490058_PERMIT FILE_20171231

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Pat McCrory
Governor
A. W. Johnson and Ercelle Johnson
Mark Johnson Dairy
1125 Snow Creek Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Donald R. van der Vaart
' SWR
. RgC�CIVED �
March 25, 2015 AQR M5
WQROS
M0oVtSSV tLLS RFGIONAL O�FIC�
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490058
Mark Johnson Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
:f
Dear A. W. Johnson and Ercelle Johnson:
In accordance with your complete permit application package received March 23, 2015, we are hereby
forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to A. W. Johnson and Ercelle Johnson,
authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General
Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for Mark Johnson Dairy, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no greater
than the following annual averages: .
Dairy Calf:
Dairy Heifer:
Milk Cow: 350
Dry Cow:
Beef Stocker Calf:
Beef Feeder:
Beef Brood Cow:
Other:
This COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2019. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and .operational information must be established for this
facility. Ally incr4asc in waste production greater than tl►e ecrlilied design capacity or increase in nunibur
of animals authorized by this COC (as. provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please read this COC and the enclosed_ State_ General Permit carefully. Please pay careful attention to the
record keel2ing and monitorinj4 conditions in this permit. Record, kee in forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site-specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply -with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh; North Carolina 27699.1636
Phone: [phone] Internet: http:[Mww.ncwater.org
An Eeual 0morlunity 1 Affirmalive Action Emolover — Made in part by recycied cater

Per NRCS standards a 10.0 -foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or. the CAWMP may result in the revocation. of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply ,for. an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Program for information on
this process.,; Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition II.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
http://www.weather.20v/gst)/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office staff
may be reached at 704-663-1699. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the General
Pemtit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
Uiv
3 J
for S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G.
Director, Division of Water Resources
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
INlooresviile Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Central Files (Permit No. AWC490058)

RECEIVED
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FEB 2 3 2015
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone] -,` `:a -'` 'TION
FAX NUMBER; [phone] MooREs"aALLa Pi�GIONAL OFFICE
6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWR regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS:
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWR regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Resources Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name: Mark Johnson Dairy
6.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm: Jonathan Creason, Iredell SWCD, 444 Bristol Dr., Statesville, NC 28677
*no new WSP design work for this plan
Telephone number: ( 704 ) 873-6761 x3
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters: Snow Creek
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located Iredell
6.5 Map name and date: Central, 1464
6.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO: REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel:
(All attachments must be signed)
Date:
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-N/E 1110106 Page 5 of 5

m
im
� � o
O°
i
� / ,• �eooJ 'fit ,O rr---
o o,'O
O .�
VM-Luk�lll-
w �� •Aar�

a,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Animal Feeding Operations Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MA Y BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
State Individual Permit — New or Expanding Animal Waste Operations
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility name: Mark Johnson Dai RECEIVEDDIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: A.W. & Ercelle Johnson,
FEB'- 4 2015
1.3 Mailing address: 1125 Snow Creek Road
SWP SECTIOEV
— MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
City, State: Statesville, NC Zip: 28625
Telephone number (include area code): ( 704 ) 880 - 4532
1.4 Physical address: 1082 Snow Creek Road
City, State: Statesville,_ NC Zip: 28625
Telephone number (include area code): ( } -
1.5 County where facility is located: Iredell
1.6 Facility location (directions from nearest major highway, using SR numbers for stats roads): Hwy. 115 north from
Statesville. Turn -right on SR 1904 E. Farm is approx. 0.75 miles on the left
1.7 Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner): Mark Johnson
1.8 Lessee's 1 Integrator's name (if applicable; circle which type is listed):
1.9 Facility's original start-up date: �50k. 1980 Date(s) of facility expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility number:
2.2 Operation Description:
Please enter the Design Capacity of the system. The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste
management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Tyne of Cattle No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Farrow to Wean (# sow) ❑ Turkey ❑ Beef Stocker Calf
❑ Farrow to Feeder (# sow) ❑ Turkey Poults ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Farrow to Finish (# sow) ❑ Dairy Heifer ..
❑ Wean to Finish (# sow) ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Gilts ®Milk Cow 35
❑ Boar/Stud
FORM: AWO-STATE-1-N/E 1110106 Page 1 of 5

if
3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 260.52 Required Acreage (as listed in the CAWMP): 206.52
2.4 Number of lagoons: Total Capacity (cubic feet): Required Capacity (cubic feet):
Number of Storage Ponds: I Total Capacity (cubic feet): 1 14,582 Required Capacity (cubic feet): 114,582
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the waste management system? YES or NO (circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? YES or, NO (circle one)
2.8 Brief description of treatment process: Waste from lot and freestall barn will be stored in WSP 1, along with wastewater from
parlor. Waste in the pond will be land applied, at agronomic rates according to WUP.
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST:
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants_ Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and two copies of the application for State Individual Permit
- Animal Waste Operations;
3.2 Three copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied and a county road map with the location of the
facility indicated;
3.3 Three copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a permit application for
animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not have been required at the time
the facility was certified but should be added to the CAWMP forpermitting purposes:
3.3.1 MRCS Site Evaluation Form NC -CPA -17 or equivalent
3.3.2 A hazard classification of the proposed lagoons, if required
3.3.3 Documentation that proposed swine facilities meet the Swine Farm Siting Act, including a site map prepared by
a Registered Land Surveyor. The scale of this map shall not exceed 1 inch = 400 feet. At a minimum, the site
map shall show the distance from the proposed houses and lagoons to occupied residences within 1500 feet,
schools, hospitals, churches, outdoor recreational facilities, national parks, state parks, historic properties, or
child care centers within 2500 feet, property boundaries within 500 feet, water supply wells within 500 feet.
The map shall also show the location of any property boundaries and perennial streams or rivers located within
75 feet of waste application areas.
3.3.4 Documentation showing that all adjoining property owners, all property owners who own property located
across a public road, street, or highway from the facility, the local health department, and the county manager
or chair of the county board of commissioners if there is no county manager, have been notified by certified
mail of your intent to construct or expand a swine farm at this location.
3.3.5 A wetlands determination
3.3.6 The lagoon/storage facility design
3.3.7 Proposed runoff control measures, if required
3.3.8 Irrigation or other land application method design
3.3.9 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) produced and
utilized by the facility
3.3.10 The soil series present on every waste disposal field
3.3.11 The crops grown on every waste disposal field
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-NIE 1110106
Page 3 of 5

3.3.12 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
3.3.13 The PAN applied to every waste disposal field
3.3.14 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
3.3.I5 The required NRCS Standard specifications
3.3.16 Emergency Action Plan
3.3.17 Insect Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.18 Odor Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.19 Mortality Control Checklist with options noted
3.3.20 Documentation proving this facility is exempt from the Moritoria on Construction or
Expansion of Swine Farms, if the application is for a swine facility,
3.3.21 A map showing the topography of the proposed facility location showing features
that affect facility design, the dimensions and elevations of any existing facilities,
the fields used for waste application, and areas where surface runoff is to be
controlled
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your
submittal. (Composting, waste transfers, etc.)
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
(Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
if 'Vfp-licdth for _ Mon_ N)}N56:p (A IA V_(Facility name listed in question I.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best ofMY
knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date �1 3
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
n c 1 A i -
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
W
application for rl � �- :11% ti 'r (Facility name listed in question l.l)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the besO of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned as incomplete.
Signature r Date I - 112%), j
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS UNIT
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-NIE 1110106 Page 4 of 5

i
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
6. SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION:
This form must be completed by the appropriate DWR regional office and included as a part of the
project submittal information.
INSTRUCTIONS TO NC PROFESSIONALS.
The classification of the downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any overflow from the facility would flow toward) in
which this animal waste management system will be operated must be determined by the appropriate DWR regional office.
Therefore, you are required, prior to submittal of the application package, to submit this form, with items 1 through 6
completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Resources Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor (see page 6 of 10). At a
minimum, you must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
location of this animal waste application system and the downslope surface waters in which they will be located. Identify the
closest downslope surface waters on the attached map copy. Once the regional office has completed the classification,
reincorporate this completed page and the topographic map into the complete application form and submit the
application package.
6.1 Farm Name:
6.2 Name & complete address of engineering firm:
Telephone number: (
6.3 Name of closest downslope surface waters:
6.4 County(ies) where the animal waste management system and surface waters are located
6.5 Map name and date:
6.6 NC Professional's Seal (If appropriate), Signature, and Date:
TO. REGIONAL AQUIFER PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where this animal waste management facility will be or has been
constructed or field located, as identified on the attached map segment(s):
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: Date:
(All attachments must be signed)
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-NIE 1110106 Page 5 of 5

of , • 1
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES REGIONAL OFFICES (9105)
Asheville Regional APS Supervisor
2090 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Duplin
Fayetteville Regional APS Supervisor
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional APS Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck
Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Duplin
Mooresville Regional APS Supervisor
610 East Center Avenue
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax[phone]
Raleigh Regional APS Supervisor
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
[phone]
Fax[phone]
Chatham
Nash
Durham
Northampton
Edgecombe
Orange
Franklin
Person
Granville
Vance
Halifax
Wake
Johnston
Warren
Lee
Wilson
Wilmington Region APS Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Alexander
Lincoln
Brunswick New Hanover
Bladen
Richmond
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Carteret Onslow
Cumberland
Robeson
Catawba
Rowan
Columbus Pender
Harnett
Sampson
Cleveland
Stanly
Duplin
Hoke
Scotland
Gaston
Union
Montgomery
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional APS Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax[phone]
1
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe ,
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
FORM: AWO-STATE-I-N/E 1/10/06 Page 6 of 5

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Johnson Dairy
Mark Johnson
1125 Snow Creek Road
Statesville, NC 28625
704-880-4532
01-21-2015
This plan has been developed by:
Jonathan Creason
Iredell SWCD
RECEIVEDMENRlD1111R
444 Bristol Dr.
FEB 2015
Statesville, NC 28677
704-873-6761
Water Quality Regional
Operations Section
eveloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
v%� ignature (owner) Date
A -ch- ops
Signatur (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
J
Plan Approved Bye' /-.23-ISS
chnical Specialist Signature Date
--- - ----------------- - -------------- ---- - ----------------------------- --------------------------- --- - ------------------ ------------------ - - - - - ---- -
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 0 1 -21-2015 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S2
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 2,712,150 gals/year by a 350
animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 60 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
18124
Incorporated
27187
Injected
27187
Irrigated
18124
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
18,124
36705
-18,581
5,492,623
-2,780,473
Year 2
18,124
32151
-14,027
4,811,115
-2,098,965
------------ -s--'-------------------- - ---- -------- -----c---------------------------------s----- --------------.-__------------------------------------
Note: In ource ID, S means standard soure, U means user defined ource. -
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2015 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
10126
la
4.93
4.93
N/A
Lloyd
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5,2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
10126
lb
17.02
17.02
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
10127
1
3.08
3.08
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
10127
2
1.15
1.15
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
10127
3
14.57
14.57
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
10128
1
14.16
14.16
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
10128
2
2.94
2.94
N/A
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
10129
1
2.52
2.52
NIA
Lloyd
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
Soybeans, Double Crop
35 bu.
10129
2
5.90
5.90
N/A
Lloyd
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
Soybeans, Double Crop
35 bu.
10130
1
5.771
5.77
NIA
ILloyd
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
10130
2
1.31
1,31
N/A
Lloyd
Com, Silage
20.9 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
Soybeans, Double Crop
36 bu.
10131
1
3,251
3.25
NIA
Lloyd
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
10131
2
2.01
2,01
N/A
Lloyd
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
Sinai] Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
Soybeans, Double Crop
36 bu.
10132
1
3.401
3.40
N/A
Lloyd
Cam, Silage
20.9 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
Soybeans, Double Crop
36 bu.
10132
2
1.27
1.27
N/A
I Lloyd
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
10133
1
0.581
0.58
N/A
Lloyd
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
10134
1
1.84
1,84
N/A
Lloyd
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
10136
1
11.78
11,78
NIA
Cecil
Com, Silage
21.9 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
Soybeans, Double Crop
40 bu.
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 1/21/2015
PCS Page I of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
1736
1
83.40
83.40
NIA
Wickham -P
Soybeans, Full Season
43 bu.
zone.
Sunflower
N/A
1736
3
10.10
10.10
NIA
Chewacla-P
Soybeans, Full Season
54 bu.
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (3 9 1).
Sunflower
NIA
1813
1
24.53
24.53
NIA
Lloyd
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
1813
2
11.951
11.95
N/A
Lloyd
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
2528
1
16.99
16.99
N/A
Lloyd
Com, Silage
20.9 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
Soybeans, Double Crop
36 bu.
8613
!
16.117
16.07
NIA
IMadison
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
Soybeans, Double Crop
31 bu.
PLAN TOTALS: 260.52 260.52
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
<— 10
zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (3 9 1).
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 1/2112015
PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed
to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications
to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other
by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the
indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the
plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs1A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res
(lbs/A)
Applin
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(1bs1A)
liquid
ManurrA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
10126
la
S2
Lloyd
4.93
4.93
Sorghum -Sudan Hay
5.2 Tons
3115-8/31
257
0
0
Broad.
257
38.46
0.00
189.60
0.00
10126
la
S2
Lloyd
4.93
4.93
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
911-3131
102
0
0
Broad.
41
6-11
0.00
30.10
0.00
10126
lb
S2
Cecil
17.02
17.02
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
_0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0.00
542.49
0.00
10127
1
S2
Cecil
3.08
3.08
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31-871
0.00
98.171
0.00
10127
2
S2
Cecil
1.15
1.15
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
0
0
Broad_
204
30.53
0.00
35.11
0.00
10127
3
S2
Cecil
14.57
14.57
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0.00
464.40
0.00
10128
1
S2
Cecil
14.16
14.16
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7/31
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.871
0.00
451.33
0.00
10128
2
S2
Cecil
2.94
2.94
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131.
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.531
0.00
89.75
0.00
10129
1
S2
Lloyd
2.52
2.52
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
20
Broad.
200
29.93
0.00
75.42
0.00
10129
1
S2
Lloyd
2.52
2.52
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3131
102
0
0
Broad,
41
6.11
0.00
15.39
0.00
10129
2
S2
Lloyd
5.90
5.90
Corn, Silage
20.2
2115-6/30
220
0
20
Broad.
200
29.93
0.00
176.58
0.00
10129
2
S2
Lloyd
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
911-3131
102
0
0
Broad.
41
6.11
0.00
36.02
0.00
10130
l
S2
Lloyd
5.77
5.77
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7131
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
176.141
0.00
10130
2
S2
Lloyd
1.31
1.31
Com, Silage
20.9
2/15-6130
228
0
20
Broad.
208
31.13
0.00
40.77
0.00
10130
2
S2
Lloyd
1.31
1.31
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3131
105
0
ad.
42
6.28
0.00
8.23
0.00
10131
1
S2
Lloyd
325
3.25
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7131
204
0
JOB
road.
204
30.53
0.001
99.21
0.00
589327 Database Version 4,1 Date Printed: 1/21/2015 WUT Page 1 of 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fent.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbsIA)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
ppliod
(WA)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gat/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
10131
2
S2
Lloyd
2.01
2.01
Corn, Silage
20.9
2115-6130
228
0
20
Broad.
208
31.13
0.00
62.56
0.00
10131
2
S2
Lloyd
2.01
2.01
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
42
6.28
0.00
12.63
0.00
10132
1
S2
Lloyd
3.40
3.40
Com, Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
228
0
20
Broad.
208
31.13
0.00
105.83
0.00
10132
1
S2
jLJoyd
3.40
3.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3131
105
0
0
Broad.
42
6.28
0.00
21.37
0.00
10132
2
S2
Lloyd
1.27
1.27
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
38.77
0.00
10133
1
S2
Lloyd
0.58
0.58
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
17.71
0.00
10134
1
S2
Lloyd
1.84
1.84
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.001
56.17
0.00
10136
1
S2
lCocil
11.78
11.78
Com, Silage
21.9
2115-6130
239
0
20
Broad.
219
32.77
0.00
386.05
0.00
10136
1
S2
Cecil
11.78
11.78
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
9/1-3131
115
0
0
Broad.
46
6.88
0.00
81.09
0.0
1736
1
S2
Wickham -P
83.40
83.40
Soybeans, Full Season
43 bu.
4/1-9/15
0
0
0
Broad.
0
O.Ool
o.00
0.00
0.00
1736
3
S2
hewacla-P
10.10
10.10
soybeans, Full Season
54 bu.
.4/1-9115
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1813
1
S2
Lloyd
24.53
24.53
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
748.82
0.00
1813
2
S2
Lloyd
11.95
11.95
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
153
0
0
Broad.
153
22.90
0.00
273.60
0.00
2528
1
S2
Lloyd
16.99
16.99
Cam. Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
228
0
20
Broad.
208
31.13
0.001
528.82
0.00
2528
1
S2
Lloyd
16-991
16.99
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
42
6.28
0.00
106.78
0.00
8613
1
S2
Madison
16.07
16.07
Com, Silage
18.4
2/15-6130
201
0
20
Broad.
181
27.09
0.00
435.26
0.00
8613
1
S2
Madison
16.07
16.07
Small Grain, Silage
8.3 Tons
911-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
1 37
5.511
0.00
88.49
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
5,492.62
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2.712.15
Balance, 1000 gallons
-2.780.4
Total Applied, tons
`
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, --- symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2015 W -UT Page 2 of 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(NIA)
Comm.
Fat.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbslA)
Rea
(WA)
Applic
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
10126
la
S2
Lloyd
4.93
4.93
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3131
102
0
0
Broad.
61
9.16
0.00
45.15
0.00
10126
lb
S2
Cecil
17,02
17.02
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7131
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0.00
542.49
0.00
10127
1
S2
Cecil
3.08
3.08
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7131
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0.00
98.17
0.00
10127
2
S2
ICecil
1.15
1.15
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7131
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
35.11
0.00
10127
3
S2
Cecil
14.57
14.57
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7131
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0.00
464.40
0.00
10128
1
S2
Cecil
14.16
14.16
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
811-7131
213
0
0
Broad.
213
31.87
0.00
451.33
0.00
10128
2
S2
Cecil
2.94
2.94
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7131
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
89.75
0.00
10129_
1
S2
Lloyd
2.52
2.52
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
911-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
61
9.16
0.00
23.08
0.00
10129
1
S2
Lloyd
2.52
2.52
Soybeans, Double Crop
35 bu.
411-9/15
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10129
2
S2
Lloyd
5.90
5.90
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3131
102
0
0
Broad.
61
9.16
0.00
54.03
0.00
10129
2
S2
Lloyd
5.90
5.90
Soybeans, Double Crop
35 bu.
411-9/15
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10130
l
S2
Lloyd
5.77
5.77
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
176.14
0.00
10130
2
S2
Lloyd
1.31
1.31
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
63
9.43
0.00
12.35
0.00
10130
2
S2
Lloyd
1.31
1.31
Soybeans, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10131
1
S2
Lloyd
3.25
3.25
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7131
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
99.21
0.00
10131
2
S2
Lloyd
2.01
2.01
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
63
9.43
0.00
18.95
0.00
10131
2
S2
Lloyd
2.01
2.01
Soybeans, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
omil
0.00
10132
1
S2
ILJoyd
3.40
3.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
911-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
63
9.43
0.00
32,05
0.00
10132
1
S2
Lloyd
3.40
3.40
Soybeans, Double Crop
36 bu.
4/1-9/15
0
0
0
Broad,
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10132
2
S2
Lloyd
1.271
1.27
Fescue May
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.531
0.00
38.77
0.00
10133
1
S2
Lloyd
0.58
0.58
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7/31
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
17.71
0.00
10134
1
S2
Lloyd
1.84
1.84
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7131
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
56.17
0.00
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2015 WUT Page 3 of 4

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Appfic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Feat.
Nutrient
Applied
(1bs/A)
Res
(]bslA)
Applie
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Mamue
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Mansur
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
10136
1
S2
1Cecil
11.78
11.78
Small Grain, Silage
10.4
911-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
69
10.33
0.00
121.63
0.00
10136
1
S2
1Cecil
11.78
11.78
Soybeans, Double Crop
40 bu.
4/1-9/15
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1736
1
S2
Wickham -P
83.40
83.40
Sunflower
NIA
311-9/30
100
0
20
Broad.
80
11.97
0.00
998.40
0.00
1736
3
S2
hewacla-P
10"10
10.10
Sunflower
N/A
311-9130
100
0
20
Broad"
1 80
11,971
0.00
120-911
0.00
1813
1
S2
Lloyd
24.53
24.53
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
8/1-7131
204
0
0
Broad.
204
30.53
0.00
748.82
0.00
1813
2
S2
Lloyd
11.95
11.95
Fescue Pasture
4.6 Tons
811-7131
153
0
0
Broad.
153
22.90
0.00
273.60
0.00
2528
1
S2
Lloyd
16.99
16.99
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3131
105
0
0
Broad.
63
9.43
0.00
160.17
0.00
2528
1
S2
Lloyd
16.99
16.99
Soybeans, Double Crop
36 bu.
411-9/15
0
0
0
Broad.
1 0
0.001
0.00
0.001
0.00
8613
1
S2
Madison
16.07
16.07
Small Grain, Silage
18.3 Tons
911-3/31
92
0
0
Broad.
55
8.26
0.00
132.74
0.00
8613
1
S2
Madison
16.07
16.07
Soybeans, Double Crop
31 bu.
4/1-9115
0
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TatalApplied,1000gallons
4,811"1t
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,71.2.15
Balance, 1000 gallons
-2,098.96
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0"00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2015 WUT Page 4 of 4

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity.
available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage
capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered
by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage
volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility, if the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates
that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is
negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either
of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with
the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Availahle Waste Storave Canacitv
Source Name I Dai (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 911
60
Plan Year Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
29
1
2
1
1
3
60
1
4
60
1
5
60
1
6
60
1
7
60
1
8
60
1
9
60
1
10
60
1
11
60
1
12
30
2
1
53
2
2
25
2
3
60
2
4
30
2
5
60
2
6
51
2
7
60
2
8
60
2.
9
60
2
10
60
2
11
30
2
12
0
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2015 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation, or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips
are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office
Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
•5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should. not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field
6.1 When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
--------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2015 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events,
or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste (shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a, lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2015 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied
at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective. cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, .piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons: Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I----------------------
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2015 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(S) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 1/21/2015 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
112" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
5: Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5s9327 . Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2015 Crop Note Page 1 of 6

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Double -Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
112" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
5: Piedmont
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted. {
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
--------------------------------------------- ---- --- --- - - ------------------------- --------------------------------- -- ---- ---------------------
584327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2015 Crop Note Page 2 of 6

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 213 to 314 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 213 to 314 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Soybeans: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25 -May 25. Review the NCSU Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 24 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However,
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 0 1 -21-2015 Crop Note Page 3 of 6

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Soybeans: Piedmont
The suggested planting date for soybeans in the Piedmont is April 25 -May 25. Review the NCSU Official
Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row
foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows and 8-10 seed/row foot for 36" rows. Increase the
seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting. Seeding depth should be 1-1 112" and adequate depth
control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can be applied at planting.
Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However,
applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor.
Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the
soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for profitable soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance time, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 601b/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, lb, 2, 3
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
584327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2015 Crop Note Page 4 of 6

The following crop note applics to field(s): 1, 1a, 2
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 112" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs..N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1 a
Sorghum -Sudan: No Comment
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Sunflower: No Comment
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2015 Crop Note Page 5 of 6

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Sunflower: No Comment
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
589327 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 01-21-2015 Crop Note Page 6 of 6

LI -I --- I.-

�.t �'� 1,.. � r ?}ery'{ ,i �j •�Q 4.` � �. U�y�, � n •� �� �`+y�}f�{����^a r•
.. \ 111; I# (�I + ,�r • . r a R' tr ' 5 ! • y. w. i '-C! r' �, .. �'�, _ ... _
IL(1 ; ; •,.. „ `U r
It
Oki r�33�'
I yr f rr)~S rx •f •A V � � 7r�,r' yF ''•�,y� "Yj��> I r -.. ,� .- `�
XL.
3� 4
tiv{ ter! s rr.
" ' , . ; rr, � 1 ,�, i. � } � �''� �' ' � • fir;:.. � _ � � �
U ' f 4{ ' �ty "f� ` 4 t . ' ,+•1 \al
j r 'r ,• 5 r �' �
%m 1 . 4F 1
~'mac �� . �- •�' ��r` � Q r I
y� ��, •' - �a 9 lam. r, '�',��
Ir A
., K',.f ;..r`' r.. ,. li r:+r. 1*i^yr�:x, ,,.,ri �F' �.4-i•u X4%7.
' tk'��'''j,�� �, r.-, i�• Y. ' fY � r r� < � �k ff r - ';.. - y�y�+
;� "4s ii �'��Yflt L,r.t� - A�- ". n• 1 r "'1 � .(' I ~a`~`�.. { Ivr`� , i,t`'% *C^': f:/l�'I� \v' ,
•I`� - ti 7 `' �4 i.::6J' � 1. .�. � . 1,. h4, 'r.� ' ,f }'}'}- �f� �l a `, G {'%
1f' .y }'. i• ._ ;. rr' f. 'itlr` -� w !1 '����{ '1' 9[}• ./ �q �. ,
! if.�' i •�'' � , 1. r'r� rt'� � ', ,' ,. '.c' Y, �f � ° "• 1r r�� 1 ti . rt' � -+:1.
rI '"v��♦yy .r+jyt�r,,,� 1�'g,'�•=. # to.t11"' },,.� '� xr �4^ fi ! �•'�''��.; I• � ��kt�,� � J�%�JJ�I
.1 ti � �A. r,r ..., 4 `4. '< ! �. l ,, �• f i, ..Ny, ''� r C�itP 14r ,
�'x{ut' T1M i •i+''� F r -t t�'1� '�'Ir 1 '�Y,'r i ' y � A8't � :'� r { („J,' �n„ r i.' �� ..� q .�. x-. 5

_,�` � �
O
�rF,.
a `{�
o
a �,
.� ., c;
p)�
".w �
� � 1 .
•ria-�. �} V :f.
• i� C' � ..
1 � � ' �}
/r '
. � { r . ' �-� �ff � r
� �,
f ,
,� � o
�\ � � ,. r ra %�;� ,tib\
Qatf �\ j / qty F_�_'�t .f, �, -'�� T i '�-�
r�M � � � �� '_ '- 1. �y, �.
f\. - 1 `� 1,, w'�� 1�` /VI�Ri(►�:i�. � � .. .f J/ h��y U � t
t y.�l''' •ala d , ,'� �� � V Yi+�w+� � �, f •`f � '� 1 I � , � �.r•��
�' -� ' h� V� 4 ` s.aar 1� ,tom•" ? � 1. . f ,��r _ uyF�} /i�o1
�R,� _t G ' ��,`II- tI �_ 'y, �� i.� IBJ
� 7 '•� ,�
' � x ��� � ��� � �� � ��� ����
.�' _ ��
ate, A 44f � , J �"� .�e�
� � '/ 'g�� ��� ii ,, s y �%
a �`{� � ��. �.�.• � . ��'�'
.. ,� lY -jl it _��:.t.,,�}. w �.:�Y 1 '�
,: � ��_
t ,� •� �
°tip,,; � �� ; - � �. �'`,, ,,, '� � '
�-':w / � �.' � � � _ E
t � ,�'�

—r-r—
+,R.
t
yr t - � t��� : � h i. ti`s• C`?�� i
f fS $ 7j
' � �� _/,r•� lel � �°r .tet • 1 � �'�e.
\ .. �� Sno -Creek
OD
'r - roti i
Sr
fJ.1-
P��� � a� mal' - T 1 � . •� � � ` � �, S +1 � � /
41,
s 1'. e,;'�t -�!: y.l � ` r) � f V 11.�i1�i V •� 1 i3
ter" • n; 1.�r aS' 1 _ �Y f ",111, . � �' _ ,
.. '+ r�.l� f , Y - � 1 � Cad, , . r . � .' . / `."' •'•'�`�' 4ti4 141 ^ 1 k1 I. 1
Wl
4n ft
�.fr + S, ,''�' Si41',1�[` v'•,1' 1'� �` ,qF 6 +1� ... ,�1.� �.4r �� ...� eF F :r
.� f � 5%i F�. -Y i _ } � i� , F t h din N � �'1 � ' � • r-
„�,., ,.1� �` + .,t; •h sir y t ♦i.. ,� � � :'7,'� ti � :� ' T � � y I r. t � .
:,+ it � ; *� ,. 1 11 ..,,; •, ��. (4+rr �"� - ' F r,,
,, i' 1y it J. v, � � +.. t 7� k , . •' ' �I, . , 7. � ' 1 i' 1�
!y. .l,- i* {. a r •'}�,7+ cv .-n f�I. it

--------------
' � �� ��B C� off`• � �� ��.� � - � s � ,
.
� � l r lid ({• y�.,�,,� � t 1�'Vl'1uU�J� 1` �';f�,`'1 ,�� J "r�• 'Z,; ��
1 1 (�l'1�1s1[G�(f7�!.f�15(f�j
�:y' t � s +i � ` V sArAl.:.f la � •'� , •1 , 1 ' ' �'. , ." � ."+�f � ,r
#.���: ,. J� �� �, 1. •'� � f •'1,61 r. `� � �� �! � �I. ,r.�
ram 9
` �•r Greek y� J
�� 4! � • -. mac.' i ( ��. � � ��!r{.r". 'k r" rd r4 4.
ter: .. � � nn r ia, ✓ ♦_ • r .Z"
`�-:r-._:a y--',se L �. �l `i1 •��` ,� � 1. � , i *" ?f � wy` � Y*

`j �.`. � - Y � � -r��. � f'm(' l �' ',, 1 •.• y1• .. �� rS "•'fir'. � r
r_�
, s ,�k t-. . t'• � n , .'rk. �' U:.w-'�r ,'��� p`� yea r. �.� - i c! f7
� �b. :LL 1, ��' i -'�y� •_�'�,+ �"`iCt. i �. � .r 67,f
,1" s" tt� - •, f r � .�,. � r 'tr'�t��a4 ° , � r 4 �,ti� ,G „� � • ,
IF
Ir
,. � ;y ��i �`I' • tires ••i ri f - , r'�7s
�yyo �• 4 r-.5 f µr ' ri ••� Joh'-F. _ rt .}. -• ,y J�j}+-•��
'^z.i,
o
q L� ��f''�o� �i rGr r ,[: ,, o ��� U�iF:+rJ��`� �j'��{-��. •�'�Y t� 1. k�, ..
l�,,I -,��y,�f�' p 1� 11��� , �` � T � r: ... u•*.p�l:�-A \, l ' � p. r �5.1..�f l
f{�t � �7," , y'`M1>)1•11 � � i r „rn L - `. � �� S � j � �,�;
` y. irk, • p {�Jr1Srr ' ` .� t f •. 't ,
14�,.,.
f
' , �`�� � "TUy/ � ,fii �,s F �'` ` ti Jr ,I �✓ r _t `i-�r � {.,� .� /�'r �� -k-��•?••�� r
16,
Or
-vwv 0 bi��
�j ra
' �' -r" , I Lie' �r *. ��' ,o . � r .,f �' • � r � i
�_ '� � � � f� � t t � ~•if'C�C rU���.•_���CC7"� I 1,�� _,. ,.....- _ r"�.�= - .� `h-,+ r
.� sY' � , � y_ ,� ; , r � 4 7r � y�j,r •+moi .. ,/ � •'.� r'tM l
r
r r J'Lk
17 • + _ :1. 4 � y .t "I` � s•' i.r tl °e ,tr'tF� J s' "� `+ �is i. si � % ,ryh,r
., r .' 4 r '�'� t s {��.i ff• �� ar �a� � �Y�i .1 ,l rf�y Q a�'� r 4'7�t -� !••�
I `1 j '� � Y ` . yq tj }% >:1 r..J'4�T.. .. . , s •�F 1� r - �..rt, ;Z��" r
I'•. �' ,r�r t, .r ,r ,• yJ. r !! r:{f�
el,'t f,. + ,' {r �. r• _ ` ).t s�r•'+1 .�r
fffff r t' . `, f ,-i x I' .' N >i s ti � r 'r �, � � J � i � ,l �+ �� - � r. ,_ R ' r �� • � b _ {. f� '
f��r i�f ,t'ij. *•��#� '� �� �' �.. •'i_• s 5:�',, ii ,�...' ��k«-,y �y,r f� .} 1, *r r ��, ,,. `F
r �I' 1 r 'X '!, 'ns r•! !• ' 7. �ra \\ � r;, +• / . it 4<.i r, .. � { j 't
'r• d r,• r'1 �'�.. I,iY �,ti7 l 1�l ..'�J' i" Y�' R 1' 'r �- �r .{'�� 'rte � ��� .r� f }� �•1 �,'
'y � •4!R' /'r.r�� - p'r_�S 1 �l _ t., ;R ,e�tlt . ,.'" ! r.�. r i !i r� :r . ,1 . a+ *"?`{. n����r.11M;j
'r .thy 1/ +�• F+ i�.• r � i '�iTf1+A�� �� t' � " r R ' . %' is f nr � , - •�' i i J•[ ., r� yt+C -1 i'
•r s R`Y. ,yrrr r o r•r It ` f e . T .•d �.{ J'ls T : �if, r '..1 d ��' .. r ' l' 4 ! i'�''4•r ',,

1 r 1
Now qD
Was
Tt
pl
J
J 1 Rru
All
�141
a .' � rl I�r�+..• r t 1 � i i � '_fit r „ ..l .e C�•'• - i, k ',1 f
,t'+rr�i ! P•'e it F'� 'k q :f {7` 1- , - r♦i,,.;� Il
?,', h t h' ) r ��+5�}� . yv< < �} r `+ r1 .� •� - 4 1 r l 4 i.f� � ., ,..� i��y' r �} a f r.�'. r �'.r{ 1 r ri�l '• j.
i.#:
Alf
r. Y(�, Iy� lr ¢¢t f ' _ r r+ 'i+• f ' l�' , ry 'i�'' ^ _ ' .
r��irL�' +L ,`,j 1+' ,,•5r + f F •;,t' '4'tii `� 1 � 'r`' •'L• � r, 1 �j �I, ,J r� + +'.?,n
,r -
r

U. S. DEPARTMENT Of AGRICULTURE
SaiL Conservation Service
NAME:
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE PIT
Date:
County:
Address:
NC -ENG -40
Rev. 7191
LENGTH I .
1
SIDE SLOPE TO 1
1 /
• o �. ,, AVE. TOP ELEV. �0 4,
dy
§+MI0 SECTION
[0' / 1
i
/ 1
AVE. BOTTOM ELEV.
. f
/_ LENGTH '70 /
(See back for volwae calculations)
Use of facility:
Capacity: kl57, 07 1 Gallons llY, Sd'2 Ft3
Soil Type:
Bench Mark Description
Bottom
Normal Liquid Level
Storage for normal Precip.
Maximum Liquid Level
25 yr. Storm Storage
Crest ESW
Max.Flow Depth
Freeboard
Top of Dam
Elev. 78'.2
Elev.
(+) t. 7 Ft.
Elev.
N �. � . Ft.
Elev. 96,0
{+) &A Ft.
({)
J. Ft.
Elev. Y3,1.2

VOLUME OF A TRAPEZOIDAL PIT
One equation ,for calculating the volume of a trapezoidal pit is:
((,c.) 10 176I 73C-0 Y71673
Volume - dgpth ( (area d top) +' (area of bottom) + (4 * area
6 -
of midsection) ] = /!.Y S LZ Ft3
Another equation for determining the volume of a trapezoidal
excavated pit with constant side slopes is;
VwdL+Zd2(4/3 Zd - w -L)�
where:
V = total volume of the pit in ft3.
w = width of the pit'at top in feet.
d = depth of the pit at top in feet.
L = length of the pit at top in feet.
Z = side slope
for 2 to 1 use Z - 2
for 21/2 to 1 use Z = 21/2
NOTE:
Dimensions used must be constructable. Always check for narrow,
deep pits. For correct results the following must be true.
w must be greater than 2Zd
L must be greater than 2Zd

Water Resources
ENYIROIIMEIrTAL QUALITY
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
A Johnson
D. Mark Johnson Farm
1125 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville, NC28677-8677
Dear Permittee,
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
RECEIVED/NCOENR/DWI3
July 8, 2016
AIL 12 2916
MOORC5VlLLE REQ ONAL OFFICE
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
D. Mark Johnson Farm
Permit Number AWC490058
Iredell County
As of this date, our records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility has
overdue fees. It is both a condition of your permit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T A 105(e) (2) to pay
the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by this Division.
The following invoices are outstanding:
Invoice Number
Due Date
Outstanding Fee $
2015PR004855
6/7/2015
180
Failure to pay the fee accordingly may result in the Division initiating enforcement actions, to
include the assessment of civil penalties. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a
recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person"
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore, it is imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested
within thirty (30) days of this Notice of Deficiency.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office.
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mall Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-contit-
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources/Water Quality Regional operations
1636%Edd.uviwCcaM j Rnloigh,INUAllCmuluw2769)-1636
919 807 6464

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
00VAluzub
DeJ. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No AWC490058)

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral 0�Emerrgency0 Other O Denied Access + ��•`
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: j ; Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: /�( CT, o s or\ Owner Email:
Owner Name: _j //zz Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: f�/� -16 4
Back-up Operator:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region:
Certification Number: /1z0("(. Y
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: , ,
w x� •-€i- �a .:``
c . ! � I .�
c, u` ' 3 "� �d ',
'I3
1
I
= �' �'f � �
1 ' 1 °�)
1 a�i
y1�..��
I .-r 4
1 1 ! ,'.y
]yr`.'a�w
Q u'
I,.
�{ I f °'t
,f.,.
S sx 'V .•� r�' -efts
Y
1 1 - .'
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
F
tit,. .
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes -§kNo
■ r / 1
- -
E ■ 1
-
_
IN r
-
-
R` ■ i " / 1
_-
q� j. y
y ksr
i q 1..
'4 ■ ,
r y
ANEMONES
__Al
'., ly��'
■
_-
Yt1 �• 1��
2it
L �' Y..
r :. � I � 5 A
.a r�� [ ,'Y=� � p..
., ■ , ;
-�
y'„ �-✓iF
, � +� yc X"' �
Y'd, . � `
�rq r`I'��} �r aC.
4'h
, A i� �
?
'F
, a�.. §J��Ni��-,
a nj•q-.K is
,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ftrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes -§kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[]Yes
=No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
214/2011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: yr
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes *`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes V DID ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structyre 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier-,
Spillway?: --�
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes -ar'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �No E3 NA E] NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes k No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 5& No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes `U'E'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste _Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[:]Yes ❑No
❑ NA
'gEf1QE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes M -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
D
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes �-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes. ❑ No
&-NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes -�-No
E] NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[] Yes ❑ No
[ NA
`$�NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
[] NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ Wl ❑ Checklists ❑ DesiV/❑ M*(❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste�Applioation ❑ Weekly Fra"o d ❑ WasteJ661ysis ❑ Soil/nalysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge
Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[]Yes *No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[]Yes ❑No
�A
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
2/4/2011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [—]Yes [] No �&NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑ Yes It No
C29—yes. ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes lj� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EKNo
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes -@�-.No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to.geuestibn #} Explain any YES answers -and/or.. any additional recon imendatkihs or'any other comments +� ? 6-
,tVFi :;... - Fri, 1.; k 'YZ
Use'drawings;of:facility to better ex lain situations,(use additional pages as•necessary)
kz does 45r vt erse cG J� : -r ori
LA
P LjAr C erz.Tzffl yC--i --0
1 Vt e+b A�AA C� D
Reviewer/Inspector Name: / Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
2/4/2011

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection U Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: & Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
.III. .1 ... I..�I I.�..
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ` Departure Time: County: t Region:
Farm Name: �r ,YV JvVsA✓� Owner Email:
Owner Name: '.i" �'"`�' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
J
Title:
Onsite Representative: V /
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
L`
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
r r
Certificad um er:
Longitude:
�RA
Discharges and Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[]Yes
❑ T
❑ Yes ❑
NA ❑ NE
A No
■
NA ❑ NE
❑.NA ❑ NE
No [] NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 ' 21412011 Continued
1
�RA
0 ETTER M. Film,
I =�Affle
6W, NI—r1:11S
10 Mr a rx
'hHy r iP■
.•4�. _-^}r
--
�'„}.j
n
lk,i Yd S?!}p3
.J i'i3
0 s•';yy'.r .,'�. - . JY err
ys.■ ..: ' �,1..,
— 1 /_�p',
'�.,i
�, (�r�A-1
--:t h
gr,� �.,; F
��y W�.0 J
�, � / ®�_ry■
� 1
®�
r1
r "+, , � TaY ^k7' �k za§i
�'s 4`�� fF "�' SSS S-
' YK
'':� ���'2
1'�� �. .��P� .d.8(@ '�'ry".'
Discharges and Stream Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[]Yes
❑ T
❑ Yes ❑
NA ❑ NE
A No
■
NA ❑ NE
❑.NA ❑ NE
No [] NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 ' 21412011 Continued

r
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
Facility Number: IDate of Inspection:
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
Waste Collection & Treatment
Is storage capaci (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
A
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 S
e 6
Identifie6e�roage,
Spillway
Designed Freeboard (in
Observed Freeboard (in
5. Are there any immediaf any of the structures observed?
❑'Yes
NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severetc.) .
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4fi were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or en ' onm tal threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Ye
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
: ❑ Y o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
—
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required rs, se ac s, or compliance a ema Ives that need
❑ s No
❑ NA
❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload zen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lb Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Outside?o Acceptable Crop ow ❑ E ' c of d Drift ❑ Application OL
r 4, . ist
12. Crop Type(s):.�' te
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or Land application site nced improyement?
'�
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable r
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents_
19. Did the facility fail to have th i rea i y available?
20. Does the facility fail to ve all om is of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box
Checklists Design - Map Lease en
recor keeping n rovdnent? If yes; c propriate
Applicalio ekly Freeboard to Analys' 1 Analysis [
infall ❑ St Crop Yield . I n Inspectio onthly and 1" Rainf
22.•Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
s No NA ❑ NE
etc.
dge into BAK
Soil
Appto ea
❑ Y'
Yes'
C
t5—NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
Q -14A
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
2/412011 Continued

`Fatili Number: - Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes NA 0 NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes A NE
2FailcEomplete
elorY.
nual sludge surve ailure to develop a POA for sludge levels
levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date -of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss ass�LAT) certification? es NA NE
Other issues
2$. Did the facility o er y dispos h rs and/or document
A
❑ NE
and report mo a ity rates that were hig#!424
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?Ae
❑ NA
C]NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediateI
3Q. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Off c of c 'r enc s uired by tNA
[:]NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, o er
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.NA
0 NE
❑ Application Field Lagoon/Storage Pond C3;,Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
Y
A
<�
[] NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
Y
N
NE
34_ Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes _
_ NA
[ NE
ta,questioa#: Explain any, YES ans►vers,and/or;any additional. recommendations or 'any comments w '� ,
JCdmnients(refer
Use drawings`offacllxty to better explain stuations(use;additional pales as necessary)
VFft
rq=Q�
1L
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
214/2011 -

r
t.
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
A.W. Johnson
Mark Johnson Dairy
1125 Snow Creek Road
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Johnson:
[F�
T MCCRORYLe
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Sccmfory
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
October 25, 2016. Director
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Mark Johnson Dairy/Facility 49-58
General Permit AWC490058
Iredell County
On August 25, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Mark Johnson Dairy and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Matthew R. Johnson, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this -report; please contact me at [phone].
Sincere
James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated August 25, 2016
ib
State dNorth Carolina I Environmental Quality I. Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regions] Office 1610 East Center Avenue. Suite 3011 Moaresvib, North Carolina 28115'
704 663 1699

a
Facility Number: 490058
Division of Water Resources
Division�of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency -
Facility Status: ' Active
Permit . AWC490056 [] Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed date;
Reason for Vlait: • Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of VlaiL 08/25/2016 Entry Time: 03:00 pm Exit Time: 5:00 pm incident # `
Farm Name: Mark Johnson Dairy Owner Ems
Owner. A W Johnson Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1125 Snow Creek Rd Statesville NC 28677
Physical Address: 1082 Snow Creek Rd Statesville NC 28625
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 54' 50" Longitude: 80° 56'51"
Exit 1-40 on Statesville, N. Wilkesboro - Hwy. 115 Exit. Travel north approx. 8 miles crossing 3 concrete bridges after crossing the
3M bridge, take the second road to the right Snow Creek Church Road. Travel 3 tenths of a mile to farm on left side of r
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
E, Records and Documents E Other Issues
Certified Operator: Matthew Ryon Johnson Operator Certification Number: 1000644
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Sita Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name .,Matthew R. Johnson Phone: [phone]
On-aite representative Matthew R. Johnson Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector. Ja_ Phon �1%
Inspector Signature: Dale:
i
Secondary Inspector(o
Inspection Summary:
06/06/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 6.08 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/26/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.96 Lbs11000 Gallons
09/06/14 > Soil Analysis
ib
page: 1

permit: AWC490058 Owner - Facility : A W Johnson Facility Number. 490058
Inspection'Da#e: 08/25/18 Inppection Type: Complianos Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
ACattie
ilk Caw 350 138
Total Design Capacity: 350
Total SSLW: 490,000
Waste Structures
Dlsignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freeboard
Storage STORAGE POND 20.00 48.00
page: 2

C
Permit: AWC490058 Owner - Facility : A W Johnson Facility. Number: 490058
Inspection Date: 08/25/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
tree No Nn' Ne
maintenance or improvement?
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
Structure
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Application Field
❑
❑
Is PAN > 10%!10 lbs.?
Other
❑ .
❑
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil?
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & TreatmentNe
o Ni N
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are'there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
-
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed_ and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? .
"❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, 'dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste AnDlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need
❑ M ❑ 13.
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%!10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil?
❑ '
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑ '.
Evidence of wind drift?
❑ ;
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

page: 4
y
'
w
Permit: AWC490058 Owner - Facility: A W Johnson Facility Number.
490058
Inspection Date: .08/25/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit:
routine
Waste Application
Yea
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grein (whew
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
r
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is'there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents r
You
No Na No
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP'readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.,
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Cl
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
'
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

l�c
Permit: AWC490058 Owner - Facility : A W Johnson Facility Number:
490058
No Na No
Inspection Date: 08/25/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
❑
Records and Documents
Yap„ ,No
No No
Crop yields?
❑
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
Monthly and T' Rainfall Inspections
❑
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
Application Field •
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ M
❑
appropriate box(es) below:.
If Other, please specify
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
CAWMP?
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up, visit by same agency?
❑
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
M
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes,. check the appropriate box below.
Application Field •
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up, visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

r' t
;. F�L
ROY COOPER
:.,
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
- Secretary
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Environmental Quality Director
March 2, 2017
A.W. Johnson
Mark Johnson Dairy
1125 Snow Creek Road
Statesville, NC 28677
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Mark Johnson Dairy/Facility 49-58
General Permit AWC490058
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
On February 28, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Mark Johnson Dairy and the
permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Matthew R. Johnson, who was present and
assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincer 1
B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional. Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated February 28, 2017
ib
State of North Carolina � Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

M Division of Water Resources
- - ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation -
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490058
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490058
Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: IredellRegion:
Mooresville
Date of Visit: 02128/2017 Entry Time: 03:00 pm Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident #
Farre Name: Mark Johnson Dairy
Owner Email:
Owner: A W Johnson
Phone:
704-876-3187
Mailing Address: 1125 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Physical Address: 1082 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28625
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator -
Location of Farm;
Latitude: 35° 54'50" Longitude:
80° 56'51
Exit 1-40 on Statesville, N. Wilkesboro - Hwy. 115 Exit. Travel north approx. 8 miles crossing 3 concrete bridges after crossing the
3rd bridge, take the second road to the right Snow Creek Church Road. Travel 3 tenths of a mile to farm on left side of r
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Matthew Ryan Johnson Operator Certification Number: 1000644
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(e): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Matthew R. Johnson Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Matthew R. Johnson Phone : [phone]
n
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(a)-
Inspection Summary:
10/17/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 7,46 Lbs11000 Gallons
06106/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 6.08 Lbs11000 Gallons
01118!17 > Soil Analysis
Phone: [phone]
Date:
f
14. Waste applied to fieldslcrops not included in the CAWMP by Registered Manure Hauler MHCO00023 as per third party
agreement. Associated waste application records reviewed following the inspection.
jb
page: 1

Permit: AWC490058 Owner - Facility : A W Johnson Facility Number: 490058
Inspection Date: 02128117 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow i 350 137
Total Design Capacity: 350
Total sSLW: 490,000
Waste Structures
I Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Storage STORAGE POND 20.00 48.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC490058
Owner - Facility : A W Johnson Facility Number: 490058
Inspection Date: 02/28/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
❑ M ❑ ❑
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Structure
❑
M ❑
❑
Application Field
❑
PAN?
❑
Other
❑
0 ❑
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ 0
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ N
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
❑ M ❑ ❑
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
[❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
Excessive Ponding?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
❑
PAN?
❑
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
❑
Outside of acceptable crap window?
❑
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M 0
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there.evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crap window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC490058 Owner - Facility : A W Johnson Facility Number: 490058
Inspection Date: 02/28/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application w Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3 I Small Grain (wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and D cuments
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
■❑❑❑
000E
❑❑■❑
❑
M ❑
❑
❑■1111
Yea
No Na No
❑■1111
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 4

1
Permit: AWC490058 Owner - Facility : A W Johnson Facility Number:
490058
Inspection Date: 02/28/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
yge No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the Facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ■
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
[❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
[]
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ : M
❑
Other Issues
Yes No No. No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
[❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

0P
Type of Visit: 4wcompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: t1g' Departure Time:�` -�J , County: �_ Region:(
Farm NamedA ` Owner Email:
Owner Name: r W JA �K�� ��V1>� J'"W ` Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical. Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Numbed'
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any Adi`scharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE'
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No N ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ A ❑ NE
r
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 214/2011 Continued
EM
��t ■ � i > -
■
-�
�#�
■ ■ " � 1 1 i 1 _�
�-"d
qua-_
� a.�' � s;�,"L - %, ''r`. F n •mss' '�
■ -- t't5ti
NOR
4�" d � o ca` �''' .. w 8 t tt�� f �r x �t •_x
ht, r
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any Adi`scharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE'
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No N ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ A ❑ NE
r
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 214/2011 Continued

Facifl Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spill"A
Designed Freeboard
Observed Freeboard
Structure 1 Structure 2
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate th-r=975—the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yeses❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ',SPJA ❑ NE
Structure 5 StructU6 6
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
E:]Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes�No C3 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Y Q 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [] Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN a 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
❑ Evide ce of Wind ft ❑Application Outside f Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): '
13. Soil Type(s):
Oo the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Yes
❑ N
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
[:]Yes ❑ N
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Re aired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ YeA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
Checklists Design ap'!1 a ements
❑Other:
s record keeping need i ovcment? If yes, check the opriate box below.
21.it
Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
e Application ar i
aste Transfe
Weather Code
❑ a Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections onthly and l" Rainfall Inspecti31 UWS
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
214/2011 Continued

Faeffity Number:- Date of Ias action:
.� 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?Yes NA NE -
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. '
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ' ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of destanimais with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Offic"�f_emereencscsituatious as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field
❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond
❑ Other:.
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAW IP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
essaty):,
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑Yece�; ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ Yes NA
❑
Yesj No ❑ NA
.361 'Itroo
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/412011
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A. W. Johnson
D. Mark Johnson Farm
1125 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28625
Dear A. W. Johnson;
.1 • r
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OFF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Ka LAPwT. 4*
March 3, 1998 2Zl�MttitiT, WUA14t%-
rti 14ATURAL itt ti tt('fl'3
IIAR 5 1998
III W .0 F#► 1,} IE�i
llf
Subject: Removal of Registration
Facility Number 49-58
Iredell County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to the
surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits listed
below, you will be required to obtain a certified animal waste management plan and contact the Division of Water
Quality prior to stocking animals. Threshold numbers of animals that require certified animal waste management plans
are as follows:
Swine 250
Confined Cattle 100
Horses 75
Sheep 1,000
Poul with a li uid wastes tem 30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sue Homewood of our staff
at [phone] ext 502.
Fin
cc: MooresvW Wates Quality.Regional-Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1 •
Mooresville Regional Office f
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor � � � N
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 30, 1997
Mr. A.W. Johnson
1125 Snowcreek Road
Statesville, North Carolina 28625
SUBJECT: Operation Review Corrective Action Recommendation
D. Mark Johnson Farm
Facility No. 49-58
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Johnson,
On July 23, an Operation Review was conducted of D. Mark Johnson Farm, facility no. 49-58. This
Review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was = being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and operated under
the responsible charge of a designated operator. However, the following management deficiency was discovered
and noted for corrective action: failure to install start pumping marker within the ponds. This management
deficiency needs to be addressed and corrected. You are encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist if
additional assistance is needed. During ensuing reviews, this same deficiency will be re-examined to determine if
corrective action was implemented.
In order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be
discharged into the.waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems
must be properly maintained_and_operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
Please remember that you are required to obtain and implement an approved animal waste management
plan by the end of this year. The plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 277 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
an
Env' ntaI Engineer I
919 North Main Street, 16.C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. A.W. Johnson
July 30,1997
Page 2
cc: Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office !�
DSWC Regional Files

]Routine OComplaint 0 Follow-up of'DWQ inspection 0 Follow -It of DSNVC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection ? x�
Facility NumberS$ .
Tinte al' inspection JO: ),; 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status:Afiegistered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Total Time fin fraction of hours
(ex. 1.2; for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
© Not Operational Last Operated: ..................................................................................................................................................
cDat1e
Farm Name: � .:1 4. n,�..)..<........... a �u
....... ..... �. J. .S}.i...... .........
1."%. .
..& ..r1 ..................
County:.......
fir....!I........................................................
SWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
h
Phone tio........................................................................................
n i
[] DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Ft
t'Sk�
Mailing.Address:..............Lj.. :7.........SN3.-u...cn L...........�
.........................
............
..s P—q J-1e...........,...................,.....zly('z S.......:....
Onsite Representative:,........( :.iwr..ti....:�a x. �1 ....................................................Integrator:
x+' SS
IKd #:, g
y#,4p3
.........................................
d' t
...:.�,#.�.s
]Routine OComplaint 0 Follow-up of'DWQ inspection 0 Follow -It of DSNVC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection ? x�
Facility NumberS$ .
Tinte al' inspection JO: ),; 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status:Afiegistered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Total Time fin fraction of hours
(ex. 1.2; for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
© Not Operational Last Operated: ..................................................................................................................................................
cDat1e
Farm Name: � .:1 4. n,�..)..<........... a �u
....... ..... �. J. .S}.i...... .........
1."%. .
..& ..r1 ..................
County:.......
fir....!I........................................................
OwnerName: ........ A:.w.:,........ J.a.�.�;.sa.�1................................................................
Phone tio........................................................................................
Facility Contact: .................... ..
........................................................
Title: .............................................................
... Phone No:
Mailing.Address:..............Lj.. :7.........SN3.-u...cn L...........�
.........................
............
..s P—q J-1e...........,...................,.....zly('z S.......:....
Onsite Representative:,........( :.iwr..ti....:�a x. �1 ....................................................Integrator:
..
.........................................
Certified Operator: ............... I ....... ................ ............... Operator Certification Number:..............
Location of harm:
Latitude • 6—� : Longitude • 4
Type of Operation Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer Mairy
= 11 — HE]
❑ Non -Laver I I ❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons/ Holding. onds ' E�=. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
General
1, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement`' ❑ Yes �fNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ YesL� INO
h, If clischarr_e is observed, (lid it reach Surface Watcr7 (If yes, notify D1��J`Ql El Yes I �No
c. Ifdischar-�e is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min''
d. Dues discharge bypass a l:t_*oon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ}
❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge:'
El Yes -KNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes )�(No
mai ntenanccliir,prove ment'?
4/30/97 Cowinued on back

I
F acility Number:
1 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Stnicture 3 Structure 4
.
.................... ..,....................................... ... I. ........... ..................................................
l0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes 'XNo
❑ Yes i(No
❑ Yes t,No
❑ YesINO
Structure 5 Structure 6
....................................................................
❑ Yes 'KNo
❑ Yes )9' No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
r
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
,
�.+�rlv s ttXlt i5 eSc 4. /V1'(7C L., f
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
XYes
❑ No
Waste Application
1.'.+1-
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
kNO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15 • N Sa�rC S"ur,�
t,i ,� N,: C •, ire,,, "�' � ro � �/"'S,
15. Crop type C-S...........-..FG��I,�<��r
t
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
"KNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
\Nory _rk4
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes NP�No
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
X 40
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Q i3 r f' LJ
arcv��,N �•�f
s i��
t,��
r
,
�.+�rlv s ttXlt i5 eSc 4. /V1'(7C L., f
^C
t�)�iC.J
1.'.+1-
15 • N Sa�rC S"ur,�
t,i ,� N,: C •, ire,,, "�' � ro � �/"'S,
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,�, ��, �� Date:
74_3
cc: Division of {Vater Quality, Water Qu 4143 Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4130197

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, 3r., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A.W. Johnson
1082 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Mr. Johnson:
IDEHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 24, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
A.W. Johnson Farm, Facility 4: 49-58
Iredeli County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on September 23, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. The facility was in good shape. However, you need to obtain a written agreement with the
persons responsible for handling the waste in from your storage pond. Continue working with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service on the implementation of your certified waste management plan.
Any further correspondence related to the subject'inspection will be sent under separate cover.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at
[phone].
Sincerely,(}
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
Al
919 North Main Street,�y
� � FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 r� An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50°10 recycled/10010 post -consumer paper
N14

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation ReviewIN
' y
RD WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection �0.
7,
W-R
outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DMVC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:m'm)
© Registered © Certified ©{Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 13 Not Operational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Dame ^ Sc�V�Vt5o� County: (f
.......................... ............................... ....... r-4..... . >~ �.� 11......,.,......,......,.........,.....,.............
Owner Name: /� �� S v %...^.�IB`7 d r '.�.P..r.i%............
Facility Contact: ,%�GrK...................moik ✓ 50,q�...... Title:................,.,........,.................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:.......... �. .........:ShU".....0!�.,... ...................................�.�A�S,.t�.il.it*,..................................... ���...7.-5.....
Onsite Rep resents►tive:..,(vi4c................ ..................................... Integrator:................ ..................
Certified Operator,.:: >,,.....a7,rot/ .................. d.'1............................. Operator -Certification Number:..21. :13...................
Location of Farnf.
fir. ....4.n.......... ice. i ..... . .............. .....5.,........, i...e . .... M.�. fl......i.s� .. u a.�.� ....R.1..... .........
..................................... Sf7v44?........ Qpr�.T.........1..,....,.tl�.......br 7...... Q.t Inti ................
Latitude 0 1 44 Longitude • ' O4<
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design:.. Current.
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer airy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity a
Total SSLW 11%e 4M
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds IL.-.� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System ti
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement`? ❑ Yes �No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at; ElLagoon F-1SprayField ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance. man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge; is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes. notiry DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (11' yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
4, Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
No
mai ntenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
❑ Yes
D�No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
❑ Yes
C9 No
7/25/97
Continued on lack

No.violations or de'f<ciencies.were'noted during this.visit. Nou.rvill receive no ftirttier
correspondence about this. visit:
Qj re.ew.ev\T' w 4 ` WCX • i10oUJP_r-
r-Q6AC �_4 T1�4
COnT�•1u£ vaor-�v� c,s i AjKL,S pvti` � e-f-A&I-e �l (3t04 �t 7/25/97
w..
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' ,
J t3
-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �f a
_W
skeility Number: -
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
❑ Yes
No
Structures (Lagoons.fioldine Ponds, Flush Pits etc.
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ......... .....&Z .............. ............................... ,.... ................................... .................................... ....................................
........ ........... .................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
WNo
It.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
'N No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
,ANO
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
❑ No
Waste Application OJ`A
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
qNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type k.. /
Y..................................................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
P<o
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
%ZLNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
9Yes
❑ No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
ANO
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
A No
For Certified or Pennitted Facilities Only N
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the 4nimal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
No.violations or de'f<ciencies.were'noted during this.visit. Nou.rvill receive no ftirttier
correspondence about this. visit:
Qj re.ew.ev\T' w 4 ` WCX • i10oUJP_r-
r-Q6AC �_4 T1�4
COnT�•1u£ vaor-�v� c,s i AjKL,S pvti` � e-f-A&I-e �l (3t04 �t 7/25/97
w..
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' ,
J t3
-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �f a

rs
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
A.W. Johnson
Rt. 11, Box A-343
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Johnson:
P?W pu
[DEF.HNFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
A.W. Johnson Farm, Facility #: 49-58
Iredell County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded, This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must lie maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street.N7%
��� FAX [phone]
Mooresville, Nord, Carolina 28115 � An Equal Opportunity(Attlrmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/10% postconsumer pope

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex G �o
Water Quali egional Supervisor
cc; Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
I:01

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary.
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A. W. Johnson
D. Mark Johnson Farm
1125 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Mr. Johnson:
L7 FE H t - iER,-!.1� r LT,It
April 3, 1997 & NATURAL ti.ZS: )E;'I!GrS
APR 7 1991
Di IMI OF 11VI4-:1t 1JI11',ANUC'r,[9T
90GRESVItl ftfa"AAL OFF6
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
D. Mark Johnson Farm
Facility Number 49--58
Iredell County
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator. Our records indicate that these
completed Forms have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Application Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will.be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
[phone].
Sincerely,
'X`4�_
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535,�4W4
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 ��C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/ 109/6 post -consumer. paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B, Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
A. W. Johnson
D. Mark Johnson Farm
.1125 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28677
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility; D. Mark Johnson Farm
Facility ID#: 49-58
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Johnson:
IDEHNR
N.C.
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH
& NATURAL IZI spUIZCFS
NOV .19 1996
U1YISt" OF fffjRC,'{Q0,14l OT?I GE,;[NT
M6C'ilS'V11tE flLuM s it afflCf
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC-2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on-going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Pre ;`', irect
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, w *
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687v
NfC An Equal Opportunity/Atfirmative Action Employer o*
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _
Facility No. q9-
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 0-3 , 1995
Time: < OS Anti
Farm Name/Owner: A • k/ 4l P15 Uri L e.#qS e j to /A k,— k
Mailing Address: Nw Cr ee �d . +A4 vi He X77'
County: -1-reJe Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative:&Vk Phone: Vlo-3187
Physical
Type of Operation: Swine_Poultry_Cattle ✓ Design Capacity•/ * Number of Animals on Site:-Z6-
Latitude:
ite:4a
Latitude: $o ° SL' ,S/" Longitude: 3sO S� 6-o' Elevation: 930 Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes ora ' Actual Freeboard: D Ft. a Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or l§ Was any erosion observed? Yes oro
p?om,- vo crr
Is adequate land avaula le {for spray? Ye or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?Ye or No
100 Feet from Wells? es or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes orQ If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No"
Additional
Inspector Name &4m Signa
Signature a
cc: Facility Assessment Unit