490054_PERMIT FILE_20171231

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality -
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P.E. ; '1 .lohn(E;',Skvarfa,
Govemor Director i `"- Secretary
March 6, 2013
Burt A. Bell MAA 1 1 2013 ;.
Bell Creek Farm ' !
115 Farmwood Dr.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Permit No. AW1490054
Bell Creek Farm
Animal Waste Management System
. Iredell County
Dear Burt A. Bell,
Reference is made to your request for rescission of the subject animal waste permit with the
submission of a completed Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form on
February 26, 2013. Staff from our Regional Office has confirmed that this Coverage is no longer
required. Therefore, in accordance with your request, Certificate of Coverage No. AWI490054
is rescinded, effective immediately.
If, in the future, you wish again to operate an animal waste management system you must first
apply for and receive a new animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage. Operating an animal
waste management system without a valid animal waste permit Certificate of Coverage will
subject the responsible party to a civil penalty of up to $25,000 per day.
Please contact the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone] if it would be helpful to
discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
,-W.
;�e
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
cc: (Mooresville Regional_ Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Fran McPherson, DWQ Budget Office —Please waive any overdue fees.
Permit File AWI490054
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.nowate[guality.om
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
011e
NorthCarolina
Vatmallrf

Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
General Information:
Name of Farm: Bell Creek Farm Facility No: AWT - 490054
Owner(s) Name: Burt Bell
Mailing Address: 115 Farmwood Drive Phone No: .704450-3339' '
Statesville, NC 28625 ^ County: i z L `Iredell '
O eration Description(remaining animals only):
F E B 19 2013
o Please check this box if there will be no animals on this farm after lagoon closure. If there will still be animals on the site
after lagoon closure, please provide the following information on the animals that will remain.
Operation Descrintion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder
o Feeder to Finish
o Farrow to Wean
o Farrow to Feeder
o Farrow to Finish
o Gilts
o. Boars
Type of Poultry No. ofAnimals
o Layer
o Non -Layer
Type of Beef No. ofAnimals
o Brood
o Feeders
o Stockers
Other Type ofLivestock:
Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Milking
oDry
o Heifers
o Calves
Number of Animals: M* )
Will the farm maintain a number of animals greater than the G.S. § 143-215.1013 threshold? Yes o No •
Will other lagoons be in operation at this farm after this one closes? Yes o No •
How many lagoons are left in use on this farm?: 0
(Name) James Bealle of the Water Quality Section's staff in the Division of
Water Quality's Mooresville Regional Office (see map on back) was contacted on
(date) for notification of the pending closure of this pond or lagoon. This notification was at least 24 hours prior to
the start of closure, which began on 6120111 (date).
I'verify that the above information is correct and complete. I have followed a closure plan, which meets all NRCS
specifications and criteria. I realize that I will be subject to enforcement action per Article 21 of the North Carolina
General Statutes if I fail to properly close out the lagoon.
Name of Land
Print):
I .
Dare: �2/�/11
The facility has followed a closure plan which meets all requirements set. forth in the NRCS Technical Guide
Standard 360. The following items were completed by the owner and verified.by me: all waste liquids and
sludges have been removed and land applied at agronomic rate, all input pipes have been removed, all slopes have
been stabilized as necessary, and vegetation established on all disturbed areas.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Jonathan Creason
Affiliation: Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District
Address (Agent 4 Bristol Drive Statesville NC 28677 Phone No.: 704-873-6761
Signature: - Date: /-.? 3 - / 3
Return within 15 days following completion of animal water storage pond or lagoon closure to:
N. C. Division Of Water Quality
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
PLC - 1 May 4, 2007

w���rra
NC®EN
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
115 Farmwood Dr.
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Burt A. Bell:
Coieen H. Sullins
Director
June 2, 2009
Natural Resources
1ad
JUN � 5X09
DWQ-
Subject: Permit No. AWI490054
Bell Creek Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Iredell County
Dee Freeman
In accordance with your March 17, 2009 request for a zero animal permit, we are hereby forwarding to
you this Permit issued to Burt A. Bell authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system. You had requested to drop the animal population at this facility to zero until such time as the
waste storage lagoon at this facility is properly closed, as you no longer wished to maintain it as an active
swine farm.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste structures on the Bell Creek Farm, with an annual capacity of no greater than an annual
average of zero (0) Cattle.
The Permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 1, 2014 and replaces the COC No.
AWC490054 issued to this facility on December 10, 2004. You are subject to the conditions of this
permit until the closure of all waste storage basins and the rescission of this permit. You must submit a
letter to the Division of Water Quality to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.
The issuance of this Permit does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all
applicable laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, or federal) nor convey any property rights
in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T. 0111(c), a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards, a 100 -ft separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this Permit may result in
revocation of this Permit or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C, the
Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR 122.41, including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Secretary
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone•, 919-733-3221 1 FAK 919.715.05881 CustomerService 1.877.623-6748 NOrthCarolina
Internet www.ncwaterquality.arg 1��� //llI ,
An Equal Opportunity 1 Afiirmalive Action Employer Naturally
�atK

If you wish to continue the activity permitted under this Permit after the expiration date of this Permit, an
application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This Permit is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
Th�is�facility, i,s.Jocated in a,county. covered by our Mooresville Regional Office, The Regional Office
Aquifer Pro tection4Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
(91`9) 733-3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (Record -Keeping Forms Package)
cc: iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWI490054

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
INDIVIDUAL SWINE ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Burt A. Bell
Iredell County
FOR THE
continued operation and maintenance of an animal waste management system for the Bell Creek Farm
(Facility), located in Iredell County, consisting of zero (0) Cattle and the application to land as specified
in the Facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The animal waste management system operated under this Permit shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. Application of waste to terraces and grassed
waterways is acceptable as long as it is applied in accordance with Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) Standards and does not result in a discharge of waste to
surface waters, wetlands, or ditches. If the Facility has a discharge of waste that reaches
surface waters or wetlands resulting from a storm event more severe than a 25 -year, 24-
hour storm, it will not be considered to be in violation of this Permit, as long as the
Facility is in compliance with its CAWMP and this Permit.
No discharge of waste shall result in a violation of the water quality standards established
for receiving waters as per Title 15A, Subchapter 213, Section .0200 of the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) and Title 15A, Subchapter 2L of the NCAC.
The facility's CAWMP is hereby incorporated by reference into this Permit. The
CAWMP must be consistent with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances, and standards
(federal, state and local) in effect at the time of siting, design, and certification of the
Facility.
4. Any proposed increase or modification to the annual average that exceeds the thresholds
set by North Carolina General Statues (NCGS) 143-215.1 OB(1) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and the Permit prior to modification of the Facility.

5. Animal waste shall not be applied within one hundred (100) feet of any well, with the
exception of monitoring wells. The allowable distance to monitoring wells shall be
established on a case-by-case basis by the Division.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
The collection, treatment, and storage facilities, and the land application equipment and
fields shall be properly operated properly and maintained at all times.
2. A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the Facility's CAWMP on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste shall be
applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
3.. Soil pH_on all land application fields must be maintained in the optimum range for crop
production.
4. Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the agronomic rate of the nutrient of concern for the receiving
crop. in no case shall land application rates result in excessive ponding or any runoff
during any given application event.
5. If manure or sludges are applied on conventionally tilled, bare soil, the waste shall be
incorporated into the soil within two (2) days after application on the land. This
requirement does not apply to no -till fields, pastures, or fields where crops are actively
growing.
Pesticides, toxic chemicals, and petroleum products shall not be disposed of in the animal
waste management system.
Domestic and/or industrial wastewater from showers, toilets, sinks, etc. shall not be
discharged into the animal waste management system. Washdown of stock trailers
owned by and used to transport animals to and from the Facility only will be permissible
as long as the system has been evaluated and approved to accommodate the additional
volume. Only those cleaning agents and soaps that are EPA -approved according to their
labels, will not harm the cover crop, and will not contravene the groundwater standards
listed in 15A NCAC 2L may be utilized in the Facility covered by this Permit.
Instruction labels are to be followed when using cleaning agents and soaps.
8. Disposal of dead animals resulting from normal mortality rates associated with the
Facility shall be done in accordance with the Facility's CAWMP and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) Veterinary Division's
statutes and regulations.
Unless accounted for in temporary storage volume, all uncontaminated runoff from the
surrounding property and buildings shall be diverted away from the waste
lagoons/storage ponds to prevent any unnecessary addition to the liquid volume in the
structures.

10. A protective, vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen
lagoon/storage pond embankments (outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping.
elevation), berms, pipe runs, and diversions to surface waters or wetlands: Trees, shrubs,
and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/storage pond
embankments. All trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices.
Lagoon/storage pond areas shall be accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
11. At the time of sludge removal from a lagoon/storage pond, the sludge must be managed
in accordance with the CAWMP. When removal of sludge from the lagoon is necessary,
provisions must be taken to prevent damage to the lagoon dikes and liner.
12. Lagoons/storage ponds.shall be kept free of foreign debris including, but not limited to,
tires, bottles, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solid waste.
13. The Facility must have at least one of the following items at all times: (a) adequate
animal waste application and handling equipment, (b) a lease, or other -written agreement,
for the use of the necessary equipment, or (c) a contract with a third party applicator
capable of providing adequate waste application.
14. No waste shall be applied in wind conditions that might reasonably be expected to cause
the mist to reach surface waters or wetlands.
15. The Permittee shall maintain buffer strips or other equivalent practices as specified in the
facility's CAWMP near feedlots, manure storage areas, and land application areas.
16. Waste shall not be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen, or snow
covered at the time of land application.
17. Land application of waste is prohibited during precipitation events. The Permittee shall
consider pending weather conditions in making the decision to land apply waste.
18. Land application activities shall cease on any application site that exceeds a Mehlich 3
Soil Test Index for Copper of greater than 3,000 (108 pounds per acre) or Zinc of greater
than 3,000 (213 pounds per acre).
19. Any major structural repairs to lagoons/storage ponds must have written documentation
from a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece
of equipment is being replaced with a piece of equipment'of the identical specifications,
no technical specialist approval is necessary [i.e. piping, reels, valves, pumps (if the
gallons per minute (gpm) capacity is not being increased or decreased), etc.] unless the
replacement involves disturbing the lagoon/storage pond embankment.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
An inspection of the animal waste collection, treatment, and storage structures, and
runoff control measures shall be conducted and documented at a frequency to insure
proper operation For example, lagoons/storage ponds, and other structures should be
inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or discharge.
2. Highly visible waste -level gauges shall be maintained to mark the level of waste in each
lagoon/storage pond that does not gravity feed through a free flowing transfer pipe into a

subsequent structure. The gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings. The
waste level in each lagoon with a waste level gauge shall be monitored and recorded
weekly on forms supplied by, or approved by, the Division.
3. A representative Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, phosphorus, copper, and
zinc, shall be conducted on each application field receiving animal waste at least every
three (3) years. An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance with
recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application.
This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Zinc
Phosphorus Copper
4. The Permittee shall record all irrigation and land application event(s) including hydraulic
loading rates, nutrient loading rates and cropping information. The Permittee shall also
record removal of solids and document nutrient loading rates if disposed on-site or record
the off-site location(s). These records must be on forms supplied by, or approved by, the
Division.
If, for any reason, there is a discharge from the animal waste management system
(including the land application sites), to surface waters or wetlands, the Permittee is
required to make notification in accordance with Condition III. 9. The discharge
notification shall include the following information:
a. Description of the discharge: A description of the discharge including an estimate of
the volume discharged, a description of the flow path to the receiving surface waters
or wetlands and a site sketch showing the path of the waste. Also, an estimation of
the volume discharged.
b. Time of the discharge: The length of time of the discharge, including the exact dates
and times that it started and stopped, and if not stopped, the anticipated time the
discharge is expected to continue.
c. Cause of the discharge: A detailed statement of the cause of the discharge. If caused
by a precipitation event, detailed information from the on-site rain gauge concerning
the inches and duration of the precipitation event.
d. All steps being taken to reduce, stop and cleanup the discharge. All steps to be taken
to prevent future discharges from the same cause.
e. Analysis of the waste: A copy of the last waste analysis conducted as required by
Condition 111. 3.
A copy of this Permit, the Facility's permit, certification forms, lessee and landowner
agreements, the CAWMP, and copies of all records required by this Permit and the
Facility's CAWMP shall be maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three (3) years.

7. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving the request from the Division, the
Permittee shall provide to the Division one (1) copy of all requested information and
reports related to the operation of the animal waste management system. Once received
by the Division, all such information and reports become public information, unless they
constitute confidential information under North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) 132-
1.2, and shall be made available to the public by the Division as specified in Chapter 132
of the NCGS.
The Division may require any additional monitoring and reporting (including but not
limited to groundwater, surface water or wetland, waste, sludge, soil, lagoon/storage pond
levels and plant tissue) necessary to determine the source, quantity, quality, and effect of
such waste upon the surface waters, groundwaters or wetlands. Such monitoring,
including its scope, frequency, duration and any sampling, testing, and reporting systems,
shall meet all applicable Division requirements.
9. Regional Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Any discharge to ditches, surface waters or wetlands.
Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or
equal to that required in Condition V. 2. of this Permit.
Over applying waste either in excess of the limits set out in the CAWMP or
where runoff enters surface waters or wetlands.
d. Failure of any component of the animal waste management system resulting in a
discharge to surface waters or wetlands.
e. Any failure of the animal waste management system that renders the Facility
incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the waste and/or sludge.
Any deterioration or leak in a lagoon/storage pond that poses an immediate threat
to the environment or human safety or health.
For any emergency, which requires immediate reporting after normal business hours,
contact must be made with the Division of Emergency Management at 1-800-858-0368.
The Permittee shall also file a written report to the appropriate Division Regional Office
within five (5) calendar days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report
shall outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to correct the problem and to
ensure that the problem does not recur. The requirement to file a written report may not
be waived by the Division Regional Office.

IV. INSPECTIONS AND ENTRY
1. The Permittee shall allow any authorized representative of Department, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law and in
accordance with reasonable and appropriate biosecurity measures, to:
a. Enter the Permittee's premises where the regulated Facility or activity is located or
conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this Permit;
b. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this Permit;
c. Inspect, at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and
control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this Permit;
and,
d. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, for the purpose of assuring permit
compliance, any substances or parameters at any location.
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
The issuance of this Permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
compliance with all applicable surface water, wetlands, groundwater and air quality
standards or for damages to surface waters, wetlands or groundwaters resulting from the
animal operation.
The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
Facility's CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for lagoons/storage ponds
must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain a 25 -year, 24-hour
storm event plus an additional one (1) foot of structural freeboard except that there shall
be no violation of this condition if: (a) there is a storm event more severe than a 25 -year,
24-hour event, (b) the Permittee is in compliance with its CAWMP, and (c) there is at
least one (1) foot of structural freeboard.
Any containment basin, such as a lagoon or a storage pond, used for waste management
shall continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of this Permit until
properly closed. When the containment basin is properly closed in accordance with the
Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) North Carolina Standard for Closure of
Waste Impoundments, February 2005 or any subsequent amendment, the containment
basin shall not be subject to the requirements of this Permit. The Permittee must submit a
letter to the Division to request rescission of the Permit by providing documentation of
closure of all containment basins.
I '
Closure shall also include a minimum of 24 hours pre -notification of the Division and
submittal ofithe Animal Waste Storage Pond and Lagoon Closure Report Form to the
address identified on the form within fifteen (15) days of completion of closure.

4. Failure of the Permittee to maintain, in full force and effect, lessee and landowner
agreements, which are required in the CAWMP, shall constitute grounds for revocation
of its COC to operate under this Permit.
5, This Permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the Facility to change
ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a Notification of Change of
Ownership form must be submitted to the Division, including documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate.
The issuance of this Permit does not prohibit the Division from reopening and modifying
the Permit, revoking and reissuing the Permit, or terminating the Permit as allowed by the
appropriate laws, rules, and regulations.
The Groundwater Compliance Boundary is established by 15A NCAC 2L and 15A
NCAC 02T .0111(c). An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2L and the Division
in addition to the penalty provisions applicable under the NCGS.
VI. PENALTIES
1. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this Permit; the Facility's
CAWMP; and/or applicable state law; may subject the Permittee to an enforcement
action by the Division including but not limited to the modification of the animal waste
management system, civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
2. The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this Permit. Any Permit
noncompliance constitutes a violation of state law and is grounds for enforcement action;
for Permit coverage termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of
Permit coverage renewal application.
3. It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an enforcement action to claim that it would
have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in -order to maintain
compliance with the conditions of this Permit.
This Permit issued the 2"d day of June, 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
,for Coleen H. Sullins, Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number AW1490054

d
Bealle, James
From: Nina F. Bell [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Bealle, James; [e-mail]
Subject: FW: lagoon closure
----- Forwarded by Burt Bell/Salisbury/MEIComposites on 06/30/2610 11:29 AM -----
Burt Bell/Salisbury/MEIComposites wrote on 06/30/2010 11:28:32 AM:
> I got in contact with Jim Summers at Iredell Soil and Water last week
> and discussed closing out my lagoons. He said there were no funds
> available to assist me (Big Suprise). We discussed converting them
> over to recreational use (swimming and fishing). He didn"t have a
> problem with that but said he would have to do a little research to
> see how that was done. We discussed sampling liquid waste and sludge,
> picking a sight for spreading each, and completing a Plan of Closure.
> I told him I would like to implement this this Fall after the corn
> harvest. I haven"t obtained a Plan yet but have a few
> questions. I will get back with you at a later date. Burt Bell
*********************************************************************************************
IMPORTANT: In compliance with federal law, the Rowan -Salisbury School System administers all
educational programs, employment activities and admissions without discrimination because of
race, religion, national or ethnic origin, color, age, military service, disability, or
gender, except where exemption is appropriate and allowed by law. The contents of this email
and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager or the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.
*** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals, and malicious content. ***
*
1

Bealle, James
From:
Nina F. Bell [[e-mail]]
Sent:
Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:52 AM
To:
Pitner, Andrew
Cc:
Bealle, James
Subject:
NOV
Importance: High
In response to the NOV given to Facility number 490054 (Permit number AW1490054)
In the future we will notify your office within 24 hours when an emergency situation
(inadequate storage) occurs.
Thank you,
Burt A Bell
Please acknowledge receipt of this email.
Nina F. Bell
Hurley Elementary School
625 Hurley School Road
Salisbury, NC 28147
school: 704-639-3039
home: 704-450-3338
When in doubt, don't.
Benjamin Franklin
IMPORTANT: In compliance with federal law, the Rowan -Salisbury School System administers all
educational programs, employment activities and admissions without discrimination because of
race, religion, national or ethnic origin, color, age, military service, disability, or
gender, except where exemption is appropriate and allowed by law. The contents of this email
and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager or the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.
*** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals, and malicious content. ***
*********************************************************************************************

0, Fp) Y
F
A7LA.
WDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED June 17, 2010
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville, NC 28625
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-0698
15A N.C.A.C. 2T. 1304
Bell Creek Farm/Facility 49-54
Individual Permit AW1490054
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Bell:
On May 26, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Bell Creek Farm and the permitted waste disposal
system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond) as required by permit. Failure to notify DWQ is a violation of
Individual Permit Condition III.9, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please
submit a written response to this Notice by June 30, 2010. Please include in your response all
actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Division of Water Quality I Aquifer Protection Section I Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] t Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equaf Opportunity l Affirmalive Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Ni7tumllb,

V
Hell Creek Farm/Facility 49-54
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
June 17, 2010
Page 2
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($2,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely, r,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated May 26, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
jb
Central Permit File AWI490054
Regional Permit File AWI490054

V
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 490054 Facility Status. Active Permit: AW1490054 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qompliance tnsoecticn Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit. Routine _._. ,.__. County: 1rQ0e11 Region: Mooresvillea-
DateofVisit: 05126/2010 Entry Time:04 00 PM Exit Time: 06-00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bell Creek Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Burt A Bell Phone: [phone] _
Mailing Address: 115 Farmwood Dr Statesville NC 28625
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°46'47" Longitude: 80°47'42"
At the intersection of Hwy 70 and Bell Farm Road (SR 2316), travel north approximately 1.5 miles on Bell Farm Rd. Dairy is on the left
side of Rd. General locatlon approximately 3 miles east of 1-77 _
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
g Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
jjOther Issues
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date: 4 L,� ?-Z%j
Secondary Inspector(s): FVV %
Inspection Summary:
05/18/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.03 Lbs11000 Gallons
11/30/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.05 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/22/09 > Soil Analysis
31. Failure to notify DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV to follow.
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
ib
Page: 1

Permit: AW1490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 05!2612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Taste Pond PRIMARY
taste Pond SECONDARY 32.00 42.0(
Page: 2

Permit: AW1490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 0512612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges _& Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application f=ield n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
nn■.n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
©
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I eJ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
B
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
®
I]
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n .
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWI490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 05/26/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain "eat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3 Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Sort Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlo� operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17_ Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
o
o
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0
■
0
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

11
Permit: AVV1490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Facility Number:
490054
Inspection Date: 05/26/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
WUP?
n
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste AppNcation?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
In
22. Did the facility fait to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
o
n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
®❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■ n
2.6. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
n
■
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
® n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit cr CAWMP? n ■ n 0
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ fl fri
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page:5

Permit: AW1490054 Owner -Facility: Burt Bell facility Number : 490054
Inspection Gate: 05126/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NF
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air I] ■
Quality representative immediately_
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0000
n■0n
n■nn
Page: 6
0
Y

North
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
NCDENR
Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear. 1VIr. Bell:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
June 17, 2010
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2010-PC-0698
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Bell Creek Farm/Facility 49-54
Individual Permit AW1490054
Iredell County
On May 26, 2010, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Bell Creek Farm and the permitted waste disposal
system. We wish to thank you for being present and assisting during the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond) as required by permit. Failure to notify DWQ is a violation of
Individual Permit Condition I1I.9, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In. the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective action, please
submit a written response to this Notice by June 30, 2010. Please include in your response all
actions taken to correct the noted violation, and prevent recurrence in the future.
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877.823.6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Bell Creek Farm/Facility 49-54
]NOTICE OF VIOLATION
June 17, 2010
Page 2
Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a recommendation of enforcement
action, to the Director of the Division of Water Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment
of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any "person" who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
`i
tl
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated May 26, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AW1490054
Regional Permit File AWI490054
jb

A
0 Division of Water Quality
rj Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 49005A Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1490054 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Irspectign Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RQQtire , County: Irede1i Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 05/26/2010 Entry Time: 04:00 PM Exit Time: 06:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name, BellCreek Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Burt A Bell Phone: 704-B72-1292
Mailing Address: 115 Farmwood Dr Statesville NC 26625
Physical Address:
Facility Status:.❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35'45'47" Longitude: �Q°47'42"
At the intersection of Hwy 70 and Bell Farm Road (SR 2316), travel north approximately 1.5 miles on Bell Farm Rd. Dairy is on the left
side of Rd. General location: approximately 3 miles east of 1-77
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary.OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Be Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date:ztl�
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
05/18/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.03 Lbs11000 Gallons
11/30/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.05 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/22/09 > Soil Analysis
31. Failure to notify DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV to follow.
Facility is currently in the process of closure.
jb
Page: 1

A
Permit: AW1490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 05/26/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Papulation
Cattle
O Cattle - Milk Caw 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total SSLW: 0
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
taste Pond PRIMARY
Baste Pond SECONDARY 32.00 42,0(
Page: 2
t

N
Permit: AVV1490054 Owner • Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 05/26/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (i€ yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection Stora a & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I e,/ large trees, severe
❑
900
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
®
n
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
Q
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AV0490054 Owner -Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection tate: 05126/201C Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Apptication
Yes No NA NF
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/i0 lbs.?
n
Total P2O5?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crap window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
■
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
n
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Ceffed Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)? '
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Cl
■
Cl
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
■
n
❑
18 Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
P=i
■
o
o
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4
j

Permit: AW1490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Facilihj Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 05/2612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
W lJ P?
no
Checklists?
Yes
Design?
NA NE
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
n in n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
n
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections afti 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crap yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPi only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ® n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n n ® n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n ® n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? n n a n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
n
in n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
in
n
no
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those
non
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AW1490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 0512612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Reutine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
3C. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ 0 n
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ■ 0 ❑ 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? n ■ ❑ 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ fl 0
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conserva a
0 Other Agency it
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z Arrival Time: Q,� 1 De uirture hole: � .Comity: _..�- � Region:
Farm Name: .. _...._-...
Owner Email:
Owner Name:Phone:
Mailing Address: .___.---- •.__:.._.... __.... .---....-._,._-._
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
- Phone No- __
Onsite Representative:..- .__...__ _ _.._.. Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
------
Back-up Operator: ... ._ ____...._._ _.TMBack-lap Certification Number: ,...,....•—_.,_...____ _.___-.
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
a° o� =" b =0=�
Latitude, Lonuitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry ' Capacity Population-
Layer
opulationLa er
❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity .Populatio!
❑ Dai Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
[I Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
El -Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: E]
Discharges & Stream I_ mgacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Ycs �❑ NA EINE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
r
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
[] Yes ❑ No`\ IA ' ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of inspection
❑ No
❑ NA
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
❑ NA
❑
Spillway?:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or -managed
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4.6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
8. Do any of the stuctures Iack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside
of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑
'necessary}k" iil-
,��_
c �� ,�, CI>II C, 33 L- AT A TVD CAS, ;')�
t OV -D C'.�UI/"��`
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued
NE
NE
E

]Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA � NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design [I Maps ❑ Other
21, Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E i I NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly freeboard . ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certifi atior
❑ Rainfall El Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and i" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather C e
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install abd maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality,concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Coinmeiits find/or:Drawing's �''' � ° �
y � � �� i
"�7
I
b 0�
12/.28/04

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation , 1
O Other Agency
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit * Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: i2 F 2 lArrival Time: ag %vv Departure Time: oy : °� County: Region:`l► _�
Farm Name: �_ ��! w� Owner Email:
Owner Name:! \ . Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: (� Integrator:
Certified Operator: ,\M )I, -e_ _„__ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: _..� `' v Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o Longitude: e
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other '
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
T ❑
Layer
T ❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
Non -L
Pullets
Poults
Design Current.
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Daia Cow
❑ Datry Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Noti-Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
Number of Structures:
Discharpes & Stream I._mpacts
}� 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
' Discharge originated at: ❑ Stmeture ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
t� a. Was the conveyance man-made?
°} b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
til c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
el
A") d. Does discharge bypass the waste management systeEn? (If yes, notify DWQ)
4 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
.'! 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
5+`0, ! Y.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
12128/04 Continued
lei
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE

1
Facility Number: — Date of inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify D Q
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El Yes El No C1 NA NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11 • Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
ReviewerlInspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued r
.a

�r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
the appropirate box. ❑ W -Up ❑ Checklists
❑ Design ❑Maps El other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Cern
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rate's that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
El Yes
El No
[__1 NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Additional Cornments and/or'Drawings:
G V�' C
12/28/04

rt�
r
Bell Creek- Dairy
Burt A. Bell
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville, NC 28625
Facility No. 49-54
Iredell County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of:
180 Milk Cows
30 Dry Cows
40 Heifers
250 Total
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
NC DENR, Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resource Conservation Service
October 26, 2004
� t

0 Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
C,
This plan has been prepared for:
Bell Creek Dairy
Burt A Bell
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville, NC 28625
704-872-1292
10-20-2004
This plan has been developed by:
John Stevenson
Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Drive
Statesville, NC 28677-2942
704-873 6761, ext
5
eveloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner) ate
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: Q'J' ld
Technical Specialist Signature Date
982716
---------------------------------------------------... ............. ............... ................ ..------ .......
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-20-2004 Cover Page 1

Tract, Field and Irrigation Pull Listing
Bell Creek Farm
Tract, Field or
Irrigation Pull
Total Acres
Broadcast Ac.
Irrigated Ac.
Land Use
Tract 4340
1
16.9
16.0
Cropland
3
2.0
2.0
Cropland
Tract 4452
1
19.3
18.5
Pasture
Tract 8294
1
3.5
Lounging
1 a
1.5
Lounging
2
6.8
1.8
(5.0)
Cropland
2-1
5.0
Cropland
2a
1.5
1.0
Cropland
3
27.0
4.1
(22.9)
Cropland
3-2
5.0
Cropland
3-3A
4.3
Cropland
3-3B
5.5
Cropland
34A
3.4
Cropland
3-413
4.7
Cropland
4
10.6
3.9
(6.7)
Cropland
4-7
3.4
Cropland
4-8
3.3
Cropland
5
14.0
1.6
(12.4)
Cropland
5-5A
4.0
Cropland
5-5B
3.5
Cropland
5-6A
1.9
Cropland
5-6B
3.0
Cropland
Tract 8769
1 13.8 13.8 Cropland
Tract 8770
1 14;0 14.0 Cropland
Acres 130.9 76.7 47.0

IREDELL
Fields Utilized for s��=
• Waste Application
DFS-T-R--ICT-
•
•
Tract 8294
Home -Tract 8294
Small Streams Mandatory Buffer 25' State Road
i }\. Streams and Ponds • Hydrants + Diversion.shp
OAvoid when wet! N Underground Main

ov£v T zstpv Pail
•
•
uoijsoijddd a;ssM
•
I jo j Pezinin spla!�
alb
11303HI

I1AT4: it`d1310 M:� =-
01 P t=i+] I [t [� 1: C-14-'1=
. ����. jol nvqz11iln sui
s

Bell Creek Dairy
The Bell Creek Dairy manages a 180 cow milking herd, with 70 supporting diary animals
of various ages.
FAM10.1-1w.1�1Did Mer.t"old 101"1
Animal Waste is managed as a slurry and scrapped from freestalls and holding and in 2
Waste Storage Ponds (WSP) connected in series for 3 — 120 day periods annually. Waste
Storage Pond No. I collects solids and liquids and has the highest level of nutrients. As it
reaches capacity liquids flow into Waste Storage Pond No. 2.
Animal Waste from WSP No. I and 2 are irrigated on to adjacent cropland. Each of the
waste storage ponds vary in the amount of nutrients stored. For this plan, we are treating
both WSPs as one source and using NRCS standards for total amount of nutrients
produced. Available Waste Samples, plus future samples are being used to establish -a
nutrient concentration history for each of the WSPs that can be used for planning field
application.
Dairy Solid are collected from confinement barns and spread mostly on. grassland.
Calves are grown out each year in outdoor hutches located on the right side of the entry
road. No waste is collected from this group. Calves are grown until 6 weeks of age in
the hutches, which are placed on a 6 inch gravel bed. The hutches are rotated to a fresh
spot after each use. The waste is washed in and allowed to dry. Once each year the
gravel is replaced and the contaminated gravel is added to heavy use areas around the
farm with sufficient grass buffers.
CROP NOTES
This pian is set up for a one year cropping system, but some systems with grass for
pasture or hay may last 8 or more years. For record keeping, continue to use the listed
PAN amounts for the crop and' field.
Plant Available Nitrogen or PAN is the nitrogen that the planned crop can utilize during
the growing season based on the management system used. Broadcast spreading and
irrigation are the systems used on this farm.
Small Grains and Tall Fescue are examples of plants grown in two crop years with the
crop year starting in January and ending in December. The PAN is divided into two
application, fall and spring. Both applications will need to be added, for crop total.
Animal waste can only be applied to land that will be harvested. In the event of crop
failure after animal waste has been applied, replant another crop that can use the
nutrients.
Page 1 of 2

The PAN for corn grown for silage, but not needed and harvested as grain, will need a
reduction by 45% due the reduction of crop residue harvested.
Small Grain grown for silage, but not needed and harvested for grain, will need no
reduction since the PAN is nearly the same. If small grains are grown for a cover crop,
only 30 lbs. of PAN can be applied, and that amount must be deducted form the
following crop.
The symbol* is shown beside some RYE and PAN amounts in the Waste Utilization
Tables. Approved RYE and PAN data for these crops are not available for the soil types
they are being grown on and I have used yield data for similar soils in the area.
RECORD KEEPING
All animal waste applications should be sampled and recorded at time of spreading or
irrigating and test results used for computing animal waste applications. This
information, along with soil test results, provides information on the additional nutrients
needed for producing the desired crops.
ANIMAL WASTE SOURCES
U1 -- Bell Creek Dairy Slurry
Waste Storage Pond I
164,800 cu ft /year x 7.48 gals. /cu.- ft. = 1,232,704 gals, of Animal Waste
Slurry.
Waste Storage Pond 2
173,147 cu.ft. x 7.48 gals./cu.ft. = 1,295,140 gals. of Animal Waste Slurry
Total Animal Waste Slurry 2,527,844 gals. per year
10,622 lbs. of PAN is collected from these Sources.
See Burt Bell Dairy Waste Manage System, prepared by Samuel C. Bingham,
dated 2-3-2003, Section I, C. for WSP 1 and Section Il, C. for WSP 2 and Section
3, for support information.
U2 — Bell Creek Dairy Solids
30 dry cows and 40 heifers produce 178 tons per year of Solids
with 1,531 lbs. of PAN.
See Burt Bell Dairy Waste Management System, by Samuel C. Bingham Dates 2-
3-2003, Section V for support information.
40 Page 2 of 2

The WasOlization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for doeration. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropflneeded to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an'estimmte of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other 6y -products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Regd
(l]as1A)
Comm.
Fero
Nutrient
Applied
(Ebs/A)
Res.
(lbs1A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure .
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4340
1
UE
Cecil
16.90
16.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Ton
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
14.95
0.00
239.22
0.00
4340
3
Ul
Appling
2.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silagc/Hay
11.3 Ton
9/1-3131
125
0
0
Broad.
125
29.25
0,001
58.49
0.00
4340
3
U1
Appling
2.00
2.00
Com, Silage
24.5 Ton
2/15-6130
267
0
0
Broad.
267
18.31
0.00
36-621
0.00
4452
1
U2
Wickham -P
19.30
18.50
Fescue Pasture
3.3 Tons
811-7131
110
0
0
Broad.
110
0.00
25.58
0.00
473.25
8294
2
UI
Roanoke
6.80
1.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
Broad.
97
22.70
0.00
40.85
0.00
8294
2
UI
Roanoke
6.80
1.80
Corn, Silage
022.0 To
2115-6130
•235
0
0
Broad.
235
54.98
0.0
98.97
0.00
82944
2-1
U1
Itavista-P
5.00
5.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Ton
9/1-3131
111
0
0
Irrig.
111
28.57
0.00
142.84
0.00
8294
2-1
Ul
havista-P
5.00
5.00
Com, Silage
24.0 Ton
2/15-6130
262
0
0
Irrig_
262
67.43
0.00
337.16
0.00
8294
2a
U1
Roanoke
1.50
1.00
Small Grain, SilagelHay
9.0 Tons
9/1-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
97
22.70
0.00
22.70
0.00
8294
2a
UI
Roanoke
1.50
1.00
Cam, Silage
*22.0 To
2/15-/30
*235
0
0
Broad.
235
54.98
0.00
54.98
0.00
8294
3
UI
Roanoke
27.0014.
Small Grain, Silage/llay
9.0 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Broad.
97
22.70
0.00
93.05
0.00
8294
3
UI
Roanoke
27.00Corn,
Silage
*22.0 To
2115-6130
*235
0
0
Broad.
235
54.98
0.00
225.43
0.00
8294
3-2
Ul
Roanoke
5.00Small
Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
'9/1-3/31
97
0
0
brig.
97
24.97
0.00
124.83
0.00
8294
3-2
UI
Roanoke
5.00
5.00
Corn, Silage
*22.0 To
2/15-6/30
*235
0
0
brig.
235
60.48
0.00
302,411,
0.00
8294
3-3A
UI
Roanoke
4.30
4.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
brig.
97
24.97
0.00
107.35
0.00
8294
MA
UI
Roanoke
4.30
4.30
Corn, Silage
*22.0 To
2115 6/30
*235
0
0
brig.
235
60.48
0.00
260.07
0.00
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 WUT Page Page 1 of 3

W -Acta rltili�-'j111hw.hlo JIMPtar t I&
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Cmp
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
L id
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
ga1/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
8294
3-313
UI
Roanoke
5.50
. 5.50
Small Grain, Silage(Hay
9.0 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
Ini g.
97
24-97
0.00
13731
0.00
8294
3-3B
UI
Roanoke
5.50
5.50
Corn, Silage
*22.0 To
2115-6/30
*235
0
0
brig.
235
60.48
0.00
332.65
0.00
8294
3-4A
UI
Roanoke
3.40
3.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
911-3/31
97
0
0
hrig.
97
24.97
0.00
84.88
0.00
8294
34A
UI
Roanoke
3.40
3.40
Corn, Silage
*22.0 To
2115-6130
*235
0
0
Itrig.
235
60.48
0.00
205.64
0.00
8294
3-43
Ul
Roanoke
4.70
4.70
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
911-3131
97
0
0
brig.
97
24.97
0.00
117.34
0.00
8294
3-413
111
Roanoke
4.70
4.70
Corn, Silage
*22.0 To
2/15-6130
*235
0
0
Irrig.
235
60-48
0.00
284.27
0.00
8294
4
UI
Chewacla-P
10.60
3.90
Small Grain, SilageMay
*10.0 To
9/1-3131
*106
0
0
Irrig.
106
27.28
0.00
106.40
0-00
8294
4
UI
Chewacla-P
10.60
3-90
Cam, Silage
28.0 Ton
2/15-6130
291
0
0
hrig.
291
21.95
0.00
85.62
0.00
8294
4-7
Ul
Chewacla-P
3.40
3.40
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3131
*95
0
0
Irrig.
95
24.45
0.00
83.13
0.00
8294
4-7
Ul
Chewacla-P
3.40
3.40
Com, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-6130
291
0
0
brig.
291
21.95
0.00
74.64
0-00
8294
4-8
Ul
Chewacla-P
3.30
3.30
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Ton
9/1-3131
*95
0
0
Irrig.
95
24.45
0.00
80.69
0.00
8294
4-8
UI
Chewacla-P
3.30
3-30
Corn, Silage
28.0 Ton
2115-6/30
291 -
0
0
Irrig.
291
21.95
0-00
72.45
0.00
8294
5
U1
Altavista -P
14.00
1.60
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Ton
911-3131
Ill
0
0
Irrig.
111
28.57
0.0
45.71
0-00
8294
5
UI
Altavista -P
14.00
1.60
Corn, Silage
*22.0 To
2115-6130
*240
0
0
Irrig.
240
61.77
0.00
98.83
0.00
8294
5-5A
Ul
Altavista -P
4.00
4.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Ton
911-3131
111
0
0
brig.
111
28.57
0.00
114.27
0.00
8294
5-5A
Ul
Altavista -P
4.00
4.00
Corn, Silage
24.0 Ton
2115-6/30
262
0
0
Irrig,
262
19.77
0.00
79.06
0.00
8294
5-513
UI
Altavista -P
3.50
3.50
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
111
0
0
Irrig,
111
28.57
0.00
99.99
0.00
8294
5-5B
UlAltavista-P
3.50
3.50
Corn, Silage
24.0 Ton
2115-6/30
262
0
0
Irrig.
262
67.43
0.00
236.01
0.00
8294
5-6A
UI
Altavista -P
1.90
1.90
Small Grain, SilagdHay
10.0 Ton
911-3/31
111
0
0
hrig,
1 l 1
28.57
0-00
54.28
0.00
8294
5-6A
U1Altavista-P
1.90
1.90
Corn, Silage
4.0 Ton
2115-6/30
262
0
0
Irrig.
262
1937
0-00
37.56
0.00
8294
5-613
U1
Altavista -P
3.00
3.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Ton
9/1-3/31
it]
0
0
Irtig,
111
28.57
0.00
85.71
0.00
8294
5613
Ul
Altavista -P
3.00
3.00
Corn, Silage
24.0 Ton
2115-6130
262
0
0
hrig.
262
67.43
0.00
202.29
0.00
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 VPJT Page Page 2 of 3

Waste Utilizable Aftear 1 in
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
d
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1006 gals
tons
8769
1
UI
Appling
13.80
13.80
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.6 Ton
9/1-3131
118
0
0
Broad.
118
27.61
0.00
381.00
0.00
8769
1
UI
Appling
13.80
13.80
Com, Silage
23.0 Ton
2/15-6130
251
0
0
Broad.
251
17.22
0.00
237.56
0.00
8770
3
UI
Cecil
14.00
14.00
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.4 Ton
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
26.91
0.00
376.70
0.00
8770
3
TuTc-il
14.00
14.00
Cam, Silage
21.9 Ton
2115-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
16-391
0.00
229.48
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
6,088.45S��.-
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,527.21Y
Balance, 1000 gallons
-3,56t.23
�
Total Applied, tons
473.25
Total Produced, tons,'
F
177.80
Balance, tons
-295.45
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol " means user entered data.
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 WUI' Page Page 3 of 3

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
• source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
Ul
Bell Creek Dairy-wsp waste generated 2,527,213 gals/year by a 250 animal Dairy (Milk
Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 105 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
10801
Incorporated
14729
Injected
16693
Irrigated
9819
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
10,633
35400
-24,767
6,088,446
-3,561,233
U2
113ell Creek Dairy -Lot waste generated 177.80 tons/year by a 70 animal Dairy (Milk
Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
765
Incorporated
1013
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/Deficit
(Tons)
Year 1 1
765
2035
-1,270
473.25
-295.45
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG -439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on-farm records to develop a User Defined Source. ,
•------ ---- - ----- -- --•--- --- ------- -- -- -- -- - --- -------- ---- --
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the.basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-20-2004 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
0provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
1 (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(lbs acre)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
4340
1
16.90
16.00
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
68
N/A
4340
3
1 2.00
2.001
Unknown
15,0
1 Appling
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
11.3 Tons
61
NIA
Corn, Silage
24.5 Tons
83
NIA
4452
1
19.30
18.50
Unknown
15,0
Wickham -P
Fescue Pasture
33 Tons
5
NIA
8294
2
6.80
1.80
Unknown
8.0
Roanoke
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9,0 Tons
49
NIA
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
8294
2-1
5.00
5.00
Unknown
8.0
Altavista -P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
54
NIA
Corn, Silage
24.07 1 ons
82
NIA
8294
2a
1.50
1.00
Unknown
8.0
Roanoke
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
49
N/A
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
8294
3
27.00
4.10
Unknown
8.0
Roanoke
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
49
NIA
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
8294
3-2
5.00
5.00
Unknown
8.0
Roanoke
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
49
NIA
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
N/A
8294
3-3A
4.30
4.30
Unknown
8.0
Roanoke
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
49
NIA
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
8294
3-3B
5.50
5.50
Unknown
8.0
Roanoke
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
49
NIA
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
8294
3-4A
140
3.40
Unknown
8.0
Roanoke
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
49
NIA
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
8294
34B
4.70
4.70
Unknown
8.0
Roanoke
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
9.0 Tons
49
NIA
Com, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
NIA
8294
4
10.6
3.90
Unknown
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
54
NIA
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
8294
4-7
3.40
3.40
Unknown
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9.0 Tons
49
NIA
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
N/A
294
4-8
3.301
3.30
Unknown
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
*9A Tons
49
N/A
Com, Silage
28.0 Tons
95
NIA
482716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/2W2004
PCS Page Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
PLAN TOTALS: 172.90 123.70
LI
Potential'Leaching
Technical,Guiddnce '
+ , : r:r .
P Management Recommendation
t
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
> 1.0 to 2.0
P205
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
Total
Useable
Plat
<= 10
> 4.0
> 100
Very High
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
Tract
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
8294
5
14.00
1.60
Unknown
9.0
Altavista -P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
54
N/A
Corn, Silage
22.0 Tons
75
N/A
8294
5-5A
4.00
4.00
Unknown
9.0
Altavista -P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
54
N/A
Corn, Silage
24.0 Tons
82
NIA
8294
5-5B
3.50
3.50
Unknown
9.0
Altavista -P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
54
NIA
Com, Silage
24.0 Tons
82
N/A
8294
5-6A
1.90
1.90
Unknown
9.0
Altavista -P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
54
N/A
Corn, Silage
24.0 Tons
82
N/A
8294
5-6B
3,00
3.00
Unknown
9.0
Altavista -P
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.0 Tons
54
N/A
Com, Silage
24.0 Tons
82
N/A
8769
1
13.80
13.80
Unknown
15.0
Appling
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.6 Tons
57
NIA
Com, Silage
23.0 Tons
78
N/A
8770
3
14.00
14.00
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
10.4 Tons
56
NIA
Corn, Silage 121.9
Tons
74
NIA
PLAN TOTALS: 172.90 123.70
LI
Potential'Leaching
Technical,Guiddnce '
+ , : r:r .
P Management Recommendation
t
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
> 1.0 to 2.0
>- 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> 2,0 to 4.0
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
High
<= 10
> 4.0
> 100
Very High
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term Nn -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
P Loss Estimate'
(!bs/acrelyear)
P Loss Indo'
Rating
.
+ , : r:r .
P Management Recommendation
t
0.0 to 1.0
0-25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 1.0 to 2.0
25 -50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
> 2,0 to 4.0
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 4.0
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/20/2004
PCS Page Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

1�
0
The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. If
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the
ximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inchesthour)
Application Amount
(inches)
8294
2-1
Altavista -P
0.50
1.0
8294
3-2
Roanoke
0.35
1.0
8294
3-3A
Roanoke
0.35
1.0
8294
3-313
Roanoke
0.35
1.0
8294
34A
Roanoke
0.35
1.0
8294
34B
Roanoke
0.35
1.0
8294
4
Chewacla-P
0.50
1.0
8294
4-7
Chewacla-P
0.50
1.0
8294
4-8
Chewacla-P
0.50
1.0
8294
5
Altavista -P
0.50
1.0
8294
5-5A
Altavista -P
0.50
1.0
8294
5-513
Altavista -P
0.50
1.0
8294
5-6A
Altavista -P
0.50
1.0
8294
5-613
Altavista -P
0.50
1.0
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 10/20/2004 IAF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

•The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg Mn
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
4340
3
Req'd Nutrients
12{5
0
01
0 0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
2.00
911-3131
Supplied By:
(f{a#ul(f? } lilac ""s
s#li iF�t
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
01
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
1 l .3 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
125
123
192
60 2
3
1
0
P Removal Rating
61 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
123
192
60 2
3
1
0
Tract Field
8294
2
Req'd Nutrients
97
0
0 0�
0
00
0
Acres App. Period
1.80
911-3131
Supplied By:
}� �{}0�
i' �i il!# '1ln�l IF"pili f t4l�ia'�itpill
.Tf?����� �A ItEd� �I plf
��1
i ,111 �i �G it� ;.Igllilll 8111311%,11" fi
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
9.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
97
96
149
47 2
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
96
149
47 2
2
0
0
Tract Field
8294
2-1
Req'd Nutrients
111
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
pp
5.00
911-3131
Supplied B
pp Y'
� ��'i iti I� Ia,N3i 'It;! i� C$#h Hy l"!#1 `} `rl+l�oih Cr��q"qti i �fj%gmli#1 d 1 1r, � �t�� t11
I'd_ i'_u1 if 1"i T,Ira rs E.J . 4 a. {e 1 anr, 4'ER is kA $I �,} ra , 11 ,t. ,t �. ,ill Ss !_Irr i
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
10.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
111
120
188
59 2
3
l
0
P Removal Rating
54 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
120
188
59 2
3
1
0
Tract Field
8294
22
Req'd Nutrients
97
0
00!
0 0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
1.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By,
"twttitt'� L r•'j �i mug ill }l'l� s i .I � ;,ilii �Ltp� "' 111 G ` it
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
01
01
0 0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
9.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
97
96
149
47 2
2
0
0
P Removal Rating 1
49 lbs/ac.
lUnknown
BALANCE
0
961
1491
471 2
2
0
0
•16 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 NMR Page Page l of 10

-Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
4W
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
8294
3
Req'd Nutrients
'97
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres 'App. Period
4.10
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
mm in= lam Mc =MIMM N=9
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
ol
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
9.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
97
96
149
47
2
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
96
1491
47
2
2
0
0
FTract Field
8294
3-2
Req'd Nutrients
97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
I
5.00
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
F, i 1� 41 JE " 17 4811XIIIIIRN 110.-`21112904 I'A'AR11i 3411.1t, "UM, LIEU -01 . I I'fftII#R-I
L 'I R "M ", ";�� "' I P
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
RYE Sample Date
9.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
97
105
164
51
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
01
105
164
51
2
2
0
0
Tract Field
8294
3-3A
Req'd Nutrients
97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
I
4.30
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
"I.S. alT11110 AN, 11-0, 014 W. mo 01411M, IR '13 1-11, M, I I AIR Iff"T2
N M
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0-
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEI Sample Date
9.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
97
105
164
51
2
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
105
164
51
2
21
- 0
0
Tract
Field
8294
3-3B
Req'd Nutrients
97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
5.50
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
Aul P11111110,161N, MAIN
NRI.Wili P-1 r, IV, wltlfli RM sn' x
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
0
01
0
0
01
0
0
RYEI Sample Date
9,0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
97
105
164
51
2
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
49 lWac.
Unknown
BALANCE
01
105
164
51
2
2
0
0
Tract Field
8294
3-4A
Req'd Nutrients
97
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3,40
9/1-3/31
Supplied By:
tNF t}0ry
r,
0' ql p
N79,
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
20)
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
9.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
97
1051
1641
51
2
2
0
0
P Removal Rating
I 1
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
lo5l
1641
-- .
_511
21
2
0
0,
--I
016 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 NMR Page Page 2 of 10

-Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEA:Field
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20 Mg
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Mn
Obs/A)
Zn
Obs/A)
Cu. Lime
(lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract
6294
3-413
Req'd Nutrients
97
0
0���,� 0
0
0
0
0#Acres
A od
pp
4.70
9/1-3131
Supplied 13
Pp Y
�
r r1tU`E ; '{1fF''�r "" lil'ilihJ'>1F{t i` =�rj�`ra �I" {nrtJi r�#'1'li
.�'l . r. y
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
9.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
•97
105
164 51
2
2
0 0
P Removal Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
105
164 51
2
2
0 0
Tract
Field
8294
4
Req'd Nutrients
*106
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Acres App. Period
3.90
9/13131
SppliedB:
� d; !1 ' 1 l } ' l nl, :i!1t1 w i � lzi� 1S%F"171 G
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Chewacla-P
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
RYE
Sample Date
*10.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
106
115
179 56
2
2
1 0
P Removal Rating
54 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
115
179 56
2
2
1 0
Tract Field
8294
4-7
Req'd Nutrients
*95
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Acres App, Period
3.40
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
3'iti��(�-�'W 1f Si13� i s 3 10150110. WA`�A A� !11''501 113 �a�itl;tjk1111aF� OPIUM,,. r.. itMmtiil. RAZ
41910' � h f � of r �. e s�'"i.
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Chewacla-P
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
*9.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
95
103
161 50
2
2
0 0
P Removal
Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
103
161 50
2
2
D 0
Tract Field
8294
4-8
Req'd Nutrients
*95
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Acres A Period
PP•
3.30
9/1-3/31
Supplied B
Pp Y
1 t
I ! r �( "Nr „ l '.tl i �1 t 1
�� a Y. "if 'a.t ��, FF .[
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Chewacla-P
Residual
0
0
0 0
01
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
*9.0 Vons
12-31-03
Manure
95
103
161 50
2
2
0 0
P Removal
Rating
49 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
103
161 50
2
2
0 0
Tract Field
6294
5
Req'd Nutrients
1 1 1
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Acres App. Period
1.60
911-3/31
Supplied By:-trt+i'jr�'=Il"l
ee,, i,,l i:�(r( llp1' ' 4 `r Pll' a°i#llit t}A"tlt,# jbht I{:rf r app1i�tz
1 „4id, ..- illl viii 1�.i1!al. !'lisp{ 7ni'i.., 41. ?.w i.w Il,r>I`iN!H 114 P, ,lYt.Y,l.w k!7 ,.l Yl i.�];�fl '11101..
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
01
0 0
RYE Sample Date
10.0 Tons
12.31-03
Manure
111
120
1$8 59
2
3
l 0
P Removal
I Rating
54 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
120
1881 591
2
3
1 1 0
016 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 NMR Page Page 3 of 10

-Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field
8294
5-5A
Req'd Nutrients
111
0{{
0
0
0
0
0
0�
Acres App. Period
4.00
911-3131
Supplied By;r'f.;iih�a
Ih �ill8� �tFt flE!tz1i�
�
I�l_ I#711 tNl�llli
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
10.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
111
120
188
59
2
3
1 0
P Removal Rating
54 lbs c.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
120
188
59
2
31
1 0
Tract Field
8294
5-5B
Req'd Nutrients
111
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Acres App. Period
3.50
911-3/31
Supplied By:
�kt I''r ! "" U i� , Y "nll
� YNI U'1t 1r `�!�AOI ! 1`11 ., rif r:.,�: ii•VA 1111 �i1:i� ?�,� [1WK110i1r 1(f� l;1!f��a,dw'� ,.:tis �.. 1 ?a�d,1r � �,ur��t�r:, .,i`, A
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
10.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
111
120
188
59
2
3
1 0
P Removal Rating
54 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
01
120
188
59
2
3
1 0
Tract
Field
8294
5-6A
Req'd Nutrients
111
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Acres I App. Period
1.90
911-3/31.
Supplied By:
I A 11 � '�� i�'� M' j ��.1 n S�V ��� I
�#�i I roti 1ft��G. tt� �� i rr�>s , a � t. r. �M
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
10.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
111
120
188
59
2
3
1 0
P Removal Rating
54 lbs c.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
120
188
59
2
3
1 0
Tract Field
8294
5-613
Req'd Nutrients
111
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Acres I APP• Period
3.00
911-3/31
Supplied By:
tr�!5.1010 ' l1411�:a
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
01
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
01
0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
10.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
111
120
188
59
2
3
1 0
P Removal Rating
54 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
120
188
59
2
3
1 0
Tract Field
8769
1
Req'd Nutrients
118
0
20
0
0
0
0 0
Acres App. Period9/1-3/31
PPPP
13.80
Su lied B Y�
1 ! �'tj, u'' �t
i AIX) I , .i 7'
t,;..,eflJiu � ,i::. �r.lr . a .r�1ir1r, ��",;
u t °�� t 6 �., � w r� , a I 13 1 �
! � •1 t t.,b � r � :, �� ;� l 7. ,� � L � �
a .� �tl�`a:! la. �k.:�i, kti;� ^�i�.�.l'*,1ltt, ,.�.?�J,'.��^ "�l
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
10.6 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
118
116
181
57
2
2
1 0
P Removal I Rating
57 lbs/ac.
jUnknown
BALANCE
0
116
161
57
2
2
1 0
016 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 MMR Page Page 4 of 10

-Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
8770 3
Req'd Nutrients
115
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres APp•Pariod
14.00 911-3131
Supplied By
N .•d�.nJl�irs ]r�l
1.�i,: ���. i;MjaYhpfy�
�i ���lt'�.li�_f
ci.f.i. -,d.wl�ig
�t�glLN %rl+il .id
1fAM1�;
< s
PE11,4+,, r11�i�'1'�•
CROP
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Ferc
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Satnple Date
10.4 Tons 12-31-03
Manure
115
113
177
55
2
2
1
4
P Removal Rating
56 Ibs/ac. Unknown
BALANCE 1
0
113
177
55
2
2 i
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
•
016 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 NMR Page Page 5 of 10

-Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(1bs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn Zn
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
4340
l
Req'd Nutrients
218
0
80
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
16.00
2115-6130
Supplied By:
IMMMM �'° , s @N� �� it € a t: kh�
Il c7"d � ���7� I'!� +� H� +{�,i'l �;���;��� �� ,� a
2:r,�ltit l°
R 'r r+ � �t};;j �:1�,,
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 D 0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
20.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
218
215
335
105
4
5
1
0
P Removal Rating
68 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
215
255
1051
4
5
1
0
Tract Field
4340
3
Req'd Nutrients
267
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres APP Period
2.00
2115.6130
SuRPliedBY
Yx(,af�,K.y,.1 d li`�iU!l}tri'lj;t`�3vrA
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Sail Series
Appling
Residual
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
24.5 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
267
263
410
128
5
6
1
0
P Removal Rating
83 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
263
410
128
5
6
1
0
Tract Field
4452
l
Req'd Nutrients
110
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
18.50
8/ ] -7131
Supplied By:
l ��' g
1tl 71� a,IP M
3; t;� {� �p� Y Y i
!JINRIT1 ti

-Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs/A)
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field
8294
3
Req'd Nutrients
0235
0
0
0
0
0 0
Acres App. Period
4.10
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
�0
l.rFn ni��li f, tett i r�! 1
;a?7ii iii ,.,t f� ilY: Ali u 3 q 'l F }R�. ti,.. tut" citj&�NaW a i ` �4 SP1 rs,`6
CROP
Carr, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0' 0
01
0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
•22.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
235
232
361
113
4
5
1 0
P Removal
Rating
75 tbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
232
361
113
4
5
1 0
Tract Field
8294
3-2
Req'd Nutrients
*235
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Acres A Period
PP•
5.00
2115-6/30
Supplied B
PP y
il;' Fi Hf {rt{[!f{��j�;!f ��y�pt
.�� t i.: P_ �i.Y.l6Vi.HA.
E`li}� i7��-. '��f
lil!,111' .11 u l�,u1 urs
CROP
Cam, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
01
0 0
RYE I Sample Date
+22.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
235
255
397
124
5
5
1 0
P Removal Rating
75 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
255
397
124
5
5
1 0
Tract
Field
8294
3-3A
Req'd Nutrients
*235
0
0y
0,p
0
0�
0
Acres App. Period
4.30
2/i5 6/30
Supplied By:
�
�`(lip'.0 Ic #eft 31:111 & ik"A� �wt7i!+t s
�0�
jtl! lrtl � Y t 3ikl .� { ` P{`G�i
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
01
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
01
0 0
RYE Sample Date
*22.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
235
255
397
124
5
5
1 0
P Removal Rating
75 lbs/ac.
Unknown-
BALANCE
0
255
397
124
5
5
1 0
Tract Field
8294
3-38
Req'd Nutrients
*235
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Acres App, Period
5.50
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
}12lli t'11 A Liii Silt i 900.0
ff 111,11011 "}INS� W 2XV&f
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
*22.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
235
255
397
124
5
5
l 0
P Removal Rating
75 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
255
397
124
5
5
1 0
Tract Field
8294
34A
Req'd Nutrients
0235
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Acres App. Period
3.40
2115-6130
Supplied By:
kl11. n 3 w
t 4?
_,u-'°ijj�{ M .r
1 f 3 ` �` 'lik F,r �.0 a, >I� 3' � t F'nr h � M $�:�'� r � r �i
i N , ;r ifr j i 1 VCR',' iif rr fit 1 t fes', l+ I 1 A t 1
#l� =� aldl ��i.t„ ilu' �,4it' r.�li� t.r ,dt, rte?tk,f 6 i »�r.�il.�l.{�,� lilt+E _ „lie`.,K,,
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Date
*22.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manurel
235
255
397
124
5
5
1 0
P Removal I Rating
75 lbs/ac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
255
397
124
5
5
1 0
016 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 NMR Page Page 7 of 10

-Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N P205 K20 Mg
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu 'Lime
(lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field
8294
34B
Rcq'd Nutrients
*235 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
Acres A . Period
4.70
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
Affla "IT "' Mj! R
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
71
0 0
Soil Series
Roanoke
Residual
0 0 0 0
0
0
RYE I Sample Dale
*22.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
235 255 397 1 124
51
5
1 01
11 Removal
Rating
75 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0 255 397 124
5
5
1 0
Tract Field
8294
4
Rcq'd Nutrients
291 0 20 0
0
0
0 0
Acres App. Period
3.90
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
1`113 0 �11 T113"! q, *X. YRWV.111r '413-Arlffllz
0sh1
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
01 0 0 0 1
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Chewacla-P
Residual
0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
RYEJ Sample Dale
28.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
291 316 492 154
6
7
1 0
P Removal Rating
95 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0 316 472 154
6
7
1 0
Tract
Tract
Field
8294
4-7
Req'd Nutrients
291 0 20 0
0
0
0
P. Period
no
ACTCS I App. Period
3.40
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
010"X,10� !2111J011 -1301"A 10 q111 Iwo W MR!"111141
r1la.95"T.
L
ARD01101 4=049.1%
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0 0 0 0
0
0
01 0
Commercial Pert, 0 0 0, 0 0 0
0 0
9 erie
Soil Series
Sol I ,
Chewacla-P
Residual
01 0 0 01
0
0
0 0
E Sample Date
Sample Dat,
28.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
291 316 492 154
6
7
1 0
P Removal Rating
95 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0 316 472 154
6
7
1 0
Tract Field
FAp
8294
4-8
Req'd Nutrients
291 0 20 0
0
0
0 0
Acres Period
I
3.30
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
U"M .
W 1. X 'alp IN, WIP I
UK"', X691
"WIN&WHI 170, FVA-112
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Pert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
01 0
Soil Series
Chewacla-P
Residual
0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
RYE Sample Dale
28.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
291 316 412 154
6
7
1 0
P Removal ting
95 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
01 316 472 154
6
7
1 0
Tract Field
8294
5
1 Req'd Nutrients
*240 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
cies App. Period
1
1,60
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
&1111.'Z�' 11 lE
N W1`51
17 !"M 52 S
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0 0 0 0
0
0
0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
01 0 0 0
01
01
0 0
RYE Sample Date
*22.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
2401 261 406 127
51
61
1.. .0
P Removal Rating
75 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
01 261 406 127
51
61
1 1 0
016 - Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 1 NMR Page Page 8 of 10

-Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbs/A)
P205 K20
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn Zn
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
8294
5-5A
Req'd Nutrients
262
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Acres App. Period
4.00
2115-6130
Supplied By:
!' e •, r� w: +s +jlit;t711
Y I", ;� C" �iI{'� jjt;�,, I W!IN��I ei 51 'r ��?� �`� 9 E 1
" It � l 1 110,
11 LINC'u411( H I r F.Mf ll�-:`it�rr�l<vi t3�ulir, ..r1,� In+i4 �l hiNf.)i M$f'i +Zi2ullMr.��i.i: .,
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
24.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
262
284
4431
139
5 6
1
0
P Removal Rating
82 lbs/ac,
Unknown
BALANCE
0
284
443
139
5 6
l
0
Tract Field
8294
5-5B
Req'd Nutrients
262
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Acres A Period"
PP�
3.50
2115-6130
Supplied B
Pp Y�
'f ��r xrn f M�F
i:.iN�l'�; a'le�i,'r1�l;� �,rlli• ,� rt��B 11�'� 41'I�;,
� rr 1 �
'�' ` IN ' x r rK 19
�r'ur'�,i�:i ��a`1(sl�'i� �� ;`F��:
n ra v ��d, � sr
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
01
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 01
0
0
RYE Sample Date
24.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
262
284
443
139
5 6
1
0
P Removal Rating
82 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
284
443
139
5 6
1
0
Tract Field
8294
5-6A
Req'd Nutrients
2622�
0
0
0
0
0d
0
Acres App. Period
1.90
2115-6130
Supplied By:
y� [� y0v'y�t req yy��rr �
ii''
�Ei�l it81 '11 Ilk���t II �1�6ftG�11r�,i M f f� IM' 11,N1�;4� � fl MAS 419t�!��dlk� th 71,31941 PM
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Altavista -P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RYE Sample Dale
24.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
262
284
443
139
5 6
1
0
PR Rating
82 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
284
443
139
5 6
1
0
Tract Field
8294
5-6B
Req'd Nutrients
262
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
W WE= Wasw.
ORIMP U. "�M� t�
@m OMNI MNI "I,
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Altavista- P
Residual
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
24.0 Tons
12-31-03
Manure
262
284
443
139
5 6
1
0
P Removal
Rating
82 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
284
443
139
5 6
1
0
Tract Field
8769
1
Req'd Nutrients
251
0
70
0
0 0
0
0
Acres App. Period
f3.80
2115-6130
Supplied By:
�111lt't� rg";h offs, Fa,,z t�� k,! t��pp����,,����,,,
„r: , iit `� .h�luUf i.:] 1 �_s:1i: ���r:sr��i� Jt°el�+�� lw�
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Soil Series
Appling
Residual)01
01
01
01
01 01
0
0
RYE Sample Date
23.0 Tons
1 12-31-03
L Manure
251
248
386
121
4 5
1
0
P Removal IRating
78 lbs/ac.
IUnknown IBALANCE
1
01
2481
3161
121
41 31
1 10
016 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 NMR Page Page 9 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(Ibs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(Ibs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
8770 3
Req'd Nutrients
239
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
ACTCS App. Period
14.00 2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
GEM.
'E�4t
k'A
Ii Z '
CROP
Cam, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cecil
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYEJ Sample Date
21.9 Tons 12-31-03
1 Manure
239
2361
367
115
4
51
11
–
P Removal Rating
74 lbs/ac. lUnknown
I BALANCE
01
2361
357
115
4
5
1 1
—io
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
0
016 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10Y2012004 NMR Page Page 10 of 10

0 0 0
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of
copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth.
Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and
zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we
can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of
lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production.
Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tonstacre)
Cu -I
Copper Recommendation
Zn -I
Zinc Recommendation
4340
l
Corn, Silage
5.3
0.0
115
None
146
None
4340
3
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
4340
3
Corn, Silage
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
4452
l
Fescue Pasture
5.3
0.0
115
None
146
None
S294
2
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
6.9
0.0
1189
None
417
None
8294
2-1
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
6.9
0.0
1189
None
417
None
8294
2-1
Corn, Silage
6.9
0.0
1189
None
417
None
8294
2a
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
6.9
0.0
1189
None
417
None
8294
2a-
Com, Silage
6.9
0.0
1189
None
417
None
8294
3
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3
Com, Silage
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3-2
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7-1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3-2
Cam, Silage
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3-3A
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3-3A
Com, Silage
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3-38
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3-38
Com, Silage
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
34A
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
34A
Com, Silage
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3-4B
Small Grain, SilagelHay
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
3-4B
Corn, Silage
7.1
0.0
1403
None
414
None
8294
4
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
6.8
0.0
664
None
268
None
8294
4
Corn, Silage
6.8
0.0
664
None
268
None
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------•----------------
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-20-2004 STV Page Page I of 2

0
Reauired Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
lame Recom.
(tona/acre)
Cu -1
Copper Recommendation
Zn -1
Zinc Recommendation
8294
4-7
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
6.8
0.0
664
None
268
None
8294
4-7
Corn, Silage
6.8
0.0
664
None
268
None
8294
4-8
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
6.8
0.0
664
None
26g
None
8294
4-8
Corn, Silage
6.8
0.0
664
None
268
None
8294
5
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.0
0.0
814
None
308
None
8294
5
Corn, Silage
7.0
0.0
.814
None
308
None
8294
5-5A
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.0
0-0
814
None
308
None
8294
5-5A
Com, Silage
7.0
0-0
814
None
308
None
8294
5-513
Small Grain, SilagelHay
7.0
0.0
814
None
308
None
8294
5-513
Com, Silage
7.0
0.0
814
None
308
None
8294
5-6A
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
7.0
0.0
814
None
308
None
8294
5-6A
Corn, Silage
7.0
0.0
814
None
308
None
8294
5-6B
Small Grain, SilagelHay
7.0
0.0
814
None
308
None
8294
5-613
Corn, Silage
7.0
0.0
814
None
308
None
8769
1
Small Grain, SilagelHay
6.3
0.0
81
None
203
None
8769
l
Corn, Silage
6.3
0.0
81
None
203
None
8770
3
Small Grain, Silage/Hay
1 6.7
0.0
175
None
331
None
8770
3
Com, Silage
1 6.7
0.0
175
None
331
None
------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-20-2004 STV Page Page 2 of 2

•
The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Camcity
Source Name I Bell Creek Dairy-wsp
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date 911
105
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
74
1
2
105
1
3
74
1
4
68
1
5
105
1
6
105
1
7
74
1
8
43
1
9
23
1
10
105
1
11
75
1
12
44
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10-20-2004 Capacity Page Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but.
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and- flies.
i--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=---------
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
013. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land '
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
•---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
iareas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining andimplementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
• Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels_. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
•-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• -----•-------•-•---------------------------------------------------
982716 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 10/20/2004 Specification Page 3

• Bell Creek Dairy
,1 Soil Survey Legend
Symbol Name Texture Slope and Erosion
AM
Altavista fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
AsB2
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes. Eroded
AsC
Appling sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
AsC2
Appling sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
AsE2
Appling sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded
CcE3
Cecil clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely, eroded
CfB2
Cecil fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
CfC2
Cecil fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, eroded
CfD2
Cecil fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
CsE
Cecil soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes
CsE2
Cecil soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded
CsF
Cecil soils, 25 to 45 percent slopes
Cw
Chewacla soils
CxB
Colfax sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Lo
Local alluvial land
Wa
Warne and Roanoke fie sandy loam
WfB2
Wickham fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded
WX2
Wickham fine sandy loam, 6 to10 percent slopes, eroded
•
I

t
AP 4:v�/j .
"�gx 6teA
t7�G�bt
Wetable Acres work Sheet %V� TiJ �¢ � A) /--_ d Z)
Tract No.
Pull Number
Wetted
Diameter
Internal
External
Arc
Angle
Pull Length
Pull Width
Ames
Acres
Stop End
Acres
Start End
Total
Acres
a
S70
S -G 6
80
3 �b
Q, 7,6'
J,`6
5�O
,670
0
3z
0.42
6,7-,!�
3
370
Li
330
6 V
a96.
1l
6.9 2
6.:
�.
�LA
�-70
3� a
L 7�
1-�x
1�0
330
,3/6
Via.
Ole
� e
99
��3 7
0,6 2
A 7S
J
7
37 b
73
a
b► 7U
��
370
,E
�30
SVa
2, 26
,7
3,3
.5--'
J -'A
3 7 D
Z//S
5
X10
6, 4
6,13 .
37 6)
J51-
336
S
a13o
a, b9
(S.�
b 7�
� ,J)
" �"
330
20 v
I, 29
0.112
370
4V
�3 o
S`C�
� 8 0
�: � 1
�. G �
t�, �� .
,�. b
C /7;L /Y 0/ �,� 9/ c%/l/

IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
Landowner/Operator Name: Burt Bell
Address: 178 Belt Farm Rd
Statesville, NC 28625
Telephone: [phone]
TABLE 1 -Field Specifications'
County: Iredell
Date: 08/10/00
Field
Number z
Approximate
Maximum
Useable Size
of Field a
(acres)
Soil Type
Slope
%
Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rate (in/hr)
Maximum
Application
per Irrigation
Cycle 4
(inches)
Comments
1
19.9
Wa
1
Corn Silage, Rye
0.35
1.0
4
4.8
Wa
1
CS, Rye
0.35
1.0
5
14.5
Cw
1
Corn Silage, Winter grain
0.35
1.0
•
' Table to be completed in its entirety by soil and water conservation district (SWCD) personnel and forwarded to the irrigation system designer.
2 See attached map provided by the SWCD for field location(s).
3 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
4 Refer to N.C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section IIG
Irrigation Parameters page -1 USDA-NRCS
September 1995 North Carolina

•
EXH1I31T D-2
TABLE 2 - Traveling Irrigation Gun Settings
I See attached snap.
2Sitow separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
3Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter),
May also ttse degrees of arc.
MRCS, NC
NNE, 1996
Field No
Hydrant NO2
Tmvel
Speedand
(ft/min)
Application TRAVELLANE
Rate Effective Effective'`Diameter
(imu) Width (fl) Lgno fl)
NozzleEQUIPMENT
(inches)
SETTINGS
Operating Operating
Pressure Pressure
@Gttn(psi) @Reel(psi)
Arc
Pattern
lowx JIM
All
W, IIEMMIIMMMW'
`
E
EV" 1
&TIN
r
ME
OVIIEVIIIEW
IN
17
BRIE
EW-
1
`�ME
�_
-_
-
ONEEMEM
__
-�_-
NINE_
-
--
-_
I See attached snap.
2Sitow separate entries for each hydrant location in each field.
3Use the following abbreviations for various arc patterns: F (full circle), TQ (three quarters), TT (two thirds), H (half circle), T (one third), Q (one quarter),
May also ttse degrees of arc.
MRCS, NC
NNE, 1996

Landowner/Operator Name.
Address,
Telephone:
TABLE X - Field Specifications
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS
(If fJUf County: I1
VSEL— Date: _ 1.lI b�_ arsi
704- 27,x— .1,249,
Fh'HI13ff D-1
l;leldl
Number
Approxhnale
Maxhnituu
Useable Size
of Irleld2 Slope
(acres) Soil Type (%) Crop(s)
Maximum
Application
Rale3
(la/hr)
Maximum
Appllcallon
per Irrleallon
Cycle3
(Inches) Comments
d t l r`
e'l (UVf
'See atlached map. •
2Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
3Refer Io Pd. C. Irrigation Guide, Field Office Te0mical Guide.. Section H G_ Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

s •�
TABLE 4 - Irrigation System Specifications
I
TABLES - Thrust Block Specifications
Desi Ener may provide thrust block details on separate sheet.
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION AREA (sq. ft.)
900 Bend
Dead End
Tee
in 67a
tSee USDA-NRCS Field Office Teclmical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430 -DD.
EXHIDIT DA
NRCS, NC
NNE, 1996
Traveling
Irrigation Gun
Solid Set
Irrigation
Flow Rate of Sprinkler (gpm)
perating Pressure at Pump (psi)
Design Precipitation Rate (in/hr)
Hose Length (feet)
f
XXXXXXxx
Type of Speed Compensation
a'� .
`�•-"
XXXJiXXXX
Pump Type (PTO, Engine, Electric)
rn
Pump Power Requirement (hp)
-t-
I
TABLES - Thrust Block Specifications
Desi Ener may provide thrust block details on separate sheet.
THRUST BLOCK
LOCATION AREA (sq. ft.)
900 Bend
Dead End
Tee
in 67a
tSee USDA-NRCS Field Office Teclmical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430 -DD.
EXHIDIT DA
NRCS, NC
NNE, 1996

EXHIBIT D-5
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNER
Name: 70tst A L 6a" _ _
�+
Company: , �n ' I Ca
Address: ( ea alie 0
7
Phone: gQ?'xx' X12
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
'11ie following details of design and materials must accompany all irrigation designs:
I. A scale drawing of the proposed irrigation system which includes hydrant locations, travel lanes, pipeline routes, thrust block locations and buffer areas where applicable.
2. Assumptions and computations for determining total dynamic head and horsepower requirements.
3. Computations used to determine all mainline and lateral pipe sizes.
4. Sources andlor calatlations used for determining application rates.
5. Computations used to determine the size of lluust blocks and illustrations of all thrust block configurations required in the system.
6. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pump, traveler and sprinkler(s)-
7. Manufacturer's specifications for the irrigation pipe and/or USDA-NRCS standard for Irrigation Water Conveyance,
N.C. Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, Practice Code 430-1313.
S. The information required by this form are the minimum requiremenis. It is the responsibility of the designer to consider all relevant factors at a particular site and address them as
appropriate.
9. , irrigation pipes should not be installed in lagoon or storage pond embankments without the approval of the designer.
NOTE: A buffer strip Z feet wide or wider must be maintained between the limits of the irrigation system and all perennial
streams and surface waters per NC Statutes.
MRCS, NC
NNE, 1996

E)a-HBFr D-6
Narrative of Irrigation System Operation
Describe tate operation of the system in Ute space provided below or on a similar sheet most convenient to the designer/supplier.
hiclude procedures such as start-up, shut -down, winterization and regular maintenance of all equipment.
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

�e t table Acres For
av�el lane space e 70 New or Existing 6sz-�qf-de
�;7'
]Start Stop Total
Inia Pulil, I nin a I End Tzible L x W/43560 ToLal End Table i Acres
-7
0 qD NE70
Z------
31,
5,727
A
IVE10 25 AIL -20--'
9 41 n -711S. W, a'A174t-
._ til . �,�... �.���L

GRA -MAC DRSTRI[I UTJ NG {COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
19101 998.3232
(910] 998.3800
NC TOLL FREE 1-800.422-3560
Specification Sheet
Bell Creek Farm
1. Acres under traveler coverage +/- 53 acres.
2310 NC HWY. 801 N
MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
2. Traveler is a Long Engine Drive with 800' of 4.5" ID PE hose and a Nelson P200
Gun.
3. Nelson P200 Gun performance with a 1.2" Taper Bore Nozzle is 380 GPM, 410'
diameter @ 80 PSI.
4. Travel lane spacing is +/- 285'
• 5. Pressure loss in 800' of 4.5" ID PE hose is 16 PSI,
6. Friction loss in 6" PR200 PVC pipe is .411100',
7. Liquid velocity in 6" PR200 PVC pipe is 4.25'/Sec.
8. Pressure requirements are, as follows:
Gun 80 PSI
3400' of 6" PR200 PVC pipe 14 PSI
800' of 4.5" ID PE hose 16 PSI
Elevation (negative) 0 PSI
Misc. 5 PSI
115 PSI
265 Head Feet
9. Travel Speed:
19.3 x GPM
Lane Space x App. Depth
19.3 x 380
f 285 x 1 25.73 In/Min 2.14 Ft/Min 128.4 Ft/Hr

GRA -MAC DISTRRBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
- r
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE
19101 998.3232
19101 998.3800
NC TOLL FREE 1.800-422-3580
.1
Specification Sheet
Bell Creek Farm
Page 2
10. Application Rate is as follows:
96.3 x GPM x 360
3.14 x (.9(radius))2 ARC
96.3 x 380 x 360
3.14 x (.9(205))2 330
36594 – .34 x 1.09 = .37 In/Hr
106886
2310 NC HWY, 501 N
MOCKSVILLE, N. C. 27028
11. Pump horsepower requirement for 380 GPM at 115 PSI (265 Head Feet) is +/- 60
BHP.
12. Conditions will exist when waste water irrigation should not be performed.
These include when soils are frozen or saturated after rainfall and when there is
excessive winds, +/- 10 mph, Length of time after rainfall events will depend on
drying conditions.

LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS, AND CALCULATION OF LAND
APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker
Biological and Agricultural Engineer
North Carolina State University
1. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. After manure has been loaded into the spreader, collect a total of 5 lbs. of manure
from different locations within the spreader.
ii. From Storage
a. Collect a total of 5 lbs. of relatively fresh manure under the surface crust avoiding
bedding materials.
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Use a length of %z" conduit open on one end and that can be easily sealed on the other
end (e.g., by placing one's thumb over the end of the conduit.
-- b. With both ends of the conduit open, extend it into the manure to the pit floor.
c. Sea] the upper end of the conduit trapping the manure that has entered the lower end,
remove and empty into a bucket or container.
d. Collect samples from at least 5 Iocations or at least enough for a total of 1 quart of
slurry.
e. Thoroughly mix this slurry and empty approximately ''/z pint into sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure the manure has been well mixed or homogenized with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take samples from approximately 5 locations in the pit, from the agitator pump, or
from the manure spreader and place in a bucket.
C. Thoroughly mix and empty % pint into sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
•i. Collect approximately %i pint of recycled lagoon liquid from the inflow pipe of the flush
% tanks.
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE, EBAE 111-84 -

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source _Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production ❑ Vegetative or wooded buffers
C� Recommended best management practices
19( Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered A Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces Pr Promote drying with proper ventilation
Gi /Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial l�Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks
. Partial microbial
decomposition
❑
Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or
• Partial microbial
O
Bottom or mid-level loading
basin surface
decomposition
❑
Tank covers
• Mixing while filling
©
Basin surface mats of solids
NA
• Agitation when emptying
❑
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
❑
Agitate only prior to manure removal
❑
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
• Partial microbial
❑
Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces
decomposition
❑
Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or . Agitation when spreading ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreaderVolatile gas emissions d Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets Lv Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause Y
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure,
. Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
❑
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
Rf
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
V
Proven biological additives or oxidants
_
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
❑
blush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
4 A
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain - • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
collection or junction conveyance WA
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown 1�
End of drainpipes at Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance 1 A lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission
• Biological mixing
• Agitation
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation
nozzles . Wind drift
AMOC - November 11, 1995, page 2
❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity
'IA ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures
N ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping
❑ Mechanical aeration
❑ Proven biological additives
N' Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
[' Minimum recommended operating procedure
❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
1� Plush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings

•
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals . Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water . Improper drainage '2' Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto . Poorly maintained access 7' Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System—Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU--BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters + Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
. r to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
N h designed
❑ Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids ❑ Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
d A pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
`Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svstems
Feeders Feed spillage Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
IR/Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10 -
day interval during summer; 15- to 30 -day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page I

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause
BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed
19 Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter stn s around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas Accumulations of animal
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove'or break up
accumulated solids as needed
Dry manure handling Accumulations ofanimal
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
Systems wastes
7- to 10 -day interval during summer; 15- to 30 -day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handlinR areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

• Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
•
•
5f Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
'sr..• - 6 ;`� Ilf !';�° i i Jl if jf i� �i Iry dl i3a'Sw '�I feljA,•dr Ii'�� -a lj,• jil.
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 704-663-1699
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 704-873-5353
SWCD 704-873-6761
MRCS 704-873-6761
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you
should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste,
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
I
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
•

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
t f
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks. Possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
• b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
` c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property? .
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters? °
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional
office; Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your
phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the
incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of
movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have
been under taken and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill Ieaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number 704-
873-5353.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number 704-873-0507, local SWCD office phone number 704-
873-6761, and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number 704-873-
6761.
•

U -j
EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-
site damage.
a. Contractors Name: Church Bros. Grading
b. Contractors Address: Statesville
c. Contractors Phone: [phone]
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the waste storage structure (NRCS,
Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: John Stevenson/Jim Summers
b. Phone: [phone]
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
. rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
„� keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.

MAINENTANCE AND OPERATIONPLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
Bell Creek Dairy
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS
5. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
G. DIVERSION
7. STOCK TRAIL
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and stored in the first Waste Storage Pond (WSP #1).
All contaminated water (wash, parlor and runoff] will flow or be piped into the Waste Storage Pond
to be constructed (WSP #2). All waste contained in both WSPs will be land applied at agronomic
rates. The WSP#1 is designed to provide 120 days storage fo'r the solid wastes produced by 258
total head, including the milking herd and the other cows and heifers that have excess to the dairy
• lot. WSP #2 has a 90 day storage period.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal Waste
Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24). hour storm, as
required under the Non -discharge regulations.
•

MAINENTANCE AND OPERATIONPLAN
'7�,i �� � � :a.�: a i IFI �, 'I! <�ir^ �y F d n, •Ir F �� y r,; 9+ �
.0200 Certification Plan
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
OVERVIEW
The Waste Storage Pond #1 was designed to store the waste produced from the animals as indicated
in the Waste Utilization Plan, including the heifers waste that accumulates on the concrete feeding
pad at souih-east end of barn, average feedlot runoff and waste water from the milk barn for a 120
day period. A permanent marker will need to be set indicating the level of storage available prior to
infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity. WSP #2 will store all polluted runoff and the
runoff from the feedlot for a 25yr-24hr storm event or greater. The Waste Storage Ponds consists
of an earthen dam, clay liner, and curbing for discharging contaminated water into the WSP.
Max. Level Below ESW Desi Storage Period
Slurry Pond 0.0' 120 days
Runoff Pond 2.1' 90 days
OPERATION
The service life of the WSP's will be determined by the level of management for the entire system.
It is expected that some solids will have accumulated in the WSP #1. The accumulated solids may
need to be removed to obtain the designed volume, if not; there will be a reduction in the usable
capacity. All figures computed in the Waste Utilization Plan have been figured on the designed
volume after construction. Adequate waste agitation must be accomplished to prevent future solid
accumulation. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid accumulation of solids which
will reduce the usable capacity of the WSP to the point that some form of dredging will be required.
MAINTENANCE
Vegetation on the darn should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a
vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing
operations must take place only when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be
mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or seepage
should be reported to the Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District office.
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists of a PTO driven agitation system and
an Underground Main and Hydrants. The Underground Main and Hydrants were designed by Gra-
Mac Distributing Co.
See enclosed OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN for The Dairy Waste Irrigation
System for additional details.

OPERATION
The initial step in each irrigation operation is to properly agitate the waste in the Storage Pond. The
importance of agitation can not be stressed enough. It is very important to agitate long enough to
thoroughly dilute solids that will accumulate in the WSP. In most cases this must be done for nearly
a half day and others longer, just prior to pumping. If application equipment (irrigation or spreader)
is owned consult owner's manuals for recommended operational procedures.
Irrigation operation should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the full storage level marker
in the structure. When the liquids level in the WSP reaches the marker, liquids must be removed by
pumping from the structure, either into the irrigation system or to a spreader tank for land
application. Do not irrigate in such a manner as to cause runoff or erosion. Do not irrigate on
frozen or saturated soils. Irrigate only until soil is near saturation point.
It may be beneficial to start the pumping cycle before the liquid reaches the marker. Example would
be if level is near marker and bad weather is forested for the area or to better time the application
with the crop needs. This may help to extend the storage period during a more critical time when
the weather is bad or poor crop timing.
The traveling gun will travel on the vegetated travel lanes located in the fields.
. MAINTENANCE
Fields that receives waste application should have soil tested annually. It is advised and
recommended that waste and soil sample results be used in conjunction with each other.
Care should be made to stop application equipment so as to prevent waste from being applied
within 25 ft of stream (See Waste Utilization Plan; Required Specifications, #11).
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The Contaminated Liquid Collection System consists of concrete curbing around the dairy lot and
PVC pipe for the conveyance of the milk room and parlor water to the WSPs. There is a scrape lane
from the heifer lot in field 4a to the WSP.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the concrete components of the Contaminated Liquid Collection System for cracks or other
damage, and make repairs or replace as needed. The Pipe outlet components shall be inspected
• seasonally for damage and repaired or replaced as needed.

MAINENTANCE AND OPERATIONPLAN
r f�
o.
.0200 Certification Plan
-0
4. VEGETATED BUFFERS
OVERVIEW
The Vegetated Buffers serve a two fold purpose; they filter sediment from exposed feeding and
lounging areas. Their width is based on slope of land and proximity to streams. These areas can be
control grazed or mowed for hay to prevent unwanted growth. These buffers are used in lieu of
storage structures. Proper maintenance of these buffers must be followed or a storage structure will
be required.
There must be a 25 ft wide buffer maintained streams and creek for waste application.
There must also be a set -back along the drainage ditches duringperiods of wet weather or
when the ditches carry water.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within the buffer. If grazing
does take place caution should be practiced to prevent overgrazing. Grass should be a minimum of
six (G) inches. These buffets should have at least 80% ground cover. Specified width must be
maintained.
5. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
OVERVIEW
Livestock Exclusion will be maintained around the lounging areas to protect the Vegetated Buffers
from over exposure from livestock.
The Diversion in fld #3a&b will be fenced out to protect the diversion and aid in filtering.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the Livestock Exclusion periodically for mechanical damage or rot. If fencing wire becomes
loose, re -tighten to original condition. If fence posts are totted or damaged in any way, teplace
damaged posts with a post which is of the proper size and type for the location of use. Refer to the
Fencing Specifications for sizes and types.

d. VEGETATED DIVERSION
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED DIVERSION will be located above the WASTE STORAGE POND #2
between field 3b and 3a. It will convey non -contaminated runoff around the structure.
MAINTENANCE
The vegetation in the diversion should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a
vigorous stand. It is essential that neither vehicles nor livestock be allowed to create travel lanes
within the diversion. The diversion should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth.
The diversion may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take
place only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less
than four (4) inches. If sedimentation has reduced the capacity of the channel, contact the Iredell
Soil and Water Conservation District for technical assistance in correcting this problem.
7. STOCK TRAIL
OVERVIEW
The STOCK TRAIL(S) improves access to forages and water by means of a stabilized trail which
reduces erosion often caused from such walkways. The STOCK TRAIL(S) will be placed at
locations indicated on sketch. It consists of an area graded, covered with a geotextile material and
gravel placed on top.
OPERATION
The travel lane should be graded if necessary to allow proper drainage. A geotextile material of
adequate strength will be placed on the soil surface. The geotextile material should be overlapped a
min. of 18", The depth of gravel will need to be calculated for the particular area to be used. Refer
to the specific design for the amount of gravel needed.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the STOCK TRAIL(S) periodically for any soft spots or damaged areas. If the gravel gets
thin, more should be applied to the recommended depth. The designed depth should be maintained
over the entire area for it to remain structurally sound.
•

MAINENTANCE AND OPERATIONPLAN
I�, i � i, iik � 5 tI?f� ,�.���c'�i M-.4 �� tS�� �rll�i i�� _�!k•ak�1 �1 f�{R�L��j, � �� `�w Wil +i� t` �i� N !c jir �.� fir.
.0200 Certification Plan
• GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
Anypresent curbing that is damaged well need to be repaired orreplaced.
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with the use of all herbicides so that desirable vegetation is not
adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any pesticide in a manner not permitted by its
labeling.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District if repairs or major modifications are required
for any of the components of this Waste Management System.
Upon completion of all items involved in this plan, your operation will be certifiable. This plan is
for only the number of animals and acres listed in this plan. Please notify the TECHNICAL
SPECIALIST{S} that signed your Waste Utilization Plan and Certification form if operational
changes take place.

I
•
BURT BELL DAIRY
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION: LOCATED on Bell Farm Road near
Fouth Creek
LONGITUDE - 080047954" W
LATITUDE - 0350464o" N
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: Maximum Number Cattle in Waste
Management System
180 MILK COWS
30 DRY COWS
40 Bred Heifers
PLANNED BY: John Stevenson, Soil Conservationist
Mac Edgerton, Civil Engineer Technician
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
REVISION February 3, 2003
Note: Mr. Bell requested to modify the waste management plan
for an anticipated expansion in the future. The revision
increases milk cow numbers from 125 to 180 cows.

•
I. Runoff Waste Storage Pond
A. Design Volumes
INDEX
1. Normal Runoff for 90 day period
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
5. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
6. Milking Parlor Wash Water
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
II. Slurry Waste Storage Pond
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 120 day period
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
3. 25 yr -- 24 hr runoff
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
5. Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
6. Waste Volume
B. Summary of Design Volumes
C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond
D. ESW elevation
III. Nutrients Stored in Slurry Waste Storage Pond
IV. Nutrients Stored in Runoff Waste Storage Pond
V. Nutrients Collected and Spread from Lounging Areas
•

� Appendix
Operation and Maintenance Plan (by Field Office)
Drainage Area ,
Runoff Waste Storage Pond Storage Volumes
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dams, 2 sheets
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Old Design Information for existing waste storage pond
located in Iredell County District Field Office
Drawings
Plan View
1
of 3
Embankment Details
2
of 3
Slurry Pond Embankment Details
3
of 3
•

. I. Runoff Waste Storage Pond.
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 90 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual.
Drainage Area = 75,733 sq ft Surface = 6,600 sq ft
Unsurface = 42,519 sq ft
•
Try 3 months:
December through February Surface Runoff Depth = 6.18"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 2.58"
Direct runoff from pond = 11..36"
Surface Runoff= 6.18"* 6,600 sq ft = 3,399 tuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= ?_-5f3'! * 42,519 sq ft = 9,141 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
1.1.36 - 5 - 6.4" = 0.5 ft/3 month
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
%
DEPTH
%
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51.
27
1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.63
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 3 months:
December through February Surface Runoff Depth = 6.18"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 2.58"
Direct runoff from pond = 11..36"
Surface Runoff= 6.18"* 6,600 sq ft = 3,399 tuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= ?_-5f3'! * 42,519 sq ft = 9,141 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
1.1.36 - 5 - 6.4" = 0.5 ft/3 month

•
•
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.9111
Total drainage area for watershed and slurry pond is
83,983 sq ft.
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 83,983 sq ft = 34,363 cu ft
12"/ft
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" = .5 ft
5. Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.5 ft
6. Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water 100 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 150 gal./day
iia.. Milk house floor wash water 300 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water 50__gal./day
500 gal./day
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 90 days
= 6,016 cu ft
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
3,399
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
9,141
cu
ft "
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
34,363
cu
ft
4.
Milk.Parlor Wash Water
6,016
cu
ft
TOTAL
52,919
cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
0.5 ft
7.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.5 ft
8.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage
1.5 ft
TOTAL
2.5 ft

C. Sizing Waste Storage Pond
y Waste storage pond for runoff will be constructed with
an embankment across a draw. Storage volume shall be
increased at least as much as shown below. Additional
excavation beyond minimum required will increase storage
period or provide additional solids accumulation storage
See drawing for computations supporting above storage
volume requirements. In summary:
•
Top of dam is elevation 87.0.
125' X 60' X 1' of excavation is required below elev.
84.5.
Pond volume shall be enlarged as much as possible
without penetrating natural clay liner.
Normal Pump Out Volume
3,399 + 9,141 + 6,016 + .5' X 45,288 sq ft
= 41,200 cu ft per 3 months
= 164,800 cu ft per year
= 45 ac -in per year
Maximum pump out level
0.5' + 1.5' + 34,363 cu ft/(21,222 sq ft) = 3.6'
Elev. 83.4
D. Pump Out Elevation and ESW Elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be irrigated
before the water level reaches the 25 yr -- 24 hr storage
volume. This elevation is 3.6 ft below the top of dam. The
emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.5 foot below the
top of dam.
I

II. Slurry Waste Storage Pond
�- The storage period will be determined.
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 120 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual.
Drainage Area = 20,127 sq ft' Surface = 20,127 sq ft
Unsurface = 0 sq ft
Try 4 months:
December through March Surface Runoff Depth = 8.66"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 3.66"
Surface Runoff= 8.66'x* 20,127 sq ft = 14,525 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
15.9 - 8.1" = 7.8" = 0.71 per 120 days
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
25 yr runoff stored in lower pond.
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Direct rainfall on slurry pond stored in lower pond.
5. 'Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.0 ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
o
DEPTH
%
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27
1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 4 months:
December through March Surface Runoff Depth = 8.66"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 3.66"
Surface Runoff= 8.66'x* 20,127 sq ft = 14,525 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
15.9 - 8.1" = 7.8" = 0.71 per 120 days
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
25 yr runoff stored in lower pond.
4. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface
Direct rainfall on slurry pond stored in lower pond.
5. 'Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1.0 ft

i
w�
1
1
6. Volume of Waste
180 dairy cows are in the freestall barn 600 of the
time. It is anticipated that 750-a of the manure produced
will be collected in the waste storage pond due to stresses
due to feeding and milking.
Volume =180 cows * 1-4-0-gal/day * 120 days * 755k
7.48. gal/cu ft
= 30,321 cu ft
30 dry dairy cows are in the feedlot 10% of the time.
109k of the manure produced will be collected in the waste
storage pond.
Volume =30 dry cows * 14.0 gal./day * 120 days * 10%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 674 cu ft
40 bred heifers are on the feedlot 1OW of the time.
10% of the manure produced will be collected in the waste
storage pond.
Volume =40 bred heifers * 10.0 gal/day
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 642 cu ft
Total = 30,321 + 674 + 642
31,637 cu ft
120 days * 100-.

B.
Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
14,525 cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
0 cu
ft
3.
.25 year - 24 hour runoff
0 cu
ft.
4.
Volume of Waste
31,637 cu
ft
TOTAL
46,162 cu
ft
5.
Rainfall minus evaporation on
pond surface
0.7 ft
6.
25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond
surface
0.0 ft
7.
Freeboard + Emergency Spillway
Stage
1.0 ft--
t-TOTAL
TOTAL
1.7 ft
C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond
Based on "As Built" data for existing waste storage pond.
124' X 124'
1.7'
wide 2:1 4.3' /2:1
nar. 2:1
100' X 100'
Volume = 4.3/6[100 X 100 + 117.2 X 117.2 + 4(108.6 X 108.6)]
= 50,820 cu ft
Normal Pump Out Volume
14,525 + 31,637 + 0.7 X 124' X 124'
= 56,925 cu ft per 120 days
= 173,147 cu ft per 365 days
= 47.7 ac -in per year
D. ESW Elevation
The 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall and runoff will be drained
to lower pond. The emergency spillway elevation is planned
1.0 foot below the top of dam. Slurry manure can be stored
to emergency spillway elevation.
4
•
J

•
•
Total Available Nutrients
,r. €
t -
• —
,E, :� •
' of _ t d1
..I �
� � �.
rr 3.i jSi
M111T.
,Fk'.
RML
A A ° ®
1 1
'✓9
Estimated Nutrients Concentration
= 9,722 lbs PAN/47.7 ac -in
= 204 lbs PAN per ac -in
= 7.5 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons
:We= MOUTH
It is estimated that 20 lbs PAN per ac -in will be
measured in this pond. This is approx. 0.7 lbs PAN per 1.000
gallons.
Estimated Nutrients = 20 lbs PAN/ac-in X 45 ac-in/yr
900 lbs PAN

-� V. Nutrients Collected and Spread from Lounging Areas
Periodically manure is collected from sections of the
lounging areas by scraping. Manure is loaded in a manure
spreader and spread on cropland or pasture.
Dry cows and bred heifers are on the lounging areas
approximately 90% of the time and approximately 40% of the
manure deposited on the lots will be scraped and spread.
Note: Unpaved scraped manure values are not in the
waste utilization standard. It appears that for beef
operations unpaved scraped quantities are about % the paved
scraped totals. This same ratio will be used for this
dairy.
Dry Cow Volume
= 30 cows x 90% x 40% x 8.5 tons/head/year
91.8 ton/year
Bred Heifers Volume =
= 40 heifers x-90% x 40% x 6 tons/head/year
= 86.4 ton/year
Total = 178 tons/year
. Note: The plant available nutrient content in beef
manure is about double for unpaved manure versus paved
scraped manure. This same ratio will be used for this dairy
manure.
PAN = 8.6 lbs/ton x 178 tons = 1,531 lbs PAN
2205 = 8.8 lbs/ton x 178 tons = 1,566 lbs P2O5
K2O = 12.2 lbs/ton.x 178 tons = 2,172 lbs K2O
•

State of North Carolina --
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
BURT A. BELL
BELL CREEK FARM
115 FARMWOOD DRIVE
STATESVILLE NC 28625
Dear Burt Bell:
OCT 3 2000
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 28, 2000
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490054
Bell Creek Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
In accordance with your application received on November 19, 1999, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Burt A. Bell, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection,. treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Bell Creek Farm Farm, located in Iredell County, with an
animal. capacity of no greater than 146 dairy cows, 46 dairy calves, and 66 dairy heifers, and the
application to Iand as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC490054j
Bell Creek Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process: Unless such a•request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only f9r all cc's)
IredellCounty Health Department
Mooresville Regional Offtcc, Water Quality Section
•Iredell County Soil fand Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
evens

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number �!� " 5'1 Facility Narrte Be// Creek 17a rm
ti
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for 2 SS Date of Certification —2Z2 0�t:�L
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management systern-is,designeduo
accommodate:
Dairy Milking dry cows /44P �;�
Heifers :V R EC E 1110 lON
Calves /5 p p0 W� Dl }AI
t"
� 6,
� �. 1 U 2000
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers �a Non -Discharge Permiftg
TOTAL ANRAAL NUMBER
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
cle,fq,
pc k1ef07 v�u��d`
w� f�f.
Wmr")
6Y 5a.w+��na�,e.,y.
lTG+n a - v e
a b,,k
of Q /r ri�y1 a�
`' s t
6 2 eJ . /o fa! 2a
Amended Certification ;only needed if the Incorrect number of animals was previously certified):. .
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the. maximrvn number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number)
Farm owner/applicant 3
Signature I _ Date
Farm manager (if applicable)
Signature Date
Technical Speciali
Signature �. Date
Phone Number ( 7oA0 8Z3- J7(61

AnIrnai W asci ,vIan s --,t: ,tn,c
:rnt '.i .c lrlel Z11( re.uir! 1)l':-:Scire'
IF-cisdr.a a . -N ew oK--- Esoanded') (olease circ:e one) V
General Information:
Name 0( rarrn Bell creek Dair1
Ow'r:e.-(S) N- aMe:Burt A Bell
y4.1.i.., 2 1 ddresz:
Firm vocation:
F;acilicy `o: 49 54
Phone `0:704-872--1292
178 Bell Farm Rd, 4tatesville, Nc 28625
Count: Farm is locace d M.- Iredell
L_citude and LOnsicude: 35 46 40 80 47 54 Inceeracor:
P!erse lccacz a cocy c(a councy road map with loc•_cion idertOted and describe beiow (Be ,cic: road
n :.rz es. dira-c—Uo ls. indePOSL Vc.): Hw 64E to Bell Farm Rd. Dairy approx. 1. 5mi. on
right before Fourth Creek.
ce a ' n D ri ti n•
Type of slvfrte jV4. of gni nals rope of Poultry No. ojAnimals Type o.(Cattle pyo, alAnintcls
M Wean to Feeder O Layer Daisy � ZS
:2 Feder to Finish 7 Pullets M Serf
Farrow to wean
M Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish Other rVpe of Livestock.11iunber of Animals:
Gilts
;3 Boars
: - afe Available for Application:,12 9_, 4 _ RA4uind u -mage: 80
,.:�—Nuarber_*LagooQs &Tsatal_Ca,Gtat 92 , 020' Cubic Feet LNC
- -:.
AxV subsurface drains present on the farm. YES or
If YES: are subsurface drains present'in the area of the LAG00N or SPRAY FIELD (please tittle ane?
+kw�awa+�s+iiwiN#oY1MMwr#MAt#iwMsriM#Mt1Mw#1Mr#as+lNwaaiiM.MM##M1M1MiMwa.YraiMwM###w#1M sit iia#11s+R1F.MW,M+M####arN#Mt#aa+M#sis+n
Owner / Mana;er A;reement
1 (we) verify that all the aW%-e information ii -correct anis wiII be updated upon changing - I (we: understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) k -now that env expansion to the existing design capi city of the waste treatment and
starsge system or construction of new facilities will require a new certiticadon to be submitted w the Division c:r
Envirunmcmai -Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there roust be no disclhw3C of
animal waste from the storage or application system to steace waters of the state either directly through a man -massa
conveyance or from a storm went Iess severe than the 2:5 -year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from clie
anplicauon of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-aff of pallutan:s from lounging and heavy use arras mast be
Mmiatized using tetanism! stand=ds developed Sy the Natural Resourcu Conservation Ser -ice. The approved plan :will be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Suit and 'Nater Cuasdi%='un Duuict- I (w4) know that any madificadon
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Cansrrvation Disuic: prior to
Lmolemenmcion. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DEti( or a new c -reification (ii the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of x title uusftr.
`acne of Land Qwner : Burt A. Bell
Signature:
Dace:
`iame of N(anal er(il cIiffe:_nc crom uwrie ):
Si-narure: Dace:
.a - "C - auz„c I. 194)'7

ucrliw L4'$lr ey:ic-icr iot,
cu nuntmizc the. run off is pollutants t;um luunginz anal use _ea.; a:e:: �,n in;tal[et: si icc;:ti
ill the p1 --n_
Forfacilities without er:eriorlots. no cerrificanon is necessar,,•.
tiame of Technical Specialist (Please Print): John Stevenson
Affliliadoniredell Soil & Water Conserv. Hist. Dace worlk- Comoie:ed:
Address (k eacy):201 Water St, Statesville NC 28677 PFt0ne `o.: 704-873-6761
Signature: Date:
D) Aaolication and Handling Equioment Installsrion (WL'p or n
Check rhe_approprram olocc
..l Animal waste appficstion and handling equipment ip=-aed in the plan is c= site and ready for use
calibration and adjustment lA.11e.'111.'S have beta provided to clic o-ne:s and err rvnmined as part of the plan.
J
Animal waste application and handling equipTF= SpCCirted in ttk plan has not been installed but the uwttu:
has pcnpz d leasing or third parry application and has provided a signed contras~.: equipment specir:ed. it
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plats: ta
required butfers u be maintained: cillbrscion ant:
adjustment guidance have beta provided w the owners and are contained as'parc of che pLan. ' ~ . . ---
Conditional approval: Animal waste application and haadling equipment sprcirtrd in the plan h=
bees pumbased and will be on site and installed by (montlVdk /y=), thire is adeq=c
storage to hold, the waste until the equipment is installed and utica the waste can be Land applied in
accordance with the cropping system coaWned in the plan: and calibration -aad adjustment guidanm have
beta provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan,
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
afflliatiOti Iredell Sol_ ' 1-,Watar t'nrlsgry _ niaL._ Due Nworik Completed: .9
Address
- - .. - Sign=
.1 -704-8
The following signature block is only to be used when the'box for rondidbnal approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (We)..certiPf.dttat I (we),have committed to purchase the animal waste application and Ding equipment as
specified itt my (our) waScn management plan and will submit to DEWa veriticadon of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 13 calendar daps following the dze spediied in the condidonal ceititicadon- i
'(we) realize d w failure to submit this verification is a violufon of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to as erifocrment icdun frt?m DENL
Name of Land Owner-
Signature:
wnerSignature: Date:
`write of )rfanager (if differenc from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Qdor Control. YnsectControl and Niortnliry NIanx!emenr (SD. Sr. WL-'?- RC or 1)
Methods to control odors std insects as specided in etre Plan have brei .installed and are operationzi. T;:e
mortality mauagernenc system as specified in the P[an has also be --n installed sad is operational.
,carne of Techitirsl Specialist (?[ease Princ): John
Affliliation Iredell Soil & Water Conser34,riot . Dace Warl- Como[e:ed: G e f 7 ._._.
Address
Signature
.{«'C •- .4.u4uac 1. lar)'
tone No.:704- -
icLe: a f

..--je return crie compie cu kur,i -U c.tic „�.... -- ---• �---.- � _
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
.P.O. Box 29535
R.zIeiffh, LNC 1.7636-0533
Please 2130 remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
to
A %VC » August t. tqw? 6

6- C
GRA-MAC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Design — Sales — Service
COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
TELEPHONE: ADVANCE EXCHANGE ROUTE 2. 80X 212
19191 968.3232 MOCKSVILLE. N. C. 27028
1919f 908-3800
June 4, 1994
Mr. -Burt Bell
Route 15, Box 246
Statesville, NC 28677
Re; Dry Hydrant Pipeline
This letter is to affirm the installation of your 6" PVC -underground
slurry irrigation pipeline with six 6" dry hydrants. Gra-Mac Distributing
Company has completed this installation of pipe at a bury depth of
between 36" to 42".along with constructing the apporiate concrete thrust
blocks for pipe support. The 6" PVC pipe is pressure rated at 200 PSI
and is designed to handle a flow of approximately 450 GPM of your dairy
waste.
Thank you for allowing Gra-Mac Distributing Company to be your irrigation
supplier and for allowing us to complete this project for you.
Sincerely
4�� &IV
Ronnie Wall

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
E Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Ef Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
7 r nv. _ _ -
Table Yb: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended Recommended
Lbs. N Lbs. N
Hydr/ Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to be to be
Tract Fld Pull Type Crop3 Anticipated Wetted Required Required Applied Applied
No. No. No. Code Code Yield/ac Acresl Per Ac. Per Fld. PerAc/pl.2 Per Fld/pl
8294
1
2b
Wa
RG
9 AUM
2.6
100
260
100
260
8294
1
3c
Wa
RG
9 AUM
4.2
100
420
100
420
8294
1
3d
Wa
RG
9 AUM
4.5
100
450
100
450
8294 j
1
4e
Wa
RG
9 AUM
4.3
100
430
100
430
8294
1
4f
Wa
RG
9 AUM
4.3
100
1 430
100
430
8294
4
la
Wa
RG
9 AUM
4.8
100
480
100
480
8294
5 1
5g
Cw
WG
50 Bu
4.3
100
430
100
430
8294
5
5h
Cw
WG
50 Bu
4.3
100
430
100
430
8294
5
6i
Cw
WG
50 Bu
2.6
100
260
100
260
8294 1
5
6j
Cw
WG 1
50 Bu
1 3.3
100
330
100
330
TOTALS THIS
TABLE
T 39.2
xxxxxxxst.
3,900
3,900
1 The wetted acreage represents the total acreage of the field under the guns. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely
will be, more than the acres shown in the tables. .
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted
for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation. Figures indicate what is available using the assumed application method at
the rates as indicated on page 20 "Narrative of Operation ".
3 Time of application for: CS: Mar -]un, RG&WG: Feb -May & Sep -Nov, PCS: Feb -May & Sept -Dec
17
2/24/00

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 2 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total nitrogen to be applied using animal waste for
all fields which are available for waste application.
TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
This summary indicates that only about 68 percent of the total annual nitrogen requirements can be provided for
the crops as listed for the fields available using animal waste produced on this livestock operation.
19
2124/00
ACRES
USEABLE
TOTAL CROP
NITROGEN
REQUIREMENT
IN POUNDS
RECOMMENDED
LBS. N TO
BE APPLIED
USING WASTE
SUPPLEMENTAL
OR RESIDUAL
LBS. OF N
REQUIRED
TOTAL TABLE la
39.2
8,624
8,624
0
TOTAL TABLE lb
39.2
3,900
3,900
0
TOTAL TABLE lc
23.6
3,776
3,776
0
TOTAL ALL TABLES
102.0
16,300
16,300
0
Amount of N Produced
11,090
&u-r� or Deficit
5,210
This summary indicates that only about 68 percent of the total annual nitrogen requirements can be provided for
the crops as listed for the fields available using animal waste produced on this livestock operation.
19
2124/00

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Using a Traveling Gun
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Application
Application
No.
No.
Type
CS
Rate
Amount
8294
4
Wa
CS
in./hr.
inches
8294
1
Wa
CS
.35
1.0
8294
3
Cw
CS
.35
1.0
8294
4
Wa
CS
.35
1.0
8294
6
Cw
CS
.35
1.0
8294
8
AfB
CS
.50
1.0
8294
1
Wa
WG
.40
1.0
8294
3
Cw
WG
.35
1.0
8294
4
Wa
WG
.40
1.0
8294
I 6
Cw
WG
.35
1.0
8294
8
AfB
WG
.50
1.0
22
2/24/00

Exisrin? or .. New
General Tnformacion:
Animal rvaSCe 'VIUrILI'-tLiiC11L Z— iUVL tyCj 11;L;1�;U,i
�?!c•:ae l•:ee �1r vrint ;11 ?nt«r-�::::��n ��lzt .ne.; zlu:esuir? .1 ;i_:::lcur��
Exoanded)' (ole2se circle one)
`+a:ne of Farm: Bell creek Dair,
Owne.*) Nam, e:Burt A Bell
Mai:iRa ddrass:
Farm Loci:iorr:
Eacifficv `o: 49 54
Phone tip:704-872-1292
178 Bell Farm Rd, tatesville, Nc 28625
COE:nC': Fctrl is locaced in: Iredell
Lacicude and Lonzicndz: 35 .46 40 / 80 47 54 Inceeracor.
P!eas� actach a cope of a county road map with locacion idzacilied and describe below (Be sce, itic: road
n=es. :niieCOSL e.C.): Hwy 64E to _Bell Farm Rd. Dairy approx. 1 . 5mi__on
right before Fourth Creek.
Opera don -2=1 a tio n:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
M Wean to Feeder
M Feeder to Finish
Cf Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
.M Farrow to Finish
M Gilts
M Boars
Type of ?ottltn• No =of r �l A Tape of Carel' Ivo, of' nrri*r¢ls
G Layer -< �r y,.- l t � . Dairy 2 2 0
Fullets ft 7 Beef
Other Tvae of: y�esroc �:1Fi . i j, 'y,_,;; ;lOt,��rrrrher of.#nim¢ls:
• _ .. =t'9e C3,, Ip,iance Enf.
acreageAvaiiabie for .application: 129.4 Required k reage: 80
_.ToML_Capac;iW_: 9 2 ; O Z O Cubic Feet (ft_.
:ire subsurface drains present on the farce:' ^ YES or �� o (please Circle oneY .T
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or S?R.A.Y FIELD (please circle one)
**93* MIll P4W&M—all MilYlMill*lF+lla*WillrMtM SIMyl**#lM;l1MipMM{Mii lM l!l YA ego **lM■iigMA*fill**** MA$1i1lM 1iJA itrlelM�lM i.1jlfM •Il lM,it k. �l!t l!l it .,i 7M lil is a+
O_ %vrter /Manager Agreement
•E (we) verify that all the above information i3"correec acid will be updated upon changing. - E (%ve) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures establishes) in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any exparmion to the existing design =pacity of the waste treatment ant:
scorsge sYstern or construction of new fac:iIities will require a new certification w be submitted to the Division or
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. E (wO understand that rht!re must be no d6-c'lame of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the ;tate either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 23 -year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run -4.0 from the
application of animal waste. i (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas roust be
minimized wing tecbricai standards ddveLuced by the Natural Resaurc= Consrrc•adon Sc: -%ice. The approved plan will be
Mad at the farm and at the office of the Local Soil and Water Conscrradon District. I (Lye) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Consenyacion District prior to
Lmolementadun. A change in land ownership requires written notification to DE.NE or a ne•.v certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days of a tide transfer.
:Varve of Land,Owner : Burt 4._ Bell
Signature:
Dace: —�
Name of Nlana,er(if dif e=nc from uwrte:):
Si;nacure: Dace:
AVVC -- Aw-u,t J. 19v'

1
J Y
I. As a technical specinlist dcii%naced by the North Ca.rcilina Soil and Water Cunse^•atiun Commissiurt pus.
:NCAC 6c= .CCO5. I certify that the animal waste management system for Che farm named above has an am,,
manageatent pian that meets or exceeds standards and st;e::ic:catiuns of the Division of Environmental !•(aha.
(DEN? as spccitied in 15,E NCAC'H.0'_17 and the USDA -Natural Rcsourc:s Conserratiun Sen -ice (MRCS) aad.'u,
`North Carolina Soil and Water Canser,ation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0=17 and I-CA'NC C 6r .00O:r
.00OS. The Following elements are included in he plan as applicable. While each cateur: designates a technical scecfalist
who may sign tach certiticaciun (SD. SI. NLp, RC. n. C11e te:::nical scecialist should"' only certify, parts for which the., arr
tcctnie:ily compe;enL
II...Certifcatioh of Design
A) Collection, Storage. Treatment System
C.)ect- the appropriate Sox
Existing facility %vithout reiront (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation espacit;~ stura_ze capability cansiscent :eidl waste utflizntiurn
mquirements. -
�vew.
Animal waste storage and treatment suucture& such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds•
have been drsived m meet or exceed the minimum standards and Spec.-iF+mtion&
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): .� M A%
MflEacion - GS Da
Address (Agency):
Sianamre:.
Work. Completed: -7 7
No.: L?Z$-
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (bisffars); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crap is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
• -�
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Pritnt): yJahr '"s'� v nson ``��'�°���-'� � - � •- �-
Affiliacion lredell Soil & Water Conserv. Dist • Dace Work Completed: 6, 0
Address(Ac-re•y)x'?o1 Water St, Statesville _ Phone
`ro.:704-873--6761
ace:- 1-�I1,jZg: -
C) Runoff Controls from Ixterior Lot
Crede the appropriate box
.Tl Faciiiry without exterior locs (SD or WU P or RC)
This facility clots not contain any exterior lots.
7! aci I 'tV Zvi pct rio I (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use arras have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (please Prim): John Stevenson
Actiliationzredell Soil & Water Conserv. Dist. Dace Work- Completed:
address (A,enc;/)•201 water st, Statesville, NC 28677 704-873-6761
�«'C •• Au wbt t. L997

it
:►n- rlC �aooiicatiori and Handling- Ecuinment
o, a ,1c-teck file approprrcue her
ry 'tt '
:7. o c j��=-i<z , �r r., ino r' :l4 •vi ��ss•' e w. !' nit a (�4'?'P or I)
o� Animal waste aopiicauun equipment sccciticd in the. plan has be -.n tither field calibrated or evaluated in
"3 accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application aquipmenc can cover the area required by the pian at races not to
e :t_ed either the sce=;tied hydraulic or nutrient loading races. a schedule for timing of apciications has been
esrsblished: recuired buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjus=e.-%t-zuidanc.— are c:.:n=ned as part of
the plan).
Animal waste application equipment soccifed in rhe plan has been designed to appy waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management. plan: (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by Lhe
plan ac races not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a Schedule for limine of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibruion and adius=ent guidance are
cuntained as part of the -plan).
�. w :' n r 'a v *'C r C iV '(1 ^ or r i .r`^ C nnC -15ing
-Irmv irriglcion. (WUP or[)
.animal waste application equipment specified in the purr has bean selected to apply waste as necessar:: to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application zquipmenc Can cover the area required by the
plan at rates -not m exceed either the specified hydraulic' or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for tinting of
appiicacions has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibradua and adjustment guidance are
-,contained as part of the plan).
Name•of Technical Specialist (Please Print): John Stevenson
Affiliationrredell Soil & water Conserv. Dist. Dace Wor'g Completed: •4/1/f7_
Address (Ag cv:2014ater St', Statesville, NC 28677 phone No.: 704-873-6761
Signature:Date: 44L'T,lf
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Nfortalitv'Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD.
SI. WUP. RC or r)
--The waste mnaa$emeac.glace for, this -facility includes a Waste ytanagement Odor Control'CheckiisL an Insect
Control Checklist. a 1�[orr,'tiity �Isaaemnr CIicliist and an Emergnnc'�r :ctiaia Plan. - Sources of tioiti-odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Hest Xanag%:ment Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
N-fanagement Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortalicy Management, Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): John. Stevenson
'Affllliacior redell Soil & water Conserv. Dist. Date Work Completed: I° 57
Address (Age v : 201 Water St, Statesville, NC 28677 Phone No.:7 4-8736761
Sionature: Dace: -1W
F) t► �►ritten'Votice of New or Exgandin_ Syrine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or r-cpanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21-1996. If the facility was built before June 21. 1996, when was is _cnnstrucced or Inst
expanded
I (we) Certify chat l (we) have aucmpmd to contact by ctrufied mail all adjoining property owners and ail property owners
who own properry located across a public road. street, or highway from chis new or expanding iw'ine farm. The notice w -as
in complianca with cbe requirements of XCGS 1.06-845. A copy of the notice and a list of chc property owners notified is
atmchcd. .
Name of Land O--Yner:
Sinnacure: Date:
tiarne of tilana-er (if mitt^c:t tram uwrte:):
ZP
Signature: Date:
%VC - .�u�a�L t, L997 3

` 1I1. Certification of Installation �,
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment lnsralladon
,�',ew. z.coanded or rvroticced rae�ficv (Si)
Animal waste storage and treaunent scrtctures. such as but not limited to lascuns and ponds. have tern ins
in accordance with the approved pian to me_t or --:,c-.ed the minimum standards and sptciitcation;.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no czrdffcaffon ,s necessary.
Name'of Te ical Specialist Please Princ): �� �C.�•?vE*1
Aftiliacian �V C � � � �.te ��r'or Ct}mplz:ed/_�
Address ( tend: -, -�! -1 RL: S7� Phone o1:_T` Zlr,?-S�'L-►2
Signature: /)--�er _ �-� :-- - Date: - D -
B) Land aoolicarion Site CNVL-M
Check rite approphare box
•M1 The cropping system is in place on ail land as specified in the animal waste manacemenc plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the on-ner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the pian by (monthldavlvear); the proposed corer crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteutilizadon plan.
Also check this box if appropriate
- - - if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification. the owner has camraicmed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of;Technical Specialist (Please Print): John St
Iredell Soil &- Water' Conserv.' Dist
-- � Affiliation ..Dace War: Completed:-- /97. - ..
.. - Tom.
201 Water - Sta`tesv ie ` 1NC 28677 - '704y=87
Addrems {AQencyl: Phone ;`io. 3"'S7`b z-`
S isnature:
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in IIL B
above has been checked.
I (we) certifv that i (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan_
and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DENI a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize chat failure m submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan aad will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action front, OF -%L
`lame of Land Owner:_„
Signature:
Date:
Name of Manager (if diffzrenc from owner):
Signature: Dace:
-A-Wc •- .iu;u!SG 1. v),)7 4

ryC) Runorl Controls rrom Exterior Lots (RC)
.a �cility with z.Yt,�rior leis
:Wcthud5 to nttncniizc the run off of pollutants ;ram luun:ing and hcavv u,e -ren; gloat 5e7:a insclllc i ;cCcitic a
in the plan.
N-. Forfaciluies without exterior, lots. no certijcatoa is necessar.•.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): John Stevenson
Affiliation Iredell Soil 4.Water Conserv. Dist. Date War:,- Camole:ed:
Address (A? ncy)' 1 t, Statesville NC 28677 Phorie :`o.:__204-873-6761
5isnsture: Date:
D) Aoolication and Handling Equioment Installarion ('W'LP or I)
Check rhe approprrare oloc
-1 anLmal waste apprication and handling equipment specified in the pian is a-, site and ready for use:
cailbracion and adjustraenc materials have beta provided to the owners and are contained 'as part of the plan.
-[ animal waste application and handling eyuipmant specified in tris ata
plan has not been inllcd but the wa-ncr
has proposed [easing or third party application and has provided a signed .-ontracn equipment specified in
the contract agrees -with the requirements of the plan: required buffers cin be maintained: caiibrstfcn and
adjustment guidance have bean provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan. ' --
Z Conditional approval: AniaW waste applicmdon and haadling equipment spec:ifi.ed in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (amonth/day/year): there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):.
Affiliadon.Iredell soil & Water. Con-Lpr_v_ n; ---f- ^„Date Work Completed: aL2Z 1,� K -
Address (Aven ): O 1 W e Phone `0.:704 - 87 3 76-1
-
- Sianamure: Date: !rte
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste appiication and handling equipment as
specified *iia' my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEMa verincation of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date spec -hied in the conditional certification. I
'(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of tete waste rnanasernent plan and %will subje= me
(us) to an enforcetneat action from DE I.
Name of Land Owner-
Signature:
wnerSignature: Date:
Name o£ -Manager (if different tram owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. insect Control and Mortality Nranazement (SD. Si. W P. RC ort)
Mtthods to control odors and insects as specified in :he Plan have beta installed and are ope:srion :l. The
mortality management syscem as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is ope:acional.
Name of Technical Specialist (Nese Print): John Stgygnpnu
Aft1liacion Iredell -Soil & water_ Conserv. Dist . D'te Work Completed: _,!,;11j11 -F7
Address
Signature
A«'C •- August L. 1997
Phone No. 7 04 -
Dam: 8 S

L rl 98 1
���-..rte •.f ` c (1 � � rt '.: 1: ., 4 , �. i 1 r r '!
f l .f�"�r��h� I � •' JA � r �1�+'^ „f �" 'rF''-Y '' � p r
111 .� 1 1 ', O ,• � V'
v f
✓ II ' rwJ e � �-. j
1 �1j. I.' l �.�„1. • �...; � L�� � • � ).Nb v^� Yttflf�,' r�
'•' + D� ..x l err. � r S � T � : �
+•'. � ��. IIS ' 4 �� 1��V �✓'�.: F/ /`
\r• � � 1. ` �-� , ; ����C, , � � ! . � ' �
�f-iff,'RO,SI p=v�TQ""'
130"-
"Y' Irl :4r
-
1; . �� • ek s
vi
ilk
,� !� � �,, �• 38• ,Flmwonci
.r� I. V•• 1 �7:i.?j j�l �`••Y � ��Nibi Msa
.�'jii0'^1'�"s"'•�I '-�•' NiE RIOR�GEOLpOM- AL sumye•.w.S'1111
•- ap 1000. E. •-!i•
ROAD CLASSIFlf;AJIW

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality SEP 2,2 1999
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 11000�f 1:",y+i► l l � IFtr
Bill Holman, Secretary r�lrn,r
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
September 15, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
178 Bell Farm Road
Statesville NC 28625
Farm Number: 49.54
Dear Burt A. Bell:
IT _J1WW
1 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Bell Creek Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1OC, must apply for coverage under
an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached
application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session
1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address -
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Susan Cauley at [phone] extension 546 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
L
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

I
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish .to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least I80 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section.
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490054
NDPU Files
0-1-0m• (F
AND NATLNUMLIRZ �RW -
R CEWD
i
'71
'r
WAY 19 �00�
F'
yy ` 1,01

0� VA r4_, Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
(r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co 7
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville NC 28625
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490054
Bell Creek Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
iredell County
Dear Burt A. Bell:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit. AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on March 7, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Burt A.
Bell, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC490054 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Bell Creek Farm, located _in Iredell County,. with .an, animal capacity of no .
greater than an annual average of 146 dairy cows, 66 heifers, and 46 claves and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWNW, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
IN NR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpl/h2o,enr.state.no.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

WAS'T'E UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: Burt A. Bell
Location: SR 2316 at Fourth Creek
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: --Dairy
Number of Animals: 243 total animals
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure(s): Waste Storage Pond (WSP) T
Application Method(s):Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to prevent pollution of
surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to reduce
the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. You must have the animal waste
L. analyzed to determine nutrient content as close to the time of application as practical and at least within
60 days of the date of application before each application cycle. Soil nutrients in all fields where waste
will be app
lied must be analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to maximize the
fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient content of the
waste. Do not apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Lime must be applied to
application fields as recommended by soil test to maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation
exchange capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons per acre per year.
With special precautions, (see Required Specification No. 4) waste may be applied to land
eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either
of these conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which is a violation of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) .0200 regulations.
9
2124100

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste should also be considered to avoid
drift and downwind odor problems.
6'. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the potential for
pollution, the waste should be applied to a growing crop. Otherwise apply waste no earlier
than 30 days prior to planting a crop or prior to forages breaking dormancy. Injecting or
otherwise incorporating the waste below the soil surface will conserve nutrients and reduce
odor problems.
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where waste is applied shall be monitored and
alternative application fields shall be used when these metals approach excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by _Irrigation_ (method(s) of application) for this is the manner in
which you have chosen to apply your waste. If you choose to alter the method of application in the future,
you need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for various waste application methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient content for Dai jX (type
operation) systems in North Carolina. Actual acreage requirements shall be based on waste analysis reports
from storage structures in your waste management system. Attached you will find information on proper
sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
Your WSPs (storage structure) is designed for 120 days of temporary storage and the temporary storage
must be removed on the average of once every 4 MONTHS. If your facility is unroofed, in no instance
should the volume of waste being stored in your structure be higher than the maximum storage marker
_ except in the event of a 25 year, 24 hour storm.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in determining the
amount per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
The waste management system which is covered by this waste utilization plan shall be operated only by
persons which hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge of an animal waste management system. The
North Carolina Water Quality Commission will provide training and certification of operators.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0217
(the .0200 rules) adopted by the Water Quality Commission.
10
2124100

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
ESTIMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year:
Manure Produced:
No
1 -2 -Er cows x 14 gallday x 120 days x 1$&$ confin. = 28,075 cuft
aAj� 164--
dry cow7.48 gal/cuft s x 14gal/daY x 120 dans x 10-� confin. = 471 tuft
7.48 gal%cift
bred heifers x 10 oral/dav x 120 days x 10 confin. = 722 cuft
G"7.-48 gal/cuft
('�flseu�
-2_1-heifers
(500-750)„ x 6 gal./day x 120 days x 10 $, confin. = 2,021 tuft
T7.48 gal/cuft
1r (3,00-500) x 4 gal/day x 120 days x 10 _confin. = 103 cuft
7.48 gal/tuft
rr�� �
,x 5 -heifers (2 -00 -3,00L -x-2.5 2.5 Qal/dav x 120 days x 100 confin. = 601 cuft
7.48 gal/cuft ,
IS -heifers (day -200) x 1.5 gal/day x 120 days x 100 % confin. = 361 cuft
7.48 gal/cuft
Total Waste Produced/storage period = 32.354 cuft
Normal Runoff:
Drainage Area - 20,127 sgft. 14,525 cuft of volume
(Refer to design packet for calculations)
TOTAL VOLUMECONTAINED IN WSP #1 = 57,642 cuft/period
x 3 periods/yr =140,537 cuft x 7.48 gal/cuft
1,293,486 gal/yr or 48 acin.
ll:
2/24/00

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Available Nutrients
WSP #1
PAN = 0.40 X 25,474 = 10,190 lbs PAN
10,190 lbs PAN/ 48 acin
= 212 lbs PAN/acin
= 7.8 lbs PAN/ 1000 gals
WSP #2
It is estimated -that 20 lbs PAN / acin will be measured in this
pond. This is approx. 0.7 lbs. / 1000 gals.
Estimated Nutrients = 20 lbs PAN/ acin x 45 acin/yr
= 900 lbs PAN
Total animal waste and waste water volume generated in one year is approxi
WSP #1 WSP #2
1,293,486 gallons 1,221,934 gals or
48 acre -inches. 45 acre -inches.
11,090 lbs. PAN per year from liquid waste
+ -- lbs. PAN per year from solid waste
=
11,090 Total lbs PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job. You should plan time and have
appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
12
2124100

l
W AST9 UTILIZATION PLAN
Values used above are based on analysis of waste from similar livestock
operations in North Carolina (source: USDA-NRCS FOTG Practice Standard
633 -Waste Utilization). Actual nutrient content of the waste from this system
may vary from these values. Waste analysis should be made of the actual waste
as soon as possible after significant waste accumulates in the storage structures .
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may he over applied while
meeting the N requirements. In the future, regulations may require
farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses nitrogen,
at your operation will accumulate sludge. This sludge mu
precautionary measures to prevent over a lication of nutrients or other elements. This slud " e will
need to have a waste analysis performed -on it beforeatwlication takes place.
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the infiltration rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such
r that runoff or ponding occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil texture,
water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount should not exceed the available water
holding capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
It is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure that an irrigation system is installed
to properly irrigate the acres shown in table 1. Failure to apply the recommended rates and amounts of
nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying forage plants under stress condition. Nitrate poisoning may
occur in livestock. Sampling forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.
13
2124/00

t
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are available for waste application. It
will not be necessary and may not be desirable to apply waste to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual nitrogen (N) requirements of the
crop to be grown based on the potential productivity of the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the Nitrogen that can be reasonably applied
to the crop and used by the crop in a timely manner using animal waste alone. It will not be practical to
meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with animal waste. Supplemental applications of commercial
fertilizer may be required during the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient needs. It is assumed
that for certain row crops only a fraction of the total annual nitrogen requirement can be applied using
animal waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on each field on the Department of
Water Quality Waste Application Record Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field application tables:
'
CROP
CODE
CROP
f j
PRODUCT'N
UNITS
. NITROGEN
REQUIREM'T
LBS./UNIT
CG
CORN - GRAIN
BUSHELS
1.13
CS
CORN - SILAGE
TONS
11.0
HCS
HAY, COOL SEASON, NOT GRAZED
TONS
45
HGL
HAY, GRASS -LEGUME MIX, NOT GRAZED
TONS
20
HSG
HAY, SMALL GRAIN, NOT GRAZED
TONS
55
PCS R
PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
13.34
OG
OATS -- GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
1.15
WG
WHEAT - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
2.05
RG
RYE GRASS - GRAZED
AUM
9
!4
2124100

WASTI; UTILIZATION PLAN
The following legend explains the soil codes which represent the specific soil types that are found in the
fields which are available for animal waste application:
SOIL
SOIL
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
CODE
TYPE
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
AfB
Altavista fine sandy loa
(2-6%)
CW
Chewacla
Subject to flooding
Wa Warne and Roanoke
fine sandy loams Subject to wetness
15
2124100

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
�!. amu,:., �-, �A qty.'. r�•� i�£ ,�;A �,'.'a. � ��.c.`'�'; ' �q.. �� .`� YYr'�:�`".. ,�$ � k .- ''` *s .�:.'�
Table la: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N
Tract Field Hydr. Pull Type Crop Anticipated Wetted Required Required
No. No. No. No. Code Codd Yield/ac Acresl Per Ac.Per Pull
8294
1/ ?
2
B
Wa
CS
22 tons
4.8
- 220
1,056
8294
x 2
3
C
Wa
CS
22 tons
4.0
220
880
8294
X
3
D
Wa
CS
22 tons
6.6
220
1,452
8294
3
4
E
Wa
CS
22 tons
3.6
220
792
8294
3
4
F
Wa
-CS
22 tons
4.8
220
1,056
8294
4`9
1
A
Wa
CS
22 tons
6.0
220
1,320
8294
5
5
G
Wa
CS
22 tons
3.9
220
858
8294
5
5
H
Wa
CS
22 torts
3.6
220
792
8294
5
6
I
Wa
CS
22 tons
2.9
220
638
8294
5
6
J
Wa
CS
22 tons
3.2
220
704
TOTALS THIS TABLE:
43.4
9,548
l The wetted acreage represents the total acreage of the field under the guns. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely
will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for.
N must be based on realistic yield expectation. Fgures indicate what is available using the assumed application method at the rates as
indicated on pare 20 "Narrative of Operation
3 Time of application for: CS - Mar -Jun, RG & WG - Feb -May & Sep -Nov, PCS: Feb -May & Sept -Dec
16 I0/18/01

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
{ u -s �, as��•;,z F4 _� .% .1'�, x' 41.i,:-a'A - r e.
{
Table Yb: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Soil
Realistic
Lbs. N
Lbs. N
Tract Field Hydr. Pull Type 'Crop .
Anticipated
Wetted
Required Required
No. No. No. No. Code Code3
Yield/ac
Acresl
Per Ac.Per Pull
8294
/Y
2
B
Wa
RG
9 AUM
4.8
100
480
8294
1-3
3
C
Wa
RG
9 AUM
4.0
100
400
8294
d 3
3
D
Wa
RG
9 AUM
6.6
100
660
8294 '
-X 3
4.
E
Wa
RG
9 AUM
3.6
100
360
8294'
3
4
F
Wa
RG
9 AUM
4.8
100
480
8294
4`
1
A
Va
RG
9 AUM
6.0
100
600
8294
5
5
G
Wa
WG
50 Bu
3.9
100
390
8294
5
5
H
Wa
WG
50 Bu
3.6
100
360
8294
5
6
I
Wa
WG
50 Bu
2.9
100
290
8294
5
6
J
Wa
WG
50 Bu
3.2
100
320
TOTALS THIS TABLE:
43.4
4,340
1 The wetted acreage represents the total acreage of the field under the guns. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely
will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for.
N must be based on realistic yield expectation. Figures indicate what is available using the assumed application method at the rates as
indicated on page 20 "Narrative of Operation ".
3 Time of application for: CS - Mar -Jun, RG & WG - Feb -May & Sep -Nov, PCS: Feb -May & Sept -Dec
17 10/18/01

i
soil
Tract Field Type
No. No. Code
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
S
Table Ic: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Recommended Recommended
.Lbs. N Lbs. N
Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to be to be
Crop Anticipated Usable_ Required Required Applied Applied
Coded Yield/ac Acresl Per Ac. Per Fld. PerAc/pl.2 Per.Fld/pl
8294
•6'�f
Cw
CS
22 tons
11.8
220
2,596
220
2,596
8294
6-f
CW
WG
50 Bu
11.8
100
1,180
100
1,180
TOTALS THIS TABLE
23.6
3,776
3,776
1 The wetted acreage represents the total acreage of the field under the guns. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most likely
will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for.
N must be based on realistic yield expectation. Figures indicate what is available using the assumed_ annlication method at the rates as
indicated in "Narrative of Operation".
3 Time of application for: CS-' Mar -Jun, RG & WG - Feb -May & Sep -Nov, PCS: Feb -May & Sept -Dec
18 10/18/01

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
.'able 2 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total nitrogen to be applied using animal waste for
all fields which are available for. waste application.
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
This summary indicates that only about 63 percent of the total annual nitrogen requirements can be provided for
the crops as listed for the fields available using animal waste produced on this livestock operation.
M
19 10/18/01
RECOMMENDED
SUPPLEMENTAL
NITROGEN
LBS. N TO
OR RESIDUAL
Acres
REQUIREMEN
BE APPLIED
LBS. OF N
Useable
IN POUNDS
USING WASTE
REQUIRED
FROM TABLE 1 a
43.4
9,548
9,548
0
FROM TABLE lb
43.4
4,340
4,340
0
FROM TABLE 1c
23.6
3,776
3,776
0
TOTALS
110.4
17,664
17,664
0
AMOUNT OF N PRODUCED
11,090
c'61� OR DEFICIT
6,574
This summary indicates that only about 63 percent of the total annual nitrogen requirements can be provided for
the crops as listed for the fields available using animal waste produced on this livestock operation.
M
19 10/18/01

�,y .}•F9 1. 4t J f,r i i%r.'- '•� RY r S'� V1' fl'N 1P1) kP - :>.f r a �,- /;,
1 '! vi `4 r 7' Po,
,4�. f r.x• F 5,:,}r , v }.I�y 54i �f e. i; ,S3",t 'N^r,. yr," t`. ; is �s •?4rY"TW.' "1� ri r Gt�� w r,�;
�; a �+( fi 1l�7� �•7 7 d i" C ✓ � -}f. d • �. ��F� rr ••� �� � -,. r !"j ^' s 1 +Jtit i4;
t4n,.*�t"d,, �4 a'�: '¢ kfi•�q•.e+ Y�, 4tj» y�.,,+th
tt* t? k i r_ u x at,
: 7 4 s9�uideb C �t.
t r ,� ►3 i, 7 4" µ _, lk 7 7^ � r'�`l �x,'i.. � a �, sr.� �,(,��'•'�,.t �� �j � � `yT �Si `� tY -�.i_tr i h�rr �•. i'},,,*3 I _.
tt".I� � �•'� � � " � jl-a y� ti L � .:...'. . ,rR � 7�L nC �? 1, ": �.yisrlr.i dg -� r'rl "r isi7t r,` 07; x�t a S a
``d"'
tr I, i , � t �' - � � """F` r{ � s Y! �' p �y, 1� i } 7 1� � • -rrl � v ,' ^}
f ti�-e ,,1+��y���...-"+. ?y -f 1`{ ^�� r�i� -•.. r�' A4��,r,�rJ�.�,y��.w.,,.rl•'.vrs � �'i4�q�r�;3'}�+i�rffS ry�"F'^s_ ,r y if
+- i. t. rY °F` ^3,t£� i 1�-� •. :'ia .' , �.` 1 ,W` p J.,. _
•`' •'� �� � is �. t Wt. �,� 4 +�� F �. �
C _'�•*�.�, .c�.� r r�-��7 sc Y� tiy,-,F�r f y .,' C'ij � r p{. t r k . �, �:
• ti r 5'7 r� � • s } �f,. � -{ �r}{.'1'.�� � �t flr � + 1
. `{^ • •� '� ;4..k +'�' v7��Vt 3�`rk'i�y�a,�Lry g��` 1 t71+ �+'1 �;.. .. � � •t-., r'� '.L' i F�r 11 �� ,(, t r�
++ .` + �� r�,f • t c`''te�1 j ��jil .- � 1 �4 `;��` � - � •.. Y y ;,1� 'i, �"�i., , � �p[rr�'� #.� +}i yrs" l[�• 7~
° [-,+�,+.k Y e hr p• %3.`E 3ta �l "� tµi ai�� �: t r ,44 e' :• 1f �'. is ��y r }\. 1i Y " i�r[}
•''�. `hi 17 `aa�1. y'r ''�1 4 .' t r;4e ��.8 •�.Yr'trr,'T,i+N ... tl.E a�� (�•
' ' } J: h: ,r �'• ; 1 e A�y('s� _ u •f, •, C ° a r • {4 , •srt"; - i EEE M
'r'r .lC 4FSl r•+'�: L.F'+S 4 } - C++1.� ! f t - ,'i�ai/ ✓7 i in 7''�� s S 4 ' i k
a „7• p e+ r+• #r
d _7y1•r>✓+' Nil' pi r�!Y . �I !1 r!� 'fyi•". -'"' r� , 7- •i
'"°' "{'i ��' c'a ,�(. ;'•� .1 r ♦ T �"� �i�� +q k`�.-'! i I J4 •� .-,r`Trt J � 3' 1 1I� #'� ,��"� �[ � & .r•"` r "� S � ;d.
' � ''�'t 1 r• + l i■ f tY
,}. 7tyT.#j;ad•+,r4 ��74 7 4,i i "-t y�, '�'i !.rli ,i �: -f;, 1t�_ i' IEr'�M '.a xf CT7i •aJrl S k '/i I a•"'
043t IT
' ' 3Y x 'K i7;` r��, ' '*+-�^-. k 1 aj+' y"` � 1 r 1� � '�rr7 en,� !Y;•: y� '' �:ia�S[ Y,� � � . t -r• f � '
a�L'• , ^Vqy R r, ,fa.7 -, 1-'�. x, p i x •,aN 'M- u 1 1 iii. ,.lr r.,..w �, .(fir-/ 1 (' y' y'k '�` ' '. 1 �:
'{ (�>..k • � n u r • fJ a Y+ +i. � •k 4 . 'C ,1t� 7 1h (. z y t w,+.� ,.._ ry
x « _ � ty . •� �.' '. s � 'yt t. �_ a � Y . e k�A ti' v,:, t Y-�'"��4;� �y` � { �•i `�'rff+..+ '; t
h
r7 �
�,,�� y.� •'.k�I/.�ra1�3y '*�lr�'.^: a?4 sSrlynv /rW7%�{�,7`i: } 1 �r'&:7j�''��j .k,��t..''• r•t',
.hA +F.'Kj, :9 +?r s,e�"tt�i. n,�'.'-.;'�`c^; +�. • i7 'p.�s •,_�....,tl+Y7�y.,4 ;. j�er'• fq- f,� �,#�l"� I"
•. � 1 ,.+�kf w. y,� t 171. `Ns. V '� f (++1�v, t'�i{�C �`� r -41` pk y��;1�g' l r,
�,a.�a� •��•� y,; $�j�•�]y��Y�`U��� , 4�t•,itk- � l� �r�jF•k(r� 7 I'r M c :4°� ( •"' Y i � � ��4a'ri {}1�.�' � ��'ti i - Z� \ � f � r " i
•'iti:y Inw T"r "'y
1
MW
!v. y�+.iA'•rK-'�r""?Y-%'�� r11e[: a, 5 t} ��•a"My.,,1'".4 µit �kkf:,�:'_�t r iFi•�rry` �''", Tf rf I'•,r
��, �' �1'n Y ri�'�� y. ' S� '�"'µce-'*f`z.,��,,. .� i�, 4 , '��-.. t�`��',. x- ,.f►'yrYkTr� � � ` �, ii- l� '_!! ti,. e '.'.�r.7�� r t r .,
iz r�7�h s.4• ti 'yet+'�*•>x•�, I+. py � '' I .c tE r,,y � � i y i ; "w, a '. G � 7
'x• 3, � t'4 �t,.y��[[r ,Ga 'k"• (]9'°,.i•�i. � �f,� •M.�.�$etf. Yv, ! `l�y� � ,!1 i S l�• .e
T^i 41 "•�_�' lh+a'f�Y{{ Yi'1' _t'f7' T++'� J I `�.';S �"M�"4a �., ?I 1 2 ] 1_ r?'�� Y, F i ,: � r � r ] � �,y, '
M p f 1 [ 1 r• 5! `k �.r,,,Jhv 4 4'�y7J'" � '!+1 ��.:.,'�cr "iy�-, fSt�a� r^+' Y _ ',� � `s h�,� _• � ` "-,"-:�"r a 1 � rs �y ". t+, r F q I R }( .
`� ++S f �'// 1 �: # ' �_ t � ( [.^.fY J5�} i � i4 �� •.1 },- • . fit• .i'S_LI7� �'4 i �7w� > �2 t�. 1. k '
S A k t; Kr 1 ti �i+,}XY F C� rt. Y, h,, s t+a,t a +,► , ; ;
'' - .a y�F�i _. 1 i 7Y • �[— •�^ �i�•7 { r it �s J rya �. c t di.: � v� li -Aii,
� � ;: fps a�!`.+.p � jy `! ��r . � 4 a a f"•�+`��•�. i7 -i � • v `ay� fi� :. , }+ J ,� I l�x,i
s j °v i � � F# s +- � t,W r�Y ✓`.! e v t � s . y �,• 1� r4 < r ,.• I � ' �� F .
u ' t3�'- �7 r� ,.p '�':t x �•, l j t i �wi �r ai, .. .. .rr -,p_
V;rn;?,�41y"hi,�-.•Na1!*. .: t � ,t• )' < d i,.��r47 �. * -
._ a, �! �r•"-.,✓

WASTE 'UTILIZATION -PLAN
• r z
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to
the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of
Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2. The Field Office must have documentation in the design folder that
the producer either owns or has a notarized long term agreement for
use of adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the
producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste,
he/she shall provide NRCS with a copy of a notarized agreement
(sample enclosed) with a landowner who is within a reasonable
proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application
for the life expectancy of the production facility. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure an update of the
Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation,
increase in the number of animals, method of utilization, or available
land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at
the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Animal waste may be applied to land that has a
Resource Management System (RMS) or an Alternative Conservation
System (ACS). If a RMS or ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will
be used where runoff leaves the field.. These filter strips will be in
addition to "Buffers" required by DWQ.
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when the wind is blowing or
any other condition exists which may cause a danger of drift from the
irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
1. provided the application does not occur during a season prone to
flooding.
23
2/24100

The waste from WSP #1 and WSP #2 will be agitated as per the "Operation & Maintenance Plan" with
a waste sample taken from each and analyzed.
The total amount of waste and waste water generated per year in both WSP #1 and WSP #2 is
2,544,157 gallons or 93.7 acre inches. Both Waste Storage Ponds (WSPs) have approx. four (4) months
storage. It is recommended that the WSPs be emptied at least every four (4) months. It is not
recommended to apply waste on cool season grasses during December through February and late May
through early August.
The amount of waste contained in WSP #1 is 1,311,453 gal./year with approximately 4,328 lbs. of Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN)/year (based on a 3 year average of actual waste analysis of 3.3 lbs./1000gal).
This gives about 12 acre -inches of wastewater and 89.6 lbs. PAN/acin every three (3) months.
The amount of waste water contained in WSP #2 is 1,237,704 gal./year with approximately 1,485 lbs.
PAN/year. This gives about 11.4 acre -inches of wastewater and 32.6 lbs PAN/acin every three (3)
months.
The gun is a Long engine drive with 850 ft of 4.5" ID PE hose and a Nelson P200 gun with a 1.2 taper
bore nozzle. The gun has an output of 380 gal/min.; with .35 -inch application rate it will require a travel
speed of 6 ft/min. If the reel has a hose length of 850 ft. divided by 6 ft/min equals 142 min./pull. At
142 min./pull x 380 gals = 53,960 gals/pull or 2 acin./pull.
WSP #1 - With 2 acin./pull x 89.6 lbs PAN/acin. = 179 lbs. PAN/pull. Given the hose length of 850 ft
and an effective wetted dia. of 287 ft = 5.6 ac/pull. With 179 lbs. PAN/pull divided by 5.6 ac. = 32 lbs
PAN/ac. being applied. At this low application rate it will take approximately 135 acres to empty WSP
#1 every four months. It is recommended more than one application be made to the same acres at a
later time as long as the total lbs. of PAN does not exceed that required by the crop. Make sure no
runoff occurs.
WSP #2 - With 2 acin /pull x 32.6 lbs. PAN/acin. = 65.2 lbs PAN/pull. -Given the hose length of 850 ft
and an effective wetted dia. of 287 ft = 5.6 ac/pull. With 65.2 lbs. PAN/pull divided by 5.6 ac. =11.6
lbs PAN/ac. being applied. At this low application rate it will take approximately 128 acres to empty
WSP #2 every six months. It is recommended more than one application be made to the same acres at
a later time as long as the total tbs. of PAN does not exceed that required by the crop. Make sure no
runoff occurs.
The example above is used only as an example of one way to manage the structures.
An option of management for the two WSP's would be to irrigate out of WSP#1 and use
WSP#2 to refill WSP#1 as needed to provide better agitation and a more irrigable liquid. A
special note should be made to sample the waste far proper analysis due to the dilution.
*Caution needs to be made in pulling out the gun
buffer areas. -A ae ae
avoid over spray onto the
3-
2
22 10/11/02
S
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
' "Tv
Ii
j
f '` iy;
�
IS 1 .� ! 1 } �I i +-.`I..
''i. 1 .7ri• f'�'.,�
>L'
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION _
The waste from WSP #1 and WSP #2 will be agitated as per the "Operation & Maintenance Plan" with
a waste sample taken from each and analyzed.
The total amount of waste and waste water generated per year in both WSP #1 and WSP #2 is
2,544,157 gallons or 93.7 acre inches. Both Waste Storage Ponds (WSPs) have approx. four (4) months
storage. It is recommended that the WSPs be emptied at least every four (4) months. It is not
recommended to apply waste on cool season grasses during December through February and late May
through early August.
The amount of waste contained in WSP #1 is 1,311,453 gal./year with approximately 4,328 lbs. of Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN)/year (based on a 3 year average of actual waste analysis of 3.3 lbs./1000gal).
This gives about 12 acre -inches of wastewater and 89.6 lbs. PAN/acin every three (3) months.
The amount of waste water contained in WSP #2 is 1,237,704 gal./year with approximately 1,485 lbs.
PAN/year. This gives about 11.4 acre -inches of wastewater and 32.6 lbs PAN/acin every three (3)
months.
The gun is a Long engine drive with 850 ft of 4.5" ID PE hose and a Nelson P200 gun with a 1.2 taper
bore nozzle. The gun has an output of 380 gal/min.; with .35 -inch application rate it will require a travel
speed of 6 ft/min. If the reel has a hose length of 850 ft. divided by 6 ft/min equals 142 min./pull. At
142 min./pull x 380 gals = 53,960 gals/pull or 2 acin./pull.
WSP #1 - With 2 acin./pull x 89.6 lbs PAN/acin. = 179 lbs. PAN/pull. Given the hose length of 850 ft
and an effective wetted dia. of 287 ft = 5.6 ac/pull. With 179 lbs. PAN/pull divided by 5.6 ac. = 32 lbs
PAN/ac. being applied. At this low application rate it will take approximately 135 acres to empty WSP
#1 every four months. It is recommended more than one application be made to the same acres at a
later time as long as the total lbs. of PAN does not exceed that required by the crop. Make sure no
runoff occurs.
WSP #2 - With 2 acin /pull x 32.6 lbs. PAN/acin. = 65.2 lbs PAN/pull. -Given the hose length of 850 ft
and an effective wetted dia. of 287 ft = 5.6 ac/pull. With 65.2 lbs. PAN/pull divided by 5.6 ac. =11.6
lbs PAN/ac. being applied. At this low application rate it will take approximately 128 acres to empty
WSP #2 every six months. It is recommended more than one application be made to the same acres at
a later time as long as the total tbs. of PAN does not exceed that required by the crop. Make sure no
runoff occurs.
The example above is used only as an example of one way to manage the structures.
An option of management for the two WSP's would be to irrigate out of WSP#1 and use
WSP#2 to refill WSP#1 as needed to provide better agitation and a more irrigable liquid. A
special note should be made to sample the waste far proper analysis due to the dilution.
*Caution needs to be made in pulling out the gun
buffer areas. -A ae ae
avoid over spray onto the
3-
2
22 10/11/02

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
.. y 4rva.k - 1 .,i.6. ' „�, i t ' / ,!sw , ' H �� ,E ' • { � F l ,
t Ydn � ��� N r � } ar.iry ✓ - f-. �a }' #a.:, r���r � f � s � ; �L �+Q, J� ',�„-,, ±� � _s� �,-h1� 7 r I ., v
Application of Waste by Irrigation
Using a Traveling Gun
Tract
Field
Soil
Crop
Application
Application
No.
No.
Type
CS
Rate
Amount
8294
4
Wa
CS
m./hr.
inches
8294
1
Wa
CS
.35
1.0*
8294
3
CW
CS
.35
1.0*
8294
4
Wa
CS
.35
1.0*
8294
6
CW
CS
.35
1.0*
8294
8
AM
CS
.50
1.0*
8294
1
Wa
WG
.40
1.0*
8294
3
CW
WG
.35
1.0*
8294
4
Wa
WG
.40
1.0*
8294
6
Cw
WG
.35
1.0*
8294
8
AfB
WG
.50
1.0*
*This amount is never reached in application of waste water due to the amount of solids
contained in the waste water coating the leaf surface. Application amount is always lower.
23
10/11/02

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
7. Liquid waste shall be ed n
q al apply at rates of to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in
a method which does not cause drift from the site during application.
No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive to
odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the
plant. This is an important consideration where swine, poultry or
other ammonia rich waste is being surface applied. Surface broadcast
solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are matted.
Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25
percent of the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a
concern where diluted, low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface
broadcast from a liquids holding structure. Where crops are severely
damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot assimilate the
nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
- occur. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also
be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. On soils with a high potential for leaching, multiple
application at lower rates should be used. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production & reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on bare soil, or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm
shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and
from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or
canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities sited on
or after October 1, 1995,) shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
24
2124100

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
,wR: 'i�•'`Czti�C.r�ti:'�'#A"'T}�'vl.L _�W'i':"i.:.C.
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
s g
other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right -df -ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal
waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands provided they have
been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways which
discharge directly into water courses. If animal waste is to be applied
on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no -runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., , shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon/holding pond embankments, berms, pipe
runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these
areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon/holding pond
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon/ holding pond
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing an "approved
closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal
discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
, inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be
applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during
the crop season.
25
2/24100

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
'� _ ry:rp •x' .aa...�-ai r �, "���R - ra ye j�,. w.yv P tip' -f' ri !
.��If"„F„ 'll�.;'�i�+�M�`". is�b�s".��,d'^..r�'hw�a'��.'3'k.��'�..x :}... i...h4 '•'�r,r).�4�.1::k��..� Yt!•V.. :7.:�i": �'.
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
l 21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top
and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain
the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining element. Zinc and
copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. Soil pH
shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for
five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC
regulations. North Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that
dead animals be disposed of within 24 hours in a manner approved
by the state veterinarian.
26
2124/00

WASTE- UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: Bell Creek Farm
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in the approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we)
know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or
construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that
there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm
event less severe than the 25 -year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on-site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be available for review
by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation or other equipment, to land apply
the animal waste described in this Waste Utilization Plan. The equipment must be available at the
appropriate time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon, holding pond, tank, or other unroofed
storage structure in a 25 year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste will be applied on
the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: Burt A. Bell
t (Please print)
Signature: -�`�� j�- � � Date: 3 Od
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) John Stevenson _
Affiliation: Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District
Address (Agency): 201 Water St.
Statesville,_ NC 28677
704-873-6761
Signature: Date:
27
2124100

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment l i •
and Natural Resources ✓ '�
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1N.C. Dgrr. Wr
WflfMONMENT, HRALTH
b
April 6, 2000 NATURAL RESOURCM
BURT A. BELL APR 11 2000
BELL CREEK FARM
178 BELL FARM ROAD 4MOf WMMMAI RAIMMM
STATESVILLE NC 28625 mm"Wi Emu
Im
Subject: Application No. AWC490054
Additional Information Request
Bell Creek Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Iredell County
Dear Burt Bell:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a review of the submitted information. Additional information is required
before we can continue our review. Please address the following by May 6, 2000:
The information received answered the items in the previous letter however, the revisions to the Waste
Utilization Plan were not signed and dated by the owner and the technical specialist. Please contact your
technical specialist to take care of this. Only the revised pages need to be submitted with the proper
signatures and dates.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before May 6, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H.0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North -
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
BURT A. BELL
BELL CREEK FARM
178 BELL FARM ROAD
STATESVILLE NC 28625
Dear Burt Bell:
February 17, 2000
..--NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURA, RFiVyR�c�Es
SWIRONMENT, HEAU131A.
aP NATURAL RESOURCES
FEB 21 2000-
1XISI11i Of €ifVINIMMAL MAu'rrTINI
NOURISVILIE kit-16HAt OFFICE
Subject: Application,No. AWC490054
Additional Information Request
Bell Creek Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Iredell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by March 18, 2000:
The irrigation parameters listed in your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) exceed current recommendations.
Irrigation events are to be listed in the WUP as the maximum application allowable for that soil type from
the time the pumps are turned on until the time they are shut off. The application events listed in your WUP
appear to be out of the Sprinkler Irrigation Guide. The Application Amounts listed in this guide have not
been adjusted for the application of animal waste. It is currently recommended that total application
amounts not exceed one inch in any application event for any soil type. If your application rates need to be
adjusted for the application of animal waste, please have your Technical Specialist revise your WUP to
reflect the appropriate application amount per event. If the rates exceed the recommended one inch, please
have your Technical Specialist justify the increased application rate in the narrative of your WUP.
2. Your WUP lists the nitrogen application rate on rye grass as 182 pounds per acre. This is higher than the
currently recommended 100 pounds per acre on any winter annual. Please contact your technical specialist
to revise the WUP or provide justification that supports the increased application rate as shown in the
current WUP. Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the
technical specialist.
3. On page 17 of your WUP, there appears to be a small typo. Field 4 is listed as being in corn silage but the
yield and application amounts are the same as for rye grass. Please review and have your technical
specialist revise as necessary.
4. Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are to be implemented at this facility should be identified (check
the appropriate BMPs) on the Mortality Management Checklist.
5. Your certification indicates that your irrigation system was installed after September 30, 1996. Since it was
installed after that date, your irrigation design must be part of your Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan. Please submit this.
5. Your facility was certified for 220 dairy animals on November 24, 1998. With your application, you
submitted a certification amendment for 243 total animals in order to correct the certified number. The
WUP submitted and the included calculations are all based on 258 total animals (15 additional calves). We
cannot permit a facility for a higher number than it is certified for. Please review this with your technical
specialist and submit a revised certification amendment, if necessary.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Application No. 49-0054
Burt Bell
Page 2
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to'my attention at the address -below. The -information requested by this leiter must be
submitted on or before March 18, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 364.
Sincerely,
Dianne Thomas
Soil Scientist
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File

1'
7
✓,o
� Division of Water Qtiahty ` �, t , + k i i o tt 9 to rya fr=.
t Faclllty N ' h zp ,,, _ _, f, a _ �4,�` J. -
i S 3 c }
umber �� Q Dtvtsion of 5oik and W ter Conservation _ �{r .
tar• r,, ? �_ +,� x..k {t fC . y M ^ 4.f, 5.�+•.!1i i i .� i t- ;: rL7 7i" °i d,
"0
W, AgencyH � �'a,, �`Y � � � t. ?=s i esp kr y rt , x i( � ,"h 1
i.:, N:S-�li ?Y,m'. i_•�r.s - ee. $ _'". :.-!+ S "-s».�� ; - ,'.: ... .. _ _ - K4a.^'13... .w.. a'. - -.fes... .!„�.".
Type of Visit `® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: os/ lo Arrival Time: ���{��` Departure Tinte: County: � U Region:
Farm Name: ����--- C V�� �" V' v� Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ Phonc: _
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: . Title: Phone
Onsite Representative: _ Integrator:
Certified Operator:! Operator Certification Number: _
Back-up Operator: _ Back-up Certification Numbe .
Location of Farm: Latitude: [=e Longitude: =° !
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population.
❑ La er
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
Laye
Non -
Other
Design . Current
Cattle —Capacity, Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ DaiEy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stockei
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
h. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
12/28/04 Conthjued
❑ Ye
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Nod.
El NE
El Yes
[I No ZA
❑ NE
No A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Conthjued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No �<A ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes,� o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thre t, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the'structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑.Yes k& ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Y<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes N ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any re uire cs, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ YesV
NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Windows ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) C-4 `1 n 1 wag `-
ti"l'�� CW �?
13. Soil type(s) V e 41'
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? a d 4 Yes o El NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
lT t•; jF}}Jij-.••x..k r]}:1�x
Comments (refertouestlon;#) .Explain"any YES.answers and/or any recommendaf�ons orrany other:comments x?�)„7F `'
P 5C'.y ;.YstiA�y
Use drawingspof facility to 6etter.explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):,
:.s r3�, �k.ti +"�'�...�r.,, `,..,..'. r. •.. "-�:..•: «,�. +p...o t^,.u,. �.�.i��;++ ..�S.v'_ � / h 3 •. F. r- i',3s,_. .3�: ..�ti��:,
V V
97
Reviewer/lnspector Name `, ` ” '� t t. z.r ? ; �, Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued
!

h
Facility Number: -- date of Inspection
Required Records &_Documents `
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes " Tg ❑ NA ❑ NE
20., Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 69EO❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box, OW JP c lists
❑ Design Other
21 . Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�WasteiJationeekhyFreeboard Waste Analysisoil Analysisaste Transfe �,An�nual Certification
�
El Sy
Rainfall eekEl�_ irr Crop Yield_J MinutenspM 'y and 1n nspections `LI Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No A [INE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? (] ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
�
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ``! ❑ Ye ❑VNo[j
❑ N
VVW
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? o, "Vt ❑ Yes ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
29, Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �9NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
1.
32.
33,
Didthe facility to notify the regional office of ems situation
er encs as required by
General PermiO Ciel discharge, freeboard problems, over applieation)
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discusscuss r' viewinspection with an on-site representative?
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes 'I< ■ NA ■ NE
■ Yes -2�.o EINA EINE
Addrtitinal;Coin'en ts-and/'Drawirigs:
12/28/04
12/28/04

M
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490054 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1490054 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Somoliance InspUction Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine, , County: Irede11 Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/10/2009 Entry Time:03-30_PM Exit Time: 05.00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bell Cre k Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Burt A Bell Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 115 Farmwocd Dr Statesville NC 28625
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant n Not Compfiant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 55°4Q'47" Longitude: 80'47'42"
At the intersection of Hwy 70 and bell Farm Road (SR 2316), travel north approximately 1.5 miles on Bell Farm Rd. Dairy is on the left
side of Rd. General location: approximately 3 miles east of 1-77
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Burt Bell Operator Certification Number: 24623
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James BeaIle Phone: [phone]
Ext.2182
Inspector Signature: Dato:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
11/30/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.05 Lbs/1000 Gailons
07/20/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.03 Lbs11000 Gallons
10/01/09 > Soil Analysis
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
tF,acility is currently in the process of closure.
'jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWI490054
Inspection Date: 12110/2009
Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspectian
A
Facility Number: 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
s
Cattle -Milk Cow 0 0
Total Design Capacity: 0
Total ssLW: 0
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond PRIMARY
aste Pond SECONDARY 32.00 48.00
Page: 2

A
Permit: AW1490054 owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date: 12/10/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
n
n
discharge?
Structure
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
Application Field
Q
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
rl
Other
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ targe trees, severe
C!
b.
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
t
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
0,
or closure plan?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
i=
■
f1
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
rl
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ targe trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
0,
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures iack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
rl
Page: 3

Permit: AW1490054 owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date: 12110/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%!10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
fl
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application -outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
Cl
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Y=1
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a tack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents.
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 4
A

Permit: AVV1490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 12/10/2009 Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? rl
Checklists? 71
Design?
Maps? n
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
E1
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
i1
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall 8 monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?, '
fl
Stocking?
fl
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
rl
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
1=l
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
0.
Cl
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n
n
fl
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
fl
❑
■
Q
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
[I
■
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
0
■
0
I]
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
0
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page 5

Permit: AW1490054 Owner -Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date: 12/10/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regions{ Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
0 M 0 0
Page: 6

`r
rBealle, James
From: Beane, James
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 4:46 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: FW: Letter from danny edwards
fyi.. .
ib
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
James .Bealle <[e-mail]>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/D WQ/APS
From: Larick, Keith
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 4:36 PM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: RE: Letter from danny edwards
James,
Danny is correct that the zero animal permits do not require a certified operator.
There is a pretty decent summary of the requirements at the bottom of this email chain:
A few highlights:
- No annual fee
- No OIC requirement
Basic recordkeeping is required:
- Freeboard
- Waste application
- Soil analysis
- Waste analysis
Records not required:
- Crop yield
- Rainfall
- Mortality/stocking
They are still required to keep records anytime they apply waste. They are also required to have current waste and soil
analysis done.
The idea of the zero -animal permit is to keep inactive farms under permit coverage, but to give them a break on some of
the requirements that active farms have.

Keith '
Please note my new email address: [e-mail]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Bealle, James
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 1:51 PM
To: Larick, Keith; Edwards, Danny; Pitner, Andrew
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: FW: Letter from danny edwards
Keith/Danny,
Mr. Bell contacted me today regarding OIC issues at his dairy. I advised him prior to reviewing the attached
correspondence that a certification is required to apply animal waste, until proper closure of the structure has
been completed and documented. Burt plans to continue to pump out his Storage Pond as needed onto adjacent
fields even though he now has a Zero Population Permit. He has stated that he may begin to work with Iredell
SWCD/NRCS toward proper closure in the near future.
To maintain consistency in the Mooresville Region, in the past we have typically required an operator's
certification to pump out Lagoons/Storage Ponds in similar situations (even if essentially water) until proper
closure has been completed. Reason = verification of the removal of solids/sludges accompanies the closure
documentation. What are your thoughts on this?
jb
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
-----Original Message -----
From: Nina F. Bell [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:42 PM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: Letter from danny edwards
From: Burt Bell [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:40 PM
To: Nina F. Bell
Subject: FWD: FW: AW1510059PO90710-swine zero animal
Sent from AT&T's Wireless network using Mobile Email
------Original Message ------
From: Edwards, Danny <[e-mail]>
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 07:30 PM
2

-swine zero animal
Subject: FW: AWI510059P090710
Burt,
You do not need to keep you OIC certification up to date. The database is showing that you
are now under the zero animal permit.
From: Larick, Keith
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:39 Alk
To: [e-mail]; Edwards, Danny
Subject: AWI510059P090710-swine zero animal
An example zero -animal permit is attached. A few highlights:
No annual fee
- No OIC requirement
Basic recordkeeping is required:
- Freeboard
- Waste application
- Soil analysis
- Waste analysis
Records not required:
- Crop yield
- Rainfall
- Mortality/stocking
It also has basic 0&M requirements like maintaining the lagoon.
The key issue for swine farms - if a swine farm gets this permit, then they cannot come back
into business without meeting the Performance Standards.
Let me know if you have any questions or comments, and sorry it took so long to get it to
you.
Thanks,
Keith
*** eSafel scanned this email for malicious content ***
*** IMPORTANT: Do not open attachments from unrecognized senders ***
IMPORTANT: In compliance with federal law, the Rowan -Salisbury School System administers all
educational programs, employment activities and admissions without discrimination because of
race, religion, national or ethnic origin, color, age, military service, disability, or
gender, except where exemption is appropriate and allowed by law. The contents of this email
and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If
you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager or the sender
immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.
*** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals, and malicious content. ***
3

iI
Division of Water Quality
j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490054 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490064 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 0310612008 Entry Time:0_1'X PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bell Creek Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Burt A 90
Mailing Address: 115 Parmwood Or _- „ Statesvifle NC 28625
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°46'47" Longitude: 80°47'42"
At the intersection of Hwy 70 and Befl f=arm Road (SR 2316), travel north approximately 1.5 miles on Bell Farm Rd. Dairy is on the left
side of Rd. General location: approximately 3 miles east of 1-77
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Burt A Bell Operator Certification Number: 24823
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Burt A. Beil Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Burt A. Befl Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James BeailePhone. 704.663-1699
Ext.216.2,
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
12/14/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.5 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/08/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.4 Lbs/1000 Gallons
11/29/07 > Soil Analysis
14, Facility Operator is currently in the process of coordinating with Iredell SWCO/NRCS to revise the CAWMP to include additional
crops for waste application.
8
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date; 03!0612008 Inspection Type; Compliance inspecticn
Facility Number : 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle - Dairy Calf 46 0
Q Cattle - Dairy Heifer 66 0
O Cattle - Milk Cow 146 53
Total Design Capacity: 258
Total SSLW: 286,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aste Pond PRIMARY
kaste Pond SECONDARY 32.00 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490054 Owner • Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number : 490054
Inspection Date: 03/06/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
nn■o
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n Cl ■ Cl
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
Excessive Ponding?
!�
Hydraulic Overload?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
000
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. 1s storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e] large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl
000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yas
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
Cl
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
!�
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date: 03/06/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 499054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Cam (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Cats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, 8
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
■
n n n
Plan(CAWMP)? ,
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ n n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Cl
■ n n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■ n n
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■ n n
20. Does the facility fail to have al} components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

r
Permit: AWC490054 Owner • Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number : 490054
Inspection Date: 03/06/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? n
Checklists? n
Design? Cl
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
moo
23. If selected, did the facility fait to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A BeA Facility Number :490054
Inspection Date: 03/06/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ 00
Quaiity representative immediately,
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DVVQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? n ■ f i
.32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? n ■ n n
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? n ■ n
Page: 6

waste analysis
.4
'Subject: waste analysis
From. Burt Bell <[e-mail]>
Date Sat, 8 Mar 2008 08:42:55 -0800 (PST)
To: [e-mail]
I faxed my 2007 Soil Analysis to you Friday. On the other hand, sending my Waste Analysis results
will not be quite as prompt. However, the news is good. After you left the other day I had to do a
"mental tracer". I remembered taking the waste sample to Piedmont Research Farm, paying the amount
I was told there, and asking them to send the sample to Raleigh. I called the Agronomic Division, they
informed me that my sample -had been processed, and they would back date and mail the results to me,
(after I paid them one dollar more). Everything is now on go. I will fax you a copy of the waste results
and my recalculations.
Thank -you for your cooperation.
Burt
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. T isyt now.
of 1 311012008 9:32 AM

03/•06/2008 05:46 7048381870 RBTRANSPORT
FAX COVER
DATE: 3 0 8
PAGES TO FOLLOW: Sa„�
To:
From:
Subject:
PAGE 01

03/06/2008 05:46 7048381870 RBTRANSPORT PAGE 02
• �� � Cc �9�P�9-.iii i4ilfiiu"r21� 'Lli[lllY`.AJrQI•d�'1r�T!�;., -
_..:-tip.......
f `-�! fl 1. .. ... .. _- -. -- F.,, ...,� ■.a f_ ne��, .fin i.
4rr--71fY! !�� +wuwiiit, GA Jl'lmj'!SU
� _ lfYlnRg'a[r� �.�,.A.� uixr i��� v✓v- i Il.i%�-}-�i3�-%'"!E7 •
Lab#; ..— s610.1RAA. L
1 2504 DAVIT; AV15 NUE i SamplclD; BURT 3 I Acct#;
STATESVIL! E, NC 28625 1tc: �:s ed� i �fTW20u i -
iirowrr•� 1L1 Xr M i167AV
-I
{ } processed: 12/3/2007
I I Field ID: _
Elernedta Lab�Ida3ltrs-- --- - •--- - - � •—
Phnsplly�'Ir
I P01>t191um
I Me�ne;liam
C:nlcium
Fater pH
Surfer pH
Sulfur
- - - I � •limon
Zinc
Manganese
i Iron
Cropper
Sodtum
soluble M
N1lrate N
hYgONir
_ Mattrr
EIR
t _.
n
Ltr•
... ...
IbS./A
--- .___.. -- .- — '—•--- ._ v ore nl_ah
� _ _
305
Ibs./A
71 d 7
I L - j •
6.7
7-85
Ibs./A
Ibs./A
Ibs./A
.-
_
--- --•• ... -----...1 ............. -�--- ---- ._tea- . , ,_._,._.. _._ I
511 Mcky'vve
I 3atuf■tibn '- � i7i�: a�.r == � ii. iv•� .yY I i..+t- i}ir..-� � i
_ - u■■■rr�muurrtrllrur�rrr
Cro,N WHEAT Per ASC- ---- • V;-W--
Limr.
i i i i i i
.■r■i.rr, i�nnoi� � . L r
Tons/Acre " = Maintenance Recommendation
SPLIT APPLICATIONS OF NITROOEN RECOMMENDED. SULFUR SHOULD BE APPLIED WHEN THE TOPDRESS NITROGEN APPLICATION IS MADE.
FLAN I' SAMPLES SHOLI W bF. TAKEN DURrNO THe GROWWO 3EA3014 TO MONITOR THE NEED FOR ADD[T101+AL T VTR1EIiT3,

03166/2008 05:48
SOUTHERN STATES
2504 DAVIE AVENUE
'SIATESVILLE, NC 28625
7P4R1R1 A7A
RRTRANgPnRT
PNp- . Aq
Waters Asrric-uknral I
UL �J, I 257Newton Highway P.O.Box 382u LJ u C8mi11a, GA 31730
M(�9) 336-7216 FAX (229) A-116 7967 .. _. .
.__. Lab#: 96103 _....---------------
SAA --
AcctN-
SempleTD. BURT 3
Received: 1 1/29/2007
Grower: M•=�]+4nnIRY
(Processed: IZ/3f2007,
Field ID: I
Vements Lab Results Low —--Mtdiur-—'•AdtgaaS: --Mg: ..Ver7•ulg;;
Phoapborus
MAgr('-.'
Water pH
Bufftr p::
Sulfur
Boron
- Zinc
Manganese
Iron
j Copper
Aluminum
Sodium
Sato btc
Salta
Nitrate N
Organic
Matter
ENR
`
205
Ibs./A
I --------
BUJ
—
I
1
I
^t i nom•
1>'l
6.
I
lbs./A
lbs./A
--'-
S.a:arin 9 1VIg 15.7 .. r H: 14.9 . _ �._.. —..c
K. 2. I 1
cram rxer o„a: c•vdtr, troa a.s< 96 °% °� 8: 66.5 90
� n -
rr�u
Crop: WHEAT Fertility Recommendations/lbs. per Acre Yield: SILAOE
Lime Gypsum N F . ,.K mg 5 ....._...—_� _—.__.__.—_—.
$ Zn Mn Fe Cu
150 • 70
Tons/Acre = Maintenance Recommendation
SPLIT APP1,ICAT1()N3 OF T4MOOEN RECOMMENDED. SUl.+ VR SIdOUIM BE APPLIED WHEN THE TOPDRES5 NITROGEN APPLICATION 19 MADE.
PLANT SAMPLES SHOULD BE TAKEN DUR:NG THE GROW INU NLAJV N'l V M.Vtvat VK i FM' Ntj_v r•Vx AL7U1I1UNAL NV t K:t4N A,),

v
CD
LU
(D
a
a_
t-
0
0-
07
z
a
F-
rn
CD
M1
co
cn
OD
s
M1
Ln
v
m
.m
m
N
i
W
A)
i
m
• 0
NCDA&a Agronomic Division Plioae: [phone] Web Site: v w.ngV.eoWagrom=I/ Grower: M 41 H Dsdry Repn No: 0%66 6
Field leformation
Applied ilrne
Reeammemixtions
-
--
Sampie Na. LW Crup
No Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P2O5
�
_
NS S
Cee
Tat
B Alm See Note
BURT2
13t Crap- SmCmin S011 m Sri
0
80-100
0
2010
0 'a
C
0
psi$ 3
2nd Crop:
0
-_-_
Test Results
Swi cum mn W/V
CCC BS%
Ac pH 7.1 X-1
Ca%
HS%
MRI
Mx-AI(1)
Min -A!(2) .
;k-1 Zx-dl
Ch -1
5•1
SS -1 Nt13-N NH4-N
Ns
MIN 0.36 1.13
165 95.0
0.8 6.7 324 91
71.0
2I.0
228
136
'--fog
60E.
2i69
153
0.2
Field 1bff rmat'm
Applied time
Refomrmendations
Smrrple No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Ume
N
P2O5
fad
Mg S
Cm
i
Zat
B A% See Note
STP]
1st Crap: SmCmia S?Korn SII
0
80` 100
5(Y-70
50-7)
0 ?
0
0
l 3
2nd Crop:
--_
0
-_
Test Resuhc
Soil Class Nei% W/V
C8C BS%
Ac PH P-1 K -I
Ca%
A"
Afn-1
Nn-A1{l)
Adn-AI(2)
2i¢-1 ZwAI
C44,1
S -I
J&.1 ? PkAr M14 -N
Ns
MIN 0,46 1.13
9.1 87.0
1.2 5.9 33 69
63.0
21.0
713
439
Z64 264
_i46
49
0.1
Field lefesmatlon
Applied I ire
Remmutenda*m
Sample Are Luz Crop
No Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Z"e
N
P201
mg S
at
Zar
B Afn See Note
JMIA
A Crop: SmGtaln SilxOrtt So
0
so- 100
120.140
0-2{
0 0
0
0
pH$ 3
2nd Crop:
0
Test Results
Soil clan mn WN
C.EC BS%
At p N P-1 K-1
Ca%
Mg%
AIry1
Aire-ASI{I}
M -AI(2) .
2a-1 Za-AI
a} -1
S4
SS -.T .V(') -N NHs-N
AW
MIN 0.32 1.15
13.7 97.0
11.4 7.] 6 110
62.0
31.0
900
533
.309 309
1545
3E
-
- -
0.2
Field Infonnalke
Applied Lime
Reom u danoms
-
Sample Ne. Last Crap
No Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205
KPO
Afg S
Can
Zn
B MQ See Note
JM18
13t Crop: SmGrain S"orn Sil
0
80- I00
0
0
0 0
0
0
pHE 3
2nd Crop:
0
i esl Results
SoUClaas HAI% W/V
CFC RM
Ac pIl P-1 K-1
Ca%
At %
Alts•1
Rn-AI(1)
ft -X41(2) ,
Zn -1. Zrr-AI
Ca -1
Sd
SS -1 :1103-N NNi-N
Na
MIN 0.32 1.13
13.0 95.0
0.7 6.8 1615 165
66.0
23.0
338
20I
_521 521
1426
57
0.2
Field infornmilon
*Ued Lime
Reemmemdafims
_
Sample No. 1ae3t Crap
Ado Yr Y/A
Crop or Year
lime
N
P20s
K2O�
Afg S
C&
ZR
B bfx see Note
jMIC
fit Cmp. SmUrLin SUarrm Sfl
-4T
80-Ioa
a
10-30
a 0
0
0
0 3
2nd Crap:
0
Teat Re"10;
Soifaam Him W/V
aC aM
Ac PA P1 KI
Ca%
Afg%
Mn -1
"A1(1)
A1rrAC(2) ,
IN -1 Zee•A1
Cm -1
S4
SS -1 Y03 -N NH*N
AW
MIN 0-56 1.08
9-7 84.0
1.6 5.8 168 102
57.0
22.0
401
351
J62 362
591
53
0.2

03/4)5/2008 11:17 7048381870 RBTRANSPORT PAGE 01
"AX COVER
DATE: 3 / V16 S
PAGES TO FOLLOW:
To:
&'z4 -
From:
Subject: '

03/95/2008 11:17 7048381870 RBTRANSPORT PAGE 02
Date: March 14, 2008
To: James Bealle
From: Burt Bell
Subject: 2007 Waste .Analysis
Dear James,
- lrecaculated.;-n.xz xva—stP--**'r}?t YSf
_ lt �. ww,.a+.£, it I I _
iv CUICUY�&u .i"Au A. inti faked you d C:opy or a waste analysis and
application records. The waste analysis has the recexvGu [iaie circled.
Any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at your
earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
5�4�

r,
m
W
0
n
s—
0
0 -
LO
Q
tx
F-
m
m
Go
m
Go
v
m
r
ao
CD
m
N
u -h
m
m
I
FORM SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Sibe(Wetted Acres)=(Aj
Fame Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone # l %P y !1` d
Slurry and Slud6- Application Field Records
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Field #
Facility Number
Spreader Operator
and Address
Operator's Phone #
From Animal waste Management Plan
Crop Type I jRecommended PAN
Loading (iblacre) = (B)
(3) ray r9% (A) M ---- 1A)
Number
""N itrient bete of Loads
Source per
{mnllddJyrj per Field
Volume of
each Load"
(getlona)
Total Volume
(2} x (S)
Volume per Acre
(geilansraae)
(4)1(A)
, a5
Waste Analysts
PAN"
Ob11 OW pal)
PAN Applied
(lbfacre} h
(S) x (5} i low
'I4WWen Balance'^'
{Iblaere}
(8)-(7)
ppIr��0
1
Crop CrcJe Totals..
5
Owners Signature Spreader Operator's Signature -�
Certified Operator (print) Operator Certification No. _
Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Conrael a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
See your waste management pian for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required wttttin 60 days of land applicallon events. r
—Enter the value received by subtrat#rng column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7} from column (8) following each appliaatlon event
�—en or nutrient source (ie. La90GntSt0rage Pond I'D, comrnerhmi fertilizer, dry litter, etc)� '1212(}i
,,1Al EW) x f r1tr Lt r ;

FARM SLUR -2 hurry and Sludge Appiicatton Field Records
m One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Ld
a 'Tact Field #
Field 64e(Wetted P=es)=(A)cilit u., i
FaNumber
Farm (rwner Spreader Operator
Owners Address / /1 and Address
Ownees Phone # i`G' 4',; D — ? 3„ C? Operator's Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
m
Go
M
ED
r- crop CyrAe f Totals:
�
Owners SrgnatureJT -A Spreader Operator`s Signature
CD Certified Operator (print) Operator Certification No.
CD
m Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a lti al deafer if you do not have your ownees manual.
" Sea yourwaste management plan for sampling frequent At a 1•inimum, waste anal is (s
Lf) y- yg required wifhin sa days of land apptlratfan events.
® —Enter tate value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Co nue subtrecting column (7) from column (8} foflowing each application evenL
nter n�
�M u of source {re. Lagaonl5iorage Pond l0, commerical nr7izer, dry litter, etc,} � �JQ Zj 12i2012008
f , I XYi ti_'6
E
R
Crop Typef
N _
Recommended PAN:
!
Loading (Iblacre) = (B)
_
.Total
0M-T?—Number
...'NUfrisnE
Date
Volu`
Vo me
Volume perAtxe
Waste Anetyals
PAN Appfled
Nltrtigen Balance"`
can
Source
(mm{d00)
ofLoada
per Field
each Load"
(gallans)
(garlons)
(2) x (3)
(gawtiacre)
(4) f (A)
PAU—
(Ib11000 gal)
(Ihfacre)
(B) x (5)1 t000
pbracm)
(B) -
OfDk
m
Go
M
ED
r- crop CyrAe f Totals:
�
Owners SrgnatureJT -A Spreader Operator`s Signature
CD Certified Operator (print) Operator Certification No.
CD
m Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a lti al deafer if you do not have your ownees manual.
" Sea yourwaste management plan for sampling frequent At a 1•inimum, waste anal is (s
Lf) y- yg required wifhin sa days of land apptlratfan events.
® —Enter tate value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Co nue subtrecting column (7) from column (8} foflowing each application evenL
nter n�
�M u of source {re. Lagaonl5iorage Pond l0, commerical nr7izer, dry litter, etc,} � �JQ Zj 12i2012008
f , I XYi ti_'6
E
R

Ln
0
LD
a
a
r
m
CD
ro
m
Nr
m
r -
r
NCDA&CS ARramemIc DhisMm Phone: [phone] Web She: wtew.mcWamffsRl+asromV
Repwt:VW24
Gmer., M, Burt Copies Ta: USDA NRCS•teedell
15 Farmwaad Dr.
SJacmi e, NC 286778554
Waste Analysis Report
,Fkrrrvs:
ONIZ12UGS
hvdell County
Sample hian adw
laiwatwy gmdu (per per adUbs ank-m oRlempt momA
.Ya wpk D3; ,
N
P 9 Ca Mg
S Pa Mn za (fir 8 Alb
a C
7bra1 4io
196 12l 4% 190
133 485 15.8 23.2 38.2 3.00
BBWUPI
fN-N
Wash thele:
_J17F1
ALD
JIM]
Na 11 i Cd Ah
At Se Li PH 9 CIN DAN
CCB% AL.E
800
CL44
Daswlp+Ef—
09-N
s:
Nvh mb Adie far firsI
lbs/10M
tlt�ei eater
iba/1&99 –44—&M
rdit.v d*d
N m w Ca At S Fe Am zn
co 8 Mo Cf
Na Ni Cd A
Al Se LI
8maxst
3.5 2b Z.6 2.q i.l 0.77 2.8 0.09 015
R25 0.00
_
0.67
Sssttpfes �ed12114f1m7
3dlrltelle]NcCinnis, Ag�nnomlcl
The wrote p:*Mc1 m t Iw a war==m uda %tr. 4VI Wi(3n Wes should be based ncl only m cre0 rangen mptltrra t Ent ropperaacutnttb>tiagt in m itte spptihlionsae. LOaas an apglfadoes cdlite
mstttlel mag be [�cesmry 1a aroyl e>ssc aecsua��ietiaruf copper In the setl.
fie p8 of thebVm BQiud is bdaarLhr htrsl range. torbaclaial aflan mid wsmetraumem Ora&& ac u qH by aMVC I fu. of sgtkOural Itme per 1400 as, ft of bweraamAk4Inose bwaa Sxa*the
IWan - sndcontinueIOU" HutatlditvmI%inthedmired natp af7IAD
CD
CD
m
N
LO
ew
M
G

r E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490054 _ _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490054 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Com lian sQ_Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 0811612007_ Entry Time: 09:006M Exit Time: 10:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bell Creeh Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Burt A Bell
Mailing Address: 115-Farmwood Of Statesville NC 28625
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°46'47" Longitude: 80°47'42"
Atthe intersection of Hwy 70 and Bell Farm Road (SR 2316), travel north approximately 1.5 miles on Bell Farm Rd. Dairy is on the left
side of Rd. General location: approximately 3 miles east of 1-77
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues
Certified Operator: Burt A Bell Operator Certification Number: 24823
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative Burt A. Bell
24 hour contact name BurtA. Bell
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:r35'�t
Inspector Signature: Date: (Oh�a7
Secondary Inspector(s
Inspection Summary:
01/08/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.09 Lbs/1000 Gallons
11/07/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.4 Lbs/1000 Gallons
12/04/06 > Soil Analysis
21. Weather Code must be recorded on the designated form (enclosed), or approved alternative form,
24 Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
C.
Page: 1

r
Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 0811612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf 46 0
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 66 0
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 146 0
Total Design Capacity: 258
Total SSLW: 286,500
Waste Structures
Type tdentifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond PRIMARY
Waste Pond SECONDARY 32.00 48.00
Page: 2

0
r Permit: AVVC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date: 08116!2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Facility Number: 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Yes No NA NE
D■nn
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
LJ
■
LJ
Q
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
D
Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
171
Frozen Ground?
Q
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date: 0811612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No .NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Cam (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
0
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
Cl
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 4
A

i
Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? n
Design? ❑
Maps? ri
Other? 0
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall& monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■ Q
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDFS only)?
n
n ■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n ❑
Q
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
n ■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ Q
D
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n ■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
0
■ n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
0
■ n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

ru
Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n
■ n
❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ C)
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
0
■ 00
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Q
■ El
❑
Page: 6

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Mr. Bell:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P,E. Director
division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
January 31, 2007
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2007-PC-0066
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Bell Creek. Farm/Facility 49-54
General Permit AWC490054
Iredell County
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on December 14, 2006, by James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
• Facility Operator failed to maintain the required Weekly Freeboard, and adequate
Precipitation records. This is a violation of General Permit Condition 111.1, III.2, III.3,
111. 10, and 111. 11, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
• Facility Operator failed to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations
(inadequate storage capacity in the Storage Pond) as required by Permit. At the time of
the inspection, waste was observed to be into the Freeboard. Failure to notify DWQ is a
violation of General Permit Condition III.13, and the CAWMP.
Please submit a written response to the Division of .Water Quality by February 15, 2007,
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future.
In responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of this page.
One
Division of Water Quality / Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresville Regional Office Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Nor hCarohna
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: www ncwateroualitv.orp Naiura!!y

Bell Creek Farm/Facility 44.54
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
January 31, 2007
Page 2
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up. to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to. contact Mr.
Bealle at [phone].
Sincerely, _
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report dated December 14, 2006
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
IredelI Soil and Water Conservation District
Animal Feeding Operations Unit, Raleigh
Regional Files
Jb

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490054 — Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490054 LJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance lnsnection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/14/2006 Entry Time:04:30 PM Exit Time: 06:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bell Creek Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Burt A Bell Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: ] 15 Farmwood Dr Statesville NC 28 25
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant N Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 354E47"_ Longitude: 80°47'42"
At the intersection of Hwy 70 and Bell Farm Road (SR 2316), travel north approximately 1.5 miles on Bell Farm Rd. Dairy is on the left
side of Rd. General location: approximately 3 miles east of 1-77
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Burt A Bell Operator Certification Number: 24823
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Burt A. Be11 Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:. James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 490054 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWQ49005A ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ County: Iredell Region: i
Date of Visit: 12/14/2oos Entry Time: 0430 PM Exit Time: 06 00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Bell Creek Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Burt A Bell
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 115 FarmVQgd Dr Statesville NC 28625
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°46'47" Longitude: 8Q04Z142"
At the intersection of Hwy 70 and Bell Farm Road (SR 2316), travel north approximately 1.5 miles on Bell Farm Rd. Dairy is on the left
side of Rd. General location: approximately 3 miles east of 1-77
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Burt A Bell Operator Certification Number: 24823
Secondary OIC(s):
Ort -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Burt A. Bell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number : 490054
Inspection Date: 1 211 412 0 06 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
11/07/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.4 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/05/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.3 Lbs11000 Gallons
12/04/06 > Sail Analysis
4. Facility Operator advised to pump down Storage Pond ASAPI
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly.
21. Weekly Freeboard, Rainfall, and > 1" RainfalitMonthly Inspections records not maintained; NOV to follow.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in January, 2007,
31. Failure to notify DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV to follow.
ib
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Inspection Date: 1211412006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490054
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 146 12
Total Design Capacity: 146
Total SSLW: 204,40D
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond PRIMARY
rite Pond SECONDARY 32.00 12.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Sell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 1211412006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
OONO
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
Cl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
000
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490054 Owner • Facility: Burt A Bell
Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 1211412006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%l10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
0000
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0000
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
110110
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
Q
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AVVC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Date: 12/1412006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ 000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? Cl
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ■
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall 8, monthly?
■
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Nn
N4
IAF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0000
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ' ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWC490054 Owner - Facility: Burt A Bell
Facility Number: 490054
Inspection Data: 1211412006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspeclion
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
■
❑ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
11000
Page: 7

Burt A. Bell
115 Farmwood Dr.
Statesville, N. C. 28625
James B. Bealle
610 East Center Avenue
Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28155
RE: NOV-2007-PC-0066 Facility 49-54
James B. Bealle,
FEB 1 4 2007
C DENR MRO
DWQ - Aquifer Protection
It was my understanding last year when I signed a form to be taken off the
inspection list that no more "official" records would have to be kept. I guess I
misunderstood. Since then I have applied the waste (.071b. N./ 1000 Gal.) at less than the
agronomic rate listed in my(CAWMP). It was a total misunderstanding on my part. It was
my intention to let the waste storage ponds clear up and eventually (with DWQ's
permission) make one pond out of the two. That was the reasoning for no record keeping.
As for the waste being in the 24 hour/25YR. portion of the WSP, this was caused, in a
large part, due to the storm/tornado we incurred shortly before your. inspection . 'Storage
pond has now been pumped down. Mowing of area has been"done.
1 am considering closing down the WSP this coming spring. I have talked
with Jim Summers at the Statesville Soil and Water office about obtaining a plan and
perhaps some financial assistance. I still owe approximately one hundred thousand
dollars on my feed bill and that is one reason emptying it hasn't been an option.
It was nice meeting you, James. I know there are a lot of responsibilities that
go along with doing your job. I look forward to working with you in the future. Feel free
to contact me at any time @ 704-450-3339.
Burt Bell

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone] Web Site: www.ncagr.com/agronomi/
Report: W04895
Grower:
Bell, Burt
Copies To: Southern States
115 Farmwood Dr.
USDA MRCS-iredell
la
A
Statesville, NC 286778554
Waste
nalysasRotiort
Farm:
1/8/2007
Iredell County
Sample Information
laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample M.
N
P K Ca M
S
Fe Mn Zn
Cu
B Mo d C
04
Tota!
25.8
17.7 333 132 63.7
9.55
4.55 0.23 0.40
0.33
0.41
IN -N
Waste Code:
-NH4
LSD
-NO3
Na Ni Cd Pb
Al
Se Li H
SS
C.N D3i% CCM ALE(W)
Description
OR -N
104
7.19
Dalry Lig. Slurry_Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop
lbs/10oo afim
tither Elements lbs/1000 aligns
Application Meibod
N
P205 K20 Ca Mg S Pe Mn
Zn Cu
B Mo a
Na
Ni Cd A5 Al Se Li
Broadcast
0.09
0.24 2.7 0.77 0.37 0.06 0.03 T
T T
T
0.87

violation
v. r
'Subject: violation
From: "bellb" <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:04:35 -0500
To: <[e-mail]>
I am sending a copy of my written response to a notice of
violation. A copy is also being mailed.
Thank you
Burt Bell
Wilkes County Schools
704-450-3339
Content -Description: wASTE LETTER.doc
IiwASTE LETTER.docl� Content -Type: application/msword
Content -Encoding: base54
1 of 1 2/12/2007 11:21 AM

v
Burt A. Bell
115 Farmwood Dr.
Statesville, N. C. 28625
James B. Bealle
610 East Center Avenue
Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28155
RE: NOV-2007-PC-0066 Facility 49-54
James B. Bealle,
It was my understanding last year when I signed a form to be taken off the
inspection list that no more "official" records would have to be kept. I guess I
misunderstood. Since then I have applied the waste (.071b. N.1 1000 Gal.) at less than the
agronomic rate listed in my(CAWMP). It was a total misunderstanding on my part. It was
my intention to let the waste storage ponds clear up and eventually (with DWQ's
permission) make one pond out of the two. That was the reasoning for no record keeping.
As for the waste being in the 24 hour125YR. portion of the WSP, this was caused, in a
large part, due to the storm/tornado we incurred shortly before your inspection .,Storage
pond has now been pumped down. Mowing of area has been done.
I am considering closing down the WSP this coming spring. I have talked
with Jim Summers at the Statesville Soil and Water office about obtaining a plan and
perhaps some financial assistance. I still owe approximately one hundred thousand
dollars on my feed bill and that is one reason emptying it hasn't been an option.
It was nice meeting you, James. I know there are a lot of responsibilities that
go along with doing your job. I look forward to working with you in the future. Feel free
to contact me at any time @ 704-450-3339.
Burt Bell
I

Type of Visit C) Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit A6 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: l� ' t " ° S Arrival Time: L�'-oo �'' Departure Time: � County: �� Region: MIZ-Z
Farm Name: �f aK P�tc Owner Email:
Owner Name: 14.�� Slo' ^^ Phone:
Mailing Address: 1 fS Feexr w -J k
Physical Address: :;7 A) C
Facility Contact: R06uk Title: C+• -t!& Z'k L Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Q Integrator:
Certified Operator: l�Tr� Bal Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0
=d
Longitude
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑
Layer
I❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
0=4 = [I
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
WrDairy Cow 1yL
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy I-leifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: E]
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
[I Yes ImNo ❑NA EINE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
�9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/2"4 Continued

Facility Number: 4f9— S Y Date of Inspection r a
❑ Yes.
[;&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
'M No
El NA
[INE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: vPPe1L 1-0,0ta
Spillway?: yeS yes
Designed Freeboard (in): SW 3a
Observed Freeboard (in): '3"3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
JE1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
FK] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes F91 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) U. .a4- Goma
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes.
[;&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[]
Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[!9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
oy 1, if -of i5 p" Cil Qr s
'Z. y rs W ur- 33
3� �
IN
Reviewer/inspector Name phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -! I —Z- eel!�
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: L( -f Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
PWaste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(9 NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
93 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
VII bAAc- to tf t l s 11-77 & *4' x-1'17
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3l.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
EINE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/qe Drawings
�rco>� pl'yNA1rZr
Ll�
r SR1VE Fd,/J--W)3 iii 3®GD a i'i,+loAfcl+ APPf e.,Aw AdeS
�r-0141K 0"I radcyRJj.
VII bAAc- to tf t l s 11-77 & *4' x-1'17
12/28/04

a��F wA r�9Q�
CO r
O Y
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Dairy
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville, North Carolina 28625
Dear Mr. Bell:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February2006
21� D
FEB 2 4 2006
Subject: Request for Removal of Registration
Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490054
Bell Creek Dairy
Animal Waste Management System
Iredell County
Thank you for notifying the Division of Water Quality that your operation is now out of business
and submitting your request for removal from the registration database. However, your
Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490054 must remain active until the animal waste management
system is completely closed according to Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS)
standards. You must continue to meet all requirements listed in the State General Permit
AWG200000. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Todd A. Bennett
Environmental Engineer
Cc: APS Central Files
Aquifer Protection Section, Mooresville Regional office
Nom` Carolina
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Serviceiura!!y
Internet: httpWh2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone].623.6748
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

0� WA]�R
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Ca Q
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
O
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
0
Division of Water Quality
December 10, 2004
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
_
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville NC 28625
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490054
Bell Creek Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Burt A. Bell:
On .lune 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for animal facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate
Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28).
To correct the facility's animal capacity and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are
hereby forwarding to you this corrected Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Burt A. Bell, authorizing
the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in
accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Bell Creek Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 146 Dairy Cows, 46 Calves, 66 Heifers, and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009, and shall hereby void the
COC dated October 1, 2004, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay_ careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization PIan has been developed based on site-specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Nor` hCarol ina
Naturatl1
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.cnr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terns and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information conceming
this COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
v
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional.Office,Aquifer-Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490054
APS Central Files

o�0F w A rF
G
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville NC 28625
Dear Burt A. Bell:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 1, 2004
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
ot., i dOO4
WC i2PT 07 E-Mik ff
AND NATURAL RESMi 1D
M00RESVI10Wa=9ME
Subject:. Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490054
Bell Creek Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 7, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Burt A.
Bell, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC490054 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Bell Creek Farm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 220 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste -Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section --Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NofthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr,state. nc.us �atll y'�%[�lJ
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper lgiLL L

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490054
APS Central Files

k
Facility Number Date of Visit:ime: I�
O Not O erational O Below Threshold
Permitted D Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Abov Threshold
FarmName: ...................3.4. 1..........4 :1�,..... ........................ County:......... f.��.....................................,
OwnerName: ................. B.&A .......... ........ ec-11 ............................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress: ........... .............i......b �................................................................................................... ..........................
FacilityContact:............................................................../Tiitle:..........................
Onsite Representative: .......... 1..............Gl•1.....................................
CertifiedOperator:............
.....................1
11................................
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • & is Longitude • 4 44
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes k No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0! No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 4No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier: .... ...... ...... .`............. ............ ,1Z ................ ........................................I......I.......I.....................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 14 No
seepage, etc.)
b. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes RNo
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ;,Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Wo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes CANo
elevation markings?
Waste Aanlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
t&No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
U'ITIo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
�+' aSs i s�J�sv�c
12. Crop type Ceram �' G �� terra
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
[(No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
I5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[&lo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
gjtNo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
1' .!. r -h M' .W f, ..�-..7s>' tr - ,.� �. ..., l t. 'Si Jii Jf." wk f •. �!.Y'd -'S f.. ' i ..� :: c r �p �''-'.:'- i� a ear 1 ; '-;� a'' -
Commeats (referto Pquestwon:#) ,((Fatplatn anyYES38answers and/or any, recamrnemclataoas orany otkter comments. �j, ,,, yi ��
.ip8N -i. 4.ri#t3ma E 'i9F89 ::, #°4 fia^.u� 9i U 1 to siii"',
Use draiviags9of facility toliett�r:explaan stdaatians:(useaddihonal pages as'necessary)Field Copy Final Notes
Sid€ �i€1€ 11 33i 3: `E .= z ((p�,., �'E.FF[[W� €✓((.,fit . ,`3 •,[[ft $$u E'd•j9 . a'.£ Ex a784i'yy FF ,ie, o�}s?{e yd -d .Yb .3.y e :.3 i[3i"y f 8�3E �:iif fSjEj pi
331�) tt. E S.3P€d 11:pp?a.°. ,};q0. , i�}p,. a��,p#.!€!p!t �E{f4sa. p1ljS { ..I { d<3. Sd3 2 PB )a Ey9{ 3 II i_i,}ja9 98 •." j 31 d` `v"5lp�{ �i 3s. t.9 il�3 f il'�f 9 ({ ., �vgj �ry9 6.{j,I £fip f}gtf f9 'A: .hl.: .n.i.} SEvt rlE�'P.9 epxa;+.;;•S4E€.' 94'{ry�y?;y�y (9.f}� 9Yi
f � NiIll i. ndda �s Y% d1�fi '- iPl,��;idt 16ta R V�'YE..
�� �`� Ou �er-'�1.o w � � ►vl � o n � � � '�o ��on� � Z ,'1 �e.c�-5 i wti � r0 u�n�
D i q
�l a uJ �3 '�' 1 Q vtc� trt.'V'e,r c+v1 0.
�+' aSs i s�J�sv�c
was 3/2b164f -- 3,c� N ib j1oo�5a(
241 21' D 3 2, L+
�JZ�T�I.�,r T�c.r� �� Rs t� � vkct�F L� �'rec.�'D v► 5� Yhac-1G `�� wJ� � r�cu +�
"q Sg{
Reviewer/Inspector Name € 3; ' €_, t3: 'c! li ! 9p'
;. -, 1 . _,.E rg.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: v
12112103 Continued
E�

to
Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Document,~
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes PLNo
❑ Yes k
❑ Yes 'B No
❑ Yes 11 No
❑ Yes tallo
❑ Yes 03 r&
❑ Yes j6Io
❑ Yes WIo
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during
dur4sri.n� giP
about
eceive urther correspondencebout visit.
visit receivefurtherorrespondence..
w�..ei,:..l!
3.this
tx 3 r 1.
dditional! N(R�I`
pttj ;rj �k;.4,j
_t'..h.:1i4.s,�. , iY,.ou'LGI �An.:oill
1KShk L7
r AbT
12112103

till-lu
�pF War�Rp Michae F. Easley, Governor
bn �Q G William G. Ross, Jr.,Seaetary
C!) North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
—� Alan W. Klimek, P.f., Director
D Division of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 29, 2003
Mr. Burt Bell
178 Bell Farm Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Bell Creek Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490054
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 28,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well maintained, and the records were
complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
d.*A
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NCDENR
Customer Service Mooresville Regional office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 677-623-6748 FAX [phone]

r4,X�`R G"t4`i„ Wf 1MI I� � y - ..,.i,,. .�...., _.. «.», -.r—+ .........�...:.
1} n??''EkrhrK �v . �� Division of Water Quality ;`� t ,H '
• qty F Q v.'`t �.
¢,�y►w.: F �, +7. "��� Q 1Ji sion'of Soil and Water Conservat[tin z t
��i ytt �el.,..;..L>-
.N'
��S
;*_ar,.S.7P^i?x`w"i1:iJ�'��.'`.,:v�.r'.'+Wir}'S
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 54 Date of Visit: 10/28/2003 Time;
.. 0 Not Operational 0 Eeloss- Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 13 Registered
Date Last Operated or above Threshold: : .........................
Farm \ante: 130I.CuR1;S fa1CJlill................................................
.......................................... County: IX.C&U.:.............................................. MQ...........
Owner Name: UUrI.A,.................................... B.P.11 ............................................................... Phone No: (.7.0.41.8.71-1292 .......................................................
Mailing .address: 115.1 azantrQad.]fir.��:e........................................................................ States�ill��l�....................................................... �#G2�..............
Facility Contact: ....................................................................... ....ritic: Phone Flo:...................................................
Onsite Representative: R IRTAFLL.............................................................................. Integrator •:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.3.t1r1Air................................... Bell..................................................... Operator Certification Number:14$Z3.............................
Location of Farm:
At the intersection of Hwy 70 and Bell Farm Road (SR 2316), travel north approximately 1.5 miles on Bell Farm Rd. Dairy i
on the left side of Rd. General location: approximately 3 miles east of I-77
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 35 • 46 47 Longitude 80 • 47 42
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Pnnulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
[I Gilts
❑ Soars
Design Current "' Design ` ' Current'-'
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity -Po ulation
❑ Layer FZDairy 220C:]Non-Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 220
Total SS LW 308,000
ry. Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area .'
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System f
Discharges S,Strean lmrtacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharue is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, if discharue is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharLe is observed. what is the estimated flow in !lalrmin?
d. Does discharge by a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Stricture 4 Stricture j Structure 6
Identifier: ......................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 30
A CIA 21A I
r.....r«...a

VJ/VJ/V 1
Facility Number: 49-54 Date of Inspection 10/28/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure pian?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
•.Vruuiura
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Waste .application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents ,
--MORE CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN WHEN RECORDING WASTE APPLICATION INFORMATION (NEATNESS).
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
.y;� �� :� . »
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: lj;_�
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
ylammen of res o,ac`laln au - - and1 dapIr dil
tioual
Use a gs,faeliet r'exp�situationA. use d, pag�: ).' ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
n
--MORE CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN WHEN RECORDING WASTE APPLICATION INFORMATION (NEATNESS).
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan JohsonI`, '' `'� _ �_;�',}�. �:r:sti9�i� �„.'p�' w
.y;� �� :� . »
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: lj;_�

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone]
Report No: 06086
Grower:
Bell, Burt
Copies to: County Extension Director
115 Farmwood Dr.
Statesville, NC 286778554
oil Test Ronort'
Farm:
1011102 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Iredell Count
Agronomist Comments:
A -- 3. $, 12
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N
Pr05
K-0 Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
BBl Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0
180-220
0
0 0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CFC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-Al(1)Mn-Al(2)
Zn -1 Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
Na -N Nth -N Na
MIN 0.32 1.08 11.3 95.0 0.6 6.3 246 157 62.0 25.0
365
231
432 432
658
85
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N
JWS
100 Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
13132 Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0
180-220
0
0 0 0
0
pH$
3
2nd Cro :
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN C£C BS% Ac pH P -I K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-Al(1)Mn-Al(2)
Zn -1 Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
Na -N NHr-N Na
MIN 0.36 1.07 13.5 96.0 0.6 6.5 358 .211 61.0 27.0
499
309
594 594
1536
110
0.4
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N
005
KO Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
13I33 Corn.Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0
160-220
0
0 0 0
0
pH$
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CFC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -Al (1)WAI (2)
Zn -1 Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
N(b-N NHr-N Na
MIN 0.33 1.11
13.9 97.0 0.4 6.9 413 209 62.0 28.0
531
322
653 653
1296
96
0.5
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N
a0s
Ih0 Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
664 Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0
180-220
0
0 0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V C£C BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -Al (1) Mn -Al (2)
Zn -1 Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
Na -N NH► -N Na
MIN 0.41 1.00
11.5 91.0 1.0 6.1 234 169 58.0 26.0
646
403
413 413
1011
86
0.5

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Grower: Bell, Burt Report No: 06086 Pg 2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N kos
11K0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
B85 Corn Grain
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0
180-220 0
0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop-,
Test Results -
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-Al(1)Mn-Al(2)
Zn -1
Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
NQ -N Nfi-N Na
MIN 0.36 1.10 10.3 93.0
0.7 6.4 210
130 64.0
23.0
671 414
344
344
611
66
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P105
I¢0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
13136 Corn,Silagc
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
.31
180-220 0-20 40.60
0 0
0
0
3
grid Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-Al(l)Mn-Al(2)
Zn -1
Zn -AI
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
Na -N NI -b -N Na
MIN 0.51 1.01
8.3 93.0
0.6 5.4 76
75 68.0
20,0
533 337
207
201
309
69
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N 1105
KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
LPI Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0
180-220 0
0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -Al (1)Mn-Al (2)
Zn -1
Zn -AI
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
NQ -N NH -N Na
MIN 0.46 1.08
11.6 93.0
0.8 6.0 205
170 61.0
24.0
1993 1213
345
345
224
80
0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5
k0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
JLTZ Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0
180-220 40-60 30-50
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac . pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-Al(1)Mn-A1(2)
Zn -1
Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
NO -N NH -N Na
MIN 0.36 1.09
10.7 93.0
0.7 6.3 45
86 74.0
16.0
789 486
136
136
116
80
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P105
l@0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
1LS Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0
180-220 0 100-120
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-Al(1)Mn-Al(2)
Zn -1
Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
Na -N NWN Na
MIN 0.46 1.12
6.1 85.0
0.9 5.8 98
45 66.0
16.0
343 226
84
84
56
52
0.1

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Grower: Bell, Burt Report No: 06086 Pg 3
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W i W
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
SB15 Corn,Sllage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
.7T
180-220 0 30-50
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -Al (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn -1
Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
NCS -N NI* -N Na
MIN 0.51 1.12
7.3 84.0
1.2 5.2 287
85 60.0
19.0
722 450 328
328
91
70
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N 1305 I¢0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
SB10 Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
.5T
180-220 0 40-60
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn-Al(1)Mn-A1(2) Zn -1
Zn -AI
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
NCI} -N NI•k-N Na
MIN 0.56 1.01
10.0 88.0
1.2 5.6 305
76 65.0
19.0
837 519 360
360
168
91
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T1A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
FOX Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0
180-220 90-110 30-50
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class 'HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn -1
Zn -AI
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
NCIH -N Nfh-N Na
MIN 0.51 1.11
7.8 90.0
0.8 6.0 22
84 57.0
28.0
706 441 73
73
89
50
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N PZ05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
NT Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn,Silage
0
180-220 0-20 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Cra
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -Al (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn -1
Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
N&N NHr-N Na
MIN 0.46 1.01
10.5 91.0
0.9 6.1 73
149 59.0
25.0
792 491 263
263
215
80
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N Pr05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
MC Corn,Silage
1st Crop: Corn.Silage
0
180-220 0 30-50
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn -1
Zn -Al
Cu -1
5-1
SS -1
NQ -N Nhb-N Na
MIN 0.51 1.07
9.7 91.0
0.9 6.2 156
86 74.0
12.0
521 327 178
178
69
57
0.1

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, INC 27607-6465 [phone] Grower: Bell, Burt Report No: 06086 Pq 4
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N Pr05
W
Mg Cu
Zn
B
, Mn
See Note
LP17 Sudangrass
1st Crop: Sudangrass
AT
50-70 0
0
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -A1(7) Mn -Al (2)
Zn -1
Zn -A1
Cu -1
S4
SS -1
NCIH -N Nl-b-N Na
MIN 0.56 1.04
6.9 '81.0
1.3 5.7 249
71
61.0
15.0
956 591
274
274
139
70
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No, Last Crop
Mo Yr T1A
Crop or Year
Lime
N a05
Kz0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
SMII H Sudangrass
1 st Crop: Sudangrass
.91
50-70 0
0
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 WAI (7)Mn-A1(2)
Zn -1
Zn -Al
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
NCA -N Nf*-N Na
MIN 0.71 1.04
6.2 74.0
1.6 5.2 209
68
59.0
9.0
612 384
162
162
116
58
0.0
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5
Kt0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
POPE Fes/OG/Tim,M
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
.9T
120-200 0
0,
0 0
0
0
12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac - pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn -1 Mn -AI (1) Mn -A1(2)
Zn -1
Zn -AI
Cu -1
S-1
SS -1
Na -N N14 -N Na
MIN 0.6 0.97
6.7 15.0
1.7 5.3 135
139
45.0
20.0
843 523
156
156
87
66
0.1

rxY
Bell Creek Farm 115 Farmwood Dr.
Burt Bell Statesville, NC 28677-8554
2-28-03
Alan Johnson
Water Quality Inspector
NC Division of Water Quality
919 Mooresville, 28115
Dear Mr. Gleason,
In follow up of letter on October, 25, 2002 from Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor, concerning Notice of Violation for Facility No. 49-54.
I have completed the following actions:
Waste analysis dated 1/31/03 have been received and filed with my Waste
Application Records. A copy is attached and records have been bought current
A copy of my General Permit and Certificate of Coverage has been located in my
Waste Management Notebook and moved to prominent location for future
reference.
If additional response is needed, please let me know.
WC CZ -PT. OF 91V'1R0NP"1 NT
Sincerely, ADM WA71 " `" !ltittCl:B
Burt Bell, Bell Creek Dairy MAR 0 b 2003

NCDA A on(
ivision 4300 Reedy Creek Road Rale, NC 27607-6465:. j3-2655 Report
No: A W
Grower: Bell, Burt Copies 70:
115 Farmwood Dr.
y, �F.
Statesville, NC 286778554
aste nal sisRe-hort Farm:
y
1/31/03
Iredell County
Sample Info.
Lab2E!!2g Results r million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID.
N
P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B
Mo C C
1
Total 817
294 771 763 337 160 274 15.3 10.4 61.9 2.64
IN -N
Waste Code:
-N714
Na Ni Cd Pb At Se Li pH SS ON
DM% CCE% ALE(K al)
LSD -
-NO3
451 6.90
Description:
OR -N
Dai Liq. Slur
Urea
Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop. : M11060 gallans...''
Other Elements
M11000gallons
Application Melbod
N P-)05 K2U Ca Mg . S Fe :(Mn Zn,. s> £.. Cu B -'Mo � -�Cl�
.Na.,.- Ni Cd
Pb Al Se Li
Irrigation
2.7 3.9 6.2 4.5 .. 2.0 .'0.93 .1.6 0.11' e .0.07 0:41 ' ,4.02 ''
3:8.
the waste product contains a large amount of copper. Application rales should be based not.only an-cr`op nitrogen requirement but copper aaamulatton in*soil al the application site.
Limits on application of the
Material maybe necess
to avoid excess accumulation of co') ' ilii `the sod = �. '
, ,,,� -. „ ., - ..; . j_

Df -t-11,-2002 09:07 PM BURT SELL 704 872 1292 P.01
6
Alan Johnson,
Burt says that he would still like to
check with you to make sure he has what
he needs. If you need an original copy of
this letter please let me know.
His mobile number is 704 - 450 - 3339.
Please phone him at your convenience.
Thank you for being so patient with us.
Nina Bell

Dec --11-2002 09:08 PM BURT BELL 704 872 2292 P.02
�.
Burt Bel!
115 Farmwood Drive
Statesville, NC 28625
NC Division of Water Quality
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Johnson;
This letter is in response to the citations given to Bell
Creek Farm on October 25, 2002. (Certificate of Coverage:
AWC490054) The following changes have been made on the
dairy so that these infractions will not occur again.
Failure to obtain a waste analysis within 60 days of the
waste applications made during May and June of this
year.
In order for this oversight not to happen again I plan to
note on my personal calender the date in which I make the
waste application and send the sample in with the Southern
States delivery van on Monday of the following week. This
should help keep me organized in a profession where it is
sometimes difficult to know what day of the week it is.
Failure to have available for review a copy of your
general permit and certificate of coverage.
A copy of the general permit and certificate of coverage
was obtained from the Soil and Water Conservation office.
The original copy was also found in our records . Both are

DEC -11.-2002 09'-09 PM BURT SELL 704 872 1292
now placed in the office at the dairy.
Please note the change of address on this letter. The
registered letter was not received until early December
because of the address difference_
Thank you for your consideration.
P. 03

� wATfA
. Midsael.F_•�siey. Gnvemor . -
William G. Russ Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan k Klimek, P.E., Director
.Division of water Duality,
l4_1,
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Burt Bell
178.Bell Farm Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Mr. Bell:
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 25, 2002
7001 2510 0005 0288 0562
Subject: Notice of Violation
Bell Creek Farm, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490054
.Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 24, 2002.
This letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation for the following.reasons:
• Failure to obtain a waste analysis within 60 days of the waste applications made during May and
June of this year. This is a violation of Section III. #4 of your general permit.
• Failure to have. available for review a copy of your general permit and certificate of coverage.
This is a violation of Section I. #4 of your general permit.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by November 10; 2002 indicating the
actions taken to correct the noted violations. Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Johnson. It
is requested that your response reference the date and subject of this NOV, as well as the facility number.
By copy of this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local District Soil and
Water Conservation, DWQ is referring this,facility for technical assistance,.if appropriate. -Ifyouu.have.any
questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate .to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Non -Discharge
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Sincerely,
L)
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
-A
N. C. Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 ?none [phone]
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine 0 Complaint O f=ollow up '0 Emergency'Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Facility Number 49 yq uate of visit: lOR4ROD2 Tinrc:
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Btd! Cj:A&.FArM................................................................... County: Jj:edell..._............................. �...--....
Owner Name: $wttA�—------ Bell __----------------------._. Phone No -
Mailing Address: X)ES..Farts xtstQd.?xxx�......................................................................... S>;gltesxal CAC........................................................ Z$!6t��..............
Facility Contact: ......Title: .................• Phone No:
....................... ...............
Onsite Representative: $UAxRF.L�.------------------------------------- Integrator: -------------------------------------------
Certified Operator:8lx> 1 A..- ......................... JL ..................................................... Operator Certification Number:24823................ .............
Location of Farm:
Lt the: intersection of Hwy 70 and Bell.Farm Road (SR 2316), travel north approilmi ately'2 miles. Dairy is on the left side of
kd. General location: approximately 3 miles east of 1-77
1 Latitude 35 * 46 47 µ Longitude $0 • 47 42
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse �' g � L�' F27"
< ;'D_esin ,` Cur rent.':; s,':;�
rDesign '. Current �xDesign " _Current
'.��o
Swiae.'�=g"�Ca"ac :°Pa
ulatiaa' :poultry-�Cas�aci P ulation ,_aCa acl uiatlan
❑ Wean to Feeder
_ ❑Layer0
�,�%attle...',
Dairy 220 135
❑ Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non Dairy
� _ z �; � ;x�, �,, , .
❑ Farrow to Feeder
.❑Other
�
E r
❑ Farrow to Finish
c
TotA1 )estlga Capaeity;� 220
E] Gilts
❑Boars
z
t
sS 3'08,0=
..�
,�
,.
�runibGr of goons ". 2 '� t`� L ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area i+•
of ng
❑
No Liquid Waste Management System
.,.onda'!`Solid
rR
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from:any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nein?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
)Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........ Ad JX...............ALL................................ -•--...._..--•--•--•--................................ ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 12 65

v�ivsrbl
w�wr+uci� '
Facility Number: '' 49-54 Date of Inspection . 10/24/2042
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
41
❑ Yes ®No
a
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [:].Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Rye Com (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®Na
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required Records _& Dneuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ® Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? - 0 Yes ®No
r
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over, application) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector. fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
IE3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further• correspondence about this visit+
Ltltl_
at •Z?.� .%:s4/��{W...n � �S7iM J..!.F.Y�N'.."i y. .-.-� 5z
---FAILED TO OBTAIN WASTE ANALYSES FOR WASTE APPLICATION MADE IN MAY AND ]UNE OF THIS YEAR-
EAR---FAILED
--- FAILEDTO HAVE A COPY OF THE FACILITY'S PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE AVAILABLE FOR
REVIEW.
OV TO BE ISSUED
---GRASS MATS IN STORAGE POND NEED TO BE REMOVED.
---THE CERTIFIED FARM PLAN AND WASTE APPLICATION RECORDS SHOULD BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND
PROTECTED.
_
Reviewer/Inspector Name. rAI AN.JOHNSON
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /������ y _. Date:
M

State of North Carolina 1WT4 4 VLA
Department of Environment _. _ .� :.....,y `w •
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary 'NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director -' •. . ., NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOUR=ES
September 28, 2000
BURT A. BELL
BELL CREEK FARM
115 FARMWOOD DRIVE
STATESVI3.LLE NC 2862
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490054
Bell Creel` Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredel1 County
Dear Burt Bell:
In accordance with your application received on ?`;ovem tr 19. 1999. wa are forWa cine this
Certificate of Covera,e (COC) issued to Burt A. sell. authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval small consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the Bell Creel; Farm Farm, located in Iredell County. with an
animal capacity of no greater than 146 dairy caws, T6 dairy calves, and 66 dairy heifers. and the
application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30. 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions.and limitations
as specified in the General.Permit, the facility's CAIWIMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the :required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm- Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC .and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CA'WNT may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this CDC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.D. Boy 29535, Ralsich, North Caroiina 27626-0525 `I eie'Dhone 919-73,3-7015 PAX 919-733-2496
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employe-, 50°o recvcledl 1 C1% poli -consumer paper

Oto� W A r�9PG
o �
Burt A.'Bell
178 Bell Farm Rd.
Stateville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Bell:
Subject:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of E=nvironment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting director
Division of Water Ouality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2402
Operation Review/Compliance
Bell Creek Farm, Facility #: 49-54
lredell County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 64 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
F—M—
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson
Environmental Specialist Ii'
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 213115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Z; 204 745 367
1
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for Intemational Mail (See reverse)
r x -----
BURT BELL
115 FARMWOOD DRIVE
STATESVIL.LE NC 28625
LO
a)
rn
d
0
co
w
0
U -
to
EL
Certified Fee -
- -
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing to
Whom & Date delivered
Return Receipt S -mrg to Whom,
Data, & Addressee's Address
1
TOTAL Postage S Fees
$
Postmark or Date

Stick postage stamps to article to cover First -Class postage, certified mall fee, and
charges for any selected optional services (See front),
1. If you want this receipt postmarked, slick the gummed stub to the right of the return
address leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service
window or hand it to your rural carrier (no extra charge).
2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the
return address o1 the article, date, detach, and retain the receipt, and mail the article.
3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address
on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the front of the article by means of the
gummed ends if space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of artide. Endorse front of article
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number.
m
a
Co
ti
Ln
rn
rn
4. if you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized a^y-ml of the I�
addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. iO
5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this
receipt. If return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811, li
6. Save this receipt and present it if you make an inquiry. 192595-99•M•2444 a

.. WArF
6F Michael . Easley
�Or QG Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
>_ y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`r Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 18, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Burt Bell
115 Farmwood Dr.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Notice of Violation
Bell Creek Farm, Inadequate Records
Certificate of Coverage AWC490054
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 12, 2001. Based
upon his review of your files, the Certificate of Coverage (COC) and, a record of the storage pond liquid levels
were not available for review. Therefore, this letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation (NOV). Failure
to provide complete records during an inspection is a violation of Section III. 1 (Monitoring and Reporting
Requirements) of your Certificate of Coverage and North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1OC.
Our database indicates that your facility was permitted in September 2000. A copy of the COC must
be available for review. Also, the freeboard level in the lower storage pond must be recorded on a weekly
basis and be available for review during an inspection. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which
should be self-explanatory.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by April 30, 2001 indicating the
actions taken to correct the noted violation. Please address your response to the attention of Mr. Johnson. It is
requested that your response reference the date and subject of this NOV, as well as the facility number.
By copy of this letter to the Division of Soil and Water Conservation and your local District Soil and
Water Conservation, DWQ is referring this facility for technical assistance, if appropriate. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. ' ,/';�-�
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County SWCD
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
WN Regional Coordinator
��A
NCDENFt
,ustomer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

of Visit (compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit Woutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or visit: (f- Time:
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
4RPermitted ❑ Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......
FarmNamc:.................... ........................................ County ..............?................. ........»...»»......
OwnerName: ..................... ------- .....? .:.f1.................................................. Phone No:..................................................... ....................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. .Title: ................................................................ Phone No:....................................................
i
Mailing Address: %l»�
Onsite Representative: ........... 31.�:............. .. integrator:
Certified Operator: J�" Lc/'T,,,,,•,.- `� ................ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry MCattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 1 11 Longitude • d "
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder 10 Layer I 11K Dairy I Z z
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Nan -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars,Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
Holding'Ponds / Solid Traps: ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges R Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Statc'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, mxifv DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 45 -No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes c�jNo
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes MNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: J."p'e� ._ _.._..............�_...... ... ............................
Freeboard(inches): ...... ._.. ..... �........... ._W........ _.......... ................„.._........_........ �.......:.» .........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there'structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes Flo
❑ Yes CNo
[:]Yes '!3 -No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes $t�-No
❑ Yes B -No
❑ Yes 4F�No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes C�6No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes .S] No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
B -No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
fnNo
17. Are rock outcro s ent?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Is there a water std well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Required.Recnrds & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. -Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
01/01/01
Continued

•
acility'Number: �j — S Date of Inspection
7.1
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2001
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
iReviewer/Inspector Name `t' -2j' x
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
01/01/01

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
August 1, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
178 Bell Farm Road
Statesville NC 28625
i ALIT:_XWA
•
a
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
N." Dll S . uW.
aNVIRONM$N'1, HRALA'n
AUG 7 2000
1 Of IRVIR11EMUL NAMSFIEF
i 08DEN E RLMAL I=
Subject: Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Bell Creek,Farm
Facility Number 49-54
Iredell County
Dear Burt A. Bell:
A letter dated January 15, 1999 was sent to advise you about concerns associated with Certified Animal
Waste Management Plans and the method by which the irrigated acres within the plans were calculated. Only
the acres that are wetted can be credited in the waste management plan as receiving waste application. Any
acreage within the plan that can not be reached by waste application equipment can not be used as part,of your
plan.
An evaluation by Rocky Durham on 4123199 was made to review the actual number of acres at your
facility that receive animal waste during land application. The evaluation of your facility has yielded one of
the following two results as indicated by the box marked with an "X". -
Category 1:
The evaluation of your facility could not be completed due to a lack of information. Please
contact your Technical Specialist to assist in providing Rocky Durham the necessary
information to potentially exempt your facility from. undergoing a complete wettable acre
determination. Please submit this information to Rocky Durham, at 919 North Main Street,
Mooresville, NC 28115, within in 90 days of the receipt of this letter. If you have 'any
questions please contact Rocky Durham at [phone]. If within 90 days you are
unable to provide Rocky Durham with the information you are automatically required
to complete a Wettable Acre Determination as described by Category 2 below, within
180 days of receipt of this letter.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Notification for Wettable Acre Determination
Animal Waste Management System
Page 2
Category 2:
❑ Your facility has been identified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
as a facility that may have overestimated the number of acres actually receiving animal
waste. Therefore, some or all of your fields may be exceeding the allowable loading rates
set in your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to resolve this issue, please contact a designated Technical Specialist to have him
or her conduct a Wettable Acre Determination for your facility. The Technical Specialist must
be one that has been approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to conduct
Wettable Acre Determinations. Many Technical Specialist with the N.C. Cooperative Extension
Service, the Soil and Water Conservation Districts, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Division of Soil and Water Conservation have received this special
designation. You may also contact a private Technical Specialist who has received this
designation, or a Professional Engineer.
All needed modifications to your Animal Waste Management System must be made and
the Wettable Acres Determination Certification must be returned to DWQ within the next
180 days. It the needed modifications are not made and if the form is not returned within the
required time, DWQ will be forced to take appropriate enforcement actions to bring this facility
into compliance. These actions may include civil penalty assessments, permit revocation,
and/or injunctive relief.
Once a Wettable Acre Determination has been completed, a copy of the attached Wettable
Acre Determination Certification must be submitted to the address listed on the form. Please
note that both the owner and the Technical Specialist must sign the certification. A copy of all
the Wettable Acre Determination documentation that applies to your Waste Utilization Plan
must be kept at your facility. DWQ,and the Division of Soil & Water Conservation Staff will
review all documentation during their annual visit of your facility. An additional copy must by
kept on file at the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office. Please note that if you install
or modify your irrigation system, a designated Irrigation Specialist or a Professional Engineer
must also sign the Wettable Acre Determination Certification.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Sonya Avant of our
Central Office staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
BURT A. BELL
BELL CREEK FARM
178 BELL FARM ROAD
STATESVILLE NC 28625
Dear Burt Bell:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
OM D1SPT, t3:
September 12, 2000 WqMpNMgN., HEAL.I.t.
0 1RATURAL RRSOUPCF-
UP -
OWN OF BIYIRO(IDWAL UAIIAGENU
11001E31<IIIE REGIONAL OfF]CE
Subject:. Application No. AWC490054
Additional Information Request
Bell Creek Farm
Animal Waste Operation
Iredell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information was requested on April 6, 2000 and to date has not bee received by the Division of Water Quality. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by October 12, 2000:
The information received on March 10, 2000 answered the items requested in the additional information,
however, the revisions to the Waste Utilization Plan were not signed and dated by the owner and the
technical specialist. Only the revised pages (17, 19, 22) need to be submitted with the proper signatures and
dates.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before October 12, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A
N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
Sincerely,
Ssasi n Caule
Y
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Iredell Soil & Water Conservation
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 -telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

aBILL HOLMAN Statesville, NC 28625
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVIL,L.E REGIONAL; OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 15, 2000
�S
Subject. DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
:FRTF.1�•.
.
Bell Creek Farm Facility #: 49-54
ES -,B: -HUNT JR.
VIGOVERNOR
Burt Bell
178 Bell Farre Rd.
aBILL HOLMAN Statesville, NC 28625
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVIL,L.E REGIONAL; OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 15, 2000
�S
Subject. DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
:FRTF.1�•.
.
Bell Creek Farm Facility #: 49-54
Iredeli County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
i
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of our facility
p Y Y
-' on August 10, 2000. Based on his observations made during the inspection the
facility appeared to be well maintained and operated and the files appeared to be
complete.
Regarding the issue of wetted acres, you need to contact your technical
specialist. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28118
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLED/110% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
-Fn
Regarding the issue of wetted acres, you need to contact your technical
specialist. Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28118
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLED/110% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

0 Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other .Agency
Type of Visit f2k�cmpiiance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit )� Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
�_ - _,. _ _ ._.�_ �.m_ _ •.. _ . — _ . _._ d.�.- -, 1)�rr „F Visit: 3'iinc: Printed on: 7/21/2000
racinty Numhcr
QoOperational O Below Threshold
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..•••••.••...•.•••••..•..
Farm Name: ........... C ............ ` County :
... ....... e....................................
Owner Namc: �rc—T �'- Thune No: .,
.......�.. .....r. �..,.Z...................................
FacilityContact: ..........................................................................'I'itle:....................................... Phone No:...................................................
blailin address•............7`....... Wn.......�........ ........�
....
Onsite Representative: �i?�+-r lae k. ..
..........................................,................................................... Integrator: ......................................................................................
Certified Operator:,,,...,.;, r. ....... �. �.�.......................................... Operator Certification Numher:...Z.k �5� .....
I.o n of Farm:
A6
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry
le ❑ Horse Latitude �• �' �• Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feedcr ❑ Laver KD7,iry ZZc:.,
[I Feeder to Finish ❑Non Laver 1[3 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons]Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lags„n Area ❑ Spray l~ ield Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps Z ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar,_,es & Stream Imuacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes j No
Dischar<=e ori«inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. [f discharge is observed, was the conveyance mase -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If dischai-Le is observed, did it reach Water of the State! 01'yes, notify DWQ)
C] Yes ❑ No
c, il' dischmi-Le is observed, what is the estimated flow in Val/thin?
d. Dries dischar«e bypass a lagoon sysien)? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes'No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storave capacity (freeboard plus storm stora`,c) less than adequate'?
SLRucture I Strjk•turc 2 Structurc
ldcnti ficr:...... Z. -I.!.1......... ..CK .......................................
Frechnard finche,):
5/00
Spillway ❑ Yes 1A No
Structurc 4 Structurc..Structure 6
...................................... ....... _............................................................
Continued on back

Facility Number: [)ate of' Inspection Printed on;
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integgrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepaae, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management of
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
7121/2000
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
zr
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
! 1. is there evidence of over application" ❑ Excessive Ponding [3 PAN ED Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type 0 u,�—VX . _ S'�7. �_s?��.f, _ r—t 'e C� r—,�, S S
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certi
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination:?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes ,KNo
❑ Yes KNo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
r
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
5TYes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available'?
13. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ WUP, checklists. design. maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (lel irrigation. Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
2l. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
.. a violaiigt. . ... . .erg. .. v. .. pofeii dirring;this:�. . . ... will ;..-e..Citi further.
CID
rre�oridence'. aboi uk'thi's :visit ...... .
Comments (refer to question #).- Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
ikc ✓L L e— ' S Yk�p e eG 19 �1 S ► �'—
❑ Yes j&No
❑ Yes �No
[:]Yes t.No
❑ Yes % No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes [K. No
Yes 5No
❑ Yes 0 No .
❑
Yes j No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
A,
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 611r, Date: 5/00

Facility Number: — Date of inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Ator helow ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes T5,No
28. Is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, [:]Yes &No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes KNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes KNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes [—]No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:
5100
5100

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
178 Bell Farm Road
Statesville NC 28625
Dear Burt A. Bell:
*IT •
NCDENR
NORTH CARQLINN� - NT OF
E=NVIRONMENT p,� URCEES
&'N+A�TURAL RMOt.lh(a1@
December 30, 1999
'JAN 10 200D
N0091 OF f ffl.fA' 191'At MANAAEMEaT
NOORFr LaE i:EWNRt Offiu
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 49-54
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincere] ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Arlo
M z I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
William E. Holman, Secretary
Burt A. Bell
178 Bell Farm Rd.
Stateville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Bell:
NCDEN'R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONME,:T AND NiauRAL REsouRCES
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
October 13, 1999
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Bell Creek Farm, Facility #: 49=54
Iredell-County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted -a site inspection of your facility,on October 7, .
1999. In general the facility appeared to be in good shape. However, the following deficiencies were
noted during the inspection:
1) The vegetation on the main storage pond needs -to be maintained.
2) Rye grass needs to be included in the waste management plan. .
3) A copy of the animal mortality checklist needs to be included in your files.
Please note that during many of Mr. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are
often missing one or more components of the farm plan that should be available for review. The
following items must be available for review by the inspector during the inspection:
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram, which shows fencing, streams, buffer zones,,and feed areas.
• Waste Application records, with -accompanying waste analyses.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization plan, tract/field.number.,,usablelwettable acres .(not -necessarily total
acreage), list of crops, PAN required,.and amount of waste produced 'by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis information. Must have three years of -data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single"folder.
• Emergency Action Plan which must -be -posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
'Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice of
Violation or other enforcement actions. Also, remember that waste applications should be made
during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general, waste should be.applied no
earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex -Gleason, P. E.
Water -Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File

outine O Com laint 0 Follow-up of DW ins ection O Follow -u of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number S Date of Inspection
Time of Inspectio:i 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified [] Registered 13 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
..........................
Farm Name: ................ 7Gl..d.........C,-r-'?,f ...........�t t! 1......................... County: .......... --IIKP- 1 ...........................................
Owner Name:.....................&.1- .A..........3.Ckt ..,......... Phone No: �% Z........ 3.:C.'-�......... .............I..........
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Maili;M�..7.
ng Address: ......:........ -Ilcy........1•""c��!✓�,....��......................... ....................................... �.��P...�.�.
Onsite Representative: e................ .5.Pr..1........................................Integrator:.........................
Certified Operator:,,,,,,,,u r' ..... xA( ............ Operator Certification Number:..,!.5K�..........
Location of Farm:
............................................................................................. I ........................................................................................................... I ................................................
.................... ; .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
atitude Longitude
Design Current ,Design Current , Design. ,
Swine Ca achy Po elation Pou,try Ca acit Po ulatKon Cattle Capacity_
�s
,k
tt
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Eow to Finish
,s
';
Division of Soil and Water Conservation Qperation Review
❑Dairy
,�
13.Dtv>ision of Soil and Water Conservation Gomphance Inspection
�f i
❑ Non -Dairy
t;
of WatO Compltancerluspeettoii
t t
❑ Other
.Other Agencyi�ision
i fatronah
°-Total SSLW
p 'Revlew ,,i
outine O Com laint 0 Follow-up of DW ins ection O Follow -u of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number S Date of Inspection
Time of Inspectio:i 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified [] Registered 13 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
..........................
Farm Name: ................ 7Gl..d.........C,-r-'?,f ...........�t t! 1......................... County: .......... --IIKP- 1 ...........................................
Owner Name:.....................&.1- .A..........3.Ckt ..,......... Phone No: �% Z........ 3.:C.'-�......... .............I..........
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Maili;M�..7.
ng Address: ......:........ -Ilcy........1•""c��!✓�,....��......................... ....................................... �.��P...�.�.
Onsite Representative: e................ .5.Pr..1........................................Integrator:.........................
Certified Operator:,,,,,,,,u r' ..... xA( ............ Operator Certification Number:..,!.5K�..........
Location of Farm:
............................................................................................. I ........................................................................................................... I ................................................
.................... ; .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
atitude Longitude
Design Current ,Design Current , Design. ,
Swine Ca achy Po elation Pou,try Ca acit Po ulatKon Cattle Capacity_
�s
,k
tt
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Eow to Finish
,s
urgent -
r'alation
t;
I Ntrmber'of Lagoons❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ' [] Spray Field Area
"0
;HoldirwgtPonds /- Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. it discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (/ryes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: `% �L,(,f�G�
Freeboard (inches): ..� EV � t� �5........................../............................................
.......................................... .............................
W 11
5. Are there any immediafe threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
[]Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes )kNo
❑ Yes tjNo
Structure 6
❑ Yes No
Continued on back
❑ Layer
1E1
❑Dairy
Non -Layer
�f i
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
°-Total SSLW
urgent -
r'alation
t;
I Ntrmber'of Lagoons❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ' [] Spray Field Area
"0
;HoldirwgtPonds /- Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. it discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (/ryes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: `% �L,(,f�G�
Freeboard (inches): ..� EV � t� �5........................../............................................
.......................................... .............................
W 11
5. Are there any immediafe threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
[]Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes )kNo
❑ Yes tjNo
Structure 6
❑ Yes No
Continued on back

Facility ?Yuinber: — Date (it' Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure pian?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuclures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
.M
13. Do the receiving crops differ with fhose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in.effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes $�No
KYes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes IVENo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes Mo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes hNo
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Wo
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes JSNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes >E] No
•PVO•VIO�a>�icjriS Or• d�fClCnCif?S •�rC I1Q�:ec1• d4rr.Frig i�i�S.V1S'It.•'Y;ou :wiil•reeive;r}o #`uithgr
Corns o7ide i ' e. ab' k l:W V151t.'
Comments refer ta; nest on'# F'Ex laih'aiu YES'ans,w'ers and/or an recontinendations or an other'cotriments'=:.Ter
Use drawrngs of fact/
it to bettei,1ezplarn situat�aas� (useE�additteanaUpages as necessary) y� iEtl,
°tl hbe
..+F. E'. ..i... e, <'• .. ;.
�Ve-ec I� K&Of— all UkLs� CLVV, si3 o-o,c..: c, q- eel ew.AL
S�Drage porl� .� �'l�erJ(s v� o� &J. r
c/ GLn
QY� X55 14 �v 6e- rqd � uY.e5� ka
Reviewer/Inspector Name _ ", ;- {t 1 „ c' . sr g • t A F
ji
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: d` t
M
3/23/99

Facility @lumber: — hate of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes�No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ YesKNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property) \
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes KNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes �No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes JR�No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes *q
Mclitional Commentsand/or.,Drawings:-
3/23/99
3/23/99

?y.JAMES B. HUNT.
N91
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
Burt A. Bell
178 Bell Farm Rd.
Stateville, NC 28677
Subject: Site Inspection
Bell Creek Farm, Facility #: 49-54
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to .be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpennitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also; the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOO R ESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2$11$
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER . 809E RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen N Ap12lication for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 Ibs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste, application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil anal, (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service'allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application. rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

State of North Carolina .
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Nater Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
IV[ EIV[ 0RANDUIV1
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langley
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
4 pperr
7
AN
N C D ET`40 R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANO NATURAL RE50URCES
Ka IMPT.
ENVIItCx'dWFi.NT, UZALMK
& NAruRAL RraouTtum
MAR F 1998
QIiE1= .ar IMM"1031 l UMM
ftwtalE ram em
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number
Any comments that the regional office can provide on the issuance of a special agreement to this
facility by the EMC would be greatly appreciated. Please provide any comments in writing (e-
mail messages are acceptable) to me as soon as possible.
Thank you for your timely assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
?H7
,✓
/ !7
Wc. %V w o '�- � wUj
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Afitrmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina ''It
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality k
APPLICATION FOR T
O A SPECIAL AGREEMENT.
4^,_ Ste,'.;.r�' � ';•.�
{INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANMIAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPEC&L•�A'G E `" E
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): 6 t Z._
2. Facility No.: Sy -
3. Facility Name:��-f��-'y _
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
5. Mailing Address: 7 CI I '" ' M ' .
City:State: Zip:
Telephone No.: (Zoe.) .Z /;2G! Z f7-2 2977
6. County where facility is located:r
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle):
8. Application Date:
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have anapproved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with -their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not .
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
FORM SPAG 1198 Page 1 of 4

?. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include.
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
FORM SPAG 1/98 1
7 /7 �s�-!
J
Ca/�i7td��
7� �,
yv �
� age 2 of 4
.s��

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a-certifiedplan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
AppIicant's Certification:
I, _ &.,,1 , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if a reuired parts of this application are not completed and if all
this facility is found to be ineligible to enter into a special agreement with the EMC nothing in
.'ALL
Print Name of
ZZ4 A.A 71-- Date
Signature of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

State of North Carolina
A Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Burt A. Bell
178 Bell Farm Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Burt A. Bell:
XIVA
NCDENR
No" CARouNA DEPARTMENT oFr
EwFtoNmENT AND NAruRALT.RFsouRCE5'1'
July 17, 1998
JUL 20 19')D
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Bell Creek Farm
Facility Number: 49-54
Iredell County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for Special
Agreement which was received on February 24, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Burt A. Bell in order
to allow additional time for Burt A. Bell to obtain and implement a certified animal waste
management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or Iiabihty for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates and
conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties,
injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/)0% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 571 or Ms. Sonya Avant at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
/ x6eo��
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DW Regional__Office---
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

'L
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-54
BURT A. BELL
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Burt A. Bell, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",
and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State
of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 211.0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-54
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-54
Special Agreement
t Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
S. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Bell Creek Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

w
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
178 Bell Farm Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Burt A. Bell:
/ • aWA
AwAoftowaft
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATuRAL R£souRCEs
August 20, 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number: 49-54
Bell Creek Farm
Iredell County
D.CI ter. OV
IROMWEVrr, Thr'W.
AVG 24 1998
a#YJS;up BF EkII!flilRMIR gt rml
a ea-UMUf is= affi&E
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: MRO Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Central Files
Shannon Langley
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-54
BURT A. BELL
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Burt A. Bell, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",
and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency of the State
of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER' and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A .
NCAC 2H.0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility v.,as registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 211.0217(a)(1)(1)).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph i (a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-54
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER'S" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-54
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Bell Creek Farm
'' urt P - is f
Print Name of Owner
Date 7-3 Q — g
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina E vironmental Management Commission:
Date
��,,,,Chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
178 Bell Farm Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Burt A. Bell:
r••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
N -C. t7$t''r. OF
f1r,.Nr,'t"
& NATUt2AL RV30L'I2cEs
FEB ;e.5 1998
MISIRN OF IN1'!R3! NOTk1 pANASfaq
Y11G3ULLE OEOXNA1 Offig
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal.Waste Management Plan
Bel I Creek Farm
Facility Number: 49-54
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as Iong as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility, If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/]0% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please subnvt this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail alone with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to brine each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your inunediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
01
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 17626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50c1� recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Burt A. Bell
Rt. 15, Box 246
Stateville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Bell:
bb
[DEHNR
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Bell Creek Farm, Facility #: 49-54
Iredell County, NC
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street,Ni;CAn
�FAX 71]4-653"6040
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Equal Opportunity{Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-463-1699X14, "� 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. ex -G eeso
Water Quali egional Supervisor

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
Q Division of Water Quality
Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection 1 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Ibxcegistered [a Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
a 1
Farm Name: ...............:' !dt....... V-e_e. .......f.r"tra-..................................... County: ............-# .r. ..5 1 ........................................
Owner Name:......................�A........ .................... I...................... ..... Phone No: % Z. �.�. ..�,. ......
..... .........................................................
Facility Contact: ....................... .. Title: ... Phone No:
MailingAddress:...... .7.. ...... r4 ....... .i kx"Yk.� .....J..................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:....... ..... Integrator:. ................ .........................
Certified Operator :.......-.......� e-lt.................................................................. Operator Certification Number,..... ...
Location of Farm:
w. 7411:7.............-....... ............. N&%. mtn...... 5K_. l..S"7...... aeA..... Fr►,r. V, ..
Raj
Z. ;..... .....5........... x..1.
.... —.-0-h.-..`M:►?.......R.-.............
Latitude ©• ®' ©" Longitude • 4 =CL
Design _ Current Design Current Design
-w tCapacity Papulatton= Poultr "'Capacity Po ulati6n; Cattle Ca acrt P
_Y P Y P P. Y .:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes _,No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JKNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gallinin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ,KNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes XNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N.No
7, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes KNo
7125197
.. . .....:......... .
❑ Layer
x
airy
`❑
Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy Z (�
❑ Other
t y "h
Total Design Capacity p[�
3.
Total SSLW
�' d
._
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area 0
5
:z ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes _,No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JKNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gallinin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ,KNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes XNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N.No
7, Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes KNo
7125197

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes (KNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
18.
Identifier:
❑ Yes
XNo
19.
Freeboard (ft): .................3..... .........
❑ Yes
JFR No
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
JgNo
11.
is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ONo
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
JKNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
<No
24.
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
(Zlo
Waste Application
❑ Yes
No
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
P No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .f-�?.1r✓1<..... r...Vq .SS......................................................................................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
20 No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
XNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
JFR No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
RNo
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
M No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
UNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
<No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
No
[� No.violatiohioi r. deficiencies.wer6ii6t4during this:visit.`Yo_ umill recei've�no�furthier
:. • ctirrespbtadei><ce about �this:yisit:� ::.:: - : ; ... ; � . � . � . � . ' . � :. � :: � :. ; : � ::.. � :...
N4 , ty e7rzzss fo e-
s -x,'11
cc.r -kAiea plc,v�
ob %vii—S Cs�i ca�c�had:l ►�� tS
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �f/G� ���= Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources A! A •
Mooresville Regional Office
0Wft%WW-.M00
]amen B. Hunt, Jr., Governor EDF-HNF;Z
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 17, 1997
Burt A. Bell
Rt. 15, Box 246
Stateville, NC 28677
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Bell Creek Farm, Facility ##: 49-54
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Bell:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on September 16, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson
of this Office. In general the facility was in good shape, As discussed during the inspection, the tree
on the storage pond needs to be cut and a pumping marker install. Other improvements concerning
the paved lot should be implemented in accordance with the plan being developed by your technical
specialist.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleson, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
M.
919 North Mcin Street,N%4)CAn
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 1TPI1�74 7'�'r,*!a 5051. recycled/100% post -consumer paper

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review_ f
R19DWO Animal Feedlot Operation Site inspection �0 a
�T:�.x' .. .,...,.:.:..i....v+w..w+.n»x..++.nwn-:v».....e. .. ..... v....r...., t -...�....a..-.,�r....,.,,r...».....ts_�-�ra.nr,nnen.nr..-.-.:--..--a. �, ..... .,...nen...............c..,.r...-. ..........++n' ':w�'+.aSt... v� :.�
Routine 0 Com taint 0 Follow-up of DIVO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number C
Time of Inspection
O' 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ORegistered 0 Certified © Applied for Permit E3 Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ........ ..........
......"
perated:.............
Farm Name ..[�.........0C:.s .....! mCounty:....... . .. . .................:c..
OwnerName: �.a�-..�................. . ............................... Phone No:..................................................... .........
Facility Contact: .......................... .. Title:................... ........ Phone No:.7. -.L. (.n..
Mailing Address: .a7. ,. r� ... .. .TGt .S. ;...1 . ...................................
.......... ............ wa ......
OnsiteRepresentative:...........................................................................:............................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator..... :. ..............................1..............................,.............. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of FCarm. /7 ' 7 I (]
..... A....%.}. ....w� L:... t�I✓ .... ........Y IF.I.... ...ii'.%. .... ... ... ........ ca.:!�.C.........Z4T... ...Ld.1..........S1i......a1.4 ..... C.S�.r.f.�................ 6
�. • n
%.�.- .. i5c...�..........C.� . ��� .kms......./.J. i..... ..... ,rit..t. � # .5 ..f -?;c................ c ��-!...�.. ....t n..... r�.�.............. ►
Latitude �• �� C�'° Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer airy j p o )
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Bows Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds JE1 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
*0
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes'
Discharge oril*inated at: ❑ La-oon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, way the conveyance man-made'
❑ Yes
❑ No
b, tf discharge is obscrvcd, did it retch Surfa, .e Water'? (If ycs. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. Ifdi.schar,'e is observed, what is the estimated flow in-al;min"
d. Does discharge bypass, a lagoon systetn'? (If yes. notify DWQ)
[I Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�Z]No
44. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes
;RNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
IgNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
ff No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'?
❑ Yes
� No
7/25/97
Continued
on hack

Facility Number: —
4
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed:'
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Punds, Flush -Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure '_ Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes PNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ......-5....!. .............. ......................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes tRNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'' ❑ Yes "No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? [Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? SR Yes ❑ No
Waste_Anplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yeso
7
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff enter g waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. P type ✓1 j �..............................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those design in in the Animal Waste %vlanaoement Plan (AW:MP)'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application! ❑ Yes ,Bj No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes �] No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment'? ❑ Yes No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ,10 No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes J,No
22_ Does record keeping need improvement'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of thenimal Waste Nlanagement Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'! ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this:visit..You.will receive no further
correspondence about this.visit:
Comtnents'(refer t© iluestion #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other"comments:`•
Use;drawini s of facility to better explain situations. (use additional u yes as nec.essar
y. p R.9 Y)
l� IG�r V 1!
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name _.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:� Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Burt A. Bell
Bell Creek Farm
179 Bell Farm Rd
Statesville NC 2$677
Dear Mr. Bell:
f
. Orr
KCAIAZL
April 3, 1997 & NATURAi,
APR 7 1991
DIVISMU OF EVI _,n.2Ei1EUTkl L'1d:4&ENW
kiDUEMLLE KNISAl OFTInE
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Designation of Operator in Charge
Bell Creek Farm
Facility Number 49--54
Iredell County
You were notified by letter dated December 5, 1996, that you were required to designate a certified animal waste
management system operator as Operator in Charge for the subject facility by January 1, 1997. Enclosed with that
letter was an Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically for your facility, Instructions for Completing
Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator, and an Application for
Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management System Operator. Our records indicate that these
completed Forms have not yet been returned to our office.
As was explained in the previous letter, a training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste
management systems involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry (with a liquid waste system). Therefore owners of
these systems were allowed to request,that they be issued temporary certifications until December 31, 1997. All that
was required to receive this temporary certification was the completion of the Application Form.
For you convenience, we are sending you additional copies of the Operator in Charge Designation Form specifically
for your facility, Instructions for Completing Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste
Management System Operator, and an Application for Temporary Certification as an Animal Waste Management
System Operator. Please return this completed Form. to this office as soon as possible but in no case later than April
25, 1997. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in locating a certified
operator.
Please note that failure to designate an Operator in Charge of your animal waste management system, is a violation
of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2 and you will be assessed a civil penalty unless an appropriately certified operator is designated.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving you of the responsibility and liability for
any past or future violations for your failure to designate an appropriate Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please contact our Technical Assistance and Certification Group at
[phone].
Sincerely,
,x-4
for
Steve W. Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Facility File
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535, N'WfVcAn
owl FAX [phone]
Ralelgh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone]% recycles/I0°,6 post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
Burt A, BeII
Bell Creek Farm
178 Bell Farm Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Mr. Bell:
IDEHNR
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENVIRONMENT, TTE % 'Pff
e? NATURAL
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation DEC 17 1996
Facility: Bell Creek Farm
Facility ID #: 49-54
Iredell County DIVISION OF ENVIRUNDEOTAL NANAGUENT
MOOAESVILLE AE0I011AL OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
cop.. Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files y
Water Pollution Control System & Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission a An Equal Opportunity/Afflrmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Ralelgh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _
Facility No. Iq -S,L
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 10-A , 1995
Time: P 00 M
Farm Name/Owner: i5e-l I Creak FArn,x e u r f A. Led
Mailing Address: .gel i C ree k PArm J. 8,3-x z y 5 4,ti-I-esv� f I e, g j7-7
County: Ire f Integrator• Phone:
On Site Representative: �R�r+� S� r► l + _ Phone: -1
Physical. Address/Location: °`� i� rnP_k ��k�n� IV
Type of Operation: Swine,Poultry_l a':4L✓Design Capacity:Lo aNumber of Animals on Site:
Latitude: p ° y7' yi� Longitude: 3s° 1/4' y f Elevation: to ° Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot +- 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) OrNo Actual Freeboard:—LFt. 9 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or& Was any erosion observed? Yes oo
Is adequate land available for spray? 0
or No Is the cover crop adequate?es r No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from a
Dwellings` es or No
100 Feet from Wells? Igor No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes o� )
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or(9
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 15 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No I
Additional Comments: d s
Inspector Nam r:tB er�y Signatur
cc: Facility Assessment Unit