550021_PERMIT FILE_20171231

(Type of Visit: is Compliance Inspection V Operation Review V Structure Evaluation V a'echnical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-ue Q Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: 03 I Arrival Time: o _ Departure Time: 0 County: �� C
Farm Name: Vll��}Q/�' la Owner Email:
Owner Name; Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
0
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region: $*llll:)
Design Current
"Design
Current �;-
Design
Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop ' �',
CattleC-apacity
Pop.
Wean to Finish
Layer
airy Cowes
2,Z0
Wean to Feeder
Non -La erai
Calf
so
Feeder to Finish
"
Heifer
l
1 O
Farrow to Wean
D , P,oult .
Design
Ca aci
Current
Po1,Jon-Dairy
ry Cowrjt7
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
La ers
x
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Layers _';
Beef Feeder
Boars .
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
11 IN
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults 1
Other
Other
♦:ua��rsareeism.z�nn.'ss amnauwnsaaq'� +/
'�mY+.''�t+•a:+K
c+:sa
qYL _ .i7f. .
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes `,�`lVa 11, ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: E] Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: L g
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes []No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify. DWQ) [:]Yes ❑No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: R�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Ycs o ❑ NA ❑ NE
O a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [, ❑ NE
Structural Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes J!!Q40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or envira ental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ YesA[o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes "'�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require EDYes I NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes NEO''No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window❑%Evidence of Wind Drift'' A❑�,`jApplication Out/sid(e�off jAppprooveedd Area
12. Crop Type(s): Ca �t1i 'S,� �C t �+vl�•1 r_�M'6 1%
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes 10 No
[] NA
0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes f
NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes "lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 1!3!]!�
❑ NA
❑ NE
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yeso ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
111
El VIT�s est Maps 0 Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check t e appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o [:]NA ❑ NE
iasieAp Ip icatio
�n Weekly Freeboard -[Waste Analysis O'Soil�is aste Transfers D_�reather Code
T'
❑16infall ❑stockingrop Yield ❑J.2T Minute Inspections a Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

acili Number: - Date of Inspection:
f24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? j����Ycs�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No 'tlZ ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
rilure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes�Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?❑Yes ❑
No
[3NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dLad _gWmalk with 24 hours and/or document [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes tallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency sittiations as required by the ❑Yes No [3NA E3 NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes t�*o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond [] Other;
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [—]Yes �<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes h1110.1/0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer,to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other.comments.
IIse drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
I,'--:-:7L
� io �3 o-
12
o
E;r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011

Type of Visit: 60 Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: a i3 Arrival Time: Departure Time: a3'• County: uxc—lk Region:
Farm Name: �1 vAp'- Owner Email:
Owner Name: Gam' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Certification Number: -2,C>
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
' .v a .+ s _. :: �, .s„
�•` �,
1 1 "-
F3
.. ■ ■■�
i �.. i. � �
, �
� ,
, ,MR1
ter®
■
■ OR
-_
DischarLes and Stream IMDaCts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No 0 NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA }❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

1 14
Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [] Yes [�t�o` [DNA ❑ NE
` I a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No [ Ai ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Strucfure 6
Identifier: i
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑'lees [] NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q,,'Oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes❑ NA E:]NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yesto ❑ NA [:]NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA] ONE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Api2lication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 'Poo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes \Eaf90 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wnd Drift ❑,� �A,p4plliication Outside of Approved a
12. Crop Type(s): $1L!1
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes_Z6o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes t&No 0 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes f�§jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No NA E
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ec is s sign ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[3<aste Applicatio Z Weekly Freeboard 4D<aste Analysis —.E!TSoil Analysis Waste Trans ers E5Weather Code
Rainfall ocki�Crop Yield�0 Minute Inspections Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes kN
A [:]NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 2/4/2011 Continued

1H1011 Number: - Date of Inspection: '-� 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Ye& E] NANE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge. If yes, check Yes ❑ No QtNA Lj NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
JETF"ailure to complete annual sludge survey ailure to develop a POA for sludge levels
L�Kn-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non -compliance -
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [] Yes ❑ NA [] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes [3 NoZNA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document F] Yes_.jjUT4o [] NA [] NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than norma .
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emer s required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeb�roblems, over-ation)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at a facility? If yes, check the box below.
Application Field Lagoon/Storage Pond Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
Yes " ElNA E] NE
Yes [] NA [D NE
Yes IVO
[] Yes)q:No
[� Yes o
[DNA E] NE
NA [] NE
E] NA [] NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011

i
Date of Visit: t°t% Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ��'� C Region:'
Farm Name: _ ` G '_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:' _® Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Phone No:
Integrator: 4�
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish.
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: ❑ e =6
Longitude: =0=1 °=1
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population_ Cattle
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Cow
Design Current
Capacity Popu�'m
LCR
Heifer t O 1 12.0
tS Dry Cow D S
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑•Beef Feeder
Number of Structures: Fh
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ❑No❑NE
❑ Yes [--]No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ YesNA ElNE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128/04 Continued
hMr, lon of Water Quality
Facility Number pivision of So 'i and Water Conservation'
Other Agency.
Visit �kCompilance Inspection
t� Operation Review Q Structure Evaluatfon Technical Assistance
for Visit 0outine O Complaint
F
0 Follow up Q Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: t°t% Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ��'� C Region:'
Farm Name: _ ` G '_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:' _® Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Phone No:
Integrator: 4�
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish.
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: ❑ e =6
Longitude: =0=1 °=1
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population_ Cattle
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Cow
Design Current
Capacity Popu�'m
LCR
Heifer t O 1 12.0
tS Dry Cow D S
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑•Beef Feeder
Number of Structures: Fh
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ❑No❑NE
❑ Yes [--]No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ YesNA ElNE
ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128/04 Continued

■
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes ❑ No [INE
L75--- tructure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stricture 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:~`
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ yes] NA [:1 NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) kK1
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen I threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ClYes o ❑ NA [INE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ElNA ElNE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ y.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? �
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes2—cl
❑ NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Ye..: NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs []Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) �� ` C-�") ` J Wi�� \ &,A
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes 2sKo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:
❑ Y4cNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
�.t. � ys ,� � � I>e � � y ��;,: �l•. �,y � IV "4: ;• Y ��i�� ; �} iki �i,*�1��. e� `.;s' s'
tCo�o epta {refer to questlon #}:. Iaxplafn any YES agewers r a reco�mmendadonsar�any,,NL"
mments t��
Ose drawings of facpity� Ea'better explain situations ad es a e�essary)'
�'•.: 'S.i �.,� Cyt r.. �i _^��
CGS- L
$�� C
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,t�' Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

Additiohid Comments and/oi• Drawings: r '
1212&/04
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
Via.
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. WUP i n Mas ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need irn rovement? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑Yes
<�
❑ NA
El NE
aste Applicationeekly Freeboard aste Analysis Soil Analysis �
aste Transfers nnual Certification
,P"Rainfall Stockingrop Yield l20 Minute Inspections ,3_90nthly and I. Rain Inspection�Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainlireakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No�A
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No jj5WA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
'*'�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead a� nimals within 24 hours and/or document
ElYes❑
NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
1:�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 L Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ YesElNA
ElNE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application
V
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes)io
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�i or ❑ NA
❑ NE
Additiohid Comments and/oi• Drawings: r '
1212&/04

19 Division of Water.:Quaiity.
Facility Number �j� 2 O Division of Sol] and Water Conservation
- Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review C) Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency C) Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 4 � Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: LV C Reglon: ffi'"�
Farm Name: 1 Owner Email:
�w -
Owner Name: C� c �' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _C01-1
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other'
❑ Other
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 ❑ ' = Longitude: = ° ❑ ' =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
I I ❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Cattle
Design
Capacity
Current
Po
i Cow
�,�5
1 qi
-SCalfi
Heifer
fQa
160
3S
Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: T-1
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
❑ YesZ4 ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ye NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
/ a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
►--v Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
E3 Yes ❑ No'NN NE
Structure 5 rue ure 6
r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ElNA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) .
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes �E o �❑ NA E]NE
through a waste management or closure plan? U
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme al threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Y" ❑ NA ElNE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA C:1 NE
maintenance or improvement:
Waste Application
la. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o
maintenance/improvement?
1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [V
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or I0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑� /Evidence off Wpii ddDDriii ❑ Application Outside of Area 1 /
12. Crop type(s) Ca r V 1 �� I �C'_' .1 C5cAA ��"`// we>
13. Soil type(s)
NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
14. Do the receiving c�differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes :No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes JX1io ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, ❑ Yes: o ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes �Kp ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ YesTj_:�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a _41�.:� �_;?y ."
,Coinnieiit.s (refer;to question #)ti:- Explain any YES.anewers-a,ndlor sny. recomuteniladons or aoy,�ather, comments.
Us_ a drawings of,i'acillty to°better; ezplain situations {usc additional psges'asnecessary)"u y ; 3,, �r ,�, ,.>;,±
..fe f.'•.`,Ss6 .,fl±.`, \ '5�" b ,F e g. L'_ .: ,�<R. i aff._ .,,..., .. .. ,....s`.L.n �F..,# -.1.
Reviewer/inspector Name1 Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

. I'Vacility Number: — Date of Inspection
Re aired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yeso El NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ yes 5❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
� e
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
aste Applicationeekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ail Analysis Waste Transfersl�nnnuual Certification
ainfall 6,5tocking Crop Yield ❑ l e Inspections Monthly and I" Rain inspections Bather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ,�KA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No �F A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an ively certified o erator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
42::§m _ ❑ Yes IVo ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead anjiru4s within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were hig an normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional ffice of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboar problems, Off app kation)
32. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ YesrK, ❑ NA
❑ Yes0 ❑ NA
❑ Yeso NA
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
El Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ y ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additiapal Comments and/or Drawings: L'
12128/04

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 550021 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC55CO21 n Denied Access
Inspection -type: CoMpiiance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Lincoln Region: MpQrt§viIle
Date of Visit: 09/16/2010 _ Entry Time:Q3:00 PM Exit Time: 04.30 PM
Farm Name: Piedmont ,Jerseys
Owner: Corey A Lutz
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 4399 Ritchie Linco_Inton NC 280929575
Physical Address: 4392 RitchieRd Lincointon NC 28029575
Facility Status: E Compliant
Location of Farm:
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude: 35°32'45" Longitude: X17'02"_ __
From the intersection of Startown Rd. (SR 1005) and Ritchie Rd. (SR 1271), travel west on Ritchie (about 1 mi.), Farm is on left.
General location: — 4 mi. north of Lincointon.
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts
ij Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Corey A Lutz Operator Certification Number: 20970
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Corey A. Lutz Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Corey A. Lutz Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James B Phone: [phone]
Ext, 21 2
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
04/15/10 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.6 Lbs11000 Gallons
06/11/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.5 Lbs/11000 Gallons
01/22/10 > Soil Analysis
a
Page: 1

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz
Inspection Date: 09/56/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Cattle
Facility Number: 550021
Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
O Cattle -Dairy Calf 50 12
O Cattle - Dairy Heifer 160 20
Q Cattle - Dry Cow 50 46
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 225 210
Total Design Capacity: 485
Total SSLW: 562, 5C0
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond 1 18.00 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number : 550021
Inspection Date: 09/16/2040 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ 0 Cl
Discharge originated at:
n ■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Structure
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n ■
Application Field
n
or closure plan?
Other
n
n ■
n
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
n
improvement?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural Freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large trees, severe
n ■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n ■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n ■
n
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
Cl ■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n ■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n ■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of Incorrect application?
n ■
❑
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page:3

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 09/16/20 1 0 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NF
PAN? Cl
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? fl
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? 17-11
Crop Type 1 Cam (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15 Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
n
n
16. did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
D
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number : 550021
Inspection Date: 09/16/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? 0
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 0 ■ 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
0
120 Minute inspections?
0
Weather code?
0
Weekly Freeboard?
0
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall 8 monthly?
rl
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
0
Crop yields?
0
Stocking?
0
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■ Cl 0
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■ 0 0
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0 ■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
fl
0 ■ 0
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
0
■ 0 0
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0000
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0 ■ 0 0
Quality representative immediately.
Page:5

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz
Inspection Date: 09/16/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspectic n with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Humber: 550021
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■np
n■nn
n■❑n
Page: 6

NC EN
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natty
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
May 21, 2010
Corey A Lutz
Piedmont Jerseys
4399 Ritchie Rd
Lincolnton, NC 28092-9575
� [E0E0W E
r I sot�rp 2 4 2010
NC DF,'�R MR ---DPP rpeman
DWQ -A uifer Pro ry
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC550021
Piedmont Jerseys
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Lincoln County
Dear Corey A Lutz:
In accordance with your April 12, 2010 request to increase the animal numbers on this farm, we are
hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Corey A Lutz, authorizing the
operation of the subject animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Piedmont Jerseys, located in Lincoln County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf: 50
Dairy Heifer: 160
Milk Cow: 225
Dry Cow: 50
Beef Stocker Calf:
Beef Feeder:
Beef Brood Cow:
Other:
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC550021 dated October 1, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please nay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
If your Waste Utilization Pian (WUP) has been developed based on site-specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 North C aroli na
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org �aturall�
An Equal Opportunely 1 Affirmative Action Employer

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
� laws; �rrules,�standards,;and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
E under fhis permit convey an property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC=2T,.0105(b a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
r wells -shall be constructed-within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field,
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 11.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting' their website at:
www.erh.noaa.aov/er/Lsi2/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Lincoln County Health Department
Lincoln County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC550021)
AFO Notebooks
-2-

ri WJ
NCIDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Corey A Lutz
Piedmont Jerseys
4399 Ritchie Rd
Lincolnton, NC 280929575
Dear Corey A Lutz:
Colleen H. Sullins
Director
LVOctober i, 2009
OCT i 4 2009
DWQ -Aquifer
Dee Freeman
IEretary
101
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC550021
Piedmont Jerseys
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Lincoln County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Corey A Lutz, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management system
in accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Piedmont Jerseys, located in Lincoln County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Dairy Calf:
Dairy Heifer: 40
Milk Cow: 200
Dry Cow: 50
Beef Stocker Calf -
Beef Feeder:
Beef Brood Cow:
Other:
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWC550021 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please pay careful attention to the
record keepi» a and monitorina conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
Locati= 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 ori -t
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1.877.623-6748 N oi-th C aro l 2nd
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org watt fra l
An Equal Opportunity l Afrmaive Action Employer �I `ij [ `f JJ�

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site-specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 -foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at icast 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition 1I.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.gov/er/M/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
fog- Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG200000)
cc; (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Lincoln County Health Department
Lincoln County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Niles (Permit No. AWC550021)
AFO Notebooks

•
0 Uvision of Water Quality
j -j Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 550021 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC550021 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance InspeQtign Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Lincoln Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/17/2009 Entry Time: 12:30 PM ,. Exit Time: 02:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Piedmont Jerseys Owner Email: Piedmontierseys cDcha
Owner: CgrPhone: 704-735-1222
Mailing Address: 4399 Ritchie Rd Lincolnton NC 280929575
Physical Address: 4399 Ritchie Rd Lincolnton NC 280929575___
f=acilityStatus: E Compliant
Location of Farm:
n Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude:35°32'45,,8 Longitude: 81°17'02"
From the intersection of Startown Rd. (SR 1005) and Ritchie Rd. (SR 1271), travel west on Ritchie (about 1 mi.), Farm is on left.
General location: — 4 mi. north of Lincolnion.
Question Areas:
jj Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
W Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Corey A Lutz Operator Certification Number: 20970
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title ' Phone
24 hour contact name Corey A. Lutz Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Corey A, Lutz Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext 2162
Inspector Signatu re, Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
06/11/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.5 Lbs/1000 Gallons
07/07/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/11/08 > Soil Analysis
a
Page: 1

N
Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Carey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 12/1712009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 40 36
Cattle - Dry Cow 50 47
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 208
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 290
Total SSLW: 390,000
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�Vasle Pond 1 18.00 30.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 12117/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? rl ■ Cl 11
Discharge originated at:
fl
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
Structure
n
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
fl
n
■
n
b. aid discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
fl
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
❑
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
f-1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
00
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
Cl
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
00
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
fl
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
fl
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

A
Permit: AVVC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A t_utz
Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 12/1712009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routire
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application
n
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n_
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Com (Sikage)
Crop Type 1
ma4rain
Crop Type 2 Barley Oats (Wheat,
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management n H
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ® ❑ Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n
nn
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n®np
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n®❑n
Yes No NA NE
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ®n n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n■nn
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
F1
WUP?
Page: 4

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 12/1712009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n■ n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections? n
Weather code? n
Weekly Freeboard?.
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
F1
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
Cl
Q
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Q
■
13
0
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection pate: 12117!2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DVVQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 M 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fait to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? 0 ■ 1) 0
33 Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 550021 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC550021 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Lincoln _ Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 08/14/2008 Entry Time:03 30 PM Exit Time: 05:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Piedmont Jerseys Owner Email:
Owner: Corey A Lutz
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 4399 Ritchie Rd Lincolnton NC 280929575
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°32'45" Longitude: 81°1702"
From the intersection of Startown Rd. (SR 1005) and Ritchie Rd. (SR 1271), travel west on Ritchie (about 1 mi.), Farm is on left.
General location: 4 mi. north of Lincolnton,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other lssues
Certified Operator: Corey A Lutz Operator Certification Number: 20970
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Corey A. Lutz Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Corey A. Lutz
Primary Inspei
Inspector Sign
Secondary Ins
Inspection Summary:
07/07/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.6 Lbs/1000 Gallons
10/05/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/11/08 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Date: 'tq,
NJ .
Page: 1

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 08/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Heiler 40 60
Q Cattle - Dry Cow 50 48
Cattle -Milk Cow 200 204
Total Design Capacity: 290
Total SSLW: 390,000
Waste Structures
TVDe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond 1 18.00 48.00
Page: 2

4
Permit: AVVC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 08/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n n ■ n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
o
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection Stora a & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of -the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Applicatio,n
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Luiz
Inspection Date: 08/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 550021
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
0,
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? n
Page: 4

.j
Permit: AWC550021 Owner -Facility; Corey A Lutz
Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 08/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
rl
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
D
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
Q
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? n
n
■
0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
0
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those I] ■ C1 n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Q ■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AVVC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz
Inspection Date: 08/1412008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 550021
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
n■C)n
n■nn
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
J ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 550021 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC550021 . ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comnlic3ttce Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Lincoln Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/0612QQ7 Entry Time: 01:30 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM Incident M
Farm Name: Piedmont Jerseys Owner Email:
Owner: Qorev A j„utz Phone: [phone] _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant
Location of Farm:
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude: - Longitude: 01°17'02"
From the intersection of Startown Rd. (SR 1005) and Ritchie Rd. (SR 1271), travel west on Ritchie (about 1 mi.), Farm is on left.
General location: — 4 mi. north of Uncolnton.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Corey A Lutz Operator Certification Number: 20970
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Corey A. Lutz Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Corey A. Lutz Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s): (��j
Inspection Summary
10/05/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.2 Lbs/1000 Gallons
06/04/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.9 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04124107 > Soil Analysis
24, Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in January, 2008.
IS
Page: 1

Permit: AWC550021 Owner -Facility* Corey A Lutz Facility Number., 550021
Inspection Date: 1210612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
1
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Dairy Heifer 40
35
Cattle - Dry Cow 50
35
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 200
205
Total Design Capacity: 290
Total SSLW: 390,000
Waste Structures
Tvpe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond 1 18.00t —
4800
Page: 2

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
,Inspection Date: 12/06/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ ❑ 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did.discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
❑
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the. structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA ' NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0
■
❑l
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? In
Frozen Ground? In
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? 11
Page. 3

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz
Facility Number: 550021 I
Inspection Date: 12/06/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
0
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
0
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
(l
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Q
Evidence of wind drift?
Q
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Q
■
0
0
17. Does the facility tack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
Q
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
fl
■
0
U
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
Q
Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 4

Permit. AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 12/06/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? it ■ ❑ n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
rl
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
171
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
Q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? - -
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibratewaste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
.❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27• Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
In
o
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0000
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number : 550021
Inspection Date: 12/06/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vis It: Routine
ti
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency. situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
D■nn
n■pp
0000
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 550021 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC550021 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Lincoln Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 1212V?_006 Entry Time: 12:30 PM Exit Time: 02-00 PM_ Incident t1:
Farm Name: Piedmont Jerseys Owner Email:
Owner: Corey A Lutes _ Phone: [phone] _
Mailing Address: 4399 Ritchie Rd Lincolnton NC 280929575
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant
Location of Farm:
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude: 35"32'45" Longitude: 81°17_Q2"
From the intersection of Startown Rd. (SR 1005) and Ritchie Rd. (SR 1271), travel west on Ritchie (about 1 mi.), Farm is on left.
General location. — 4 mi. north of Lincolnton.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other lssues
Certified Operator: Corey A Lutz Operator Certification Number: 20970
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Corey A. Lutz Phone: [phone]
On-site representative Corey A, Lutz Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: C"loy��3S' 2162
Inspector Signature, Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
11/20/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/05/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.8 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/10/06 > Soil Analysis
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number: 550021
Inspection Date: 12!2112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle - Milk Cow 200 200
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond 1 18.00 48.00
Page: 2

.' Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number : 550021
Inspection Date: 12/21/2006 Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream lmpacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
Cl
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
Cl
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4 js storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan? .
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?'
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
In
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number : 550021
Inspection Dale: 12/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205? Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window? Q
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of applicatlon area?
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
CropType 2 Small Grain (Wheat,
yp Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
0
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
■
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
0
Q
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Q
■
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q
■
❑
Cl
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Q
■
❑
Q
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
Q
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? n
Page: 4
0

r
a
' Permit: AVVC550021 Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz
Facility Number :
550021
Inspection Date: 12!2112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
' ❑
Design?
Q
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
Q
■
Q
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
Q
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Transfers?
Q
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
Q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? Q
n
■
Q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
Q
Q.
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
Q
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
0
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Q
Q
■
Q
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Q Q
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a,regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ Q
Quality representative immediately,
Page: 5

Permit: AVVC550021 ' Owner - Facility: Corey A Lutz Facility Number : 550421
Inspection Date: 12/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ n ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 0000
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■nn
Page: 6

9
Type of Visit *0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:r�'�Y- s Arrival Time: 3: Y Departure Time: County: ",o& Region: eO
Farm Name: R;eiSau ter Owner Email:
Owner Name: <v_09,k L.., tL _ Phone:
Mailing Address: L(377 Q c«AA2v 2t*9►i
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Ld%k L.��� Title: C6-01 -dxz Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ::V
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine., Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =0 ❑ 1 ❑" Longitude: = ° ❑ ❑ "
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
Non -L
Pullets
Other
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
® Dairy Cow oea o
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Da Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: a
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

i
Facility Number: SS— Zt Date of Inspection
❑ Yes
R] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
JK] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: L,-^4 fbod
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 150
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify
DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes X3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 1r aLj , SA aj1a-+o�;u5 , S Lo J<,2!
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
R] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination:
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RD No
❑ NA
❑ NE
I—S-ai S -ate
r�
5•�
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: iaDate: <6 -1 �' �' p f
12/28/04 Continued

• Facility Number, C — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [9 NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Fs] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
�l ir7F-� /tXv. i>
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
EINE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[:]Yes
�0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Aslditloial.Commetitsand/nr Drawings
COI p ijtl� +a+ 0►� o vL.t'C �/jjL �AT�i .
�l ir7F-� /tXv. i>
12/28/04

Division ; 4
Water
il and Water::Conservation
ofSo
OO
.. thea:--pgency .,
Type of Visit Iii Compliance Inspection p Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit a Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
Q =Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................
FarmName:.................................................................................. County: .... A.G!L:.4........................................................
OwnerName: ... 61.15Y. .... L'"ft:.................................................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
Mailing Address: .....VJ..W... 10 ... -We. / k '... `
...................................................................-...........:.................................... ° ?_1....
FacilityContact: ...............................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative:.......................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator: ................................................... .. . .... ............ ... ........... . ..................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry IN Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • s 94 Longitude • 4 44
'Design:.Current a Design Crirrent_"' DeS1�i1 r" Cul In 1t
Cap aci . Po-ulation .:".Poultry ._ .. "' : Ca� aci 1.Po_ ulauon:' .` Cattle_ Ca acr "'=sPo elation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ®Dairy p
❑ Non -Layer F . ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other I
" Total Design Capacity,- ,3.'r o
i. Total'SSLW
Number,of Lagoons
. E
'.H
Discha , e_s & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. ........ .................. ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 3
12/12103 Continued

Fpcility jiumber: !C,5— i t Date of Inspection
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Rye- </no# o.ru►,�S
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes © No
❑ Yes [S No
❑ Yes ❑x No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ED No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
CommeOt3 (fefelrtO,qutshon #) Exphdn any�YES ansWers3and/or any recommendiations or.sny ayther colllm_CIItS. '
Wi drii*fii sof illitytto better explain ¢situation ,(use addihonal�pages as necessary); FO Field Copy 0 Final Notes
�' r�►R� � Re ro+tfS � rpcarc �„ ��1� - � � -
-- Gft
T
Reviewer/Ins ector Name, * �� n '� 't
p _F __ . �..W ��
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112/03 Continued

Facility Number: S — Date of Inspection
Reaulred Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
0 No
34.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
❑ Yes
Cl No
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
0 No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
F3 No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Cl No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1 " Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

O�O� W A
j r
�. !may
4 `C
Corey Lutz
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 10, 2004
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Piedmont Jerseys -
4399 Ritchie Road
Lincolnton NC 28092 ISM
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No.,AWC550021
Piedmont Jerseys
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Lincoln County
Dear Corey Lutz:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for animal facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate
Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28).
To correct the facility's animal capacity and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are
hereby forwarding to you this corrected Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Corey Lutz, authorizing
the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in
accordance with General Permit AWG200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Piedmont Jerseys, located in Lincoln County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy Cows, 40 Heifers, 50 Dry Cows, and the application to land
as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009, and shall hereby void the
COC dated October 1, 2004, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site-specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is,
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Nom` Carolina
datura!!;
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o,enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAflirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAW -MP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
C/
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
[Iv_looresville Regional"Office; Aquifer Protd—etion Section
Lincoln County Health Department
Lincoln County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC550021
APS Central Files

W A TF9
P
Corey Lutz
Piedmont Jerseys
4399 Ritchie Road
Lincolnton NC 28092
Dear Corey Lutz:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 1, 2004
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
t U 1 9 u L-0
OCT 1 2004
AlAD "ATUt3ALn2SMRCES
iDO1dI_S1f1LLLr -Oi'�tC'
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC550021
Piedmont Jerseys
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Lincoln County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on March 10, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Corey
Lutz, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC550021 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the 'management
of animal waste from the Piedmont Jerseys, located in Lincoln County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 290 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please Ray careful attention to the record kee in
and monitoringconditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section —Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NofthCarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]Internet: h2o.enr,state, nc,us Natullally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

M
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A namc/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
v
ell -
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Lincoln County Health Department
Lincoln County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC550021
APS Central Files

Corey Lutz
Piedmont Jerseys
4399 Ritchie Road
Lincolnton NC 28092
Dear Corey Lutz:
y Governor
'=_roamesources
ecretary
tmNorth Carolina Deparel��r�r
�a�rUV�, P. E., Director
- Division of Water Quality
11 SO
May 1, 2003 1.
WAiERSSO
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC550021
Piedmont Jerseys
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Lincoln County
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division -of Water -Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on March 10, 2003 and in accordance with the directive of
Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Corey
Lutz, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land
application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC550021 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not Iimited to, the.management
of animal waste from the Piedmont Jerseys, located in Lincoln County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 200 Dairy, 40 Heifer, 50 Dry cattle and the application to land as
specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining, the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified. design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. wd
ENR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any. wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish .to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Lincoln County Health Department
Lincoln County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC550021
NDPU Files

. -WASTE- UTILIZATION _PLAN -
.Producer: COREY LUTZ - PIEDMONT JERSEYS
Location: 4399 RITCHIE ROAD
Telephone: ( 704 ) 735-1222
Type Operation: DAIRY - JERSEY
Number of Animals: 290 ( 200 MILK COWS, 40 HEIFERS, 50 DRY COWS)_
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure(s): WASTE POND
Application Method(s): IRRIGATION AND SPREADER
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
You must have the animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content
as close to the time of application as practical and at least within
60 days of the date of application before each application cycle.
Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must be
analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced
for realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste
application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize. Lime must be
applied to application fields as recommended by soil test to
maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, (see Required Specification No. 4) waste may be
applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per year.
1

WASTE
UTILIZATIQNPLA
N
F
r I r
�.:.:.! .. =♦_"R., L..: E.=1.r_.._z_ _��__-��.. i T �.L-1".u.�..iab Sz
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is a violation
of the North'Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
.0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions at the time of field application of waste
should also be considered to avoid drift and downwind odor
problems.
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for
to reduce the potential for pollution,
applied to a growing crop. Otherwise
earlier than 30 days prior to planting
forages breaking dormancy. Injecting
incorporating the waste below the soil
nutrients and reduce odor problems.
crop production and
the waste should be
apply waste no
a crop or prior to
or otherwise
surface will conserve
7. Zinc and copper levels in the soils in all fields where
waste is applied shall be monitored and alternative
application fields shall be used when these metals approach
excess levels.
This plan is based on waste application by IRRIGATION AND SPREADER for
this is the manner in which you have chosen to apply your waste. If
you choose to alter the method(s) of application in the future, you
need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for various waste
application methods are not the same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for DAIRY systems in North Carolina. Actual
acreage requirements shall be based on waste analysis reports from
storage structures in your waste management system. Attached you will
find information on proper sampling techniques, preparation, and
transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
Your WASTE POND is designed for 365 days of temporary storage and the
temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
12 MONTHS. If your facility is unroofed, in no instance should the
volume of waste being stored in your structure be higher than the
maximum storage marker except in the event of a 25 year, 24 hour
storm.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount per acre to apply and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
N

WASTETIL.lZgl:O,N PLAN
f':��_.._...
. .iI-I-, - l -- - r n.d _se .. ... :. ,. ei .: e... _ ...:
.. ...... ..I .I ar _,�.]..hl. illL .:..I .i<J.}....�1: 1.13a��,..i.,_i.... .n1.�M n:- :.. .1,:�... _. :��...1_ ..mf,vi -� _nl-.,_
The waste management system which is covered by this waste utilization
plan shall be operated only by persons which hold a valid certificate
as an operator in charge of an animal waste management system. The
North Carolina Water Quality Commission will provide training and
certification of operators.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 (the .0200 rules) adopted by the
Water Quality Commission.
3

LlZATLC]N PLAN
r ST."T.-I �,`,- r. lid _
14
ESTIMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM LIQUID WASTE
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year
FROM WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PLAN BY BINGHAM ON 10-10=96
THE WASTE STORAGE POND WILL BE EMPTIED WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
NORMAL PUMP OUT VOLUME EACH YEAR IS AS FOLLOWS:
93,368 CU. FT.
25.7 AC.- IN
= 698,000 GALLONS
FOR 50% COLLECTION OF WASTE FOR 200 JERSEY MILK COWS THE PAN WAS ESTIMATED TO
BE 4,556 LBS. THE AVERAGE WEIGHT OF A JERSEY MILK COW IS 900 LBS.
ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION IN WASTE POND IS ESTIMATED TO :
4556 LBS. PAN/698,000
= 6.5 LBS PAN/1000 GALLONS
= 177 LBS. PAN/AC-IN
F

y yl WAST-E=fn UT L ZATION-..-.PLA
k t 1:.i L' 4 I- "l�5'S
ESTIMATE OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
FROM SOLID WASTE
FROM WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PLAN BY BINGHAM ON 10-10-96
OTHER MANURE AROUND CALF HUTCHES AND HAY RINGS WILL BE HAULED AND SPREAD. THIS
VOLUME IS ESTIMATED IN THE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS PLAN
NORMAL ESTIMATED HAUL VOLUME IS AS FOLLOWS:
DAY OLD TO 200 LB. HEIFERS - 54 TON
DRY COWS 202 TON
TOTAL 256 TON
THE PAN FOR THIS MANURE IS ESTIMATED TO BE 4.3 LBS. PER TON FROM NRCS
STANDARDS. PAN FOR SPREADER HAUL = 256 TON @ 4.3 LBS. PAN/TON
1,101 LBS. PAN"
5

one year is approximately 256 tons and
698,000 gallons or 25.7 acre -inches.
9,556 lbs. PAN per year from liquid waste
+ 1.,101 lbs. PAN per year from solid waste
= 5,657 Total lbs. PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job.
You should plan time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste
in a timely manner.
Values used above are based on analysis of waste
from similar livestock operations in North Carolina
(source: USDA-NRCS FOTG Practice Standard 633 -Waste
Utilization). Actual nutrient content of the waste
from this system may vary from these values. Waste
analysis should be made of the actual waste as soon
as possible after significant waste accumulates in
the storage structure(s).
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be
over applied while meeting the N requirements. in
the future, regulations may require farmers in
some parts of North Carolina to have a nutrient
management plan that addresses all nutrients.
This plan only addresses nitrogen.
C

WASTES UTI LIZATION AN -
Z" 7s.____.mF,�...w..vZ[c'ex_.....-.
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the infiltration
rate of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding
occurs. This rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil
structure, soil texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The
application amount should not exceed the available water holding
capacity of the soil at the time of irrigation nor should the plant
available nitrogen applied exceed the nitrogen needs of the crop.
It is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to
ensure that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the
acres shown in tables 1 through 3. Failure to apply the recommended
rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan
invalid.
Caution must be exercised in grazing or haying forage plants under
stress condition. Nitrate poisoning may occur in livestock. Sampling
forage or hay for nitrate levels is recommended.
7

t
WASTE -,UTI L I Z-ATN P LAN
I.0
_ -
w-�:...Y...._...-.«a...... «-.1_..___.__.....�--,..�
WASTE APPLICATION TABLES
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are
available for waste application. It will not be necessary and may not
be desirable to apply waste to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual
nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown based on the
potential productivity of the soil and assuming no double cropping.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the
Nitrogen that can be reasonably applied to the crop and used by the
crop in a timely manner using animal waste alone. It will not be
practical to meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with animal
waste. Supplemental applications of commercial fertilizer may be
required during the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient
needs_ It is assumed that for certain row crops only a fraction of
the total annual nitrogen requirement can be applied using -animal
waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on
each field on the Department of Water Quality Waste Application Record
Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field
application tables.
CROP
CODE
CROP
PRODUCT'N
UNITS
NITROGEN
REQUIREM'T
LBS./UNIT
CS
CORN -- SILAGE
TONS
11.0
SG
SMALL GRAIN SILAGE
CROP
60.0
SGS
SMALL GRAIN SILAGE SPRING TOP DRESSED
CROP
60.0
SO
SORGHUM - GRAZED
TONS
45,0
PCS
PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
16.4
M
MATUA - GRAZED
TONS
40.0
M.

WASTE UTILIZATL4N PLAN �..
CF _-
r
The following legend explains the soil codes which represent the
specific soil types that are found in the fields which are available
for animal waste application:
SOIL
CODE
SOIL
TYPE
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
RVA
RIVERVIEW
OCCASIONALLY FLOODED
MsB
MASADA SANDY LOAM
GnC2
GASTON SANDY CLAY LOAM
GnB2
GASTON SANDY CLAY LOAM
BnB
BUMCOMBE SAND
GaD
GASTON LOAM
9

WASTE UTILIZATIC)N :PLAN
a a
ati--�,, A.
Table 1: WASTE APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
WETTABLE ACRES
Recommended
Soil Realistic Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be
No. No. Code Code Yield Useable Per Ac. Applied2
1525
2
PULLS
1 north
MsB
PCS
6.8 AUM
3.7
112
414.4
2 north
MsB
PCS
6.8 AUM
7.1
112
795.0
3 north
MsB
PCS
6.8 AUM
7.3
112
818.0
4 north
MsB
PCS
6.8 AUM
6.7
112
750.0
5 north
MsB
PCS
6.8 AUM
6.3
112
706.0
6 north
MsB
PCS
6.8 AUM
6.0
112
672.0
7 north
MsB
PCS
6.8 AUM
5.0
112
560.0
8 north
MsB
PCS
6.8 AUM
5.1
112
571.0
held 3
1 south
GnB2
PCS
6.8 ALM
2.6
112
437.0
2 south
GnB2
PCS
6.8 AUM
3.9
112
437.0
3 south
GnB2
PCS
6.8 AUM
4.1
112
459.0
4 south
GnB2
PCS
6.8 AUM
4.3
112
482.0
5 south
GnB2
PCS
6.8 AUM
4.4
112
493.0
6 south
GnB2
PCS
6.8 AUM.
4.2
112
470.0
7 south
GnB2
PCs
6.8 AUM
4.0
112
448.0
10

r
' �X1%
I
VVF
I
I .,. jF
f IJF 16i�11...
TO,
r _, yyI, I s i�, k 1,4y i'
- fr14 ith� -
�4i f I fa I,y ! yl�l IJi�fI t ��f 1.-h ii
l -'i A�I I.f. E IfG Gl y�f 15,4TIP}�Ji
int �9hI� - I.i
_� I I _.wl�hu -'�'�✓IDk _i�ua'" I1 +I IK
i Ilye _ - e� .. '�E kl —Z.70
8 south
GnB2
PCs
6.8 AUM
4.2
112
470.0
field l
9 south
GnB2
CS
15,5
3.2
186
595.0
10 nottE
Gn132
CS
15.5
2.0
186
372.0
10 south
RvA
CS
21.0
2.7
252
680.0
1 i south
RvA
CS
21.0
3.8
252
958.0
12 souti
ChA
CS
15.5
4.4
186
818.0
13 soutt
RvA
CS
21.0
4.3
252
1084.0
TOTALS THIS TABLE 99.3 13489
1 The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus
the required buffer areas which.border streams or residential
areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most
likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal -waste only. If nutrients from other sources
such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted
for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
11

TIL-,--,! ZATION. PLAN ,
Table 1: WASTE .APPLICATION FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
ALTERNATIVE CROPS THAT CAN BE USED ON THESE FIELDS
Recommended
Soil Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Tract Field Type Crop Anticipated Acresl Required to be
No. No. Code coda Yield Useable Per Ac. Ani)lied2
1525
2
MSB
SG
CROP
47.2
60
2832
SGS
CROP
47.2
60
2832
CS
19 TONS/AC
47.2
209
9865
M
4 TONS/AC
47.2
160
7552
SO
4 TONS/AC
47.2
180
8496
3
GnB2
SG
CROP
31.7
60
1902
SGS
CROP
31.7
60
1902
CS
15.5 TONS/AC
31.7
171
5421
M
4 TONS/AC,
31.7
160
5072
SO
4 TONS/AC.
31.7
180
5706
1
RvA
SG
CROP
20.4
60
1224
SGS
CROP
20.4
60
1224
M
4 TON/AC
20.4
160
3264
SO
4 TON/AC
20.4
180
3672
TOTALS THIS TABLE
12

The useable acreage represents the total acreage of the field minus
the required buffer areas which border streams or residential
areas. Actual total acres in the fields listed may, and most
likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
2 This N is from animal waste only. if nutrients from other sources
such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted
for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
13

Table 3 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and the total
nitrogen to be applied using animal waste for all fields which are
available for waste application.
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
This summary indicates that only about 42 percent of
nitrogen requirements can be provided for the crops
fields available using animal waste produced on this
operation.
14
the total annual
as listed for the
livestock
ACRES
USEABLE
TOTAL CROP
NITROGEN
REQUIREMENT
IN POUNDS
RECOMMENDED
LBS. N TO
BE APPLIED
USING WASTE
SUPPLEMENTAL
OR RESIDUAL
LBS. OF N
REQUIRED
FROM TABLE 1
99.3
13489
5657
7832
FROM TABLE 1A
FROM TABLE 2
FROM TABLE 2A
FROM TABLE 2B
TOTAL ALL TABLES
99.3
13489
5657
7832
This summary indicates that only about 42 percent of
nitrogen requirements can be provided for the crops
fields available using animal waste produced on this
operation.
14
the total annual
as listed for the
livestock

TILIZATION,t,m.PLAN
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
'MANURE FOR MILKING HERD WILL BE STORED IN A WASTE STORAGE POND FOR
APPROXIMATELY I YEAR AND WILL BE IRRIGATED. DURING THE COURSE OF ONE
YEAR, THIS FACILITY WILL STORE 698,393 GALLONS OR 25.7 AC -IN OF SLURRY WASTE.
DAILY SCRAPING OF WASTE IS REQUIRED TO MOVE THE WASTE INTO THE STORAGE
FACILITY. IF ALL OF ONE YEARS WASTE WERE SPREAD USING A 3000 GALLON
SPREADER, IT WOULD TAKE APPROXIMATELY 233 LOADS. IF MANURE IS SPREAD BY
IRRIGATION USING A PUMP RATE OF 300 GALLONS PER MINUTE, IT WOULD TAKE
APPROXIMATELY 40 HOURS TO SPREAD ONE YEARS ACCUMULATION OF MANURE.
THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS OF MANURE WILL BE COLLECTED AT OTHER PARTS OF THEI
FARM:
11. DAY OLD TO 200 LB. HEIFERS
2. DRY COWS
TOTAL
54 TON
202 TON
256 TON
THE PAN FOR THIS MANURE IS ESTIMATED TO BE 4.3 LBS. PAN PER TON FROM THE
NRCS STANDARDS.
PAN FOR SPREADER HAUL = 256 TON @ 4.3 LBS/TON = 1,101 LBS. PAN,
IF ALL OF ONE YEARS WASTE WERE SPREAD USING A 6 TON SPREADER., IT WOULD
TAKE APPROSIMATELY 43 LOADS. ASSUMING I LOAD PER HOUR, IT WILL TAKE 43
HOURS TO SPREAD THIS MANURE.
(Use additional sheets as needed to describe the operation of the
system within the context of the livestock operation)
14

Is
Is

Application of Waste by Irrigation
Field No. Tract No. Soil Type Crop Application Application Application
Rate Amount Time
(in./hr.), (inches) I (hours)
2
1525
MSB
PCS
0.4
0.4
70
3
1525
GnB2
PCS
0.4
0.4
53
1
1525
RvA
CS
0.4
0.4
34
THIS TABLE IS NOT NEEDED IF WASTE IS NOT BEING APPLIED BY IRRIGATION, HOWEVER A SE IILAR TABLE WILL BE
NEEDED FOR DRY LITTER OR SLURRY.
17

WASTE Tj L
FIELD OFFICE INSTRUCTIONS
'LAN,..,.
TO FIELD OFFICE PERSONNEL PREPARING TMS PLAN:
The following items and the Required Specifications must be addressed in the Waste
Utilization Plan in order for the plan to meet the minimum requirements of the .0200 rules
and NRCS standards. All of these concerns may not be applicable for a given operation.
Additional concerns may have to be addressed at certain operations. These items express
the minimum requirements. Where necessary, the planner/designer is to elaborate on these
concerns or add others as applicable. Comments within these items that are in parenthesis,
are underlined, and are bold typed are for Field Office reference only and are not to be
included in the landowner's copy of the plan. This note is also provided only for Field
Office reference and is not to be included in the landowner's copy of the plan.
1. The waste utilization plan will include all the animal waste generated on the farm.
2. Lagoons and other uncovered waste containment structures must be maintained below the
maximum operating level to provide adequate storage for a 25 -year, 24-hour storm event
in addition to the one (1) foot mandatory freeboard.
17

WASTe UTIL-IZA
ON, --PL
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade
conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation or land
application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited. Illegal
discharges are subject to the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the
Division of Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic
crop yields based on soil type, available moisture, historical data, climate conditions,
and level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict the rate of
application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield
tables at the discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Animal waste may be applied to land that has a Resource Management System (RMS)
or an Alternative Conservation System (ACS). If a RMS or ACS is used the soil loss
shall be no greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will be
used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in addition to 'Buffers"
required by DWQ. [See FOTG Standard 393 - Filter Strips and Standard 392 -
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste
should not be applied when the wind is blowing or any other condition exists which
may cause a danger of drift from the irrigation field.
b. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When applied to conservation tilled
crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application does not
occur during a season prone to flooding. See "Weather and Climate in North
Carolina" in the Technical Reference - Environment file for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that
runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does not
cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order to
control conditions conducive to odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the
surface is frozen.
1>E

I ­­
:WASTC_.,UTI LIZATIOrI PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICA TIONS
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop
is not damaged by burning or smothering of the plant. This is an important
consideration where swine, poultry or other ammonia rich waste is being surface
applied. Surface broadcast solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are
matted. Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25 percent of
the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a concern where diluted, low
nutrient waste is irrigated or surface broadcast from a liquids holding structure.
Where crops are severely damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot
assimilate the nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to occur.
The -potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils
with a high potential for leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should
be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. On soils with a high potential for leaching, multiple application at lower
rates should be used. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production &
reduce the potential for pollution, the waste shall not be applied more than 30 days
prior to planting of the crop on bare soil, or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nutrients.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from a
lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation
ditch or canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995) shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to surface water. (See
Standard 393 - Filter Stri s and Standard 392 - Riparian Forest Buffer)
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those
owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-
ways.
ight-ofways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by
a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted
wetlands provided they have been approved as a land application site by a "technical
specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways which discharge
directly into water courses. If animal waste is to be applied on other grassed
waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates and in a manner that causes no
runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc.,
shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
19

MASTra,UTIL—IZATIOr1 -PLAN -=
REQUIRED SPECIFICA TIONS
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas
(lagoon/holding pond embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). If needed, special
vegetation shall be provided for these areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species,
etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon/holding pond areas
should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoontholding pond berms and structures
should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. if animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing an "approved closure plan" which will
eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular
basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should
be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for
direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct
human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker
will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -
determining element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and
alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. Soil
pH shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry waste application records
shall be maintained for three (3) years. Waste application records for all other waste
shall be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations. North
Carolina General Statute 106403 requires that dead animals be disposed of within 24
hours in a manner approved by the state veterinarian.
20

WASTE UTILIZATION -PL:AN
WASTE
UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm: PIEDMONT JERSEYS
OvnerAfanager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any -expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year, 24 --hour
storm. The -approved plan will be filed on-site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation
or other equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in
this Waste Utilization Plan. The equipment must be available at
the appropriate time such that no discharge occurs from the lagoon,
holding pond, tank, or other unroofed storage structure in a 25
year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste will
be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate
tames and at rates that no run-off occurs.
Name of Facility Owner: COREY LUTZ
(Please print)
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(If different from owner):
Signature: Date:
la 2�-- 99
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please print) RICK H. MC SWAIN
Affiliation: LINCOLN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Address (Agency): 1.15 WEST MAIN STREET, LINCOLNTON N.C. 28092
Signature:

7
Z
0
h
S
Waste Storage Pond
Notes 25' vegetated buffer from alt
streams
and ditches.
Travel Lane Spacing - 240'
Start and Stop pull from edge
of field - 162.5'
Stop Pul
-c
c
r
r
r
��x
Wettable Acres
October 13, 1999
'1 North' -
3.7
acres
12
North' -
7.1
acres
'3
North' -
7.3
acres
'4
North' -
6.7
acres
'5
North" -
6.3
acres
'6
North' -.
6.0
acres
'7
North' -
5.0
acres
'8
North' -
5.1
acres
'1
South' -
2.6
acres
'2
South' -
3.9
acres
'3
South' -
4.1
acres
'4
South' -
4.3
acres
'5
South' -
4.4
acres
'6
South' -
4.2
acres
"7
South" -
4.0
acres
'8
South' -
4.2
acres
'9
North' -
3.2
acres
`10
North'
- 2.0
acres
'10
South"
- 2.7
acres
'11
South'
- 3.8
acres
'12
South'
- 4.4
acres
'13
South'
- 4.3
acres
TOTAL -
99.3
acres
Scale 1" = 300'
Corey Lutz Dairy
Lincoln County, North Carolina
Irrigation System
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE f
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
0 -ow ,�or.a
�„ SCB lass 's
Tram
wMVP81jal :
lutz93.dwg

4wb
Q
-0-0 C+ — z
-)°O
^QcoC+
- <
ro r0
(p
S
n
to
Q
Q:5
Lfl
C+
c
3 A
Q-LnrOzy
roOro
ton
Ln
ro
I
3
ro
rip
co
: Q
(U rg
Ot r
c+ r+
.0
srD
D N
O 3 .
3
P
3 �
ro
s
(D
O
�
S
N
O
_0
to
u,�nos £1, pnd
ASL - •
u�nos 21, llnC
£g ,u�nos 11. llnd
_ u�nOS a1• llnd
.,ON l llnd
L }.AON 8, llnd
_ ,u�nOs a• llnd = w
,0 a p
QI
p 'o
.off
_ ,u�aoN L• llnd
,uAnoS L• r}n d
09 .
_ u}.1°N 9, rend
,aL6 '
V9 .ulnos 9,' llnd
_ u��'ON S• llnd
,0201 .
,089 .uvn°s S• llnd
JON b• )Ind
,0601
299
.uJenoS llnd
p tz £• 11nd
,0021
9 _ ,u�nos C. lrnd Q.
:3 1 _ u��'ON Z•
LA
lln
,291 '
"013.u�nOs 2, llnd -Ap
•u� no 1. l}nd 6t, d
101C
p
LA
H
O
p
p
I
O 3
3

o�OF SAT �RQG Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 21, 2003
Mr. Corey Lutz
4399 Ritchie Rd.
Lincolnton, NC 28092
Subject: Piedmont Jerseys, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: #AWC550021
Lincoln County, NC
Dear Mr. Lutz:
Mr, Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 17,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained; and the
records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
AN%
iiCDENR —
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation j
Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
I)ateal'\`isit: 04/17/2403 Tinte:
Facility Number 55 21
Q Not O er'allllllal Q Below'1'hreslurlcl
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered I);rte last C)llcruted (or Ahoy c "Tlurshold: .........._ ..
Farm Name: Pit:.dmatxt.Jelrseas................................................................... Count)': Lj=QLn................................... 1lDtQ ........
Owlier Pante: C!?LCy- ----- ----- - --- l.t�JZ.- - --- --- ----- --- ----- -- I'hone No: 7.04.73.1 1 22-----------------------------
al:tilini; Address: Q9.9,R tghk.RQAd..........
Uixr.Qb tva..N.0................
Facility Contact:..........................................................."Title: ......................... Phone No
MOM,..............
Onsite Representative: GQ .......... Intet;ratnr: ---------._.----------------- -- -----
Certified Operator:Carey-A................................ Lulz ................................................... Operator Certilication Nurnber:;09,70 ............................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Startown Rd. (SR 1005) and Ritchie Rd. (SR 1271), travel west on Ritchie (about 1 mi.), Farm is on
left. General location: — 4 mi. north of Lincointon.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse L:IIitUde F 35 • 32 45 l,ortl;ilude 131 • 17 02
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity population
Poultry
Caimcitv Po ulation Cattle
CRacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I I
® Dairy
1 290 200
❑ Feeder to Finish
JE1 Non -Layer
I I
❑ Non -Dairy
[ --]Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
-
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
290
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW"
406,000
❑ Boars
%Number of Lagoons _ �1 J j❑ Subsurface Drains Present ��❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps E= JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar•��es S Stream Ltnyacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is ohsen ed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. II'dischar_e is observed, did it reach \�,'ater of the State? (If' yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow ill "al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (II'yes, nitrify D\\,Q)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
\\'ante Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure ? Strncturc 3 Structure: 4 Snnucture j Structure ti
Identifier: _.
Freeboard (inches): 24

w.ri v.ri v r
Facility Number: 55--21 Date of hispec•tion 04/17/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees; severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
LUrrrlr[NC"
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
11'aste_Application
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
N No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
[:)Yes
N No ,
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Docinnems
FACILITY WAS IN GOOD SHAPE AND THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
;cn'S:r"Rx316`r"9:,: ,'W" ds• _ _.,:•rr,...-. _•. _,. - �. 1 ,M ��;,.?•-,.. a,.�.._. M....c=+� r.�r�;a.'. a
Comments (rreferto questilonr#);Explain anyeYES; answers and/or any.recommendaddfia'or any,,ot er comments: � ,' I�
_U+�sfe�•_drawings'o[ fay ityY to bMetytYeyar explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)y El Field Copy C3 Final Notes s j
MOZ-4 _z Y'�WL�: .iaV ;•.bu Vr`t. er'.:.IYS�^_'�'.:�il ~i✓ "4 ii1. h � . �"'+r n? .-r_Y..lY_+. *',"t. �r{..T+%/ .w..4..—rst['.'F'r^.v-fi�-�.a`i t`:Np".^'p.L 1.'Y`
DUE TO THE DROUGHT, NO FALL APPLICATION OF WASTE TO LOWER THE WASTE LEVEL IN THE STORAGE POND
WAS NEEDED.
FACILITY WAS IN GOOD SHAPE AND THE RECORDS APPEARED TO BE COMPLETE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'Alan Johson
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: �� Date: J
>•

`0
wArE9�C'
1 �1 9
Corey Lutz
4399 Ritchie Rd.
Lincolnton, NC 28092
Dear Mr. Lutz:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
April 26, 2002
Subject: Piedmont Jerseys, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: #AWC550021
Lincoln County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on April 25,
2002. Based on his observation made during the inspection, the facility appeared to be well
operated and maintained; and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection
report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
wh
MM
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

'OF ow
Type of Visit Q Compliance inspection O Ope (tion Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 55 21 irate or Visit: 4/25/1002 Time:
0 Not O erational C Below Threshold
N Permitted m Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: P.iallatAtntUlwrM.'s................................................................................. County. UmIxt.............................................. MQ..........
OwnerName: C1Rrcy....................................... LWX.......... ................................................... Phone No: 704:!USr.3.?X22...........................................................
Mailing Address: 4.Mitt:ll<iE.Rattd ... ......................I._. Ul
........... U901RIQ>vI..SIG.................................................... U092 ..............
FacilityContact I.......... Titic:........ ......................... ............................... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: COREILUTZ _ .. ....._I..................................................Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Car=A................................. Lute.......................... ... Operator Certification Number:2Q9.7
Location of Farm:
ravel West from Lincolnton on Hwy. 27 to Reepsville Road. Travel north on ReepsvWe Road (about 1 mi.) to Startown & 1
oad. Travel East (about 4 mi,) on Startown to Ritchie Road. Travel North on Ritchie (about 2 mi.), Farm on Left. .r.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3S ' 32 45 Longitude 81 • 17i F -0-2--16i
;.: :d..'=.r £' -�: ""p' �..t. -+,.a .zn ...r c.9
-.e] ` .ir C' r, i �+,i:rreYtt•
yt 'i.+ lk ^'��a!CtLrreAt
{:i� �Q u.IatIQ11tiL
r 5^y, !f'le i�a,�:vCi ^o.'.^^.",4+' �iJ�' �"` i�:-/r rnf.
fr #.1i " + �4urre�it„i{
ht r�X. et yiptt'�i41
w 9{
cwc. v Caq fi-ri r• . � .. :• �i
�-Pa tilationr,�: aci '',Po- tilation,�
r --„ ,..,�.�;Ca
❑ Wean to Feeder
r j] Layer ® Dairy 290 200
'
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non-Layer❑Non-Dairy
t�
❑ Farrow to Wean
1a0
Q r
s?I ❑Othery�
s��,,� aigGs a 290
ixx €�,. _. ,w ; ..
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,°:„r
❑ Baars
406,000 �d
mea
r as +� I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ SpjrayieldAa
�a� drips 'r ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System r a .
Discharges 8 stream Impacts'
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [3 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: [:]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
}
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed! what is the estimated tlow in-al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
I
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection C Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ........... ------- ..... ...................... ................................... ......... .......... .............. ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 72
05103101 Continued

w
F'acAity Number: 55-21 Date of inspection 4/25/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any'of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste An_nlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Graze) Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW")? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Rcauired
Records & Documents
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:;?
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ VaM, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? .
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
ets U VIV miner ny
n 1u0 ❑ Field Copy ❑Final Nates
--FACILITY AND RECORDS APPEAR TO BE IN GOOD SHAPE.
Reviewer/Inspector Name QxNSQNY - : �� a�.1 � �'-Af:,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:;?
05103101 /� Continued

A.i
ncm2ini
Facility Number: 55-21 Date of Inspection 4/25R002
4sltte Issue
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes ® No
26. Is there any evidence of wind drift during.land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
A.i
ncm2ini

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Corey Lutz
2349 Startown Rd.
Newton, NC 28658
Dear Mr. Lutz:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 4, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Piedmont Farm, Facility #: 18-22
Catawba County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on October 30, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. It was noted that milk parlor waste flows into a ditch that leads to a stream approxi-
mately 0.25 mile from the farm. Corrective action must be taken to allevieate any discharge of
wastewater. Please contact Mr. Johnson in writing by November 14, 1997 as to the actions taken.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
510,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental
laws and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
iD
D. Rez Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Catawba SWCD
AJ
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 Ncn`t Mcin Street, N1-ft;6
N1coresviile. Nero, Ccrclina 2811 �`' _ Fr { �0a �c'"s�qa

t
'° a},; .❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Reviewa ,r
_DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection r' f
fir0outine 70 Complaint G Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DMVC review O Other
Date of Inspectiou r
Facility Number
Time of Inspection i�;-? 24 hr. (hh:mm)
D Registered ©Certified 13 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113INotOperational I Date Last Operated: ..............
II
Farm\ame:..1.e.��/1`�`!`!~�............
....................(:oanty:....ti��,:..14c�............................................
Owner Name:........ 4..� .R -r-` ,�':_.............. 1� 5-� �Z......,.. Nltotte No:........... 2.7... 4..5�Q................. ...................
Facility Contact: ..... ............ �- ;...................... Title: Phone No: .....................
Alailinl; Address:... ,.4�1......,., 5 1'.. .r.,......JU................................
Onsite Representative:........... cD.r ..f.........✓✓ 411:. ............... I .........................
..
Certified Operator;....... CC?.C75�`j................... ......... L."A...F........................
Location of Farre:
Integrator: ................................
Operator Certification Number:..... -2.°r�..7()............
....��4)s:%1........L /..1......:.1:3. �', 5... .......� :. .......... ... ' i ...: j„(... ...�... ......�.i.f.�l.��..... �.�... � .... ,.�,:,k1,.i.. . ,..TL"�i.,J.a.�s. ..1U{?�C ZCY.3.. �
r7 ,........................... 104', j<. .....
....5..�.' z
Latitude ' 1 « Longitude =• 4
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder I JE1 Layer JRDairy �IC1
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 ,,Non -Laver ILI Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder, 10 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
El Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Subsurface Drains PresentJLi] Lagoon Area Jl] Spray Field Area
`o l.iuuid Waste NlanaLement Svstem
Dlscllar�,e ori,inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. If dischar,e is observed, dial it reach Surface Water'? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If dischur-e is observed, what is the estimuted flow in -ul/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste mana"ement system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
G. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7!1 5147
❑ Yes ' &No
I VI Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
.Z No
❑ Yes
8No
RYes
❑ No
❑ Yes 19No
❑ Yes `gNo

A Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures (Lagoons,11olding fonds Flush Pits etc.)/�
9. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less Ihaadequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ......................................................................... ...........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes �'N0
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5 Structure 6
................................................................
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application li,
14. Is there physical ev'iddnce of over application'?
(If in excess of WMP. or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
10. �l�l.(.G�.........�.t.e t.l�.................................................
15. Crop type �-. .�...�..... '�........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW'vIP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only /imal
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of theA Waste ;Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
[� No.violations or deficiencies rvere`nt ted during this:visit.-.You.will receive no further
correspondence about this.visit'..
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes K
No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes �Vo
❑ Yes 50'o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
C6mments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments:
Use°drawings of facility to 6eiterexplaiti'situations. (use additional pages as'necessary} 2:
n J
�r
I,,,/Or � V-tAAO1 - �c:i�. Pnjj� C- Af"jj� - (t?4s
`rD a. s�tc�(� s �reflt.� `-f GGt+ aw c y, ivo ;,y atc
7125197 7
ReviewerMspector Name

hate of North Carolina -
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
James D. Mc Alister
3438 East Maiden Road
Maiden NC 28650
Dear Mr. Mc Alister
A 4
-MOM
IL
E)EHNF=1
November 6, 1997
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Kc. DRIFT. Or
QI1VYi5?A `i b4�a vr, US A L Pt3,
& NATURAL F.It5t)URC!�
NOV 10 1991
DWISION OF INVIRUNUITAt VAUGEMEM
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle; horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system..
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 9191515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
9191515-7302.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality Files
sharedfolder/beth/animalwaste/tempcertfollowup

' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Corey Lutz
2349 Startown Rd.
Newton, NC 28658
Dear Mr, Lutz:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 4, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Piedmont Farm, Facility #: 18-22
Catawba County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on October 30, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of
this Office. It was noted that milk parlor waste flows into a ditch that leads to a stream approxi-
mately 0.25 mile from the farm. Corrective action must be taken to allevieate any discharge of
wastewater. Please contact Mr. Johnson in writing by November 14, 1997 as to the actions taken.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for'penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental
Iaws and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone],
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Catawba SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
AJ
Regional Coordinator
919 North Main Street, N44if1C
W-
hlcoresville, North Ccrcline 28115 4 FAX [phone]
An E';Ucl Opp ortunit f/Affirrr.ctive Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 - ',-p, ,.

�] DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review ,
WQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine O Complaint O Follom°-up of DW0 inspection O Follow-up of IISWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
rime of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered U Certified U Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
-
Farm Name:Q l/t20 /L (sir County: .!,.?.................................................
................................................
AOwner Name: rr r..� ..............1.. Phone No: ............. I—,....................
Facility Contact: ....C` ?!...........177:��Z..•..................... Title: Phone No
...........................................................................................................................
Mailing Address:..,, .,��1......... Y.. Q4.��.n......RAY................................ ...... Q . :Cil'1................................................... 'a.�. ..
Onsite Representative:........... �.r .......... ,#. .. ...... Integrator:.. .............. .................
Certified Operator; ....... cor-eyI........ t,{. ................................ Operator Certification Number:.....'2~ t �.
Location of Farm.
rrd ,.........L/J.......5.�s.:. ,.:...
...........................',li?�.f....l(;... .........t.1i.cri............5.....,p�.....sc�.... S...�..r.s.�!` .....R,ry....
Latitude ' 1 44 Longitude • 4 "
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds
Design Current Design . Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer Dairy .:21�
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
lJ Subsurface Drains Present JU Lagoon Area J© Spray Field Area
❑ ,No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need inairite nance/improvement?
❑ Yes
'ELNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
1610 Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [3 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man -mach?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharwgye is observed, diel it reach Surlace Water? (I1'yes, notily DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
❑ No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
M No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes
9No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
XYes
❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
t
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
19No
7/25/97
Continued art back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes J;'No
Structures La goons Boldin Ponds Flush Pits etc- ��
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less4a//a&6te? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ....................................................................................................................................... ..............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application f
14. Is there physical ev"idke of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
.........................................................
15. Crop type .....�'o.rm... �.....�1�G4.........�.1i2j...l�...................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Pennilled Facilities Only /fJ
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the/A" imal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No. viol atioits or deficiencie's.�' ere -noted during this" visit. - Nou.w'tll re'ceive-lo further
cofrespondence about this.visif.:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 5� No
❑ Yes 1Q No
❑ Yes PkNo
❑ Yes (KNo
❑ Yes §;LNo
❑Yes � No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use,dr'awings.of facility to better explain situations,
(use additional pages as necessary);
drera. � is
. 1
Milk AdOr �-Qr(�CL t't�1�np�
`Y10tt.3:. Iti►`r~d a (�r'T��
��'� rt'4_:�
4D �, swtcr(� s �rek t yj L�
al.t) Cy, 110 ,m� aJ,
ll, U
v S
7/25147
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: AI&A��
Date: /0 - 3 0—�

Dear Mr. Lutz:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENV[RONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 16, 2000
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
General Permit: AWG200000
Piedmont Fane, Facility #: 55-21
Catawba County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 14,
2000. Based on his observations during the inspection, this letter is being issued as a Notice of
Violation for the following:
Failure to have the Certificate of Coverage (AWC55002 l) available for review.
Failure to have a waste analysis performed within 60 days of the May 1999 waste
application date.
• Failure to have a record of the weekly waste storage pond level as required by your
Certificate of Coverage.
Failing to maintain the required records is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 and General Permit AWG200000. It is requested that a written response be submitted to
this office by March 30, 2000, addressing above noted problems. Please address the information
to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ 919 NORTH MAIN 8TAICET, MOORESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone]FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECVCL EG/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
}..
1
/JAMES B: HUNT JR...'"a
GOVERNOR '
-
at
Ny
"rr
Dear Mr. Lutz:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENV[RONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 16, 2000
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
General Permit: AWG200000
Piedmont Fane, Facility #: 55-21
Catawba County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 14,
2000. Based on his observations during the inspection, this letter is being issued as a Notice of
Violation for the following:
Failure to have the Certificate of Coverage (AWC55002 l) available for review.
Failure to have a waste analysis performed within 60 days of the May 1999 waste
application date.
• Failure to have a record of the weekly waste storage pond level as required by your
Certificate of Coverage.
Failing to maintain the required records is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 and General Permit AWG200000. It is requested that a written response be submitted to
this office by March 30, 2000, addressing above noted problems. Please address the information
to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ 919 NORTH MAIN 8TAICET, MOORESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone]FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECVCL EG/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
L HOLMAN Corey Lutz
SECRETARY
4399 Ritchie Rd.
LincoInton, NC 28092
%. KERR T. STEVENS.F"r-..
Dear Mr. Lutz:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENV[RONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 16, 2000
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
General Permit: AWG200000
Piedmont Fane, Facility #: 55-21
Catawba County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 14,
2000. Based on his observations during the inspection, this letter is being issued as a Notice of
Violation for the following:
Failure to have the Certificate of Coverage (AWC55002 l) available for review.
Failure to have a waste analysis performed within 60 days of the May 1999 waste
application date.
• Failure to have a record of the weekly waste storage pond level as required by your
Certificate of Coverage.
Failing to maintain the required records is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 and General Permit AWG200000. It is requested that a written response be submitted to
this office by March 30, 2000, addressing above noted problems. Please address the information
to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ 919 NORTH MAIN 8TAICET, MOORESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone]FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECVCL EG/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r�RQG
❑ � 'C
Corey Lutz
4399 Ritchie Rd.
Lincointon, NC 28092
Subject:
Dear Mr. Lutz:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretery
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 9, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Piedmont Farm, Facility #: 18-22
Lincoln County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date, if the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Sincerely_-
Alan D. Johnson '
Environmental. Specialist 11
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

c INArE
9pG Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 29, 2001
Corey Lutz
4399 Ritchie Rd.
Lincolnton, NC 28092
Subject: Piedmont Jerseys, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: #AWC550021
Lincoln County, NC
Dear Mr. Lutz:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site -inspection of your facility on August 23,
2001. Based on his observation made during the inspection, the facility appeared to be well
operated and maintained; and the records were complete. Enclosed please find the inspection
report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at'[phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
slaw
ZL
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

L
'•�:f:'J' ", rFY .� ,ct. L.'r 4�;,7: r� •�Z -'r••. - ..7 i:`:��'"-''lt.r.!r •,'S S-�;►`J -,w. �- �...: . ,;•.t:. -..3 wr _ ,> > - f s •'�:' •,: :.
��� r+ K4f s Yf.Ey,�i•,7si��ih"' �?,r''k� �,.�a,r''�'.} *� IY1510n Of �ateT.QUahty �"': r JJ y'Y -• 1 i r•r;: € � es a ,i,•
� JI p !,-` .�i• L 1 7 .�FIIS"L ....y w . {: + '•:r �• T �[.�.ht � E t . J ' J .i
y+ ;���'..�'' � ���`� �tl��•visian bf 5oi1 and iter Conservuton ,fit , .I+:�i'' t.��� ,. � , `x .. ;.^ , ��.�,r,
Tz� tS"`� '"tri , c�:• ,�jt�f}� � ��` '44pcc�'7iVC:� w� Mr i .kl%f,r�,, Ori � _�'?`'�-`'�-2 �c �1'a "t e y�' inti � +.. ,�:
�,. ,� •.! '•�ti +''• .� 3c�. `�+M "f 0.��1yyjt�ther gency �'�' �� � „��.,i,�f�,.l�;. Y K3� �,y� � {{+�+,w).�"- 1n7 ���� � ��
�YCi.a�+v.�... /: ���.h�fi1R �i,r� L SII II I I I .F�� ✓���'f,�vY� J'1.V�• ����J•'1:1�.��
'a.L --k;. � "a+#J 1Z��A�1.a� $ r'i� ��� �?�_%.. :,e?s�4:. ...'d".�Gi��i�#:=.� �.S'3�� i-! •-(`- .I...r..��,:,Lta_.�,"•�. lll_ii'
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit dQ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z
Date of Visit: Tune:
Q Not O crational t'J Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 13 Registered
Farm Name ........!....1.�.-Sad.• ••...........:�..Lti e ..... .............
Owner Name: .....................
?..(......... ............5!�L�..
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County:.. ... 4h�.cakv\.............
Phone No:
FacilityContact: ....................--.............. ...............-_.............. Title: ........................................................... Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: ................... ................ ..... -........ C..ajt,.,,..-,........................................ �4 .
Onsite Representative: 1 ( -A ......... ..... Integrator: ..................................................... .......... .......................
Certified Operator: .................... Co .. !�Ie4........ .... ���............._-....-.............. Operator Certification dumber:......--............-.-...-....-...
Location of Farm: [
rr
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Rl Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �' �• �' Longitude �' �L �••
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder I JCI Laver I I VLDairy I 'Z�—v I� }
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
:. ❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Tra�ss : ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes qO No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,o No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes X] No
01/01/01
Continued

Facility Number: —
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? (Spillway ❑ Yes ❑`No
structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ..............
Freeboard (inches): ..........Z ... .........................................................
...................................................................................................................................... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure pian?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type L 6r ,.v Sv l sy', u/, .
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those desig4ated in the Certified
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
17. Are rock o s present'?
18. Is there a water ply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary?
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Renuired Records & Documents
❑ Yes J�DNo
❑ Yes No
Cl Yes No
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes Qj No
❑ Yes I�No
mal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ Yes
❑?4o
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes J No
❑ Yes J2 No
❑Yes [3 No
❑ Unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No
t9. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes J No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 14;1No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1© No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? \\
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes eP No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ Yes No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes i❑\ No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor issues
28. Does the discharge pipe From the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 110 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes g No
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: _ nate of Inspection 0
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2001
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes &,No
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name7, Mr~" --W
Reviewer/Inspector Signature e2e.t Date: Z li f
01/0x/01

T'71 9tv
�NCDENR
• ,� � y`' - . Sys.. Y#..
-Hf.JAME9 B. HUNT JR.
� �GOVffRNOR
�45';: • Vis:. I
A91LL HOLMAN Corey Lutz
SECRETARY
4399 Ritchie Rd.
'4 * r Lincolnton, NC 28092
KERR ;1: STEVEN6 � �1i
DIRECTOR
Dear Mr. Lutz:
!�J NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 16, 2000
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
General Permit: AWG200000
Piedmont Farm, Facility #: 55-21
Catawba County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on March 14,
2000. Based on his observations during the inspection, this letter is being issued as a Notice of
Violation for the following:
z kI
• Failure to have the Certificate of Coverage (AWC550021) available for review.
- 1 Failure to have a waste analysis performed within 60 days of the May 1999 waste
application date.
Failure to have a record of the weekly waste storage pond level as required by your
Certificate of Coverage.
1
Failing to maintain the required records is a violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-
" 215.1 and General Permit AWG200000. It is requested that a written response be submitted to
this office by March 30, 2000, addressing above noted problems. Please address the information
""•' to the attention of Mr. Johnson.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ 919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NOATH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER — 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

13 Division'of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
13 Division of Soil'and Water Conservation -Compliance Inspection
0 Division of Water Quality - Compliance inspection +. '
[] Other Agency - Operation Review
0 Routine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection I 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted C4 Certified © Conditionally Certified [] Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Lust Operated:
Farm Name: .............. ..!.e.�7si!Y�Q?/1. ....l r!'Y1....................................... County:......... r 1'N:1..�,.,?..!:1...............................................
/ 7
Owner Name: ............... � ...... ....Sr"` Z. - 'Phone No:.. ..��`..� Zz.Z..................................
.. ...........
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................ritle:...................................................... ..... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:.....�2j.q.......f.�........1..... ...................... ....
�..........I........................... ZKOJZ-
Onsite
Representative:..........::.`...................................................... ................... Integrator: ..........................
Certified Operator:.... r 0 )r.e ...... �Operator Certification Number: ......
..... „.....................
Lo ation of Farm:
.. ... ... ......... .. .. ... ........ .. .
tude Longitude
Design Current Design Current esign. Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle apacity `` Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer gDairy
❑ Feeder to Finish JE1 Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity;
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSW,
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
❑ Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Cl No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 5
identifier:
Freeboard
(inches): ........... . .
....................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
Continued on back

l:acifity Number: -- Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is.there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
❑ Yes kNo
❑ Yes ['{No
❑ Yes0 No
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes Qq No
❑ Yes [�f!No
13. Do the receiving crops ditl.er with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes iz,No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [KLNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ,INo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documentti
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
lb. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time,of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 9LNo
❑ Yes PJ No
,Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes 1❑ No
X Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,P1 No
❑ Yes q No
❑ Yes tCl No
❑ Yes A� No
❑ Yes AE�,No
❑ Yes S No
fcj yIja Icjn1s'oi. 001cie Obs' •w` 're inoted. 00669 Ns -visit; • Y:oie O'11'6O'4iye ijd MOW .
Corres orideh6e:ab'06fthis visit: .
.Comments'{refer to question'#)i" Explain siny YES answers and/or any reeoinmendattons or oily other comments:�r r
U se drawings of facility, to better explain situations {use.additional pages as•necessary
[[ c�+c/ n �pA.
�e— W a.54 •e. o " o- i S t—s C `� TD2L L l' �t W Cc 5 15 CCX r lU "
W C5 � e_ a� o�.`� nor, M ald 2 t v1nck� 1 ClCA -
ytt� Lcv-a� Lv,
n/� n
J,
eve: +'1. as c.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name''
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: tom- Date:
La

Facility Number: — Date of laspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes 6NO
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Arc there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes allo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes a,No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes SNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes P9 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ONo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes [�L:No
Additional Comments an orDrawings: F
s
A,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Corey Lutz
Piedmont JerseyOs
4399 Ritchie Road
Lincolnton NC 28092
Dear Corey Lutz:
1 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPA TMENT-DF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURA S�_p�
�'�
December 30, 1999 F
`NOQ;R(;* .
4Q�u
F'ufi?Fgti�� �'•'ai'+i'r
•lf irF;;�jtti ����r� ��Ir
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 55-21
Lincoln County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerel
r
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Lincoln County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

05/05/99 11;04 COOPERATII.E EXT. SERVICE 001
1A /
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service
0011460 of A6r10111tae a0d Ufo 8000aM
tiasian County Center
1303 Dallas Chorryville Nighymy
P.O. /lox 470
unnes K 20034-0470
744922{1301 Mionu1 / 704-M :34161104
I o � A fah Johnsen
From '•fr1�feC� 1% �r� �aOrl
Ark,
4,1999
C�oreY's co rrec�d
5he�ks . l2 Go mPU-kj' �n /mU 10j have 6eek
4akir?l
or�o�r'nals -bdat� .
ht&(4-t-
EmAymant and opportunitlae are offered to all poopie regardleas of too, sulut, Ilaliwlal ullgin, suk age. or dlsablllly.
North Cmulkia Slide Unlyemlty, North Carolina A&T Stale University, U.S. Depanm9nf 01 Agriculture, end local govammoots COOpotdting,

FORM MR -1 Lagoon Liquid Irfigation FM& Remi
For Recording irrigafffln Evwts on Different Folds
Farm Owner lCQvy Lutz Facility Number - 21
I ngation OperaW as above
�Ml
MINIM
RISEN-
MINIM
moi• 'moi
,I
': � �r
fl1
�
:�
� OC=
L.: J6�
irr
- • yid - i
•
.�
�1J i:Le�ir3ai/�J
•h: �. � . titi:
-�
� 1
is
�MONSOON
MONSOON
M-,tgW
r
r
A
n
0
0
n
M
U)
M
I

Fom RM -2 Lagoon Ligmd knpban Freks Rewrd
One Form for Each Redd perCrop Gude
Trad# 1525 FmWC2 FRcWvmW,*W S5 - 21
FEW Skm (wetted aae* _ (A) $-5
Fam Oar COWLutz bligaft was smi
Owrmr"s Address 4399 Rddit Rd Opeab ft SM
Lin NC 28M Addmm
Owrers PE=e # 04)735.1222 OperaWs Phoae 8
Pram VWaSde Utffmadan Plan
CrOP TY" ex Remm LNT112
-- - - i UxWft te
{?a
(il (2) (4)
s-„
-
-
lr.
PD: aW Crap cycle Totals 12225 L . 58901
o mmes swouffe OPCMwf§ at Vs
OperaW P" C??!y Uft app Cep, No. 2
NCDA Wasu AreAss or Eqamferst or NRICS Ezftaft TedvwW Guide Sacbm 833.
'" Erderlm vahm revWvad byabtw rXg eolxm (10) firma (s)- Cotems rAho myra (10 than cakmm (11) fblmi g eah hipe€im everd:
1n
kD
kn
m
cn
0
O
0
X
;-1
U7
m
m
9

FOM IR -2
Trac#
Field Sze (Wetted acres) = (A)
Ferro Owow
OwnWs Address
Ore's Rum #
Lagoon Liquid Vxiga5w Fields Record
One Fom for lEacb F*W per Crop Cyde
'ASPS Feld# ff. Wd F3
4
Lrdz
4399 foie Rd
Liricolt n MC 2M92
104) T3&'1222
Fad MWt 55 - 21
Vrigat M Q�aitor saw
It4ptiw Operatu% Sartre
Address
Opemcr's Ply #
Frrn Waste Uffftaffm Plan
Crop Type Syntex Reconwim ded PAN tit
Loafing Qi=(8)
(11 (2) (3) {4) (6) (6) (7) (S) (9) 00) (41)
�:, .,1
=`
mamma
1 /'1 •�
111 i
Owes SFtat we
ED
Ln
cn
�n
m
to
U)
M
M
CPOTgb" Sgt p
Cw"w Opp (P" 22M Linz _ Operatees Gail Na. 20M
• NCOAVYasteAnalsts orEganrakmd or FRCS Esftaete, Tedr&WGdMe SeIbn 933.
" Eryter tae ra4ua received !F oeisrsWr ( �y tr+onl (B3. Cordmie su eeg adum (iO) #rotncokrm i 11) falbvAr g eacts event_

FOW MR -2 Legm Lqj d hQMw Feed Record
Ore furl fbr Each Feud per Gap Cede
Trads 15n I rkd 4p �42q 3o Faciy Nwber� -
Fbid Size (reffied acres) = 94 7
Farm Oyrrar 9m Luh SEM
US'sAddreSSR Chie Rd la on Opts Sam
€hw*fto NC 2M mess
O melt F%m 73'5.1= O;me1ne's Plmae #
Am iAisefe imam Wim
e IFteCafnMergdled' r MA
o"'aft ) s
Cal (Z m (A) (51 m m (31 (8l 110)
i
,loom,
an
I
i �iyiL1 ► t��:.1::�����
'K
1
Caffie /),,,vqCqmLdz O,e,.,,kW5 209
70
' NCUA as% Anwjkft1orEqWm1wt or NRCS Exdk TedNwd GWb Sec6m $33.
' EDW the +rhe teas troknsut {1(JjcwftosuwgriRtgcdmi (10) f m c Asan (11) bkwftV each n4atm eves.
I

FOIA IWN2 L.agn Lid MigOon Fields Repo d
One Fern for Eacb Feed per Cmp Gee
Tit #I5 Field # lz hi 15 Facia) Number
ReM Ske (weded acres) _ W 4.5
Farm Owner Cavy tUz Hgoon Operafor sans
OwneesAddress 4399 Rit hfe did Irrigation Operator's same
Limon NC 23M Address
Ovrn's i�iror►e 735-1122 motor's Phone At
Frons Waste LldNcngw Ftarr
Crop Type lRyagmw fescue pastrme Rf=mmemW PANT 83.6
Loading Qdraae) = (B?
(11 (M r3) 141 fS% fe) m Lbs fal 1101
fill
vwer's Ngrm 0
CeFUftd Op mdx lam* Corte► Lutz _ Operator's Cerfificoan No. 2W70
NCAA W es$e Angylm or Equkmlwt or NRCS Esftulu6 Twh mcal C-Edde Sedton 633_
'* Emterttrerage.eoeited bya g=Iu mn (10)trorn (BN. Cm timm subUmft cok mn (10)from c duan (11) fatal V each hrValonevent
G
Ln
Ln
m
Y
m
C)
a
j10
X
m
n
m
r.r-. 00
Ill .c+ 111 ;- 1
-
♦. :io- . -
�������
vwer's Ngrm 0
CeFUftd Op mdx lam* Corte► Lutz _ Operator's Cerfificoan No. 2W70
NCAA W es$e Angylm or Equkmlwt or NRCS Esftulu6 Twh mcal C-Edde Sedton 633_
'* Emterttrerage.eoeited bya g=Iu mn (10)trorn (BN. Cm timm subUmft cok mn (10)from c duan (11) fatal V each hrValonevent
G
Ln
Ln
m
Y
m
C)
a
j10
X
m
n
m

Folz R,2
Lagoon UQWd k igadon FlWds R9=d
One Farm for Each Reid per Crap Gyde
Trac # 1525 FIe1Q #, l M— FadTt£y Number
Field Site (fid a"w) = (M 4
Farm flamer L t6- l6- Waffm Opsraw sante
Ownet"s Addrew, 4395 Mie lid fn%pom Opts mm
1.11 6-i NC 28M Address
Ownees Phone [phone] Opesatofs phone #
FroarMob UWzff6on Phm
Crop Type pasteae Rscattt. .ended PAR 83.6
Lftamft (IWSCM) = 4
MU
I
1! ! •r. 1'1'1 �=' 1
►r
• . a�.:•
MUM
z trop Cycle TabJsj
Oarrws sgaawre Operatm Sisnatum
ceded Opp 2gM Luft ^w. Dpersbfs Cerlxttc;adon No. 2WO
' NCBA Wads Ana yW or int a6- NRCS Esftactp, Tem GMS Secbm 633.
"Frt+erthevabo mosWed bye wk mn (14) from (ft Coajnve g coWmn (i0)ftw evert
w
m
9

FOFM NM -2 Lagom Uquid k6gi iaa ROW Re=d
-
Che Fern for Each Reid per Cmp Cycb
Tr. -.t P 1625 Find V IZ t& t;4 faciy N
PMd Stye d acres) = V45
farm Owner GMW Luft 1 Operator sage
Chows Alidess 4M Rfttie Rd b.1gaft Op 's same
Lhxx *m W, 28M Address
owmes tahow # 73&I 22 Opera's Phos P
RM, Wase uWaxem Pin
ow pasam R mirrreasded PIM 83.6
t waft 4bhiae} = [$i
(1} fm m (dl fat lei M CIO)
P{J: Aaw Crop "Cie TGmft - -- 74121
DMS S sbralln Cowataft Sgmfte
Ceded gmatN 0" LAM E.= Opts CemFcmom No, 28.470
NCOA V93sCe qnW= or Eqdwdent or t(RCS Estrate, Tedd C,jide ScOm 633
utile wake recd►ed4y sub' g cadYm (iG) ftm i81 e n {�0} fzom ! Beach a�oa�
0
cn
cn
Ln
W
C)
C)
D
m
x
cn
m
m
:K
•.1
P{J: Aaw Crop "Cie TGmft - -- 74121
DMS S sbralln Cowataft Sgmfte
Ceded gmatN 0" LAM E.= Opts CemFcmom No, 28.470
NCOA V93sCe qnW= or Eqdwdent or t(RCS Estrate, Tedd C,jide ScOm 633
utile wake recd►ed4y sub' g cadYm (iG) ftm i81 e n {�0} fzom ! Beach a�oa�
0
cn
cn
Ln
W
C)
C)
D
m
x
cn
m
m

FORA IRR -2
Trail i#
FMd s"ee NmUd acres = (A
Farm Owner
Ownet`s Addrm
Cwners Phone #
Lagoon !quid lrtgaW Fmids Record
One Form for Eah Field per Crop Cycle
1525 Heid *-f 3 hdr H4
4
Lutz
4399 Ritc,7re Rd
€.irro **M NC 28092
04 735-9222
FadMY NwTdW
irrigation Operator same
gabon Operetor's same
Address
owrwoes, Pham
From Vbstm Udgza&m Ptan
C.rGP7)"M Imatm Pastore Ftecommen*w Pr�i� M6
Louring (Macre) = iB}
M f21 t31 141 (51 f9? M f8] 191 f1m
f11)
Mn atm Crop Cycfe Tata#S 3M3
�ai��l�la��ll�
0WOWS Sw1aftue Operators Slonatrrre
Certffred Operator (Prino Corey Luiz Operators CwtTwatim Nc. 2Wth
" NCAA Waste Antayrds ar EquWalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Sedan 633
"EJrffirthavalue received by sting ccku m (i0) hoer (Bj_ Ccn&me subtracting cokw r jta) from cokmm (11)f0HOWMg each &tXftn eveaL
ED
Un
kD
UD
P.
.
1'1.! - !
•+.- �i�(W1000
Mn atm Crop Cycfe Tata#S 3M3
�ai��l�la��ll�
0WOWS Sw1aftue Operators Slonatrrre
Certffred Operator (Prino Corey Luiz Operators CwtTwatim Nc. 2Wth
" NCAA Waste Antayrds ar EquWalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Sedan 633
"EJrffirthavalue received by sting ccku m (i0) hoer (Bj_ Ccn&me subtracting cokw r jta) from cokmm (11)f0HOWMg each &tXftn eveaL
ED
Un
kD
UD
P.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 14; 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
REQUESTED
Corey Lutz
Piedmont Jersey's
2245 Startown Rd
Newton NC 28658
Farm Number: 55 - 21
Dear Corey Lutz:
A 1kF!WA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Piedmont Jersey's, in accordance with G. S. 143-215.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sialty (6Q days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of general Iocation
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for err T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 5, 1999
George Lutz tri CM
Lutz Dairy N'C' � �3i �Xr'
w'Aytftt?.tA�#Ei"i'Yt i.
1611 Lutz Dairy Road vi, iV lim.l Nt i¢t
Lincolnton NC 28492
MAR 18 1999
,
Ctat E .t-.nt mo
Dear George Lutz:
• •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Removal of Registration
Lutz Dairy
Facility Number 55-15
Lincoln County
This is to acknowledge receipt of your request that your facility no longer be registered as an animal waste
management system per the terms of 15A NCAC 2H .0217. The information you provided us indicated that your
operation's animal population does not exceed the number set forth by 15A NCAC 2H .0217, and therefore does not
require registration for a certified animal waste management plan.
Under 15A NCAC 2H .0217, your facility is deemed permitted if waste is properly managed and does not
reach the surface waters of the state. Any system determined to have an adverse impact on water quality may be
required to obtain a waste management plan or an individual permit. You are reminded that a discharge of wastes to
the surface waters of the state will subject you to a civil penalty up to $10,000 per day.
Should you decide to increase the number of animals housed at your facility beyond the threshold limits
listed below, you will be required to receive approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to stocking animals
to that level. Threshold numbers of animals are as follows:
Swine
250
Confined Cattle
100
Horses
75
Sheep
1,000
Poult with a liquid wastes stem
30,000
If you have questions regarding this letter or the status of your operation please call Sonya Avant of our
staff at [phone] ext 571.
Sincerely,
a,,�J
!" A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Mooresville Water Quality Regional Office
Lincoln Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-4535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

FORM IRR 1 Lin U*W hgatbn Fields Regard � For Recording fin Events m FIdds
Farm Owner Lutr i=agcy Num
Intgation Operator Same Is;boas
L,KCbfell
®
U: „m.
MAMP
NORM
®i•si
��
��! r_
I i�l
! i
OEM
M.Now
'
U: „m.

o FOM Int -2 Lao_.." L.kd WrIgafim FWdSd
One Foam for Each Heid per mop Cycle
ata
O
N
O
Tinct #
F%!d Slra (meted s) = (A)
Farm Oww
Owneee Addresa
Owner's Phone #
15Za F"MEd # 12, tW C2
as
Lutz
4M Mchle Rd
M
dr�ion NC 28452
735-1222
FaCRY Nu ether 55 - 2t
migow Operator same
IMgat(an Open kft some
Address
Opus Phone #
from Waste UffRmUon Main
Crop Tillie 1SLdw orrumided PAN 112. _..
L�m 0}=� —
(1) (2) m (4) (5) m m (a) (9) (10)
V t)
Mfr
1 III
1 r
W y � (..
I
I -
1•i f i:�.
�.� 11.11=f _
':1:
•�� I
11-1I�1 w -fM
�M-1
�'E
ill
��
�n
�(11�1 :+t,,1 ::�
®
1{ - •
1 •� �. w ., � 1 1-1 iK,
a' ' I:1 Y rl rCll I = • ,, Tj • r - It(f - ���fl :II � 1�
J
-.. Ilr�ea �.ri4r af:� �' I - r � 4 •f:r :r . I gra l•.. • Jit: 1
' NCDA Wasb Aramis or Eq*aftd or NMS Es*mte, iedw" Gude Section 633

h
o FORM SRR -2 Lagoon Lqu#d I meson Fields Recad
fo One Form for Each Ficld per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Fleld Sim(wetted aces) =(A)
Farm Owrrer
Owrrers Address
Dwrm is Phone 0
1525 L Meld 6 3 F3
4
Corey Lutz
4338 Rkd* lel
BLlC 28M
M222
Facffity Mmber 55171 21
arript m Opmtm Sam
Miawn Owaws same
Address
Operators Pitons s.
Fmm taste UMbmUorr Plan
Crop TWe IStKIOX Reconumnded PAN 112
Loading (Was) = (B) -
• NVM ar EquWafarr# or N RCS Edrrus, Teclmicd Guide seaft 633.
-' Exner f w trams recdved fir s bbacft oDk ma (t0) fPom (Bjt CarMM sttbtradrtg aalumn (10)trim catnrtvr (11) fDlmNft each mon event.
Iii 1 .:�
F111 =
�•. ai ii.
• NVM ar EquWafarr# or N RCS Edrrus, Teclmicd Guide seaft 633.
-' Exner f w trams recdved fir s bbacft oDk ma (t0) fPom (Bjt CarMM sttbtradrtg aalumn (10)trim catnrtvr (11) fDlmNft each mon event.

FORM IRR -2 Lagoon Liquid h%adm Fields Re=d
Ons Form for Eadi IFidd per Crop Cyde
Tract# 1525 Mah a2 hdr KS FmItty Nwnbar 5a - 27
Fletd Shoe (wetted mes) =(A) 7
Farm Owner CorW UAz Migabort Opmabrsame
Owner's Addrm 4395 Ritchie Rd Iff4plian Odor's sante
Llttc*ibn NC 28092 Address
owner's Rum 735-1222 Opts mw* #t
ROM Waste uttUzeftri Fftm
Gmp Type lRyegmm fea pasWe ROODMWIdOd PAW 83.6
1 oW �9 imam? = (B) -- --- --
M M1 Im - t43 fm fm M fal (M 1103
tilt
loom,
MT 2I.i
I�
•. i.
i
'� �+ sirc,�.
ii 1•
i tl
• — �.{ — iL',-" . h�. <t'r"". '� cis rr i'r.'�f .r�i
• t1(;DA VVaate Ana}tSts or Equteraienl er NRCS Lester Tr -' him &jk* Semi 633.
- Enteritle value ranted by vA*vdnq COMM (19) *= M Carni = AftaGbV vallM (M) fr M column (11) ib[lWft eaeh bipetiari eVeM

a FORA IRR -2 Lag= Ugvld IrrIgaffm Fief Reowd
One Form for Each Field lw C'mp Cyde
Tract # 15¢5 FIeM # 12, ildr 15. Facility Wunber ® - 21
Real Sin {wted acres) = (A) 4.5
FarmOmw CWW Utz irrigator Operator saine
OwWs Aftm 4309 Rdotdo Rd Irrlgatim OperM&s same
Uncohm NC 28M Address
OarmwS RMIG # 735-1222 OperaWa Phone #
From Taste tmbmftm Pian
Crap Type IRyogms fescm paSUG { Rsco�r}r� r/ PAN 83A
m M Cal 141 fm {gal m 0 is1 {705
t •
"M Map—
a Iilra •��a :•ia� • v Sa�_i _[;n - araiia� i •�.• E /
w -m Waste Arms crftAWMmNFCS Ems, Tectmlcel Gude Seaton 833.
— Erdulbo Veale received bysu*BC ttg colem (lq Tlasn (4 ComMm SW&M ting ccyun in (1% ham catumri (11) kOmAirtg esch Woftn event.
MITI!
t •
"M Map—
a Iilra •��a :•ia� • v Sa�_i _[;n - araiia� i •�.• E /
w -m Waste Arms crftAWMmNFCS Ems, Tectmlcel Gude Seaton 833.
— Erdulbo Veale received bysu*BC ttg colem (lq Tlasn (4 ComMm SW&M ting ccyun in (1% ham catumri (11) kOmAirtg esch Woftn event.

o FORM IRR -2 Lagoon tJquW Irrigation Fields Reo d
Orta Form for Each Field per crop (yda
Trait 9 1 M i=leld # 3 ttdr .15 FacOy Number
Field Size acres) _ (14) 4
Farm Owner QXW Lutz la4alko 4peraw same
Owners Address 43 9 Rttdde Rd irrigagm Operatlal's same
Lhcotnton NC 26092 Address
Owners Phone 4 IM 735-1222 Opemws Phone 9
From tfttas#e tri Ran
Crap Type Matua pashffe Reo mmanded PAN 83.6
Loading (bfea e)
f a•-
•:
,::� , L.
OEM :i.
1 i F
1 i
.r:.
OREM
moi.
,.
m
MMM�i
II i
■
- - qp Wit' •fir`•
i vim!
:- Il C: � � n: _na - � • • : :af 1 .a is �c! Mll iai . .i L• 1• ss
NCDA Wfte AraYISW or E*dvale.111 or 1 r=S Esi als, TeMniaal Ql 9 am.
— Erder ttts vaWe ram by srlbML-d lg catum n (70) From (B� CZgri B SU' I "' COhM (#t) from oattarM (11) Mowing each evo t.

o FORM IRR -2 Lagoon Llqu 1 FWWs Rmmrd
0rte Form far Each FM Pw CrcP Cyde
0
r
Trach
F kM Sae twa ted acres) = (A]
Farm Omw
s Addmss
owws Phone #
16626 Feld # 12, hdr G4
COM Luiz
4399 FMMJe Rd
L NC 28082
735.1222
Fad ty N 55 - 21
k6gation Operaw same
womn OPWI arcs same
AddnM
Op~s Fhorts #
FMM Wasbe Uffization PIM
Cmp Type IRyagrws PBSLVO RecomrnerWW PAN 8:3.6
Loadrtg (Wac a) = - �hii
111 121 IM t41 (M IM m im (M tim
rf 11
intiPW , r,r i �L_ i■ �.
�u i,"a.e �,s : i 1 � - r � •Ir r,, -, . /'_, fl •h3 i n � !3 1 r
* t4= Waste Art yy ft or int of MR= EsOns1 . Ter t bW Q dit teibn 633.
'* Fidel the value ts=trad by afts OM Iolurrur (10) font ft Car*= ad*sding autumn (10) t M O*Mn (11) ung each it(tMn esr a
Bomani
intiPW , r,r i �L_ i■ �.
�u i,"a.e �,s : i 1 � - r � •Ir r,, -, . /'_, fl •h3 i n � !3 1 r
* t4= Waste Art yy ft or int of MR= EsOns1 . Ter t bW Q dit teibn 633.
'* Fidel the value ts=trad by afts OM Iolurrur (10) font ft Car*= ad*sding autumn (10) t M O*Mn (11) ung each it(tMn esr a

CD
N
O
FOW MR -2
Tract a
Fkdd stw (wetted scres) = (N
Farts Owner
Owne 's Address
CWnses Phone #
Lag xm UqtjW burr Fk is Record
One Farm for Eads FkarW Per Crop Cycle
1621 Field # 13, hdr H4
a
gm Ltdz
4399 Ri#Ohie Rte
0 Li on NC 28092
785-1222
FacZy Number �� - 21
IrrlgaWn Operator San*
Irk Operator% Sarno
Addms
CperaWs Phare #
Fwm Vhste Utilization Plan
Crop Type rakm pastwe Re=, mended PAH 83.6
Loading (tbAKm) = i8i ----
PD 2M C1r w C" TOOL..47132.61
Owner's Sow re A&_ S ;
Certrad Operafmr Frirttj 2M OpMM%CMWtaftnNo, 20970
•wom 1 vert Rmrolser cr NRCS Esirrae, Techr*4d GWde 5eet6oa 833.
- Entu tho t1aw momved bye *=A (10)ftm ft CwfflnW arbft*V X1110) 6rom OOtllfrlrl (11) to oming each hr sash
17 0M.
PD 2M C1r w C" TOOL..47132.61
Owner's Sow re A&_ S ;
Certrad Operafmr Frirttj 2M OpMM%CMWtaftnNo, 20970
•wom 1 vert Rmrolser cr NRCS Esirrae, Techr*4d GWde 5eet6oa 833.
- Entu tho t1aw momved bye *=A (10)ftm ft CwfflnW arbft*V X1110) 6rom OOtllfrlrl (11) to oming each hr sash

JAMEB H. BUNT
...ti GOVERNOR
AJ14)
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 23, 1999
Corey Lutz
4399 Ritchie Rd.
Lincolnton, NC 28092
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Piedmont Farm, Facility #: 55-21
Lincoln County, NC
Dear Mr. Lutz:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on
February 11,1999. In general, the facility was observed to be in good shape.
A review of the files indicated that the waste application records were in error.
Because the area covered by each irrigation hydrant is set up as a separate waste
application "field", it would be more prudent to complete your waste application records
in the same manner (a different waste application form for each field (pull)). Also, I
understand that Ms. Drexler with the Cooperative Extension Service is assisting you
with setting up a database on the computer. Be reminded that it is your responsibility to
doublecheck the information and calculations to ensure that the information is correct.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc. Lincoln SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 16
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /APPIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLEO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

E Division of Soil and Water Conservation -Operation Review
© Division of.Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
© Other Agency - Operation Review
outinc 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -u of DS%VC review 0 Other
Facility Number Z Date of Ins'pc0inn — � �
'Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
(] Permitted tCertified ❑ Conditionally Certified 17 Registered Not O erational Date bast Operated:
z`F.Yr......... County: :............Fr+...C.�..
............
Farm Narne:..................kf21�r�....... .aa.. ............ .............................
........................
Owner Name: ............. .t -.Y.................. �: .. ....... Phone No: .......5 `LY.-.. .Z ..� �.....���A
Facility Contact: .......... 1111. ... Title:........ Phone No
y /- [ -
Mailing Address: ..... I�..,X.1..-�.,1`.............�L.�1�1.r..�........e..A.... . .....�..J4,�CG?. �Sr�........�........ ................... ...........1111...........
OnsitcRepresentative: .... (:.ar>° y ................... /............................................. Intel;rator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator :....... rot" ........................... es..7............................................ Operator Certification Number:..: f.. O.............
Location of Farm:
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......... ................. .....I................... ...............
.................... ........................ ......................... ........................ .......................................................... ...........
jai tttudc 0 �i6 Longrtude • 46 —
�iwtne +Capacity roputatlon
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Populati n
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy 1.Z
❑ Non -Layer I I I JE]Non_Dairyj
❑ Other I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischartres & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
it. li' discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. It'tiischargc is observed, diel it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. [f discharge is observed, what is the estimated Ilow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sysicni?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste (collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
ldent.ificr: #
Freeboard (inches)...............��......:..................................... ....................
.........................................................................................
1/6/99
1
❑ Yes
$4No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
OVo
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure 6
................................
Continued on back

a
Facility. Number: — Date of Inspection
5. -Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes E4No
r
seepage, etc.)
6, Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes KNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/impi ovement'? ❑ Yes 9:�No
9. Does any pact of the waste management system other'than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ANO
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes y4D No
Waste ADolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes �No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes , No
12. Crop type .... �%............................................................................................................................................................................................................:..........
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? E] Yes ZNo
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Pian readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes JWJ No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes P,No
❑ Yes XjNo
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes RN
❑ Yes DjLVo
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes K'No
l. ... ...io ... rleficieriri. .. . re rioted uw-in ttiis.visit:. Yoti �vi�l.re. . ...further . .
eor'aresporjdeincc:a'botit'this visit: ......
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or.any.other comments.:...` 1..`.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):,
A
G). 4lse
at` enc n i rrt44 tit ��.A
IJ�Ti �l �HGI� f s5 �+G(J1�
Reviewer/Inspector Name. d�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: n' av
N
1/6/99

JAMES B. HuNT
GOVERNOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 18, 1998
Corey Lutz
2349 Startown Rd.
Newton, NC 28658
Subject: Site Inspection
Piedmont Farm, Facility #: 18-22
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Lutz:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some
general guidance for the animal facilities regarding the management of the storage
pond/lagoon and waste application fields. For more specific/detailed information,
please contact your technical specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop, Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone]p FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - HO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen (N] Application for Qommon Crops_
• Small Grains: One-third (113) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the com is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (112) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (112) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 601bs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amountin equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount -of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely tum around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
.two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Catawba SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

Count
mco n
Owner
Corey Utz
Manager
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
I Piedmont Jersey's
l one um er
7-324-5059
essee
Region
O ARO O MRO O WARO O WSRO
p FRO O RRO O WIRD
lo'cateA.on.Kitcnie.Kd in.nortnwest L' incoln.' +
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
operation was relocateg relocaterom Catawba County 19-22. +
t :.:: ........QST. ,:... Date inactivated or closed
Type of Operation
p Swine p Poultry M Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity
Total 200 Cattl!7
SSLW 290,000
Dairy

~ Latitude
p Request to be removed p Removal Confirmation Recieved
Longitude
p Higher Yields
p Vegetation
C] Acreage
n Other
Comments
Basin Name•
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits Database

i
j[] Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3Other Agency
_yj
Mivision of Water Quality
A!•
.. .. ... .. ..... .
Moutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of MVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date ofInspection
Facility Number Z�
I - Tithe of Inspection 24hr. (hh:mm)
.............
D RegisteredhKertir.ied 0 Applied for Permit M Permitted 113 Not Oper.—it—io—n—al-1. Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName . ............ . ........ -5 ........................................ County:...... . 4.14-c-exh, .......................... ........... I ...........
Owner Name: .................... 'T e.y Lz Phone No:
. .......................................................................................
.................. .......... - ......................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title-- ............................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ..... .......................... . ..... .............................. I., ...... I ............... ... � X.4 .. T.13
Onsite Representative . ........11-� ....... f...........4
.... .......... 41116 .................................................. Integrator:................... ......................
..............
Certified Operator !ZQr:q ....... L.J.'c . ....................................... Operator Certification Number_..Z!�.70 ..........
Lorlition of Farm-
rte.......
A
4 rfr . .. ... ... r ...... V .. �;�V ........... - - -------
.... C.�r.L .... ;5 . . ....% ..........
Latitude =1 46
Design.. .., Current
Swine Capacity Population
El Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
[] Farrow to Wean
E] Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
E] Gilts
ff Boars
Longitude 0 & it
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population. Cattle Capacity., °Obpulation
IEl Layer IMID'airy Zc-t�
0 Non -Layer I[] Nan-Dairyl
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 20o
Total:SSLW
F
Number'6f Lagoons / Holding Ponds
10 S u bsu rface Drains Present JFO Lgon Area ID S pray Field Area
F, JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [I Yes JgNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes §ZNo
Discharge originated at: C] Lagoon 0 Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes. notify DWQ) D Yes [I No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125/97
D Yes 0 No
0 Yes W No
0 Yes 5i(No
0 Yes %�No
0 Yes .6No
E] Yes ONo
Continued on back
0

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagooncj fol dint! Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2
Identi ficr:
Freeboard (ft): ................ ly............. ................... .................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3 Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes '[No
❑ Yes ��iNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any or questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoffntering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............... Ci...........r...�.....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMPP
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q No.violatioits oir deficiencies werenotedduring this,visit..You.will receive no further
correspondence W oitt this',visit.-
❑ Yes �'cNo
❑ Yes (B�o
❑ Yes tgNo
❑ Yes NNo
❑ Yes �ENo
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes` Wo
El Yes §�No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes/allo
ClYes �No
❑ Yes EZNo
❑ Yes >No
❑ Yes — xS.No
Cl Yes_io
Comments (iefer'to question #}: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations -or -any, other commenti;
Use,drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
V IYIc �/L�Ggi. �� !?�L"� l' V) I i
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
.5 E
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: I
Date:
LI