490038_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Environmental
Quality
Bennett Baucom
Baucom Brothers Farm
6002 Morgan Mill Rd
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear Bennett Baucom:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
RECEVEDINCDE NRIDW RDirector
January 31, 2017 FEB - 2 2017
WOROs
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Re: Renewal of the Expired Permit
Permit No.: AWI900038
Union County
Your facility was approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation Individual Non -
Discharge Permits, which has since expired. Our records indicate that the Division has not received from
you a completed renewal application form to date. In order to maintain coverage under the current Permit,
please complete one of the following actions:
1. Please indicate if your facility is depopulated and the lagoon(s) or storage pond(s) at your facility
have been properly closed according to the NRCS standards. In that case, you may send us a written
request to rescind this permit by submitting a completed Lagoon & Waste Storage Pond Closure
Form. A blank copy of the form can be found at:
httv:lIdea .nc.gov/abogtldivisions/water-resources/water-resourc es-permits/wastewater-branchlanimal-
feeding=operation-permits/reporting-forms
2. Please submit a renewal application form that must be completed, signed and returned to this office.
Please include two (2) copies of your most recent Waste Utilization Plan along with the field maps, if
your facility is still active.
The renewal application form for the State or NPDES Individual Permit for Existing Operations can be
found at:
hgp:Hdeg.ne. gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/was_tewater-branch/animal-
feedin -o eration- ermits/a lications
40
3. If you area cattle facility that has gone below the threshold animal numbers (< 100), you may request
the rescission of your permit provided if the average size of the confined cattle herd at the cattle facility,
calculated on an annual basis during the three years prior to the request for rescission, is less than one
hundred confined cattle.
Please submit the requested information within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter to the following
address:
NCDENR—DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
: --Nathinq Compares" --,,Continued...
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a permit within the time period specified may result in a
civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid permit would constitute'a violation
ofNCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact me at 919-807-6341.
Sincerely,
J. R. Joshi, Soil Scientist
Animal Feeding Operations Program
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Union County Soil and Water Conservation District
WQROS Unit Central Files (AWI900038)
16,

jyv,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Eeveriy Eaves Perdue Coleen H, Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
December 30, 2010
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Re: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
NOD-2010-PC-1244
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
General Permit AWC490038
Iredell County
Dear Ms. Redmond:
During February, 2010, a representative of your animal operation informed staff of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS) that there was
inadequate freeboard in the Lagoons(s) or Storage Pond(s) serving the facility.. General Permit
Condition IIL13 states — "Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division
Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than tiventy four (24) hours follolving
first knowledge of the. ..Jailure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater
than or equal to that required in. , , this General Permit." We appreciate the fact that you
reported the problem of high waste.level as required by your permit and have worked with our
staff to manage the problem once it occurred.
While we recognize the extraordinary weather conditions existing at the time, the lack of
adequate freeboard reported to our office still represents non-compliance with the Certificate of
Coverage issued to your facility. As you are aware, this non-compliance is subject to appropriate
enforcement action by DWQ. The factors that lead to non-compliance, efforts to notify DWQ of
the problem, efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent
future problems have all been factors in our decision regarding enforcement. Upon review and
consideration of the information submitted and/or discussed with DWQ staff; the Mooresville
Regional Office has determined that a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) is appropriate and that no
further compliance/enforcement actions will be taken by the Division for the high waste levels
occurring between October, 2009 and March, 2010.
D11'SK2 i`'ti8f9rQti8lil'i.aQ„119'?;3ie;fi0nSE�?iQa;iV1 7fESYllleC;e41�n3i'of<I
61? gas; Center.4venue, Sun, 30... MDxesAi =_. Nomi, Cai.,Ana 28115
rhone:7a»-6i?.-16PP `Fax:� Oustamner Servic; ;-&:'•02 -67;s
Iniemet. wvrA,,.n=varer.;::aRN.org
�oieCarol�na
,'Natrirally

Kenneth NlacGibbon DairylFacility 49-38
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
December 30, 2010
Page 2
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
This may include, but is not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, ' adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the waste levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throuahout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Beaile or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated December 16, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC490038
Regional Permit File AWC490038
jb

I
IM Divisicn of Water Quality
iD Civisicn of Soil and Water Conservation
Ot:, er Ag ncy
Facdiry Number : ,OG".8 Faciiihy Status: : Permit: Denied Access
inspection Type: Comc!iance lnsp�rtic
Reason for Visit: R-%tire County
Inactive or Closed Date:
Irece" Region: Prlcoresviile
Date of Visit: 1211512010 Entry Time:,32'QG PM Exit T7me: ^d ?0 PEA Incident #:
Farm Name: Kenneth Macaibbop Calm Cwner Email:
Owner: Vircie 5 Redmond Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 134 Wes�glotiv Rd Statesville NO 286251538 _..
Physical Address: 1 9 Wp tel w Rd Statesville NC 286251538
Facility Status: n Compliant S Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'01'10" Longitude: 0'5'
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest corner of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Kenneth R, MacGibbon
On -site representative
Primary Inspector: James
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s)
Kenneth R. MacGibbon
Inspection Summary:
11/01/10 > Waste Ana!vsis > N = 5.8 Lbs'1000 Gallons
06r16110 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.3 Lbs,r1000 Gallons
04109l10 > Soil Analysis
Operator Certification Number: 28284
Title
Phone
Phone: 7C4-592-2374
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Ext.21 fit
Date:
31. WeeKly Freebcarc recor^s indicate that the maximum waste level in the Storage Pond was exceeded in February, 2010. U110
was notified of emergency si=uatiens on 02108l10, and the POA was received on 03/10110 as required by Permit; NOD to follow
Jb
Rage 1

Permit: AVVC490038 Owner- Faciiity: Vlrgie S Redmond
Facility Number: 490038
inspection Date: 1211612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
0 Cattle - Dair/ Calf
25
37
Ji Cattle - Dairj Heifer
105
130
Cattle - Dry Caw
30
30
Ji Cattle - Mllk Cow
160
150
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379,750
mr.,,*- C4- .-+. .-
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 31.20 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: VAIC4G0036 Owner • Facilit r: Vircie 5 itvGmcno Facility Number:
19C•038
Inspection Date: 1;;'612O1O !nspection Type: 1 nmpiiance Insrectior. Reason for Visit: FrOne
Disc„arg
es 8 p
Siren' , impacts
Yes
No N A NE
—
1. is anv discharce cdser✓ed fr::m, any par, of the operation?
n
M
ei
n
Discharge originated at:
Struc:re
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-rrr -da?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (4 yes, notify DVVQ)
❑
n
�
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
®
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
On
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storeg.e & Treatment
..
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
rn
rn
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management on
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
In
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
❑
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste strictures require maintenance or
n
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
14A
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that ,need maintenance or
n
M,
00
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
I
❑
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)? n
Page 3

Permit: AVVC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 1211612010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAID?
77
Is FAN > 10%110 lbs.?
17
TOtai P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Crain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need Improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
11. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19 Did the facility fail to have CetTcate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components or the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
n®nn
Hann
nn.®❑
Harm
Hann
Yes No NA NE
Hann
n�nn
n
Page:4

Permit:.;YNC19M18 Owner- Facility: Virgie S Facility Number: 190038
Inspection Oato: 12f15/2010 Inspection Type: Compflanca !rspeciion Ru:3scn for Visit::=.outine
Record''s and Documents YeS No Na NE
C�hEC;<ISLS? �
��Sign? n
iv,a c.s? n
tither^ n
21. Does record keeping need improvement" n iim n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
In
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Fora, (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
® n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
®
n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permi,?
n
n
® n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively cell fled operator in charge?
n
EM
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessmen� (PLAT) cariification?
n
F
n
O:her Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Perini; or CAMP?
29. Laid the facility fail to.properly dispose of dead animals witNn 24 hours and/or document and report ihese
n
13
n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30..At the time of the inspection did the facili y pose an air quaiiry concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
RZ
n n
Quality representative irnrnediately.
Page.5

Permit: A'NC190038 Cwner - Facility: `lirgie S Redmord
Facility Numt)er :
490C38
Inspection Cate: 12,'1612Ct0 inspection Type: Compliance 'nspecticr
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility tail io not v regional I]VJC of emergency situations as required b"y Permit?
n
n
n
32. [Did Peviewenllnspector fall to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
n
®n
n
33. Goes facility require a fsllcw-up visit by same agency?
❑
®
n
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
❑
®
Q
r
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Spray Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
Page: 6

ffJ';A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of LEnvironment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Colee.n H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
December 30, 2010
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Re: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
NOD-2010-PC-1244
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
General Permit AWC490038
Iredell County
Dear Ms. Redmond:
During February, 2010, a representative of your animal operation informed staff of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS) that there was
inadequate freeboard in the Lagoons(s) or Storage Pond(s) serving the facility. General Permit
Condition 111.13 states — "Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Division
Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours following
first knowledge of the, ..failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater
than or equal to that required in. . .this General Permit." We appreciate the fact that you
reported the problem of high waste,level as required by your permit and have worked with our
staff to manage the problem once it occurred.
While we recognize the extraordinary weather conditions existing at the time, the lack of
adequate freeboard reported to our office still represents non-compliance with the Certificate of
Coverage issued to your facility. As you are aware, this non-compliance is subject to appropriate
enforcement action by DWQ. The factors that lead to non-compliance, efforts to notify DVA'Q of
the problem, efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent
future problems have all been factors in our decision regarding enforcement. Upon review and
consideration of the information submitted and/or discussed with D'WQ staff, the Mooresville
Regional Office has determined that a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) is appropriate and that no
further compliance/enforcement actions will be taken by the Division for the high waste levels
occurring between October; 2009 and 14arch, 2010.
o Ih'eier.�uaiity l y�iie DMIeCt{ar SS1ft5: M�0resvilis Regina: OHM
610 eas, center Avenue, Sivie 301. h1o3resvi11e, Nor!.-: Carolina 28115;
r : i a4 en'3-168P IFax: Ousiama- 5arvim: 1-677,-62--67 "
�rlic'i td�' LY1'FJl'-R:1Vc".`Py:7wiih'.0 y
N ne
ofthCamlina
,I'1' MUrallif

Kenneth NAacGibbon,Dairy/Facility 49.38
NoTiCE OF DEFICIENCY
December 30, 2010
Page 2
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range.
This may include, but is not limited to, water conservation practices, adding additional
application sites, updating your cropping systems, adding additional and/or more flexible
application equipment, and maintaining the waste levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate
levels throughout the year. Our staff looks forward to continuing to work with you and your
Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement any needed changes to your system.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance inspection Report dated December 16, 2010
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC490038
Regional Permit File AWC490038
jb

r
Division of Water Quality
i� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
C Qther Agr�ncv
Facility Numtler : `038 Facility Status: r t:;Q Permit:.a'r`,'Cec00cn n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Com li nre Inso cti r Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: PcuL_r.. _ County: Irece!! Region: Mccresvdle
Date of Visit: 12/1520'0 Entry Time:03-00,PNI Exit Time: 04 30 PAW Incident 4:
Farm Name: Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Viraie S Redmond Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1.3411Vestg10w Rd � Statesville NC 286251536
Physical Address: 139 We tcl w Rd Statesville NC 286251538
Facility Status: f_� Compliant In Not Compliant, Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 30°01'10" Longitude: $C°55'58"
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglew Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest corner of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
U Discharges & Stream Impacts Vlaste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:. Kenneth R MacGibbon
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 28284
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kenneth R MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: ,tames Phone: 704-663•1699
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary inspectors)
Inspection Summary:
I I/C1110 > Waste Analvsis > N = 5.8 Lbs/1000 Galiorrs
05!16110 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.3 Lbs11000 Gallons
04/09/10 > Soil Analysis
31. Weekly Freeboard records indicate that the maximum waste level in the Storage Pont was exceeded in Februa,- , 2010. DWQ
was notified of emergency situations on 02/08110, and the POA was received on 03/1Oil 0 as required by Permit; NOD to follow.
!b
Page: 1

t
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Facility Number : 490028
Inspection Rate: 1211612010 inspection Type: Comoliance lrseection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Cattle
Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle - Oairr CV
25
37
Cattle -Dairy heifer
^ 05
130
Cattle -Dry Cow
3C
30
Cable - Milk Cow
160
150
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379,750
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond WSP 31 20 48 00
Page: 2

J
4
Permit: Owner - Facility: Vircie S aedmond Facility Number: ac0038
Inspection Date: 12:'012010 inspection Type: Compiiance i. scec:ior Reason far Visit: r Liure
& Stre< :'" m a tS Yes No NA NE
Cise.,a___rr�_es ��.
1. is any discharge f any per.. cf the cpera;icr,.? n ® C-1 r'
Discharge originate, a
Structure n
Application Field
Other n
a. Was conveyance man -mach? n n n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DVVQ) n n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
rl
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
®❑
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
1Z
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.i large trees, severe
0
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed andlor managed through a waste management
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
12
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
IJA
NE
10 Are there any require buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
®n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorreci application;?
if yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding? (]
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page. 3

Permit: AWC490038 owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmend
Facility Number : 490038
Inspection Hate: 12/1612010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Rourme
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 1C°o110 lbs.?
n
Total P2O5?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 8
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2 I
Soil Type 3
SoIJ Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
®
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
®
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigafion design or wettable acre determination?
n
n
®
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
®
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
i01)
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
®
00
20. floes the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

I
Permit: A:"11C,19CC38 Owner - Facility: Virsie S 1�ec7,ond Facility Number : 490038
Inspection'?a[o: 12.1612010 Inspection Type: Compiianc2 °rscection F_ asrn for Visit: R.ourine
Recorc's and Documents Yes No NA NE
['
'.hcC`(1I5i5?
D,:si;n? F-1
Ulacs?
Other?
21. Does retard 'peeping need improvement" r n ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
1771
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
lnspectiors after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual sci! analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22 Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
® in n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ® n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
r1
I l n
25. Did the facifity fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n ® n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
® n n
27 Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) cedificaticn?
n
n n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
25 Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit; or CAMP?
❑
❑ [i
29 Did the fa3i!ity fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or don r eni and repo/; those
n
n n
mortalir� rates that exceed normai rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the faciiiy pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
n n
Quality representative immedialefy.
Page.5

Permit: AWC490038 QWner - Faciilty: Virgie 5 Redmond
Facility Number: 490C2P
Inspection Date: 12'1512' 1p Inspection Type. Compliance •.nspecercn
Reason for Visit: Routire
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did tl e facility fail to noting ,egion.af rW10 of emergency situations as required -y Permit?
❑
M n
n
32. Enid Revfewer,'Inspec;crfail to discuss reviewlinspecticn with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a °oIIeW-up visit by same agency?
n
n
n
34. Are suhsurface drains present on this farm?
I
❑
® n
Ol
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
0
n
n
n
Page: 6

LROY-'COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL, 5..�g
_Secretary"
Water Resources S. JAY'ZIMMERMAN
Environmental Quality Director
May 18, 2017
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-3 8
General Permit AWC490038
Iredell County
Dear Ms. Redmond:
On March 31, 2017, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy and
the permitted waste disposal, system: We wish to thank Kenneth R. MacGibbon, who was
present and assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however-, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Watcr Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated March 31, 2017
Jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
-704-663-1699

DivisO*j af.WaterResources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
490038 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWC490038
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Iredell Region:
Mooresville
Date of Visit:
03/31/2017 Entry Time: 01:00 pm
Exit Time: 2:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
Owner Email:
Owner:
Virgie S Redmond
Phone:
704-592-2374
Mailing Address:
134 Westglow Rd
Statesville NC 286251538
Physical Address:
139 Westglow Rd
Statesville NC 286251538
Facility Status:•
0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 36' 01' Longitude:
80° 55' 58"
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest comer of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon Operator Certification Number: 28284
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(a): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspactor(s):
Inspection Summary:
02/23/17 > Waste Analysis > N = 11.5 Lbs11000 Gallons
11/15/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.25 Lbsl1000 Gallons
04/07/15 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone: [phone] Far
Date:-7
I
page: 1

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility : Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
In_ 4n tion.Date: 03/31/17 Inpsection.Type: Compliance Inspection ason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
25
25
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
105
110
Cattle - Dry Cow
30
30
Cattle -Milk Cow
160
155
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379.750
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 31.20 36.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility : Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
-Inspection Date: 03/31/17 Inpsection Type: - :Gompliance Inspection Reason for Visit: • Routine ,.�.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
110
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Cl 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yea
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zr', etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%p/10 IbsJ' .
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
r
page: 3

Permit: AWC490038
Owner- Facility:' Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspectiop�pate:" 03/31/17 Inspection Type: __ Compliance Inspection . Reas,g0,for Visit:. Routine
Waste Application
Yes N2 Na N2
Crop Type 1
Com (silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19.. Did the facility fail to have Ceffcate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility : Virgie S Redmond Facility Number:
.Inspert�ws,©ate: - 03131117. _..... Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection. .. P,oc�)an for Visit:
490038
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No N
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections,
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
2.4. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ .
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ M
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ E
❑
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWM P?
33.-Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up;visit by same agency?
Yes No Na Na
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑ N ❑ ❑
❑l
❑■❑❑
❑ ■❑ ❑
page: 5

Type of Visit: iP Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: A* Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other. O Denied Access
Date of Visit: O c Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 1 S, orx- Owner Email: _
Owner Name: '�► �� ` % Phone:
Mailing Address;
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative-.
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator: -
Location of Farm:
Title:
Wean to Finish
[Layer
Wean to Feeder
Non-L.
Feeder to Finish
D , P,i
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Gilts
Non-L
Boars
1. X11
1pullcts
Other
Phone:
Number: C 2� 2"? 44
Number:
Latitude; Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Imaacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
r.
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Cow
Calf
Cow
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yds—jB-Uo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NE
[]Yes [:]No
No ZrA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
� 21412011 Continue ;

[Facillty,Number:, - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is'storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes <No NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ' ❑ NE
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate -threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes aSro ❑ NA .❑ NE
waste management or closure planT
If any of questions 4-6 were`answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmgptalUhreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes/ Io_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Ye -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvemen
0
I
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil t'
❑ 'Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 4L4 J
12: Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No < ❑ NP�
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes � Q NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate
readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
■ ►_j�� ■ ■
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Ma s Lease AgreementsLe.21. Doe record keeping need im ovement? If yes, check ppropriate box below. NfersNo ❑ NA NE
lication ee Freeboard W e Anal sis ❑ Soi Anal sis�21udge
r Code
Rainfall ❑ Stocking rop Yield ❑ 0 ' to Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspect' nsvey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

-r
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA [] NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Outer Issues
28. Did the facility fail t ispose of dead animals w' h 24 hours and/or.document ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergent situations as required by the ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -a
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
fl6/l��cs U
0 o�/as S
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
ion s,(use additional pages as necessary) .,tL �4
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
January 11, 2016
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625,
PAT MCCRORY
9. Governor
DONAJLD R. 'VAN DER VAART
ticcrc•ia+y
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
General Permit AWC490038
Iredell County
Dear Ms. Redmond:
Director
On December 10, 2015, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy and
the permitted waste disposal system: We wish to thank Kenneth R. MacGibbon, who was
present and assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jamb% B. Bealle III, EnvironmentarSpecialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ.
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated December 10, 2015
jb
Slate of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Monroeville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite Ml I Mooresville, North Carolina 28113
704663 1699

❑
❑
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
.490038
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490038
Denied Access,
Inppectlon Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Iredell Region:
Mooresville
Date of Visit:
1211012015 Entry Time:
01:30 pm Exit Time: 2:30 pm Incident 6
Farm Name:
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
Owner Email:
Owner:
Virgie S Redmond
Phone:
704-592-2374
Mailing Address:
134 Westglow Rd
Statesville NC 286251538
Physical Address:
139 Westglow Rd
Statesville NC 266251538
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:,36° 01' Longitude: 80' 55' 58"
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest comer of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon Operator Certification Number: 28284
Secondary OIC(s): .
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kenneth R. MacGibbon. Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: James
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
16/15/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.80 Lbs11000 Gallons
06/18/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 6.75 Lbs11000 Gallons
04/07/15 > Soil Analysis
Jb
Phone. [phone]d
Date.
page: 1

Permit: AWC490038 Owner -Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 12/10/15 . Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
25
40
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
105
125
Cattle - Dry Cow
30
25
Cattle -Milk Cow
160
150
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379,750
Waste Structures
Disignited Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 31.20 36.00
page: 2

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility : Virgie S Redmond Facility Number:' 490038
Inspection Date: 12/10/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge. odginoted at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ M
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Slate? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑0
❑
Cl
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storasie $ Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate'threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large
El❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B: Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan? -
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
' 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures -require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aoplication
Yes No Na Ne
10.-Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Cl
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

19
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility : Virgie S Redmond Facility Number:
490038
Inspection Date: 12/10/15 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste'Appllcation
Yea No-N Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2 ,
small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type B
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
El
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ M ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yeg No Nj No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
MCI ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility : Virgie S Redmond Facility Number:
490038
Inspection Date: 12/10/15 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yee
No -
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ N
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
28. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ 0
❑
Other. Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
Cl
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other `
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
1101111
page: ' 5

S ,
t
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
August 8, 2016
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER NAART
Secmiary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
General Permit AWC490038
Iredell County
Dear Ms. Redmond:
Director
On July 21, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water
Quality Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy and
the permitted waste disposal system. We wish to thank Kenneth .R.' MaeGibbon, who was
present and assisted during the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
. d7Bealle III, Environmental Specialist.
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated July 21, 2016
Jb
1
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I, Water Resources j Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 E Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facllity Number: 490038 Facility Status: Active permit AWC490038 Denied Access, ;
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit. Routine i County: • Iredell Region:
Date of Via It: 07/21/2016 Entry Time. 03.00 pm Exit Time: 4:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Virgie S. Redmond Phone:
Mailing Address: 134 Westglow Rd Statesville NC 286251538
Physical Address: 139 Westglow Rd
Statesville NC 286251538
Mooresville
704-592-2374
Facility Status: Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36° 01' Longitude: 80° 55' 58"
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest comer of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
,Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon Operator Certification Number: 28284
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Primary Inspector. James
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Kenneth R. MacGibbon
Kenneth R. MacGibbon
Inspection Summary:
06129/16 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.46 Lbs11000 Gallons
03121 /16 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.52 Lbs11000 Gallons
04/07/15 > Soil Analysis
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Phone: - 7-663-1699 Ft
Date:
IF I
Stormwater runoff that comes into contact with waste must be controlled following BMPs to prevent potential discharge. Facility
Operator advised to coordinate with Iredell SWCDINRCS to develop and implement a plan to address ASAPI
ib
page: 1

J
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility : Virgie S Redmond Facility Number. 490038
Inspection Date'. 07/21/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
25
25
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
105
150
Cattle -Dry Cow
30
30
Cattle - Milk Cow
160
140
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SS LW: 379,750
ftsULStructures
Disignatod Observed
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond WSP 31,20' 42A0
page: 2

Permit: AW0490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: , 07/21/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharnea & Stream Impacts
Yes No NiLNQ
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
[]
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑M
❑
❑
State otherthan from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No No No
4, is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑M
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe'erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,
Yes No Na Ng'
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, .or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑, ..
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

'r
e
Permit: AWC490038 Owner.- Facility i Virgie S Redmond Facility Number
490038
Inspection Date: 07/21/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yee No No Ne
Crop Type 1 E
Com (silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6.
14: Do the receiving'crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑ 0
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na' Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.'
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑0
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
1
❑
Rainfall? 1
Stacking?
El
w
page: 4

I
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility : - Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 07/21/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documen
)LU
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1". Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ M ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility -fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ M ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ M ❑
Other Issues
Yee No Na Ne
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? If yes,'
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑0 ❑ ❑
page: 5

I
(Type of Visit: 41 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: # Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 07 2t Arrival Time: 'e
Departure Time: unty: Region: aFarm Name: !�'Ab'V �q Owner Email: '—�—
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: ¢T
Certification Number: !a.' u 2— �l
Certification Number:
Longitude:
� ,✓�y *� A :v � - h, 9 �°
-
Irv.
�.^'fO.,,S a��-' "
�e� - N" '
� �;��..
;� r k` &�
� y:: .S -
■WROTE-�a3sr�_"may
1 I <,
'�
i +t
' _► 1��1
ply
■
--
�•,
■
�
__
;.
■
� �
==
1
777
■
�
-� {
■
�
��
��
i �, y.'� �upse �� d',�r�,
d ,his ,�� '
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? C] Yd -== [D NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes []NO ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No tl ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Y A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 ' 21412011 Continued

r
Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste. Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes ` �dS NA NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes No NE
Stru Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Id
FSpillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): IC:
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes !S:NA NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a Yes NA NA NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes fo NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes jZo NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes %, �OEI NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application -�-
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes � o ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there e ' ce of incorrect land application? If yes, check t e appropriate box below. Yes NA NE
xcessive Ponding raulic Overlo Frozen Ground Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)'
�Oui&
PAN10%orl0lbs. �fio Phosphorus Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
of Acceptable Crop Window �idence of Wind Drift pplication Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Types)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Yes]
NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[] Yes
[ to NA
F] NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
Yes
No
[] NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
o NA
NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes
NA
NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
El Yes
A
NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes NA NE
the appropriate box. �� �raps
� gr ❑
Checklists esi a s ease A eements Other:
21. D record keeping need im vement? If yes, check. ppropriate box below s NA NE
Wa do ;2_�O
WSoi a s' Waste T sfers ea r Code
infall Stockin Crop Yield Min a spections onthly and V Rainfall Inspections fudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes.. gZZo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes [,] No #A [] NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

` Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No , A [:]'NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were high normal?
Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes�N�o A
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No 0 NA
[] NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes USmjo ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-sitc representative?
❑ YesWr"F_NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comiiaentsr(referrto question #):Explain any:YES aoswers.and/or'a�ty�additional recainirnendatioas3ar any other corrtments,�r 5
i.• .,'. r 4 '.-k' S
luse.dirawtnl;s offacility;to better explainssituateons (use'additionalages•as;necessary). , k ,✓ n :.
al-
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3of3 21412011

A
`4
Type of Visit: d&Compliance Inspection n Operation Review O Structure Evaluation - O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: i& Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency Q Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: .4w Departure Time: County: Region:TU�3-6
Farm Name: i CA Owner Email:
Owner Name: • Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification
Certification
Longitude:
yR'
w
1 � . w�s' � k L I 1 _ �• k -�+1 1 "�� I 1 r s4 'S V - -=
tw
_
Drum
1'�4x�, _,I'� Mr(4 '. 1,1 1.'VIr IJ^'nL
l■
, , --,-
--�.r
■,,
NORM
•: - n� h?xi:u74
•. 'ern 9,1 v *� 1` S +s--k ••�i-�r
■
-_
a Ap 5� �h IW
w' p ti
f+.• e:,,pc�w
�iC ���'4'W.X YR�'�'a;�+���-yam �i ,y�"} 1.,
[a1 ■
* ' - _-
��
■
f 1
-_
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Y<io
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[]Yes [:]No
A
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the'waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes -❑ N
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Y
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters "
❑ es No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: IDati of Inspection:
Waste Collection.& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yeo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
17r-
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ��
Observed Freeboard (in): '"
5. Are there any immediate thr a integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage; etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir RUWffMTffi—hat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [] Yes NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) V
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes C5�Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes o NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 I. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.. ❑ Yec�❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window E idence 9f Wind Drift M Application Outside o Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): -
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate -box,
ON0 s s ❑ Deli-gn�E] MapTT] �Lease Agreements
❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
IN
❑ Yes '[&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o [] NA ❑ NE
[:]Other:
2record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aeWaste Application eekly Freeboard to Analysis Soil Anal s aste Transfers Bather Code
v
nfall tocking ❑ CreiEld 120 Minu#e Inspections Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspe udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued
or

1 Faclli Number: - Date of inspection:
1 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste a application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? # I ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues �r
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead 24 hours and/or document
e ❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑Yes ❑ NA
[] NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of a er required by the
❑Yes NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes'~❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑Yes ❑ NA
_]NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes A
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Ye o ❑ NA
❑ NE
uy/ora-&'
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Insp'ector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 214/2011

4
Date of Visit:' Arrival Time: Z: Departure Time: ounty: Region:
Farm Name: jlv1�COwner Email:'
1 C % [� 11
Owner Name: �3x {AV Q �] . Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: , n `� Integrator:
Certifeed Operator: V, ti !` V /�� 1 Certification Number: 2
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
1
Latitude:
Longitude: '
' - r ,1 ,.•I,
I w:p}y. tf%•�; f�^�L I
'ti�7. � '��,,,+� ,'+1• N .. ..
- r
W5 kf'S •b� R RI.�
� l 1 �., li ' 1 .t 1 i' 1 1 � � '�h i"T"�r`f i - I
r ,� ., vK -y +Y� w: "� ti�y�" "'�+4�Ey,-.�;�u�-n'L•,4M �u'�.4. ......,,
` I 1 t . ,w5
•�-�-
r
■EIMT.M.man
�r
. ■
,1
��
'��
1■1l�■
r'��f
1.... .I. I,i r .Y `- 1 �'�';' I~Il 1f 'x�j.
.�■
, � --,-
-�N��I
, R ■�-
,�
y
�;
r 01301
`1 • � �-. 1 � +.hr-ti.Ef IT.., �, f„� �ny'k� ,�1 a� ,�.�`r �� ■
'�•� � � 4 f�" J '`tw G� �A7 1'�if i`4w .Mf� x5:
�` "fY� � S '`� r •'h"^"sP� .✓ �` ,.,�.��n. ■
'�j• °
-�
`��v�7 j �� 'tr:y1��,�M� T�+. tpV.�'� 1 �r Sa 9�a v�4 �, "
; t � L^- �''5�+� iir� } J. ?�`�j 1, t
� �i �: S � re�t �!"M i ��,siY t C Y 51,
�"�,''i'� until �:'r..r S 1��JM �.�7� n �� �".t`sY {
r
�
--
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
_ 10
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
�
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0A
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does'the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
A
❑ NE .
�2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes a
❑ NA
❑ NE.
'ere there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
,ye
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
State other than from a discharge? 4
,law I of3
21412014 Continued

%
Facili Number: - Date of Inspection;
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 1a ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑Yes [] No❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �1��FNA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yeo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes`�"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) ,
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application°
10. Are there any required buffers,
maintenance or improvement?
hives that need ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manurb/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑Ye o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes"400 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NoNE
❑ Yes f�;/[]
NA ❑ NE
Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Othe :
21. Does record keeps vement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ste Applicat' n ��Weekly Freeboard ante Ana ysi SnLLAnalysis ste ransf tier Code
ainfaIl Stocking�Yield 0 Minute Inspections �onthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yesz ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continue
r�

i
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes o 0 NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes No NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
[] Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon -
List structures) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [] Yes <No NA L] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes ED No NE
Other Issues
2$. Did the facility fail to properly ispose of dead animals wv th 24 hours and/or document �] Yes ioT�] NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? Yes ❑ NA [] NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes�o NA NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-app tion)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yeso NA NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond [] Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Xj
NE
33. -Did the Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative? NA NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ NA NE
Comments (refer to question #):tEaplaia,aEry YES,answers,sndlor" dy addiboii I(r".ecomme3ndatio ' , ra zo eir,.comvWhts "
¢rgYt ..r.,„,�." --.�.3�u'.1.:j,�^--�.:�'krn!o-' �;' ,'r sae.'„Jyr' x %r� y'�^ r.W
Use dra`vin e'af+facili eta better ex .Iain;s�tuahons; use,additionalt a eseaatuecessa '`,,,��?�
Vt6*'�
Fs3 24( - S
CReviewer/Inspector Name:
�•iewer/inspector Signature:
age 3 oj3
Phone:
Date:
21412014

f.--��.. �-�--.
f: �,�
�� S � �
r
`�

Division of -Water Quality
Facflity'Num er y'0 Division ofFSoil and Water°Conservation
0 Other Ageacy
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (9 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 t Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name_ EAA)A� A W cOwner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Phone:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design,'.. Current.
Swine' Capacity Pop. '-
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder. to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
".a Other
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Wet Poultry
La ^er
Non -La er
Dry Poultry
Layers
Non -La ers
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Design Current
Design :Current
Cattle Capacity Popp
K'J—Daii7v Cow t r_ -
Cow
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Corr
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 'jEtV ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No�, ' ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No ❑ NE
,2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Y:Zo
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ' ❑ Y CC] NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - I jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
1 a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes )`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ` Io [D NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ e4faq] threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes4Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [] PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
I2. Crop Type(s): —�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NEqZ
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Y No ❑ N ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes "[I'No 0 NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
I9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �2< ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes hi�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
Chec is esign Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. P.aEsteTra5nsfe5rs,
❑ NA NE
��aste Applic n Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis 5oi1 AnalysisWe ther Code
infall Stocking rop Yield �20 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes�o ❑ N ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [] No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued �"

facility Number: - _ Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, chec e ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey. ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? - ❑ Ye ❑ NA ❑ NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? :E<❑ NE
Other Issues �
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead ac ' als with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 7fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher t an m nora '�"`�
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative inunediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of eWergencx situati s as required by the ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? [] Yes 1!5"1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Coiniinents (refer to question. ft Explaiwany YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use. drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Z :E 6-M G 44Vk<z,\
C<:,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
11 Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412011

r
�C)
PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM D [EC [ N V
OWNER: MRS. M. S. REDMOND APR 14 W
02ERATOR: Mac Gibbon
JOB CLASS: IV t L;VVU - h4W101'
DAIRY SIZE: 160 MILK COWS
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil COnVe:rvationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil. Engineer
APPROVED BY: 14 L-• DATE:
7-14-98
Revision #1 - Planned originally for Keith gtephens. Mr.
Stephens subleased farm to MrdlGibbon. . M:.. ; Gibbon. will
operate a little differently. Changes mado throughout plan.
RECEIVED I DENR / DWQ
Agijifpr Pmtert6n Sartton
APR 0 6 2009 -

II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the waste production described above in a manner
that does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The
system planned will prevent discharge of pDllutants to
surface and groundwater by recycling waste through soil and
plants.
The following design and plans are rejuiread:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Pollut-ad Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash water for Milk Herd and Dry Cows
The storage period will be determined in the existing
pond. The manure will handled as a slurry in order to
handle the manure easily and in as concent7rated volume as
possible. Truck hauling will be'used to empty waste storage
pond.
B. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions.,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
C. Livestock Exclusion_ and Filter Areas i°or 400 to 750 lb
Heifers
Forty 400 to 750 lb heifers will be pastuxe:d on the
farm. 24 acres of pasture is available for this heifer
group. Cattle will be fed at an existing need alley. The
feed alley will be roofed to control manure: and runoff from
the area. Manure will be stored under the roofed feed area
until it is spread. Hay will be fed in a zing on the ridge.
Water tanks will be needed to water animals.
4
11

D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas J:or Bred Heifers
Forty bred heifers will be pastured on the back of
farm. Twenty-one acres of pasture is avai:able for this
heifer group. Cattle will be fenced out of stream. Cattle
will be fed a TMR at a roofed feed bunk. ':'he same feed bunk
used for 400 to 750 lb heifers. Manure wi:.l bestored under
the roofed feed area until it is spread. Flay will be fed in
A ring on the ridge. Water tanks will be needed to water
animals.
E. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas I -or Close Up Bred
Heifers and Dry Cows
Thirty-five dry cows and close up bred heifers will be
pastured on lot next to State Road. 10 acres of pasture is
available for this animal group. Cattle w..11 lie fed silage
at an existing feed alley. The -feed alley is roofed and
curbed to contain manure_ Hay.will be fed on a. ring on a
heavy use area. Grass filters are to be maintained below
the lounging area and feed area.
F. Silo Runoff and Leachate
Silo runoff and leachate will be diverted through
vegetative filters. Solids will be cleaned out. of diversion
along the waste storage pond at regular int:erva.ls. See
drawing.
G. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and raises that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste appl:�cations will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
H. Operation and Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will. be prepared.

III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Waster
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 150 day period
Drainage area -surfaced lot. Use averc.ge runoff values
in Ag. Waste Management Field Manual. Concrete channels
shall carry 25 yr - 24 hr runoff to Waste Storage Pond. The
drainage area was taken from old design. It appears
reasonable.
Drainage Area s 14,300 sq ft Surface = 14,300 sq ft
Unsurface = 0 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
DEPTH
%
DEPTH[
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85 -
20
0.144
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.9"
1.6
MAR.-
4. 51
55
2 .4 8
24
1. 01;
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84:
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.8s,
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27
1.1',
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.212
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1,0_,
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74:
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.811'
1.7
Try 5 months:
October through February Surface Runoff Depth = 9.93"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 4.35"
Surface Runoff- 9, 9311 * 14,300 sq ft = 11,8713 cuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= "* 0 aq ft a 0 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall m1n'.1s evaporation on pond surface
17.75 9.1 = 8.71'
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
= 0.7 ft/5 month
25yr-24hr runoff- " * 14,300 sq ft = 5,851 cu ft
12"/ft

4. 'Volume of Waste
1C0
_.� 14,e milk cows in freestall barn and 10 sick or fresh
cows are on concrete 100% of the time. look of the manure
produced will be collected in the waste storage: pond.
Volume =160 cows *,14.0 gal/Slav * 150 days } loot
7.48 gal/cu ft
W 44,920 cu ft
30 dry cows will be housed in freesta:'_1 shed next to
freestall barn. 100% of the .manure produced by these cows
will be collected.
Volume =30 cows * ].__ . 0 qgIZdgy_* 150 days * 1Ci0%
7.48 gal/cu ft
8,422 cu ft
Total 44,920 cu ft + 8,422 cu. ft = 53, 342- cru- ft.
4N
6.
25 yr -24 hr rainfall, on the pond sur::ace
Rainfall = 5.5" _ .5 ft
Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water
ii. Tank wash water
iii. Milk house floor wash water
iv. Cow wash water
Volume = 700 gal/day*l.cu ft/7.48 gal* 15o days
= 14,037 cu ft
200 gal./day
5o gal./day
400 gal./day
50 gal./day
700 gal./day
7. Freeboard & ESW - 1.7 ft See design :ln field office
file for freeboard and emergency spillway depth
designed.
A. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
11.833
cu ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
0
cu ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
5.851
cu ft
4.
Manure
53.342
cu ft
5.,
Milking Parlor Wash Water
14.037
cu ft
TOTAL
95, 063
cu ft
4.
Rainfall minus Evaporation
0.8 ft
S.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall
.5 ft
6.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
1-7 ft
Total
3.0 ft

C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond f-)r Manure
wide
nar.
129' X 147'
88' X 88'
Volume z 7.9/6{88 X 88 + 130.7 X 118.0 + 4(109.4 X 103.0))
89,848 cu €t
This pond has 5 months of storage.
Normal Pump Out Volume
11,833 + 53,342 + 14,037 + .8' X 129' X 147'
94,382 cu ft per 150 days
229,663 cu £t per 365 days
1,718,000 gallons per year
573 - 3,000 gallon loads
Maximum pump out level
0.5' + 1.7' + 5851/(120' X 1401) 2 6'
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should to hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 2.6 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.7 foot
below the top of dam.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot and freestall barbs. The District
Conservationist will design all diversions. Diversions
shall be designed to carry the 25 year - 2�; hour runoff plus
capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
- and maintain on existing buildings.

V. Lounging Areas, Heavy Use Areas and Filter areas
All heavy use areas consist of 9" or compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter clot;l. ILI1 heavy use
areas will be fenced. Runoff from these areas and lounging
areas will be directed across well maintained grass sods.
Heavy use areas and lounging areas will be located to
provide the maximum grass filter possible. Gress filters
shall be at least 1001 wide below lounging areas and heavy
use areas. Swells or diversions shall be :onst:ructed and
maintained along fence lines to kick water into filters at
frequent intervals.
A. Day old to 200 1b iier Group
C'cires
25 young are kept in hutches :near the milking
herd. Approximately 75k of the. manure is ::olle;cted and
spread regularly.
Volume
of manure=25 calves *1.1_aal/h dav* 365 dais*.75= 1372 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft
B. 200 to 400 lb Heifer Group
25 young heifers are kept in sheds and smell lots near
the milking herd. 100% of the manure is c4311ec:ted and
spread regularly.
Volume of manure.
25 G.'* * 365 days*1010%= .1, 660 cu ft
N-L i tar S 7.48 gal/cu ft
C. 400 to 750 lb Heifers
40 heifers 400 to 750 lbs will be h=3ed in 24 acre
pasture behind freestall barn. Heifers will be: fed hay in a
ring on a 40' X 40' heavy use area. A 60' X 121 stock trail
will be constructed from feed alley to the pasture to allow
clean water diversion, from freestall barn. The: feed alley
will be modified by adding d roof. Manur+= will be stored
under roof at fed bunk. Approximately 25!s of the manure is
collected and spread at: feed bunk and hay :-"eed area.
Volume s
of manure-40 aalA9&w* .0 real/hd/day* 365 da,rs*.;.'5. 2,928 tuft
7.48 gal/cu ft

D. Bred Heifers
40 heifers will be housed in 21 acre pasture on back of.
farm. Heifers will be fed hay in a ring or► a 40' X 60'
heavy use area. A TMR will be fed in existing feed alley.
The same alley used for 400 to 750 lb heifers will be used.
Manure will be store under roof at the feed alley. A 250' X
12, stock trail will be constructed from fEned alley to
pasture. This will provide access across a drainage way
near feed alley. Approximately 25% of the manL.re is
collected and spread at feed bunk and hay i`eed area.
Volume
of manure-40 head *10...¢ aal/hd/dav*365 day.,3* . 2E­ 4,880 cuft
7.48 gal/cu ft
Cattle will drink water at a water tank. Cattle will be
fenced from stream.
E. Close Up Bred Heifer and Dry Cow Group
Thirty-five close up bred heifers and dry cows are
located on 10 acres of pasture along state road. They are
fed silage at an existing roofed concrete ',:eed alley. A
45' x45' heavy use area will be installed next to feed alley
to feed hay. A 100` grass filter will be established below
the heavy use area, lounging area, etc. Manure will be
stored on concrete feed alley between collection and
hauling. The -concrete alley will store manure for several
weeks. Some modification of wooden curb in needed.
Approximately 25W of manure will be collected a.t concrete
alley.
Volume of Manure
-35 head + j4„rg,sjj d/dav * 365 days* .25- 4,270 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft
F. Dry Cows
An average of 30 caws are confined to free stall shed
next to freestall. barn. Manure is collected and stored in
waste storage pond. Clean water from barn roofs will be
diverted under access road to feed driveway.

VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for milking herd will be stored in a waste
storage pond for over 5 months and will be conventionally
spread.
During the course of one year, this facility will store
1,718,000 gallons of slurry waste. Daily scraping of waste
is required to move the waste into the storage facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collectred at other
parts of the farm:
1.
Day old to 200 lb Heifers
1,372
cu
ft
2.
200 to 400 lb Heifers
3,660
cu
ft
3.
400 to 750 lb Heifers
2,928
cu
ft
4.
Bred Heifers
4,880
cu
ft
5.
Close Up Bred Heifers and Dry Cows
4,270
cu
ft
Total
::7, 110
cu
ft
If all of one years waste were spread using a .100 cu ft
spreader, it would take approximately 86 IDads,
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damag,� to underground
drainage systems may result from the exces,aive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from heavy use areas, lounging are<<s and trench
silos will be diverted through grass filter. areas. Grass
sods will be maintained all year round. These areas maybe
controlled grazed in late spring and early fall. when ground
is dry. Weeds may require chemical control or periodic bush
hogging. Grass filters below heavy use areas will be
maintained in a good grass sod. Filter are.as below heavy
use areas shall be graded to establish sha:_low flows.
C. Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Slurry Pond for Milk Herd
TOTAL NUTRIENTS
QlgPOSAL LOSSES 1�VAI MLE
NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 32,080
lbs.
0.44 14,115
lbs.
P205 19,528
lbs.
0.70 13,670
lbs.
K20 29,292
lbs.
0.70 2C,504
lbs.
8:5 lbs PAN per 1000
gallons

b. Other Manure around the Farm
TOTAL _NUTRIENTS DISPQSAL LOSSM AVAILABLENUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 6,369 lbs. 0.43 2,739 lbs.
P205 3,949 lbs. 0.70 2,764 lbs.
K20 5,541 lbs: 0.70 3,879 lbs.
C. Total Available Nutrients (a and b atove)
PAN 16,854 lbs
P205 16,434 lbs
K20 24,383 lbs
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
CROW UNITS ACRES YIELD APP:LIC. RATE
S.Grain Sil. tons 90 2.0 9,400 gal/ac
Corn Silage tons 68 15.0 17,600 gal/ac
b. Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED lbs applied/ac (lbs. used/ac)
CROP ACRES N P205 K20
Grain Silage 90 80 (80)
Corn Silage 68 150 (165)
G. Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEE MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SHP OCT NOV DEC
Grain S i 19 0 NNNNNMZn4NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN.qNM NNNNN
Corn S i l 68 NNNNNNNNN NNNNNNN.TNNN?JNNNNNN11NNNNNN
N = not a recommended disposal period
E. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pol:.utants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage ponds a:. -id d`.versions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
The waste storage pond shall be pumped before it
reaches a point 2.6 ft. below the top of t:ze dam. Post
shall be set with the top at these elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage ponds shall be
mowed annually and eroded areas patched. :?encj.ng shall be
�- checked and repaired as required.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor
V irgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westgiow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear V irgie Redmond:
Director
August 4, 2009
Subject: Additional Information Request
Application No. AWC490038
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
Iredell County
Secretary
The Animal Feeding Operation Unit of Division of Water Quality's Aquifer Protection Section has
completed a preliminary review of your renewal permit application package. Additional information is
required before we may continue our review. Please address the following items within 30 (thirty) days
of receipt of this letter:
Missing Waste Utilization Plan:
You were requested to submit two copies of your facility's Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) or,
Nutrient Management Plan (NMP). Our records show both copies of the waste plan are missing in
your permit application we received. Please submit missing copies of your current WUP or NMP to
my attention at the Mail Service Center address given on at the bottom of the first page of this
letter.
A blank copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan Certification can be downloaded from the following
web link:
http:llh2o.enr.state.nc.uslapslafouldocumentslAnimal WasteManagementSystemCertificationFormO9l 806.doc
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and
regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items shall
result in future requests for additional information.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated, with two (2) copies submitted. Please
note that failure to provide this additional information on or y result in
your application being returned as incomplete. D
AUG 5 W
NC DENR MRO I�"` Caro ina
' iifprtura}l�
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 'telephone: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.ore Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: [phone]

Failure to request renewal of your- coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may
result in a civil penalty. Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would
constitute a violation of NCGS- 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
e-
Larry W. Wade PE
Environmental Engineer I
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Files- AWC490038
1 ,.

RECEIVED 1 DENR I DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: MRS. M. S. REDMOND
OPERATOR: Mac Gibbon SEP - 2 2M
JOB CLASS: IV DWQ A u eRProteDction
DAIRY SIZE: 160 MILK COWS
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
APPROVED BY: �-
DATE :
7-14-98
Revision #1 - Planned originally for Keith .4tephens. Mr.
� Stephens subleased farm to MrGibbon. . Mi.. cGibbon. will
operate a little differently. Changes made: throughout plan.

Animal Waste Management Plan CeriiicationRECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
(Please type orMprint all inftxmatioa'that Linea as re airs d si aturcl Nu fee Protertion
Exist3tt or New or . Ex ande+d . {please circle one) AFL
G
Ingrat jnfi4rMati�:r:
NameofFarm: Kenneth Mat:Gi,bbon Dairy _. ....,.,,,,_Fai:ilityNo.' '19 38
Owners) Name: Vergi a-_S. Redmond Phone No: 744-592-2374
Mailing Address; 134 Wei w g d• esuille, NC U
Farrar Location: Coi mty Farm is located in- I r e d e 11 _
Latitude and Longitude: _36 :- la / _A25 58_ Integrator:_ n/a
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and iiescrib.- below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.). _3. _,115 N light ran Wes to _low Road
First dairy on the left:
_O rmttiotz Descri tics
T)pe of Sudne No. of Anima*
© Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
a Farrow to Weari
* Farrow to Feeder
* Farrow to Flemish
❑Gilts
a Beasts �
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
Type of Cartle
No. of Animalr
0 Layer
N Dairy
330
O Pullets
0 Beef
Milk cows
160
Heifers
105
Other 7jpe of Li vestock.
— Dry Cows
30
Calves
25
F.x�►¢AdLiB Q'plTCrtUll ��y r r -• r , , I iE'� ` � � �, r
P►rvtoitt Acsr G r. x` : dr #tivaall7tsii tv : rotiml,7esr G"a rfty
a_
Acreage Available fee Appiicatiot%:— 48,E -_3_ Raltured Acreage: - 158
Number of Lagoons / Storage Fan6 l Total Capacity: 89,848 84 8 _ Cubic Feet (ft3 )
Are suhwfwe drains present on the bursa: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains preseni in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIE LD (ple-= circle one)
as**er*sec**s*sw�a�rs,�*r*ago*t**arms*rra�ss**e*r•�r#*s**ss**rs,�sc*s**t***3*suss*s**ss*swar
Owner I Manager agreement
1 (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon clanging. t (we) understand the operatiou
and maws teaunce procedures estaablished in the approved animal waste management plan fcwr the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expadsirn to the exisdag de;igm cafacity of the waste treatme t and
storage system or constrwion of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management beftxe the new animals ere stocked. i (we) understand thin there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the sate eitiber directly -through a roan -made
conveyance or from a swrtam event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off born the
application of animal waste. 1 (wee) understand that run-off of pollutants &oar, lounging and heavy use area trust be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservttion Service. The approved plan will be
filed atthe fames and at the office of the local $oil and Water Conservation District. I (we) ''Iocnow that any modification must
be approved by a technical spa.ialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires %titter, acti&cation to DEM or a new certifi,ation (.f the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land%yner
Signature- Date:_
Warne of M anal (i f di ffe t tircm over ); Lh1Ma C G i h b i2JZ.r _
Signature:_ f 9.� Date:. G"
AWC - Ault t, t"7

CertiCcation Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number 49-38_ _ _ Facility Name KwnnPt-h Man-Gi bhn i d&i"
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for --3_ Q.._ Date of Certific: tion r,
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking 260
Dry cows _ if) _
Heifers _ ] 05
Calves _ 25
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS 330 _ **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you &) not nead to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certi::ied for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility, Your aatificar,on number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate. The above numbers are not an increase. The original
certification did not include the cow groups but their waste
was considered.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at rhis jaciliry has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature Date
Farm manager (if applicable
Signature Date i % `% % — -�
Technical Specialist
Signature Y Date
Phone Number [phone] X3 _.

11. Waste Management objective
A system will be planned to economically ass possible
handle all the waste production described above; in a manner
that does not degrade air, soil or water rfssources. The
system planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to
surface and ground water by recycling wast{: through soil and
plants.
The fallowing design and plans are required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water for Milk Nerd and Dry Cows
The storage period will be determined in the existing
pond. The manure will handled as a slurry in order to
handle the manure easily and in as concentrated volume as
possible. Truck hauling will be -used to empty waste storage
pond.
B. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
C. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for 400 to 750 lb
Heifers
Forty 400 to 750 lb heifers will be pz:stuzed on the
farm. 24 acres of pasture is available for this heifer
group. Cattle will be fed at an existing feed alley. The
feed alley will be roofed to control manure: and runoff from
the area. Manure will be stored under the roofed feed area
until it .is spread. Hay will be fed in a zing on the ridge.
Water tanks will be needed to water animals.

D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for Bred Heifers
�i Forty bred heifers will be pastured or.. the back of
farm. Twenty-one acres of pasture is available for this
heifer group. Cattle will be fenced out of stream. Cattle
will be fed a TMR at a roofed feed bunk. The same feed bunk
used for 400 to 750 lb heifers. Manure will, be stored under
the roofed feed area until it is spread. I -lay will be fed in
a ring on the ridge. Water tanks will be needed to water
animals.
E. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas #:or Close Up Bred
Heifers and Dry Cows
Thirty-five dry cows and close up bred heifers will be
pastured on lot next to State Road. 10 acres of pasture is
available for this animal group. Cattle w:.11 be fed silage
at an existing feed alley. The feed alley is roofed and
curbed to contain manure. Hay.w.ill be fed on ring on a
heavy use area. Grass filters are to be mainted ned below
the lounging area and feed area.
F. Silo Runoff and Leachate
Silo runoff and leachate will be dive::ted through
vegetative filters. Solids will be cleaned out. of diversion
along the waste storage pond at regular in':ervais. See
drawing.
G. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rages that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
H. Operation and Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.

III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 150 day period
Drainage area surfaced lot. Use averELge runoff values
in Ag. Waste Management Field Manual. Concrete channels
shall carry 25 yr - 24 hr runoff to Waste Storage Pond, The
drainage area was taken from old design. It appears
reasonable.
Drainage Area w 14,300 sq ft Surface = 14,300 sq ft
Unsurface = 0 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
V
DEPTH
t
DEPT11
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85,
20
0.14.
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.9"
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1..0t
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.85,
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27
1.1=
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.2-
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.5C.
3.9
SEP .
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.. 2;
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.0?
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.8"
1.7
Try 5 months:
October
through February Surface
Runoff
Depth = 9.93"
Unsurface
Runoff
Depth = 4.35"
Surface Runoffs 9.93"* 14,300 sq ft = 11,81-3 cuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff- 4.35"* 0 sq ft - 0 cuff
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
17.75 - 9.1 - 8.7"
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN m 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
= 0.7 ft/5 month
25yr-24hr runoff=rA-21! * 14,300 sq ft = 5,851 cu ft
12"/ft

4. Volume of Waste
t(1a
"8 milk cows in freestall barn and 10 sic:k or fresh
caws are on concrete 100% of the time. 100k of the manure
produced will he collected in the waste storage pond.
Volume =160 cows *,14.0 gal/day * 150 days * 100%
7.48 gal/cu ft
44,920 cu ft
30 dry cows will be housed in freesta:.1 shed next to
freestall barn. loot of the manure producE;d by these. cows
will be collected.
Volume =30 cows * I-.Q_gallday-* 150 days * 1C0%
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 8,422 cu ft
Total 44,920 cu ft + 8,422 cu. ft 53,342 cu ft
5. 25 yr -24 hr rainfall on the pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" - .5 ft
6. Milking Parlor Wash Water
i.
Pipeline and milker wash water
200
gal./day
ii.
Tank wash water
50
gal./day
iii.
Milk house floor wash water
400
gal./day
iv.
Cow wash water
50
cga,1-.Zda-Y
700 gal./day
Volume = 700 gal/day*1.cu ft/7.48 gal* 1SC days
= 14,037 cu ft
7. Freeboard & ESW = 1.7 ft See design in field Office
file for freeboard and emergency spillway depth
designed.
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1. Surface Runoff 11,833 cu ft
2. Unsurface Runoff 0 Cu ft
3. 25 year - 24 hour runoff 5,851 cu ft
4. Manure 53,342 cu ft
5.. Milking Parlor Wash Water 14,037.gM ft
TOTAL 85,063 cu ft
4. Rainfall minus Evaporation 0.8 ft
5. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall .5 ft
6. Freeboard & Emergency Spillway t
Total 3.0 ft

VI. waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for milking herd will be stored in a waste
storage pond for over 5 months and will be conventionally
spread.
During the course of one year, this f<cility will store
1,718,000 gallons of slurry waste. Daily zscraping of waste
is required to move the waste into the storage facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at other
parts of the farm:
1. Day old to 200 lb Heifers 1.,372 cu ft
2. 200 to 400 lb Heifers 3,660 cu ft
3. 400 to 750 lb Heifers 2,928 cu ft
4. Bred Heifers 4,880 cu ft
5. Close Up Bred Heifers and Dry Cows 4,270 cu ft
• Total 17,110 cu ft
If all of one years waste were spread usincf a 200 cu ft
spreader, it would take approximately 86 leads.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage: to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from, heavy use areas, lounging areas and trench
silos will be diverted through grass filter areas. Grass
sods will be maintained all year round. These areas maybe
controlled grazed in late spring and early fall when ground
is dry. Weeds may require chemical control or periodic bush
hogging. Grass filters below heavy use areas will be
maintained in a good grass sod. Filter areas below heavy
use areas shall be graded to establish shallow flows.
C. Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Slurry Pond for Milk Herd
TEA ,_NLrT2�I T 'S
DUP06AL _.L SSFU
�VASL I,E NUS
(nutrient availability')
r
N 32,080 lbs.
0.44
14,115
lbs.
P205 19,528 lbs.
0.70
13,670
lbs.
K20 29,292 lbs.
0.70
2C,504
lbs.
8.5 lbs PAN
per 1000
gallons

b. Other Manure around the Farm
TOTAL NUjFIENTS .015FQSAL LOSSES :%VA iABLE INWRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 6,369 lbs. 0.43 2,739 lbs.
P205 3,949 lbs. 0.70 2,764 lbs.
K20 5,541 lbs: 0.70 3,879 lbs..
C. Total Available Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN 16,854 lbs
P205 1.6 , 4 34 lbs
K20 24,383 The
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
CROP UNITS ACRES YIELD APPLIC. RATE
S.Grain Sil. tons 90 2.0 9,400 gal/ac
Corn Silage tons 68 15.0 17,600 gal/ac
b. Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED lbs applied/ac (l'os. used/ac)
CROP ACRES N P205 K20
Grain Silage 90 80 (80).
Corn Silage 68 150 (165)
C. Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL NJG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Grain Si190 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNUNNNNNNNNN.qNN NNNNN
Corn Sit 68 NNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNYNNN!
N - not a recommended disposal pe:-iod�
E. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr sto::age capacity
is maintained in the waste storage ponds and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
The waste storage pond shall be pumped be::ore it
reaches a point 2.6 ft. below the top of the dam. Post
shall be set with the top at these elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage ponds shall be
mowed annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be
checked and repaired as required.

C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
wide
nar.
1.29' X 147'
8d' X 88'
2.9:1.
2.5:1.
Volume m 7.9/6(88 X 88 + 130.7 X 1.18,0 + 4•'109.4 X 103.0)]
89,848 cu ft
This pond has 5 months of storage.
Normal Pump Out Volume
11,83.3 + 53,342 + 1.4,037 + .61 X 129' X 147'
94,382 cu ft per 150 days
229,663 cu ft per 365 days
s 1,718,000 gallons per year
573 - 3,000 gallon loads
Maximum pump out level
0.5' +, 1.71 + 5851./ (120' X 140' ) a 2. 6'
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 2.6 ft below the top of
darn. The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.7 foot
below the top of dam.
IV. Clean Water. Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constx•L.cted around waste
storage pond and feedlot and freestall barr.s. The District
Conservationist will design all diversions. Diversions
shad be designed to carry the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus
capacity to store some sediment.
S. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
Y and mainra.in vn existing buildings.

V. Lounging Areas, Heavy Use Areas and F:lltes° areas
All heavy use areas consist of 9" or compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. F,ll heavy use
areas will be fenced. Runoff from these areas a-nd lounging
areas will be directed across well maintained grass sods.
Heavy use areas and lounging areas will be located to
provide the maximum grass filter possible. GrF.ss filters
shall be at least 100' wide below lounging areG.s and heavy
use areas. Swells or diversions shall be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to kick water into filters at
frequent intervals.
Calf
A. Day old to 200 lb mar Group
04)r'.s
25 young are kept in hutches near the milking
herd. Approximately 75t of the, manure is collected and
spread regularly.
Volume
of manure=25 calves* 5 ga * 365 daA?s*.15= 1372 cu ft
7.48 gal cu ft
B. 200 to 400 lb Heifer Group
25 young heifers are kept in sheds and small lots near
the milking herd. 100% of the manure is collected and
spread regularly.
Volume of manure.
25*3.0 gal/hd/dav* 365 days*10OV= 3,660 cu ft
�li ts-% 7.48 gal/cu ft
C. 400 to 750 lb Heifers
40 heifers 400 to 750 lbs will be hou.ied in 24 acre
pasture behind freestall barn. Heifers will be fed hay in a
rind on a 40' X 40, heavy use area. A 60' X'12' stock trail
will be constructed from feed alley to the pasture to allow
clean water diversion from freestall, barn. The feed alley
will be modified by adding A roof. Manures will be stored
under roof at fed bunk. Approximately 251- of the manure is
collected and spread at feed bunk and hay feed area.
volume 4e4e',s
of manure=40 ra4A&&&*6 . 0--g�ZhdZ iay* 365 days* . 25= 2,928 tuft
7.48 gal/cu ft

D. Bred Heifers
_- 40 heifers will be housed in 21 acre pasture on back of
farm. Heifers will be fed hay in a ring on a 40' X 60'
heavy use area. A TMR will be fed in existing feed alley.
The same alley used for 400 to 750 lb heifers will be used.
Manure will be store under roof at the feed alley. A 250' X
121 stock trail will be constructed from feted alley to
pasture. This will provide access across z� drainage way
near feed alley, Approximately 25% of the manure is
collected and spread at feed bunk and hay feed area.
Volume
of manure-40 head *10.0gal/hd/dav*365 dayv*.25= 4,880 tuft
/'W&..A( : tty,f „ 7.48 gal/cu ft
Cattle will drink water at a water tank: Cattle will be
fenced from stream.
E. Close Up ,Bred Heifer and Dry Cow Group
Thirty --five close up bred heifers and dry cows are
located. on 10 acres of pasture along state road. They are
fed silage at an existing roofed concrete freed alley. A
451x45' heavy use area will be installed next to feed alley
to feed hay. A 1001 grass filter will be Established below
the heavy use area, lounging area, etc. Mature will be
stored on concrete feed alley between collection and
hauling. The concrete alley will store manure for several
weeks. Some modification of wooden curb is, needed.
Approximately 25% of manure will be collected at concrete
alley.
Volume of Manure
=35 head * IQ gA11hdjday * 365 days*.2Fa 4,270 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft
F. Dry Cows
An average of 30 cows are confined to freestall shed.
next to freestal.l barn. Manure is collected and stored in
waste storage pond. Clean water from barn roofs will be
diverted under access road to feed driveway.

RECEIVED
DIVISIOP 47'7 kk'ATER QUALITY
V/OLATIo N -1
AUG - 9 2013
NC UENIR MRO
J)WQ -Aquifer Protoctior,
AUG - 9 2013
iORI
MOORESVh-L,- r._.Ci0NAL OFFICE
MAJOTA3N I N G TW E WASTE LEVEL 1N 7N E STORAGE PON:?
L JAS I MPOSSIALC 'DUE To WEAT14R 06101TloNS . TOO IDOC14
RPjN I F2EQ UENT PQECI PAT7001 TNF IN A81L1TW TO GET 097D
EXTREMEL4 WET FIELDS r RN-b lEmhas ON 00STOM
1404RVESTER TO GET WoieK ZONE 1N R T)MELLI MO NNEQ.
RS SOON Rs out 0 0srom 1.1 A�evcsr82 wAs P61E Ta
C'UT ANa C90P 00k WkEAT FIELDS l U)j9STE WAS
I MME11PTELY RE177OVEI FROM SiOeAGF PONZ ANC? RPP41eD
TO FIELDS. TNF &)t9S7'E LEVEL W,9,S IN eomPLIfiNCE
�rTNt►� R 17A�.
VIOLAT1oN Jr
NOTIFIC4770tU of eRPAejTY s1TUA770)J Ta :D w4 rJAS
NOi ZONE TU£ TD 7WE JAILUkE OF-196'14 RSSiSTANCE
Iti h PoeFV l DUS EPI SOZE . AOUdi) IT IVECFSSfik y TO
SEFe 0j5SjsT13NeE F► ON) 009k Soutc 's TO soLV£
774E /SSOES.
KEIVIVEV Me G1BBanl
ff8tjffF_7W fnAc6r,88ok) ZRiEV

J
A" FILE
NCDEFIR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Ms. Redmond:
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
June 28, 2013
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
NOV-2013-PC-0233
15A N.C.A.C, 2T .1304
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
General Permit AWC490038'
Iredell County
On June 21, 2013, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy and the permitted waste
disposal system. We wish to thank Kenneth R. MacGibbon, who was present and assisted during
the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to maintain waste level in the Storage Pond to provide for adequate storage capacity.
This is a violation of General Permit Condition V.2, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, take all necessary additional steps to insure waste level remains in compliance with
the permit.
Violation II:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond as noted in the Weekly Freeboard records) as required by permit.
Failure to notify DWQ is a violation of General Permit Condition III.13, and the. CAWMP.
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section / Mooresville Regional Office 1�7One
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 1 � O Carolina
Phone:[phone] Fax: 704-663�040
Internet:: www,ncwaterquality.org L `
An Equal Opportunity 4 Affirmative Action Employer

Kenneth MaeGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONI
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
June28,2013
Page 2
Required Corrective Action for Violation II:
In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by July 15, 2013. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the future.
The Division of Water Quality is considering a Recommendation for Enforcement against
Kenneth MaeGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38 for the referenced violations. Should you have
justification that the violations were caused by circumstances beyond your control, or have
additional explanations, please include the supporting documentation in the written response.
We will review your response and forward it to the Division Director as an attachment to the
Recommendation for Enforcement. The Director of the Division of Water Quality may issue a
civil penalty assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any
"Person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a permit under authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated June 21, 2013
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation via E-Mail
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC490038
Regional Permit File AWC490038
Jb

Division of Water Quality
r ... [)Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 490038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliano Inspection_ -,- Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Ire ell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 06/2112013 _ Entry Time, 02:00 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner: Verde S Redmond
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 134 Westglow Rd _ �tatesv'lle NC 286251538
Physical Address: 139 Westalow Rd Statesville NC 286251536
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude:36°01'10" Longitude: 80°55'58
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest comer of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other issues
Operator Certification Number: 28284
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Ile Phone: [phone]
Ext. 0` z �1
Inspector Signature: __ Date: )) J
Secondary I
Inspection Summary:
12/10/12 > Waste Analysis > N.= 9.58 Lbs/1000 Gallons
05/29/12 > Waste Analysis > N = 26.3 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/20/13 > Soil Analysis
4., 30. Weekly Freeboard records indicate that the maximum waste level in the Storage Pond was exceeded up to 6" into the
Structural Freeboard from 05/08/13 through 05/22/13. Failure to notify DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV/NOI
to follow.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie 5 Redmond Facility Number. 490038
Inspection Date: 06/21/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf
25
15
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
105
150
Q Cattle - Dry Cow
30
2
Cattle -Milk Cow
160.
175
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379,75C
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Laste Pond WSP 31.20 48.00
Page: 2

'i
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 06/21/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection-.:- • • - --• Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges $ Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ' ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
❑ M
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■ ❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacityless than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
if yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?•(Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Inspection Date:-06/21/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number: 490038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type S
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑ ■
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0011
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, clieck the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW0490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 06/21/2013 Inspection. Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
Cl
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fall to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ goo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ❑
■ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie 5 Redmond
Inspection Date: 06/21/2013; •. • Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490038
Reason for.Vislt: -Routine
Records and Documents- Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 13000
Other issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ■ ❑ ❑ (:3
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
Page: 6

RMU R
North Carolina Department of Environment and. Natural. Resources.
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, Ill
Governor Acting Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED June 28, 2013
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
NOV-2013-PC-0233
15A N.C.A.C. 2T .1304
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
General Permit AWC490038
Iredell County
Dear Ms. Redmond:
On June 21, 2013, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Aquifer
Protection Section (APS), inspected the Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy and the permitted waste
disposal system. We wish to thank Kenneth R. MacGibbon, who was present and assisted during
the inspection.
As a result of this inspection, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 2T .1304, you have been found to be in violation of your permit as follows:
Violation I:
Failure to maintain waste level in the Storage Pond to provide for adequate storage capacity.
This is a violation of General Permit Condition V.2, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP).
Required Corrective Action for Violation I:
In the future, take all necessary additional steps to insure waste level remains in compliance with
the permit.
Violation II:
Failure to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations (inadequate storage
capacity in the Storage Pond as noted in the Weekly Freeboard records) as required by permit.
Failure to notify DWQ is a violation of General Permit Condition III.13, and the CAWMP.
Division of Water Quality / Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 NO e Carolina
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality,arg atur��tl�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

a
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38 t
NOTICE OF VIOLATION/
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENFORCE
June28,2013
Page 2
Required Corrective Action for Violation II:
In the future, report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office or the Division of
Emergency Management as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours
following first knowledge of the occurrence of any emergency event in accordance with the
permit.
The Division of Water Quality requests that, in addition to the specified corrective actions,
please submit a written response to this Notice by July 15, 2013. Please include in your
response all actions taken to correct the noted violations, and prevent recurrence in the future.
The Division of Water Quality is considering a Recommendation for Enforcement against
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38 for the referenced violations. Should you have
justification that the violations were caused by circumstances beyond your control, or have
additional explanations, please include the supporting documentation in the written response.
We will review your response and forward it to the Division Director as an attachment to the
Recommendation for Enforcement. The Director of the Division of Water Quality may issue a
civil penalty assessment of not more than Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) against any
"Person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of
a permit under authority of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A.
Should you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Mr. Bealle or me at (704)
663-1699.
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated June 21, 2013
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation via E-Mail
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC490038
Regional Permit File AWC490038
jb

Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water.,Conservation..
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 49OQ38 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490038 i_I Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Ire ell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 4612112013 Entry Time: 02:QO PM Exit Time: 0100 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: KennWb MagGibbon Dairy -,, _ Owner Email:
Owner: Virgie S Redmond
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1.341(Uestaloyv Rd ___- ____ Statesville NC286251538
Physical Address: 139 Westglow Rd _ Statesville NC 286251538
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant N Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 36°2110"___ Longitude: 80T55'58"
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest comer of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts.
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues .
Operator Certification Number: 28284
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Ile Phone:
704-663-1699
Ext. 6
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary
Inspection Summary:
12/10/12 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.58 Lbs11000 Gallons
05/29/12 > Waste Analysis > N = 26.3 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/20/13 > Soil Analysis
4., 30. Weekly Freeboard records indicate that the maximum waste level in the Storage Pond was exceeded up to 6" into the
Structural Freeboard from 05/08/13 through 05/22/13. Failure to notify DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV/N01
to follow.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 06/21/2013 -•• Inspection Type: -Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle i
O Cattle - Dairy Calf
25
15
Celle -Dairy Heifer ;
105
150
Cattle - Dry Cow
30
2
Cattle - Milk Cow
160
175
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379,750
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Paste Pond WSP 31.20 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490038 Owner- Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 06/21/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection" •Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the Slate (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ M ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 110110
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than 0000
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives thaf need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? 0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
Cl
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Cl
Page: 3

r
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond
-- - - Inspection Date: 06/21/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection •
Facility Number. 490039
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
a
Yes No NA NE
PAN? j
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
a
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
11011 ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

t
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 06/21/2013 inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ❑ ■ Cl
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? DEDO
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 06/21/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine —
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 0000
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspectiou 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 410 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0 4 1 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: AWL Region: W
Farm Name: c, Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
.Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: � i ,SAC Q WFI - Certification Number: � 2yLf
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
•U•� i� �..�� eye.,. _S. ! `. ,� iW' "1. '•
'.'�w ��%.�Y ,'"�w'� +,{�j.�"�• r i � I :urNa+
g }J:.4ti S�i
F 3^, � �tt'� �
'�4'„• ''td ;i,
4- �
� 51F`W,.
I
%Y� �1� '� S -1li 3r
1',- � �` a
Ne?,ry � �,
� Y 5 A"`C
�.
�Mk
11
..ly. - *
�X
■
•
--
�{
Mik .^d'�y PP! '. .�kt4 .�.a
.:. 1 I i
`,31A
Pal
Man-
�fA'Alw
L
�-�
■
-�
'�
� ��kF. � `; � r 75-'!'
"�"�3'wLir6'•.�E
�' ,r.�'1��
y+'p�iq 2�'�y,A'p.i
+4 -Yxt
'■
!
-_
`
■
__'th
��,�'�
IJ'q.✓'Fff.�,�T`YP� 6
-; •nlv ,i`ii .art i �-rV+.'k.��.�
's4� q§'Y.i
''Ik�`tl iu5"`�k
t,... I
-
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
.tl
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? []Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes [—]No A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes [] No ❑ A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 21412011 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment '
4. Is storage pacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ E
o [] NA ❑ NE
*� a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes ❑ N NA ❑ NE
Structur I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): .126
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes If ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes >g o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yee o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ''� ��
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑
12. Crop Type(s):
Outside of Approved Area
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑YesA o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable [] Yes ❑ NoA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes t5< ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
IMMKOE M EM■®
Reuuired Records & Documents �--+
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �la ❑ NA C] NE
W i ��
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check E] Yes Z" ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
Chec �s s esign Maps a Agreements ❑Other: 1011
21. Does record keeping ne�irovement? If yes, check appropriate box below. A❑ Y ❑ NA ❑ NE
�nZinfall,0
a Applicationc:t Freeboard Waste Analysis `Soil Analysis rite Tra sfers Weather Code
StockingAZec
ield 0 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainf spections udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No2j�7A ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Ins ection:
124. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes_o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher t aan normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-app
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field [] Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes] NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�F-.a.-, .,
1se.drawings'of;factlrty to better ex laiit.situations (uie add_itionai pages as pecessary}
(�­7
v
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

i
:a
Fac>It ,y.NUmber
tR"
• Div
�'O DiVi
" O'iDth�
in of WateC�QU'$lityi _ ` i =rye
rn"of Stlil�and Water3Couservation ` ; .�;
Agency 3, ; r
Type of Wilt 40 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit @ Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 00t/2 �,, iQ I�24 ArNrival Time: -- Dej(p�ar�tu�re Time: '�3` �'�'` County:. Region:
Farm Name: ►' `Qt 1'L 'Y L"`C�` t-o tyOwner Email:
Owner Name: V r M S1' _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ,� (/j �,, Integrator: g
Certified Operator: rWx�kA t MACG Operator Certification Number: �y25�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ oits
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 1 Longitude: 0 ° 0
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La ei
Dry'Poultry
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current .
Cattle Capacity PMOlaupn
ar Cow
O11
O
Mbairy Calf
Uplaia Heifei
LDS
1 t d
Fry Cow
Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑•Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
: b: Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Ye4�7b
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
&NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
1; NA
❑ NE
1A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes 1KVo
NA
ElNE
El Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

a
Facility Number: --
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment �
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 41NA ❑ NE
O� a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NE
SrefI Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 4 d
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): S 2�
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ElYes ❑ NA [I NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes APO- ❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[IYes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes K70_ ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Applicatio
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes . ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Appp�li-cation Outside of Area
Crop
12. type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ YesjF.,LVo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate' per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination', ❑ Yes ❑ No�gA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes iVo NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
asJ�a/tiz � 1Z,3,L�sll �= C�r�t+�t�i L�►
__0 DCD L. *4
Reviewer/Ins ector Name ,"
p _.. , '"• � : _ � r.��=_- , s-,, l one
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: te:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number, — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes �e NA ❑ NE
the approprI box. p ❑Checklists De ' er —�
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,'check the appropriate box below. ❑ :Yles NA ❑ NE
ast 101waste Application 2rWeekly,Freeboard e Analysis oil Analysis aste Transfers - f Annual Certification
ainfall�ocking �op Yield I inute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections A5 Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes-{ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?�
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? �""�
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certif cation?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
. If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NE
❑Ye o A
j
❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ NoA
❑ NE
❑ Yes _QKo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No �MNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ')5zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes Wo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes o
ElNA
❑ NE
ElYes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

i
.Division of Water Quality
_Q Division of Soil an, d'Wster"Conservation'
D Other•Agency ,
r
sii�
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O�` Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: i Za%l j Arrival Time; j�:�P�. Departure Time: a�'•� County: l Region:
Farm Name:v R` ^ �`t l� Owner Email:
Owner Name: V I A_ � Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: y�� Integrator:
Certified Operator: �P''` "' ► '`�C�'�� Operator Certification Number: �1
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Back-up Certification Number:
Laiitude: 0 0=& 0 Longitude: 0 o=
Design Current Design Current Design . Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity PAR""
n
❑ Wean to Finish _ 1
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turke Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Stnicture ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
0
t7
VDEZCow
Z�
0
ei
l
2C"�
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowj
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State'(gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge? .
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No LT ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE.
[]Yes ((��,,❑ NoN7�o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes'> t ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes,_a❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural, plus storm, storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): -
❑ Yes NA [I NE
El Yes ❑No El NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, eic.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment Iat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA Cl NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑
{Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks} El Yes Cl`�o El NA NE
9..Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes _' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
it. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yee No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding - ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination, ❑ Yes ❑ Nqn,�A ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes o ElNA ElNE
ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer,to question #js yExplain any YES answers apolor: any recommendations.,or any other commenfs 7w,,
Dse drawings of,facility to better explain sK6ua ons (use additional pages as necessary] 4 q�' �4.t
,1++_..v;z...
C(Z:l �-:Z
L4 GOt,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12127104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did.the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. estgn Maps Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Yes �o El NA
El NE
Waste Application �eekly Freeboard �aste Analysis oil Analysis
,��
�C I waste Transfers Annual Certification
Rainfall ❑,$locking j�rop Yield 0,1-ZISlblinute Inspections F21lontbly and 1 " Rain Inspections 'Weather
Code
�
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑Yes �FPJo ❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NoA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste a lication equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yeo ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the pertnit?
❑ Yes ❑ No k
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yeslo ❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
[--]Yes [:]No XA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dea animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were high tan normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes—:�*o
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of em�genc�situations as required by
❑ Yes No
El NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes S10
❑ NA
❑ NE
Cddrtronal Coitiatnerits aril/or.Draw ings
j
12128104

x
Type of Visit 410 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: i t O Arrival Time: 03: Departure Time: o; $ County:
Farm Name: A IMAJA
VIA c (_ Owner Email:
Owner Name: V ti "'yYv Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Region:.
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: K ( Operator Certification Number: s�
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: o Longitude: o
Discharges & Stream Impacts ���,
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ElYesi}.'Vo LJ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
L Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes; notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No -A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No,A ❑ NE
El ❑ No A . ❑ NE
❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ es NA ❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
r
�j a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
?� Structu l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
identifier: �w
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 2.0
I
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate Lthreats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
.
❑ Yeo ❑ NA ❑ NE L
❑ Yes ❑ No; '�(NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes")dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Downy of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes Ado ❑ NA [I NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not -applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
_Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ] NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) V__­4" `r ��S v r
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No [I NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes []No [�.A ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ElNE
1 S. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes o NA ❑ NE
%l o z
Reviewer/Inspector Name i°:. ,. K���;lz'lrr't `�.f.e Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ YesO ❑ NA El
the appropirate box.
Oth i ❑ Maps ❑ er
21. Does r rd keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El s ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekl Freeboard �aste Analysis oil Analysis aste Transfers Annual Certi ication
infall Stocking Crop Yield 0 Minute Inspections ly and V Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 5Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes NA ❑ NE
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equiprr)ent as required by the permit? ❑ YesNA ElNE
2S. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ElYes El Nod ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of deadnimals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes IISKNO ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [I NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31, Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer ene situations as required by ❑ o [I NA El NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, eeboar�rnhlews, over applicatio
32 Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA . ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes . o� ❑ NA$ ❑ NE
Jly3' "'d"""'° C'deias'U�'rkt %4h't[t^i�'^'�;A31 «d7k1"Y.F,yS " " I'
Additio©al Comments and/o}aDrawings".�'- ,,V •, u� S ,. rM
�1
i V
i
12128104

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: _ - 3S County: 4 ".0
Facility Name: c r c;' I
Certified Operator Name: -,P- h G&o 1 �i `6/Operator #
1. Current liquid level(s) ire inches as measured from the current liquid level.in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; .and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/Identifier (0):
Spillway (Yes or No):
..
Level (inches):
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year-24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste
l hereby certify that I have reviewed the informat n Iiste<�dt
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and a . ityr-the-re
-O"h &e, jh IYI d (91 A d a
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
;lIclG '�
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
I
®r
r
included within the attached Plan
on is accurate and correct.
one: 70 f S Z Z % -�'
:3 a
PoA Cover Page, 2/21100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE,
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): � MIM,��bn�►
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.4$ ala lo`nnss =
12 ' ft
X
inches
2,0 A.-
X inches
G1 ftz
Off,sx137,S--
X a.63 U57 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design ) 50 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 531 3L/,;� ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g = 531�cL�2 ft3
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design L ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30 days =
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 /6 4
375 3 SY S' 3
m. (lines e + k) x line I =
1000
�� 7 S / ft3
gallons
5'. S Ib/1000 gal.
19 8 1 lb PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 1

1.
structure ID: I
line m =
1 PAN
—lb
2.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
n.linesl+2+3+4+3+6
lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD.
DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING
THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
-492
s. remaining
IRR-2 PAN
balance
(iblacre)
t. TOTAL PAN
BALANCE
FOR FIELD
(lbs.)
column r x s
u.
application
window`
o
Z
'31
Y
State current crop endina application
date or next croo application
beoinnina date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period Q
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = S 3 S lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PoA (30 Day) 2121l00 2

w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 12 S lb. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) _ j, ID 3,5 , R lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) j 4 , lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00 3

FILE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED December 4, 2009
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2009-PC-0963
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
General Permit AWC490038
Iredell County
Dear Ms. Redmond:
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to' protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on November 19, 2009, by James B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
• Facility Operator failed to conduct the required Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60)
days (before or after) of the date of application. This is a violation of General Permit
Condition III.5, III.10, and III.11, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by December 18, 2009,
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted-violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future.
In responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of this page.
Division of Water Quality/ Aquifer Protection Section/ Mooresville Regional office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, Norlh Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] Faxi 704.663.60401 Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy/Facility 49-38
I�oTICE OF VIOLATION
December 4, 2009
Page 2
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Bealle at [phone].
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report dated November 19, 2009
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC490038
Regional Permit File AWC490038
jb

i
Division of Water Quality
j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 490038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AM490038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine -„^ County: Iredelt Region: Mooresviil
Date of Visit: 11/19/2009 Entry Time:02:00 PM Exit Time: 03:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Virgie--S-Redmond Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1.34 West_ l w Rd _ Statesville NC 28 251538
Physical Address: 139 Westaiow Rd Statesville NO 28625153$
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°01'10" Longitude:
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General Iocation:.Northwest corner of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Kenneth R. MacGibbon
Operator Certification Number: 28284
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James BSa4,e Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature:
Date: P�4
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
06Y24/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 10.0 Lbs11000 Gallons
02/11/09 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.7 Lbs/1000 Gallons
03/20/09 > Soil Analysis
21. Failure to conduct Waste Analysis at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application; NOV to follow.
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Vrgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 11/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle i
O Cattle - Dairy Calf
25
25
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
105
136
Cattle - Dry Cow
30
34
Cattle -Milk Caw
160
140
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379,750
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
asle Pond I WSP 31.20 48.00
Page: 2

L,
f
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number : 490038
Inspection Date: 11/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1'. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ i=l n
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field Q
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made? El Cl ■
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n ■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■ Q
Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
I]
■ ❑
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■ ❑
Q
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
In
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management Q
■ n
Q
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
El
■ ❑
n
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl
■ 0
Q
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ Q
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below. j
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload? fl
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

i
Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility; Virgie S Redmond
Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 11/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
I
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
In
i
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crap window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type i
Com (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■ n n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ 0 ■ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ n n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n ■ n ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ 0 ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie 5 Redmond' Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 11/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ n n n
If -yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application?
El
120 Minute inspections?
In
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
In
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
In
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ Cl n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■ Cl ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n ■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ !� n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those
n
■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■ n 0
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number; 490038
Inspection Date: 11/1912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regiona4 DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ r1
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewAnspection with on -site representative? n ■ fl ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? n ■ ❑ 0
Page: 6

AFC E nnBa 15, Zoo 9
R7TENTION. TPMES 13EAUE
NolEfI2
RF : Nor1ep- OF ViOLATIOrJ
N04-2009-PO-0963
LD,EC 17 M9
NC DFNR MRo
©WQ - Aquifer Protection
p (j),qS-rjE filVI9,-YSIS 1NAs TONL U)17NIN SI Lj(&0)
-DA ys OF A PPG ►CAT WOU R S PER PC2m ,r- R-FQUI Pemar.
7l4E qjj q LyS ►s REPoeT kECEIV6-b LGAS MISRHCE.D
RFTFr2 WOJ76 AOkMg.
%ilk �r(jr(,e ���P02TS C�icc $�iLF.D
Iry Ili /�PP1`'oP2l/� IYOT�$GU,� �02
��U2� C'��t�c�A-�vcE %Ns�FCTioN.r.
—X4t4uA �luL
,CN IYE7U M0619 8O,L)
HEN H&M M190618go) OA iE L/
V11261E S, PEDma►)2� FI)km
FAC[ L rTq 0 -3 f
CeNgk.AL PE,-/I21r 19WC,V90038
.T,2E2sELL CourV7-V

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 490038 Facility Status: Active ' Permit: A`NC490038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspecton _ ^, Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RQWjij2e _ County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: QO/ QL2QQ8 Entry Time:01 �30 PM Exit Time: 02 ; Q PM incident #:
Farm Name: Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: Virgie S. Redmond Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 134 Westglow Rd Stateaville NC 286251538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36"01'10" Longitude: 80°55'58"
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest corner of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon Operator Certification Number: 28284
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Represbntative(s), Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
Primary Ins^�^*^-•
Inspector S
Secondary
Inspection Summary:
06/17/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 11.8 Lbs11000 Gallons
03/05/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 7.4 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/08/08 > Soil Analysis
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in June, 2008.
a
Phone: [phone]
>rxt.2162
Date: 'im Z
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Inspection Date: 0612012D08 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Dairy Calf
25
45
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
105
105
Q Cattle - Dry Cow
30
18
Cattle - Milk Cow
160
155
Waste Structures
Type Identifies•
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379,750
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
1 -7
ka,t, Pond TW5P 31.20 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 0612012008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. is an discharge observed from an
y g y part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
fl
Application Field
Other
Q
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
0
■
Q
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
it
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
0
0
0
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
■
Q
Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
D
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
F,
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Q
0011
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? ❑.
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Inspection Date: 06/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 490038
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
Q
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn
(Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n
❑
■
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
o
o
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 06/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
n
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
fl
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Tl
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
11
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge surrey as required by the permit?
n
Cl
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
❑
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ ❑ n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ n D
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number : 490038
Inspection Date: 06/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? D ■ ❑ n
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? 0 ■ ❑ 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ■ ❑
Page: 6

ti
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:'490038 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoe,j12n_ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Bedell Region: MQoresvillQ_
Date of Visit: 11M6I2007 Entry Time:01 Q0 PM Exit Time: 0230 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Kenneth MacGibbgn Ugiry Owner Email:
Owner: Virgie S Redmond
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 1 4 Westalow Rd Statesville NC 28625153§,_
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant
Location of Farm:
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude:36°01'10" Longitude:80°55'58"
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 116 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location; Northwest corner of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
1WRecords and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Kenneth R MacGibbon Operator Certification Number: 28284
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s): Ci
Inspection Summary:
10/03/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 12.6 Lbs11000 Gallons
06/18/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 9.4 Lbs11000 Gallons
04/03/07 > Soil Analysis
1b
Page: 1

i
Permit: AWC490038 Owner -Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Facility Number: 490038 ;
Inspection Date: 11/1612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Dairy Calf
25
-25
Q Cattle'- Dairy Heifer
105
135
Cattle - Dry Cow
30
26
Cattle -Milk Cow
160
135
Waste Structures
1
Type Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SS!_W: 379,750
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond TWSP 31.20 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 11/16/2007 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges $ Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ 0 it
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other 0
a. Was conveyance man-made? C] Q rl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ■ 0
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
❑
■
0
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0
■
0
0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
0
■
0
0
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Cl
■
0
0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
0
■
0
0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0
■
0
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
0
0
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
0
0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
■
0
0
improvement?
Waste Applicatiorl
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
0
■
0
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
i t
■
0
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
0
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
171
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
0
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie 5 Redmond
Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 11/1612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN. 10%110 lbs.?
Total P205?
❑
I
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
D
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
C T 2 '
Small Grain Cover
rop ype
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
D
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
D
D
■
D
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D
■
n
D
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
D
D
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D
■
D
D
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
D
Page: 4

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 11/1612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? D
Maps?
Other? In
21. Does record keeping need improvement? D ■ D D
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? El
120 Minute inspections? n
Weather code? D
Weekly Freeboard? n
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? D
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n
Waste Analysis? n
Annual soil analysis? n
Crop yields?
Stocking? D
Annual'Certifcation Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
D
D
■ D
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
D
■
D D
25 Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge•survey as required by the permit?
D
n
■ n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? D ■ n D
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? n 0 ■ fl
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? D ■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those D ■ 0 D
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n D
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 1111 W200i Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
:A
ri4hn� fccunr Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■nn
n■nn
n ■ n n
Page: 6

NOVEnmz wl zoo-1
i v ; :TP MES 8C A)LLF
Fi?M ��NNF--tW IW66166300
hi NOV 2 1 2007 11
RE IN FoeMv ToA) 06—STiL-D
P,�aIVE MESs669 of NoV�lna61- /9,�_oa7,

o Y av c i /Ot.: -e 9
�y
5-4
OWQ ADuiRProt0 #inn
I-o-y 70 Ij � 6 3 (r) 0 (-/ Z,,

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 4490038 Facility Status: Act+ve Permit: AWC490038 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredell Region: Nloo-resvilie
Date of Visit: 1.,2/20/2006 Entry Time:04;00 PM Exit Time: 05,30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy Owner Email:
Owner: j(jWie_S Redmond
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 134 Westaiow Rd Statesville NC 286251538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°01'10" Longitude: 80'55'58"
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest corner of
Iredell Co.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Kenneth R Macgibbon
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
operator Certification Number: 28284
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kenneth R, MacGibbon . Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kenneth R. MacGibbon Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:C4i
Secondary Inspectors)
Inspection Summary:
10/20/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 6.3 Lbs11000 Gallons
06/06/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 8.3 Lbs11000 Gallons
03/31/06 > Soil Analysis
7. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the Storage Pond embankments, and vegetation shall
be mowed regularly. Eradicate rodents and, repair tunneling damage.
21. Weather Code must be recorded on the designated form (enclosed).
jb
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number : 490038 J
Inspection Date: 12/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
© Cattle - Dairy Calf
25
50
Cattle -Dairy Heifer
105
100
O Cattle - Dry Cow
30
30
Cattle - Milk Cow
160
130
Total Design Capacity: 320
Total SSLW: 379,750
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard
Observed Freeboard
aste Pond
I WSP
31.20
48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AVVC490038 Owner - Facility; Virgie S Redmond Facility Number: 490038
Inspection pate: 12t20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
o
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
n
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
Q
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application _
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
!�
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490038 Owner— Facility: Virgie S Redmond
Facility Number: 490038
Inspection Date: 12/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
C T 2
Small Grain Cover
rop ype
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Ty0e 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
❑
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
n
■
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there.a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
In
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
o
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 4

• Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number : 490038
Inspection Date: 12)20I2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
■ ❑ ❑
n
0
Weather code?
■
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
Cl
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
0
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES oniy)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install, and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■
n
n
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
In
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
n
n
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n
■
n
Vow
M-
WA
uF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ n ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ fl it
duality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490038 Owner - Facility: Virgie S Redmond Facility Number : 490038
y
Inspection Date: 12/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 ■ ❑
3Z Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ 0
Page: 6

Fw A rF
Michael F. Easley, Governor
,
Aw.,
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
y
.r
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 14, 2005 R`
ILJI I`11 Virgie S. Redmond SEP 16 2005
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Rd. NC DENR MRO
DWQ - A uifer Protet
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490038
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Virgie S. Redmond:
In accordance with your application received on September 8, 2005, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Virgie S. Redmond, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG200000. e
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity
of no greater than an annual average of 160 Dairy Cows, 30 Dry Cows, 105 Heifers, and 25 Calves,
and the application to land as specified .in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP).
The,COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoringconditions onditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan. is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Nam` Cara}}ina
,XQtrlrlally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between ' water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
f 'spray field. 1 +
f Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
Ior the CAWMP may ,result; in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
2,1-5.6AC7t'1 ough'1143-215.6C-in �uding civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue ,di `activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit; please contact Keith Larick at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWC490038)
AFO Files

a
Type of Visit XCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit A Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0' .p Arrival Time: (l Departure Time: County: XA/ Region: j'e. 'o
Farm Name: �� �'/�G'o"� tgkr Owner Email:
Owner Name:��� Phone:
Mailing Address: r3 y redsa/�e .� o�a6as
Physical Address: .;7
Facility Contact: "14- 'R* 1 '�� Title: 4k D .- Phone No:
Onsite Representative:,;
Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Operator Certification Number:q y
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 6 = Longitude: 0 ° = i
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
h, JEI Non-Layet
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
F�Dairy
Cow
a
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: F-1'
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes )�g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

r
Facility Number: Z/ —W
Date of Inspection
iv Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
V.
❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier: 601
Spillway?: Y-eS
Designed Freeboard (in): l$
Observed Freeboard (in): 72,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
19 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
J%No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[9No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[' Yes
% No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
fB No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
6 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
[:]Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside
of Area
12. Crop type(s) d1 ! 6-;L ;j
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
(SNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,
El Yes
1 �1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
` 0 No
❑NA
❑ NE
17. Af A/ to- d Il''l' 04 N - i7. 4, 416IL hi. 14 ►j
ReviewerAnspector Name w iI ��K " _ " '"'� R Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 1.0 J 0
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: y q - d Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
' tNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IJFNA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
;-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
;.NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
IgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
*No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
54No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NF
General Permit'? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
6 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency`?
❑ Yes
r�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
A"tionkFCoiriments,and/or Drawings , E ;. w.
'TrY 4- A.&, a w� � 1.,.., �•� . F �•
12128104

lk�
NORTH CAROL[NA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 13, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Keith Stephens
159 Ivy Dale Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site Inspection
Stephens Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stephens:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on February 10, 1998 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. A Notice of Deficiency (NOD) is being issued for the
improper application of waste and the lack of storage in the waste pond.
During the inspection three waste application fields were inspected. Of the three,
only one appeared to be planted to a crop. Of the other two fields, one appeared to be
fallow and the other corn stover. Please provide this office with a copy of your waste
application records (loads, fields, N applied, crop).
It was evident on the day of the inspection that the waste storage pond had been
full prior to the removal of waste. It is required that adequate freeboard (1 ft plus
capacity to contain a 25-yr 24-hr storm event) be maintained in the waste pond. The
files indicate that a similar problem was observe last July during the inspection by Mr.
Johnson and Mr. Joe Zimmerman (Division of Soil and Water).
The state register list 150 animals as the design capacity for the waste manage-
ment system. During the inspection it was indicated that there are approximately 180
animals. You need to consult with your technical specialist to ensure your system can
handle this number of animals.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2131 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - ISO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAP$R

4
Page Two
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by March 20,
1998 indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problems. Please address your
response to Mr. Johnson. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex G /ca P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 8, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Keith Stephens
159 Ivy Dale Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Notice of Deficiency (second notice)
Animal Operation Site Inspection
Stephens Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stephens:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on February 10, 1998 by Mr. Alan
Johnson of this Office. As a result of the inspection, a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) was
issued for the improper application of waste and the lack of storage in the waste pond.
During the inspection three waste application fields were inspected. Only one field
appeared to be planted to a crop. Of the other two fields, one appeared to be fallow and the
other corn stover. You were asked to provide this office with a copy of your waste
application records (loads, fields, N applied, crop) by March 20, 1998. As of this date, a
response has not been recieved.
It is requested that this office receive a copy of your waste application records by April
18, 1998. Please address your reponse to Mr. Johnson. If you have any questions concerning
this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 261 1 5
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/tO% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Type of Visit IkCompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Woutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted 13 Certified © Condition
ally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Ab veriThreshold•
Farm Name: ............. f. � /..fir.......... F?IGI,Q t 1+.................... ............................. County:.......... %' .i�l.............................................
k4eSS � .......... .........................5..................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress: ..................................................................................... . .............................. ...............................................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. fTitle:................................................................ Phone No:.........
OnsiteRepresentative: ....... I. �1............ ..C... l.. .L7 ''�. .................... Integrator:............................................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude » ' it Longitude • ' 44
Discharges & Stream I_Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes X No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JgNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes KNa
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity'(freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway ❑ Yes gNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ar
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes KNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? [:]Yes J4 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level [:]Yes 1p No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
,
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes RNo
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type c6e Y1 . // 9: f_"" If el _ g 5A4 0-e_
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes -XNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes `gNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes RNo
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Flo
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
3I . If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes Uq
❑ Yes IZ No
❑ Yes P1 No
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes V No
14,
❑ Yes *No
❑ Yes E& No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes $No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

October 28, 2003
NC Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Attention: Mr. Alan Johnson
Subject: Notice of Violation (NOV)
MacGibbon Dairy, Site Inspection
Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Johnson:
NC DEPT. OF ENiM'IRUWAtiNX 2
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
IORESVIt LF ,(%yAL OFFICE
a
OCT 2 9 2003
WATER QUAD..; j' SECTION
The site inspection of our facility on October 15, 2003 resulted in a Notice of Violation
for failure to keep weekly records of the waste storage pond's freeboard level.
Please be advised that as of October 22, 2003, weekly records of the waste storage
pond's freeboard level are being maintained.
Sincerely,
Kenneth MacGibbon

tll-AlAj JAA4�1
Mi ael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 17, 2003
7001 2510 0004 8286 5375
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Reguested
Mr. Ken MacGibbons
134 Westglow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677-1538
Subject:
Dear Mr. MacGibbons:
Notice of Violation (NOV)
MacGibbons Dairy, Site Inspection
Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on October 15,
2003. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Violation for failure to keep a weekly record of the
waste storage pond's freeboard level. This failure is a violation of Section III, # 1 of your General
Permit.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by October 30, 2003
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation. Please address your response to the
attention of Mr. Johnson. It is also requested that your response reference the date and subject of
this NOV, as well as the facility number.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Nondischarge
Compliance/Enforcement Unit
File
�A
N-GENR
Customer Service
1 8 7 7-623-6748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

h-''9,e Divislon of Water Quality, '.. �. `'4 ir' � s L*�•.,.
r� t;5hra.tNn, Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
41y''ST . 7.r{c'd i•�s>,';�4 •l. +.�s iFr �.: f• y'�;}•'kT..-cr
35 �,_�k#;C�&3r.R+,-rr'L-O.OtherpgencYJ� - `, - �;•:Flpitlr�{.t� ±1 A4{t.5y:�a
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Fallow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilitv Number q9 38 f Date (it, Visit: 10I15/Z003 'Time:
.., f Q Not O terational Q Below 'Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or above 'Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ................................................................ . .... C'ounty:1.tcjdcll................................................ lYMQ...........
Owner Name' Virgie.S.................................. Rcdmand ................................................... Phone No:
M-101ing Address: } 4..1�' setgiR}�! i;0atd........................................... .. S.(BLt.0Y.illg.lYC............................... ....... 21�W. a.53.ii-.
.............................. .................
l-acilitc Coatact..............................................................................."l'itle.......................... ............................... Phone,No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: ................................... . Lttegraim...
Certified Operator:...1UAry..L................................... Mag;.QbbJ).R.................................... Operator Certification NUniber-233.03 .............................
Location of Farm:
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest
orner of iredell Co,
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • O1 10 Longitude $0 • 55 58
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder I JE3 Layer 1 ® Dairy 1 320 140
❑ Feeder to Finish JEI Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 320
[I Gilts
=�
❑ Boars 71 Total SSLW' 448,000
Number of Lagoons 1 1❑ Subsurface Drains Present JJLJ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds [Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischiLg22 S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (It* yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in-al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes []No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Slrucnrre 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Struenire 6
Identifier: ........................................................................................................ .............................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 36

11 JrVJIVI
Facility Number: 49-38 Date of inspection l0/15/20 3-
'\'15. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? •
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures Iack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
�Irru erluc:u
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12.• Crop type Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Corn (Silage & Grain) pasture
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) -
❑ Yes
N No
I9. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
N Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspcctor fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
•?` _ ydYRC >sY:a7•r.�yk.C^••,+'•.:aH;;µ•.,�s�•�-�Jy,•,».^•,•e•'�►#7'•Lfit+e�'ir�Vi�i'74arx4?+Y:1.•7Rl.:.j65sAFL�i`CuTFXdf.1i$AsiC'° h'+rt:�'}2wl:T�.`n"-TriGi�:•iKafwaA:A:btq.
o e'n_t's' /%!ref r t quRessYtion#} Explain aay�YES ausw ,; a r y recomun datio o chit �othe eats
?
s,t'fac ty to' ett t�Is nt�it e ad a es� a ❑ pield Copy ❑Final Notes
r{u
µ
FAILED TO RECORD THE WEEKLY WASTE STORAGE POND FREEBOARD LEVEL. NOV TO BE ISSUED.
..y ..! `?, ,., .i - t 'i,' .°tna `rs� ! r. rtr r,i'1Fr''S!C•'Y h�
:. «.. '' • .. ' 4 .. L_ . «.. ? ; k r .y ti may, . c. s `.. `tom, 1 �� F
Reviewer/Inspector Name Alan l* h on
Reviewer/Inspector Slgnature: Date:
I�

i
`o�Of W A r�gQG
r
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville NC 28625-1538
Dear Virgie S. Redmond:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Viram G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of EnvirftrOhtlauri;e nd,Natural Resos
�SOIII
Aloe.... ,
tan W.'Klimek, P.E:,Dire
rDivision of WafeQQua
March 28, 2003 1 APR 0 1 2003
Subject: Application No. AWC490038
Additional Information Request
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
Iredell County
lip
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. Additional information is
required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 27, 2003:
1. This office currently has a waste utilization plan (WUP) for this facility that was dated 6/812000. The plan was written
for 160 milk cows, 30 dry cows and 85 heifers. A recent site visitation made to this farm suggested including recently
cleared land on Tract 304 in the waste utilization plan. Please verify that the same WUP is being followed on this farm
and, if so, have the following items addressed:
a. Please verify that the acreage on the newly cleared land in Tract 304 is included in the WUP.
b. Storage volume calculations for your facility are missing in the permit package and need to be submitted for each
storage pond.
c. Site map (county map) showing the location of your facility ids missing in the permit package.
d. Field maps (aerial maps with acreage noted) are missing for the following tratcs: T-1485, T-1477, and T-1358.
If you have modified the WUP since, then please submit a copy of most recent WUP that reflects correct number of
animals, crops grown, field utilized and has field maps with acreage clearly marked on the maps.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before April 27, 2003 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in
accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-2I5.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
J. R. Jos i
Soil Sc' mist
Non- scharge Permitting Unit
cc: Kenneth MacGibbon,139 Westglow Road, Statesville, NC 28625
%MV6-resville Regional Office, Water Quality
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit intemet httpJ/h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer - 50% recycled/10% past -consumer paper

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Vergie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Wesiglow Road
Statesville NC 28677-1538
Dear Virgie S.-Redmond:
N IT 1 T ]JWW
- - V
__T
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANWTUF, y1R�l.=SOURCES
May 31, 2000
'SUN.
Subject: Application No. AWC490038
Additional Information Request
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
Animal Waste Operation
Iredell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application.
Additional information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by June 30, 2000:
11
Your certification is for 160 milk cows and 115 heifer/dry cows. Your waste utilization plan, however, is for 160 cows
only. Please verify that all the animals are accounted for in the nitrogen calculation and cropping scheme in your waste
utilization plan.
2. The map for Tract 1405 Field 9 is unclear. Please provide a clearer map that identifies (outlines or highlights)
and shows the acreage for each field to be used for waste application.
3. Please provide the application windows (apply months) for various crops that are included in your waste
utilization plan.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information
should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this
letter must be submitted on or before June 30, 2000 or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance
with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.I and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
JR Joshi
Soil Scie tist
Non -Di harge tPerinitting Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

r4C OEPT. 4F -W ROWai ENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MORESV1LLE F'EGIO,'4AL OFFICE
..,p� Michael F. Easley, Governor
�w Willia G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environmentand Natural Resources
JAN 1 4 2003 Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
January 13, 20IATER QUAUTY SECTIM
Vergie S. Redmond Facility Number 49 - 38
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville NC 28677-1538
Subject: Public Meetings for Draft Renewal of State Non -Discharge Animal Waste Operation General
Permits
Dear Producer:
Your animal waste management facility is scheduled to be issued coverage under the Animal Waste
Operation General Permits in the near future. The Division of Water Quality (Division) staff is currently
in the process of renewing the Animal Waste Operation General Permits and is scheduled to have the
permit reissued by early April 2003. Once the permit is reissued, your facility would be eligible for
coverage under the reissued permit.
The Division has published a public notice regarding these renewed general permits. A copy of
the draft animal waste operation general permits and fact sheets are available at the website
hftp:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/
or by writing or calling:
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Telephone number: [phone], ext. 574
The Division will be conducting public meetings regarding these renewed permits. The following is a
list of dates, times, and locations of the public meetings:
February 3, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Kenansville — .tames Sprunt Community College
February 4, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Williamston — Martin Community College (Bldg. 2 Auditorium)
February 6, 2003; 7-9 p.m.; Iredell — Iredell County Center
Further information can be obtained by reviewing the Fact Sheet available at the website and address
listed above.
Cc: iMao er sville=Region laon Of ice, Divisionon of-Water_Quality
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit Application File 49 - 38
V*A
NCDEhill
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
tntemet http://h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

oto� wAr�gQ�
O 'C
Gary MacGibbons
139 Westglow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject:
Dear Mr. MacGibbons:
cc-:-C� �Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
MacGibbons Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County,,NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program. Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 64 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times: There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storage pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan D.Johnson
Environmental -Specialist II
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

0�0� WAr�9QG Michael F. Easley
_ Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory
g ry J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 20, 2002
Ken MacGibbons,
134 Westglow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677-1538
Subject: MacGibbons Dairy, Site Inspection
Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. MacGibbons:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on November
19, 2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be properly maintained, and the
records were complete. Please find enclosed a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
A*4
Rne
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax (7D4) 663-6040

ITyo of Visit Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
(Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access 1
Facility Number 49 38 Date of Visit: 11J19Jzo02 Time:
NNot Operational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.._
Farm Name: Kci)lletb.li'IaCGIbhQ0.AAiry ..................... ...... Counh. Itcdell.................................... MR L.......
Owner Name:.y i�Sr----------____-- RedmQaii-------------------_-_--- Phone No: (7M59.2Z374hern59-2=2slxedwand-.
Mailing Address: 13.4.dWQ.YY..RQ,%d ................................ .... 1867 -1536...
Facility Contact: ..................................................:........Title: ........................ lf'ltone No:
Onsite Representative:.�G�Q------------------------------
Certified Operator: GAxy..I,,,,................................. M&C(;jjkb.QU .................................... Operator Certification
Location of Farm:
Travel 2 mi. east from Hwy 115 on SR 1865 (Westglow Rd.). Farm is on the left side of road. General location: Northwest
:orner of Iredell Co.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Worse Latitude 3671 • 01 10 « Longitude 80 • 55 ®
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was'the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b.. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes . ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
XVaste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:._.-.._.....--------•-----............................ ............... ........... -•--•--•--•--•--•-----•-.............................. .......... .................
Freeboard (inches): 36

v✓ivri vi
Facility Number: 49-38
Date of inspection 11/19/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Wheat Cam (Silage & Grain)
w�uueuuT - ,
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
omalall-11.0❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
--For N carryovers, write: "carryover from previous crop" and insert the PAN rate in the appropriate place on the SLD2 or SLUR2
form. I
I
---Be sure to have the acreage that has been cleared on tract 304 included in your plan.
�V dT,y'r f� .'i^Jti 'S'��O�; �Fl`]/CTTS"o.,; f••OC"N'^'+•*1�j'~WJ. Y� �4.. �� d5 r�4'F ��;X '�YSS
Reviewer/Inspector Name AN-"JOHNSOi�.t Ty �L ^x.• , x i .'��:_:x r:. t r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �� : y--

"� a 3 �i7.S�rlF }Y.,'F�c�� .��".l}. '!'4.�v'4f ��`� 'i� - Y -w" S[j. _ .' � -... tS ,:s' .,5 - rs� F �.y,.:14:�:>�r, ,t- rr o-•.. c -'l!e v^� w: � g� ,
� .�`r. a. - .-1.[ ..is'.i 'L'j'��„ -. _ '.^". y. - u7.�.5; ✓�-_ t .. r �-;i�, -�i�'� -, .ram } id����-.pp
W A 9pG Michael F. Easley
` Governor
William G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
June 1, 2001
Ken McGibbons
134 Westglow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677-1538
Subject: McGibbons Dairy
Site Inspection Report
Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. McGibbons:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May 30, 2001.
Based on his observations made during the inspection, the facility requires general maintenance.
Also, a copy of the certification form is needed for your files.
With the exception of the above the records appeared to be complete. Enclosed please find the
inspection report, which should be self-explanatory. If you have any questions concerning this
matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
A
D2
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
DJ /3-
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit .p Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ,Q Routine .Q Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
© Permitted &ICertifed ❑ Conditionally Certified •❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ----......f�./.....�rFL? ..�l�hf.''`............ .............. Countv:...........---- ........ .......................
.1.:.� .. C..
f/ /Owner Name: ,__._..... (� t C Phone No: .
_...�........—..............,G..;..C1..........................................................................................................
Facilit_r Contact: vy5 Phone No: „
...f.'i...... �.... .......................Title:.......�..._...................... .............................
Mailing Address:....��,,t•-.•/ .e f�C�✓ ......� .................... 5! `::....... >`! /.�-...........................
Onsite Representative: ....i,......t�., 4�:.�...iQ a integrator: ................... _...
_.....
Certified Operator: fi .• _ � � b bds L, Operator Certification Number: ,,,,,,,.,_,_...................._,,.
11. ...._.............. .. L ......_.....
Location of Farm:
A'
�i
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry KCattfe ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �� ��•+
Design Current
twine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy %Z
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
_.Total SSLW
Numher,of-Lagoons . ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Pondi /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the.operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. Ii discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a iagoon system? {If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes %10 No
❑ Yes. ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 4�1No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
01101/01 Continued

��' � .s;..' � - � :.r }' , �`-:�;�Kb' Zv+�,+ S Wit'-yi'1�� _ 1 ,.j ti '$r� . a .. - y`"'4 �. �.: �.� ..K °.•:
Eacili Number .:_ = x ; -�
ty Date of Iiispecti'b,
NA'aste Collection & Treatment
4: Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less thun adequate? ,Spillway ❑ Yes 21No
Structure 1 Structure '_ Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
................................. ............................. ................... .,............. ....... .... ....... :....................... ..... I....---.. ..... _............ ...................................
..
Freeboard (inches): T.. l........................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any o!' d"c structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly adL!7— -;_d and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If am' of questions 4-6 was answer_ .'es. and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenanrer'';; pro . em _ nt .'
8. Does any part of the waste management system.othL�r man waste structures require main tenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack- adequate, gauged markers with rcQuired maximum and minimum'liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessiyr Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes I�Wo
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes E ,No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designate in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWNfP)? ❑ Yes ,Q No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land appiication? ❑ Yes %L�No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination" ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes >Q No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes &No
17. A,,r&-ra't Foutcrops present? ❑ Yes ❑ No
1$. Is th ater supply well within 250 feet of the serayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ On -site 1 Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & GeneraI Permit c- other Permit readily available? OZ'es ❑ No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Ctr::ried Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? '
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.) ❑ Yes iif No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? 6e/ irrigation.:reeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes X No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any anplicabie setbaCK-riteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes sp No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified ocemmr :-charge? ❑ Yes All No
24. FaiI to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations : -squired by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over applica_ion'; ❑ Yes )Q No
'S. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to disc',ss ; e'• ie i -; ec:: -- ith on -site representative? ❑ Yes q No
26. Does facility require a follow-up :::. sannz []Yes A} No
27. Were any additional problems note_ :Vhicl) c212st -.;.... .:ance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ,,EjNo
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the ,.; _-::-.tme.m ha storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage uc-.a -xnri no
29, Are there any dead ani '.=-"; :.ct ; n; - '_? hours?
01/01/01
++ - Yes Z No
Continued

'r. ,J ka<rrr..ag y✓' '� �C.p Iiw,i c 1� "�5'�� ��.^" ti y_-.� yam`" r-i.K� 4a 7N ^i n - r r Fiat �:^.n- , ..ram : *t-Ff �.
sEr�wN *'rP �" ? :[:k^{ r•:• « ; ;• '3, " t -
�:: ..y
Facility Number: _ Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/4/2001
30, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ip No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes j No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
113 No'violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Corriments (refer to�"u'est10A# : r Iain an YFS answers ai/or'an`'.recotnieridakioiis or any`'o'tlier-camii�etits;'
Use drawin'' :oi facil- "io better a xlatn sttuafaons t�se�'adcLixona7..pagesr as necessa
tar r xl � st7') ' -
❑ Fteld Copy []FinalNotes
. u." c; h... _. - :_i . !� =_f r,.�.;ir., w __.Tnrr.. �.W r�•r;.
Lb
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
4`EC C t`
recVLOV, S /c-, t ., l.xs .)/Ots
Date:

�:=:r•GOYZ:RNOR
t J�
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 17, 2000
Gary MacGibbons
134 Westglow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
MacGibbons Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. MacGibbons:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on August 15, 2000. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be
maintained and operated in accordance with the farm plan. Also, the waste
application records appeared to be complete.
Enclosed please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 19
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / APPIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% P03T-CONSUMER PAPER

Division of Water Qualitv
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
© Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit x
Routine O complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Tiinc: ETZnPrinterl on: 7/21/2000
I facility \umher
o , t operational
Q Beln%v "threshold
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date last Operated or ;Ihnve Threshold: .................
r CsL / n / County:..... ✓ ( .....
FarmName. ..........1. ............ l..0 ................. .C......L................................... ............... °.t�...-.......................................
• � 7
Owner tame: ,% ' Le. ............. � h!`5�u ............. Phone .,\o:..,J�...�.F.........Z.3.2..�............................
-t
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title.......................... ....... Phone No: ........
flailingAddress: .... ........�S1.e 5G.)..........L1X ......................................... ..........................
Onsite .Representative: �.v ///lcG......�'7 Cw7 S Integrator:.............................................................
Certified Operator: .............�Ti �� C'..... �r ? laiti.S..................... Operator Certification Numher:.....Z3 !�C)
..............I.
Lnca ' n of Farm:
T
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • • •• Longitude a ` °•
Design Current
Swine Canacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacin, PopulationCattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver I I I n Dairy C)
❑ Non -Laver I Nan -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag"-sn area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid NN"aste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is anv discharge observed from any part of the operation'? El Yes No
Discharge orig=inated a[: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Il' dischtrrec is ohservcd. was the conveyance roan-rnade'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If dischar�.se is ohserved. did it reach Water Of the Stag! (If yes, norifv DWQ) [I Yes ❑ No
C. if discha1-2C is 011surved. Whut is the estimated Ilow in vaihnin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a laLmon system'? (If ves. notify DWQi
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'? ❑ Spillway
SUuuturc I Su•ur;ttrru ? Structure ; Structure 4 Structure d
ldcntif'irr: ...............
Freehnarci (imuhca):
5100
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
[:]Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
Continued on back
ri

Facility Number — D:itc of fnspcctioft Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed:? (ie/ trees. severe erosion. ❑ Yes F4 No
- seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or manag>ed through a waste manai7ement or
closure plan'? ❑ Yes t;vo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'! ❑ Yes kNo
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes j�KNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'! ❑ Yes D4 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? [:]Yes �&No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes 25_�fo
12. Crop type .K-el I �t G.f S5(
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those desiunated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
[2Vo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
RN
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Covera;e & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
allo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP. checklists. design. maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement" (ie/ irrigation. freeboard. waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
S No
21.
Did the facility failto have a actively certified operator in charve?
❑ Yes
Z No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
ONo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�_ 0
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
r�No
t �'V ... .. t>tcj�is oi• defieiencles ri4ere hatted iiitrtrig phis:visit: Yai� will receive Rio; #'urt4ter
.-Cor:resi�ondenc'e:a'boutithis
visit. •'-:-:-:•:•:-:::::::::::'::':':::':'.': :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to betterexplain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
f -r A,
I ��vc�,t.�lr, r�— ups a �` (t
� �n"�C..e'-A-s Wei ob5, dam
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Cam. �— Date: 5100

Facility number: — Date of inspection Vrinlvd on: 7/21/2000
Mor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge �Jor helow ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes �Qlvo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes �o
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken Can belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 5:Wo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 09�No
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged Fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'? ElYes ❑ No
ments
FM
5100
J

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Vergie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville NC 28677-1538
Dear Vergie S. Redmond:
1 � •
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND �� R,F_I
ATot 1+ia�ll�
December 30, 1999 QJA%
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 49-38
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal. and,industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 57I.
Sincere]
x �
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 14, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEMT REQUESTED
ergie S. Reamond
Kenneth MacGibbons Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville NC 28677-1538
Farm Number: 49 - 38
Dear Vergie S. Redmond:
1 M?WA •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Kenneth MacGibbons Dairy, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C,
must apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter,
your farm has six 60 days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Alan Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at (704) 66 -1699.
Since ,
W_
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

M
F6r.m SLUk,
Trac It 9
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner.
Owner's Address
Owners Phone#
TER, 1999
km
Facility Nubet 4 7
Spreader operator 0m, J Ac C, ff, .1
Spreader Operator's
tj r' ki es t., I -Fla
Operators Phone a wel- z'x ?.I —
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Recommended PAN
Crop Type I-Gadind'(itUacre) = (B)
(1) (21
Slurry and Sludge A�.a- . --Lion Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Ito
---Meld #
=7
1/k
U
/34 "1,11, R)50,,,k Ne- ,Ixafr
f3l
Ifil 171 lal
Date
(mn-ddd/yr)
N of Loads Per Field
I
Volume of Loads
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Pei Acre'
(gaVacj
(4) - (A)
Waste Analysis
PAN (lb/1 000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Itklac)
J(5) x (6)] + 1.000
Ndkbgpn Balance
k� (13) - (7)
AMC
0,06
Crop Cycle Totals
Owners Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)��`` Operator Certification #
-an be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual.
lee your animal wage management plan for sampling frequency- At a ml *mwn. waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events -
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) born (BI. Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

Form SLUk-
Tract a
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Slurry and Sludge A .-- ...:lion Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
p
Field #
s .?
FER
Fatality Number 3 4�-
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operators
Address
Operators Phone # 7D _ f
From Animal Waste Management Plan
6&RCrop Type Recommended PAN yp
G Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
(3)
141
l+51
rfil
f71
181
Date
(mmldd/r)
Y
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads l
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2j K (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gatlac)
(4) + (A)
2
Waste Analysis
PAN (lb/1000 gat)
PAN Applied
(Ib/ac)
US) K (g)j . 1,000
Nitrogen Balance
(Iblac)
-/7-
ooO 4%
S.O e00
98;
Y.9.f
R 3
70,/C51-
—/ —
10
Wowe
000
/
9
/7
a.
f
t
f
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) A,� L I''J,� G_C.Zo ?
Operators Signature 1. L- �L
Operator Certification # ZakV3
-an be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local deader if you do not have your owners manual.
;ee your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
=ntdr the value received by subvacrg colunm (7) fraon (Bf Continue subtracting column (7) from column (a) following each application event.

Form SLUR- -
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Slurry and Sludge 4., - . .ition Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Feld #
.0
f
n
7° - 9A -
Z2-
FEB g 1919
Facility Number
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operators
Address way I lew
Operator's Phone # 7o , / - 9 _ 37
Frorn Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
iza Loading (Iblacre) = (B) / 00
If
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(a)
Date
(mm/ddlyr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gavac)
(4) + (A)
2
waste Analysis
PAN Ib/11H10 al
( gal)
PAN Applied
(Iblac)
[(5) x (fi)l + 1.000
Nitrogen Balance ;
(�►ac)
(B) - (7)
4fj
s
¢v
IV
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature k, L
Certified Operator (Print) L ,� �i Operator Certification # 2 33 D 3
Can be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by suubtraditg column (7) from (Sr' Continue subbing column (7) from column (8) following each application event_

Form SLUR...
Tract #
Field Size.(acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Slurry and Sludge A,.-; - --tion Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
30
Field # /
r � •a n
/.w U mks 4 or -e
7011- -a
FER
, �Wv
Facility Number
3F(-
Spreader Operator �, L
oe
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operatoes Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (B) Zo
(1) (2)
f31
141
r51
f61
171
(s1
Date
(rnrn/dd/yr)
# of Loads Per Field
I
Volume of Loads
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gallac)
(4) + (q)
Waste Analysis 2
PAN (lb/1000 al
gal)
PAN Applied
(Ib/ac)
{(5) X (6)1 + 1.000
Nitrogen Balance
(lbl�)
(B) - (7)
3x eo a
C
1,2 -fr
C
ae a /
o o
/0 0 o
Fr'.
6f ?a
a e o
Crop Cycle Totals
C33 3
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature A,�-�
Certified Operator (Print) L fir e Operator Certification # 2 �� 3
Can B found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual.
See your ignimal waste managernent plan for sampling frequency_ At a minimum,
inimu, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land appocation events.
Enter the value received by subtracting colurnn (7) from (Br. Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.
w

Form SLUk.
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Slung and Sludge AF; . :;tion Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Field #
7.�
�cs� 1e.� Q� a .lrr 4k 2
Facility Number''^
Spreader Operator ,
Spreader Operator's
Address /Q
Operator's Phone # 5/ _
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop 'Type Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (B) /
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(a)
Date
{mMddlyr)
# of Loads Per Field
m
Volume of Loads I
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gallac)
(4) + (A)
Waste Analysis 2
PAN {Ib/1Q00 gal)
PAN Applied
(Iblac)
[(5) x (B)] + 1.000
Nitrogen Balance
(Iblac)
(B) - (7)
oo
/ 5*1I , Er
, 9S
M. 93
137,07
'�!�
S
zoo 0
ovo
/
95�
2 C. 9 SRI
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature A,
Cedtfied Operator (Print) G 1-4c Getz :3 Operator Certification # jg330
:;an be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a kcal dealer of you do not have your owner's manual.
See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency- At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (13f Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) fonowing each application event.

d ii:s`.jF,.
�F
KDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GDVERNOR
y"
`_ WAYN]i i0aDEV:TTt
-SECRETARY L�Jst
X
0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 29, 1999
Gary MacGibbons
139 Westglow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site Inspection
MacGibbons Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
lredell County, NC
Dear Mr. MacGibbons:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on
January 26, 1999. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Deficiency due to the incomplete waste application
records. Please complete your waste application records and mail a copy to the
r� Mooresville Regional Office by February 14, 1999. It is requested that you address
, the information to Mr. Johnson's attention.
It was noted that the filter area for the clean water diversion needs to be
Y" maintained periodically until the vegetation becomes well established. Regarding your
x discussion concerning winter rye, if produced as a hay crop, please note on your waste
application form the date of harvest and tonnage. If the crop is not to be used as hay,
then you need to contact your technical specialist for the proper nitrogen application
rate.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
N
Sincerely, ,
y
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
91 9 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 1 S
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY! AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
1

[3 Division of.Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
7. ADivision of Water Quality -Compliance Inspection
E3 Other Agency - Operation Review s
Routine 0 Cam }laint O f ollow-u of DwQ ins ection 0 Follow-up of DS« C veview 0 Other
Facility Number d .— hate of Inspection
Tian. of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
❑ Permitted [{Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 1E3 Not O crational I Date Last Operated:
FarmName: 6 County:.....................................................................................
CI..Cr.... �............Q ['1.................t r.1.1......................................
Owner Name: 1�:..1.,�„ter,,,,.„...... .... �clvt� �� lhonc No: tt+} --� Z 2 3
.... !;
Facilikw' Contact: S Q.Y.11.......!l!t4.:. rl..f,?A?.4?.►.1............... Iitle:. .�� ..tM Phone No .�.. t.L.-....2. -7
Mailing Address:....il..; .........r. e ...�s-�K24„..... R.�........................................... .` 5.. �..1.11........................................ . :R..?k �.....
Onsite Representative: Le,. :..C,T1..b ..t.,. . Intehrator'.......................................................
Certified Operator: ....,...1�.: ..Y'.. ....................•........................ Operator Certification Number:..... �30, ................
Location of Farm:
Latitude longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System I - -
Dischart!es &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge uriginatcd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Tf discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made.,
h. II'discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if discharge is ohserved. what is the estimated flaw in galhnin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any. adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Tcient.ifier: �
Frcchu:u'd (inches): l r_:........................................................................................................................................................
1 /6/99
❑ Yes ❑.'No
r
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
E�M)
❑ Yes
A No
❑ Yes
RNo
Structure 6
Continued on
back

Facility Number: — D.,te of InSpcetion / Z
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes [KNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or'managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes Wo
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes XNo
8. Does any pail of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? QKY'es 0 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
❑ Yes
XNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑Nitrogen
❑ Yes
54 No
12. Crop type .......... i.'..Yy......f......�. ....................................................... ..............................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
QSNo
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
❑ Yes
j,;;�No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
5� No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
KNo
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
EKNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
KNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
JaYes
❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[R'No
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
KNo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
�9 No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes KNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Uj�No
0. No.vitalations or. deficiencies .were' n&.led durin' .iis:visit:. _Ytitti vill.r. -c' a nab ftirtiiei-
eorresporidebr e' about: this visit.::: .. ..: : :
Comments (refeir to question#):`Explain any YES answers and/or any;recommendations,or any,•otlier comments ` Ii.a
Usgs o f facility.to betterexplain'situations. (use additional pages as necessary):`!, e drawin
�) Ttt f- e k sxr� t O h �D �- �IG Kl L lv-s r' ' f CA-Vt ` IAU�- $ i e-
i-Y-'`►'t
tL ee�C $ }S, b McL , wx o t1 0. ,-P_c,3V- b cL
�} ��L C �" �C•Q.'�� s r`� CW c.ST'i` ���1,` �[��`� ei�r,� �/l�'Ei�2 � `1V�
tt�e f� Gary v i�i@, ►. ,as�t Cl^)plice..iX,s'1 retrrti�,x Ski '� . t?�.'. ��cA Ors 'H-e-
< -Q , n l c t2
how -IC.Lq ���75 �c�►�vGy� QtttcS 0.w�0wnT 0T Vonvka-.5—
�
ReviewerAnspector Name .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /�G 11 �j b O-S 0 1, Date:
1 /6/99

�l\LrYG1�R :`
Z.
JAMES B. HUNTJR. .Gary MacGibbons
139 Westglow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Mr. MacGibbons:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 29, 1999
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site Inspection
MacGibbons Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on
January 26, 1999. Based on the observations made during the inspection, this report is
being issued as a Notice of Deficiency due to the incomplete waste application
records. Please complete your waste application records and mail a copy to the
Mooresville Regional Office by February 14, 1999. It is requested that you address
the information to Mr. Johnson's attention.
It was noted that the filter area for the clean water diversion needs to be
maintained periodically until the vegetation becomes well established. Regarding your
discussion concerning winter rye, if produced as a hay crop, please note on your waste
application form the date of harvest and tonnage. If the crop is not to be used as hay,
then you need to contact your technical specialist for the proper nitrogen application
rate.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
AJ
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORE5VILLC, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 60% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

"[3°Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water• Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency -Operation Review -
IC(Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-u of DWQ ins ection Q Follow-up of DS1'4'C review Q Other
1
Facility Number C Dnte of lnspcction
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
J] Permitted j�Certified Q Conditionally Certified © Registered 0 Not U crational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ........%!.l.eiCounty: ...................................................................
Owner N'ame:....1�r..4 �'..................... �� O i1. Phone No: .............................. } _`f Z ...... Z3
Facility Contact, -Crary 4.. Yl.....r.1.............. ..kpS.......... ....... Phone No
....................... �+�.)..�.2.-..,.2.a..?.1.....
Mailing Address:....L.;......... W..A.-..V... L4.Q.V,...... nS. rA 5' S 4?..4.41�...................................... .
Onsite Representative: .... .Y. f..l?......1`. Integrator: ....................................................
Certified Operator:... .67&.r.................. 6'.n ....................... Operator Certification Number:.....�3P3................
Location of Farm:
................. r............
.......................................
..._................
...........
..................
.......................
.........
.........
....................
.............
.........
—..................
.......................
.......
/..... ........... ............. ..... .............. ........................... ...................... �r
Latitude ��•' Longitude �• ��"
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer Dairy f G l
❑ Non -Layer ❑•Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons L❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JLJ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps JE3 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes C! No
1
Discharge. originated at: ❑ Lagoon El Spray Field El Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'!
h. U discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon .ryswm?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier:
/r
Freeboard (inches): ........,
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
E8:No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
No
Structure 6
1/5/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there'any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or'ntanaged through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require main tenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10.. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Crop type ..........4Y >.►.:..► 1......r...... ... ..................................................................
�
❑ Yes [KNo
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, reaps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
('ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes Rio
❑ Yes XNo
Qi'ycs 0 No
❑ Yes 5ZNo
❑ Yes fRZNo
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes J?SNo
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes L4 No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes EkNo
❑ Yes M:No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes A No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes KNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes grNo
No.vialatioRs.or. def ciericaes .were noted. during Nils visit:.1'oti vn'll.reeeive',ni further .:. •. `
• eofresbbiidehee; aboui; this ;visit.. • . ; ; . . ..... . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . , . ,
Coinments-(refer to question Explain, any YES answers and/or any; recommendations, or any other. comments F
Use d`rawings .of facilityao better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
G 7-/jam _ ,� �-t ]�7� i` i� r e (`}�'.#i A.
-
Q) ale' kk o t- ? i o r\ o 1- �xa vtl� L �%- , ..R tti-�4tR 1A�� t 5 ~�V� C ` ..
ette cop qt+�- 44,e ►.:,41s �'( lict��er� relC1 5k }..1a �7'�,. LiiICC� Trs e
t 1-Di� { `Zs•G�
ILG to c� ion►, a p, 1 c. a--[" 0n
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Zi%,e 1-7 � �"E yjs 0 0..E Date: _%�(/ f V 11/6199

ElDivision of Soil and Water,` Conservation -'Operation Review, i_ i P''' i. ; �`'' d
O'Division of Soil and WaterConservation - Compliance`Inspectio'n
� 1 �
' JR'Di*ision of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
A'
13Other Agency -Operation Review
IQ(Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow-up of l)WQ inspection Q Follow-up of I)SWC review Q Other
Facility Number C Dat:e. of Inspcelirrn �
Time of Inspection `,j 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ['Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered [3 Not Opera Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name:
........ (.I..(.g..{°r...,.�T,t.,�.....�?,l.'.1............. ...................... County:...................................... ...............
......... .... ............................
Owner Name: di t.-�� „(,� �e lytu Phone No: S"t ...
I - ! 37
Facility Contact: SI�.ry......M&F 7.rI K?6.✓1...............Title- ��SS...� ............................ .... Phone NoCtis.�.�..�{.2..-....2�.3.7.!�.....
Mailing Address: .... L.5..,................... ................ .. .....`...Q..4# ...................................... Onsite Representative:....!f...............t..h.....Q. ................................... Integrator:..,.....................................,.............................................
Certified Operator: .. �t. i6 ..v...!........................ Operator Certification Number:,.... ,................
[.vocation of Farm:
...........................................:..............................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................... ............. .. w
Latitude
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude • 1 it
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I III Dairy Q
❑ Non -Layer ],Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is ohservect, was the conveyance man-made"
h. If discharge is observed, dirt it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If dischar�oe is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min`!
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon syslcm`1
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate'?
Structure I
Identifier:
/i
Freeboard (inches): ........ 6.................
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes 0�qo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ Yes
A No
❑ Yes
F�LNo
Structure 6
116/99 Continued on hack

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or'mmnaged through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvcinent?
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
�z
❑ Yes XNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
P type �.Inn......................................................................................................................
12. Crop t c r e,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, frcchoard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, frcchoard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El
N.o.vioiadons.or. deficiencies .were mated. wring f iis.visit:. You v' *11'rettAve no further . .
-' - cgrresb6dde[tce: ttihout'this ;visit.:
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes MNo
Qi;Ycs 0 No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes 2SNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes Iwo
❑ Yes . KNo
W Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes WNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes Wo
Comments .(refer to question #):' Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any. other comments.
t
Use 6awirigs of facility to better explain situations.
\S�(use additional pages as necessary): i
�) `he- 2N1SiQn Vr" �v&vkl iv_s `dC0_K 1 L&NCJ Y' � 51V-3t_ r�Vk 0 `
pi
?A e,-e.CSC �O �e-
Ale. t'4 co
icy l
tj , a S er s Ltd �lct 1� e.
Ao �,e m r a� a l, c ��n ri_ .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .4y h J O'AyySph Date: Z1_Z!o1_f— L I1/6/99

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE. REGIONAL OFFICE
DCVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
Keith Stephens
159 Ivy Dale Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Site Inspection
Stephens Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stephens:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. Also, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field.
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOOR E9VILLE, NORTH CAROL] NA281 IS
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 809E RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recommendations for Nitrogen M M1lication for Common Crops:
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the corn is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid -February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid -August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped (as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond was pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service -allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application.rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to 8) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
1 Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredeil SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

C
O
CO
CO)
9
ti
to
a.
'Z 287 395 364
US Postal Service 2/16/98
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail See reverse
Sent to MR KEITH STEPHENS
Street & Number
Post Otfloe, State, & ZIP Coda
HARMONY
Postage
$
Certified Fee
Spada] Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt Showing to
Whom & Date Delivered
Retum Receipt %'ng to Whom,
Date, & Addresss's Address
TOTAL Postage & Fees Is
Postmark or Date
a

Stick postage stamps to article to coverFlrst-Class postage, cenwmd mail fee, and
charges for any selected optional services (See front).
1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub.to the right of the return
address leaving the receipt attached, and present the article at a post office service
window or hand it to your rural carrier (no extra charge).
2. It you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the
return address of the article, date, detach, and retain the receipt, and mail the article.
3. H you want a return receipt, write the certified mad number and your name and address
on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the front of the article by means of the
gummed ends if space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse lmnt of article
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number.
4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the
addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article.
5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the frord of this
"receipt. If return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811,
6. Sase this receipt and present 8 0 you make an inquiry. 102595-97-13-0145
m
m
U7
cn
M
N

1
NORTH CAROL.INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 13, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED,
Keith Stephens
159 Ivy Dale Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site Inspection
Stephens Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stephens:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on February 10, 1998 by Mr.
Alan Johnson of this Office. A Notice of Deficiency (NOD) is being issued for the
improper application of waste and the lack of storage in the waste pond.
During the inspection three waste application fields were inspected. Of the three,
only one appeared to be planted to a crop. Of the other two fields, one appeared to be
fallow and the other corn stover. Please provide this office with a copy of your waste
application records (loads, fields, N applied, crop).
It was evident on the day of the inspection that the waste storage pond had been
full prior to the removal of waste. It is required that adequate freeboard (1 ft plus
capacity to contain a 25-yr 24-hr storm event) be maintained in the waste pond. The
files indicate that a similar problem was observe last July during the inspection by Mr.
Johnson and Mr. Joe Zimmerman (Division of Soil and Water).
The state register list 150 animals as the design capacity for the waste manage-
ment system. During the inspection it was indicated that there are approximately 180
animals. You need to consult with your technical specialist to ensure your system can
handle this number of animals.
919 NORTH MAIN SYR It ET. MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 261 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r', t
Page Two
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by March 20,
1998 indicating the actions taken to correct the noted problems. Please address your
response to Mr. Johnson. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: IredeIl SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex G ?eason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

toutine O Complaint O Follow-up of OWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: registered El Applied for Permit
Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection _
Time of Inspection 7 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr .15 min)) Spent on Review C
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
❑ Not JJOperational Date Last Operated:......................................................................................rr......... ................................... ...................
FarmName..........`!. ?.,?1�1:a. ......... .c.r..I................................................. County:..... t.. .�rl............................I.......................
Land Owner Name:
......%�.1...... S .............. ......I.��.�c....LF:c.G1ra.c..�........................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility ConctacA ... PiA4.............ai...4..k)S......... Title:................................................ Phone NO:..........................................................
MailingAddress.1a 1....... ........i�s............................................��.4a.a�.�a...................................................
f
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................... .................................. . ........................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.... �..�.. .......................a1............................. Operator Certification Number:.... —1.5k;.0 ...............
Location of Farm:
r
...........4.....5.9..... /`�� ...........� u.� �.� �? � �[.�....�� . �,�.�..................
. ��.{c,,,,` ......_.+�. ��..��.........r�....:..... sly,a.5-
4
`.1....�a
�! f g. .. �+�. ......,,dr../ .....t.. .�f. ......(2 4 7LS}.i�...... ...1 .l:.�X. �.............l� til k.. ...i..z....c
.!.\......1.5? 7.......................I......................... ..
Latitude �' �' �« Longitude �• ��«
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? �es ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? RYes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify.DWQ) ❑ Yes [:]No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes �dNo
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?��
Continued on back
� 1

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Ye o
Structures (Lagoons.Ilolding Ponds. Flush fits, etc.))
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ESo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure :3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...........................................................
...................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft):........�1...5........................I.............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
JVNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
4N�o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
&0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
�No
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......... CQ ►'rl....... .verb ......................................
.....................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan
(AWMP)? A�/' ❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ftNo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
.Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
allo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
,Yes
❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
fj�No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
P� No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only /V//4/-
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes NNo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'? ❑ Yes No
No.violations or deficiencies were -noted during this. visit. .You.will receive no further
cbrrespotidence about this, visit'.,,
Comments (refer,to question 0):'�Explalnany. YES answers Arid/or any' -recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of iacihty to bett�erryexplatn sttuahans (use addrtional pages as necessary} }
hecte~ `tit C W eA k V� +tue_ h,-�4s -�O 6e �"t.el
e— I>onk LOaS i c� Ue. � voL•e'5 d-6e:cn5 LA"nt A pc [.a � eery (o e,ae t S fir},
P_O de*.-4- � e �, ins dull L.�d 1,5,, �O
aG'Cc�use✓ �� �,G�c�. p���?��tt3� o� ux�s��r{ occ�� 1 O`��! �c�, Y eco=,ems use, c.e��
3owi o � wn e t s b e«5 a� �ti cc��,� s1 o.v� opt �.t1ows, T4 ewe be- a..C1c .
`tie- rvt� c�oesH'�- an aC_��JPLy C�rClvai�S ciPi'�oije
7/25A
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �%,4�Y- �� A� Date- —(C3" j'

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 8, 1998
Keith Stephens
159 Ivy Dale Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Notice of Deficiency (second notice)
Animal Operation Site Inspection
Stephens Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stephens:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on February 10, 1998 by Mr. Alan
Johnson of this Office. As a result of the inspection, a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) was
issued for the improper application of waste and the lack of storage in the waste pond.
During the inspection three waste application fields were inspected. Only one field
appeared to be planted to a crop. Of the other two fields, one appeared to be fallow and the
other corn stover. You were asked to provide this office with a copy of your waste
application records (loads, fields, N applied, crop) by March 20, 1998. As of this date, a
response has not been recieved.
It is requested that this office receive a copy of your waste application records by April
18, 1998. Please address your reponse to Mr. Johnson. If you have any questions concerning
this matter, please do not hesitate to contact W. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
AJ
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA $81 15
PHONE [phone] FA% 704-663-6040
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POSY -CONSUMER PAPER

11— �
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
M.S. Redmond
Stephens Dairy
159 Ivydale Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear M.S. Redmond:
IWAWK A
1
loft
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENvlRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
N.C. DEFT. op
ENVIRON-NI'T.11Pum-t
& NATURAL R!r,3(5Lj k(,�TS
FEB 25 1998
!MSM OF NUMONVITAl RVIS DENT
OQ4=1E IVaUAL O fl&E
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Stephens Dairy
Facility Number: 49-38
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

F2
Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine.
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to brine your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the subnuttal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Boa 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5o% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality .
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED
M.S. Redmond
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear M.S. Redmond:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 14, 1998
�.G. D.r ZT. 09
+;'�tentia'r:NT, tV,,AtM9
f? NATU1tAt. R t:SU ' W IPS
OCT 28 1998
0116103 L�F Ettti'1 �1$E1?NTA! i" .,.':u{5it11T
9M MUM fzuslhA1 OFFICE
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Williams dairy
Facilit 49-38
Ra unt
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on June 22, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with M.S. Redmond in
order to allow additional time for M.S. Redmond to obtain and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this Ietter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this Ietter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions; I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about.any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
i Howard,7r. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Regional Office w/attachment
Shannon Langley w/attachment
Central Files w/attachment

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL INiANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF ]FEDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-38
M.S. REDMOND
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by M.S. Redmond, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the. SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or. for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm.Number: 49-38
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act 'or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-38
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER"; upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Stephens Dairy (Facility # 49-38)
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mrs. Virgie Redmond
CIO Mrs. Dixie MacGibbon
139 West Glow Road
Statesville, NC 28625
Dear Mrs. Redmond:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 20, 1998
n:c. DF+ r. c>P
& NATUli M. ft;_-at>L kt_LS
OCT 28 1998
#WAMLE Rt MAL urns
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
MacGibbon Dairy
Facility Number: 49-38
Iredell County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your
application for Special Agreement which was received on June 22, 1998, the
Environmental Management Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special
agreement with Virgie Redmond in order to allow additional time for Virgie Redmond to
obtain and implement a certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) for the
subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by
the dates and terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed
documents to the attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within
fourteen (14) calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you
the responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the
North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated
thereunder. All dates and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to

;;
civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to
the Division of Water Quality.
Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the
Agreement carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement,
and contact Mr. Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of
the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone],ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone]
ext. 539.
Sincerely,
': 5 /-" - Z' - J.
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
EN Regional.O�ce w/attachment
Shannon Langley wlattachment
Central Files wlattachment

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGENIENT CON&i IISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-38
VIRGIE_RMMOND
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into 'by .Vi rgie Redmoriohereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143E-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the -following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within. the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).. , ..
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither parry will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina-
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph l (a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste -management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number:. 49-38
Special Agreement
1 Page 2 - -
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated- thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified 100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date • past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war; -
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will'be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-38
Special -Agreement
Page 3
7. .The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For MacGibbon Daity Facility # 49-38)
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
M. S. Redmond
159 Ivydale Road
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear M.S. Redmond:
A14
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 17, 1998
SEP ^fix 1998
n1y151t"I Qf EkVfi°"`;'�`'� i?l '�'' • � .. �r
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Stephens Dairy
Facility Number: 49-38
Iredell County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on June 22, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with M.S. Redmond in
order to allow additional time for M.S. Redmond to obtain and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
Sincerel ,
A. Preston Howard, r. P
Attachment
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Mooresville -Regional _Office ,
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-38
M.S. REDMOND
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by M.S. Redmond, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by December 31, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-38
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except l 5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER'S" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-38
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Stephens Dairy (Facility # 49-38)
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 15, 1998
M. S. Redmond
139 Westglow Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Certified Farm Deadline
Stephens Dairy, Facility #49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Ms. Redmond:
For your information, please find enclosed the second request for the status update
regarding the certified farm plan for your facility. However, the application for the
extension is not attached. Mr. Keith Stephens received the original notice with the
application form.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
If
Alan D. Johnson
Environmental Specialist II
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 261 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
[y and Natural Resources
In Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
M.S. Redmond
Stephens Dairy
159 Ivydale Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear M.S. Redmond:
A & 1•NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 12, 1998 KQ np-PT' OF
V1WiRO#+ MUNT, R'R kI.eVd
& NATURAL R'EVOU tfsKS
JUN 15 1998
ION1101 CCU IUMIjtt `t1 �P1iT
Subject: Second request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Stephens Dairy
Facility Number: 49-38
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
In a letter dated February 11, 1998, received by you on February 19, 1998, this office advised you that
we had no record of having received the required Certification for the subject facility. Our letter further
requested that you provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not submitted as
required. This explanation was due by March 21, 1998. To date we have received no response from you.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that MUST be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established in15A NCAC 2H .0217(axl)(A). Facilities which maintain the niunber of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A).
Please respond within 10 days of your receipt of this letter and submit all responses to this matter to the
following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified amoral waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Complianm/Enfarcement Unit
tDWQ-Regional-O
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SO% recycled110% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
` Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water u ity Supervisor
FROM: Shannon Langl
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
r••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVJRONMEN`f AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Uj3Nrr
JUN 25 1998
Awsto
"11a�+ilF .4'IMT
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycied/10% post -consumer paper

NA' UTtAIr, kt,.Y)URCi3
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources JUN 25 1998
Division of Water Quality
I �sN U.. FN1`4(t�6;tMT�t t�&Vzt W
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT �X0,. UL ; ,,
(LNFOR.NIATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREEM&T)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): V 1 r a 'I e Map. A
2. Facility No.:
3. Facility Name:
-.31f
Senhens Hai
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
f r i e 2-RadMnd � Ec ��i a„
5. Mailing Address: _ e S f l01d R01261
City: ±af ei i i'l lei � _ State: j/C Zip: 4�. 5
Telephone No.: Cy ) %'? - szg Non-UischXg© permitting
6. County where facility is located: -77l"Q ale
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry, Cattle): L7Q7T l e
8. Application Date: 6 `If ff
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into'a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their Iocal Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not .
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
RECEIVE
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 1 of 4
JUN 2 3 1998
Vi ATER QUALITY SECTION
,l;n L�charge Compliance Enf.

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste 'management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Fundsexpended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
ina 4r.9703.70
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Hid / nn 4,7 Tn //nf.1 'on"/ 1�qmn 10le- /�vm.c iia �Of .�hctlo
I
Wz'
.6. Oelo6er /99t- Ale vU Ose- . Suck Ta. /r. awl
Applicant's Certification:
attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I undrrsta if all required Darts off is aQplica gn are not competed aj]d_if all
his facility is found to be ineligible to enter into a special agreement with the EMC nothing in
Print flame of Owner
VX;a oaf'. Ulf` J - Date if- 91
Signal re of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 3 of 4

w
Re r ired ftins:
One (1) original and No (2) copies of the completed and appropriate12executed
application form, along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
ViFOR.MATION ANDMATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626.0535
FORM SPAG V98 Page 4 of 4

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Iredell County (Statesville Field Office (704)8 -6761
, ,
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Stephens, Keith
Business Name: M. S. Redmond
Business ID: redmms
----------------------------------------------------------
Client Address
------------------------------
139 Westglow road
Statesville, NC
28677-1538
Client Phone Ext Description
-----------------------------------
7045925035
Page 3 of 6
Jun 18, 1998
RECEIVED
WA 1 ER QL' L(TY SECTION
.'UN 2 2 #998
Business Address
------------------------------
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC
28677-9517
Business Phone Ext Description
-------------- --------------------
704-592-2522 BUS
NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Objective Assisted By: RHB
Fund ID: C01 Date: 01/14/98
Note:
To implement and maintain all practices in the 0200 waste utilization
plan as required by law.
-------------------------_-_----------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Plan Cover Note Assisted By: RHB
Fund ID: COI Date: 01/14/98
Note:
A 0200 waste utilization plan has been prepared and contains all
required practices.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 06/17/98
Note:
Don Redmond called and discussed the plan and cost share agreement. I
asked him if he had reviewed and he said he had. I also encourage him to
have the special agreement sent in.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Iredell County (Statesville Field Office [phone]
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Stephens, Keith
Business Name: M. S. Redmond
Business ID: redmms
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: 8CS
Page 4 of 6
Jun 18, 1998
Assisted By: LLH
Date: 06/05/98-
Note:
Mrs Redmond and Ken Vaughn called and discussed the cost share contract.
She had questions about contract. I encouraged her to get the special
extension completed. Should have been in February.
-----------------------------__--------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 8CS Date:.04/24/98
Note:
Keith Stephens came by the office and reviewed the NCACSP contract and
the 0200 certification plan. He said that he wanted to keep the contract
in his name even though another producer will be coming to the MS Redmond
farm to milk. He said that he would continue to be the operator and
applicant for the contract. I requested that before he begins work that
he meet with me at the farm and with Mrs. Redmond to review the plans and
contract. I also explained that the cost share money was for those
producers that needed to be certified. If the new producer requested to
drop below the limit of 100 at any feed area then the cost share money
could not be used.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 03/03/98
Note:
Received the approval from the Raleigh Div SW that Keith Stephens could
begin work. Approval was pending the setbacks and distances being put on
contract as water quality statement. Completed and returned to Div.
Raleigh. Copies made of the cost share plan and of the WUP and Keith and
Mrs. Redmond were notified that plan was ready to pick up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 02/04/98
Note:
I completed the 0200 plan and contract and contacted Mr. Stephens and
Mrs. Redmond that they need to sign the documents and to schedule to come
by the office and do this.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Iredell County (Statesville Field Office [phone]
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Stephens, Keith
Business Name: M. S. Redmond
Business ID: redmms
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: 7CS
Page 5 of 6
Jun 18, 1998
Assisted By: LLH
Date: 08/13/97
Note:
Reviewed the 0200 plan and Mrs. Redmond accepted the plan presented and
agreed to work towards its completion. Did want to receive agricultural
cost share money if available and when plan could be prepared.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 07/28/97
Note:
Met at the farm and reviewed the plan and determined solutions that were
acceptable with Mrs. Redmond and Mr. Stephens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: LLH
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 07/08/97
Note:
Met at farm to begin the 0200 plan with Mrs. Redmond and Mr. Keith
Stephens.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: RHB
Fund ID: FSA Date: 12/11/96
Note:
Tract 1330, 1331 and 1405 were added to this business.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: KJD
Fund ID: COI Date: 08/02/95
Note:
Aerial inspection of animal waste pond was conducted on 07/17/95 as
requested by Gov Jim Hunt.

U,.S.'DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 6 of 6
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Jun 18, 1998
Iredell County (Statesville Field Office [phone]
Assistance Notes
Client Name: Stephens, Keith
Business Name: M. S. Redmond
Business ID: redmms
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: DKB
Fund ID: C01 Date: 10/13/94
Note:
HEL Determination completed for field 4.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
cMooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
,I�Oclthan B. Howes, Secretary
Keith Stephens
159 Ivy Dale Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Stephens:
4164MAI
;1
[DaHNF;Z
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 18, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Stephens Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on July 14, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this
Office. It was observed that the storage pond had been discharging for sometime prior to the
inspection. The storage pond water level should remain at 18 inches below the top of the storage pond
at all times. Also, as discussed with Mr. Johnson, curbing needs to be installed between the back barn
and the storage pond to prevent waste from entering the clean water diversion. Waste that has
accumulated between the barn and storage pond should be removed.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
7 ti
4� D. Rex Gleason, P. E. a
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
Virgie Redmond, owner
AJ
919 North Main Street,
6 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 Nv-*crC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 = a.._ 50% recycled/10% pdst-consumer paper

❑ DSVVC Animal .Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
14
10 Routine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection Vollow7p of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection �]
Facility Number 3
Time of Inspection / G , 24 hr. (Winm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection fincludes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...... ................. »...... .............. »».................. ....... ....... »»t..i..»............... ....... ...................
Farm Name• ...5"�!��fcL ................ .............
..........................
.... ... .................. .................. »...
ff11
LandOwner Name:.1.�.E. ji ............. .......i f'c ti'-..��:�7,.............................. Phone No: ............................. .......... ........ ......................................
Facility Conctact:..:.. � t ........ j l�/ � �............ Title: ...........................�.../................ Phone No: ..� %. .:... .� � .............
MailingAddress:...l .......... : .i: ... sl.'....../.......»....... ....... ........... ........ ..1lrc .... ........ ........... ............ ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:.... -..`.�`. ��:....�- .e�. 1�..... .................. .._...... . Integrator: ... . ..... ............... . ....... . ....... . ........................... . ..........
CertifiedOperator: ........ .... . ................................... ................................................ . ........... Operator Certification Number:.................................... ...
Location of Farm:
r� a ...,t??... 3s :. ,�,n ..., ........._... 1.+! �(....l. }........... .....5. ............G . ..........!s i. , a.. s.; 4b`.....�hf� .4................. .
...sue.,......... :1:......L. lu. .�......... � trY1....�,t 1....... K:. �....... � , rk .. r. Kx c. Yia .: t ................
r--1r""----I r---" _ �—r_____n srL' '>, L��vti( 1 3 �t L-; 2>t c; j�
i_I Longltuae L_i� i__i• E I..
type of Uperation and Design Capacity
Swine Design Current Design'„ Current ,;:� = ''� Design'Current
Ca aci Po elation ::Poultry Ca aci Po elation' Cattle Ces aci Po ul lion '
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ai (� U
❑ Feeder to Finish I0 Non -Layer ❑Non-Dai
171 Farrow to Wean h
Farrow to Feeder Total Design Capacity p
Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Number of Lagoaas / Ho ding Pogds,'# k ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
g : ; i ;E ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area ,
f W
-General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? .
❑ Yes &No
❑ Yes C!No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes
❑ No
Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
IS No
Ja Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: ..7T. —=71 7
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
rNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
WNo
Structures _Q,agoaltand/off HQ1 ink ondS
9: Is storage4mpacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
IR No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
....» ' » .......... ... ........ .._..... ........ ...... ......... _......... .... »»..... ............... »»....._ .............
..........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
ENo
I I. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity ofany of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E�No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
SZYes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
AYes
❑ No
W3stg Appliggtion
1.4. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
ANo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type r1...'.d.i.....t�"C...r.,...iat#......t.t"+.R........................��v..EtlttiS
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
E(Yes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
fiZNo
Eor Certified Facilities Only /r1
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
Cl No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other.comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
n
r�
as) + V'VC, ►1�S t�tr r ✓� a ��Clvy
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: bf ;
ctv'i.z_V^� 6 ��Sc�cir.Sc 3�u ►'^
Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Se4tioj, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

-JAN 2$ '97 02:16PM P.22
. t
�I1nM.4L WASTELMANAGEMENI ,SYSTEM
OPERATQR IN CHARGE
DESIGNATION FORM
4�
t '
ANDIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT S)TIMM:
F8cak ID Number; `% County:
OPERATOR Ili CHARGE
Home Mailing Address
City State _ Zip
Certificate # Social Security #
Work Phone Home Phone
Signature Date
OWNED
Mailing Address City
State Zip Telephone#
Signature Date
Please -Mall to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, N.C. 27&;453S
11

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Ms. Virgie Redmond
134 Westglow Road
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
Dear Ms. Redmond,
AT?WA
IDEIHNF;Z
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 16, 1997
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral
Stephens Dairy
Facility No. 49-38
Iredell County
On July 3, an Operation Review was conducted of Stephens Dairy, facility no. 49-38. This Review,.
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215. l OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, wastewater was observed discharging from the lagoon system and workings its way
down hill and possibly into a nearby branch. Since it is illegal to discharge animal waste into waters of the State,
your operation along with supporting documentation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for further
investigation and possible enforcement action. G.S. 143-215. 10E requires me to notify Division of Water Quality
and the owner/operator of this observed violation. It was also noted that the pond lacked adequate freeboard and that
the pond needs to have a pumping marker installed and to have brush and heavy vegetation cleared away.
As discussed during the Review, it is imperative that this discharge is eliminated immediately. You are
strongly encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist for help. You may also want to contact your local
Soil and Water Conservation District Office since they may be able to provide you with additional technical and/or
financial assistance to implement corrective best management practices.
Please remember that in order for your facility to be in compliance with environmental regulations, animal
waste cannot be discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
disposal systems must be properly sized, maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified
operator.
Also remember that all registered livestock operations are required to obtain and implement an approved
animal waste management plan by the end of this year, and to gain certification as a animal waste system operator.
The animal waste management plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 277 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional
information.
919 North Main Street, NAW
W '* FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Ms. Virgie Redmond
July 16,1997
Page 2
Sincerely,
J seph C. Zinuln rman
Environmental Engineer I
cc: Keith Stephens, Dairy Operator
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Alan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
Don Redmond, Davie Soil and Water Conservation District
DSWC Regional Files

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
JamesB. Hunt, Jr., Governor
*;, 2nat�an B. Howes, Secretary
Keith Stephens
159 Ivy Dale Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Dear Mr. Stephens:
i,A I
EDEHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 18, 1997
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations Site
Inspection Report
Stephens Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on July 14, 1997 by Mr. Alan Johnson of this
Office. It was observed that the storage pond had been discharging for sometime prior to the
inspection. The storage pond water level should remain at 18 inches below the top of the storage pond
at all times. Also, as discussed with Mr. Johnson, curbing needs to be installed between the back barn
and the storage pond to prevent waste from entering the clean water diversion. Waste that has
accumulated between the barn and storage pond should be removed.
Any further correspondence related to the subject inspection will be sent under separate
cover. Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to
$10,000 per day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws
and regulations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell County SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
Virgie Redmond, owner
AJ
919 North Main Street, Nil
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-6663-1699 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW9 inspectionWallow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
3
Time of Inspection /_ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
�( Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: '"'t Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review • 5
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or I ns pection includes travel and processin
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .................................._......_.........................................._. .............................._.................
Farm Name: ...... ��� e �"cll+ ............................. `V
............................................... County: ......
.................... ........... ..........
LandOwner Name: .Llz( �.6.'.e:....................@ �.............................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Conctact:..... .:.S:..I ........;2IMP ........... Title :................................................ Phone No:.. ;r. ... 4 _0-'' ............
MailingAddress: ... f41............. {..... 1....,...... ...................................
..�f?T�s,f!Q.......................................... ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:.......vi.2h.................................. Integrator:.......................................................................................
CertifiedOperator: ..... . ...... . .......................... . ....... ............. . ....................... . ........ . ........... I Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
y....!5........ .......K,......EMT ........�.�.... ��1..... ......... 4
.........e.� �,. ...sa., x......-:r e ....... .&z5........... rr n ...Q,n ...... .... r........ �.�.. ........ ! � s� v1► ? n. ............. a
r----� L�J 0 0 131 w-esF tcu
Latitude • ' " Longitude • ' "
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ErNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1�wo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) .,t_ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? [:]Yes ;E�No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require JaYes ❑ No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

Fagiiity Number:
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8, Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
tc nres (f_.gQon.s and/or Ifolding_P__¢nds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
- 71
Structure 4
❑ Yes rNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Vlo
❑ Yes KNo
Structure 5 Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
ft�qo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity oiany of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
E DVo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
EZYcs
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
AYes
❑ No
WnAe_Application y/4
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
tKNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type aE rt...7 zd. G,�S�....Q.....&.L 2'i", ..t,.k+5.... ... ............ ...........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
I9. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
NkYes
❑ No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
fi(No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ANo
FoLCertified Facilities Only//
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments ,(refer to question { Explain any YES answers and/or any. recommendationsor any o..ther commentsT f
jq, coh � O'S PY f oha ckma \e.A
�j) C r`b1! �� I�j 60 cF bGtrvN
1r(ZY' P64 -:rOhlel ~� C
3) t'd has �o � Y °`:"�,u ISc�" : �, 4 _.S
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'W"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: )-s
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Se do , Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

-JAN 28 197 92:16PM
P, 2/2
WeV93#06M L
AND4AL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYMM:
Facil ty IDy Number:
y ++4/V — .3 S� +_ _ ++, yy Cyyouny yy y y:7::yV-r. d5'.tyyi++�.yy�._yy,�� yy yy
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address
City Stone Zip
Certificate # Social Security #
Work Phone Home Phone
Signature Date
OWNER_
Mailing Address City-
state Zip Telephone#
Signature Date
Please Maul to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, H.C. 27&;-033a

M
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor IDEEHNF;Z
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 1997
Keith Stephens
I59 Ivy Dale Rd.
Harmony, NC 28634
Subject: Certification/Notice of Violations
Stephens Dairy, Facility #: 49-38
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Stephens:
The deadline for the certified waste management plan to be implemented is December 31, 1997,
and there will be no extension of the deadline. With this in mind, this letter will touch on some of the
general components and issues that are of concern during an inspection.
As a certified, or soon to be certified, farm your files at a minimum must contain the following
information, and need to be available for review during the inspection:
Certification forms
Site diagram - showing fencing, streams, buffer zones
Waste application records/forms
Maps of acreage and irrigated fields
Waste utilization plan
Waste and soil analysis records
Emergency action plan and mortality & odor control checklist
Regarding waste application records, all information should be recorded. This includes (but is
not limited to) the field used, total minutes waste was applied (if required), the amount of waste irrigated/
hauled, the amount of nitrogen applied and the crop nitrogen balance. The crops and fields that are being
utilized for waste application must be specified in the certified waste management plan. For those
facilities that grow hay, the date when the hay is harvested should be recorded. If you feel the plan does
not allow you the flexibility you need, contact a technical specialist to have the farm plan modified.
For lagoons/storage ponds, remember that a freeboard of 12 inches plus an additional 5 - 9
inches (depending on location) for a 25 year/24 hour rain event must be maintained from the top of the
storage pond/lagoon. If there is an emergency spillway/pipe, then the level must be maintained to
compensate for a 25 yr/24 hr storm. A pumping marker must also be installed. This may be a pipe or
other structure that is already in the lagoon. Whatever the marker is, it must be prominently identified.
919 North Main Street, N)111111111
�C
FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115An Equal Opportunity/Affirmbtive Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 500% recycled/10°k post -consumer paper

'f
Page 2
The question often comes up as to what warrants a Notice of Violation (NOV). An NOV may
be issued for the following instances, among others:
a) inadequate freeboard,
b) inadequate land for waste application,
c) application on an unapproved crop/acreage,
d) discharge of waste from'lagoon/facility,
e) excessive vegetation on the sideslopes of a lagoon/pond, or
f) other minor deficiencies.
Examples of a deficiency would be the waste or soil analysis forms not being up to date or the
application records not being filled out properly.
Please note, failure to submit the certification form by December 31, 1997, does not exclude you
from the responsibility of maintaining your storage pond/lagoon levels and waste application records.
Also, please be advised that North Carolina General Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per
day per violation as well as criminal penalties for violations of state environmental laws and regulations.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Alan Johnson or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
D.iex'Glso , ` 'd""-
Water Quai egional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Facility Assessment Unit
Regional Coordinator
WE

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5,1996
M.S. Redmond
Chris Wallace Dairy
159 Ivydale Rd
Harmony NC 28634
Dear Mr. Redmond:
IDEF.HNF;Z
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Chris Wallace Dairy
Facility ID #: 49-38
Iredell County
N.C. DEFT. OF
ENVIRONMENT. ITE -\t,TH;
d NATURAL 3t1„yOUI.C3B
DEC 17 1996
411ASIDI Of ERVINNINTAL f1AKAGR El1T
NOLRESELLE REGMAL OFFICE
Senate Bill I217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation form to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Niles
Water Pollution Control System �0 Volce 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission NVf CAn Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
P.O. Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 50% recycles!/10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention: _
Facility No. t?
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIns
SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ? 51995
Time: q 1 } �"
Farm Name/Owner:_ /�i, S,{?0&4
Mailing Address: Wes i�w kV S (Akyd+1 /V(— 296
County:_ reedeg Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Prrpft Ad Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine_Poultry_Cattle'�Design Capacity�SONumber of Animals on Site:
Latitude: "..2 ' 10 " Longitude: so' s5 $" ElevatioV&!��_Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes o4D Actual Freeboard: Q Ft. G9 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or�I1oJ Was any erosion observed? Yes or,
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No? Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No?
Crop(s) being utilized; I Gott59 t �-fflrv% _
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? Gbr No
100 Feet from Wells? (yPor No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or 00
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes oo ' If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specificacreagewith cover crop)? Yes or No
fitinnal C'nmmentc- t /rig /a4,&vH- -ri GIrC�D �� �OHd'i,�l> 11+�w�dClr
Inspector Name �u 91
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Signature

of w A r, R
� r
p Y
a
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross'Jr., Secretary
North Carolina DepartdJf U%& riment an&atural Resources
/, M GM, i riw.et,.„ ;�f v
Ian W. Klimek,,P,En., Director
�1.1:1tc4-.Division of Water Quality
May 30, 2003 c;
�JUN 0 4 2003
Virgie S. Redmond ,
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville NC 28625-1538WATE ON].".'
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490038
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment, Storage
and Application System
Iredell County
Dear Virgie S. Redmond:
In accordance with your application received on July 6, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Virgie S. Redmond, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment,
storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist
of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management of animal waste from the Kenneth
MacGibbon Dairy Farm, located in Iredeli County, with an animal capacity of no greater than annual average of
160 Dairy Cows, 30 Dry Cows, 105 Heifers, and 25 Calves, and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as specified in the
General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the
required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste
production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as
provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual
increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation of future
samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is inaccurate you will
need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to. comply with all applicable laws,
rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate under this
permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit documentation
to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking of the facility.
Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any
wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit or the
CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6A through
143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the General
Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
internet http)/h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% racycled/10% post -consumer paper
DENR Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer

This COC is not automatically transferable. A narn.Uownership change application must be submitted to the
Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to apply for
an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this process. Unless such a
request is made within 30 days, this-COC shall be final and binding. i
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office —The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional;;information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact J.-R. Joshi at [phone] ext. 363. �.tr
Sincerely,
r
is
n
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all,cc's)
cM_ oores%Ile.Regional Office, Watef'Quality Section
IreJdell County Health Department -
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490038
NDPU Files

• 1 r
` State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
;Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
. any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 FacilityName: Kenneth MacGibbo a90 S
1.2 Print Land Owner's name; Virgie S. Redmond V 1 i
13 Mailing address: 134 Westglow Road
WA Ra AL,TYsED
ACT
1 e,
City, State: Statesville NC .01 _ Zip: 28611538 _ >mr�n�
Telephone Number (include area code): 446-7W4- 'y0�V —S 17,2 - 2S g g
1.4 County where facility is located: lredell
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): In the Northwest corner of Iredell Co. located on SR
1865 Wes low Rd. and ito 2 miles east from Hwy. 115.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
L7 �essee'sintegrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
»n11-__ 11� nn f r.I! rw.1 ,-11 A 1 /7 1 e�e I ' . _in --.
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/40
1.9 Date(s)of Facility Expatision(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION;
2.1 Facility No.: __449_ (county number); 38 -- (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description:.Cattle operation j
a�iry
160- Certified Design Capacity
Is. the above information correct? Xlyes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The 'No; -of Animals" should be the maximum numbir for which the waste management structures were designed.
i
Type of Swine
0 Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
No. of Animals
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) _
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
o Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm:
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Layer
0 Non -Layer
0 Turkey
T eYpof Cattle No. of f Animals
0 Dairy / 60 0
0 Beef �_____-
No. of Animals:
j
i

2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 282 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 150
2.4 Number of lagoon storage pon (circle which is applicable): r
2.5 Are subsurface drains presen within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or N (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
0 YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited?
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by Signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item. i
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field Iocations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Ut�Jization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land appplication field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3..11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
A22licants Initials`
V�
E—s
,2�

Facility Number: 49 - 38
Facility Name: Kenneth MacGibbons Dairy
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION: d I Q Gl E S
0M 00 b (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for' &dlYkZk d14&6d4,edA-) DAle (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed y me and is accurate and complete to the st of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package wit[ b!p returned to me as incomplete.
Signature Date 6 -164 " 9 9
5, MANAG'ERACERTIFICATION: oWlete only if different from the Land Owner)
I
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for fl„r�47V gdC 61880AJ V /4Y (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been revieN e-W y me attd is-neewWe comp ete tote esvo my now a ge. I un erstand that ,if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supp rung information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete. 7 �y
Signature
Date -� y
THE COMPUTED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]

i�''. 3'� a• _ R., iy"�,. aQ�,�„�# g • � 4 � � ��- � YI; �.f+.._ pp�{,'«{ �'C,..1 h,t. _ ,1
y�`I n � S I •a1 .. l A'3 .�,'. • TS ' � 1 ', _. f ,
�.:7 �: f�1 far_ ilM ✓�I. ' � - •�� �r.Y:
• i _ Y..4xS"i ,tii, fl+i� M 'VI , 97< 1 V •.r...
Y" [yam �". L'✓v�l� _ �i�4ii•�r.1rw / 9 S
�r�w �� C i„•: ��~, ,I. , t.�,�ay: :+�• R-i�i if•ydr • � ,rr1,T �' _ r��.
° +IIl� ;tr-.`_I''!:� .}d. t�:l-f li asi -. :.�':�� Yt��,�:.w•ti': -.1�' r4.'.�. ',�,

NOW
'f.
ti,
14 7:
Ile"
Pf
Jl j
2i.
Mel.
rz;.
!7V
T I
........ ......
it
it
'f.
ti,
14 7:
Ile"
Pf
Jl j
2i.
Mel.
rz;.
!7V
T I
........ ......
it
it

i
•oQr S
r � �„ 1 ;
rF
Si
•i'n
¢.
S �
Yr
� t I � 9 r, • •
' S -
F
:
fir' R r
�' " . � �" 1 � q
y �'} • ��.,. ,t
1'
r • �fr. , _.Y re! i y� °" €. S f e�`,1•.Ri'u_J•'
J Y .�
_C
+b i �r �•/ "' Rp .e�..'•.• �i-
S yt• ' _ I r � y..
^
,f t , - § �T:7FAre4a .'. � '�' �JI :•.��L�'`�'•" .• �' , p�rT'.� r .� 'r
jRZ � �i � .6 � >E 3 � •A4' dqN 3 K t' '
JYr 'W✓...'f- 1�1� �. has �bY r -4' 3i 5,1' I Q ♦ 6 4 jr s i FN..N'� Tg` fiiP•9 f 'd r; ;
r i•3 �
�, y � an„at: - Cyr - F � ' ` r 1 � �► t '( � -_ 5�� ��l .•. ,,�, is� ,j3 � ��� � rfr . �3 � 1s'ry � `•r
�rc� � } ¢. , t � '�> r � rA 7r pt- � k-' , t _ _ gyp•. +. � '� y
`�7 �:' � Y . rR'•4 �" ''s ` s•tt r �' n � � �' 1 � i � 'f a k `�.' Y�. ,•
fit'{r .•1 ,, < r'1,r 4 v.t?',;; i 9 �,x r�'r�'_� �
-I
�i� a�`skj' i. � i :' j� •'i re,' � ' .tea= :' � � "� ' < pit
f t-rr e�� 1 :l iryY...•p� � ..
1j. si L' r r b,:'�k }.;i•��l . .'� ► i'.'i..",r .. `� r�•�,_, S'
G`t ���' '�,.+ ��'., .4 „•�,'.- �iXk� -*�7 .r�,; ,, . '� `��' � �.` ,ic ��r;�� .{:2 r:
Ir

�C� \6 eat
77 77777
�rsVol
HEAVY USE AREA
I iw. "y�EED MAY
Zc` Y. z0
HEAVY LISE AReq
WATER AxK
LIVE S n)CK �>f�
OcLuslwq
�>crrc=qnMD5Sp
9
IF
t
�r
X -
+ ION I}PPRCK 2 d Ac
m rm
To PA51TRc144
�•; ���
FFNC�Hca' � a� E:c:s7r�vG
jNC�rrE MAtEY FREEST
18"C PP_ asWplm
L ba'x 1s• .
srOCk TRAIL
To PASrc1aF-
FEr+ca< r6c�•
REA_f O SEAREA za-
ROAD
r rON APPRox . Zq AC
17
NE'w GROUND PLANTED -
To PASTJJRE
ESN PA511)RE FENC-9
�;i15Tr11jsa F�JCc
RAMNEO FENCE"
----�- -----V, OR A I N AGE WAY
s;+A-Y
f• A
WOODED AgEA
Ga ROEN
10 FV940
- cwvs
WASTE-
P014D
s•
isr,NG 1NAT'ER TASK
-- 1
00 D At C.�RBED
E Y i
DUTLLr T
POH i{at E
0.044 AL
45'X• -s'
r4en FF FAVY USE A A
cc
U0
k� M
5c 1_ E r APPrzox. z o-
MAC GIBBON DAIRY
IREDE;,LL COUNTY, NORTH CAROUNA
PLAN VIEW
WA-STE MANAGE"M E Nr sYSre m
U S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
-,
tiara
Re,,:sra �►-fie ----------------_ __...__�.__
fIKN . .
,J ea.�.«......_._ pft l
SCS-ENG-313A REV 9-75

KENNETH MjyAC#V0N5 DAIRY
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RECEIVED
OPERATION W1 TER OVAUTY SEC170114
JUL 0 6 1999
AND Nun -Discharge Peftt6ng
MAINTENANCE PLAN
(0200 CERTIFICATION PLAN)
For a herd size of 160 milk cows
In Cooperation with
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
December 14, 1998

a
AMMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT .PLAN
.V6VV arca�.aaaa:aaavu s +�
KENNETH MacGIBBONS DAIRY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FARM
SKETCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . III
I
i
SYSTEM OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . IV
I
WASTE STORAGE POND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . I
2.
AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM . . . • .
• • • • • 1
3.
CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM . . , . .
. • • • • 2
4.
VEGETATED DIVERSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 3
VEGETATED BUFFERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . • • 3
$ .
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 4
'�.
GRASSED WATERWAY SILO FILTER . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 4
•
HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . • . 4
STOCK TRAIL (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 5
10.
TROUGH OR TANK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 6
i l .
GENERAL COMMENTS . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
. . . . . 7
12.
-EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 8
13.
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 9
i
14.
APPENDICES (Waste Sample Collection Information,
Specification
Sheets) . . . . . . . .
. . . (END?

-HI

yvx
S� IiFA\fY USEAREA
• �,R;� ��cE� HAY
L►VE 5TIOCK
&cwslok
ffNLrgk'
3
Za- IC ?-0 ,
HeAvy USE AREA
wAr:r a AnK
Va."
..ctl 9
WOODS
GULLIES
AND SPRINGS
`5
X
i K hPPRCK z Art
x
0
NEW GR4UW0 PLANTED
To PASTUR15
ZSo�� !z'
$To t.K T'RNI/Is"cpp,
7a
�- WCOAEO AIZE! �-
S,, c. 6.4 RO EAl ..�
�x15r�NG WATER TANK
Oh s ROa D AND LURBt" D i
M.p;4
,ia H � �Ro�t �koc15�
Eli 15T I � Fib EE 5T
UMI'E FF D ALLEY SAAAM WASTF POND cc,+Y.,IleX
45'X*5
(, a `x �3' + y - � 14 FAVY USE A A
Ewa )+AK
• s"ckTRAIL- -
FEr C bo c
W � �x
.�.
cr 3 Y
f d - 400 - 75-0 lb
C.
a
E-�ftigTIMG Faucc
Q1„AAMED FENCE
�P , oRAiNAGE WAY
I '+ APPRO-A.24d-
MAC G i 6Bo N DAIRY
YREuEL.L. CODUTY, NORTH- CAROUMI
PLAN VIEW
WASTE MA MAGEN a wr SYSTEM
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTU
SOEL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Aq
orn
Taw-------------
7rae�....._.._...... -- ---- -----.. OswM� w
w !
u..�...--...-...._...._._....___.... �..3
SCS-ENG•313A REV

A m,"m i A * nr A m++riir %9 A AT A f %V UV.NT 'PT."
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
I. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM
3. CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM
4. VEGETATED DIVERSION
5. VEGETATED BUFFERS
6. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
7. GRASSED WATERWAY SILO FILTER
8. HEAVY USE AREAS
9. STOCK TRAILS
10. TANKS
11. WASTE UTILIZATION OF COLLECTED WASTE
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots and stored in the WASTE STORAGE
POND (WSP). All contaminated water (wash,parlor and runoff will be Piped into WSP.
All waste contained in WSP will be land appLied at agronomic rates. The WASTE
STORAGE POND is designed to provide 150 days (5 MONTHS) storage for the solid
wastes produced by 160 head milking herd.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal
Waste Contaminates to surface waters from the twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24)
hour storm, as required under the Non -discharge regulations.

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT.. PLAN
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot runoff
and waste water from the milk barn for a 5 Month (150 day) period. Curbs will
be installed along 120 feet of the existing concrete lot to force contaminated
runoff into the pond. A permanent marker will need to be set indicating the
level of storage available prior to infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm
capacity. This elevation is 2.6 feet below the top of the dam. The emergency
spillway is planned 1.7 feet below the top of the dam. The WASTE STORAGE
POND consists of an earthen dam, clay liner, and curbing for discharging
contaminated water into the WSP.
OPERATION
The service life of the WSP will be determined by the level of management for
the entire system. Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in
the WSP. The accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity to a
point which requires removal of the solids for many years IF adequate waste
agitation is maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid
accumulation of solids which will reduce the usable capacity of the WSP to the
Point that some form of dredging will be required.
N AINTENANCE
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as
needed to maintain a vigorous stand. The dam should be mowed at least
annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place only
when the soil of the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a
height of less than four(4) inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or
seepage should be reported to the Iredell Soil & Water Conservation District
office.
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPLICATION SYSTEM consists of properly agitating the
slurry prior to each pumping of animal waste. Have certified operator complete
proper records forall waste applied to land identified in the WASTE
UTILIZATION PLAN. Waste will be land applied using slurry spreader.
See WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN for additional details.

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT .PLAIN
OPERATION
Agitation of the slurry should be initiated prior to the liquid level reaching the
f ill storage level marker in the structure. When the liquids level in the WSP
reaches the marker, liquids must be removed by umpinag from the structure to
a spreader tank for land application. Do not apply in such a manner as to
cause runoff or erosion. Do not apply on frozen or saturated soils. The initial step in each application operation is to properly agitate the waste in
the Storage Pond. If application equipment (spreader) is owned consult owners
manuals for recommended operational procedures.
MAINTENANCE
Fields that receive waste application should have soil tested annually. It is
recommended that waste and soil sample results be used in conjunction with
each other.
OVERVIEW
The CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION SYSTEM consists of installing the
120 feet of 12 inch high concrete curb along the concrete lot and will be used
to force the contaminated runoff into the waste storage pond. After installed
daily scraping of the waste into the pond will be needed. Existing parlor pipe
currently carries waste from the milking parlor to the waste storage pond. Silo
leachate currently drains under the scrap lane through a pipe. This will need
to be kept open so that this water can drain into a grassed waterway. This will
filter the contaminated silage but it does not need to be collected in the waste
storage pond.
NLMXTENMCE
Inspect the concrete components of the CONTAMINATED LIQUID COLLECTION
SYSTEM for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed.
The Lumber Pipe Cradle and Bent Support components shall be inspected
seasonally for rot and mechanical damage and repaired or replaced as needed.
Inspect the drop structures seasonally and remove accumulated solids.
Annually inspect the pipe coating, and clean and recoat as needed.
z

In periods of cold and subfreezing temperatures, inspect the pipe for
accumulation of ice by CAREFULLY removing the cap of the cleanout. Caution:
If liquids have accumulated in the pipe above the cleanout, the force of these
liquids tends to "blow" the cap of the cleanout off during removal. Remove any
ice manually or by melting with hot water.
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED DIVERSION will be located above the WASTE STORAGE
POND and will convey non -contaminated runoff around the structure.
aAnvMxMcE
The vegetation in the diversion should be inspected periodically
and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand. It is essential that neither
vehicles nor livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within the diversion.
The diversion should be mowed at least annuallly to prevent woody growth.
The diversion may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing
Operations must take place only when the soils are dry, and vegetation should
not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches. If
sedimentation has reduced the capacity of the channel, contact the Iredell Soil
and Water Conservation District for technical assistance in correcting this
Problem. Only contaminated water needs to drain into the pond.
.3

ANBAAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
OVERVIEW
The VEGETATED BUFFERS serve a two fold purpose, they filter sediment from
exposed feeding and lounging areas and provide the necessary set -backs for
waste application operations. Their width is based on slope of land and
Proximity to streams. These areas can be control grazed or mowed for hay to
prevent unwanted growth. These buffers are used in lieu of storage structures.
Proper maintenance of these buffers must be followed or a storage structure
will be required. See the plan map for the location of these areas and their
widths. Where lounge lots are bare of vegetation for more than 45 days per
year these buffers need to be a minimum of 100 feet wide. These buffers need
to be established along the drainageway of the bred heifer/dry cow lounge lot
(field 5). They will also be established below the roofed feed alley for both heifer
groups. Additional grass buffers will be established and maintained below the
freestall barn to filter runoff water draining into the grassed waterway.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the buffer periodically for sediment accumulation and erosion within
the,buffer. If does take place caution should be practiced to prevent
over g. �hould be a minimum of six (6) inches. These buffers
shouwe at least 80% ground cover. Specified width must be maintained.
OVERVEFOW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION will be installed according to NRCS standard 382
(Fenc, where recommended by the technical specialists. LIVESTOCK
EXCLUSION will be installed at locations as indicated on Ian maps. It needs
to be added to the dry cow/bred heifer lounge area (field 5�, Also the silo filter
area will be excluded as it also filters runoff from the 400-750 pound heifer
lounge lot. Animals will also be excluded from the drainageway below the bred
heifer hay feeding area in field 7. Also the area below the concrete/roofed
feeding area will be excluded. The field 6 where 40 (400-750 pound heifers) are
located will be managed as a pasture. It is large enough that it will be treated
as pasture and will not include livestock exclusion.

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT. PLAN
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or
rot. If fencing wire becomes loose, re -tighten to original specifications. If fence
posts are rotted or damaged in any way, replace damaged posts with a post
Which meets the
original specifications.
The GRASSED WATERWAY is a natural or constructed channel that is shaped
or graded to required dimensions and established in suitable vegetation for the
stable conveyance of runoff. The purpose is to convey water concentrations to
a suitable outlet without causing erosion or flooding and to improve water
qyu_ality.
This is needed below the pipe that carries runoff from the silos. This water
needs only to be filtered and the grassed waterway when properly constructed
will serve as this filter. Before grading follow a detailed specificalon for this
waterway.

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT: PLAN
Inspect the GRASSED WATERWAY periodically for sediment and silage
accumulation and erosion within the waterway. If grazing does take place
caution should be practiced to prevent overgrazing and no grazing taken place
during times when the soil is saturated. Grass should be a minimum of six (6)
inches. The waterway should have at least 80% ground cover. Specified width
must be maintained. Also care should be taken to keep the pipe unclogged.
i
The HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION will be placed at locations indicated on
sketch. It consists of an area graded, covered with a g�eotextile material and
gravel placed on top.! The areas where these are netted are in fields 5, 6, 7
and will serve as locations for feeding hay.
The area that needs to be protected should be graded if necessary to allow
proper drainage. A geotextile material of adequate strength will be placed on
the soil surface. the eotextile material should be overlapped a min. of 18".
The depth of gravel will need to be calculated for the particular area to be used.
Refer to -the specific design for the amount of gravel needed. See the cost share
contract for this information.
Inspect the HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION periodically for any soft spots or
damaged areas. If the gravel gets thin, more should be applied to the
recommended depth.. The designed depth should be maintained over the entire
area for it to remain structurally sound. Careful attention to this maintenance
will be necessary as waste from these areas will need to be removed whenever
it begins to accumulate.
Z

ANUWAL WASTE MANAGEMENT yPLAN
The STOCK TRAIL(S) improve access to forages and water by means of a
stabilized trail which reduces erosion often caused from such walkways. The
STOCK TRAIL(S) will be placed at locations indicated on sketch. It consists of
an area graded, covered with a geotextile material and gravel placed on top.
The trail is needed into the covered heifer feeding lane and to the heavy use
area located between field fi and 7. The total length for the trail will be 260
feet.
OEZRMQN
The travel lane should be graded if necessary to allow proper drainage. A
geotextile material of adequate strength will be placed on the soil surface. The
geotextile material should be overlapped a min. of 18". The depth of gravel will
need to be calculated for the particular area to be used. Refer to the specific
design for the amount of gravel needed. Each trail should have a broad based
dip across it to prevent runoff from running down the trail for a long distance.
ANCE
Inspect the STOCK TRAIL(S) periodically for any soft spots or damaged areas.
If the gravel gets thin, more should be applied to the recommended depth. The
designed depth should be maintained over the entire area for it to remain
structurally sound.
11. TROUGH OR TANK
OVERVIEW
TROUGH AND TANK consists of (watering tank) to provide drinking water for
livestock at a stabilized location. Tanks are needed in field 7 and field 5. Water
tanks are already installed in the freestall barn.
OPERATION
The location should be such that proper surface drainage will not cause
ponding and all wet areas should be avoided. The site should be as level as
possible. The tank or trough should be sized for the type and number of
animals that will be using the facility. The site needs to be over cut to the
depth of the gravel (to pr6vide drainage) and a Geotextile material (Mira$ 160N
or equivalent) will be placed on the ground and Crusher -run gravel will be
placed on it at a minimum thickness of 9 inches.
17

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the TROUGH 6R TANK area periodically for any soft spots or damaged
areas in the cloth an gravel. If the gravel gets thin, more should be applied to
the recommcnded de�th. The designed depth should be maintained over the
entire area for it to remain structurally sound. Inspect the tank itself along
with the base for darpage and repair or replace if necessary.
GENERAL COMMENTS
AGREED TO ITEMS
Establish grassed waterway for filter area, install livestock exclusion along the
filter area and draina�eway in field 5 and field 7. Heavy use areas to be
installed in field 5, S, and '7. The concrete feeding lane will be covered with a
roof and curbs instal4ed. Water tanks will be maintained in field 5 and 7.
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should Ibe exercised with the use of all herbicides so that
desirable vegetation not adversely affected. It is a violation of law to use any
pesticide in a mannei not permitted by its labeling.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soft' and Water Conservation District if repairs or major
modifications are regy ired for any of the components of this Waste
Management System
Upon completion of 'items involved in this plan, your operation will be
certiflable. This RIO its for only the number of animals and acres listed in this
plan. Please notify_t4e TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS) that signed your Waste
Utilization Plan andertification form if operational changes take place.
I

CY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
' DWg 704-663-1699
EMERGEN�Y MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 704-873-5353
SWCD 704-873-6761
NRCS 704-873-6761
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your
operation are leaking, overflowing, or running off site. You should not
wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave your property to consider
that you have a proem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen
The following are some
action items you sho-jila take.
I. Stop the release !of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may
or may not be pposs le. Suggested responses to some possible
problems are listed Blow.
A. Lagoon over#lo,w ossible solutions are:
a. Add soil to erm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wast s to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flo . to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure rho surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediatelyt stop waste application.
b. Create a tei#porary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate Mwte to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate ar rd eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate th application rates for the fields where runoff
occurred. I
C: Leafage fro the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycl pump.
b. Stop irri a on pump.
e. Close valve to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.

A[`TinN PLAN
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action
include:
Stop recyclepump.
Stop irrigation pump.
Make sure siphon occurs.
Stop all illiew
in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
Repair allprior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from ba0e or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as
opposed to flowing eaks. Possible action:
a. Dig a small sump �or ditch away from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a su mersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are cause by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and
illl holes and comppa with a clay type soil.
c. Have a profess evaluate the condition of the side walls and
lagoon bottom as so as possible.
Assess the este4t of the spilt and note any obvious damages.
Did the waste ach any surface waters?
Approximatel , how much was released and for what duration?
gA?y damage n�ted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property
Did the spill 1 ave the property?
Does the spillave the potential to reach surface waters?
Could a future train event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
Are potable ter wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
rea
How much ched surface waters?
a. During normal b4siness hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water
guality) regional off e; Phone [phone]. After hours, emergency
number: 919-733-3 2. Your phone call should include: your name,
facility, telephone n ber, the details of the incident from item 2 above,
the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement
of the spill, weather d wind conditions. The corrective measures that
have been under n, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. if spill leaves pro erty or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone
number 704-873-53 3.
c. Instruct EMS to ntact local Health Deppartment.
d. Contact CES, ph ne number 704-873-0507, local SWCD office phone
number 704-873-67 1, and local MRCS office for advice/technical
assistance phone n ber 704-873-6761.
/0

ACTION PLAN
4: If none of the ve Works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department
and eapiaia your pr blem to them and ask that person to contact
the proper agencies or you.
6: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem
to Minim' off site ; damage.
a. Contractors
b. Contractors
c. Contractors
6: Contact the t
structure (MRCS,
a. Name%
b. Phone:
specialist who certified the waste storage
Ag Engineer, etc.)
7: Implement proe uses as advised by DWg and technical
assistance agencies to rectify the damage, repair the system, and
ss reassethe waste nsdgmniftnt plan to -keep problems With release
of wastes from ha

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source _ cruse UMl's to Mlalmbe Odor Site Specilic Prncliccs
t-,ttttsle:al U:tiey Iauthiel un Vegetative or wooded buffers
let Reconunended best managenwo itractices
d Good judgment and common sense
j—,a,cd has or boon alley • Wet atanurc-cuvcscd surraces tO Scrape or flush daily
stnta•rs $ promote trying halt FWW vdadilatiot
Let
Routine checks mul maintenance on waterem
bydrauL& pipes, stock tanks
1lc�l,ird as a tc
• Ut roue _
42r
Ivemute drying with proper ventilation
• 1'astial ttticttilsial th annpusitiun
Repbace wet ur manure -covered bedding
Nimune dsy slacks
1'mtiat ntictobial deconpositiun
Provide liquid drnburge for stored ntan we
5lwage dash aK bzein
• I'astial nrietubial decontposition ;
0Ilu4letm
or mid•h:vel loading
suil-ace
• Mixing while filling;
a
Twolt corers
• Agitation orhrn emptying
D
Uasin surface nuts orsdds;
0
MW=ize lot mnuff and liquid additions
[7 Agitate only prior to mmnae removal
O 1'rtrven biok>dical additives or axidmis
ictiiiag Rusin surfaces • I'm fial usictubial decomposition 0 Liquid drainage from settled solids
• Mixing while Collins O Rtnnore solids rellnlarly
• Agitation %video cinpl ina
tilasatuc. slurry or shp%,c Agitation arlten spreading U Soil ia*ea U= of shnry/sbK%=
Ri>,eartcr't totlels— — V,buI gain CMMa 5 ------------ —--__---
hum �l aNitim or oxi bmb
Uncnvcged manure, • Vulatile gat emissions while D Sod injection orb
dos ry tw sludge on lick! drying Co Son lot orporatioa tv" dg Ms
ius faces t- 4md in d& tntirorou layer:: ror rapid drying
ti� Nroveo odditiva or oxillmu
1=hssla larks
of
© plush IA cormK
liquid while tanks arc filling © Exlcood 011fims to near bolbm of la U with
anti -stern rents -
wiside chain callm, lion • Agilatkm during svastc%vata IW 11 ox corers
or junclimt boxes conveyance
ANIM -.November i 1, 1"6. Page I

Ice Cause IIMPs to Minimize Odor Site Sltceilie t'rnctkcs
1 Al slatidms
a Agilaliun during sump tank
O
Sump tank cov= ,
filling and drawd o wn
and of do abspilics at
0 Agilalit"i during wasicsvader
NEf
Extend disdawr point of pipes underneath
lagtxm
conveyance
lagoon Ildphid level .
I ,agwvn Stu faces
0 Vol.-tlile gas emission;
11
Proper hsgooa liquid capacity;
• Mulugical Inixing;
0
Cecmd Wguou startup Prey:
• Agitation
O
Mininivar t z&m ormi-to-volunu raliu;
D
Minintow mina wlKn pumphhg;
❑
Mscleattilal aeaatIon;
❑
Proven biological additives;
h e igalkm slninkler
•, l tigls pressure agilalkm.
❑
lrrizWe on dry days with little or no wind;
ntwks
. Winn) drift
13
Minbuum reeoamhes:dcd opumb g procedure;
o Pump Waite near lagoon lk pld surrace;
0 Pump morn second-oup lagoon;
o Rush residual manure train pipes at end of
:lurry/shhdge: punlimp
tkadl animals Cwcass decomposition tEr Proper dispositbm ofeaarasses
Swuling waicr addnndni 0 Insivroper ddainage; Grade and landscape such that water drains
lacililics . Microbial decomposition ur away rronh facilities
organic matter
t►4sld II acked onto public • Poorly maintained) access roads Farm sous toad maintanom
roads front farm wcess
Ad dillenal lnGnmation : Available From :
(:allle Manure Managelisent ; 0200 RuIcIUMP Packet NCSU. Cowry Extension Centel
Dairy Educalional Unit Manure Manragemcni System - Lake Wbeekr Road Field Labondory; 48AB 209-95 NCSU - PfAE
Lagoon Vnign and Management fur Livestock Manure Tresuncat and Stomp; EBAE 103-83 NCSU - DAE
Alanagenhcnl of Dairy Wastewmer . MAE IW83 NCSU - UAE
Caliln atiun of Mamne and Wastewater Application 13"ipumd ; EBAE Fad Stied NCSU - BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Managdneld: Odors and Flics ; PR0107,1995 Conkreatce Piaceeftip Florida Cooperative Extesrsien
• AKIM - November 11. 1996. 1'29c 2

4�NhC.L Mar, G�6brrtj a ny
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Suarce Cause IfMPs to CoutnA Iumb Site Spceittc 1'r aelIyes
Uguld Splew
^I4uslt (intlds • Acctunalativn of solids p Fhrsb sydem Is designed and opppq«)
suffiWently to rmnove aceanmubded solids front
gattttrs as designed.
Q Runore bridging oraecunwlsted sdids at
dee
1.2g4ronx egad fits Solids Maintain lsguous, settling basins and pits vvhde
pest breed`aig is apparent to ntintadm the
crusting or solids to a depth of so atom than b -
s htcites over mare than 3094 of surrme.
Excessive Vcgclalive Decaying vegewdun ad Maintain vegetative control along banks or
Glowds 40M and othdr•impor:n:hnems to PC It
accumulation of decaying vegetdive matter
along walees edge on hupoundhneut's perimeter.
DU Systems
Meddlers Feet! Spillage &d Dafta. opwdte and maintain food sy"us (e.g..
ban ken and troughs) to winiraize tyro
accuumlatiou ordmyiag wastage.
Ld Clean up spillage on a routine bash (et.. T - 10
day interval drdiag =www;13-30 day iMen d
- Feed Slaage
Reduce moisture accmumbttion Within and
around bmaedi t pakmer or feed storage
areas by tasuriag *shop away rram site
=WVor provillt adeepate conudnatew (e.g..
covered bin ror kc vm's rain and similar nigh
moisllae grow ).
011"-imped far aad temme or bra& fop aatattulatod
solids in litter IV%* aratutd reed slongp as
needed.
Ak11C - November It. 1996. Page 1

50111-ce 4:111se Mrs to Control Insects Site Specific Prrctices
A reim-M t lukling Aaesr� 9 Accins11 in imm or srniami'vitiates Or UIhuhme kmv arms that trap moisture along
NIXI I'ccd svmtngc r,n= and other locMiarm where waste
accumulates mud disturbance by anknals is
minimal.
j21� Maintain rence rows and roller strips around
smintal bolding areas to mininvim
accumuuiations or wastes (Le-, inspect rot and
reumve or break up aecustivisted solids as
1)r y Mmme c I Imarilif+g 1,13 Rcmve spiiiege on a routine basis (e-g.. 7 - 10
:��•stenas day interval during surnmer, 15-30 day baer ral
during winter) wben manure is loaded ror land
aphiiamtiun or di pu=l.
+� Provide rot adetituda drahoge around d manure
stodtpiles.
+� inq mt for and re nova: or bmak up accuanulieled
wastes In fiber strips around stockpiles and
m mare handling net, as needed.
I-tm mote irtranmaiian crnatacl the C:unimmlive 1.;x tensiam Servke, Department of lsrrtolrtolugy. Box 7613. Norio C:omram State University.
Italeigh. HC.27695-7613.
al
6 h IIC - Nuvenrbcr 11. 1996. Page 2

r
iNfortality ylana,ement ylethods
{check which methods) acre being implemented)
Burial three ;feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge off the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public bodv of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete inci eration
In the case of: dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by tl'e Department of Agriculture
Anv method
mace possibI
human or am
attached)
hick in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
tal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be

Producer:, d+ MACOMRns
Location:an IIR 1865, dairv_an legit
Telephone: �ne_�n2.2391
Type Operation: » Dairy
Number of Animals: 160_Miudn_ _....
(Design Capacity)
Storage Structure(s): One VMte fjtorW 19nd_
Application Method(s):Sl ---= Tack
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a specified rate to
prevent pollution of surface water and/or groundwater. The plant nutrients in the
animal waste should be used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required
for the crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.:
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient. You must have the
animal waste analyzed to determine nutrient content as close to the time of
application as practical and at least within 60 days of the date of application before
each application cycle. Soil nutrients in all fields where waste will be applied must
be analyzed at least annually so that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic
yields of the crop to be grown. Soil test and waste analysis records shall be kept for
five (5) years.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization plan in order to
maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to ensure that it is applied in an
environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the
nutrient content of the waste. Do not aVly more nitrogen than the crop
can utilize. Lime must be applied to app cation fields as recommended
by soil test to maintain the plant uptake of nutrients.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration rates, leaching
potentials, cation exchange capacities, and available water holding
capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at greater than 5 tons
per acre per year. With special precautions, (see Required Specification
No. 4) waste may be applied to land eroding at up to 10 tons per acre per
year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining, or when the
surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is a violation of the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) .0200 regulations.

UTILIZATION
Wind condition at the time of field application of waste should also be
considered to; avoid drift and downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize th' value of nutrients for crop production and to reduce the
potential for ollution, the waste should be applied to a mowing crop.
Otherwise ap ly waste no earlier than 30 days prior to planting a crop or
Prior to foraagg s bge
g dormancy. Injecting or otherwise incorporating
the waste bell w oil surface will conserve nutrients and reduce odor
problems.
7. Zinc and copIored
er levels in the soils in all fields where waste is applied
shall be monand alternative application fields shall be used when
these metalspproach excess levels.
MIS glan is based on was�e application by _slurry tank for this is the manner in
whicyou have chosen to apply your waste. if you choose to alter the method(s) of
application in the future, ou need to revise this plan. Nutrient levels for various
waste application method are not the same.
The estimated acres need to apply the animal waste is based on typical nutrient
content for „dairy slF
s tems In North Carolina. Actual acreage requirements
Ohall be based on wysis reports from the storage structure in your waste
Management systemched you will find information on proper sampling
echniques, preparation, d transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
Your waste storage pond 14 designed for ],a days of temporary stor a and the
temporary storage must bi removed on the average of once every (5) PM -MONTHS.
(f your facility is unroofed,; in no instance should the volume of waste being stored in
your structure be higher than the maximum storage marker except in the event of a
25 year, 24 hour storm. is marker is 2.6 feet berow the top of the dam.
mall your technical s eci t after you receive the waste analysis report for
4Lssistance in dete� a amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the te.
z

waste mana eme
operated only by p
animal waste man
mmission will prov
Is waste utilization
h 15A NCAC 2H X
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
tem which is covered by this waste utilization plan shall
i which hold a valid certificate as an operator in charge of
nt system. The North Carolina Water Quality
Lining and certification of operators.
if carried out, meets the requirements for compliance
he .0200 rules) adopted by the Water Quality

91,575 cu ft per 150
or :556 3000 gallon
Blurry pond waste
UTILIZATION PLAN
OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
. L IQUM WASTE
■ a?a, 833 au ft per 365 days • 1, 667, 000 gallons
Y-

TE UTILIZATION PLAN
E$TMATJ OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN
i
.._
Day old to 200 lb Heifers 1,372 cu ft
200 �o 400 lb Heifers 3,660 cu ft
no 750 Ib Heifer 2,928 cu ft
Heifers 4,880 cu ft
Dryy owsBred Heifers 4,270 cu ft
17,110 cu ft
solid waste PAN 2,7391bs,
f
i
i
i
I
I

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Total animal waste and waste water volume generated in one year
is approximately 17.110 su fLor 637 tons and
1,718. 00 gallons.
14,115 lbs. PAN per year from liquid waste
+ 2,739 lbs. PAN per year from solid waste
O . 16.944 Total lbs. PAN per year
Applying the above amount of waste as calculated above is a big job. You should
p time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely manner.
Values used above are based on analysis of waste from
similar livestock operations in North Carolina (source; USDA-
MRCS FOTG Practice Standard 633-Waste Utilization) .
Actual nutrient content of the waste from this system may
vary from these values. Waste analysis should be made of
the actual waste as soon as possible after significant waste
accumulates in the storage structure(s).
The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over
Tpplruhile meeting the N requirements. In the
ture, re rations may require farmers in some parts
Of North Carolina to have a nutrient management
plan that addresses all nutrients. This plan only
addresses nitrogen.

N
UTILIZATION PLAN
µbon must be exercised ' grazing or
gate poisoning may occur livestock.
ommended.
i
plants under stress condition.
,age or hay for nitrate levels is
7

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN.
The crop fields shown in the Waste Application Tables that follow are available for
waste application. It will not be necessary and may not be desirable to apply waste
to each of these fields in any given year.
The Lbs. of Nitrogen Per Acre shown in the tables are estimated annual nitrogen (N)
requirements of the crop to be grown based on the potential productivity of the soil.
The Recommended Lbs. of N to be Applied per acre indicates the Nitrogen that can be
reasonably applied to the crop and used by the crop in a timely manner using animal
waste alone. It will not be practical to meet all the nutrient needs of some crops with
animal waste. Supplemental applications of commercial fertilizer may be required
during the growing season in order to meet all crop nutrient needs. It is assumed
that for certain row crops only a fraction of the total annual nitrogen requirement can
be applied using animal waste.
The landowner shall record the actual waste application volume made on each field
on the Department of Water Quality Waste Application Record Form.
The following legend explains the crop codes used in the field application tables:
NITROGEN
CROP
CROP
PRODUCT'
REQUIREM'T
CODE
UNITS
LBS./UNIT
CG i CORN - GRAIN I BUSHELS 1.13
CS j CORN - SILAGE E TONS 1 11.0
I HCS I HAY, COOL SEASON, NOT GRAZED I TONS 1 45 1
� HGL I HAY, GRASS -LEGUME MIX, NOT GRAZED I TONS 1 20 1
HSG
HAY, SMALL GRAIN, NOT GRAZED
TONS
55
PCs
'PASTURE, COOL SEASON
AUM
13.34
OG
OATS - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
1.15
WG
WHEAT - GRAIN ONLY
BUSHELS
2.05
N

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r:..?:•.; .: },:'::• :Y� ::r :+.ii'o- ,::�:., t;.{t•.:,,,y. • i}} ...¢;: �: }:: }.. r.. ,3.R:r..S +.i#S•3:.. r + :'�••.t�:.�.::•
l:i?.
j
•':{,n:iv'•.::. .. %r 'i X'. v•: iy v.v:•• . :::.:^:j'_ v,! i...
f� . Y,
Y ?,+�: 3' $' f., �;:r.• ?: >...,:..rat., a .. r.. i........ .
.....i'.,. .:l..�4•
t._ {.`;+}:�f'• �4�Jti$::✓;N i /• :{A:..i :, $:$�:{+i{ii�{'�$rli�:+ .: $t.•..n .k{,�. n:y.: .vA.. ....
.:..• .. �•..•:•.. •.,.v... ..: . f.; .,. r..,:.r •.5.,. .. ..• .:...,
The following
legend explains the soil codes which represent the specific soil types
that ar
found in the #fields which are available for anima] waste application:
1
S06L
SOIL
COMMENTS REGARDING SUITABILITY
CO E
i
TYPE
OF SOILS FOR WASTE APPLICATION
AS 2
Appling sand loam
(6-10%)
Cf$2
Cecil fine sandy loam
Cf�2
Cecil fine sandy load
(6-10%,severely eroded)
Cw
Chewacla soils
(flood plain)
Cc�3
Cecil Clay loam
N

•
j
I
WAS E
UTILIZATION PLAN
}..v .i�: :l, :C f7'. �''•S :. �:�<�.;:i:��);: ii'Fff�:i't:„'W.t`?4}'' .?'.':tt?:' .{h.•n :},•.;•
':t' t,f ;,Fa {iL•r ri�:}h.;. ..s w, {St� ra, .{{{.f:W; , i ..e{ms� •,"i':(v?'.f.�$ $:tc'i :ii } .t :� i..{;.:
�: ,c:• `�{ 7f '.:f� :;,�i; ,, oi:i; :h'i!:�':•> •.Yt`''::r. :+.?'� r�r'1 {rr,`.�'.? ;•?fr
{3 �k:�. �r:
. .fi „��.x .•:,•3r: ^ .:��� t• :: :'.::2W, > •t...r. 'tax'{t ;.,: .:.
... .. ,x2.:;:t�r. Miirh..:. x..G:., f�' a} �c$�•,:�r k `y �y� tfi 'k :.', L):}-r ftiy �-�Y .,.... ,"`tia
aai.F:rr:�'y�`.;�:.�G: ,',•r�:#:r�t#r�ki„{�.c„n.w.�vst.t::,nrk.},}•,R'NkY,�#•<.,�.srtfu$tw::,i•>r.,..,:?;a�.'.L.�..,,:27a::
i '',t' { -�',
�}
t�'•#r:+in�,.'�kG'..::�..�.
, i'-r....?+c::.'..
Table I:
WASTE
LICATION
FIELDS
OWNED
BY PRODUCER
Recommended
Lbs. N
Soil
Realistic
Lbs. N
to be
Tract
Field
Type
Crop
Anticipated
Acres'
Required
Applied
No.
No.
Code
Cole
Yield
Useable
Per Ac.
To Fld.2
30'14
1
CfB2
18 ton12.0
216
881.0
3014
2
CfC2
C}S
17 ton
4.6
204
319.0
1330
3
CcC3
CS
12 ton
12.5
144
612.0
1331
1
AsC2
C
17 ton
28.0
204
2042.0
13 1
5
CMC2
C
17 ton
14.5
204
904.0
13 1
6
CfB2
C
18 ton
6.6
216
485.0
301
1
CfB2
G
HIG
4 ton
12.0
240
979.0
30
2
CfC2
HG
3 ton
4.6
180
282.0
1330
2A
Cw
H
4 ton
3.0
240
245.0
13 0
3
CcC3
HSG
3 ton
12.5
180
765.0
13 1
1
AsC2
HSG
3 ton
28.0
180
1714.0
13 1
5
CmC2
HSG
3 ton
14.5
180
888.0
13 1
6
CfB2
HS
4 ton
6.6
240
539.0
13�0
1
CfB2
PC5
4 ton
27.0
156
1432.0
13 0
2
CfC2
PCB
3 ton
35.0
117
1392.0
TOTALS
T 10
TABLE -s
221.4
MXxxXXX
13, 479
/d

AAS E UTILIZATION PLAN
� r ?:;?•:: r'?;; err,+. >,.,: r,,»x,. , r•m?;,.:t{•;•';4r, +KI{.it;xh r:d�. .�,
f:n,....,;xr:.s:.:.:':r,Y.+tw.r.:,f#•:`:::>.',xad?•..,..�a3a:::•a+:::,a_s ::+F
1 T e useable acreage repres nts the total acreage of the field minus the required
uffer areas which border treams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the
elds listed may, and mos Y likel will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
Z 3
is N is from animal wastq only. If nutrients from other sources such as
ommercial fertilizer are a plied, they must be accounted for. N must be based
a realistic yield ezpectaion.
Il

'2
UTILIZATION PLAN
FIELDS OWNED BY PRODUCER
Realistic
Anticipated Acres
1
Yield Useable
Recommended
Lbs. N Lbs. N to
Required be Applied
Per Ac. To
TOTALS IS TABLE t 61.1 4442.0
useable acreage reprea nts the total acreage of the field minus the required
Ter areas which border treams or residential areas. Actual total acres in the
ds listed may, and mos ; likely will be, more than the acres shown in the tables.
N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other sources such as
cimercial fertilizer are applied, they must be accounted for. N must be based
realistic yield ezpecdoon.
iz

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Table 3 presents a summary of all nitrogen requirements and. the total nitrogen to be
applied using animal waste f�r all fields which are available for waste application.
TABLE 3: Su MARY OF WASTE APPLICATION
TOTAL CROP
RECOMMENDED
SUPPLEML
ACRES
NITROGEN
LBS . N TO
ORRF&H�B
USEABLE'
REQUIREMET
BE APPLIED
LBS. OFN
IN POUNDS&
USING WASTE
REQUIRED
FROM TABLE 1
221.4
48,091
13,479
34,612
FROM TABLE 1A
61.1
1
1 12,385
4,442
7,943
TOTAL ALL TABLE
282.5
b0,47b
17,921
42,555
n1i summary indicates that only about 2$ percent of the total annual nitrogen
requirements can be provided, for the crops as listed for the fields available using
animal waste produced on thus livestock operation.
1 This is the required amot
the crop.
2 This is all the PAN that is
of N needed to meet the Realistic Yield Expectation for
from the specific sources of waste produced.
/-4

WAS
Animal waste will be collecti
areas and other areas whert
be pumped from the wastes;
the above chart. The amouu
nitrogen requirements of thi
of 'these fields were planned
14downer chooses to apply
recommended total nitrogen
Other solid waste will be
the plan.
UTILIZATION PLAN
d in the waste storage pond and from the heavy use
animal waste can be collected. The slurry waste will
:orage pond and land applied to the fields identified in
t of waste available is not enough to satisfy the
crops planned on the fields in the plan. However all
is they may be needed in the future. Also, if
more waste to some fields and does not exceed the
requirements of that crop he can do so.
with a manure spreader to the fields identified in
14

4
7

a q r
ya 1 t�il t 1
rIA
S
x
" _,y! .L � .' r••�,:.- ram" e f
ii ', s 'iF•JtlRA i.Y'
r yyJ��
: • •u 1; Fl �.` 4�. fr '4r' �S,' '� •:.! Y � x ��d ,i 1
,� .�-'1t�;} r r'k �"'t i XiiY_ CrF � y ti h���� r1� w14•t .i 's_ L 1 ,� r a4T J; j µ �'1•cl ••
tau }? �, r ;�.w s+, JY+P i � � , 51 • r ° �':• '4 � � '
.a� ,ti"� E•�++1•li�at::'y ;,r +iN d j �•Y� ^r.S � �* � � t . 3 r ���y:
;rHi ZR iS''i { i•�;F y's. , ''�' SF.•Ya a � r +7 -�d4: `'s, '" rti
.t? Lyyy���1 � rtif„ � � � �� . .� _ J + {' t yrMlY • i
wtr .L,,, .�. - F�f� t �.4' s+ a � "'... jL M tiLf i r,•-iM � � � �"a�'+: t','
• Y R�.ff �'^.K•j� t 'l •.�•:. P - �.r ra {�csJ„ ' `S�t 4"S,t.d' ^ C'rt r. _�
1 �- '�' F' 4 - v r. +', - J' ��L,r"� a L ira,�Yc1� �i.4,: �••`�,� ..J. 1 ,
of 1 � '"'N' •"r � - +''Y' r W i t {f � f,, }rr ^;�,
. a,r "r.'.c•�-��'!V" IF nr •1sy h 'r,'. - Z. S.':.��"�� � �_ e �,
•:. �� -1 :F, cf . [Y�.il4 � � w�•l: V � r% I ���•...�� �L �:5 t
+ _ � ct •. Y.
••1'..� ,.k e; �. l? " t..+ u.0 tl Ire, '��, = r .� � y a ���.?,E?, ( \ L ,f+�'i•'� ,n,�! } �.� ' � ..:
ryi�t. rrt+- rrr� }�J �.� ' .ti _.� Y ,F 'r �� � '''].� '��..• �� .'.
r � �. �,• a I v fI r., y. t.. »jJ.�lfi. c - ,r rf.'
�. �': � '''�',l•+ie-. :�('Y�.,'•f � ;�Y ti. `�•tu'�. (.. ,�Ir q?),paacFsr. fir, Y . '
�. ;y: .:rt rd •�,' 1 •`,' _ ram" i1.1� Y - .J,4' i- '"!"1' ,
y,,'
: _ ..:'-�'�'�u� _.. ri;',�'�..r:c`}:a�4'r�� •:f• „Jr,a,�. •.,��..,7�i

11
f
�Z7
Z,!,; 7) 1.
jk. *owl
oll
Lf.,
F
It. �l
:1. ell,

..., ,,,, r Ress-•.,py, _ ,� •r `r �,. i r `' r rn �` t. • -rs
L
�r i?fps r, ��t,',+'•n'�%fK r�' s • �' r' 1 ry �'
-r r-y S T �"` r �.i' 1 ••7 ti-C � •A� ..ham f
.�s . y.. .r' }.•vc k, u .� . . I,'. 7 � � S�vpii:+•
'� .d it 'f L.i r j1- - •, �y,,yi ••', . � .i
P; ^t'= i - •. 1 L• � ", .j ,.r'" t{!FF •-'sit$"�' _ _ ;`/�,.. .
� r ' , ' R 1 ��.• .r ' arm{ ` ��. ' r T � i �n �•w'�..'i •l ! ix
'"CF
� � � 'g ai 1 tit i s �� .r -� � � � - �i� � C j+t_ r� ••�i^ 7 k � L 1 �;
f It,
"' ' a .gyp ` " • ; {. ,ar• "; a _ ;' '
Y ]j'►=* y, a � r��. a�� S s ri'i4 = H �ri"�.4'►T T �a 1'i�tt"': 5>•;a..i'j � t t':a#�liY ��'�"y� ��.,..,..-
`3r .l r J -F. H!^ r !. r fj' f 7 'l ,.' �L`!• sS" �` -
• i T y '1 1 rw. 7 �' l �iy7'1 J 4 ,.. iV`�.+."'4 _v`fr'^r' r F .f•-; r. ',
�. t C .i s A F ♦i �a
'ime3.
�� �� yi�ty rr•it�Y'�.t {p Z r. r �,�4 �' ��' �.i r � . �E
'r. e ; + f f[ � � * :, � J 1 .:1 ;�?' _ P. •. i fir, ': -�t'�"., + •wsiY
; � '�d'.�'c::rq {�• y ,'::•� +. •� .i. rC,.FY c-,'; � s � ; ,L ' r • � r�y,.�,l ,� '
.ar'r .> `'� � ••.i-.�1� "�,+�i k >r;`i ~ ��r P'"y��'Y •t '�e',iir " i �!� �'f '€... `SY ''�`; y' - .,may„_ 1
" � , '+�•' i t �,'�A«.:l `jf�, r' ' a•",may a r a`¢. '�" � _ . i
i ai�• ���ss ^.�' ����i� r ai+ _ s ` �! i.' 7j , r S:" . J •-r:<175 ��A�.'�# ,l � �.,.w,�l. ,
`7;; ^•;_.,� j,Q ��, ,r•� '. :_! si..°y R�+S ��i•;•4 y �Yf^r. E'Ly"r1�� ..i. �i''�i+,;�"^rF� .el
1 { `r y+ , '� � ! i ' i w � � ' ( . _ •45" n.pi. �, r'1W'�;�� " ii
�' l •�. Ar•" *'a rel , .."U L'"�. Sir _ ;t�, _
r
�•;.+* ti,'r � 'r • , !C:f. Ili � , ',5 ,; .• i�.+ i� �'y .��"�' + y'S��t.:' r fir•
i �; .•�. r\ l• ►her r_�w:+; !Y ;1}'l i 41`ww
�^ ��. 1 � �'� { ��7►' J•`•l. y�s� � ,yr �'�� .�'. �"fi•.,¢.}5��11. �'� f1'�r`�''tT� ��IFS,r�
.a` mot' Y� �'�' ::.'-�•rir . � i s ; � , `�i�rir'�f �`' .

WASTE UTILIZA
TION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach'surface waters of the state by runoff,
drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge
during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which
reaches surface water Is prohibited. Illegal discharges are subject to
the assessment of civil penalties of $10,000 per day by the Division of
Water Quality for every day the discharge continues.
2
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen
needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of application for other
nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at
the discretion of the planner.
4.
5.
Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per
acre per year. Animal waste mayy be applied £o land that has a
Resource Management System (US) or an Alternative Conservation
System (ACS). If a RMS or ACS is used the soil loss shall be no
greater than 10 tons per acre per year and appropriate filter strips will
be used where runoff leaves the field. These filter strips will be in
addition to 'Buffers" required by DWg. _
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste
application. Waste should not be, applied when the wind is blowing or
any other condition exists which may cause a danger of drift from the
irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled crop and. When applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur -during a season prone to
16

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
r.... �...rx r«w.�Mfn e.hw ...... +. ....: r..� ...... ':..r v�.......' ....vv .. rv: -..'. .. ...
REQunt ► SP=WZCATIONS
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in
a method which does not cause drift from the site during application.
No ponding should occur in order to control conditions conducive to
odor or flies and provide uniformity of application.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not damaged by burning or smothering of the
Plant. This is an important consideration where swine, poultry or
other ammonia rich waste is being surface applied. Surface broadcast
solids or slurries may damage crops if leaf surfaces are matted.
Generally waste should be applied such that no more than 20 to 25
percent of the leaf area is covered. This should not normally be a
concern where diluted, low nutrient waste is irrigated or surface
broadcast from a liquids holding structure. Where crops are severely
damaged due to waste application, the plants cannot assimilate the
nutrients and discharge of pollutants to surface waters is likely to
occur. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also
be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a highppotential for leaching. Waste
nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum
and a suitable winter cover crop planted to take up released
nutrients. On soils with a high potential for leaching, multiple
application at lower rates should be used. To maximize the value of
nutrients for crop production & reduce the potential for pollution, the
waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the
crop on bare soil, or forages breaking dormancy. Injecting the waste
or disking will conserve nutrients.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm
shall be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and
from any perennial stream or river (other than an irrigation ditch or
canal). Animal waste (other than swine waste from facilities sited on
or after October 1, 1995 J shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to
surface water. See Standard 3,23 •
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings
other than those owned by the landowner.
r1►

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
.... .. ....... .... .... ... .r,.... �� u,<:. .:J....... A �.. ?.... v i. �... fin.. a.. � v..t.�.. ... ..k�...� .� ., ... i r .,. ..... .... ............. ... � ..... ...� ..
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal
waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands provided th have
been approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist".
Animal waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways which
discharge directly into water courses. If animal waste is to be applied
on othergrassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic
rates and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,
toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste
management system.
17. A protective cover of ap roppriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (ialloonYholding pond embanlonents, berms, pipe
runs, etc.). If needed, special vegetation shall be provided for these
areas and shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation.
Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc. are
limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon/holding pond
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Lagoon/holding pond
berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
erosion, leakage, or discharge.
IS. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,
the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing an "approved
closure plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an regal
discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills.
A regular maintenance checklist should be kept, on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste
is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be
applied preplant with no further applications of animal waste during
the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top
and bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain
the liquid level between the markers. A marker will be required to
mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
/F

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REguntw SPEGII cAnoNS
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be
tested at least annually at crop sites where waste products are
applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining element. Zinc and
copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. Soil H
shall be adjusted for optimum crop production and maintained. oil
and waste analysis records shall be kept for five (5) years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3) years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for
five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC
regulations. North Carolina General Statute 106-403 requires that
dead animals be disposed of within 24 hours in a manner approved
by the state veterinarian.
19

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications and the
operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I (we) know that any expansion to the
existing design capacity' of the waste treatment and storage system or
construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new animals are
stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste
from this system to surface waters of the state from a storm event less severe than
the 25-year, 24-hour storm, The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm
office and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District and will be
available for review by NCDWg upon request.
I (we) understand that I (we) must own or have access to irrigation or other
equipment, to land apply the animal waste described in this Waste Utilization
Plan. The equipment must be available at the appro riate time such that no
discharge occurs from the lagoon, holding pond, tank, or other unroofed storage
structure in a 25 year, 24 hour storm event. I (we) also certify that the waste will
be applied on the land according to this plan at the appropriate times and at rates
that no run-off occurs.
Name of Faeflfty owner:
(nesse paint)
qq
Signature: ate:if I
oL
Name of Mang ges(jfOiPrent owuer):Kenneth M"Gibbons
Signature: BpG6 ate:Z 9Z f
Name of Technical Specfalist:mew print)
Affiliation:NRCS
Address (Agency):
Signature: Date:
20

Animal Waste IvIarzagement Plan Certifi;TT��Pause (yet!m
or orint ail incor:ition idiat ;Ioei noc reuuire Z si-.it)
Ecistina ar etiti or- Expa�rrded ''(please circle one). DEC i R 193u
General Information:
Name of Farm: ke nne-4k
Owner(s) Name:_
VQ rG r
OjGe- Grbbon fQt I-
S',
4'rn T r: t OUALIT ` S CTION
Erf .38
Phone No: 749Y-S 2-- 252 z
Nlailina Address: i '54 Wc,t w o0(rc7+ iIle 1K C L % -
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: Tt-e J e 11
Latitude and Lonzitude:4L 01 �� 1 9 SS7' SS integrator: N1A
P!e se attach a coot/ of a county road mao with location. ide-ndfied and describe beiow (Be speciric: road
names. directions. milepost. e,c.): Hwy /I � /V 0,7C .%y-{c,rr:����
See d Garry aA- Art rf
Ooerntion Descriotion:
Type of Swine No. of:inbnals
:2 wean to Feeder
Z� Fcederto Finish
-:1 Farrow to Wean
:1 Farrow to Feeder
-Z Farrow to Finish
* Gilts
t Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type or Carrle No. of An finals
* Layer Dairy -- A
* Pullets :1 Beef �•
16 U �I/,C COwSJ S P �rear
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for application: at Z Required Acreage: /Sd
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds : Total Capacity:a'P?9 GG Cubic Feet {ft'�Y�4.---
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: ITS or 0�0) (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
*******Mfla**ag**M***fie fR red *f*****i S* M****** iaisia******* ail***rta' ***
Owner / Mana;er Agreement
I (wet verify that ail the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing*. [ (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage s}•stem or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmentnl N[anasement before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man -trade
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the ? 5-year. 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from Lhe
application of uima.l waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas trust be
minimized using technicsl standards developed by the Natural Resources Consmation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification
must be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A change in land ownership requires written nodfication to DE:NI or a ne:v certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within 60 days Of a title transfer.
Name of Land/Owner: U '+ r E 4- Re rn ao
Signature:_
Name of M
Signature:
iI di�p i .—eIE from 0
V/ f 1) I Liz,
Date:
enhc��• �a� C•orb�•�S
Date:
h

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to l_;A
NCAC of .0005. I certify that the animal waste manag,emznt SN'Stem for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and soecificaduns of the Division of Environmental `[anasemcnt
(DEN[) as specified in 15A `iCAC'_H.0'17 and the LSD?. -Natural Resources Conser,ation Service (MRCS) and/or the
North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 13A NCAC 2H.0217 and ISA NCAC 6F .0001-
.0005. The following, elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each case-zory designates a technical specialist
who may sisn each certification (SD. SI, WUP, RC. I), the technical specialist should only ce:dfy parts for which they are
technically competent. '
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection. Storage. _Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
Existing facility without re crQ tit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity: storage capabilicy consistent :with waste utilization
requirements.
New. ex anded or retrofated facility (SD)
,animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. lagoons and ponds.
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimurn standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ Lo rr y Iyt° /)arY
Affiliation u5D09- N C S ` Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): 20 f wfJa{cr8N.C. aY(,77 Phone No.:704-r73-�71_/
Signature: Date: /Z- ?.'
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of [anti for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient loading, rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): LRr r �e A__nG rim
Affiliation USDA- C Date Work Completed:- 7- q
Address (Agency): o201 Watf2r _r7OL:L, ( N.C. '967? Phone No.:70f-•-"73-6741
Signature: 101, 94d.� Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
Z Facility without exterior lets (SD or WUP.or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
W _Facility tvich exterior Igts (RC)
.Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by MRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): I Q� e_ndrrk
-Vfiliation USDA- A/RCS Date tibWork Completed: 7-I S-9r
.address (Agency): b l W a er- St Al' L°. d P67 Phone No.:7b¢- P7.f-6761
Signature: Date. � ` �• Z /'{- 4V
AWC - August 1. 1' /"

D). Application and Handling Eauinment
Check ,he appropriare tar - -
iz Exisdas r t~Q,3nding„t;,icility with existing waste nnnlication equipment (%VU? or I)
animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either tied calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design chars and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hvdrauiic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of apt`iications has been
established. required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are ,:.,stained as part of
the plan).
=1 tietv.-,mandej, nr zsisctnp facility wig out exiscing wiste a2plicntinn equipment fnr ima irrig-Itinn. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply ;waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can cower the area required by die
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adiussnem guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
_Z: New. eunnded. nr exictiu-facilitv_:vithoutexistins waste anolitatinn equinnient rorlind ;pread'sns neat +lsiti;
misty irrisntion. (W P or I)
Aninial waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessar,, to
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can corer the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applicadons has been established; required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adjustment guidance are
..contained as part of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): l a rr k� Hcrid r'(
Affiliation USDA- N C Date Work Completed: A - / 7 - 9 S'
Address (tlaencv):.ZO ( wad ►- S-� vi 7 Phone No.:7044W - 67 6 /
Signature: Date: / z - /`/ - V
E) Odor Control. insect Control_. Nfortality Management and Emergency action Plan (SD
SL WUP. RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste tianasement Odor Control Checklist, an Insect
Control Checklist. a Mortality ,ManageMenE Checklist and an Emergency action Plan. Sources of both odors and
insets have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Managemem Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Born the
NlorWity Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): La rr e n d tx
Affiliation U S D A - IV RV- s Date Work Completed: /2 - t/- Q$
Address (Ages v}: �o W IL 5f, f e vile lV C •ZV,?7 phone No.:7D4- f73-6761
Signature: Date: / x-
F) Written Notice of New or Exnandine Swine Farris /V/A
The folio%.ing signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21. 1996. if the racility was built before June 21. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) cerdfv that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road. street. or Highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was
in compliance with the requirements of vCGS 106-305. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Dace:
Name of Mana;er (if different from owne_ ).
Signature: Date:
AVVC -- Au--ust 1. 191) 3

III. Certification of Installatioiz
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment Installation
New. e.e anded or re!rotitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds. have been installed
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or e-teed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Lary- y f(er)Qrtx
Affiliation U5,Dq il/)PC$ _ Date Work Completed:_
Address (Ageac-r Wail St g C. .Z8 77 Phone No. Io4-F73-(676/
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
�' The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/davlvear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteudlizadon plan.
Z) Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within ^30 days
of this certification. the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_mar-r�4 He,
Affiliation Lt 564 - N e e- S _ ._f _ _Date Work Completed: -2
Address (
S isnature
No.:744-673 -(676/
�z-/y ?
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim crap for erosion control. and will submit to DENT a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar clays following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- Au,ust !. 1997

C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facihiv with exceriar. leas
Vlcttiods to minimize die run off of pollutants from luunein� and azav use .^:zaa ,taut bc_ t installed as speLitie !
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots. no Certification fs necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): LA.rr-_en drr Y. _
Affiliation Ld 5DA - N2C 5 Date Wort Completed:
Address (Age:ic).., 115 ,A A - lV I? C S P' one N0.:704- F73 - 676/
Signature: Date:
D) aoolication and Handlin7, Eauiument Installation (WL:P or I)
Check the aapropriare blocs
�! Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is a: site and read; for use:
calibration and adjustment materials have been Provided to the owne:s and are contained as put of the plan.
J Animal waste application and 'candling equipment Specified in fhe plan has not b<c:i i imlled but d e. owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contract agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Z! Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): L-a rr'4 A(e ij d r r)C
affiliation USDA-- V kC S Date Work Completed: 7-1G-
Address (Agent ): -2 of h)4 77 Phone No
?44 P7J -G7Gl
Shmarure: - - -Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked. IVIA
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of deliver; and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date spec:itied in [lie conditional certiticadom I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: • _ - Date:
E) Odor Control. insect Control and Mortality Mannement (SD. Si. WUP. RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational.
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Fame of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Lar-ry llendr1K
Aftlliation USDA- N)?CJS ' Date
.address (:
Signature:
%VC August 1. L99
Work Completed: /-Z-//- f V
Phone N0.•704• M -676/
Date:
The

Please return the completed form to the Division of tiV`ater Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment,',.and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29-935
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
%VC -- Ausust t. 1997

WAIF
0 9
`0�
o
4
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Virgie S. Redmond
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
134 Westglow Road
Statesville NC 28625-1538
Dear Virgie S. Redmond:
Michael F, Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
March 28, 2003
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.,Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Application No. AWC490038
Additional Information Request
Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy
Iredell County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. Additional information is
required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by April 27, 2003:
I. This office currently has a waste utilization -plan (WUP) for this facility that was dated 6/8/2000. The plan was written
for 160 milk cows, 30 dry cows and 85 heifers. A recent site visitation made to this farm suggested including recently
cleared land on Tract 304 in the waste utilization plan. Please verify that the same WUP is being followed on this farm
and, if so, have the following items addressed:
a. Please verify that the acreage on the newly cleared land in Tract 304 is included in the WUP. k 5
b. Storage volume calculations for your facility are missing in the permit package and need to be submitted for each
storage pond. .5�; t"� •rr �+r:� ram•! .+ f. t', i' ,-f'. ,��. 7_ S v t�� J , e n. r�:,,�.•
c, Site map (county map) showing the location of your facility ids missing in the permit package. i,�
d. Field maps (aerial maps with acreage noted) are missing for the following tratcs: T-1485, T-1477, and T-1358. ✓-
j5 till
If you have modified the WUP since, then please submit a copy of most recent WUP that reflects correct number of
animals, crops grown, field utilized and has field maps with acreage clearly marked on the maps. .Se.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be
signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter
must be submitted on or before April 27, 2003 or the Division will return yotir application as incomplete in
accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200 and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a
violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental
Management Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 363.
Sincerely,
J. R. Jos 1
Soil Se' ntist
Non- scharge Permitting Unit
cc: Kenneth MacGibbon, 139 Westglow Road, Statesville, NC 28625
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality
ell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File Ra►
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJRt2o.enr.ne.state.us/ndpu N�
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
Please type or print all information'that goes not require a simature)
Existing or New ._: or`:.:- Expanded '..(please circle one)
General Information:
Name ofFarm: Kenneth MacGibbon Dairy FaciiityNo: 49 -- 38
Owner(s) Name:yergie S. Redmond Phone No: 704-592-2374
Mailing Address:134 westalow Road; Statesville. NC 28677-1.538
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: I r e d e l l
Latitude and Longitude: 36 01 10 / 80 55 58 Integrator: n/a
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.):(SIR-1869)
First dairy on the left.
O eration Description;
Type of Swine No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
* Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
• Gilts
❑ Soars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
0 Layer
❑ Pullets
Other Type of Livestock
Type of Cattle
3 Dairy
❑ Beef
Milk cows
Heifers
Dry Cows
Calves
No. of Animals
330
160
105
30
25
,
E*aijdiNg Upernteon U�ely r G ',G
PreviausDes�gn'Cdpacrfy .,- �...`,�--.:9dditionalDesi�nCapactty :-.� Tofa?'Desrgn.Capactty- '� vu
Acreage Available for Application: 4 81.3 Required Acreage: 158
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity: 89,848 Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
************************************************************************************
Owner / Manager Agreement
l (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. 1 (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made
conveyance or from a storm event Iess severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the
application of animal waste. 1 (we) understand that tun -off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimized using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be
filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. 1(we) know that any modification must
be approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A
change in land ownership requires written notification to D£M or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of La
Signature:�_�
Name of Manager
Signature:
AWC — August 1, 1"7
from owner):
Date: Yli7 /65
Date: O

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number 99-38 Facility Name Kenneth Mar-Gihhnn Dairy_
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for 330_... Date of Certification 4 / 15 /o� _2 00 2�_
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking 160
Dry cows 30_
Heifers 7 05 _
Calves 25_
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers _.
TOTAL CONFINED ANIMALS _ .-a2..Q_ **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate. The above numbers are not an increase. The original
certification slid not include the cow groups but their waste
was considered.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant
Signature �t V - _ Date f I
Farm manager (i lidca�bl
Signature
nature � ,[� i Date Z
Technical Specialist `f�lG — 03
Signature4Date
Phone Number (70, j 873-6761 x3

'ram ,••,,,,�,-� -�� 1+ kJ.•: ? �Ld�, ik �I,. T.`. s �. y�,
yy� /`Z,V (�.:� w
r •� ;
I •/QV � ,, t'i � t1
ve r.5 � � /� J ! � :4.'� ��. � �., &rrt. � ter,. t { .. , f. � ''r � I 1' r., • _4 ,f.- �r:v -s r « J� �i =t
p(A rnn � , .f y •��, I Y,�+ - �'r 5 W :t� o,�rt , i 3 �., � �' 1 1 ``. fj+'. l `�F
}f I " ^ f F {�` � t� -M1•�' �. �nr iN r� ;l, ',. 3�„ i' a '� ' 1 ! I � - - I.
�' 4 Jisr a 1 per
• �/� � ` \ � , r ;�, � 4� e• �`+,ry'� + '`r' I : '4 �IJ � -- , � • i �4ef�l„i .�Ct i, � �r'r;•�- t+� j• �
},r�
�'! w ,J
�' �• , `yf 1 r �t �� �'" .4 � .,.� �, dry•\�u: ��
} � }k � +'r4 I + '� I « - � • a i F� � � J �....,1 �1 iyr � �'w u_.-. � .
_ �1�' 1*Y� a t{, �: +'i 1 h; �1'fu.'�"� t -`y"''`, �`^a 4 f �{'. `1 f a1`i" J"��I �',_._ i:. •1 e i A� ^'7 � �-
3 a r.. , ! .' r i' ; r _ s 11 �,..��.. F / �'•r �� ``';"35 ''� rrJ • .
Na
„ " G�c,; tt /•+�°Y 's :,�: �1 � � � , r ` , -1 Fs .,�,,'r�i� „ � ; f t r�t°��{'ki
Tr
'�. rr w r ff 1 1 \ -^�, I s,r:y. -., ., • C/�. T'��--!
FF
r ti�i ` t 1• � � '� � ��- • K �' pis F' r � �'f'� � �t� �, ;r 1 i. r ��a ` ti 'r
>�" . Yti !"^�,� a ` ° +•J.f-s�� - .. ,y q L s .. ��"r.� � 1 t � r �r r<
"Jnf�1'1 :i i { +cti fr 11/,_1(t� �.� J �r , �� �ii.' nln �{d}.��,�,�.I r�1r J � "v ¢ _ y t � F � r,�1` �r`,r��TM'"+`��� s• r � r.
r
� E. ti s +n � ' 'r ''�.. J � t P19 a ,r V r its { � ,•_,---•�,', , v'� r'� t- ,.
VNIN
•*; �• � y ° "� , e'S e"YS S � >' )) # , ! ' � ri� I, p ,3 �,r.�l . � '�wr; ? ;
y��s at• �-. I�i r..r,' r i � �s � 1i ^J�" ,✓i o �s J��� }'�` �� � - 'iY, l �
,•'-t 17.{yr 'i..�!` � ! � [xl?I � ��II ��k j �� ir �� ��:�. x �� q_ i , r � r�, ! �� v'! "� ti "� ,
v,�'r�i'i4.
t.
,-i� •.-�� {.hfff' �'"'• { '4``(�(` Y; t'��,1 7'.'� .. �t"t_��I1 ,�r"i'
♦.. fir. J. .7r°� r � 6j � �' � "�7 T1 ikLj �.p r/ r k , ��.! ��- !
{`ISr'���,, sl
E ; �ZIr3 a3�, Sri �� 7jj •}I'+
7 `j j3 I 11
hillRAW y r i e Q,7D-f� 1 '`, r `l�t1Yl�•v*^�' \ `-y ' � � 1 {\ti
A+'� _
}. fir' �. a..

Iredell County
Dairies
4>^ !' " r'^• S1 \ ^,�, ,....... '+t r"wNrr a n -mil l'.:!;. ✓',.
�"r'�. p,� , j � , 'J � v ,� ...r � �.,r,.._- ,i�p`•-" 5:� .�':t�l��" � ; ,�-�;I:;� - ,i�?"'17 y + � �� ;511><, , r'fti I'�
tr. r r y ('�v.,,,yt� 1 / , '•vl 'e-i i t �✓1,yy�. ri a - tl .,4::, V
.1 ^'r `firs , .. w • �...1,.. f? I IrY. t Myer* Fan, IncHoststlar
d V
kk �r ear ,. —,..•+^'a,,,�i:.mo-r _. awrr_ v ,-:i :. { -1Re IVl h'�cn t .s,. •r�= p - � -ri.r1 �_ .. j � _a^.• u.i ry 1rIki1N`r'.
t dry ?C n 4s~ [-.�'T_• ar 3� ' R y r�! C r_,
}}1`,?
rr fit, y -d'LK' y `acwr ,r•1 ', /r } "-Ir ''�j
Y 1 1d e
r� a 'r- b' 1 ij_ a,, i"-• 1"" z L ° I 3t wr ....... O 'r . r t BeEohe[GIOSe
q F�, JSIROId SOnfLler
"r
• i) Mh r� •ry 7 - W\
aqr r✓ �. T c Wlll[atns ralll +�,. :,� EIJ a,"': .�.1'• f:1 ,g� �, ��I +e+kd {, 1w+w: y .. 1II,f,� „y § , r..
" ,.., Kemrsth rbbort . r J } r Y r Allan lohrtwn
,lf•�HOtnaWilliams 4.-p •,p,,'1� laid,' t• F _,,.-. I I n wr.t� r, Eli yr,
b '.{, y -' J'- I.f' l+' /r^.,:y/ c : y g a#k�'<' ,. arr'' ,y y;•�. i a �"% I, •1 f t{ , 1f J i r
�, FA r 't-L�1.�,"0 �../�,at�• �, Idq y :ar r .1•� ,, y `.�}F+ g-tr.. J�� 'f �� ! ;'' + I �#�.:>•""�•''lt:a.ilt �I�"r
�' p•-,ira✓ " s l Xl. ♦ s ^ •1 fi a '. �r 1 .Ir n _E " aq i� a t µ '`` t TodhCtanGlk` v. Ravi Burgess
;�
<�Ny ,} d .� u+�~�'�•-'rit74. ,„l t .xi
Tommy 11w1our 1•t or;.- °r. 0/ +{+;,:3 '.:• dLcdherter_ i i7 ^'Ir• ;",Gild
fy d Jj f
•"•+:e , , i + `3 ,,+. 17- 'Ai-.,f, �a. k t7 1 '?" .,,',+f ,.r r
farryGalihet
-=..��� r;e. "^ �� ';rp �.p ..� '.r• x �' + 1•` t,. -x �'r ,«!•• � 1✓'`?�;� i1� np
t S ,tJ� Y } r I _ 1 115 � i ✓ t1;. r'�P• . 4 d' f i^ y„ � » � ; - /F Q _r.'l} ;^ f,- x
Mn , ^s r °�h d HollendFazms#2 3 a ]' Geliher,r!'
k. t le,a :` - 4 t" ..1 Jimmy M '
p„a t '""y.:r� umt �•-;yc i y lr ., e'ti_?�'L r " A �,. +, ✓
^�,'��t `� r ,w •rl-
E'k.•- r. ts1 4 'ri t ti.}yy , , t ��:A� n selu: t ven Redmond - fe" fr 4r'`*5.:: - ' . .-�' - • ° ,.� J
Ladd nary
1yy1 Goodman r' r' Harmony Acres
3"i= a r` • ...1' .✓ r a\a
a p rw+ ,m 3s .: a :i':" •rd" t 1 '„'s, a - r.
James `' �}p:�:-7.- .rS.'. -,'' �x � r { Peti'Y etan6u , tL�' rr i•s�.. .
q., v t A'r i ,r� Holland Feints N I - r_ ' , Y', \\ r' 1' Edna Hu[is -
Sam Darnels i Ai'�tp
ut�: 9 k m
,tom+,,, v yl �i pr 11r','T 1 Dean Boger
Wf y,v6f ,"i ,:1'J':,
{-y.,,s S . -.Neal JotrrtsonyM Ll
Williams harry _ ak` lien Shslsan 'I r
-7 ¢ t •,•'r SAY �`.
a. S R=- 4 11 ?h 7 r' r� C1larLe3 Payne-
t Norman Riddle t',:,s,:S., �S '�a..J �.:,, � r�� t '�•L--:/-^�"'�j 3b+.t• �t -t�- � g ��1':.`!
,n r• t a.,, rs> •n r 1„- s !t+..:i`."' '^�`• 1g f F P Ca[tner
r.::1 r t FF;sy - Mark Johnson u r . ' 7w y pd 5 a , tv rJ 1 E -, IlI I y ;]
' •L ..t t I. 1 +Gf r,+, 1/ F. k ° fr --- O 1,
Lf�` a " ,h `ss„d r'� Rob tMitchell .r i;� �' /`...». n113
1 f 1 y}! a.r Jerry Htg=t'- ./t +Wayne Rntrertsa[t;7 a .L �I
Herman
s,.d r vt . JeffManes i ,`y}A f l . N
i t '.;a '!, 7 ,'. ArdKoolmlan.+s,.:1t :s;iwsFSyf� -+.ai1--a�:F-a.s d
�ca�r p 1 jJ _
+r Tz!v" Way. swat :,. 5.y - t ++ - trs... ' . ''.Ra LowmanJIJr .• �`�' �,,;.r
Dennis 'S L t i t' i:.„ Y },. n u• � I t :'
y �e' ....;+;•' 1 ti-•.-.. ,,, f '. i, i-+ .pF's+c it r! •r.= {F iv 7`�•. J M T
Fr,. '�' a` tP it CAI -
UM
`, _ f"eorge McAuleyRay Elmf
"� {
nL,ec Shtttllakc[
t 'Lt'"s'r lq
RortnieStevrart
r:d }- 1
b ti t5 a" s �� f��rT o T• + r,
T � A• T r.e , 1 Ard K 1 u rn. 1g . •,� <
'�°c�L' ps r--"'r '' ,` r J$tttt ¢•"�-S>, sJ.
, , V� e.. - .K °°P"en r',• Dmtl[y Mdler
x i � ti-�1ts W � ,7 � '���?. � a. � - "r� � • �° r- 4•� F ''
' t erne �"' J '"r•�...r, - i a !�q' ,{_ ` :rff I.K a , d- :.x r.' a 1 +[♦ M
f `�
�� f'•p ,�L.:, .�1c Ai�^.,. 3�.a t'� _�:icm•e rn ^rs' t��L '+\ '►',�'�."d:-. .r. .r-,,.. n� '4�oj��,.�%r..��.i4.p ,7,�;.,.� ' w;`rp ,C Wyly 'r�4"R°ii-''i`�Y
o,l .u�� �5�,. `••-.k .i++if b4 {}" 'k tr P* r[P
h { ee f :. ..,r° !� ,u '^ ii[7dO 3 . . 2t g . •c '"!'iL ' t�♦vf -r • `.,_�,p r r,
I � r tsr .'•._ 9 'xr w r '+a7,�
t 3 rr4++ '' -_', (u�:-. ,d'r 1-.. tC' w•r . kt+ �' ='1141 -E - - I �: ` \
�" .. rs•7 �,,� n = S 1 per ,I� ♦ '�' '-5{{-�� a ,� r 'Mack Beava
�S: p,.. Kenneth Clay r.,w ",�. + `"• ,'� j7 +. "jL - .R.- r.['f .y' 4:p. {{// -Y .� r, Ix i .y{ '! t
."� ',1� `f: �SI;S.et" 'v ,,` y tW rra- t,r' 1,
r; ,. ".
} rx H ,�^
��'' '. ey 9a 5: ci 'j.- .b q. pp 0•r ?[..r v.•. ,,, ..rn� .°~`! t i.! '
Tracylenlans • 'l'�T+ ,.:,,.:r•:. _ 81.ttt� :mar .6:4• 5 N,I.po, .,r E �". rr - d •,r ai t- ,.�
Fred Sutlav[``r^- Slattley Snkeleather *.p s = ,1tbi i' '< I - "•�d
t' f,,'Y.' -. - # ~ 7 , t 7-~ n r r"' r �f�"Y L �1 9`1.,• F G 7r�` n'' �i' ' ,_ -+,-•
1 a = ,>.T - 1 7 ,,,> . lrr t a l �/ { ar.•- $t f`It'1 c'+ ,; " ;, �A ,.1' ir: P
f,5� �rW �r Rmdvray a„` f J Et Cj€ d t [, Per[y8e11 ill
�i ,r -. •i, e7 11 A Jr 1 ; - 0 - r Y T:} " ,l a �w}.' A' i` air ! i f :y,: '
j/f.F90 ,,,... y' = t -I:,4 ,'. '' rr�= ''' r •� n -a -
{ +,J,- �! N`5�me Ca[rns, al
w ,�' 9 ` ' C '.d 7,• 4�.y;t a " its''{ ti.
,r A.
0 ess 9 �, - -"vxr`n.�, rt �b'r, •u . lt,, i ...11 .:�,Jl ::Burt L}ell kr-et%'_"�f+ im,l �I 1 ,..,• Y f "r,
Marl Pope t-ie�•.ar 4l ' Xr r4 - 'h �` .�.' x�. . J "-+"...r „'ti rr\ ?r '"ih _'it,P W ' i'r✓"`
.er. � .a � } `.. '7 r� fS4 n;� i i �v�:i ` �..��,•- r 4 f - t r.:e �.y 0.'�r!
`'�„art•e; �%,.� 4. �� -y`� �`�.� 4 eti•,^.� � �.� �-- -r..� ���c � ��7
.7ty�p� !• rr ..` .. * ar i0� .rl•='i 'r . i _ ,.,r +we+i f.." `�",-- F ��1` .vlr ty,/J/p`/' -, :I, r 'rtr,'
h�j�,,-fr y, Jw' ] 1' . 1 r 1�=:• `]j �..y?I•.
\.f'}-,
'Jerry W",Redmond' ,yw,ci � .:,� 'x«':? F�' `� r tfj�. I!S'✓I q�. I.. J. �t-' 'u ff5
Girn.h °n*^,'"dd:.77
,:$r. r... ,.iF -1r " r. �`'-- G-- .:;. .r�'r•:.:',',:`sy., _ r '��. k; c�- 1
,�4 �
-'�b
°T
X.
,c 'I '•,i 4
-Rex Bell
I Y C r
'�-
_.�
.;Y.� q •�- r,f� � e' •,1+. r�y�t ..n au" s' r w.,..t,� � � ,4 r .
1III„r ,N:��.
Rudy T[ontman�� sn::il.r i e p,. 3t i fy
-.`j
�•-,�1 ".'[h r}a i+ i- d ;-�.a i� O ' vim' �. 3•t-.'h; y�e t �: a _ -t�� _ '°:r �1. � 'v;J (".
�„ IU '�ir 4 :a,a „>E w< ~.t � //'4p t ,r,. �1, ,i,' r 'a �• t a•-./ J �� i ..i`
✓_ a',.-�,:,I�°-"rG.�.•.� r'i ry fr.rZt -, S: rr 1 C fn �sn. t J T t. ! i : � 7n. >��r + ,1. +! t ", 'y, "'+'.In, 5 r: h 1' 1.} '"f" r i -_1, t» y
�,{
n-
'y, '•, yr�1 1 Hr '.,1.:4�.^Io• , -s,. ': Ifi 'r Y:. e r t �rrtl.`�}p�::F t • „ r .2 r,. t I, @.rn f . 4F:.- j".- q p,� 1 rr nA' 1+, �C-t
.Y .a� 'a�ii ��l t'�.b3it 'r�.•,���/,;'. s�� !.rr Vf y., i2 �i.:, �♦ ��Y �ti, ta. .}rs �i��St�t.���,L E4. '-L rf;,�� �f�':: �t��. ti �a,..i e. t;
```"' 1:r ' �.! a "'�,r,,yf, . ♦" -'.p r`-is r Y f+r+m. t :. ,:.I> .i I: r . -r 4t .�'r['-�tiSlw, r'{
N�_ Cltd•e�. Q �/.��,. . � , nl r"`_ #t `t "�� U,�d � � :� , 1 � i �tt !1 '. +� ): �'� � ✓ t'� .
n Gr. ��. � •� �! ; r �� �Ilni, �- .�'r't ! . n S a r .� q' z J•f F ;
try., `'I'a:
".+'•� •PY 1.;_ a • >E .slv'y�N �=i1: a� rui: � '• � � �".p; : ° P I �'`�Nurc ,Q.:M ' r:,l�t'r 1-r:,, , r -. _Ir :• -. ^r, Y r � 4 .s s . � . t � �'t ; -rv^{ al ^:�
Ati;+• - x_>L 4tit it+tyL } :I:! d'."4 ::-m M i..47_ •^'i't^" ,? ry �3 ,p�
� .T. + �.r. ," r - v�'\Tr r - ' �,'.4 F r 6 2 r y \�' 1 m: y,-- ' .'w ,�,�+ .r' SC. ��•eK ,w - . 9,.! - :° +-"'. i' Ni r y'
.��' „� j ' 1! 'v f �. Y fl 7� ; �! ["�•pf � ki 1Y�-� .Gn ry i� •� 9j, `r� ' f � N 116 ����
r� � e �.1,ai9n,w 'y'S^{��:-':tttc�y )staba r .� 11 � e. S ;a' w t4 ti ,,, .,�j .� r t•'y .k �`+ � �* :�
.aS [ t. � $ •,} ;1`t ,1��' t�. x 'S r./ir r .r gs �> f 1 { f 1 , r.
"� y +. r �'�ti,i �- . r1 bh .i�'r�ii r 3�br [•.�r. \- �k�4 �� '�.r yl1 rry �y f It El
� ,. .,.;?�,r,1 't- �. v'�. �; t�•- � If - c4 •s " ��« ,�. x1 Rt. r.. ti�- -'s, ""�y' e;l"' nlry-;�
Pii"
dV,Ja_. �' yr �, .:- , .,SMr+in.�•FLOrritC faF .;'2e _;!
:.\,,. ru _ +.� -t• 15l rr ' bra: f ti`_"ti. Y Js,k : t r n r"�' ly<. "^^ S
., r M ;. � j�r. t � � �� \Y D y,.rr9!, � - 1' 11a a.. a Y i / • w
ia� rr ." i e" i� ti }� . - �v ` a, �r r 7 .yi,�> ' f _ b rr .ti �"'� ♦ l L,,.�.
_ - - r �1 - �'/r'o � �,, .?1�4i��, ;�+i• +f{*1r' ?x � Pi�}��.''�Q Ci _ _ G � i... �' z ,"'rf�•'ti �`r�..•• .
9�:1� It � t �'•'\ ".� ff�i��.j'� 1 1 raw. �� , a -- a" _ r fAl[ C l i"r4.i�•r ✓� � i.' 1 t
-. 1'C,
—A, lr' sJ �
ly � r irr..a �� �..�7�" �rM-'��! .I r.E,�.. �e�" I r 1 ' 15S' �• h �y � ,.,�.I i! � iF ertsY
`♦ T t� �, .� K t �i�^ � ;`-� C p �r 7 A '7" n:- i 'mot r ` L
1 �
�++ l
��,' k Irty�� '� � - ( h -' P b .nr 1A` �� �� _w � tip: { I I � r» { 4i'-! �� 1.� ~ F qi ten:., � � � �,.3 ��;.• �':J •
n Y .' J ., 'X b' 1 •�!Y .Y it i,~' 3 rQ� � ~ 'i"� Se i3 /� � 4� I ` I.•y .r
-
'h SS e ! I• ✓,t [ I a + �
,�14yi 77.at+ttn L,II r�rrr' , r 11;�f t d a [ j 4
_ a Irviilrh t utY?Zl�!° (q 'e l'^ `fl`.rf rl:+ay M; '- ` 'k ls.+ aL1 +t a I I A- l A. 'e ..Morris Johnston
j,.• M1 # i sc 1st {�'t v+{ 'y'+' 1 v ,nror M �r +jil `
��{{ �- s, � • '�
"rrr f A `'^'� S `, ! '•q1
f �'F ?'r r• t'* s 1�s RorrruePatte[xon )•�
4'3{;K 1wr ? :°"m �'• as a �jri\
r
''�V"+'�'�i"F
�+.t •. Y t - ��-• � s e �•=J ,� •-•> l�,°�.,
uc: v CAtMl0 @ ` a�
tsry 4 + , t ` r { �.m•'s-t iu, rt s 1 � .. � �+ n 4st3+r,,,,,r-Lr :J�1 =..r+.. r `� Wr, �
Y l r r i s "LI ' a r `r a -� --� r, - h� `q•- '� 1
- �h-,iy'�yyY� ih �'�{ � 1' � � �F" iZ �';- r#* rya" f�i � �I`m���(1Jl�'y l� } Fy+ r r,�'x• wr r �c � �}� 19r r a K 1 $ 'h;
:- L II •i? t
1'.n`n+ �., ,.pd ...r ,_. .,d!.r:La�..�-��ii�'. �'w✓r1-!'.�„L�,,f.r+:hb j0., v e �� "s.- bx :. ��--.."".'+%� ��r . 4��
4/7/03

0
WR?Zy A V
APR �41�D
sf
Non. p 2 8 200
��ha�9e
9
PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: MRS. M. S. REDMOND
OPERATOR: Mac Gibbon.'
JOB CLASS: IV
DAIRY SIZE: 160 MILK COWS
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
orc
APPROVED BY:
1
gg
DATE:
7-14-98
Revision #1 - Planned originally for Keith tephens. Mr.
Stephens subleased farm to Mr�ibbon.. MI Gibbon, will
operate a little differently. Changes made throughout plan.

II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the waste production described above in a manner
that does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The
system planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to
surface and ground water by recycling waste through soil and
plants.
The following design and plans are required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water for Milk Herd and Dry Cows
The storage period will be determined in the existing
pond. The manure will handled as a slurry in order to
handle the manure easily and in as concentrated volume as
possible_ Truck hauling will be, -used to empty waste storage
pond.
B. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
C. 'Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for 400 to 750 lb
Heifers
Forty 400 to 750 lb heifers will be pastured on the
farm. 24 acres of pasture is available for this heifer
group. Cattle will be fed at an existing feed alley. The
feed alley will be roofed to control manure and runoff from
the area. Manure will be stored under the roofed feed area
until it is spread. Hay will be fed in a ring on the ridge.
Water tanks will be needed to water animals.

D. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for Bred Heifers
Forty bred heifers will be pastured on the back of
farm. Twenty-one acres of pasture is available for this
heifer group. Cattle will be fenced out of stream. Cattle
will be fed a TMR at a roofed feed bunk. The same feed bunk
used for 400 to 750 lb heifers. Manure will be stored under
the roofed feed area until it is spread. Hay will be fed in
a ring on the ridge. Water tanks will be needed to water
animals.
E. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas for Close Up Bred
Heifers and Dry Cows
Thirty-five dry cows and close up bred heifers will be
pastured on lot next to State Road. 10 acres of pasture is
available for this animal group. Cattle will be fed silage
at an existing feed alley. The feed alley is roofed and
curbed to contain manure. Hay.will be fed on a ring on a
heavy use area. Grass filters are to be maintained below
the lounging area and feed area.
F. Silo Runoff and Leachate
Silo runoff and leachate will be diverted through
vegetative filters. Solids will be cleaned out of diversion
along the waste storage pond at regular intervals. See
drawing.
G. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
H. Operation and Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.

III. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 150 day period
Drainage area surfaced lot. Use average runoff values
in Ag. Waste Management Field Manual. Concrete channels
shall carry 25 yr - 24 hr runoff to Waste Storage Pond. The
drainage area was taken from old design. It appears
reasonable.
Drainage Area = 14,300 sq ft Surface = 14,300 sq ft
Unsurface = 0 sq ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
o
DEPTH
%
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85•
20
0.14
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.69
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27
1.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
.32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 5
months:
October through February Surface
Runoff
Depth = 9.93"
Unsurface
Runoff
Depth = 4.35"
Surface Runoff= 9.93"* 14,300 sq ft = 11,833 cuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 4.3511* 0 sq ft = 0 cuft
12 in/ft
2. RainfAl2 minus evaporation on pond surface
17.75 - 9.1 = 8.7"
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
= 0.7 ft/5 month
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.9111 * 14,300 sq ft = 5,851 cu ft
12"/ft

4. Volume of Waste
Ica
,1-5r0 milk cows'in freestall barn and 10 sick or fresh
cows are on concrete 100% of the time. 100°s of the manure
produced will be collected in the waste storage pond.
Volume =160 cows *.14.0 gal/day * 150 days * 100%
7.48 gal/cu ft
44,920 cu ft
30 dry cows will be housed in freestall shed next to
freestall barn. 100% of the manure produced by these cows
will be collected.
Volume =30 cows * 14.0_caal/daY_* 150 days * 100%
7.48 gal/cu ft
8,422 cu ft
Total 44,920 cu ft + 8,422 cu.ft = 53,342 cu•ft
5.
V.
25 yr -24 hr rainfall on the pond surface
Rainfall = 5.5" _ .5 ft
Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water
ii. Tank wash water
iii. Milk house floor wash water
iv. Cow wash water
Volume 700 gal/day*l.cu ft/7.48 gal* 150 days
14,037 cu ft
200 gal./day
50 gal./day
400 gal./day
SO oral . /dav
700 gal./day
7. Freeboard & ESW = 1.7 ft See design in field Office
file for freeboard and emergency spillway depth
designed.
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
11,833
cu
ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
0
cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
5,851
cu
ft
4.
Manure
53,342
cu
ft
5..
Milking Parlor Wash Water _
14,037
cu
ft
TOTAL
85,063
cu
ft,
4.
Rainfall minus Evaporation
0.8
ft
5.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall
.5
ft
6.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
1.7
ft
Total
3.0
ft

C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
129' X 147'
9M
wide 2.5:1 \ 7.9' / 2.9:1
nar. 1.3:1 ` 2.5:1
88' X 88'
Volume = 7.9/6[88 X 88 + 130.7 X 118.0 + 4(109.4 X 103.0))
89,848 cu ft
This pond has 5 months of storage.
Normal Pump Out Volume
11,833 + 53,342 + 14,037 + .8' X 129' X 147'
= 94,382 cu ft per 150 days
= 229,663 cu ft per 365 days
= 1,718,000 gallons per year
573 - 3,000 gallon loads
Maximum pump out level
0.5' + 1.7' + 5851/(120' X 140') = 2.6'
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 2.6 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1.7 foot
below the top of dam.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed around waste
storage pond and feedlot and freestall barns. The District
Conservationist will design all diversions. Diversions
shall be designed to carry the 25 year - 24 hour runoff plus
capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.

f
V. Lounging Areas, Heavy Use Areas and Filter areas
All heavy use areas consist of 9" or compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. All heavy use
areas will be fenced. Runoff from these areas and lounging
areas will be directed across well maintained grass sods.
Heavy use areas and lounging areas will be located to
provide the maximum grass filter possible. Grass filters
shall be at least 100, wide below lounging areas and heavy
use areas. Swells or diversions shall be constructed and
maintained along fence lines to kick water into filters at
frequent intervals.
A. Day old to 200 lb HQ44Q. r Group
C41✓.Ls
25 young h=ifn=s are kept in hutches near the milking
herd. Approximately 750 of the manure is collected and
spread regularly.
Volume
of manure=25 calves*1.5 al hd da * 365 days*.75= 1372 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft
B. 200 to 400 lb Heifer Group
25 young heifers are kept in sheds and small lots near
the milking herd. 100°s of the manure is collected and
spread regularly.
Volume of manure=
25 e-I%r=n*3.0 cral/hd/dav* 365 days*100.•°s= 3,660 cu ft
;+Zfars 7.48 gal/cu ft
C. 400 to 750 lb Heifers
40 heifers 400 to 750 lbs will be housed in 24 acre
pasture behind freestall barn. Heifers will be fed hay in a
ring on a 40' X 40, heavy use area. A 60' X'12' stock trail
will be constructed from feed alley to the pasture to allow
clean water diversion from freestall barn. The feed alley
will be modified by adding a roof. Manure will be stored
under roof at fed bunk. Approximately 25k of the manure is
collected and spread at feed bunk and hay feed area.
Volumers
of manure=40 Gaa za&*6.0_aal/hd/dav* 365 days*.25= 2,928 tuft
7.48 gal/cu ft

D. Bred Heifers
40 heifers will be housed in 21 acre pasture on back of
farm. Heifers will be fed hay in a ring on a 40' X 60'
heavy use area. A TMR will be fed in existing feed alley.
The same alley used for 400 to 750 lb heifers will be used.
Manure will be store under roof at the feed alley. A 250' X
12' stock trail will be constructed from feed alley to
pasture. This will provide access across a drainage way
near feed alley. Approximately 25% of the manure is
collected and spread at feed bunk and hay feed area.
Volume
of manure=40 head *10.0 gal/hd/day*365 days*.25= 4,880 cuft
`f r (,2�GI'/ju.A : Ir/%140 7.48 gal/cu ft
Cattle will drink water at a water tank: Cattle will be
fenced from stream.
E. . Close Up Bred Heifer and Dry Cow Group
Thirty-five close up bred heifers and dry cows are
located on 10 acres of pasture along state road. They are
fed silage at an existing roofed concrete feed alley. A
45'x45' heavy use area will be installed next to feed alley
to feed hay. A 100' grass filter will be established below
the heavy use area, lounging area, 'etc. Manure will be
stored on concrete feed alley between collection and
hauling. The concrete alley will store manure for several
weeks. Some modification of wooden curb is needed.
Approximately 25%- of manure will be collected at concrete
alley.
Volume of Manure
=35 head * 10 _gal/hd/daY * 365 days*.25= 4,270 cu ft
7.48 gal/cu ft
F. Dry Cows
An average of 30 cows are confined to freestall shed
next to freestal,1 barn. Manure is collected and stored in
waste storage pond. Clean water from barn roofs will be
diverted under access road to feed driveway.

VI. Waste Utilization Plan
A. 'Management Facts (liquid manure)
Manure for milking herd will be stored in a waste
storage pond for over 5 months and will be conventionally
spread.
During the course of one year, this facility will store
1,718,000 gallons of slurry waste. Daily scraping of waste
is required to move the waste into the storage facility.
The following amounts of manure will be collected at other
parts of the farm:
1.
Day old to 200
lb Heifers
1,372
cu
ft
2.
200 to 400 lb
Heifers
3,660
cu
ft
3.
400 to 750 lb
Heifers
2,928
cu
ft
4.
Bred Heifers
4,880
cu
ft
S.
Close Up Bred
Heifers and Dry Cows
4,270
cu
ft
• Total
17,110
cu
ft
If all of one years waste were spread using a 200 cu ft
spreader, it would take approximately 86 loads.
Ground conditions must be evaluated prior to spreading.
Irreversible compaction problems and damage to underground
drainage systems may result from the excessive weight of a
loaded spreader. Caution should be exercised to insure that
waste does not run or wash off the land.
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
Runoff from heavy use areas, lounging areas and trench
silos will be diverted through grass filter areas. Grass
sods will be maintained all year round. These areas maybe
controlled grazed in late spring and early fall when ground
is dry. Weeds may require chemical control or periodic bush
hogging. Grass filters below heavy use areas will be
maintained in a good grass sod. Filter areas below heavy
use areas shall be graded to establish shallow flows.
C. Nutrient computations
Manure application shall be based on actual soil test
and manure analysis.
a. Slurry Pond for Milk Herd
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTR_I..ENT
(nutrient availability)
N 32,080 lbs. 0.44 14,115 lbs.
P2O5 19,528 lbs. 0.70 13,670 lbs.
K2O 29,292 lbs. 0.70 20,504 lbs.
8.5 lbs PAN per 1000 gallons

b. Other Manure around the Farm
TOTAL NUTRIENTS DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(nutrient availability)
N 6,369 lbs. 0.43 2,739 lbs.
P205 3,949 lbs. 0.70 2,764 lbs.
K20 5,541 lbs: 0.70 3,879 lbs.
C. Total Available Nutrients (a and b above)
PAN 16,854 lbs
P205 16,434 lbs
K20 24,383 lbs
D. Solid Waste Utilization Based on the Following
Cropping System
a. Cropping Plan (EXAMPLE)
CROP UNITS ACRES YIELD APPLIC. RATE
S.Grain Sil. tons 90 2.0 9,400 gal/ac
Corn Silage tons 68 15.0 17,600 gal/ac
b. Nutrient Balance (EXAMPLE)
REQUIRED lbs applied/ac (lbs. used/ac)
CROP ACRES N P205 K20
Grain Silage 90 80 (80)
Corn Silage 68 150 (165)
C. Disposal Calendar (EXAMPLE)
CROP AC. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Grain Si190 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNN
Corn Sil 68 NNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
N = not a recommended disposal period
E. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage ponds and diversions for
clean water and polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
The waste storage pond shall be pumped before it
reaches a point 2.6 ft. below the top of the dam. Post
shall be set with the top at these elevations.
Vegetation around the waste storage ponds shall be
mowed annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be
checked and repaired as required.

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Kenneth MacGibbons Dairy
Kenneth MacGibbon
139 Westglow Road
Statesville, NC 28625-1538
704-592-2365
04-14-2003
This plan has been developed by:
Larry Hendrix
NR CS
444 Bristol Drive
Statesville, NC 28677
704-873-6761 x3
Develop Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
U (r
Signature (owner) Date
2��4 c 1- _ 0 3
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Techni Specialist Signature
6/ -/G-- 03
Date
----------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
241775 Database Version 10 Date Printed: 04-14-2003 Cover Page I

U.J. UCt'AK I MLN I Ut- AUKIL;UL I UHL NRCS-CPA-1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE REV. 11-91
CONSERVATION. PLAN, MAP LEGEND
T1330
Name Kenneth MacGibbon Address 139 Westglow Road; Statesville, NC Zip 28625
1
3
27.0
13.0
Cropland
Cropland
40.0
Farm Boundary ......................
Field or !_and Use Boundary...
Field Acreage .........................
320 Ac.
Field Number .........................
Private Road .......................... —
— — — — —
Public Road ...........................
Buildings, houses ...................
Perennial Stream ...................
Intermittent Stream ................
Vegetative Waterway-
EXISTING PLANNED
Fence' ......... ....... ................. .
`When existing fences are combined with other
symbols, they may be shown as tofiows:
Fence along both sides of
road.................................... - -V- V
Fence along one side of
ditch....................................
Fence to be removed... ..................
Ditch to be removed .......................
T-1 T-2
Terrace" .................................... ".
Diversion— ............................... D-1 D-2
"The dots represent blocks; the arrows
represent spills
Drainage ditch ................................ —.—— - —. — -- ♦------ *
(open drain)
Tile Drain .......................................:.. -r--�--�► ro—� — o—�►
Dam and Reservoir ........................
--- - '-
Field Border ................................... --
Fire Break .................................... — F F— -- F— — F--
0 0
Spdng and Trough .........................
Excavated Holding Pit, Lagoon
Water Control Structure ................. _ 1✓'
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue,

m

NRCS-CONS-13 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
OCTOBER 1974 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL MAP
fi / 3 3"0
Owner _ Vergie Redmond Operator Kenneth MacGibbon
County Iredell State NC Date 4/14103
Soil Survey sheet(s) or code nos. = Approximate scale 1" =1320
" Prepared by the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service cooperating
1 with Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
-,+."" + -._. + a Vie. k � •. ~ � �' ♦, h w
SO
A�. Ph - y A li"'p„•,.}v .F a � - 9:,*.. yy. 1•• _ k
YaD
'..n« at- , 1 , il�r � r. A: •rr�_- � Crt. r Co ..' l,N
"lx4 D t: f
s '$' :• w , } •.� � � _ ?' VV ' � � G �f �'r . • .;urn '' �
Cc$
'`' '�� �^ •,%i � riy >•.; S,x. }r; �.: � �''L,;�.. ' .Lrr f +. 4`4• y-:-"<r_.r�r. �:7•.
,• . 1�"- •S�' f y.. .�y,� � Gcl� ';7t•y:.`,�: f ylLr �.,. �-'�=fir. �-�f3 � t'.4 �. � 4 /
„""F''� _ �u ice}, ,� ��. �ti ( r"4 " '4 v �r°'"'r,�!j `e:.:tif•
y . ��. / ,1Jr� � ,off .-». � y r •" 1 .�.t i1 ` ay..•..� �+i •w `ti
r � ..• C•i _l . : ' i.-+,fir .�'' :i.e�x'%`�'�-''w�•�n.."�1 "1 � �yy.�. .���y. t� w�� /��
,4• ,yy.. :•��• �'y'7 S'� +`-T r, � L/n .� �4'„may ��1� �•ii �II�,�.r
r�'. ., rC1 ., � ..,�V �+�T7,x ..�. i:.:. ! wry} •f�'+ 1,_�'Y.•%'x "�.'�c: i'?im` :rt 1LG�!S�h��x�L'►M� 1
-� _ :_;,�- 4r rb� � z�}� �!� �y:"_ •'•�� ���F';.s";`a'`t';�; `•�i*agKli+.'ti.br�a7'.ulY '^„iL�'
.;.t .� ; . F •r-ac�C;..r.,= SJ "�7r6.:�>e � . ;._ t . , , .� � � %�F .ram!+
'» r,.r••..,:':tia - •:rr.";:�•�i`- `at. =�L srT�"�-R�_ -.� �'r`�'�'t`�'NFh.- s..•,
.: ". "r-`sr„}w' � i f � � �`,� � yJs�""�s.�ys� _ �.� � `n� r��# '� 6� - , a• :t"; ..." F � r -.
• «R► � { - � .w`t' '+� •..� �"+ �* `rv, i;•tr=;-�. [ r er r k}ti as=..._rt
.+ 2 �- � :Y _!„ '4 ;,-y'�r-•i arr,} � :3 � �'�! ,y .A[`�:s�+ .�,. � �!, h e m•+.'7,r. ,:�.of:�

U.S. UENAH I MEN 1 UE AURIGUL I URE NR(;,i-UPA-1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE REV. 11-91
CONSERVATION. PLAN, MAP LEGEND
T1331
Name Kenneth MacGibbon Address 139 Westolow Road; Statesville, NC Zip 28625
1
29.6
Cropland
5
19.8
Cropland
6
6.3
Cropland
55.7
Farm Boundary ......................
Field or Land Use Boundary... �■
....r ...� �--
Field Acreage .........................
320 Ac.
Field Number .........................
O
Private Road .......................... —
— — — — —
Public Road ...........................
Buildings, houses ...................
Perennial Stream ........ -.........
Intermittent Stream ................
Vegetative Waterway
EXISTING PLANNED
Fence` ............................................
"When existing fences are combined with other
symbols, they may be shown as follows:
Fence along both sides of
road.................................... V V
Fence along one side of
ditch....................................
Fence to be removed.......
Ditch to be removed .......................
T-1 T-2
Terrace- .................................... ♦► •—
Diversion" ............................... D-1 D-2
"The dots represent blocks: the arrows
represent spills
Drainage ditch ................................ —.._`......_.. *.----*
(open drain)
Tile Drain .
Dam and Reservoir .................
Field Border ............................
Fire Break .............................
Spring and Trough .......................
Excavated Holding Pit, Lagoon .....
Water Control Structure ................
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.
-- F F— -- F— — F--
0 0

��'+', `.4 1fY�j•a•'�1�ij uP bif�°y� r�" t,�+. Ir7 M kp} � S�� S �f ,� y '� 5 9'. i
a"1'�''%r�tilrrt��sE� +w��•i�f���� �!� «,""." `a�4 ��e.,i, 1�f r '3d f,;ltj/� � � r E�4,!
a+
' �, ! � � 1� � {.tfi �y�wil-'h�� iY/�{ ir�'�1'� ��E SI � �y� Y- � J ` 1• "i � � � 7•t'�
2�"��Ri�3�.'i[��.l�%� 5�aa �•:;i •+ .��r ��w57,•�� r r.� _ter'.
��• .:• )Y 7 t w t r � 4�'w � rif}. r ,I�t pt_ i "'4i r .a !,�
a r�'Y�� �.��l�r' f� V��'.R ! �,�. .+ndtlar a r+ Y lf.�' r �•`�� �Y'F
'I
' Sr� A i ry !• rs e� ¢�t4 ,r! r } '<�f� r fyf�l "� J�`}�t'�• ,
'�, , r} t � 4 1"Eir• � ����Jf r' t rr"k� MSr rY,'�", �,�,w�}r t r :.fir t�'.'� r �i �y� k ti•�"i�' r'�1 e �` � �'�
�'. ��� } Ir��,x y��, s - �yy � �nte;y, rt � t / ! ° r1 y> k N�. 'f�� i ••' "
t• �flti � h :-.� r M' fklK'.� df,i ��r� r � u E r �
�, s,%:• ru � � .;�i c � `' � � � � z � air r ,
l!l���v�`Jrm_ . `'•'�,v.1+.��1'"4+Q`,'..�±'3�� .:.�...'1 '�i"r.��"'"+..�''�;.�5s7l. ,,. ,. . 4'",� [ � . r.' .��, .: i it` ,a"F'�P
--Is

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NRCS-CPA-1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE REV. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN -MAP LEGEND
T1358
Name Kenneth MacGibbon Address 139 Westplow Road; Statesville, NC Zip 28625
1
15A
Cropland
2
8.7
Hayland
3
7.9
Cropland
5
6.2
Hayland
6
18.1
Hayland
56.3
Farm Boundary ......................
Field or Land Use Boundary...—
Fietd Acreage .........................
320 Ac,
Field Number .........................
O2
Private Road .......................... .
_ _ _ _ _ ,
Public Road ...........................
Buildings, houses ...................
.
Perennial Stream ...................
Intermittent Stream ................
l —.__-
Vegetative Waterway ............."
EXISTING PLANNED
Fence' ............................................
*When existing fences are combined with other
symbols, they may be shown as follows:
Fence along both sides of
road............................. V V
Fence along one side of
ditch........I .................
Fence to be removed .....................
Ditch to be removed .......................
T-1 T-2
Terrace"' .................................... 10 —�
—1110.
Diversion" ............................... D-1 D-2
"The dots represent blocks; the arrows
represent spills
Drainage ditch ................................ ———•—•—•• i------�
(open drain)
Tile Drain ..................................... �—i--.--i► _o-�.._...4..—_�
Dam and Reservoir ........................
Field Border ................................... — ■ ■— -- ■— .--
Fire Break .................................... — F F— -- F— — F--
0 o
Spring and Trough .......................
Excavated Holding Pit, Lagoon .....
Water Control Structure... ..............
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.

Mr Kenneth MacGibbon
Iredell SWCD
Date: 04/17/2003
Conservation Plan Map T1358
NRCS -
Larry Hendrix
�6 t 'rh ° f��U ,r4_ r �, �r y�w �'�}''q •y'"l. `rs� s
i,_� ,air rVF3�1 a �f, '
x tl �Ff •.
, r �' "-.af4`�"" 3`�>t'�`'"�`�y i ti'�pp'H,* � tip. _ 9•�s`� i � ^y�Y'� -',i
s H 4
i'4�� Ft: ��� iH ��"�rs's V yi.�t9}A4'�ah-•
�yV'
17
dr
'-Uf
L• �_' y A, h � �, 5
�,4-,� t S' k, S a' •. �}4P k � _{,�"� M ? � ,� .
,.�tl
;,w• f x� tis-•,�j -'. •P " �. _,�? f � S � ` �a �.�,
ON
r�,.[°''1
� i,Ya� >1y a •n++ n}.'s a� .s E'�; r14i ir• �� :}, ,914� �s �� �k �513{S',, ,F,l�•,�"T.Sn t � i +r �;pd/fr'
ri .I..•,.r^l 'Z4 ° rR pN'i4'.��' g� r �-aj-�} +P�f'Si��'•,y:yq.��
fsrl6.!N L^�'y 1 w'r ii pe f•Yl YF�fll�s�?frl�.�P ll;1`,.
.,�V" i
. Y i1 {1�
`Y
�F g
, �k yn 14
r' 3rwr�1
waia 3 g +,
� F•r '41 sr 74, Ni yp � r l� ,ti i yr +a°'". •t�y.�Y �}�,y n � Mp�,� �r 41,#„ �h
kn7' ,' 4ri v *,MI-�'' �r's 5td'�a.Y. i'iF', iR'"�,''Y!i'h
�
�� 11' •,yr�e'"^ ; r t -
K��IM�
S " v �lr.kse �,
�'.. "C���,. „ r tt. �A�• '?J� �'. � � ;j�i_`•�� �,,1�.. s��';- t. } Rrt !tip ". .:r " d� ;� 4 w'.
���.,r �, ,Y}}: i:, din ''t '�+�I'yrP H ,1 S .r4r ne•�,j y'%, �s .qi'" r R�r "Jk�s'�':fi
�, �hi�,�r.':'�I1 i• r�j ."!➢�_�, r^t`. 'be9'�- ��- - ,•w{�u-_ �y t.,xy3 r�'�`dd 5� e � .f�_
Y' ,ss+ h*�' P r• ,, a �� �r,><. � F .�
` 'jLA
. � �ma ` wi y' )E 5�.� f�''ff•��'� }� ' ¢ f `'*(zt wi: •°.�'�?,�c` � �dt "3 x'i �' "+'
..p +%y .. ,.w• - f �+;�..3 t t } is x - t
t ��t. +e�i�'y�•°� 1y� � F - .f" i P� ax°,� v r ` t��;�; rob,�r.� ,r, s
Legend .,.... .... � .�
0 Planned Land Units Scale 1" = 660'
N
USDA 900 0 900 1800 Feet

NRCS-CONS-13
OCTOBER 1974
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL MAP
-r 1358'
Owner Operator Kenneth MacGibbon
County Iredell State NC Date 4114103
Soil Survey sheet(s) or code nos. 1 Approximate scale 1" =1320
" Prepared by the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service cooperating
twith Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District

U.S. L&PARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NRCS-CPA-1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE REV. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP LEGEND
T1373
Name Kenneth MacGibbon Address 139 Westqlow Road; Statesville, -NC Zip 28625
' FIE y gCRES i a rjj�,�pM ._. ;€wMAN SY OLDS,T, rah a 1N: fk�'`?'t
1
25.5
Cropland
25.5
Farm Boundary ......................
Field or Land Use Boundary...
Field Acreage .........................
320 Ac.
Field Numbef.........................
O
Private Road .......................... —
— — — — —
Public Road ...........................
Buildings, houses ...................
Perennial Stream ...................
Intermittent Stream ................ r
�' �___-•�
Vegetative Waterway
EXISTING PLANNED r
Fence'
"When existing fences are combined with other
symbols, they may be shown as follows:
Fence along both sides of
road..... ............... I .... ........... , V V
Fence along one side of
ditch . .................... I .......
.......
Fence to be removed .....................
Ditch to be removed .......................
T-1 T-2
Terrace" ........................... -....... d —�
Diversion— .............................. D-1 D-2
"The dots represent blocks; the arrows
represent spills
Drainage ditch............ --------- 110 ------*
(open drain)
TileDrain ..........................................
Dam and Reservoir- ... P .................. �t
Field Border ................................... — . .— -- — . --
Fire Break .................................... — F F— -- F— — F--
0 O
Spring and Trough ......................... , V
Excavated Holding Pit, Lagoon.....
Water Control Structure ................
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.

V6,

NRCS-CONS-13
OCTOBER 1974
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL MAP
Owner Vergie Redmond Operator Kenneth MacGibbon
County Iredell State NC Date 4/14/03
Soil Survey sheet(s) or code nos. Approximate scale 1" = 1320
" Prepared by the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service cooperating
twith Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NRCS-CPA-1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE REV. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP LEGEND
T1405
Name Kenneth MacGibbon Address 139 West low Road Statesville NC Zip 28625
L'iA. AtJDx. $ ay .Fr ;� °: s 6 ya��..'''�ff
ACRES q�' MAP SYMBOLSr n,
1
18.8
Cropland
4
8.1
Cropland
8
8.5
Pastureland
9
8.2
Pastureland
43.6
Farm Boundary .....................
Field or Land Use Boundary.,
Field Acreage .........................
320 Ac.
Field Number .........................
Q
Private Road .......................... —
— — — —
Public Road ...........................
Buildings, houses ...................
Perennial Stream ...................
Intermittent Stream ................
Vegetative Waterway
EXISTING PLANNED
Fence'
'When existing fences are combined with other
symbols, they may be shown as follows:
Fence along both sides of
road................... ........ ...... — V V
Fence along one side of
ditch
Fence to be removed .....................
Ditch to be removed .......................
T-1 T-2
Terrace"' .................................... �� - ►
Diversion" ............................... D-1 D-2 1�
"The dots represent blocks; the arrows
represent spills
Drainage ditch................................---11111P ------•- ------
(open drain)
rile Drain ....................................
Dam and Reservoir ........................
Field Border ...................................
— ■ ■ —
- - . — — . --
Fire Break ....................................
— F F—
-- F— — F --
Spring and Trough .........................
D
/
0
Excavated Holding Pit, Lagoon
Water Control Structure .................
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.

NRCS-CONS-13 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
OCTOBER 1974 , NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
i
SOIL MAP
r IY6S
Owner Vergie Redmond Operator Kenneth MacGibbon
County Iredell State NC Date 4114/03
Soil Survey sheet(s) or code nos. Approximate scale 1" = 1320
" Prepared by the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service cooperating
twith Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
r
F 21,3(. -yam., /-�. w

U,S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NRCS-CPA-1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE REV. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP LEGEND
T1477
Name
Kenneth MacGibbon Address
139 West
low Road' Statesville NC Zip 28625
' .I
f .��rr:
':x.. {� MAC SYMBOLS
����'�
�, FfEi:D�
4 ACR SA
a� °L;4ND USE. ,' .
'{S°
,{
1
9.8
Cropland
9.8
Farm Boundary ...................
Field or Land Use Boundary
Field Acreage .........................
320 Ac.
Field Number .........................
O
Private Road .......................... —
— — — — —
Public Road ...........................
Buildings, houses ...................
Perennial Stream ...................
Intermittent Stream ................
-.--
Vegetative Waterway
EXISTING PLANNED
Fence'
'When existing fences are combined with other
symbols, they may be shown as follows:
Fence along both sides of
road.................................... _ V V
Fence along one side of
ditch....................................
Fence to be removed .....................
Ditch to be removed .......................
T-1 T-2
Terrace" .................................... �---(♦ •--- —�
Diversion- ............................... D-1 D-2
"The dots represent blocks; the arrows
represent spills
Drainage ditch ................................ — - — -- ------
(open drain)
Tile Drain .......................................... —.10-o—�+—o—®
Dam and Reservoir ........................
-'-~ --
Field Border .................................. — ■ ■ — -- ■ — -- . --
Fire Break .................................... — F
O
Spring and Trough .........................
Excavated Holding Pit, Lagoon.....
Water Control Structure .................
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.
F— -- F— — F--

Mr Kenneth MacGibbon Conservation Plan Map T1477
Iredell SWCD
Date: 04/10/2003
NRCS
Larry Hendrix
Legend
C] Planned Land Units Scale 1" = 330'
Public rivers.shp
N
USDA 500 0 500 1000 Feet

NRCS-CONS-13
OCTOBER 1974
U,S, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL MAP
7-
Owner Arnold Souther Operator Kenneth MacGibbon
County Iredell State NC Date 4114/03
Soil Survey sheet(s) or code nos. 6 Approximate scale 1" = 1320
" Prepared by the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service cooperating
twith Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
H
9.
v
'0

U.S. UCF'AK I MtN I UI- AUKIGUL I UKE NRCS-CPA-1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE REV. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP LEGEND
T 304
Name Kenneth MacGibbon Address 139 Westolow Road: Statesville, NC Zip 28625-1538
F.I LD
NE MEN"
,
1
24.2
Cropland
2
19.3
Cropland
2A
0.4
Wildlife
213
0.2
Wildlife
2C
0.2
Wildlife
44.3
Farm Boundary... ...... ............
Field or Land Use Boundary...•
Field Acreage .........................
320 Ac.
Field Number .........................
O2
Private Road .......................... —
— — — — _
Public Road ...........................
Buildings, houses ...................
EA
Perennial Stream.. .................
Intermittent Stream ................
``'--_--•�
Vegetative Waterway
EXISTING PLANNED
Fence"
'When existing fences are combined with other
symbols, they may be shown as follows:
Fence along both sides of
road.................................... V V
Fence along one side of
ditch....................................
Fence to be removed .....................
Ditch to be removed .......................
T-1 T-2
Terrace- .................................... .� i► •--- —�
Diversion" ............................... D-1 D-2
"The dots represent blocks, the arrows
represent spills
Drainage ditch ..................... --------- ------
(open drain)
Tile Drain..........................................
-.—�.=C
-o -�--o—►
Dam and Reservoir ........................
Field Border ...................................
— ■ . —
-- ■ — — ■ _-
Fire Break ....................................
— F F—
-- F— — F --
Spring and Trough .........................
o
\C=6=W/
a
Excavated Holding Pit, Lagoon .....
Water Control Structure .................
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.

IS.", ��� f.. f
,.. :�( �,�IS LPG+ �•.,;'•1ir� :

_USDA United States Natural
— Department of Resources
Agriculture Conservation
Service
Non -Technical Descriptions
T304, T1330, T1331, T1358, T1373, Tt405, T1477
Soil Survey Area: Iredell County, North Carolina
Survey Status: Out-of-date
Correlation Date: 09/01/1961
Distribution Date: 05/09/2002
Map Unit: AsB2 APPLINC SAND YLOAM, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES, ERODED
Description Category: SOI
These gently sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum
from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and
shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: AsC2 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES, ERODED
Description Category: SOI
These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum
from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and
shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: CfB2 CECIL FINE SANDYLOAM, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES, ERODED
Description Category: SOI
These gently sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum
from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and
shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: CfC2 CECIL FINE SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES, ERODED
Description Category: SOI
These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum
from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and
shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: CmB2 CECIL SANDYLOAM, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES, ERODED
Description Category: SOI
These gently sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum
from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and
shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: CmC2 CECIL SAND YLOAM, 6 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPES, ERODED
Description Category: SOI
These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum
from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and
shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: CmD2 CECIL SAND YLOAM, 10 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES, ERODED (PA COLET)
Description Category: SOI
The Natural Resources Conservation Seriice
is an agency of the
United States Department of Agricullure
April 14, 2003
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum
from felsic rocks. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and
shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
Map Unit: Cw CHEWACLA SOILS
Description Category: SOI
These nearly level, very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils are on flood plains. They formed in loamy
alluvial deposits. They have a loamy surface layer and subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink -
swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is within a depth of 0.5 to 1.5 feet. These soils are
subject to frequent flooding.
Map Unit: Lo LOCAL ALLUVIAL LAND
Description Category: SOI
This map unit consists of a miscellaneous land type that has not been classified according to Soil
Taxonomy. An on -site investigation is needed to determine soil properties affecting the intended land
use.
Map Unit: MdDZ MADISON GRAVELLYFINE SANDYLOAM, 10 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES,
ERODE
Description Category: SOI
These strongly sloping, very deep, well drained, eroded soils are on uplands. They formed in residuum
weathered from mica gneiss and mica schist. They have a loamy surface layer with a significant amount
of gravel mixed in. They have a clayey subsoil with a high mica content. Permeability is moderate and
shrink -swell potential is low. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.

Narrative
MACGI13BON DAIRY FARM
Existing storage pond available with 150 day storage period. Clean water is excluded from the feedlot
and pond by using diversions and guttering where practical. Waste from 160 milk cows and 30 dry
cows will be collected in the WSP. This is 100 percent of their waste. Other animal groups include
2 (40 head heifer groups) that are located on pasture. These amimals are fed at an existing feed alley
and this waste will be scraped and hauled.A large grass filter area below the freestall barn has been
established and is maintain to filter nutrients from confined animals. Heavy use areas and stock trails
are used to protect areas in the heifer pastures. Waste from the heavy use areas will be scraped and
hauled using manure spreader. Waste from the slurry pond will be broadcast spread using a manure
spreader. Other smaller groups are identified below.
CROP NOTES
If corn is harvested for grain the PAN required will need to be reduced by 45 percent. If nitrogen is
applied to
small grain and it is used for a cover crop the maximum amount to apply is 30 pounds of PAN. This
amount will
also need to be shown on the following crop to be grown.
ANIMAL WASTE SOURCES
U 1 -Kenneth MacGibbons Animal Waste Slurry
1,718,000 gallons of animal waste slurry is produced each year. (160 milking cows and 30 dry cows)
This group produces 14,115 PAN (Plant Available Nitrogen)
For support information See Waste Management System design by Samuel C. Bingham dated 7/15/98
sections III, A-F and section VI, C, a and b.
U2 - Kenneth MacGibbons Animal Waste Solids
In this group there are 25 calves @ 75 percent collected
25 young heifers @ 100 percent collected
40 heifers @ 25 percent collected
40 bred heifers @ 25 percent collected
This group produces 17,110 cubic feet X 62 pounds/cubic feet divided by 2000 pounds/ton =
530 tons of animal waste solids.
This group produces 2,739 lbs. of PAN (Plant Available Nitrogen)
..----------------------------••--- ......-- ------ ­ ........................ .....------- ...---------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-14-2003 Narrative Page 1 of 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U1
Kenneth MacGibbon Animal Waste Slurry waste generated 1,718,000
gals/year by a 190 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry
operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 150 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
14130
Incorporated
19269
Injected
21838
Irrigated
12846
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
69,836.80
8,490,976
-6,772,976
U2
Kenneth MacGibbon Animal Waste Solids waste generated 530.01
tons/year by a 130 animal Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
2740
Incorporated
3632
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
NIA
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Quantity Applied
(Tons)
Surplus/Deficit (Tons)
Year 1
9,520.50
1,841.58
-1,311.57
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled "Soil Facts: Use of On -Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan" for
guidance on using on -farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
------------------ b-,-�� --- ------ ---- _r,d­ -- ......---- --,- --- ,----- - -- -- -- -- -- ----------------------•----------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source,
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 Source Page 1 of 1

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number ofacres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied Soil tests should be used
to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of
animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert-
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
MethodFbs/A
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
1000
gal1A
tans
1000 Gals
tans
--1330
1
UI
Chewacla-P
29.00
27.00
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Tons
911-3131
*95
0
0
Broad.
95
11.55
0
311.86
0.00
--1330
1
U I
Chewacla-P
29.00
27.00
1 Co-, Silage
28.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
291
0
0
Broad.
291
35.38
0
955.28
0.00
--1330
3
Ul
Cecil
13.00
13.00
Small Crain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
107
13.01
p
169.12
0.00
-1330
3
U 1
Cecil
13.00
13.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2115-6130
218
0
01
Broad-
218
26.51
0
344.57
0.00
-1331
1
UI
Appling
29.60
28.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
911-3/31
111
0
0
Broad.
111
13-50
0
385.98
0.00
--1331
1
UI
Appling
29-60
28.60
Corn, Silage
21.8 Tons
2115-6/30
238
0
0
Broad-
238
28.94
0
827.59
0.00
--1331
5
Ul
Cecil
19.80
19-80
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
911-3131
98
0
0
Broad.
98
11.92
0
235.92
0.00
--1331
5
Ul
Cecil
19.80
19.80
Com, Silage
18.4 Tons
2115-6130
201
0
0
Broad-
201
24.44
0
483.98
0.00
--1331
6
U1
Cecil
6.30
6.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
107
13.01
0
81.96
0.00
--1331
6
U 1
Cecil
6.30
6.30
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2115-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
26.51
p
166.9$
0.00
-1358
1
1 Ul
Appling
15.40
15.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3131
102
0
01
Broad-
102
12.40
0
190.98
0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- --------------- ------ -•----
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/17/03 WUT Page 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract I
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
fibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N I
N
lbs/A
1000
ga11A
tons
1000 ¢als
tons
--1358
t
UI
Appling
15.40
15.40
Com, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
26.51
0
408.19
0.00
-1358
2
U2
Madison
8.70
8-70
Fr.. Hay
3.1 Tons
811-7/3)
138
0
0
Broad.
138
0.00
27
0.00
232.23
--1358
3
U2
Cecil
7.90
7-90
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.00
37
0.00
291.87
-1358
5
U2
Cecil
6.20
6.20
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
811-7/31
169
0
0
Broad.
169
- 0.00
33
0.00
202.68
--1358
6
U2
Cecil
18.10
18,10
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
191
0
0
Broad.
191
0.00
37
0.00
668.72
--1373
1
U1
Appling
27.00
25,50
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3131
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.40
0
316.24
0.00
-1373
1
U1
Appling
27.00
25.50
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
26.51
0
675.88
0.00
-1405
1
Ul
Cecil
19.80
18.10
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
13.01
0
235.47
0.00
--1405
1
Uk
Cecil
18.80
18.10
Co., Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
26.51
0
479,74
0.00
--1405
4
Ul
Cecil
810
8-10
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
911-3/3)
107
0
0
Broad.
107
13-01
0
105.38
0.00
--1405
4
U 1
Cecil
8.10
8.10
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
26.51
01
214.69
0.00
-1405
8
U2
Cecil
8-50
8.50
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7/31
143
0
0
Broad.
143
0.00
28
0.00
235.12
--1405
9
U2
Cecil
8.20
8.20
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
8/1-7/31
133
0
0
Broad.
133
0.00
26
0.00
210.96
-1477
1
U 1
Cecil
9.90
9.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3131
107
0
0
Broad.
107
13.01
0
117.09
0.00
--1477
1
UI
Cecil
9-80
9.00
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2115-6130
218
0
0
Broad.
218
26.51
0
239.55
0.00
-3041
I
UI
Cecil
24,20
23.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad.
107
13-01
0
301.82
0.00
-304
1
U1
Cecil
24.20
23.20
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
26.51
0
614,92
0,00
--304
2
U 1
Cecil
19-301
17.30
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
98
0
0
Broad.
98
11.92
0
206.13
0.00
-304
2
U1
Cecil
19-30
17.30
Corn, Silage
18A Tons
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
24,44
Q
422.78
0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/17/03
-------------------
WUT Page 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year l
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
gal1A
tons
1000 uals
tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
8,490,98
v
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,718,00
a 7^ -'
Balance, 1000 gallons
-6,772.98
Total Applied, tons
; -=,
1,841.58
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
530.01
Balance, tons
T.
-1,311.57
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -- means [eased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol • means user entered data.
-------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t61286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/17/03 WUT Pave 3

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index and the
Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating is also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, the planned manure application rate is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure.
PlannP.rl (�rnnc Riimmnrw
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
PLAT
Rating
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(lbs./acre)
1330i
1
29.00
27.00
Unknown
9.0
Chewacla-P
Small Grain, Silage
*9.0 Tons
41
Corn, Silage
28.0 Tons
101
1330
3
13.00
13.00
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
43
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
72
1331
1
29.60
28.60
Unknown
15.0
Appling
Small Grain, Silage
10.0 Tons
45
Com, Silage
21.8 Tons
78
1331
5
19.80
19.80
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
40
Corn, Silage
18.4 Tons
66
1331
6
6.30
6,30
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
43
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
72
1358
1
15.40
15.40
Unknown
15.0
AnplinQ
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
42
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
72
1358
2
8.70
8,70
Unknown
15.0
Madison
Fescue hay
3.1 Tons
56
1358
3
7.90
7.90
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
77
1358
5
6.20
6.20
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
3.8 Tons
68
1358
6
18.10
18.10
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
77
1373
1
27.00
25.50
Unknown
15.0
Appling
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
42
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
72
1405
1
18.80
19. 10
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
43
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
72
1405
4
8.10
8,10
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
43
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
72
1405
8
8.50
8.50
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
22
1405
9
8.20
8.20
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Fescue Pasture
4.0 Tons
20
1477
1
9.80
9.00
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
43
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
72
304
1
' 24.20
23,20
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
43
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
72
304
2
19.30
17.30
Unknown
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
40
Com, Silage
18.4 Tons
66
PLAN TOTALS: 277.90 268,90
161286 Database Version 2.0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed: 04-17-2003 PCS Page 1 of 2

Lf
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
12
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to .
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
w f0
soluble nutrient leaching below the
Foot zone.
High potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
soluble nutrient leaching below the
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
root zone.
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol 4 means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of
other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this
nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be
required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient MnnaaPmPnt RPnnmmenrlationc
YEAR
0
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs1A)
Ca
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbslA)
Lime
(tons)
Tract
0
0
0
0
0.0
AcreslApn. Period
SLItiplied H
!
I
tl E
Crop
Small Grain, Silage
RYF Iqa le Da to
nng
04-04-03
P Removal Ratin
41 lbstac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
97
151
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0
00
A .Pero
Su Eyed H
r;,tjl'Yhn
v'S?e +
It?-?;'�'
Llv��i
, lfyk'c
�,cf �,r1iv
IIt?'Il�yi
t e :l.ki
hA'.,r1Y cl
Crop
Small Grain, Silage
04-04-03
P Removal Ratin
43 lbs/ae,
Unknown
BALANCE
01
109
170
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
00,0
PeriodAc
l
ti ¢i ..ii.ildii.t
_l..i
r}i 41€ f
I .�
f ..lu II„ .:
}a it .a
3
w_i .r, .: a
; l �,,
i10 „i.n1..
Crop
Small Grain, Silage
04-09-03
P Removal Rating
45 Ibs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
113
166.
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
lAcreslApi).
0
0.0
Period
Su lied By:
"'`��� `
,,5� )"s
',' ,f;
ll._it .�'.
• }a�
�, ,
lr �1i,,iA
i,;t;�
Crop
Small Grain, Silage
04-09-03
P Removal Rating
40 lbs/ac.
Unknown
BALANCE
0
100
155
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Tr c
0
Acreskj2p. Period
Su lied By:
Crop
Small Grain, Silage
04-09-03
P Removal Ratin
43 Ibs/ac. I
Unknown
BALANCE 1
0
109
170
01
0
0
0
D
do
--- -- --------- --- ---- —I ... .. .....-- •-•-• - -..--- -
161286 Database Version 2 0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 NMR Page 1 of 6

Mittripnt Mnnqcyi-.mpnt Ri-.r-.nmmf-.ndnflnnc
Small Grain, Silage
". R. "I.
Small Grain, Silage
run
Small Grain, Silage
iSmall
Grain, Silage
I M EARN 0".
�R
fl
�R
RIM
M11
Small Grain, Silage
E IT I two M
------ ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 NMR Page 2 of 6

YEAR
NOTE: Symbc
0
I * means user entered
ata.
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(IbslA)
K20
(Ibs1A)
Ca
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 NMA Page 3 of 6

Nutrient Mnnnaement RennmmPndntinnc
0.7 Me
���
... .,
�ii
.1
�n���■�e��n��
11
��
►ai3i��1�1' - .
�iTi�
r . 1 1
.
'�.F.�III
... r
.CT.L�
1• 1• 1
��������
1 1
Ia[.�1tT�i '�Ti.l�l
Iil+�iaiFSllt[I�[11i7�f��
■Ci1:! u. - r ;
W, 1 ..
�fflr ME
-.
•
r
nn. - r :�
1• 1.
®
, ,
illil�liiLi������
i 1
I:[�i ..
�IilIla
. 1
• • • :
. . WI
1 1 ..
11�a%.'1
Ii�Illll .IrTii!
1 1
.,-
-
�Zsf.1lE,ii��������
1 1
I fi►77{LLiC1A1►L'
ifY7��
1 '
�®®�����
1 1
------ - --- --- --- -- -- ----------------- - - ---- --
161286 Database Version 2.Q Date Printed: 04-17-2003 NMR Page 4 of 6

Nutrient ManaaPmPnt Rr-rnmmPnrintinne
MINIM
■ii1i� nl � i�®'
1
n 1. �
�fVl�������
i 1
11
Fescue
■i�'�a ...NOR
■Ca�l'l I. !
i { 11
IM/IICIT"Ti1f:7IhTt:
1 1 1.
!' 1' i������
Ma i/i51�3i�T�1�171T1��]If�1�S1�7�Fc�
C
nMR.",
u. - , .017,
1I
1' 1 1
„• -
�
�����
1 1
111 "I
--- ------ - -- --- --- ---..... --•-• --- --- --..-. ---- ....------------- - - --- --
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 NMR Pag e 5 of 6

NiitrrntMonxnen`rn/Pernn,nmpnrIn6nmn
Crop
Fescue Pasture
stall—
f)
A.
n
n.
n
61
f) n
AcresTop. Period
PA
Period
OQ
2115-6/10
Stionlied Bv:
J.
JJ :f -
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data,
----_-._---_----_---'-------------__------------'---_---_-_--'
l6l286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04'17'2003 NMRPuAc 6 of

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil
sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Re uired Soil Test Value
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-1
Zinc Recommendation
1330
1
Small Grain, Silage
6.3
0.0
71
None
251
None
1330
1
Corn, Silage
6-3
0.0
71
Norte
251 1
None
1330
3
Small Grain, Silage
6.3
0.0
71
None
251
]None
1330
3
Corn, Silage
6.3
0.0
71
None
251
None
1331
1
Small Grain, Silage
6.8
0.0
128
None
382
None
1331
1
Corn, Silage
6.8
0.0
128
None
382
None
1331
5
Small Grain, Silage
6.6
1 0.0
242
None
325
None
1331
5
Corn, Silage
6.6
0.0
242
None
325
None
1331
6
Small Grain, Silage
7.1
0.0
351
None
549
None
1331
6
Corn, Silage
7.1
0.0
351
None
549
None
1358
1
Small Grain, Silage
6.3
0.0
71
None
251
None
1358
1
Corn, Silage
6.3
0.0
71
None
251
None
1358
2
Fescue Hay
6.1
0.0
289
None
345
None
1358
3
Fescue Hay
6.1
0.0
289
None
345
None
1358
5
Fescue Hay
6.1
0-0
289
None
345
None
1358
6
Fescue Hay
6-1
0.0
289
None
345
None
1373
1
Small Grain, Silage
6.8
0.0
496
None
329
None
1373
1
Corn, Silage
6-8
0-0
496
None
329
None
1405
1
Small Grain, Silage
6.6
0.0
402
]None
494
None
1405
1
Corn, Silage
6.6
0.01
402 1
None
494
1 None
1405
4
Small Grain, Silage
6.4
0.0
436
None
526
None
1405
4 -
Corn, Silage
6.4
0.01
436
1 None
526
1 None
----------- ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ---- ----- --
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 STV Page 1 of 2

Recluired oil Test Values
'tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Ca-1
Copper Recommendation
Zn-l-
Zinc Recommendation
1405
8
Fescue Pasture
6.1
0.0
289
None
345
None
1405
9
Fescue Pasture
6.1
0.0
289
None
345
None
1477
1
Small Grain, Silage
6.8
0.0
496
None
329
None
1477
1
Com, Silage
6.8
0.0
496
None
329
None
304
1
Small Grain, Silage
6.9
0.0
320
None
601
None
304
2
Small Grain, Silage
6.7
0.0
470
None
374
None
304
2
lCorn, Silage
6.7
0.0
470
None
1 374
None
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•----------------------------------------------------- ------ ---
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 STV Page 2 of 2

r
The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Canacitv
Source Name
I Kenneth MacGibbon Animal Waste Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
19115
150
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
119
1
2
91
1
3
150
1
4
120
1
5
150
1
6
120
1
7
89
1
8
58
1
9
28
1
10
150
1
11
120
1
12
89
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------------------------------------•---------• ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
161286 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 04-17-2003 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management,
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When an waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
-----------------------------------------------
241775 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/14/03 Specification Pape 1

0
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste_ to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .---=---------------------- -.-
241775 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/14/03 Specification Page 2

•
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". AnimaI
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or -drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
ero sion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
241775 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/14/03 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
241775 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 4/14/03 Specification Page 4