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1618
Phone: 919 — 733-0026 1 FAX: 919 — 733-1338
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Oren Stout -
View -La Dairy
281 Harris Bridge Rd
Stony Point NC 28678
Dear Oren Stout:
K4,
•
- 010k
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 30, 1999
11A A!. ,.
Subject: Fertilizer AppIicfttt-Reco'4f1#9R1E#r
Animal Waste Management Sy's'tem"`
Facility Number 49-65
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR 1, IRR2, DRY I , DRY2, DRY3, SLUR], SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincere ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

XDEN
JAMES B. HUNT JI
GOVERNOR
: ,wAYNE iicDEV17T
SECRETARY l
.1
f e +.,I
f,
E
i )
Oren Stout
281 Harris Bridge Rd.
Stony Point, NC 28678
Dear Mr. Stout:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OF'F'ICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 7, 1999
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
View -La Dairy, Facility #: 49-65
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on June 4,
1999. In general the facility appeared to be in good shape.
During many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review. The
following items must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, feed areas must be shown.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization pian: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info: Must have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice
of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should be
made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general waste should
be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gle son, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc. File 919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE• NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER-50'jo' RECYCLED/50% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

'� Py�E V €I f € s �`ldWat& ConservatofOperation RevlewlDivision of Soi
Snit anilrWater CQnset�vtlion; ,Com liancellns eCtlOn€ ' €w3 r� j
€.. IiiP i
l€ {
t j,ce Insp
i
Divtsion of Water Qualtty €Cn�rtplianection` "
f t
[t € f .. z^ € € 71 t P� 3 €€
€ i Other�AgeRCy Op@IAtlon PReAOW f€ +°'
.,c.= Pt3
40 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DSV ins ection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspeclion En 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted © Certified . © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Nlime �.. : xi...-........ c��. t.lC... County: ...... I.......
........:� l L ......� .... (Dunt J- l`e.:? 1.
. . .....................
OwnerName:..........tl' ............................I t?..`.................................... Phone No:............5.....-......Y........................
Facility Contact.:.............................................................................. Title• Phone No
Mailing Address . Inj.. V` \ '�r1.
....... y'.1{ .....A - '� 5. ................... .....I...............
Onsite Representative- ............ S ..............................................•... Integrator: „•„•....
Certified Operator:......... Lo. M4.fri:.P ............ . ,S� j„ ............ Operator Certification Number � %_
'Id.,-ation of Farm: `
...........................................................................
atitude �� �� F--1, Longitude
Design Current Design; Current € Design Cu"Trent
Capacity Po ulation „iT :Capacity. Population Cattle Capacity Po ulation
Swine P, it p
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts,
❑ Boars
�.
{ ;Number of Lagoons , i ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JOSpray Field Area
Holding:Pontls /..,Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System C
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes C .No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notiry DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes K No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes %2 No
Waste Collection & Treatment /I --
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? N Spillway ❑ YeA No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3. Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: {{��
Freeboard(inches): ..........YB........................................................................................................................................................... ..............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes A No
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
.k 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? [3 Excessive Ponding C] PAN
12. Crop type CCNr-.4 pa" tt & . {\ u��"Pc _ '
❑ Yes '�5No
❑ Yes gJ No
❑ Yes{ No
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes /tS No
❑ Yes k No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes la'No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ,[No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 15 No
[:]Yes RNo
OkYes )Q No
KYes ❑ No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes f9No
❑ Yes ' 4 No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes �RNo
❑ Yes KA
❑ Yes P -No
P.bio viglafiotis:or. iitrje nties ftre opted• Mwiog this:visit; • :Y:ou wiil•reetiye 0o. fut tr
corres oricieit�e: abo�ut. this visit. . • • .. • • • .. • . •
5'"' � 1 1 h 1 1 >T k"
Comments (refer to question #) t Ezplam any++�YES, answers and/or any recommendations orjany other co(urtt menta 'r5 t( u J1
I 1 1 t --
g'£:. "�1 13?.4d•• ,1_.,I,
�. t.. ,k..: �. j� ".. ,° ! , 'e�� • _ £iS: ��.: II. • ..�:E:t I /,�.,.£�; 1 < S 1. , � . ..+3"���.1 1 1jg ]] ''. 1E
3 r8,p pil :. �. 3 •'.
�Ilse;drawmgs faCiltty to better explain sitUatians ;(Weiaddltional';pages asinecessary) €i 33 {ji3.1�1# E� E{lfl3t�i: 8 lgjl 4 ' 31 �N t€f j'� f3 jI33 11 3y j l'.
kof
rl.'t-._:1 ,i':'� e:E43-1 Ut'q.,.li'.
� •
�iv�•e-�� ems«' �' nc� '� iGn N�s � �-- ,
��pr' tc�TCC�C9iti�31 Q ilFW\41 151�0AI-7 K1
4
zi-rt it�i�� i �§ r =�r I
Reviewer/Inspector Name r, C ri +
,li I k1361
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: c- ._ Date:
3/23/99

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number- WSJ Operation is flagged fora wettable
Farm Name: /•e -c" acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: CSL Part ll eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: 2bcA 76 h 6rw y Operation not required to secure .WA
Date of site visit 9
Date of most recent WUP: r/2 c./5�
Annual farm PAN deficit: C3 pounds
determinatio at this time based on
exemption lF E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determinationbased on P9 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6_ stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE:75 %exemption cannot be
applied to farms that.fall the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part Il - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11.75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determinationrequired because operation fails -one of the. eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of -acreage which resulted :in overapplication -Df wastewater:(PAN) on spray
field(s) according #ofarm's Iast two years -of-irrigation-secords...
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field .limitations -(numerous.ditches;failure#o_deduct;required ..
bufferlsetback acreage; or25% of total acreage.identified:in-CAWMP':includes
small, irregulady shaped fieIds -fieldslessfhan-b acres for travelersmr less#han
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination .required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number
Part Ill. Field
by Field Determination
of
75% Exemption Rule for'WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'S
TYPE of
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
l
I
1
FIELD N UMBER' - hvdrant. null_ zone. or point numbers may he used in niece of field numbers
-denPndinn nn r AWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD.NUMBERI- must be clearly delineated on map_
COMMENTS'- back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acresandttiavingreceived lessthan 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the -farm's previous two years' (1997 -& d 998) of irrigation Tecords,:cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must -be noted in -the romment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations
P1 Plan.facks following information; _
P2 Plan revision may satisfy 75% rulebased on adequate overall PAN deficit and by
adjusting all field acreage to below 75% use rate .
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation. system):

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
Oren Stout
281 Harris Bridge Rd.
Stony Point, NC 28678
Subject: Site Inspection
View -La Dairy, Facility #: 49-65
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stout:
Mr. AIan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
u.npermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESV I LLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTON EMPLOYCR-50% RECYCLEO/10% POST-CONSUMIER PAPIER

`1
Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen M Application for Common—Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (112) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be'some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

i;
Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the intemet. Through the.US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application, rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For fanners who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

-.
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
16 Division of Water Quality
Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DW2 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
�C1-
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered fC�ertified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 13 Not Operational Date Last Operated: .............
Farin Name: V i •ec.�l — Lc, � � Count --�v_ t�
........................1......................................................� .................................. y:..............................,.......1c.J..................
OwnerName: ................ ................. ... Phone No: ` S ( s
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title Phone No:
Mailing Address: ...... ........`. 1-5. .......A?:F �_..k5... � r�.& ........... _5.6A....... l6 uk......................
Onsite Representative:....{N csC{nA . ................ ...... lkrx
......... v.............................. Integrator:...................
Certified Operator;.......`. . Q .... Operator Certification Number,,.Z...I... cj.. (e.,Z.,..
Location of Farm:
........... ;Arr_ e.L ...� . K , ...........ur",,.y....L.A!V! ::....... !K!r... r�I ..�Hrr� . .."� (?,............ . 4�L... ..:.... .......
All
... �S-S'7....... .t .. pr.�....... ....a l ..t. "7C�..... L .. K�.......mm., t:t. i.....a R3e5. `S?i'1....5 . t. ...........
Latitude ®a ©� ®`� Longitude ®' ®' ! $� � YZ-
.1W " Design' .Current Design, Current Design .. Gar"rent
t
Sr ute5 k Capacity' ;Population - Pciullry' Capacity. Population . CaEtle ; „t,apacity,,.Pnpulattion
❑En to Feeder
❑ Layerder
to Finish
JE I Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑;
Farrow to Finish
'Total Desi
,
Gilts
❑Boars"
❑ Dairy
❑Non -Dai
gn Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ItNo
❑ Yes Mo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IR No
❑ Yesto
o
E01 Yes
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes A No

Facility Number; —
8. Are Iherc I�gaQns or �toragG p�nd� on 5it� which Reed to �� properly cio���
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ANO
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(tt):.......... t5..................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ANo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes V .No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes IKO
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses ''\\
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ) Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes k
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......... � .ICYL..... ..................................... ..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes V No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for Iand application?
❑ Yes
�&No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
f No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
EziKNo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
,PsNo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
El Yes
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes1v
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
JkNo
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
K.No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause. noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
�No
No.violationsoi deficiencies were,not6d during this:visit.- You"will rece'ive•ilo.furtliei :
e0fres064dettce A out -this'visiL, :::::.:. :.::.:::..::: .:::. ; :.:.: .
31
L�e7G
s►kO
��
t phi`(
j Uw�
��
i�
�� a Ce,
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: AY -114f_ 11/T Date:

i.:
sili�W'.i5i� s ii' ?7a'r•'f'�
Yl §.. .�"Fi¢!•.`.'hs4 •:
0 I ' 1 F 6>
t
''" r `l
Count
ri ed7]
qjwner
ren Istout
manager
ayne Stout
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
view -La ,uairy
PhoneNumber
7-585-6508
essee
Region
0 ARO 0 MKU 0 WXRO 0
p FRO p RRO p WIRO
1.4U.ar htatesvine'ana 'West -on pur mwy. w and• turn ICL* onto Alidway'DrIwand turn *LV auto •Harris' +
Bridge Rd;•arid Oh farRi is U. n�iXe:on:t�e loft.; • .......... .
Certified Operator in Chargeayne ,
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
Date inactivated or closed
p Swine p Poultry M Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity
Total 60 Cattle
SSLW 84,000
Dairy

� f - fi'.'�i'v-iiF.'6t02?:v�6Y£ti�SSA�::7&£,352�f•�•.
�r ,'i•r+9i _n3tiAAt;2:<1)R4,.fifi,ZiS?l:t: 'tS f
e e res
15
ec
Sciali— Larry Hendrix
p rialis John Stevenson
nteg ator
p Request to be removed p Removal Confirmation Recieved
Comments
Longitude
Basin
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported
Higher Yields
Vegetation
Acreage
Other
Name• a in
to Permits Database

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
WA
Health and Natural Resources aja Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Governor p E H N l -R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 30, 1997
Mr, Oren Stout
281 Harris Bridge Road
Stony Point, North Carolina 28678
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
View -La Dairy.
Facility No. 49-65
Iredell County
Dear Mr, Stout,
On July 23, an Operation Review was conducted of View -La Dairy, facility no. 49-65. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215. l OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, the level of waste in the holding pond exceeded the level allowed by regulation. Since
failure to maintain adequate freeboard and storage capacity in the pond is a violation, your operation along with
supporting documentation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for further investigation and possible
enforcement action. G.S. 143-215.10E requires me to notify Division of Water Quality and the owner/operator of
this observed violation.
As discussed during the Review, it is imperative that this problem be resolved as soon as possible. You are
strongly encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for help. You may also want to contact your local
Soil and Water Conservation District Office since they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or
financial assistance to implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental regulations, animal
waste c�anno be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
disposal systems must be properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified
operator.
Also remember that all registered Iivestock operations are required to obtain and implement an approved
animal waste management plan by the end of this year, and to gain certification as a animal waste system operator.
The animal waste management plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 277 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional
information.
919 North Main Street, 4.C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 101% post -consumer paper

Mr. Oren Stout
July 30, 1997
Page 2
Sincerely,
sep C. Z' e;nnm
noir n iEngineer I
cc: Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files ,

'1
i�S �swi1..� 4 .ekF.Y SW f«„ �i�xW4&'OG�i
x DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
:�❑ WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspeet>conW.
„
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow -u of DS%VC review O Other
Date of Inspection Q
Facility Number
Time of Inspec tion 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr 15 mini) Spent on Review
,hcCertified [3Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated
Farm Name: ....... vi,e�.,.,.::..h.?�....... ola........................................
...................
Owner Name:...................*5±a.1,1 .
Facility Contact:........ K.y�e..........s ....................... Title: 1
Mailing Address:.........2.? L.... f�rris....... r -i' tette[....................
Onsite Representative: ........ U,.1Ar.f......... S aa.........................I...........................
County: ............ rF.u..k../........................... .......................
Picone No:.............. S:.: �.....`..6.. ?`7S
................................... Phone\'o:...............................�.................
Lk
....... ..`'.f.V��...•�.i�.?j-:..........)J-C................ .z.>�.....ze...........
.
Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:..,,, ..... Operator Certification Number: ................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • L 04& Longitude a 0` :;
Type of Operation
swine
e
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Laver I I D_Non-Dairvt—_
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL`V
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds I0 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
-General
I. Are there anv buffers that need maintenance/improvement`'
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Iii:charge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a. If dischar•w,e is observed, was the conveyance man-made''
h. Ii'discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water:' (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min:'
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system'' (If yes, 110tify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Dory any part of the waste management system (other than la,+oons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/iniprirvement'?
❑ Yes No
C1 Yes p4 Ivo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes *o
Cl Yes *0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ANO
Continued on hack

)Facility K mher: — S
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures I Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4
... I...N�..............................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop typeC(sT.rrC....................................�� ^...?..........................,..........................Atl.r.1
❑ YesNo
C3Yes Na
❑ Yes )M�Ko
Xyes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure G
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss
review/'gspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Faciities Only *C�`kc ffSC',z t��� rAf,- r_ --
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yeso
L r�-�-^� � -f
❑ Yes
o
❑ Yes11
YJ/�
G f
q �r«
$.�
Yes
i�,crSr/
❑ No
❑ Yes
XIN 0
❑ Yes ,i'5,,�lo
❑ YesXNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes )5�No
❑ Yes )KVO
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes X
No
kilYes ❑ No
Xyes [:]No
w �•+Tier a��a �s ai .!,�EI1]"�1.Y �;�I .
AJ /r 4Nt�rCA APoYlo%ri-1
Lj11f,`
Reviewer/Inspector Name '.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
cc: Division of )Vater Quality,
l�Ce �5
L r�-�-^� � -f
v,.f^%
L,..ey1C
YJ/�
G f
,i__ _
�—,
�� Date:
712-
-1, �..�>
cility Assessment Unit 4/30197

Or%e.tq 'r 4,,,4-

46
d©
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ESTIMATE OF _VOLUME OF WASTE PRODUCED -
3 ODUC O_
3
Amount of Waste Produced Per Xear(gallons. ft _,..tons. etc.)
60 animals X -J4 gallons of waste/animal/day X 365 days
= 306.,§00 gallons of waste per year
__6Q animals X 7 gallons of excess water/animal/day X 365 days
153.300 gallons of water per year
Total animal waste and waste water volume
generated in one year is approximately
459,9U gallons.
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
459.9 1000 gallons of waste X 3.95 lbs. PAN/1000 gallons of waste =
I-8 -7 lbs. PAN/year.
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan time
and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
The applicator is gaut'o e that P an be
fiver appLte—d_-ifapolication is -madg _based on
Nitr,o en alone. This plan only addresses
Nitrogen.
Stine accumulation should not be a factor using the ex_ist_ina
storage ponrjprovided„thorough agitation is accomplished before and
4!,rir1g each pump -nut and provided the _waste storage pond is emptied of
It waste. Sht3u1d sludge accumulags_�ccur_i the sludge must be
gnarled for _nutrient levels erzor "two sprgading_._

Ar
+/V
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
The crop fields shown on Table 1 are available for was e application.
It will not be necessary and may not be desirable to apply waste to
each of these fields in any given year. It is assumed that for row
crops only a fraction of the total annual nitrogen requirement can be
applied using animal waste.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the table are estimated annual
nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown based on the
potential productivity of the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The landowner is encouraged to develop a method to record the actual
waste application volume made on each field. The Livestock Waste
Spreading Record sheet attached is an optional means of keeping such a
record.
Table ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Useable Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type, Per Ac.l Acres'& Utilized Application
711,E
2
Cf9Z„i,Pa;cure
1 133
2.2
!_ 27 1_— '—March
_
7111
3 !
CfC2
1 204
9.5
1_ 938
March
711;12;
CfC2
_!Corn _
!Corn
204
2.6
530 ��
March
711!6a
!
CmB2
!Pasture
! 123
3.8
! 467
March
_711!6b
!
CfC2
!Alfalfa
! 100
._ 7.5
! 750 !
Anril
711a
7 i_Cf82
'Cor,n�X04
! 15.1
!_3080
October
711,!
4 !
CfC2
r;
'Pastue
123
17.4
! 2140 �;
_
September
711
1 5a 1
CfC2
* 'Corn
; 204
! 7,0
! 1428 _ �.
_October,_
7
9-f C2
'Hay
6
7.5
1238
A
_703!
1
CC2
204
! 15.3
! 1121
October
_;Corn
Amount
Total
of N
:-87-9
Produced
Deficit
! 14963
1817 _
; 131.46
This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources
such As commgrcial fertilizer pre a ied t e must be -accounted for.
N must be�based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE_ The ap�l.icator_ is cautioned that P and K may over _.poiied
wh 1e meeCzng the N re_y�Lirements. Beginning_ in 1996 the Coastal Zane
Manaa2tment Act w 11 rzc irk (jr in some e st�.r cI�un,ties of North
Caro 1- na to_have _a nutr i�nr__ mana emenr elan t ha r_ addr?sse_ s alll
nur.rients. This an onl_; addresses Nitrogen_ __

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
MAP SHOW IJIG -TliE- FIELDS TO BE USED_ FOR -TRE-UTILIZATION OF
WASTE WATER.
Ij
M9.1

y4
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Tract
No.
Field
No.
Soil
Type
Crop
Application
Rate(In/Hr)
Application
Amount(In.)
711
2
CfC2
Pasture
.4
1.60
711
3
CfC2
Corn
.4
2.95
711
12
CfC2
Corn
.4
2.95
711
6a
CmB2
Pasture
.4
1.60
711
6b
CfC2
Alfalfa
.4
2.90
711
7
CfB2
Corn
.4
2.95
711
4
CfC2
Pasture
.4
1.60
711
5a
CfC2
Pasture
.4
1.60
711
5b
CfC2
Hay
.4
1.60
711 1
1
CfC2
Corn
.4
2.95
"HIS ''ABL? IS NOT NEEDED I? HASTE IS NOT BEING AP?LIED 37 IRRIGATION, HOAEY3R A SIMILAR TABLE WILL 3E NEEDED ?OR DR?
E,TEH OR SLURRY.

''/State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
]aures B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Oren Stout
281 Harris Bridge Rd.
Stony Point, NC 28678
Dear Mr. Stout:
IDEHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 22, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
View -La Dairy, Facility #: 49-65
Iredell County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on September 18, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson
of this Office. The facility was in good shape. However, you need to start maintaining all records
pertaining to your waste applications. Also, you pumping markers should be more prominently
identified.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely, �y
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
919 North Main Street,N%ICAn
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolinc 28115 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Vcice 704-6,63-1699 50% recycled!! 0010 post -consumer paper

Routine O Coln laint O Follow -u of 1)W{ ins ection O Follow -u of l)SWC review• O Other
1.Date of Inspection
FacilitF' Number
Time of Inspection EZE�M 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered � Certified [3 Applied for P1.ermit [] Permitted 13 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ............
5�7
Farm Name:.......... ..� CFI. n�r�:r j... County:....,.. '-£ll ......................... .......................
Owner Name :......... li.r-e�. ................... s5- Phone No:
Facility Contact: ....0 Y..I:�..................... ? .`5 ... Title:.......,K''�.................................... Phone No:..................................................
!''ff % Snr
Mailing Address:. . 1�........ f l f.!'li s..... Cr+'G`!�'.t?...... ............. ,f...�d......r....................................
Onsite Representative: .............. Integra/tor:...............
Certified Operator-,..... :..(i1G K. -............... S . %
..................................... Operator Certification Number,............,.........
...................
Location of Farm:
...a.n......... 5B ... J520 ..... .... t er-� t�,.:.8,-3, e,.., �cxz� t.....r..�......�,In:.. s,ec .c�.ra...�W:...
P S..........m.fF T...t'�M.....,.,.....�t�Yi....613k�../l1/.......C�t'1........�E'
r -----I& r ------- -r . I-
L -- 1 I 1 1 E I E E
Design Current Design Current Design ;Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity ropulation
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds
❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I❑Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If dischar-e is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? tlf yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
i
v
❑ Spray Field Area
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes 'A No
❑ Yes 14No
❑ Yes 4&] -No
Continued on back
...........
❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation ReviewI
y
i
0DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
A
y
Routine O Coln laint O Follow -u of 1)W{ ins ection O Follow -u of l)SWC review• O Other
1.Date of Inspection
FacilitF' Number
Time of Inspection EZE�M 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered � Certified [3 Applied for P1.ermit [] Permitted 13 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ............
5�7
Farm Name:.......... ..� CFI. n�r�:r j... County:....,.. '-£ll ......................... .......................
Owner Name :......... li.r-e�. ................... s5- Phone No:
Facility Contact: ....0 Y..I:�..................... ? .`5 ... Title:.......,K''�.................................... Phone No:..................................................
!''ff % Snr
Mailing Address:. . 1�........ f l f.!'li s..... Cr+'G`!�'.t?...... ............. ,f...�d......r....................................
Onsite Representative: .............. Integra/tor:...............
Certified Operator-,..... :..(i1G K. -............... S . %
..................................... Operator Certification Number,............,.........
...................
Location of Farm:
...a.n......... 5B ... J520 ..... .... t er-� t�,.:.8,-3, e,.., �cxz� t.....r..�......�,In:.. s,ec .c�.ra...�W:...
P S..........m.fF T...t'�M.....,.,.....�t�Yi....613k�../l1/.......C�t'1........�E'
r -----I& r ------- -r . I-
L -- 1 I 1 1 E I E E
Design Current Design Current Design ;Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity ropulation
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds
❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I❑Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If dischar-e is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? tlf yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
i
v
❑ Spray Field Area
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes 'A No
❑ Yes 14No
❑ Yes 4&] -No
Continued on back

Facility umber: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lat'oons.tiolding Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑Yes `No
❑ Yes gNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ........... -0 ........................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures'?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste :Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type..................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes _E' Io
❑ Yes QNo
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes VINO
.......................................................
❑ Yes
JA
❑ Yes
MNo'
❑ Yes
WO
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ Yes
Wo
❑ Yes
M No
—
Wes
❑ No
0 No.violations'or. de' icienci'es.wer'e noted'during this.visit, Yoil4ill receive no further
correspondence ahout this.visit.
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers•and/or any'rec
Use drawings of facility to'tietter ezplanf situations '(use.additfilmal pages,a
the 1�cci�i �� f5 tri Somal. Shape—
ry.)
❑ Yes ;RJ No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes KNo
13)Lse
`tie
are iron. �i��c_�
`�-t..e�
o.r� mo CL
22 Z)
Vlt r-,. 5 �I�:swT .SLtDk1G\ �j�'c� � "1
tV1CL�v�i�"�hi►1q
wa..s�-
a���� C��Y1 �t?(.ur�s ..
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name # �,. 0 D. . . ..........
H f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
,lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Oren Stout
Rt. 2, Box 194
Stony Point, NC 28678
Dear Mr. Stout:
Alia
�EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
View -La Dairy, Facility ##: 49-65
Iredell County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997;
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must he specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
ft
919 North Main Street, W 1;6 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 ��C An Equal QpportunityLAffirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 : ?..,_ 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly:
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D .�ex'G ee o Sl
Water Quali egional uervisor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
Oren Stout
View -La Dairy
281 Harris Bridge Rd
Stony Point NC 28678
Dear Mr. Stout:
[DaHNF;Z
N.C. T)FPJ>T. op
ENVTP.OI��'�fr��IT, HI;.4r,,7g�;
NATURA1. Rt- [:3
DEC 17 1996
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: View -La Dairy DIVISION Of iNVIAQt{1!F[!Tk! fdAliA6Cf�lEfli
Facility ID #: 49-65 fdQQAESYaIE AlG1Qt1A! OFFICE
Iredell County
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste:
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR Steve W. wider
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files 11L T
Water Pollution Control System 1W 4 Volce 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
%
Operators Certification Commission �f An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 IT, 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.lga =`�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS VISITATION RECORD
DATE: '1995
Time: F ,YS�f%/n
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: _
County:—.a I-leepe Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: ,_/ -
Type of Operation: Swine_Poultry_Cattle v Design Capacity: number of Animals on Site:—
Latitude: �� Longitude:S+ °,` 'j� " Elevation! Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of l Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or 19 Actual Freeboard:_LFt. 0 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes ooWas any erosion observed? Yes Zv
Is adequate land available for spray?(9or No Is the cover crop adequate? Liar No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Gra ss
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings or No
100 Feet from Wells? e or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
7
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit